A multivariate neuroimaging biomarker of individual outcome to transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression

Toward a neurocircuit-based sequential transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of pediatric bipolar II disorder

BACKGROUND

Abnormalities in large-scale neuronal networks-the frontoparietal central executive network (CEN)-are consistent findings in bipolar disorder and potential therapeutic targets for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to assess the effects of CEN neurocircuit-based sequential TMS on the clinical symptoms and cognitive functions of adolescents with bipolar II disorder.

METHODS

The study was a single-blinded, randomized, placebo-control trial. Participants with DSM-5-defined bipolar disorder II were recruited and randomized to receive either a sham treatment (n = 20) or an active TMS treatment (n = 22). The active group patients were taking medication, with intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) treatment provided as adjunctive treatment targeting the left DLPFC, the left ITG, and the left PPC nodes consecutively. Patients completed the measurements of HAMD and the Das-Naglieri Cognition Assessment System at baseline and 3 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

A significant group-by-time interaction was observed in the HAMD, total cognition, and planning. Post-hoc analysis revealed that patients in the active group significantly improved HAMD scores following neurostimulation. Moreover, within-subject analysis indicated that the active group significantly improved in scores of total cognition and planning, while the sham group did not. No significant differences were seen in the other cognitive measures.

CONCLUSION

The neurocircuit-based sequential TMS protocol targeting three CEN nodes, in conjunction with medication, safely and effectively improved depressive symptoms and cognitive function in adolescents with bipolar II disorder.

Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

Recent studies have provided promising evidence that neuroimaging data can predict treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As most of these studies had small sample sizes, a meta-analysis is warranted to identify the most robust findings and imaging modalities, and to compare predictive outcomes obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and studies using clinical and demographic features. We conducted a literature search from database inception to July 22, 2023, to identify studies using pretreatment clinical or brain MRI features to predict treatment outcomes in patients with MDD. Two meta-analyses were conducted on clinical and MRI studies, respectively. The meta-regression was employed to explore the effects of covariates and compare the predictive performance between clinical and MRI groups, as well as across MRI modalities and intervention subgroups. Meta-analysis of 13 clinical studies yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73, while in 44 MRI studies, the AUC was 0.89. MRI studies showed a higher sensitivity than clinical studies (0.78 vs. 0.62, Z = 3.42, P = 0.001). In MRI studies, resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) exhibited a higher specificity than task-based fMRI (tbfMRI) (0.79 vs. 0.69, Z = -2.86, P = 0.004). No significant differences in predictive performance were found between structural and functional MRI, nor between different interventions. Of note, predictive MRI features for treatment outcomes in studies using antidepressants were predominantly located in the limbic and default mode networks, while studies of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) were restricted mainly to the limbic network. Our findings suggest a promise for pretreatment brain MRI features to predict MDD treatment outcomes, outperforming clinical features. While tasks in tbfMRI studies differed, those studies overall had less predictive utility than rsfMRI data. Overlapping but distinct network-level measures predicted antidepressants and ECT outcomes. Future studies are needed to predict outcomes using multiple MRI features, and to clarify whether imaging features predict outcomes generally or differ depending on treatments.

Magnetic resonance imaging connectivity features associated with response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an FDA-approved neuromodulation treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), thought to work by altering dysfunctional brain connectivity pathways, or by indirectly modulating the activity of subcortical brain regions. Clinical response to TMS remains highly variable, highlighting the need for baseline predictors of response and for understanding brain changes associated with response. This systematic review examined brain connectivity features, and changes in connectivity features, associated with clinical improvement following TMS in MDD. Forty-one studies met inclusion criteria, including 1097 people with MDD. Most studies delivered one of two types of TMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and measured connectivity using resting-state functional MRI. The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex was the most well-studied brain region, particularly its connectivity with the TMS target or with the "executive control network" of brain regions. There was marked heterogeneity in findings. There is a need for greater understanding of how cortical TMS modulates connectivity with, and the activity of, subcortical regions, and how these effects change within and across treatment sessions.

A predictive study of the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of major depressive disorder: An fMRI-based machine learning analysis

BACKGROUND

In order to improve taVNS efficacy, the usage of fMRI to explore the predictive neuroimaging markers would be beneficial for screening the appropriate MDD population before treatment.

METHODS

A total of 86 MDD patients were recruited in this study, and all subjects were conducted with the clinical scales and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan before and after 8 weeks' taVNS treatment. A two-stage feature selection strategy combining Machine Learning and Statistical was used to screen out the critical brain functional connections (FC) that were significantly associated with efficacy prediction, then the efficacy prediction model was constructed for taVNS treating MDD. Finally, the model was validated by separated the responding and non-responding patients.

RESULTS

This study showed that taVNS produced promising clinical efficacy in the treatment of mild and moderate MDD. Eleven FCs were selected out and were found to be associated with the cortico-striatal-pallidum-thalamic loop, the hippocampus and cerebellum and the HAMD-17 scores. The prediction model was created based on these FCs for the efficacy prediction of taVNS treatment. The R-square of the conducted regression model for predicting HAMD-17 reduction rate is 0.44, and the AUC for classifying the responding and non-responding patients is 0.856.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the validity and feasibility of combining neuroimaging and machine learning techniques to predict the efficacy of taVNS on MDD, and provides an effective solution for personalized and precise treatment for MDD.

Neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment response in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies

Predicting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) could reduce the financial and psychological risks of treatment failure. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed studies that leveraged neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers to predict rTMS response in MDD. Five databases were searched from inception to May 25, 2023. The primary meta-analytic outcome was predictive accuracy pooled from classification models. Regression models were summarized qualitatively. A promising marker was identified if it showed a sensitivity and specificity of 80% or higher in at least two independent studies. Searching yielded 36 studies. Twenty-two classification modeling studies produced an estimated area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.83-0.92), with 86.8% sensitivity (95% CI = 80.6-91.2%) and 81.9% specificity (95% CI = 76.1-86.4%). Frontal theta cordance measured by electroencephalography is closest to proof of concept. Predicting rTMS response using neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers is promising for clinical decision-making. However, replications by different research groups are needed to establish rigorous markers.

Trajectories of improvement with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression in the BRIGhTMIND trial

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established non-invasive brain stimulation treatment for major depressive disorder, but there is marked inter-individual variability in response. Using latent class growth analysis with session-by-session patient global impression ratings from the recently completed BRIGhTMIND trial, we identified five distinct classes of improvement trajectory during a 20-session treatment course. This included a substantial class of patients noticing delayed onset of improvement. Contrary to prior expectations, members of a class characterised by early and continued improvement showed greatest inter-session variability in stimulated location. By relating target locations and inter-session variability to a well-studied atlas, we estimated an average of 3.0 brain networks were stimulated across the treatment course in this group, compared to 1.1 in a group that reported symptom worsening (p < 0.001, d = 0.893). If confirmed, this would suggest that deliberate targeting of multiple brain networks could be beneficial to rTMS outcomes.

Cognitive enhancing effect of rTMS combined with tDCS in patients with major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive dysfunction is one of the common symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been studied separately in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in MDD patients. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS combined with tDCS as a new therapy to improve neurocognitive impairment in MDD patients.

METHODS

In this brief 2-week, double-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled trial, a total of 550 patients were screened, and 240 MDD inpatients were randomized into four groups (active rTMS + active tDCS, active rTMS + sham tDCS, sham rTMS + active tDCS, sham rTMS + sham tDCS). Finally, 203 patients completed the study and received 10 treatment sessions over a 2-week period. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) was performed to assess patients' cognitive function at baseline and week 2. Also, we applied the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24) to assess patients' depressive symptoms at baseline and week 2.

RESULTS

After 10 sessions of treatment, the rTMS combined with the tDCS group showed more significant improvements in the RBANS total score, immediate memory, and visuospatial/constructional index score (all p < 0.05). Moreover, post hoc tests revealed a significant increase in the RBANS total score and Visuospatial/Constructional in the combined treatment group compared to the other three groups but in the immediate memory, the combined treatment group only showed a better improvement than the sham group. The results also showed the RBANS total score increased significantly higher in the active rTMS group compared with the sham group. However, rTMS or tDCS alone was not superior to the sham group in terms of other cognitive performance. In addition, the rTMS combined with the tDCS group showed a greater reduction in HDRS-24 total score and a better depression response rate than the other three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

rTMS combined with tDCS treatment is more effective than any single intervention in treating cognitive dysfunction and depressive symptoms in MDD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052122).

Distinctive intrinsic functional connectivity alterations of anterior cingulate cortex subdivisions in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Evidence of whether the intrinsic functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and its subregions is altered in major depressive disorder (MDD) remains inconclusive. A systematic review and meta-analysis were therefore performed on the whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) studies using the ACC and its subregions as seed regions in MDD, in order to draw more reliable conclusions. Forty-four ACC-based rsFC studies were included, comprising 25 subgenual ACC-based studies, 11 pregenual ACC-based studies, and 17 dorsal ACC-based studies. Specific alterations of rsFC were identified for each ACC subregion in patients with MDD, with altered rsFC of subgenual ACC in emotion-related brain regions, of pregenual ACC in sensorimotor-related regions, and of dorsal ACC in cognition-related regions. Furthermore, meta-regression analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between the pgACC-caudate hypoconnectivity and percentage of female patients in the study cohort. This meta-analysis provides robust evidence of altered intrinsic functional connectivity of the ACC subregions in MDD, which may hold relevance to understanding the origin of, and treating, the emotional, sensorimotor and cognitive dysfunctions that are often observed in these patients.

Personalized and Circuit-Based Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Evidence, Controversies, and Opportunities

The development of neuroimaging methodologies to map brain connectivity has transformed our understanding of psychiatric disorders, the distributed effects of brain stimulation, and how transcranial magnetic stimulation can be best employed to target and ameliorate psychiatric symptoms. In parallel, neuroimaging research has revealed that higher-order brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex, which represent the most common therapeutic brain stimulation targets for psychiatric disorders, show some of the highest levels of interindividual variation in brain connectivity. These findings provide the rationale for personalized target site selection based on person-specific brain network architecture. Recent advances have made it possible to determine reproducible personalized targets with millimeter precision in clinically tractable acquisition times. These advances enable the potential advantages of spatially personalized transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting to be evaluated and translated to basic and clinical applications. In this review, we outline the motivation for target site personalization, preliminary support (mostly in depression), convergent evidence from other brain stimulation modalities, and generalizability beyond depression and the prefrontal cortex. We end by detailing methodological recommendations, controversies, and notable alternatives. Overall, while this research area appears highly promising, the value of personalized targeting remains unclear, and dedicated large prospective randomized clinical trials using validated methodology are critical.

When to hold and when to fold: Early prediction of nonresponse to transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Determining when to recommend a change in treatment regimen due to insufficient improvement is a common challenge in therapeutics.

METHODS

In a sample of 7215 patients with major depressive disorder treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and with PHQ-9 scores before, during and after the course, 3 groups were identified based on number of acute course sessions: exactly 36 sessions (N = 3591), more than 36 sessions (N = 975), and less than 36 sessions (N = 2649). Two techniques were used to determine thresholds for percentage change in PHQ-9 scores at assessments after 10, 20, and 30 sessions that optimized prediction of endpoint response status: the Youden index and fixing the false positive rate at 10%. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the accuracy of identifying final nonresponders and responders, respectively.

RESULTS

There was greater accuracy in predicting final response than nonresponse, especially in the groups that had at least 36 sessions. Substantial proportions of patients with low levels of early improvement were classified as responders at the end of treatment.

LIMITATIONS

The findings should be validated with clinician ratings using a more comprehensive depression severity scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Manifesting clinical improvement early in the TMS course is strongly predictive of final status as a responder, while lack of early improvement is a relatively poor indicator of final nonresponse status. The predictive value of lack of early symptomatic improvement is too low to make reliable recommendations regarding changes in treatment regimen.

Elevating the field for applying neuroimaging to individual patients in psychiatry

Although neuroimaging has been widely applied in psychiatry, much of the exuberance in decades past has been tempered by failed replications and a lack of definitive evidence to support the utility of imaging to inform clinical decisions. There are multiple promising ways forward to demonstrate the relevance of neuroimaging for psychiatry at the individual patient level. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging is developing as a sensitive measure of neurometabolic processes of particular relevance that holds promise as a new way to characterize patient abnormalities as well as variability in response to treatment. Neuroimaging may also be particularly suited to the science of brain stimulation interventions in psychiatry given that imaging can both inform brain targeting as well as measure changes in brain circuit communication as a function of how effectively interventions improve symptoms. We argue that a greater focus on individual patient imaging data will pave the way to stronger relevance to clinical care in psychiatry. We also stress the importance of using imaging in symptom-relevant experimental manipulations and how relevance will be best demonstrated by pairing imaging with differential treatment prediction and outcome measurement. The priorities for using brain imaging to inform psychiatry may be shifting, which compels the field to solidify clinical relevance for individual patients over exploratory associations and biomarkers that ultimately fail to replicate.

Prediction of depression treatment outcome from multimodal data: a CAN-BIND-1 report

BACKGROUND

Prediction of treatment outcomes is a key step in improving the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND) aims to predict antidepressant treatment outcomes through analyses of clinical assessment, neuroimaging, and blood biomarkers.

METHODS

In the CAN-BIND-1 dataset of 192 adults with MDD and outcomes of treatment with escitalopram, we applied machine learning models in a nested cross-validation framework. Across 210 analyses, we examined combinations of predictive variables from three modalities, measured at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment, and five machine learning methods with and without feature selection. To optimize the predictors-to-observations ratio, we followed a tiered approach with 134 and 1152 variables in tier 1 and tier 2 respectively.

RESULTS

A combination of baseline tier 1 clinical, neuroimaging, and molecular variables predicted response with a mean balanced accuracy of 0.57 (best model mean 0.62) compared to 0.54 (best model mean 0.61) in single modality models. Adding week 2 predictors improved the prediction of response to a mean balanced accuracy of 0.59 (best model mean 0.66). Adding tier 2 features did not improve prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of clinical, neuroimaging, and molecular data improves the prediction of treatment outcomes over single modality measurement. The addition of measurements from the early stages of treatment adds precision. Present results are limited by lack of external validation. To achieve clinically meaningful prediction, the multimodal measurement should be scaled up to larger samples and the robustness of prediction tested in an external validation dataset.

Predicting Dimensional Antidepressant Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation using Pretreatment Resting-state Functional Connectivity

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for depression and has been shown to modulate resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of depression-relevant neural circuits. To date, however, few studies have investigated whether individual treatment-related symptom changes are predictable from pretreatment RSFC. We use machine learning to predict dimensional changes in depressive symptoms using pretreatment patterns of RSFC. We hypothesized that changes in dimensional depressive symptoms would be predicted more accurately than scale total scores. Patients with depression (n=26) underwent pretreatment RSFC MRI. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Random forest regression (RFR) models were trained and tested to predict treatment-related symptom changes captured by the HDRS-17, HDRS-6 and three previously identified HDRS subscales: core mood/anhedonia (CMA), somatic disturbances, and insomnia. Changes along the CMA, HDRS-17, and HDRS-6 were predicted significantly above chance, with 9%, 2%, and 2% of out-of-sample outcome variance explained, respectively (all p<0.01). CMA changes were predicted more accurately than the HDRS-17 (p<0.05). Higher baseline global connectivity (GC) of default mode network (DMN) subregions and the somatomotor network (SMN) predicted poorer symptom reduction, while higher GC of the right dorsal attention (DAN) frontoparietal control (FPCN), and visual networks (VN) predicted reduced CMA symptoms. HDRS-17 and HDRS-6 changes were predicted with similar GC patterns. These results suggest that RSFC spanning the DMN, SMN, DAN, FPCN, and VN subregions predict dimensional changes with greater accuracy than syndromal changes following rTMS. These findings highlight the need to assess more granular clinical dimensions in therapeutic studies, particularly device neuromodulation studies, and echo earlier studies supporting that dimensional outcomes improve model accuracy.

Brain connectivity in major depressive disorder: a precision component of treatment modalities?

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a very prevalent mental disorder that imposes an enormous burden on individuals, society, and health care systems. Most patients benefit from commonly used treatment methods such as pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). However, the clinical decision on which treatment method to use remains generally informed and the individual clinical response is difficult to predict. Most likely, a combination of neural variability and heterogeneity in MDD still impedes a full understanding of the disorder, as well as influences treatment success in many cases. With the help of neuroimaging methods like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), the brain can be understood as a modular set of functional and structural networks. In recent years, many studies have investigated baseline connectivity biomarkers of treatment response and the connectivity changes after successful treatment. Here, we systematically review the literature and summarize findings from longitudinal interventional studies investigating the functional and structural connectivity in MDD. By compiling and discussing these findings, we recommend the scientific and clinical community to deepen the systematization of findings to pave the way for future systems neuroscience roadmaps that include brain connectivity parameters as a possible precision component of the clinical evaluation and therapeutic decision.

Neuroimaging Correlates of Treatment Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become a promising strategy for bipolar disorder (BD). This study reviews neuroimaging findings, indicating functional, structural, and metabolic brain changes associated with TMS in BD. Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar were searched without any restrictions for studies investigating neuroimaging biomarkers, through structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), functional MRI (fMRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), in association with response to TMS in patients with BD. Eleven studies were included (fMRI = 4, MRI = 1, PET = 3, SPECT = 2, and MRS = 1). Important fMRI predictors of response to repetitive TMS (rTMS) included higher connectivity of emotion regulation and executive control regions. Prominent MRI predictors included lower ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity and lower superior frontal and caudal middle frontal volumes. SPECT studies found hypoconnectivity of the uncus/parahippocampal cortex and right thalamus in non-responders. The post-rTMS changes using fMRI mostly showed increased connectivity among the areas neighboring the coil. Increased blood perfusion was reported post-rTMS in PET and SPECT studies. Treatment response comparison between unipolar depression and BD revealed almost equal responses. Neuroimaging evidence suggests various correlates of response to rTMS in BD, which needs to be further replicated in future studies.

Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is giving rise to a revolution in medicine and health care. Mental health conditions are highly prevalent in many countries, and the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk of further erosion of the mental well-being in the population. Therefore, it is relevant to assess the current status of the application of AI toward mental health research to inform about trends, gaps, opportunities, and challenges.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to perform a systematic overview of AI applications in mental health in terms of methodologies, data, outcomes, performance, and quality.

METHODS

A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane databases was conducted to collect records of use cases of AI for mental health disorder studies from January 2016 to November 2021. Records were screened for eligibility if they were a practical implementation of AI in clinical trials involving mental health conditions. Records of AI study cases were evaluated and categorized by the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). Data related to trial settings, collection methodology, features, outcomes, and model development and evaluation were extracted following the CHARMS (Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies) guideline. Further, evaluation of risk of bias is provided.

RESULTS

A total of 429 nonduplicated records were retrieved from the databases and 129 were included for a full assessment-18 of which were manually added. The distribution of AI applications in mental health was found unbalanced between ICD-11 mental health categories. Predominant categories were Depressive disorders (n=70) and Schizophrenia or other primary psychotic disorders (n=26). Most interventions were based on randomized controlled trials (n=62), followed by prospective cohorts (n=24) among observational studies. AI was typically applied to evaluate quality of treatments (n=44) or stratify patients into subgroups and clusters (n=31). Models usually applied a combination of questionnaires and scales to assess symptom severity using electronic health records (n=49) as well as medical images (n=33). Quality assessment revealed important flaws in the process of AI application and data preprocessing pipelines. One-third of the studies (n=56) did not report any preprocessing or data preparation. One-fifth of the models were developed by comparing several methods (n=35) without assessing their suitability in advance and a small proportion reported external validation (n=21). Only 1 paper reported a second assessment of a previous AI model. Risk of bias and transparent reporting yielded low scores due to a poor reporting of the strategy for adjusting hyperparameters, coefficients, and the explainability of the models. International collaboration was anecdotal (n=17) and data and developed models mostly remained private (n=126).

CONCLUSIONS

These significant shortcomings, alongside the lack of information to ensure reproducibility and transparency, are indicative of the challenges that AI in mental health needs to face before contributing to a solid base for knowledge generation and for being a support tool in mental health management.

Cognitive functioning as predictor and marker of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depressive disorders: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive performance in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is frequently impaired and related to functional outcomes. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) may exert its effects on MDD acting both on depressive symptoms and neurocognition. Furthermore, cognitive status could predict the therapeutic response of depressive symptoms to rTMS. However, cognitive performances as a predictor of rTMS response in MDD has not been thoroughly investigated. This review aims to evaluate the role of pre-treatment cognitive performance as a predictor of clinical response to rTMS, and the effects of rTMS on neurocognition in MDD.

METHOD

A systematic review of studies evaluating neurocognition in MDD as an outcome and/or predictor of response to rTMS was conducted using PubMed/Medline and Embase.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles were identified: 25 studies included neurocognition as a predictor of response to rTMS; 56 used cognitive evaluation as an outcome of rTMS. Baseline cognitive performance and cognitive improvements after rTMS predicted clinical response to rTMS. Moreover, rTMS improved cognition in MDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive assessment could predict improvement of depression in MDD patients undergoing rTMS and help selecting patients that could have beneficial effects from rTMS. A routine cognitive assessment might stratify MDD patients and track rTMS related cognitive improvement.

Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review

Major depressive disorder is a heterogeneous diagnostic category with multiple available treatments. With the goal of optimizing treatment selection, researchers are developing computational models that attempt to predict treatment response based on various pretreatment measures. In this paper, we review studies that use brain activity data to predict treatment response. Our aim is to highlight and clarify important methodological differences between various studies that relate to the incorporation of domain knowledge, specifically within two approaches delineated as data-driven and theory-driven. We argue that theory-driven generative modeling, which explicitly models information processing in the brain and thus can capture disease mechanisms, is a promising emerging approach that is only beginning to be utilized in treatment response prediction. The predictors extracted via such models could improve interpretability, which is critical for clinical decision-making. We also identify several methodological limitations across the reviewed studies and provide suggestions for addressing them. Namely, we consider problems with dichotomizing treatment outcomes, the importance of investigating more than one treatment in a given study for differential treatment response predictions, the need for a patient-centered approach for defining treatment outcomes, and finally, the use of internal and external validation methods for improving model generalizability.

Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment for Neuroimaging in Depressive Disorders

Depressive disorders are highly heterogeneous in nature. Previous studies have not been useful for the clinical diagnosis and prediction of outcomes of major depressive disorder (MDD) at the individual level, although they provide many meaningful insights. To make inferences beyond group-level analyses, machine learning (ML) techniques can be used for the diagnosis of subtypes of MDD and the prediction of treatment responses. We searched PubMed for relevant studies published until December 2021 that included depressive disorders and applied ML algorithms in neuroimaging fields for depressive disorders. We divided these studies into two sections, namely diagnosis and treatment outcomes, for the application of prediction using ML. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies using ML algorithms were included. Thirty studies were summarized for the prediction of an MDD diagnosis. In addition, 19 studies on the prediction of treatment outcomes for MDD were reviewed. We summarized and discussed the results of previous studies. For future research results to be useful in clinical practice, ML enabling individual inferences is important. At the same time, there are important challenges to be addressed in the future.

Superior temporal gyrus functional connectivity predicts transcranial direct current stimulation response in Schizophrenia: A machine learning study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising adjuvant treatment for persistent auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) in Schizophrenia (SZ). Nonetheless, there is considerable inter-patient variability in the treatment response of AVH to tDCS in SZ. Machine-learned models have the potential to predict clinical response to tDCS in SZ. This study aims to examine the feasibility of identifying SZ patients with persistent AVH (SZ-AVH) who will respond to tDCS based on resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). Thirty-four SZ-AVH patients underwent resting-state functional MRI at baseline followed by add-on, twice-daily, 20-min sessions with tDCS (conventional/high-definition) for 5 days. A machine learning model was developed to identify tDCS treatment responders based on the rs-FC pattern, using the left superior temporal gyrus (LSTG) as the seed region. Functional connectivity between LSTG and brain regions involved in auditory and sensorimotor processing emerged as the important predictors of the tDCS treatment response. L1-regularized logistic regression model had an overall accuracy of 72.5% in classifying responders vs. non-responders. This model outperformed the state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNN) model-both without (59.41%) and with pre-training (68.82%). It also outperformed the L1-logistic regression model trained with baseline demographic features and clinical scores of SZ patients. This study reports the first evidence that rs-fMRI-derived brain connectivity pattern can predict the clinical response of persistent AVH to add-on tDCS in SZ patients with 72.5% accuracy.

Angle-tuned coils: attractive building blocks for TMS with improved depth-spread performance

Objective.A novel angle-tuned ring coil is proposed for improving the depth-spread performance of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils and serve as the building blocks for high-performance composite coils and multisite TMS systems.Approach.Improving depth-spread performance by reducing field divergence through creating a more elliptical emitted field distribution from the coil. To accomplish that, instead of enriching the Fourier components along the planarized (x-y) directions, which requires different arrays to occupy large brain surface areas, we worked along the radial (z) direction by using tilted coil angles and stacking coil numbers to reduce the divergence of the emitted near field without occupying large head surface areas. The emitted electric field distributions were theoretically simulated in spherical and real human head models to analyze the depth-spread performance of proposed coils and compare with existing figure-8 coils. The results were then experimentally validated with field probes andin-vivoanimal tests.Main results.The proposed 'angle-tuning' concept improves the depth-spread performance of individual coils with a significantly smaller footprint than existing and proposed coils. For composite structures, using the proposed coils as basic building blocks simplifies the design and manufacturing process and helps accomplish a leading depth-spread performance. In addition, the footprint of the proposed system is intrinsically small, making them suitable for multisite stimulations of inter and intra-hemispheric brain regions with an improved spread and less electric field divergence.Significance.Few brain functions are operated by isolated single brain regions but rather by coordinated networks involving multiple brain regions. Simultaneous or sequential multisite stimulations may provide tools for mechanistic studies of brain functions and the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. The proposed AT coil goes beyond the traditional depth-spread tradeoff rule of TMS coils, which provides the possibility of building new composite structures and new multisite TMS tools.

From the Group to the Individual in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Biomarkers of Social Cognitive Impairments and Therapeutic Translation

People with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) often experience persistent social cognitive impairments, associated with poor functional outcome. There are currently no approved treatment options for these debilitating symptoms, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Work to date has elucidated differential social processes and underlying neural circuitry affected in SSDs, which may be amenable to modulation using neurostimulation. Further, advances in functional connectivity mapping and electric field modeling may be used to identify individualized treatment targets to maximize the impact of brain stimulation on social cognitive networks. Here, we review literature supporting a roadmap for translating functional connectivity biomarker discovery to individualized treatment development for social cognitive impairments in SSDs. First, we outline the relevance of social cognitive impairments in SSDs. We review machine learning approaches for dimensional brain-behavior biomarker discovery, emphasizing the importance of individual differences. We synthesize research showing that brain stimulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, can be used to target relevant networks. Further, functional connectivity-based individualized targeting may enhance treatment response. We then outline recent approaches to account for neuroanatomical variability and optimize coil positioning to individually maximize target engagement. Overall, the synthesized literature provides support for the utility and feasibility of this translational approach to precision treatment. The proposed roadmap to translate biomarkers of social cognitive impairments to individualized treatment is currently under evaluation in precision-guided trials. Such a translational approach may also be applicable across conditions and generalizable for the development of individualized neurostimulation targeting other behavioral deficits.

Large-scale structural network change correlates with clinical response to rTMS in depression

Response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) varies widely. The neural mechanisms underlying rTMS are thought to involve changes in large-scale networks. Whether structural network integrity and plasticity are associated with response to rTMS therapy is unclear. Structural MRIs were acquired from a series of 70 adult healthy controls and 268 persons with MDD who participated in two arms of a large randomized, non-inferiority trial, THREE-D, comparing intermittent theta-burst stimulation to high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Patients were grouped according to percentage improvement on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Score at treatment completion. For the entire sample and then for each treatment arm, multivariate analyses were used to characterize structural covariance networks (SCN) from cortical gray matter thickness, volume, and surface area maps from T1-weighted MRI. The association between SCNs and clinical improvement was assessed. For both study arms, cortical thickness and volume SCNs distinguished healthy controls from MDD (p = 0.005); however, post-hoc analyses did not reveal a significant association between pre-treatment SCN expression and clinical improvement. We also isolated an anticorrelated SCN between the left DLPFC rTMS target site and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex across cortical measures (p = 0.0004). Post-treatment change in cortical thickness SCN architecture was associated with clinical improvement in treatment responders (p = 0.001), but not in non-responders. Structural network changes may underpin clinical response to rTMS, and SCNs are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of depression and neural mechanisms of plasticity and response to circuit-based treatments.

Early Fractional Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation Can Predict the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Treatment for Migraine Without Aura

Migraine is a common primary headache disorder. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been verified to be effective in patients with migraine without aura (MWoA). However, there are large interindividual differences in patients’ responses to taVNS. This study aimed to explore whether pretreatment fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (fALFF) features could predict clinical outcomes in MWoA patients after 4-week taVNS. Sixty MWoA patients and sixty well-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited, and migraineurs received 4-week taVNS treatment. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data were collected, and the significant differences of fALFF were detected between MWoA patients and HCs using two-sample t-test. A mask of these significant regions was generated and used for subsequent analysis. The abnormal fALFF in the mask was used to predict taVNS efficacy for MWoA using a support vector regression (SVR) model combining with feature select of weight based on the LIBSVM toolbox. We found that (1) compared with HCs, MWoA patients exhibited increased fALFF in the left thalamus, left inferior parietal gyrus (IPG), bilateral precentral gyrus (PreCG), right postcentral gyrus (PoCG), and bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMAs), but decreased in the bilateral precuneus and left superior frontal gyrus (SFG)/medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC); (2) after 4-week taVNS treatment, the fALFF values significantly decreased in these brain regions based on the pretreatment comparison. Importantly, the decreased fALFF in the bilateral precuneus was positively associated with the reduction in the attack times (r = 0.357, p = 0.005, Bonferroni correction, 0.05/5), whereas the reduced fALFF in the right PoCG was negatively associated with reduced visual analog scale (VAS) scores (r = −0.267, p = 0.039, uncorrected); (3) the SVR model exhibited a good performance for prediction (r = 0.411, p < 0.001),which suggests that these extracted fALFF features could be used as reliable biomarkers to predict the treatment response of taVNS for MWoA patients. This study demonstrated that the baseline fALFF features have good potential for predicting individualized treatment response of taVNS in MWoA patients, and those weight brain areas are mainly involved in the thalamocortical (TC) circuits, default mode network (DMN), and descending pain modulation system (DPMS). This will contribute to well understanding the mechanism of taVNS in treating MWoA patients and may help to screen ideal patients who respond well to taVNS treatment.

Biomarkers Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

SUMMARY

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a method for focal brain stimulation that is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction where small intracranial electric currents are generated by a powerful fluctuating magnetic field. Over the past three decades, TMS has shown promise in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders in adults. However, the use of TMS in children has been more limited. We provide a brief introduction to the TMS technique; common TMS protocols including single-pulse TMS, paired-pulse TMS, paired associative stimulation, and repetitive TMS; and relevant TMS-derived neurophysiological measurements including resting and active motor threshold, cortical silent period, paired-pulse TMS measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation, and plasticity metrics after repetitive TMS. We then discuss the biomarker applications of TMS in a few representative neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, fragile X syndrome, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tourette syndrome, and developmental stuttering.

A combination of P300 and eye movement data improves the accuracy of auxiliary diagnoses of depression

BACKGROUND

Exploratory eye movements (EEMs) and P300 are often used to facilitate the clinical diagnosis of depression. However, There were few studies using the combination of EEMs and P300 to build a model for detecting depression and predicting a curative effect.

METHODS

Sixty patients were recruited for 2 groups: high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) combined with paroxetine group and simple paroxetine group. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by the Hamilton Depression scale-24(HAMD-24), EEMs and P300. The classification model of the auxiliary diagnosis of depression and the prediction model of the two treatments were developed based on a machine learning algorithm.

RESULTS

The classification model with the greatest accuracy for patients with depression and healthy controls was 95.24% (AUC = 0.75, recall = 1.00, precision = 0.95, F1-score = 0.97). The root mean square error (RMSE) of the model for predicting the efficacy of high frequency rTMS combined with paroxetine was 3.54 (MAE [mean absolute error] = 2.56, R² = -0.53). The RMSE of the model for predicting the efficacy of paroxetine was 4.97 (MAE = 4.00, R² = -0.91).

CONCLUSION

Based on the machine learning algorithm, P300 and EEMs data was suitable for modeling to distinguish depression patients and healthy individuals. However, it was not suitable for predicting the efficacy of high frequency rTMS combined with paroxetine or to predict the efficacy of paroxetine.

Abnormal core functional connectivity on the pathology of MDD and antidepressant treatment: A systematic review

RATIONALE/IMPORTANCE

Researches have highlighted communication deficits between resting-state brain networks in major depressive disorder (MDD), as reflected in abnormal functional connectivity (FC). However, it is unclear whether impaired FC is associated with MDD pathology or is simply incidental to MDD symptoms. Moreover, there is no generalized theory to analyze the impact of treatment modalities on MDD.

OBJECTIVES

To address the issues, we conducted a systematic review of 49 eligible papers to provide insight into the pathological mechanisms of MDD patients by summarizing resting-state FC alterations involving mood and cognitive abnormalities and the effects of medications on them.

RESULTS

Mood disorders in MDD were characterized by abnormal FC between the amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Cognitive impairment manifests as deficits in executive function, attention, memory, and rumination, primarily modulated by dysfunction between the fronto-parietal network and default mode network. Especially, we proposed the set of core abnormal FC (CA-FC) contributing to mood and cognitive impairment in MDD, currently including ACC-left precuneus/amygdala, rostral ACC-left dorsolateral PFC, left subgenual ACC-left cerebellar, left PFC- anterior subcallosal, and left precuneus-left pulvinar. After treatment, patients with normalized CA-FC showed remission of depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a CA-FC set for possible causative principle of MDD, which unifies the FC results from specific, difficult-to-analyze conditions into one outcome set for screening. Furthermore, CA-FC varies from person to person, and the low success rate of a single treatment may be due to the inability to cover too many CA-FC.

Baseline Clinical and Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Treatment Response to High-Frequency rTMS Over the Left DLPFC for Resistant Depression

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven to be an efficient treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, the success rate of this method is still low, and the treatment outcome is unpredictable. The objective of this study was to explore clinical and structural neuroimaging factors as potential biomarkers of the efficacy of high-frequency (HF) rTMS (20 Hz) over the left dorso-lateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC).

METHODS

We analyzed the records of 131 patients with mood disorders who were treated with rTMS and were assessed at baseline at the end of the stimulation and at 1 month after the end of the treatment. The response is defined as a 50% decrease in the MADRS score between the first and the last assessment. Each of these patients underwent a T1 MRI scan of the brain, which was subsequently segmented with FreeSurfer. Whole-brain analyses [Query, Design, Estimate, Contrast (QDEC)] were conducted and corrected for multiple comparisons. Additionally, the responder status was also analyzed using binomial multivariate regression models. The explored variables were clinical and anatomical features of the rTMS target obtained from T1 MRI: target-scalp distance, DLPFC gray matter thickness, and various cortical measures of interest previously studied.

RESULTS

The results of a binomial multivariate regression model indicated that depression type (p = 0.025), gender (p = 0.010), and the severity of depression (p = 0.027) were found to be associated with response to rTMS. Additionally, the resistance stage showed a significant trend (p = 0.055). Whole-brain analyses on volume revealed that the average volume of the left part of the superior frontal and the caudal middle frontal regions is associated with the response status. Other MRI-based measures are not significantly associated with response to rTMS in our population.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we investigated the clinical and neuroimaging biomarkers associated with responsiveness to high-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC in a large sample of patients with TRD. Women, patients with bipolar depressive disorder (BDD), and patients who are less resistant to HF rTMS respond better. Responders present a lower volume of the left part of the superior frontal gyrus and the caudal middle frontal gyrus. These findings support further investigation into the use of clinical variables and structural MRI as possible biomarkers of rTMS treatment response.

Individual interregional perfusion between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation targets and the subgenual anterior cortex predicts response and remission to aiTBS treatment in medication-resistant depression: The influence of behavioral inhibition

BACKGROUND

Accelerated intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (aiTBS) has been put forward as an effective treatment to alleviate depressive symptoms. Baseline functional connectivity (FC) patterns between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the subgenual anterior cortex (sgACC) have gained a lot of attention as a potential biomarker for response. However, arterial spin labeling (ASL) - measuring regional cerebral blood flow - may allow a more straightforward physiological interpretation of such interregional functional connections.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether baseline covariance perfusion connectivity between the individually stimulated left DLPFC targets and sgACC could predict meaningful clinical outcome. Considering that individual characteristics may influence efficacy prediction, all patients were also assessed with the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scale.

METHODS

After baseline ASL scanning, forty-one medication-resistant depressed patients received twenty sessions of neuronavigated left DLPFC aiTBS in an accelerated sham-controlled crossover fashion, where all stimulation sessions were spread over four days (Trial registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805).

RESULTS

Stronger individual baseline interregional covariance perfusion connectivity patterns predicted response and/or remission. Furthermore, responders and remitters with higher BIS scores displayed stronger baseline interregional perfusion connections.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting the left DLPFC with aiTBS based on personal structural imaging data only may not be the most optimal method to enhance meaningful antidepressant responses. Individual baseline interregional perfusion connectivity could be an important added brain imaging method for individual optimization of more valid stimulation targets within the left DLPFC. Additional therapies dealing with behavioral inhibition may be warranted.

Using Brain Imaging to Improve Spatial Targeting of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for depression but is limited in that the optimal therapeutic target remains unknown. Early TMS trials lacked a focal target and thus positioned the TMS coil over the prefrontal cortex using scalp measurements. Over time, it became clear that this method leads to variation in the stimulation site and that this could contribute to heterogeneity in antidepressant response. Newer methods allow for precise positioning of the TMS coil over a specific brain location, but leveraging these precise methods requires a more precise therapeutic target. We review how neuroimaging is being used to identify a more focal therapeutic target for depression. We highlight recent studies showing that more effective TMS targets in the frontal cortex are functionally connected to deep limbic regions such as the subgenual cingulate cortex. We review how connectivity might be used to identify an optimal TMS target for use in all patients and potentially even a personalized target for each individual patient. We address the clinical implications of this emerging field and highlight critical questions for future research.

Understanding complex functional wiring patterns in major depressive disorder through brain functional connectome

Brain function relies on efficient communications between distinct brain systems. The pathology of major depressive disorder (MDD) damages functional brain networks, resulting in cognitive impairment. Here, we reviewed the associations between brain functional connectome changes and MDD pathogenesis. We also highlighted the utility of brain functional connectome for differentiating MDD from other similar psychiatric disorders, predicting recurrence and suicide attempts in MDD, and evaluating treatment responses. Converging evidence has now linked aberrant brain functional network organization in MDD to the dysregulation of neurotransmitter signaling and neuroplasticity, providing insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of the disease and antidepressant efficacy. Widespread connectome dysfunctions in MDD patients include multiple, large-scale brain networks as well as local disturbances in brain circuits associated with negative and positive valence systems and cognitive functions. Although the clinical utility of the brain functional connectome remains to be realized, recent findings provide further promise that research in this area may lead to improved diagnosis, treatments, and clinical outcomes of MDD.

Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular modulatory technique for the noninvasive diagnosis and therapy of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Unfortunately, current modulation strategies are only modestly effective. The literature provides strong evidence that the modulatory effects of TMS vary depending on device components and stimulation protocols. These differential effects are important when designing precise modulatory strategies for clinical or research applications. Developments in TMS have been accompanied by advances in combining TMS with neuroimaging techniques, including electroencephalography, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Such studies appear particularly promising as they may not only allow us to probe affected brain areas during TMS but also seem to predict underlying research directions that may enable us to precisely target and remodel impaired cortices or circuits. However, few precise modulation strategies are available, and the long-term safety and efficacy of these strategies need to be confirmed. Here, we review the literature on possible technologies for precise modulation to highlight progress along with limitations with the goal of suggesting future directions for this field.

Recent Advances and Future Directions in Brain MR Imaging Studies in Schizophrenia: Toward Elucidating Brain Pathology and Developing Clinical Tools

Schizophrenia is a common severe psychiatric disorder that affects approximately 1% of general population through the life course. Historically, in Kraepelin's time, schizophrenia was a disease unit conceptualized as dementia praecox; however, since then, the disease concept has changed. Recent MRI studies had shown that the neuropathology of the brain in this disorder was characterized by mild progression before and after the onset of the disease, and that the brain alterations were relatively smaller than assumed. Although genetic factors contribute to the brain alterations in schizophrenia, which are thought to be trait differences, other changes include factors that are common in psychiatric diseases. Furthermore, it has been shown that the brain differences specific to schizophrenia were relatively small compared to other changes, such as those caused by brain development, aging, and gender. In addition, compared to the disease and participant factors, machine and imaging protocol differences could affect MRI signals, which should be addressed in multi-site studies. Recent advances in MRI modalities, such as multi-shell diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and multimodal brain imaging analysis, may be candidates to sharpen the characterization of schizophrenia-specific factors and provide new insights. The Brain/MINDS Beyond Human Brain MRI (BMB-HBM) project has been launched considering the differences and noises irrespective of the disease pathologies and includes the future perspectives of MRI studies for various psychiatric and neurological disorders. The sites use restricted MRI machines and harmonized multi-modal protocols, standardized image preprocessing, and traveling subject harmonization. Data sharing to the public will be planned in FY 2024. In the future, we believe that combining a high-quality human MRI dataset with genetic data, randomized controlled trials, and MRI for non-human primates and animal models will enable us to understand schizophrenia, elucidate its neural bases and therapeutic targets, and provide tools for clinical application at bedside.

What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations?

Functional connectivity (FC), or the statistical interdependence of blood-oxygen dependent level (BOLD) signals between brain regions using fMRI, has emerged as a widely used tool for probing functional abnormalities in clinical populations due to the promise of the approach across conceptual, technical, and practical levels. With an already vast and steadily accumulating neuroimaging literature on neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurological diseases and disorders in which FC is a primary measure, we aim here to provide a high-level synthesis of major concepts that have arisen from FC findings in a manner that cuts across different clinical conditions and sheds light on overarching principles. We highlight that FC has allowed us to discover the ubiquity of intrinsic functional networks across virtually all brains and clarify typical patterns of neurodevelopment over the lifespan. This understanding of typical FC maturation with age has provided important benchmarks against which to evaluate divergent maturation in early life and degeneration in late life. This in turn has led to the important insight that many clinical conditions are associated with complex, distributed, network-level changes in the brain, as opposed to solely focal abnormalities. We further emphasize the important role that FC studies have played in supporting a dimensional approach to studying transdiagnostic clinical symptoms and in enhancing the multimodal characterization and prediction of the trajectory of symptom progression across conditions. We highlight the unprecedented opportunity offered by FC to probe functional abnormalities in clinical conditions where brain function could not be easily studied otherwise, such as in disorders of consciousness. Lastly, we suggest high priority areas for future research and acknowledge critical barriers associated with the use of FC methods, particularly those related to artifact removal, data denoising and feasibility in clinical contexts.

Personalized prediction of transcranial magnetic stimulation clinical response in patients with treatment-refractory depression using neuroimaging biomarkers and machine learning

BACKGROUND

Functional connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate (sgACC) may serve as a biomarker for transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment response. The first aim was to establish whether this finding is veridical or artifactually induced by the pre-processing method. Furthermore, alternative biomarkers were identified and the clinical utility for personalized medicine was examined.

METHODS

Resting-state fMRI data were collected in medication-refractory depressed patients (n = 70, 16 males) before undergoing neuronavigated left DLPFC rTMS. Seed-based analyses were performed with and without global signal regression pre-processing to identify biomarkers of short-term and long-term treatment response. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve and supervised machine learning analyses were applied to assess the clinical utility of these biomarkers for the classification of categorical rTMS response.

RESULTS

Regardless of the pre-processing method, DLPFC-sgACC connectivity was not associated with treatment outcome. Instead, poorer connectivity between the sgACC and three clusters (peak locations: frontal pole, superior parietal lobule, occipital cortex) and DLPFC-central opercular cortex were observed in long-term nonresponders. The identified connections could serve as acceptable to excellent markers. Combining the features using supervised machine learning reached accuracy rates of 95.35% (CI=82.94-100.00) and 88.89% (CI=63.96-100.00) in the cross-validation and test dataset, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size was moderate, and features for machine learning were based on group differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term nonresponders showed greater disrupted connectivity in regions involving the central executive network. Our findings may aid the development of personalized medicine for medication-refractory depression.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder: A Focus on Neurodevelopment

Adolescent depression is a potentially lethal condition and a leading cause of disability for this age group. There is an urgent need for novel efficacious treatments since half of adolescents with depression fail to respond to current therapies and up to 70% of those who respond will relapse within 5 years. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults who do not respond to pharmacological or behavioral interventions. In contrast, rTMS has not demonstrated the same degree of efficacy in adolescent MDD. We argue that this is due, in part, to conceptual and methodological shortcomings in the existing literature. In our review, we first provide a neurodevelopmentally focused overview of adolescent depression. We then summarize the rTMS literature in adult and adolescent MDD focusing on both the putative mechanisms of action and neurodevelopmental factors that may influence efficacy in adolescents. We then identify limitations in the existing adolescent MDD rTMS literature and propose specific parameters and approaches that may be used to optimize efficacy in this uniquely vulnerable age group. Specifically, we suggest ways in which future studies reduce clinical and neural heterogeneity, optimize neuronavigation by drawing from functional brain imaging, apply current knowledge of rTMS parameters and neurodevelopment, and employ an experimental therapeutics platform to identify neural targets and biomarkers for response. We conclude that rTMS is worthy of further investigation. Furthermore, we suggest that following these recommendations in future studies will offer a more rigorous test of rTMS as an effective treatment for adolescent depression.

Magnetic resonance imaging for individual prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No tools are currently available to predict whether a patient suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) will respond to a certain treatment. Machine learning analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data has shown potential in predicting response for individual patients, which may enable personalized treatment decisions and increase treatment efficacy. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of MRI-guided response prediction in MDD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies using MRI to predict single-subject response to antidepressant treatment in patients with MDD. Classification performance was calculated using a bivariate model and expressed as area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity. In addition, we analyzed differences in classification performance between different interventions and MRI modalities. Meta-analysis of 22 samples including 957 patients showed an overall area under the bivariate summary receiver operating curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87), sensitivity of 77% (95% CI 71-82), and specificity of 79% (95% CI 73-84). Although classification performance was higher for electroconvulsive therapy outcome prediction (n = 285, 80% sensitivity, 83% specificity) than medication outcome prediction (n = 283, 75% sensitivity, 72% specificity), there was no significant difference in classification performance between treatments or MRI modalities. Prediction of treatment response using machine learning analysis of MRI data is promising but should not yet be implemented into clinical practice. Future studies with more generalizable samples and external validation are needed to establish the potential of MRI to realize individualized patient care in MDD.

Treatment of major depressive disorder with bilateral theta burst stimulation: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial (TBS-D)

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is currently evolving as an effective and safe therapeutic tool in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, already established rTMS treatment paradigms are rather time-consuming. With theta burst stimulation (TBS), a patterned form of rTMS, treatment time can be substantially reduced. Pilot studies and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrate non-inferiority of TBS to 10 Hz rTMS and support a wider use in MDD. Still, data from placebo-controlled multicenter RCTs are lacking. In this placebo-controlled multicenter study, 236 patients with MDD will be randomized to either intermittent TBS (iTBS) to the left and continuous TBS (cTBS) to the right dlPFC or bilateral sham stimulation (1:1 ratio). The treatment will be performed with 80% resting motor threshold intensity over six consecutive weeks (30 sessions). The primary outcome is the treatment response rate (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale reduction ≥ 50%). The aim of the study is to confirm the superiority of active bilateral TBS compared to placebo treatment. In two satellite studies, we intend to identify possible MRI-based and (epi-)genetic predictors of responsiveness to TBS therapy. Positive results will support the clinical use of bilateral TBS as an advantageous, efficient, and well-tolerated treatment and pave the way for further individualization of MDD therapy.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04392947).

Resting State Functional Connectivity Biomarkers of Treatment Response in Mood Disorders: A Review

There are currently no validated treatment biomarkers in psychiatry. Resting State Functional Connectivity (RSFC) is a popular method for investigating the neural correlates of mood disorders, but the breadth of the field makes it difficult to assess progress toward treatment response biomarkers. In this review, we followed general PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the evidence base for mood disorder treatment biomarkers across diagnoses, brain network models, and treatment modalities. We hypothesized that no treatment biomarker would be validated across these domains or with independent datasets. Results are organized, interpreted, and discussed in the context of four popular analytic techniques: (1) reference region (seed-based) analysis, (2) independent component analysis, (3) graph theory analysis, and (4) other methods. Cortico-limbic connectivity is implicated across studies, but there is no single biomarker that spans analyses or that has been replicated in multiple independent datasets. We discuss RSFC limitations and future directions in biomarker development.

The Spontaneous Activity Pattern of the Middle Occipital Gyrus Predicts the Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Migraine Without Aura

The purpose of the present study was to explore whether and to what extent the neuroimaging markers could predict the relief of the symptoms of patients with migraine without aura (MWoA) following a 4-week acupuncture treatment period. In study 1, the advanced multivariate pattern analysis was applied to perform a classification analysis between 40 patients with MWoA and 40 healthy subjects (HS) based on the z-transformed amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (zALFF) maps. In study 2, the meaningful classifying features were selected as predicting features and the support vector regression models were constructed to predict the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks and headache intensity in 40 patients with MWoA. In study 3, a region of interest-based comparison between the pre- and post-treatment zALFF maps was conducted in 33 patients with MwoA to assess the changes in predicting features after acupuncture intervention. The zALFF value of the foci in the bilateral middle occipital gyrus, right fusiform gyrus, left insula, and left superior cerebellum could discriminate patients with MWoA from HS with higher than 70% accuracy. The zALFF value of the clusters in the right and left middle occipital gyrus could effectively predict the relief of headache intensity (R ² = 0.38 ± 0.059, mean squared error = 2.626 ± 0.325) and frequency of migraine attacks (R ² = 0.284 ± 0.072, mean squared error = 20.535 ± 2.701) after the 4-week acupuncture treatment period. Moreover, the zALFF values of these two clusters were both significantly reduced after treatment. The present study demonstrated the feasibility and validity of applying machine learning technologies and individual cerebral spontaneous activity patterns to predict acupuncture treatment outcomes in patients with MWoA. The data provided a quantitative benchmark for selecting acupuncture for MWoA.

Neuroimaging in the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for patient with depression: a protocol for a coordinate-based meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

As a prevalent psychiatric disease, depression is a life-threatening mental disorder that may cause work disability and premature death. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation procedure, which has been reported to have a significant effect on antidepressant treatment in recent years. However, the parameters of TMS for depression that can produce the best clinical benefits remain unknown. In the present study, we will evaluate the effect of TMS treatment for depression from the perspective of functional neuroimaging by performing a meta-analysis based on included studies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers will search published studies in the following five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WANGFANG DATA from inception to 1 June 2020. Then we will select studies according to predesigned inclusion and exclusion criteria. After extracting data from included studies, activation likelihood estimation will be applied to data synthesis. Any disagreement will be checked by the third reviewer who will also make the final decision.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This work does not require ethics approval as it will be based on published studies. This review will be published in peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020165436.

A multivariate neuroimaging biomarker of individual outcome to transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression

The neurobiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) remains incompletely understood, and many individuals fail to respond to standard treatments. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has emerged as a promising antidepressant therapy. However, the heterogeneity of response underscores a pressing need for biomarkers of treatment outcome. We acquired resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data in 47 MDD individuals prior to 5-8 weeks of rTMS treatment targeted using the F3 beam approach and in 29 healthy comparison subjects. The caudate, prefrontal cortex, and thalamus showed significantly lower blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal power in MDD individuals at baseline. Critically, individuals who responded best to treatment were associated with lower pre-treatment BOLD power in these regions. Additionally, functional connectivity (FC) in the default mode and affective networks was associated with treatment response. We leveraged these findings to train support vector machines (SVMs) to predict individual treatment responses, based on learned patterns of baseline FC, BOLD signal power and clinical features. Treatment response (responder vs. nonresponder) was predicted with 85-95% accuracy. Reduction in symptoms was predicted to within a mean error of ±16% (r = .68, p < .001). These preliminary findings suggest that therapeutic outcome to DLPFC-rTMS could be predicted at a clinically meaningful level using only a small number of core neurobiological features of MDD, warranting prospective testing to ascertain generalizability. This provides a novel, transparent and physiologically plausible multivariate approach for classification of individual response to what has become the most commonly employed rTMS treatment worldwide. This study utilizes data from a larger clinical study (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Investigating Predictors of Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression; ACTRN12610001071011; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=336262).