Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diphenhydramine 25 mg in young and elderly volunteers

[Comparative study of the clinical efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combination Levroso Long with Melaxen and Diphenhydramine in patients with drowsiness]

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Levroso Long (fixed dose combination (hereinafter referred to as «FDC») diphenhydramine and melatonin, 25 mg + 3 mg and FDC diphenhydramine and melatonin 50 mg + 3 mg, respectively, capsules with modified release, NovaMedica Innotech LLC) in comparison with diphenhydramine medicines 50 mg (Diphenhydramine tablets, DALHIMFARM OJSC, Russia) and 3 mg melatonin (Melaxen tablets, Unipharm Inc., USA) in patients with insomnia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material and methods. A multicenter open randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted in parallel groups. The study included 312 patients with an insomnia diagnosis verified in accordance with the DSM-IV criteria (ICD code F51.0-10) and an insomnia severity index (ICI) >8 points. The patients were randomized into 4 groups and took the following medications for 10 days: patients of group 1 - Levroso Long (25 mg diphenhydramine and 3 mg melatonin), group 2 - Levroso Long combination drug (50 mg diphenhydramine and 3 mg melatonin), Group 3 -Diphenhydramine 50 mg, 4^th - Melaxen 3 mg. A comparative assessment was performed on the 7^th and 10^th days of therapy according to the primary endpoint - ICI, and secondary endpoints - the results of the assessment based on the Leeds Sleep Assessment Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire, the Scale of the overall clinical impression of improvement and the analysis of the profile of adverse events (NA).

RESULTS

The FDC of diphenhydramine 25 mg + melatonin 3 mg was more effective than diphenhydramine 50 mg, and FDC diphenhydramine 50 mg + melatonin 3 mg was more effective than diphenhydramine 50 mg or melatonin 3 mg on both primary and secondary endpoints. In a safety assessment, the highest incidence of adverse events (48.7%) in the diphenhydramine 50 mg group was significantly lower in groups 1 (29.5%), 2 (12.8%) and 4 (1.3%). All reported adverse events in the FDC groups were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that Levroso Long in two dosages surpassed monotherapy with 50 mg of Diphenhydramine (50 mg) or Melaxen (3 mg) in patients with insomnia in terms of efficacy parameters. The benefit/risk ratio of the studied drug is favorable compared to monotherapy.

Beauty of the beast: anticholinergic tropane alkaloids in therapeutics

Tropane alkaloids (TAs) are among the most valued chemical compounds known since pre-historic times. Poisonous plants from Solanaceae family (Hyoscyamus niger, Datura, Atropa belladonna, Scopolia lurida, Mandragora officinarum, Duboisia) and Erythroxylaceae (Erythroxylum coca) are rich sources of tropane alkaloids. These compounds possess the anticholinergic properties as they could block the neurotransmitter acetylcholine action in the central and peripheral nervous system by binding at either muscarinic and/or nicotinic receptors. Hence, they are of great clinical importance and are used as antiemetics, anesthetics, antispasmodics, bronchodilator and mydriatics. They also serve as the lead compounds to generate more effective drugs. Due to the important pharmacological action they are listed in the WHO list of essential medicines and are available in market with FDA approval. However, being anticholinergic in action, TA medication are under the suspicion of causing dementia and cognitive decline like other medications with anticholinergic action, interestingly which is incorrect. There are published reviews on chemistry, biosynthesis, pharmacology, safety concerns, biotechnological aspects of TAs but the detailed information on anticholinergic mechanism of action, clinical pharmacology, FDA approval and anticholinergic burden is lacking. Hence the present review tries to fill this lacuna by critically summarizing and discussing the above mentioned aspects.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of SM-1, a triple-drug combination to increase total sleep time

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SM-1 after administration of a single oral dose to healthy volunteers in a placebo-controlled double-blind trial of daytime sedation. Secondary objectives were to determine the onset, duration, and offset of the sedative effects using subjective and objective measures of sedation. Safety and tolerability of SM-1 were also investigated.

METHODS

Males and females 18-45 years of age received SM-1, a combination drug product comprised of diphenhydramine, zolpidem (delayed release), and lorazepam (delayed release). The pharmacokinetic profile of each drug was determined from blood samples. Sedative effects were assessed by visual analog scale, digit symbol substitution test, memory test, and quantitative electroencephalography.

RESULTS

Similar number and severity of adverse events were observed following administration of SM-1 and placebo. Onset of sedation, as determined by subjective, performance, and electroencephalography measures, occurred 0.5-1 hr postdose, lasting about 7-7.5 hr. Plasma concentration curves for the two delayed-release components were altered compared with published data for unmodified drugs. Exposure values obtained with the combination product were in good agreement with published values of the drugs given individually.

CONCLUSIONS

SM-1 was well tolerated and has pharmacologic activity starting within an hour of ingestion, lasting approximately 7-8 hr. Sedative activity was seen with subjective, psychomotor, and electroencephalography assays.

Sex differences in the pharmacology of itch therapies-a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Chronic itch is the most common skin-related condition, associated with a high psychosocial and economic burden. In recent years, increasing evidence of sex differences in the perception, clinical presentation and treatment requirements of itch points towards potential benefits when using sex-adapted therapies. It is well-known that body composition, absorption, metabolism, elimination and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) differ between sexes, but only little is known about the impact of sex in the pharmacology of itch treatments, which could help to rationalise sex-adapted treatment strategies.

AIM

To evaluate and review sex effects in the pharmacokinetics and /-dynamics of drugs used to treat itch.

METHODS

In this narrative review we performed a PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) search using the terms (itch OR pruritus) AND (gender OR sex) AND (drug OR medication OR pharmacokinetics OR pharmacodynamics). Additional searches were performed for the topical and systemic drugs recommended by the European Guideline on Chronic Pruritus.

RESULTS

We found numerous reports with variable levels of evidence of sex effects with respect to the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of 14 drug classes used for the treatment of itch, including a total of 19 systemic and 3 topical drugs. Women seem to present higher plasma levels of several drugs used in itch treatment, including tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants (e.g. doxepin, amitriptyline, mirtazapine), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine), immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil), serotonin receptor antagonists (e.g. ondansetron) and betablockers (e.g. propranolol). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were generally more common in women. Being female was reported to be an independent risk factor for QTc-prolongation associated with antihistamines and tetracyclic antidepressants. Additionally, women seem to be more prone to sedative effects of antihistamines, and to suffer from a higher frequency as well as severity of side effects with systemic calcineurin inhibitors, opioid agonists, and opioid antagonists. Women were also sensitised more often to topically applied drugs. Of note, apart from only one experimental study with capsaicin, none of these reports were designed specifically to assess the effect of sex (and gender) in the treatment of itch.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Our review supports previous reports that sex is of importance in the pharmacokinetics and /-dynamics of several drugs used to treat itch although those drugs were mostly evaluated for non-itch indications. However, the results are limited by methodological limitations evident in most studies such as underrepresentation of women in clinical trials. This emphasises the need to study the impact of sex (and gender) in future itch trials to yield better outcomes and prevent ADRs in both sexes.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetic Study of Diphenhydramine HCl in Children and Adolescents

Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics were characterized following a single oral dose in children aged 2 to 17 years using a weight- and age-based dosing schedule with more tiers than the current age-based dosing schedule recommended by the nonprescription drug monograph. This study was conducted in 42 subjects, aged 2 to 17 years. Doses were based on a weight-age dosing schedule, ranging from 6.25 to 50 mg. An oral dose was administered with water about 2 hours after a light breakfast. Plasma samples were obtained up to 48 hours after dosing and analyzed for diphenhydramine. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods, and the relationship of oral clearance with age was assessed using linear regression. Over an 8-fold range of doses, C_max and AUC increased ∼90 % to ∼140% across age groups, with a similar T_max (1.5 hours). Oral CL/F increased with age, but after allometric scaling, no maturation-related change in CL/F was apparent. Mild somnolence was the most commonly reported adverse event (95% of the subjects). A weight-age dosing schedule using an 8-fold range of doses achieved C_max and AUC that increased about 2-fold across age groups. No effect of maturation on CL/F was observed after allometric scaling.

Over-the-counter medications containing diphenhydramine and doxylamine used by older adults to improve sleep

Background The unintentional misuse of over-the-counter sleep aids among older adults is an important public health problem and a focus of Healthy People 2020. Accordingly, the 2015 Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults recommends that individuals 65 years or older avoid use of diphenhydramine and doxylamine; however, many over-the-counter sleep products contain these active ingredients. Objective To identify the proportion of older adults using an over-the-counter medication containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine, and compare their characteristics with older adults using an over-the-counter medication that does not contain these ingredients. Setting Study participants were recruited from the Community Registry of the Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center. Method The study sample was taken from a larger survey of 1025 participants on sleep health and over-the-counter sleep medication use conducted from February to April 2015. A subset of 169 participants aged 65 and older reporting taking at least one over-the-counter product to improve sleep within the past 30 days (16.5%) were selected for our analysis on associations between participant characteristics and potentially inappropriate use of over-the-counter sleep medications. Main outcome measure The proportion and characteristics of older adults taking at least one over-the-counter medication containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine. Results Of the 223 over-the-counter sleep medications listed by participants, 115 (52%) contained diphenhydramine or doxylamine. Using the Beers Criteria, we found that more than half of participants (59%) had used a potentially inappropriate over-the-counter medication containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine to improve sleep within the past 30 days. Participants taking at least one diphenhydramine or doxylamine containing medication were less likely to be aware of any safety risks in taking over-the-counter sleep medications than participants not taking these products (38 vs 49%, p = 0.016). Conclusion A majority of older adults in a limited sample from the United States taking an over-the-counter medication to improve sleep are taking a product containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine, both of which are classified as potentially inappropriate for older adults. Awareness of the safety risks of over-the-counter medications and addressing conditions that impact sleep quality could be facilitated through consultation with pharmacists and other healthcare providers.

Analysis of the variability of the pharmacokinetics of multiple drugs in young adult and elderly subjects and its implications for acceptable daily exposures and cleaning validation limits

The elderly constitute a significant, potentially sensitive, subpopulation within the general population, which must be taken into account when performing risk assessments including determining an acceptable daily exposure (ADE) for the purpose of a cleaning validation. Known differences in the pharmacokinetics of drugs between young adults (who are typically the subjects recruited into clinical trials) and the elderly are potential contributors affecting the interindividual uncertainty factor (UF_H) component of the ADE calculation. The UF_H values were calculated for 206 drugs for young adult and elderly groups separately and combined (with the elderly assumed to be a sensitive subpopulation) from published studies where the pharmacokinetics of the young adult and elderly groups were directly compared. Based on the analysis presented here, it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 10 for worker populations (which are assumed to be approximately equivalent to the young adult groups) where no supporting pharmacokinetic data exist, while it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 15 for the general population, to take the elderly into consideration when calculating ADE values. The underlying reasons for the large differences between the exposures in the young adult and elderly subjects for the 10 compounds which show the greatest separation are different in almost every case, involving the OCT2 transporter, glucuronidation, hydrolysis, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 or CYP3A5. Therefore, there is no consistent underlying mechanism which appears responsible for the largest differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between young adult and elderly subjects.

Sleep Health and Appropriate Use of OTC Sleep Aids in Older Adults-Recommendations of a Gerontological Society of America Workgroup

Getting a good night's sleep can be challenging for older adults with chronic medical conditions, which often interfere with sleep. As a result, many older adults turn to over-the-counter (OTC) sleep aids, that is, products with diphenhydramine or doxylamine. However, these products are indicated only for occasional difficulty with sleep, not for chronic use; and their safety and efficacy has not been well established in general and in older adults specifically. To engage national stakeholders in a discussion of OTC sleep aids in older adults, the Gerontological Society of America (GSA) convened a multidisciplinary workgroup. The Workgroup examined differences between younger and older adults in sleep health and use of OTC sleep aids using data from the National Health and Wellness Survey; assessed the pharmacologic properties and medication effects of OTC sleep aids; and worked with stakeholders to promote strategies for safe and effective use. Older adults are more likely to take diphenhydramine or doxylamine products 15 or more days in a month, an indicator of inappropriate use. The Workgroup recommends research to investigate the ways older people use OTC sleep aids. The goal should be reduction in inappropriate use and associated risks, such as daytime sedation, compromised cognitive function, and falls. In addition, the Workgroup recommends a greater role for community pharmacists in counseling older adults on appropriate use of OTC sleep aids.

Characterization of cognitive dysfunction in Sjögren's syndrome patients

Sjögren's syndrome is an autoimmune disorder primarily affecting women, with decreased saliva and tear production as the principal characteristic. Cognitive, neurological, and psychiatric disorders also are associated with Sjögren's. The present study addressed the hypothesis that patients with Sjögren's syndrome differ significantly from matched controls in the prevalence and impact of a number of neuropsychiatric abnormalities. Sjögren's patients and controls (n = 37 per group) underwent medical and psychiatric evaluation, demographic assessments, quality of life and symptom evaluation, and extensive testing of cognitive function and memory. Patients and controls were closely matched for age, gender distribution, verbal IQ, marital status, educational level, employment status, and current/past medical or psychiatric history. On most subjective self-ratings, Sjögren's patients reported greater fatigue, impaired physical functioning, feeling depressed, and autonomic symptomatology compared to controls. Impaired memory was described mainly as loss of thought continuity in the midst of a task or activity. However, the majority of objective measures of cognition, psychomotor function, and memory showed minimal differences between groups. Sjögren's patients rate themselves as impaired on multiple ratings of emotional, cognitive, and physical function, but objective measures of cognition reveal fewer substantive differences between patients and matched controls. Sjögren's patients perceive deteriorated physical function over time, but they achieve a level of functioning comparable to controls despite the burden of their illness.

Dynamics and Kinetics of a Modified-Release Formulation of Zolpidem: Comparison With Immediate-Release Standard Zolpidem and Placebo

Modified-release (MR) zolpidem was developed to maintain effective plasma concentrations during the 3- to 6-hour post-dosage interval, corresponding to the middle portion of the typical sleep interval. Modified-release zolpidem (12.5 mg), standard immediate-release (IR) zolpidem (10 mg), and placebo were compared in a double-blind, single-dose, 3-way crossover daytime study of healthy volunteers (n = 70 completers). Effect areas for electroencephalographic beta amplitude during 0 to 8 hours and 3 to 6 hours after dosage were greater for MR compared to IR (P < .001). The digit-symbol substitution test and sedation rating scales behaved similarly. MR and IR did not differ in effects at 8 hours post-dosage nor in halflife or clearance. Time of peak plasma concentration (tmax) was significantly longer for MR (2.4 vs 2.0 hours, P < .004), and dose-normalized peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was lower (12.2 vs 14.0 ng/mL/mg, P < .001). MR zolpidem also had greater area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) during the 3- to 6-hour interval (P < .001). Thus, MR zolpidem produces sustained plasma levels compared to IR, with resulting enhancement of pharmacodynamic effects in the 3- to 6-hour post-dosage interval.

Age and Gender Effects on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ramelteon, a Hypnotic Agent Acting via Melatonin Receptors MT1and MT2

Effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ramelteon, a hypnotic acting via binding to melatonin MT(1) and MT(2) receptors, were evaluated in healthy young (18-34 years) and elderly (63-79 years) volunteers. Part 1 evaluated the pharmacokinetics of open-label oral ramelteon, 16 mg. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized, 2-trial crossover pharmacodynamic study of 16-mg ramelteon and matching placebo. Ramelteon clearance was significantly reduced in elderly vs young volunteers (384 vs 883 mL/min/kg, P<.01) and half-life significantly increased (1.9 vs 1.3 h, P<.001). Gender did not significantly influence clearance or half-life. Ramelteon was extensively transformed to its hydroxylated M-II metabolite, with serum AUC values averaging about 30 times those of the parent drug. Compared to placebo, ramelteon increased self- and observer-rated sedation, but age and gender did not influence the magnitude of the ramelteon-placebo difference. Ramelteon did not significantly impair digit-symbol substitution test performance or impair information acquisition and recall. Thus, the reduced clearance and higher serum levels of ramelteon in elderly subjects were not associated with enhanced pharmacodynamic effects. The usually recommended clinical dose of ramelteon (8 mg) does not require modification based on age or gender.

Cognitive effects of quetiapine in a patient with dementia with Lewy bodies

A recent large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial, the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness-Alzheimer's Disease study, found a significant worsening of cognitive functioning in a sample of patients with Alzheimer's disease. To date there have been no equally powered studies examining the cognitive effects of atypical antipsychotics in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies, the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder. This case report describes a significant cognitive improvement observed through the use of an atypical antipsychotic in a patient with dementia with Lewy bodies. The observed divergence in cognitive responsiveness is discussed mechanistically on both the clinical and neuromolecular level. Limitations to this case study design are presented and discussed. The prudence of caution in importing the results of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness-Alzheimer's Disease study to the dementia with Lewy bodies population is summarized and presented for psychiatrists, neurologists and primary care providers, with an intent to stimulate discussion and further research.

A systematic review of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment induced by anticholinergic, antihistamine, GABAergic and opioid drugs

BACKGROUND

Mild cognitive deficits are experienced by 18% of community-dwelling older adults, many of whom do not progress to dementia. The effect of commonly used medication on subtle impairments in cognitive function may be under-recognized.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the review was to examine the evidence attributing amnestic or non-amnestic cognitive impairment to the use of medication with anticholinergic, antihistamine, GABAergic or opioid effects.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adults without underlying central nervous system disorders who underwent detailed neuropsychological testing prior to and after oral administration of drugs affecting cholinergic, histaminergic, GABAergic or opioid receptor pathways. Seventy-eight studies were identified, reporting 162 trials testing medication from the four targeted drug classes. Two investigators independently appraised study quality and extracted relevant data on the occurrence of amnestic, non-amnestic or combined cognitive deficits induced by each drug class. Only trials using validated neuropsychological tests were included. Quality of the evidence for each drug class was assessed based on consistency of results across trials and the presence of a dose-response gradient.

RESULTS

In studies of short-, intermediate- and long-acting benzodiazepine drugs (n = 68 trials), these drugs consistently induced both amnestic and non-amnestic cognitive impairments, with evidence of a dose-response relationship. H(1)-antihistamine agents (n = 12) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 15) induced non-amnestic deficits in attention and information processing. Non-benzodiazepine derivatives (n = 29) also produced combined deficits, but less consistently than benzodiazepine drugs. The evidence was inconclusive for the type of cognitive impairment induced by different bladder relaxant antimuscarinics (n = 9) as well as for narcotic agents (n = 5) and antipsychotics (n = 5). Among healthy volunteers >60 years of age, low doses of commonly used medications such as lorazepam 0.5 mg, oxybutynin immediate release 5 mg and oxycodone 10 mg produced combined deficits.

CONCLUSION

Non-amnestic mild cognitive deficits are consistently induced by first-generation antihistamines and tricyclic antidepressants, while benzodiazepines provoke combined amnestic and non-amnestic impairments. Risk-benefit considerations should be discussed with patients in order to enable an informed choice about drug discontinuation or substitution to potentially reverse cognitive adverse effects.

Efficacy of diphenhydramine in the prevention of vertigo and nausea at 7 T MRI

PURPOSE

In this study the potential of diphenhydramine in reducing respectively preventing vertigo and nausea induced by the ultra-high static magnetic field at 7 T was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective, double blinded, placebo controlled, cross-over randomized study the sensations of 34 volunteers before, during and after exposure to the static magnetic field with and without drug respectively placebo administration were quantified. Fast table motion was applied to increase the incidence of otherwise sparse reports of field related sensations.

RESULTS

The strength of vertigo can be reduced by the application of diphenhydramine.

CONCLUSION

Diphenhydramine, even at a low dose, reduces the strength of vertigo at ultra-high static magnetic fields, may be used preventively, and could pave the way to even higher field strength.

Evidence for oxazepam as an in vivo probe of UGT2B15: oxazepam clearance is reduced by UGT2B15 D85Y polymorphism but unaffected by UGT2B17 deletion

AIMS

Although in vitro studies indicate that oxazepam is an isoform-selective substrate probe for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B15, the utility of this drug as an in vivo probe is uncertain. The main aim of this study was to determine whether common missense polymorphisms in the UGT2B15 gene (D85Y and K523T) are associated with altered oxazepam pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We also determined the possible influence of a common deletion polymorphism in the gene encoding UGT2B17, which shows substantial substrate specificity overlap with UGT2B15.

METHODS

Thirty healthy male subjects were administered 15 mg of oxazepam by mouth followed by plasma oxazepam concentration monitoring for 36 h, and pharmacodynamic testing for 8 h. Genotypes were determined by genomic polymerase chain reaction and commercial 5'-nuclease assays.

RESULTS

Allele frequencies for D85Y, K523T, UGT2B17del were 47%, 23% and 19%, respectively. Median oxazepam apparent oral clearance was significantly lower in 85YY subjects (1.62 ml min(-1) kg(-1)) compared with 85DD subjects (3.35 ml min(-1) kg(-1); P= 0.003, Student-Newman-Keuls test), whereas 85DY subjects were intermediate (2.34 ml min(-1) kg(-1); P= 0.018 vs. 85DD, P= 0.034 vs. 85YY). Regression analysis indicated that UGT2B15 D85Y genotype accounted for 34% of interindividual variability. However, neither UGT2B15 K523T nor UGT2B17del was associated with altered oxazepam disposition. Furthermore, no differences in pharmacodynamic measures, including quantitative electroencephalography, digit-symbol substitution test, self- or observer-rated visual analogue scales, could be demonstrated for any of the polymorphisms evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results identify UGT2B15 D85Y as a major determinant of oxazepam clearance, and indicate that oxazepam may be useful as an in vivo probe for glucuronidation by UGT2B15.

Short-term clarithromycin administration impairs clearance and enhances pharmacodynamic effects of trazodone but not of zolpidem

The kinetic and dynamic interactions of 5 mg zolpidem and 50 mg trazodone with 500 mg clarithromycin (4 doses given over 32 h) were investigated in a 5-way double crossover study with 10 healthy volunteers. The five treatment conditions were: placebo + placebo; zolpidem + placebo; zolpidem + clarithromycin; trazodone + placebo; and trazodone + clarithromycin. Coadministration of clarithromycin increased trazodone area under the curve, prolonged elimination half-life, increased peak plasma concentration (C(max)), and reduced oral clearance. In contrast, clarithromycin had no significant effect on any kinetic parameter for zolpidem. Clarithromycin did not potentiate sedation caused by zolpidem. However, clarithromycin coadministered with trazodone significantly increased self- and observer-rated sedation and ratings of feeling "spacey." Thus, short-term clarithromycin coadministration significantly impairs trazodone clearance, elevates plasma concentrations, and enhances sedative effects. However, clarithromycin has no significant kinetic or dynamic interaction with zolpidem.

Selective histamine H1 antagonism: novel hypnotic and pharmacologic actions challenge classical notions of antihistamines

Numerous "antihistamines" as well as various psychotropic medications with antihistamine properties are widely utilized to treat insomnia. Over-the-counter sleep aids usually contain an antihistamine and various antidepressants and antipsychotics with antihistamine properties have sedative-hypnotic actions. Although widely used for the treatment of insomnia, many agents that block the histamine H1 receptor are also widely considered to have therapeutic limitations, including the development of next-day carryover sedation, as well as problems with chronic use, such as the development of tolerance to sedative-hypnotic actions and weight gain. Although these clinical actions are classically attributed to blockade of the H1 receptor, recent findings with H1 selective agents and H1 selective dosing of older agents are challenging these notions and suggest that some of the clinical limitations of current H1-blocking agents at their currently utilized doses could be attributable to other properties of these drugs, especially to their simultaneous actions on muscarinic, cholinergic, and adrenergic receptors. Selective H1 antagonism is emerging as a novel approach to the treatment of insomnia, without tolerance, weight gain, or the need for the restrictive prescription scheduling required of other hypnotics.

Effects of 2-week treatment with temazepam and diphenhydramine in elderly insomniacs: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

A randomized, controlled, crossover clinical study compared 14-night treatment with 15 mg temazepam, 50 mg diphenhydramine, and placebo in elderly individuals with insomnia (mean age, 73.9 years; range, 70-89 years). Primary outcome measures were subjective assessments of sleep recorded on sleep diaries. Secondary measures were the morning-after psychomotor impairment, using the digit symbol substitution task and the manual tracking task, and the morning-after memory impairment, using a free-recall procedure. Results showed sleep improvements with 15 mg temazepam compared with placebo-sleep quality (mean score, 3.3 +/- 0.9 vs 2.9 +/- 0.8; P = 0.03), total sleep time (6.9 +/- 1.0 hours vs 6.3 +/-1.3 hours; P = 0.02), number of awakenings (1.5 +/- 1.3 vs 2.0 +/- 1.2; P < 0.001), and sleep-onset latency (25 +/- 22 minutes vs 37 +/- 25 minutes; P = 0.03). Improvements were seen with diphenhydramine treatment compared with placebo on the number of awakenings only (mean, 1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 2.0 +/- 1.2; P < 0.05). Numbers of adverse events reported were similar after all treatments, although there was 1 fall during temazepam treatment. Findings indicate that temazepam is more effective than diphenhydramine when compared with placebo at the doses tested, although this advantage is mitigated by the risk of falls associated with temazepam use. The choice of agent to use in the elderly must consider these relative benefits and risks.

How much is too much? Oligosymptomatic presentation after 11.5 g of diphenhydramine

We report the case of a 47-year-old male obese Caucasian patient presenting 2 hours after ingestion of 11.5 g of diphenhydramine. Despite this excessive overdose, he showed only a few hours of impaired consciousness and no further symptoms. A diphenhydramine plasma concentration of 15 352 nmol/L was measured 8 hours after the overdose ingestion. A heterogeneous CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer genotype excludes a pharmacokinetic explanation for this unusually oligosymptomatic presentation. However, the patient suffered from longstanding, refractory depression despite numerous treatment attempts with various drugs, pointing to the possibility of decreased pharmacodynamic responsiveness for therapeutic and toxic effects. Human & Experimental Toxicology (2007) 26, 131-133

Relationship between sedation and pupillary function: comparison of diazepam and diphenhydramine

AIMS

To examine the relationship between sedation and pupillary function by comparing the effects of diazepam and diphenhydramine on arousal and pupillary activity.

METHODS

Fifteen male volunteers participated in three weekly sessions in which they received (i) diazepam 10 mg, (ii) diphenhydramine 75 mg and (iii) placebo, according to a balanced, double-blind protocol. Pupil diameter was measured with infrared pupillometry under four luminance levels. Alertness was assessed by visual analogue scales (VAS) and by critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF). Blood pressure, heart rate and skin conductance were recorded by conventional methods. Data were analysed with analysis of variance (anova) with multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

There were significant effects of ambient luminance (F3,42 = 305.7, P < 0.001) and treatment condition (F2,28 = 9.0, P < 0.01) on pupil diameter; diphenhydramine caused miosis at all luminance levels (P < 0.05). The light reflex response was not affected. Both active drugs reduced the pre-post treatment changes compared with placebo [mean difference from placebo (95% confidence interval)]: in CFFF (Hz), diazepam -0.73 (-1.63, 0.17), diphenhydramine -1.46 (-2.40, -0.52); and VAS alertness (mm), diazepam -11.49 (-19.19, -3.79), diphenhydramine -19.83 (-27.46, -12.20). There were significant effects of both session (F2,26 = 145.1, P < 0.001) and treatment (F2,26 = 5.5, P < 0.01) on skin conductance; skin conductance was reduced by both drugs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The miosis by diphenhydramine and the reduction in skin conductance by both drugs may indicate central sympatholytic effects. A lack of a sympatholytic effect of diazepam on the pupil may be due to the masking of the miosis by mydriasis resulting from the inhibition of the parasympathetic output to the iris.

Pharmacokinetics in older persons

BACKGROUND

Physiologic changes and disease-related alterations in organ function occur with aging. These changes can affect drug pharmacokinetics in older persons.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and their clinical relevance.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted using the terms elderly and pharmacokinetics. Other reviews were also included for literature searching. The review includes literature in particular from 1990 through April 2004. Some articles from before 1990 were included to help illustrate principles of age-related pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

There are minor changes in drug absorption with aging. The effect of aging on small-bowel transporter systems is not yet fully established. Bioavailability of highly extracted drugs often is increased with age. Transdermal absorption may be delayed, especially in the case of water-soluble compounds. Fat-soluble drugs may distribute more widely and water-soluble drugs less extensively in older persons. Hepatic drug metabolism shows wide interindividual variation, and in many cases, there is an age-related decline in elimination of metabolized drugs, particularly those eliminated by the cytochrome enzyme system. Any decrement in cytochrome enzyme metabolism appears nonselective. Synthetic conjugation metabolism is less affected by age. Pseudocapillarization of the sinusoidal endothelium in the liver, restricting oxygen diffusion, and the decline in liver size and liver blood flow may influence age-related changes in rate of hepatic metabolism. Frailty, physiological stress, and illness are important predictors of drug metabolism in older individuals. Inhibition of drug metabolism is not altered with aging, but induction is reduced in a minority of studies. Renal drug elimination typically declines with age, commensurate with the fall in creatinine clearance. Renal tubular organic acid transport may decline with age, while the function of the organic base transporter is preserved but may be less responsive to stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Changes in pharmacokinetics occur due to age-related physiologic perturbations. These changes contribute to altered dose requirements in older persons, particularly in the case of drugs eliminated by the kidney. Interindividual variation, disease, frailty, and stress may overshadow age-related changes.

Acute pharmacological effects of temazepam, diphenhydramine, and valerian in healthy elderly subjects

Elderly insomniacs are often treated pharmacologically with benzodiazepines, antihistamines, or natural products. A double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess the comparative pharmacodynamics of single doses of temazepam (15 and 30 mg), diphenhydramine (50 and 75 mg), and valerian (400 and 800 mg) in 14 healthy elderly volunteers (mean age, 71.6 years; range, 65-89). Assessments were made at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours postdosing with use of validated measures of subjective sedation and mood (visual analogue scales, Tufts University Benzodiazepine scale) and psychomotor performance (manual tracking and digit symbol substitution tests). Temazepam had dose-dependent effects on sedation and psychomotor ability with a distinct time course. Temazepam 30 mg had the most detrimental effect on psychomotor ability (p < 0.001 compared with all other treatments). Temazepam 30 mg and both doses of diphenhydramine elicited significantly greater sedation than placebo (p < 0.05, all), and temazepam had the greatest effect. There was no difference in sedation scores between 50 and 75 mg diphenhydramine. Sedative effects were slightly lesser with 15 mg temazepam and were not significant in comparison with placebo. Psychomotor impairment was evident after administration of 75 mg diphenhydramine in comparison with placebo on the manual tracking test (p < 0.05); this was less than the impairment with 30 mg temazepam (p < 0.001) but similar to that with 15 mg temazepam (NS). No psychomotor impairment was detected with 50 mg diphenhydramine. Valerian was not different from placebo on any measure of psychomotor performance or sedation.

Short-term exposure to low-dose ritonavir impairs clearance and enhances adverse effects of trazodone

Antiretroviral agents may participate in drug interactions that influence the efficacy and toxicity of other antiretrovirals, as well as pharmacologic treatments of coincident or complicating diseases. The viral protease inhibitor, ritonavir, may cause drug interactions by inhibiting the activity of cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) isoforms. In a single-dose, blinded, four-way crossover study, 10 healthy volunteer subjects received 50 mg of trazodone hydrochloride or matching placebo concurrent with low-dose ritonavir (four doses of 200 mg each) or with placebo. Compared to the control condition, ritonavir significantly reduced apparent oral clearance of trazodone (155 +/- 23 vs. 75 +/- 12 ml/min, p < 0.001), prolonged elimination half-life (6.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 14.9 +/- 3.9 h, p < 0.05), and increased peak plasma concentrations (842 +/- 64 vs. 1125 +/- 111 ng/ml, p < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). Coadministration of trazodone with ritonavir increased sedation, fatigue, and performance impairment compared to trazodone plus placebo; differences reached significance only for the digitsymbol substitution test. Three subjects experienced nausea, dizziness, or hypotension when trazodone was given with ritonavir; 1 of these subjects also experienced syncope. Thus short-term low-dose administration of ritonavir impairs oral clearance of trazodone and increases the occurrence of adverse reactions. The findings are consistent with impairment of CYP3A-mediated trazodone metabolism by ritonavir.

Sedation and performance impairment of diphenhydramine and second-generation antihistamines: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antihistamines are among the most frequently used medications in the United States. Despite dramatically higher cost, second-generation antihistamines are replacing diphenhydramine because of the perception that they are not constrained by its sedating effects.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine, through meta-analytic procedures, the collective evidence regarding the sedating and performance-impairing effects of diphenhydramine relative to placebo and second-generation antihistamines.

METHODS

A search that began with the MEDLINE database was limited to those studies that included patients with atopic disease and control subjects, were blinded and randomized clinical trials, objectively examined alertness and psychomotor performance, reported means and variances, and were written in English. Information was systematically abstracted from the resulting 18 articles, and effect size was calculated.

RESULTS

Diphenhydramine impaired performance relative to placebo control and second-generation antihistamines, including acrivastine, astemizole, cetirizine, fexofenadine, loratadine, and terfenadine. However, results were quite varied, the average sedating effect of diphenhydramine was modest, and in some instances results of tests of performance in the diphenhydramine group showed less sedation than in the control or second-generation antihistamine groups. A significant (P <.05) average effect size indicated a mild sedating effect caused by second-generation antihistamines in comparison with placebo.

CONCLUSION

The absence of a consistent finding of diphenhydramine-induced sedation is surprising given that most studies have been designed to increase the probability of this outcome, including administering a 50-mg dose. On the basis of this meta-analysis of performance-impairment trials, a clear and consistent distinction between sedating and nonsedating antihistamines does not exist.

Relative contribution of CYP3A to amitriptyline clearance in humans: in vitro and in vivo studies

The relative contribution of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) to the oral clearance of amitriptyline in humans has been assessed using a combination of in vitro approaches together with a clinical pharmacokinetic interaction study using the CYP3A-selective inhibitor ketoconazole. Lymphoblast-expressed CYPs were used to study amitriptyline N-demethylation and E-10 hydroxylation in vitro. The relative activity factor (RAF) approach was used to predict the relative contribution of each CYP isoform to the net hepatic intrinsic clearance (sum of N-demethylation and E-10 hydroxylation). Assuming no extrahepatic metabolism, the model-predicted contribution of CYP3A to net intrinsic clearance should equal the fractional decrement in apparent oral clearance of amitriptyline upon complete inhibition of the enzyme. This hypothesis was tested in a clinical study of amitriptyline (50 mg, p.o.) with ketoconazole (three 200 mg doses spaced 12 hours apart) in 8 healthy volunteers. The RAF approach predicted CYP2C19 to be the dominant contributor (34%), with a mean 21% contribution of CYP3A (range: 8%-42% in a panel of 12 human livers). The mean apparent oral clearance of amitriptyline in 8 human volunteers was decreased from 2791 ml/min in the control condition to 2069 ml/min with ketoconazole. The average 21% decrement (range: 2%-40%) was identical to the mean value predicted in vitro using the RAF approach. The central nervous system (CNS) sedative effects of amitriptyline were slightly greater when ketoconazole was coadministered, but the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, CYP3A plays a relatively minor role in amitriptyline clearance in vivo, which is consistent with in vitro predictions using the RAF approach.

A comparative pharmacokinetic and dynamic evaluation of alprazolam sustained-release, bromazepam, and lorazepam

Sustained-release (SR) alprazolam may facilitate compliance with oral benzodiazepine treatment of panic disorders that currently requires doses administered three or four times daily. To compare the pharmacokinetic, psychomotor performance, and subjective effects of alprazolam SR (1.5 mg), bromazepam (3 mg taken three times daily), and lorazepam (1 mg taken three times daily), 13 male volunteers (aged 20-45 years) randomly received on four separate occasions one of these medications or placebo. Once before and 11 times after drug administration, the subjects were tested using psychomotor performance tests (manual tracking and digit-symbol substitution test [DSST]) and computerized questionnaires (such as the Tufts University Benzodiazepine Scale [TUBS], the Addiction Research Center Inventory, and the visual analog scales) to determine the subjective effects of the drugs. Blood samples for the determination of the plasma levels of the drugs were collected before and 17 times after the drug was administered. A peak plateau of plasma alprazolam began approximately 6 hours after the dose, which was later than the initial peaks for lorazepam and bromazepam (1-2 hours after the dose). Once this plateau had begun, alprazolam SR sustained that concentration better than did the other two formulations. Of the 10 measures on which the response averaged for the first 14 hours differed among drugs (p < 0.05), bromazepam differed from placebo on two measures, lorazepam on four (including DSST Performance and TUBS Sedation), and alprazolam SR on nine (including all four affected by lorazepam). Lorazepam and alprazolam, but not bromazepam, produced significantly more sedation than placebo. The doses of the three drugs were not equipotent in sedation and mood effects. None of the drugs tested differed from placebo on measures relevant to abuse liability.

Sedation and antihistamines: a review of inter-drug differences using proportional impairment ratios

The use of antihistamines (AHs) has until recently been associated with a number of undesirable side effects, the most troublesome of which is sedation. There are two aspects to sedation. The first, an objectively determined measure based on the results of psychometric tests from controlled trials, and the second, the subject's response to the administration of a drug. Since AHs are largely used in ambulant patients, a complete evaluation of sedation should be performed through standardised objective and subjective tests, shown to be sensitive to the central effects of AHs.An extensive review of the literature identified 76 studies of H(1) receptor antagonists in healthy volunteers, in which assessment of sedation was the primary objective. Results from studies published in peer-reviewed journals which employed a placebo condition as well as a positive internal control using a crossover design were analysed to determine the extent to which a particular antihistamine produced impairments on a battery of psychometric tests. The impairment index for each antihistamine was calculated and subsequently compared with the impairment index obtained for all other AHs.The calculation of this proportional impairment ratio enabled the sedative potential of an individual antihistamine to be identified relative to all other AHs and thus allowed the ranking of AHs with respect to their ability to cause impairments of cognitive and psychomotor function.Findings from this review clearly demonstrate that there are distinct classes of AHs with respect to their ability to impair cognitive function and psychomotor performance. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Differential impairment of triazolam and zolpidem clearance by ritonavir

BACKGROUND

The viral protease inhibitor ritonavir has the capacity to inhibit and induce the activity of cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) isoforms, leading to drug interactions that may influence the efficacy and toxicity of other antiretroviral therapies, as well as pharmacologic treatments of coincident or complicating diseases.

METHODS

The inhibitory effect of ritonavir on the biotransformation of the hypnotic agents triazolam and zolpidem was tested in vitro using human liver microsomes. In a double-blind clinical study, volunteer study subjects received 0.125 mg triazolam or 5.0 mg zolpidem concurrent with low-dose ritonavir (four doses of 200 mg), or with placebo.

RESULTS

Ritonavir was a potent in vitro inhibitor of triazolam hydroxylation but was less potent as an inhibitor of zolpidem hydroxylation. In the clinical study, ritonavir reduced triazolam clearance to < 4% of control values (p < .005), prolonged elimination half-life (41 versus 3 hours; p < .005), and magnified benzodiazepine agonist effects such as sedation and performance impairment. In contrast, ritonavir reduced zolpidem clearance to 78% of control values (p < .08), and slightly prolonged elimination half-life (2.4 versus 2.0 hours; NS). Benzodiazepine agonist effects of zolpidem were not altered by ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

Short-term low-dose administration of ritonavir produces a large and significant impairment of triazolam clearance and enhancement of clinical effects. In contrast, ritonavir produced small and clinically unimportant reductions in zolpidem clearance. The findings are consistent with the complete dependence of triazolam clearance on CYP3A activity, compared with the partial dependence of zolpidem clearance on CYP3A.

Kinetic and dynamic interaction study of zolpidem with ketoconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole

BACKGROUND

Azole antifungal agents may impair hepatic clearance of drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450-3A isoforms. The imidazopyridine hypnotic agent zolpidem is metabolized in humans in part by P450-3A, as well as by a number of other cytochromes. Potential interactions of zolpidem with 3 commonly prescribed azole derivatives were evaluated in a controlled clinical study.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, 5-way, crossover, clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study, 12 volunteers received (A) zolpidem placebo plus azole placebo, (B) 5 mg zolpidem plus azole placebo (C) zolpidem plus ketoconazole, (D) zolpidem plus itraconazole, and (E) zolpidem plus fluconazole.

RESULTS

Mean apparent oral clearance of zolpidem when given with placebo was 422 mL/min, and elimination half-life was 1.9 hours. Clearance was significantly reduced to 250 mL/min when zolpidem was given with ketoconazole, and half-life was prolonged to 2.4 hours. Coadministration of zolpidem with itraconazole or fluconazole also reduced clearance (320 and 338 mL/min), but differences compared to the zolpidem plus placebo treatment did not reach significance. Zolpidem-induced benzodiazepine agonist effects (increased electrocardiographic beta activity, digit-symbol substitution test impairment, and delayed recall) during the first 4 hours after dosage were enhanced by ketoconazole but not by itraconazole or fluconazole.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of zolpidem with ketoconazole impairs zolpidem clearance and enhances its benzodiazepine-like agonist pharmacodynamic effects. Itraconazole and fluconazole had a small influence on zolpidem kinetics and dynamics. The findings are consistent with in vitro studies of differentially impaired zolpidem metabolism by azole derivatives.