Mayo normative studies: A conditional normative model for longitudinal change on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test and preliminary validation in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

Longitudinal normative standards for cognitive tests and composites using harmonized data from two Wisconsin AD-risk-enriched cohorts

INTRODUCTION

Published norms are typically cross-sectional and often are not sensitive to preclinical cognitive changes due to dementia. We developed and validated demographically adjusted cross-sectional and longitudinal normative standards using harmonized outcomes from two Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk-enriched cohorts.

METHODS

Data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were combined. Quantile regression was used to develop unconditional (cross-sectional) and conditional (longitudinal) normative standards for 18 outcomes using data from cognitively unimpaired participants (N = 1390; mean follow-up = 9.25 years). Validity analyses (N = 2456) examined relationships between percentile scores (centiles), consensus-based cognitive statuses, and AD biomarker levels.

RESULTS

Unconditional and conditional centiles were lower in those with consensus-based impairment or biomarker positivity. Similarly, quantitative biomarker levels were higher in those whose centiles suggested decline.

DISCUSSION

This study presents normative standards for cognitive measures sensitive to pre-clinical changes. Future directions will investigate potential clinical applications of longitudinal normative standards.

HIGHLIGHTS

Quantile regression was used to construct longitudinal norms for cognitive tests. Poorer percentile scores were related to concurrent diagnosis and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. A ShinyApp was built to display test scores and norms and flag low performance.

Symptomatic Clusters Related to Amyloid Positivity in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals

Background

The NIA-AA Research Framework on Alzheimer's disease (AD) proposes a transitional stage (stage 2) characterized by subtle cognitive decline, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild neurobehavioral symptoms (NPS).

Objective

To identify participant clusters based on stage 2 features and assess their association with amyloid positivity in cognitively unimpaired individuals.

Methods

We included baseline data of N = 338 cognitively unimpaired participants from the DELCODE cohort with data on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for AD. Classification into the AD continuum (i.e., amyloid positivity, A+) was based on Aβ42/40 status. Neuropsychological test data were used to assess subtle objective cognitive dysfunction (OBJ), the subjective cognitive decline interview (SCD-I) was used to detect SCD, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) was used to assess NPS. A two-step cluster analysis was carried out and differences in AD biomarkers between clusters were analyzed.

Results

We identified three distinct participant clusters based on presented symptoms. The highest rate of A+ participants (47.6%) was found in a cluster characterized by both OBJ and SCD. A cluster of participants that presented with SCD and NPS (A+:26.6%) and a cluster of participants with overall few symptoms (A+:19.7%) showed amyloid positivity in a range that was not higher than the expected A+ rate for the age group. Across the full sample, participants with a combination of SCD and OBJ in the memory domain showed a lower Aβ42/ptau181 ratio compared to those with neither SCD nor OBJ.

Conclusions

The cluster characterized by participants with OBJ and concomitant SCD was enriched for amyloid pathology.

Mayo-PACC: A parsimonious preclinical Alzheimer's disease cognitive composite comprised of public-domain measures to facilitate clinical translation

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to define a Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer's disease Cognitive Composite (Mayo-PACC) that prioritizes parsimony and use of public domain measures to facilitate clinical translation.

METHODS

Cognitively unimpaired participants aged 65 to 85 at baseline with amyloid PET imaging were included, yielding 428 amyloid negative (A-) and 186 amyloid positive (A+) individuals with 7 years mean follow-up. Sensitivity to amyloid-related cognitive decline was examined using slope estimates derived from linear mixed models (difference in annualized change across A+ and A- groups). We compared differences in rates of change between Mayo-PACC and other composites (A+ > A- indicating more significant decline in A+).

RESULTS

All composites showed sensitivity to amyloid-related longitudinal cognitive decline (A+ > A- annualized change p < 0.05). Comparisons revealed that Mayo-PACC (AVLT sum of trials 1-5+6+delay, Trails B, animal fluency) showed comparable longitudinal sensitivity to other composites.

DISCUSSION

Mayo-PACC performs similarly to other composites and can be directly translated to the clinic.

Assessing Longitudinal Cognitive Change in Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Estimated Standardized Regression-Based Formulas

BACKGROUND

Cognitive change in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a likely prodrome to Alzheimer's disease, can be tracked with repeated neuropsychological assessments, but there has been little work quantifying these changes over time. Cognitive change can be statistically examined using standardized regression-based (SRB) formulas, which yield a z-score indicating amount of change compared to a normative group.

OBJECTIVE

To use SRB z-scores to quantify cognitive change in a sample of patients classified as MCI at baseline, and to compare cognitive change in those who remained MCI on follow-up (MCI-Stable) and those who progressed to dementia (MCI-Decline).

METHODS

Using 283 MCI patients from a cognitive disorders clinic who were re-assessed after approximately one- and one-half years, SRB z-scores were calculated for each test in a comprehensive neuropsychological battery for each participant.

RESULTS

There was a significant decline between timepoints across all cognitive tests, with the greatest amount of decline on tests of learning and memory. Group differences were seen on nearly all cognitive tests, with the MCI-Decline group showing more decline (i.e., significantly larger and negative z-scores) than the MCI-Stable participants. Notable cognitive decline was also observed in the MCI-Stable group, with z-scores ranging from -0.01 - -2.24 compared to normative data.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the amount of cognitive decline that occurs in MCI, including for those who remain "stable" and those who progress to dementia. It also demonstrates the value of the SRB method in more clearly quantifying cognitive decline, which may help identify individuals most vulnerable to MCI progression.