1
|
Little MP, Wakeford R, Zablotska LB, Borrego D, Griffin KT, Allodji RS, de Vathaire F, Lee C, Brenner AV, Miller JS, Campbell D, Pearce MS, Sadetzki S, Doody MM, Holmberg E, Lundell M, French B, Adams MJ, Berrington de González A, Linet MS. Radiation exposure and leukaemia risk among cohorts of persons exposed to low and moderate doses of external ionising radiation in childhood. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1152-1165. [PMID: 37596407 PMCID: PMC10539334 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02387-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many high-dose groups demonstrate increased leukaemia risks, with risk greatest following childhood exposure; risks at low/moderate doses are less clear. METHODS We conducted a pooled analysis of the major radiation-associated leukaemias (acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with/without the inclusion of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)) in ten childhood-exposed groups, including Japanese atomic bomb survivors, four therapeutically irradiated and five diagnostically exposed cohorts, a mixture of incidence and mortality data. Relative/absolute risk Poisson regression models were fitted. RESULTS Of 365 cases/deaths of leukaemias excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, there were 272 AML/CML/ALL among 310,905 persons (7,641,362 person-years), with mean active bone marrow (ABM) dose of 0.11 Gy (range 0-5.95). We estimated significant (P < 0.005) linear excess relative risks/Gy (ERR/Gy) for: AML (n = 140) = 1.48 (95% CI 0.59-2.85), CML (n = 61) = 1.77 (95% CI 0.38-4.50), and ALL (n = 71) = 6.65 (95% CI 2.79-14.83). There is upward curvature in the dose response for ALL and AML over the full dose range, although at lower doses (<0.5 Gy) curvature for ALL is downwards. DISCUSSION We found increased ERR/Gy for all major types of radiation-associated leukaemia after childhood exposure to ABM doses that were predominantly (for 99%) <1 Gy, and consistent with our prior analysis focusing on <100 mGy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
| | - Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Lydia B Zablotska
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 2nd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - David Borrego
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| | - Keith T Griffin
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| | - Rodrigue S Allodji
- Equipe d'Epidémiologie des radiations, Unité 1018 INSERM, Bâtiment B2M, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Cedex, 94805, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Equipe d'Epidémiologie des radiations, Unité 1018 INSERM, Bâtiment B2M, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Cedex, 94805, France
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| | - Alina V Brenner
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| | - Jeremy S Miller
- Information Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, 20904, USA
| | - David Campbell
- Information Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, 20904, USA
| | - Mark S Pearce
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in chemical and radiation threats and hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Siegal Sadetzki
- Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
- Cancer & Radiation Epidemiology Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel & Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Michele M Doody
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413-45, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Marie Lundell
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, S-17176, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Benjamin French
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael Jacob Adams
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Boulevard, CU 420644, Rochester, NY, 14642-0644, USA
| | - Amy Berrington de González
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Martha S Linet
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Appleton JD, Kendall GM. Gamma-radiation levels outdoors in Great Britain based on K, Th and U geochemical data. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY 2022; 251-252:106948. [PMID: 35763965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Gamma-rays from naturally occurring radionuclides are a major component of background radiation. They are an important tool for geology and are also important for radiation protection. In this paper we use over a quarter of a million geochemical measurements of concentrations of potassium, thorium and uranium in soils and in stream sediments to estimate outdoor gamma-ray dose rates across Great Britain. The soil concentrations are generally at a depth of 5-20 cm with some at 35-50 cm. Soil measurements will give spatially relatively precise estimates, but as soil data are not available for much of Scotland, stream sediment data are used there. Kriging methods are used to estimate surface concentrations of K, Th and U and dose rates are imputed from these concentrations. Our results are compared with measurement surveys of both outdoor and indoor gamma-ray dose rates. Recently there has been interest in exploring the carcinogenic risks of low dose radiation by investigating associations between childhood cancer rates and doses from natural background gamma radiation. To achieve adequate statistical power, such studies must be so large that it is impractical to assess exposures by direct measurements in the homes of study subjects. Instead the exposures must be modelled. The results presented here will be an important input to such work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Appleton
- British Geological Survey, Keyworth, NG12 5GG, UK.
| | - G M Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Folly CL, Mazzei-Abba A, Coste A, Kreis C, Spycher BD. Measurements and determinants of children's exposure to background gamma radiation in Switzerland. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:354-363. [PMID: 35349709 PMCID: PMC9124624 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Epidemiological studies of children's cancer risks associated with background gamma radiation exposure have used geographic exposure models to estimate exposure at their locations of residence. We measured personal exposure to background gamma radiation, and we investigated the extent to which it was associated with children's whereabouts. We collected data on whereabouts and exposure to background gamma radiation over a 5-day period among children aged 4-15 years in Switzerland. We used D-Shuttle dosimeters to measure children's exposure, and we asked parents to write their children's activities in diaries. We used Poisson mixed-effects and linear regression models to investigate the association of hourly and overall doses, respectively, with children's reported whereabouts. During the observed time, 149 participating children spent 66% indoors at home; 19% indoors away from home; and 15% outdoors. The mean personal exposure was 85.7 nSv/h (range 52.3 nSv/h-145 nSv/h). Exposure was 1.077 (95% CI 1.067, 1.087) times higher indoors than outdoors and varied by building material and (predicted) outdoor dose rates. Our study provides detailed information about children's patterns of exposure to background gamma radiation in Switzerland. Dwelling building materials and outdoor dose rates are important determinants of children's exposure. Future epidemiological studies may benefit from including information about building materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe L Folly
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antonella Mazzei-Abba
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Astrid Coste
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- INSERM UMR 1296, Radiation : Defense, Health,Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Bâtiment Cheney A 1er étage 28 rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Christian Kreis
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ben D Spycher
- Corresponding author. Ben D. Spycher, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Association Between SHMT1 rs1979277 Polymorphism and Risk of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2022; 44:e616-e622. [PMID: 33974584 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to explore the potential association the cytosolic serine hydroxy methyltransferase (SHMT1) rs1979277 polymorphism and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MATERIALS AND METHODS Comprehensive search of Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Biomedical Literature Database electronic database, was performed to identify relevant studies published throughout April 30, 2019. The heterogeneity in the study was judged by the I2 and P-values, and then the random ratio or fixed effect was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (OR) based on the presence or absence of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis is used to estimate the impact of individual studies on aggregate estimates. The publication bias of the study was tested using a funnel plot and an Egger regression. RESULTS Nine studies with a total of 6492 participants (2971 patients; 3521 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. We found that SHMT1 rs1979277 polymorphism was not significantly associated with the risk of ALL in the dominant model: CC versus CT+TT (OR=0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-1.54, P=0.57), recessive model: CC+CT versus TT (OR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.44-1.49, P=0.50) and allele model: C versus T (OR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.52-1.35, P=0.48). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association were found in dominant, recessive and allele models in both Caucasian and Asian populations. CONCLUSION Our study indicated that the SHMT1 rs1979277 polymorphism was not associated with the risk of susceptibility to ALL.
Collapse
|
5
|
Little MP, Wakeford R, Bouffler SD, Abalo K, Hauptmann M, Hamada N, Kendall GM. Review of the risk of cancer following low and moderate doses of sparsely ionising radiation received in early life in groups with individually estimated doses. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 159:106983. [PMID: 34959181 PMCID: PMC9118883 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The detrimental health effects associated with the receipt of moderate (0.1-1 Gy) and high (>1 Gy) acute doses of sparsely ionising radiation are well established from human epidemiological studies. There is accumulating direct evidence of excess risk of cancer in a number of populations exposed at lower acute doses or doses received over a protracted period. There is evidence that relative risks are generally higher after radiation exposures in utero or in childhood. METHODS AND FINDINGS We reviewed and summarised evidence from 60 studies of cancer or benign neoplasms following low- or moderate-level exposure in utero or in childhood from medical and environmental sources. In most of the populations studied the exposure was predominantly to sparsely ionising radiation, such as X-rays and gamma-rays. There were significant (p < 0.001) excess risks for all cancers, and particularly large excess relative risks were observed for brain/CNS tumours, thyroid cancer (including nodules) and leukaemia. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the totality of this large body of data relating to in utero and childhood exposure provides support for the existence of excess cancer and benign neoplasm risk associated with radiation doses < 0.1 Gy, and for certain groups exposed to natural background radiation, to fallout and medical X-rays in utero, at about 0.02 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-9778, USA.
| | - Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Simon D Bouffler
- Radiation Effects Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK
| | - Kossi Abalo
- Laboratoire d'Épidémiologie, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, BP 17, 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Fehrbelliner Strasse 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Radiation Safety Unit, Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), 2-11-1 Iwado-kita, Komae, Tokyo 201-8511, Japan
| | - Gerald M Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazzei-Abba A, Folly CL, Kreis C, Ammann RA, Adam C, Brack E, Egger M, Kuehni CE, Spycher BD. External background ionizing radiation and childhood cancer: Update of a nationwide cohort analysis. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY 2021; 238-239:106734. [PMID: 34521026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation is known to cause cancer. Exposure during childhood is associated with a greater excess relative risk for leukemia and tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) than exposure in later life. Cancer risks associated with low-dose exposure (<100 mSv) are uncertain. We previously investigated the association between the incidence of childhood cancer and levels of exposure to external background radiation from terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays in Switzerland using data from a nationwide census-based cohort study. Here, we provide an update of that study using an extended follow-up period and an improved exposure model. METHODS We included all children 0-15 years of age registered in the Swiss national censuses 1990, 2000, and 2010-2015. We identified incident cancer cases during 1990-2016 using probabilistic record linkage with the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. Exposure to terrestrial and cosmic radiation at children's place of residence was estimated using geographic exposure models based on aerial spectrometric gamma-ray measurements. We estimated and included the contribution from 137Cs deposition after the Chernobyl accident. We created a nested case-control sample and fitted conditional logistic regression models adjusting for sex, year of birth, neighborhood socioeconomic position, and modelled outdoor NO2 concentration. We also estimated the population attributable fraction for childhood cancer due to external background radiation. RESULTS We included 3,401,113 children and identified 3,137 incident cases of cancer, including 951 leukemia, 495 lymphoma, and 701 CNS tumor cases. Median follow-up in the cohort was 6.0 years (interquartile range: 4.3-10.1) and median cumulative exposure since birth was 8.2 mSv (range: 0-31.2). Hazard ratios per 1 mSv increase in cumulative dose of external background radiation were 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06) for all cancers combined, 1.06 (1.01-1.10) for leukemia, 1.03 (0.98-1.08) for lymphoma, and 1.06 (1.01-1.11) for CNS tumors. Adjustment for potential confounders had little effect on the results. Based on these results, the estimated population attributable fraction for leukemia and CNS tumors due to external background radiation was 32% (7-49%) and 34% (5-51%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that background ionizing radiation contributes to the risk of leukemia and CNS tumors in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Mazzei-Abba
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Christophe L Folly
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Christian Kreis
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Roland A Ammann
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kinderaerzte KurWerk, Burgdorf, Switzerland.
| | - Cécile Adam
- Woman-Mother-Child Department, Division of Pediatrics, Oncology and Hematology Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Eva Brack
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Matthias Egger
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Claudia E Kuehni
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Ben D Spycher
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berlivet J, Hémon D, Cléro É, Ielsch G, Laurier D, Faure L, Clavel J, Goujon S. Residential exposure to natural background radiation at birth and risk of childhood acute leukemia in France, 1990-2009. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY 2021; 233:106613. [PMID: 33895630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of natural background radiation (NBR) in childhood acute leukemia (AL) remains unclear. Several large record based studies have recently reported heterogeneous results. Differences in exposure assessment timing may explain this heterogeneity. OBJECTIVES In a previous ecological study we did not observe any association between childhood AL incidence in France and NBR exposure at the time of diagnosis. With the same methodology, the present study focused on NBR exposure at the time of birth. Based on data from the French national registry of childhood cancer, we analyzed all AL together, and lymphoblastic and myeloid AL, separately. METHODS We included 6,059 childhood AL cases born and diagnosed in mainland France between 1990 and 2009. NBR levels in municipalities of residence at birth were estimated by cokriging models, using NBR measurements and precise geological data. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) per unit variation of exposure was estimated with Poisson regression models, with adjustment for socio-demographic indicators and ultraviolet radiation levels. NBR exposures were considered at the time of birth, and cumulatively from birth to diagnosis. We also estimated a total NBR dose to red-bone marrow (RBM). RESULTS There was no evidence for an association between NBR exposure at birth and childhood AL incidence, neither overall (gamma radiation: IRR = 0.99 (0.94,1.05) per 50 nSv/h; radon: IRR = 0.97 (0.91,1.03) per 100 Bq/m3) nor for the main AL types. The conclusions were similar with the cumulative exposures, and the total RBM dose. CONCLUSIONS The study was based on high quality incidence data, large numbers of AL cases, and validated models of NBR exposure assessment. In all, the results further support the hypothesis that NBR are not associated to childhood AL in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Berlivet
- Inserm, UMR 1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Epidemiology of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers Team (EPICEA), Paris University, Villejuif, F-94807, France
| | - Denis Hémon
- Inserm, UMR 1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Epidemiology of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers Team (EPICEA), Paris University, Villejuif, F-94807, France
| | - Énora Cléro
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Health and Environment Division, Fontenay-aux-Roses, F-92262, France
| | - Geraldine Ielsch
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Health and Environment Division, Fontenay-aux-Roses, F-92262, France
| | - Dominique Laurier
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Health and Environment Division, Fontenay-aux-Roses, F-92262, France
| | - Laure Faure
- Inserm, UMR 1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Epidemiology of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers Team (EPICEA), Paris University, Villejuif, F-94807, France; French National Registry of Childhood Hematological Malignancies (RNHE), Villejuif, F-94807, France
| | - Jacqueline Clavel
- Inserm, UMR 1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Epidemiology of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers Team (EPICEA), Paris University, Villejuif, F-94807, France; French National Registry of Childhood Hematological Malignancies (RNHE), Villejuif, F-94807, France
| | - Stéphanie Goujon
- Inserm, UMR 1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Epidemiology of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers Team (EPICEA), Paris University, Villejuif, F-94807, France; French National Registry of Childhood Hematological Malignancies (RNHE), Villejuif, F-94807, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Pediatric Cancers in the West of Iran. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.113496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Occurrence of pediatric cancers is affected by maternal, environmental, and hereditary/genetic factors. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between background radiation, ultrasound and other possible risk factors for pediatric cancers incidence indicators. Methods: In a cross-sectional study during 2 years, 103 patients under 14 years were studied. A total of 13 environmental, maternal and hereditary/genetic risk factors were studied, and the study was performed by using a questionnaire, measurement of background radiation, and statistical data. Incidence in the studied sample size at city (ISSSC) and incidence in the studied sample size at area (ISSSA) indicators were defined. Results: The mean age of patients was (6.31 ± 3.22) including 54 (52.4%) males and 49 (47.6%) females. History of repeated ultrasound before gender determination (RUBGD) and repeated ultrasound during pregnancy (RUDP) were statistically higher in solid tumors group. Toxic substances (TS) and pediatric medical ionizing radiation (PMIR) was higher in hematologic malignancies. Statistically significant association were found between of cancer types and Family history of leukemia (FHL), Family history of solid tumors (FHST), Abortion history (AH), Maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP), Children’s residence place (CRP), and background radiation (BR) variables. No statistically significant association was found between cancer types and maternal pregnancy age (MPA), IVF baby, and maternal ionizing radiation exposure (MIRE) variables. Conclusions: Pediatric cancers are multifactorial diseases. Increased background radiation is correlated with an increased incidence of all pediatric malignancies. It seems that increasing ultrasound scans might increase the risk of solid tumors in children.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lethaus B, Gruichev D, Gräfe D, Bartella AK, Hahnel S, Yovev T, Pausch NC, Krause M. "Black bone": the new backbone in CAD/CAM-assisted craniosynostosis surgery? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1735-1741. [PMID: 32519160 PMCID: PMC8116246 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques have been implemented in craniosynostosis surgery to facilitate cranial remodeling. However, until now, computed tomography (CT) scans with ionizing radiation were necessary to plan the procedure and create guiding templates. The purpose of this study was to present our series using CAD/CAM techniques in planning and conducting fronto-orbital advancement surgery in patients with trigonocephaly with datasets acquired only by "black bone" magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS Six consecutively operated cases from 2019 were included in this study. All patients suffered from non-syndromic trigonocephaly with no primary surgeries. All patients underwent cranial MRI including black bone sequences. Preoperative planning and guides were created based on the DICOM datasets. We analyzed demographic data, clinical data, and outcome measured by Whitaker score. RESULTS In all cases, precise frontobasal advancement was possible with the CAD/CAM guides created by black bone MRI. The mean operation time and planning time were 222 and 32 min. The time on intensive and intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC) time was 4.5 days, respectively. All but one case were classified as Whitaker I. CONCLUSION In trigonocephaly treatment by frontobasal advancement, black bone MRI-based CAD/CAM craniosynostosis surgery is safe and feasible. It offers the major advantage of completely avoiding CT scans and ionizing radiation with superior imaging quality of intracranial structures. Thus, it improves intraoperative safety and-at the same time-has the potential to reduce operating room (OR) time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Lethaus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Dimitar Gruichev
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniel Gräfe
- Department of Paediatric Radiology, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander K Bartella
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hahnel
- Department of Prosthodontics and Materials Science, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tsanko Yovev
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Niels Christian Pausch
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias Krause
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Milder CM, Kendall GM, Arsham A, Schöllnberger H, Wakeford R, Cullings HM, Little MP. Summary of Radiation Research Society Online 66th Annual Meeting, Symposium on "Epidemiology: Updates on epidemiological low dose studies," including discussion. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:866-873. [PMID: 33395353 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1867326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cato M Milder
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gerald M Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Aryana Arsham
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Helmut Schöllnberger
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Harry M Cullings
- Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kendall GM, Little MP, Wakeford R. A review of studies of childhood cancer and natural background radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:769-781. [PMID: 33395329 PMCID: PMC10686050 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1867926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The projected existence and magnitude of carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiation at low doses and low-dose rates is perhaps the most important issue in radiation protection today. Studies of childhood cancer and natural background radiation have the potential to throw direct light on this question, into a dose range below a few tens of mSv. This paper describes the studies that have been undertaken and their context, discusses some problems that arise and summarizes the present position. CONCLUSIONS Many such studies have been undertaken, but most were too small to have a realistic chance of detecting the small effects expected from such low doses, based on risk projections from higher exposures. Case-control or cohort studies are to be preferred methodologically to ecological studies but can be prone to problems of registration/participation bias. Interview-based studies of the requisite size would be prohibitively expensive and would undoubtedly also run into problems of participation bias. Register-based studies can be very large and are free of participation bias. However, they need to estimate the radiation exposure of study subjects using models rather than individual measurements in the homes of those concerned. At present, no firm conclusions can be drawn from the studies that have been published to date. Further data and perhaps pooled studies offer a way forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald M Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Piao M, Zhang L. Knockdown of SNHG16 suppresses the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of leukemia cells via miR‑193a‑5p/CDK8. Int J Mol Med 2020; 46:1175-1185. [PMID: 32705162 PMCID: PMC7387099 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Although small nucleolar RNA host gene 16 (SNHG16) is known to exhibit auxo-action in certain types of tumor, its role in leukemia remains unclear. The present study analyzed the role and mechanisms of action of SNHG16 in leukemia cells in order to identify therapeutic targets for this disease. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to determine SNHG16 expression in human leukemia cell lines. Using TargetScan 7.2 and dual-luciferase reporter assay, the target genes of SNHG16 were verified. Following the downregulation of the expression of SNHG16 or its target genes, Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was performed to examine the viability of the leukemia cells. In addition, flow cytometry was performed to analyze the cell apoptotic rates, and colony formation assays were used to determine the cell proliferative ability. RT-qPCR and western blot analysis were used to determine the association between SNHG16 and its target genes. SNHG16 was found to be abnormally highly expressed in acute myeloblastic leukemia cell lines, the knockdown of which weakened the viability of the leukemia cells, suppressed cell proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis. miR-193a-5p could bind to SNHG16, and its target gene was CDK8. Moreover, the expression of miR-193a-5p increased with the decrease in SNHG16 expression, while the inhibition of miR-193a-5p promoted the expression of CDK8. The downregulation of miR-193a-5p enhanced the viability of the leukemia cells, accelerated cell cloning and reduced cell apoptosis, which was completely opposite to the effects observed with the silencing of CDK8. The knockdown of SNHG16 suppressed the viability of the leukemia cells, suppressed cell proliferation, and induced cell apoptosis by regulating miR-193a-5p/CDK8. Thus, SNHG16 may prove to be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meihua Piao
- Clinical Laboratory, Yanbian University Hospital (Yanbian Hospital), Yanji, Jilin 133000, P.R. China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Neonatology, Weinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Weinan, Shaanxi 714000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hauptmann M, Daniels RD, Cardis E, Cullings HM, Kendall G, Laurier D, Linet MS, Little MP, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Richardson DB, Stram DO, Thierry-Chef I, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Gilbert ES, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Summary Bias Assessment and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:188-200. [PMID: 32657347 PMCID: PMC8454205 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ionizing radiation is an established carcinogen, but risks from low-dose exposures are controversial. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII review of the epidemiological data in 2006, many subsequent publications have reported excess cancer risks from low-dose exposures. Our aim was to systematically review these studies to assess the magnitude of the risk and whether the positive findings could be explained by biases. METHODS Eligible studies had mean cumulative doses of less than 100 mGy, individualized dose estimates, risk estimates, and confidence intervals (CI) for the dose-response and were published in 2006-2017. We summarized the evidence for bias (dose error, confounding, outcome ascertainment) and its likely direction for each study. We tested whether the median excess relative risk (ERR) per unit dose equals zero and assessed the impact of excluding positive studies with potential bias away from the null. We performed a meta-analysis to quantify the ERR and assess consistency across studies for all solid cancers and leukemia. RESULTS Of the 26 eligible studies, 8 concerned environmental, 4 medical, and 14 occupational exposure. For solid cancers, 16 of 22 studies reported positive ERRs per unit dose, and we rejected the hypothesis that the median ERR equals zero (P = .03). After exclusion of 4 positive studies with potential positive bias, 12 of 18 studies reported positive ERRs per unit dose (P = .12). For leukemia, 17 of 20 studies were positive, and we rejected the hypothesis that the median ERR per unit dose equals zero (P = .001), also after exclusion of 5 positive studies with potential positive bias (P = .02). For adulthood exposure, the meta-ERR at 100 mGy was 0.029 (95% CI = 0.011 to 0.047) for solid cancers and 0.16 (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.25) for leukemia. For childhood exposure, the meta-ERR at 100 mGy for leukemia was 2.84 (95% CI = 0.37 to 5.32); there were only two eligible studies of all solid cancers. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic assessments in this monograph showed that these new epidemiological studies are characterized by several limitations, but only a few positive studies were potentially biased away from the null. After exclusion of these studies, the majority of studies still reported positive risk estimates. We therefore conclude that these new epidemiological studies directly support excess cancer risks from low-dose ionizing radiation. Furthermore, the magnitude of the cancer risks from these low-dose radiation exposures was statistically compatible with the radiation dose-related cancer risks of the atomic bomb survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hauptmann
- Correspondence to: Michael Hauptmann, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane. Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Daniels RD, Kendall GM, Thierry-Chef I, Linet MS, Cullings HM. Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:114-132. [PMID: 32657346 PMCID: PMC7667397 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A monograph systematically evaluating recent evidence on the dose-response relationship between low-dose ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risk required a critical appraisal of dosimetry methods in 26 potentially informative studies. METHODS The relevant literature included studies published in 2006-2017. Studies comprised case-control and cohort designs examining populations predominantly exposed to sparsely ionizing radiation, mostly from external sources, resulting in average doses of no more than 100 mGy. At least two dosimetrists reviewed each study and appraised the strengths and weaknesses of the dosimetry systems used, including assessment of sources and effects of dose estimation error. An overarching concern was whether dose error might cause the spurious appearance of a dose-response where none was present. RESULTS The review included 8 environmental, 4 medical, and 14 occupational studies that varied in properties relative to evaluation criteria. Treatment of dose estimation error also varied among studies, although few conducted a comprehensive evaluation. Six studies appeared to have known or suspected biases in dose estimates. The potential for these biases to cause a spurious dose-response association was constrained to three case-control studies that relied extensively on information gathered in interviews conducted after case ascertainment. CONCLUSIONS The potential for spurious dose-response associations from dose information appeared limited to case-control studies vulnerable to recall errors that may be differential by case status. Otherwise, risk estimates appeared reasonably free of a substantial bias from dose estimation error. Future studies would benefit from a comprehensive evaluation of dose estimation errors, including methods accounting for their potential effects on dose-response associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Daniels
- Division of Science Integration, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Gerald M Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, NDPH, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Martha S Linet
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Harry M Cullings
- Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Linet MS, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Berrington de González A. Outcome Assessment in Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risks: Sources, Level of Ascertainment, and Misclassification. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:154-175. [PMID: 32657350 PMCID: PMC8454197 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcome assessment problems and errors that could lead to biased risk estimates in low-dose radiation epidemiological studies of cancer risks have not been systematically evaluated. METHODS Incidence or mortality risks for all cancers or all solid cancers combined and for leukemia were examined in 26 studies published in 2006-2017 involving low-dose (mean dose ≤100 mGy) radiation from environmental, medical, or occupational sources. We evaluated the impact of loss to follow-up, under- or overascertainment, outcome misclassification, and changing classifications occurring similarly or differentially across radiation dose levels. RESULTS Loss to follow-up was not reported in 62% of studies, but when reported it was generally small. Only one study critically evaluated the completeness of the sources of vital status. Underascertainment of cancers ("false negatives") was a potential shortcoming for cohorts that could not be linked with high-quality population-based registries, particularly during early years of exposure in five studies, in two lacking complete residential history, and in one with substantial emigration. False positives may have occurred as a result of cancer ascertainment from self- or next-of-kin report in three studies or from enhanced medical surveillance of exposed patients that could lead to detection bias (eg, reporting precancer lesions as physician-diagnosed cancer) in one study. Most pediatric but few adult leukemia studies used expert hematopathology review or current classifications. Only a few studies recoded solid cancers to the latest International Classification of Diseases or International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes. These outcome assessment shortcomings were generally nondifferential in relation to radiation exposure level except possibly in four studies. CONCLUSION The majority of studies lacked information to enable comprehensive evaluation of all major sources of outcome assessment errors, although reported data suggested that the outcome assessment limitations generally had little effect on risk or biased estimates towards the null except possibly in four studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha S Linet
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD
| | - Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
- Monographs Programme, Evidence Synthesis and Classification Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Amy Berrington de González
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schubauer-Berigan MK, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Cardis E, Laurier D, Lubin JH, Hauptmann M, Richardson DB. Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:133-153. [PMID: 32657349 PMCID: PMC7355263 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-dose, penetrating photon radiation exposure is ubiquitous, yet our understanding of cancer risk at low doses and dose rates derives mainly from high-dose studies. Although a large number of low-dose cancer studies have been recently published, concern exists about the potential for confounding to distort findings. The aim of this study was to describe and assess the likely impact of confounding and selection bias within the context of a systematic review. METHODS We summarized confounding control methods for 26 studies published from 2006 to 2017 by exposure setting (environmental, medical, or occupational) and identified confounders of potential concern. We used information from these and related studies to assess evidence for confounding and selection bias. For factors in which direct or indirect evidence of confounding was lacking for certain studies, we used a theoretical adjustment to determine whether uncontrolled confounding was likely to have affected the results. RESULTS For medical studies of childhood cancers, confounding by indication (CBI) was the main concern. Lifestyle-related factors were of primary concern for environmental and medical studies of adult cancers and for occupational studies. For occupational studies, other workplace exposures and healthy worker survivor bias were additionally of interest. For most of these factors, however, review of the direct and indirect evidence suggested that confounding was minimal. One study showed evidence of selection bias, and three occupational studies did not adjust for lifestyle or healthy worker survivor bias correlates. Theoretical adjustment for three factors (smoking and asbestos in occupational studies and CBI in childhood cancer studies) demonstrated that these were unlikely to explain positive study findings due to the rarity of exposure (eg, CBI) or the relatively weak association with the outcome (eg, smoking or asbestos and all cancers). CONCLUSION Confounding and selection bias are unlikely to explain the findings from most low-dose radiation epidemiology studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
- Evidence Synthesis and Classification Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Radiation Programme, Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Dominique Laurier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Jay H Lubin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (MH); Brandenburg Medical School, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - David B Richardson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gilbert ES, Little MP, Preston DL, Stram DO. Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:176-187. [PMID: 32657345 PMCID: PMC7355296 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This article addresses issues relevant to interpreting findings from 26 epidemiologic studies of persons exposed to low-dose radiation. We review the extensive data from both epidemiologic studies of persons exposed at moderate or high doses and from radiobiology that together have firmly established radiation as carcinogenic. We then discuss the use of the linear relative risk model that has been used to describe data from both low- and moderate- or high-dose studies. We consider the effects of dose measurement errors; these can reduce statistical power and lead to underestimation of risks but are very unlikely to bring about a spurious dose response. We estimate statistical power for the low-dose studies under the assumption that true risks of radiation-related cancers are those expected from studies of Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Finally, we discuss the interpretation of confidence intervals and statistical tests and the applicability of the Bradford Hill principles for a causal relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethel S Gilbert
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Daniel O Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Daniels RD, Cardis E, Cullings HM, Gilbert E, Hauptmann M, Kendall G, Laurier D, Linet MS, Little MP, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Richardson DB, Stram D, Thierry-Chef I, Schubauer-Berigan MK. Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:97-113. [PMID: 32657348 PMCID: PMC7610154 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Whether low-dose ionizing radiation can cause cancer is a critical and long-debated question in radiation protection. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation report by the National Academies in 2006, new publications from large, well-powered epidemiological studies of low doses have reported positive dose-response relationships. It has been suggested, however, that biases could explain these findings. We conducted a systematic review of epidemiological studies with mean doses less than 100 mGy published 2006-2017. We required individualized doses and dose-response estimates with confidence intervals. We identified 26 eligible studies (eight environmental, four medical, and 14 occupational), including 91 000 solid cancers and 13 000 leukemias. Mean doses ranged from 0.1 to 82 mGy. The excess relative risk at 100 mGy was positive for 16 of 22 solid cancer studies and 17 of 20 leukemia studies. The aim of this monograph was to systematically review the potential biases in these studies (including dose uncertainty, confounding, and outcome misclassification) and to assess whether the subset of minimally biased studies provides evidence for cancer risks from low-dose radiation. Here, we describe the framework for the systematic bias review and provide an overview of the eligible studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert D Daniels
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ethel Gilbert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | | | - Martha S Linet
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark P Little
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jay H Lubin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel Stram
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dong Y, Shi O, Zeng Q, Lu X, Wang W, Li Y, Wang Q. Leukemia incidence trends at the global, regional, and national level between 1990 and 2017. Exp Hematol Oncol 2020; 9:14. [PMID: 32577323 PMCID: PMC7304189 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-020-00170-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leukemias are a group of life-threatening malignant disorders of the blood and bone marrow. The incidence of leukemia varies by pathological types and among different populations. Methods We retrieved the incidence data for leukemia by sex, age, location, calendar year, and type from the Global Burden of Disease online database. The estimated average percentage change (EAPC) was used to quantify the trends of the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of leukemia from 1990 to 2017. Results Globally, while the number of newly diagnosed leukemia cases increased from 354.5 thousand in 1990 to 518.5 thousand in 2017, the ASIR decreased by 0.43% per year. The number of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases worldwide increased from 49.1 thousand in 1990 to 64.2 thousand in 2017, whereas the ASIR experienced a decrease (EAPC = - 0.08, 95% CI - 0.15, - 0.02). Between 1990 and 2017, there were 55, 29, and 111 countries or territories that experienced a significant increase, remained stable, and experienced a significant decrease in ASIR of ALL, respectively. The case of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has increased more than twice between 1990 and 2017. The ASIR of CLL increased by 0.46% per year from 1990 to 2017. More than 85% of all countries saw an increase in ASIR of CLL. In 1990, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounted for 18.0% of the total leukemia cases worldwide. This proportion increased to 23.1% in 2017. The ASIR of AML increased from 1.35/100,000 to 1.54/100,000, with an EAPC of 0.56 (95% CI 0.49, 0.62). A total of 127 countries or territories experienced a significant increase in the ASIR of AML. The number of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cases increased from 31.8 thousand in 1990 to 34.2 thousand in 2017. The ASIR of CML decreased from 0.75/100,000 to 0.43/100,000. A total of 141 countries or territories saw a decrease in ASIR of CML. Conclusions A significant decrease in leukemia incidence was observed between 1990 and 2017. However, in the same period, the incidence rates of AML and CLL significantly increased in most countries, suggesting that both types of leukemia might become a major global public health concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Dong
- Department of Hematology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong 525000 China
| | - Oumin Shi
- Health Science Center, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518020 China
| | - Quanxiang Zeng
- Digestion Department of Digestion, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong 525000 China
| | - Xiaoqin Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014 China
| | - Wei Wang
- School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014 China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Oncology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002 China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014 China.,School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014 China.,China-Canada Medical and Healthcare Science Association, Toronto, ON L3R 1A3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Konstantinoudis G, Schuhmacher D, Ammann RA, Diesch T, Kuehni CE, Spycher BD. Bayesian spatial modelling of childhood cancer incidence in Switzerland using exact point data: a nationwide study during 1985-2015. Int J Health Geogr 2020; 19:15. [PMID: 32303231 PMCID: PMC7165384 DOI: 10.1186/s12942-020-00211-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aetiology of most childhood cancers is largely unknown. Spatially varying environmental factors such as traffic-related air pollution, background radiation and agricultural pesticides might contribute to the development of childhood cancer. This study is the first investigation of the spatial disease mapping of childhood cancers using exact geocodes of place of residence. METHODS We included 5947 children diagnosed with cancer in Switzerland during 1985-2015 at 0-15 years of age from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. We modelled cancer risk using log-Gaussian Cox processes and indirect standardisation to adjust for age and year of diagnosis. We examined whether the spatial variation of risk can be explained by modelled ambient air concentration of NO2, modelled exposure to background ionising radiation, area-based socio-economic position (SEP), linguistic region, duration in years of general cancer registration in the canton or degree of urbanisation. RESULTS For all childhood cancers combined, the posterior median relative risk (RR), compared to the national level, varied by location from 0.83 to 1.13 (min to max). Corresponding ranges were 0.96 to 1.09 for leukaemia, 0.90 to 1.13 for lymphoma, and 0.82 to 1.23 for central nervous system (CNS) tumours. The covariates considered explained 72% of the observed spatial variation for all cancers, 81% for leukaemia, 82% for lymphoma and 64% for CNS tumours. There was weak evidence of an association of CNS tumour incidence with modelled exposure to background ionising radiation (RR per SD difference 1.17; 0.98-1.40) and with SEP (1.6; 1.00-1.13). CONCLUSION Of the investigated diagnostic groups, childhood CNS tumours showed the largest spatial variation. The selected covariates only partially explained the observed variation of CNS tumours suggesting that other environmental factors also play a role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garyfallos Konstantinoudis
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Dominic Schuhmacher
- Institute for Mathematical Stochastics, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Roland A Ammann
- Department of Paediatrics Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tamara Diesch
- Division of Paediatric Oncology/Haematology, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Claudia E Kuehni
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ben D Spycher
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mazzei-Abba A, Folly CL, Coste A, Wakeford R, Little MP, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Kendall G, Hémon D, Nikkilä A, Spix C, Auvinen A, Spycher BD. Epidemiological studies of natural sources of radiation and childhood cancer: current challenges and future perspectives. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:R1-R23. [PMID: 31751953 PMCID: PMC10654695 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab5a38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The empirical estimation of cancer risks in children associated with low-dose ionising radiation (<100 mSv) remains a challenge. The main reason is that the required combination of large sample sizes with accurate and comprehensive exposure assessment is difficult to achieve. An international scientific workshop, 'Childhood cancer and background radiation', organised by the Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine of the University of Bern, brought together researchers in this field to evaluate how epidemiological studies of background radiation and childhood cancer can best improve our understanding of the effects of low-dose ionising radiation. This review summarises and evaluates the findings of these studies with regard to their methodological differences, identifies key limitations and challenges, and proposes ways to move forward. Large childhood cancer registries, such as those in Great Britain, France and Germany, now permit the conducting of studies that should have sufficient statistical power to detect the effects predicted by standard risk models. Nevertheless, larger studies or pooled studies will be needed to investigate disease subgroups. The main challenge is to accurately assess children's individual exposure to radiation from natural sources and from other sources, as well as potentially confounding non-radiation exposures, in such large study populations. For this, the study groups should learn from each other to improve exposure estimation and develop new ways to validate exposure models with personal dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Mazzei-Abba
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rühm W, Breckow J, Dietze G, Friedl A, Greinert R, Jacob P, Kistinger S, Michel R, Müller WU, Otten H, Streffer C, Weiss W. Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2020; 59:9-27. [PMID: 31677018 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-019-00817-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This paper summarises the view of the German Commission on Radiological Protection ("Strahlenschutzkommission", SSK) on the rationale behind the currently valid dose limits and dose constraints for workers recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The paper includes a discussion of the reasoning behind current dose limits followed by a discussion of the detriment used by ICRP as a measure for stochastic health effects. Studies on radiation-induced cancer are reviewed because this endpoint represents the most important contribution to detriment. Recent findings on radiation-induced circulatory disease that are currently not included in detriment calculation are also reviewed. It appeared that for detriment calculations the contribution of circulatory diseases plays only a secondary role, although the uncertainties involved in their risk estimates are considerable. These discussions are complemented by a review of the procedures currently in use in Germany, or in discussion elsewhere, to define limits for genotoxic carcinogens. To put these concepts in perspective, actual occupational radiation exposures are exemplified with data from Germany, for the year 2012, and regulations in Germany are compared to the recommendations issued by ICRP. Conclusions include, among others, considerations on radiation protection concepts currently in use and recommendations of the SSK on the limitation of annual effective dose and effective dose cumulated over a whole working life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Werner Rühm
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Therapy, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
| | | | - Günter Dietze
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Anna Friedl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Peter Jacob
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Heinz Otten
- Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Talibov M, Olsson A, Bailey H, Erdmann F, Metayer C, Magnani C, Petridou E, Auvinen A, Spector L, Clavel J, Roman E, Dockerty J, Nikkilä A, Lohi O, Kang A, Psaltopoulou T, Miligi L, Vila J, Cardis E, Schüz J. Parental occupational exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields and risk of leukaemia in the offspring: findings from the Childhood Leukaemia International Consortium (CLIC). Occup Environ Med 2019; 76:746-753. [PMID: 31358566 PMCID: PMC6817988 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previously published studies on parental occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in their offspring were inconsistent. We therefore evaluated this question within the Childhood Leukemia International Consortium. METHODS We pooled 11 case-control studies including 9723 childhood leukaemia cases and 17 099 controls. Parental occupational ELF-MF exposure was estimated by linking jobs to an ELF-MF job-exposure matrix (JEM). Logistic regression models were used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs in pooled analyses and meta-analyses. RESULTS ORs from pooled analyses for paternal ELF-MF exposure >0.2 microtesla (µT) at conception were 1.04 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.13) for ALL and 1.06 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.29) for AML, compared with ≤0.2 µT. Corresponding ORs for maternal ELF-MF exposure during pregnancy were 1.00 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) for ALL and 0.85 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.16) for AML. No trends of increasing ORs with increasing exposure level were evident. Furthermore, no associations were observed in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS In this large international dataset applying a comprehensive quantitative JEM, we did not find any associations between parental occupational ELF-MF exposure and childhood leukaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madar Talibov
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Ann Olsson
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Helen Bailey
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Friederike Erdmann
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Catherine Metayer
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Corrado Magnani
- Dipartimento di Medicina Traslazionale, SCDU Epidemiologia del Tumori, Universita' del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Eleni Petridou
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens & Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Faculty of Social/Health Sciences, Tampereen yliopisto, Tampere, Finland
| | - Logan Spector
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jacqueline Clavel
- U1018, INSERM, Villejuif, France
- CESP UMRS-1018, Paris Sud University, Villejuif, France
| | - Eve Roman
- Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - John Dockerty
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Atte Nikkilä
- Faculty of Medicine and Biosciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Olli Lohi
- Tampere Center for Child Health Research, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Alice Kang
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Theodora Psaltopoulou
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens & Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Athens, Greece
| | - Lucia Miligi
- Environmental and Occuaptional Epidemiology Unit, ISPO Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy
| | - Javier Vila
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joachim Schüz
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hong JY, Han K, Jung JH, Kim JS. Association of Exposure to Diagnostic Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation With Risk of Cancer Among Youths in South Korea. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1910584. [PMID: 31483470 PMCID: PMC6727680 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation has great medical benefits; however, its increasing use has raised concerns about possible cancer risks. OBJECTIVE To examine the risk of cancer after diagnostic low-dose radiation exposure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study included youths aged 0 to 19 years at baseline from South Korean National Health Insurance System claim records from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015. Exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation was classified as any that occurred on or after the entry date, when the participant was aged 0 to 19 years, on or before the exit date, and at least 2 years before any cancer diagnosis. Cancer diagnoses were based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes. Data were analyzed from March 2018 to September 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary analysis assessed the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for exposed vs nonexposed individuals using the number of person-years as an offset. RESULTS The cohort included a total of 12 068 821 individuals (6 339 782 [52.5%] boys). There were 2 309 841 individuals (19.1%) aged 0 to 4 years, 2 951 679 individuals (24.5%) aged 5 to 9 years, 3 489 709 individuals (28.9%) aged 10 to 14 years, and 3 317 593 individuals (27.5%) aged 15 to 19 years. Of these, 1 275 829 individuals (10.6%) were exposed to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation between 2006 and 2015, and 10 792 992 individuals (89.4%) were not exposed. By December 31, 2015, 21 912 cancers were recorded. Among individuals who had been exposed, 1444 individuals (0.1%) received a cancer diagnosis. The overall cancer incidence was greater among exposed individuals than among nonexposed individuals after adjusting for age and sex (IRR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.56-1.73]; P < .001). Among individuals who had undergone computed tomography scans in particular, the overall cancer incidence was greater among exposed individuals than among nonexposed individuals after adjusting for age and sex (IRR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.45-1.63]; P < .001). The incidence of cancer increased significantly for many types of lymphoid, hematopoietic, and solid cancers after exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation. Among lymphoid and hematopoietic cancers, incidence of cancer increased the most for other myeloid leukemias (IRR, 2.14 [95% CI, 1.86-2.46]) and myelodysplasia (IRR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.77-3.47]). Among solid cancers, incidence of cancer increased the most for breast (IRR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.35-3.99]) and thyroid (IRR, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.97-2.20]) cancers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found an association of increased incidence of cancer with exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation in a large cohort. Given this risk, diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation should be limited to situations in which there is a definite clinical indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Young Hong
- Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyungdo Han
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Catholic University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Hyung Jung
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Catholic University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung Sun Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Comparison of Intended Lengthening of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Ultrasound Versus X-Ray. J Pediatr Orthop 2019; 39:e141-e146. [PMID: 29016427 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS), there has been a trend to use magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) in order to reduce the number of surgeries. To confirm the amount of lengthening, spine radiographs were required. Recently, ultrasound (US) has been added to monitor lengthening of MCGR to avoid radiation exposure. Our aim was to determine whether US is as accurate as plain radiography (x-ray) in determining the amount of length achieved at individual MCGR lengthening episodes. METHODS Retrospective study; inclusion criteria: EOS cases with dual MCGR with minimum 12 months follow-up. Intended lengthening IL (mm), lengthening on US (mm) and x-ray (mm) were documented from medical records for both right and left rods. Primary (no surgery before MCGR) and conversion (other types of instrumentation were replaced with MCGR) cases were reviewed separately. P-values determined with analysis of variance. RESULTS Sixteen cases with 100 lengthening episodes met the inclusion criteria. Eleven were primary MCGR cases with 67 episodes. Mean follow-up was 19±5 months. Significant differences were found between IL (3.4±1 mm), US (2.7±1.9 mm), and x-ray (4.1±2.2 mm) (P<0.001). The difference between IL and x-ray was minimal, but statistically significant (P=0.046). US showed statistically lower values than both IL (P=0.001) and x-ray (P<0.001). The mean ratio of x-ray/IL, US/IL, and US/x-ray were 1.1, 0.75, and 0.84, respectively. Five conversion cases had 33 episodes. Mean follow-up was 21±2 months. Significant differences were found between IL (3.4±0.8 mm), US (1.3±0.8 mm), and x-ray (1.7±0.9 mm) (P<0.001) but there was no significant difference between US and x-ray (P=0.283). IL was significantly higher than both US (P< 0.001) and x-ray (P<0.001). The mean ratio of x-ray/IL, US/IL, and US/x-ray were 0.64, 0.41, and 1.1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS US can provide confirmatory information of noninvasive lengthening of MCGR. However, US tended to underestimate the achieved length as measured by x-ray in primary cases. Conversion cases demonstrate better concordance between US and x-ray but in these cases less overall length was achieved at each lengthening episode. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
26
|
Kendall GM, Chernyavskiy P, Appleton JD, Miles JCH, Wakeford R, Athanson M, Vincent TJ, McColl NP, Little MP. Modelling the bimodal distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in Great Britain. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2018; 57:321-347. [PMID: 30132159 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0752-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Gamma radiation from naturally occurring sources (including directly ionizing cosmic-rays) is a major component of background radiation. An understanding of the magnitude and variation of doses from these sources is important, and the ability to predict them is required for epidemiological studies. In the present paper, indoor measurements of naturally occurring gamma-rays at representative locations in Great Britain are summarized. It is shown that, although the individual measurement data appear unimodal, the distribution of gamma-ray dose-rates when averaged over relatively small areas, which probably better represents the underlying distribution with inter-house variation reduced, appears bimodal. The dose-rate distributions predicted by three empirical and geostatistical models are also bimodal and compatible with the distributions of the areally averaged dose-rates. The distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in the UK is compared with those in other countries, which also tend to appear bimodal (or possibly multimodal). The variation of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates with geology, socio-economic status of the area, building type, and period of construction are explored. The factors affecting indoor dose-rates from background gamma radiation are complex and frequently intertwined, but geology, period of construction, and socio-economic status are influential; the first is potentially most influential, perhaps, because it can be used as a general proxy for local building materials. Various statistical models are tested for predicting indoor gamma-ray dose-rates at unmeasured locations. Significant improvements over previous modelling are reported. The dose-rate estimates generated by these models reflect the imputed underlying distribution of dose-rates and provide acceptable predictions at geographical locations without measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, NDPH, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
| | - P Chernyavskiy
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, DHHS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Ross Hall 331, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071-3036, USA
| | - J D Appleton
- British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
| | - J C H Miles
- , Nobles Close, Grove, Oxfordshire, OX12 0NR, UK
| | - R Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - M Athanson
- Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BG, UK
| | - T J Vincent
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, University of Oxford, New Richards Building, Old Road, Oxford, UK
| | - N P McColl
- Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, Didcot Oxon, OX11 0RQ, UK
| | - M P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, DHHS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nikkilä A, Kendall G, Raitanen J, Spycher B, Lohi O, Auvinen A. Effects of incomplete residential histories on studies of environmental exposure with application to childhood leukaemia and background radiation. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2018; 166:466-472. [PMID: 29945121 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/16/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
When evaluating environmental exposures, residential exposures are often most relevant. In most countries, it is impossible to establish full residential histories. In recent publications, childhood leukaemia and background radiation have been studied with and without full residential histories. This paper investigates the consequences of lacking such full data. Data from a nationwide Finnish Case-Control study of Childhood Leukaemia and gamma rays were analysed. This included 1093 children diagnosed with leukaemia in Finland in 1990-2011. Each case was matched by gender and year of birth to three controls. Full residential histories were available. The dose estimates were based on outdoor background radiation measurements. The indoor dose rates were obtained with a dwelling type specific conversion coefficient and the individual time-weighted mean red bone marrow dose rates were calculated using age-specific indoor occupancy and the age and gender of the child. Radiation from Chernobyl fallout was included and a 2-year latency period assumed. The median separation between successive dwellings was 3.4 km and median difference in red bone marrow dose 2.9 nSv/h. The Pearson correlation between the indoor red bone marrow dose rates of successive dwellings was 0.62 (95% CI 0.60, 0.64). The odds ratio for a 10 nSv/h increase in dose rate with full residential histories was 1.01 (95% CI 0.97, 1.05). Similar odds ratios were calculated with dose rates based on only the first dwelling (1.02, 95% CI 0.99, 1.05) and only the last dwelling (1.00, 95% CI 0.98, 1.03) and for subjects who had lived only in a single dwelling (1.05, 95% CI 0.98, 1.10). Knowledge of full residential histories would always be the option of choice. However, due to the strong correlation between exposure estimates in successive dwellings and the uncertainty about the most relevant exposure period, estimation of overall exposure level from a single address is also informative. Error in dose estimation is likely to cause some degree of classical measurement error resulting in bias towards the null.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atte Nikkilä
- Faculty of Medicine and Biosciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Gerald Kendall
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, NDPH, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Jani Raitanen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland
| | - Ben Spycher
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olli Lohi
- Tampere Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
For stochastic effects such as cancer, linear-quadratic models of dose are often used to extrapolate from the experience of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors to estimate risks from low doses and low dose rates. The low dose extrapolation factor (LDEF), which consists of the ratio of the low dose slope (as derived via fitting a linear-quadratic model) to the slope of the straight line fitted to a specific dose range, is used to derive the degree of overestimation (if LDEF > 1) or underestimation (if LDEF < 1) of low dose risk by linear extrapolation from effects at higher doses. Likewise, a dose rate extrapolation factor (DREF) can be defined, consisting of the ratio of the low dose slopes at high and low dose rates. This paper reviews a variety of human and animal data for cancer and non-cancer endpoints to assess evidence for curvature in the dose response (i.e. LDEF) and modifications of the dose response by dose rate (i.e. DREF). The JANUS mouse data imply that LDEF is approximately 0.2-0.8 and DREF is approximately 1.2-2.3 for many tumours following gamma exposure, with corresponding figures of approximately 0.1-0.9 and 0.0-0.2 following neutron exposure. This paper also cursorily reviews human data which allow direct estimates of low dose and low dose rate risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-9778, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Little MP, Wakeford R, Borrego D, French B, Zablotska LB, Adams MJ, Allodji R, de Vathaire F, Lee C, Brenner AV, Miller JS, Campbell D, Pearce MS, Doody MM, Holmberg E, Lundell M, Sadetzki S, Linet MS, Berrington de González A. Leukaemia and myeloid malignancy among people exposed to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionising radiation during childhood: a pooled analysis of nine historical cohort studies. LANCET HAEMATOLOGY 2018; 5:e346-e358. [PMID: 30026010 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30092-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substantial evidence links exposure to moderate or high doses of ionising radiation, particularly in childhood, with increased risk of leukaemia. The association of leukaemia with exposure to low-dose (<100 mSv) radiation is less certain, although this is the dose range most relevant to the general population. We aimed to estimate the risk of leukaemia associated with low-dose radiation exposure in childhood (age <21 years). METHODS In this analysis of historical cohort studies, we pooled eligible cohorts reported up to June 30, 2014. We evaluated leukaemia and myeloid malignancy outcomes in these cohorts with the relevant International Classification of Diseases and International Classification of Diseases for Oncology definitions. The cohorts included had not been treated for malignant disease, had reported at least five cases of the relevant haematopoietic neoplasms, and estimated individual active bone marrow (ABM) doses. We restricted analysis to individuals who were younger than 21 years at first irradiation who had mean cumulative ABM doses of less than 100 mSv. Dose-response models were fitted by use of Poisson regression. The data were received in fully anonymised form by the statistical analyst. FINDINGS We identified nine eligible cohorts from Canada, France, Japan, Sweden, the UK, and the USA, including 262 573 people who had been exposed to less than 100 mSv enrolled between June 4, 1915, and Dec 31, 2004. Mean follow-up was 19·63 years (SD 17·75) and mean cumulative ABM dose was 19·6 mSv (SD 22·7). 154 myeloid malignancies were identified (which included 79 acute myeloid leukaemias, eight myelodysplastic syndromes, and 36 chronic myeloid leukaemias, in addition to other unspecified myeloid malignancies) and 40 acute lymphoblastic leukaemias, with 221 leukaemias (including otherwise unclassified leukaemias but excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia) identified overall. The fitted relative risks at 100 mSv were 3·09 (95% CI 1·41-5·92; ptrend=0·008) for acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes combined, 2·56 (1·09-5·06; ptrend=0·033) for acute myeloid leukaemia, and 5·66 (1·35-19·71; ptrend=0·023) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. There was no clear dose-response for chronic myeloid leukaemia, which had a relative risk at 100 mSv of 0·36 (0·00-2·36; ptrend=0·394). There were few indications of between-cohort heterogeneity or departure from linearity. For acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes combined and for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, the dose-responses remained significant for doses of less than 50 mSv. Excess absolute risks at 100 mSv were in the range of 0·1-0·4 cases or deaths per 10 000 person-years. INTERPRETATION The risks of acute myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were significantly increased after cumulative doses of ionising radiation of less than 100 mSv in childhood or adolescence, with an excess risk also apparent for cumulative radiation doses of less than 50 mSv for some endpoints. These findings support an increased risk of leukaemia associated with low-dose exposure to radiation and imply that the current system of radiological protection is prudent and not overly protective. FUNDING National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute, and US National Institutes for Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Borrego
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Lydia B Zablotska
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - M Jacob Adams
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Rodrigue Allodji
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM Unit 1018, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM Unit 1018, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alina V Brenner
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Mark S Pearce
- Institute of Health and Society, and National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit for Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Michele M Doody
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie Lundell
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Siegal Sadetzki
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Gertner Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Martha S Linet
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nikkilä A, Raitanen J, Lohi O, Auvinen A. Radiation exposure from computerized tomography and risk of childhood leukemia: Finnish register-based case-control study of childhood leukemia (FRECCLE). Haematologica 2018; 103:1873-1880. [PMID: 29976736 PMCID: PMC6278981 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.187716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The only well-established risk factors for childhood leukemia are high-dose ionizing radiation and Down syndrome. Computerized tomography is a common source of low-dose radiation. In this study, we examined the magnitude of the risk of childhood leukemia after pediatric computed tomography examinations. We evaluated the association of computed tomography scans with risk of childhood leukemia in a nationwide register-based case-control study. Cases (n=1,093) were identified from the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry and three controls, matched by gender and age, were randomly selected for each case from the Population Registry. Information was also obtained on birth weight, maternal smoking, parental socioeconomic status and background gamma radiation. Data on computed tomography scans were collected from the ten largest hospitals in Finland, covering approximately 87% of all pediatric computed tomography scans. Red bone marrow doses were estimated with NCICT dose calculation software. The data were analyzed using exact conditional logistic regression analysis. A total of 15 cases (1.4%) and ten controls (0.3%) had undergone one or more computed tomography scans, excluding a 2-year latency period. For one or more computed tomography scans, we observed an odds ratio of 2.82 (95% confidence interval: 1.05 – 7.56). Cumulative red bone marrow dose from computed tomography scans showed an excess odds ratio of 0.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.02 – 0.26) per mGy. Our results are consistent with the notion that even low doses of ionizing radiation observably increase the risk of childhood leukemia. However, the observed risk estimates are somewhat higher than those in earlier studies, probably due to random error, although unknown predisposing factors cannot be ruled out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atte Nikkilä
- Faculty of Medicine and Biosciences, University of Tampere
| | - Jani Raitanen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere.,UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere
| | - Olli Lohi
- Faculty of Medicine and Biosciences, University of Tampere.,Tampere Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere.,UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere.,STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wen M, Zhou B, Lin X, Chen Y, Song J, Li Y, Zacksenhaus E, Ben-David Y, Hao X. Associations Between XPD Lys751Gln Polymorphism and Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis. Front Genet 2018; 9:218. [PMID: 30100919 PMCID: PMC6073102 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to define the potential relationship between xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) Lys751Gln polymorphisms and the risk of leukemia. Methods: A comprehensive search of Pubmed, Web of Science, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was conducted to identify original articles published before March 2017 concerning the association between XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms and leukemia risk. A literature quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using I2 statistics. Random- or fixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) in the presence or absence of heterogeneity, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the influence of individual studies on the pooled estimate. Publication bias was investigated using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test. All data analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 and Revman 5.3. Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 7525 participants (2,757 patients; 4,768 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. We found that XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms significantly increased the risk of developing leukemia in both dominant OR = 1.21, 95%CI [1.10–1.35], P ≤ 0.001) and heterozygote (OR = 1.22, 95%CI [1.09–1.36], P ≤ 0.001) model. An allele model showed a borderline significant increase in leukemia risk (OR = 1.13, 95%CI [1.00–1.27], P = 0.05). A subgroup analysis revealed a consistent association between XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms and leukemia risk for some genetic models in Caucasian populations, adult or chronic groups, and in almost all models of childhood or acute groups. Conclusion: Our results indicate that XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism increases the risk of leukemia, especially in childhood and acute cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.,College of Basic Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.,The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, China
| | - Bo Zhou
- College of Basic Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Xin Lin
- College of Basic Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Yunhua Chen
- College of Basic Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Jialei Song
- State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.,The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, China
| | - Yanmei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.,The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, China
| | - Eldad Zacksenhaus
- Department of Medicine, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yaacov Ben-David
- State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.,The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, China
| | - Xiaojiang Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.,The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kheifets L, Swanson J, Yuan Y, Kusters C, Vergara X. Comparative analyses of studies of childhood leukemia and magnetic fields, radon and gamma radiation. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2017; 37:459-491. [PMID: 28586320 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aa5fc7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In this paper we compare the findings of epidemiologic studies of childhood leukemia that examined at least two of ELF magnetic fields and/or distance to power lines, and exposure to radon and gamma radiation or distance to nuclear plants. Many of the methodologic aspects are common to studies of non-ionising (i.e. ELF-MF) and ionising radiation. A systematic search and review of studies with more than one exposure under study identified 33 key and 35 supplementary papers from ten countries that have been included in this review. Examining studies that have looked at several radiation exposures, and comparing similarities and differences for the different types of radiation, through the use of directed acyclic graphs, we evaluate to what extent bias, confounding and other methodological issues might be operating in these studies. We found some indication of bias, although results are not clear cut. There is little evidence that confounding has had a substantial influence on results. Influence of the residential mobility on the study conduct and interpretation is complex and can manifest as a selection bias, confounding, increased measurement error or could also be a potential risk factor. Other factors associated with distance to power lines and to nuclear power plants should be investigated. A more complete and consistent reporting of results in the future studies will allow for a more informative comparison across studies and integration of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leeka Kheifets
- University of California Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - John Swanson
- National Grid, 1-3 Strand, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yingzhe Yuan
- University of California Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Cynthia Kusters
- University of California Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Ximena Vergara
- University of California Los Angeles, United States of America
- Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rühm W, Eidemüller M, Kaiser JC. Biologically-based mechanistic models of radiation-related carcinogenesis applied to epidemiological data. Int J Radiat Biol 2017; 93:1093-1117. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1310405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Werner Rühm
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Center München, Institute of Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Markus Eidemüller
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Center München, Institute of Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jan Christian Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Center München, Institute of Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Verbiest T, Finnon R, Brown N, Finnon P, Bouffler S, Badie C. NOD Scid Gamma Mice Are Permissive to Allogeneic HSC Transplantation without Prior Conditioning. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:E1850. [PMID: 27827995 PMCID: PMC5133850 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17111850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Scid hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) have an intrinsic defect in their maintenance within the bone marrow (BM) niche which facilitates HSC transplantation without the absolute requirement of prior conditioning. Nevertheless, NOD scid mice have a significantly altered life span due to early development of thymic lymphomas, which compromises the ability to study the long-term fate of exogenous HSCs and their progeny. Here, we present data on the transplantation of HSCs into NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice to achieve long-term engraftment without prior conditioning. We transplanted allogeneic HSCs constitutively expressing the mCherry fluorescent marker into age-matched NSG mice and assessed donor chimerism 6 months post-transplantation. All transplanted NSG mice showed long-term myeloid and lymphoid cell chimerism. Also, in vivo irradiated HSCs showed long-term engraftment, although overall white blood cell (WBC) donor chimerism was lower compared with non-irradiated HSCs. Using this novel NSG transplantation model, we will be able to study the effects of low dose in vivo X-ray exposure on the long-term fate of HSCs, without the requirement of prior radio-ablation of the recipient, and thus leaving the recipient's BM microenvironment uncompromised. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that allogeneic HSCs from a different inbred strain can compete for niches in the BM compartment of NSG mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Verbiest
- Cancer Mechanisms and Biomarkers Group, Radiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 ORQ, UK.
- CRUK & MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
| | - Rosemary Finnon
- Cancer Mechanisms and Biomarkers Group, Radiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 ORQ, UK.
| | - Natalie Brown
- Cancer Mechanisms and Biomarkers Group, Radiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 ORQ, UK.
| | - Paul Finnon
- Cancer Mechanisms and Biomarkers Group, Radiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 ORQ, UK.
| | - Simon Bouffler
- Cancer Mechanisms and Biomarkers Group, Radiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 ORQ, UK.
| | - Christophe Badie
- Cancer Mechanisms and Biomarkers Group, Radiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 ORQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Individual response to ionizing radiation. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2016; 770:369-386. [PMID: 27919342 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The human response to ionizing radiation (IR) varies among individuals. The first evidence of the individual response to IR was reported in the beginning of the 20th century. Considering nearly one century of observations, we here propose three aspects of individual IR response: radiosensitivity for early or late adverse tissue events after radiotherapy on normal tissues (non-cancer effects attributable to cell death); radiosusceptibility for IR-induced cancers; and radiodegeneration for non-cancer effects that are often attributable to mechanisms other than cell death (e.g., cataracts and circulatory disease). All the molecular and cellular mechanisms behind IR-induced individual effects are not fully elucidated. However, some specific assays may help their quantification according to the dose and to the genetic status. Accumulated data on individual factors have suggested that the individual IR response cannot be ignored and raises some clinical and societal issues. The individual IR response therefore needs to be taken into account to better evaluate the risks related to IR exposure.
Collapse
|