Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument

Evaluation of the trajectory of recovery following surgically treated acetabular fractures

Aims

Acetabular fractures are associated with long-term morbidity. Our prospective cohort study sought to understand the recovery trajectory of this injury over five years.

Methods

Eligible patients at a level I trauma centre were recruited into a longitudinal registry of surgical acetabular fractures between June 2004 and August 2019. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS), were recorded at baseline pre-injury recall and six months, one year, two years, and five years postoperatively. Comparative analyses were performed for elementary and associated fracture patterns. The proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was determined. The rate of, and time to, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) was also established.

Results

We recruited 251 patients (253 fractures), with a 4:1 male to female ratio and mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.4). Associated fracture patterns accounted for 56.5% of fractures (n = 143). Trajectory analysis showed all timepoints had significant disability versus baseline, including final follow-up (p < 0.001). Elementary fractures had higher SF-36 PCS at six months (p = 0.023) and one year (p = 0.007) compared to associated fractures, but not at two years (p = 0.135) or five years (p = 0.631). The MCID in SF-36 PCS was observed in 37.3% of patients (69/185) between six months and one year, 26.9% of patients (39/145) between one and two years, and 23.3% of patients (20/86) between two and five years, highlighting the long recovery potential of these injuries. A significant proportion of patients failed to attain the MCID after five years (38.1%; 40/105). Conversion to THA occurred in 13.1% of patients (11/110 elementary and 22/143 associated fractures). Approximately two-thirds of THAs (21/33 patients; 63.6%) were performed within two years of index surgery.

Conclusion

Acetabular fractures significantly impact physical function. Recovery trajectory is often elongated beyond one year, with two-thirds of our patients displaying persistent clinically relevant long-term disability.

The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the literature on traumatic foot fractures: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Adequate foot function is paramount in daily activities, yet the incidence of foot fractures shows a rising trend. Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used for research; however, the use of a wide variety of available instruments is undesirable. In the current study, an overview is provided of patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical research evaluating outcomes of foot fractures. Tools are provided to choose the most adequate instrument in future research.

METHODS

To identify the instruments, a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles published since 2000, reporting on traumatic foot fractures and/or their posttraumatic sequelae, and using a minimum of one condition- or region-specific patient-reported outcome measure were included. Forty-nine instruments were identified, used 636 times collectively. These instruments were evaluated on frequency of use, bones or joints analyzed with the instruments, the type and amount of contained items, and existing literature on their psychometric properties.

RESULTS

The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was used predominantly (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; n = 243, 38.2%), followed by the Maryland Foot Score (n = 90, 14.2%). Twenty-seven instruments were included for further analysis. The majority included questions on mobility (27/27) and pain (24/27). Tools to select an adequate instrument for new research are presented in the appendices.

DISCUSSION

Controversy surrounds the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale as other authors have found that its psychometric properties, indicating it measures what it is supposed to measure adequately, are flawed.

CONCLUSION

A multitude of specific patient-reported outcome measures concerning foot fractures exists. Furthermore, the predominantly used instrument is deemed insufficient regarding quality as found by other studies. A valid, reliable, and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for clinical research on foot fractures is necessary. The most adequate existing ones for future research on different topics can be found through the tools provided.

Novel Parathyroid Hormone-Based Bone Graft, KUR-113, in Treatment of Acute Open Tibial Shaft Fracture: A Phase-2 Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of an open tibial shaft fracture (TSF) is complex, and many cases are associated with delayed bone union or malunion. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) plays a key role in bone metabolism. A peptide fragment of PTH (PTH1-34) has been shown to promote bone healing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel PTH-based bone graft (KUR-113) in the treatment of subjects with an open TSF.

METHODS

The study was a randomized, controlled, open-label (dose-blinded), dose-finding study of 200 subjects who had an open TSF secondary to trauma. Subjects were randomized into 1 of 4 groups to receive the standard of care (SoC) alone (control) or the SoC plus a single application of 4 mL of KUR-113 containing TGplPTH1-34 in fibrin at a concentration of 0.133 mg/mL (KUR-113-low), 0.4 mg/mL (KUR-113-mid), or 1.0 mg/mL (KUR-113-high). KUR-113 was administered at the fracture site after internal fracture fixation and before wound closure. Subjects were followed for up to 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome measure was fracture healing at 6 months assessed by the study investigator using radiographic and clinical measures. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects with fracture healing at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 200 subjects were enrolled and randomized to 1 of the 4 treatments. The primary end point was met in the KUR-113-mid group, which showed a significantly higher prevalence of healing at 6 months than the control group (37 of 46; 80.4% versus 31 of 48; 64.6%). By 12 months, healing had occurred in the majority of subjects in all treatment groups, with the control group requiring more surgical interventions to achieve fracture healing. Adverse events occurred at similar frequencies between the KUR-113 groups and the SoC group. No ectopic bone formation or abnormal bone resorption at the fracture site was observed in any of the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

KUR-113 has the potential to be a good adjunctive therapy in the treatment of open TSFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Functional outcomes more than 5 years following acetabulum fracture

Objectives:

The purposes of this project were to evaluate functional outcomes more than 5 years after acetabulum fracture and to determine factors related to function.

Methods:

This retrospective study consisted of 205 adult patients treated for acetabulum fracture who completed the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) a minimum of 5 years following injury. The MFA includes survey of daily activities, gross and fine mobility, social and work function, sleeping, and mood. Higher scores indicate worse function.

Results:

Two hundred five patients with 210 fractures, 69.3% of whom were male, with mean age of 45.7 and mean body mass index 30.1 were included after mean 128 months follow-up. Fracture patterns included OTA/AO 62A (37.1%), 62B (40.5%), or 62C (22.4%), and 80.0% were treated surgically. Late complications were noted in 35.2%, including posttraumatic arthrosis (PTA: 19.5%), osteonecrosis and/or heterotopic ossification. Mean MFA of all patients was 31.4, indicating substantial residual dysfunction. Worse MFA scores were associated with morbid obesity (body mass index >40: 42.3, P>.09), and current tobacco smoking history vs former smoker vs nonsmoker (45.2 vs 36.1 vs 23.0, P < .002). Patients with late complications had worse mean MFA scores (38.7 vs 27.7, P = .001); PTA was the most common late complication, occurring in 19.5%.

Conclusions:

More than 5 years following acetabulum fracture, substantial residual dysfunction was noted, as demonstrated by mean MFA. Worse outcomes were associated with late complications and tobacco smoking. While fracture pattern was not associated with outcome, those patients who had late complications, mostly PTA, had worse outcomes.

Tobacco smoking is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after torsional ankle fracture

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of current and remote tobacco smoking on clinical and functional outcomes after torsional ankle fracture.

Methods:

Nine hundred thirty-five patients treated surgically for torsional ankle fracture over 9 years were reviewed. Tobacco smoking status at the time of injury was defined as current (48.3%), former (11.7%), and nonsmoker (40.0%). Complications, unplanned secondary procedures, pain medication use, and functional outcome scores, as measured by Foot Function Index and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) surveys.

Results:

Mean age was 44.8 years, with 50.3% male. More than 6 months following injury current smokers were more likely than former smokers and nonsmokers to report ankle pain (67.8% vs 45.8% vs 47.5%) and to use prescription pain medicines (23.0% vs 10.4% vs 6.3%), all P < .05. Multiple logistic regression found current tobacco use to be an independent predictor for prescription pain medication use, and worse scores for the Foot Function Index, SMFA Dysfunction, and SMFA Bothersome scores, all P < .05. Complications occurred in 15.5% of all patients, and 10.7% underwent unplanned secondary operations. Tobacco smoking was not associated with more complications or secondary procedures.

Conclusion:

Current smokers are more likely to use prescription pain medications several months after injury and have worse patient-reported functional outcome scores after surgical treatment of torsional ankle fractures than former smokers and nonsmokers.

Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: What Change Matters in Ankle Fractures

Accurate interpretation of the clinical significance of patient-reported outcome (PRO) research requires determination of the threshold where a difference in PRO score represents a clinical benefit to patients, termed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is one of the most commonly utilized PRO tools in orthopaedics. However, to date, no MCID has been determined. The purpose of this study was to define the MCID for the SMFA. A prospectively collected ankle fracture outcomes registry was reviewed between 2014 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were isolated ankle fracture, treatment with open reduction and internal fixation, and 6-week follow-up with completed SMFA. Two commonly utilized methods to determine the MCID, the anchor and distribution methods, were performed in this study. Overall, 105 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Utilizing both the overall health anchor and the mental and emotional health anchor, the MCID was 7.3 (n = 17 and n = 19, respectively). The distribution method MCID was 7.0 (n = 105). Our study found the MCID values for the SMFA to converge around a value of 7 for the 3 analyses. This indicates that a threshold of 7 should be applied to studies utilizing the SMFA to determine the clinical significance of the results.

Determinants of functional outcome following ankle fracture

Objectives:

To assess the patient and injury characteristics that impact functional outcomes after ankle fracture.

Design:

Retrospective study.

Setting:

Urban level I trauma center.

Patients/Participants:

One thousand patients underwent fixation of ankle fracture (AO/OTA 44) between 2006 and 2015. Four hundred sixteen completed functional outcome surveys by telephone or mail at a mean of 5.9 years after injury.

Intervention:

Open reduction internal fixation.

Main outcome measure:

Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).

Results:

Mean age was 46.7 years, with 46.2% male. Higher (worse) FFI scores were seen in tobacco users (38.9 vs 30.1), recreational drug users (45.9 vs 32.7), and the morbidly obese (52.0 vs 30.6), all P < .005. Higher (worse) SMFA dysfunction and bothersome scores were also seen in these groups, and in females and alcohol users. Multiple regression analysis identified female gender, obesity, tobacco and alcohol use, complications, secondary procedures, and multiple additional injuries as independent predictors of higher scores (all P < .04). Fracture patterns, open fracture, and development of arthritis had no impact on FFI or SMFA scores.

Conclusion:

Patient characteristics, not under surgeon-control, such as female sex, obesity, and substance use, appear to contribute to patient-reported functional outcome scores more than injury characteristics.

Level of Evidence:

Level 3, prognostic

Impact of Psychosocial and Economic Factors on Functional Outcomes After Operative Calcaneus Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To report functional outcome scores after operative intraarticular calcaneus fracture and to determine risk factors associated with worse outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Urban Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-six patients with 114 calcaneus fractures treated by a single surgeon over a 14-year period.

INTERVENTION

Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation with lateral extensile approach or percutaneous reduction and fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Functional outcome scores as assessed by the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) and the Foot Function Index (FFI) after mean 56 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients (75%) completed functional outcome questionnaires. Patients with functional outcome data were more often employed (86% vs. 67%, P = 0.07), but were no different in terms of age, sex, medical history, mechanism of injury, or injury characteristics. The mean FFI score was 30 (range: 2-89), and the mean MFA score was 28 (range: 2-80). One-third of patients reported scores >30 on the FFI, MFA, or both. Age, sex, tobacco use, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, open injury, and postoperative infection were not associated with outcome scores. Alcohol abuse and failure to return to work were associated with worse (higher) FFI scores. Alcohol abuse, psychiatric illness, unemployment (before and after injury), polytrauma, and posttraumatic osteoarthrosis were associated with worse (higher) MFA scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Polytrauma, alcohol abuse, psychiatric illness, work status, and posttraumatic osteoarthrosis were predictors of poor functional outcomes. The findings of this study add to previous literature that has demonstrated the importance of social, behavioral, and environmental factors on recovery after orthopaedic injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Impact of Coronal Plane Deformity on Ankle Arthrodesis and Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Ankle coronal plane deformity represents a complex 3-dimensional problem, and comparative data are lacking to guide treatment recommendations for optimal treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis with concomitant coronal plane deformity.

METHODS

In total, 224 patients treated for end-stage ankle arthritis were enrolled in an observational trial. Of 112 patients followed more than 2 years, 48 patients (19 arthrodesis, 29 arthroplasty) had coronal plane deformity and were compared to 64 patients without coronal plane deformity (18 arthrodesis, 46 arthroplasty) defined as greater than 10 degrees of varus or valgus. The arthroplasty implants used had different internal constraints to intracomponent coronal plane tilting. Patients completed Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA) and SF-36 preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Measures included change in SF-36 and MFA, as well as compared reoperation rates and pain scales.

RESULTS

For the groups with coronal plane ankle deformity, the median for the arthrodesis group was 19.0 degrees and the median for the arthroplasty group was 16.9 degrees. In the deformity cohort during the follow-up period, we had 7 major reoperations: 2 in the arthrodesis group and 5 in the arthroplasty group, all with the less constrained implant design. MFA, vitality, and social function of the SF-36 improved for all groups. Patients without preoperative deformities had greater improvement with fusion or replacement at both 2 and 3 years. There was no difference in improvement between those patients with coronal deformity who received arthroplasty vs arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with and without coronal plane deformity may benefit from ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis, although greater improvements may be expected in those without preoperative deformity. In this study, at final follow-up of 3 years, overall we found no meaningful difference in patient-reported outcomes between the patients with preoperative coronal plane deformities whether they had a fusion or a replacement as treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, comparative study.

New versus old: 95 degree angled blade plate versus distal femoral locking plate. A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The purpose was to compare the locking condylar plate (LCP) with the 95° angled blade plate (ABP) for distal femoral fracture patterns amenable to either device. Our hypothesis was that LCP would outperform ABP with primary outcome of nonunion and secondary outcomes of reoperation and malunion.

METHODS

78 adult patients with 79 eligible fractures and mean age of 60 years were prospectively randomized to LCP (n = 45) or ABP (n = 34). Mean ISS was 16. 22% fractures were open. Patient-reported functional outcomes were assessed with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA).

RESULTS

All patients were followed to union, and mean follow-up was 25 months. There were no differences in age, sex, fracture pattern, co-morbidities or mechanism for the two groups. Three patients had infections, one superficial after LCP and one deep infection each after ABP and LCP. Three patients developed nonunion after LCP versus none after ABP (p = 0.06). Nine patients healed with minor deformity after LCP versus 5 following ABP. One fracture had major deformity after ABP versus two after LCP. Eight patients had a secondary procedure following LCP versus two after ABP (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The investigation failed to support newer technology being better. Evidence did not indicate the LCP was superior to the ABP. Trends for primary union and fewer secondary procedures suggest that ABP may have superior performance to LCP for fracture patterns which may be treated with either implant.

Comparing the responsiveness of a generic and a musculoskeletal specific functional outcome measure in orthopaedic patients with operative fixation of pelvic ring, acetabulum, or tibia fractures: a comparison between single injury and multiply injured patients

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the responsiveness, or the ability to detect clinical change in a disease, between the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) and musculoskeletal specific Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the orthopaedic trauma population. Stratified analysis was performed to compare whether responsiveness differs between patients with single or multiple orthopaedic injuries.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

A total of 659 patients with orthopaedic trauma injuries to the pelvis, acetabulum, or tibia were included for analysis. There were 485 patients with a single isolated injury and 174 patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Responsiveness was calculated through the standard response mean (SRM), the proportion meeting a minimal clinically important difference, and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS

Between baseline and 6 months the magnitude of the SRM for SF-36 was consistently greater than that of SMFA in patients with single (P < .01) and multiple injuries (P < .01). Between 6 and 12 months, there were no differences in SRM across all cohorts. The proportion of patients who achieved minimal clinically important difference was consistently higher when assessed with SF-36 compared with SMFA between baseline and 6 months (81.8% vs 68.1%, P < .0001) and between 6 and 12 months (63.3% vs 55.4%, P = .01).A ceiling effect was only observed at baseline for the SMFA with 16.6% of patients achieving the maximal level of functioning detectable. No floor effects were seen in either PROM.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that SF-36 has superior responsiveness versus SMFA in both polytrauma and isolated injury patients and supports the collection of SF-36 as the primary PROM in prospective orthopaedic trauma studies irrespective of whether the patient has an isolated injury or multiple injuries.

Using the STTGMA Risk Stratification Tool to Predict Complications, Additional Operations, and Functional Outcomes After Ankle Fracture

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of a validated trauma triage score to stratify postdischarge complications, secondary procedures, and functional outcomes after ankle fracture.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred fifteen patients 55 years of age and older with 431 ankle fractures.

INTERVENTION

Closed or open reduction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle-Aged Patients (STTGMA), postdischarge complications, secondary operations, Foot Function Index (FFI, n = 167), and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA, n = 165).

RESULTS

Mean age was 66 years, 38% were men, and 68% of fractures were secondary to ground-level falls. Forty patients (9.6%) required an additional procedure, with implant removal most common (n = 21, 5.1%), and 102 (25%) experienced a postdischarge complication. On multiple linear regression, STTGMA was not a significant independent predictor of complications or secondary procedures. Patients completed FFI and SMFA surveys a median of 62 months (5.2 years) after injury. On the FFI, low-risk STTGMA stratification was an independent predictor of worse functional outcomes. Similarly, low-risk stratification was a predictor of worse scores on the SMFA dysfunction and daily activity subcategories (both B > 10, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-risk STTGMA stratification predicted worse long-term function. The STTGMA tool was not able to meaningfully stratify risk of postdischarge complications and secondary procedures after ankle fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of hallux valgus open and percutaneous surgery on AOFAS scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To estimate the comparative effect of open and percutaneous hallux valgus (HV) surgery on patients' quality of life (QoL) using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale including total score and individual domains (pain, function, and alignment).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2020 for studies on the effect of HV surgery on patients' QoL using the AOFAS score. A standardized mean difference score was calculated on the total AOFAS score and on each AOFAS domain (pain, function, and alignment) using Cohen's d index.

RESULTS

Considering the 53 published studies included, the pooled effect size (ES) estimates for the AOFAS total score were 3.69 (95% CI 3.37-4.01; I² = 95.5%) for open surgery and 3.40 (95% CI 2.99-3.80, I² = 88.2%) for percutaneous surgery. The total pooled ES estimate was 3.61 (95% CI 3.35-3.87, I² = 94.5%). Considering the pain domain, the pooled ES estimates were 2.21 (95% CI 1.98-2.43, I² = 64%) for open surgery and 2.52 (95% CI 1.83-3.20, I² = 92.6%) for percutaneous surgery. For the function domain, the pooled ES estimates were 1.37 (95% CI 0.93-1.81, I² = 91%) for open surgery and 2.28 (95% CI 1.10-3.47, I² = 96.8%) for percutaneous surgery. Finally, the pooled ES estimates for the alignment domain were 3.99 (95% CI 3.51-4.47, I² = 85.7%) for open surgery and 2.66 (95% CI 2.23-3.09, I² = 78.5%) for percutaneous surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our data support that HV surgery increases the total AOFAS score as well as the AOFAS scores by domain (pain, function, and alignment). Furthermore, our data show that HV surgery increases patients' QoL, after both open and percutaneous surgery, without differences between them.

Ankle fractures in patients over age 55 years: Predictors of functional outcome

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors of functional outcomes following treatment of ankle fracture in patients 55 years or older.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred twenty-nine patients with torsional ankle fractures (44A-C): 233 patients (54%) were ages 55 to 64, 25% were between the ages 65 and 74; 21% were 75 years or older.

INTERVENTION

Operative or nonoperative management of ankle fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Early complications were assessed for all patients after minimum of 6 months, and functional outcome scores as assessed by the Foot Function Index (FFI; n = 166, 39%) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA; n = 168, 39%) after median 57 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Surgical management was elected in 67% of patients. Nonoperative management became more common with advancing age and was associated with fewer unplanned operations (12% vs 3%, P < .01) and complications (21% vs 13%, P = .07). African American race was associated with worse pain on the FFI (P = .002) and BMI was associated with worse (higher) scores on all categories of the FFI and SMFA (all P < .05). Diabetes, neuropathy, and mental illness were also predictive of worse scores on various categories of both surveys. Assistive device use or nonambulatory status at the time of injury was associated with worse disability/dysfunction, activity, and mobility scores on both the FFI and SMFA (all P > 15, P < .05). Sex, Hispanic ethnicity, tobacco use, open fracture, dislocation, fracture pattern, and operative management were not independent predictors in this regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline health and ambulatory capacity at injury were more predictive of outcomes following ankle fracture than were fracture characteristics or type of treatment.

Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on Functional Outcomes and Complications After Torsional Ankle Fracture

INTRODUCTION

It is well known that patients with diabetes mellitus experience higher complication rates after torsional ankle fracture; however, the functional consequences remain less clear. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of diabetes on complications, secondary operations, and functional outcomes after torsional ankle fracture.

METHODS

Nine hundred seventy-nine adult patients treated surgically for a torsional ankle injury (Orthopaedic Trauma Association 44B, 44C) over 13 years were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, comorbidities, injury characteristics, complications, and secondary procedures were recorded. Patient-reported outcome surveys: Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment were obtained after minimum of 12 months. Multivariable analysis was done to account for confounding variables.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients (13.4%) had diabetes. Diabetic patients were older (56.4 versus 43.0 years, P < 0.001), with no difference in sex or race. Body mass index was higher among diabetics (36.0 versus 30.4, P < 0.001) as were most medical comorbidities, including stroke, neuropathy, pulmonary disease, and renal disease (all P < 0.03). There were no differences in rates of dislocations or open injuries. Diabetics experienced more complications (26.0% versus 14.6%, P = 0.001), specifically deep infections (6.9% versus 1.3%, P = 0.001), and had more secondary procedures (18.3% versus 9.1%, P = 0.001), including débridement, arthrodesis, and amputation (all P < 0.02). Diabetes was a significant independent predictor of worse FFI activity limitation scores (P = 0.032), but was not predictive of worse outcomes on any other subscore of the FFI or Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes was associated with more complications and secondary operations. However, functional outcomes including pain and dysfunction were not markedly affected by these clinical outcomes, potentially due to diminished sensory function and less baseline physical activity among diabetic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III.

The effect of obesity on post-operative complications and functional outcomes after surgical treatment of torsional ankle fracture: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a growing public health concern. While diabetes mellitus is associated with obesity and is a risk for infection and other complications, effects of obesity on outcomes remains less clear. The purpose was to determine effect of obesity on complications, secondary operations, and functional outcomes after surgical treatment of ankle fracture.

METHODS

955 adult patients treated surgically for torsional ankle injury were reviewed. Obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥30), and patients without obesity were matched for age, sex, race, diabetes, and fracture pattern. Patient reported outcomes, measured by Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), were obtained after 12 months.

RESULTS

632 patients (316 obese [mean BMI 36.7] and 316 non-obese [mean BMI 25.5]) with mean age 44.6 years were analyzed. Each group was 52.5% female, and 6.6% had diabetes mellitus. 75.6% of fractures in each group were AO/OTA type 44B and 24.4% were 44C. Non-obese patients were more likely tobacco users (63.3% vs 40.2%, p<0.001). Obese patients trended toward more dislocations (41.8% vs 35.4%, p=0.10), with similar rate of open fracture. Obese patients trended toward more complications (28.5% vs 22.5%. p=0.08) and wound healing problems (4.7% vs 2.2%, p=0.08) with similar rates of secondary procedures. Total FFI scores were higher (worse) for obese patients (35.4 vs 28.5, p=0.03); subcategory scores for disability and activity limitation were worse (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively), and obesity was associated with worse SMFA bothersome (31.0 vs 23.6, p=0.02) and mobility scores (41.8 vs 32.5, p=0.008), with a trend towards worse SMFA dysfunction scores in obese patients (29.7 vs 24.7, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is associated with worse functional outcomes by FFI and SMFA surveys. Contributions of baseline limitations to these poor scores in obese patients remain unclear. Injury characteristics were similar between obese and non-obese patients, though obese patients may be more prone to dislocations. A trend was noted for obese patients to experience more complications and wound healing issues, although rates of secondary operations were no different.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Symptom and Disability Measurement by Common Foot and Ankle-Specific Outcome Rating Scales

BACKGROUND

Well-designed foot and ankle clinical outcomes research requires region-specific subjective outcome measures. Many foot and ankle-specific instruments are now available. Determining which instruments to choose is daunting. We present a patient survey to determine the most relevant questions pertaining to them.

METHODS

Sixteen foot and ankle-specific outcome instruments were chosen based on popularity, emphasizing valid, reliable, responsive scores. Subjective portions were consolidated and given to 109 patients with osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) (39), ankle instability (35), and ankle arthritis (35). Outcome instruments were measured according to 4 criteria: number of questions endorsed by 51%, number with high mean importance, number with low mean importance, and number with the highest-ranking frequency importance product. Instruments were then ranked based on relative score, with the highest scores indicating the instrument was the most useful for that sample.

RESULTS

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) achieved the highest score in all 4 categories for OLT, followed by Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Score. The FAOS achieved the highest score in all 4 categories for ankle instability, followed by FAAM and AAOS. For osteoarthritis, the FAOS achieved the highest relative score followed by FAAM and AAOS. The AOF, Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, and AAS are instruments commonly used that had lower relative scores.

CONCLUSION

The FAOS, FAAM, and AAOS Foot and Ankle Score contain several items important to patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus, ankle instability, and ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Sports Medicine: A Concise Resource for Clinicians and Researchers

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of assessing patient outcomes during patient care, current evidence suggests relatively limited use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by athletic trainers (ATs). Major barriers to PROM use include lack of knowledge, navigating the intricate process of assessing a wide variety of PROMs, and selecting the most appropriate PROM to use for care. A concise resource for ATs to consult when selecting and implementing PROMs may help facilitate the use of PROMs in athletic health care.

OBJECTIVE

To review the instrument essentials and clinical utility of PROMs used by ATs.

METHODS

We studied 11 lower extremity region-specific, 10 upper extremity region-specific, 6 generic, and 3 single-item PROMs based on the endorsement of at least 10% of ATs who use PROMs, as reported in a recent investigation of PROM use in athletic training. A literature search was conducted for each included PROM that focused on identifying and extracting components of the instrument essentials (ie, instrument development, reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretability, and precision) and clinical utility (ie, acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness). Through independent review and group consensus, we also classified each PROM question by International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domain and health-related quality-of-life dimensions.

KEY FINDINGS

The PROMs contained in this report generally possessed appropriate instrument essentials and clinical utility. Moreover, the PROMs generally emphasized body structure and function as well as the physical functioning of the patient. Athletic trainers aiming to assess patients via a whole-person approach may benefit from combining different PROMs for use in patient care to ensure broader attention to disablement health domains and health-related quality-of-life dimensions.

Late Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneus Fractures: Successful Management With Anatomic Reduction

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures treated more than 25 days after injury by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a lateral extensile surgical approach.

METHODS

Twenty patients identified by retrospective review of our trauma database were treated with ORIF for a displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture more than 25 days after injury. OTA/AO 82-B and 82-C fracture patterns were included. All had ORIF by a lateral extensile approach. Bohler's angle was measured on injury radiographs, after operative fixation and the final follow-up and compared with the Bohler's angle of the contralateral uninjured extremity. Patients completed a Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) to evaluate the functional outcome.

RESULTS

The mean number of days from injury to fixation was 33.4 days (range, 26-58 days). A total of 18/20 patients were available for follow-up (mean 26.1 months; range 12.5-100 months). Eleven injuries were joint depression (82-C), and 7 injuries were tongue type (82-B) fracture patterns. The reason for delayed presentation was delayed transfer to our institution (11 patients), hemodynamic instability from polytrauma (2 patients), excessive fracture blisters (2 patients), and sepsis (1 patient). Bohler's angle at the time of injury was a mean of 10.9 degrees, which corrected to a mean of 33.3 after operative fixation but decreased to a mean of 28.1 at the time of the final follow-up. The mean Bohler angle was 32.3 on the contralateral uninjured side. The mean MFA score was 16.5 (range, 1-34). There were no wound infections or subtalar arthrodesis procedures performed.

CONCLUSIONS

ORIF by a lateral extensile approach is a safe and viable option for patients presenting in a delayed fashion with a displaced intraarticular calcaneus fracture. Marked improvement in the Bohler angle, acceptable functional outcome, and low complication rates can be expected when surgery is performed by an experienced surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The development of a novel patient-derived recovery scale for open tibial fractures

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of recovery for use in patients who have suffered an open tibial fracture.

METHODS

An initial pool of 109 items was generated from previous qualitative data relating to recovery following an open tibial fracture. These items were field tested in a cohort of patients recovering from an open tibial fracture. They were asked to comment on the content of the items and structure of the scale. Reduction in the number of items led to a refined scale tested in a larger cohort of patients. Principal components analysis permitted further reduction and the development of a definitive scale. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed for the retained items.

RESULTS

The initial scale was completed by 35 patients who were recovering from an open tibial fracture. Subjective and objective analysis permitted removal of poorly performing items and the addition of items suggested by patients. The refined scale consisted of 50 Likert scaled items and eight additional items. It was completed on 228 occasions by a different cohort of 204 patients with an open tibial fracture recruited from several UK orthoplastic tertiary referral centres. There were eight underlying components with tangible real-life meaning, which were retained as sub-scales represented by ten Likert scaled and eight non-Likert items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good to excellent.

CONCLUSION

The Wales Lower Limb Trauma Recovery (WaLLTR) Scale is the first tool to be developed from patient data with the potential to assess recovery following an open tibial fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):17-25.

Nerve Injury With Acetabulum Fractures: Incidence and Factors Affecting Recovery

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors associated with nerve injury after acetabulum fracture and to evaluate recovery and outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Nine hundred seventy-five skeletally mature patients with acetabulum fracture.

INTERVENTION

Operative and nonoperative management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Nerve injuries, categorized as traumatic or iatrogenic, recovery (none, partial, or complete), and patient-reported functional outcomes with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (n = 353, 36.2%).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (3.3%) experienced nerve injury with 24 (78%) resulting from trauma and 23 with an associated posterior hip dislocation. Eight injuries (25%) were iatrogenic. Thirty-one (97%) occurred in patients with operative fractures (n = 738). The most common fracture pattern associated with nerve injury was transverse posterior wall (31% of injuries). Obesity was more common in patients with nerve injuries (59% vs. 30% in those without nerve injury (P = 0.001), but was not related to age or sex. Sixty-five percent of sciatic nerve injuries were to the common peroneal division only, while none were isolated to the tibial division. All iatrogenic injuries occurred after the ilioinguinal approach (P < 0.001). Overall, 50% experienced partial nerve recovery and 22% had complete recovery. However, 24% of patients with sciatic or common peroneal injuries had no recovery. Thirty-three percent of tobacco smokers experienced no recovery (vs. 26% of nonsmokers). Average Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for patients with nerve injuries was 32, similar to those without (33).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior acetabulum fracture dislocations are associated with traumatic nerve injury, although 25% of nerve injuries were iatrogenic. Nerve injuries are more common in obese patients. More than one-quarter of patients had no recorded nerve recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The expansion and validation of a new upper extremity item bank for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS)

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) includes a Physical Function (PF) item bank and an Upper Extremity (UE) item bank, which is composed of a subset of items from the PF bank. The UE item bank has few items and known ceiling effects. Therefore, this study aimed to expand the item bank to assess a wider range of functioning. With the additional content, other psychometric properties-improved content validity, item bank depth, range of measurement, and score reliability-were also evaluated. We convened an expert panel to review potential items, and then conducted psychometric analyses on both extant and newly-collected data.

RESULTS

Expert focus groups reviewed the PF item bank for items that were "sufficiently" related to upper extremity functioning for inclusion in the expanded UE item bank. The candidate item bank was quantitatively evaluated in a new sample of 600 people. The final items were calibrated in an aggregated dataset (n = 11,635) from two existing datasets, and the newly collected sample. The original UE item bank included 15 items. After expert review and quantitative evaluation, 31 items were added. The combined 46 items were calibrated using item response theory (IRT). Then computer adaptive tests (CATs) were simulated based off of the psychometric results. These indicated that the new UE item bank has an extended measurement range compared to the original version.

CONCLUSIONS

The expanded PROMIS UE item bank assesses a wider range of upper extremity functioning compared to the initial UE item bank. However, ceiling effects remain a concern for unimpaired groups. The new UE item bank is recommended for individuals with known or suspected upper extremity limitations.

Open ankle fractures are associated with complications and reoperations

Objectives:

To assess clinical and functional outcomes after open versus closed ankle fracture.

Design:

Retrospective comparative study.

Location:

Level 1 Trauma Center.

Patients/Participants:

1303 patients treated for ankle fractures (Weber B and C) between 2003 and 2015. One hundred sixty-five patients (12.7%) presented with open fracture and 1138 (87.3%) with closed fracture.

Intervention:

Surgical or conservative management of ankle fracture.

Main Outcome Measure:

Rates of complications and reoperations. Patient-reported functional outcomes were assessed with the Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), after a minimum of 12 months.

Results:

Mean age was 46 years and 49% of patients were male. Higher mean age was associated with open injuries (51 vs 45 years, P < 0.001), and fractures were increasingly open with aging. Open fractures were associated with high-energy mechanisms: 44% following motor vehicle or motorcycle collisions, although the majority of open fractures in patients >65 years occurred after ground-level fall. Complications occurred more often after open fracture (33% vs 11%) and necessitated more secondary procedures (19% vs. 7%), both P < 0.001. Multivariate regression analysis identified open fracture as a predictor of complications and of worse scores on the activity categories of both the FFI and SMFA.

Conclusion:

Open fractures occurred more often after high energy mechanisms, and were generally more complex than closed fractures. Advanced age was common among open fracture patients, likely contributing to higher complication and secondary procedure rates. Greater morbidity after open ankle fractures was associated with minor differences on activity functions of the FFI and SMFA.

Level of Evidence: Level 3, prognostic

Comparison of Generic, Musculoskeletal-Specific, and Foot and Ankle-Specific Outcome Measures Over Time in Tibial Plafond Fractures

BACKGROUND

This study performed a psychometric analysis assessing and comparing the responsiveness of the relevant components of a generic (Short Form-36 [SF36]), a musculoskeletal-specific (Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment [SMFA]), and a foot and ankle-specific (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS]) outcome score when evaluating surgically treated tibial plafond fractures over time.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients were followed for 12 months after their tibial plafond fracture. Responsiveness, or the ability to detect clinical change in a disease, was evaluated through the standardized response mean (SRM), the proportion meeting a minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS

The SRM of the SF36-Physical Component Summary (PCS) was significantly greater than the SMFA-dysfunction index (DI) (P < .01) and FAOS-Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (P = .01) between baseline and 6 months, whereas the SRMs of only SF36-PCS and FAOS-ADL differed (P = .01) between 6 and 12 months. The proportion of patients achieving an MCID for SF36-PCS was higher than FAOS-ADL (P = .03) between baseline and 6 months and higher than SMFA-DI (P = .04) between 6 and 12 months. The FAOS-ADL showed substantial ceiling effects at baseline (88.2%) but much less at 6 months (5.9%) and 12 months (9.8%). Smaller ceiling effects were observed for the SMFA-DI (11.8%) at baseline, whereas none were observed for the SF36-PCS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that the SF36-PCS had greater responsiveness in assessing tibial plafond fractures compared to the SMFA-DI and FAOS-ADL, particularly in the first 6 months after surgery. In addition, limitations were revealed in the SMFA-DI and FAOS-ADL. This study illustrates the necessary diligence required for selection of outcome measures, as musculoskeletal and anatomy specific scores are not necessarily superior.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Step Activity After Surgical Treatment of Ankle Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory activity is reduced in patients with ankle arthritis. In this study, we measured step activity over time in 2 treatment groups and secondarily compared step activity with results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Patients who were treated with either ankle arthrodesis or ankle arthroplasty wore a step activity monitor preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Changes from preoperative baseline in total steps per day and per-day metrics of low, medium, and high-activity step counts were measured in both treatment groups. Step activity was compared with each subject's PROM scores as reported on the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical function and bodily pain subscales.

RESULTS

Of the 3 activity levels, combined group high-activity step counts showed the greatest increase (mean of 278 steps [95% confidence interval (CI), 150 to 407 steps], a 46% improvement from preoperatively). At 6 months, the mean high-activity step improvement for the arthroplasty group was 194 steps compared with a mean decline of 44 steps for the arthrodesis group (mean 238-step difference [95% CI, -60 to 536 steps]). By 36 months postoperatively, the greater improvement in high-activity steps for the arthroplasty versus the arthrodesis group was no longer present. There were no significant pairwise differences in improvement based on surgical treatment method at any individual follow-up time point. For a within-patient increase of 1,000 total steps, there was a mean change in the MFA, SF-36 physical function, and SF-36 bodily pain scores of -1.8 (95% CI, -2.4 to -1.2), 3.8 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.8), and 2.8 (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.9), respectively (p < 0.0001 for all associations). There was no evidence that the association differed by study visit, or by study visit and surgical procedure interaction (p > 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of ankle arthritis significantly improves ambulatory activity, with greater change occurring at high activity levels. Improvement may occur more quickly following arthroplasty than arthrodesis, but at 3 years, we detected no significant difference between the 2 procedures. Step counts, while associated with PROMs, do not parallel them, and thus may be a useful supplementary measure, particularly in longitudinal studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mental illness is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after ankle fracture

Objectives

To assess clinical and functional outcomes after ankle fracture in patients with preexisting mental illness.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Level 1 trauma center.

Patients/Participants

One thousand three hundred seventy-eight adult patients treated for ankle fractures; 228 (17%) had preexisting mental illness.

Intervention

Open reduction internal fixation.

Main outcome measure

Rates of complications and reoperations. Functional outcomes were assessed via Foot Function Index (n = 530) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (n = 530).

Results

Depression was the most common mental illness (63%), followed by anxiety (23%). Mental illness was associated with older age, female sex, and preexisting medical comorbidities, including diabetes and obesity. Mental illness was not associated with specific fracture patterns or open injury. Complications occurred no more often in patients with mental illness, but secondary operations (13% vs 7%) were more likely, particularly implant removals (8% vs 4%), both P < .05. Functional outcomes were worse in mentally ill patients as measured by the Foot Function Index (39 vs 30, P = .006) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Mobility: 45 vs 35, Bothersome: 35 vs 26 and Dysfunction: 35 vs 26, all P < .01.

Conclusion

Secondary operations were nearly 50% more frequent in patients with mental illness, and functional outcome scores were significantly worse, suggesting that mental illness, unrelated to injury and treatment parameters, has major influence on outcomes. In the future, strategies to identify and treat mental illness prior to and after treatment could improve functional outcomes following ankle fracture.

Patient-reported Outcome Instruments in Lower Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Advances in fracture fixation and soft tissue coverage continue to improve the care of patients after limb-threatening lower extremity (LE) trauma. However, debate continues regarding which treatment option-reconstruction or amputation-is most appropriate. Many authors have attempted to quantify the patient experience in this treatment paradigm; however, they have not used patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments specific to this population. Our aim was to identify and evaluate PRO instruments developed specifically for LE trauma, applicable to reconstruction and amputation, using established PRO instrument development and validation guidelines.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method to query PubMed, Medline Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane, Medline Web of Science, and Psych Info databases from inception to November 2016. Publications were included that described the development and/or validation of a PRO instrument assessing satisfaction and/or quality of life in LE trauma, applicable to both amputation and reconstruction. Two authors independently reviewed each full-text citation.

Results

After removing duplicates, 6,290 abstracts were identified via the database query. Following a preliminary title and abstract screen, 657 full-text citations were reviewed. Of these references, none satisfied the previously established inclusion criteria.

Conclusions

No studies were identified that described a PRO instrument developed to assess outcomes in LE trauma patients applicable to both reconstruction and amputation. There is thus a need for a PRO instrument designed specifically for patients who have sustained limb-threatening LE trauma to guide treatment decisions.

The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: a study of the reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in patients sustaining trauma

OBJECTIVE

To assess test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA-NL) in patients who sustained acute physical trauma.

DESIGN

A longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

A level 1 trauma center in The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

Patients who required hospital admission after sustaining an acute physical trauma.

INTERVENTION

Patients completed the SMFA-NL at six weeks, eight weeks and six months post-injury.

MAIN MEASURE

The measures used were The Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Test-retest reliability (between six and eight weeks post-injury) using intraclass correlation coefficients, the smallest detectable change and Bland and Altman plots. Construct validity (six weeks post-injury) and responsiveness (between six weeks and six months post-injury) were evaluated using the hypothesis testing method.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients (mean age: 46.5, SD: 13.4) participated, 145 patients completed the retest questionnaires (eight weeks) and 160 patients completed the responsiveness questionnaires (six months). The intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability on all subscales (0.80 to 0.98). The smallest detectable change was 17.4 for the Upper Extremity Dysfunction subscale, 11.0 for the Lower Extremity Dysfunction subscales, 13.9 for the Problems with Daily Activities subscale and 16.5 for the Mental and Emotional Problems subscale. At group level, the smallest detectable change ranged from 1.48 to 1.96. A total of 86% of the construct validity hypotheses and 79% of the responsiveness hypotheses were confirmed.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the SMFA-NL has good to excellent reliability, sufficient construct validity and is able to detect change in physical function over time.

Measuring outcomes following tibial fracture

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine how outcome is measured following adult tibial fracture in the modern era of functional outcome measurement and patient reported outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of publications since 2009 was performed, looking specifically at acute, adult tibial shaft fractures. Ovid Medline, Embase, PubMed and PsycINFO databases were searched for relevant titles which were then screened by two authors with adjudication where necessary by a third. Relevant articles were reviewed in full and data was extracted concerning the study participants, study design and any measures that were used to quantify the results following fracture. The results were collated and patient reported outcome measures were assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) standards.

RESULTS

A total of 943 titles and articles were reviewed, with 117 included for full analysis. A wide range of clinical and radiological "outcomes" were described, along with named clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures. There was considerable heterogeneity and lack of detail in the description of the simplest outcomes, such as union, infection or reoperation. Reported clinician and patient reported outcome measures are variably used. None of the identified patient reported outcome measures have been validated for use following tibial fracture.

CONCLUSION

We recommend definition of a core outcome set for use following tibial fracture. This will standardise outcome reporting following these injuries. Furthermore, there is need for a validated patient reported outcome measure to better assess patient important outcomes in this patient group.

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcome Measures Used in Circular Frame Fixation

INTRODUCTION

Clinical studies in orthopedics are using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) increasingly. PROMs are often being designed for a specific disease or an area of the body with the aim of being patient centered. As yet, none exists specifically for treatment with circular ring external fixation devices.

AIM

The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the published literature related to the use of PROMs in patients that underwent treatment with circular frames (Ilizarov or Hexapod Type Fixators).

METHODS

An online literature search was conducted for English language articles using the Scopus.

RESULTS

There were 534 published articles identified. After initial filtering for relevance and duplication, this figure reduced to 17, with no further articles identified through searching the bibliographies. Exclusion criteria removed two articles resulting in 15 articles included in the final review. Out of the 15 studies identified, a total of 10 different scoring measures where used. The majority of studies used a combination of joint/limb-specific and generic health PROMs with an average of 2.5 per study. No paper specifically discussed all eight PROMs criteria when justifying which PROMs they used.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that none of the PROMs analyzed in this systematic review are truly representative of the health outcomes specific to this patient group and, therefore, propose that a PROM specific to this patient group needs to be developed.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Antonios T, Barker A, Ibrahim I, et al. A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcome Measures Used in Circular Frame Fixation. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):34-44.

Structural Validity of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in Patients With Injuries

BACKGROUND

The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure, originally having 2 elements of outcome: the function index and the bother index. In multiple studies, it has been argued that the SMFA should be scored using 3, 4, or 6 subscales instead. Therefore, there is inconsistency with the number of underlying dimensions of the SMFA.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the various proposed subscale configurations of the SMFA in a broad range of Dutch patients with injuries.

DESIGN

This study used a prospective cohort design.

METHODS

Participants with injuries were asked to complete the Dutch SMFA (SMFA-NL) at 5 to 8 weeks postinjury. The structural validity of the 6 different factor structures that have been proposed in other studies was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach alpha.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients participated (response rate = 74%). A 4-factor structure showed an acceptable fit (root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.070, comparative fit index = 0.973, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.971). Other models, including the original 2-index structure, showed insufficient structural validity in Dutch patients with injuries. The 4-factor structure showed sufficient discriminant validity and good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha ≥ 0.83).

LIMITATIONS

It is unclear whether conclusions are generalizable across different countries, people who are elderly, and people without injuries.

CONCLUSION

In a broad range of patients with injuries, the SMFA-NL may be best scored and interpreted using a 4-factor structure. Other factor structures showed insufficient structural validity.

Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing interest in the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, there is a large variety of PROMs and a lack of consensus regarding preference for their use. Aim of this study is to determine how often PROMS are used for foot and ankle disorders, for what purpose PROMs are used, and what the preferences of the foot and ankle surgeons are, when choosing a PROM to use.

METHODS

Members of the Ankleplatform Study Group-Science of Variation Collaborative were invited to participate in this survey by email. The online survey consisted of six questions on the use and preferences regarding foot and ankle PROMs.

RESULTS

188 participants completed the questionnaire. Of the respondents 17% reported not to use PROMs, 72% stated to use PROMS for research, 39% routinely for patient care and 34% for registration or quality assessment. The respondents were familiar with 30 different outcome measures, of which 20 were PROMs. One of the excluded outcome measures, the AOFAS Hindfoot scale was most commonly reported as preferred outcome measure. FAOS and MOXFQ were the preferred PROMs, reported by 9.7% of the surgeons. Subsequently followed by the FFI (4.3%), the FAAM (3.7%) and the VAS-FA (3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A large majority of the foot and ankle surgeons uses PROMs. The AOFAS hindfoot scale is mentioned as the most preferred outcome measure, while in fact this is not a PROM. Of the twenty different PROMs mentioned in this study, most reported were the FAOS and MOXFQ both supported by only 9.7% of the surgeons. For proper comparison between patients in clinical practice and research, consensus is needed on which easy-to-use PROM with adequate clinimetric properties should be used. Therefore more evidence in the field of clinimetrics of foot and ankle outcome measures is needed.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Arthrodesis and Two Generations of Ankle Replacement Implants

BACKGROUND

We analyzed self-reported outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients treated with ankle arthrodesis or total ankle replacement (TAR) during a time of transition from older to newer-generation TAR implants.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study comparing outcomes in 273 consecutive patients treated for ankle arthritis with arthrodesis or TAR between 2005 and 2011. Adult patients with end-stage ankle arthritis who were able to walk and willing and able to respond to surveys were included in the study. Patients were excluded when they had another lower-limb problem that might affect walking. At baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36-month follow-up visits, participants completed a pain score, a Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA), and a Short Form-36 (SF-36) survey.

RESULTS

There was significant mean improvement in most outcomes after surgery regardless of procedure. In general, the greatest improvement occurred during the first 6 months of follow-up. Linear mixed-effects regression adjusted for differences at baseline in age, body mass index (BMI), and surgery type showed that at 6 months the scores were improved by a mean (and standard error) of 12.6 ± 0.7 (33%) on the MFA, 22.0 ± 1.4 (56%) on the SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) scale, 32.4 ± 1.6 (93%) on the SF-36 Bodily Pain (BP) scale, and 4.0 ± 0.2 (63%) on the pain rating scale. The mean improvements in the MFA and SF-36 PF scores over the 3-year follow-up period were significantly better after the TARs than after the arthrodeses, with differences between the 2 groups of 3.6 ± 1.6 (p = 0.023) and 7.5 ± 2.9 (p = 0.0098), respectively. The differences between the 2 groups were slightly greater when only the newer TAR devices were compared with the arthrodeses (MFA = 3.8 ± 1.8 [p = 0.031], SF-36 PF = 8.8 ± 3.3 [p = 0.0074], SF-36 BP = 7.3 ± 3.6 [p = 0.045], and pain score = 0.8 ± 0.4 [p = 0.038]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported improved comfort and function after both surgical treatments. The average improvement in the MFA and SF-36 PF scores was better after TAR than after arthrodesis, particularly when the TAR had been done with later-generation implants. Younger patients had greater functional improvements than older patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Contemporary acetabular fracture surgery

In the time since Letournel popularised the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures, more than 25 years ago, there have been many changes within the field, related to patients, surgical technique, implants and post-operative care. However, the long-term outcomes appear largely unchanged. Does this represent stasis or have the advances been mitigated by other negative factors? In this article we have attempted to document the recent changes within the surgery of patients with a fracture involving the acetabulum, outline contemporary management, and identify the major problem areas where further research is most needed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1125–31

[Long-term outcome following multiple trauma in working age : A prospective study in a Swiss trauma center]

BACKGROUND

Given the lack of data in the available literature, we were interested in the disability rate and corresponding insurance costs following multiple trauma in Switzerland. The possible impact of demographic, traumatic and hospital process factors as well as subjective and objective longer-term outcome variables on insurance data acquired were examined.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Following multiple trauma the clinical and socioeconomic parameters in 145 survivors of working age were investigated over 2 and 4 years post-injury at a Swiss trauma center (University Hospital Basel). The correlation with the corresponding data provided by the largest Swiss accident insurance company (Suva, n = 63) was tested by univariate and multivariate analysis and patients insured at Suva were compared with those insured elsewhere (n = 82).

RESULTS

The mean level of disability in this cohort of multiple trauma patients insured at Suva was 43 %. The insurer expected costs of more than 1 million Swiss Francs per multiply injured patient. In univariate analysis, only discrete correlations (maximum r = 0.37) were found with resulting disability, but significant correlations were found in subsequent multivariate testing most of all for age and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA 11 % and 15 % predictive capacity, p = 0.001; corrected R² = 0.26). Among variables of longer-term outcome the Euro Quality of Life Group health-related quality of life in five dimensions (EQ-5D) correlated almost as highly with the objective extent of disability as did the reduced capacity to work declared by the patients (0.64 and 0.7, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The estimation of long-term disability following multiple trauma based on primary data following injury appears to be possible only to a limited extent. Given the clinical and socioeconomic relevance, comparable analyses are necessary by including all insurance providers involved.

Complications and Functional Outcomes After Pantalar Dislocation

BACKGROUND

Pantalar dislocations without associated talar fracture are rare and have high risks of complications, including infection, osteonecrosis, and posttraumatic osteoarthrosis. Limited information on later function exists. This study evaluated complications and outcomes following pantalar dislocation without talar fracture.

METHODS

Nineteen patients were identified with open (n = 14) or closed (n = 5) pantalar dislocations without talar fracture. Ten male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 39.6 years (range, 19 to 68 years) were included. Open injuries underwent surgical debridement. Sixteen patients had open reduction, and 2 had closed reduction. Fixation was achieved with Kirschner wires (n = 4), external fixation (n = 9), or both (n = 3). Two patients did not have fixation. Another patient had primary transtibial amputation due to nonreconstructible foot trauma. Charts and radiographs were reviewed to identify infection, osteonecrosis, and posttraumatic arthrosis. Data on pain, medications, range of motion, and secondary procedures were collected. After a minimum of 1 year, Foot Function Index (FFI) and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) surveys were administered.

RESULTS

The mean clinical follow-up was 45.1 months. Two patients had superficial wound-healing problems with prolonged drainage, which healed with dressing changes and oral antibiotics, and 1 patient developed cellulitis 4 months after injury, which resolved with intravenous antibiotics. No deep wound infections occurred. Fourteen (88%) of the 16 patients with a minimum of 11 months of radiographic follow-up developed osteonecrosis, 2 with collapse of the talar dome, and 7 (44%) developed arthrosis of ≥1 peritalar articulation. Outcome surveys were obtained for 11 (58%) of the 19 patients, at a mean of 5.2 years after injury. The mean MFA score was 30.3, and the mean FFI score was 25.3. Six of 10 survey respondents had returned to employment, but 88% (14 of 16) of the patients with radiographic and clinical follow-up reported at least mild pain and 75% (12 of 16) were taking analgesics.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent surgical debridement of open injuries and reimplantation of the talus after pantalar dislocation was not associated with deep infection. Osteonecrosis occurred in the majority of patients, but collapse was uncommon. Persistent pain and functional limitations are frequent after pantalar dislocation, as reflected in extremity-specific and generalized functional outcome scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Can Tibial Shaft Fractures Bear Weight After Intramedullary Nailing? A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine the potential benefits and risks associated with weight-bearing after intramedullary (IM) nailing of unstable tibial shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Two New York State level 1 trauma centers, one level 2 trauma center, and 1 tertiary care orthopaedic hospital in a large urban center in New York City.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-eight patients with 90 tibial shaft fractures were enrolled. The following were used as inclusion criteria: (1) skeletally mature adult patients 18 years of age or older, (2) displaced fractures of tibial diaphysis (OTA type 42) treated with operative intervention, and (3) radiographs, including injury, operative, and completion of follow-up. Sixty-eight patients with 70 tibial shaft fractures completed follow-up.

INTERVENTION

All patients were treated with locked IM nailing. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: immediate weight-bearing-as-tolerated (WBAT) or non-weight-bearing for the first 6 postoperative weeks (NWB).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fracture union or treatment failure/revision surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the observed time to union between groups (WBAT = 22.1 ± 11.7 weeks vs. NWB = 21.3 ± 9.9 weeks; P = 0.76). Rates of complications did not statistically differ between groups. No fracture loss of reduction leading to malunion was encountered. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for all domains did not statistically differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate weight-bearing after IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures is safe and is not associated with an increase in adverse events or complications. Patients should be allowed to bear weight as tolerated after IM nailing of OTA subtype 42-A and 42-B tibial shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessment of functional outcomes of surgically managed acetabular fractures

We performed a systematic review of the literature pertaining to the functional outcomes of the surgical management of acetabular fractures. A total of 69 articles met our inclusion criteria, revealing that eight generic outcome instruments were used, along with five specific instruments. The majority of studies reported outcomes using a version of the d’Aubigne and Postel score, which has not been validated for use in acetabular fracture. Few validated outcome measures were reported. No psychometric testing of outcome instruments was performed. The current assessment of outcomes in surgery for acetabular fractures lacks scientific rigour, and does not give reliable outcome data for either scientific comparison or patient counselling.

Take home message: The use of non-validated functional outcome measures is a major limitation of the current literature pertaining to surgical management of acetabular fractures; future studies should use validated outcome measures to ensure the legitimacy of the reported results.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:690–5.

Psychometric properties of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: a systematic review

Objectives:

To investigate the psychometric properties of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).

Data sources:

A systematic search of the following databases was undertaken concerning psychometric evidence of the MFA and SMFA: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cinahl. References of retrieved articles were inspected for additional data.

Review method:

Articles evaluating the validity, reliability or responsiveness of the MFA or SMFA in patients with musculoskeletal disorders were included in this systematic review. The methodological quality of included articles was critically appraised and the psychometric data were extracted using standardized forms. An established set of criteria were used to synthetize the evidence in order to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of included questionnaires and the gaps in the literature.

Results:

Nine articles on MFA and 24 articles on SMFA met the inclusion criteria. The SMFA fulfilled 75% of the psychometric criteria analyzed, while the MFA fulfilled only 50%. MFA and SMFA have excellent content validity and relative reliability (weighted average intraclass correlation coefficient ⩾ 0.87), and are moderately to highly responsive (standardized response mean between 0.65 and 1.13). Absolute reliability and clinically important difference of both questionnaires need to be defined, while the construct validity of MFA still needs to be established.

Conclusion:

MFA and SMFA are reliable and responsive tools for monitoring the function of patients with various musculoskeletal disorders. Still, research is needed to justify their usage in a clinical setting.

Acetabular fractures converted to total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: how does function compare to primary total hip arthroplasty?

OBJECTIVES

Little data exist regarding the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) after acetabular fracture treatment failure. We hypothesize that these patients achieve a lower level of function than those who undergo primary THA for osteoarthritis (atraumatic).

DESIGN

Retrospective review. Control group consisted of sequential patients who underwent a primary THA for osteoarthritis and were 60 years or older at the time of surgery.

SETTING

Level I Academic Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

One hundred seventy-one patients older than 60 years when they sustained an acetabular fracture were included in this study. Seventeen (10%) patients were converted to THA. Control patients were treated with primary THA for osteoarthritis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Musculoskeletal function assessment scores and Harris Hip scores were obtained after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation, 3 underwent nonoperative treatment, and 1 received an acute THA. The most common fracture patterns converted to THA were associated both column (n = 5) and posterior column with posterior wall (n = 5). The average time to conversion to THA was 35 months. When compared with controls, patients who had THA after an acetabular fracture had significantly higher Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores and significantly lower Harris Hip scores, indicating worse level of function.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo THA after acetabular fracture have significantly worse functional outcome scores when compared with patients who undergo a primary THA for osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III.

Prognostic value of computed tomography classification systems for intra-articular calcaneus fractures

BACKGROUND

There are several published computed tomography (CT) classification systems for calcaneus fractures, each validated by a different standard. The goal of this study was to measure which system would best predict clinical outcomes as measured by a widely used and validated musculoskeletal health status questionnaire.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients with isolated intra-articular joint depression calcaneus fractures more than 2 years after treatment were identified. All had preoperative CT studies and were treated with open reduction and plate fixation using a lateral extensile approach. Four different blinded reviewers classified injuries according to the CT classification systems of Crosby and Fitzgibbons, Eastwood, and Sanders. Functional outcomes evaluated with a Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA). The mean follow-up was 4.3 years.

RESULTS

The mean MFA score was 15.7 (SD = 11.6), which is not significantly different from published values for midfoot injuries, hindfoot injuries, or both, 1 year after injury (mean = 22.1, SD = 18.4). The classification systems of Crosby and Fitzgibbons, Eastwood, and Sanders, the number of fragments of the posterior facet, and payer status were not significantly associated with outcome as determined by the MFA. The Sanders classification trended toward significance. Anterior process comminution and surgeon's overall impression of severity were significantly associated with functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of anterior process comminution was an important determinant of functional outcome with increasing anterior process comminution significantly associated with worsened functional outcome (P = .04). In addition, the surgeon's overall impression of severity of injury was predictive of functional outcome (P = .02), as determined by MFA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years: a systematic review of the literature

The increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in an ageing population has contributed to older patients becoming the fastest-growing group presenting with acetabular fractures. We performed a systematic review of the literature involving a number of databases to identify studies that included the treatment outcome of acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years. An initial search identified 61 studies; after exclusion by two independent reviewers, 15 studies were considered to meet the inclusion criteria. All were case series. The mean Coleman score for methodological quality assessment was 37 (25 to 49). There were 415 fractures in 414 patients. Pooled analysis revealed a mean age of 71.8 years (55 to 96) and a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (1 to 210). In seven studies the results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were presented: this was combined with simultaneous hip replacement (THR) in four, and one study had a mixture of these strategies. The results of percutaneous fixation were presented in two studies, and a single study revealed the results of non-operative treatment. With fixation of the fracture, the overall mean rate of conversion to THR was 23.1% (0% to 45.5%). The mean rate of non-fatal complications was 39.8% (0% to 64%), and the mean mortality rate was 19.1% (5% to 50%) at a mean of 64 months (95% confidence interval 59.4 to 68.6; range 12 to 143). Further data dealing with the classification of the fracture, the surgical approach used, operative time, blood loss, functional and radiological outcomes were also analysed. This study highlights that, of the many forms of treatment available for this group of patients, there is a trend to higher complication rates and the need for further surgery compared with the results of the treatment of acetabular fractures in younger patients.

Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective

Modern interest in patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in orthopaedics dates back to the mid-1980s. While gradual growth of activity in this area has occurred over the past 25 years, the extent to which this research methodology is applied in clinical practice to improve patient care is unclear. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Historically, clinical research in orthopaedics has focused on the technical success of treatment, and objective indicators such as mortality, morbidity, and complications. By contrast, the PROMs framework focuses on effects of treatment described in terms of relief of symptoms, restoring functional ability, and improving quality of life. PROMs can be used to study the relative effects of disease, injury, and treatment across different health conditions. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: All clinical research should begin with identifying clear and meaningful research questions so that the resources and efforts required for data collection result in useful data. Different consumers of research data have different perspectives on what comprises meaningful information. Involving stakeholders such as patients, providers, payers, and policy-makers when defining priorities in the larger research endeavor is one way to inform what type of data should be collected in a particular study. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: Widespread collection of outcomes data would potentially aid these stakeholders by identifying best practices, benefits and costs, and important patient or practice characteristics related to outcomes. Several initiatives currently underway may help systematic collection of PROMs, create efficient systems, and foster collaborations to provide support and resources to minimize costs.

Development and validation of a pediatric sports activity rating scale: the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS)

BACKGROUND

Having simple and reliable validated outcome measures is vital to conducting high-quality outcomes research in the field of orthopaedic surgery. Activity level is a key prognostic variable for patients with sports injuries. There is a paucity of such activity scales for children and adolescents who are otherwise healthy and athletically active. In addition to frequency and intensity of athletic activity, level of play and coach/trainer supervision are important variables unique to children and adolescents that are not captured in available adult scoring systems.

PURPOSE

To create and validate a concise and comprehensive activity rating scale for athletically active children and adolescents 10 to 18 years of age.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Item generation was performed with a panel of orthopaedic surgeons and adolescent athletes. Item reduction, pilot testing and scale refinement resulted in a final 8-item instrument, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS). Existing methods were used to determine reliability and validation. The Flesch-Kincaid score was calculated at a 6.6th-grade reading level (approximately 13 years old); therefore, although all subjects provided their own answers, parents were allowed to assist children younger than 13 years with reading the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Scale reliability was excellent (test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91; internal consistency, Cronbach alpha = .914), and there were no floor or ceiling effects. There was also robust construct validity: Convergent validity testing revealed positive correlations between the HSS Pedi-FABS and level of competition in athletic activity, number of reported hours of athletic activity per week, and existing comparable adult and pediatric scales. Discriminant validity was shown with age, body mass index, and type of sport as measured by the Daniel scale.

CONCLUSION

The 8-item HSS Pedi-FABS can be used to reliably and accurately evaluate activity level as a prognostic variable for clinical research studies. It is a simple, reliable, and valid metric to assess activity in children and adolescents 10 to 18 years of age. This instrument will lead to better evaluation of posttreatment outcomes and patient-reported activity for child and adolescent athletes.

Return to duty and deployment after major joint arthroplasty

With an increasing incidence, individuals are undergoing total joint arthroplasty at a younger age. This study evaluated the likelihood of return to duty and deployment to the combat zone after major joint arthroplasty and their relationship to functional outcome. Retrospectively, service members having undergone major joint arthroplasty completed the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and a deployment specific questionnaire; 93.3% (n=42/45) follow-up was achieved with the average time from surgery being 4 1/2 years. Eighty-six percent of patients returned to duty. Of those, at least 70% were able to deploy to the combat zone and all were able to complete a full tour as assigned. No statistical significance was seen between those that deployed and those that did not in both the bothersome index and functional assessment scores. Total joint arthroplasty presents an effective intervention when appropriately indicated in a young active population seeking the ability to continue a military career.

The musculoskeletal function assessment: establishing normative data

OBJECTIVES

Historically, outcomes in orthopedic surgery had been assessed using clinical scores. Currently, functional outcome has become the important measure. The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment is valid and reliable, patient-assessed health status questionnaire used by physicians to determine outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Reference values for outcomes instruments establish a baseline for evaluating patient function. What have come to be accepted as reference values for the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment were published in 1999 from a small nonpatient sample. The purpose of this prospective study was to establish normal reference values for the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment for healthy adults for a larger, randomly selected population.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Musculoskeletal Function Assessment data were collected from subjects within a 100-mile radius of our midwestern city.

PARTICIPANTS

The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire was administered to 406 participants randomly selected from public data. Data were collected over a 2-year period. There were 215 male and 191 female responders. Stratification criteria included gender, age (18-35, 36-55, and 56-89 years), and body mass index. There were 58 in age group 28-35 years, 102 in age group 36-55 year, and 246 in age group 56-89 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary study measure was to compare Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for healthy nonpatient participants in the Midwest to the nonpatient data originally published in 1999.

RESULTS

Musculoskeletal Function Assessment values were significantly higher, indicating poorer function, in all categories and demographics when compared with the previously reported data.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study shows that our normal population's baseline function is significantly poorer than previously reported. In addition to indicating that the previously reported information possibly was incorrect, our findings suggest that temporal and/or geographic conditions may influence Musculoskeletal Function Assessment normative data. Therefore, assessing functional outcome may be a dynamic rather than a static process, requiring periodic updating to reestablish normative data.