Simultaneous Mapping of T1 and T2 Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting in a Cohort of Healthy Subjects at 1.5T

Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D-MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases

PURPOSE

Quantitative MRI techniques such as MR fingerprinting (MRF) promise more objective and comparable measurements of tissue properties at the point-of-care than weighted imaging. However, few direct cross-modal comparisons of MRF's repeatability and reproducibility versus weighted acquisitions have been performed. This work proposes a novel fully automated pipeline for quantitatively comparing cross-modal imaging performance in vivo via atlas-based sampling.

METHODS

We acquire whole-brain 3D-MRF, turbo spin echo, and MPRAGE sequences three times each on two scanners across 10 subjects, for a total of 60 multimodal datasets. The proposed automated registration and analysis pipeline uses linear and nonlinear registration to align all qualitative and quantitative DICOM stacks to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) 152 space, then samples each dataset's native space through transformation inversion to compare performance within atlas regions across subjects, scanners, and repetitions.

RESULTS

Voxel values within MRF-derived maps were found to be more repeatable (σT1  = 1.90, σT2  = 3.20) across sessions than vendor-reconstructed MPRAGE (σT1w  = 6.04) or turbo spin echo (σT2w  = 5.66) images. Additionally, MRF was found to be more reproducible across scanners (σT1  = 2.21, σT2  = 3.89) than either qualitative modality (σT1w  = 7.84, σT2w  = 7.76). Notably, differences between repeatability and reproducibility of in vivo MRF were insignificant, unlike the weighted images.

CONCLUSION

MRF data from many sessions and scanners can potentially be treated as a single dataset for harmonized analysis or longitudinal comparisons without the additional regularization steps needed for qualitative modalities.

Deep image prior cine MR fingerprinting with B1 + spin history correction

PURPOSE

To develop a deep image prior (DIP) reconstruction for B1 + -corrected 2D cine MR fingerprinting (MRF).

METHODS

The proposed method combines low-rank (LR) modeling with a DIP to generate cardiac phase-resolved parameter maps without motion correction, employing self-supervised training to enforce consistency with undersampled spiral k-space data. Two implementations were tested: one approach (DIP) for cine T1 , T2 , and M0 mapping, and a second approach (DIP with effective B1 + estimation [DIP-B1]) that also generated an effective B1 + map to correct for errors due to RF transmit inhomogeneities, through-plane motion, and blood flow. Cine MRF data were acquired in 14 healthy subjects and four reconstructions were compared: LR, low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC), DIP, and DIP-B1. Results were compared to diastolic ECG-triggered MRF, MOLLI, and T2 -prep bSSFP. Additionally, bright-blood and dark-blood images calculated from cine MRF maps were used to quantify ventricular function and compared to reference cine measurements.

RESULTS

DIP and DIP-B1 outperformed other cine MRF reconstructions with improved noise suppression and delineation of high-resolution details. Within-segment variability in the myocardium (reported as the coefficient of variation for T1 /T2 ) was lowest for DIP-B1 (2.3/8.3%) followed by DIP (2.7/8.7%), LRMC (3.5/10.5%), and LR (15.3/39.6%). Spatial homogeneity improved with DIP-B1 having the lowest intersegment variability (2.6/4.1%). The mean bias in ejection fraction was -1.1% compared to reference cine scans.

CONCLUSION

A DIP reconstruction for 2D cine MRF enabled cardiac phase-resolved mapping of T1 , T2 , M0 , and the effective B1 + with improved noise suppression and precision compared to LR and LRMC.

Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stands as a vital medical imaging technique, renowned for its ability to offer high-resolution images of the human body with remarkable soft-tissue contrast. This enables healthcare professionals to gain valuable insights into various aspects of the human body, including morphology, structural integrity, and physiological processes. Quantitative imaging provides compositional measurements of the human body, but, currently, either it takes a long scan time or is limited to low spatial resolutions. Undersampled k-space data acquisitions have significantly helped to reduce MRI scan time, while compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) reconstructions have mitigated the associated undersampling artifacts. Alternatively, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) provides an efficient and versatile framework to acquire and quantify multiple tissue properties simultaneously from a single fast MRI scan. The MRF framework involves four key aspects: (1) pulse sequence design; (2) rapid (undersampled) data acquisition; (3) encoding of tissue properties in MR signal evolutions or fingerprints; and (4) simultaneous recovery of multiple quantitative spatial maps. This paper provides an extensive literature review of the MRF framework, addressing the trends associated with these four key aspects. There are specific challenges in MRF for all ranges of magnetic field strengths and all body parts, which can present opportunities for further investigation. We aim to review the best practices in each key aspect of MRF, as well as for different applications, such as cardiac, brain, and musculoskeletal imaging, among others. A comprehensive review of these applications will enable us to assess future trends and their implications for the translation of MRF into these biomedical imaging applications.

The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1)

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the "all-in-one" approaches, and Part 2 the "real-time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.

Synthetic multi-contrast late gadolinium enhancement imaging using post-contrast magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is the non-invasive reference standard for identifying myocardial scar and fibrosis but has limitations, including difficulty delineating subendocardial scar and operator dependence on image quality. The purpose of this work is to assess the feasibility of generating multi-contrast synthetic LGE images from post-contrast T1 and T2 maps acquired using magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). Fifteen consecutive patients with a history of prior ischemic cardiomyopathy (12 men; mean age 63  ±  13 years) were prospectively scanned at 1.5 T between Oct 2020 and May 2021 using conventional LGE and MRF after injection of gadolinium contrast. Three classes of synthetic LGE images were derived from MRF post-contrast T1 and T2 maps: bright-blood phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), black- and gray-blood T2 -prepared PSIR (T2 -PSIR), and a novel "tissue-optimized" image to enhance differentiation among scar, viable myocardium, and blood. Image quality was assessed on a 1-5 Likert scale by two cardiologists, and contrast was quantified as the mean absolute difference (MAD) in pixel intensities between two tissues, with different methods compared using Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni post hoc tests. Per-patient and per-segment scar detection rates were evaluated using conventional LGE images as reference. Image quality scores were highest for synthetic PSIR (4.0) and reference images (3.8), followed by synthetic tissue-optimized (3.3), gray-blood T2 -PSIR (3.0), and black-blood T2 -PSIR (2.6). Among synthetic images, PSIR yielded the highest myocardium/scar contrast (MAD = 0.42) but the lowest blood/scar contrast (MAD = 0.05), and vice versa for T2 -PSIR, while tissue-optimized images achieved a balance among all tissues (myocardium/scar MAD = 0.16, blood/scar MAD = 0.26, myocardium/blood MAD = 0.10). Based on reference mid-ventricular LGE scans, 13/15 patients had myocardial scar. The per-patient sensitivity/accuracy for synthetic images were the following: PSIR, 85/87%; black-blood T2 -PSIR, 62/53%; gray-blood T2 -PSIR, 100/93%; tissue optimized, 100/93%. Synthetic multi-contrast LGE images can be generated from post-contrast MRF data without additional scan time, with initial feasibility shown in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Overview, Technical Developments, and Applications

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an established imaging modality with proven utility in assessing cardiovascular diseases. The ability of CMR to characterize myocardial tissue using T1 - and T2 -weighted imaging, parametric mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement has allowed for the non-invasive identification of specific pathologies not previously possible with modalities like echocardiography. However, CMR examinations are lengthy and technically complex, requiring multiple pulse sequences and different anatomical planes to comprehensively assess myocardial structure, function, and tissue composition. To increase the overall impact of this modality, there is a need to simplify and shorten CMR exams to improve access and efficiency, while also providing reproducible quantitative measurements. Multiparametric MRI techniques that measure multiple tissue properties offer one potential solution to this problem. This review provides an in-depth look at one such multiparametric approach, cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). The article is structured as follows. First, a brief review of single-parametric and (non-Fingerprinting) multiparametric CMR mapping techniques is presented. Second, a general overview of cardiac MRF is provided covering pulse sequence implementation, dictionary generation, fast k-space sampling methods, and pattern recognition. Third, recent technical advances in cardiac MRF are covered spanning a variety of topics, including simultaneous multislice and 3D sampling, motion correction algorithms, cine MRF, synthetic multicontrast imaging, extensions to measure additional clinically important tissue properties (proton density fat fraction, T2 *, and T1ρ ), and deep learning methods for image reconstruction and parameter estimation. The last section will discuss potential clinical applications, concluding with a perspective on how multiparametric techniques like MRF may enable streamlined CMR protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: A Review of Clinical Applications

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an approach to quantitative magnetic resonance imaging that allows for efficient simultaneous measurements of multiple tissue properties, which are then used to create accurate and reproducible quantitative maps of these properties. As the technique has gained popularity, the extent of preclinical and clinical applications has vastly increased. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of currently investigated preclinical and clinical applications of MRF, as well as future directions. Topics covered include MRF in neuroimaging, neurovascular, prostate, liver, kidney, breast, abdominal quantitative imaging, cardiac, and musculoskeletal applications.

Assessment of MRF for simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification and water-fat separation in the liver at 0.55 T

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work was to assess the feasibility of performing MRF in the liver on a 0.55 T scanner and to examine the feasibility of water-fat separation using rosette MRF at 0.55 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Spiral and rosette MRF sequences were implemented on a commercial 0.55 T scanner. The accuracy of both sequences in T1 and T2 quantification was validated in the ISMRM/NIST system phantom. The efficacy of rosette MRF in water-fat separation was evaluated in simulations and water/oil phantoms. Both spiral and rosette MRF were performed in the liver of healthy subjects.

RESULTS

In the ISMRM/NIST phantom, both spiral and rosette MRF achieved good agreement with reference values in T1 and T2 measurements. In addition, rosette MRF enables water-fat separation and can generate water- and fat- specific T1 maps, T2 maps, and proton density images from the same dataset for a spatial resolution of 1.56 × 1.56 × 5mm3 within the acquisition time of 15 s.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to measure T1 and T2 simultaneously in the liver using MRF on a 0.55 T system with lower performance gradients compared to state-of-the-art 1.5 T and 3 T systems within an acquisition time of 15 s. In addition, rosette MRF enables water-fat separation along with T1 and T2 quantification with no time penalty.

Comparing Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) and the MAGiC Sequence for Simultaneous T1 and T2 Quantitative Measurements in the Female Pelvis: A Prospective Study

The aim of this study was to explore the potential of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), an emerging quantitative MRI technique, in measuring relaxation values of female pelvic tissues compared to the conventional magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC) sequence. The study included 32 female patients who underwent routine pelvic MRI exams using anterior and posterior array coils on a 3T clinical scanner. Our findings demonstrated significant correlations between MRF and MAGiC measured T1 and T2 values (p < 0.0001) for various pelvic tissues, including ilium, femoral head, gluteus, obturator, iliopsoas, erector spinae, uterus, cervix, and cutaneous fat. The tissue contrasts generated from conventional MRI and synthetic MRF also showed agreement in bone, muscle, and uterus for both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. This study highlights the strengths of MRF in providing simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping. MRF offers distinct tissue contrast and has the potential for accurate diagnosis of female pelvic diseases, including tumors, fibroids, endometriosis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Additionally, MRF shows promise in monitoring disease progression or treatment response. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of MRF in the field of female pelvic organ imaging and suggests that it could be a valuable addition to the clinical practice of pelvic MRI exams. Further research is needed to establish the clinical utility of MRF and to develop standardized protocols for its implementation in clinical practice.

Quantitative MRI in cardiometabolic disease: From conventional cardiac and liver tissue mapping techniques to multi-parametric approaches

Cardiometabolic disease refers to the spectrum of chronic conditions that include diabetes, hypertension, atheromatosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and their long-term impact on cardiovascular health. Histological studies have confirmed several modifications at the tissue level in cardiometabolic disease. Recently, quantitative MR methods have enabled non-invasive myocardial and liver tissue characterization. MR relaxation mapping techniques such as T₁, T_1ρ, T₂ and T₂* provide a pixel-by-pixel representation of the corresponding tissue specific relaxation times, which have been shown to correlate with fibrosis, altered tissue perfusion, oedema and iron levels. Proton density fat fraction mapping approaches allow measurement of lipid tissue in the organ of interest. Several studies have demonstrated their utility as early diagnostic biomarkers and their potential to bear prognostic implications. Conventionally, the quantification of these parameters by MRI relies on the acquisition of sequential scans, encoding and mapping only one parameter per scan. However, this methodology is time inefficient and suffers from the confounding effects of the relaxation parameters in each single map, limiting wider clinical and research applications. To address these limitations, several novel approaches have been proposed that encode multiple tissue parameters simultaneously, providing co-registered multiparametric information of the tissues of interest. This review aims to describe the multi-faceted myocardial and hepatic tissue alterations in cardiometabolic disease and to motivate the application of relaxometry and proton-density cardiac and liver tissue mapping techniques. Current approaches in myocardial and liver tissue characterization as well as latest technical developments in multiparametric quantitative MRI are included. Limitations and challenges of these novel approaches, and recommendations to facilitate clinical validation are also discussed.

Dynamic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting During Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers: First Results

BACKGROUND

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) enables simultaneous mapping of myocardial T1 and T2 with very short acquisition times. Breathing maneuvers have been utilized as a vasoactive stress test to dynamically characterize myocardial tissue in vivo. We tested the feasibility of sequential, rapid cMRF acquisitions during breathing maneuvers to quantify myocardial T1 and T2 changes.

METHODS

We measured T1 and T2 values using conventional T1 and T2-mapping techniques (modified look locker inversion [MOLLI] and T2-prepared balanced-steady state free precession), and a 15 heartbeat (15-hb) and rapid 5-hb cMRF sequence in a phantom and in 9 healthy volunteers. The cMRF_5-hb sequence was also used to dynamically assess T1 and T2 changes over the course of a vasoactive combined breathing maneuver.

RESULTS

In healthy volunteers, the mean myocardial T1 of the different mapping methodologies were: MOLLI 1,224 ± 81 ms, cMRF_15-hb 1,359 ± 97 ms, and cMRF_5-hb 1,357 ± 76 ms. The mean myocardial T2 measured with the conventional mapping technique was 41.7 ± 6.7 ms, while for cMRF_15-hb 29.6 ± 5.8 ms and cMRF_5-hb 30.5 ± 5.8 ms. T2 was reduced with vasoconstriction (post-hyperventilation compared to a baseline resting state) (30.15 ± 1.53 ms vs. 27.99 ± 2.07 ms, p = 0.02), while T1 did not change with hyperventilation. During the vasodilatory breath-hold, no significant change of myocardial T1 and T2 was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

cMRF_5-hb enables simultaneous mapping of myocardial T1 and T2, and may be used to track dynamic changes of myocardial T1 and T2 during vasoactive combined breathing maneuvers.

Cardiac MR fingerprinting with a short acquisition window in consecutive patients referred for clinical CMR and healthy volunteers

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) has been demonstrated to enable robust and accurate T₁ and T₂ mapping for the detection of myocardial fibrosis and edema. However, the relatively long acquisition window (250 ms) used in previous cMRF studies might leave it vulnerable to motion artifacts in patients with high heart rates. The goal of this study was therefore to compare cMRF with a short acquisition window (154 ms) and low-rank reconstruction to routine cardiac T₁ and T₂ mapping at 1.5 T. Phantom studies showed that the proposed cMRF had a high T₁ and T₂ accuracy over a wider range than routine mapping techniques. In 9 healthy volunteers, the proposed cMRF showed small but significant myocardial T₁ and T₂ differences compared to routine mapping (ΔT₁ = 1.5%, P = 0.031 and ΔT₂ = - 7.1%, P < 0.001). In 61 consecutive patients referred for CMR, the native T₁ values were slightly lower (ΔT₁ = 1.6%; P = 0.02), while T₂ values did not show statistical difference (ΔT₂ = 4.3%; P = 0.11). However, the difference was higher in post-contrast myocardial T₁ values (ΔT₁ = 12.3%; P < 0.001), which was reflected in the extracellular volume (ΔECV = 2.4%; P < 0.001). Across all subjects, the proposed cMRF had a lower precision when compared to routine techniques, although its higher spatial resolution enabled the visualization of smaller details.

State of the Art: Quantitative Cardiac MRI in Cardiac Amyloidosis

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is characterized by amyloid infiltration in the myocardial extracellular space, causing heart failure. Patients with CA are currently underdiagnosed. Cardiac involvement is significantly associated with the prognosis and treatment decision-making for CA. Early identification and accurate stratification are the crucial first step in patient management. Comprehensive cardiac MRI-based evaluation of the cardiac structure, function, and myocardial tissue characterization assesses cardiac involvement by tracing disease processes. Emerging quantitative tissue characterization techniques have introduced new measures that can identify early staged CA and monitor disease progression or response after treatment. Quantitative cardiac MRI is becoming an instrumental tool in understanding CA, which leads to changes in individualized patient care. This review aimed to discuss the quantitative cardiac MRI-based assessment of CA using established and emerging techniques. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development

Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques (SMART) are gaining attention for their potential to overcome some of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging's (CMR) clinical limitations. The major advantages of SMART lie within their ability to simultaneously capture multiple "features" such as cardiac motion, respiratory motion, T1/T2 relaxation. This review aims to summarize the overarching theory of SMART, describing key concepts that many of these techniques share to produce co-registered, high quality CMR images in less time and with less requirements for specialized personnel. Further, this review provides an overview of the recent developments in the field of SMART by describing how they work, the parameters they can acquire, their status of clinical testing and validation, and by providing examples for how their use can improve the current state of clinical CMR workflows. Many of the SMART are in early phases of development and testing, thus larger scale, controlled trials are needed to evaluate their use in clinical setting and with different cardiac pathologies.

Artificial intelligence in cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a fast MRI-based technique that allows for multiparametric quantitative characterization of the tissues of interest in a single acquisition. In particular, it has gained attention in the field of cardiac imaging due to its ability to provide simultaneous and co-registered myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping in a single breath-held cardiac MRF scan, in addition to other parameters. Initial results in small healthy subject groups and clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility and potential of MRF imaging. Ongoing research is being conducted to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of cardiac MRF. However, these improvements usually increase the complexity of image reconstruction and dictionary generation and introduce the need for sequence optimization. Each of these steps increase the computational demand and processing time of MRF. The latest advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including progress in deep learning and the development of neural networks for MRI, now present an opportunity to efficiently address these issues. Artificial intelligence can be used to optimize candidate sequences and reduce the memory demand and computational time required for reconstruction and post-processing. Recently, proposed machine learning-based approaches have been shown to reduce dictionary generation and reconstruction times by several orders of magnitude. Such applications of AI should help to remove these bottlenecks and speed up cardiac MRF, improving its practical utility and allowing for its potential inclusion in clinical routine. This review aims to summarize the latest developments in artificial intelligence applied to cardiac MRF. Particularly, we focus on the application of machine learning at different steps of the MRF process, such as sequence optimization, dictionary generation and image reconstruction.

Cardiac MRF using rosette trajectories for simultaneous myocardial T1, T2, and proton density fat fraction mapping

The goal of this work is to extend prior work on cardiac MR Fingerprinting (cMRF) using rosette k-space trajectories to enable simultaneous T₁, T₂, and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) mapping in the heart. A rosette trajectory designed for water-fat separation at 1.5T was used in a 2D ECG-triggered 15-heartbeat cMRF sequence. Water and fat specific T₁ and T₂ maps were generated from the cMRF data. A PDFF map was also retrieved using Hierarchical IDEAL by segmenting the rosette cMRF data into multiple echoes. The accuracy of rosette cMRF in T₁, T₂, and PDFF quantification was validated in the ISMRM/NIST phantom and an in-house built fat fraction phantom, respectively. The proposed method was also applied for myocardial tissue mapping of healthy subjects and cardiac patients at 1.5T. T₁, T₂, and PDFF values measured using rosette cMRF in the ISMRM/NIST phantom and the fat fraction phantom agreed well with the reference values. In 16 healthy subjects, rosette cMRF yielded T₁ values which were 80~90 ms higher than spiral cMRF and MOLLI. T₂ values obtained using rosette cMRF were ~3 ms higher than spiral cMRF and ~5 ms lower than conventional T₂-prep bSSFP method. Rosette cMRF was also able to detect abnormal T₁ and T₂ values in cardiomyopathy patients and may provide more accurate maps due to effective fat suppression. In conclusion, this study shows that rosette cMRF has the potential for efficient cardiac tissue characterization through simultaneous quantification of myocardial T₁, T₂, and PDFF.

A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Reconstruction for Shortening the Breathhold and Acquisition Window in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting

The aim of this study is to shorten the breathhold and diastolic acquisition window in cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for simultaneous T1, T2, and proton spin density (M0) mapping to improve scan efficiency and reduce motion artifacts. To this end, a novel reconstruction was developed that combines low-rank subspace modeling with a deep image prior, termed DIP-MRF. A system of neural networks is used to generate spatial basis images and quantitative tissue property maps, with training performed using only the undersampled k-space measurements from the current scan. This approach avoids difficulties with obtaining in vivo MRF training data, as training is performed de novo for each acquisition. Calculation of the forward model during training is accelerated by using GRAPPA operator gridding to shift spiral k-space data to Cartesian grid points, and by using a neural network to rapidly generate fingerprints in place of a Bloch equation simulation. DIP-MRF was evaluated in simulations and at 1.5 T in a standardized phantom, 18 healthy subjects, and 10 patients with suspected cardiomyopathy. In addition to conventional mapping, two cardiac MRF sequences were acquired, one with a 15-heartbeat(HB) breathhold and 254 ms acquisition window, and one with a 5HB breathhold and 150 ms acquisition window. In simulations, DIP-MRF yielded decreased nRMSE compared to dictionary matching and a sparse and locally low rank (SLLR-MRF) reconstruction. Strong correlation (R2 &gt; 0.999) with T1 and T2 reference values was observed in the phantom using the 5HB/150 ms scan with DIP-MRF. DIP-MRF provided better suppression of noise and aliasing artifacts in vivo, especially for the 5HB/150 ms scan, and lower intersubject and intrasubject variability compared to dictionary matching and SLLR-MRF. Furthermore, it yielded a better agreement between myocardial T1 and T2 from 15HB/254 ms and 5HB/150 ms MRF scans, with a bias of −9 ms for T1 and 2 ms for T2. In summary, this study introduces an extension of the deep image prior framework for cardiac MRF tissue property mapping, which does not require pre-training with in vivo scans, and has the potential to reduce motion artifacts by enabling a shortened breathhold and acquisition window.

Characterization of cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting

BACKGROUND

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis absent appropriate treatment. Elevated native myocardial T₁ and T₂ have been reported for CA, and tissue characterization by cardiac MRI may expedite diagnosis and treatment. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) has the potential to enable tissue characterization for CA through rapid, simultaneous T₁ and T₂ mapping. Furthermore, cMRF signal timecourses may provide additional information beyond myocardial T₁ and T₂.

METHODS

Nine CA patients and five controls were scanned at 3 T using a prospectively gated cMRF acquisition. Two cMRF-based analysis approaches were examined: (1) relaxometric-based linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using native T₁ and T₂, and (2) signal timecourse-based LDA. The Fisher coefficient was used to compare the separability of patient and control groups from both approaches. Leave-two-out cross-validation was employed to evaluate the classification error rates of both approaches.

RESULTS

Elevated myocardial T₁ and T₂ was observed in patients vs controls (T₁: 1395 ± 121 vs 1240 ± 36.4 ms, p < 0.05; T₂: 36.8 ± 3.3 vs 31.8 ± 2.6 ms, p < 0.05). LDA scores were elevated in patients for relaxometric-based LDA (0.56 ± 0.28 vs 0.18 ± 0.13, p < 0.05) and timecourse-based LDA (0.97 ± 0.02 vs 0.02 ± 0.02, p < 0.05). The Fisher coefficient was greater for timecourse-based LDA (60.8) vs relaxometric-based LDA (1.6). Classification error rates were lower for timecourse-based LDA vs relaxometric-based LDA (12.6 ± 24.3 vs 22.5 ± 30.1%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that cMRF may be a valuable technique for the detection and characterization of CA. Analysis of cMRF signal timecourse data may improve tissue characterization as compared to analysis of native T₁ and T₂ alone.

Cartesian dictionary-based native T1 and T2 mapping of the myocardium

PURPOSE

To implement and evaluate a new dictionary-based technique for native myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping using Cartesian sampling.

METHODS

The proposed technique (Multimapping) consisted of single-shot Cartesian image acquisitions in 10 consecutive cardiac cycles, with inversion pulses in cycle 1 and 5, and T₂ preparation (TE: 30 ms, 50 ms, and 70 ms) in cycles 8-10. Multimapping was simulated for different T₁ and T₂ , where entries corresponding to the k-space centers were matched to acquired data. Experiments were performed in a phantom, 16 healthy subjects, and 3 patients with cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Multimapping phantom measurements showed good agreement with reference values for both T₁ and T₂ , with no discernable heart-rate dependency for T₁ and T₂ within the range of myocardium. In vivo mean T₁ in healthy subjects was significantly higher using Multimapping (T₁ = 1114 ± 14 ms) compared to the reference (T₁ = 991 ± 26 ms) (p < 0.01). Mean Multimapping T₂ (47.1 ± 1.3 ms) and T₂ spatial variability (5.8 ± 1.0 ms) was significantly lower compared to the reference (T₂ = 54.7 ± 2.2 ms, p < 0.001; spatial variability = 8.4 ± 2.0 ms, p < 0.01). Increased T₁ and T₂ was detected in all patients using Multimapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimapping allows for simultaneous native myocardial T₁ and T₂ mapping with a conventional Cartesian trajectory, demonstrating promising in vivo image quality and parameter quantification results.

Simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T1ρ cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting for contrast agent-free myocardial tissue characterization

PURPOSE

To develop a simultaneous T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) approach to enable comprehensive contrast agent-free myocardial tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan.

METHODS

A 2D gradient-echo electrocardiogram-triggered cardiac MRF sequence with low flip angles, varying magnetization preparation, and spiral trajectory was acquired at 1.5 T to encode T₁ , T₂ , and T_1⍴ simultaneously. The MRF images were reconstructed using low-rank inversion, regularized with a multicontrast patch-based higher-order reconstruction. Parametric maps were generated and matched in the singular value domain to extended phase graph-based dictionaries. The proposed approach was tested in phantoms and 10 healthy subjects and compared against conventional methods in terms of coefficients of determination and best fits for the phantom study, and in terms of Bland-Altman agreement, average values and coefficient of variation of T₁ , T₂ , and T_1⍴ for the healthy subjects study.

RESULTS

The T₁ , T₂ , and T_1⍴ MRF values showed excellent correlation with conventional spin-echo and clinical mapping methods in phantom studies (r² > 0.97). Measured MRF values in myocardial tissue (mean ± SD) were 1133 ± 33 ms, 38.8 ± 3.5 ms, and 52.0 ± 4.0 ms for T₁ , T₂ and T1_⍴ , respectively, against 1053 ± 47 ms, 50.4 ± 3.9 ms, and 55.9 ± 3.3 ms for T₁ modified Look-Locker inversion imaging, T₂ gradient and spin echo, and T_1⍴ turbo field echo, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A cardiac MRF approach for simultaneous quantification of myocardial T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ in a single breath-hold MR scan of about 16 seconds has been proposed. The approach has been investigated in phantoms and healthy subjects showing good agreement with reference spin echo measurements and conventional clinical maps.

Technical overview of magnetic resonance fingerprinting and its applications in radiation therapy

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an emerging imaging technique for rapid and simultaneous quantification of multiple tissue properties. The technique has been developed for quantitative imaging of different organs. The obtained quantitative measures have the potential to improve multiple steps of a typical radiotherapy workflow and potentially further improve integration of magnetic resonance imaging guided clinical decision making. In this review paper, we first provide a technical overview of the MRF method from data acquisition to postprocessing, along with recent development in advanced reconstruction methods. We further discuss critical aspects that could influence its usage in radiation therapy, such as accuracy and precision, repeatability and reproducibility, geometric distortion, and motion robustness. Finally, future directions for MRF application in radiation therapy are discussed.

Repeatability of MR fingerprinting in normal cervix and utility in cervical carcinoma

Background

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a fast-imaging acquisition technique that generates quantitative and co-registered parametric maps. The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the agreement between MRF and phantom reference values, scan-rescan repeatability of MRF in normal cervix, and its ability to distinguish cervical carcinoma (CC) from normal cervical tissues.

Methods

An International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) phantom was scanned using MRF 15 times over 65 days. Agreement between MRF and phantom reference T1 and T2 values was assessed by linear regression. Healthy volunteers and patients with suspected CC were prospectively recruited. MRF was repeated twice for healthy volunteers (MRF1 and MRF2). Volumes of interest of normal cervical tissues and CC were delineated on T1 and T2 maps. MRF scan-rescan repeatability was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots, within-subject coefficients of variation (wCV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). T1 and T2 values were compared between CC and normal cervical tissues using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic efficiency.

Results

Strong correlations were observed between MRF and phantom (R²=0.999 for T1, 0.981 for T2). Twelve healthy volunteers (28.7±5.1 years) and 28 patients with CC (54.6±15.2 years) were recruited for the in-vivo experiments. Repeatability of MRF parameters were wCV <3% for T1, <5% for T2 and ICC ≥0.92 for T1, ≥0.94 for T2. T1 value of CC (1,529±112 ms) was higher than normal mucosa [MRF1: 1,430±129 ms, MRF2: 1,440±130 ms; P=0.031, area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.717] and normal stroma (MRF1: 1,258±101 ms, MRF2: 1,276±105 ms; P<0.001, AUC ≥0.946). T2 value of CC (69±9 ms) was lower than normal mucosa (MRF1: 88±16 ms, MRF2: 87±13 ms; P<0.001, AUC ≥0.854), but was not different from normal stroma (P=0.919).

Conclusions

Excellent agreement was observed between MRF and phantom reference values. MRF exhibited excellent scan-rescan repeatability in normal cervix with potential value in differentiating CC from normal cervical tissues.

Recommendation for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Phenotypic Study: Imaging Part

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides important biomarkers for the early diagnosis of many cardiovascular diseases and has been reported to reveal phenome-wide associations of cardiac/aortic structure and functionality in population studies. Nevertheless, due to the complexity of operation and variations among manufactural vendors, magnetic field strengths, coils, sequences, scan parameters, and image analysis approaches, CMR is rarely used in large cohort studies. Existing guidelines mainly focused on the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, which did not aim to basic research. The purpose of this study was to propose a recommendation for CMR based phenotype measurements for cohort study. We classify the imaging sequences of CMR into three categories according to the importance and universality of corresponding measurable phenotypes. The acquisition time and repeatability of the phenotypic measurement were also taken into consideration during the categorization. Unlike other guidelines, this recommendation focused on quantitative measurement of large amount of phenotypes from CMR.

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Trends in technical development and potential clinical applications

Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged in recent years as an approach for evaluating a range of cardiovascular conditions, with T1 and T2 mapping at the forefront of these developments. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) provides a rapid and robust framework for simultaneous quantification of myocardial T1 and T2 in addition to other tissue properties. Since the advent of cMRF, a number of technical developments and clinical validation studies have been reported. This review provides an overview of cMRF, recent technical developments, healthy subject and patient studies, anticipated technical improvements, and potential clinical applications. Recent technical developments include slice profile and pulse efficiency corrections, improvements in image reconstruction, simultaneous multislice imaging, 3D whole-ventricle imaging, motion-resolved imaging, fat-water separation, and machine learning for rapid dictionary generation. Future technical developments in cMRF, such as B0 and B1 field mapping, acceleration of acquisition and reconstruction, imaging of patients with implanted devices, and quantification of additional tissue properties are also described. Potential clinical applications include characterization of infiltrative, inflammatory, and ischemic cardiomyopathies, tissue characterization in the left atrium and right ventricle, post-cardiac transplantation assessment, reduction of contrast material, pre-procedural planning for electrophysiology interventions, and imaging of patients with implanted devices.

T1, T2, and Fat Fraction Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Preliminary Clinical Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Dixon cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) has been recently introduced to simultaneously provide water T₁ , water T₂ , and fat fraction (FF) maps.

PURPOSE

To assess Dixon cardiac MRF repeatability in healthy subjects and its clinical feasibility in a cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease.

POPULATION

T1MES phantom, water-fat phantom, 11 healthy subjects and 19 patients with suspected cardiovascular disease.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T, inversion recovery spin echo (IRSE), multiecho spin echo (MESE), modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI), T₂ gradient spin echo (T₂ -GRASE), 6-echo gradient rewound echo (GRE), and Dixon cardiac MRF.

ASSESSMENT

Dixon cardiac MRF precision was assessed through repeated scans against conventional MOLLI, T₂ -GRASE, and PDFF in phantom and 11 healthy subjects. Dixon cardiac MRF native T₁ , T₂ , FF, postcontrast T₁ and synthetic extracellular volume (ECV) maps were assessed in 19 patients in comparison to conventional sequences. Measurements in patients were performed in the septum and in late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) areas and assessed using mean value distributions, correlation, and Bland-Altman plots. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were assessed by three experts using 5-point scoring scales.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired Wilcoxon rank signed test and paired t-tests were applied. Statistical significance was indicated by *(P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Dixon cardiac MRF showed good overall precision in phantom and in vivo. Septal average repeatability was ~23 msec for T₁ , ~2.2 msec for T₂ , and ~1% for FF. Biases in healthy subjects/patients were measured at +37 msec*/+60 msec* and -8.8 msec*/-8 msec* when compared to MOLLI and T₂ -GRASE, respectively. No statistically significant differences in postcontrast T₁ (P = 0.17) and synthetic ECV (P = 0.19) measurements were observed in patients.

DATA CONCLUSION

Dixon cardiac MRF attained good overall precision in phantom and healthy subjects, while providing coregistered T₁ , T₂ , and fat fraction maps in a single breath-hold scan with similar or better image quality than conventional methods in patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE

2.

Deep learning reconstruction for cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 mapping

PURPOSE

To develop a deep learning method for rapidly reconstructing T₁ and T₂ maps from undersampled electrocardiogram (ECG) triggered cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) images.

METHODS

A neural network was developed that outputs T₁ and T₂ values when given a measured cMRF signal time course and cardiac RR interval times recorded by an ECG. Over 8 million cMRF signals, corresponding to 4000 random cardiac rhythms, were simulated for training. The training signals were corrupted by simulated k-space undersampling artifacts and random phase shifts to promote robust learning. The deep learning reconstruction was evaluated in Monte Carlo simulations for a variety of cardiac rhythms and compared with dictionary-based pattern matching in 58 healthy subjects at 1.5T.

RESULTS

In simulations, the normalized root-mean-square error (nRMSE) for T₁ was below 1% in myocardium, blood, and liver for all tested heart rates. For T₂ , the nRMSE was below 4% for myocardium and liver and below 6% for blood for all heart rates. The difference in the mean myocardial T₁ or T₂ observed in vivo between dictionary matching and deep learning was 3.6 ms for T₁ and -0.2 ms for T₂ . Whereas dictionary generation and pattern matching required more than 4 min per slice, the deep learning reconstruction only required 336 ms.

CONCLUSION

A neural network is introduced for reconstructing cMRF T₁ and T₂ maps directly from undersampled spiral images in under 400 ms and is robust to arbitrary cardiac rhythms, which paves the way for rapid online display of cMRF maps.