Standardization of nomenclature and causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury: summary of a clinical research workshop

Development of a nomogram to predict in-ICU mortality of elderly patients with sepsis-associated liver injury: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

Background

Sepsis-associated liver injury (SALI) is a frequent and lethal complication among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite its significance, there has been a notable lack of specialized tools for evaluating the in-ICU mortality risk in these patients. This study seeks to address this gap by developing a practical nomogram to predict risk factors associated with in-ICU mortality in patients suffering from SALI.

Methods

Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database, a Critical Care Public Medical Information Mart. The diagnostic criteria for sepsis adhered to the Sepsis 3.0 guidelines, requiring a SOFA score of ≥ 2. SALI was defined as total bilirubin (TBIL) levels > 2 mg/dL in patients with sepsis and an International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 1.5. Lasso regression analyses were conducted on the training set (n = 653) to develop a predictive nomogram model. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate model discrimination. Model calibration was assessed through calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests. Clinical decision curves were plotted to analyze the net benefit of the model and evaluate its clinical applicability.

Results

A total of 934 elderly patients with SALI were included in the study. Random seeds were allocated in a 7:3 ratio, resulting in training and validation sets comprising 653 and 281 patients, respectively. Variables were selected using lasso regression, culminating in the inclusion of six final variables within the model. The nomogram was evaluated against standard ICU scoring systems, specifically SAPS II and SOFA scores, yielding AUROC values of 0.814, 0.798, and 0.634 for the training set, respectively. Conversely, the validation set demonstrated AUROC values of 0.809, 0.791, and 0.596. The nomogram exhibited strong predictive performance for in-ICU outcomes. P-values from the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for both training and validation sets were recorded at 0.627 and 0.486, respectively, indicating good fit quality. Decision curve analysis revealed that the nomogram consistently provides greater net benefits compared to SAPS II and SOFA scores.

Conclusion

A prediction model of in-ICU mortality in SALI elderly patients was established by screening variables through lasso regression. Nomgram was the best predictor of in-ICU mortality in SALI patients, which has a high reference value and clinical application.

Clinical guidance for cannabidiol-associated hepatotoxicity: A narrative review

There is increasing evidence that cannabidiol (CBD) use is associated with clinically significant liver enzyme (LE) elevations and drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The proportion of LE elevations and DILI events reported in the literature meet the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' (CIOMS) classification of a common adverse drug reaction. However, these potential adverse events are unknown to many clinicians and may be overlooked. The increasing use of CBD for both medical and non-medical use necessitates clear direction in the diagnosis and management of CBD-associated hepatotoxicity. To our knowledge, no such clinical guidance currently exists. For people presenting with elevated LEs, CBD use should be screened for and be considered in the differential diagnosis. This narrative review will provide clinicians with guidance in the prevention, detection, and management of CBD-related hepatotoxicity.

Drug-induced liver injury related to gene therapy: A new challenge to be managed

Gene therapy is being successfully developed for the treatment of several genetic disorders. Various methods of gene transfer have been developed to enable the production of the deficient enzyme or protein. One of the most important is adeno-associated virus vectors, which have been shown to be viable for use in in vivo gene therapy. Several gene therapies have already been approved. They are also promising for acquired diseases. Important examples include gene therapy for haemophilia A and B, X-linked myotubular myopathy, spinal muscular atrophy and several liver diseases such as Criggler-Najjar disease, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and Fabry disease. However, the introduction of a foreign compound into hepatocytes leads to hepatic reactions with heterogeneous phenotypic expression and a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from mild transaminase elevation to acute liver failure. Several mechanisms appear to be involved in liver injury, including an immune response, but also direct toxicity depending on the method of gene transfer. As a result, the incidence, expression and severity of liver injury vary from indication to indication and from patient to patient. Patients treated for haemophilia A are more prone to transaminase elevation than those treated for haemophilia B. Corticosteroids are successfully used to correct liver reactions but also to prevent degradation of the transferred gene and loss of therapeutic activity. The aim of this review is to describe the risk of liver injury according to the indication for gene therapy and the short- and long-term management currently proposed to prevent or correct liver reactions in clinical practice.

Propensity score matching-based analysis of the effect of corticosteroids in treating severe drug-induced liver injury

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is no conventional treatment for patients with severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) except for discontinuation of liver injury drugs and symptomatic supportive therapy. Opinions on whether corticosteroids can be used to treat severe DILI are conflicting, and most of the relevant clinical studies are case reports or retrospective studies, which still need to be supported by high-level evidence-based medical studies. This study aimed to evaluate the effect and tolerance of corticosteroids in patients with severe DILI. Risk factors associated with patient failure to cure were also explored.

METHODS

Propensity score matching based on nearest-neighbor 1:1 matching was used to screen severe DILI patients in the corticosteroids and control groups. Severe DILI was defined as elevated serum ALT and/or ALP with TBIL≥5 ULN (5 mg/dL or 85.5 μmol/L) with or without INR ≥1.5. Patients were treated with conventional therapy combined with corticosteroids in the corticosteroids group and only conventional therapy in the control group.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients, 73 each in the corticosteroids and control groups, were included in this study. By analyzing the entire cohort, we found no significant difference in cure rates between patients in the corticosteroid group and control group (34.2% vs. 20.5 %, p = 0.095), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the two groups (20.5% vs. 20.5 %, p = 1.000). However, TBIL decreased more in the corticosteroids group on day 7 (89.2 ± 107.6 μmol/L vs. 58.8 ± 70.7 μmol/L, p = 0.046). In subgroup analyses, patients whose TBIL remained elevated despite conventional treatment had a higher TBIL decline on day 7,14 after use of corticosteroid (99.2 ± 98.5μmol/L vs. -23.3 ± 50.4μmol/L, p < 0.001; 120 ± 119.1μmol/L vs. 61.2 ± 98.5μmol/L, p = 0.047). The cure rate of patients in the corticosteroid group was significantly higher than that of the control group (36.1 % versus 4.5 %, p = 0.016). The proportion of patients with TBIL <85.5 μmol/L was also significantly higher in the corticosteroid group than in the control group at day 7 (p = 0.016) and day 14 (p = 0.004) after treatment. In the subgroup analysis of patients with different clinical phenotypes, the causative agent was herbal, autoimmune antibody-positive and 40 % < PTA ≤ 50 % of patients, corticosteroid use did not increase the cure rate of the patients. Univariate and multifactorial analyses found corticosteroid use to be a protective factor for failure to cure in patients with severe DILI (p < 0.001, OR:0.191,95 % CI:0.072-0.470), and peak TBIL to be a risk factor (p = 0.003, OR:1.016,95 % CI:1.007-1.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of corticosteroids could not increase the cure rate in patients with severe DILI, but it could rapidly reduce the patient's TBIL at an earlier stage. Corticosteroids could also promote curing in patients with elevated TBIL after conventional treatment. Corticosteroid use was a protective factor for failure to cure in patients with severe DILI and peak TBIL was a risk factor.

Exploration of the clinical characteristics and potential mechanisms of liver injury induced by proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data related to clinical characteristics and potential mechanisms of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)-related liver injury are sparse, thus the purpose of this study is to summarize the clinical features and molecular mechanisms of PPIs-induced liver injury.

METHODS

We collected case report on liver injury induced by PPIs in English and Chinese for retrospective analysis. Clinical and pathological data and outcomes were obtained and analyzed. Network pharmacology and molecular docking techniques were employed to examine the mechanism.

RESULT

Twenty-three patients with PPIs-induced liver injury were enrolled. PPIs-induced liver injury is a rare adverse reaction, ranging from asymptomatic elevated transaminases to fulminant liver failure. Omeprazole was the drug with the highest number of associated reports. The most common symptom was fatigue. The most common liver injury pattern was hepatocellular injury. A total of 13 intersection targets of PPIs and liver injury were screened, and the top 10 targets were included, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was significantly enriched. The results of molecular docking implied that the PPIs could combine well with key targets.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving long-term treatment with PPIs should consider monitoring liver function. PPIs exhibit considerable capacity in liver injury via especially the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway.

AIBP protects drug-induced liver injury by inhibiting MAPK-mediated NR4A1 expression

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. AIBP is a binding protein of apolipoprotein AI involved in lipid metabolism and maintenance of oxidative respiration in mitochondria, but its role in DILI is unclear. By constructing AIBP knockout mice, overexpressing and knocking down AIBP in cell lines, we established animal and cell models of DILI. Using western blotting and real-time qPCR assay, we explored the influence of AIBP in activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signal pathways and possible targets. AIBP was downregulated during hepatocyte injury. AIBP deficient mice develop severe liver injury and more sensitive to drug-induced cell death. Overexpression of AIBP protects cells under APAP treatment. Furthermore, AIBP inhibits the activation of MAPK pathways, through which AIBP regulates NR4A1. These results suggest that AIBP is expected to become a valuable biomarker and therapeutic target in liver injury.

Bavachinin, a main compound of Psoraleae Fructus, facilitates GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis and causes hepatotoxicity in mice

Psoraleae Fructus (PF, Psoralea corylifolia L.), a traditional medicine with a long history of application, is widely used clinically for the treatment of various diseases. However, the reports of PF-related adverse reactions, such as hepatotoxicity, phototoxic dermatitis, and allergy, are increasing year by year, with liver injury being the mostly common. Our previous studies have demonstrated that PF and its preparations can cause liver injury in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated susceptibility mouse model, but the mechanism of PF-related liver injury is unclear. In this study, we showed that PF and bavachinin, a major component of PF, can directly induce the expression of caspase-1 and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), indicating that PF and bavachinin can directly triggered the activation of inflammasome. Furthermore, pretreatment with NLR family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3), NLR family CARD domain containing 4 (NLRC4) or absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasome inhibitors, containing MCC950, ODN TTAGGG (ODN) and carnosol, all significantly reversed bavachinin-induced inflammasome activation. Mechanistically, bavachinin dose-dependently promote Gasdermin D (GSDMD) post-shear activation and then induce mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) production and this effect is markedly inhibited by pretreatment with N-Acetylcysteine amide (NAC). In addition, combination treatment of LPS and bavachinin significantly induced liver injury in mice, but not LPS or bavachinin alone, and transcriptome analysis further validated these results. Thus, PF and bavachinin can induce the activation of inflammasome by promoting GSDMD cleavage and cause hepatotoxicity in mice. Therefore, PF, bavachinin, and PF-related preparations should be avoided in patients with inflammasome activation-associated diseases.

A High-Throughput Microphysiological Liver Chip System to Model Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using Human Liver Organoids

Background and Aims

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major failure mode in pharmaceutical development. This study aims to address the limitations of existing preclinical models by assessing a high-throughput, microfluidic liver-on-a-chip system, termed "Curio Barrier Liver Chips," and its capacity to recapitulate the effects of chronic hepatotoxic drug treatment through metabolic and phenotypic characterization.

Methods

Curio Barrier liver chips (Curiochips), fabricated in an 8 × 2 well configuration, were utilized to establish three dimensional liver organoid cultures. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells were differentiated into human liver organoids, and their viability, liver-specific functions, and pharmacological responses were assessed over 28 days.

Results

The Curiochips successfully maintained liver physiology and function, showing strong albumin secretion and cytochrome (CYP) P450 activities for 28 days. Unlike traditional models requiring millimolar drug concentrations to detect hepatotoxicity, this platform showed increased sensitivity for acetaminophen and fialuridine at micromolar concentrations. In situ differentiation of foregut spheroids to liver organoids was also achieved, further simplifying the establishment of liver chips. Furthermore, the chips demonstrated viability, function, and DILI responsiveness for 28 days, making this an improved model for studying idiosyncratic DILI with prolonged drug exposure and high-throughput capabilities compared to other available systems or primary human hepatocytes.

Conclusion

The Curiochips offer an advanced, miniaturized in vitro model for early-stage drug development and a sensitive, responsive, and cost-effective means to detect direct hepatotoxicity. Induced pluripotent stem cell liver organoids, in conjunction with the Curiochip, deliver a high-throughput platform with robust functionality and pharmacological responsiveness that make it a promising tool for improving the prediction and understanding of DILI risk prediction, especially with prolonged drug exposure. The model also opens new avenues for research in other chronic liver diseases.

Phytotherapy-Induced Hepatocytotoxicity: A Case Report

Herbal and complementary medicine are frequently integrated with conventional medicine. We aim to report a case of severe herbal-induced liver injury (HILI) due to chronic use of green tea and protein shake. We present both clinical and laboratory evidence implicating mitochondrial toxicity and an immune response leading to a hypersensitivity reaction to the products. We have recently treated a 39-year-old man with hepatotoxicity resulting from a combination of a green tea-containing powder and a branched-chain amino acid supplement that was commenced 2 months previously. The hepatotoxicity resolved by stopping the consumption of these products and no other cause was detected. We decided to perform a lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA) to determine if there was laboratory support for this diagnosis. LTA (% toxicity) represents the response of the mitochondria to toxic injury. To determine the role of the proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the patient's reaction, we measured the level of cytokines and chemokine in the media of growing cells, exposed to each product or to a combination of products. The increased cytokines and chemokines are presented as the x-fold elevations from the upper limit of normal (ULN) for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) (pg/mL × 1.5 ULN) and interleukin (IL)-1β (pg/mL × 1.8 ULN). Higher elevations were found for interferon (IFN)-β, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL 13, IL-15 (pg/mL × 2 ULN), regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted (RANTES) (pg/mL × 2 ULN), and nuclear factor (NFκB) (pg/mL × 3 ULN). The highest increases were for vascular endothelial factor (VEGF) (pg/mL × 10 ULN), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (pg/mL × 13 ULN). An examination of cellular markers showed the difference between programmed cell death (apoptosis) and cell death due to necrosis. In our case, cytokeratin-ccK18 (M-30) U/L was within the normal limits, suggesting that apoptosis was normal, while ccK8(M65) U/L was elevated at 1.5 × ULN. This result implies that upon the treatment of the patient's lymphocytes with the products, the mechanism of toxicity is necrosis. In susceptible individuals, the combination of protein and herbal tea produces mitochondrial toxicity and a strong T-lymphocyte-1 response, leading to HILI. There is a need of international reporting of adverse drug reactions by clinicians, laboratories, and pharmaceutical manufacturers to drug regulatory authorities. This requires internationally accepted standard definitions of reactions, as well as criteria for assessment.

CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced liver injury: Clinical phenotypes and role of corticosteroid treatment

Background & Aims

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are the cornerstone of systemic therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. In the various therapeutic studies with CDK4/6 inhibitors, elevations in liver tests were more frequent than in the control groups. The mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced liver toxicity is not well understood; moreover, natural history and appropriate management are poorly described.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study, collecting cases of CDK4/6 hepatitis from the REFHEPS (Réseau Francophone pour l'étude de l'HEpatotoxicité des Produits de Santé) database.

Results

In this study, we report on 22 cases of hepatitis induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, n = 19 and abemaciclib, n = 3). According to the CTCAE classification, all hepatitis cases were grade 3 or 4. Twelve (54.6%) patients had a liver biopsy showing acute centrilobular hepatitis with foci of necrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate. Nine (40.9%) patients were treated with corticosteroids for resolution of hepatitis. In three cases, another CDK4/6 inhibitor could be resumed after resolution of the hepatitis without recurrence.

Conclusions

CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced hepatitis is poorly described in the literature but there are several arguments pointing out that these drugs should be included in the DI-ALH (drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis) category.

Impact and implications

This study highlights the clinical significance and hepatotoxic risks of CDK4/6 inhibitors, like ribociclib and abemaciclib, in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer treatment. It underscores the necessity for enhanced hepatic monitoring and tailored management strategies, including corticosteroid intervention for unresolved hepatitis post-withdrawal. These findings are crucial for oncologists, hepatologists, and patients, guiding therapeutic decisions and indicating careful liver function monitoring during therapy. The utility of corticosteroids in managing drug-induced hepatitis and the feasibility of resuming CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy post-recovery are notable practical outcomes. Nonetheless, the study's retrospective nature and limited case numbers introduce constraints, underscoring the need for further research to refine our understanding of CDK4/6 inhibitor-associated hepatotoxicity.

A Case Report of Pembrolizumab-Induced Allergic Hepatitis

The immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab is now considered a first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. Pembrolizumab is less toxic than conventional chemotherapy but may result in immune-related adverse events. We report a case in which liver injury occurred just two days after the administration of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. A 48-year-old woman achieved a complete response after chemoradiotherapy for cT2N3bM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with multiple lymph node metastases. However, the tumor recurred one year later, and she was started on pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. On day 3, her alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transaminase concentrations markedly increased. She was initially diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury and all medications were withdrawn. Her liver function recovered within two weeks without intervention. The lymphocyte transformation test was only positive for pembrolizumab. Clinicians should consider pembrolizumab-induced allergic hepatitis as a possible cause of liver injury after excluding liver metastasis and immune-related adverse events.

Comparison of safety and efficacy between Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 infection in patients with advanced kidney disease: a retrospective observational study

Background

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is used in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with normal or mild renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2). There is limited data regarding its use in advanced kidney disease (eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2). We performed a retrospective territory-wide observational study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir when compared with molnupiravir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 with advanced kidney disease.

Methods

We adopted target trial emulation using data from a territory-wide electronic health record database on eligible patients aged ≥18 years with advanced kidney disease (history of eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) who were infected with COVID-19 and were prescribed with either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within five days of infection during the period from 16 March 2022 to 31 December 2022. A sequence trial approach and 1:4 propensity score matching was applied based on the baseline covariates including age, sex, number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hospitalisation, eGFR, renal replacement therapy, comorbidities (cancer, respiratory disease, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, diabetes, hypertension), and drug use (renin-angiotensin-system agents, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, nitrates, lipid lowering agents, insulins, oral antidiabetic drugs, antiplatelets, immuno-suppressants, corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2 receptor antagonists, monoclonal antibody infusion) within past 90 days. Individuals were followed up from the index date until the earliest outcome occurrence, death, 90 days from index date or the end of data availability. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted with baseline covariates was used to compare the risk of outcomes between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients and molnupiravir recipients which include (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) intensive care unit (ICU) admission, (iii) ventilatory support, (iv) hospitalisation, (v) hepatic impairment, (vi) ischaemic stroke, and (vii) myocardial infarction. Subgroup analyses included age (<70; ≥70 years); sex, Charlson comorbidity index (≤5; >5), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received (0-1; ≥2 doses).

Findings

A total of 4886 patients were included (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 1462; molnupiravir: 3424). There were 347 events of all-cause mortality (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 74, 5.06%; molnupiravir: 273, 7.97%), 10 events of ICU admission (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 4, 0.27%; molnupiravir: 6, 0.18%), 48 events of ventilatory support (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 13, 0.89%; molnupiravir: 35, 1.02%), 836 events of hospitalisation (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 218, 23.98%; molnupiravir: 618, 28.14%), 1 event of hepatic impairment (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 0, 0%; molnupiravir: 1, 0.03%), 8 events of ischaemic stroke (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 3, 0.22%; molnupiravir: 5, 0.16%) and 9 events of myocardial infarction (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 2, 0.15%; molnupiravir: 7, 0.22%). Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir users had lower rates of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction (ARR) at 90 days 2.91%, 95% CI: 1.47-4.36%) and hospitalisation (ARR at 90 days 4.16%, 95% CI: 0.81-7.51%) as compared with molnupiravir users. Similar rates of ICU admission (ARR at 90 days -0.09%, 95% CI: -0.4 to 0.2%), ventilatory support (ARR at 90 days 0.13%, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.72%), hepatic impairment (ARR at 90 days 0.03%, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.09%), ischaemic stroke (ARR at 90 days -0.06%, 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.22%), and myocardial infarction (ARR at 90 days 0.07%, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.33%) were found between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir users. Consistent results were observed in relative risk adjusted with baseline characteristics. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.455-0.857) and hospitalisation (HR: 0.782, 95% CI: 0.64-0.954).

Interpretation

Patients with COVID-19 with advanced kidney disease receiving nirmatrelvir-ritonavir had a lower rate of all-cause mortality and hospital admission when compared with molnupiravir. Other adverse clinical outcomes were similar in both treatment groups.

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund (COVID1903010), Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Utility of liver stiffness measurement in the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the role of liver stiffness measurement (LSM), evaluated using transient elastography (TE), for the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)/veno-occlusive disease (VOD), a complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, ultrasonography (US) and LSM were performed on 86 adult patients (55 men and 31 women) undergoing HSCT between January 2016 and December 2022. Characteristics and changes in liver stiffness (LS) were compared between patients with and without SOS/VOD.

RESULTS

Of the 86 patients, 14 were diagnosed with SOS/VOD. A significant increase in LS (ranging from 12.6 to 55.1 kPa, median 23.8 kPa) compared to pre-HSCT values was observed in all patients who developed SOS/VOD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the diagnosis of SOS/VOD was 0.9663 (0.933-0.995) for LS ≥ 17.4 kPa after HSCT. Post-transplant LS exceeded 17.4 kPa in all 14 patients in the SOS/VOD group (100%) and in seven patients in the non-SOS/VOD group (9.7%). The sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 90.3%, respectively. AUROC for the diagnosis of SOS/VOD was 0.973 (0.943-1.000) for LS increase ≥  + 12.6 kPa from baseline after HSCT. The change of ≥  + 12.6 kPa from baseline was observed in all 14 patients in the SOS/VOD group (100%) and in four patients in the non-SOS/VOD group (5.6%). The sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 94.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LSM using TE may contribute to establishing the diagnosis of SOS/VOD after HSCT.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major problem in the United States, commonly leading to hospital admission. Diagnosing DILI is difficult as it is a diagnosis of exclusion requiring a temporal relationship between drug exposure and liver injury and a thorough work up for other causes. In addition, DILI has a very variable clinical and histologic presentation that can mimic many different etiologies of liver disease. Objective scoring systems can assess the probability that a drug caused the liver injury but liver biopsy findings are not part of the criteria used in these systems. This review will address some of the recent updates to the scoring systems and the role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of DILI.

Association of BMI with mortality in drug-induced liver injury

BACKGROUND

To clarify the associations between BMI and the incidences of all-cause death or liver-related death (LRD)/liver transplantation (LT) in drug-induced liver injury (DILI).

METHODS

DILI patients from three hospitals were retrospectively retrieved and follow-up from 2009 to 2021. They were categorized into underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (BMI of 18.5-23.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (BMI of 24-27.9 kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 ) groups. Cox regression models were conducted to reveal the effect of BMI on all-cause death or LRD/LT.

RESULTS

A total of 1469 eligible DILI patients were included: underweight 73 (4.97%), normal weight 811 (55.21%), overweight 473 (32.20%) and obese 112 (7.62%). Eighty-nine patients (6.06%) had all-cause death, of which 66 patients (4.49%) had LRD/LT. The median age was 52 years old, and females were 1039 (70.73%). The associations between BMI and all-cause mortality ( nonlinear test P <  0.01) or liver-related mortality/LT ( nonlinear test P  = 0.01) were J-shaped. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that underweight (HR: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.51-6.02) was significantly associated with all-cause mortality after adjusting for age and sex. Furthermore, obese males were significantly associated with liver-related mortality/LT (HR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.13-10.72) after additional adjustment for serological indices and comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Association between BMI and mortality is a J-shape. The overall mortality was significantly higher in underweight and obese group. Male obesity is independently associated with LRD/LT. These findings indicate that DILI patients with extreme BMI would have a high risk of dismal outcomes, which warrants extra medical care.

Immune-mediated hepatitis: Basic concepts and treatment

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized advanced cancer management. Nevertheless, the generalized use of these medications has led to an increase in the incidence of adverse immune-mediated events and the liver is one of the most frequently affected organs. Liver involvement associated with the administration of immunotherapy is known as immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH), whose incidence and clinical characteristics have been described by different authors. It often presents as mild elevations of amino transferase levels, seen in routine blood tests, that spontaneously return to normal, but it can also manifest as severe transaminitis, possibly leading to the permanent discontinuation of treatment. The aim of the following review was to describe the most up-to-date concepts regarding the epidemiology, diagnosis, risk factors, and progression of IMH, as well as its incidence in different types of common cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment recommendations according to the most current guidelines are also provided.

Industry Review of Best Practices for Risk Management of Drug-Induced Liver Injury from Development to Real-World Use

The relative treatment benefit of a drug for patients during development, marketing authorization review, or after approval includes an assessment of the risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). In this article, the Pharmacovigilance and Risk Mitigation Working Group of the IQ-DILI Initiative launched in June 2016 within the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development presents and reviews three key topics for essential risk management activities to identify, characterize, monitor, mitigate, and communicate DILI risk associated with small molecules during drug development. The three topics are: (1) Current best practices for characterizing the DILI phenotype and the severity and incidence of DILI in the treatment population, including DILI identification, prediction and recovery. (2) Characterization of the relative treatment benefit for patients who will be exposed to a drug and the attendant risk of DILI in conjunction with existing global risk mitigation strategies. (3) Implementation of risk mitigation strategies during drug development highlighting patient factors, healthcare settings and site of product administration, and prescriber and healthcare provider factors. Industry guidance is provided for assessing whether the product labeling is sufficient to minimize the risk of DILI or whether a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) Risk Management Plan (RMP) with additional Risk Minimization Measures (aRMM) is needed.

Marked Hepatotoxicity Associated With Losartan Treatment: A Case Report

Losartan is a widely prescribed angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) used for the management of hypertension and various cardiovascular conditions. While it is generally considered a safe medication, rare cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported in the literature. We present a case of severe hepatic injury and sub-fulminant hepatitis attributed to losartan use in a 54-year-old male patient with underlying hypertension. He presented with a two-week history of abdominal pain, progressive jaundice, dark urine, and vomiting, followed by altered sensorium. His clinical picture, serology, and imaging findings confirmed a severe hepatic injury. After ruling out all possible causes, he was diagnosed with drug-induced hepatotoxicity with losartan treatment. He started improving gradually after losartan discontinuation, N-acetylcysteine administration, and supportive management with close monitoring of liver enzymes. This case report aims to underscore the importance of recognizing losartan as one of the potential causes of hepatotoxicity.

The progress of autoimmune hepatitis research and future challenges

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver inflammatory disease with various immune system manifestations, showing a global trend of increased prevalence. AIH is diagnosed through histological abnormalities, clinical manifestations, and biochemical indicators. The biochemical markers involve interfacial hepatitis, transaminase abnormalities, positive autoantibodies, etc. Although AIH pathogenesis is unclear, gene mutations and immunological factors could be the leading factors. AIH usually presents as a chronic liver disease and sometimes as acute hepatitis, making it challenging to distinguish it from drug-related hepatitis due to similar clinical symptoms. Normalizing transaminases and serum IgG levels is essential in assessing the remission status of AIH treatment. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are the first-line AIH treatment, with lifelong maintenance therapy in some patients. The quality of life and survival can be improved after appropriate treatment. However, certain limitations jeopardize the quality of treatment, including long treatment cycles, side effects, poor patient compliance, and inability to inhibit liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Accurate AIH animal models will help us understand the pathophysiology of the disease while providing fresh perspectives for avoiding and treating AIH. This review will help us understand AIH better, from the cellular and molecular causes to the clinical features, and will provide insight into new therapy techniques with fewer side effects.

Liver injury in children: signal analysis of suspected drugs based on the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Evidence of drug-induced liver injury is abundant in adults but is lacking in children. Our aim was to identify suspected drug signals associated with pediatric liver injury.

METHODS

Hepatic adverse events (HAEs) among children reported in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed to summarize pediatric HAEs, and a disproportionality analysis was conducted by evaluating reporting odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios to detect suspected drugs.

RESULTS

Here, 14,143 pediatric cases were reported, specifically 49.6% in males, 45.1% in females, and 5.2% unknown. Most patients (68.8%) were 6-18 years old. Hospitalization ranked first among definite outcomes (7,207 cases, 37.2%). In total, 264 disproportionate drug signals were identified. The top 10 drugs by the number of reports were paracetamol (1,365; ROR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-3.8), methotrexate (878; ROR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.3-2.7), vincristine (649; ROR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.8-3.3), valproic acid (511; ROR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.9-3.6), cyclophosphamide (490; ROR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.6), tacrolimus (427; ROR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.7), prednisone (416; ROR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.3), prednisolone (401; ROR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.1-2.5), etoposide (378; ROR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.1-2.6), and cytarabine (344; ROR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.5-3.2). After excluding validated hepatotoxic drugs, six were newly detected, specifically acetylcysteine, thiopental, temazepam, nefopam, primaquine, and pyrimethamine.

CONCLUSIONS

The hepatotoxic risk associated with 264 signals needs to be noted in practice. The causality of hepatotoxicity and mechanism among new signals should be verified with preclinical and clinical studies.

Morphologic and molecular analysis of liver injury after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reveals distinct characteristics

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver injury after COVID-19 vaccination is very rare and shows clinical and histomorphological similarities with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Little is known about the pathophysiology of COVID-19 vaccine-induced liver injury (VILI) and its relationship to AIH. Therefore, we compared VILI with AIH.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded liver biopsy samples from patients with VILI (n = 6) and from patients with an initial diagnosis of AIH (n = 9) were included. Both cohorts were compared by histomorphological evaluation, whole-transcriptome and spatial transcriptome sequencing, multiplex immunofluorescence, and immune repertoire sequencing.

RESULTS

Histomorphology was similar in both cohorts but showed more pronounced centrilobular necrosis in VILI. Gene expression profiling showed that mitochondrial metabolism and oxidative stress-related pathways were more and interferon response pathways were less enriched in VILI. Multiplex analysis revealed that inflammation in VILI was dominated by CD8+ effector T cells, similar to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis. In contrast, AIH showed a dominance of CD4+ effector T cells and CD79a+ B and plasma cells. T-cell receptor (TCR) and B-cell receptor sequencing showed that T and B cell clones were more dominant in VILI than in AIH. In addition, many T cell clones detected in the liver were also found in the blood. Interestingly, analysis of TCR beta chain and Ig heavy chain variable-joining gene usage further showed that TRBV6-1, TRBV5-1, TRBV7-6, and IgHV1-24 genes are used differently in VILI than in AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses support that SARS-CoV-2 VILI is related to AIH but also shows distinct differences from AIH in histomorphology, pathway activation, cellular immune infiltrates, and TCR usage. Therefore, VILI may be a separate entity, which is distinct from AIH and more closely related to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Little is known about the pathophysiology of COVID-19 vaccine-induced liver injury (VILI). Our analysis shows that COVID-19 VILI shares some similarities with autoimmune hepatitis, but also has distinct differences such as increased activation of metabolic pathways, a more prominent CD8+ T cell infiltrate, and an oligoclonal T and B cell response. Our findings suggest that VILI is a distinct disease entity. Therefore, there is a good chance that many patients with COVID-19 VILI will recover completely and will not develop long-term autoimmune hepatitis.

Hepatotoxicity from high-dose methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphoma

Background

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is a mainstay of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) treatment. Transient hepatotoxicity from HDMTX has been characterized in pediatric patients but not in adults. We sought to characterize hepatotoxicity in adult PCNSL patients undergoing HDMTX treatment.

Methods

Retrospective study of 65 PCNSL patients treated at the University of Virginia from 02/01/2002 to 04/01/2020 was performed. Hepatotoxicity was defined using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) for adverse events, fifth version. High-grade hepatotoxicity was defined as a bilirubin or aminotransferase CTC grade of 3 or 4. Relationships between clinical factors and hepatotoxicity were assessed with logistic regression.

Results

Most patients (90.8%) had a rise of at least one aminotransferase CTC grade during HDMTX treatment. 46.2% had high-grade hepatotoxicity based on aminotransferase CTC grade. No patients developed high-grade bilirubin CTC grades during chemotherapy. Liver enzyme test values decreased to low CTC grade or normal in 93.8% of patients after the conclusion of HDMTX treatment without treatment regimen changes. Prior ALT elevation (P = .0120) was a statistically significant predictor of high-grade hepatotoxicity during treatment. Prior history of hypertension was associated with increased risk of toxic serum methotrexate levels during any cycle (P = .0036).

Conclusions

Hepatotoxicity develops in the majority of HDMTX-treated PCNSL patients. Transaminase values decreased to low or normal CTC grades in almost all patients after treatment, without modification of MTX dosage. Prior ALT elevation may predict patients' increased hepatotoxicity risk, and hypertension history may be a risk factor for delayed MTX excretion.

Mapping the incidence of drug-induced liver injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an increasing etiology of liver dysfunction, with various incidence worldwide. To better understand the disease burden and establish appropriate preventive and treatment strategies, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the incidence of DILI published up to June 1, 2022. According to the predefined criteria, only population-based studies were included. Incidence was presented as cases per 100 000 person-years with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included. The overall incidence of DILI was 4.94 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 4.05-5.83). Time-based cumulative meta-analysis suggested that the incidence of DILI increased over time since 2010. The incidence varied by regions, with Asia having the highest incidence of 17.82 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 6.26-29.38), while North America having the lowest incidence of 1.72 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 0.48-2.95). All studies reported a higher incidence of DILI in the elderly but comparable incidences between male and female (3.42 per 100 000 person-years vs 4.64 per 100 000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

The global incidence of DILI has been increasing since 2010, with the highest incidence in Asia. Understanding the epidemiological characteristics of DILI helps establish specific strategies to deal with this emerging health problems.

A human liver organoid screening platform for DILI risk prediction

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), both intrinsic and idiosyncratic, causes frequent morbidity, mortality, clinical trial failures and post-approval withdrawal. This suggests an unmet need for improved in vitro models for DILI risk prediction that can account for diverse host genetics and other clinical factors. In this study, we evaluated the utility of human liver organoids (HLOs) for high-throughput DILI risk prediction and in an organ-on-chip system.

METHODS

HLOs were derived from three separate iPSC lines and benchmarked on two platforms for their ability to model in vitro liver function and identify hepatotoxic compounds using biochemical assays for albumin, ALT, AST, microscopy-based morphological profiling, and single-cell transcriptomics: i) HLOs dispersed in 384-well-formatted plates and exposed to a library of compounds; ii) HLOs adapted to a liver-on-chip system.

RESULTS

Dispersed HLOs derived from the three iPSC lines had similar DILI predictive capacity as intact HLOs in a high-throughput screening format, allowing for measurable IC50 values of compound cytotoxicity. Distinct morphological differences were observed in cells treated with drugs exerting differing mechanisms of toxicity. On-chip HLOs significantly increased albumin production, CYP450 expression, and ALT/AST release when treated with known hepatoxic drugs compared to dispersed HLOs and primary human hepatocytes. On-chip HLOs were able to predict the synergistic hepatotoxicity of tenofovir-inarigivir and displayed steatosis and mitochondrial perturbation, via phenotypic and transcriptomic analysis, on exposure to fialuridine and acetaminophen, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-throughput and liver-on-chip systems exhibit enhanced in vivo-like functions and demonstrate the potential utility of these platforms for DILI risk assessment. Tenofovir-inarigivr-associated hepatotoxicity was observed and correlates with the clinical manifestation of DILI observed in patients.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Idiosyncratic (spontaneous, patient-specific) drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is difficult to study due to the lack of liver models that function as human liver tissue and are adaptable for large-scale drug screening. Human liver organoids grown from patient stem cells respond to known DILI-causing drugs in both a high-throughput and on a physiological "chip" culture system. These platforms show promise for researchers in their use as predictive models for novel drugs before entering clinical trials and as a potential in vitro diagnostic tool. Our findings support further development of patient-derived liver organoid lines and their use in the context of DILI research.

Clinical Pattern of Tolvaptan-Associated Liver Injury in Trial Participants With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD): An Analysis of Pivotal Clinical Trials

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Tolvaptan is associated with risk of drug-induced liver injury when used to treat autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). After this risk was described based on the clinical trials TEMPO 3:4 and TEMPO 4:4, additional data from the REPRISE trial and a long-term extension of TEMPO 4:4, REPRISE, and other tolvaptan trials in ADPKD have become available. To further characterize the hepatic safety profile of tolvaptan, an analysis of the expanded dataset was conducted.

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of safety data from prospective clinical trials of tolvaptan.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter clinical trials including more than 2,900 tolvaptan-treated participants, more than 2,300 with at least 18 months of drug exposure.

INTERVENTION

Tolvaptan administered twice daily in split-dose regimens.

OUTCOMES

Frequency of liver enzyme level increases detected by regular laboratory monitoring.

RESULTS

In the placebo-controlled REPRISE trial, more tolvaptan- than placebo-treated participants (38 of 681 [5.6%] vs 8 of 685 [1.2%]) experienced alanine aminotransferase level increases to >3× the upper limit of normal (ULN), similar to TEMPO 3:4 (40 of 957 [4.4%] vs 5 of 484 [1.0%]). No participant in REPRISE or the long-term extension experienced concurrent alanine aminotransferase level increases to >3× ULN and total bilirubin increases to >2× ULN ("Hy's Law" laboratory criteria). Based on the expanded dataset, liver enzyme increases most often occurred within 18 months after tolvaptan initiation and were less frequent thereafter. Increased levels returned to normal or near normal after treatment interruption or discontinuation. Thirty-eight patients were rechallenged with tolvaptan after the initial drug-induced liver injury episode, with return of liver enzyme level increases in 30; 1 additional participant showed a clinical "adaptation" after the initial episode, with resolution of the enzyme level increases despite continuation of tolvaptan.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of Hy's Law cases in REPRISE and the long-term extension trial support monthly liver enzyme monitoring during the first 18 months of tolvaptan exposure and every 3 months thereafter to detect and manage enzyme level increases, as is recommended on the drug label.

FUNDING

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trials included in the dataset were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study numbers NCT00428948 (TEMPO 3:4), NCT01214421 (TEMPO 4:4), NCT02160145 (REPRISE), and NCT02251275 (long-term extension).

Hepatobiliary disease after bone marrow transplant

INTRODUCTION

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the standard treatment for several hematologic pathologies. Post-BMT patients may develop hepatobiliary complications that impact morbidity and mortality. The differential diagnosis may include drug-induced liver injury (DILI), sepsis-associated liver injury (SALI), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), viral hepatitis, ischemic and fulminant hepatitis, among others.

AREA COVERED

Defining the etiology of hepatobiliary injury is challenging due to the overlapping symptoms. Thus, it is necessary to be aware of and understand the clinical characteristics of these hepatobiliary complications and provide adequate management with possible better outcomes. We reviewed the scientific literature focused on early hepatobiliary complications associated with BMT. We searched the PubMed database using the following descriptors: hepatic complications, drug-induced liver disease, graft-versus-host disease, cholestasis, sepsis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, cytomegalovirus, viral hepatitis, bone marrow transplantation, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

Post-BMT hepatobiliary complications comprise several differential diagnoses and are challenges for the hepatologist's clinical practice. When evaluating these patients, it is necessary to consider the temporality between the use of certain medications, the increase in liver enzymes, and the presence of infection, in addition to applying diagnostic criteria and complementary tests for a specific diagnosis.

Hepatotoxicity of Drugs Used in Multiple Sclerosis, Diagnostic Challenge, and the Role of HLA Genotype Susceptibility

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and the association with other autoimmune diseases is well-documented. There are many therapeutic options for the treatment of MS. Most of the available drugs cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to variable extents with heterogeneous clinical and biological manifestations, including liver injury with or without signs of hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The diagnosis of DILI may be particularly difficult because MS is frequently associated with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis. Recent advances suggest that MS and immune-mediated DILI could be promoted by genetic factors, including HLA genotype. In addition, some of these drugs may promote hepatitis B virus reactivation. This review explores the potential hepatotoxicity of drugs used to treat MS and the criteria to distinguish DILI from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis associated with MS. The role of susceptible genes both promoting MS and causing the hepatotoxicity of the drug used for MS treatment is also discussed.

Severe Drug-Induced Liver Injury From Over-the-Counter Medication

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is difficult to diagnose as it presents with a wide variety of clinical manifestations and there is no established specific biomarker. However, clinicians require expertise in diagnosing DILI as it can lead to critical illness, is relatively common, and can be caused by a variety of drugs, herbal medicines, and supplements. A 67-year-old male was admitted to the hospital with a fever, jaundice, and fatigue. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed no morphological abnormalities in the hepatobiliary system. On the third day of hospitalization, the liver damage and acute kidney injury progressed, and the patient was transferred to our intensive care unit. To further investigate the cause of multiple organ damage, the patient underwent repeated history taking and additional laboratory testing. In addition to the common causes of hepatic and renal damage, we also tested for rickettsiosis and leptospirosis, as the patient reported partaking regularly in outdoor leisure activities. On day seven of hospitalization, the patient recalled taking over-the-counter herbal flu medications approximately five days prior to admission; therefore, we suspected DILI and performed a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST). The DLST was positive for one drug. As other causes had been ruled out, the patient was diagnosed with severe DILI. The clinical course of the patient was observed with the patient's laboratory data and fever improving spontaneously. This case taught us several important lessons for the investigation of liver injury. Firstly, even with over-the-counter drugs, liver injury can be severe. Secondly, while the DLST is available for investigating DILI, false positives, especially for medicinal herbs, should be noted, and it is necessary to adequately rule out other diseases. Finally, when the cause of liver injury is unclear, patient history taking should be repeated carefully.

Histological and serological features of acute liver injury after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver injury with autoimmune features after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is increasingly reported. We investigated a large international cohort of individuals with acute hepatitis arising after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, focusing on histological and serological features.

METHODS

Individuals without known pre-existing liver diseases and transaminase levels ≥5x the upper limit of normal within 3 months after any anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and available liver biopsy were included. Fifty-nine patients were recruited; 35 females; median age 54 years. They were exposed to various combinations of mRNA, vectorial, inactivated and protein-based vaccines.

RESULTS

Liver histology showed predominantly lobular hepatitis in 45 (76%), predominantly portal hepatitis in 10 (17%), and other patterns in four (7%) cases; seven had fibrosis Ishak stage ≥3, associated with more severe interface hepatitis. Autoimmune serology, centrally tested in 31 cases, showed anti-antinuclear antibody in 23 (74%), anti-smooth muscle antibody in 19 (61%), anti-gastric parietal cells in eight (26%), anti-liver kidney microsomal antibody in four (13%), and anti-mitochondrial antibody in four (13%) cases. Ninety-one percent were treated with steroids ± azathioprine. Serum transaminase levels improved in all cases and were normal in 24/58 (41%) after 3 months, and in 30/46 (65%) after 6 months. One patient required liver transplantation. Of 15 patients re-exposed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, three relapsed.

CONCLUSION

Acute liver injury arising after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is frequently associated with lobular hepatitis and positive autoantibodies. Whether there is a causal relationship between liver damage and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines remains to be established. A close follow-up is warranted to assess the long-term outcomes of this condition.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Cases of liver injury after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been published. We investigated a large international cohort of individuals with acute hepatitis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, focusing on liver biopsy findings and autoantibodies: liver biopsy frequently shows inflammation of the lobule, which is typical of recent injury, and autoantibodies are frequently positive. Whether there is a causal relationship between liver damage and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines remains to be established. Close follow-up is warranted to assess the long-term outcome of this condition.

L-carbocisteine can cause cholestasis with vanishing bile duct syndrome in children: A case report

RATIONALE

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is the acquired progressive destruction and disappearance of intrahepatic interlobular bile ducts in the absence of underlying liver or biliary tract disease, causing chronic cholestasis. Infections, drugs, toxins, malignant diseases, and certain immunological processes are associated with the development of this syndrome. There have been no reports of children developing VBDS as a consequence of the administration of L-carbocisteine.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 9-year-old Japanese girl presented with fever, jaundice, and skin rash. Laboratory investigations revealed elevated levels of serum transaminases, γ-glutamyltransferase, and bilirubin. Histopathological features were consistent with a diagnosis of VBDS. Drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation tests (DLST) were positive for L-carbocisteine.

DIAGNOSIS

VBDS caused by L-carbocisteine.

INTERVENTIONS

Ursodeoxycholic acid and discontinuation of L-carbocisteine.

OUTCOMES

The patient responded to treatment based upon discontinuation of L-carbocisteine and administration of ursodeoxycholic acid. Her transaminase and bilirubin levels were normalized gradually.

LESSONS

Physicians should be aware of the fact that L-carbocisteine can cause cholestasis with VBDS in children.

Incidence of Hepatitis E Infection in American Patients With Suspected Drug-Induced Liver Injury Is Low and Declining: The DILIN Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection rarely causes icteric hepatitis, yet 10%-40% of adult Americans have serological evidence of previous infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, presentation, and outcome of acute and previous HEV infection in a large cohort of patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI).

METHODS

Serum samples from 2012 patients enrolled in the DILI Network were tested for anti-HEV immunoglobulin G (IgG). Those with detectable anti-HEV IgG underwent testing for anti-HEV IgM; those with detectable anti-HEV immunoglobulin m (IgM) were tested for HEV RNA.

RESULTS

Anti-HEV IgG was detected in 407 (20%) patients and associated with increasing subject age and earlier year of enrollment. The median age of seropositive subjects was more than a decade higher than seronegative subjects (59.8 vs 48.7 years). The overall prevalence of anti-HEV declined from 22% (2004-2011) to 18% (2012-2019), suggestive of a cohort effect. The frequency of acute hepatitis E (median ALT = 1231 IU/L) also decreased from 3% (2004-2008) to 1.2% (2009-2013) to 0.6% (2014-2019). These results suggest that acute HEV infection is usually subclinical and was much more frequent in this cohort before 2004.

DISCUSSION

Acute HEV infection accounts for less than 1% of suspected American DILI cases and is more frequent in older men. Previous HEV infection is also most commonly seen in older individuals. Clinicians should consider testing for unsuspected acute HEV infection in older adult patients with acute hepatocellular DILI and jaundice.

Impact of Liver Functions by Repurposed Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment

Liver injury is an important complication that may arise in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is accompanied by a transient increase of transaminases and/or other liver enzymes. Liver function test (LFT) abnormalities generally disappear when the COVID-19 resolves or hepatotoxic drugs are discontinued. The LFT abnormalities are associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), due to the overuse of antimalarials, antivirals, and antimicrobials. Studies have reported varying levels of these liver injuries in COVID-19 patients; however, most involve elevated serum aminotransferases. Hepatic dysfunction is significantly high in patients with severe illness and has poor outcome. Normally, the liver is involved in the metabolism of many drugs, including nucleoside analogs and protease inhibitors, which are currently repurposed to treat COVID-19. In addition to the manifestation of COVID-19, drugs implemented in its treatment may aggravate liver injuries. Thus, DILI should be considered especially in those COVID-19 patients with underlying liver disease. It was unclear whether the elevated liver enzymes have originated from the underlying disease or DILI in this population. Furthermore, it is difficult to establish a direct relationship between a specific drug and liver injury. Another possible effect of liver damage may due to inflammatory cytokine storm in severe COVID-19. Liver injury can change metabolism, excretion, dosing, and expected concentrations of the drugs, which may make it difficult to achieve a therapeutic dose of the drug or increase the risk of adverse effects. These repurposed drugs have shown limited efficacy against the virus and the disease itself; however, they still pose risk of adverse effects. Careful and close monitoring of LFTs in COVID-19 patients can provide early diagnosis of liver injury, and the risk of DILI could be reduced. Also, drug interactions in liver-transplanted patients should always be kept in mind for certain immunosuppressive therapies and their known signs of DILI. Altogether, abnormal LFTs should not be regarded as a contraindication to use COVID-19 experimental therapies if needed under emergent status.

Identification of MRI features associated with injury type, severity, and prognosis in drug-induced liver injury

OBJECTIVES

To identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with injury type, severity, and liver transplantation (LT)/liver-related death (LRD) in drug-induced liver injury (DILI).

METHODS

The eligible DILI patients (2016 to 2020) who underwent contrast abdominal MRI within 3 months of onset were retrospectively analysed at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. The MRI features independently associated with severity and prognosis were identified by backwards logistic regression. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are given.

RESULTS

The median age of 180 patients was 55.5 years, with 126 (70.0%) women. The injury types included hepatocellular (135 cases, 75.0%), mixed (23, 12.8%), and cholestatic (22, 12.2%). The proportion of periportal oedema in patients with hepatocellular and mixed injury was significantly higher than that in cholestatic injury (62.2%, 47.8% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001). For severity, 157 (87.2%) patients had mild to moderate injury, and 23 (12.8%) had severe to fatal/LT. Irregularity of the liver surface (6.56 (95% CI, 1.27-22.84)), transient hepatic attenuation difference (THAD) (3.27 (95% CI, 1.14-9.36)), and splenomegaly (5.86 (95% CI, 1.96-17.53)) were independently associated with severity. Eight (4.4%) patients died/underwent LT. THAD (8.89 (95% CI, 1.35-58.43)), and ascites (64.63 (95% CI, 6.93-602.40)) were independently associated with LT/LRD. The prediction of the new model employing THAD and ascites for LT/LRD within 1 year was 0.959 (95% CI, 0.917-1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Periportal oedema was associated with the type of injury. Irregularity of the liver surface, THAD, and splenomegaly were associated with severity. THAD and ascites may have potential clinical utility in predicting LT/LRD outcomes within 1 year.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast abdominal magnetic resonance imaging features can help clinicians evaluate the type of injury, severity, and poor prognosis of drug-induced liver injury. • Transient hepatic attenuation difference and ascites have potential clinical utility in the prediction of the poor prognosis of liver transplantation/liver-related death. • The new model predicting poor prognosis has a relatively high sensitivity of 0.875 and a high specificity of 0.919.

Drug-Induced Hepatitis in Children: The Experience of a Single Center in Romania

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is uncommon but potentially lethal. Over 6 years, 2533 children with acute liver disease were identified in our center, 48 of which suffered from toxic hepatitis, and 40 exhibited DILI (22 paracetamol-related, 14 albendazole-related). The most affected children were in the 13–17-year-old age group. The mean time between drug ingestion and disease diagnosis was 25.4 h for paracetamol-related DILI and 21.6 days for the albendazole-related group. Clinical features were mostly gastrointestinal, jaundice being reported in 30% of the cases. Regarding the type of liver injury, for 70% of the patients it was hepatocellular (mostly paracetamol toxicity), for 11% cholestatic, and for 19% mixed (albendazole-related). The mean initial ALT value was 1020 U/L for all DILIs. Coagulopathy was only identified for the acetaminophen-related group. The median number of hospitalization days was 6.9 for DILI related to acetaminophen ingestion, compared with 7 for the idiosyncratic pattern. When applying the DILI severity index, 81% of the patients were categorized as having a mild hepatic ailment, while 19% had a moderate–severe or severe disease. No deaths were reported in the study group. The diagnosis of DILI involves the exclusion of other causes of liver injury; therefore, it is considered one of the most challenging diagnoses in hepatology.

Alteration of Bile Acids and Omega-6 PUFAs Are Correlated With the Progression and Prognosis of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Background & Aims

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the leading causes of liver failure with some of the patients progressed to chronic DILI. The mechanisms underlying the severity and chronicity of DILI are poorly elucidated and the biomarkers are limited. Metabolites and gut microbiota played a crucial role in the development of various liver diseases. Herein, a systematic analysis of serum metabolites and gut microbiota was performed in DILI patients, aiming to identify metabolites correlated with the progression and clinical prognosis of DILI.

Methods

Various serum metabolites were quantitated using a metabolite array technology in this prospective study. Gut microbiome compositions and the expression profiles of liver genes were determined in patients with DILI and healthy controls.

Results

Metabolomic analysis revealed that bile acids (BAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were closely related to DILI severity and chronicity respectively. The ratios of serum primary/secondary BAs and omega-6/omega-3 PUFAs were elevated in DILI patients. A model established by adrenic acid (AdA) and aspartic acid (Asp) exerts good performance for predicting the chronicity of DLIL. Hepatic transcriptome revealed enhanced expression of PUFA peroxidation and supressed expression of BA synthesis related genes in DILI patients. In addition, Lactic acid bacteria and BA converting bacteria were increased in gut of DILI patients. Besides, elevated serum malondialdehyde (MDA) and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) was observed in DILI patients.

Conclusion

BAs and PUFAs could be potent markers for the severity and chronicity of DILI respectively. The panel of AdA and Asp could be ideal predictive model for the risk of chronicity at the acute stage of DILI. Gut microbiota might act as a negative feedback mechanism to maintain the homeostasis of BAs and PUFAs via FGF19 signalling and PUFA saturation, respectively. Our study revealed novel biomarkers for severe and chronic DILI and provided new therapeutic targets for DILI.

A novel phenotype-based drug-induced liver injury causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT) allows for signal confirmation in early drug development

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) requires accurate case adjudication, with expert opinion being the current best practice.

AIM

We utilised a novel DILI causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT), which uses drug-specific liver injury phenotypes, to examine potential DILI in early phase ximelagatran clinical development.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of liver injury events from four Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) trials, in which patients were randomised to receive oral ximelagatran or adjusted-dose warfarin. A stepwise process was used with iterative adjustments. The DILI phenotype was characterised by latency, R-value, and AST/ALT ratio. A scoring algorithm was applied to liver events to assess how closely the liver events matched the Interquatile-Range for the working phenotype for each of the three parameters.

FINDINGS

Data from 3115 patients included in the SPORTIF trials as above were available. The initial ximelagatran phenotype was developed based on five liver injury cases from the ximelagatran arm and was then validated against an additional eight cases (5 ximelagatran, 3 warfarin); in these eight cases, there was a statistically significant difference in the total DILI-CAT scores of the two drugs (p = 0.016) between ximelagatran and warfarin. Together, these ten ximelagatran cases generated a second, refined ximelagatran phenotype, which was validated against an additional 75 cases (53 ximelagatran/22 warfarin)-again with statistically significant different DILI-CAT ximelagatran vs. warfarin scores (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DILI-CAT, a clinically intuitive, data-driven, computer-assisted scoring algorithm, is a useful tool for early detection of drug's hepatotoxicity in clinical drug development.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Mexican View

Content available: Author Audio Recording.

Isoxanthohumol, a component of Sophora flavescens, promotes the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and induces idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Sophora flavescens is a traditional Chinese medicine commonly used in clinical practice, which has the effects of clearing away heat and dampness. Unfortunately, it has been reported that Sophora flavescens and its preparation may cause liver damage to a certain extent, but the exact mechanism is not clear.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the safety and risk of Sophora flavescens and to elucidate the relationship between Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) and the NOD-like receptor family protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Western blot, Caspase-Glo® 1 Inflammasome Assay, ELISA kits, Flow cytometry and FLIPRT Tetra system were used to study the effect of isoxanthohumol (IXN) on the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and its mechanism. Combined with the lipopolysaccharide-mediated susceptibility IDILI model in mice to evaluate the hepatotoxicity of IXN.

RESULTS

IXN facilitates the activation of caspase-1 and secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β triggered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP), nigericin but not those induced by silicon dioxide and poly (I:C). Furthermore, the activation of NLR-family CARD-containing protein 4 (NLRC4) and the absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) was not affected by IXN. Mechanistically, IXN promotes NLRP3-dependent apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a C-terminal caspase recruitment domain (ASC) oligomerization and the generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) triggered by ATP. The in vivo data showed that non-hepatotoxic doses of IXN resulted in increased levels of glutamate-pyruvate transaminase, glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase, tumor necrosis factor and IL-1β in the serum and showed increased liver inflammation in the susceptible IDILI model mediated by lipopolysaccharide.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that IXN enhances NLRP3 inflammasome activation by promoting the accumulation of ATP-induced mtROS and ASC oligomerization to cause IDILI, indicating that IXN may be a risk factor for liver injury caused by the clinical use of Sophora flavescens.

Herb-Induced Liver Injury—A Challenging Diagnosis

Herb-induced liver injury (HILI) can be caused by supplements containing herbs, natural products, and products used in traditional medicine. Herbal products’ most common adverse reaction is hepatotoxicity. Almost every plant part can be used to make herbal products, and these products can come in many different forms, such as teas, powders, oils, creams, capsules, and injectables. HILI incidence and prevalence are hard to estimate and vary from study to study because of insufficient large-scale prospective studies. The diagnosis of HILI is a challenging process that requires not only insight but also a high degree of suspicion by the clinician. HILI presents with unspecific symptoms and is a diagnosis of exclusion. For diagnosis, it is necessary to make a causality assessment; the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences assessment is the preferred method worldwide. The most effective treatment is the suspension of the use of the suspected herbal product and close monitoring of liver function. The objective of this review is to highlight the necessary steps for the clinician to follow to reach a correct diagnosis of herb-induced liver injury. Further studies of HILI are needed to better understand its complexity and prevent increased morbidity and mortality.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Clinical Evidence of N-Acetyl Cysteine Protective Effects

Oxidative stress is a key pathological feature implicated in both acute and chronic liver diseases, including drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The latter describes hepatic injury arising as a direct toxic effect of administered drugs or their metabolites. Although still underreported, DILI remains a significant cause of liver failure, especially in developed nations. Currently, it is understood that mitochondrial-generated oxidative stress and abnormalities in phase I/II metabolism, leading to glutathione (GSH) suppression, drive the onset of DILI. N-Acetyl cysteine (NAC) has attracted a lot of interest as a therapeutic agent against DILI because of its strong antioxidant properties, especially in relation to enhancing endogenous GSH content to counteract oxidative stress. Thus, in addition to updating information on the pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in oxidative-induced hepatic injury, the current review critically discusses clinical evidence on the protective effects of NAC against DILI, including the reduction of patient mortality. Besides injury caused by paracetamol, NAC can also improve liver function in relation to other forms of liver injury such as those induced by excessive alcohol intake. The implicated therapeutic mechanisms of NAC extend from enhancing hepatic GSH levels to reducing biomarkers of paracetamol toxicity such as keratin-18 and circulating caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18. However, there is still lack of evidence confirming the benefits of using NAC in combination with other therapies in patients with DILI.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Due To Losartan

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenging diagnosis since a wide variety of medicines can cause adverse reactions. Losartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARA-II) approved for the treatment of arterial hypertension. The most common adverse effects are fatigue, anaemia, weakness and cough. An increase in transaminases has been reported with less frequency (<2% of cases). Although the mechanism is not fully understood, DILI onset is usually within 1-8 weeks of therapy, and hepatic enzymology usually normalizes 2-4 months after drug suspension. The authors present the case of a 66-year-old male patient with a medical history of arterial hypertension and a prior hospitalization (4 years previously) for drug-induced hepatitis, which, at the time, was attributed to a dietary supplement. Four years later, because of new onset of hypertension, losartan was reintroduced. After 3 weeks, the patient was admitted to the emergency department with complaints of acute abdominal pain associated with asthenia, nausea and increased abdominal volume that had first developed 8 days previously. After exclusion of other causes, DILI associated with losartan was assumed. This is a very rare adverse effect since only seven cases have been described in the literature.

LEARNING POINTS

Toxic hepatitis due to losartan is very rare, despite widespread use of the drug.A high index of suspicion for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) should be maintained while other diagnoses are carefully excluded.Monitoring the use of the offending drug is crucial, since DILI recurrence is associated with worse prognosis.

Pazopanib-induced severe acute liver injury: A case report

RATIONALE

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States. Painkillers and fever antipyretics are the most common cause of DILI. Hepatic injury can be provoked by DILI as hepatocellular or cholestatic type.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 48-year-old woman presented jaundice accompanied by nausea and vomiting. The patient was an inactive hepatitis B carrier with low viral titer and was diagnosed renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with hepatic metastasis requiring pazopanib treatment. Prior to administration of pazopanib, tenofovir administration was started to prevent exacerbation of hepatitis B. The patient was referred to clinic of gastroenterology department due to sudden elevation of bilirubin after 5 weeks of pazopanib treatment.

DIAGNOSES

Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography showed non-specific finding other than metastatic nodule in the liver and liver cirrhosis. After then, the patient was performed liver biopsy, and the biopsy result was acute cholestatic hepatitis with centrilobular area necrosis and portal inflammation. Therefore, considering the clinical history and biopsy results, the patient was diagnosed as DILI due to pazopanib.

INTERVENTIONS

After the biopsy, empirical steroid therapy was initiated and after 7 weeks of pazopanib discontinuation.

OUTCOMES

The total bilirubin level returned to normal from peak level of 24.61 to 1.52 mg/dL.

LESSONS

In patients with renal cell carcinoma, pazopanib treatment requires clinical caution as it causes rare complications such as severe jaundice and acute cholestatic hepatitis.

Critical Review of Gaps in the Diagnosis and Management of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Associated with Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) encompasses the unexpected damage that drugs can cause to the liver. DILI may develop in the context of an immunoallergic syndrome with cutaneous manifestations, which are sometimes severe (SCARs). Nevirapine, allopurinol, anti-epileptics, sulfonamides, and antibiotics are the most frequent culprit drugs for DILI associated with SCARs. Interestingly, alleles HLA-B*58:01 and HLA-A*31:01 are associated with both adverse reactions. However, there is no consensus about the criteria used for the characterization of liver injury in this context, and the different thresholds for DILI definition make it difficult to gain insight into this complex disorder. Moreover, current limitations when evaluating causality in patients with DILI associated with SCARs are related to the plethora of causality assessment methods and the lack of consensual complementary tools. Finally, the management of this condition encompasses the treatment of liver and skin injury. Although the use of immunomodulant agents is accepted for SCARs, their role in treating liver injury remains controversial. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to test their efficacy and safety to address this complex entity. Therefore, this review aims to identify the current gaps in the definition, diagnosis, prognosis, and management of DILI associated with SCARs, proposing different strategies to fill in these gaps.

The Immunological Mechanisms and Immune-Based Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has become one of the major challenges of drug safety all over the word. So far, about 1,100 commonly used drugs including the medications used regularly, herbal and/or dietary supplements, have been reported to induce liver injury. Moreover, DILI is the main cause of the interruption of new drugs development and drugs withdrawn from the pharmaceutical market. Acute DILI may evolve into chronic DILI or even worse, commonly lead to life-threatening acute liver failure in Western countries. It is generally considered to have a close relationship to genetic factors, environmental risk factors, and host immunity, through the drug itself or its metabolites, leading to a series of cellular events, such as haptenization and immune response activation. Despite many researches on DILI, the specific biomarkers about it are not applicable to clinical diagnosis, which still relies on the exclusion of other causes of liver disease in clinical practice as before. Additionally, circumstantial evidence has suggested that DILI is mediated by the immune system. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms of the immune response to DILI and provide guidance for the future development of biomarkers for the early detection, prediction, and diagnosis of DILI.

Repeated or Continuous Medically Supervised Ketamine Administration Associated with Hepatobiliary Adverse Events: A Retrospective Case Series

Introduction

Emerging off-label medical uses of ketamine for the treatment of persistent conditions such as depression and chronic pain often require repeated administration. Cases reported by other countries suggest that long-term and repeated exposure to ketamine may be associated with several risks, including but not limited to hepatobiliary damage.

Objective

We aimed (1) to characterize the association between repeated administration of ketamine for off-label medical use and hepatobiliary events and (2) to describe recent trends in the use of ketamine across different clinical settings.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective case series analysis, utilizing reports identified from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database as well as the medical literature. We included all cases reported through July 2018 describing both repeated exposure to ketamine in a hospital or ambulatory setting and a hepatobiliary adverse event. We excluded cases describing ketamine abuse. We identified adverse hepatobiliary events using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA^®) and summarized various case characteristics including: patient demographics, route of ketamine administration, dose, time to onset of event, type of event, and pre-existing risk factors for hepatobiliary disease. To assess trends in the demand for ketamine, we used IQVIA, National Sales Perspectives™ to provide the nationally estimated number of vials sold for ketamine from the manufacturer to all US channels of distribution from 2013 through 2017.

Results

We identified 14 unique cases that met selection criteria with 21 hepatobiliary adverse events including liver enzyme elevation in all cases, biliary dilation with liver cirrhosis (n = 1), biliary dilation with cholangitis (n = 1), and pericholeductal fibrosis (n = 1). Most cases received ketamine for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome or chronic pain. In cases with a reported time to onset, the majority of events occurred within 4 days. The nationally estimated number of ketamine vials sold in the USA from manufacturers to various channels of distribution increased from 1.2 million in 2013 to 2.1 million in 2017.

Conclusions

We report an association between repeated or continuous administration of ketamine and hepatobiliary adverse events. Increased awareness among clinicians may mitigate these adverse outcomes, especially in the context of growing ketamine sales.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01120-9.

The Unmet Needs of Hepatitis E Virus Diagnosis in Suspected Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Limited Resource Setting

Background: Currently, there are no specific biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and the diagnosis of DILI is based mainly on the exclusion of other causes of liver dysfunction and the recognition of potential causative drugs. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) diagnosis is not routinely enrolled in many countries, and HEV infection could be misdiagnosed as DILI.

Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed plasma samples (n = 80) collected from suspected DILI for HEV markers such as anti-HEV IgM, anti-HEV IgG, and HEV RNA. Anti-HEV antibodies were assessed using commercial ELISA kits. HEV RNA was tested by RT-qPCR targeting HEV ORF2/3, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and a putative threshold for liver function parameters was determined.

Results: Out of 80 samples, 12 samples were positive for anti-HEV IgM and anti-HEV IgG, and HEV RNA was detected in seven samples. The median viral load was 3.46 × 10³ IU/ml, and the isolated viruses belonged to HEV genotype 1. The level of liver enzymes such as alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST), but not alkaline phosphatase (ALP), was significantly higher in HEV confirmed cases than in non-HEV confirmed cases. We identified a plasma ALT level of at least 415.5 U/L and AST level of at least 332 U/L; ALT/ALP ratio of at least 5.08 could be used as a guide for the patients diagnosed as DILI to be tested for HEV infection. The previous liver function parameters showed high sensitivity and good specificity.

Conclusion: Hepatitis E virus was detected in suspected DILI cases. The diagnosis of DILI is not secure until HEV testing is done. Liver function parameters can be used as a guide for HEV testing in suspected DILI cases in countries with limited resources.

Late hepatic toxicity surveillance for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer: Recommendations from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group

BACKGROUND

Survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer may develop treatment-induced chronic liver disease. Surveillance guidelines can improve survivors' health outcomes. However, current recommendations vary, leading to uncertainty about optimal screening. The International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group has developed recommendations for the surveillance of late hepatotoxicity after CAYA cancer.

METHODS

Evidence-based methods based on the GRADE framework were used in guideline development. A multidisciplinary guideline panel performed systematic literature reviews, developed evidence summaries, appraised the evidence, and formulated recommendations on the basis of evidence, clinical judgement, and consideration of benefits versus the harms of the surveillance while allowing for flexibility in implementation across different health care systems.

RESULTS

The guideline strongly recommends a physical examination and measurement of serum liver enzyme concentrations (ALT, AST, gGT, ALP) once at entry into long-term follow-up for survivors treated with radiotherapy potentially exposing the liver (moderate- to high-quality evidence). For survivors treated with busulfan, thioguanine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, dactinomycin, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), or hepatic surgery, or with a history of chronic viral hepatitis or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, similar surveillance for late hepatotoxicity once at entry into LTFU is reasonable (low-quality evidence/expert opinion, moderate recommendation). For survivors who have undergone HSCT and/or received multiple red blood cell transfusions, surveillance for iron overload with serum ferritin is strongly recommended once at long-term follow-up entry.

CONCLUSIONS

These evidence-based, internationally-harmonized recommendations for the surveillance of late hepatic toxicity in cancer survivors can inform clinical care and guide future research of health outcomes for CAYA cancer survivors.