1
|
Gøtzsche HF, Woerly B, Popa F, Shchepin ON, Prikhodko IS, López-Villalba Á, Woyzichovski J, Krieglsteiner L, Novozhilov YK, Klahr A, Schnittler M. A new species of Diacheopsis (Myxomycetes) and a new habitat for myxomycetes. Mycologia 2025; 117:183-200. [PMID: 39499826 DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2024.2413343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/07/2024]
Abstract
We describe a new species, Diacheopsis resinae (Myxomycetes), collected from a microhabitat new for myxomycetes: stem wounds of coniferous trees (Norway spruce) where the resin is overgrown with a community of resinicolous fungi. The 80 known collections come from the Vosges (France), the Black Forest (Germany), Swabian Alp (Germany), and several localities in Denmark and Norway. Observations, but as well as metabarcoding of substrate samples with fungal (ITS [internal transcribed spacer]), bacterial (16S rDNA), and myxomycete (18S nuc rDNA) primers from eight trunks, revealed the new myxomycete to co-occur with resin-degrading ascomycetes (Infundichalara microchona, Lophium arboricola, Zythia resinae). The gram-negative bacterial genera Endobacter and Sphingomonas were found to be abundant in the substrate and may be a food source for the myxomycete. Fruit bodies were found mostly during the more humid winter season, with a peak in January/February. Partial sequences of two independent molecular markers (18S nuc rDNA, EF1α [elongation factor 1-alpha] gene) were obtained for 41 accessions, which form a monophyletic cluster in a two-gene phylogeny of Stemonititidales but do not group with other species of Diacheopsis, thus rendering this genus paraphyletic. The new species, although exclusively developing sessile sporocarps and morphologically undoubtedly falling into the genus Diacheopsis, is most closely related to species of Lamproderma, especially L. album, L. zonatum, and L. zonatopulchellum. Within D. resinae, three groups can be differentiated, which show nearly complete reproductive isolation, as judged from a recombination analysis of the two unlinked markers and the allelic combinations of the EF1α gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bernard Woerly
- Rue des Comtes de Stralenheim 14, Oberbronn F-67110, France
| | - Flavius Popa
- Black Forest National Park, Seebach D-77889, Germany
| | - Oleg N Shchepin
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, Greifswald D-17489, Germany
- Laboratory of Mycology, V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov St. 2, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia
| | - Ilya S Prikhodko
- Laboratory of Mycology, V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov St. 2, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia
| | - Ángela López-Villalba
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, Greifswald D-17489, Germany
| | - Jan Woyzichovski
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, Greifswald D-17489, Germany
| | | | - Yuri K Novozhilov
- Laboratory of Mycology, V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov St. 2, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia
| | - Anja Klahr
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, Greifswald D-17489, Germany
| | - Martin Schnittler
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, Greifswald D-17489, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kilian IC, Kirse A, Peters RS, Bourlat SJ, Fonseca VG, Wägele WJ, Hamm A, Mengual X. Maximizing Identification Precision of Hymenoptera and Brachycera (Diptera) With a Non-Destructive DNA Metabarcoding Approach. Ecol Evol 2025; 15:e70770. [PMID: 39850753 PMCID: PMC11756930 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 10/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2025] Open
Abstract
In recent years, DNA metabarcoding has been used for a more efficient assessment of bulk samples. However, there remains a paucity of studies examining potential disparities in species identification methodologies. Here, we explore the outcomes of diverse clustering and filtering techniques on data from a non-destructive metabarcoding approach, compared to species-level morphological identification of Brachycera (Diptera) and Hymenoptera of two bulk samples collected with Malaise traps. The study evaluated four distinct approaches, namely clustering to Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) or ASVs clustered to Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) coupled with subsequent filtering using the LULU algorithm at 84% and 96% minimum match. In total, 114 species of Brachycera (35 families) and 85 species of Hymenoptera (27 families) were identified morphologically. Depending on the selected approach, DNA metabarcoding results strongly varied in terms of detected molecular units blasted to brachyceran and hymenopteran species. For Brachycera, ASVs clustered into OTUs followed by LULU using a 96% minimum match (OTU96) inferred the number of molecular units closest to the number of morphologically identified species. Using Syrphidae as an exemplary family, we found an overlap ranging from 9% to 81% between the morphological identification and the different clustering and filtering approaches, OTU96 being also here the closest one. For Hymenoptera, while OTU96 also yielded the highest number of molecular units, it was still considerably low compared to the number of morphologically identified species. Our results show that metabarcoding methodology needs to be significantly improved to be applied to Hymenoptera. Conversely, for Brachycera, we acknowledge the promise of employing a non-destructive metabarcoding approach, incorporating ASV clustering into OTUs and filtering with LULU, to derive dependable species lists. Such lists hold significant potential for applications in biomonitoring, conservation efforts, and other related fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel C. Kilian
- Museum Koenig BonnLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity ChangeBonnGermany
- Agroecology and Organic Farming Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
| | - Ameli Kirse
- Museum Koenig BonnLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity ChangeBonnGermany
| | - Ralph S. Peters
- Museum Koenig BonnLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity ChangeBonnGermany
| | - Sarah J. Bourlat
- Museum Koenig BonnLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity ChangeBonnGermany
| | - Vera G. Fonseca
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas)WeymouthDorsetUK
| | - Wolfgang J. Wägele
- Museum Koenig BonnLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity ChangeBonnGermany
| | - Andrée Hamm
- Agroecology and Organic Farming Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
| | - Ximo Mengual
- Museum Koenig BonnLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity ChangeBonnGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buchner D, Sinclair JS, Ayasse M, Beermann AJ, Buse J, Dziock F, Enss J, Frenzel M, Hörren T, Li Y, Monaghan MT, Morkel C, Müller J, Pauls SU, Richter R, Scharnweber T, Sorg M, Stoll S, Twietmeyer S, Weisser WW, Wiggering B, Wilmking M, Zotz G, Gessner MO, Haase P, Leese F. Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: Metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from Malaise traps across Germany. Mol Ecol Resour 2025; 25:e14023. [PMID: 39364584 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.14023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
Mitigating ongoing losses of insects and their key functions (e.g. pollination) requires tracking large-scale and long-term community changes. However, doing so has been hindered by the high diversity of insect species that requires prohibitively high investments of time, funding and taxonomic expertise when addressed with conventional tools. Here, we show that these concerns can be addressed through a comprehensive, scalable and cost-efficient DNA metabarcoding workflow. We use 1815 samples from 75 Malaise traps across Germany from 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate how metabarcoding can be incorporated into large-scale insect monitoring networks for less than 50 € per sample, including supplies, labour and maintenance. We validated the detected species using two publicly available databases (GBOL and GBIF) and the judgement of taxonomic experts. With an average of 1.4 M sequence reads per sample we uncovered 10,803 validated insect species, of which 83.9% were represented by a single Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU). We estimated another 21,043 plausible species, which we argue either lack a reference barcode or are undescribed. The total of 31,846 species is similar to the number of insect species known for Germany (~35,500). Because Malaise traps capture only a subset of insects, our approach identified many species likely unknown from Germany or new to science. Our reproducible workflow (~80% OTU-similarity among years) provides a blueprint for large-scale biodiversity monitoring of insects and other biodiversity components in near real time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Buchner
- Aquatic Ecosystem Research, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - James S Sinclair
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany
| | - Manfred Ayasse
- Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Arne J Beermann
- Aquatic Ecosystem Research, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
- Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Essen, Germany
| | - Jörn Buse
- Black Forest National Park, Freudenstadt, Germany
| | - Frank Dziock
- University of Applied Sciences HTW Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julian Enss
- Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Essen, Germany
- Entomological Society Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
- Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Mark Frenzel
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Department of Community Ecology, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Yuanheng Li
- Aquatic Ecosystem Research, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael T Monaghan
- Department of Evolutionary and Integrative Ecology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Morkel
- Kellerwald-Edersee National Park, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany
| | - Steffen U Pauls
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Ronny Richter
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute for Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tobias Scharnweber
- Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Martin Sorg
- Entomological Society Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Stefan Stoll
- Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
- Environmental Campus Birkenfeld, University of Applied Sciences Trier, Hoppstädten-Weiersbach, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang W Weisser
- Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Life Science Systems, School of Life Sciences, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
| | | | - Martin Wilmking
- Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Gerhard Zotz
- Institute of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Mark O Gessner
- Department of Plankton and Microbial Ecology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology & Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany
- Department of Ecology, Berlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Haase
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany
- Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Essen, Germany
- Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Leese
- Aquatic Ecosystem Research, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany
- Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maurenza D, Crouzeilles R, Prevedello JA, Almeida-Gomes M, Schmoeler M, Pardini R, Banks-Leite C, Vieira MV, Metzger JP, Fonseca CR, Zanin M, Mendes AF, Boesing AL, Rezende AA, Filgueiras BKC, Barros CDSD, Estavillo C, Peres CA, Esteves CF, Rigueira D, Faria D, Mariano-Neto E, Cazetta E, Capellesso ES, Vieira EM, Hasui E, Júnior EMSS, Ramos FN, Gomes FS, Paise G, Leal IR, Morante-Filho JC, Bogoni JA, Ferraz KMPMDB, Rocha-Santos L, Reis LCD, Querido LCDA, Magnago LFS, Santos LGRO, Passamani M, Tabarelli M, Marques MCM, Lima MM, Matos MA, Graipel ME, Silveira MS, Pessoa MDS, Safar NVH, Brancalion PHS, Porto TJ, Püttker T. Effects of deforestation on multitaxa community similarity in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2024:e14419. [PMID: 39563599 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024]
Abstract
Habitat loss can lead to biotic homogenization (decrease in β diversity) or differentiation (increase in β diversity) of biological communities. However, it is unclear which of these ecological processes predominates in human-modified landscapes. We used data on vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants to quantify β diversity based on species occurrence and abundance among communities in 1367 landscapes with varying amounts of habitat (<30%, 30-60%, or >60% of forest cover) throughout the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Decreases in habitat amount below 30% led to increased compositional similarity of vertebrate and invertebrate communities, which may indicate a process of biotic homogenization throughout the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. No pattern was detected in plant communities. We found that habitat loss was associated with a deterministic increase in faunal community similarity, which is consistent with a selected subset of species being capable of thriving in human-modified landscapes. The lack of pattern found in plants was consistent with known variation between taxa in community responses to habitat amount. Brazilian legislation requiring the preservation of 20% of Atlantic Forest native vegetation may be insufficient to prevent the biotic homogenization of faunal communities. Our results highlight the importance of preserving large amounts of habitat, providing source areas for the recolonization of deforested landscapes, and avoiding large-scale impacts of homogenization of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Maurenza
- Centro Nacional de Conservação da Flora, Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Renato Crouzeilles
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Mombak, São Paulo, Brazil
- Institute for Capacity Exchange in Environmental Decisions, Dickson, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | - Mauricio Almeida-Gomes
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil
| | - Marina Schmoeler
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Institute for Capacity Exchange in Environmental Decisions, Dickson, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Renata Pardini
- Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cristina Banks-Leite
- Department of Life Science, Imperial College London - Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK
| | - Marcus Vinicius Vieira
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Jean Paul Metzger
- Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Marina Zanin
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alex Fernando Mendes
- Departamento de Ciências Florestais, Universidade de São Paulo - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Andrea Larissa Boesing
- Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Senckenberg Biodiversität und Klima Forschungszentrum (BiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Andréia Alves Rezende
- Departamento de Biologia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Carlos A Peres
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia - Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Carolina Franco Esteves
- Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais, São José dos Campos, Brazil
| | - Dary Rigueira
- Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
- Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado da Bahia, Instituto do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Deborah Faria
- Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
| | | | - Eliana Cazetta
- Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
| | | | | | - Erica Hasui
- Instituto de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
| | | | - Flavio Nunes Ramos
- Instituto de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
| | | | - Gabriela Paise
- Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Regional do Cariri, Crato, Brazil
| | - Inara Roberta Leal
- Departamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
| | - José Carlos Morante-Filho
- Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
| | - Juliano André Bogoni
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil
| | | | - Larissa Rocha-Santos
- Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Marcelo Passamani
- Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Tabarelli
- Departamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Maurício Eduardo Graipel
- Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Maxwell Souza Silveira
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil
| | - Michaele de Souza Pessoa
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil
| | | | - Pedro Henrique Santin Brancalion
- Departamento de Ciências Florestais, Universidade de São Paulo - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Tiago Jordão Porto
- Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado da Bahia, Instituto do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Thomas Püttker
- Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thomas LJ, Kirse A, Raus H, Langen K, Nümann B, Tschan GF, Gemeinholzer B, Wägele JW, Bourlat SJ. Synchronised monitoring of plant and insect diversity: a case study using automated Malaise traps and DNA-based methods. Biodivers Data J 2024; 12:e127669. [PMID: 39114129 PMCID: PMC11303846 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.12.e127669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The occurrence and distribution of insects and their possible associations with plant species are largely unknown in Germany and baseline data to monitor future trends are urgently needed. Using newly-designed automated Malaise trap multi-samplers, the occurrence of insect species and their potential associations with plants was monitored synchronously at two contrasting field sites in Germany: an urban botanical garden and a forest research station. Taxa were identified by metabarcoding of the insects and the plant traces present in the preservative ethanol of the Malaise trap samples. For comparison, a botanical survey was conducted in the vicinity of the traps. Across both sites, we identified a total of 1290 exact sequence variants (ESVs) assigned to Insecta, of which 205 are known to be pollinators. In the botanical garden, we detected the occurrence of 128 plant taxa, of which 41 also had one of their known insect pollinator species detected. Insect species richness was highest in May, mainly attributed to an increase in Diptera. These results present a case study of the applicability of automated sampling and DNA-based methods to monitor the timings of flowering and corresponding activity of plant-visiting insects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leighton J Thomas
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| | - Ameli Kirse
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| | - Hanna Raus
- University of Kassel, Kassel, GermanyUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
| | - Kathrin Langen
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| | - Björn Nümann
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| | - Georg F. Tschan
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| | | | - J. Wolfgang Wägele
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| | - Sarah J Bourlat
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, GermanyLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum KoenigBonnGermany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Emerson BC, Borges PAV, Cardoso P, Convey P, deWaard JR, Economo EP, Gillespie RG, Kennedy S, Krehenwinkel H, Meier R, Roderick GK, Strasberg D, Thébaud C, Traveset A, Creedy TJ, Meramveliotakis E, Noguerales V, Overcast I, Morlon H, Papadopoulou A, Vogler AP, Arribas P, Andújar C. Collective and harmonized high throughput barcoding of insular arthropod biodiversity: Toward a Genomic Observatories Network for islands. Mol Ecol 2023; 32:6161-6176. [PMID: 36156326 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Current understanding of ecological and evolutionary processes underlying island biodiversity is heavily shaped by empirical data from plants and birds, although arthropods comprise the overwhelming majority of known animal species, and as such can provide key insights into processes governing biodiversity. Novel high throughput sequencing (HTS) approaches are now emerging as powerful tools to overcome limitations in the availability of arthropod biodiversity data, and hence provide insights into these processes. Here, we explored how these tools might be most effectively exploited for comprehensive and comparable inventory and monitoring of insular arthropod biodiversity. We first reviewed the strengths, limitations and potential synergies among existing approaches of high throughput barcode sequencing. We considered how this could be complemented with deep learning approaches applied to image analysis to study arthropod biodiversity. We then explored how these approaches could be implemented within the framework of an island Genomic Observatories Network (iGON) for the advancement of fundamental and applied understanding of island biodiversity. To this end, we identified seven island biology themes at the interface of ecology, evolution and conservation biology, within which collective and harmonized efforts in HTS arthropod inventory could yield significant advances in island biodiversity research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent C Emerson
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Paulo A V Borges
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity Group, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Environment, CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
| | - Pedro Cardoso
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity Group, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Environment, CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Peter Convey
- British Antarctic Survey, NERC, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa
| | - Jeremy R deWaard
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
| | - Evan P Economo
- Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
- Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rosemary G Gillespie
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Susan Kennedy
- Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
| | | | - Rudolf Meier
- Center for Integrative Biodiversity Discovery, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - George K Roderick
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | | | - Christophe Thébaud
- UMR 5174 EDB Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France
| | - Anna Traveset
- Global Change Research Group, Mediterranean Institut of Advanced Studies (CSIC-UIB), Mallorca, Spain
| | - Thomas J Creedy
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | | | - Víctor Noguerales
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Isaac Overcast
- Département de Biologie, École normale supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Morlon
- Département de Biologie, École normale supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Anna Papadopoulou
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Alfried P Vogler
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paula Arribas
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Carmelo Andújar
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uphus L, Uhler J, Tobisch C, Rojas-Botero S, Lüpke M, Benjamin C, Englmeier J, Fricke U, Ganuza C, Haensel M, Redlich S, Zhang J, Müller J, Menzel A. Earlier and more uniform spring green-up linked to lower insect richness and biomass in temperate forests. Commun Biol 2023; 6:1052. [PMID: 37935790 PMCID: PMC10630471 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05422-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Urbanization and agricultural intensification are considered the main causes of recent insect decline in temperate Europe, while direct climate warming effects are still ambiguous. Nonetheless, higher temperatures advance spring leaf emergence, which in turn may directly or indirectly affect insects. We therefore investigated how Sentinel-2-derived start of season (SOS) and its spatial variability (SV-SOS) are affected by spring temperature and whether these green-up variables can explain insect biomass and richness across a climate and land-use gradient in southern Germany. We found that the effects of both spring green-up variables on insect biomass and richness differed between land-use types, but were strongest in forests. Here, insect richness and biomass were higher with later green-up (SOS) and higher SV-SOS. In turn, higher spring temperatures advanced SOS, while SV-SOS was lower at warmer sites. We conclude that with a warming climate, insect biomass and richness in forests may be affected negatively due to earlier and more uniform green-up. Promising adaptation strategies should therefore focus on spatial variability in green-up in forests, thus plant species and structural diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Uphus
- Ecoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
| | - Johannes Uhler
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - Cynthia Tobisch
- Restoration Ecology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
| | - Sandra Rojas-Botero
- Restoration Ecology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Marvin Lüpke
- Ecoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Caryl Benjamin
- Ecoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Jana Englmeier
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - Ute Fricke
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Ganuza
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maria Haensel
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Sarah Redlich
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany
| | - Annette Menzel
- Ecoclimatology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Müller J, Mitesser O, Schaefer HM, Seibold S, Busse A, Kriegel P, Rabl D, Gelis R, Arteaga A, Freile J, Leite GA, de Melo TN, LeBien J, Campos-Cerqueira M, Blüthgen N, Tremlett CJ, Böttger D, Feldhaar H, Grella N, Falconí-López A, Donoso DA, Moriniere J, Buřivalová Z. Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6191. [PMID: 37848442 PMCID: PMC10582010 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41693-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Tropical forest recovery is fundamental to addressing the intertwined climate and biodiversity loss crises. While regenerating trees sequester carbon relatively quickly, the pace of biodiversity recovery remains contentious. Here, we use bioacoustics and metabarcoding to measure forest recovery post-agriculture in a global biodiversity hotspot in Ecuador. We show that the community composition, and not species richness, of vocalizing vertebrates identified by experts reflects the restoration gradient. Two automated measures - an acoustic index model and a bird community composition derived from an independently developed Convolutional Neural Network - correlated well with restoration (adj-R² = 0.62 and 0.69, respectively). Importantly, both measures reflected composition of non-vocalizing nocturnal insects identified via metabarcoding. We show that such automated monitoring tools, based on new technologies, can effectively monitor the success of forest recovery, using robust and reproducible data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany.
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Freyungerstr. 2, 94481, Grafenau, Germany.
| | - Oliver Mitesser
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - H Martin Schaefer
- Fundación Jocotoco, Valladolid N24-414 y Luis Cordero, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Sebastian Seibold
- Technical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Research Group, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354, Freising, Germany
- Berchtesgaden National Park, Doktorberg 6, Berchtesgaden, 83471, Germany
| | - Annika Busse
- Saxon-Switzerland National Park, An der Elbe 4, 01814, Bad Schandau, Germany
| | - Peter Kriegel
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - Dominik Rabl
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - Rudy Gelis
- Yanayacu Research Center, Cosanga, Ecuador
| | | | - Juan Freile
- Pasaje El Moro E4-216 y Norberto Salazar, EC 170902, Tumbaco, DMQ, Ecuador
| | - Gabriel Augusto Leite
- Rainforest Connection, Science Department, 440 Cobia Drive, Suite 1902, Katy, TX, 77494, USA
| | | | - Jack LeBien
- Rainforest Connection, Science Department, 440 Cobia Drive, Suite 1902, Katy, TX, 77494, USA
| | | | - Nico Blüthgen
- Ecological Networks Lab, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr. 3, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Constance J Tremlett
- Ecological Networks Lab, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr. 3, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Dennis Böttger
- Phyletisches Museum, Institute for Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Heike Feldhaar
- Animal Population Ecology, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Nina Grella
- Animal Population Ecology, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ana Falconí-López
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
- Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Medio Ambiente y Salud-BIOMAS-Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuador
| | - David A Donoso
- Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Medio Ambiente y Salud-BIOMAS-Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuador
- Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Av. Ladrón de Guevara E11-253, CP 17-01-2759, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Jerome Moriniere
- AIM - Advanced Identification Methods GmbH, Niemeyerstr. 1, 04179, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Zuzana Buřivalová
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology and The Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lenzi A, Birtele D, Gisondi S, Romano M, Petriccione B, Cerretti P, Campanaro A. Robber flies and hover flies (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae and Syrphidae) in beech forests of the central Apennines: a contribution to the inventory of insect biodiversity in Italian State Nature Reserves. Biodivers Data J 2023; 11:e101327. [PMID: 37215463 PMCID: PMC10199333 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.11.e101327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The present paper describes a sampling-event dataset on species belonging to two families of Diptera (Syrphidae and Asilidae) collected between 2012 and 2019 in two Italian beech forests located in the central Apennines. The reference dataset consists of an annotated checklist and has been published on Zenodo. Syrphidae and Asilidae are two widespread and key ecological groups, including predator, pollinator and saproxylic species. Despite their pivotal role in both natural and man-made ecosystems, these families are still poorly known in terms of local distribution and open-access sampling-event data are rare in Italy. New information This open-access dataset includes 2,295 specimens for a total of 21 Asilidae and 65 Syrphidae species. Information about the collection (e.g. place, date, methods applied, collector) and the identification (e.g. species name, author, taxon ID) of the species is provided. Given the current biodiversity crisis, the publication of checklists, sampling-event data and datasets on insect communities in open-access repositories is highly recommended, as it represents the opportunity to share biodiversity information amongst different stakeholders. Moreover, such data are also a valuable source of information for nature reserve managers responsible for monitoring the conservation status of protected and endangered species and habitats and for evaluating the effects of conservation actions over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Lenzi
- Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria – Centro di ricerca Difesa e Certificazione, Firenze, ItalyConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria – Centro di ricerca Difesa e CertificazioneFirenzeItaly
- Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, ItalyDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, Sapienza Università di RomaRomaItaly
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, ItalyNBFC, National Biodiversity Future CenterPalermoItaly
| | - Daniele Birtele
- Carabinieri Biodiversità, Reparto di Verona – Centro Nazionale Carabinieri Biodiversità “Bosco Fontana", Marmirolo (Mantova), ItalyCarabinieri Biodiversità, Reparto di Verona – Centro Nazionale Carabinieri Biodiversità “Bosco Fontana"Marmirolo (Mantova)Italy
| | - Silvia Gisondi
- Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria – Centro di ricerca Difesa e Certificazione, Firenze, ItalyConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria – Centro di ricerca Difesa e CertificazioneFirenzeItaly
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, ItalyNBFC, National Biodiversity Future CenterPalermoItaly
| | - Mario Romano
- Raggruppamento Carabinieri Biodiversità, Reparto di Castel di Sangro, Castel di Sangro (L'Aquila), ItalyRaggruppamento Carabinieri Biodiversità, Reparto di Castel di SangroCastel di Sangro (L'Aquila)Italy
| | - Bruno Petriccione
- Colonnello dei Carabinieri per la Biodiversità, nella riserva, Castel di Sangro, ItalyColonnello dei Carabinieri per la Biodiversità, nella riservaCastel di SangroItaly
| | - Pierfilippo Cerretti
- Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, ItalyDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, Sapienza Università di RomaRomaItaly
| | - Alessandro Campanaro
- Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria – Centro di ricerca Difesa e Certificazione, Firenze, ItalyConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria – Centro di ricerca Difesa e CertificazioneFirenzeItaly
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, ItalyNBFC, National Biodiversity Future CenterPalermoItaly
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li M, Lei T, Wang G, Zhang D, Liu H, Zhang Z. Monitoring insect biodiversity and comparison of sampling strategies using metabarcoding: A case study in the Yanshan Mountains, China. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10031. [PMID: 37091562 PMCID: PMC10121320 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Insects are the richest and most diverse group of animals and yet there remains a lack, not only of systematic research into their distribution across some key regions of the planet, but of standardized sampling strategies for their study. The Yanshan Mountains, being the boundary range between the Inner Mongolian Plateau and the North China Plain, present an indispensable piece of the insect biodiversity puzzle: both requiring systematic study and offering opportunities for the development of standardized methodologies. This is the first use of DNA metabarcoding to survey the insect biodiversity of the Yanshan Mountains. The study focuses on differences of community composition among samples collected via different methods and from different habitat types. In total, 74 bulk samples were collected from five habitat types (scrubland, woodland, wetland, farmland and grassland) using three collection methods (sweep netting, Malaise traps and light traps). After DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing and diversity analysis were performed, a total of 7427 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at ≥97% sequence similarity level were delimited, of which 7083 OTUs were identified as belonging to Insecta. Orthoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera and Hemiptera were found to be the dominant orders according to community composition analysis. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis based on Bray-Curtis distances revealed highly divergent estimates of insect community composition among samples differentiated by the collection method (R = .524802, p = .001), but nonsignificant difference among samples differentiated according to habitat (R = .051102, p = .078). The study therefore appears to indicate that the concurrent use of varied collection methods is essential to the accurate monitoring of insect biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Li
- College of Biological Science and TechnologyTaiyuan Normal UniversityJinzhongChina
| | - Ting Lei
- College of Biological Science and TechnologyTaiyuan Normal UniversityJinzhongChina
| | - Guobin Wang
- College of Biological Science and TechnologyTaiyuan Normal UniversityJinzhongChina
| | - Danli Zhang
- College of Biological Science and TechnologyTaiyuan Normal UniversityJinzhongChina
| | - Huaxi Liu
- Department of Life SciencesNatural History MuseumLondonUK
| | - Zhiwei Zhang
- College of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural UniversityJinzhongChina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tobisch C, Rojas-Botero S, Uhler J, Müller J, Kollmann J, Moning C, Brändle M, Gossner MM, Redlich S, Zhang J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Benjamin C, Englmeier J, Fricke U, Ganuza C, Haensel M, Riebl R, Uphus L, Ewald J. Plant species composition and local habitat conditions as primary determinants of terrestrial arthropod assemblages. Oecologia 2023; 201:813-825. [PMID: 36869183 PMCID: PMC10038969 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05345-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
Arthropods respond to vegetation in multiple ways since plants provide habitat and food resources and indicate local abiotic conditions. However, the relative importance of these factors for arthropod assemblages is less well understood. We aimed to disentangle the effects of plant species composition and environmental drivers on arthropod taxonomic composition and to assess which aspects of vegetation contribute to the relationships between plant and arthropod assemblages. In a multi-scale field study in Southern Germany, we sampled vascular plants and terrestrial arthropods in typical habitats of temperate landscapes. We compared independent and shared effects of vegetation and abiotic predictors on arthropod composition distinguishing between four large orders (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera), and five functional groups (herbivores, pollinators, predators, parasitoids, detritivores). Across all investigated groups, plant species composition explained the major fraction of variation in arthropod composition, while land-cover composition was another important predictor. Moreover, the local habitat conditions depicted by the indicator values of the plant communities were more important for arthropod composition than trophic relationships between certain plant and arthropod species. Among trophic groups, predators showed the strongest response to plant species composition, while responses of herbivores and pollinators were stronger than those of parasitoids and detritivores. Our results highlight the relevance of plant community composition for terrestrial arthropod assemblages across multiple taxa and trophic levels and emphasize the value of plants as a proxy for characterizing habitat conditions that are hardly accessible to direct environmental measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Tobisch
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany.
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
| | - Sandra Rojas-Botero
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Johannes Uhler
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany
| | - Johannes Kollmann
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Christoph Moning
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
| | - Martin Brändle
- Division of Animal Ecology, Department of Ecology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Martin M Gossner
- Forest Entomology, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Redlich
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Caryl Benjamin
- Ecoclimatology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Jana Englmeier
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ute Fricke
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Ganuza
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maria Haensel
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Rebekka Riebl
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Lars Uphus
- Ecoclimatology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Jörg Ewald
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zizka VMA, Geiger MF, Hörren T, Kirse A, Noll NW, Schäffler L, Scherges AM, Sorg M. Repeated subsamples during DNA extraction reveal increased diversity estimates in DNA metabarcoding of Malaise traps. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e9502. [PMID: 36447594 PMCID: PMC9702565 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
With increased application of DNA metabarcoding in biodiversity assessment, various laboratory protocols have been optimized, and their further evaluation is subject of current research. Homogenization of bulk samples and subsequent DNA extraction from a subsample of destructed tissue is a common first stage of the metabarcoding process. This can either be conducted using sample material soaked in a storage fixative, e.g., ethanol (here referred to as "wet" treatment) or from dried individuals ("dry"). However, it remains uncertain if perfect mixing and equal distribution of DNA within the tube is ensured during homogenization and to what extent incomplete mixing and resulting variations in tissue composition affect diversity assessments if only a fraction of the destructed sample is processed in the downstream metabarcoding workflow. Here we investigated the efficiency of homogenization under wet and dry conditions and tested how variations in destructed tissue composition might affect diversity assessments of complex arthropod samples. We considered five time intervals of Malaise trap bulk samples and process nine different subsamples of homogenized tissue (20 mg each) in both treatments. Results indicate a more consistent diversity assessment from dried material, but at the cost of a higher processing time. Both approaches detected comparable OTU diversity and revealed similar taxa compositions in a single tissue extraction. With an increased number of tissue subsamples during DNA extraction, OTU diversity increased for both approaches, especially for highly diverse samples obtained during the summer. Here, particularly the detection of small and low-biomass taxa increased. The processing of multiple subsamples in the metabarcoding protocol can therefore be a helpful procedure to enhance diversity estimates and counteract taxonomic bias in biodiversity assessments. However, the process induces higher costs and time effort and the application in large-scale biodiversity assessment, e.g., in monitoring schemes needs to be considered on project-specific prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera M. A. Zizka
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation ScienceBonnGermany
| | - Matthias F. Geiger
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation ScienceBonnGermany
| | | | - Ameli Kirse
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation ScienceBonnGermany
| | - Niklas W. Noll
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation ScienceBonnGermany
| | - Livia Schäffler
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation ScienceBonnGermany
| | - Alice M. Scherges
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation ScienceBonnGermany
| | - Martin Sorg
- Entomological Society Krefeld (EVK)KrefeldGermany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fluctuating insect diversity, abundance and biomass across agricultural landscapes. Sci Rep 2022; 12:17706. [PMID: 36271271 PMCID: PMC9587014 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20989-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Habitat destruction and deterioration of habitat quality caused a severe decline of biodiversity, such as insect diversity. In this study, we analyze insect diversity and biomass across agro-environments. We collected flying insects with 20 malaise traps across a landscape mosaic consisting of organic (eight traps) and conventional (four traps) farmland, as well as across agricultural land that has been recently converted from conventional to organic farming (eight traps). Sampling was conducted over 2 years, in 2019 and 2020, with in total 340 sampling events. We measured the dry weight of the captured organisms and identified species diversity by analyzing Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) via metabarcoding. The results obtained show temporal dynamics. The number of OTUs were always higher than the number of BINs. OTUs and BINs were moderately to highly correlated, while the number of OTUs and BINs were only moderately positively correlated with dry biomass. OTUs and BINs as well as biomass were highest in the recently transformed farmland if compared with pure organic and conventional farmland sites, which showed no significant differences in respect of insect diversity. OTU and BIN numbers but not the OTU/BIN ratio significantly decreased with increasing distance from the nearest forest fringe. The numbers of OTUs, BINs and the OTU/BIN proportion, as well as OTU and BIN/biomass proportions varied strongly over seasons, irrespective of agricultural practice. Based on our findings, we suggest to combine data on insect species richness and biomass measured over a period of time, to derive a largely complete and meaningful assessment of biodiversity for a specific region.
Collapse
|
14
|
Arribas P, Andújar C, Bohmann K, deWaard JR, Economo EP, Elbrecht V, Geisen S, Goberna M, Krehenwinkel H, Novotny V, Zinger L, Creedy TJ, Meramveliotakis E, Noguerales V, Overcast I, Morlon H, Papadopoulou A, Vogler AP, Emerson BC. Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods. Gigascience 2022; 11:6646445. [PMID: 35852418 PMCID: PMC9295367 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giac065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Metazoan metabarcoding is emerging as an essential strategy for inventorying biodiversity, with diverse projects currently generating massive quantities of community-level data. The potential for integrating across such data sets offers new opportunities to better understand biodiversity and how it might respond to global change. However, large-scale syntheses may be compromised if metabarcoding workflows differ from each other. There are ongoing efforts to improve standardization for the reporting of inventory data. However, harmonization at the stage of generating metabarcode data has yet to be addressed. A modular framework for harmonized data generation offers a pathway to navigate the complex structure of terrestrial metazoan biodiversity. Here, through our collective expertise as practitioners, method developers, and researchers leading metabarcoding initiatives to inventory terrestrial biodiversity, we seek to initiate a harmonized framework for metabarcode data generation, with a terrestrial arthropod module. We develop an initial set of submodules covering the 5 main steps of metabarcode data generation: (i) sample acquisition; (ii) sample processing; (iii) DNA extraction; (iv) polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing; and (v) DNA sequence and metadata deposition, providing a backbone for a terrestrial arthropod module. To achieve this, we (i) identified key points for harmonization, (ii) reviewed the current state of the art, and (iii) distilled existing knowledge within submodules, thus promoting best practice by providing guidelines and recommendations to reduce the universe of methodological options. We advocate the adoption and further development of the terrestrial arthropod module. We further encourage the development of modules for other biodiversity fractions as an essential step toward large-scale biodiversity synthesis through harmonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Arribas
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Carmelo Andújar
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Kristine Bohmann
- Section for Evolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeremy R deWaard
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, N1G2W1 Guelph, Canada.,School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, N1G2W1 Guelph, Canada
| | - Evan P Economo
- Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 904-0495 Japan
| | - Vasco Elbrecht
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring (ZBM), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig,D-53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefan Geisen
- Laboratory of Nematology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Goberna
- Department of Environment and Agronomy, INIA-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Vojtech Novotny
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.,Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Zinger
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.,Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas J Creedy
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK
| | | | - Víctor Noguerales
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Isaac Overcast
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Morlon
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anna Papadopoulou
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Alfried P Vogler
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK.,Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, UK
| | - Brent C Emerson
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaczmarek M, Entling MH, Hoffmann C. Using Malaise Traps and Metabarcoding for Biodiversity Assessment in Vineyards: Effects of Weather and Trapping Effort. INSECTS 2022; 13:insects13060507. [PMID: 35735844 PMCID: PMC9224819 DOI: 10.3390/insects13060507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Metabarcoding is a powerful tool for ecological studies and monitoring that might provide a solution to the time-consuming taxonomic identification of the vast diversity of insects. Here, we assess how ambient weather conditions during Malaise trap exposure and the effort of trapping affect biomass and taxa richness in vineyards. Biomass varied by more than twofold with weather conditions. It increased with warmer and drier weather but was not significantly related with wind or precipitation. Taxa richness showed a saturating relationship with increasing trapping duration and was influenced by environmental and seasonal effects. Taxa accumulation was high, increasing fourfold from three days of monthly trap exposure compared to continuous trapping and nearly sixfold from sampling at a single site compared to 32 sites. The limited saturation was mainly due to a large number of singletons, such as rare species, in the metabarcoding dataset. Metabarcoding can be key for long-term insect monitoring. We conclude that single traps operated for up to ten days per month are suitable to monitor the presence of common species. However, more intensive trapping is necessary for a good representation of rare species in biodiversity monitoring. The data collected here can potentially guide the design of monitoring studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Kaczmarek
- Julius Kühn Institute—Federal Research Institute for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Fruit Crops and Viticulture, Geilweilerhof, D-76833 Siebeldingen, Germany;
- Institute for Environmental Sciences—iES Landau, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, D-76829 Landau in der Pfalz, Germany;
- Correspondence:
| | - Martin H. Entling
- Institute for Environmental Sciences—iES Landau, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, D-76829 Landau in der Pfalz, Germany;
| | - Christoph Hoffmann
- Julius Kühn Institute—Federal Research Institute for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Fruit Crops and Viticulture, Geilweilerhof, D-76833 Siebeldingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ganuza C, Redlich S, Uhler J, Tobisch C, Rojas-Botero S, Peters MK, Zhang J, Benjamin CS, Englmeier J, Ewald J, Fricke U, Haensel M, Kollmann J, Riebl R, Uphus L, Müller J, Steffan-Dewenter I. Interactive effects of climate and land use on pollinator diversity differ among taxa and scales. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2022; 8:eabm9359. [PMID: 35544641 PMCID: PMC9075793 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Changes in climate and land use are major threats to pollinating insects, an essential functional group. Here, we unravel the largely unknown interactive effects of both threats on seven pollinator taxa using a multiscale space-for-time approach across large climate and land-use gradients in a temperate region. Pollinator community composition, regional gamma diversity, and community dissimilarity (beta diversity) of pollinator taxa were shaped by climate-land-use interactions, while local alpha diversity was solely explained by their additive effects. Pollinator diversity increased with reduced land-use intensity (forest < grassland < arable land < urban) and high flowering-plant diversity at different spatial scales, and higher temperatures homogenized pollinator communities across regions. Our study reveals declines in pollinator diversity with land-use intensity at multiple spatial scales and regional community homogenization in warmer and drier climates. Management options at several scales are highlighted to mitigate impacts of climate change on pollinators and their ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Ganuza
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Redlich
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Uhler
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Cynthia Tobisch
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Sandra Rojas-Botero
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Marcell K. Peters
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Caryl S. Benjamin
- TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecoclimatology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Jana Englmeier
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Ewald
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
| | - Ute Fricke
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maria Haensel
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Johannes Kollmann
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Rebekka Riebl
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Lars Uphus
- TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecoclimatology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Svenningsen CS, Bowler DE, Hecker S, Bladt J, Grescho V, Dam NM, Dauber J, Eichenberg D, Ejrnæs R, Fløjgaard C, Frenzel M, Frøslev TG, Hansen AJ, Heilmann‐Clausen J, Huang Y, Larsen JC, Menger J, Nayan NLBM, Pedersen LB, Richter A, Dunn RR, Tøttrup AP, Bonn A. Flying insect biomass is negatively associated with urban cover in surrounding landscapes. DIVERS DISTRIB 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diana E. Bowler
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Biodiversity Jena Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| | - Susanne Hecker
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| | - Jesper Bladt
- Department of Bioscience – Biodiversity and Conservation Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| | - Volker Grescho
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| | - Nicole M. Dam
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Biodiversity Jena Germany
| | - Jens Dauber
- Thünen‐Institute of Biodiversity Braunschweig Germany
| | - David Eichenberg
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| | - Rasmus Ejrnæs
- Department of Bioscience – Biodiversity and Conservation Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| | - Camilla Fløjgaard
- Department of Bioscience – Biodiversity and Conservation Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| | - Mark Frenzel
- Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Halle Germany
| | - Tobias G. Frøslev
- Centre for GeoGenetics GLOBE Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Anders J. Hansen
- Centre for GeoGenetics GLOBE Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Jacob Heilmann‐Clausen
- Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate GLOBE Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Yuanyuan Huang
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| | - Jonas C. Larsen
- Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Juliana Menger
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
- Coordenação de Biodiversidade Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus Brazil
| | - Nur L. B. M. Nayan
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| | - Lene B. Pedersen
- Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Anett Richter
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
- Thünen‐Institute of Biodiversity Braunschweig Germany
| | - Robert R. Dunn
- Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
| | - Anders P. Tøttrup
- Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Aletta Bonn
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Biodiversity Jena Germany
- Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Krueger T, Cross AT, Hübner J, Morinière J, Hausmann A, Fleischmann A. A novel approach for reliable qualitative and quantitative prey spectra identification of carnivorous plants combining DNA metabarcoding and macro photography. Sci Rep 2022; 12:4778. [PMID: 35314716 PMCID: PMC8938489 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08580-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Prey spectra (the number and composition of captured arthropods) represent a crucial aspect of carnivorous plant ecology, yet remain poorly studied. Traditional morphology-based approaches for prey identification are time-intensive, require specialists with considerable knowledge of arthropod taxonomy, and are hampered by high numbers of unidentifiable (i.e., heavily digested) prey items. We examined prey spectra of three species of closely-related annual Drosera (Droseraceae, sundews) from tropical northern Australia using a novel DNA metabarcoding approach with in-situ macro photography as a plausibility control and to facilitate prey quantity estimations. This new method facilitated accurate analyses of carnivorous plant prey spectra (even of heavily digested prey lacking characteristic morphological features) at a taxonomic resolution and level of completeness far exceeding morphology-based methods and approaching the 100% mark at arthropod order level. Although the three studied species exhibited significant differences in detected prey spectra, little prey specialisation was observed and habitat or plant population density variations were likely the main drivers of prey spectra dissimilarity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thilo Krueger
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| | - Adam T. Cross
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia ,EcoHealth Network, Brookline, MA USA
| | - Jeremy Hübner
- grid.452282.b0000 0001 1013 3702Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Axel Hausmann
- grid.452282.b0000 0001 1013 3702Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Fleischmann
- grid.452781.d0000 0001 2203 6205Botanische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-BSM), Munich, Germany ,grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XGeoBio-Center LMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kortmann M, Roth N, Buse J, Hilszczański J, Jaworski T, Morinière J, Seidl R, Thorn S, Müller JC. Arthropod dark taxa provide new insights into diversity responses to bark beetle infestations. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e2516. [PMID: 34918844 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Natural disturbances are increasing around the globe, also impacting protected areas. Although previous studies have indicated that natural disturbances result in mainly positive effects on biodiversity, these analyses mostly focused on a few well established taxonomic groups, and thus uncertainty remains regarding the comprehensive impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity. Using Malaise traps and meta-barcoding, we studied a broad range of arthropod taxa, including dark and cryptic taxa, along a gradient of bark beetle disturbance severities in five European national parks. We identified order-level community thresholds of disturbance severity and classified barcode index numbers (BINs; a cluster system for DNA sequences, where each cluster corresponds to a species) as negative or positive disturbance indicators. Negative indicator BINs decreased above thresholds of low to medium disturbance severity (20%-30% of trees killed), whereas positive indicator BINs benefited from high disturbance severity (76%-98%). BINs allocated to a species name contained nearly as many positive as negative disturbance indicators, but dark and cryptic taxa, particularly Diptera and Hymenoptera in our data, contained higher numbers of negative disturbance indicator BINs. Analyses of changes in the richness of BINs showed variable responses of arthropods to disturbance severity at lower taxonomic levels, whereas no significant signal was detected at the order level due to the compensatory responses of the underlying taxa. We conclude that the analyses of dark taxa can offer new insights into biodiversity responses to disturbances. Our results suggest considerable potential for forest management to foster arthropod diversity, for example by maintaining both closed-canopy forests (>70% cover) and open forests (<30% cover) on the landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Kortmann
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology (Zoology III), Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - Nicolas Roth
- Bern University of Applied Sciences, School of Agricultural Forest and Food Sciences, Zollikofen, Switzerland
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Jörn Buse
- Department for Ecological Monitoring, Research and Species Protection, Black Forest National Park, Seebach, Germany
| | - Jacek Hilszczański
- Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, Raszyn, Poland
| | - Tomasz Jaworski
- Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, Raszyn, Poland
| | | | - Rupert Seidl
- Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- Berchtesgaden National Park, Berchtesgaden, Germany
| | - Simon Thorn
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology (Zoology III), Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany
| | - Jörg C Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology (Zoology III), Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Raupach MJ, Rulik B, Spelda J. Surprisingly high genetic divergence of the mitochondrial DNA barcode fragment (COI) within Central European woodlice species (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea). Zookeys 2022; 1082:103-125. [PMID: 35115867 PMCID: PMC8794987 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1082.69851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA barcoding has become the most popular approach for species identification in recent years. As part of the German Barcode of Life project, the first DNA barcode library for terrestrial and freshwater isopods from Germany is presented. The analyzed barcode library included 38 terrestrial (78% of the documented species of Germany) and five freshwater (63%) species. A total of 513 new barcodes was generated and 518 DNA barcodes were analyzed. This analysis revealed surprisingly high intraspecific genetic distances for numerous species, with a maximum of 29.4% for Platyarthrus hoffmannseggii Brandt, 1833. The number of BINs per species ranged from one (32 species, 68%) to a maximum of six for Trachelipus rathkii (Brandt, 1833). In spite of such high intraspecific variability, interspecific distances with values between 12.6% and 29.8% allowed a valid species assignment of all analyzed isopods. The observed high intraspecific distances presumably result from phylogeographic events, Wolbachia infections, atypical mitochondrial DNAs, heteroplasmy, or various combinations of these factors. Our study represents the first step in generating an extensive reference library of DNA barcodes for terrestrial and freshwater isopods for future molecular biodiversity assessment studies.
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Elbrecht V, Bourlat SJ, Hörren T, Lindner A, Mordente A, Noll NW, Schäffler L, Sorg M, Zizka VMA. Pooling size sorted Malaise trap fractions to maximize taxon recovery with metabarcoding. PeerJ 2021; 9:e12177. [PMID: 34707928 PMCID: PMC8500090 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Small and rare specimens can remain undetected when metabarcoding is applied on bulk samples with a high specimen size heterogeneity. This is especially critical for Malaise trap samples, where most of the biodiversity is contributed by small taxa with low biomass. The separation of samples in different size fractions for downstream analysis is one possibility to increase detection of small and rare taxa. However, experiments systematically testing different size sorting approaches and subsequent proportional pooling of fractions are lacking, but would provide important information for the optimization of metabarcoding protocols. We set out to find a size sorting strategy for Malaise trap samples that maximizes taxonomic recovery but remains scalable and time efficient. Methods Three Malaise trap samples were sorted into four size classes using dry sieving. Each fraction was homogenized and lysed. The corresponding lysates were pooled to simulate unsorted samples. Pooling was additionally conducted in equal proportions and in four different proportions enriching the small size fraction of samples. DNA from the individual size classes as well as the pooled fractions was extracted and metabarcoded using the FwhF2 and Fol-degen-rev primer set. Additionally, alternative wet sieving strategies were explored. Results The small size fractions harboured the highest diversity and were best represented when pooling in favour of small specimens. Metabarcoding of unsorted samples decreases taxon recovery compared to size sorted samples. A size separation into only two fractions (below 4 mm and above) can double taxon recovery compared to not size sorting. However, increasing the sequencing depth 3- to 4-fold can also increase taxon recovery to levels comparable with size sorting, but remains biased towards biomass rich taxa in the sample. Conclusion We demonstrate that size fractionation of Malaise trap bulk samples can increase taxon recovery. While results show distinct patterns, the lack of statistical support due to the limited number of samples processed is a limitation. Due to increased speed and lower risk of cross-contamination as well as specimen damage we recommend wet sieving and proportional pooling of the lysates in favour of the small size fraction (80–90% volume). However, for large-scale projects with time constraints, increasing sequencing depth is an alternative solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasco Elbrecht
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany.,SimplexDNA AG, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sarah J Bourlat
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Angie Lindner
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | - Adriana Mordente
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas W Noll
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | - Livia Schäffler
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Sorg
- Entomological Society Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Vera M A Zizka
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Uhler J, Redlich S, Zhang J, Hothorn T, Tobisch C, Ewald J, Thorn S, Seibold S, Mitesser O, Morinière J, Bozicevic V, Benjamin CS, Englmeier J, Fricke U, Ganuza C, Haensel M, Riebl R, Rojas-Botero S, Rummler T, Uphus L, Schmidt S, Steffan-Dewenter I, Müller J. Relationship of insect biomass and richness with land use along a climate gradient. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5946. [PMID: 34642336 PMCID: PMC8511018 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26181-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently reported insect declines have raised both political and social concern. Although the declines have been attributed to land use and climate change, supporting evidence suffers from low taxonomic resolution, short time series, a focus on local scales, and the collinearity of the identified drivers. In this study, we conducted a systematic assessment of insect populations in southern Germany, which showed that differences in insect biomass and richness are highly context dependent. We found the largest difference in biomass between semi-natural and urban environments (-42%), whereas differences in total richness (-29%) and the richness of threatened species (-56%) were largest from semi-natural to agricultural environments. These results point to urbanization and agriculture as major drivers of decline. We also found that richness and biomass increase monotonously with increasing temperature, independent of habitat. The contrasting patterns of insect biomass and richness question the use of these indicators as mutual surrogates. Our study provides support for the implementation of more comprehensive measures aimed at habitat restoration in order to halt insect declines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Uhler
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Redlich
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Hothorn
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Cynthia Tobisch
- Institute of Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
| | - Jörg Ewald
- Botany & Vegetation Science, Faculty of Forestry, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
| | - Simon Thorn
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Seibold
- Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest management Group, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.,Berchtesgaden National Park, Berchtesgaden, Germany
| | - Oliver Mitesser
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Caryl S Benjamin
- TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecoclimatology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Jana Englmeier
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ute Fricke
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Ganuza
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maria Haensel
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Centre of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Rebekka Riebl
- Professorship of Ecological Services, Bayreuth Centre of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Sandra Rojas-Botero
- Chair of Restoration Ecology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Thomas Rummler
- Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Lars Uphus
- TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecoclimatology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Stefan Schmidt
- SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. .,Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Montgomery GA, Belitz MW, Guralnick RP, Tingley MW. Standards and Best Practices for Monitoring and Benchmarking Insects. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.579193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly relevant and needed amid accelerating concern about insect trends in the Anthropocene. The growing recognition that insect populations may be in decline has given rise to a renewed call for insect population monitoring by scientists, and a desire from the broader public to participate in insect surveys. However, due to the immense diversity of insects and a vast assortment of data collection methods, there is a general lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods, such that a sudden and unplanned expansion of data collection may fail to meet its ecological potential or conservation needs without a coordinated focus on standards and best practices. To begin to address this problem, we provide simple guidelines for maximizing return on proven inventory methods that will provide insect benchmarking data suitable for a variety of ecological responses, including occurrence and distribution, phenology, abundance and biomass, and diversity and species composition. To track these responses, we present seven primary insect sampling methods—malaise trapping, light trapping, pan trapping, pitfall trappings, beating sheets, acoustic monitoring, and active visual surveys—and recommend standards while highlighting examples of model programs. For each method, we discuss key topics such as recommended spatial and temporal scales of sampling, important metadata to track, and degree of replication needed to produce rigorous estimates of ecological responses. We additionally suggest protocols for scalable insect monitoring, from backyards to national parks. Overall, we aim to compile a resource that can be used by diverse individuals and organizations seeking to initiate or improve insect monitoring programs in this era of rapid change.
Collapse
|