Idiopathic portal hypertension: natural history and long-term outcome

Advanced cystic fibrosis liver disease: Endovascular, endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical considerations

Up to 90% of people with CF (pwCF) will have some form of hepatobiliary involvement. This manuscript aims to explore the different endovascular, endoscopic, radiological and surgical procedures available to diagnose and manage the most severe form of CF hepatobiliary involvement (CFHBI) known as advanced cystic fibrosis liver disease (aCFLD), seen in 10% of pwCF. These procedures and interventions include liver biopsy, hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement, gastrostomy tube placement to optimize nutrition, paracentesis, endoscopic variceal control of bleeding and portosystemic shunting before liver transplantation. By utilizing advanced diagnostic or surgical techniques, healthcare professionals of pwCF can more effectively manage patients with CFHBI and aCFLD and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Disease: Classification and Clinical Relevance

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a well-recognized clinico-pathological entity, which is associated with clinical signs and symptoms, imaging, and endoscopic features of portal hypertension (PHT), in absence of cirrhosis. In patients with NCPH without known risk factors of PHT or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, the condition is called idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). There are multiple infectious, immune related causes, systemic diseases, drug and toxin exposures, haematological disorders, and metabolic risk factors that have been associated with this INCPH. However, the causal pathogenesis is still unclear. The Vascular liver disorders interest group group recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) as a syndromic entity, which provides definite histopathological criteria for diagnosis of NCPH (table 1). The three classical histo-morphological lesions specific for PSVD include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal fibrosis. The PSVD definition includes patients with portal vein thrombosis, PVT, and even those without PHT, thus broadening the scope of diagnosis to include patients who may have presented early, prior to haemodynamic changes consistent with PHT. However, this new diagnosis has pros and cons. The cons include mandating invasive liver biopsy to assess the PSVD histological triad in all patients with NCPH, an erstwhile clinical diagnosis in Asian patients. In addition, the natural history of the subclinical forms of PSVD without PHT and linear progression to develop PHT is unknown yet. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD, fallacies and strengths of the old and new schema, pathobiology of this disease, and clinical correlates in an Asian context. Although formulation of standardised diagnostic criteria is useful for comparison of clinical cohorts with INCPH/PSVD, prospective clinical validation in global cohorts is necessary to avoid misclassification of vascular disorders of the liver.

The autoimmune landscape of Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder: What the rheumatologist needs to know

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) encompasses a group of vascular disorders characterized by lesions of the portal venules and sinusoids with clinical manifestations ranging from non-specific abnormalities in serum liver enzymes to clinically overt portal hypertension and related complications. Several reports have documented cases of PSVD in patients with systemic autoimmune conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. It is of note that these diseases share specific pathophysiological features with PSVD, including endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and molecular signatures. This narrative review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the association between PSVD and systemic autoimmune diseases, emphasizing the importance of promptly recognizing this condition in the rheumatological practice, and highlighting the key aspects where further research is necessary from both pathogenic and clinical perspectives.

Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Disease and Portal Hypertension

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is the medical diagnosis for a patient who has portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy. There are several specific histologic findings for PSVD, including obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal fibrosis. Epidemiologic reports vary widely among regions; PSVD comprises less than 10% of causes of portal hypertension in Western countries but incidence has been found to be as high as 48% in India. There is an expansive list of etiologies that have been reported to cause PSVD.

Clinical characteristics and natural history of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease: A cohort study of 234 patients in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is an under-recognized and under-diagnosed disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of PSVD.

METHODS

The patients who underwent liver biopsies were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical and pathological data were reviewed and screened according to the latest diagnostic criteria of PSVD.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were diagnosed as PSVD, including 103 patients presented with portal hypertension (PH) and 131 patients without PH. At baseline, the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels were higher in the no-PH group. The liver stiffness increased in the PH group. In histological review, obliterative portal venopathy, sinusoidal dilatation and architectural disturbance were more common in the PH group, while portal tract abnormalities were more widely distributed in the no-PH group. After a median follow-up of 43.6 months, the survival rate of patients with baseline liver decompensation was 76.0%, and that of patients at a liver compensated stage in the PH group was 98.7%. First variceal bleeding occurred in 13.8% of patients with gastric-oesophageal varices. None of the patients in the no-PH group developed portal hypertension during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

PSVD can manifest as PH or mild liver enzyme abnormalities. There are significant differences in pathological features among patients with different clinical manifestations. Recurrent ascites are the main cause of death in PSVD patients. However, patients without PH have a slow disease progression, with recurrent elevated GGT levels being their main clinical feature.

Prospective evaluation of patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single centre study

BACKGROUND

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a spectrum of liver diseases, including porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder, with portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of cirrhosis. The natural history and diagnostic approach to NCPH are not well understood.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate disease progression and outcomes in NCPH.

METHODS

Patients with or at risk for NCPH were enrolled in a single centre prospective study; two groups were formed based on the presence of specific features of PH, such as varices, collaterals, portal hypertensive gastropathy or portal hypertensive bleeding. All participants underwent a baseline liver biopsy. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and imaging were repeated every 6-12 months.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients without specific features of PH (Group I), and 35 patients with specific features (Group II) were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 50 months. Group II had higher hepatic venous pressure gradients, non-invasive measures of PH and a lower platelet count (PLT) when compared to Group I. Rates of survival and decompensation were similar in both groups. Patients with PLT ≤100 K/mcL had lower survival compared to those with PLT >100 K/mcL. Patients with LSM ≥10 kPa had lower survival and survival without decompensation when compared to patients with LSM <10 kPa.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients irrespective of specific features of PH had similar survival or survival without decompensation. Patients without specific features are at risk for disease progression and should be monitored closely. Thrombocytopenia and increased LSM are associated with severe forms of liver disease, which are strongly associated with outcomes.

[Portosinusoidal vascular disorder: A paradigm shift]

The term portosinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) refers to a clinical-pathological entity that encompasses those patients with intrahepatic vascular damage without cirrhosis at risk of developing severe complications of portal hypertension. Numerous systemic diseases, genetic disorders, and toxic agents have been associated with this pathology, making its diagnosis an important clinical challenge. The recent description of uniform diagnostic criteria and a better understanding of its pathophysiology will allow for better identification of patients, even in early stages of the disease. Although there is currently no effective etiological treatment available, early diagnosis allows for the development of preventive strategies for some severe complications of portal hypertension.

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder in chronic HBV: A significant coexistence not to be overlooked

Background & Aims

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) encompasses a group of liver diseases with vascular abnormalities that can cause portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis. The new diagnostic criteria allow for coexistence with other liver diseases, however its relationship with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess HBV prevalence in a PSVD cohort and evaluate its clinical impact.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on patients with PSVD at Hospital Clínic Barcelona. HBV serology was evaluated, and patients were categorized into HBV chronic infection, past infection, or no HBV exposure. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared.

Results

We included 155 patients with PSVD. Prevalence of CHB and past HBV infection in patients with PSVD was higher than in the general population (5.8% vs. 0.5%, p <0.0001 and 20% vs. 9.1%, p <0.0001, respectively). Patients with CHB had a significant delay in PSVD diagnosis compared to those without CHB (11 [5-25] vs. 1 [0-3] years, p = 0.002) and had a more advanced disease (MELD score 12 [9-17] vs. 9 [7-11], p = 0.012) at the time of PSVD diagnosis. The clinical evolution of PSVD in patients with CHB was marked by a significantly higher transplantation rate at the last follow-up (33% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Recognizing the coexistence of PSVD and CHB is important for timely diagnosis and optimal management, highlighting the potential benefits of specialized care for potentially improved outcomes.

Impact and implications

The new diagnostic criteria for porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) allow for coexistence with other liver diseases. The results of the present study highlight, for the first time, a non-negligible prevalence of chronic hepatitis B in the PSVD population that was previously unknown. Coexistence may challenge and delay the PSVD diagnosis and is associated with a more unfavorable clinical course. Our findings will increase awareness of this coexistence and improve PSVD diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the data will encourage new studies to determine the prevalence and clinical behavior of other chronic liver diseases that coexist with PSVD.

Application of ultrasonography-elastography score to suspect porto-sinusoidal vascular disease in patients with portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are causes of portal hypertension characterized respectively by an intrahepatic and a pre-hepatic obstacle to the flow in the portal system. As PVT may be a consequence of PSVD, in PVT patients at presentation, a pre-existing PSVD should be suspected. In these patients the identification of an underlying PSVD would have relevant implication regarding follow-up and therapeutic management, but it could be challenging. In this setting ultrasonography may be valuable in differential diagnosis. The aim of the study was to use ultrasonography to identify parameters to discriminate between PSVD and "pure" PVT and then to suspect PVT secondary to a pre-existing PSVD.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with histologically proven PSVD and forty-eight patients affected by chronic PVT were enrolled and submitted to abdominal ultrasonography with elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI).

RESULTS

ARFI was higher and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) diameter was wider in PSVD patients than in PVT patients. Thus, a prognostic score was obtained as linear combinations of the two parameters with a good discrimination capacity between PSVD and PVT (the area under the curve = 0.780; 95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.869).

CONCLUSIONS

A score based on ARFI and SMV diameter may be useful to suspect an underlying PSVD in patients with PVT and to identify a subgroup of patients to be submitted to liver biopsy.

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD): Application of new diagnostic criteria in a multicenter cohort of patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The term porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) was recently proposed to replace that of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) to describe patients with typical histological lesions in absence of cirrhosis, irrespective of the presence/absence of portal hypertension (PH), and new diagnostic criteria were defined. The study aimed to compare the applicability between the diagnostic criteria of PSVD and those of INCPH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

53 patients affected by PSVD were enrolled. Biochemical, clinical, ultrasound and histological data, the presence and type of associated diseases were recorded in a database. According to the new criteria, histological data and signs of PH were divided into specific and non-specific. Percutaneous and transjugular biopsies were compared to establish the usability of the two methods for diagnostic purposes.

RESULTS

In 85% of the patients the diagnosis of PSVD was obtained by applying the first criterion (25 had specific histological signs with specific signs of PH); one patient presented with specific histological signs but no PH. In 8 patients the diagnosis was obtained by applying the second criterion. 19% of patients had portal vein thrombosis. Finally, the prevalence of the various histological lesions was similar between the patients submitted to percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that the diagnostic criteria of PSVD lead to the inclusion of a greater number of patients than INCPH.

Recent Advances in the Pathogenesis and Clinical Evaluation of Portal Hypertension in Chronic Liver Disease

In chronic liver disease, hepatic stellate cell activation and degeneration of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells lead to structural changes, which are secondary to fibrosis and the presence of regenerative nodules in the sinusoids, and to functional changes, which are related to vasoconstriction. The combination of such changes increases intrahepatic vascular resistance and causes portal hypertension. The subsequent increase in splanchnic and systemic hyperdynamic circulation further increases the portal blood flow, thereby exacerbating portal hypertension. In clinical practice, the hepatic venous pressure gradient is the gold-standard measure of portal hypertension; a value of ≥10 mm Hg is defined as clinically significant portal hypertension, which is severe and is associated with the risk of liver-related events. Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement is somewhat invasive, so evidence on the utility of risk stratification by elastography and serum biomarkers is needed. The various stages of cirrhosis are associated with different outcomes. In viral hepatitis-related cirrhosis, viral suppression or elimination by nucleos(t)ide analog or direct-acting antivirals results in recompensation of liver function and portal pressure. However, careful follow-up should be continued, because some cases have residual clinically significant portal hypertension even after achieving sustained virologic response. In this study, we reviewed the current and future prospects for portal hypertension.

The genetics of portal hypertension: Recent developments and the road ahead

Portal hypertension (PH), defined as a pathological increase in the portal vein pressure, has different aetiologies and causes. Intrahepatic PH is mostly secondary to the presence of underlying liver disease leading to cirrhosis, characterized by parenchymal changes with deregulated accumulation of extracellular matrix and vascular abnormalities; liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatic stellate cells are key players in PH progression, able to influence each other. However, PH may also develop independently of parenchymal damage, as occur in portosinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD), a group of clinical and histological entities characterized by portal vasculature dysfunctions. In this particular group of disorders, the pathophysiology of PH is still poorly understood. In the last years, several genetic studies, based on genome-wide association studies or whole-exome sequencing analysis, have highlighted the importance of genetic heritability in PH pathogenesis, both in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic cases. The common PNPLA3 p.I148M variant, one of the main determinants of the susceptibility to steatotic liver disease, has also been associated with decompensation in patients with PH. Genetic variations at loci influencing coagulation, mainly the ABO locus, may directly contribute to the pathogenesis of PH. Rare genetic variants have been associated with familiar cases of progressive PSVD. In this review, we summarize the recent knowledges on genetic variants predisposing to PH development, contributing to better understand the role of genetic factors in PH pathogenesis.

Management of liver disease and portal hypertension in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID)

Patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) frequently develop liver disease and associated complications, which represent an increasingly prevalent unmet medical need. The main hepatic manifestation of CVID is nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), resulting in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). Liver disease is often underdiagnosed, leading to poor outcomes and decreased survival. The increasing numbers of patients with CVID who are diagnosed late with progressive liver disease underscores the importance of appropriate clinical management and treatment of liver complications. At the same time, specific guidelines for the clinical management of CVID-related liver disease are still lacking. Here, we review the epidemiology of CVID-related liver disease, reveal new insights into NRH and NCPH biology and highlight recently uncovered opportunities for NCPH diagnostics in CVID. Finally, we focus on current management of liver disease, portal hypertension and its complications - the key challenge in patients with CVID. Specifically, we review recent data regarding the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and liver transplantation in clinical management. The role for anticoagulants and immunosuppressants targeting the pathogenesis of NRH will also be discussed. We propose an updated algorithm for the diagnostic work-up and treatment of NCPH in CVID. Finally, we consider future needs and therapeutic opportunities for CVID-related liver disease.

A Narrative Review on Non-Cirrohotic Portal Hypertension: Not All Portal Hypertensions Mean Cirrhosis

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH), also known as idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) and porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD), is a rare disease characterized by intrahepatic portal hypertension (IPH) in the absence of cirrhosis. The precise etiopathogenesis of IPH is an area of ongoing research. NCPH diagnosis is challenging, as there are no specific tests available to confirm the disease, and a high-quality liver biopsy, detailed clinical information, and an expert pathologist are necessary for diagnosis. Currently, the treatment of NCPH relies on the prevention of complications related to portal hypertension, following current guidelines of cirrhotic portal hypertension. No treatment has been studied that aimed to modify the natural history of the disease; however, transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) placement, shunt and liver transplantation are considerable symptomatic options. In this review, we discuss the heterogeneity of NCPH as well as its etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation and management issues. Starting from the assumption that portal hypertension does not always mean cirrhosis, cooperative studies are probably needed to clarify the issues of etiology and the possible genetic background of this rare disease. This knowledge might lead to better treatment and perhaps better prevention.

Prevalence of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy, (HE) although commonly associated with cirrhosis, has also been reported in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). The importance of identifying and treating HE in NCPH lies in the fact that many patients may be wrongly diagnosed as having psychiatric or neurologic disorders. Hence, we aimed to systematically review the prevalence of HE in NCPH.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of three databases (Medline, Embase and Scopus) was conducted from inception to November 2022 for studies reporting on the prevalence of minimal HE (MHE) and overt HE (OHE) in patients with NCPH. Results were presented as pooled proportions with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Total 25 studies (n = 1487) were included after screening 551 records. The pooled prevalence of MHE in NPCH was 32.9% (95% CI: 26.7-39.0) without any difference between adult (32.9%, 95% CI: 23.5-42.3) and pediatric patients (32.6%, 95% CI: 26.1-39.1) (p = 0.941). There was no significant difference in the prevalence between patients with NCPH and compensated cirrhosis with odds ratio of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.77-1.44). The pooled event rate for prior history of OHE in NCPH was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.3-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Around one-third of the patients with NCPH have MHE, irrespective of age group. OHE is extremely rare in NCPH and is usually associated with a precipitating factor.

Evolving Understanding of Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension

Although cirrhosis is one of the most common causes of portal hypertension, noncirrhotic portal hypertension can result from hemodynamic perturbations occurring in the prehepatic, intrahepatic, and posthepatic circulation. Intrahepatic portal hypertension can be further subclassified relative to the hepatic sinusoids as presinusoidal, sinusoidal, and postsinusoidal. For many of these differential diagnoses, the etiology is known but the cause of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension, recently included in porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD), remains poorly understood. Herein, we discuss the diagnostic pathological features of noncirrhotic portal hypertension, with an emphasis on PSVD.

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Vascular Liver Diseases: Focus on Thrombosis

Vascular liver disorders (VLDs) comprise a wide spectrum of clinical-pathological entities that primarily affect the hepatic vascular system of both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. VLDs more frequently involve the portal and the hepatic veins, as well as liver sinusoids, resulting in an imbalance of liver homeostasis with serious consequences, such as the development of portal hypertension and liver fibrosis. Surprisingly, many VLDs are characterized by a prothrombotic phenotype. The molecular mechanisms that cause thrombosis in VLD are only partially explained by the alteration in the Virchow's triad (hypercoagulability, blood stasis, and endothelial damage) and nowadays their pathogenesis is incompletely described and understood. Studies about this topic have been hampered by the low incidence of VLDs in the general population and by the absence of suitable animal models. Recently, the role of coagulation imbalance in liver disease has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms linked to fibrogenesis, so a novel interest in vascular alterations of the liver has been renewed. This review provides a detailed analysis of the current knowledge of molecular mechanisms of VLD. We also focus on the promising role of anticoagulation as a strategy to prevent liver complications and to improve the outcome of these patients.

Liver Transplantation for Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Liver Disorder: Long-term Outcome

BACKGROUND

Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disorder (PSVD) is a rare disease that occasionally requires liver transplantation (LT), despite usually presenting preserved liver function. There remains a paucity of data pertaining to LT in PSVD. The aim was to identify features associated with post-LT outcomes in PSVD.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre study of 79 patients who received LT for PSVD.

RESULTS

Median post-LT follow-up was 37 (range 1-261) mo. Refractory ascites 24 (30%), hepatic encephalopathy 16 (20%), and hepatopulmonary syndrome 13 (16.3%) were the most frequent indications for LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the indication in only 2 patients. Twenty-four patients died, 7 due to liver and 17 to non-liver related causes. Post-LT survival was 82.2%, 80.7%, and 68.6% at 1, 2, and 5 y, respectively. Post-LT survival was significantly better in patients without (n = 58) than in those with a persistent severe PSVD-associated condition (n = 21). Pre-LT hyperbilirubinemia levels and creatinine >100 µmol/L were also independently associated with poor survival. Six patients (7.6%) required a second LT. Recurrence of PSVD was confirmed by liver biopsy in only 1 patient and in 3 further patients it was likely.

CONCLUSIONS

LT in PSVD is associated with an acceptable outcome in the absence of associated severe conditions. However, persistence of a severe associated condition, pre-LT high bilirubin levels, or creatinine >100 µmol/L impact outcome, and these are features that should be considered when evaluating PSVD patients for LT. PSVD recurrence is possible after LT and needs to be explored, at least, in cases of posttransplant portal hypertension.

Paediatric porto-sinusoidal vascular disease: Two different clinical phenotypes with subtle histological differences

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In paediatrics, porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is relatively unknown and probably underdiagnosed. We aimed to describe clinical phenotypes, histology and outcome of children diagnosed with PSVD.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre study of children diagnosed with PSVD. Diagnosis of PSVD was based on histopathology reports; liver specimens were re-evaluated by two expert liver pathologists.

RESULTS

Sixty two children diagnosed with PSVD (M/F = 36/26, median age 6.6 years, range 3.3-10.6), from 7 centres, were included. Thirty-six presented with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension, PH, (PH-PSVD Group = 58%) while 26 had a liver biopsy because of chronic elevation of transaminases without PH (noPH-PSVD Group = 42%). On histology review, the two groups differed for the prevalence of obliterative portal venopathy (more prevalent in PH-PSVD, p = 0.005), and hypervascularised portal tracts (more common in noPH-PSVD, p = 0.039), the other histological changes were equally distributed. At multivariate analysis, platelet count ≤185 000/mm³ was the only independent determinant of PH (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 7 years (range 3.0-11.2), in PH-PSVD group 3/36 (8%) required TIPS placement, 5/36 (14%) developed pulmonary vascular complications of PH, and 7/36 (19%) required liver transplantation. In noPH-PSVD none progressed to PH nor had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric patients with PSVD present with two different clinical phenotypes, one characterised by PH and one by chronic elevation of transaminases without PH. PSVD should be included among the conditions causing isolated hypertransaminasaemia. On histology, the differences between the two groups are subtle. Medium-term outcome is favourable in patients without PH; progression of the disease is observed in those with PH.

Attach importance to the individualized treatment of adult portal hypertension based on etiology and pathogenesis: A review

There are many factors that can cause portal hypertension and secondary symptoms such as ascites, splenomegaly, and variceal hemorrhage, can seriously affect patients' quality of life and even threaten their lives. In this paper, we summarize various causes of portal hypertension based on etiology and pathogenesis and give individualized treatment strategies in order to remind clinicians to pay attention to the identification of different causes and select corresponding treatment, so that patients are provided with the optimal treatment strategies and benefit from them.

Portal vein thrombosis, hepatic decompensation, and survival in patients with porto-sinusoidal vascular disease and portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is a novel nomenclature to describe non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and characteristic histology without portal vein thrombosis (PVT). It is a more inclusive definition than the previously well-recognized entity idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. There is a paucity of data on PSVD patients.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients diagnosed with PSVD and portal hypertension (PH) between 2005 and 2021 were included. Data were retrieved from electronic medical record system and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 33 patients, 6 (18%) occurred in post-transplant allograft liver. After a median follow-up of 96 months (interquartile range, IQR [52, 139]), 14 deaths occurred (42%), 4 directly related to decompensated liver disease. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 94%, 87% and 58%. PVT occurred in 10 patients (30%). The Nelson-Aalen cumulative risk estimate for PVT at 1, 5 and 10 years were 16%, 25% and 48%. The median model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh score at initial presentation were 8 (IQR [7-12]) and 5 [5-6], and increased to 13 [8, 18] and 7 [5, 8], respectively, at the end of follow-up. Of the 11 patients who presented with splenomegaly and no specific sign of PH, 7 (64%) developed varices and 3 (27%) ascites at a median follow-up of 100 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PSVD with PH is not a benign entity. Mortality, PVT and hepatic decompensation are common. Patients with PSVD must be closely monitored, including those who only have non-specific clinical signs (e.g., splenomegaly) of PH.

Natural History of Hepatosplenic Schistosomiasis (HSS) Non–Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension (NCPH): Influence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Decompensation in Prognosis

Background: Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS) is a peculiar form of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). Although HSS patients present normal hepatic function, some evolve signs of hepatocellular failure and features of decompensated cirrhosis. The natural history of HSS-NCPH is unknown. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted that evaluated patients who fulfilled clinical-laboratorial criteria for HSS. Results: A total of 105 patients were included. Eleven patients already presented with decompensated disease and had lower transplant-free survival at 5 years than those without (61% vs. 95%, p = 0.015). Among 94 patients without prior decompensation, the median follow-up was 62 months and 44% of them had varicose bleeding (two or more episodes in 27%). Twenty-one patients presented at least one episode of decompensation (10-year probability 38%). Upon multivariate analysis, varicose bleeding and higher bilirubin levels were associated with decompensation. The 10-year probability of survival was 87%. Development of decompensation and age were predictive of mortality. Conclusion: HSS is characterized by multiple episodes of GI bleeding, a high probability of decompensation and reduced survival at the end of the first decade. Decompensation is more common in patients with varicose esophageal bleeding and is associated with lower survival.

Vascular liver diseases: A sex-oriented analysis of the literature

Vascular liver diseases are an heterogenous group of diseases that collectively represent an important health issue in the field of liver diseases. This narrative review was elaborated by the Special Interest Group (SIG) "Gender in Hepatology" of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF). We aimed to review the current knowledge regarding the potential role of biological sex in patients with vascular liver diseases such as splanchnic vein thrombosis, hepatic vein thrombosis, porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder, and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. As vascular liver diseases commonly affect young individuals, including women in childbearing age, we also included a specific section on the management of pregnancy in these challenging patients.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension: 30 years experience from China

Liver diseases are a major cause of illness and death worldwide. In China, liver diseases, primarily viral hepatitis, affect approximately 300 million people, thus having a major impact on the global burden of liver diseases. Portal hypertension is the most severe complication of chronic liver diseases, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and bleeding from gastroesophageal varices. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) represents a very effective treatment of these complications. Since its introduction 30 years ago in China, the use of TIPS has evolved and has played an increasingly important role in the management of the complications of portal hypertension. This review will focus on the history, current application and management of complications of TIPS in China.

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder

It is well established that portal hypertension can occur in the absence of cirrhosis, as reported in patients with immune disorders, infections and thrombophilia. However, similar histological abnormalities primarily affecting the hepatic sinusoidal and (peri)portal vasculature have also been observed in patients without portal hypertension. Thus, the term porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) has recently been introduced to describe a group of vascular diseases of the liver featuring lesions encompassing the portal venules and sinusoids, irrespective of the presence/absence of portal hypertension. Liver biopsy is fundamental for PSVD diagnosis. Specific histology findings include nodular regenerative hyperplasia, obliterative portal venopathy/portal vein stenosis and incomplete septal fibrosis/cirrhosis. Since other conditions including alcohol-related and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, or viral hepatitis, or the presence of portal vein thrombosis may occur in patients with PSVD, their relative contribution to liver damage should be carefully assessed. In addition to histology and clinical diagnostic criteria, imaging and non-invasive tests such as liver and spleen stiffness measurements could aid in the diagnostic workup. The introduction of PSVD as a novel clinical entity will facilitate collaborative studies and investigations into the underlying molecular pathomechanisms encompassed by this term.

Pathological and imaging features of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH), a kind of portal sinus vascular disease with unknown etiology, is characterized by the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of liver cirrhosis or known risk factors accountable for PH. It has an extremely high rate of initial misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. Liver biopsy is the only way to make a definitive diagnosis. Non-invasive modalities, such as CT imaging, are becoming a hot topic of interest in recent years. This article summarizes the pathological and CT/MRI features of INCPH and the key points of differentiation from cirrhosis, to improve clinicians' understanding of INCPH and reduce the rate of initial misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses.

Contrast-enhanced CT and liver surface nodularity for the diagnosis of porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder: A case-control study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is a rare and commonly overlooked cause of portal hypertension. The interest of CT analysis, including quantification of liver surface nodularity (LSN) for PSVD diagnosis has not been established. This study aimed at assessing the performance of LSN and CT features for a PSVD diagnosis in patients with signs of portal hypertension.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This retrospective case-control study included a learning cohort consisting of 50 patients with histologically proven PSVD, according to VALDIG criteria, and 100 control patients with histologically proven cirrhosis, matched on ascites. All patients and controls had at least one sign of portal hypertension and CT available within 1 year of liver biopsy. Principal component analysis of CT features separated patients with PSVD from patients with cirrhosis. Patients with PSVD had lower median LSN than those with cirrhosis (2.4 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified LSN < 2.5 and normal-sized or enlarged segment IV as independently associated with PSVD. Combination of these two features had a specificity of 90% for PSVD and a diagnostic accuracy of 84%. Even better results were obtained in an independent multicenter validation cohort including 53 patients with PSVD and 106 control patients with cirrhosis (specificity 94%, diagnostic accuracy 87%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study that included a total of 103 patients with PSVD and 206 patients with cirrhosis demonstrates that LSN < 2.5 combined with normal-sized or enlarged segment IV strongly suggests PSVD in patients with signs of portal hypertension.

Isolated gastric variceal bleeding related to non-cirrhotic portal hypertension following oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome has been reported after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, but liver fibrosis and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) are rarely reported.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we describe the case of a 64-year-old woman who developed isolated gastric variceal bleeding 16 mo after completing eight cycles of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine chemotherapy after colon cancer resection. Surprisingly, splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia were not accompanied by variceal bleeding, which has been reported to have predictive value for gastric variceal formation. However, a liver biopsy showed fibrosis in the portal area, suggesting NCPH. The patient underwent endoscopic treatment and experienced no further symptoms.

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to guard against long-term complications after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Sometimes splenic size and platelet level may not always accurately predict the occurrence of portal hypertension.

Clinical Course of Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease Is Distinct From Idiopathic Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) was recently proposed as novel clinical entity characterized by typical histological changes with or without portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of cirrhosis. Thus, we aimed to describe clinical characteristics and the outcome of PSVD patients and to compare these to patients meeting traditional idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) criteria.

METHODS

Patients undergoing liver biopsy (baseline) ±hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement at the Vienna General Hospital between 2000-2019 were screened for PSVD and INCPH criteria.

RESULTS

91 patients were diagnosed with PSVD of which 28 (30.8%) also fulfilled INCPH criteria (INCPH+/PSVD+). Specific histological and specific clinical PH signs were found in 72 (79.1%) and 54 (59.3%) patients, respectively. INCPH+/PSVD+ showed higher Child-Pugh-scores (7±2 vs 6±1 points; P = .002) and a higher prevalence of decompensation (57.1% vs 28.6%; P = .009) than INCPH-/PSVD+ patients. Importantly, hepatic decompensation after three years (3Y) occurred in 11.2% of PSVD patients with specific clinical signs of PH, while no decompensation occurred in patients with only specific histological or with unspecific clinical/histological signs (P = .002). When categorizing by INCPH definition, 3Y decompensation was 13.4% in INCPH+/PSVD+ and 3.8% in INCPH-/PSVD+ (P = .120). While overall mortality was similar in INCPH+/PSVD+ (n = 6; 21.4%) and INCPH-/PSVD+ (n = 10; 15.9%) patients (P = .558), liver-related mortality tended to be higher in INCPH+/PSVD+ (6.9%) than in INCPH-/PSVD+ (0%; P = .078).

CONCLUSION

Novel PSVD criteria facilitate diagnosis. Compared to INCPH, clinical course of PSVD patients is more favorable. Importantly, specific signs of PH including varices and collaterals are associated with hepatic decompensation and mortality.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of vascular liver diseases

Vascular disorders of the liver are rare diseases, some of which are diagnosed mainly with non-invasive tests and others by liver biopsy. Non-invasive methods can be used to diagnose and monitor these diseases. However, their evaluation needs to be performed by expert centers. Liver biopsy is needed each time there is an unexplained abnormality.

Cognitive Impairement in Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension: Highlights on Physiopathology, Diagnosis and Management

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is one of the most frequent complications of cirrhosis. Several studies and case reports have shown that cognitive impairment may also be a tangible complication of portal hypertension secondary to chronic portal vein thrombosis and to porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD). In these conditions, representing the main causes of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) in the Western world, both overt and minimal/covert HE occurs in a non-neglectable proportion of patients, even lower than in cirrhosis, and it is mainly sustained by the presence of large porto-systemic shunt. In these patients, the liver function is usually preserved or only mildly altered, and the development of porto-systemic shunt is either spontaneous or iatrogenically frequent; HE is an example of type-B HE. To date, in the absence of strong evidence and large cooperative studies, for the diagnosis and the management of HE in NCPH, the same approach used for HE occurring in cirrhosis is applied. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of type B hepatic encephalopathy, focusing on its pathophysiology, diagnostic tools and management in patients affected by porto-sinusoidal vascular disease and chronic portal vein thrombosis.

Prediction of esophagogastric varices associated with oxaliplatin administration

Background

Oxaliplatin is a key drug for the chemotherapy of colorectal cancer; however, it is also known to cause non‐cirrhotic portal hypertension. We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who developed esophagogastric varices (EGVs) after treatment with oxaliplatin.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with chemotherapy including oxaliplatin between 2010 and 2016. All patients were evaluated by contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CE‐CT) every 3 months both during and after treatment; and endoscopy was performed when appearance of portal hypertension was suspected.

Results

A total of 106 patients were divided into two groups: EGV formation (n = 6) and EGV non‐formation (n = 100). In the EGV group, platelet counts decreased and the size of the spleen calculated by CT (CT spleen index; CT‐SI) increased markedly. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the change in platelet counts was 0.81 (80% sensitivity and 83% specificity) at 3 months post treatment, and the maximum AUC for CT‐SI was 0.89 (79% sensitivity and 83% specificity) at 6 months post treatment.

Conclusions

EGV formation could be predicted by the assessment of platelet counts and spleen size. If progressive splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia are observed not only during but also after completion of the oxaliplatin‐containing chemotherapy, EGVs should be confirmed by endoscopy for avoiding subsequent rupture.

Identifying Patients at High Risk of Developing Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

The term porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) has been recently proposed to replace the term idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) to describe patients with or without signs of portal hypertension and typical histological lesions involving the portal venules or sinusoids in the absence of cirrhosis. According to the new definition, the presence of known causes of liver disease as well as of portal vein thrombosis does not rule out PSVD. Therefore, the patients in whom the diagnosis of PSVD is possible are much more than the patients strictly fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for INCPH. In this setting, the clinical challenge for the hepatologist is to identify patients at risk of developing PSVD and to indicate liver biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. We describe some possible scenarios in which PSVD should always be suspected, and we provide some tools useful to reach the diagnosis of PSVD.

Pediatric non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: Endoscopic outcome and perspectives from developing nations

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) forms an important subset of portal hypertension in children. Variceal bleed and splenomegaly are their predominant presentation. Laboratory features show cytopenias (hypersplenism) and preserved hepatic synthetic functions. Repeated sessions of endoscopic variceal ligation or endoscopic sclerotherapy eradicate esophageal varices in almost all cases. After variceal eradication, there is an increased risk of other complications like secondary gastric varices, cholangiopathy, colopathy, growth failure, especially in extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). Massive splenomegaly-related pain and early satiety cause poor quality of life (QoL). Meso-Rex bypass is the definitive therapy when the procedure is anatomically feasible in EHPVO. Other portosystemic shunt surgeries with splenectomy are indicated when patients present late and spleen-related issues predominate. Shunt surgeries prevent rebleed, improve growth and QoL. Non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) is a less common cause of portal hypertension in children in developing nations. Presentation in the second decade, massive splenomegaly and patent portal vein are discriminating features of NCPF. Shunt surgery is required in severe cases when endotherapy is insufficient for the varices. Congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) presents with firm palpable liver and splenomegaly. Ductal plate malformation forms the histological hallmark of CHF. CHF is commonly associated with Caroli’s disease, renal cysts, and syndromes associated with neurological defects. Isolated CHF has a favourable prognosis requiring endotherapy. Liver transplantation is required when there is decompensation or recurrent cholangitis, especially in Caroli’s syndrome. Combined liver-kidney transplantation is indicated when both liver and renal issues are present.

TAFRO syndrome complicated by porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease with portal hypertension: a case report

Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease (PSVD) is a disorder that can cause portal hypertension without liver cirrhosis. TAFRO syndrome is a systemic inflammatory disorder with a background of immunological abnormalities. We report a case of TAFRO syndrome complicated by PSVD with portal hypertension. A 39-year-old man developed refractory ascites and esophageal varices. Lymph node histology revealed multicentric Castleman disease-like features. Intravenous methylprednisolone and tocilizumab therapy improved ascites and renal dysfunction, but the patient developed severe infections. The diagnosis of TAFRO syndrome in patients complicated by PSVD with portal hypertension encourages the consideration of appropriate treatment for these patients.

Autoimmune biomarkers in porto-sinusoidal vascular disease: Potential role in its diagnosis and pathophysiology

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is a rare disease that requires excluding cirrhosis and other causes of portal hypertension for its diagnosis because it lacks a specific diagnostical test. Although it has been occasionally associated with autoimmune diseases, the pathophysiology of PSVD remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of autoimmunity in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of PSVD.

METHODS

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with PSVD and 39 with cirrhosis matched by gender, signs of portal hypertension and liver function were included (training set). By using Indirect Immunofluorescence, ELISA and slot-blot methods data 22 autoantibodies were identified in patients with PSVD and cirrhosis. Presence of anti-endothelial cells antibodies (AECA) was assayed by a cell-based ELISA. Thirty-one PSVD, 40 cirrhosis patients, 15 patients with splenomegaly associated with haematological disease and 14 healthy donors were included in a validation set.

FINDINGS

The proportion of patients with at least one positive antibody was statistically significantly higher in patients with PSVD compared with cirrhosis (92% vs 56%; P < .01). Specifically, AECA were significantly more frequent in PSVD than in cirrhosis (38% vs 15%; P = .013). Results were confirmed in the validation set. In the overall population, presence of AECA had a 63% positive predictive value for diagnosing PSVD and a 71% negative predictive value, with a specificity of 94% when the 1/16 level is used as cut-off. AECA positive serum samples react with a 68-72 kDa protein of human liver endothelial sinusoidal cells.

Divergences in Macrophage Activation Markers Soluble CD163 and Mannose Receptor in Patients With Non-cirrhotic and Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

Introduction

Macrophages are involved in development and progression of chronic liver disease and portal hypertension. The macrophage activation markers soluble (s)CD163 and soluble mannose receptor (sMR), are associated with portal hypertension in patient with liver cirrhosis but never investigated in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. We hypothesized higher levels in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension than patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. We investigated sCD163 and sMR levels in patients with portal hypertension due to idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with and without cirrhosis.

Methods

We studied plasma sCD163 and sMR levels in patients with IPH (n = 26), non-cirrhotic PVT (n = 20), patients with cirrhosis without PVT (n = 31) and with PVT (n = 17), and healthy controls (n = 15).

Results

Median sCD163 concentration was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.24-1.83) mg/L in healthy controls, 1.96 (95% CI: 1.49-2.56) in patients with non-cirrhotic PVT and 2.16 (95% CI: 1.75-2.66) in patients with IPH. There was no difference between non-cirrhotic PVT patients and healthy controls, whereas IPH patients had significantly higher levels than controls (P < 0.05). The median sCD163 was significantly higher in the cirrhotic groups compared to the other groups, with a median sCD163 of 6.31 (95% CI: 5.16-7.73) in cirrhotics without PVT and 5.19 (95% CI: 4.18-6.46) with PVT (P < 0.01, all). Similar differences were observed for sMR.

Conclusion

Soluble CD163 and sMR levels are elevated in patients with IPH and patients with cirrhosis, but normal in patients with non-cirrhotic PVT. This suggests that hepatic macrophage activation is more driven by the underlying liver disease with cirrhosis than portal hypertension.

Idiopathic refractory ascites after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a previously unrecognized entity

At our center, we observed a series of patients who developed transudative refractory ascites secondary to noncirrhotic, non-veno-occlusive disease (VOD)-related portal hypertension after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Patients were considered to have idiopathic portal hypertension-related refractory ascites (IRA) if they developed ascites secondary to intrahepatic portal hypertension (serum ascites albumin gradient ≥1.1 g/dL or hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >5 mm Hg), but did not meet the clinical criteria for classical VOD/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) and did not have any alternate etiology of portal hypertension. From our institutional database, we identified 40 patients who developed IRA after allo-HSCT between 2004 and 2018. The patients' median age at the time of allo-HSCT was 54 years (range, 21-73 years). The median time to development of IRA after allo-HSCT was 80 days (range, 16-576 days). The median number of paracentesis was 3 (range, 1-11), and 15 (38%) patients had an intraperitoneal catheter placed for continued drainage of the rapidly accumulating ascites. Portal pressures were measured in 19 patients; 6 (15%) had moderate portal hypertension (HVPG 6-9 mm Hg), and 13 (33%) had severe portal hypertension (HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg). Liver biopsy was performed in 24 patients. None of the patients met the criteria for classical VOD/SOS (clinical/histological) or cirrhosis (histological). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 63%, and the median survival duration after the development of the IRA was 7 months (range, 0.8-125.6 months). IRA is a poorly understood and often fatal complication of allo-HSCT.

A case of idiopathic portal hypertension accompanying multiple hepatic nodular regenerative hyperplasia in a patient with systemic sclerosis

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is one of the background diseases causing nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH). Furthermore, IPH patients accompanied with autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc), are more likely to form NRH in the liver. A 76-year-old woman had been aware of the Raynaud's phenomenon and scleroderma for the past 30 years. In this case, she presented with abdominal fullness, and her imaging analysis revealed ascites and multiple liver nodules. On Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI), donut-like uptake was observed in the nodules in the hepatobiliary phase. Liver biopsy of a nodule demonstrated that it was composed of hyperplastic hepatocytes without fibrous septa, and dilated sinusoids were observed beside the nodule. Conversely, background liver showed that peripheral portal veins appeared stenotic with dense fibrosis in the portal area. The final diagnosis was that multiple NRH of the liver developed in SSc patient accompanying IPH. This case suggests that NRH may be unexpectedly diagnosed in patients with autoimmune diseases accompanying IPH.

Idiopathic Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension and Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease: Review of Current Data

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a clinicopathologic disease entity characterized by the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of liver cirrhosis or known risk factors accountable for PH. Multiple hematologic, immune-related, infectious, hereditary and metabolic risk factors have been associated with this disorder. Still, the exact etiopathogenesis is largely unknown. The recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) scheme broadens the spectrum of the disease by also including patients without clinical PH who are found to have similar histopathologic findings on core liver biopsies. Three histomorphologic lesions have been identified as specific for PSVD to include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia and incomplete septal cirrhosis/fibrosis. However, these findings are often subtle, under-recognized and subjective with low interobserver agreement among pathologists. Additionally, the natural history of the subclinical forms of the disease remains unexplored. The clinical course is more favorable compared to cirrhosis patients, especially in the absence of clinical PH or liver dysfunction. There are no universally accepted guidelines in regard to diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD. Hence, this review emphasizes the need to raise awareness of this entity by highlighting its complex pathophysiology and clinicopathologic associations. Lastly, formulation of standardized diagnostic criteria with clinical validation is necessary to avoid misclassifying vascular diseases of the liver and to develop and implement targeted therapeutic strategies.

The cost-effectiveness of schistosomiasis screening and treatment among recently resettled refugees to Canada: an economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Many refugees and asylum seekers from countries where schistosomiasis is endemic are infected with the Schistosoma parasite when they arrive in Canada. We assessed, from a systemic perspective, which of the following management strategies by health care providers is cost-effective: testing for schistosomiasis and treating if the individual is infected, treating presumptively or waiting for symptoms to emerge.

METHODS

We constructed a decision-tree model to examine the cost-effectiveness of 3 management strategies: watchful waiting, screening and treatment, and presumptive treatment. We obtained data for the model from the literature and other sources, to predict deaths and chronic complications caused by schistosomiasis, as well as costs and net monetary benefit.

RESULTS

Presumptive treatment was cost-saving if the prevalence of schistosomiasis in the target population was greater than 2.1%. In our baseline analysis, presumptive treatment was associated with an increase of 0.156 quality-adjusted life years and a cost saving of $405 per person, compared with watchful waiting. It was also more effective and less costly than screening and treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Among recently resettled refugees and asylum claimants in Canada, from countries where schistosomiasis is endemic, presumptive treatment was predicted to be less costly and more effective than watchful waiting or screening and treatment. Our results support a revision of the current Canadian recommendations.

Causes and Management of Non-cirrhotic Portal Hypertension​

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) includes a heterogeneous group of conditions. The aim of this paper is to make an overview on the denominations, diagnostical features and management of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) and chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) being the main causes of NCPH in the Western world.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of NCPH consists in the treatment of associated diseases and of portal hypertension (PH). PH due to PSVD or PVT is managed similarly to PH due to cirrhosis. TIPS placement and liver transplantation are considerable options in patients with refractory variceal bleeding/ascites and with progressive liver failure. Anticoagulation is a cornerstone both in the treatment of thrombosis in PSVD and in the prevention of thrombosis recurrence in patients with portal cavernoma. Physicians should be aware of the existence of PSVD and chronic PVT and actively search them in particular settings. To now, the management of portal hypertension-related complications in NCPH is the same of those of cirrhosis. Large cooperative studies on the natural history of NCPH are necessary to better define its management.

A Rare Presentation of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Presenting With Bleeding Esophageal Varices Secondary to a Malignant Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

A 60-year-old woman presented with six months of abdominal pain, weight loss and diarrhea for which she underwent bidirectional endoscopies that were unremarkable. Over the next two weeks, she developed non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and presented with esophageal variceal bleeding. A diffuse large B-cell lymphoma encircling her celiac axis with a tumor thrombosis of the superior mesenteric, splenic and portal veins was found to be the cause of her portal hypertension. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed to control her variceal bleeding. She was started on R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) chemotherapy and after three cycles her symptoms have subsided, and a CT scan has shown shrinking mesenteric lymphadenopathy.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension

These guidelines on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) in the management of portal hypertension have been commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee (CSSC) of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the Liver Section of the BSG. The guidelines are new and have been produced in collaboration with the British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) and British Association of the Study of the Liver (BASL). The guidelines development group comprises elected members of the BSG Liver Section, representation from BASL, a nursing representative and two patient representatives. The quality of evidence and grading of recommendations was appraised using the GRADE system. These guidelines are aimed at healthcare professionals considering referring a patient for a TIPSS. They comprise the following subheadings: indications; patient selection; procedural details; complications; and research agenda. They are not designed to address: the management of the underlying liver disease; the role of TIPSS in children; or complex technical and procedural aspects of TIPSS.

Diagnostic challenges in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension - porto sinusoidal vascular disease

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension consists of a group of diseases characterized by signs and complications of portal hypertension, which differ from cirrhosis through histological alterations, hemodynamic characterization and, clinical outcome. Because of the similarities in clinical presentation and imaging signs, frequently these patients, and particularly those with porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD), are misdiagnosed as having liver cirrhosis and thus raising difficulties in their diagnosis. The most challenging differentiation to be considered is between PSVD and cirrhosis and, although not pathognomonic, liver biopsy is still the standard of diagnosis. Although they still require extended validation before being broadly used, new non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease, like transient elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound or metabolomic profiling, have shown promising results. Another issue is the differentiation between PSVD and chronic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction, especially now when it is known that 40% of patients suffering from PSVD develop portal vein thrombosis. In this particular case, once the portal vein thrombosis occurred, the diagnosis of PSVD is impossible according to the current guidelines. Moreover, so far, the differentiation between PSVD and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome has not been clear so far in particular circumstances. In this review we highlighted the diagnostic challenges regarding the PSVD, as well as the current techniques used in the evaluation of these patients.