Allospecific CD4(+) T cells retain effector function and are actively regulated by Treg cells in the context of transplantation tolerance

Targeted depletion of PD-1-expressing cells induces immune tolerance through peripheral clonal deletion

Thymic negative selection of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is essential for establishing self-tolerance and acquired allograft tolerance following organ transplantation. However, it is unclear whether and how peripheral clonal deletion of alloreactive T cells induces transplantation tolerance. Here, we establish that programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is a hallmark of alloreactive T cells and is associated with clonal expansion after alloantigen encounter. Moreover, we found that diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR)-mediated ablation of PD-1+ cells reshaped the TCR repertoire through peripheral clonal deletion of alloreactive T cells and promoted tolerance in mouse transplantation models. In addition, by using PD-1-specific depleting antibodies, we found that antibody-mediated depletion of PD-1+ cells prevented heart transplant rejection and the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in humanized PD-1 mice. Thus, these data suggest that PD-1 is an attractive target for peripheral clonal deletion and induction of immune tolerance.

MicroRNA let-7a mediates posttranscriptional inhibition of Nr4A1 and exacerbates cardiac allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute allograft rejection remains a major obstacle after heart transplantation, and CD4+ T cells play a crucial role in allograft rejection. Upregulation of Nr4A1 could regulate CD4+ T-cell function and alleviate allograft rejection. However, the regulatory mechanism of Nr4A1 in allograft rejection remains elusive.

METHODS

BCLb/c mouse hearts were transplanted into WT C57BL/6 mice, and dynamic detection of the changes in Nr4A1 expression revealed that Nr4A1 was regulated posttranscriptionally after heart transplantation. Potential upstream miRNAs of Nr4A1 were screened, and the transfection of cells with these miRNA mimics/inhibitors and dual-luciferase reporter experiments were performed to clarify the regulatory mechanism of miRNAs on Nr4A1 expression. The miRNA agomiR/antagomiR was applied in vivo to validate the role of the corresponding miRNA in heart transplantation. Finally, Nr4A1 knockout mice and an adoptive T-cell cotransfer model were used to confirm the specific effects of miRNA.

RESULTS

The expression of Nr4A1 protein (rather than mRNA) exhibited a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing rapidly, and this phenomenon could not be reversed by lysosomal or proteasomal inhibitors. The miRNA let-7a directly binds to the Nr4A1 3'UTR and posttranscriptionally regulates Nr4A1 expression. The let-7a antagomiR prolonged allograft survival and regulated CD4+ T-cell function by upregulating Nr4A1 protein expression in CD4+ T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that let-7a is a potential target for interfering with Nr4A1 expression in CD4+ T cells and preventing the pathological progression of cardiac allograft rejection.

Oral alloantigen exposure promotes donor-specific tolerance in a mouse model of minor-mismatched skin transplantation

Oral antigen exposure is a powerful, non-invasive route to induce immune tolerance to dietary antigens, and has been modestly successful at prolonging graft survival in rodent models of transplantation. To harness the mechanisms of oral tolerance for promoting long-term graft acceptance, we developed a mouse model where the antigen ovalbumin (OVA) was introduced orally prior to transplantation with skin grafts expressing OVA. Oral OVA treatment pre-transplantation promoted permanent graft acceptance and linked tolerance to skin grafts expressing OVA fused to the additional antigen 2W. Tolerance was donor-specific, as secondary donor-matched, but not third-party allografts were spontaneously accepted. Oral OVA treatment promoted an anergic phenotype in OVA-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ conventional T cells (Tconvs) and expanded OVA-reactive Tregs pre-transplantation. However, skin graft acceptance following oral OVA resisted partial depletion of Tregs and blockade of PD-L1. Mechanistically, we revealed a role for the proximal gut draining lymph nodes (gdLNs) in mediating this effect, as an intestinal infection that drains to the proximal gdLNs prevented tolerance induction. Our study extends previous work applying oral antigen exposure to transplantation and serves as proof of concept that the systemic immune mechanisms supporting oral tolerance are sufficient to promote long-term graft acceptance.

Cytosporone B (Csn-B), an NR4A1 agonist, attenuates acute cardiac allograft rejection by inducing differential apoptosis of CD4+T cells

CD4+T cell-mediated acute rejection remains a major factor that affects the early survival of transplanted organs post-transplantation. Here, we reveal that nuclear receptor subfamily 4 Group A member 1 (Nr4A1) was upregulated during cardiac allograft rejection and that the increased Nr4A1 was primarily localized in intragraft-infiltrating CD4+T cells. Nr4A1 acts as a transcription factor with an important role in CD4+T cell apoptosis, differentiation and T cell dysfunction, which indicates that Nr4A1 may play a critical role in transplant rejection. Cytosporone B (Csn-B) is a naturally occurring agonist of Nr4A1, and the role of Csn-B in the physiological process of cardiac rejection is poorly defined. This study constructed an acute rejection model of abdominal heterotopic cardiac transplantation in mice and investigated whether Csn-B could attenuate acute transplant rejection by modulating the CD4+T lymphocyte response. The results showed that Csn-B prolonged murine cardiac allograft survival and reduced inflammation in allografts. Subsequently, it was confirmed that Csn-B functions by inducing non-Treg apoptosis and promoting Treg cell differentiation. Finally, we also confirmed that Csn-B attenuates acute rejection by directly targeting Nr4A1 in CD4+T cells. Our data suggest that Csn-B is a promising novel therapeutic approach for acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Engineering Strategies for Allogeneic Solid Tissue Acceptance

Advances in allogeneic transplantation of solid organs and tissues depend on our understanding of mechanisms that mediate the prevention of graft rejection. For the past decades, clinical practice has established guidelines to prevent allograft rejection, which mostly rely on the intake of nontargeted immunosuppressants as the gold standard. However, such lifelong regimens have been reported to trigger severe morbidities and commonly fail in preventing late allograft loss. In this review, the biology of allogeneic rejection and self-tolerance is analyzed, as well as the mechanisms of cellular-based therapeutics driving suppression and/or tolerance. Bioinspired engineering strategies that take advantage of cells, biomaterials, or combinations thereof to prevent allograft rejection are addressed, as well as biological mechanisms that drive their efficacy.

Resilience of T cell-intrinsic dysfunction in transplantation tolerance

Following antigen stimulation, naïve T cells differentiate into memory cells that mediate antigen clearance more efficiently upon repeat encounter. Donor-specific tolerance can be achieved in a subset of transplant recipients, but some of these grafts are rejected after years of stability, often following infections. Whether T cell memory can develop from a tolerant state and whether these formerly tolerant patients develop antidonor memory is not known. Using a mouse model of cardiac transplantation in which donor-specific tolerance is induced with costimulation blockade (CoB) plus donor-specific transfusion (DST), we have previously shown that systemic infection with Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) months after transplantation can erode or transiently abrogate established tolerance. In this study, we tracked donor-reactive T cells to investigate whether memory can be induced when alloreactive T cells are activated in the setting of tolerance. We show alloreactive T cells persist after induction of cardiac transplantation tolerance, but fail to acquire a memory phenotype despite becoming antigen experienced. Instead, donor-reactive T cells develop T cell-intrinsic dysfunction evidenced when removed from the tolerant environment. Notably, Lm infection after tolerance did not rescue alloreactive T cell memory differentiation or functionality. CoB and antigen persistence were sufficient together but not separately to achieve alloreactive T cell dysfunction, and conventional immunosuppression could substitute for CoB. Antigen persistence was required, as early but not late surgical allograft removal precluded the acquisition of T cell dysfunction. Our results demonstrate transplant tolerance-associated T cell-intrinsic dysfunction that is resistant to memory development even after Lm-mediated disruption of tolerance.

The pursuit of transplantation tolerance: new mechanistic insights

Donor-specific transplantation tolerance that enables weaning from immunosuppressive drugs but retains immune competence to non-graft antigens has been a lasting pursuit since the discovery of neonatal tolerance. More recently, efforts have been devoted not only to understanding how transplantation tolerance can be induced but also the mechanisms necessary to maintain it as well as how inflammatory exposure challenges its durability. This review focuses on recent advances regarding key peripheral mechanisms of T cell tolerance, with the underlying hypothesis that a combination of several of these mechanisms may afford a more robust and durable tolerance and that a better understanding of these individual pathways may permit longitudinal tracking of tolerance following clinical transplantation to serve as biomarkers. This review may enable a personalized assessment of the degree of tolerance in individual patients and the opportunity to strengthen the robustness of peripheral tolerance.

Distinct Graft-Specific TCR Avidity Profiles during Acute Rejection and Tolerance

Mechanisms implicated in robust transplantation tolerance at the cellular level can be broadly categorized into those that inhibit alloreactive T cells intrinsically (clonal deletion and dysfunction) or extrinsically through regulation. Here, we investigated whether additional population-level mechanisms control T cells by examining whether therapeutically induced peripheral transplantation tolerance could influence T cell populations' avidity for alloantigens. Whereas T cells with high avidity preferentially accumulated during acute rejection of allografts, the alloreactive T cells in tolerant recipients retained a low-avidity profile, comparable to naive mice despite evidence of activation. These contrasting avidity profiles upon productive versus tolerogenic stimulation were durable and persisted upon alloantigen re-encounter in the absence of any immunosuppression. Thus, peripheral transplantation tolerance involves control of alloreactive T cells at the population level, in addition to the individual cell level. Controlling expansion or eliminating high-affinity, donor-specific T cells long term may be desirable to achieve robust transplantation tolerance in the clinic.

Evolving Approaches in the Identification of Allograft-Reactive T and B Cells in Mice and Humans

Whether a transplanted allograft is stably accepted, rejected, or achieves immunological tolerance is dependent on the frequency and function of alloreactive lymphocytes, making the identification and analysis of alloreactive T and B cells in transplant recipients critical for understanding mechanisms, and the prediction of allograft outcome. In animal models, tracking the fate of graft-reactive T and B cells allows investigators to uncover their biology and develop new therapeutic strategies to protect the graft. In the clinic, identification and quantification of graft-reactive T and B cells allows for the early diagnosis of immune reactivity and therapeutic intervention to prevent graft loss. In addition to rejection, probing of T and B cell fate in vivo provides insights into the underlying mechanisms of alloimmunity or tolerance that may lead to biomarkers predicting graft fate. In this review, we discuss existing and developing approaches to track and analyze alloreactive T and B cells in mice and humans and provide examples of discoveries made utilizing these techniques. These approaches include mixed lymphocyte reactions, trans-vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity, enzyme-linked immunospot assays, the use of antigen receptor transgenic lymphocytes, and utilization of peptide-major histocompatibility multimers, along with imaging techniques for static multiparameter analysis or dynamic in vivo tracking. Such approaches have already refined our understanding of the alloimmune response and are pointing to new ways to improve allograft outcomes in the clinic.

PD-L1/PD-L2-expressing B-1 cells inhibit alloreactive T cells in mice

B cells constitute a complex system of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and exist as distinct subsets that differ in their lineage affiliation, surface molecule expression, and biological function, thus potentially regulating the immune response. In this study, we investigated the immune-regulatory roles of murine B cell subsets as regulatory APCs targeting alloreactive T cells. Either splenic B cells, peritoneal cavity (PerC) B cells, or non-B cells from Balb/c mice were intravenously injected into B6 mice. Serum levels of anti-Balb/c antibodies in the recipients of PerC B cells were significantly lower than those in the recipients of splenic B cells and PerC non-B cells, as determined over a 4-week period after the injection. Mixed-lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays using splenocytes from the B6 mice at 2 weeks after the injection revealed the significantly reduced anti-Balb/c T cell-responses in the recipients of PerC B cells, as compared to those in the recipients of splenic B cells or untreated control mice. Since PerC B cells contained MHC class II⁺ CD80⁺ CD86⁺ PD-L1⁺ PD-L2⁺ cells among the CD5⁺ B-1a cell subset, PerC B cells from Balb/c mice were pre-incubated with anti-PD-L1/PD-L2 mAbs prior to injection. This treatment abrogated their immune-regulatory effects on anti-Balb/c T cells in the MLR assays. In addition, the inoculation with Balb/c PerC B cells significantly prolonged the survival of subsequently grafted Balb/c hearts in B6 mouse recipients, whereas that with SPL B cells did not. These findings indicate that the PerC B cells, including PD-L1/PD-L2 B-1a cells, may suppress T cells responding to allostimulation, and thus may be optimal for donor lymphocyte injection.

Tracking of TCR-Transgenic T Cells Reveals That Multiple Mechanisms Maintain Cardiac Transplant Tolerance in Mice

Solid organ transplantation tolerance can be achieved following select transient immunosuppressive regimens that result in long-lasting restraint of alloimmunity without affecting responses to other antigens. Transplantation tolerance has been observed in animal models following costimulation or coreceptor blockade therapies, and in a subset of patients through induction protocols that include donor bone marrow transplantation, or following withdrawal of immunosuppression. Previous data from our lab and others have shown that proinflammatory interventions that successfully prevent the induction of transplantation tolerance in mice often fail to break tolerance once it has been stably established. This suggests that established tolerance acquires resilience to proinflammatory insults, and prompted us to investigate the mechanisms that maintain a stable state of robust tolerance. Our results demonstrate that only a triple intervention of depleting CD25⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs), blocking programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) signals, and transferring low numbers of alloreactive T cells was sufficient to break established tolerance. We infer from these observations that Tregs and PD-1/PD-L1 signals cooperate to preserve a low alloreactive T cell frequency to maintain tolerance. Thus, therapeutic protocols designed to induce multiple parallel mechanisms of peripheral tolerance may be necessary to achieve robust transplantation tolerance capable of maintaining one allograft for life in the clinic.

Effect of FTY720 (fingolimod) on graft survival in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown that FTY720 has inconsistent effects in kidney transplant recipients. Several review articles on FTY720 have been published, but most have focused on the mechanism of action of FTY720. Therefore, this review aims to evaluate and determine the beneficial and harmful effects of FTY720 therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We electronically searched the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, the Web of Sciences, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. Any clinical, randomised controlled trials relating to FTY720 for treating kidney transplant recipients were included without publication status or language restriction. Study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality were performed independently by two researchers. Data were synthesised by either the fixed effects or the random effects model according to a heterogeneity test. If the extracted data were suitable for meta-analysis, STATA software was used to combine the relative risks for dichotomous outcomes, and the mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% CIs were measured. Death, loss of function and incidence of acute kidney rejection were assessed as the primary outcomes. Renal graft function, malignancy, delayed graft function and infection were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

ETHICS/DISSEMINATION

This review does not require formal ethics approval because the data are not individualised. The resulting review article will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015024648.

Kinetics of Alloantigen-Specific Regulatory CD4 T Cell Development and Tissue Distribution After Donor-Specific Transfusion and Costimulatory Blockade

BACKGROUND

The influence of donor-side regulation toward recipient antigens on graft outcome is poorly understood.

METHODS

Because this influence might be due in part to the accumulation of tissue-resident memory T cells in the donor organ, we used a standard murine tolerization model (donor-specific transfusion plus CD40L blockade) to determine the kinetics of development and peripheralization of allospecific regulatory T cell in lymphoid tissues and liver, a secondary lymphoid organ used in transplantation.

RESULTS

We found that donor-specific transfusion and CD40L blockade leads to a progressive and sustained T regulatory allospecific response. The cytokines IL10, TGFβ, and IL35 all contributed to the regulatory phenomenon as determined by trans vivo delayed hypersensitivity assay. Unexpectedly, an early and transient self-specific regulatory response was found as well. Using double reporter mice (forkhead box p 3 [Foxp3]-yellow fluorescent protein, Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene 3 [Ebi3]-TdTomRed), we found an increase in Foxp3+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells paralleling the regulatory response. The Ebi3+ CD4 T cells (IL35-producing) were mainly classic Treg cells (Foxp3+CD25+), whereas TGFβ+ CD4 T cells are mostly Foxp3-negative, suggesting 2 different CD4 Treg cell subsets. Liver-resident TGFβ+ CD4 T cells appeared more rapidly than Ebi3-producing T cells, whereas at later timepoints, the Ebi3 response predominated both in lymphoid tissues and liver.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of appearance of donor organ resident Treg cell subsets should be considered in experiments testing the role of bidirectional regulation in transplant tolerance.

Transplantation Tolerance Induction: Cell Therapies and Their Mechanisms

Cell-based therapies have been studied extensively in the context of transplantation tolerance induction. The most successful protocols have relied on transfusion of bone marrow prior to the transplantation of a renal allograft. However, it is not clear that stem cells found in bone marrow are required in order to render a transplant candidate immunologically tolerant. Accordingly, mesenchymal stem cells, regulatory myeloid cells, T regulatory cells, and other cell types are being tested as possible routes to tolerance induction, in the absence of donor-derived stem cells. Early data with each of these cell types have been encouraging. However, the induction regimen capable of achieving consistent tolerance, while avoiding unwanted sided effects, and which is scalable to the human patient, has yet to be identified. Here, we present the status of investigations of various tolerogenic cell types and the mechanistic rationale for their use in tolerance induction protocols.

Transplantation tolerance: context matters

Costimulation blockade has been one of the most studied strategies to achieve immune tolerance, particularly in transplantation. Yet, in spite of the robust nature of the tolerance-inducing potential of costimulation blockade, a comprehensive understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying tolerance induction is still missing. Nevertheless, progress has been continuously made. In this issue of the European Journal of Immunology, Chai et al. [Eur. J. Immunol. 2015. 45: 2017-2027] show that transplantation tolerance induced with an anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody relies on the coexistence of several tolerogenic mechanisms rather than one simple regulatory mechanism. These observations highlight the importance of concerted actions involving multiple pathways, namely apoptosis, acquisition of regulatory cells, or inhibition of proliferation, all of which contribute to the induction and maintenance of robust immune tolerance. A better understanding of these distinct tolerogenic pathways may lead to the development of better tolerance-inducing therapeutics.