Biventricular pacemaker therapy improves exercise capacity in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy via augmented diastolic filling on exercise

Optimizing diastolic filling by pacing in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for symptomatic patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sequential atrioventricular (AV) pacing, from different right ventricular (RV) sites with varying AV delays, on the diastolic function and functional capacity of patients with nHCM.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with symptomatic nHCM and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria included PR interval >150 ms, E/e' ≥15, and an indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Doppler echocardiographic study was performed during dual-chamber pacing at various AV intervals. Pacing was performed at 3 RV sites: RV apex (RVA), RV midseptum (RVS), and RV outflow tract (RVO). The site and sensed AV delay (SAVD) at which optimal diastolic filling occurred were chosen based on diastolic filling period and E/e'. During ICD implantation, the RV lead was implanted at the site identified by the pacing study. Devices were programmed in DDD mode at the optimal SAVD. During follow-up, diastolic function and functional capacity were assessed.

RESULTS

Among the 21 patients (age 47.8 ± 7.7 years; 81.0% male), baseline E/A and E/e' were 2.4 ± 0.6 and 17.2 ± 2.2, respectively. There was an improvement in diastolic function (E/e') in 18 patients (responders) when pacing from the RVA (12.9 ± 3.4; P <.001) than from the RVS (16.6 ± 2.3) and RVO (16.9 ± 2.2). Among responders, optimal diastolic filling occurred at SAVD of 130-160 ms with RVA pacing. Nonresponders had longer duration of symptoms (P = .006), lower LV ejection fraction (P = .037), and higher late gadolinium enhancement burden (P <.001). During 13.5 ± 1.5 months of follow-up, there was an improvement (Δ) in diastolic function (E/e' -4.1 ± 0.5), functional capacity (New York Heart Association functional class -1.5 ± 0.3), and reduction in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level (-55.6 ± 12.3 pg/mL) compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Pacing at an optimized AV delay from the RVA improves diastolic function and functional capacity in a subset of patients with nHCM.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Bradycardia in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Effect

PURPOSE

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is as an innovative physiological pacing approach. The research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is scarce. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effect of LBBP in bradycardia NOHCM patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation indication.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients with NOHCM who received LBBP were retrospectively enrolled as a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) group. Following 1:3 matching, 39 patients without HCM were randomly matched as a control group. Echocardiographic index and pacing parameters were collected.

RESULTS

The successful LBBP was achieved in 96.2% of all cases (50/52), and the success rate of the HCM group was 92.3% (12/13). In the HCM group, the paced QRS duration (from the pacing stimulus to QRS end) was 145.6±20.8 ms. The stimulus to left ventricular activation time (s-LVAT) was 87.4±15.2 ms. In the control group, the paced QRS duration was 139.4±17.2 ms, and the s-LVAT was 79.9±14.1 ms. During the implantation, R-wave sensing and the pacing threshold of the HCM group were significantly higher than the control group (20.2±10.5 vs 12.5±5.9 mV, P < 0.05; 0.8±0.3 vs 0.6±0.2V/0.4 ms, P < 0.05). In addition, the fluoroscopic duration and procedural duration were longer in the HCM group (14.8±8.3 vs 10.3±6.6min, P = 0.07; 131.8±50.5 vs 101.4±41.6 min, P < 0.05). The lead insertion depth was 15±2 mm in the HCM group, and no procedure-related complications occurred. During the 12-month follow-up, pacing parameters remained stable and were of no significance in the two groups. The cardiac function did not deteriorate, and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not increase in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LBBP might be feasible and safe for NOHCM patients with conventional bradycardia pacing indication, and there is no deterioration in cardiac function and LVOTG of patients with NOHCM.

Implications of S-glutathionylation of sarcomere proteins in cardiac disorders, therapies, and diagnosis

The discovery that cardiac sarcomere proteins are substrates for S-glutathionylation and that this post-translational modification correlates strongly with diastolic dysfunction led to new concepts regarding how levels of oxidative stress affect the heartbeat. Major sarcomere proteins for which there is evidence of S-glutathionylation include cardiac myosin binding protein C (cMyBP-C), actin, cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and titin. Our hypothesis is that these S-glutathionylated proteins are significant factors in acquired and familial disorders of the heart; and, when released into the serum, provide novel biomarkers. We consider the molecular mechanisms for these effects in the context of recent revelations of how these proteins control cardiac dynamics in close collaboration with Ca2+ fluxes. These revelations were made using powerful approaches and technologies that were focused on thin filaments, thick filaments, and titin filaments. Here we integrate their regulatory processes in the sarcomere as modulated mainly by neuro-humoral control of phosphorylation inasmuch evidence indicates that S-glutathionylation and protein phosphorylation, promoting increased dynamics and modifying the Frank-Starling relation, may be mutually exclusive. Earlier studies demonstrated that in addition to cTnI as a well-established biomarker for cardiac disorders, serum levels of cMyBP-C are also a biomarker for cardiac disorders. We describe recent studies approaching the question of whether serum levels of S-glutathionylated-cMyBP-C could be employed as an important clinical tool in patient stratification, early diagnosis in at risk patients before HFpEF, determination of progression, effectiveness of therapeutic approaches, and as a guide in developing future therapies.

Broad Electrocardiogram Syndromes Spectrum: From Common Emergencies to Particular Electrical Heart Disorders

Electrocardiogram (ECG) still remains a very useful diagnostic method in modern cardiology. Its broad availability, noninvasiveness and good sensitivity explain why it plays a capital role in the very beginning of the process of diagnosis for every patient, with or without cardiac-related complaints. For the practitioner, good training in ECG interpretation is mandatory. Sometimes, the ECG trace reveals particular aspects that may cause confusion and complicate decision-making. In this article, we present several less common situations underlying the general context and ECG features. The syndromes studied have a high pathological significance and may range from acute emergencies that call for a rapid therapeutical response to chronic syndromes that require prolonged observation, monitoring and risk stratification.

Current therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

AIMS

The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the effect of the current therapies over the pathophysiological and clinical characteristics of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 41 studies identified from 1383 retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane was conducted. Therapies were grouped in pharmacological, invasive and physical exercise. Pharmacological agents had no effect on functional capacity measured by VO2max (1.11 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: -0.04, 2.25, P < 0.05). Invasive septal reduction therapies increased VO2max (+3.2 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: 1.78, 4.60, P < 0.05). Structured physical exercise programmes did not report contraindications and evidenced the highest increases on functional capacity (VO2max + 4.33 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: 0.20, 8.45, P < 0.05). Patients with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction at rest improved their VO2max to a greater extent compared with those without resting LVOT obstruction (2.82 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: 1.97, 3.67 vs. 1.18; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.74, P < 0.05). Peak LVOT gradient was reduced with the three treatment options with the highest reduction observed for invasive therapies. Left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced in pharmacological and invasive procedures. No effect was observed after physical exercise. Symptomatic status improved with the three options and to a greater extent with invasive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive septal reduction therapies increase VO2max, improve symptomatic status, and reduce resting and peak LVOT gradient, thus might be considered in obstructive patients. Physical exercise emerges as a coadjuvant therapy, which is safe and associated with benefits on functional capacity. Pharmacological agents improve reported NYHA class, but not functional capacity.

A year in heart failure: an update of recent findings

Major changes have occurred in these last years in heart failure (HF) management. Landmark trials and the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HF have established four classes of drugs for treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction: angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or an angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor, beta‐blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors, namely, dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. These drugs consistently showed benefits on mortality, HF hospitalizations, and quality of life. Correction of iron deficiency is indicated to improve symptoms and reduce HF hospitalizations. AFFIRM‐AHF showed 26% reduction in total HF hospitalizations with ferric carboxymaltose vs. placebo in patients hospitalized for acute HF (P = 0.013). The guanylate cyclase activator vericiguat and the myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil improved outcomes in randomized placebo‐controlled trials, and vericiguat is now approved for clinical practice. Treatment of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was a major unmet clinical need until this year when the results of EMPEROR‐Preserved (EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic HFpEF) were issued. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced by 21% (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.90; P < 0.001), the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Advances in the treatment of specific phenotypes of HF, including atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies, cardiac amyloidosis, and cancer‐related HF, also occurred. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic still plays a major role in HF epidemiology and management. All these aspects are highlighted in this review.