Influence of Meals and Glycemic Changes on QT Interval Dynamics

Pooled analysis of routine safety parameters observed in healthy participants at baseline and following placebo administration in early phase clinical studies

Phase I trials inform on the initial safety profile of a new molecule and impact whether further development is pursued or not. Understanding the effect of non-pharmacological factors on the variability of routine safety parameters could improve decision making in these early clinical trials, helping to separate signals related to the new molecule from background "noise." To understand the impact of non-pharmacological factors on routine safety parameters, we evaluated pooled safety data from over 1000 healthy participants treated with placebo in phase I trials between 2009 and 2018. The phase I participants were predominantly men, less than or equal to 50 years, White, and non-Hispanic; and approximately an equal proportion had body mass index in the normal and overweight/obese range. Following administration of placebo, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory parameters remained near predose baseline values. Large changes from baseline were observed for many safety parameters, but these occurred in a relatively small number of participants. At least one adverse event (AE) occurred in 49.7% of participants receiving placebo in single ascending dose (SAD) studies and in 72.4% of participants receiving placebo in multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies, with headache being the most commonly reported AE (18.7% in SAD and 28.3% in MAD studies). Overall, these analyses are consistent with non-pharmacological factors having a small impact on routine safety parameters in a phase I trial. The provided supplemental data may be used to contextualize the magnitude and frequency of abnormal safety values and AEs observed in phase I trials.

Glucose and Fructose Supplementation and Their Acute Effects on Electrocardiographic Time Intervals during Anaerobic Cycling Exercise in Healthy Individuals: A Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Double-Blind Randomized Crossover-Controlled Trial

The impact of glucose and fructose supplementation on acute cardiac effects during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a topic that is rarely investigated. The aim of the presented secondary outcome analysis of a double-blind, randomized crossover-controlled trial was to investigate the impact of glucose (Glu), fructose (Fru), glucose and fructose (GluFru), and sucralose on electrocardiogram (ECG), heart rate variability (HRV), premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), and heart rate turn points (HRTP) during CPET. Fourteen healthy individuals (age 25.4 ± 2.5 years, body mass index (BMI) 23.7 ± 1.7 kg/m2, body mass (BM) of 76.3 ± 12.3 kg) participated in this study, of which 12 were included for analysis. Participants received 1 g/kg BM of Glu, 1 g/kg BM of Fru, 0.5 g/kg BM of GluFru (each), and 0.2 g sucralose dissolved in 300 mL 30 min prior to each exercise session. No relevant clinical pathology or significant inter-individual differences between our participants could be revealed for baseline ECG parameters, such as heart rate (HR) (mean HR 70 ± 16 bpm), PQ interval (146 ± 20 ms), QRS interval (87 ± 16 ms) and the QT (405 ± 39 ms), and QTc interval (431 ± 15 ms). We found preserved cardiac autonomic function by analyzing the acute effects of different Glu, Fru, GluFru, or sucralose supplementation on cardiac autonomic function by Schellong-1 testing. SDNN and RMSSD revealed normal sympathetic and parasympathetic activities displaying a balanced system of cardiac autonomic regulation across our participating subjects with no impact on the metabolism. During CPET performance analyses, HRV values did not indicate significant changes between the ingested drinks within the different time points. Comparing the HRTP of the CPET with endurance testing by variable metabolic conditions, no significant differences were found between the HRTP of the CPET data (170 ± 12 bpm), Glu (171 ± 10 bpm), Fru (171 ± 9 bpm), GluFru (172 ± 9 bpm), and sucralose (170 ± 8 bpm) (p = 0.83). Additionally, the obtained time to reach HRTP did not significantly differ between Glu (202 ± 75 s), Fru (190 ± 88 s), GluFru (210 ± 89 s), and sucralose (190 ± 34 s) (p = 0.59). The significance of this study lies in evaluating the varying metabolic conditions on cardiac autonomic modulation in young healthy individuals. In contrast, our participants showed comparable cardiac autonomic responses determined by ECG and CPET.

Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose-escalation, Double-blind Study of Dasiglucagon Effects on QTc in Healthy Volunteers

Background

Dasiglucagon is a novel glucagon analog that is stable in aqueous formulation and approved for use in severe hypoglycemia. Concentration QTc analyses are critical for assessing risk of drug-induced QTc prolongation and potential for fatal cardiac arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether dasiglucagon treatment resulted in any clinically relevant effect on cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers.

Methods

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation Phase I trial was conducted at a single center in Germany between November 2018 and June 2019. Sixty healthy volunteers aged 18 to 45 years were randomized within dose cohorts to receive intravenous dasiglucagon, intravenous placebo, or subcutaneous dasiglucagon. In the intravenous administration cohorts, doses ranged from 0.03 mg to 1.5 mg. The subcutaneous administration cohort received the approved 0.6 mg dose. In the intravenous administration cohorts, serial electrocardiograms were extracted from continuous Holter monitors at prespecified time points beginning the day before dosing and through 24 hours postdose. Heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration were evaluated. Concentration-QT analyses corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) were performed using both a linear mixed-effects and a maximum estimated effect (E_max) model.

Results

At the doses studied, dasiglucagon did not have any clinically relevant effect on heart rate, PR interval, or QRS duration. A minor prolongation of the QTcF interval was observed without any clear dose or concentration dependency. Both the linear and E_max models predicted mean and 90% CIs of placebo-corrected change in QTcF remained below 10 ms (the threshold of regulatory concern), although the linear model did not fit the data well at low dasiglucagon plasma concentrations. In the E_max model, the E_max of dasiglucagon was 3.6 ms (90% CI, 1.23–5.95 ms), and the amount to produce half the effect of E_max) was 426.0 pmol/L (90% CI, −48.8 to 900.71 pmol/L). The treatment effect-specific intercept was −0.44 ms (90% CI, −2.37 to 1.49 ms). The most frequently observed treatment-emergent adverse events reported in the trial were gastrointestinal disorders such as nausea and vomiting.

Conclusions

Dasiglucagon does not cause clinically relevant QTc prolongation in concentrations up to ≈30,000 pmol/L, a level 5-fold higher than the highest observed plasma concentrations in clinical trials investigating use of the approved 0.6 mg SC dose. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735225; EudraCT identifier: 2018-002025-32. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)

Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability

Monitoring of QTc interval is mandated in different clinical conditions. Nevertheless, intra-subject variability of QTc intervals reduces the clinical utility of QTc monitoring strategies. Since this variability is partly related to QT heart rate correction, 10 different heart rate corrections (Bazett, Fridericia, Dmitrienko, Framingham, Schlamowitz, Hodges, Ashman, Rautaharju, Sarma, and Rabkin) were applied to 452,440 ECG measurements made in 539 healthy volunteers (259 females, mean age 33.3 ± 8.4 years). For each correction formula, the short term (5-min time-points) and long-term (day-time hours) variability of rate corrected QT values (QTc) was investigated together with the comparisons of the QTc values with individually corrected QTcI values obtained by subject-specific modelling of the QT/RR relationship and hysteresis. The results showed that (a) both in terms of short-term and long-term QTc variability, Bazett correction led to QTc values that were more variable than the results of other corrections (p < 0.00001 for all), (b) the QTc variability by Fridericia and Framingham corrections were not systematically different from each other but were lower than the results of other corrections (p-value between 0.033 and < 0.00001), and (c) on average, Bazett QTc values departed from QTcI intervals more than the QTc values of other corrections. The study concludes that (a) previous suggestions that Bazett correction should no longer be used in clinical practice are fully justified, (b) replacing Bazett correction with Fridericia and/or Framingham corrections would improve clinical QTc monitoring, (c) heart rate stability is needed for valid QTc assessment, and (d) development of further QTc corrections for day-to-day use is not warranted.

Concentration-QT modelling of the novel DHFR inhibitor P218 in healthy male volunteers

Aims

Given the increasing emergence of drug resistance in Plasmodium, new antimalarials are urgently required. P218 is an aminopyridine that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase being developed as a malaria chemoprotective drug. Assessing the effect of new compounds on cardiac intervals is key during early drug development to determine their cardiac safety.

Methods

This double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study evaluated the effect of P218 on electrocardiographic parameters following oral administration of seven single‐ascending doses up to 1000 mg in 56 healthy volunteers. Participants were randomized to treatment or placebo at a 3:1 ratio. P218 was administered in the fasted state with standardized lunch served 4 hours after dosing. 12‐lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate at regular intervals on the test day, and at 48, 72, 120, 168, 192 and 240 hours thereafter. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluations were collected at similar time points. Concentration‐effect modelling was used to assess the effect of P218 and its metabolites on cardiac intervals.

Results

Concentration–effect analysis showed that P218 does not prolong the QTcF, J‐Tpeak or TpTe interval at all doses tested. No significant changes in QRS or PR intervals were observed. Two‐sided 90% confidence intervals of subinterval effects of P218 and its metabolites were consistently below the regulatory concern threshold for all doses. Study sensitivity was confirmed by significant shortening of QTcF after a meal.

Conclusion

Oral administration of P218 up to 1000 mg does not prolong QTcF and does not significantly change QRS or PR intervals, suggesting low risk for drug‐induced proarrhythmia.

A Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Effects of Cortexolone 17α-Propionate, Also Known as Clascoterone, on the QT Interval Using the Meal Effect to Demonstrate ECG Assay Sensitivity

Cortexolone 17α‐propionate, also known as clascoterone, is a potent androgen receptor inhibitor intended for the topical treatment of skin diseases associated with androgenic pathway alterations. In nonclinical studies, cortexolone 17α‐propionate was found to have a weak inhibitory effect on human Ether‐à‐go‐go‐Related Gene (hERG) potassium channels, which are vital for normal electrical activity in the heart. When used in a cream formulation, little cortexolone 17α‐propionate is absorbed. However, the solution formulation developed for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia leads to a measurable systemic concentration and accumulation of the antiandrogen. This phase 1 study assessed the effect of cortexolone 17α‐propionate on the QTc interval using concentration‐effect analysis and the effect of a meal on QTc to confirm assay sensitivity. Thirty‐two volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the active drug or a matching vehicle as placebo. Participants were dosed twice daily on days 1 to 3 (225 mg applied topically as a 7.5% solution 12 hours apart) and once on day 4. Pharmacokinetic and electrocardiogram assessments were performed after supratherapeutic doses. Assay sensitivity was successfully confirmed by using the food effect on the QTc interval. The results of this concentration‐QTc analysis demonstrate that cortexolone 17α‐propionate and its metabolite/degradation product had no effect on the QTc interval in the concentration range tested.

Effect of Memantine on QT/QTc Interval in a Healthy Korean Population

Studies on the effects of memantine on QT prolongation have yielded conflicting results. For a long time, memantine was reported to be a safe drug without QT prolongation; however, several case studies have reported memantine-induced QT prolongation in Alzheimer's patients. This study evaluated the relationship between memantine blood levels, and QT interval changes. Over a 2-week period, we orally administered 20 mg of memantine daily to achieve a steady state in 57 healthy Korean subjects. We measured and analyzed the QT interval and blood memantine concentrations simultaneously before and after treatment, as well as 2 weeks after the last dosing. Correlation analysis was done between blood memantine level and QT interval. No serious adverse events occurred during the study period. Repeated dosing of memantine did not show clinically significant QT interval changes after treatment. Regression analysis was performed based on the results; there was no statistical association between memantine blood level and QT prolongation. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated no clinically significant changes in the QT interval with therapeutic blood levels of memantine.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Concentration-QTc Analysis of Tetrodotoxin: A Randomized, Dose Escalation Study in Healthy Adults

Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is a highly specific voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) blocker in clinical evaluation as a peripheral-acting analgesic for chronic pain. This study presents the first published results of the safety including cardiac liability of TTX at therapeutic-relevant concentrations in twenty-five healthy adults. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and positive- (moxifloxacin) controlled study evaluated single ascending doses of 15 µg, 30 µg, and 45 µg TTX over 3 periods with a 7-day washout between each period. Subcutaneous injections of TTX were readily absorbed, reaching maximum plasma concentration (C_max) within 1.5 h. Both extent of exposure (AUC) and C_max increased in proportion to dose. No QT prolongation was identified by concentration-QTc analysis and the upper bounds of the two-sided 90% confidence interval of predicted maximum baseline and placebo corrected QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) value did not exceed 10 ms for all tetrodotoxin doses, thereby meeting the criteria of a negative QT study. Safety assessments showed no clinically relevant changes with values similar between all groups and no subject withdrawing due to adverse events. Paresthesia, oral-paresthesia, headache, dizziness, nausea, and myalgia were the most common TEAEs (overall occurrence ≥5%) in the TTX treatment groups. TTX doses investigated in this study are safe, well-tolerated, and lack proarrhythmic proclivity.

Understanding and managing cardiac side-effects of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia

Second-generation antipsychotic medications (SGAs) have advanced the treatment of schizophrenia over the past 30 years. However, a number of potentially life-threatening cardiac side-effects associated with these treatments concern and can discourage prescribers from administering these evidence-based treatments. This review provides a practical, psychiatrist-oriented understanding of the relative frequencies, mechanisms, investigations and treatments associated with these cardiac toxicities. We aim to highlight that these are relatively rare complications of an effective class of drug and to promote the advantages of early involvement of cardiologists in the psychiatric multidisciplinary team to guide the investigation and management of these conditions.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article you will be able to: •

The Effect of Lower and Higher Calorie Meal on the Parameters of Ventricular Repolarization in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND:

Cardiovascular modulation following meal consumption has been known. Little and conflicting data is present regarding electrocardiographic QT and QTc intervals after a meal, and status of ventricular repolarization following meal is not known comprehensively.

AIM:

To inquire the electrocardiographic status of ventricular repolarisation thoroughly after lower and higher calorie meal consumption in a comparative manner.

METHODS:

A group of 61 healthy individuals were studied before and after lunch. They were divided into two groups according to the calorie consumed (higher calorie and lower calorie; median 1580 and 900 kcals, respectively). Calorie consumed was estimated using dietary guidelines. Data was collected from 12-lead ECG both in a fasted state and 2nd postprandial hour for each participant. Parameters of ventricular repolarization, namely, JTp, Tp-e, QT, QTc intervals and their ratios, as well as RR intervals, were compared between fasted and postprandial states for every participant.

RESULTS:

Tp-e and QTc intervals, and Tp-e/QTc ratio do not significantly change after both higher- and lower-calorie meals. JTp and QT intervals significantly shorten in both groups, regardless of the calorie consumed. While JTp shows a positive correlation with RR interval both before and after a meal in lower calorie intake group, no correlation was found with RR interval after a meal in higher calorie group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher calorie intake during a meal is a predictor for greater shortening in JTp and QT, compared to lower calorie meal.

CONCLUSION:

Our study may guide future studies on ventricular repolarisation, particularly those conducted on various disease conditions or drug effect of cardiac electrophysiology.

The Cardiovascular Effects of a Meal: J-Tpeak and Tpeak -Tend Assessment and Further Insights Into the Physiological Effects

Meal intake leads to a significant and prolonged increase in cardiac output to supply the splanchnic vasculature. A meal is associated with sympathetic activation of the cardiovascular system, and food ingestion is correlated with an increase in heart rate, an increase in cardiac stroke volume, and QTc interval shortening for up to 7 hours. Given the complexity of the system, one or several of many mechanisms could explain this observation. The shortening of the QTc interval was correlated with a rise of C‐peptide following food ingestion, but the mechanisms by which C‐peptide may be involved in the modulation of cardiac repolarization are still unknown. This shortening of the myocardial action potential caused by the ingestion of food was further investigated in the present study by measuring the QRS, J‐T_peak, and T_peak‐T_end intervals in search of further clues to better understand the underlying mechanisms. A retrospective analysis was conducted based on data collected in a formal thorough QT/QTc study in which 32 subjects received a carbohydrate‐rich “continental” breakfast, moxifloxacin without food, and moxifloxacin with food. We assessed the effect of food on T‐wave morphology using validated algorithms for measurement of J‐T_peak and T_peak‐T_end intervals. Our findings demonstrate that a standardized meal significantly shortened J‐T_peak for 4 hours after a meal and to a much lesser extent and shorter duration (up to 1 hour) prolonged the T_peak‐T_end and QRS intervals. This suggests that the QTc shortening occurs mainly during phase 2 of the cardiac action potential. As there was no corresponding effect on T_peak‐T_end beyond the first hour, we conclude that a meal does not interfere with the outward correcting potassium channels but possibly with Ca²⁺ currents. An effect on mainly Ca²⁺ aligns well with our understanding of physiology whereby an increase in stroke volume, as observed after a meal, is associated with changes in Ca²⁺ cycling in and out of the sarcoplasmic reticulum during cardiac myocyte contraction.

Confirmation of the Cardiac Safety of PGF2α Receptor Antagonist OBE022 in a First-in-Human Study in Healthy Subjects, Using Intensive ECG Assessments

OBE022, a new orally active prostaglandin F2α  receptor antagonist (OBE022) with myometrial selectivity is being developed to reduce uterine contractions during preterm labor. This first-in-human study evaluated the effect of OBE022 following multiple doses on the QT interval in 23 healthy postmenopausal women, using the effect of a meal on QTc to demonstrate assay sensitivity. We report the cardiac safety outcome performed during the multiple ascending part of this trial. OBE022 was administered after a standardized breakfast on day 1 and in the fasted state from day 3 to day 9 wth a standardized lunch 4 hours after administration. Concentration-effect modeling was used to assess the effect of prodrug OBE022 and parent OBE002 on QTc after a single dose (days 1 and 3) and multiple doses (day 9). The concentration-response analysis showed the absence of QTc prolongation at all doses tested. Two-sided 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean Cmax  for estimated QTc effects of OBE022 and OBE002 of all dose groups were consistently below the threshold of regulatory concern. The sensitivity of this study to detect small changes in the QTc was confirmed by a significant shortening of the QTc on days 1, 3, and 9 after standardized meals. This study establishes that neither prodrug OBE022 nor parent OBE002 prolong the QTc interval. The observed food effect on the QT interval validated the assay on all assessment days. Both the change from predose, premeal and the change from premeal, postdose demonstrated the specificity of the method.

Diurnal Profile of the QTc Interval Following Moxifloxacin Administration

Understanding the physiological fluctuations in the corrected QT (QTc) interval is important to accurately interpret the variations in drug-induced prolongation. The present study aimed to define the time course of the effect of moxifloxacin on the QT interval to understand the duration of the responses to moxifloxacin. This retrospective analysis was performed on data taken from a thorough QT 4-way crossover study with 40 subjects. Each period consisted of a baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) day (day -1) and a treatment day (day 1). On both days, ECGs were recorded simultaneously using 2 different systems operating in parallel: a bedside ECG and a continuous Holter recording. The subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 treatments: 5 mg and 40 mg of intravenous amisulpride, a single oral dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg), or placebo. Standardized meals, identical in all 4 periods, with similar nutritional value were served. Bedside ECG results confirmed that the moxifloxacin peak effect was delayed in the fed state and showed that the Fridericia corrected QT prolongation induced by moxifloxacin persisted until the end of the 24-hour measurement period. The use of continuous Holter monitoring provided further insight, as it revealed that the moxifloxacin effect on QTc was influenced by diurnal and nocturnal environmental factors, and hysteresis effects were noticeable. The findings suggested that moxifloxacin prolongs QTc beyond its elimination from the blood circulation. This is of relevance to current concentration-effect modeling approaches, which presume the absence of hysteresis effects.

Drug-induced Proarrhythmia and Torsade de Pointes: A Primer for Students and Practitioners of Medicine and Pharmacy

Multiple marketing withdrawals due to proarrhythmic concerns occurred in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom in the late 1980s to early 2000s. This primer reviews the clinical implications of a drug's identified proarrhythmic liability, the issues associated with these safety-related withdrawals, and the actions taken by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and by regulatory agencies in terms of changing drug development practices and introducing new nonclinical and clinical tests to asses proarrhythmic liability. ICH Guidelines S7B and E14 were released in 2005. Since then, they have been adopted by many regional regulatory authorities and have guided nonclinical and clinical proarrhythmic cardiac safety assessments during drug development. While this regulatory paradigm has been successful in preventing drugs with unanticipated potential for inducing the rare but potentially fatal polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia torsade de pointes from entering the market, it has led to the termination of drug development programs for other potentially useful medicines because of isolated results from studies with limited predictive value. Research efforts are now exploring alternative approaches to better predict potential proarrhythmic liabilities. For example, in the domain of human electrocardiographic assessments, concentration-response modeling conducted during phase 1 clinical development has recently become an accepted alternate primary methodology to the ICH E14 "thorough QT/QTc" study for defining a drug's corrected QT interval prolongation liability under certain conditions. When a drug's therapeutic benefit is considered important at a public health level but there is also an identified proarrhythmic liability that may result from administration of the single drug in certain individuals and/or drug-drug interactions, marketing approval will be accompanied by appropriate directions in the drug's prescribing information. Health-care professionals in the fields of medicine and pharmacy need to consider the prescribing information in conjunction with individual patients' clinical characteristics and concomitant medications when prescribing and dispensing such drugs.

Estimation of the Power of the Food Effect on QTc to Show Assay Sensitivity

The most recent International Conference on Harmonisation E14 Q&A document states that a separate positive control would not be necessary provided sufficiently high exposures are achieved in the early-phase studies. Realistically, a phase 1 study is unlikely to include a pharmacological positive control, and in cases in which plasma levels of the drug exceeding therapeutic levels are not achieved, the lack of a positive control can constitute a limitation when excluding an effect of regulatory concern. It has been proposed to use the effect of a standardized meal on the estimate of the diurnal time course of QTc to show assay sensitivity. We conducted simulations by subsampling subjects from a 3 different studies and could show that the effect on food on QTc can be reliably prove assay sensitivity for sample sizes as low as 3 × 6 subjects with a power greater than 80%.

Model-Based Evaluation of Exenatide Effects on the QT Interval in Healthy Subjects Following Continuous IV Infusion

Investigation of the cardiovascular proarrhythmic potential of a new chemical entity is now an integral part of drug development. Studies suggest that meals and glycemic changes can influence QT intervals, and a semimechanistic model has been developed that incorporates the effects of changes in glucose concentrations on heart rate (HR) and QT intervals. This analysis aimed to adapt the glucose-HR-QT model to incorporate the effects of exenatide, a drug that reduces postprandial increases in glucose concentrations. The final model includes stimulatory drug effects on glucose elimination and HR perturbations. The targeted and constant exenatide plasma concentrations (>200 pg/mL), via intravenous infusions at multiple dose levels, resulted in significant inhibition of glucose concentrations. The exenatide concentration associated with 50% of the stimulation of HR production was 584 pg/mL. After accounting for exenatide effects on glucose and HR, no additional drug effects were required to explain observed changes in the QT interval. Resulting glucose, HR, and QT profiles at all exenatide concentrations were adequately described. For therapeutic agents that alter glycemic conditions, particularly those that alter postprandial glucose, the QT interval cannot be directly compared to that with placebo without first accounting for confounding factors (eg, glucose) either through mathematical modeling or careful consideration of mealtime placement in the study design.