Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in breast cancer and correlation with the prognostic factors

Do Habitat MRI and Fractal Analysis Help Distinguish Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From Non-Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma

Purpose: To determine whether multiparametric MRI-based spatial habitats and fractal analysis can help distinguish triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from non-TNBC. Method: Multiparametric DWI and DCE-MRI at 3T were obtained from 142 biopsy- and surgery-proven breast cancer with 148 breast lesions (TNBC = 26 and non-TNBC = 122). The contrast-enhancing lesions were divided into 3 spatial habitats based on perfusion and diffusion patterns using K-means clustering. The fractal dimension (FD) of the tumour subregions was calculated. The accuracy of the habitat segmentation was measured using the Dice index. Inter- and intra-reader reliability were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ability to predict TNBC status was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: The Dice index for the whole tumour was 0.81 for inter-reader and 0.88 for intra-reader reliability. The inter- and intra-reader reliability were excellent for all 3 tumour habitats and fractal features (ICC > 0.9). TNBC had a lower hypervascular cellular habitat and higher FD 1 compared to non-TNBC (all P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that hypervascular cellular habitat (OR = 0.88) and FD 1 (OR = 1.35) were independently associated with TNBC (all P < .001) after adjusting for rim enhancement, axillary lymph nodes status, and histological grade. The diagnostic model combining hypervascular cellular habitat and FD 1 showed excellent discriminatory ability for TNBC, with an AUC of 0.951 and an accuracy of 91.9%. Conclusions: The fraction of hypervascular cellular habitat and its FD may serve as useful imaging biomarkers for predicting TNBC status.

Discrimination between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers: a comparative study of four MRI diffusion models

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of conventional DWI, continuous-time random walk (CTRW), fractional order calculus (FROC), and stretched exponential model (SEM) in discriminating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

This prospective study included 158 women who underwent DWI, CTRW, FROC, and SEM and were pathologically categorized into the HER2-zero-expressing group (n = 10), HER2-low-expressing group (n = 86), and HER2-overexpressing group (n = 62). Nine diffusion parameters, namely ADC, αCTRW, βCTRW, DCTRW, βFROC, DFROC, μFROC, αSEM, and DDCSEM of the primary tumor, were derived from four diffusion models. These diffusion metrics and clinicopathologic features were compared between groups. Logistic regression was used to determine the optimal diffusion metrics and clinicopathologic variables for classifying the HER2-expressing statuses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate their discriminative ability.

RESULTS

The estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and tumor size differed between HER2-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing groups (p < 0.001 to p = 0.009). The αCTRW, DCTRW, βFROC, DFROC, μFROC, αSEM, and DDCSEM were significantly lower in HER2-low-expressing BCs than those in HER2-overexpressing BCs (p < 0.001 to p = 0.01). Further multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the αCTRW was the single best discriminative metric, with an area under the curve (AUC) being higher than that of ADC (0.802 vs. 0.610, p < 0.05); the addition of ER status, PR status, and tumor size to the αCTRW improved the AUC to 0.877.

CONCLUSIONS

The αCTRW could help discriminate the HER2-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing BCs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing breast cancer (BC) might also benefit from the HER2-targeted therapy. Prediction of HER2-low-expressing BC or HER2-overexpressing BC is crucial for appropriate management. Advanced continuous-time random walk diffusion MRI offers a solution to this clinical issue.

KEY POINTS

• Human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC had lower αCTRW, DCTRW, βFROC, DFROC, μFROC, αSEM, and DDCSEM values compared with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. • The αCTRW was the single best diffusion metric (AUC = 0.802) for discrimination between the HER2-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers. • The addition of αCTRW to the clinicopathologic features (estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and tumor size) further improved the discriminative ability.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Characterizing Changes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Assessment of treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) may guide individualized care for improved patient outcomes. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures tissue anisotropy and could be useful for characterizing changes in the tumors and adjacent fibroglandular tissue (FGT) of TNBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of DTI parameters for prediction of treatment response in TNBC patients undergoing NAST.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Eighty-six women (average age: 51 ± 11 years) with biopsy-proven clinical stage I-III TNBC who underwent NAST followed by definitive surgery. 47% of patients (40/86) had pathologic complete response (pCR).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T/reduced field of view single-shot echo-planar DTI sequence.

ASSESSMENT

Three MRI scans were acquired longitudinally (pre-treatment, after 2 cycles of NAST, and after 4 cycles of NAST). Eleven histogram features were extracted from DTI parameter maps of tumors, a peritumoral region (PTR), and FGT in the ipsilateral breast. DTI parameters included apparent diffusion coefficients and relative diffusion anisotropies. pCR status was determined at surgery.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Longitudinal changes of DTI features were tested for discrimination of pCR using Mann-Whitney U test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

47% of patients (40/86) had pCR. DTI parameters assessed after 2 and 4 cycles of NAST were significantly different between pCR and non-pCR patients when compared between tumors, PTRs, and FGTs. The median surface/average anisotropy of the PTR, measured after 2 and 4 cycles of NAST, increased in pCR patients and decreased in non-pCR patients (AUC: 0.78; 0.027 ± 0.043 vs. -0.017 ± 0.042 mm2 /s).

DATA CONCLUSION

Quantitative DTI features from breast tumors and the peritumoral tissue may be useful for predicting the response to NAST in TNBC.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Diffusion tensor imaging: survival analysis prediction in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the performance of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with invasive breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 49 women with invasive breast cancer who were diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 were included. All patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DTI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features, with examiners blinded to the clinical data. Volume anisotropy (VA), fractional anisotropy (FA), and ADC values were measured to assess intratumoral measured heterogeneity. Correlations and differences in diffusion metrics according to OS and DFS status of the cases were analyzed. The discriminative ability of the quantitative findings was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and validated in the independent cohort.

RESULTS

We evaluated patients with metastases (n = 13, 36.5%) and those without metastases (n = 36, 73.5%). Differences in the ADC, FA, and VA values were observed. The results of Cox regression survival analysis for all the patients included in the survival analysis revealed that DTI metrics contributed to the prediction of overall survival (OS) in the emerging models (p < 0.05). Both FA and VA were associated with OS (p = 0.037 and p = 0.038, respectively). However, ADC was not associated with OS (p = 0.177) or DFS (p = 0.252).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of DTI-MRI in breast cancer with statistical survival analysis techniques. We believe that DTI measurements can be used as a biomarker for OS analysis in breast cancer given the available data.

Noninvasive Prediction of Sperm Retrieval Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is the first-line treatment plan for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). However, studies reported that the overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) was 43% to 63% among men with NOA, implying that nearly half of the patients fail sperm retrieval. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in predicting SRR in patients with NOA. Seventy patients diagnosed with NOA were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the outcome of sperm retrieval during mTESE: success (29 patients) and failure (41 patients). Scrotal magnetic resonance imaging was performed, and the DTI parameters, including mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy, were analyzed between groups. The results showed that there was a significant difference in mean diffusivity values between the two groups, and the area under the curve for mean diffusivity was calculated as 0.865, with a sensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 97.5%. No statistically significant difference was observed in fractional anisotropy values and sex hormone levels between the two groups. This study demonstrated that the mean diffusivity value might serve as a useful noninvasive imaging marker for predicting the SRR of NOA patients undergoing mTESE.

Preoperative prediction of Ki-67 status in invasive breast carcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging

Background

The Ki-67 is a beneficial marker of tumor aggressiveness. It is proliferation index that has been used to distinguish luminal B from luminal A breast cancers. By fast progress in quantitative radiology modalities, tumor biology and genetics can be assessed in a more accurate, predictive, and cost-effective method. The aim of this study was to assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in prediction of Ki-67 status in patients with invasive breast carcinoma estimate cut off values between breast cancer with high Ki-67 status and those with low Ki-67 status.

Results

Cut off ADC (apparent diffusion co-efficient) value of 0.657 mm2/s had 96.4% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 93.8% accuracy in differentiating cases with high Ki67 from those with low Ki67. Cut off maximum enhancement value of 1715 had 96.4% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 93.8% accuracy in differentiating cases with high Ki67 from those with low Ki67. Cut off washout rate of 0.73 I/S had 60.7% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 62.5% accuracy in differentiating cases with high Ki67 from those with low Ki67. Cut off time to peak value of 304 had 71.4% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 71.9% accuracy in differentiating cases with high Ki67 from those with low Ki67.

Conclusions

ADC, time to peak and maximum enhancement values had high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in differentiating breast cancer with high Ki-67 status from those with low Ki-67 status.

A review of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging for breast cancer: Towards noninvasive biomarker

Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an important adjunct to conventional breast MRI and shows promise as a noninvasive biomarker of breast cancer in multiple clinical scenarios, from the discrimination of benign and malignant lesions, prediction, and evaluation of treatment response to a prognostic assessment of breast cancer. Various quantitative parameters are derived from different DWI models based on special prior knowledge and assumptions, have different meanings, and are easy to confuse. In this review, we describe the quantitative parameters derived from conventional and advanced DWI models commonly used in breast cancer and summarize the promising clinical applications of these quantitative parameters. Although promising, it is still challenging for these quantitative parameters to become clinically useful noninvasive biomarkers in breast cancer, as multiple factors may result in variations in quantitative parameter measurements. Finally, we briefly describe some considerations regarding the factors that cause variations.

Clinical utility of abbreviated breast MRI based on diffusion tensor imaging in patients underwent breast conservative therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the added value of the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters to abbreviated breast MRI protocol in differentiating recurrent breast cancer from post-operative changes in cases of breast conservative surgery (BCS).

METHODS

This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained in all patients. 47 female patients (mean age, 49 years; range, 32-66 years) that previously underwent breast conservative surgery with a palpable mass were included in this study (62 breast lesions). Two abbreviated MRI protocols were compared using 1.5 Tesla MRI, AB-MRI 1 (axial T1, T2, pre-contrast T1, 1st post-contrast and subtracted images) and AB-MRI 2 (same sequences plus adding DTI). In both protocols, the wash-in rate was calculated. Histopathology was used as the standard of reference. Appropriate statistical tests were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for each protocol.

RESULTS

The mean total acquisition time was of 6 min for AB-MRI 1 and 10 min for AB-MRI 2 protocols while the mean interpretation time was of 57.5 and 75 s, respectively. Among analyzed DTI parameters, MD (mean diffusivity) showed the highest sensitivity (96.43%) and specificity (91.18%) (P value =  < 0.001). FA (fractional anisotropy), AD (axial diffusivity) and RD (radial diffusivity) showed sensitivity = (78.57%, 82.14% and 85.71%), specificity = (88.24, 85.29% and 79.41%), respectively, P value (< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DTI may be included in abbreviated MRI protocols without a significant increase in acquisition time and with the advantage of increasing specificity and clinical utility in the characterization of post-conservative breast lesions.

The road to breast cancer screening with diffusion MRI

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women with a huge medical, social and economic impact. Mammography (MMG) has been the gold standard method until now because it is relatively inexpensive and widely available. However, MMG suffers from certain limitations, such as exposure to X-rays and difficulty of interpretation in dense breasts. Among other imaging methods, MRI has clearly the highest sensitivity and specificity, and breast MRI is the gold standard for the investigation and management of suspicious lesions revealed by MMG. Despite this performance, MRI, which does not rely on X-rays, is not used for screening except for a well-defined category of women at risk, because of its high cost and limited availability. In addition, the standard approach to breast MRI relies on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI with the injection of Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA), which have their own contraindications and can lead to deposit of gadolinium in tissues, including the brain, when examinations are repeated. On the other hand, diffusion MRI of breast, which provides information on tissue microstructure and tumor perfusion without the use of contrast agents, has been shown to offer higher specificity than DCE MRI with similar sensitivity, superior to MMG. Diffusion MRI thus appears to be a promising alternative approach to breast cancer screening, with the primary goal of eliminating with a very high probability the existence of a life-threatening lesion. To achieve this goal, it is first necessary to standardize the protocols for acquisition and analysis of diffusion MRI data, which have been found to vary largely in the literature. Second, the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of MRI examinations must be significantly improved, which may become possible with the development of dedicated low-field MRI units for breast cancer screening. In this article, we will first review the principles and current status of diffusion MRI, comparing its clinical performance with MMG and DCE MRI. We will then look at how breast diffusion MRI could be implemented and standardized to optimize accuracy of results. Finally, we will discuss how a dedicated, low-cost prototype of breast MRI system could be implemented and introduced to the healthcare market.

Prediction of local breast cancer recurrence after surgery: the added value of diffusion tensor imaging

Background

There is considerable overlap between benign postoperative changes and recurrent breast cancer imaging features in patients surgically treated for breast cancer. This study aims to evaluate the value of adding multiple diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters, including mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity, (AD), and relative anisotropy (RA) in differentiating breast cancer recurrence from postoperative changes in patients who were surgically treated for breast cancer and to also evaluate the role of these parameters in characterizing the different pathologies seen in the postoperative breast.

Results

This is a prospective study that was performed on female patients who were surgically treated for breast cancer. The study was done on 60 cases having 77 breast lesions. (Sixty-two of them were described as mass lesions and 15 of them were described as non-mass enhancement on MRI.) Among analyzed DTI parameters, MD showed the highest sensitivity (97.1%), specificity (88.1%), and accuracy (92.2%) in predicting recurrent breast cancer. FA, AD, and RD showed sensitivity (77.1%, 85.7%, and 88.6%) and specificity (83.3%, 83.3%, and 73.8%) in predicting recurrent breast cancer, respectively. The median MD values were lower in grade III recurrent breast cancers when compared to its values in recurrent grade II breast cancers and recurrent DCIS (0.6 × 10–3 mm2/s vs. 0.8 × 10–3 mm2/s and 0.9 × 10–3 mm2/s), respectively. FA also showed median values in grade III recurrent breast cancer higher than its values in grade II recurrent breast cancer and recurrent DCIS (0.6 vs. 0.5 and 0.39), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, F1 score, and MCC of DCE-MRI alone versus DCE-MRI plus combined DTI parameters were 88.6% versus 100%, 88.1% versus 90.5%, 86.1% versus 89.7%, 90.2% versus 100%, 88.3% versus 94.6%, 87.3% versus 94.6%, and 76.5% versus 90.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

DTI may play an important role as a complementary method to discriminate recurrent breast cancer from postoperative changes in patients surgically treated for previous breast cancer.

Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An Overview of Recent Findings and Perspectives

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women and the leading cause of death. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures that are widely used in the diagnostic and treatment evaluation of breast cancer. This review article describes the characteristics of new MRI methods and reviews recent findings on breast cancer diagnosis. This review study was performed on the literature sourced from scientific citation websites such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science until July 2021. All relevant works published on the mentioned scientific citation websites were investigated. Because of the propensity of malignancies to limit diffusion, DWI can improve MRI diagnostic specificity. Diffusion tensor imaging gives additional information about diffusion directionality and anisotropy over traditional DWI. Recent findings showed that DWI and DTI and their characteristics may facilitate earlier and more accurate diagnosis, followed by better treatment. Overall, with the development of instruments and novel MRI modalities, it may be possible to diagnose breast cancer more effectively in the early stages.

Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques

The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.

Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality for breast cancer detection. This systematic review investigated the role of quantitative MRI features in classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer. We performed a literature search of articles published on the application of quantitative MRI features in invasive breast cancer molecular subtype classification in PubMed from 1 January 2002 to 30 September 2021. Of the 1275 studies identified, 106 studies with a total of 12,989 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Bias was assessed based using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies. All studies were case-controlled and research-based. Most studies assessed quantitative MRI features using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) kinetic features and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We present a summary of the quantitative MRI features and their correlations with breast cancer subtypes. In DCE studies, conflicting results have been reported; therefore, we performed a meta-analysis. Significant differences in the time intensity curve patterns were observed between receptor statuses. In 10 studies, including a total of 1276 lesions, the pooled difference in proportions of type Ⅲ curves (wash-out) between oestrogen receptor-positive and -negative cancers was not significant (95% confidence interval (CI): [−0.10, 0.03]). In nine studies, including a total of 1070 lesions, the pooled difference in proportions of type 3 curves between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and -negative cancers was significant (95% CI: [0.01, 0.14]). In six studies including a total of 622 lesions, the pooled difference in proportions of type 3 curves between the high and low Ki-67 groups was significant (95% CI: [0.17, 0.44]). However, the type 3 curve itself is a nonspecific finding in breast cancer. Many studies have examined the relationship between mean ADC and breast cancer subtypes; however, the ADC values overlapped significantly between subtypes. The heterogeneity of ADC using kurtosis or difference, diffusion tensor imaging parameters, and relaxation time was reported recently with promising results; however, current evidence is limited, and further studies are required to explore these potential applications.

Clinical experience of tensor-valued diffusion encoding for microstructure imaging by diffusional variance decomposition in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging plays a key role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of breast tumors. However, it remains unclear how to interpret single diffusion encoding with respect to its link with tissue microstructure. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to use tensor-valued diffusion encoding to investigate the underlying microstructure of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and evaluate its potential value in a clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI examination from July 2020 to March 2021. We reviewed the MRI of 29 patients with 30 IDCs, including analysis by diffusional variance decomposition enabled by tensor-valued diffusion encoding. The diffusion parameters of mean diffusivity (MD), total mean kurtosis (MKT), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MKA), isotropic mean kurtosis (MKI), macroscopic fractional anisotropy (FA), and microscopic fractional anisotropy (µFA) were estimated. The parameter differences were compared between IDC and normal fibroglandular breast tissue (FGBT), as well as the association between the diffusion parameters and histopathologic items.

RESULTS

The mean value of MD in IDCs was significantly lower than that of normal FGBT (1.07±0.27 vs. 1.34±0.29, P<0.001); however, MKT, MKA, MKI, FA, and µFA were significantly higher (P<0.005). Among all the diffusion parameters, MKI was positively correlated with the tumor size on both MRI and pathological specimen (rs=0.38, P<0.05 vs. rs=0.54, P<0.01), whereas MKT had a positive correlation with the tumor size in the pathological specimen only (rs=0.47, P<0.02). In addition, the lymph node (LN) metastasis group had significantly higher MKT, MKA, and µFA compared to the metastasis negative group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tensor-valued diffusion encoding enables a useful non-invasive method for characterizing breast cancers with information on tissue microstructures. Particularly, µFA could be a potential imaging biomarker for evaluating breast cancers prior to surgery or chemotherapy.

Quantitative Parameters of Diffusion Spectrum Imaging: HER2 Status Prediction in Patients With Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) in preoperatively predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 114 and 56 female patients with invasive ductal carcinoma were consecutively included in a derivation cohort and an independent validation cohort, respectively. Each patient was categorized into HER2-positive or HER2-negative groups based on the pathologic result. All patients underwent DSI and conventional MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The tumor size, type of the time-signal intensity curve (TIC) from DCE-MRI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, and quantitative parameters derived from DSI, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) of primary tumors, were measured and compared between the HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups in the derivation cohort. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential independent predictors of HER2 status. The discriminative ability of quantitative parameters was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and validated in the independent cohort.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, the tumor size, TIC type, and ADC values did not differ between the HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups (p = 0.126-0.961). DSI quantitative parameters including axial kurtosis of DKI (DKI_AK), non-Gaussianity (MAP_NG), axial non-Gaussianity (MAP_NGAx), radial non-Gaussianity (MAP_NGRad), return-to-origin probability (MAP_RTOP), return-to-axis probability of MAP (MAP_RTAP), and intracellular volume fraction of NODDI (NODDI_ICVF) were lower in the HER2-positive group than in the HER2-negative group (p ≤ 0.001-0.035). DSI quantitative parameters including radial diffusivity (DTI_RD), mean diffusivity of DTI (DTI_MD), mean squared diffusion (MAP_MSD), and q-space inverse variance of MAP (MAP_QIV) were higher in the HER2-positive group than in the HER2-negative group (p = 0.016-0.049). The ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of ADC was 0.632 and 0.568, respectively, in the derivation and validation cohorts. The AUC values of DSI quantitative parameters ranged from 0.628 to 0.700 and from 0.673 to 0.721, respectively, in the derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression analysis showed that only NODDI_ICVF was an independent predictor of HER2 status (p = 0.001), with an AUC of 0.700 and 0.721, respectively, in the derivation and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

DSI could be helpful for preoperative prediction of HER2, but DSI alone may not be sufficient in predicting HER2 status preoperatively in patients with breast cancer.

Diffusion tensor imaging of oral carcinoma: Clinical evaluation and comparison with histopathological findings

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as a noninvasive method for the evaluation of histological grade and lymph node metastasis in patients with oral carcinoma (OC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with histologically confirmed OC underwent examination by 3-T MRI. DTI was performed using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence with b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² and motion-probing gradients in 12 noncollinear directions. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) maps were compared with histopathological findings. The DTI parameters were correlated with the histological grade of the OCs based on the World Health Organization grading criteria and the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

The FA values (0.275 ± 0.058) of OC were significantly lower than those of normal tongue, muscle, and parotid glands (P < 0.001 for all), and the MD, AD, and RD values (1.220 ± 0.149, 1.434 ± 0.172, and 1.019 ± 0.165 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively) were significantly higher than their respective normal values (P < 0.001 for all). Significant inverse correlations with histological grades were shown for FA, MD, AD, and RD values in OC patients (r = -0.862, r = -0.797, r = -0.747, and r = -0.844, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). In addition, there was a significant difference in the FA values of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes (0.186 vs. 0.276), MD (0.923 vs. 1.242 × 10^-3 mm²/s), AD (1.246 vs. 1.621 × 10^-3 mm²/s), and RD (0.792 vs. 1.100 × 10^-3 mm²/s; P < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

DTI may be clinically useful for the noninvasive evaluation of histological grade and lymph node metastasis in OC patients.

Diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a new horizon for characterisation of suspicious breast lesions

AIM

To investigate the value of new diffusion-weighted imaging applications in the characterisation of suspicious breast lesions with emphasis on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and fibre tractography (FT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present prospective study included 40 female patients with suspicious breast lesions according to sono-mammography American College of Radiologists' classification. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), DTI, and FT after meeting the inclusion criteria. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was performed as the reference standard for radiological evaluation. The study was conducted between August 2018 and January 2019. The final diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically.

RESULTS

Malignant lesions were diagnosed in 32/40 (80%) patients and 8/40 (20%) patients had benign lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of malignant lesions were statistically lower than that of benign lesions (p<0.001) using a cut-off value of 0.99±0.07×10^-3 mm²/s. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values were lower in malignant lesions than in benign lesions with a cut-off value for malignancy of 0.19±0.05 and were statistically significant (p<0.005). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of combined DTI and FT were similar to DCE MRI (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

DTI and FT are new applications of DWI. They show promising results for the evaluation of suspicious breast masses and can distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions with statistical significance approaching contrast-enhanced MRI, which is considered the imaging reference standard for characterising breast lesions.

Diffusion tensor imaging of rectal carcinoma: Clinical evaluation and its correlation with histopathological findings

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess the feasibility of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to noninvasively evaluate histological grade and lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma (RC).

METHODS

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with histologically confirmed RC were examined by 1.5-T MRI. DTI was performed using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence with b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² and motion-probing gradients in nine noncollinear directions. Fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD) maps were compared with histopathological findings.

RESULTS

The FA values (0.357 ± 0.047) of the RCs were significantly lower than those of the normal rectal wall, muscle, prostate, and uterus (P < 0.001 for all), while the AD, MD, and RD values (1.221 ± 0.131, 0.804 ± 0.075, and 0.667 ± 0.057 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively) were also significantly lower than their respective normal values (P < 0.001 for all). The FA, AD, MD, and RD values for RC additionally showed significant inverse correlations with histological grades (r = -0.781, r = -0.750, r = -0.718, and r = -0.682, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). Further, the FA (0.430 vs. 0.611), AD (1.246 vs. 1.608 × 10^-3 mm²/s), MD (0.776 vs. 1.036 × 10^-3 mm²/s), and RD (0.651 vs. 0.824 × 10^-3 mm²/s) (P < 0.001 for all) of the metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

DTI may be clinically useful for the noninvasive evaluation of histological grade and lymph node metastasis in patients with RC.

Current and Emerging Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, and early detection remains a principal factor for improved patient outcomes and reduced mortality. Clinically, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are routinely used in determining benign and malignant tumor phenotypes and for monitoring treatment outcomes. Static MRI techniques enable superior structural contrast between adipose and fibroglandular tissues, while dynamic MRI techniques can elucidate functional characteristics of malignant tumors. The preferred clinical procedure-dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-illuminates the hypervascularity of breast tumors through a gadolinium-based contrast agent; however, accumulation of the potentially toxic contrast agent remains a major limitation of the technique, propelling MRI research toward finding an alternative, noninvasive method. Three such techniques are magnetic resonance spectroscopy, chemical exchange saturation transfer, and non-contrast diffusion weighted imaging. These methods shed light on underlying chemical composition, provide snapshots of tissue metabolism, and more pronouncedly characterize microstructural heterogeneity. This review article outlines the present state of clinical MRI for breast cancer and examines several research techniques that demonstrate capacity for clinical translation. Ultimately, multi-parametric MRI-incorporating one or more of these emerging methods-presently holds the best potential to afford improved specificity and deliver excellent accuracy to clinics for the prediction, detection, and monitoring of breast cancer.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group

The European Society of Breast Radiology (EUSOBI) established an International Breast DWI working group. The working group consists of clinical breast MRI experts, MRI physicists, and representatives from large vendors of MRI equipment, invited based upon proven expertise in breast MRI and/or in particular breast DWI, representing 25 sites from 16 countries. The aims of the working group are (a) to promote the use of breast DWI into clinical practice by issuing consensus statements and initiate collaborative research where appropriate; (b) to define necessary standards and provide practical guidance for clinical application of breast DWI; (c) to develop a standardized and translatable multisite multivendor quality assurance protocol, especially for multisite research studies; (d) to find consensus on optimal methods for image processing/analysis, visualization, and interpretation; and (e) to work collaboratively with system vendors to improve breast DWI sequences. First consensus recommendations, presented in this paper, include acquisition parameters for standard breast DWI sequences including specifications of b values, fat saturation, spatial resolution, and repetition and echo times. To describe lesions in an objective way, levels of diffusion restriction/hindrance in the breast have been defined based on the published literature on breast DWI. The use of a small ROI placed on the darkest part of the lesion on the ADC map, avoiding necrotic, noisy or non-enhancing lesion voxels is currently recommended. The working group emphasizes the need for standardization and quality assurance before ADC thresholds are applied. The working group encourages further research in advanced diffusion techniques and tailored DWI strategies for specific indications.

Key Points

• The working group considers breast DWI an essential part of a multiparametric breast MRI protocol and encourages its use.

• Basic requirements for routine clinical application of breast DWI are provided, including recommendations on b values, fat saturation, spatial resolution, and other sequence parameters.

• Diffusion levels in breast lesions are defined based on meta-analysis data and methods to obtain a reliable ADC value are detailed.

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Characterizing Breast Tumors: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Rationale and Objectives: Controversy still exists on the diagnosability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for breast lesions characterization across published studies. The clinical guideline of DTI used in the breast has not been established. This meta-analysis aims to pool relevant evidences and evaluate the diagnostic performance of DTI in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions.

Materials and Methods: The studies that assessed the diagnostic performance of DTI parameters in the breast were searched in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library between January 2010 and September 2019. Standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and three diffusion eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3) were calculated using Review Manager 5.2. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated with a bivariate model. Publication bias and heterogeneity between studies were also assessed using Stata 12.0.

Results: Sixteen eligible studies incorporating 1,636 patients were included. The standardized mean differences indicated that breast cancers had a significantly higher FA but lower MD, λ1, λ2, and λ3 than those of benign lesions (all P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) had a significantly lower MD value than that of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (P = 0.02). λ1 showed the best diagnostic accuracy with pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 93%, 92%, and 0.97, followed by MD (AUC = 0.92, sensitivity = 87%, specificity = 83%) and FA (AUC = 0.76, sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 70%) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Conclusion: DTI with multiple quantitative parameters was adequate to differentiate breast cancers from benign lesions based on their biological characteristics. MD can further distinguish IBC from DCIS. The parameters, especially λ1 and MD, should attract our attention in clinical practice.

Application of in vivo MR methods in the study of breast cancer metabolism

In the last two decades, various in vivo MR methodologies have been evaluated for their potential in the study of cancer metabolism. During malignant transformation, metabolic alterations occur, leading to morphological and functional changes. Among various MR methods, in vivo MRS has been extensively used in breast cancer to study the metabolism of cells, tissues or whole organs. It provides biochemical information at the metabolite level. Altered choline, phospholipid and energy metabolism has been documented using proton (¹ H), phosphorus (³¹ P) and carbon (¹³ C) isotopes. Increased levels of choline-containing compounds, phosphomonoesters and phosphodiesters in breast cancer, which are indicative of altered choline and phospholipid metabolism, have been reported using in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo NMR studies. These changes are reversed on successful therapy, which depends on the treatment regimen given. Monitoring the various tumor intermediary metabolic pathways using nuclear spin hyperpolarization of ¹³ C-labeled substrates by dynamic nuclear polarization has also been recently reported. Furthermore, the utility of various methods such as diffusion, dynamic contrast and perfusion MRI have also been evaluated to study breast tumor metabolism. Parameters such as tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient, volume transfer coefficient and extracellular volume ratio are estimated. These parameters provide information on the changes in tumor microstructure, microenvironment, abnormal vasculature, permeability and grade of the tumor. Such changes seen during cancer progression are due to alterations in the tumor metabolism, leading to changes in cell architecture. Due to architectural changes, the tissue mechanical properties are altered; this can be studied using magnetic resonance elastography, which measures the elastic properties of tissues. Moreover, these structural MRI methods can be used to investigate the effect of therapy-induced changes in tumor characteristics. This review discusses the potential of various in vivo MR methodologies in the study of breast cancer metabolism.

Diffusion MRI of the breast: Current status and future directions

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly being incorporated into routine breast MRI protocols in many institutions worldwide, and there are abundant breast DWI indications ranging from lesion detection and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors to assessing prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer and predicting treatment response. DWI has the potential to serve as a noncontrast MR screening method. Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, which is a commonly used quantitative DWI measure, advanced DWI models such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), non-Gaussian diffusion MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are extensively exploited in this field, allowing the characterization of tissue perfusion and architecture and improving diagnostic accuracy without the use of contrast agents. This review will give a summary of the clinical literature along with future directions. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:70-90.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to compare dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping as a stand-alone parameter without any other supportive sequence for breast cancer detection and to assess its combination as multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved single-center study, prospectively acquired data of 106 patients who underwent breast MRI from 12/2010 to 09/2014 for an imaging abnormality (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 0, 4/5) were retrospectively analyzed. Four readers independently assessed DWI and DCE as well as combined as mpMRI. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories, lesion size, and mean apparent diffusion coefficient values were recorded. Histopathology was used as the gold standard. Appropriate statistical tests were used to compare diagnostic values.

RESULTS

There were 69 malignant and 41 benign tumors in 106 patients. Four patients presented with bilateral lesions. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was the most sensitive test for breast cancer detection, with an average sensitivity of 100%. Diffusion-weighted imaging alone was less sensitive (82%; P < 0.001) but more specific than DCE-MRI (86.8% vs 76.6%; P = 0.002). Diagnostic accuracy was 83.7% for DWI and 90.6% for DCE-MRI. Multiparametric MRI achieved a sensitivity of 96.8%, not statistically different from DCE-MRI (P = 0.12) and with a similar specificity as DWI (83.8%; P = 0.195), maximizing diagnostic accuracy to 91.9%. There was almost perfect interreader agreement for DWI (κ = 0.864) and DCE-MRI (κ = 0.875) for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is most sensitive for breast cancer detection and thus still indispensable. Multiparametric MRI using DCE-MRI and DWI maintains a high sensitivity, increases specificity, and maximizes diagnostic accuracy, often preventing unnecessary breast biopsies. Diffusion-weighted imaging should not be used as a stand-alone parameter because it detects significantly fewer cancers in comparison with DCE-MRI and mpMRI.

A Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for Breast Lesion Characterization

Background Various techniques are available to assess diffusion properties of breast lesions as a marker of malignancy at MRI. The diagnostic performance of these diffusion markers has not been comprehensively assessed. Purpose To compare by meta-analysis the diagnostic performance of parameters from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions. Materials and Methods PubMed and Embase databases were searched from January to March 2018 for studies in English that assessed the diagnostic performance of DWI, DTI, and IVIM in the breast. Studies were reviewed according to eligibility and exclusion criteria. Publication bias and heterogeneity between studies were assessed. Pooled summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were obtained for each parameter by using a bivariate model. A subanalysis investigated the effect of MRI parameters on diagnostic performance by using a Student t test or a one-way analysis of variance. Results From 73 eligible studies, 6791 lesions (3930 malignant and 2861 benign) were included. Publication bias was evident for studies that evaluated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Significant heterogeneity (P < .05) was present for all parameters except the perfusion fraction (f). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for ADC was 89%, 82%, and 0.92, respectively. The highest performing parameter for DTI was the prime diffusion coefficient (λ1), and pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve was 93%, 90%, and 0.94, respectively. The highest performing parameter for IVIM was tissue diffusivity (D), and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve was 88%, 79%, and 0.90. Choice of MRI parameters had no significant effect on diagnostic performance. Conclusion Diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging, and intravoxel incoherent motion have comparable diagnostic accuracy with high sensitivity and specificity. Intravoxel incoherent motion is comparable to apparent diffusion coefficient. Diffusion-tensor imaging is potentially promising but to date the number of studies is limited. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Diffusion tensor imaging parameters in differentiation recurrent breast cancer from post-operative changes in patients with breast-conserving surgery

AIM OF THE WORK

To investigate mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as complementary tools to differentiate recurrent breast cancer from post-operative changes in patients with breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study was conducted upon 30 patients with BCS that underwent DTI and dynamic contrast MR imaging. DTI was performed using an axial two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence. The MD and FA of the lesions were calculated by 2 observers. A single pixel seed isotropic region of interest was placed in the solid part of the tumor on the axial color FA map guided by an enhanced part of the tumor. The final diagnosis was done by biopsy for all patients.

RESULTS

/s) used for differentiation between entities revealed sensitivity (76.9%, 92.3%), specificity (82.4%, 64.7%) and accuracy (80%, 76.7%) of both observers respectively. At ROC curve analysis of FA, the AUC was 0.82 and 0.75 by both observers. The threshold FA (0.82, 0.75) was used for differentiation between entities revealed sensitivity (92.3%, 76.9%), specificity (70.6%, 70.6%) and accuracy of (80.0%, 73.3%) of both observers respectively. There was a strong positive correlation of MD (r = 0.86) and FA (r = 0.73) of both observers. Combined analysis of FA and MD used for differentiation between entities had AUC (0.90, 0.88) revealed sensitivity (92.3%, 92.3%), specificity (82.4%, 70.6%) and accuracy of (86.7%, 80.0%) for both observers respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined analysis of MD and FA of DTI may play an important role as a non-invasive method for differentiation recurrent breast cancer from post-operative changes in patients with BCS.

Monitoring In-Vivo the Mammary Gland Microstructure during Morphogenesis from Lactation to Post-Weaning Using Diffusion Tensor MRI

Lactation and the return to the pre-conception state during post-weaning are regulated by hormonal induced processes that modify the microstructure of the mammary gland, leading to changes in the features of the ductal / glandular tissue, the stroma and the fat tissue. These changes create a challenge in the radiological workup of breast disorder during lactation and early post-weaning. Here we present non-invasive MRI protocols designed to record in vivo high spatial resolution, T₂-weighted images and diffusion tensor images of the entire mammary gland. Advanced imaging processing tools enabled tracking the changes in the anatomical and microstructural features of the mammary gland from the time of lactation to post-weaning. Specifically, by using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) it was possible to quantitatively distinguish between the ductal / glandular tissue distention during lactation and the post-weaning involution. The application of the T₂-weighted imaging and DTI is completely safe, non-invasive and uses intrinsic contrast based on differences in transverse relaxation rates and water diffusion rates in various directions, respectively. This study provides a basis for further in-vivo monitoring of changes during the mammary developmental stages, as well as identifying changes due to malignant transformation in patients with pregnancy associated breast cancer (PABC).