Evaluation of pressure-driven brain infusions in nonhuman primates by intra-operative 7 Tesla MRI

A comprehensive review on modeling aspects of infusion-based drug delivery in the brain

Brain disorders represent an ever-increasing health challenge worldwide. While conventional drug therapies are less effective due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier, infusion-based methods of drug delivery to the brain represent a promising option. Since these methods are mechanically controlled and involve multiple physical phases ranging from the neural and molecular scales to the brain scale, highly efficient and precise delivery procedures can significantly benefit from a comprehensive understanding of drug-brain and device-brain interactions. Behind these interactions are principles of biophysics and biomechanics that can be described and captured using mathematical models. Although biomechanics and biophysics have received considerable attention, a comprehensive mechanistic model for modeling infusion-based drug delivery in the brain has yet to be developed. Therefore, this article reviews the state-of-the-art mechanistic studies that can support the development of next-generation models for infusion-based brain drug delivery from the perspective of fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, and mathematical modeling. The supporting techniques and database are also summarized to provide further insights. Finally, the challenges are highlighted and perspectives on future research directions are provided. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the immense potential of infusion-based drug delivery methods for bypassing the blood-brain barrier and efficiently delivering drugs to the brain, achieving optimal drug distribution remains a significant challenge. This is primarily due to our limited understanding of the complex interactions between drugs and the brain that are governed by principles of biophysics and biomechanics, and can be described using mathematical models. This article provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art mechanistic studies that can help to unravel the mechanism of drug transport in the brain across the scales, which underpins the development of next-generation models for infusion-based brain drug delivery. More broadly, this review will serve as a starting point for developing more effective treatments for brain diseases and mechanistic models that can be used to study other soft tissue and biomaterials.

Insights into Infusion-Based Targeted Drug Delivery in the Brain: Perspectives, Challenges and Opportunities

Targeted drug delivery in the brain is instrumental in the treatment of lethal brain diseases, such as glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive primary central nervous system tumour in adults. Infusion-based drug delivery techniques, which directly administer to the tissue for local treatment, as in convection-enhanced delivery (CED), provide an important opportunity; however, poor understanding of the pressure-driven drug transport mechanisms in the brain has hindered its ultimate success in clinical applications. In this review, we focus on the biomechanical and biochemical aspects of infusion-based targeted drug delivery in the brain and look into the underlying molecular level mechanisms. We discuss recent advances and challenges in the complementary field of medical robotics and its use in targeted drug delivery in the brain. A critical overview of current research in these areas and their clinical implications is provided. This review delivers new ideas and perspectives for further studies of targeted drug delivery in the brain.

Delivery strategies for cell-based therapies in the brain: overcoming multiple barriers

Cell-based therapies to the brain are promising for the treatment of multiple brain disorders including neurodegeneration and cancers. In order to access the brain parenchyma, there are multiple physiological barriers that must be overcome depending on the route of delivery. Specifically, the blood-brain barrier has been a major difficulty in drug delivery for decades, and it still presents a challenge for the delivery of therapeutic cells. Other barriers, including the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier and lymphatic-brain barrier, are less explored, but may offer specific challenges or opportunities for therapeutic delivery. Here we discuss the barriers to the brain and the strategies currently in place to deliver cell-based therapies, including engineered T cells, dendritic cells, and stem cells, to treat diseases. With a particular focus on cancers, we also highlight the current ongoing clinical trials that use cell-based therapies to treat disease, many of which show promise at treating some of the deadliest illnesses.

Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model to estimate backflow during flow-controlled infusions into the brain

Convection-enhanced delivery is a technique to bypass the blood–brain barrier and deliver therapeutic drugs into the brain tissue. However, animal investigations and preliminary clinical trials have reported reduced efficacy to transport the infused drug in specific zones, attributed mainly to backflow, in which an annular gap is formed outside the catheter and the fluid preferentially flows toward the surface of the brain rather than through the tissue in front of the cannula tip. In this study, a three-dimensional human brain finite element model of backflow was developed to study the influence of anatomical structures during flow-controlled infusions. Predictions of backflow length were compared under the influence of ventricular pressure and the distance between the cannula and the ventricles. Simulations with zero relative ventricle pressure displayed similar backflow length predictions for larger cannula-ventricle distances. In addition, infusions near the ventricles revealed smaller backflow length and the liquid was observed to escape to the longitudinal fissure and ventricular cavities. Simulations with larger cannula-ventricle distances and nonzero relative ventricular pressure showed an increase of fluid flow through the tissue and away from the ventricles. These results reveal the importance of considering both the subject-specific anatomical details and the nonlinear effects in models focused on analyzing current and potential treatment options associated with convection-enhanced delivery optimization for future clinical trials.

Imaging of Convective Drug Delivery in the Nervous System

Convection-enhanced delivery permits the direct homogeneous delivery of small- and large-molecular-weight putative therapeutics to the nervous system in a manner that bypasses the blood-nervous system barrier. The development of co-infused surrogate imaging tracers (for computed tomography and MRI) allows for the real-time, noninvasive monitoring of infusate distribution during convective delivery. Real-time image monitoring of convective distribution of therapeutic agents insures that targeted structures/nervous system regions are adequately perfused, enhances safety, informs efficacy (or lack thereof) of putative agents, and provides critical information regarding the properties of convection-enhanced delivery in normal and various pathologic tissue states.

Convection-enhanced delivery to the central nervous system

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a bulk flow–driven process. Its properties permit direct, homogeneous, targeted perfusion of CNS regions with putative therapeutics while bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Development of surrogate imaging tracers that are co-infused during drug delivery now permit accurate, noninvasive real-time tracking of convective infusate flow in nervous system tissues. The potential advantages of CED in the CNS over other currently available drug delivery techniques, including systemic delivery, intrathecal and/or intraventricular distribution, and polymer implantation, have led to its application in research studies and clinical trials. The authors review the biophysical principles of convective flow and the technology, properties, and clinical applications of convective delivery in the CNS.

Convection Enhanced Delivery: A Comparison of infusion characteristics in ex vivo and in vivo non-human primate brain tissue

Background

Convection enhanced delivery (CED) is emerging as a promising infusion toolto facilitate delivery of therapeutic agents into the brain via mechanically controlled pumps. Infusion protocols and catheter design have an important impact on delivery. CED is a valid alternative for systemic administration of agents in clinical trials for cell and gene therapies. Where gel and ex vivo models are not sufficient in modeling the disease, in vivo models allow researchers to better understand the underlying mechanisms of neuron degeneration, which is helpful in finding novel approaches to control the process or reverse the progression. Determining the risks, benefits, and efficacy of new gene therapies introduced via CED will pave a way to enter human clinical trial.

Purpose

The objective of this study is to compare volume distribution (Vd)/ volume infused (Vi) ratios and backflow measurements following CED infusions in ex vivo versus in vivo non-human primate brain tissue, based on infusion protocols developed in vitro.

Methods

In ex vivo infusions, the first brain received 2 infusions using a balloon catheter at rates of 1 μL/min and 2 μL/min for 30 minutes. The second and third brains received infusions using a valve-tip (VT) catheter at 1 μL/min for 30 minutes. The fourth brain received a total of 45 μL infused at a rate of 1 μL/min for 15 minutes followed by 2 μL/min for 15 minutes. Imaging was performed (SPGR FA34) every 3 minutes. In the in vivo group, 4 subjects received a total of 8 infusions of 50 μL. Subjects 1 and 2 received infusions at 1.0 μL/min using a VT catheter in the left hemisphere and a smart-flow (SF) catheter in the right hemisphere. Subjects 3 and 4 each received 1 infusion in the left and right hemisphere at 1.0 μL/min.

Results

MRI calculations of Vd/Vi did not significantly differ from those obtained on post-mortem pathology. The mean measured Vd/Vi of in vivo (5.23 + /-1.67) compared to ex vivo (2.17 + /-1.39) demonstrated a significantly larger Vd/Vi for in vivo by 2.4 times (p = 0.0017).

Conclusion

We detected higher ratios in the in vivo subjects than in ex vivo. This difference could be explained by the extra cellular space volume fraction. Studies evaluating backflow and morphology use in vivo tissue as a medium are recommended. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate the role blood pressure and heart rate may play in human CED clinical trials.