Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus infection

Co-infection of blood borne viruses in blood donors: A cross-sectional study from North India

BACKGROUND

There are several studies on prevalence of individual infectious disease markers (mono-infection) in donors but none on prevalence of coinfection. Co-infection is significant as it leads to accelerated disease progression. We, therefore, evaluated the prevalence of co-infection among blood donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cross-sectional analysis was conducted in blood donors. All donors were tested for anti-HIV I and II, HBsAg, anti-HBC IgM, anti-HCV, Malaria and syphilis by chemiluminescence and ID-NAT assay. All reactive donor samples were confirmed by using confirmatory assays. Donors were grouped as mono-infected and co-infected. The student t-test was used for comparison.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 106,238 blood donors were tested. Mean age of donors was 34.2 years and 94.2% of blood donors were males. 1776 (1.67%) donor samples were confirmed serologically reactive. 1714 (1.61%) samples were reactive for single marker (mono-infected) while 62 (0.05%) donors' samples exhibited co-infection. 18 donors were positive for HBV+HCV followed by HIV +syphilis (14).

CONCLUSION

We report for the first time the prevalence of different co-infection patterns in blood donors. Co-infection influence the disease progression; it would be important to investigate the co-infection prevalence in larger sample size.

Liver Function Tests Abnormalities and Hepatitis B Virus & Hepatitis C Virus Co-infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected Patients in India

BACKGROUND

While highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) has improved survival of HIV-infected patients, there is increasing liver disease and progressive Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) related liver disease.

AIMS

To study the liver function tests (LFT) and HBV and HCV co-infection in HIV-infected patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All HIV-positive patients presenting to a tertiary level hospital from April 2009 to April 2011 were evaluated. Baseline LFT, CD4/CD8 counts, ultrasound abdomen, HBsAg, IgG anti-HBc, HBVDNA, Anti-HCV and HCVRNA were done in all patients. LFT was repeated monthly or more frequently with anti-tubercular therapy (ATT)/HAART.

RESULTS

Abnormal LFT were seen in 143/320 (44.6%) HIV-infected patients (n = 320; M-282, F-38; mean age-35.4 ± 7.3 years). Baseline LFT was abnormal in 48 (15%) [hepatotropic viruses-19, alcohol-24, NAFLD-1, disseminated TB-1, idiopathic-03). Subsequent LFT derangement developed in 95/272 (34.9%). In the majority, the LFT abnormality was mild (119/143-83.2%) and multi-factorial [HAART 132 (76.4%), alcohol 69 (48.2%), ATT 31 (21.7%), HBV 16 (11.2%), HCV 15 (10.4%)]. Using multivariate analysis, abnormal LFT were associated with HAART (OR, 5.92; 95%CI, 2.83-12.37), ATT (OR, 2.06; 95%CI, 1.06-3.99) or HCV infection (OR, 2.54; 95%CI, 1.03-6.26). Significant hepatotoxicity requiring drug modification was seen in only 7 cases. HBV, HCV and HBV + HCV co-infection were seen in 37 (11.6%), 28 (8.8%) and 2 (0.6%) respectively. Occult co-infections were rare [HBV-1 (0.3%); HCV-3 (0.9%)].

CONCLUSION

While LFT abnormalities in HIV are common, they are usually mild and multifactorial. HBV and HCV co-infections were seen in 11.6% and 8.8%, respectively. Occult HBV and HCV infections were rare.

A cross-sectional study of liver function tests in HIV-infected persons in Western India

BACKGROUND

Derangement of liver function tests (LFTs) is common in people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (PLHA). The cause is multifactorial. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the commonest cause and others being alcohol abuse and concomitant viral hepatitis. The aim of the research was to study the prevalence of LFT abnormalities in PLHA.

METHODS

The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital. Evaluation included a detailed history, thorough clinical examination and investigations including a haemogram, serum biochemistry, serology for hepatitis, and CD4 cell count.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were evaluated. Of these, 212 (85.82%) were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), 111 (44.93%) were on anti-tubercular therapy (ATT), and 94 (38.05%) were on concurrent ATT-ART. Abnormal LFTs were seen in 128/247 (51.82%) PLHA. In the majority (88.28%), the LFT abnormalities were mild. LFT abnormalities were seen in 109/212 (51.4%) patients on ART, in 56/111 (50.5%) patients on ATT, 46/94 (48.93%) patients on concurrent ART-ATT. There was no difference in LFT abnormalities among the three groups nor was there any significant association with alcohol consumption. There was a statistically significant co-relation between albumin/globulin ratio and CD4 count (p = 0.0002). Counter-intuitively, LFT abnormalities were commoner in patients not receiving nevirapine (p = 0.043), but severe abnormalities (grade III/grade IV) were commoner in those receiving nevirapine (p = 0.005) and in those on concurrent ART-ATT (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

LFT abnormalities in PLHA are common; but usually mild. There is a strong association between severe abnormalities and nevirapine-based therapy (p = 0.02) and concurrent ATT-ART (p = 0.008).

Liver involvement in human immunodeficiency virus infection

The advances in management of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) with highly effective anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) have resulted in increased longevity of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. AIDS-related illnesses now account for less than 50 % of the deaths, and liver diseases have emerged as the leading cause of death in patients with HIV infection. Chronic viral hepatitis, drug-related hepatotoxicity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and opportunistic infections are the common liver diseases that are seen in HIV-infected individuals. Because of the shared routes of transmission, co-infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are very common in HIV-infected persons. Hepatitis C is the most common viral hepatitis seen in HIV-infected patients. With the availability of directly acting agents, treatment outcome of HCV is comparable to that seen in non HIV-infected patients. Careful monitoring is required for drug interactions and drug-induced hepatotoxicity and modification of drugs should be done where necessary. The results of liver transplantation in select HIV-infected patients can be comparable with those of HIV-negative patients.

Hepatitis C virus quasispecies and pseudotype analysis from acute infection to chronicity in HIV-1 co-infected individuals

HIV-1 infected patients who acquire HCV infection have higher rates of chronicity and liver disease progression than patients with HCV mono-infection. Understanding early events in this pathogenic process is important. We applied single genome sequencing of the E1 to NS3 regions and viral pseudotype neutralization assays to explore the consequences of viral quasispecies evolution from pre-seroconversion to chronicity in four co-infected individuals (mean follow up 566 days). We observed that one to three founder viruses were transmitted. Relatively low viral sequence diversity, possibly related to an impaired immune response, due to HIV infection was observed in three patients. However, the fourth patient, after an early purifying selection displayed increasing E2 sequence evolution, possibly related to being on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Viral pseudotypes generated from HCV variants showed relative resistance to neutralization by autologous plasma but not to plasma collected from later time points, confirming ongoing virus escape from antibody neutralization.

Liver fibrosis, microbial translocation and immune activation markers in HIV and HCV infections and in HIV/HCV co-infection

BACKGROUND

Liver fibrosis is accelerated in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C viruses.

AIMS

We investigated the correlation between liver fibrosis, immune activation and microbial translocation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) mono-infections, HIV/HCV co-infection, and healthy controls (20 subjects/group). Peripheral blood was analysed to determine the levels of Forkhead box 3 (Foxp3) T cells, TGF-β1, CD14 (soluble and surface isoforms), IL-17 and bacterial translocation products. These measurements were correlated to the severity of liver fibrosis, measured with the FIB-4 score and transient elastography.

RESULTS

Foxp3T cell levels were significantly elevated in HIV mono-infected and co-infected groups (p<0.0005). FIB-4 and liver stiffness values inversely correlated with TGF-β1 (p=0.0155 and p=0.0498). Bacterial DNA differed significantly in the HIV-positive compared to the other groups: HIV/HCV co-infected subjects had significantly higher serum levels of bacterial translocation products, CD14, and IL-17 levels (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrosis stage in HIV/HCV co-infection may be influenced by immune activation due either by viral infections or to bacterial translocation.

Survival of HIV-positive individuals with hepatitis B and C infection in Michigan

We sought to estimate mortality and associated factors in HIV-hepatitis co-infected individuals in Michigan using a retrospective cohort study. For the study period of 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2009, all HIV-infected individuals were matched to hepatitis B and C cases. In the final Cox proportional hazards regression model, individuals of other [hazard ratio (HR) 2·2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·4-3·2] and black (HR 1·3, 95% CI 1·1-1·6) race had decreased survival compared to white race. Similarly, injecting drug users (IDUs) (HR 2·1, 95% CI 1·6-2·6), men who have sex with men (MSM)/IDUs (HR 1·5, 95% CI 1·1-2·2), individuals with undetermined risk (HR 1·5, 95% CI 1·2-1·9) and heterosexual practices (HR 1·4, 95% CI 1·1-1·8) had decreased survival compared to MSM. Additionally, an interaction was found between current HIV status and co-infection. Mortality in HIV-hepatitis co-infected individuals remains a continuing problem. Our study can help in planning interventions to reduce mortality in HIV-infected individuals.

Liver disease, HIV and aging

The life expectancy of HIV-infected patients has increased due to the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in controlling HIV replication; thus, the population living with HIV infection is steadily aging. Liver-related morbidity and mortality has emerged as a leading problem in HIV-infected patients. Since aging, HIV infection and HAART all affect the liver, understanding the impact of the combination of these factors on liver disease is crucial for optimisation of care in the aging HIV-infected population. This review will focus on the current understanding of liver disease in older (>50 years old) HIV-negative individuals and in HIV-infected individuals. Areas for future research in the area of HIV, liver disease and aging will also be discussed.

Use of transient elastography (FibroScan®) for the noninvasive assessment of portal hypertension in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing portal pressure and correlates with the occurrence of portal hypertension (PH)-related complications. Transient elastography (TE) is a new, highly accurate noninvasive technique, which enables us to evaluate hepatic fibrosis to detect advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. We performed a hepatic haemodynamic study and TE in 38 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The association between HVPG and liver stiffness was assessed by linear regression. The diagnostic value of TE was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We considered clinically significant PH as an HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg and severe PH as an HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg. A total of 38 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included. Twenty-eight patients (73.7%) had clinically significant PH (HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg), and 23 (60.5%) of these had severe PH (HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg). We found a statistically significant association between liver stiffness (kPa) and HVPG (r(2) = 0.46, P < 0.001, straight line equation HVPG=7.4 + 0.204*TE). The areas under the ROC curves were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.97] and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.94) for the prediction of HVPG ≥ 10 and ≥ 12 mmHg, respectively. Our data suggest that TE can predict the presence of clinically significant and severe PH in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

A higher correlation of HCV core antigen with CD4+ T cell counts compared with HCV RNA in HCV/HIV-1 coinfected patients

Development of HCV infection is typically followed by chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in most patients, while spontaneous HCV viral clearance (SVC) occurs in only a minority of subjects. Compared with the widespread application of HCV RNA testing by quantitative RT-PCR technique, HCV core antigen detection may be an alternative indicator in the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infections and in monitoring the status of infectious individuals. However, the correlation and differences between these two indicators in HCV infection need more investigation, especially in patients coinfected by HIV-1. In this study, a total of 354 anti-HCV and/or anti-HIV serum positive residents from a village of central China were enrolled. Besides HCV-related hepatopathic variables including clinical status, ALT, AST, anti-HCV Abs, as well as the altered CD4+/CD8+ T cell counts, HCV core antigen and HCV viral load were also measured. The concentration of serum HCV core antigen was highly correlated with level of HCV RNA in CHC patients with or without HIV-1 coinfection. Of note, HCV core antigen concentration was negatively correlated with CD4+ T cell count, while no correlation was found between HCV RNA level and CD4+ T cell count. Our findings suggested that quantitative detection of plasma HCV core antigen may be an alternative indicator of HCV RNA qPCR assay when evaluating the association between HCV replication and host immune status in HCV/HIV-1 coinfected patients.

Increasing prevalence of HCC and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are at risk for developing costly and morbid complications, although the actual prevalence of these complications is unknown. We examined time trends in the prevalence of cirrhosis and its related complications, such as hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We calculated the annual prevalence of cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and HCC in a national sample of veterans diagnosed with HCV between 1996 and 2006. Patients with HCV who had at least one physician visit in a given calendar year were included in the analysis of prevalence for that year. We used direct standardization to adjust the prevalence of cirrhosis and related complications for increasing age of the cohort as well as sex and changes in clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In this cohort, the number of individuals with HCV increased from 17,261 in 1996 to 106,242 in 2006. The prevalence of cirrhosis increased from 9% in 1996 to 18.5% in 2006. The prevalence of patients with decompensated cirrhosis doubled, from 5% in 1996 to 11% in 2006, whereas the prevalence of HCC increased approximately 20-fold (0.07% in 1996 to 1.3% in 2006). After adjustment, the time trend in the prevalence of cirrhosis (and its complications) was lower than the crude trend, although it still increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of cirrhosis and HCC in HCV-infected patients has increased significantly over the past 10 years. An aging cohort of patients with HCV could partly explain our findings. Clinicians and health care systems should develop strategies to provide timely and effective care to this high-risk population of patients.

The changing epidemiology of HIV-infected patients in the intensive care unit

With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV has become a chronic disease. As HIV-infected patients are aging, they are at increased risk for comorbid diseases. These non-AIDS related diseases account for a growing proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in HIV-infected patients in recent studies. HIV-infected patients still present to the ICU with HIV-related conditions such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), but these conditions are becoming less common. Respiratory failure remains the most common indication for ICU admission. Immune reconstitution inflammatory response syndrome and toxicities related to HAART may also result in ICU admission. While ICU survival has improved since the earliest era of the HIV epidemic, hospital mortality for HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU remains around 30%. Risk factors for ICU mortality include poor functional status, weight loss, more than one year between HIV diagnosis and ICU admission, lower serum albumin, higher severity of illness, need for mechanical ventilation, and respiratory failure-particularly if due to PCP and accompanied by pneumothorax. The impact of HAART on ICU outcomes is unclear. HAART administration in the ICU can be challenging due to limited delivery routes, concern for viral resistance and medication toxicities. There are no data to determine the safety or efficacy of HAART initiation in the ICU. Future studies are needed to address the role of age, associated comorbidities and impact of HAART on outcomes of HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU.

HIV infection and the liver: the importance of HCV-HIV coinfection and drug-induced liver injury

Hepatitis C virus-Human immunodeficiency virus (HCV-HIV) coinfections are identified in up to 30% of patients infected with HIV and in 8% of patients infected with HCV. Now that progression of HIV and deaths due to AIDS can be prevented by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), it is clear that HCV coinfection is associated with accelerated progression to cirrhosis and increased liver-related morbidity and mortality. Antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for HCV in HCV-HIV coinfected patients is less successful than in patients with HCV monoinfection, and HAART can cause drug-induced liver injury. Multiple barriers limit the number of HCV-HIV coinfected patients who receive antiviral therapy for HCV, and the role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in HIV monoinfected and HCV-HIV coinfected patients remains controversial. Clinical trials of HCV-specific protease or polymerase inhibitors combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin are needed urgently in coinfected patients, both before and after OLT.

Pharmacodynamics of PEG-IFN-alpha-2a in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: implications for treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) have not been described in HCV/HIV co-infected patients. We sought to estimate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PEG-IFN and determine whether these parameters predict treatment outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-six HCV/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-co-infected patients were treated with a 48-week regimen of PEG-IFN (180 microg/week) plus ribavirin (11 mg/kg/day). HCV RNA and PEG-IFN concentrations were obtained from samples collected until week 12. A modeling framework that includes pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters was developed.

RESULTS

Five patients discontinued treatment. Seven patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). PEG-IFN concentrations at day 8 were similar to steady-state levels (p=0.15) and overall pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in SVRs and non-SVRs. The maximum PEG-IFN effectiveness during the first PEG-IFN dose and the HCV-infected cell loss rate (delta), were significantly higher in SVRs compared to non-SVRs (median 95% vs. 86% [p=0.013], 0.27 vs. 0.11 day(-1) [p=0.006], respectively). Patients infected with HCV genotype 1 had a significantly lower average first-week PEG-IFN effectiveness (median 70% vs. 88% [p=0.043]), however, 4- to 12-week PEG-IFN effectiveness was not significantly different compared to those with genotype 3 (p=0.114). Genotype 1 had a significantly lower delta compared to genotype 3 (median 0.14 vs. 0.23 day(-1) [p=0.021]). The PEG-IFN concentration that decreased HCV production by 50% (EC(50)) was lower in genotype 3 compared to genotype 1 (median 1.3 vs. 3.4 [p=0.034]).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the HCV-infected cell loss rate (delta) and the maximum effectiveness of the first dose of PEG-IFN-alpha-2a characterised HIV co-infected patients and were highly predictive of SVR. Further studies are needed to validate these viral kinetic parameters as early on-treatment prognosticators of response in patients with HCV and HIV.

Factors that influence an HIV coinfected patient's decision to start hepatitis C treatment

Liver disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C (HCV), yet few HIV coinfected patients actually receive HCV treatment. Providers must first be willing to prescribe treatment, but the patient ultimately makes the decision to accept or decline a treatment recommendation. We used a process model framework to explore the factors influencing patients' treatment decision-making. We conducted semistructured interviews with 35 HIV coinfected patients and 11 primary care providers at three HIV clinics in Los Angeles, California. Patients reported that stability of HIV disease, perceived need for HCV treatment, treatment readiness, willingness to deal with side effects, absence of substance abuse, and stability of mental health and overall life circumstances are key factors influencing treatment decision-making. Patients also spoke of the influence of the trusting relationship that many had with their provider, and providers acknowledged an awareness of the influence of how they present the risks and benefits of HCV treatment and the overall tone of their recommendation (encouraging, dissuasive, or neutral). These results speak to a social decision-making process between the patient and provider-a partnership that involves sequential interactions whereby both the patient and provider may influence the other's evaluation of the patient's readiness for treatment, with treatment initiation dependent on both agreeing on the need for treatment and the patient's readiness for treatment.

Hepatitis C treatment experiences and decision making among patients living with HIV infection

Hepatitis C infection is a major problem for approximately 250,000 HIV-infected persons in the United States. Although HIV infection is well-controlled in most of this population, they suffer liver-associated morbidity and mortality. Conversely, hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake remains quite low (15%-30%). Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to explore HCV treatment experiences and decision making in adults with HIV infection. The study sample included 39 coinfected adults; 16 in the HCV-treated cohort (who were interviewed a maximum of 3 times) and 23 in the HCV-nontreatment cohort. Analysis of interviews identified 2 treatment barriers (fears and vicarious experiences) and 4 facilitating factors (experience with illness management, patient-provider relationships, gaining sober time, and facing treatment head-on). Analysis of these data also revealed a preliminary model to guide intervention development and theoretical perspectives. Ultimately, research is urgently needed to test interventions that improve HCV evaluation and treatment uptake among HIV-infected patients.

Co-infecção por HIV/HCV em hospital universitário de Recife, Brasil

OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência do vírus da hepatite C (HCV) e fatores de risco associados com a co-infecção em pessoas soropositivas para HIV. MÉTODOS: Estudo do tipo transversal, descritivo e analítico, com 343 portadores do HIV atendidos em um hospital universitário de Recife (PE), no período de março a dezembro de 2003. Os pacientes foram submetidos a um questionário padronizado sobre os fatores de risco. Nas amostras de soro foram pesquisados o anti-HCV pelo ELISA, o HCV-RNA por meio da RT-PCR e a identificação dos genótipos foi realizada no equipamento ABI377 (PE Biosystems®). As análises estatísticas utilizadas foram a univariada, a multivariada e a regressão logística múltipla. RESULTADOS: A prevalência encontrada para o HCV foi de 4,1% (14/343) pelo ELISA e de 3,2 % (11/343) quando utilizada a RT-PCR. Os genótipos mais freqüentes foram 1b (45%), 3 (33%) e 1a (22%). A faixa etária com maior proporção de co-infectados foi a de 30 a 39 anos, com predomínio do sexo masculino (64,3%). Após regressão logística múltipla, apenas a variável transfusão sangüínea permaneceu como fator de risco para o HCV (OR=4,28; IC 95%: 1,44;12,73). CONCLUSÕES: A prevalência da co-infecção HIV/HCV foi baixa, a transfusão sangüínea foi um fator de risco e o genótipo 1b do HCV foi o mais freqüente.

Medical consequences of drug abuse and co-occurring infections: research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse

Substance abuse still remains one of the major problems in the world today, with millions of people abusing legal and illegal drugs. In addition, a billion people may also be infected with one or more infections. Both drugs of abuse and infections are associated with enormous burden of social, economic, and health consequences. This article briefly discusses a few medical consequences of drugs of abuse and infections such as human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, psychiatric complications in hepatitis C infection, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions among medications used in the treatment of addiction and infections, and new drugs in development for the treatment of infections. Research is encouraged to study interactions between infections, drugs of abuse, and underlying pathophysiologic and molecular/genetic mechanisms of these interactions.

The Symptom Experience of HIV/HCV-Coinfected Adults

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has emerged as a major problem for adults with HIV infection. This report describes the symptom experience of HIV/HCV-coinfected adults at entry into a longitudinal mixed-method study. In-depth qualitative interviews and a standardized quantitative symptom measure were used to capture the symptom experiences of 39 (46% women) HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Four major themes emerged from the qualitative interviews: (a) difficulty differentiating between HIV and HCV-related symptoms, (b) commonly cited HCV-related symptoms, (c) ways to control or manage HCV-related symptoms, and (d) lack of symptoms or tests to monitor HCV disease. Participants reported an average of 10 different symptoms and a mean symptom experience score of 18.33 (range = 2-47). Results show the significant symptom burden experienced by HIV/HCV-coinfected adults. However, results suggest that the prevalence of symptoms for HIV/HCV-coinfected patients may not be greater than those experienced by patients with HIV infection alone.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and other primary liver cancers in hepatitis C patients in Sweden - a low endemic country

The aim of this study was to assess the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other primary liver cancers (PLC) in the nationwide cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients in Sweden. The basis was the total HCV-cohort notified in 1990-2004, after excluding 3238 people also reported with hepatitis B, the study cohort consisted of 36 126 people contributing an observation time of 246 105 person-years. The most common route of transmission was intravenous drug use (57%). The national Cancer Registry was used for follow-up, and 354 developed PLC (mainly HCC), of whom 234 were eligible for statistical analysis. The PLC incidence in the HCV cohort was compared with the incidence in the general population, and a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated for six different strata according to estimated duration of infection. The highest relative risk, SIR: 46 (95% CI: 36-56) was found in the stratum 25-30 years with HCV infection and SIR: 40 (95% CI: 31-51) in the stratum 30-35 years with infection. In the entire community-based HCV cohort in Sweden we found a highly increased risk of liver cancer compared to the general population. The highest relative risk was among people who had been infected for more than 25 years.

The Neuropathology of HIV/AIDS

The introduction of Highly Active Anti-retroviral Therapy (HAART) has resulted in significant decreases in morbidity and mortality for subjects infected with HIV. The brain is a major target organ for HIV resulting in significant neuropathological changes in most HIV infected subjects and a wide range of clinical neurological symptoms including HIV associated dementia. In the pre-HAART era HIV associated dementia was a common complication of AIDS. However, since the introduction of HAART the incidence of HIV associated dementia has fallen, but the prevelance has actually risen due to the increasing number of infected subjects and increased life expectancy. HIV associated dementia correlates most closely with neuroinflammation rather than directly with viral load or HIV encephalitis. HIV related clinical and neuropathological disorders are more prevalent in drug abusers than in other risk groups. This review focuses on the shifting pathology observed in HIV infected subjects since the introduction of HAART, discussing the clinical manifestations of these and the influence of confounding factors such as drug abuse and Hepatitis C co-infection.

Underlying pathophysiology of HCV infection in HIV-positive drug users

HCV and HIV infections are very common among injection drug users (IDUs). It is well known that 80-90% of HIV-infected IDUs are also infected with HCV. Furthermore, patients with HCV/HIV co-infection are at a higher risk of progressing to end-stage liver disease, namely cirrhosis. Even though there is increasing global awareness of HCV/HIV co-infection and extended therapeutic programs for this infected population, little is known about the HCV/HIV pathophysiology that mediates the rapid progression to hepatic disease. Liver disease caused by HCV/HIV co-infection is characterized by inflammation and cell-death. Recent reports suggest that the HIV and HCV envelope proteins may induce apoptosis and inflammation in hepatocytes via a novel pathway involving collaborative signaling. Moreover, HCV/HIV co-infection may also alter the cytokine production in vivo. Further studies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of HCV and HIV-mediated pathogenesis will help in the development of therapeutic strategies against HCV/HIV co-infection in these patients.

Trends for genetic variation of Hepatitis C Virus quasispecies in Human Immunodeficiency virus-1 coinfected patients

Chronic infection by Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) causes liver fibrosis, which is accelerated by unknown mechanisms in patients with HIV-1 coinfection. The evolution of HCV quasispecies in this setting of coinfection is not fully understood. To compare HCV quasispecies between HIV-HCV coinfection and HCV monoinfection, we sequenced 340 HCV clones from the HVR-1 and NS3 regions at two different time points in two groups of treatment-naïve patients with HCV-1a infection: (1) HIV-HCV positive (n=6); and (2) HIV negative-HCV positive (n=3). In HCV/HIV coinfection, we found a trend for reduced HCV genetic complexity and diversity, and a trend towards reduced dN/dS ratios in the HVR-1 region, especially in those patients with CD4<200cells/mm(3), who lost positive selective immune pressure in the HVR-1 region. Differences in immune regulation of HCV quasispecies in HIV coinfected individuals deserve further exploration to clarify the different outcomes of chronic hepatitis C noted between the immunocompromised and the immunocompetent host.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

Acute and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a serious health problem worldwide, however, there has been advancement in the treatment of HCV infection due to standard treatment using pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The literature indicates that therapy for HCV is becoming more individualized. In addition to considering genotype and viral RNA levels before treatment, achievement of an early virologic response (EVR) and a rapid virologic response (RVR) is now possible during therapy. Moreover, problem patients, such as non-responders, relapsers, HIV or HBV co-infected patients, patients with liver cirrhosis, and pre- or post-liver transplantation patients are an increasing fraction of the patients requiring treatment. This article reviews the literature regarding standard treatments and problem patients with acute and chronic HCV infection. It also includes discussion on contraindications and side effects of treatment with interferon and ribavirin, as well as new drug development.

Changing treatment paradigms: hepatitis C virus in HIV-infected patients

The evaluation of hepatic histology and treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients is rapidly changing. HCV has become an important cause of mortality in HIV-infected patients. Consequently, assessment of liver histology in all coinfected patients is particularly important. The evaluation of hepatic histology is shifting from reliance on the liver biopsy toward noninvasive modalities. Additionally, the importance of HCV-associated morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients has prompted increasing numbers of these patients to be HCV treatment candidates. Prospective trials in coinfected patients have reported lower sustained virologic responses compared to HCV-monoinfected patients. Consequently, the numbers of coinfected nonresponders to pegylated interferon/ribavirin continues to increase. Because none of the presently available treatment modalities for pegylated interferon/ribavirin nonresponders are clearly efficacious, management decisions must be individualized. The options include, HCV-specific medications, maintenance therapy, the use of alternative interferon formulations, and observation. HCV-specific agents, particularly protease and polymerase inhibitors, show early promise in HCV-monoinfected individuals. Their use in coinfected patients, however, is likely to be delayed for several years, and they are likely to be used in combination with interferon. Low-dose pegylated interferon, administered in an attempt to slow fibrosis progression (maintenance therapy), is being evaluated in several large prospective trials in monoinfected and coinfected patients. Observation may be best for nonresponders with relatively mild hepatic histology. In summary, HCV treatment will likely follow the example forged by HIV. In the near future, combinations of different drugs will likely be used simultaneously to result in durable viral suppression.

Integrating treatment for hepatitis C virus infection into an HIV clinic

In the United States, one-third of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients are also coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Of 228 coinfected patients whose charts were reviewed in our 2000 study, only 2 had received therapy with interferon. To address low rates of treatment, in 2001 we implemented a program to shift the primary responsibility for oversight of care for HCV-infected patients from the liver clinic to HIV primary care clinicians and to provide education and support regarding adherence to patients. Critical elements of the program include education of HIV clinicians with regard to treatment for HCV infection, establishment of a coinfection clinic in the HIV clinic, assignment of a full-time Registered Nurse for monitoring and support of patients undergoing treatment for HCV infection, and development of a weekly peer group for the coinfected patients. Preliminary treatment results for patients in the program suggest that this approach has promise for improving outcomes of treatment among coinfected patients.

Treatment of hepatitis C infection

HCV infection is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease worldwide,and it results in cirrhosis, liver failure, and HCC. As a result, hepatitis C cirrhosis has become the principal indication for liver transplantation. Ironically,HCV infection can be cured with available antiviral therapies, but only a minority of infected persons has ever been treated. The current standard of therapy isa combination of PEG-IFNalpha and ribavirin, which produces high rates of SVRs(absence of detectable HCV RNA at least 24 weeks after cessation of therapy):42% to 56% in genotype 1 and 75% to 84% in genotypes 2 and 3. Recent reports indicate that the less frequent genotypes 4, 5, and 6 also are responsive to combination therapy. Recommendations for treatment of conventional and special patient populations were reviewed in detail. Newer therapeutics that are entering clinical trials provide hope that SVRs may be possible in patients who are difficult to treat and in nonresponders to current therapy.

HCV virological assessment

Virological assessment of HCV infection relies on a series of assays that are essential for diagnostic purposes and to adopt therapeutic decisions. Diagnostic assays can be classified in three groups: assays that are designed to detect specific antibodies to HCV; techniques that detect and quantify viral load; and tests aimed at determining the infecting HCV type. In general, the use of these assays is similar in HCV infected patients as in those co-infected with HCV and HIV. Co-infected patients, however, have some inherent characteristics (deficient immune status, high HCV-RNA concentrations, particular genotype distribution, low response to antiviral therapy) that make the interpretation of such assays slightly different. Regarding assays to detect antibodies to HCV, last generation tests have a similar sensitivity in mono-infected and co-infected individuals. HCV-RNA testing might be helpful in anti-HCV negative individuals with clinical or analytical suspicion of liver disease. Genotype determination in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV should be performed by methods relying on sequence analysis, since serotyping assays have shown a lower sensitivity in co-infected cohorts. HCV-RNA concentration is a strong predictor of response to therapy. Due to the higher viral load of co-infected patients compared to HCV mono-infected individuals, those assays with a wide dynamic range seem more appropriate to monitor viral load during treatment.

Do Type and Duration of Antiretroviral Therapy Attenuate Liver Fibrosis in HIV--Hepatitis C Virus--Coinfected Patients?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether type and duration of therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection attenuates liver fibrosis in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection.

METHODS

Patients with HCV monoinfection (group 1) and HIV-HCV coinfection were retrospectively selected; the latter patients were classified into the following 3 groups: group 2, patients who received no therapy or only nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); group 3, those who received highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); and group 4, those who initially received NRTIs followed by HAART. Fibrosis stage (scale, 0-6) and necroinflammatory score (scale, 0-18) were assessed according to the Ishak system. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-one patients (296 HCV-monoinfected patients and 85 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients) were recruited. The durations of HIV therapy before liver biopsy was performed for groups 2, 3, and 4 were 3.8 +/- 2.8, 3.3 +/- 1.8, and 6.6 +/- 2.2 years. The time from HIV diagnosis to HAART initiation was shorter for group 3 than for group 4 (9.1 +/- 7.3 vs. 34.1 +/- 13.1 months; P < .0001). Groups 1 and 3 had similar fibrosis stages (3.1 +/- 2 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.4), rates of fibrosis progression (0.13 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.11 per year), and necroinflammatory scores (6.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 6.1 +/- 2.0). Groups 2 and 4 had significantly more-advanced liver disease, as determined by fibrosis stage (4.6 +/- 1.8 vs. 4.3 +/- 2.0; P < .0009), rate of fibrosis progression (0.24 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.10 per year; P < .0001), and prevalence of cirrhosis (68% vs. 55%; P < .006), compared with group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

HIC-HCV-coinfected subjects who receive HAART as their sole form of therapy have liver histology findings comparable to those for HCV-monoinfected patients. A similar degree of benefit is not observed for HIV-HCV-coinfected patients who receive no therapy, NRTIs, or HAART after NRTIs, despite having a longer duration of therapy.

Drug interactions between psychoactive substances and antiretroviral therapy in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency and hepatitis viruses

The liver disease characteristic of alcohol dependence encompasses three main related entities: steatosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis. Alcoholic cirrhosis is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Alcohol intake among injecting drug users is a major contributor to transmission of viral infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C viruses (HCV). HIV and HCV coinfected patients develop liver diseases earlier and more severely than the monoinfected individuals, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Interactions exist between the therapeutic drugs used to minimize and control the drug and alcohol dependence. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions occur between the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and alcohol, different HAART components and methadone, or each one of the therapies with the other, thus contributing to a higher toxicity level. With the evolution of effective antiretroviral therapy, survival of persons with HIV, and the syndrome it causes, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) has increased dramatically. Drug-drug interactions may appear between alcohol and anti-HBV or anti-HCV, therapy in the presence or absence of anti-HIV therapy. Several other medical-, social-, and drug-related factors of this population have to be considered when providing HAART. Because many coinfected patients also have problems with substance use, dealing with their drug dependence is an important first step in an attempt to improve adherence to and tolerance of antiviral therapy. It is necessary to minimize the risk of liver disease acceleration and/or reinfection with hepatitis viruses. Knowledge of potential drug interactions between methadone, antiretroviral therapy, psychoactive drugs, and antipsychotics and the role of coinfection with HBV or HCV and the drugs used in eradicating viral hepatitis permits suitable antiretroviral combinations.

HIV coinfection shortens the survival of patients with hepatitis C virus-related decompensated cirrhosis

The impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection on the survival of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is unknown. Because HIV infection is no longer considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation in some countries, it has become a priority to address this topic. The objective of this study was to compare the survival of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HCV. In a retrospective cohort study, the survival of 1,037 HCV monoinfected and 180 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis after the first hepatic decompensation was analyzed. Of the group, 386 (37%) HCV-monoinfected and 100 (56%) HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects died during the follow-up. The median survival time of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients was 16 and 48 months, respectively (P < .001). The relative risk (95% CI) of death for HIV-infected patients was 2.26 (1.51-3.38). Other independent predictors of survival were age older than 63 years (2.25 [1.53-3.31]); Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B versus class A (1.95 [1.41-2.68]) and class C versus class A (2.78 [1.66-4.70]); hepatitis D virus infection (1.56 [1.12-4.77]); model for end-stage liver disease score, (1.05 [1.01-1-11]); more than one simultaneous decompensation (1.23 [1.12-3.33]); and the type of the first hepatic decompensation, with a poorer prognosis associated with encephalopathy compared with portal hypertensive gastrointestinal bleeding (2.03 [1.26-3.10]). In conclusion, HIV coinfection reduces considerably the survival of patients with HCV-related ESLD independently of other markers of poor prognosis. This fact must be taken into account to establish the adequate timing of liver transplantation in HIV-coinfected subjects.

Hepatitis C in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus. A review and experience of a Brazilian ambulatory

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) share the same transmission mechanisms. The prevalence of HCV in the HIV-infected population varies from region to region, throughout the world, depending on different exposure factors to both viruses. Co-infection with HIV accelerates the progression of the disease caused by HCV, appears to worsen the progression of the HIV infection and increases HCV transmission. Therefore, clinical management and treatment of HCV is a priority in medical facilities that receive HIV-infected patients. Clinical management of these patients involves specific diagnostic procedures and appropriately trained medical staff. The indication of treatment should meet specific clinical and laboratory criteria. There are a number of drugs currently available to treat hepatitis C in co-infected patients.

HBV and HCV prevalence and viraemia in HIV-positive and HIV-negative pregnant women in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: the ANRS 1236 study

A retrospective survey estimating the prevalence of hepatitis viruses B (HBV) and C (HCV) was conducted on samples taken in 1,002 African pregnant women (501 diagnosed as HIV-1 positive and 501 HIV-1 negative) participating in a clinical trial program conducted in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire (West Africa). Hepatitis B markers studied were HBs antigen (HBsAg), and if positive, HBe antigen/anti-HBe antibodies and HBV DNA. Two third generation (G3) HCV enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were used for primary HCV screening. All anti-HCV antibody-positive sera were assessed further with supplementary assays (one another G3 EIA, RIBA 3.0, and HCV RNA). HCV genotypes were also determined. HBsAg was found in a similar proportion among HIV-positive (45/499, 9.0%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.6-11.9) and HIV-negative (40/498, 8.0%, 95% CI, 5.8-10.8) women (P = 0.58). The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B, based on HBV DNA positive results, was more frequent in HIV-positive women (26.7%), compared to HIV-negative women (9.4%) (P = 0.06). In the case of hepatitis C infection, after supplementary testing allowing the elimination of frequent false-positive screening results, a prevalence rate of about 1% was found, both in HIV-positive (6/501, 1.2%, 95% CI, 0.44-2.59) and HIV-negative (4/501, 0.8%, 95% CI, 0.22-2.03) women (P = 0.53). Of the 10 samples confirmed positive and assessed for HCV RNA, eight (80%) were viraemic and belonged to HCV genotypes 1 or 2. The relative high frequency of HIV/HBV coinfection in Côte d'Ivoire emphasises the need for monitoring the risk of hepatotoxicity by antiretroviral therapy in such patients. We propose an accurate and cost-efficient algorithm for HCV diagnosis in Africa.

Integrating hepatitis C services into existing HIV services: the experiences of a sample of U.S. drug treatment units

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most prevalent blood-borne infectious disease in the United States, especially among drug users, and coinfection with HIV is common. Because drug users are often medically underserved, drug treatment units are important sites of opportunity for providing services for these infectious diseases. Given the commonalities in the routes of transmission of HIV and HCV, and the fact that many drug treatment units have established an infrastructure to provide HIV services, some have suggested integrating HCV services into those already established for HIV. Using data collected in a telephone survey with 89 drug treatment units throughout the United States, this paper examines the extent to which drug treatment units have expanded their HIV services to include those for HCV, and the extent to which this expansion was facilitated by having HIV services in place. Overall, a greater proportion of methadone maintenance than drug-free treatment units provided services for HIV and HCV. The majority of units in both modalities that provided HIV- and HCV-related services expanded their HIV service delivery to include similar HCV services, and one third expanded all of their HIV services. A large number of these units, however, indicated that having an HIV service infrastructure did not facilitate this expansion, often because the units wanted to emphasize differences in the two viral infections. Policy makers and individual treatment units need to develop strategies that capitalize on existing infrastructures while maintaining the distinction between HIV and HCV primary and secondary prevention efforts.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients: epidemiological features, clinical presentation and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasing cause of mortality in HIV-seropositive individuals. The aim of the study was to compare the main features of HCC in HIV-seropositive individuals with those in to HIV-negative patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All HIV-infected subjects with a diagnosis of HCC included in three cancer registry databases were enrolled in the study as cases. HCC cases that occurred in the province of Brescia, North Italy, in the period 1995-1998 and all cases reported at the Italian Liver Cancer Project were enrolled as controls. All data were collected using a standardized case report form. The main clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with HCC and their survival were compared between HIV-positive and uninfected subjects.

RESULTS

Forty-one HIV-infected subjects with HCC were identified. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age and sex identified an association between HIV infection and HCV infection [odds ratio (OR), 11; P = 0.005], and infiltrating tumours and/or extranodal metastasis at presentation (OR = 11.8; P < 0.001). HIV infection was independently associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio, 1.63; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

HCC in HIV-infected patients is mainly associated with underlying chronic hepatitis C and has a more aggressive clinical course. Thus, preventative strategies (including the treatment of hepatitis C) should be implemented in the management of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a new era of disease control

The management of chronic viral hepatitis has changed significantly with the availability of effective antiviral agents. There is now a high probability that timely intervention can arrest development of cirrhosis, thereby preventing mortality from portal hypertension, liver failure and liver cancer. This two-part review discusses the implications of this new era of antiviral therapy for physicians. The present review is about chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV); a similar review that considers the treatment of hepatitis B virus will be published in a later issue of the Internal Medicine Journal. Chronic HCV infection is common, but fibrotic progression of liver disease is slow and variable; many infected persons never develop cirrhosis. Case selection for antiviral therapy is crucial. The most effective therapy is a pegylated (long-acting) interferon with ribavirin. Sustained viral response (SVR) (absent viraemia 6 months after completing treatment) can be obtained in 40-60% of individuals infected with genotype 1 and in approximately 67% with genotype 4 after 12 months of treatment. Response rates are higher (75-85%) with genotypes 2 and 3 after only 6 months of treatment. Late relapse is negligible after SVR. This viral cure reverses hepatic fibrosis, reduces the risk of liver failure and of hepato-cellular carcinoma. Combination therapy requires a supportive setting to minimize the impact of side-effects and maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Overall management of HCV-infected persons must also embrace measures to improve quality of life by preventing or dealing with psychosocial issues and advocating lifestyle changes to counter comorbidity from alcohol, central obesity and insulin resistance. These latter factors favour fibrotic disease progression, complications of cirrhosis (such as hepatocellular carcinoma) and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as eroding the chances of SVR with antiviral therapy.

[Chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients. Study of 55 cases with liver biopsy]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To study the evolution of chronic hepatitis in HIV-HCV co-infected patients and the factors conditioning this evolution.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

55 intravenous drug users with HIV-HCV co-infection were studied. We performed a clinical and laboratory study determining the age at the time of HCV infection and the date of liver biopsy, HIV stage, CD4 cell count, viral load, and time under antiretroviral treatment. Moreover, we analyzed the HCV genotype, HCV viral load, ALT plasmatic level, and liver biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were made.

RESULTS

55 patients with HIV-HCV co-infection were evaluated. In the multivariate analysis, gender (p = 0.034; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.306-1082.625), lowest level of CD4+ lymphocytes (p = 0.021; 95% CI, 1,693-653,484) and highest viral load value (p = 0.022; 95% CI, 1366-53,817) were significantly correlated with liver disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Both a male sex and a poor immune system situation are associated with a worse evolution of chronic hepatitis C.

Treatment of the hepatitis C virus in patients coinfected with HIV

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common among individuals with HIV, and the progression of liver disease is accelerated in coinfected individuals compared with those with HCV alone. HCV coinfection also can decrease tolerability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, the presence of HCV appears to increase morbidity and mortality in these individuals, and as such the management of both HCV and HIV in coinfected individuals requires careful consideration. Although coinfected patients should be considered for HCV therapy, the limited information to date indicates a lower rate of virologic response with current HCV therapies. Moreover, interactions between HCV and HIV antiviral medications may occur and potentially affect treatment efficacy. Thus, the decision to undertake HCV treatment must be individualized.

Pegylated interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus-co-infected non-responders and relapsers to IFN-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFN-alpha) and ribavirin is the most effective available treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Its role in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients who have failed IFN-based therapy is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of this therapy in HIV/HCV-co-infected non-responders and relapsers.

DESIGN

An open-label cohort study of 32 non-responders and relapsers to IFN (with or without ribavirin). Patients were treated for 48 weeks with PEG-IFN-alpha 2b and ribavirin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A sustained virological response (SVR) defined as a negative HCV-RNA level 24 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 40 years; 78% were men, 67% had genotype 1, and 36% had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. The majority had a CD4 cell count greater than 200 cells/microl (97%) and an undetectable HIV-RNA level (81%). Fifteen patients (47%) withdrew because of adverse events, predominantly neuropsychiatric. In an intention-to-treat analysis, a SVR was observed in five patients (16%); 9% with genotype 1 versus 29% with genotype 3 and 33% with genotype 4 (P = NS). Additional, but statistically non-significant, univariate predictors of response were lower serum HCV-RNA (P = 0.07) and higher alanine aminotransferase levels (P = 0.055) at baseline. No patient with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis responded. Treatment had a minimal impact on HIV parameters.

CONCLUSION

PEG-IFN-alpha 2b and ribavirin is a potentially useful therapy in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients who have failed standard IFN-based regimens. Strategies to improve adherence are vital so as to maximize long-term response rates.