Assessing the impact of pollution on the Japaratuba river in Brazil using the Drosophila wing spot test

Genotoxicity of surface waters in Brazil

Brazil has abundant surface water resources, huge aquatic biodiversity and is home to 213 million people. Genotoxicity assays are sensitive tools to detect the effects of contaminants in surface waters and wastewaters, as well as to determine potential risks of contaminated waters to aquatic organisms and human health. This work aimed to survey the articles published in 2000-2021 that evaluated the genotoxicity of surface waters within Brazilian territory to unveil the profile and trends of this topic over time. In our searches, we considered articles focused on assessing aquatic biota, articles that conducted experiments with caged organisms or standardized tests in the aquatic sites, as well as articles that transported water or sediment samples from aquatic sites to the laboratory, where exposures were performed with organisms or standardized tests. We retrieved geographical information on the aquatic sites evaluated, the genotoxicity assays used, the percentage of genotoxicity detected, and, when possible, the causative agent of aquatic pollution. A total of 248 articles were identified. There was a trend of increase in the number of publications and annual diversity of hydrographic regions evaluated over time. Most articles focused on rivers from large metropolises. A very low number of articles were conducted on coastal and marine ecosystems. Water genotoxicity was detected in most articles, regardless of methodological approach, even in little-studied hydrographic regions. The micronucleus test and the alkaline comet assay were widely applied with blood samples, mainly derived from fish. Allium and Salmonella tests were the most frequently used standard protocols. Despite most articles did not confirm polluting sources and genotoxic agents, the detection of genotoxicity provides useful information for the management of water pollution. We discuss key points to be assessed to reach a more complete picture of the genotoxicity of surface waters in Brazil.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in superficial water from a tropical estuarine system: Distribution, seasonal variations, sources and ecological risk assessment

This study aimed to evaluate the PAH distribution, sources, seasonal variations and ecological risk assessment in superficial water from the Japaratuba River, Brazil. PAH concentrations ranged from 4 to 119ngL^-1. It was observed that the PAH total concentrations and profiles showed significant differences when comparing the dry season (summer) with the rainy season (winter). Furthermore, most of the PAH originated from pyrogenic sources in the winter, whereas a mixture of sources was observed in the summer. PAH concentration levels found in this study were considered lower than those obtained in other estuarine systems. Ecological risk assessment was determined for individual PAH, based on the risk quotient (RQ) to evaluate the risk of aquatic biota's exposure to PAH. Results suggested that the Japaratuba River has achieved a moderate degree of ecological risk for high molecular weight, showing the importance of identifying these carcinogenic and mutagenic compounds in aquatic systems.

In vivo and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of 2-methylisoborneol, causal agent of earthy-musty taste and odor in water

The water eutrophication process by phosphorus and nitrogen allows cyanobacteria blooms which promote, among other effects, the generation and release of the metabolite 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) in the environment. This substance has been shown to be recalcitrant to conventional water treatment, degrading water quality. Considering the limited number of studies on the biological effects of 2-MIB in eukaryotic organisms, the present study assessed the genotoxicity of 2-MIB using the in vitro comet assay and cytokinesis block-micronucleus (CBMN-Cytome) assay on Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells and the in vivo Drosophila melanogaster Somatic Mutation and Recombination Test (SMART). The results showed that 2-MIB (125, 250 and 500 µg/mL) was unable to induce gene and chromosome mutations or events associated with mitotic recombination in the SMART. Similarly, four different concentrations (7.5, 15, 30 and 60 µg/mL) of 2-MIB did not induce increments in frequencies of micronuclei, nuclear buds, and nucleoplasmatic bridges in the CBMN-Cytome assay. In the comet assay, the positive results were restricted to the highest dose, 60 µg/mL of 2-MIB. The results obtained may help evaluate the genotoxic profile of extracellular algal products.

Recombinagenic activity of water and sediment from Sinos River and Araçá and Garças Streams (Canoas, Brazil), in the Drosophila wing spot test

This study characterizes the likely interaction of surface water and sediment samples with DNA to quantitatively and qualitatively establish their mutagenic and/or recombinagenic activity. Samples were collected at 5 different sites within the area of Araçá Stream and 2 different sites within the Sinos River mouth and Garças Stream in the municipality of Canoas, RS, Brazil. The area is impacted by untreated urban discharges (sites 1-7), agricultural pesticides (sites 5 and 7), hospital waste (site 3), animal dejects (site 5), small industries (sites 4, 5 and 6) and vehicular discharges (sites 2, 4, 5 and 6). The wing Somatic Mutation and Recombination Test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster was used. The test detects simultaneously mutations and recombination induced by the activity of genotoxins of direct and indirect action. All the samples displayed a massive recombinagenic response, but no mutagenic activity was detected in any of the evaluated samples. This study was done in D. melanogaster with unprocessed water and sediment samples attributing a massive and exclusive recombinagenic action associated to the induction of homologous recombination--a genetic phenomenon involved in the loss of heterozygosity.

Genotoxicity of water from the Songhua River, China, in 1994-1995 and 2002-2003: Potential risks for human health

A previous study showed that the cancer mortalities are higher for residents who lived nearby the Songhua River heavily polluted by organic contamination. It is important to determine its risk of carcinogenic potential. Short-term genotoxic bio-assays using Salmonella, Sister Chromatid Exchange (SCE), and Micronuclei (MN) assays were employed to examine the genotoxic activity of ether extracts of water samples taken from the Songhua River. The results of the Salmonella bioassay indicated that there were indirect frame-shift mutagens in the water samples. A dose-response relationship for the SCE and MN assays was obtained. These results showed that organic extracts of water samples have genotoxic activity and the risk of carcinogenic potential to human health. The mutagenesis of water samples had changed compared to the results in 1994-1995. An increasing trend of risk of carcinogenic potential in the Songhua River after ten years should be noted and needs to be studied further.

Genotoxicity of water from the Paraguay River near Cáceres-MT, Brazil in the Drosophila wing-spot test

The genotoxic activity of surface water samples from four sites along the Paraguay River, near Cáceres, Mato Grosso State, Brazil, was investigated using the Drosophila melanogaster Somatic Mutation and Recombination test (SMART). Effluents from sanitary sewers and agroindustrial effluents (residual effluents from slaughterhouses, leather tanneries, and dairies) flow into the Paraguay River, and directly or indirectly contaminate water from sampling sites 1-3. Site 4 was an upriver reference site that received no domestic or agroindustrial discharges. Water was collected at 4 time periods: September 2003 and August 2004 (periods of low water or drought); and April 2004 and March 2005 (periods of high water or flood). Chromium concentrations above statutory limits were detected at sites 1-3 (August 2004), and sites 1, 2 and 4 (March 2005). Sulfur compounds were also detected at sites 1-3. The SMART performed using standard (ST) cross flies detected genotoxic responses in only two samples, the August 2004 site 1 sample and the March 2005 site 2 sample. Many more samples were positive using high bioactivation (HB) cross flies: site 1 (all collection periods), site 2 (September 2003 and April 2004), and site 3 (September 2003 and August 2004). Mutant frequency comparisons between marker-heterozygous and balancer-heterozygous flies from the HB cross indicated that the positive genotoxic responses for the site 2 (April 2004) and site 3 (September 2003) samples were due mainly to mitotic recombination. Our findings indicate that the section of the Paraguay River within the urban perimeter of Cáceres is contaminated with genotoxic agents.

Comparative genotoxicity evaluation of imidazolinone herbicides in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster

In the present study, five analogous herbicides, namely Imazapyr (IMZR), Imazapic (IMZC), Imazethapyr (IMZT), Imazamox (IMZX) and Imazaquin (IMZQ), were evaluated for genotoxicity (mutagenic and recombinagenic activity) in the wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) of Drosophila melanogaster. They are classified as imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides and their mode of action is to inhibit acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS), an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of the amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine. Two crosses were used: the standard (ST) cross and the high bioactivation (HB) cross. The latter is characterized by high levels of cytochrome P450 conferring increased sensitivity to promutagens and procarcinogens. Three-day-old larvae were exposed by chronic feeding (48 h) to four different concentrations of these herbicides (2.5, 5.0, 10.0 or 20.0 mM). For the evaluation of genotoxic effects, the frequencies of spots per individual in the treated series were compared to the concurrent negative control series (ultrapure water). Imazapyr, Imazapic and Imazethapyr gave negative results with both crosses of the wing spot test. In the ST cross, Imazamox showed positive results only for large single spots (20.0 mM IMZX) and weak positive results for total spots (10.0 and 20.0 mM IMZX), while Imazaquin showed positive results only for large single spots (5.0 and 20.0mM IMZQ) and a weak positive result for total spots (20.0 mM IMZQ). These positive results are mainly due to induced recombination and to a minor extent to mutations. In the HB cross, only Imazamox (5.0 mM IMZX) showed a weak positive result for small single spots. The positive control urethane, a promutagen, caused an increase in the number of all types of spots in both crosses. In conclusion, the results of chronic treatments performed at high doses (toxicity was observed at higher doses) shows the existence of a genotoxic risk for IMZX and IMZQ exposure under these experimental conditions, and indicate the need for further research to delineate the exact mechanisms involved.