TCDD-dependent downregulation of gamma-catenin in rat liver epithelial cells (WB-F344)

Ral GEF with the PH Domain and SH3 Binding Motif 1 Regulated by Splicing Factor Junction Plakoglobin and Pyrimidine Metabolism Are Prognostic in Uterine Carcinosarcoma

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a highly invasive malignant tumor that originated from the uterine epithelium. Many studies suggested that the abnormal changes of alternative splicing (AS) of pre-mRNA are related to the occurrence and metastasis of the tumor. This study investigates the mechanism of alternative splicing events (ASEs) in the tumorigenesis and metastasis of UCS. RNA-seq of UCS samples and alternative splicing event (ASE) data of UCS samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and TCGASpliceSeq databases, several times. Firstly, we performed the Cox regression analysis to identify the overall survival-related alternative splicing events (OSRASEs). Secondly, a multivariate model was applied to approach the prognostic values of the risk score. Afterwards, a coexpressed network between splicing factors (SFs) and OSRASEs was constructed. In order to explore the relationship between the potential prognostic signaling pathways and OSRASEs, we fabricated a network between these pathways and OSRASEs. Finally, validations from multidimension platforms were used to explain the results unambiguously. 1,040 OSRASEs were identified by Cox regression. Then, 6 OSRASEs were incorporated in a multivariable model by Lasso regression. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.957. The risk score rendered from the multivariate model was corroborated to be an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001). In the network of SFs and ASEs, junction plakoglobin (JUP) noteworthily regulated RALGPS1-87608-AT (P < 0.001, R = 0.455). Additionally, RALGPS1-87608-AT (P = 0.006) showed a prominent relationship with distant metastasis. KEGG pathways related to prognosis of UCS were selected by gene set variation analysis (GSVA). The pyrimidine metabolism (P < 0.001, R = -0.470) was the key pathway coexpressed with RALGPS1. We considered that aberrant JUP significantly regulated RALGPS1-87608-AT and the pyrimidine metabolism pathway might play a significant part in the metastasis and prognosis of UCS.

Environmental Ligands of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Their Effects in Models of Adult Liver Progenitor Cells

The toxicity of environmental and dietary ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in mature liver parenchymal cells is well appreciated, while considerably less attention has been paid to their impact on cell populations exhibiting phenotypic features of liver progenitor cells. Here, we discuss the results suggesting that the consequences of the AhR activation in the cellular models derived from bipotent liver progenitors could markedly differ from those in hepatocytes. In contact-inhibited liver progenitor cells, the AhR agonists induce a range of effects potentially linked with tumor promotion. They can stimulate cell cycle progression/proliferation and deregulate cell-to-cell communication, which is associated with downregulation of proteins forming gap junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes (such as connexin 43, E-cadherin, β-catenin, and plakoglobin), as well as with reduced cell adhesion and inhibition of intercellular communication. At the same time, toxic AhR ligands may affect the activity of the signaling pathways contributing to regulation of liver progenitor cell activation and/or differentiation, such as downregulation of Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β signaling, or upregulation of transcriptional targets of YAP/TAZ, the effectors of Hippo signaling pathway. These data illustrate the need to better understand the potential role of liver progenitors in the AhR-mediated liver carcinogenesis and tumor promotion.

Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cancer

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a cytosolic ligand-activated transcription factor, belongs to the member of bHLH/PAS family of heterodimeric transcriptional regulators and is widely expressed in a variety of animal species and humans. Recent animal and human data suggested that AHR is involved in various signaling pathways critical to cell normal homeostasis, which covers multiple aspects of physiology, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, gene regulation, cell motility and migration, inflammation and others. Dysregulation of these physiological processes is known to contribute to events such as tumor initiation, promotion, and progression. Increasing epidemiological and experimental animal data provided substantial support for an association between abnormal AHR function and cancer, implicating AHR may be a novel drug-interfering target for cancers. The proposed underlying mechanisms of its actions in cancer involved multiple aspects, (a) inhibiting the functional expression of the key anti-oncogenes (such as p53 and BRCA1), (b) promoting stem cells transforming and angiogenesis, (c) altering cell survival, proliferation and differentiation by influencing the physiologic processes of cell-cycle, apoptosis, cell contact-inhibition, metabolism and remodel of extracellular matrix, and cell-matrix interaction, (d) cross-talking with the signaling pathways of estrogen receptor and inflammation. This review aims to provide a brief overview of recent investigations into the role of AHR and the underlying mechanisms of its actions in cancer, which were explored by the new technologies emerging in recent years.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor negatively regulates expression of the plakoglobin gene (jup)

Plakoglobin is an important component of intercellular junctions, including both desmosomes and adherens junctions, which is known as a tumor suppressor. Although mutations in the plakoglobin gene (Jup) and/or changes in its protein levels have been observed in various disease states, including cancer progression or cardiovascular defects, the information about endogenous or exogenous stimuli orchestrating Jup expression is limited. Here we show that the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) may regulate Jup expression in a cell-specific manner. We observed a significant suppressive effect of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a model toxic exogenous activator of the AhR signaling, on Jup expression in a variety of experimental models derived from rodent tissues, including contact-inhibited rat liver progenitor cells (where TCDD induces cell proliferation), rat and mouse hepatoma cell models (where TCDD inhibits cell cycle progression), cardiac cells derived from the mouse embryonic stem cells, or cardiomyocytes isolated from neonatal rat hearts. The small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of AhR confirmed its role in both basal and TCDD-deregulated Jup expression. The analysis of genomic DNA located ~2.5kb upstream of rat Jup gene revealed a presence of evolutionarily conserved AhR binding motifs, which were confirmed upon their cloning into luciferase reporter construct. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of Jup expression affected both proliferation and attachment of liver progenitor cells. The present data indicate that the AhR may contribute to negative regulation of Jup gene expression in rodent cellular models, which may affect cell adherence and proliferation.

Role of the Arylhydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) in the Pathology of Asthma and COPD

The dioxins and dioxin-like compounds in cigarette smoke and environmental pollutants modulate immunological responses. These environmental toxicants are known to cause lung cancer but have also recently been implicated in allergic and inflammatory diseases such as bronchitis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In a novel pathway of this response, the activation of a nuclear receptor, arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR), mediates the effects of these toxins through the arachidonic acid cascade, cell differentiation, cell-cell adhesion interactions, cytokine expression, and mucin production that are implicated in the pathogenesis and exacerbation of asthma/COPD. We have previously reported that human bronchial epithelial cells express AhR, and AhR activation induces mucin production through reactive oxygen species. This review discusses the role of AhR in asthma and COPD, focusing in particular on inflammatory and resident cells in the lung. We describe the important impact that AhR activation may have on the inflammation phase in the pathology of asthma and COPD. In addition, crosstalk of AhR signaling with other ligand-activated transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) has been well documented.

Role of the arylhydrocarbon receptor in lung disease

Ubiquitous environmental contaminants such as dioxins have long been implicated in cellular toxicity, but only recently have various biological effects been linked to immune regulation. These plentiful noxious agents exert their effects through the arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) recognized as a ligand-activated transcription factor. AhR activation mediates gene alteration, cell-cell adhesion interaction, cytokine expression, and mucin production, which are involved in the induction of cancer or inflammation. We have reported that human bronchial epithelial cells express AhR, and AhR activation induces mucin production through reactive oxygen species. This review discusses the role of AhR in lung disease, focusing in particular on airway epithelial cells. In addition, although it is not yet clear how the activation of AhR modifies carcinogenesis or airway inflammation, we mention a potent therapeutic target for AhR activation in the prevention/treatment of lung cancer, allergic asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Differential effects of indirubin and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signalling in liver progenitor cells

In the present study, we investigated the effects of potential endogenous ligand indirubin on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signalling, with a focus on the AhR-dependent gene expression and cell cycle progression in rat liver progenitor cells, and compared them with the effects of a model toxic AhR ligand, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The low (picomolar and nanomolar) doses of indirubin, corresponding to expected endogenous levels, induced a transient translocation of AhR to the nucleus, while high (micromolar) doses induced a long-term AhR nuclear translocation, followed by its degradation, similar to the effects of TCDD. Whereas high doses of indirubin recruited AhR/ARNT1 dimer to rat Cyp1a1 promoter, the low doses did not induce its DNA binding, as revealed by the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. This corresponded with the fact that the micromolar doses of indirubin significantly increased Cyp1a1/1b1 mRNA in a way similar to TCDD, while the low doses of indirubin were only poor inducers of Cyp1a1/1b1 expression. Comparable patterns of expression were observed also for other AhR gene targets, such as Nqo1 and Nrf2. Also, only micromolar doses of indirubin were able to mimic the effects of TCDD on cell cycle and proliferation of liver progenitor cells or hepatoma cells. Nevertheless, indirubin at low concentrations may have unique effects on gene expression in non-tumorigenic cells. Although both TCDD and the high doses of indirubin repressed plakoglobin (Jup) expression, the picomolar doses of indirubin, unlike the equimolar doses of TCDD, increased mRNA levels of this important desmosomal and adherens junctions constituent. These present data suggest that the outcome of AhR activation induced by indirubin at concentrations expected in vivo may differ from the AhR signalling triggered by exogenous toxic ligands, such as TCDD.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in the regulation of cell-cell contact and tumor growth

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor, which is activated by a large group of environmental pollutants including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins and planar polychlorinated biphenyls. Ligand binding leads to dimerization of the AhR with aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator and transcriptional activation of several xenobiotic phase I and phase II metabolizing enzymes, such as cytochrome P4501A1 and glutathione-S-transferase, respectively. Since phase I enzymes convert inert carcinogens to active genotoxins, the AhR plays a key role in tumor initiation. Besides this classical route, the AhR mediates tumor promotion and recent evidence suggests that the AhR also plays a role in tumor progression. To date, no mechanistic link could be established between the canonical pathway involving xenobiotic metabolism and AhR-dependent tumor promotion and progression. A hallmark of tumor promotion is unbalanced proliferation, whereas tumor progression is characterized by dedifferentiation, increased motility and metastasis of tumor cells. Tumor progression and presumably also tumor promotion are triggered by loss of cell-cell contact. Cell-cell contact is known to be a critical regulator of proliferation, differentiation and cell motility in vitro and in vivo. Increasing evidence suggests that activation of the AhR may lead to deregulation of cell-cell contact, thereby inducing unbalanced proliferation, dedifferentiation and enhanced motility. In line with this is the finding of increased AhR expression and malignancy in some animal and human cancers. Here, we summarize our current knowledge on non-canonical AhR-driven pathways being involved in deregulation of cell-cell contact and discuss the data with respect to tumor initiation, promotion and progression.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) pathway as a regulatory pathway for cell adhesion and matrix metabolism

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is an orphan receptor in the basic helix-loop-helix PAS family of transcriptional regulators. Although the endogenous regulator of this pathway has not been identified, the AhR is known to bind and be activated by a variety of compounds ranging from environmental contaminants to flavanoids. The function of this receptor is still unclear; however, animal models indicate that the AhR is important for normal development. One hypothesis is that the AhR senses cellular stress and initiates the cellular response by altering gene expression and inhibiting cell cycle progression and that activation of the AhR by exogenous environmental chemicals results in the dysregulation of this normal function. In this review we will examine the role of the AhR in the regulation of genes and proteins involved in cell adhesion and matrix remodeling, and discuss the implications of these changes in development and disease. In addition, we will discuss evidence suggesting that the AhR pathway is responsive to changes in matrix composition as well as cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions.

TCDD deregulates contact inhibition in rat liver oval cells via Ah receptor, JunD and cyclin A

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a transcription factor involved in physiological processes, but also mediates most, if not all, toxic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Activation of the AhR by TCDD leads to its dimerization with aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (ARNT) and transcriptional activation of several phase I and II metabolizing enzymes. However, this classical signalling pathway so far failed to explain the pleiotropic hazardous effects of TCDD, such as developmental toxicity and tumour promotion. Thus, there is an urgent need to define genetic programmes orchestrated by AhR to unravel its role in physiology and toxicology. Here we show that TCDD treatment of rat liver oval cells leads to induction of the transcription factor JunD, resulting in transcriptional upregulation of the proto-oncogene cyclin A which finally triggers a release from contact inhibition. Ectopic expression of cyclin A in confluent cultures overcomes G(1) arrest, indicating that increased cyclin A levels are indeed sufficient to bypass contact inhibition. Functional interference with AhR-, but not with ARNT, abolished TCDD-induced increase in JunD and cyclin A and prevented loss of contact inhibition. In summary, we have discovered a novel AhR-dependent and probably ARNT-independent signalling pathway involving JunD and cyclin A, which mediates TCDD-induced deregulation of cell cycle control.

β-Naphthoflavone and 3′-methoxy-4′-nitroflavone exert ambiguous effects on Ah receptor-dependent cell proliferation and gene expression in rat liver ‘stem-like’ cells

Both natural and synthetic flavonoids are known to interact with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR); however, their agonist/antagonist properties in vitro have been so far studied mostly in the context of cytochrome P450 1A1 gene (Cyp1a1) regulation. We investigated effects of two synthetic flavones known either as AhR agonist (beta-naphthoflavone; BNF) or antagonist (3'-methoxy-4'-nitroflavone; 3M4NF), using an in vitro model of liver 'stem-like' cells, on expression of various AhR target genes and AhR-dependent cell proliferation. We found that the presumed antagonist 3M4NF induces a partial nuclear translocation and activation of AhR. Although inhibiting the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced Cyp1a1 expression, 3M4NF alone induced a minor increase of CYP1A1 mRNA and protein. However, 3M4NF did not induce AhR binding to synthetic dioxin response elements (DRE). In contrast to Cyp1a1, 3M4NF induced a marked expression of other AhR-regulated genes, such as Cyp1b1 and Nqo1, as well as transcriptional repression of Cdh13 gene, confirming that its effects may be promoter-context specific. Like BNF, 3M4NF induced AhR-dependent cell proliferation of contact-inhibited rat liver 'stem-like' WB-F344 cells, associated with a marked upregulation of Cyclin A, as well as the downregulation of proteins involved in formation of cell-cell contacts. Based on these experimental findings, we conclude that partial agonists/antagonists of AhR can increase cell proliferation rate and AhR-dependent genes expression in both cell type- and gene-specific manner. The specificity of effects of flavones on diverse AhR targets should be taken into account, when studying AhR signaling using presumed AhR antagonists.

Ah receptor: Dioxin-mediated toxic responses as hints to deregulated physiologic functions

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor and member of the bHLH/PAS (basic Helix-Loop-Helix/Per-Arnt-Sim) family of chemosensors and developmental regulators. It represents a multifunctional molecular switch regulating endo- and xenobiotic metabolism as well as cell proliferation and differentiation. Physiologic functions of the AhR are beginning to be understood, including functions in vascular development, and in detoxification of endo- and xenobiotics. The AhR is also recognized as the culprit for most toxic responses observed after exposure to dioxins and related compounds such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The non-metabolizable AhR agonist TCDD has to be distinguished from the myriad of metabolizable agonists present as dietary contaminants and plant constituents as well as endogenous toxins. The hypothesis is emerging that the diverse tissue-specific, TCDD-mediated toxicities are due to sustained and inappropriate AhR activation leading to deregulated physiologic functions. In support of this hypothesis recent observations in the context of some TCDD-mediated toxic responses are discussed, such as chloracne, cleft palate, thymus involution and in particular carcinogenesis. Major open questions are addressed, such as ligand-independent AhR activation by phosphorylation and the large differences in species-dependent susceptibility to toxic responses. Though important issues remain unresolved, the commentary is intended to stimulate efforts to understand dioxin-mediated toxic responses with emphasis on carcinogenesis in comparison with AhR-mediated physiologic functions.

Evaluation of the role of c-Src and ERK in TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition in WB-F344 cells

TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) is the most potent tumor promoter ever tested in rodents. Although it is known that most of the effects of TCDD are mediated by binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the mechanisms leading to tumor promotion remain to be elucidated. Loss of contact-inhibition is one characteristic hallmark in tumorigenesis. In WB-F344 cells, TCDD induces a release from contact-inhibition which is manifested by a twofold increase in DNA-synthesis and cell number when TCDD (1 nmol L-1) is given to confluent cells. Because TCDD leads to phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and an increase in c-Src-activation in WB-F344 cells, we investigated the functional relevance of this observation. Pharmacological inhibition of c-Src using PP1 (10 micromol L-1) or genistein (10 micromol L-1) did not prevent TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition. In accordance, elevation of cyclin A-a previously identified target of TCDD and marker of S-phase entry-was not reduced in the presence of PP1 or genistein. Western blot analysis revealed that phosphorylation of the EGF-receptor downstream target ERK was not induced in response to TCDD. Furthermore, TCDD-dependent increase in DNA-synthesis was not inhibited by the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 (10 micromol L-1). Our data show that neither c-Src-activation, nor ERK-activation are required for TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition arguing against a functional role of EGF-receptor activation in response to TCDD in WB-F344 cells.

Lack of effects of postnatal exposure to a mixture of aryl hydrocarbon-receptor agonists on the development of methylnitrosourea-induced mammary tumors in sprague-dawley rats

There are concerns that early life exposure to organochlorines, including aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists, may lead to long-term effects and increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Our objective was to test if postnatal exposure to a mixture of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD)-like chemicals would modulate the development of methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced mammary tumors. Females received by gavage a mixture containing 3 non-ortho-polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), 6 polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), and 7 polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20d of age. The doses were equivalent to 0, 1, 10, 100, or 1000 times the amount ingested through breast milk by a human infant during its first 24 d of life. Subgroups of 1000 x reated rats and controls were sacrificed at 21 d of age for assessment of mammary-gland development, cell death, and proliferation. Mammary-tumor development was assessed in MNU (30 mg/kg body weight ip at 50 days of age)-induced rats pre-exposed to the mixture (MNU-0, MNU-1, MNU-10, MNU-100, MNU-1000). Rats were sacrificed when their mammary tumors reached 1 cm in diameter, or when the rats reached > or = 32 wk of age. Mammary-gland whole mounts were analyzed with all palpable and microscopic lesions (n = 1563) histologically classified and grouped as benign, intraductal proliferations, or malignant. There were no marked effects on age at onset of puberty (vaginal opening) and estrous cyclicity. Despite a significant decrease in proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive mammary cells in 1000 x treated 21-d-old rats, there were no long-term dose-response effects on mammary-gland morphology and tumor development. In conclusion, postnatal exposure to the mixture of AhR agonists had no significant effects on the development of MNU-initiated mammary tumors.

Transforming growth factor-?1 is not involved in TCDD-dependent release from contact inhibition in WB-F344 cells

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is the most potent tumor promoter ever tested in rodents. Although it is known that most of the effects of TCDD are mediated by binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the mechanisms leading to tumor promotion still remain to be elucidated. Loss of contact inhibition is one characteristic hallmark in tumorigenesis. In WB-F344 cells TCDD induces a release from contact inhibition which is manifested by a two- to threefold increase in DNA synthesis when TCDD (1 nM) is applied to confluent cells. Since proliferation of epithelial cells is known to be inhibited by TGF-beta, we investigated whether decreased TGF-beta1 mediates TCDD-dependent release from contact inhibition in WB-F344 cells. Expression of TGF-beta (type II) receptor in WB-F344 cells was analyzed by Western blot analysis. Exposure of 0.1 ng/ml TGF-beta1 to exponentially growing WB-F344 cells resulted in a 40% decrease in DNA synthesis, which was blocked by preincubation with a neutralizing anti-TGF-beta1 antibody, indicating that the TGF-beta receptor in WB-F344 cells is functionally active. Preincubation of confluent, G1-arrested cultures with the neutralizing anti-TGF-beta1-antibody did not lead to an increase in DNA synthesis, ruling out an involvement of TGF-beta1 in mediating contact inhibition in WB-F344 cells. In accord with this, Western blot analysis revealed that protein expression of TGF-beta1 is neither upregulated in confluent cultures nor decreased after TCDD treatment. We conclude that TGF-beta1 is not involved in contact inhibition or in TCDD-dependent release from contact inhibition in WB-F344 cells.

Transforming growth factor beta1 is not involved in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin-dependent release from contact-inhibition in WB-F344 cells

TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin) is the most potent tumor promoter ever tested in rodents. Although it is known that most of the effects of TCDD are mediated by binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the mechanisms leading to tumor promotion still remain to be elucidated. Loss of contact-inhibition is one characteristic hallmark in tumorigenesis. In WB-F344 cells, TCDD induces a release from contact-inhibition, which is manifested by a two- to three-fold increase in DNA-synthesis when TCDD (1 nM) is given to confluent cells. Since proliferation of epithelial cells is known to be inhibited by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) we investigated whether decreased TGF-beta expression mediates TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition in WB-F344 cells. Expression of TGF-beta (type II) receptor in WB-F344 cells was shown by Western blot analysis. Exposure of exponentially growing WB-F344 cells to 0.1 ng/ml TGF-beta1 resulted in a 40% decrease in DNA synthesis, which could be blocked by pre-incubation with a neutralizing anti-TGF-beta1 antibody indicating that the TGF-beta receptor in WB-F344 cells is functionally active. Pre-incubation of confluent, G1-arrested cultures with the neutralizing anti-TGF-beta1 antibody did not lead to an increase in DNA synthesis, ruling out an involvement of TGF-beta1 in mediating contact-inhibition in WB-F344 cells. In accordance with this, Western blot analysis revealed that protein expression of TGF-beta1 was neither upregulated in confluent cultures nor decreased after TCDD treatment. We therefore conclude that TGF-beta1 is not involved in contact-inhibition nor in TCDD-dependent release from contact-inhibition in WB-F344 cells.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons modulate cell proliferation in rat hepatic epithelial stem-like WB-F344 cells

Although many polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are recognized as potent mutagens and carcinogens, relatively little is known about their role in the tumor promotion. It is known that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) can induce release of rat hepatic oval epithelial cells from contact inhibition by a mechanism possibly involving the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation. Many PAHs are AhR ligands and are known to act as transient inducers of AhR-mediated activity. In this study, effects of 19 selected PAHs on proliferation of confluent rat liver epithelial WB-F344 cells were investigated. Non-mutagens that are weak activators or nonactivators of AhR-mediated activity had no effect on cell proliferation. Relatively strong or moderate AhR ligands with low mutagenic potencies, such as benzofluoranthenes, benz[a]anthracene, and chrysene, were found to increase cell numbers, which corresponded to an increased percentage of cells entering S-phase. Strong mutagens, including benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, increased a percentage of cells in S-phase without inducing a concomitant increase in cell numbers. The treatment with mutagenic PAHs was associated with an increased DNA synthesis and induction of cell death, which corresponded with the activation of p53 tumor suppressor. Apoptosis was blocked by pifithrin-alpha, the chemical inhibitor of p53. Both weakly and strongly mutagenic PAHs known as AhR ligands were found to induce significant increase of cytochrome P4501A activity, suggesting a presence of functional AhR. The results of the present study seem to suggest that a release from contact inhibition could be a part of tumor promoting effects of AhR-activating PAHs; however, the genotoxic effects of some PAHs associated with p53 activation might interfere with this process.