A revised electronic version of RUCAM for the diagnosis of DILI

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Drug-induced liver injury related to avacopan therapy

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of avacopan as remission induction therapy for Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is well-established. However, concerns regarding liver injury post-avacopan treatment remain, especially in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with avacopan treatment.

METHODS

This study included 22 patients with AAV who were treated with avacopan at multiple centres in Japan between September 2021 and March 2024. DILI was assessed by the Japanese version of a revised electronic causality assessment method (RECAM-J 2023).

RESULTS

Among the 22 patients treated with avacopan, DILI was observed in nine cases (40.9%): six with microscopic polyangiitis and three with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Severe DILI with elevated total bilirubin (T-Bil) was observed in four of the nine patients (44.4%), a few weeks after the initiation of avacopan therapy. Eight of the nine patients (88.9%) with DILI improved after discontinuation of avacopan and other medications, and one patient developed vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) leading to death. Avacopan-induced DILI was classified into three patterns: 1, short-term injury without T-Bil elevation; 2, transient cholestatic liver injury with T-Bil elevation; 3, decompensated liver injury with marked T-Bil elevation (VBDS). The risk factors for severe DILI with T-Bil elevation in Japanese patients included older age, lower body mass index and early onset DILI following the initiation of avacopan treatment.

CONCLUSION

Avacopan-induced DILI is relatively common in Japan and could be lethal. Frequent laboratory follow-ups should be considered, especially for elderly and low-body-weight patients.

Identification of Distinguishing Features of Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Liver Injury Associated With Sepsis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It can be difficult to distinguish between drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and liver injury associated with sepsis (sepsis induced liver injury, SILI). The aims of the study were to compare clinical and biochemical features between DILI and SILI and identify distinguishing characteristics that might assist in diagnosing these conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective cohorts of all DILI cases diagnosed in Iceland 2009-2024 and SILI 2006-2024 were divided into hepatocellular and cholestatic (CS/mixed) patterns. Patients had: > 5× upper limit of normal (ULN) of ALT and/or > 2× ULN in ALP. RUCAM and expert opinion were used in the causality assessment of DILI, and SILI patients had to fulfil international consensus criteria.

RESULTS

Overall 275 DILI patients (median age 59 years, 63% females), 153 with SILI (67 years, 49% females) were included. Among patients with HC type, 57% with SILI and only one (0.9%) with DILI had normal liver tests 2 weeks after the event. The peak value of AST was 1794 (IQR 931-3526) IU/L in HC type of SILI but 584 (315-1013) IU/L in DILI, p < 0.001. CS/mixed type of SILI resolved also significantly faster while CS/mixed pattern of DILI had significantly higher ALP at onset and peak ALT than SILI. SILI had 30% mortality compared to DILI (2%) p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Marked elevation of AST and rapid resolution with a HC pattern of liver injury favours the diagnosis of SILI. Cholestatic/mixed SILI also resolves rapidly in contrast to CS/mixed DILI that is associated with markers of more pronounced liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury due to avacopan improved by mycophenolate mofetil: A case report

RATIONALE

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis that predominantly affects small vessels. Glucocorticoids are the standard therapeutic agents for AAV; however, their long-term use can cause damage. Avacopan is a small-molecule complement component 5a receptor antagonist that reduces vasculitis and can potentially be used as an alternative to glucocorticoids. However, its therapeutic efficacy remains unknown, and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a concern associated with its use.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 74-year-old woman with a history of granulomatosis with polyangiitis was admitted to our hospital with a 1-week history of fatigue and anorexia.

DIAGNOSES

She had started avacopan 3 months before hospitalization. Blood tests showed severe liver injury, and since other diseases were ruled out, she was diagnosed with DILI secondary to avacopan.

INTERVENTIONS

Avacopan was discontinued, and glucocorticoid doses were increased and ursodeoxycholic acid was administered; however, the liver injury did not resolve. Therefore, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was started.

OUTCOMES

The liver injury was resolved after starting MMF.

LESSONS

MMF is effective in treating DILI caused by avacopan.

IQ DILI Consensus Opinion: Best Practices for Rechallenge Following Suspected Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Clinical Trials

Rechallenge with study drug after suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during drug development requires a comprehensive assessment of risks and benefits. Lack of universal consensus or societal guidelines makes this decision-making process more challenging and difficult to manage in clinical development. The sparse published literature is biased towards reporting cases of positive rechallenge (recurrent DILI), often with adverse outcomes. The heterogeneity of available data and inconsistent approaches to drug rechallenge likely lead to bias in our perception of the risks of rechallenge, ultimately leaving this topic controversial. The IQ DILI Causality Assessment Working Group, in collaboration with academic and regulatory experts, developed this manuscript with the following objectives: (1) understand and describe current practices via literature review and survey of practices and opinions among drug developers, academic experts, and regulators; (2) propose a consistent and structured approach to decision-making and managing the rechallenge process; (3) facilitate better understanding of the risks and benefits of rechallenge via a standardized approach to collecting rechallenge data, including outcomes and the importance of publishing rechallenge data; and (4) the role of obtaining a liver biopsy, guidance on when a biopsy might be considered, and what histologic findings can assist in making the rechallenge decision. Lastly, knowledge gaps in the drug rechallenge paradigm are highlighted alongside the proposal to standardize the collection and publication of rechallenge data to help address these gaps. This consensus expert opinion does not encourage rechallenge but provides guidance for drug developers to apply a consistent approach to rechallenge.

A case report of liver failure caused by Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg: A rare case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg is a traditional Chinese medicinal plant recognized for its therapeutic properties, which include heat-clearing, toxicity-eliminating, anti-inflammatory, pain-relieving, blood circulation-promoting, blood stasis-resolving, wind-dispersing, and phlegm-resolving actions. It is predominantly used in clinical settings to manage inflammatory disorders, such as febrile convulsions, hepatitis, snakebites, and cellulitis. To date, no documented cases of liver failure attributable to T hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg have been reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 50-year-old female patient presented with symptoms of xanthochromia, tea-colored urine, fatigue, and anorexia following a three-day course of T hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Liver function tests revealed elevated alanine aminotransferase (1386 U/L) and AST (405 U/L) levels.

DIAGNOSES

Liver failure induced by T hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg was diagnosed.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received treatment that included discontinuation of hepatotoxic drugs, administration of N-acetylcysteine for liver protection, nutritional support, and correction of acid-base and electrolyte imbalances.

OUTCOMES

After 11 days of liver-protective and nutritional therapy, significant improvements in the patient's condition were noted. The symptoms of xanthochromia and tea-colored urine subsided, and liver function markers decreased markedly, returning to near-normal levels. No further complaints of discomfort were reported, and the patient was discharged with prescribed medications for follow-up.

LESSON

The possibility of liver failure following the use of T hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg should be considered. When patients present with symptoms such as fat intolerance, xanthochromia, poor appetite, nausea, and dark urine after consuming this herb, liver function tests should be promptly conducted to exclude the possibility of drug-induced liver injury. T hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg has the potential to induce liver failure. Liver-protective measures, including nutritional support, proved to be effective in managing the condition.

The Frequency of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Due to Antibiotics Among Hospitalised Patients

INTRODUCTION

Most epidemiological studies have found antibiotics to be the most common cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). It is unclear what the risk of DILI is associated with different antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of DILI due to the most commonly used antibiotics among inpatients, in a population-based setting.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with the 14 most-used antibiotics at Landspitali University Hospital Iceland 2012-2023, with concomitant: > 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or > 2 × ULN of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), were identified. If DILI was a potential cause, the Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method (RECAM) method was used to determine likelihood of DILI.

RESULTS

Overall 2292 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 52 of whom were found to have DILI, median age 67 (range 21-93) years, 58% females, 17 (33%) with jaundice and three (5.8%) died of liver failure. The most commonly implicated agent was amoxicillin/clavulanate (n = 23) in 1:1327 users (0.075%), ceftriaxone (n = 8) 1:3779 (0.02%), cefazolin (n = 7) 1: 6363 (0.016%), cloxacillin 1:6024 (n = 4) (0.017%), piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 2) 1:1551 (0.097%), vancomycin (n = 2) 1:1966 (0.076%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) (n = 3) 1:1096 (0.091%) and ciprofloxacin (n = 1) 1:10,938 (0.009%). In two cases, more than one antibiotic was considered likely.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-induced liver injury was found to be a rare adverse effect of antibiotics in a population-based setting. Overall, 33% presented with jaundice but three died of liver failure, all due to amoxicillin/clavulanate, which was the most common cause occurring in around 1 in 1300 users. However, TMP/SMX was associated with the highest proportional risk of DILI.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Caused by Metamizole: Identification of a Characteristic Injury Pattern

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to metamizole has gained increasing attention. Causality assessment remains a challenge, especially in patients with co-medications. We therefore aimed to further characterise metamizole DILI cases.

METHODS

The data of patients with metamizole intake from our prospective study on acute liver injury with potential drug-related causes were analysed. Diagnosis and causality assessment were based on a thorough work-up and long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

DILI was associated with metamizole in 61 of 324 DILI patients (prevalence 18.8%). A highly characteristic clinical pattern was observed in 43 of the 61 patients, characterised by marked elevation of transaminases peaking at the time of DILI recognition and a more pronounced increase of bilirubin within the first 3 days of clinical presentation. Patients fitting this picture had higher rates of jaundice, coagulopathy, and acute liver failure, however outcomes did not differ significantly when compared to non-metamizole DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients. Overall, fatal adverse outcomes defined by death or liver transplantation were observed in 13.1% of metamizole DILI patients. On multivariate analysis, only aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and INR were independently associated with a fatal adverse outcome. INR, in particular, performed better than Hy's law, bilirubin, transaminases, and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), with a c-statistic of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70-1.0). At a cut-off of ≥ 2.1, sensitivity and specificity for a fatal adverse outcome were 75% and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Metamizole DILI can present with a characteristic pattern that can help clinicians to identify metamizole as the causative agent. Outcome, however, is not associated with this clinical picture and should rather be predicted by INR at onset.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02353455.

Methods for causality assessment of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

The diagnosis of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenging task due to the lack of specific features or definitive diagnostic tools. A minimum of clinical and pharmacological information is required, together with laboratory and imaging tests to exclude other causes of liver injury. Several standardized methods have been developed to support clinical judgement and establish causality assessment, the most widely used being the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method-RUCAM-and structured Expert Opinion. More recently, an evidence-based, revised RUCAM, Electronic Causality Assessment Method-RECAM-has been developed and, although still a work in progress, may replace RUCAM scoring in the future. International collaborative networks and ongoing research efforts are key to advancing biomarker qualification and validation and developing new in vitro patient-based methods that will help improve DILI diagnosis and move towards a personalized medicine approach.

Artificial Intelligence: An Emerging Tool for Studying Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex and potentially severe adverse reaction to drugs, herbal products or dietary supplements. DILI can mimic other liver diseases clinical presentation, and currently lacks specific diagnostic biomarkers, which hinders its diagnosis. In some cases, DILI may progress to acute liver failure. Given its public health risk, novel methodologies to enhance the understanding of DILI are crucial. Recently, the increasing availability of larger datasets has highlighted artificial intelligence (AI) as a powerful tool to construct complex models. In this review, we summarise the evidence about the use of AI in DILI research, explaining fundamental AI concepts and its subfields. We present findings from AI-based approaches in DILI investigations for risk stratification, prognostic evaluation and causality assessment and discuss the adoption of natural language processing (NLP) and large language models (LLM) in the clinical setting. Finally, we explore future perspectives and challenges in utilising AI for DILI research.

Mechanisms and aetiology-dependent treatment of acute liver failure

This review compiles the mechanisms of acute liver failure (ALF) as well as the current and potential therapeutic approaches, including aetiology-specific treatment, and the issues encountered with such approaches. On a cellular level, ALF is characterized by massive hepatocyte death due to different types of cellular demise. Compensatory hyperplasia and functional recovery are possible when the regenerative capacity is sufficient to sustain hepatic function. ALF has a high mortality of about 30% and can lead to death in a very short time despite maximum therapeutic intervention. Besides aetiology-specific therapy and intensive care, the therapeutic option of emergency liver transplantation has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with ALF. However, due to limiting factors such as organ shortage, many patients die on the waiting list. In addition to graft assessment, machine perfusion may have the potential to recondition marginal organs and thus expand the organ donor pool.

Secondary sclerosing cholangitis due to drug-induced liver injury: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The main objective of our study was to assess the frequency of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) patients with coexisting secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) within our center and then analyze clinical features of these patients. SSC has received limited attention in the context of DILI. These changes can be observed on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study involving 185 consecutive patients diagnosed with DILI between January 2020 and August 2024. We reviewed MRCP images of 81 available patients.

RESULTS

Among the 185 patients, 81 underwent MRCP and 14 patients (17.3%) were diagnosed with SSC. Nine (64.3%) of 14 were diagnosed with biliary strictures in extrahepatic bile ducts, and 11 of 14 patients (78.6%) displayed segmental distribution. The SSC group showed higher peak alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values (660 vs. 290 U/l, P  = 0.015), longer resolution time (114 vs. 61 days, P  = 0.038), and a higher frequency of chronic injury (35.7% vs. 10.4%, P  = 0.016). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified peak ALP values as a risk factor for SSC [odds ratio = 1.002 (1.000-1.005), P  = 0.030].

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of drug-related SSC has noticeably increased in recent years. The higher peak ALP values potentially associated with an increased risk of drug-related SSC onset.

Challenges in herbal-induced liver injury identification and prevention

Herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) are being used worldwide at an increasing rate. Mirroring this trend, HDS-induced liver injury, also known as HDS-induced liver injury (HILI), has increased significantly over the past three decades in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN), now accounting for 20% of cases of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). There are significant challenges in the identification and prevention of HILI due to varying presentations, ability to make clear diagnosis, identification of the responsible ingredient, lack of treatment, and lack of regulatory oversight of HDS products to confirm their ingredients and ensure safety. The major implicated agents include anabolic steroids, green tea extract, garcinia cambogia, kratom, ashwagandha, turmeric and multi-ingredient nutritional supplements. Fortunately, with the formation of major DILI consortiums across the world, the last decade has seen advances in the identification of at-risk genetic phenotypes, the use of chemical analysis on multi-ingredient nutritional supplements, and the publication of data/injury patterns of potentially risky HDS.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a global problem and can develop from exposure to prescription or over-the-counter medications as well as herbal and dietary supplements. The diagnosis of DILI is clinically challenging, and liver injury can be severe leading to liver failure, death, or liver transplantation. Patients with underlying chronic liver diseases (CLD) may be at increased risk for DILI, which is associated with factors related to drug or liver disease.

METHODS

This review summarises current knowledge on the risk and outcomes of DILI in patients with CLD.

RESULTS

Patients with CLD may be at an increased risk for DILI. Additionally patients with underlying CLD are at risk for more severe liver injury and worse outcomes after DILI.

DISCUSSION

The risk for and poor outcomes from DILI are accentuated in patients with CLD and potentially leading to the worst-case scenario of acute-on-chronic liver failure. We highlight the key observations on DILI with a broad range of underlying liver diseases and the high-DILI risk agents implicated in those populations.

Drug-induced liver injury. Part I: Classification, diagnosis and treatment

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a growing clinical problem. Antibiotics remain the most common cause of DILI in Europe. Their clinical spectrum is very broad, from asymptomatic to acute liver failure. Currently, DILI is categorized as hepatocellular (R ≥ 5), cholestatic (R ≤ 2) or mixed (R = 2-5) injury based on the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ratio. DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion and requires a wide differential diagnosis. The most important step in management is discontinuation of the drug suspected of causing liver damage. The list of specific antidotes that eliminate the effects of hepatotoxins is unfortunately very short. In symptomatic treatment, glucocorticosteroids and ursodeoxycholic acid have been used in selected cases. Liver transplantation is an optional treatment in patients with acute liver failure.

Investigation of the Role of Chemical Analysis in Causality Assessment of Herbal and Dietary Supplement-Induced Liver Injury

BACKGROUND

 The attribution of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to specific herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) is confounded by inaccurate labels and undisclosed ingredients. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) determines the attribution of injury to an agent through its structured expert opinion causality assessment process, but without the use of chemical analysis data of HDS. We aimed to determine the impact of chemical analysis of HDS products on prior causality assessment scores.

METHODS

Obtained samples of HDS consumed by DILIN-enrolled patients were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Chemical analysis data were compared to label accuracy and detect whether the product contained botanical and non-botanical compounds. A comparison of the causality scores reassessed with chemical analysis was compared with the original scores.

RESULTS

A total of 54 previously adjudicated cases with chemical analysis available were reassessed for causality with chemical analysis data; reviewers were blinded to original causality scores. Using the chemical analysis data, 37% (n = 20) of the 54 cases were scored with a higher likelihood of DILI compared with the original causality scores; 14 of the 20 (70%) moved from probable to highly likely; 52% had no change in causality score; and 11% of cases were scored as a lower likelihood of DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

 Our study demonstrates that there is value in using HDS chemical analysis data in the causality assessment process for DILI. In more than a third of cases, chemical analysis of products led to an increased confidence in DILI attribution to HDS. These findings suggest that chemical analysis is an important tool in causality assessment for HDS agents, specifically in challenging situations, and further studies are needed to confirm its applicability in clinical practice.

Useful biomarkers for predicting poor prognosis of patients with drug-induced liver injury: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) plays an important role in liver failure and causes mortality. Patients with DILI compatible with Hy's law are associated with poorer outcomes. However, the predictive accuracy of Hy's law is not good enough in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the optimal values of biomarkers associated with the prognosis of DILI.

METHODS

From June 1, 2014-May 30, 2022, patients with reported DILI were included. Patients' characteristics, drugs, DILI type, liver enzymes, and comorbidities were assessed. The associations with DILI-related comorbidities and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-five DILI patients were enrolled, 5 patients died of liver failure, and 23 patients died within 56 weeks after DILI. This study found that 15 mg/dL of total bilirubin, 1000 U/L of ALT, and 2 of PT-INR were optimal cut-off values in predicting DILI-related mortality. For the overall survival, patients with sepsis (HR:5.053, 95% CI:1.594-16.018, p = 0.006), malignancy (HR:4.371, 95% CI:1.573-12.147, p = 0.005), or end-stage renal disease (HR:7.409, 95% CI:1.404-39.103, p = 0.018) were independent poor prognostic factors in multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Total bilirubin >15 mg/dL, ALT >1000 U/L, and PT-INR >2 are useful biomarkers in predicting DILI-related mortality. DILI patients with sepsis, malignancy, or end-stage renal disease are associated with worse overall survival.

Liver function trends in children with suspected drug-induced hepatocellular injury: A survey using an electronic medical records database

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a common adverse drug event with limited pediatric data in the literature. This study aimed to use pediatric electronic medical records to assess hepatocellular DILI in pediatric patients who were prescribed liver-injury-inducing drugs.

METHODS

The Pediatric Medical Information Collection System (P-MICS) is a centralized database integrating electronic medical records from over 40 medical pediatric centers. Pediatric patients in the P-MICS with serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels five or more times the upper limit of normal and who were below 15 years of age were selected. Those with liver diseases unrelated to drug-induced causes were excluded. We identified drugs prescribed 2 to 90 days before the first elevated ALT reading. High-risk liver-injury-causing drugs were determined based on the LiverTox score. We analyzed post-event ALT and total bilirubin levels (TB) and DILI management.

RESULTS

Of the 817 patients with suspected DILI, 251 were prescribed four drugs identified as high-risk drugs for hepatocellular DILI: methotrexate (n = 129), aspirin (n = 82), vancomycin (n = 58), and cyclophosphamide (n = 51). The median ALT level at the first event was 245 U/L. Approximately 35% of methotrexate users and cyclophosphamide users experienced recurrent ALT elevation. Some methotrexate users also showed TB elevation. Discontinuation of high-risk drugs resulted in fewer relapses and TB elevations than pharmacotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The P-MICS effectively identifies pediatric patients with potential liver injury and tracks liver function in those prescribed liver-injury-causing drugs. This study underscores liver injury risks in pediatric anticancer drug users, highlighting the utility of the P-MICS in monitoring off-label drug safety in children.

Hepatotoxicity in Cancer Immunotherapy: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Perspectives

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has positively impacted oncological treatments. Despite its effectiveness, immunotherapy is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, including the liver. Hepatotoxicity primarily manifests as immune-related hepatitis and, less frequently, cholangitis. Several risk factors, such as pre-existing autoimmune and liver diseases, the type of immunotherapy, and combination regimens, play a role in immune-related hepatotoxicity (irH), although reliable predictive markers or models are still lacking. The severity of irH ranges from mild to severe cases, up to, in rare instances, acute liver failure. Management strategies require regular monitoring for early diagnosis and interventions, encompassing strict monitoring for mild cases to the permanent suspension of immunotherapy for severe forms. Corticosteroids are the backbone of treatment in moderate and high-grade damage, alone or in combination with additional immunosuppressive drugs for resistant or refractory cases. Given the relatively low number of events and the lack of dedicated prospective studies, much uncertainty remains about the optimal management of irH, especially in the most severe cases. This review presents the main features of irH, focusing on injury patterns and mechanisms, and provides an overview of the management landscape, from standard care to the latest evidence.

Primary Iliopsoas Abscess and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Emergency Department: A Case Report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Iliopsoas abscess (IPA) is a rare condition with varied symptomology and etiology. Less than one-third of patients with IPA present in the emergency department (ED) with the traditional triad of fever, back pain, and restricted hip motion (or limp), leading to delays in diagnosis and management. Acute liver failure is also a rare clinical presentation in the ED, being associated with high morbidity and mortality. It occurs most often in young patients without pre-existing liver disease, presenting unique challenges in clinical management. Most cases currently happen because of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), mainly from acetaminophen or idiosyncratic drug reactions. This case report aims to raise awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the two atypical presentations in ED and introduce a potential differential diagnosis when evaluating patients with fever and back pain or liver enzyme elevations with or without nonspecific symptoms associated with the development of jaundice. The intention is to provide insights into the signs and symptoms that may indicate the presence of an iliopsoas abscess and prompt additional investigations.

CASE REPORT

Here, we describe a case of primary iliopsoas abscess associated with drug-induced liver injury in our ED. The patient complained of pain in the left lumbar region and fatigue that started two weeks before this presentation, claiming that, during the previous night, the pain suddenly worsened. At the first clinical examination in the ED, the patient presented pain at palpation in the right hypochondriac and left lumbar regions, accompanied by fever, vomiting, and jaundice. On abdominal ultrasonography, the diagnosis of acute cholangitis was suspected. The laboratory test shows leukocytosis with neutrophilia, thrombocytosis, elevated liver enzymes, and hyperbilirubinemia with the predominance of indirect bilirubin. After analyzing the laboratory test results, we repeated and performed a more detailed anamnesis and medical history of the patient. Because of her increasing pain and persistent fever, she recognized excessive consumption in the last five days of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. We performed abdominal and pelvic computed tomography, which confirmed the diagnosis of cholelithiasis observed with the diameter of the bile duct within normal limits but also showed an abscess collection fused to the interfibrillar level of the left iliopsoas muscle, a diagnosis we most likely would have missed. The patient was hospitalized in the General Surgery Department, and surgical abscess drainage was performed. The patient's evolution was excellent; she was discharged after 11 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The case presented here exemplifies how iliopsoas abscess, a rare cause of back pain, can quickly go unrecognized, especially in the emergency department. Our experiences will raise awareness among doctors in emergency departments about this uncommon but essential diagnosis. With advancements in diagnostic tools and techniques, we hope that more cases of iliopsoas abscess will be accurately diagnosed. Moreover, no case report from the literature has presented IPA associated with DILI. This case is unique because our patient did not exhibit classic features of either pathology. This case also emphasizes the importance of a medical history that includes thorough evaluations of potential high utilization of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

Review article: Recommendations for detection, assessment and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury during clinical trials in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major concern for oncology drugs in clinical practice and under development. Monitoring cancer patients for hepatotoxicity is challenging as these patients may have abnormal liver tests pre-treatment or on-study for many reasons including liver injury due to past oncology treatments, hepatic metastases, medical co-morbidities such as heart failure, and concomitant medications. At present, there are no regulatory guidelines or position papers that systematically address best practices pertaining to DILI detection, assessment and management in oncology patients.

AIMS

The goals of this review are (1) to examine and interpret the available evidence and (2) to make recommendations for detection, monitoring, adjudication, and management of suspected hepatocellular DILI during oncology clinical trials.

METHODS

This manuscript was developed by the IQ Consortium (International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in pharmaceutical development) DILI Initiative that consists of members from 17 pharmaceutical companies, in collaboration with academic and regulatory DILI experts. The manuscript is based on extensive literature review, expert interpretation of the literature, and several rounds of consensus discussions.

RESULTS

This review highlights recommendations for patient eligibility for clinical trials with or without primary/metastatic liver involvement, as well as changes in liver tests that should trigger increased monitoring and/or discontinuation of study drug. Guidance regarding causality assessment for suspected DILI events, rechallenge and dose-modification is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This review brings together evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion to provide the first dedicated consensus for best practices in detection, assessment, and management of DILI in oncology clinical trials.

Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of RECAM in North American Patients With Suspected Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

INTRODUCTION

The Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method (RECAM) is an updated, electronic version of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) to diagnose drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The primary aim of this study was to compare RECAM vs RUCAM in patients with suspected DILI.

METHODS

Patient encounters from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2019, were searched for suspected DILI using ICD-10 K71 codes for toxic liver disease. DILI Network (DILIN) expert opinion scores were assigned to each case (1/2/3 = probable DILI, 4/5 = non-DILI). RECAM and RUCAM scores were compared with DILIN expert opinion scores.

RESULTS

Among 766,930 encounters searched, 120 unique patients met inclusion criteria with 72 (60%) adjudicated as probable-DILI. The most frequent suspect drugs were antimicrobials (38.3%), antineoplastics (8.3%), and antirheumatic drugs (8.3%). The mean age was 49.2 + 15.6 years, and 50% were female with 45.8% having hepatocellular injury. RUCAM had better agreement with DILIN expert opinion for probable-DILI vs RECAM (66.7% vs 44.4%, P = 0.018). Both had 100% agreement with DILIN expert opinion for non-DILI. Frequently missing laboratory data included hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (64.3%) and antihepatitis E virus (HEV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing (70%), leading to loss of up to 6 points in RECAM scoring but not affecting RUCAM scores. A modified RECAM that made HCV RNA and anti-HEV IgM optional had better agreement with DILIN expert opinion compared with RUCAM (79.2% vs 66.7%, P = 0.09).

DISCUSSION

Among 120 suspected DILI cases, RUCAM had better agreement with DILIN expert opinion scores vs RECAM. Making HCV RNA and anti-HEV IgM testing optional significantly improved agreement between RECAM and DILIN expert opinion. Future modifications to RECAM are needed to improve causality assessment in North American patients with suspected DILI.

Insights gained into the injury mechanism of drug and herb induced liver injury in the hepatic microenvironment

Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) and herb Induced Liver Injury (HILI) continues to pose a substantial challenge in both clinical practice and drug development, representing a grave threat to patient well-being. This comprehensive review introduces a novel perspective on DILI and HILI by thoroughly exploring the intricate microenvironment of the liver. The dynamic interplay among hepatocytes, sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, cholangiocytes, and the intricate vascular network assumes a central role in drug metabolism and detoxification. Significantly, this microenvironment is emerging as a critical determinant of susceptibility to DILI and HILI. The review delves into the multifaceted interactions within the liver microenvironment, providing valuable insights into the complex mechanisms that underlie DILI and HILI. Furthermore, we discuss potential strategies for mitigating drug-induced liver injury by targeting these influential factors, emphasizing their clinical relevance. By highlighting recent advances and future prospects, our aim is to shed light on the promising avenue of leveraging the liver microenvironment for the prevention and mitigation of DILI and HILI. This deeper understanding is crucial for advancing clinical practices and ensuring patient safety in the realm of DILI and HILI.

ERAP-1 and ERAP-2 Variants in Liver Injury After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: A US Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to describe the presenting features, genetic factors, and outcomes of 23 adults who developed liver injury after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination.

METHODS

Patients with suspected COVID-19 vaccine hepatitis were enrolled into the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. Causality was assessed using the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network expert opinion score. High-resolution HLA sequencing was undertaken using Illumina platform.

RESULTS

Amongst the 16 high causality cases, median time to onset was 16 days, median age was 63 years, and 75% were female. The injury was hepatocellular in 75% with a median alanine aminotransferase of 497 U/L, and 37% had jaundice. An antinuclear antibody and smooth muscle antibody were detectable in 27% and 36%, but only 12% had an elevated immunoglobulin G level. During follow-up, 37% received a short course of corticosteroids, and 88% fully recovered by 6 months with no deaths observed. HLA alleles associated with autoimmune hepatitis were not overrepresented compared with controls, but an ERAP-2 variant (rs1263907) and the ERAP-1 Hap6 haplotype were significantly overrepresented in the high causality cases vs controls ( P = 0.026 and 5 × 10 -5 , respectively).

DISCUSSION

Acute liver injury may arise within 8 weeks of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that is generally mild and self-limited in most patients. The absence of an association with the AIH HLA alleles combined with the significant ERAP-2 and ERAP-1 Hap6 haplotype associations implicates a unique but very rare host immune response to vaccine-derived antigens in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 vaccine hepatotoxicity.

Safety of naltrexone in patients with cirrhosis

Background & Aims

Treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) improves survival in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis. However, medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) are underutilized in this population, partially due to concerns regarding drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Our aim was to evaluate the safety of naltrexone in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with cirrhosis who were prescribed naltrexone using the VOCAL (Veterans Outcomes and Costs Associated with Liver Disease) database. Patients with new initiation of naltrexone after diagnosis of cirrhosis who had liver enzymes checked within a 3-month time frame were included. A chart review was performed on patients who developed alanine aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase elevations to more than 2× or 5× the upper limit of normal, respectively. The RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method) was used to determine if DILI occurred.

Results

A total of 3,285 patients with cirrhosis were initiated on naltrexone, of whom 2,940 had laboratory testing during the high-risk DILI period. Only 2% of patients had liver enzyme elevations, and among those, 30 (48%) were classified as "DILI excluded" and 32 (52%) were classified as "DILI unlikely". No patients were classified as possible, probable, or highly probable DILI. No deaths or new decompensations were attributed to naltrexone.

Conclusions

Naltrexone in patients with cirrhosis was not associated with development of DILI using RUCAM scoring. Naltrexone appears to be safe in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

Impact and Implications

Naltrexone is an effective medication for treating alcohol use disorder but is underutilized in patients with underlying liver disease due to historical concerns regarding hepatotoxicity. This retrospective study shows no drug-induced liver injury in a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis with new initiation of naltrexone. This study may encourage providers to prescribe naltrexone to patients with existing liver disease with ongoing alcohol use disorder.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) ascribed to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the USA-Update with genetic correlations

OBJECTIVE

To describe patients with NSAID-DILI, including genetic factors associated with idiosyncratic DILI.

METHODS

In DILIN, subjects with presumed DILI are enrolled and followed for at least 6 months. Causality is adjudicated by a Delphic approach. HLA sequencing of multiethnic NSAID-DILI patients and HLA allele imputation of matching population controls were performed following overall, class and drug-based association analysis. Significant results were tested in a non-Hispanic White (NHW) case-control replication cohort.

RESULTS

Between September 2004 and March 2022, causality was adjudicated in 2498, and 55 (41 [75%] women) were assessed as likely due to NSAIDs. Median age at onset was 55 y (range 22-83 y). Diclofenac was the causative drug in 29, celecoxib in 7, ibuprofen in 5, etodolac and meloxicam each in 4. Except for meloxicam and oxaprozin (n = 2), the liver injury was hepatocellular with median R 15-25. HLA-DRB1*04:03 and HLA-B*35:03 were significantly more frequent in NSAID-DILI patients than in non-NSAID DILI controls. Interestingly, 85% of the HLA-DRB1*04:03 carriers developed DILI due to the use of acetic acid derivative NSAIDs, supporting the hypothesis that HLA-DRB1*04:03 could be a drug and/or class risk factor. HLA-B*35:03 but not HLA-DRB1*04:03 association was confirmed in the independent NHW replication cohort, which was largely driven by diclofenac.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite prevalent use, NSAID-DILI is infrequent in the United States. Diclofenac is the most commonly implicated, and adherence to warnings of risk and close observation are recommended. The increased frequency of HLA-B*35:03 and DRB1*04:03, driven by diclofenac, suggests the importance of immune-mediated responses.

RECAM-J 2023-Validation and development of the Japanese version of RECAM for the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury

AIM

The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is challenging. We modified the revised electronic version of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) for the diagnosis of DILI (RECAM), the scoring system developed in US and Spanish cohorts in 2022, and developed RECAM-J 2023 to align with the clinical practice in Japan. In the current study, we introduce RECAM-J 2023 and verify its performance in the context of Japanese patients with DILI.

METHODS

After translation of RECAM into Japanese, modifications were made to develop RECAM-J 2023 without any alteration to the scores. To examine the validity and performance of RECAM-J 2023, clinical information on DILI and non-DILI cases in Japan were retrospectively collected. The diagnosis of DILI was made by expert's decision. Then we scored each case using RECAM-J 2023, and calculated area under curve (AUC) values for identification for DILI.

RESULTS

We collected data from 538 DILI and 128 non-DILI cases. The sum of highly probable (HP) and probable (PR) cases categorized by RECAM-J 2023 were only 206 (38%) in DILI cases. As the primary cause of low scores was the deduction with missing hepatitis virus markers, which is unlikely to be an issue in prospective applications, we rescored without these deductions. At this time, the sum of HP and PR was raised to 421 (78%). The AUCs of RECAM-J 2023 without deductions were 0.70 and 0.88 for identifying at least HP, and at least PR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RECAM-J 2023, when prospectively used without any missing hepatitis virus markers, provides acceptable performance for identifying at least PR DILI cases in Japanese daily clinical practice.

Phenotyping Hepatic Immune-Related Adverse Events in the Setting of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

PURPOSE

We present and validate a rule-based algorithm for the detection of moderate to severe liver-related immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a real-world patient cohort. The algorithm can be applied to studies of irAEs in large data sets.

METHODS

We developed a set of criteria to define hepatic irAEs. The criteria include: the temporality of elevated laboratory measurements in the first 2-14 weeks of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, steroid intervention within 2 weeks of the onset of elevated laboratory measurements, and intervention with a duration of at least 2 weeks. These criteria are based on the kinetics of patients who experienced moderate to severe hepatotoxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 2-4). We applied these criteria to a retrospective cohort of 682 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and treated with ICI. All patients were required to have baseline laboratory measurements before and after the initiation of ICI.

RESULTS

A set of 63 equally sampled patients were reviewed by two blinded, clinical adjudicators. Disagreements were reviewed and consensus was taken to be the ground truth. Of these, 25 patients with irAEs were identified, 16 were determined to be hepatic irAEs, 36 patients were nonadverse events, and two patients were of indeterminant status. Reviewers agreed in 44 of 63 patients, including 19 patients with irAEs (0.70 concordance, Fleiss' kappa: 0.43). By comparison, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity and specificity of identifying hepatic irAEs of 0.63 and 0.81, respectively, with a test efficiency (percent correctly classified) of 0.78 and outcome-weighted F1 score of 0.74.

CONCLUSION

The algorithm achieves greater concordance with the ground truth than either individual clinical adjudicator for the detection of irAEs.

Rechallenge in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: An analysis of cases in two large prospective registries according to existing definitions

INTRODUCTION

Data on positive rechallenge in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are scarce. We aim to analyse the clinical presentation, outcome and drugs associated with positive rechallenge in two DILI registries.

METHODS

Cases from the Spanish and Latin American DILI registries were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcome of cases with positive rechallenge according to CIOMS/RUCAM and current definitions were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 1418 patients with idiosyncratic DILI, 58 cases had positive rechallenge (4.1%). Patients with positive rechallenge had shorter duration of therapy (p=0.001) and latency (p=0.003). In patients with rechallenge, aspartate transaminase levels were increased (p=0.026) and showed a prolonged time to recovery (p=0.020), albeit no differences were seen in terms of fatal outcomes. The main drug implicated in rechallenge was amoxicillin-clavulanate (17%). The majority of re-exposure events were unintentional (71%). Using both existing definitions of positive rechallenge, there were four cases which exclusively fulfilled the current criteria and five which only meet the historical definition. All cases of positive rechallenge, irrespective of the pattern of damage, fulfilled the criteria of either alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2 times ULN.

CONCLUSIONS

Episodes of rechallenge were characterised by shorter duration of therapy and latency, and longer time to resolution, but did not show an increased incidence of fatal outcome. Based on our findings, ALT ≥3 times ULN and/or ALP ≥2 times ULN, regardless of the pattern of damage, is proposed as a new definition of rechallenge in DILI.

Evaluating the Safety of Herbal Medicine on Renal Function: A Comprehensive Analysis from Six Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted with Four Formulations from Traditional Korean Medicine

The growing popularity of herbal medicine raises concerns about potential nephrotoxicity risks, while limited evidence hinders a comprehensive impact assessment. This study aims to investigate the overall risk features of herbal medicine on kidney injury. We conducted a retrospective analysis on renal function changes, including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), through data from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in South Korea. A total of 407 participants (142 males, 265 females) received either one of four different herbal medicines (240 participants) or a placebo (167 participants). When comparing changes in eGFR regarding the mean, 90th-percentile value, and 20% reduction after treatment, there was no significant difference between the herbal-treated and placebo groups. This study provided a helpful reference for examining the safety issues of herbal remedies, especially regarding kidney function.

Validation of the revised electronic version of RUCAM for diagnosis of DILI in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

The Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method (RECAM), a computerized update of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Methodology (RUCAM), was recently proposed. In this study, we validated and compared the utility of the RECAM and RUCAM in Chinese patients with a single conventional or herbal agent-induced liver injury.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter cohort of well-established DILI and non-DILI patients from 5 centers in China, the diagnostic performance of the RUCAM and RECAM was compared by AUC analysis. The consistency was evaluated by weighted kappa. The major causes of discrepancy were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 481 DILI and 100 non-DILI patients were included. In total, 62.6% of the DILI cases were induced by conventional agents, and 37.4% were induced by herbs. The RECAM had relatively higher AUC than RUCAM for overall [0.947 (0.926-0.964) vs. 0.867 (0.836-0.893), p=0.0016], conventional agents [0.923 (0.890-0.949) vs. 0.819 (0.775-0.858), p=0.0185], and herbs [0.972 (0.941-0.989) vs.0.911 (0.866-0.944), p=0.0199]. Latency, scores associated with hepatitis B, and hepatotoxicity information of the insulting drugs were the 3 main causes for the inconsistency between RECAM and RUCAM scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The RECAM had relatively better diagnostic performance than RUCAM, with a higher AUC for Chinese DILI patients. Timely updates of the LiverTox category and refinement of serum markers to exclude hepatitis B activity would further improve the applicability of RECAM in areas where the use of herbs and resolution of past HBV infections are common.

Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. Currently, the diagnosis of DILI still follows the strategy of exclusion. Therefore, a detailed history taking and a thorough and careful exclusion of other potential causes of liver injury is the key to correct diagnosis. This guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest research advances and aims to provide professional guidance to clinicians on how to identify suspected DILI timely and standardize the diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Based on the clinical settings in China, the guideline also specifically focused on DILI in chronic liver disease, drug-induced viral hepatitis reactivation, common causing agents of DILI (herbal and dietary supplements, anti-tuberculosis drugs, and antineoplastic drugs), and signal of DILI in clinical trials and its assessment.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Dietary Supplement-Induced Hepatotoxicity: A Clinical Perspective

The consumption of dietary supplements (DS) has resulted in a significant and escalating number of cases involving liver injury. It is crucial for clinicians and consumers to be well informed about the adverse effects of such products, leading to their discontinuation and timely reporting of any harmful cases. This article delves into the clinical perspective of DS-related hepatotoxicity, highlighting key concepts such as a systematic diagnostic approach. The discussion extends to notable examples of both currently popular and potential future dietary supplements, such as garcinia cambogia, turmeric, and ashwagandha, accompanied by an overview of recent findings. Causality assessment tools play a crucial role in establishing a connection between these products and instances of liver injury, with consideration of the advantages and disadvantages associated with their use. Fostering a comprehensive understanding of regulatory standards, coupled with a solid foundation of knowledge of DS, will prove instrumental in preventing DS-related hepatotoxicity. Achieving this goal requires collaborative efforts from both consumers and clinicians.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major problem in the United States, commonly leading to hospital admission. Diagnosing DILI is difficult as it is a diagnosis of exclusion requiring a temporal relationship between drug exposure and liver injury and a thorough work up for other causes. In addition, DILI has a very variable clinical and histologic presentation that can mimic many different etiologies of liver disease. Objective scoring systems can assess the probability that a drug caused the liver injury but liver biopsy findings are not part of the criteria used in these systems. This review will address some of the recent updates to the scoring systems and the role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of DILI.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Ketamine restriction correlates with reduced cholestatic liver injury and improved outcomes in critically ill patients with burn injury

Background & Aims

Ketamine-associated cholestatic liver injury is reported in patients with severe burn injury, but its association with patient outcome is unclear. We investigated the relationship between ketamine exposure, cholestatic liver injury, and outcome of critically ill patients with burn injury.

Methods

In a retrospective study, patients with severe burn injury were analysed across two periods: unrestricted ketamine prescription (ketamine-liberal) and capped ketamine dosage (ketamine-restricted). The primary endpoint was cholestatic liver injury, and the secondary endpoint was 3-month mortality. Binary logistic regression models and the revised electronic causality assessment method were used to measure the strength of associations and causality assessment, respectively.

Results

Of 279 patients (median age 51 [IQR 31-67] years; 63.1% men; burned surface area 28.5%, IQR 20-45%), 155 (56%) were in the ketamine-liberal group, and 124 (44%) were in the ketamine-restricted group, with comparable clinical characteristics, except for ketamine exposure (median doses 265.0 [IQR 0-8,021] mg and 20 [IQR 0-105] mg, respectively; p <0.001). A dose- and time-dependent relationship was observed between ketamine exposure and cholestatic liver injury. Ketamine restriction was associated with a reduced risk of cholestatic liver injury (adjusted odds ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.50; p = 0.003) and with a higher probability of 3-month survival (p = 0.035). The revised electronic causality assessment method indicated that ketamine was probably and possibly the cause of cholestatic liver injury for 14 and 10 patients, respectively. Cholangitis was not observed in the ketamine-restricted group. In propensity-matched patients, the risk of 3-month mortality was higher (adjusted odds ratio 9.92, 95% CI 2.76-39.05; p = 0.001) in patients with cholestatic liver injury and ketamine exposure ≥10,000 mg. Other sedative drugs were not associated with liver and patient outcome.

Conclusions

In this cohort, ketamine restriction was associated with less cholestatic liver injury and reduced 3-month mortality.

Impact and implications

In a cohort of 279 critically ill patients with burn injury, ketamine was associated with a risk of liver bile duct toxicity. The risk was found to be dependent on both the dosage and duration of ketamine use. A restriction policy of ketamine prescription was associated with a risk reduction of liver injury and 3-month mortality. These findings have implications for the analgesia and sedation of critically ill patients with ketamine, with higher doses raising safety concerns.

Roadmap to DILI research in Europe. A proposal from COST action ProEuroDILINet

In the current article the aims for a constructive way forward in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) are to highlight the most important priorities in research and clinical science, therefore supporting a more informed, focused, and better funded future for European DILI research. This Roadmap aims to identify key challenges, define a shared vision across all stakeholders for the opportunities to overcome these challenges and propose a high-quality research program to achieve progress on the prediction, prevention, diagnosis and management of this condition and impact on healthcare practice in the field of DILI. This will involve 1. Creation of a database encompassing optimised case report form for prospectively identified DILI cases with well-characterised controls with competing diagnoses, biological samples, and imaging data; 2. Establishing of preclinical models to improve the assessment and prediction of hepatotoxicity in humans to guide future drug safety testing; 3. Emphasis on implementation science and 4. Enhanced collaboration between drug-developers, clinicians and regulatory scientists. This proposed operational framework will advance DILI research and may bring together basic, applied, translational and clinical research in DILI.

Liver biopsy for assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis clinical trials: Expert consensus from the Liver Forum

BACKGROUND

Causality assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials can be challenging, and liver biopsies are not routinely performed as part of this evaluation. While the field is moving away from liver biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, information not identified by non-invasive testing may be provided on histology.

AIM

To address the appropriate utilisation of liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment in this setting.

METHODS

From 2020 to 2022, the Liver Forum convened a series of webinars on issues pertaining to liver biopsy during MASH trials. The Histology Working Group was formed to generate a series of consensus documents addressing these challenges. This manuscript focuses on liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment.

RESULTS

Expert opinion, guidance and recommendations on the role of liver biopsy as part of causality assessment of suspected DILI occurring during clinical trials for a drug(s) being developed for MASH are provided. Lessons learned from prior MASH programs are reviewed and gaps identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are no pathognomonic features, histologic evaluation of suspected DILI during MASH clinical trials may alter patient management, define the pattern and severity of injury, detect findings that favour a diagnosis of DILI versus MASH progression, identify prognostic features, characterise the clinicopathological phenotype of DILI, and/or define lesions that influence decisions about trial discontinuation and further development of the drug.