1
|
Davies HG, Thorley EV, Al-Bahadili R, Sutton N, Burt J, Hookham L, Karampatsas K, Lambach P, Muñoz F, Cutland CL, Omer S, Le Doare K. Defining and reporting adverse events of special interest in comparative maternal vaccine studies: a systematic review. Vaccine X 2024; 18:100464. [PMID: 38495929 PMCID: PMC10943481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The GAIA (Global Alignment on Immunisation Safety Assessment in Pregnancy) consortium was established in 2014 with the aim of creating a standardised, globally coordinated approach to monitoring the safety of vaccines administered in pregnancy. The consortium developed twenty-six standardised definitions for classifying obstetric and infant adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the current state of adverse event reporting in maternal vaccine trials following the publication of the case definitions by GAIA, and the extent to which these case definitions have been adopted in maternal vaccine safety research. Methods A comprehensive search of published literature was undertaken to identify maternal vaccine research studies. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keyword searches to identify observational or interventional studies that examined vaccine safety in pregnant women with a comparator group. A two-reviewer screening process was undertaken, and a narrative synthesis of the results presented. Results 14,737 titles were identified from database searches, 435 titles were selected as potentially relevant, 256 were excluded, the remaining 116 papers were included. Influenza vaccine was the most studied (25.0%), followed by TDaP (20.7%) and SARS-CoV-2 (12.9%).Ninety-one studies (78.4%) were conducted in high-income settings. Forty-eight (41.4%) utilised electronic health-records. The majority focused on reporting adverse events of special interest (AESI) in pregnancy (65.0%) alone or in addition to reactogenicity (27.6%). The most frequently reported AESI were preterm birth, small for gestational age and hypertensive disorders. Fewer than 10 studies reported use of GAIA definitions. Gestational age assessment was poorly described; of 39 studies reporting stillbirths 30.8% provided no description of the gestational age threshold. Conclusions Low-income settings remain under-represented in comparative maternal vaccine safety research. There has been poor uptake of GAIA case definitions. A lack of harmonisation and standardisation persists limiting comparability of the generated safety data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah G Davies
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
- MRC, UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
- Makerere University John Hopkins Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emma V Thorley
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rossul Al-Bahadili
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalina Sutton
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Burt
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Hookham
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kostas Karampatsas
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Flor Muñoz
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clare L Cutland
- Wits African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Wits-Alive), School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saad Omer
- O’Donnell School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
- Makerere University John Hopkins Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wolfe DM, Fell D, Garritty C, Hamel C, Butler C, Hersi M, Ahmadzai N, Rice DB, Esmaeilisaraji L, Michaud A, Soobiah C, Ghassemi M, Khan PA, Sinilaite A, Skidmore B, Tricco AC, Moher D, Hutton B. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066182. [PMID: 37673449 PMCID: PMC10496691 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review to evaluate associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes and maternal non-obstetric serious adverse events (SAEs), taking into consideration confounding and temporal biases. METHODS Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Embase Classic+Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched to June 2021 for observational studies assessing associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and maternal non-obstetric SAEs and adverse birth outcomes, including preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, small-for-gestational-age birth and congenital anomalies. Studies of live attenuated vaccines, single-arm cohort studies and abstract-only publications were excluded. Records were screened using a liberal accelerated approach initially, followed by a dual independent approach for full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted, where two or more studies met methodological criteria for inclusion. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess evidence certainty. RESULTS Of 9443 records screened, 63 studies were included. Twenty-nine studies (24 cohort and 5 case-control) evaluated seasonal influenza vaccination (trivalent and/or quadrivalent) versus no vaccination and were the focus of our prioritised syntheses; 34 studies of pandemic vaccines (2009 A/H1N1 and others), combinations of pandemic and seasonal vaccines, and seasonal versus seasonal vaccines were also reviewed. Control for confounding and temporal biases was inconsistent across studies, limiting pooling of data. Meta-analyses for preterm birth, spontaneous abortion and small-for-gestational-age birth demonstrated no significant associations with seasonal influenza vaccination. Immortal time bias was observed in a sensitivity analysis of meta-analysing risk-based preterm birth data. In descriptive summaries for stillbirth, congenital anomalies and maternal non-obstetric SAEs, no significant association with increased risk was found in any studies. All evidence was of very low certainty. CONCLUSIONS Evidence of very low certainty suggests that seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with adverse birth outcomes or maternal non-obstetric SAEs. Appropriate control of confounding and temporal biases in future studies would improve the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianna M Wolfe
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deshayne Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantelle Garritty
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Candyce Hamel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Butler
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mona Hersi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadera Ahmadzai
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle B Rice
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Psychiatry, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Leila Esmaeilisaraji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Michaud
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlene Soobiah
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Ghassemi
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul A Khan
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Sinilaite
- Centre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Epidemiology Division & Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaikh H, Koli P, Undale V, Pardeshi A, Asalkar M, Sahastrabuddhe S, Kawade A, Upasani C. Safety and Protective Effects of Influenza Vaccination in Pregnant Women on Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes in Pune, India: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1034. [PMID: 37376423 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal influenza vaccination provides effective protection against influenza infections in pregnant women and their newborns. In India, the influenza vaccine has not yet been offered through immunization programs, owing to the lack of sufficient safety data for pregnant Indian women. METHODS This cross-sectional observational study enrolled 558 women admitted to the obstetrics ward of a civic hospital in Pune. Study-related information was obtained from the participants through hospital records and interviews using structured questionnaires. Univariate and multivariable analysis was used, and the chi-square test with adjusted odds ratio was estimated to account for vaccine exposure and the temporal nature of each outcome, respectively. RESULTS Women not vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy had a higher risk of delivering very LBW infants, and possible protective effects were suggested (AOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 5.58, p = 0.03). No association was observed between maternal influenza vaccination for Caesarean section (LSCS) (AOR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.78, 1.85), stillbirth (AOR 1.8, 95% CI 0.18, 24.64) and NICU admission (AOR, 0.87, 0.29 to 2.85), and congenital anomaly (AOR, 0.81, 0.10 to 3.87). INTERPRETATION These results show that the influenza vaccine administered during pregnancy is safe and might lower the risk of negative birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanif Shaikh
- Department of Pharmacology, SNJB's Shriman Suresh Dada Jain College of Pharmacy, Chandwad 423101, India
- International Vaccine Institute, SNU Research Park, Gwanak ro, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Pranesha Koli
- Department of Pharmacology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pune 411018, India
| | - Vaishali Undale
- Department of Pharmacology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pune 411018, India
| | - Anil Pardeshi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College, KEM Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Mahesh Asalkar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation's Postgraduate Institute, Yashwantrao Chavan Memorial Hospital, Pune 411018, India
| | - Sushant Sahastrabuddhe
- International Vaccine Institute, SNU Research Park, Gwanak ro, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Anand Kawade
- Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune 412216, India
| | - Chandrashekhar Upasani
- Department of Pharmacology, SNJB's Shriman Suresh Dada Jain College of Pharmacy, Chandwad 423101, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Regan AK, Munoz FM. Efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: realizing the potential of maternal influenza immunization. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:649-660. [PMID: 33832397 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1915138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe complications following influenza infection compared to the general population. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy can offer direct protection to pregnant women and passive immunity to infants up to 6 months of age via maternal antibodies. Pregnant women are a high priority group for influenza immunization.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the basis for recommending influenza vaccine to pregnant women, current immunization policies, the evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of maternal vaccination, and future research needed. We conducted a search of PubMed for articles describing the safety or efficacy of influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy. Published articles from inception to 17 November 2020 were reviewed.Expert opinion: Experimental and observational evidence support the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of influenza immunization during pregnancy. These data support the continued provision of inactivated influenza vaccine to pregnant women, as recommended by global immunization policies. To achieve success with maternal influenza immunization programs, further work is needed to inform policy development in low- and middle-income settings and implementation and promotion in high-income settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette K Regan
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dawood FS, Kittikraisak W, Patel A, Rentz Hunt D, Suntarattiwong P, Wesley MG, Thompson MG, Soto G, Mundhada S, Arriola CS, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Brummer T, Cabrera S, Chang HH, Deshmukh M, Ellison D, Florian R, Gonzales O, Kurhe K, Kaoiean S, Rawangban B, Lindstrom S, Llajaruna E, Mott JA, Saha S, Prakash A, Mohanty S, Sinthuwattanawibool C, Tinoco Y. Incidence of influenza during pregnancy and association with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in three middle-income countries: a multisite prospective longitudinal cohort study. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021; 21:97-106. [PMID: 33129424 PMCID: PMC10563867 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30592-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination during pregnancy prevents influenza among women and their infants but remains underused among pregnant women. We aimed to quantify the risk of antenatal influenza and examine its association with perinatal outcomes. METHODS We did a prospective cohort study in pregnant women in India, Peru, and Thailand. Before the 2017 and 2018 influenza seasons, we enrolled pregnant women aged 18 years or older with expected delivery dates 8 weeks or more after the season started. We contacted women twice weekly until the end of pregnancy to identify illnesses with symptoms of myalgia, cough, runny nose or nasal congestion, sore throat, or difficulty breathing and collected mid-turbinate nasal swabs from symptomatic women for influenza real-time RT-PCR testing. We assessed the association of antenatal influenza with preterm birth, late pregnancy loss (≥13 weeks gestation), small for gestational age (SGA), and birthweight of term singleton infants using Cox proportional hazards models or generalised linear models to adjust for potential confounders. FINDINGS Between March 13, 2017, and Aug 3, 2018, we enrolled 11 277 women with a median age of 26 years (IQR 23-31) and gestational age of 19 weeks (14-24). 1474 (13%) received influenza vaccines. 310 participants (3%) had influenza (270 [87%] influenza A and 40 [13%] influenza B). Influenza incidences weighted by the population of women of childbearing age in each study country were 88·7 per 10 000 pregnant woman-months (95% CI 68·6 to 114·8) during the 2017 season and 69·6 per 10 000 pregnant woman-months (53·8 to 90·2) during the 2018 season. Antenatal influenza was not associated with preterm birth (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1·4, 95% CI 0·9 to 2·0; p=0·096) or having an SGA infant (adjusted relative risk 1·0, 95% CI 0·8 to 1·3, p=0·97), but was associated with late pregnancy loss (aHR 10·7, 95% CI 4·3 to 27·0; p<0·0001) and reduction in mean birthweight of term, singleton infants (-55·3 g, 95% CI -109·3 to -1·4; p=0·0445). INTERPRETATION Women had a 0·7-0·9% risk of influenza per month of pregnancy during the influenza season, and antenatal influenza was associated with increased risk for some adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support the added value of antenatal influenza vaccination to improve perinatal outcomes. FUNDING US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. TRANSLATIONS For the Thai, Hindi, Marathi and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatimah S Dawood
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Wanitchaya Kittikraisak
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Archana Patel
- Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India; Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India
| | | | - Piyarat Suntarattiwong
- Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Meredith G Wesley
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Abt Associates, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Giselle Soto
- US Naval Medical Research Unit No 6, Bellavista, Peru
| | | | - Carmen S Arriola
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Howard H Chang
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Damon Ellison
- Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Kunal Kurhe
- Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
| | | | | | - Stephen Lindstrom
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Joshua A Mott
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Siddhartha Saha
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Sarita Mohanty
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Yeny Tinoco
- US Naval Medical Research Unit No 6, Bellavista, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mohammed H, Roberts CT, Grzeskowiak LE, Giles LC, Dekker GA, Marshall HS. Safety and protective effects of maternal influenza vaccination on pregnancy and birth outcomes: A prospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 26:100522. [PMID: 32964200 PMCID: PMC7490992 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study aimed to assess the safety and protective effect of maternal influenza vaccination on pregnancy and birth outcomes. METHODS The study population comprised 1253 healthy nulliparous pregnant women in South Australia between 2015 and 2018. Participants were followed prospectively, with vaccination status (confirmed by medical records), pregnancy, and birth outcome data collected by midwives. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated accounting for time-varying vaccine exposure and temporal nature of each outcome. FINDINGS Maternal influenza vaccination (48%, 603 of 1253) reduced the risk for pre-delivery hospitalisation with influenza like illness (aHR 0•61; 95% CI 0•39, 0•97). Maternal influenza vaccination was not associated with spontaneous abortion (aHR 0•42, 95% CI 0•12, 1•45), chorioamnionitis (aRR 0•78, 95% CI, 0•32, 1•88), gestational hypertension (aHR 0•78, 95% CI 0•47, 1•29), pre-eclampsia (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0•54, 1•27), gestational diabetes (aHR 1•16, 95% CI 0•82, 1•66) nor preterm birth (aHR 0•94, 95% CI 0•59, 1•49). No associations between antenatal influenza vaccination and congenital anomalies, admission to the neonatal care unit, low Apgar scores, and mechanical ventilation were observed. Results were not materially changed after adjustment for pertussis vaccination. We observed a protective effect of maternal influenza vaccination on low birth weight (aHR 0•46, 95% CI 0•23, 0•94) and a marginal protective effect on small for gestational age births (aHR 0•65, 95% CI 0•40, 1•04) during periods of high influenza activity. INTERPRETATION These results support the safety of maternal influenza vaccination and suggest a protective effect in reducing the rates of low birthweight and small for gestational age births. FUNDING There was no funding for this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassen Mohammed
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Claire T. Roberts
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke E. Grzeskowiak
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- SA Pharmacy, Flinders Medical Centre, SA Health, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lynne C. Giles
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gustaaf A. Dekker
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Women's and Children's Division, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen S. Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide 5006, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Englund JA, Chu HY. Respiratory Virus Infection During Pregnancy: Does It Matter? J Infect Dis 2019; 218:512-515. [PMID: 29741694 PMCID: PMC7107415 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital/University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Helen Y Chu
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rolfes MA, Vonglokham P, Khanthamaly V, Chitry B, Pholsena V, Chitranondh V, Mirza SA, Moen A, Bresee JS, Xeuatvongsa A, Olsen SJ. Measurement of birth outcomes in analyses of the impact of maternal influenza vaccination. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2019; 13:547-555. [PMID: 31424627 PMCID: PMC6800304 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The estimated association of maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes may be sensitive to methods used to define preterm birth or small‐for‐gestational age (SGA). Methods In a cohort of pregnant women in Lao People's Democratic Republic, we estimated gestational age from: (a) date of last menstrual period (LMP), (b) any prenatal ultrasound, (c) first trimester ultrasound, (d) Ballard Score at delivery, and (e) an algorithm combining LMP and ultrasound. Infants were classified as SGA at birth using a Canadian, global, and equation‐based growth reference. We estimated the association of maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes, by influenza activity, using multivariable log‐binomial regression and Cox proportional hazards regression with vaccination as a time‐varying exposure. Results The frequency of preterm birth in the cohort varied by method to estimate gestational age, from 5% using Ballard Score to 15% using any ultrasound. Using LMP, any ultrasound, or the algorithm, we found statistically significant reductions in preterm birth among vaccinated women during periods of high influenza activity and statistically significant increases in SGA, using a Canadian growth reference. We did not find statistically significant associations with SGA when using global or equation‐based growth references. Conclusions The association of maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes was most affected by the choice of a growth reference used to define SGA at birth. The association with pre‐term birth was present and consistent across multiple statistical approaches. Future studies of birth outcomes, specifically SGA, should carefully consider the potential for bias introduced by measurement choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Rolfes
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Viengphone Khanthamaly
- Influenza Program, U.S. CDC-Lao PDR, American Embassy, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
| | - Bounlap Chitry
- Mother and Child Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
| | | | - Visith Chitranondh
- Luang Prabang Provincial Hospital, Luang Prabang, Lao People's Democratic Republic
| | - Sara A Mirza
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann Moen
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Joseph S Bresee
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Sonja J Olsen
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katz J, Englund JA, Steinhoff MC, Khatry SK, Shrestha L, Kuypers J, Mullany LC, Chu HY, LeClerq SC, Kozuki N, Tielsch JM. Nutritional status of infants at six months of age following maternal influenza immunization: A randomized placebo-controlled trial in rural Nepal. Vaccine 2017; 35:6743-6750. [PMID: 29100709 PMCID: PMC5714610 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal influenza vaccination has increased birth weight in two randomized trials in South Asia but the impact on infant growth is unknown. METHODS A randomized placebo-controlled trial of year round maternal influenza immunization was conducted in two annual cohorts in Sarlahi District, southern plains of Nepal, from April 2011 through April 2014. Infants born to women enrolled in the trial had weight, length, and head circumference measured at birth and 6 months of age. The study was powered for the 3 primary trial outcomes but not for stunting and wasting at 6 months of age. RESULTS 3693 women received placebo or influenza vaccine between 17 and 34 weeks gestation, resulting in 3646 live births. About 72% of infants who survived had weight and length measurements between 150 and 210 days of age. Prevalence of stunting (<-2 Z scores length-for-age) was 14.8% in the placebo and 13.6% in the vaccine groups, respectively. Stunting < -3 Z scores was 3.2% versus 2.0% in placebo versus vaccine groups (RR: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.39, 1.04)). Wasting (< -2 Z scores weight for length) was 10.3% versus 11.0% for placebo versus vaccine groups. Severe wasting (< -3 Z scores weight for length) was 3.8% for placebo versus 2.6% for vaccine (RR: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.07)). The impact of flu vaccine on wasting was greater in cohort 2 than in cohort 1, (RR: 0.66 (0.44, 0.99) for any wasting), and RR: 0.45 (0.19, 1.09) for severe wasting. This corresponded to a larger impact on birth weight and a better vaccine match with circulating viruses in cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS Although maternal immunization reduced low birth weight by 15%, only wasting at 6 months in the 2nd cohort was statistically significantly difference. However, the study was underpowered to detect reductions of public health importance. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01034254).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Katz
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room W5009, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA.
| | - Janet A Englund
- Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Foundation, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way N.E., R5441, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
| | - Mark C Steinhoff
- Global Health Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC2048, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Subarna K Khatry
- Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project - Sarlahi, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Laxman Shrestha
- Tribhuvan University, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Jane Kuypers
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Molecular Virology Laboratory, Suite 320, 1616 Eastlake Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
| | - Luke C Mullany
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room W5009, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA.
| | - Helen Y Chu
- University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Ave, MS 359779, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
| | - Steven C LeClerq
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room W5009, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA; Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project - Sarlahi, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Naoko Kozuki
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room W5009, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA.
| | - James M Tielsch
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Department of Global Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
| |
Collapse
|