Mn-DPDP-enhanced MR imaging of malignant liver lesions: efficacy and safety in 20 patients

Manganese-derived biomaterials for tumor diagnosis and therapy

Manganese (Mn) is widely recognized owing to its low cost, non-toxic nature, and versatile oxidation states, leading to the emergence of various Mn-based nanomaterials with applications across diverse fields, particularly in tumor diagnosis and therapy. Systematic reviews specifically addressing the tumor diagnosis and therapy aspects of Mn-derived biomaterials are lacking. This review comprehensively explores the physicochemical characteristics and synthesis methods of Mn-derived biomaterials, emphasizing their role in tumor diagnostics, including magnetic resonance imaging, photoacoustic and photothermal imaging, ultrasound imaging, multimodal imaging, and biodetection. Moreover, the advantages of Mn-based materials in tumor treatment applications are discussed, including drug delivery, tumor microenvironment regulation, synergistic photothermal, photodynamic, and chemodynamic therapies, tumor immunotherapy, and imaging-guided therapy. The review concludes by providing insights into the current landscape and future directions for Mn-driven advancements in the field, serving as a comprehensive resource for researchers and clinicians.

Metal-Based Complexes as Pharmaceuticals for Molecular Imaging of the Liver

This article reviews the use of metal complexes as contrast agents (CA) and radiopharmaceuticals for the anatomical and functional imaging of the liver. The main focus was on two established imaging modalities: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine, the latter including scintigraphy and positron emission tomography (PET). The review provides an overview on approved pharmaceuticals like Gd-based CA and ^99mTc-based radiometal complexes, and also on novel agents such as ⁶⁸Ga-based PET tracers. Metal complexes are presented by their imaging modality, with subsections focusing on their structure and mode of action. Uptake mechanisms, metabolism, and specificity are presented, in context with advantages and limitations of the diagnostic application and taking into account the respective imaging technique.

Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Overview and Central Nervous System Applications With a Focus on Neurodegeneration

Manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) rose to prominence in the 1990s as a sensitive approach to high contrast imaging. Following the discovery of manganese conductance through calcium-permeable channels, MEMRI applications expanded to include functional imaging in the central nervous system (CNS) and other body systems. MEMRI has since been employed in the investigation of physiology in many animal models and in humans. Here, we review historical perspectives that follow the evolution of applied MRI research into MEMRI with particular focus on its potential toxicity. Furthermore, we discuss the more current in vivo investigative uses of MEMRI in CNS investigations and the brief but decorated clinical usage of chelated manganese compound mangafodipir in humans.

Cholangiocarcinoma: current and novel imaging techniques

The radiologic manifestations of cholangiocarcinomas are extremely diverse, since these tumors vary greatly in location, growth pattern, and histologic type. Familiarity with the imaging manifestations of cholangiocarcinomas is important for accurate detection and characterization of these tumors and assessment of resectability. Advances in imaging techniques have led to the availability of an array of modalities that, used independently or in combination, can aid in the accurate diagnosis and evaluation of cholangiocarcinomas in preparation for advanced surgical procedures and treatment planning. Response to novel targeted therapies can also be assessed with newer imaging tools. Hence, knowledge of current and emerging imaging applications is essential for correct diagnosis and appropriate management of these tumors.

Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver

Imaging of the liver is performed most often to detect and characterize focal liver lesions. MR imaging has been the method of choice to assess focal liver lesions accurately. Nonspecific intravenous contrast agents have been used for routine abdominal MR imaging protocols including liver imaging. Over the last 10 to 15 years new contrast agents have been developed that combine the excellent contrast resolution of MR imaging with improved tissue specificity. This article reviews various contrast agents that are in clinical use for liver MR imaging and discusses their potential clinical role.

Safety of MR liver specific contrast media

Over the past few years a number of magnetic resonance (MR) liver specific contrast agents have been introduced. In this report the safety issues of these agents are addressed. A literature search was carried out. Based on the available information, simple guidelines on the safety issue of liver specific contrast agents have been produced by the Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. The report and guidelines were discussed at the 11th European Symposium on Urogenital Radiology in Santiago de Compostela. Liver specific contrast agents appear in general to be safe and well tolerated. However, the incidence of adverse reactions with iron oxides and the intravenous manganese based agent seems to be slightly higher than with gadolinium based agents. However, no safety information from comparative clinical trials has been published. Guidelines on the safety aspects are presented.

Increased manganese concentration in the liver after oral intake

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Manganese is a well-known liver-specific agent used in magnetic resonance imaging. For this purpose, manganese is now administered intravenously. In theory it should be possible to increase the gastrointestinal uptake of manganese through the use of nutritional products as promoters. Such an agent has now been formulated. As part of a primary pharmacologic investigation, the uptake of manganese in the kidney, heart, and liver was studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred two female Sprague Dawley rats fasted for 18 hours before the agent (CMC-001) was given orally by gavage. One hundred micromol/kg BW was given to all rats except six, who served as controls. Various concentrations of the promoters (vitamin D3 and the amino acid alanine) were also given. Three hours after administration the rats were killed and the heart, the liver and kidneys were removed. The manganese content was determined by atomic absorption.

RESULTS

No systematic increased concentration of manganese was found in either the kidneys or the heart; whereas the manganese content of the liver (approximately 100%) increased significantly compared with the controls and the group receiving pure manganese. No side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to increase the gastrointestinal uptake of manganese in fasting rats and thereby increase the concentration in the liver.

Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications

Hepatobiliary contrast agents with uptake into hepatocytes followed by variable biliary excretion represent a unique class of cell-specific MR contrast agents. Two hepatobiliary contrast agents, mangafodipir trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine, are already clinically approved. A third hepatobiliary contrast agent, Gd-EOB-DTPA, is under consideration. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview on the properties, clinical development and application of these three hepatobiliary contrast agents. Bolus injectable paramagnetic hepatobiliary contrast agents combine established features of extracellular agents with the advantages of hepatocyte specificity. The detection and characterisation of focal liver disease appears to be improved compared to unenhanced MRI, MRI with unspecific contrast agents and contrast-enhanced CT. To decrease the total time spent by a patient in the MR scanner, it is advisable to administer the agent immediately after acquisition of unenhanced T1-w MRI. After infusion or bolus injection (with dynamic FS-T1-w 2D or 3D GRE) of the contrast agent, moderately and heavily T2w images are acquired. Post-contrast T1-w MRI is started upon completion of T2-w MRI for mangafodipir trisodium and Gd-EOB-DTPA as early as 20 min following injection, while gadobenate dimeglumine scans are obtained >60 min following injection. Post-contrast acquisition techniques with near isotropic 3D pulse sequences with fat saturation parallel the technical progress made by MSCT combined with an unparalleled improvement in tumour-liver contrast. The individual decision that hepatobiliary contrast agent one uses is partly based on personal preferences. No comparative studies have been conducted comparing the advantages or disadvantages of all three agents directly against each other.

MRI contrast agents for evaluating focal hepatic lesions

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an important tool in the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions especially when other investigations such as ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) are inconclusive. The purpose of this pictorial review is to briefly summarize the properties of various MRI contrast agents used in hepatic imaging and to highlight their role in evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

Efficacy and safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. Multicenter phase III clinical trials. Efficacy of early imaging

The efficacy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting and characterizing, or excluding, hepatic masses was assessed in 404 patients, following the intravenous administration of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection, a hepatic MRI contrast agent. An initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination was followed by unenhanced MRI, injection of MnDPDP (5 micromol/kg IV), and enhanced MRI at 15 minutes post injection. Agreement of the radiologic diagnoses with the patients' final diagnoses was higher for enhanced MRI and for the combined unenhanced and enhanced MRI evaluations than for unenhanced MRI alone or enhanced CT using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. Mangafodipir-enhanced MRI uniquely provided additional diagnostic information in 48% of the patients, and patient management was consequently altered in 6% of the patients. MnDPDP-enhanced MRI was comparable or superior to unenhanced MRI and enhanced CT for the detection, classification, and diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients with known or suspected focal liver disease.

Safety of approved MR contrast media for intravenous injection

In the last 10 years, the use of intravenous contrast media in magnetic resonance (MR) has become well-established clinical practice. Contrast media provide critical additional diagnostic information in many instances. The gadolinium chelates constitute the largest group of MR contrast media and are considered to be very safe. These agents are thought to be safer than nonionic iodinated contrast agents. Unlike x-ray agents, the gadolinium chelates are not nephrotoxic. Minor adverse reactions, including nausea (1%-2% for all agents) and hives (<1% for all agents), occur in a very low percent of cases. Health care personnel should be aware of the (extremely uncommon) potential for severe anaphylactoid reactions in association with the use of MR contrast media and be prepared should complications arise. The four gadolinium chelates currently available worldwide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadoteridol, gadodiamide, and gadoterate meglumine, cannot be differentiated on the basis of adverse reactions. Far fewer patients have been examined to date with the two other agents that have widespread approval, mangafodipir trisodium and ferumoxides. These latter two agents are considered to be very safe but have a higher percentage of associated adverse reactions (7%-17% with mangafodipir trisodium and 15% with ferumoxides). This review discusses the safety issues involved with administration of intravenous contrast media in MR imaging, focusing on the six agents (four gadolinium chelates, one manganese chelate, and the last a large iron particle) with widespread use world-wide.

Safety and efficacy of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. multicenter phase III clinical trials (safety)

The short-term safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection was studied in 546 adults with known or suspected focal liver lesions. An initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination was followed by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), injection of MnDPDP (5 micromol/kg), and enhanced MRI. Adverse events were reported for 23% of the patients; most were mild to moderate in intensity, did not require treatment, and were not drug related. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (7%) and headache (4%). The incidence of serious adverse events was low (nine events in six patients) and not drug related. Injection-associated discomfort was reported for 69% of the patients, and the most commonly reported discomforts included heat (49%) and flushing (33%). Changes in laboratory values and vital signs were generally transient, were not clinically significant, and did not require treatment. There were no clinically significant short-term risks from exposure to MnDPDP.

Influence of the hepatobiliary contrast agent mangafodipir trisodium (MN-DPDP) on the imaging properties of abdominal organs

To assess the influence of Mangafodipir Trisodium on the imaging properties of abdominal organs when using T1-weighted gradient-echo (GE) and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences, thirty patients with focal lesions in the liver were examined at a field strength of 1.5 T before and after intravenous administration of Mangafodipir Trisodium (dose: 5 micromol/kg of body weight). Administration of Mangafodipir Trisodium led to a significant increase in the signal intensity of the liver tissue (p < 0.001), the spleen (p < 0.01), the pancreas (p < 0.001), and the kidneys (p < 0.001) in the T1-weighted GE sequence, while there was no relevant enhancement in fatty tissue and the musculature. In the T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence, there was no relevant change in the signal following administration of a contrast agent. The contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) between the lesions and the liver tissue increased significantly in the post-contrast T1-weighted GE sequence (p < 0.001), while there was no change in the contrast-to-noise ratio in the post-contrast T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence. The contrast-to-noise ratio of the plain T2-weighted TSE sequence was significantly higher than that in the post-contrast T1-weighted GE sequence (p < 0.001). Although Mangafodipir Trisodium was primarily developed as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for demonstration and differentiation of liver lesions, it also affects the signal levels in the pancreas, spleen, and kidneys in the T1-weighted image. Awareness of this effect on the extrahepatic tissue makes it easier to interpret pathological findings in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen.

Liver-specific MR imaging contrast agents

Liver-specific MR imaging contrast agents consist of iron oxide particles or specially designed paramagnetic complexes targeting either the reticulo-endothelial system of the liver or the hepatocytes. These agents enhance the relaxation of water molecules in normal liver tissue and are excluded from abnormal tissue, such as metastases. Relaxation enhancement provides a map of normal liver function, increasing conspicuity of focal abnormalities. Understanding the indications and use of these agents is a central challenge for radiologists practicing liver MR imaging.

Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver

The evolution of contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver has proceeded along several different paths with the common goal of improving liver-lesion contrast. These contrast agents are used to accentuate the inherent differences in liver-lesion signal intensity through differential enhancement of proton relaxation within adjacent tissues. Contrast agents used for hepatic MR imaging can be broadly categorized into those that target the extracellular space, the hepatobiliary system, and the reticuloendothelial system. Although only a small number of liver contrast agents are currently available, others are rapidly proceeding through clinical trials and may soon be added to our clinical armamentarium. This article will briefly review the current clinical experience with these agents, discussing their mechanism of contrast enhancement, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in the evaluation of focal liver lesions.

Tolerability and utility of mangafodipir trisodium injection (MnDPDP) at the dose of 5 mumol/kg body weight in detecting focal liver tumors: results of a phase III trial using an infusion technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the tolerability of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) and its utility for enhancing the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to detect focal hepatic lesions compared with non-enhanced MR and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

119 patients with focal hepatic lesions were examined by MR and by contrast-enhanced CT. MR was performed before and after the infusion of 5 mumol/kg MnDPDP, at a concentration of 10 mumol/ml. Histologic confirmation was obtained in 79 patients.

RESULTS

There were no severe adverse events. Five patients reported mild adverse events related to the infusion. MnDPDP-enhanced SE T1 and GE T1 sequences revealed more focal lesions than the same sequences before contrast infusion in, respectively 22.6 and 36.1% of the cases, and fewer focal lesions in, respectively 5.9 and 1.7% of the cases. Contrast-enhanced MR demonstrated more focal lesions than the SE T2 sequence in 29.4% of cases and fewer lesions in 5.9% of cases. MnDPDP-enhanced MR revealed more nodules than CT in 31.1% of cases and fewer nodules in 13.4% of cases. The additional information provided by MnDPDP enhancement led to modification of management for 12 patients (10.1%).

CONCLUSION

MnDPDP is a well-tolerated contrast agent allowing better MR detection of focal hepatic lesions than non-enhanced MR or contrast-enhanced CT.

Contrast enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA in MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice: a comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the new liver-specific magnetic resonance contrast agent gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Seventeen mice with 66 chemically induced HCCs underwent magnetic resonance imaging with both Gd-EOB-DTPA (30 mumol/kg) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO; 10 mumol/kg). After enhancement, lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of 47 detected HCCs increased negatively from 3.7 +/- 10.7 (mean +/- SD) to -55.1 +/- 25.8 with Gd-EOB-DTPA (P < .001) and increased positively from 10.4 +/- 10.4 to 26.1 +/- 16.3 with SPIO (P < .001). The improvement of CNR after administration of SPIO was less in smaller lesions (< 4 mm), whereas that after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA was independent of lesion size. However, Gd-EOB-DTPA positively enhanced four HCCs (8.5%), both highly differentiated (grade 1) and moderately differentiated (grade 2). Gd-EOB-DTPA allows the conspicuous detection of small HCCs; however, moderately differentiated HCCs occasionally may be positively enhanced.

Comparison of gadolinium chelates with manganese-DPDP for liver lesion detection and characterization: preliminary results

Nonspecific extracellular gadolinium chelate (NEGd) was prospectively compared with managanese (Mn)-DPDP (Mn) for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions of various histology. Seventeen patients with known or suspected focal liver lesions underwent NEGd and Mn-enhanced studies at 1.5 T. Study findings were correlated with histology (five patients), computed tomography (CT) examinations (17 patients), and 4- to 13-month imaging follow-up by CT and/or MR (five patients). NEGd studies were performed as serial postcontrast spoiled gradient echo (SGE) sequences, and Mn studies were performed as SGE sequences 15 and 30 min postocontrast and T1-weighted, fat-suppressed spin echo at 16 min. NEGd and Mn images were prospectively interpreted in a separate blinded fashion. Lesion detection and characterization were determined. NEGd and Mn-enhanced images demonstrated 61 and 49 lesions, respectively (p = .1, NS). A total of 60 and 33 lesions were characterized on NEGd and Mn images, respectively, which was significantly different (p = .008). No differences were observed for the detection and characterization of liver metastases; whereas there was a trend for superior detection and characterization for hepatocellular carcinoma with NEGA.

The uptake of Mn-DPDP by hepatocytes is not mediated by the facilitated transport of pyridoxine

Manganese-dipyridoxal diphosphate (Mn-DPDP) is a liver-selective contrast agent selectively taken up by the hepatocytes. Because of the analogy of structure with pyridoxine (vitamin B6), it was previously suggested that this compound can be selectively taken up by the facilitated transport of vitamers B6. To understand the uptake mechanism, an in vivo binding study was performed based on a competition between 54Mn-DPDP and pyridoxine on the one hand, and Mn-DPDP and [3H]pyridoxine on the other. We found that the [3H]pyridoxine levels in the liver were not significantly different 5 min after intravenous administration of several doses of Mn-DPDP (5 nmol/kg to 50 mumol/kg): 5.0 +/- 0.3% of the injected dose/g tissue. The content of 54Mn (administered as 54Mn-DPDP) in the liver was not affected by a saturation dose of pyridoxine (1 mmol/kg) and was found to be constant (+/- 10% of the injected dose/g tissue) for 60 min. These experiments showed that the uptake of Mn-DPDP is not mediated by the transporter of pyridoxine.

Evidence for the dissociation of the hepatobiliary MRI contrast agent Mn-DPDP

These experiments assessed and quantitated the release of free manganese Mn++ from the hepatobiliary contrast agent Mn-DPDP (manganese dipyridoxal diphosphate), using several magnetic resonance techniques (EPR spectroscopy, 31P-NMR spectroscopy, and relaxometry) to differentiate between free Mn++ and Mn++ in complexes in various preparations. The presence of calcium and magnesium in physiological concentrations in aqueous solutions induced the release of Mn++ from the complex, as did incubation of the complex in liver homogenates. After intravenous injection of 15 mumol/kg of Mn-DPDP, both EPR and 31P-NMR spectroscopy demonstrated that Mn-DPDP is partly dissociated (approximately 25%) in the liver. By comparing in vitro and ex vivo data from the liver, we concluded that the dissociation of Mn-DPDP occurs primarily in the liver, whereas a minor portion of the dissociated. Mn found in the liver comes from dissociation of the complex in the blood. Most of the dissociated Mn in liver becomes bound to macromolecules and is responsible for the enhancement of relaxivity observed with this agent.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver

Postcontrast images with a 0.1 mmol/kg dose of a gadolinium chelate with extracellular distribution, when acquired dynamically during breath holding, can improve both differential diagnosis and lesion recognition in liver MR imaging. Initial results at 0.3 mmol/kg, compared with 0.1 mmol/kg, suggest a substantial improvement in lesion identification at the high dose, as assessed by using signal intensity difference divided by noise. Of the gadolinium chelates with predominantly renal excretion, only gadoteridol is presently approved in the United States at the high dose, with limited clinical evaluation for liver imaging performed to date. For linear chelates, such as gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadodiamide injection, the degree to which release of free gadolinium ion occurs is a possible issue because of lower in vivo stability (42,43). Preliminary results with hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates and iron particulate agents are favorable with regard to efficacy, although these agents remain in clinical trials.