Age-related hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in gastric cancers

Potent therapeutic strategy in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability-high and/or deficient mismatch repair

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignancy that presents challenges in patient care worldwide. The mismatch repair (MMR) system is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism that protects genome integrity during replication. Deficient MMR (dMMR) results in an increased accumulation of genetic errors in microsatellite sequences, leading to the development of a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype. Most MSI-H/dMMR GCs arise sporadically, mainly due to MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) epigenetic silencing. Unlike microsatellite-stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) GCs, MSI-H/dMMR GCs are relatively rare and represent a distinct subtype with genomic instability, a high somatic mutational burden, favorable immunogenicity, different responses to treatment, and prognosis. dMMR/MSI-H status is a robust predictive biomarker for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to high neoantigen load, prominent tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) overexpression. However, a subset of MSI-H/dMMR GC patients does not benefit from immunotherapy, highlighting the need for further research into predictive biomarkers and resistance mechanisms. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical, molecular, immunogenic, and therapeutic aspects of MSI-H/dMMR GC, with a focus on the impact of ICIs in immunotherapy and their potential as neoadjuvant therapies. Understanding the complexity and diversity of the molecular and immunological profiles of MSI-H/dMMR GC will drive the development of more effective therapeutic strategies and molecular targets for future precision medicine.

Global burden, risk factors, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular biomarkers and outcomes of microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer

Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) has gained considerable interests since it was approved as a tumor-agnostic biomarker in immunotherapy. However, the reported characteristics of MSI-H gastric cancer (GC) are inconsistent due to the biological complexity. Here, we aim to clarify the prevalence, risk factors, clinicopathological/molecular features and outcomes of MSI-H GC though a comprehensive review on 43246 patients from 134 cohorts. Overall, the proportion of MSI-H GC was 14.5% (95% CI, 13.3%-15.8%). Patients with MSI-H GC were less likely to have Epstein-Barr virus infection. High incidences of MSI-H GC were associated with female, older age, lower gastric body, Lauren intestinal histology, WHO tubular and mucinous subtypes, and early disease stage. Additionally, patients with MSI-H GC harbored more KRAS mutation, PD-L1 positivity, CD8 overexpression, and higher TMB, but less HER2 positivity and TP53 mutation. When treated with conventional strategy, the 5-year survival rates in MSI-H patients (70.3%) and MSI-L/MSS patients (43.7%) were significantly different (p<0.001). Patients with MSI-H GC derived larger benefit from immunotherapy in term of overall survival (pInteraction<0.001) and objective response (pInteraction=0.02). Since the prevalence of MSI-H GC is relatively high and associated with distinct clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, MSI testing should be conducted during standard diagnostical activity. Moreover, giving MSI-H tumors are often diagnosed at early stage and have favorable outcomes, less aggressive treatment strategies may be considered in clinical practice. In summary, this panoramic review may assist in design and/or interpretation of clinical trials, provide references in drug development, and constitute complementary information in drafting the clinical practice guideline.

Perioperative Chemotherapy Could Not Improve the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Multicenter, Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

To date, the role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) remains to be proven in gastric cancer, and it is difficult to judge its value in clinical application. Our study aimed to investigate how MMR status affected the prognosis in patients with gastrectomy, as well as the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with dMMR with gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with gastric cancer with certain pathologic diagnosis of dMMR or proficient MMR (pMMR) using immunohistochemistry from 4 high-volume hospitals in China were included. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with dMMR or pMMR in 1:2 ratios. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared statistically using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to determine the risk factors for survival.

RESULTS

In total, data from 6176 patients with gastric cancer were ultimately analyzed, and loss of expression of one or more MMR proteins was observed in 293 patients (293/6176, 4.74%). Compared to patients with pMMR, patients with dMMR are more likely to be older (≥66, 45.70% vs. 27.94%, P < .001), distal location (83.51% vs. 64.19%, P < .001), intestinal type (42.21% vs. 34.46%, P < .001), and in the earlier pTNM stage (pTNM I, 32.79% vs. 29.09%, P = .009). Patients with gastric cancer with dMMR showed better OS than those with pMMR before PSM (P = .002); however, this survival advantage was not observed for patients with dMMR after PSM (P = .467). As for perioperative chemotherapy, results of multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that perioperative chemotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS in patients with dMMR with gastric cancer (HR = 0.558, 95% CI, 0.270-1.152, P = .186 and HR = 0.912, 95% CI, 0.464-1.793, P = .822, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, perioperative chemotherapy could not prolong the OS and PFS of patients with dMMR with gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of gastric papillary adenocarcinoma

Papillary adenocarcinoma is defined as carcinoma with a well-defined papillary or villous structure. Despite sharing clinicopathological and morphological features with tubular adenocarcinomas, papillary adenocarcinomas frequently show microsatellite instability. The present study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features, molecular classification, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression characteristics of papillary adenocarcinoma, especially tumors with microsatellite instability. We examined the microsatellite status and expression of mucin core proteins and PD-L1 as well as the clinicopathological features in 40 gastric papillary adenocarcinomas. Surrogate immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and mismatch repair proteins along with Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA in situ hybridization were performed for molecular classification. Female predominance and frequent microsatellite instability were observed in papillary adenocarcinoma in comparison with tubular adenocarcinoma. The presence of microsatellite instability in papillary adenocarcinoma was significantly correlated with older age, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and Crohn's-like lymphoid reactions. Surrogate examination demonstrated that the genomically stable type (17 cases, 42.5%) was the most common, followed by the microsatellite-unstable type (14 cases, 35%). Among the seven cases showing PD-L1-positive expression in tumor cells, four involved carcinomas with microsatellite instability. These results reveal the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of gastric papillary adenocarcinoma.

Does Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer establish a significant relationship with the multiple genes related to gastric carcinogenesis?

Gastric cancer has been categorized into molecular subtypes including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive tumors, which provide clinicopathological and prognostic information. In this study, we investigated the EBV infection status of patients with gastric cancer and its correlation with the clinicopathological characteristics and multiple genes related to gastric carcinogenesis. The data of 460 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection between January 2017 and February 2022 were analyzed. The clinicopathological features and prognosis of the patients with EBV-positive gastric cancers were compared with those of EBV-negative gastric cancers. Immunohistochemistry for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), C-erb B2, Ki-67, and p53 was performed. Additionally, in situ hybridization was conducted to detect EBV, and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis was used to assess the deficiency in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. EBV-positivity and MSI were identified in 10.4% and 37.3% of gastric cancer patients, respectively. EBV positivity was associated with male gender (P = 0.001), proximal location (P = 0.004), poorly differentiated histological type (P = 0.048), moderate to severe lymphoid stroma (P = 0.006), high Ki-67 expression (P = 0.02), and a shorter resection margin. EGFR was more often expressed in EBV-negative gastric cancers (P < 0.001). MSI tumors were associated with older age (P = 0.01), the presence of lymphatic invasion (P = 0.02), less perineural invasion (P = 0.05), and the presence of H. pylori infection (P = 0.05). EBV positive gastric cancer is associated with increased Ki-67 and decreased EGFR expression and a shorter resection margin due to the prominent lymphoid stroma. However, MMR deficiency is not associated with EBV status even though MSI gastric cancer is related to H. pylori status.

A virtual biopsy study of microsatellite instability in gastric cancer based on deep learning radiomics

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to develop and validate a virtual biopsy model to predict microsatellite instability (MSI) status in preoperative gastric cancer (GC) patients based on clinical information and the radiomics of deep learning algorithms.

METHODS

A total of 223 GC patients with MSI status detected by postoperative immunohistochemical staining (IHC) were retrospectively recruited and randomly assigned to the training (n = 167) and testing (n = 56) sets in a 3:1 ratio. In the training set, 982 high-throughput radiomic features were extracted from preoperative abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and screened. According to the deep learning multilayer perceptron (MLP), 15 optimal features were optimized to establish the radiomic feature score (Rad-score), and LASSO regression was used to screen out clinically independent predictors. Based on logistic regression, the Rad-score and clinically independent predictors were integrated to build the clinical radiomics model and visualized as a nomogram and independently verified in the testing set. The performance and clinical applicability of hybrid model in identifying MSI status were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve (DCA).

RESULTS

The AUCs of the clinical image model in training set and testing set were 0.883 [95% CI: 0.822-0.945] and 0.802 [95% CI: 0.666-0.937], respectively. This hybrid model showed good consistency in the calibration curve and clinical applicability in the DCA curve, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using preoperative imaging and clinical information, we developed a deep-learning-based radiomics model for the non-invasive evaluation of MSI in GC patients. This model maybe can potentially support clinical treatment decision making for GC patients.

Haploinsufficiency by minute MutL homolog 1 promoter DNA methylation may represent unique phenotypes of microsatellite instability-gastric carcinogenesis

Promoter DNA methylation of MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) is considered to play a causative role in microsatellite instability (MSI) carcinogenesis in primary gastric cancer, and a high MSI status is associated with treatment sensitivity to human cancers. Nevertheless, clinicopathological analysis is defective for MLH1 methylation status in a quantitative manner. We newly developed quantitative methylation specific PCR using a TaqMan probe and applied it to 138 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy in addition to basic molecular features such as MSI, Epstein Barr virus, and other DNA methylation status. (1) In primary gastric cancer, median methylation value was 0.055, ranging from 0 to 124.3. First, MLH1 hypermethylation was strongly correlated with MSI-High/MSI-Low status and suppressed immunostaining (P < 0.0001). (2) The MLH1 hypermethylation was associated with advanced age (P = 0.0048), antral location (P = 0.0486), synchronous multiple gastric cancer (P = 0.0001), and differentiated histology (P = 0.028). (3) Log-rank plot analysis identified the most relevant cut-off value (0.23) to reflect gentle phenotypes in MLH1 hypermethylation cases (P = 0.0019), especially in advanced gastric cancer (P = 0.0132), which are designated as haploinsufficiency of MSI (MSI-haplo) phenotype in this study. (4) In synchronous multiple gastric cancer, MLH1 hypermethylation was not necessarily confirmed as field cancerization. (5) MSI-haplo defined by MLH1 methylation status represented distinct prognostic phenotype even after molecular classifications. MLH1 hypermethylation designated as MSI-haplo may represent unique prognostic phenotype during gastric carcinogenesis.

Clinical and pathological analysis of companion diagnostic testing of microsatellite instability-high for pembrolizumab in gynaecologic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability-high is a known biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy. It is also a known tumour feature of Lynch syndrome, detected most frequently in endometrial cancer. However, it remains unclear how microsatellite instability testing is carried out in the clinical field.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with gynaecological malignant tumours who underwent microsatellite instability testing as a companion diagnosis for pembrolizumab and 16 patients who previously underwent microsatellite instability testing as a screening for Lynch syndrome were recruited. Clinical information, microsatellite instability status, outcomes, genetic assessments and information about cancer tissue were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients had 101 gynaecologic malignant tumours including 26 endometrial, 38 ovarian and 28 cervical cancers, 9 with other tumours including 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers. All tissue samples were successfully tested, even though some were ≥10-year-old samples. Three cases (3.0%, 3/99) showed microsatellite instability-high; all cases were endometrial cancers with one case of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer [11.5% (3/26) in endometrial cancer, 2.6% (1/38) in ovarian cancer], and there was no microsatellite instability-high in cervical and other cancers. One of the endometrial cancer patients received pembrolizumab treatment, but finally died of cancer. Two other cases underwent genetic testing; both were diagnosed as Lynch syndrome. Six cases (37.5%) showed microsatellite instability-high in screening for Lynch syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsatellite instability-high was less commonly detected as a companion diagnosis for pembrolizumab in unselected gynaecologic patients. Genetic counselling should be always provided along with treatment selection.

Expression profiles of gastric cancer molecular subtypes in remnant tumors

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a carcinoma arising in the stomach remnant after previous gastric resection. It is frequently reported as a tumor with a poor prognosis and distinct biological features from primary gastric cancer (PGC). However, as it is less frequent, its profile regarding the current molecular classifications of gastric cancer has not been evaluated.

AIM

To evaluate a cohort of RGC according to molecular subtypes of GC using a panel of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to determine whether the expression profile is different between PGC and RGC.

METHODS

Consecutive RGC patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2009 and 2019 were assessed using seven GC panels: Epstein-Barr virus in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins (MutL homolog 1, MutS homolog 2, MutS homolog 6, and PMS1 homolog 2), p53 protein, and E-cadherin expression. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival of these patients were compared to 284 PGC patients.

RESULTS

A total of 40 RGC patients were enrolled in this study. Compared to PGC, older age (P < 0.001), male (P < 0.001), lower body mass index (P = 0.010), and lower hemoglobin level (P < 0.001) were associated with RGC patients. No difference was observed regarding Lauren’s type and pathologic Tumor Node Metastasis stage between the groups. Regarding the profiles evaluated, EBV-positive tumors were higher in RGC compared to PGC (P = 0.039). The frequency of microsatellite instability, aberrant p53 immunostaining, and loss of E-cadherin expression were similar between RGC and PGC. Higher rates of simultaneous alterations in two or more profiles were observed in RGC compared to PGC (P < 0.001). According to the molecular classification, the subtypes were defined as EBV in nine (22.5%) cases, microsatellite instability in nine (22.5%) cases, genomically stable in one (2.5%) case, and chromosomal instability in 21 (52.5%) cases. There was no significant difference in survival between molecular subtypes in RGC patients.

CONCLUSION

RGC was associated with EBV positivity and higher rates of co-altered expression profiles compared to PGC. According to the molecular classification, there was no significant difference in survival between the subtypes of RGC.

Remnant gastric cancer: a neglected group with high potential for immunotherapy

PURPOSE

The importance of targeted therapy and interest in the study of predictive markers in gastric cancer (GC) have increased in recent years with the use of anti-HER2 therapy and immunotherapy with anti-PD1/PD-L1 for microsatellite instability (MSI) and PD-L1 + tumors. However, the behavior of remnant GC (RGC) in this scenario is poorly reported. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of RGC and its association with the expression of current markers for targeted therapy.

METHODS

All RGC resections performed in a single center from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. As a comparison group, 53 primary proximal GC (PGC) who underwent total D2-gastrectomy were selected. HER2, MSI status and PD-L1 expression were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Combined Positive Score (CPS) was used to determine PD-L1 positivity.

RESULTS

A total of 40 RGC were included. RGC patients were older (p = 0.001), had lower BMI (p = 0.001) and number of resected lymph nodes (p < 0.001) compared to the PGC. Regarding markers expression, MSI was higher in RGC than PGC (27.5% vs 9.4%, p = 0.022). The frequency of CPS-positive was 32.5% and 26.4% in RGC and PGC, respectively (p = 0.522). HER2 positivity was 17.5% and 22.6% for RGC and PGC, respectively (p = 0.543). In survival analysis, DFS was better for RGC CPS-positive than RGC CPS-negative (p = 0.039) patients. There was no difference in survival considering MSI status.

CONCLUSION

RGC had higher incidence of MSI than PGC, and CPS-positive RGC was associated with better survival. The immunological profile of RGC patients suggests that they would be good candidates for immunotherapy.

Solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach: clinicopathological and molecular characteristics and histogenesis

BACKGROUND

Despite predominant microsatellite instability (MSI) in intestinal-type gastric carcinomas, we found the most frequent MSI in solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA). Although this tumor is classified as PDA, it is hypothesized to possess peculiar features among PDAs. The present study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of this tumor.

METHODS

We examined the expression of p53, mismatch-repair proteins, and mucin core glycoproteins; microsatellite status; and mutations in KRAS and BRAF, as well as clinicopathological features, in 54 cases of PDA of the stomach (31 solid-type PDAs and 23 non-solid-type PDAs).

RESULTS

The proportion (51.6%) of MSI in solid-type PDA was significantly higher than that in non-solid-type PDA (4.5%) (p = 0.00022). The proportion of absent expression of MLH1 (58.1%) and PMS2 (51.6%) in solid-type PDA was significantly higher than that in non-solid-type PDA (4.5 and 8%) (p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the mutations of KRAS and BRAF among PDAs. MSI-positive solid-type PDA was significantly associated with older age, female predominance, lower third location, concordant glandular component, and absent MLH1 and PMS2 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that MSI-positive solid-type PDA has peculiar clinicopathological features and that MSI with absent MLH1 and PMS2 expression may play an important role in tumor development. In addition, from the viewpoint of histogenesis, MSI-positive solid-type PDA may originate from differentiated-type adenocarcinoma.

Molecular Diagnostics in Esophageal and Gastric Neoplasms: 2018 Update

Esophageal cancer (EC) is rapidly increasing in incidence in the United States. Genetic changes associated with the development of EC involve the p16, p53, and APC genes. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) overexpression is seen in gastroesophageal junction carcinoma and a subset gastric carcinoma (GC). Interestingly, up to 50% cases of GC are related to Helicobacter pylori infection and up to 16% are related to EBV infection. Microsatellite instability is observed in up to 39% of GC and cell free nucleic acid analysis provides additional opportunities for diagnosis and prognosis of disease.

Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: molecular bases, clinical perspectives, and new treatment approaches

Gastric cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies, with limited treatment options in both locally advanced and metastatic setting, resulting in poor prognosis. Based on genomic characterization, stomach tumour has recently been described as a heterogeneous disease composed by different subtypes, each of them with peculiar molecular aspects and specific clinical behaviour. With an incidence of 22% among all western gastric tumour cases, stomach cancer with microsatellite instability was identified as one of these subgroups. Retrospective studies and limited prospective trials reported differences between gastric cancers with microsatellite stability and those with instability, mainly concerning clinical and pathological features, but also in regard to immunological microenvironment, correlation with prognostic value, and responses to treatment. In particular, gastric cancer with microsatellite instability constitutes a small but relevant subgroup associated with older age, female sex, distal stomach location, and lower number of lymph-node metastases. Emerging data attribute to microsatellite instability status a favourable prognostic meaning, whereas the poor outcomes reported after perioperative chemotherapy administration suggest a detrimental role of cytotoxic drugs in this gastric cancer subgroup. The strong immunogenicity and the widespread expression of immune-checkpoint ligands make microsatellite instability subtype more vulnerable to immunotherapeutic approach, e.g., with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 antibodies. Since gastric cancer with microsatellite instability shows specific features and clinical behaviour not overlapping with microsatellite stable disease, microsatellite instability test might be suitable for inclusion in a diagnostic setting for all tumour stages to guarantee the most targeted and effective treatment to every patient.

Promoter hypermethylation of RAR-β tumor suppressor gene in gastric carcinoma: Association with histological type and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

While gastric cancer is a common cancer in the world and Iran, its molecular mechanisms are not fully understood as yet. Epigenetic modifications can lead to alteration of gene expression and development of tumorigenesis mechanisms.

METHODS

To clarify the difference in DNA methylation pattern of histological types in gastric carcinoma, CpG islands in the promoters of retinoic acid receptor β gene (RAR-β) was studied using methylation-specific PCR.

RESULTS

In gastric cancer tissues, hypermethylation frequency of RAR-β gene was respectively 61 and 33% for diffuse and intestinal type. In diffuse type, hypermethylation of RAR-β has been significantly associated with invasion (P= 0.007), differentiation (P= 0.033) and location (P= 0.012) of the tumor. However, hypermethylation of RAR-β correlated only with tumor size (P= 0.029) in intestinal type. For adjacent non-tumor samples, hypermethylation of RAR-β was not detected and there was no significant association between age of diagnosis and hypermethylation of RAR-β in both types of gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support previous findings denoting a distinct profile of promoter hypermethylation status in the development of the intestinal and diffuse type of gastric carcinoma and the process of the tumorigenesis in these subtypes of gastric cancer is different from each other.

Association Between hMLH1 Promoter Methylation and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) is located on chromosome 3q21-23. As a classic tumor suppressor gene, many researchers have studied the association between hMLH1 promoter methylation and gastric cancer, but their conclusions were not always consistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to make a more integrated and precise estimate of the associations.

Method: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were retrieved without language restrictions. Data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and Stata 12.0 software. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was used to assess the statistical associations.

Result: A total of 39 studies published before January 20, 2018 were included in this study. The results indicated that the frequency of hMLH1 promoter methylation in gastric cancers was substantially higher than that in non-cancer controls (OR = 7.94, 95%CI = 4.32–14.58, P < 0.001). Furthermore, hMLH1 promoter methylation had considerable associations with lymph node metastasis, microsatellite instability (MSI), and low expression of hMLH1 protein (OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 1.04–2.26, P = 0.03; OR = 15.33, 95%CI = 9.26–25.36, P < 0.001; OR = 37.86, 95%CI = 18.03–79.50, P < 0.001, respectively). No association was found between hMLH1 promoter methylation and Lauren classification or Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection status.

Conclusion: The present study provides evidence that promoter methylation of hMLH1 is a major causative event in the occurrence and development of human gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of Epstein-Barr virus infection, microsatellite instability, and PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gastric cancer (GC) has recently been categorized in molecular subtypes, which include Epstein-Barr (EBV)-positive and microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors. This distinction may provide prognostic information and identifies therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to evaluate EBV, MSI, and PD-L1 immunoexpression in GC and its relationship with clinicopathological characteristics and patient's prognosis.

METHODS

We evaluated 287 GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy through immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair proteins and PD-L1, and in situ hybridization for EBV detection utilizing tissue microarray.

RESULTS

EBV-positive and MSI were identified in 10.5% and 27% of the GCs, respectively. EBV positivity was associated to male gender (P = 0.032), proximal location (P < 0.001), undetermined Lauren type (P < 0.001), poorly differentiated histology (P = 0.043) and severe inflammatory infiltrate (P < 0.001). MSI-tumors were associated to older age (P = 0.002), subtotal gastrectomy (P = 0.004), pN0 (P = 0.024) and earlier TNM stage (P = 0.020). PD-L1-positive was seen in 8.8% of cases, with predominant expression in EBV-positive GC (P < 0.001). MSI was associated to better survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

EBV-positive GCs had increased PD-L1 expression, while MSI GC had better survival outcome. EBV and MSI subgroups are distinct GC entities, their recognition is feasible by conventional techniques, and it may help individualize follow-up and guide adjuvant therapy.

Epigenetic regulation of DNA repair genes and implications for tumor therapy

DNA repair represents the first barrier against genotoxic stress causing metabolic changes, inflammation and cancer. Besides its role in preventing cancer, DNA repair needs also to be considered during cancer treatment with radiation and DNA damaging drugs as it impacts therapy outcome. The DNA repair capacity is mainly governed by the expression level of repair genes. Alterations in the expression of repair genes can occur due to mutations in their coding or promoter region, changes in the expression of transcription factors activating or repressing these genes, and/or epigenetic factors changing histone modifications and CpG promoter methylation or demethylation levels. In this review we provide an overview on the epigenetic regulation of DNA repair genes. We summarize the mechanisms underlying CpG methylation and demethylation, with de novo methyltransferases and DNA repair involved in gain and loss of CpG methylation, respectively. We discuss the role of components of the DNA damage response, p53, PARP-1 and GADD45a on the regulation of the DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase DNMT1, the key enzyme responsible for gene silencing. We stress the relevance of epigenetic silencing of DNA repair genes for tumor formation and tumor therapy. A paradigmatic example is provided by the DNA repair protein O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), which is silenced in up to 40% of various cancers through CpG promoter methylation. The CpG methylation status of the MGMT promoter strongly correlates with clinical outcome and, therefore, is used as prognostic marker during glioblastoma therapy. Mismatch repair genes are also subject of epigenetic silencing, which was shown to correlate with colorectal cancer formation. For many other repair genes shown to be epigenetically regulated the clinical outcome is not yet clear. We also address the question of whether genotoxic stress itself can lead to epigenetic alterations of genes encoding proteins involved in the defense against genotoxic stress.

Diagnostic, Predictive, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Molecular Biomarkers in Third Millennium: A Breakthrough in Gastric Cancer

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third cause of cancer death. The clinical outcomes of the patients are still not encouraging with a low rate of 5 years' survival. Often the disease is diagnosed at advanced stages and this obviously negatively affects patients outcomes. A deep understanding of molecular basis of gastric cancer can lead to the identification of diagnostic, predictive, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers.

Main Body

This paper aims to give a global view on the molecular classification and mechanisms involved in the development of the tumour and on the biomarkers for gastric cancer. We discuss the role of E-cadherin, HER2, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), MET, human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), microsatellite instability (MSI), PD-L1, and TP53. We have also considered in this manuscript new emerging biomarkers as matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), microRNAs, and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs).

Conclusions

Identifying and validating diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic biomarkers will have a huge impact on patients outcomes as they will allow early detection of tumours and also guide the choice of a targeted therapy based on specific molecular features of the cancer.

Molecular key to understand the gastric cancer biology in elderly patients-The role of microsatellite instability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in gastric cancer (GC) is associated with older age. We present the clinicopathological results of younger and older patients with MSI GC.

METHODS

We analyzed 472 patients with GC. MSI analysis was done on fresh frozen tissue using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats: NR-21, NR-24, NR-27, BAT-25, and BAR-26. Clinical and pathological analysis was performed for different age groups.

RESULTS

We observed better survival in elderly MSI GC patients compared to younger patients. The percentage of MSI GC increases gradually with increasing age, accounting for 48% of patients over the age of 85 years. A difference in survival was seen between MSI and MSS groups of patients older than 65 years, while no statistical difference was seen for younger groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that MSI status has a significant prognostic factor in patients aged over 70 years (MSS vs. MSI; HR 1.82, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

MSI is an important prognostic factor above all in elderly GC patients. It is associated with favorable prognosis and may help in planning different approaches to treatment in this subgroup. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:344-350. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The clinicopathological significance of hMLH1 hypermethylation in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis and literature review

The hMLH1 gene plays an essential role in DNA repair. Methylation of the hMLH1 gene is common in many types of cancer and can lead to the loss of hMLH1 expression. However, the association and clinicopathological significance between hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is elusive. Here, we investigated the correlation of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation and NSCLC using 13 studies by comprising 1,056 lung cancer patients via a meta-analysis. We observed that 1) loss of hMLH1 protein expression was significantly associated with its promoter hypermethylation, 2) hMLH1 gene inactivation through hypermethylation contributed to the tumorigenesis of NSCLC, which could be a decisive factor for the pathogenesis of NSCLC due to its high occurrence in NSCLC tissues compared to normal lung tissues, 3) a correlation exists between histologic subtypes/disease stages (TNM I+II vs III+IV) and hypermethylation status of hMLH1 gene, and 4) NSCLC patients with hMLH1 hypermethylation and subsequent low expression levels of hMLH1 have a short overall survival period than those patients with normal expression of hMLH1 gene. hMLH1 mRNA predicts patient survival in lung cancer, and this was confirmed by using a public database. We then discussed the tumor suppressor function of hMLH1 and the clinicopathological significance of hMLH1 in NSCLC. We concluded that hMLH1 hypermethylation should be an early diagnostic marker for NSCLC and also a prognostic index for NSCLC. hMLH1 is an interesting therapeutic target in human lung cancers.

Gastric biomarkers: a global review

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor 5-year survival and large global burden of disease. The disease is biologically and genetically heterogeneous with a poorly understood carcinogenesis at the molecular level. Despite the many prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic biomarkers investigated to date, gastric cancer continues to be detected at an advanced stage with resultant poor clinical outcomes.

MAIN BODY

This is a global review of gastric biomarkers with an emphasis on HER2, E-cadherin, fibroblast growth factor receptor, mammalian target of rapamycin, and hepatocyte growth factor receptor as well as sections on microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, matrix metalloproteinases, PD-L1, TP53, and microsatellite instability.

CONCLUSION

A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis and biological features of gastric cancer, including the identification and characterization of diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic biomarkers, hopefully will provide improved clinical outcomes.

Molecular diagnostics in esophageal and gastric neoplasms

Esophageal carcinoma is the most rapidly increasing tumor in incidence in the United States. It has an established association with a precursor lesion (Barrett esophagus). Gastric carcinoma (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the world. The prognosis for patients with advanced stage GC and esophageal carcinoma is poor. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) overexpression is seen in gastroesophageal junction carcinoma and a subset of GC. HER-2 overexpressing tumors are eligible for HER-2 targeted therapies, which lead to a better survival in these patients.

Frequent microsatellite instability in papillary and solid-type, poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been observed in 8-39 % of sporadic gastric cancers. However, despite numerous reports indicating a significant relationship between intestinal-type histology and MSI, detailed correlation between histological subtypes and MSI remains obscure. The purpose of the present study is to clarify the relationship between histological subtype and microsatellite status in gastric carcinomas.

METHODS

Microsatellite status was examined for 464 consecutive gastric carcinomas from 420 patients as well as histological subtypes and other clinicopathological findings.

RESULTS

MSI was observed in 82 carcinomas (17.7 %), and the greatest proportions were observed in solid-type, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (43.0 %) and papillary adenocarcinoma (32.5 %), both being significantly higher than those of other subtypes. The proportion increased with advancing age (0 % at 51-64 years, 8.5 % at 65-74 years, 18.4 % at 75-84 years, 35.3 % at 85-96 years). Compared with microsatellite-stable carcinomas, microsatellite-unstable carcinomas were significantly related with older age, female gender, antral location, and predominant papillary adenocarcinoma and solid-type, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Poorly differentiated type carcinoma was significantly less frequent than differentiated type in microsatellite-unstable cancer at the early stage, whereas no significant difference existed at the advanced stage.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that there are specific histological subtypes with highly frequent MSI and that gastric carcinoma with MSI originates from differentiated-type carcinomas, indicating histological diversity during tumor growth.

Expression of AID, P53, and Mlh1 proteins in endoscopically resected differentiated-type early gastric cancer

AIM

To analyze the expression of the tumor-related proteins in differentiated-type early gastric carcinoma (DEGC) samples.

METHODS

Tumor specimens were obtained from 102 patients (75 males and 27 females) who had received an endoscopic tumor resection at Tottori University Hospital between 2007 and 2009. Ninety-one cancer samples corresponded to noninvasive or intramucosal carcinoma according to the Vienna classification system, and 11 samples were submucosal invasive carcinomas. All of the EGCs were histologically differentiated carcinomas. All patients were classified as having Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infections by endoscopic atrophic changes or by testing seropositive for H. pylori IgG. All of the samples were histopathologically classified as either tubular or papillary adenocarcinoma according to their structure. The immunohistochemical staining was performed in a blinded manner with respect to the clinical information. Two independent observers evaluated protein expression. All data were statistically analyzed then.

RESULTS

The rates of aberrant activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) expression and P53 overexpression were both 34.3% in DEGCs. The expression of Mlh1 was lost in 18.6% of DEGCs. Aberrant AID expression was not significantly associated with P53 overexpression in DEGCs. However, AID expression was associated with the severity of mononuclear cell activity in the non-cancerous mucosa adjacent to the tumor (P = 0.064). The rate of P53 expression was significantly greater in flat or depressed tumors than in elevated tumors. The frequency of Mlh1 loss was significantly increased in distal tumors, elevated gross-type tumors, papillary histological-type tumors, and tumors with a severe degree of endoscopic atrophic gastritis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Aberrant AID expression, P53 overexpression, and the loss of Mlh1 were all associated with clinicopathological features and gastric mucosal alterations in DEGCs. The aberrant expression of AID protein may partly contribute to the induction of nuclear P53 expression.

Inactivation of COX-2, HMLH1 and CDKN2A gene by promoter methylation in gastric cancer: relationship with histological subtype, tumor location and Helicobacter pylori genotype

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the inactivation of COX-2, HMLH1 and CDKN2A by promoter methylation and its relationship with the infection by different Helicobacter pylori strains in gastric cancer.

METHODS

DNA extracted from 76 H. pylori-positive gastric tumor samples was available for promoter methylation identification by methylation-specific PCR and H. pylori subtyping by PCR. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine COX-2, p16(INK4A) and HMLH1 expression.

RESULTS

A strong negative correlation was found between the expression of these markers and the presence of promoter methylation in their genes. Among cardia tumors, negativity of p16(INK4A) was a significant finding. On the other hand, in noncardia tumors, the histological subtypes had different gene expression patterns. In the intestinal subtype, a significant finding was HMLH1 inactivation by methylation, while in the diffuse subtype, CDKN2A inactivation by methylation was the significant finding. Tumors with methylated COX-2 and HMLH1 genes were associated with H. pylori vacA s1 (p = 0.025 and 0.047, respectively), and the nonmethylated tumors were associated with the presence of the gene flaA.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the inactivation of these genes by methylation occurs by distinct pathways according to the histological subtype and tumor location and depends on the H. pylori genotype.

Clinicopathological and patient characteristics of early gastric neoplasia endoscopically resected with loss of Mlh1 expression

Hypermethylation of the promoter region of the MLH1 gene leads to loss of Mlh1 protein expression and plays a key role in the development of gastric cancer. Little is known about the association between Mlh1 expression and the clinicopathological and patient characteristics in early gastric neoplasia, particularly in endoscopically resected tumors. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine Mlh1 expression in 140 early gastric neoplasias obtained by endoscopic resection and comprising 31 gastric adenomas (GAs) and 109 early gastric cancers (EGCs), and compared them to corresponding clinicopathological and patient data. P53 expression and phenotypic profiles were also analyzed. The rate of reduced Mlh1 expression and P53 overexpression was 9.6 and 6.5% in GAs, and 27.5 and 27.5% in EGCs, respectively. In elderly patients (≥65 years of age), the aberrant expression of Mlh1 in EGCs was more significant in female than in male patients (59.9 vs. 29.8%; P=0.016). In addition, the frequency of aberrant Mlh1 expression in EGCs increased significantly in patients with oncological family histories and elevated gross type (P=0.033 and P=0.04, respectively). Moreover, a significant correlation was observed among aberrant Mlh1, P53-negative and HGM expression. The present findings suggest that loss of Mlh1 expression is associated with age, gender, oncological family history and tumor growth pattern in EGC. Patient and tumor characteristics are key factors in the screening, surveillance and diagnosis of early gastric neoplasia, particularly in elderly individuals.

The prognostic significance of whole blood global and specific DNA methylation levels in gastric adenocarcinoma

Background

Epigenetics, particularly DNA methylation, has recently been elucidated as important in gastric cancer (GC) initiation and progression. We investigated the clinical and prognostic importance of whole blood global and site-specific DNA methylation in GC.

Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood of 105 Omani GC patients at diagnosis. DNA methylation was quantified by pyrosequencing of global DNA and specific gene promoter regions at 5 CpG sites for CDH1, 7 CpG sites for p16, 4 CpG sites for p53, and 3 CpG sites for RUNX3. DNA methylation levels in patients were categorized into low, medium, and high tertiles. Associations between methylation level category and clinicopathological features were evaluated using χ² tests. Survival analyses were carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. A backward conditional Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of survival.

Results

Older GC patients had increased methylation levels at specific CpG sites within the CDH1, p53, and RUNX-3 promoters. Male gender was significantly associated with reduced global and increased site-specific DNA methylation levels in CDH1, p16, and p53 promoters. Global DNA low methylation level was associated with better survival on univariate analysis. Patients with high and medium methylation vs. low methylation levels across p16 promoter CpG sites, site 2 in particular, had better survival. Multivariate analysis showed that global DNA hypermethylation was a significant independent predictor of worse survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1–3.8; p = 0.02) and high methylation mean values across p16 promoter sites 1–7 were associated with better survival with HR of 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1–0.8; p = 0.02) respectively.

Conclusions

Analysis of global and site-specific DNA methylation in peripheral blood by pyrosequencing provides quantitative DNA methylation values that may serve as important prognostic indicators.

Role of methylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in the development of gastric and colorectal carcinoma in the elderly

The occurrence of malignant neoplasms increases with advancing age. Although aging and carcinogenesis are basically different processes, they share phenomena such as the accumulation of DNA damage and abnormal proteins. Recent advances in molecular biology have shown an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes in both aging and carcinogenesis, as well as the alteration of metabolism, immunosenescence and shortened telomeres. DNA methylation is a representative epigenetic phenomenon and is frequently involved in controlling gene functions during development and tumorigenesis. We herein focused on methylation of genes in the development of gastrointestinal carcinomas in the elderly. The proportion of gastric and colorectal carcinomas with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter increases with age, reaching 25-30% of all carcinomas of the stomach and large intestine in elderly patients. These tumors have clinicopathological and molecular characteristics such as loss of hMLH1 expression, microsatellite instability, poorly differentiated histology, peritumoral inflammatory cell infiltration, low incidence of lymph node metastasis and favorable prognosis. However, methylation-related carcinogenesis accounts for up to approximately one-third of tumors, and other mechanisms; for example chromosomal instability as a result of telomere dysfunction, are responsible for the development of most carcinomas in the elderly.

Aberrant methylation of DNA mismatch repair genes in elderly patients with sporadic gastric carcinoma: A comparison with younger patients

BACKGROUND

Hypermethylation of promoters that regulate the expression of DNA repair genes is associated with gastric carcinoma (GC). Little is known regarding the association between age of disease onset and differences in molecular profiles.

METHODS

The two study groups consisted of 100 elderly patients and 100 younger patients. The aberrant DNA methylation patterns of four mismatch repair genes, hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, and MGMT, were compared by bisulfite modification and methylation-specific PCR (MSP).

RESULTS

The methylation frequencies for hMLH1 and hMSH3 were significantly higher for the elderly than for the younger GC patients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.031, respectively). A significant correlation was observed between aberrant hMLH1, hMSH3, and MGMT methylation and the loss of hMLH1, hMSH3, and MGMT protein expression (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.001, respectively). The prevalence of aberrant hMLH1 and hMSH3 methylation increased significantly with age.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH3 is age related and thus may play an important role in gastric carcinogenesis in the elderly. Screening for hMLH1 and hMSH3 methylation may have clinical significance for the evaluation of elderly patients with GC.

Relationship between mismatch repair gene hMLH1 promoter methylation and gastric carcinoma

AIM: To detect the hypermethylation status of the 5'CpG island locating in the promoter region of hMLH1 (mismatch repair genes, MMR) gene, and to investigate the role of hMLH1 methylation in gastric carcinogenesis.

METHODS: Methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR) was used to examine the methylation status of hMLH1 promoter in 60 gastric carcinomas and 60 caner-adjacent normal tissues, and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was used to detect the mRNA expression of hMLH1 in the above tissues.

RESULTS: The expression of hMLH1 mRNA was significantly lower in cancer tissues than that in cancer adjacent tissues (t = 4.082, P < 0.01). The incidence of hMLH1 promoter methylation occurred in 30% (18/60) cases. No methylation of hMLH1 promoter was found in cancer-adjacent normal tissues. The methylation of hMLH1 promoter did not correlate with the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma. Seventeen of 21 (81%) hMLH1 mRNA-negative cases exhibited prominent methylation, but 1 of 39 (2.5%) hMLH1 mRNA-positive cases showed methylation. There existed a significant correlation between hMLH1 methylation and mRNA decrease (χ² = 8.0182, P = 0.0046).

CONCLUSION: Promoter methylation of hMLH1 is closely related to the expression loss of hMLH1 mRNA, which is involved in gastric carcinogenesis.

Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of gastric cancer: clinical implications

Gastric cancer is of major importance world-wide being the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. According to Lauren's histological classification gastric cancer is divided in two groups, the better differentiated intestinal carcinomas and the poorly differentiated diffuse-type cancers. The genetic changes underlying the initiation and progression of gastric cancer are not well defined. Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving a number of genetic and epigenetic factors. Although it has been proposed that different genetic pathways exist for differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas, the two histological subtypes of gastric cancer share some common genetic alterations. Currently, tumor histology and pathologic stage are the major prognostic variables used in the clinical practice for gastric cancer patients. However, it is known that tumors with similar morphology may differ in biological aggressiveness, prognosis and response to treatment. Molecular genetic analysis of gastric cancer revealed a number of associations of certain genetic changes with pathological features, tumor biological behavior and prognosis of gastric cancer patients, suggesting that these genetic abnormalities might play an important role in gastric tumorigenesis. Increasing evidence suggests that the molecular genetic changes could be helpful in the clinical setting, contributing to prognosis and management of patients. Regarding epigenetic events in gastric tumorigenesis, a number of methylating markers have been proposed for risk assessment, prognostic evaluation and as therapeutic targets. However, further research is required in order to systematically investigate the genetic changes in gastric cancer estimating also their usefulness in the clinical practice. A good understanding of the genetic changes underlying gastric carcinogenesis may provide new perspectives for prognosis and screening of high risk individuals. Some of the genetic alterations could definitely improve tumor classification and management of gastric cancer patients. Also, based on molecular data identified in gastric cancer novel therapeutics might help to improve the treatment of this disease.

Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of gastric and colorectal carcinomas in the elderly

The occurrence of malignant neoplasms increases with advancing age. Although aging and carcinogenesis are basically different processes, there are phenomena common to each such as accumulation of DNA damage and abnormal proteins. Gastric and colorectal carcinomas are representative tumors in which the prevalence and the number of patients increase significantly with age. Compared with gastric and colorectal cancers occurring in younger patients, those occurring in older patients have clinicopathological differences in tumor location, gender distribution, histological type, histological diversity, multiplicity, incidence of lymph node metastasis, and prognosis. In the elderly there are peculiar types of carcinoma such as medullary-type poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma and solid-type poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma, both of which occur in older women. Methylation, apoptosis, and telomere dysfunction play important roles in the development of gastric and colorectal cancers in the elderly.

Epigenetic modification and gastrointestinal tumor

Carcinogenesis springs from the combined forces of both genetic and epigenetic events. The role of epigenetic modification in the progression of carcinoma has been suggested by a lot of evidences in recent years. An epigenetic event alters the activity of genes without changing their structure. Gastrointestinal tumor is the most common cancer in China, and the investigation of epigenetic modification is significant in cell immunity, phylaxis, cell differentiation and preventive therapy.

Methylation analysis of hMLH1 gene promoter by a bisulfite-sensitive single-strand conformation polymorphism-capillary electrophoresis method

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification that alters transcription in those genes containing CpG islands. In this report, a novel DNA methylation analysis method was developed employing bisulfite-single strand conformation polymorphism combined with capillary electrophoresis (bisulfite-SSCP-CE). During the bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA, a high concentration of sodium bisulfite (4.8 mol/L) was preferred in order to shorten reaction time and minimize template degradation. The methylated and unmethylated ssDNA of hMLH1 promoter were simultaneously separated under the optimized CE conditions, including 6% SLPA with 10% glycerol as sieving medium, 25 degrees C as separation temperature and 12 kV as running voltage. The heterogeneous methylation of hMLH1 promoter was identified in 13 of 64 colorectal cancer patients. Moreover, hMLH1 promoter methylation had a significant relationship with protein expression loss and increased with the age of patients. Our results indicated that DNA methylation analysis for a large number of clinical samples would be facilitated by use of the bisulfite-SSCP-CE method.

Age-related alteration in the association of microsatellite instability with absent hMLH1 expression and histological types of colorectal carcinoma

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is present in approximately 15-20% of sporadic colorectal cancers. However, despite the increased prevalence of absent hMLH1 expression and MSI in colorectal cancer in the elderly, few attempts have been made to define it in detail. The aim of the present paper was to correlate age-related alterations in absent hMLH1 expression and MSI with various histological types of colorectal carcinoma. hMLH1 expression and microsatellite status were studied in 184 colorectal carcinomas (49 well-differentiated, 49 moderately differentiated, 49 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, and 37 mucinous carcinomas). The prevalence of absent hMLH1 expression was higher in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (63%) and mucinous carcinoma (43%) than in well- (8%) and moderately (12%) differentiated adenocarcinomas. MSI was found more frequently in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (69%) and mucinous carcinoma (41%) than in well- and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (8% and 6%, respectively). Age-related differences in absent hMLH1 expression and MSI were found only in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, in which the prevalence of medullary-type carcinoma increased with advancing age. These results indicate that an age-related increase of medullary-type tumors in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma may play an important role in the increase of absent hMLH1 expression and MSI in colorectal carcinoma.

Immunohistochemical expression of mismatch repair genes: A screening tool for predicting mutator phenotype in liver fluke infection-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To clarify possible contributions of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system in carcinogenesis of liver fluke infection-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) by using immunohistochemical assay.

METHODS: A total of 29 ICC samples, which had been assessed for genomic instability by a PCR-based method, were used for study. They were examined immunohistochemically to demonstrate protein expression of two MMR genes, hMSH2 and hMLH1. Results obtained were compared with their mutator phenotype assessed previously.

RESULTS: Either hMSH2 or hMLH1 protein was obviously expressed in 28 of 29 (96.6%) ICC samples. Positive nuclear localization of hMSH2 or hMLH1 protein was observed in 86.2% (25/29) or 93.1% (27/29) ICC cases, respectively, while their negative nuclear reactivity was only detected in 13.8% (4/29) or 6.9% (2/29) ICC cases analyzed, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our study, probably for the first time, showed through immunohistochemical detection of hMSH2 and hMLH1 gene that DNA MMR system does not play a prominent role in liver fluke infection-associated cholangiocarcinogenesis. These results confirm previous findings on mutational status of these genes assessed through a PCR-based method. The immunohistochemical analysis has proven to be an effective and sensitive approach for screening MMR deficiency regardless of somatic inactivation or promoter hypermethylation of hMSH2 and/or hMLH1 gene. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry is more advantageous compared to mutator phenotyping assay in terms of simplicity, less time consuming and cost effectiveness for screening possible involvements of target MMR genes in tumorigenesis.

Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer is associated with better prognosis in only stage II cancers

BACKGROUND

The assessment of microsatellite instability (MSI) is not included yet in the routine evaluation of patients with gastric cancer, as controversial data exist regarding its prognostic value.

METHODS

We determined the clinical significance of MSI in 510 sporadic gastric cancers, using the mononucleotide markers BAT25 and BAT26. The results were compared with the immunohistochemical expression of the mismatch repair proteins Mlh1 and Msh2.

RESULTS

MSI was present in 83 (16%) cancers and correlated with better survival (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that the MSI phenotype was an independent factor (P = .005) and added prognostic information to TNM stage, location, and age. The relative risk of death for MSI cancer patients was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.8). Moreover, when grouped according to stage, only stage II cancers showed a significant effect of MSI status on survival (P = .011; hazard ratio = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8). MSI also correlated with older age (P = .002), female gender (P < .001), intestinal histotype (P = .011), lower T stage (P = .018), and less lymph node involvement (P < .001). Finally, comparison of the results of immunohistochemical expression of the mismatch repair proteins Mlh1 and Msh2 with microsatellite analysis showed concordant results in 95% of neoplasms, with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsatellite analysis of gastric cancer has clinical utility in determination of prognosis, but should be determined in only stage II neoplasms in a routine clinical setting. Immunohistochemistry may be considered sufficient, although microsatellite analysis is preferable.

Expression of tumor suppressor and tumor-related proteins in differentiated carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with tubular component and pure undifferentiated carcinoma of the stomach

BACKGROUND

The recent development of tissue microarray (TMA) technology allows high-throughput protein expression profiling of cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry. We attempted to clarify the derivation of undifferentiated-type gastric carcinoma with tubular component by using TMA.

METHODS

We constructed a TMA system composed of six paraffin blocks in which 274 samples of formalin-fixed gastric carcinoma tissue from 274 patients were embedded. Using this system, we performed immunohistochemical stains for five tumor suppressor and tumor-related proteins, i.e. p53, p16, hMLH1, c-erbB-2 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The 274 gastric carcinomas were histopathologically divided into the following three groups according to the degree of differentiation: differentiated-type (D-type), undifferentiated-type with tubular component (UT-type) and pure undifferentiated-type (UP-type). Immunohistochemical results were then compared with histological types.

RESULTS

The percentages of abnormal expression of each protein in D-type, UT-type and UP-type carcinomas were as follows: 27% (38/143), 17% (17/98) and 15% (5/33) for p53; 27% (39/143), 19% (19/98) and 18% (6/33) for p16; 38% (54/143), 44% (43/98) and 24% (8/33) for hMLH1; 15% (22/143), 5% (5/98) and 0% (0/33) for c-erbB-2; and 22% (31/143), 35% (34/98) and 70% (23/33) for CEA. UP-type carcinomas exhibited the lowest frequencies of abnormal expression for p53, p16, hMLH1 and c-erbB-2, but the highest frequencies for CEA. UT-type carcinomas generally showed intermediate frequencies between those of D-type and UP-type carcinomas. Differences between D-type and UP-type for c-erbB-2 (P < 0.05) and CEA (P < 0.001) were significant, as were differences between D-type and UT-type for c-erbB-2 (P < 0.05) and CEA (P < 0.05), and differences between UT-type and UP-type for hMLH1 (P < 0.05) and CEA (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings reveal that gastric carcinomas have distinct expression profiles for tumor suppressor and tumor-related proteins depending on histological types, and support the hypothesis that UT-type carcinomas are derived not only from D-type but also from UP-type carcinomas. We also found significant differences between abnormal protein expression and other clinicopathological parameters such as gender, age and status of tumor and nodes.

N/A

N/A

Potential diagnostic and prognostic values of detecting promoter hypermethylation in the serum of patients with gastric cancer

While there is no reliable serum biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with gastric cancer, we tested the potential diagnostic and prognostic values of detecting methylation changes in the serum of gastric cancer patients. DNA was extracted from the pretherapeutic serum of 60 patients with confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and 22 age-matched noncancer controls. Promoter hypermethylation in 10 tumour-related genes (APC, E-cadherin, GSTP1, hMLH1, MGMT, p15, p16, SOCS1, TIMP3 and TGF-beta RII) was determined by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (MethyLight). Preferential methylation in the serum DNA of gastric cancer patients was noted in APC (17%), E-cadherin (13%), hMLH1 (41%) and TIMP3 (17%) genes. Moreover, patients with stages III/IV diseases tended to have higher concentrations of methylated APC (P=0.08), TIMP3 (P=0.005) and hMLH1 (P=0.03) in the serum. In all, 33 cancers (55%) had methylation detected in the serum in at least one of these four markers, while three normal subjects had methylation detected in the serum (specificity 86%). The combined use of APC and E-cadherin methylation markers identified a subgroup of cancer patients with worse prognosis (median survival 3.3 vs 16.1 months, P=0.006). These results suggest that the detection of DNA methylation in the serum may carry both diagnostic and therapeutic values in gastric cancer patients.

Aberrant CpG island methylation in early-onset sporadic gastric carcinoma

PURPOSE

Gastric carcinoma more commonly affects older patients, and it is thought that cases of early-onset gastric carcinoma may develop with a different molecular profile different from that of carcinoma occurring at a later age. We assayed the methylation status and genetic changes in genes associated with the APC-beta-catenin axis and the mismatch repair system in relatively early-onset gastric carcinoma samples to determine their association with gastric carcinogenesis.

METHODS

Tumor and normal tissue DNA samples were obtained from 40 patients with early-onset (< 50 y) gastric carcinomas and assayed for APC and CTNNB1 mutations, microsatellite instability, and methylation of the promoters of the hMLH1, TIMP3, THBS1, DAP- K, GSTP1 , APC, and MINT2.

RESULTS

Promoter methylation at these seven loci ranged from 12.5 to 62%, with 38/40 tumors (95%) showing promoter methylation at more than one locus. The CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP) was classified as high in 16 tumors (40%), low in 22 tumors (55%), and negative in 2 tumors (5%). Two concurrent missense mutations (E1685G, R1763L) in the APC mutation cluster region were detected in two tumors, nine tumors showed loss of APC heterozygosity (LOH), and two showed both LOH and promoter methylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that, unlike in colorectal carcinoma, APC and CTNNB1 mutations do not appear to be highly implicated in early-onset gastric carcinogenesis. In contrast, our data show that promoter methylation is a prevalent phenomenon in early-onset gastric carcinoma and may be related to gastric carcinogenesis.

DNA methylation profiles of differentiated-type gastric carcinomas with distinct mucin phenotypes

Gastric carcinomas (GC) are classified into four phenotypes according to mucin expression. Previous studies revealed the association of distinct genetic profiles in GC with mucin phenotypic expression; however, the roles of epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation, are poorly understood. We examined whether the phenotypic expression of GC was associated with DNA methylation of hMLH1, MGMT, p16(INK4a), RAR-beta or CDH1. Expression of HGM, M-GGMC-1, MUC2, and CD10 was analyzed immunohistochemically in 33 advanced GC with differentiated histology. HGM was expressed in 14 (42.4%) cases, M-GGMC-1 in five (15.2%) cases, MUC2 in 15 (45.5%) cases and CD10 in 18 (54.5%) cases. DNA methylation was detected in five (15.2%) cases for hMLH1, 11 (33.3%) cases for MGMT, 13 (39.4%) cases for p16(INK4a), 17 (51.5%) cases for RAR-beta and 14 (42.4%) cases for CDH1 by bisulfite-polymerase chain reaction and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. DNA methylation of hMLH1 occurred more frequently in MUC2-negative GC than in MUC2-positive GC (P = 0.0488, Fisher's exact test). In contrast, MGMT was more frequently methylated in MUC2-positive GC than in MUC2-negative GC (P = 0.0078, Fisher's exact test). There was no correlation between gastric or intestinal-markers and methylation of the p16(INK4a), RAR-beta and CDH1 genes. These results indicate that DNA methylation of specific genes, such as hMLH1 and MGMT, may be involved partly in the distinct phenotypic expression of GC.

Cancer and aging: symposium of the 27th annual meeting of the Japanese society for biomedical gerontology, Tokyo

Although many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the strong link between aging and cancer, the exact mechanisms responsible for the increased frequency of occurrence of cancer with advancing age have not been fully defined. Recent evidence indicates that malregulation of the apoptotic process may be involved in some aging process as well as in the development of cancer. Although it is still under debate how apoptosis is expressed during aging in vivo, this phenomenon is an important factor in unwinding the complicated mechanisms that link cancer and aging. In this review, we report on the discussion at the symposium of the 27th annual meeting of the Japanese society for biomedical gerontology, regarding recent findings from aging and carcinogenesis studies using animal models, the characteristics of cancer in patients with Werner's syndrome, the epigenetic changes in human cancers and aging, and the characteristics of human cancers in the elderly. It was concluded that apoptosis plays a role in the aging process and carcinogenesis in vivo, likely as an inherent protective mechanism against various kinds of damages to genes/chromosomes.

DNA hypermethylation of tumor-related genes in gastric carcinoma

The hypermethylation of the CpG islands is a common mechanism for the inactivation of tumor-related genes. In the present study, we analyzed the methylation status of genes for cell repair such as hMLH1, MGMT, and GSTP1, and a gastric cancer-specifically methylated DNA fragment, MINT 25 in gastric cancer cases and control groups. The study population consisted of 100 gastric cancer patients (50 distal and 50 proximal carcinomas), and 238 healthy controls. All genes showed more frequent hypermethylation in the cases than in the control group (p<0.0001). We investigated the association between promoter hypermethylation and relevant parameters including age, gender, alcohol consumption, smoking, and family history. There was a common hypermethylation of hMLH1 (p=0.008), MGMT (p= 0.0001), and GSTP1 (p=0.0003) in females. This study also demonstrates that hypermethylation was strongly associated with non-drinkers (MGMT, p=0.046 and MINT 25, p=0.049) and non-smokers (hMLH1, p=0.044; MGMT, p=0.0003; MINT 25, p=0.029). Moreover, the frequency of MINT 25 hypermethylation increased with age (p=0.037), and MGMT methylation was frequently detected in distal gastric cancer than in proximal type (p=0.038). Our study suggested that promoter hypermethylation of the genes involved in cell repair system and MINT 25 is associated strongly with some subgroups of primary gastric carcinoma.

DNA hypermethylation in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Transcriptional silencing of tumour suppressor genes by DNA hypermethylation plays a crucial role in the progression of gastric cancer. Many genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, tissue invasion, DNA repair and apoptosis have been shown to be inactivated by this type of epigenetic mechanism.

RESULTS

Recent studies have demonstrated that DNA hypermethylation begins early in cancer progression, and in some cases, may precede the neoplastic process. Ageing is associated with DNA hypermethylation, and may provide a mechanistic link between ageing and cancer. Several reports have indicated that Epstein-Barr virus-related gastric cancer is associated with a high frequency of DNA hypermethylation, suggesting that viral oncogenesis might involve DNA hypermethylation with inactivation of tumour suppressor genes. Hypermethylation of hMLH1 with the resulting loss of its expression is known to cause microsatellite instability, which reflects genomic instability associated with defective DNA mismatch repair genes in the tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, recent studies demonstrate that DNA hypermethylation is a crucial mechanism of inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in gastric cancer. A better understanding of DNA hypermethylation will provide us with new opportunities in the diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer.