1
|
Wankhede D, Yuan T, Kloor M, Halama N, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M. Clinical significance of combined tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:609-619. [PMID: 38734024 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00091-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are established prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Previous studies evaluating the combination of TIL and MSI status identified distinct colorectal cancer subtypes with unique prognostic associations. However, these studies were often limited by sample size, particularly for MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours, and there is no comprehensive summary of the available evidence. We aimed to review the literature to compare the survival outcomes associated with the subtypes derived from the integrated MSI-TIL classification in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library without language restrictions, for articles published between Jan 1, 1990, and March 13, 2024. Patient cohorts comparing different combinations of TIL (high or low) and MSI status (MSI or microsatellite stable [MSS]) in patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer were included. Studies were excluded if they focused on neoadjuvant therapy or on other immune markers such as B cells or macrophages. Methodological quality assessment was done with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale; data appraisal and extraction was done independently by two reviewers. Summary estimates were extracted from published reports. The primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. A frequentist network meta-analysis was done to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for each outcome. The MSI-TIL subgroups were prognostically ranked based on P-score, bias, magnitude, and precision of associations with each outcome. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023461108). FINDINGS Of 302 studies initially identified, 21 studies (comprising 14 028 patients) were included in the systematic review and 19 (13 029 patients) in the meta-analysis. Nine studies were identified with a low risk of bias and the remaining ten had a moderate risk of bias. The MSI-TIL-high (MSI-TIL-H) subtype exhibited longer overall survival (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·34-0·61; I2=77·7%), disease-free survival (0·43, 0·32-0·58; I2=61·6%), and cancer-specific survival (0·53, 0·43-0·66; I2=0%), followed by the MSS-TIL-H subtype for overall survival (HR 0·53, 0·41-0·69; I2=77·7%), disease-free survival (0·52, 0·41-0·64; I2=61·6%), and cancer-specific survival (0·55, 0·47-0·64; I2=0%) than did patients with MSS-TIL-low tumours (MSS-TIL-L). Patients with the MSI-TIL-L subtype had similar overall survival (0·88, 0·66-1·18; I2=77·7%) and disease-free survival (0·93, 0·69-1·26; I2=61·6%), but a modestly longer cancer-specific survival (0·72, 0·57-0·90; I2=0%) than did the MSS-TIL-L subtype. Results from the direct and indirect evidence were strongly congruous. INTERPRETATION The findings from this network meta-analysis suggest that better survival was only observed among patients with TIL-H colorectal cancer, regardless of MSI or MSS status. The integrated MSI-TIL classification should be further explored as a predictive tool for clinical decision-making in early-stage colorectal cancer. FUNDING German Research Council (HO 5117/2-2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Wankhede
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanwei Yuan
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Helmholtz Institute for Translational Oncology, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pan XH, Tan B, Chin YH, Lee ECZ, Kong G, Chong B, Kueh M, Khoo CM, Mehta A, Majety P, Grandhi GR, Dimitriadis GK, Foo R, Chew NWS, Le Roux CW, Mamas MA, Chan MY. Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and other weight loss drugs in overweight and obesity: a network meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2024; 32:840-856. [PMID: 38413012 DOI: 10.1002/oby.24002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide compared to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and other weight loss drugs in the treatment of overweight and obesity. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials on tirzepatide, GLP-1 RA, and weight loss drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. A network meta-analysis was performed, drawing direct and indirect comparisons between treatment groups. Network diagrams and surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis were performed for primary (≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, absolute weight loss) and secondary outcomes and adverse effects. RESULTS Thirty-one randomized controlled trials, involving more than 35,000 patients, were included in this study. Tirzepatide 15 mg ranked in the top three across weight-related parameters, glycemic profile (glycated hemoglobin), lipid parameters (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides), and blood pressure. Tirzepatide 15 mg had the highest efficacy compared with placebo for achieving ≥15% weight loss (risk ratio 10.24, 95% CI: 6.42-16.34). As compared to placebo, tirzepatide and GLP-1 RA across all doses had significant increases in gastrointestinal adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS The superiority of tirzepatide and GLP-1 RA in inducing weight loss and their ability to target multiple metabolic parameters render them promising candidates in the treatment of patients with overweight and obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin-Hui Pan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bryan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yip Han Chin
- Ministry of Health Holdings, Ministry of Health, Singapore
| | - Ethan Cheng Zhe Lee
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Gwyneth Kong
- Ministry of Health Holdings, Ministry of Health, Singapore
| | - Bryan Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Martin Kueh
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland & University College Dublin Malaysia Campus, George Town, Malaysia
| | - Chin Meng Khoo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Endocrinology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Anurag Mehta
- VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Priyanka Majety
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Gowtham R Grandhi
- VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Georgios K Dimitriadis
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Roger Foo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| | - Nicholas W S Chew
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| | - Carel W Le Roux
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Mark Y Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sreenivasan J, Malik A, Khan MS, Lloji A, Hooda U, Aronow WS, Lanier GM, Pan S, Greene SJ, Murad MH, Michos ED, Cooper HA, Gass A, Gupta R, Desai NR, Mentz RJ, Frishman WH, Panza JA. Pharmacotherapies in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cardiol Rev 2024; 32:114-123. [PMID: 36576372 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Various pharmacotherapies exist for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but with unclear comparative efficacy. We searched EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library from inception through August 2021 for all randomized clinical trials in HFpEF (EF >40%) that evaluated beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Outcomes assessed were cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. We included 22 randomized clinical trials (30,673 participants; mean age = 71.7 ± 4.2 years; females = 49.3 ± 7.7%; median follow-up = 24.4 ± 11.1 months). Compared with placebo, there was no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular mortality [beta-blockers; odds ratio (OR) 0.79 (0.46-1.34), MRA; OR 0.90 (0.70-1.14), ACE OR 0.95 (0.59-1.53), ARB; OR 1.02 (0.87-1.19), ARNI; OR 0.97 (0.74-1.26) and SGLT2i; OR 1.00 (0.84-1.18)] or all-cause mortality [beta blockers; OR 0.75 (0.54-1.04), MRA; OR 0.90 (0.75-1.08) ACE; OR 1.05 (0.71-1.54), ARB; OR 1.03 (0.91-1.15), ARNI; OR 0.99 (0.82-1.20) and SGLT2i; OR 1.00 (0.89-1.13)]. The certainty in these estimates was low or very low. There was a significantly reduction in HF hospitalization with the use of SGLT2i [OR 0.71 (0.62-0.82), moderate certainty], ARNI [OR 0.77 (0.63-0.94), low certainty], and MRA [OR 0.81 (0.66-0.98), moderate certainty]; with corresponding P scores of 0.84, 0.68, and 0.58, respectively. In HFpEF, the use of beta-blockers, MRA, ACE/ARB/ARNI, or SGLT2i was not associated with improved cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. SGLT2i, ARNI, and MRA reduced the risk of HF hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayakumar Sreenivasan
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Aaqib Malik
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Muhammad Shahzeb Khan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Amanda Lloji
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Urvashi Hooda
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Wilbert S Aronow
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Gregg M Lanier
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Stephen Pan
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Stephen J Greene
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Erin D Michos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Howard A Cooper
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Alan Gass
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| | - Rahul Gupta
- Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA
| | - Nihar R Desai
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Robert J Mentz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Julio A Panza
- From the Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haslbeck FB, Mueller K, Karen T, Loewy J, Meerpohl JJ, Bassler D. Musical and vocal interventions to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:CD013472. [PMID: 37675934 PMCID: PMC10483930 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013472.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preterm birth interferes with brain maturation, and subsequent clinical events and interventions may have additional deleterious effects. Music as therapy is offered increasingly in neonatal intensive care units aiming to improve health outcomes and quality of life for both preterm infants and the well-being of their parents. Systematic reviews of mixed methodological quality have demonstrated ambiguous results for the efficacy of various types of auditory stimulation of preterm infants. A more comprehensive and rigorous systematic review is needed to address controversies arising from apparently conflicting studies and reviews. OBJECTIVES We assessed the overall efficacy of music and vocal interventions for physiological and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants (< 37 weeks' gestation) compared to standard care. In addition, we aimed to determine specific effects of various interventions for physiological, anthropometric, social-emotional, neurodevelopmental short- and long-term outcomes in the infants, parental well-being, and bonding. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, RILM Abstracts, and ERIC in November 2021; and Proquest Dissertations in February 2019. We searched the reference lists of related systematic reviews, and of studies selected for inclusion and clinical trial registries. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel, and cluster-randomised controlled trials with preterm infants < 37 weeks` gestation during hospitalisation, and parents when they were involved in the intervention. Interventions were any music or vocal stimulation provided live or via a recording by a music therapist, a parent, or a healthcare professional compared to standard care. The intervention duration was greater than five minutes and needed to occur more than three times. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three review authors independently extracted data. We analysed the treatment effects of the individual trials using RevMan Web using a fixed-effects model to combine the data. Where possible, we presented results in meta-analyses using mean differences with 95% CI. We performed heterogeneity tests. When the I2 statistic was higher than 50%, we assessed the source of the heterogeneity by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 25 trials recruiting 1532 infants and 691 parents (21 parallel-group RCTs, four cross-over RCTs). The infants gestational age at birth varied from 23 to 36 weeks, taking place in NICUs (level 1 to 3) around the world. Within the trials, the intervention varied widely in type, delivery, frequency, and duration. Music and voice were mainly characterised by calm, soft, musical parameters in lullaby style, often integrating the sung mother's voice live or recorded, defined as music therapy or music medicine. The general risk of bias in the included studies varied from low to high risk of bias. Music and vocal interventions compared to standard care Music/vocal interventions do not increase oxygen saturation in the infants during the intervention (mean difference (MD) 0.13, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.59; P = 0.59; 958 infants, 10 studies; high-certainty evidence). Music and voice probably do not increase oxygen saturation post-intervention either (MD 0.63, 95% CI -0.01 to 1.26; P = 0.05; 800 infants, 7 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). The intervention may not increase infant development (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID)) with the cognitive composition score (MD 0.35, 95% CI -4.85 to 5.55; P = 0.90; 69 infants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence); the motor composition score (MD -0.17, 95% CI -5.45 to 5.11; P = 0.95; 69 infants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence); and the language composition score (MD 0.38, 95% CI -5.45 to 6.21; P = 0.90; 69 infants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). Music therapy may not reduce parental state-trait anxiety (MD -1.12, 95% CI -3.20 to 0.96; P = 0.29; 97 parents, 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). The intervention probably does not reduce respiratory rate during the intervention (MD 0.42, 95% CI -1.05 to 1.90; P = 0.57; 750 infants; 7 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and post-intervention (MD 0.51, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.58; P = 0.63; 636 infants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). However, music/vocal interventions probably reduce heart rates in preterm infants during the intervention (MD -1.38, 95% CI -2.63 to -0.12; P = 0.03; 1014 infants; 11 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). This beneficial effect was even stronger after the intervention. Music/vocal interventions reduce heart rate post-intervention (MD -3.80, 95% CI -5.05 to -2.55; P < 0.00001; 903 infants, 9 studies; high-certainty evidence) with wide CIs ranging from medium to large beneficial effects. Music therapy may not reduce postnatal depression (MD 0.50, 95% CI -1.80 to 2.81; P = 0.67; 67 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of music therapy on parental state anxiety (MD -0.15, 95% CI -2.72 to 2.41; P = 0.91; 87 parents, 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about any further effects regarding all other secondary short- and long-term outcomes on the infants, parental well-being, and bonding/attachment. Two studies evaluated adverse effects as an explicit outcome of interest and reported no adverse effects from music and voice. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Music/vocal interventions do not increase oxygen saturation during and probably not after the intervention compared to standard care. The evidence suggests that music and voice do not increase infant development (BSID) or reduce parental state-trait anxiety. The intervention probably does not reduce respiratory rate in preterm infants. However, music/vocal interventions probably reduce heart rates in preterm infants during the intervention, and this beneficial effect is even stronger after the intervention, demonstrating that music/vocal interventions reduce heart rates in preterm infants post-intervention. We found no reports of adverse effects from music and voice. Due to low-certainty evidence for all other outcomes, we could not draw any further conclusions regarding overall efficacy nor the possible impact of different intervention types, frequencies, or durations. Further research with more power, fewer risks of bias, and more sensitive and clinically relevant outcomes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katharina Mueller
- Zentrum für Kinder und Jugendmedizin, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Karen
- Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joanne Loewy
- Mount Sinai Health System, The Louis Armstrong Center for Music & Medicine, New York City, USA
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Bassler
- Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Micke F, Held S, Lindenthal J, Donath L. Effects of electromyostimulation on performance parameters in sportive and trained athletes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci 2022:1-11. [PMID: 35913269 DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2107437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different electromyostimulation (EMS) training interventions on performance parameters in trained athletes. The research was conducted until may 2021 using the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and SPORTDiscus for studies with the following inclusion criteria: (a) controlled trials, (b) EMS trials with at least one exercise and/or control group, (c) strength and/or jump and/or sprint and/or aerobic capacity parameter as outcome (d) sportive/trained subjects. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and random effects models were calculated. Thirty-six studies with 1.092 participants were selected and 4 different networks (strength, jump, sprint, aerobic capacity) were built. A ranking of different exercise methods was achieved. The highest effects for pairwise comparisons against the reference control "active control" were found for a combination of resistance training with superimposed EMS and additional jump training (outcome strength: 4.43 SMD [2.15; 6.70 CI]; outcome jump: 3.14 SMD [1.80;4.49]), jump training with superimposed whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) (outcome sprint: 1.65 SMD [0.67; 2.63 CI] and high intensity bodyweight resistance training with superimposed WB-EMS (outcome aerobic capacity: 0.83 SMD [-0.49; 2.16 CI]. These findings indicate that the choice of EMS-specific factors such as the EMS application mode, the combination with voluntary activation, and the selection of stimulation protocols has an impact on the magnitude of the effects and should therefore be carefully considered, especially in athletes. Superimposed EMS with relatively low volume, high intensity and outcome-specific movement pattern appeared to positively influence adaptations in athletes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Micke
- German Sport University Cologne, Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| | - Steffen Held
- German Sport University Cologne, Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| | - Jessica Lindenthal
- German Sport University Cologne, Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| | - Lars Donath
- German Sport University Cologne, Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ludyga S, Held S, Rappelt L, Donath L, Klatt S. A network meta-analysis comparing the effects of exercise and cognitive training on executive function in young and middle-aged adults. Eur J Sport Sci 2022:1-11. [PMID: 35848068 DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2099765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIn young and middle-aged adults, executive function is associated with success in work-life and mental health. Physical activity with and without cognitive training has the potential to benefit executive function, but its relative effectiveness remains unclear. This network meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of different exercise and cognitive training types and their combination on executive function in young and middle-aged adults. PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were searched for experimental studies that compared pre- to posttest changes in inhibitory control and/ or working memory between one or more intervention groups and a control group. Interventions were ranked on their relative effectiveness using P-scores. Study quality was rated using the PEDro scale. Forty-six studies were included and yielded 30 and 70 pair-wise effect sizes for the inhibitory control and working memory networks, respectively. With one exception, all studies were of high quality. Combined exercise and working memory training induced the greatest benefits for working memory (standardized mean differences, SMD = 0.59), whereas training a single executive function (SMD = 0.32) was most effective for inhibitory control. The effectiveness of working memory training (SMD ≥ 0.27) and coordinative exercise (SMD ≥ 0.20 to 0.29) ranked second and third for both executive function outcomes. In contrast, the effectiveness of endurance exercise was comparable to active controls on both networks. In young and middle-aged adults, exercise with coordinative demands seems to have an effectiveness similar to working memory training. The combination of exercise and cognitive training further increases executive function benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steffen Held
- German Sport University; Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| | - Ludwig Rappelt
- German Sport University; Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| | - Lars Donath
- German Sport University; Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
| | - Stefanie Klatt
- German Sport University; Department of Cognitive and Team/Racket Sport Research
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steeb T, Wessely A, Petzold A, Brinker TJ, Schmitz L, Leiter U, Garbe C, Schöffski O, Berking C, Heppt MV. Evaluation of Long-term Clearance Rates of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:1066-1077. [PMID: 34347015 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Importance Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). However, most randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses focus on short-term efficacy outcomes. Objective To investigate and synthesize the long-term efficacy (≥12 months) of interventions for AK from parallel-arm randomized clinical trials. Data Sources Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Central were conducted from inception until April 6, 2020. The reference lists of the included studies and pertinent trial registers were hand searched. The study was completed February 27, 2021. Study Selection Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of 2741 records. Finally, 17 published reports (original studies and follow-up reports) referring to 15 independent randomized clinical trials with an overall sample size of 4252 patients were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data on study, patient, and intervention characteristics. Network meta-analysis (NMA) of each outcome was conducted with a frequentist approach. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for NMA was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials was used to evaluate the methodologic quality. Main Outcomes and Measures Participant complete clearance, participant partial clearance, and lesion-specific clearance were the outcomes, with each assessed at least 12 months after the end of treatment. Results Data from 15 independent randomized clinical trials including 4252 patients were extracted and synthesized. Ten studies were included in an NMA for the outcome of participant complete clearance, with photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinate (ALA-PDT) showing the most favorable risk ratio (RR) compared with placebo (RR, 8.06; 95% CI, 2.07-31.37; GRADE, moderate), followed by imiquimod, 5% (RR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.26-15.84; GRADE, very low), photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) (RR, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.21-29.41; GRADE, low), and cryosurgery (RR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.36-16.66; GRADE, very low). Similarly, ALA-PDT had the highest RR in the NMA for lesion-specific clearance (RR, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.49-10.33; GRADE, moderate). No NMA was possible for participant partial clearance owing to poor reporting of this outcome. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and network meta-analysis found that therapy including ALA-PDT, imiquimod, 5%, MAL-PDT, and cryosurgery was associated with significant long-term efficacy in the NMA. This study provides data for a possible use in an evidence-based framework for selecting interventions with sustained lesion clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lutz Schmitz
- Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.,Institute of Dermatopathology, MVZ Corius DermPathBonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business, Economics and Society, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A review of the quantitative effectiveness evidence synthesis methods used in public health intervention guidelines. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:278. [PMID: 33535975 PMCID: PMC7860217 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10162-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of public health interventions create challenges in evaluating their effectiveness. There have been huge advancements in quantitative evidence synthesis methods development (including meta-analysis) for dealing with heterogeneity of intervention effects, inappropriate 'lumping' of interventions, adjusting for different populations and outcomes and the inclusion of various study types. Growing awareness of the importance of using all available evidence has led to the publication of guidance documents for implementing methods to improve decision making by answering policy relevant questions. METHODS The first part of this paper reviews the methods used to synthesise quantitative effectiveness evidence in public health guidelines by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) that had been published or updated since the previous review in 2012 until the 19th August 2019.The second part of this paper provides an update of the statistical methods and explains how they address issues related to evaluating effectiveness evidence of public health interventions. RESULTS The proportion of NICE public health guidelines that used a meta-analysis as part of the synthesis of effectiveness evidence has increased since the previous review in 2012 from 23% (9 out of 39) to 31% (14 out of 45). The proportion of NICE guidelines that synthesised the evidence using only a narrative review decreased from 74% (29 out of 39) to 60% (27 out of 45).An application in the prevention of accidents in children at home illustrated how the choice of synthesis methods can enable more informed decision making by defining and estimating the effectiveness of more distinct interventions, including combinations of intervention components, and identifying subgroups in which interventions are most effective. CONCLUSIONS Despite methodology development and the publication of guidance documents to address issues in public health intervention evaluation since the original review, NICE public health guidelines are not making full use of meta-analysis and other tools that would provide decision makers with fuller information with which to develop policy. There is an evident need to facilitate the translation of the synthesis methods into a public health context and encourage the use of methods to improve decision making.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sehmbi H, Brull R, Ceballos KR, Shah UJ, Martin J, Tobias A, Solo K, Abdallah FW. Perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine: network meta-analysis of adjunctive effects on supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:974-990. [PMID: 33118163 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Both perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine are used as local anaesthetic adjuncts to enhance peripheral nerve block characteristics. However, the effects of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine based on their administration routes have not been directly compared, and the relative extent to which each adjunct prolongs sensory blockade remains unclear. This network meta-analysis sought to compare and rank the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as supraclavicular block adjuncts. We sought randomised trials investigating the effects of adding perineural and intravenous dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to long-acting local anaesthetics on supraclavicular block characteristics, including time to block onset and durations of sensory, motor and analgesic blockade. Data were compared and ranked according to relative effectiveness for each outcome. Our primary outcome was sensory block duration, with a 2-h difference considered clinically important. We performed a frequentist analysis, using the GRADE framework to appraise evidence. One-hundred trials (5728 patients) were included. Expressed as mean (95%CI), the control group (local anaesthetic alone) had a duration of sensory block of 401 (366-435) min, motor block duration of 369 (330-408) min and analgesic duration of 435 (386-483) min. Compared with control, sensory block was prolonged most by intravenous dexamethasone [mean difference (95%CI) 477 (160-795) min], followed by perineural dexamethasone [411 (343-480) min] and perineural dexmedetomidine [284 (235-333) min]. Motor block was prolonged most by perineural dexamethasone [mean difference (95%CI) 294 (236-352) min], followed by intravenous dexamethasone [289 (129-448)min] and perineural dexmedetomidine [258 (212-304)min]. Analgesic duration was prolonged most by perineural dexamethasone [mean difference (95%CI) 518 (448-589) min], followed by intravenous dexamethasone [478 (277-679) min] and perineural dexmedetomidine [318 (266-371) min]. Intravenous dexmedetomidine did not prolong sensory, motor or analgesic block durations. No major network inconsistencies were found. The quality of evidence for intravenous dexamethasone, perineural dexamethasone and perineural dexmedetomidine for prolongation of supraclavicular sensory block duration was 'low', 'very low' and 'low', respectively. Regardless of route, dexamethasone as an adjunct prolonged the durations of sensory and analgesic blockade to a greater extent than dexmedetomidine. Differences in block characteristics between perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were not clinically important. Intravenous dexmedetomidine did not affect block characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Sehmbi
- Department of Anesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - R Brull
- Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K R Ceballos
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - U J Shah
- Department of Anesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - J Martin
- Department of Anesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - A Tobias
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K Solo
- London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - F W Abdallah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weibel S, Rücker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, Mayer D, Riemer M, Schaefer MS, Raj D, Backhaus I, Helf A, Schlesinger T, Kienbaum P, Kranke P. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10:CD012859. [PMID: 33075160 PMCID: PMC8094506 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012859.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia and surgery. Up to 80% of patients may be affected. These outcomes are a major cause of patient dissatisfaction and may lead to prolonged hospital stay and higher costs of care along with more severe complications. Many antiemetic drugs are available for prophylaxis. They have various mechanisms of action and side effects, but there is still uncertainty about which drugs are most effective with the fewest side effects. OBJECTIVES • To compare the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic pharmacologic interventions (antiemetic drugs) against no treatment, against placebo, or against each other (as monotherapy or combination prophylaxis) for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia • To generate a clinically useful ranking of antiemetic drugs (monotherapy and combination prophylaxis) based on efficacy and safety • To identify the best dose or dose range of antiemetic drugs in terms of efficacy and safety SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. The first search was performed in November 2017 and was updated in April 2020. In the update of the search, 39 eligible studies were found that were not included in the analysis (listed as awaiting classification). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing effectiveness or side effects of single antiemetic drugs in any dose or combination against each other or against an inactive control in adults undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia. All antiemetic drugs belonged to one of the following substance classes: 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, D₂ receptor antagonists, NK₁ receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and anticholinergics. No language restrictions were applied. Abstract publications were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS A review team of 11 authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias and subsequently extracted data. We performed pair-wise meta-analyses for drugs of direct interest (amisulpride, aprepitant, casopitant, dexamethasone, dimenhydrinate, dolasetron, droperidol, fosaprepitant, granisetron, haloperidol, meclizine, methylprednisolone, metoclopramide, ondansetron, palonosetron, perphenazine, promethazine, ramosetron, rolapitant, scopolamine, and tropisetron) compared to placebo (inactive control). We performed network meta-analyses (NMAs) to estimate the relative effects and ranking (with placebo as reference) of all available single drugs and combinations. Primary outcomes were vomiting within 24 hours postoperatively, serious adverse events (SAEs), and any adverse event (AE). Secondary outcomes were drug class-specific side effects (e.g. headache), mortality, early and late vomiting, nausea, and complete response. We performed subgroup network meta-analysis with dose of drugs as a moderator variable using dose ranges based on previous consensus recommendations. We assessed certainty of evidence of NMA treatment effects for all primary outcomes and drug class-specific side effects according to GRADE (CINeMA, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis). We restricted GRADE assessment to single drugs of direct interest compared to placebo. MAIN RESULTS We included 585 studies (97,516 randomized participants). Most of these studies were small (median sample size of 100); they were published between 1965 and 2017 and were primarily conducted in Asia (51%), Europe (25%), and North America (16%). Mean age of the overall population was 42 years. Most participants were women (83%), had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II (70%), received perioperative opioids (88%), and underwent gynaecologic (32%) or gastrointestinal surgery (19%) under general anaesthesia using volatile anaesthetics (88%). In this review, 44 single drugs and 51 drug combinations were compared. Most studies investigated only single drugs (72%) and included an inactive control arm (66%). The three most investigated single drugs in this review were ondansetron (246 studies), dexamethasone (120 studies), and droperidol (97 studies). Almost all studies (89%) reported at least one efficacy outcome relevant for this review. However, only 56% reported at least one relevant safety outcome. Altogether, 157 studies (27%) were assessed as having overall low risk of bias, 101 studies (17%) overall high risk of bias, and 327 studies (56%) overall unclear risk of bias. Vomiting within 24 hours postoperatively Relative effects from NMA for vomiting within 24 hours (282 RCTs, 50,812 participants, 28 single drugs, and 36 drug combinations) suggest that 29 out of 36 drug combinations and 10 out of 28 single drugs showed a clinically important benefit (defined as the upper end of the 95% confidence interval (CI) below a risk ratio (RR) of 0.8) compared to placebo. Combinations of drugs were generally more effective than single drugs in preventing vomiting. However, single NK₁ receptor antagonists showed treatment effects similar to most of the drug combinations. High-certainty evidence suggests that the following single drugs reduce vomiting (ordered by decreasing efficacy): aprepitant (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.38, high certainty, rank 3/28 of single drugs); ramosetron (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.59, high certainty, rank 5/28); granisetron (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.54, high certainty, rank 6/28); dexamethasone (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.57, high certainty, rank 8/28); and ondansetron (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.60, high certainty, rank 13/28). Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that the following single drugs probably reduce vomiting: fosaprepitant (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21, moderate certainty, rank 1/28) and droperidol (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69, moderate certainty, rank 20/28). Recommended and high doses of granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol showed clinically important benefit, but low doses showed no clinically important benefit. Aprepitant was used mainly at high doses, ramosetron at recommended doses, and fosaprepitant at doses of 150 mg (with no dose recommendation available). Frequency of SAEs Twenty-eight RCTs were included in the NMA for SAEs (10,766 participants, 13 single drugs, and eight drug combinations). The certainty of evidence for SAEs when using one of the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol compared to placebo) ranged from very low to low. Droperidol (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08 to 9.71, low certainty, rank 6/13) may reduce SAEs. We are uncertain about the effects of aprepitant (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 7.36, very low certainty, rank 11/13), ramosetron (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.05 to 15.74, very low certainty, rank 7/13), granisetron (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 13.15, very low certainty, rank 10/13), dexamethasone (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.28 to 4.85, very low certainty, rank 9/13), and ondansetron (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.32 to 8.10, very low certainty, rank 12/13). No studies reporting SAEs were available for fosaprepitant. Frequency of any AE Sixty-one RCTs were included in the NMA for any AE (19,423 participants, 15 single drugs, and 11 drug combinations). The certainty of evidence for any AE when using one of the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol compared to placebo) ranged from very low to moderate. Granisetron (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05, moderate certainty, rank 7/15) probably has no or little effect on any AE. Dexamethasone (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.08, low certainty, rank 2/15) and droperidol (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, low certainty, rank 6/15) may reduce any AE. Ondansetron (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01, low certainty, rank 9/15) may have little or no effect on any AE. We are uncertain about the effects of aprepitant (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, very low certainty, rank 3/15) and ramosetron (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.54, very low certainty, rank 11/15) on any AE. No studies reporting any AE were available for fosaprepitant. Class-specific side effects For class-specific side effects (headache, constipation, wound infection, extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, arrhythmia, and QT prolongation) of relevant substances, the certainty of evidence for the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs mostly ranged from very low to low. Exceptions were that ondansetron probably increases headache (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28, moderate certainty, rank 18/23) and probably reduces sedation (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96, moderate certainty, rank 5/24) compared to placebo. The latter effect is limited to recommended and high doses of ondansetron. Droperidol probably reduces headache (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86, moderate certainty, rank 5/23) compared to placebo. We have high-certainty evidence that dexamethasone (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.09, high certainty, rank 16/24) has no effect on sedation compared to placebo. No studies assessed substance class-specific side effects for fosaprepitant. Direction and magnitude of network effect estimates together with level of evidence certainty are graphically summarized for all pre-defined GRADE-relevant outcomes and all drugs of direct interest compared to placebo in http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4066353. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found high-certainty evidence that five single drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, and ondansetron) reduce vomiting, and moderate-certainty evidence that two other single drugs (fosaprepitant and droperidol) probably reduce vomiting, compared to placebo. Four of the six substance classes (5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, D₂ receptor antagonists, NK₁ receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids) were thus represented by at least one drug with important benefit for prevention of vomiting. Combinations of drugs were generally more effective than the corresponding single drugs in preventing vomiting. NK₁ receptor antagonists were the most effective drug class and had comparable efficacy to most of the drug combinations. 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists were the best studied substance class. For most of the single drugs of direct interest, we found only very low to low certainty evidence for safety outcomes such as occurrence of SAEs, any AE, and substance class-specific side effects. Recommended and high doses of granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol were more effective than low doses for prevention of vomiting. Dose dependency of side effects was rarely found due to the limited number of studies, except for the less sedating effect of recommended and high doses of ondansetron. The results of the review are transferable mainly to patients at higher risk of nausea and vomiting (i.e. healthy women undergoing inhalational anaesthesia and receiving perioperative opioids). Overall study quality was limited, but certainty assessments of effect estimates consider this limitation. No further efficacy studies are needed as there is evidence of moderate to high certainty for seven single drugs with relevant benefit for prevention of vomiting. However, additional studies are needed to investigate potential side effects of these drugs and to examine higher-risk patient populations (e.g. individuals with diabetes and heart disease).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Weibel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Leopold Hj Eberhart
- Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nathan L Pace
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Hannah M Hartl
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Olivia L Jordan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Debora Mayer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Manuel Riemer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana Raj
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Insa Backhaus
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Helf
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Schlesinger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Peter Kienbaum
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Kranke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Torbahn G, Schoene D, Schwingshackl L, Rücker G, Knüttel H, Kemmler W, Sieber CC, Batsis JA, Villareal DT, Stroebele-Benschop N, Volkert D, Kiesswetter E. Effective SLOPE: EffectS of Lifestyle interventions in Older PEople with obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038330. [PMID: 33033022 PMCID: PMC7542917 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity is highly prevalent in older adults aged 65 years or older. Different lifestyle interventions (diet, exercise, self-management) are available but benefits and harms have not been fully quantified comparing all available health promotion interventions. Special consideration must be given to functional outcomes and possible adverse effects (loss of muscle and bone mass, hypoglycaemia) of weight loss interventions in this age group. The objective of this study is to synthesise the evidence regarding the effects of different types and modalities of lifestyle interventions, or their combinations, on physical function and obesity-related outcomes such as body composition in older adults with obesity. METHODS AND ANALYSES Six databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psychinfo and Web of Science) and two trial registries (Clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) will be searched for randomised controlled trials of lifestyle interventions in older adults with obesity. Screening (title/abstract and full-text) and data extraction of references as well as assessment of risk of bias and rating of the certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analyses) will be performed by two reviewers independently. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses will be conducted to determine the pooled effects from each intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION We will submit our findings to peer-reviewed journals and present at national and international conferences as well as in scientific medical societies. Patient-targeted dissemination will involve local and national advocate groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019147286.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Torbahn
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Bayern, Germany
| | - Daniel Schoene
- Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Lukas Schwingshackl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Helge Knüttel
- University Library, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Kemmler
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Cornel C Sieber
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Bayern, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - John A Batsis
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dennis T Villareal
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
- Department of Nutritional Psychology, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Dorothee Volkert
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Bayern, Germany
| | - Eva Kiesswetter
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Bayern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eggins E, Dawe S, Wilson DB, Chandler‐Mather N, Betts J. PROTOCOL: Psychosocial, pharmacological and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2020; 16:e1113. [PMID: 37131914 PMCID: PMC8356279 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
This review aims to first enhance and update existing reviews by comprehensively synthesising the full array of psychosocial, pharmacological and legal interventions that aim to improve the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents. Second, the review aims to use network meta-analysis to integrate and examine the comparative impact of these interventions. Specifically, the review will address the following research questions: (1) What is the comparative impact of psychosocial, pharmacological, and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents? (2) Does the impact of interventions vary according to the child developmental period (e.g., infancy, early childhood, adolescence) or the type of (a) outcome measure; (b) substance misuse; (c) practitioner implementing the intervention; or (d) intervention setting? (3) Does the impact of interventions vary by the country of implementation?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Eggins
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith UniversityMount GravattQueenslandAustralia
| | - Sharon Dawe
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith UniversityMount GravattQueenslandAustralia
| | - David B. Wilson
- Department of CriminologyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Ned Chandler‐Mather
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith UniversityMount GravattQueenslandAustralia
| | - Joseph Betts
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith UniversityMount GravattQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Torres‐Navarro I, Briz‐Redón Á, Botella‐Estrada R. Systemic therapies for Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: a SCORTEN‐based systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 35:159-171. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I. Torres‐Navarro
- Dermatology Department Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe València Spain
| | - Á. Briz‐Redón
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research Universitat de València València Spain
| | - R. Botella‐Estrada
- Dermatology Department Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe València Spain
- Department of Medicine Universitat de València València Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Steeb T, Wessely A, Schmitz L, Heppt F, Kirchberger MC, Berking C, Heppt MV. Interventions for Actinic Keratosis in Nonscalp and Nonface Localizations: Results from a Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis. J Invest Dermatol 2020; 141:345-354.e8. [PMID: 32645365 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Myriad interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis located on the face or scalp. However, lesions located outside the head and neck have received little attention until now. We aimed to synthesize the current knowledge of interventions for actinic keratosis in nonscalp and nonface localizations. Randomized controlled trials reporting data for these localizations were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library CENTRAL, as well as in pertinent trial registers until 25 March 2020. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials with 1,380 patients were included in a systematic review. Five treatment modalities were evaluated and compared with placebo in a frequentist network meta-analysis, including cryosurgery, ingenol mebutate, photodynamic therapy, colchicine, and 5-fluorouracil. In the network meta-analysis, cryosurgery showed the highest participant complete clearance rates (risk ratio, 7.73; 95% confidence interval = 3.21-18.61; 10 studies; I2 = 20.3%; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, ++--) and lesion clearance rates (risk ratio, 2.97; 95% confidence interval = 2.45-3.59; 4 studies; I2 = 0%; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, ++--) compared with placebo. Ingenol mebutate demonstrated the highest participant partial clearance rates compared with placebo (risk ratio, 7.12; 95% confidence interval = 4.36-11.64; 5 studies; I2 = 0%; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, +++-). The mean reduction of lesions and occurrence of adverse events was poorly reported. The certainty of the evidence varied from very low to high and was limited by imprecision and study limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Schmitz
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany; Institute of Dermatopathology, MVZ Corius DermPathBonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franz Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael C Kirchberger
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Uthman OA, Al-Khudairy L, Nduka CU, Court R, Mistry H, Melendez-Torres GJ, Taylor-Phillips S, Clarke A. Determining optimal strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review, cost-effectiveness review and network meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev 2020; 9:105. [PMID: 32381116 PMCID: PMC7204030 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01366-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent improvements in the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the UK, deaths from CVD are relatively high compared with other high-income countries. An estimated 7 million people in the UK are living with CVD, and the healthcare cost is approximately £11 billion annually. In more than 90% of cases, the risk of a first heart attack is thought to be related to modifiable risk factors including smoking, poor diet, lipidemia, high blood pressure, inactivity, obesity and excess alcohol consumption. The aim of the study is to synthesise evidence for the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different interventions for the primary prevention of CVD. METHODS We will systematically search databases (for example, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library) and the reference lists of previous systematic reviews for randomised controlled trials that assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of any form of intervention aimed at adult populations for the primary prevention of CVD, including but not limited to lipid lowering medications, blood pressure lowering medications, antiplatelet agents, nutritional supplements, dietary interventions, health promotion programmes, physical activity interventions or structural and policy interventions. Interventions may or may not be targeted at high-risk groups. Publications from any year will be considered for inclusion. The primary outcome will be all cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will be cardiovascular diseases related mortality, major cardiovascular events, coronary heart disease, incremental costs per quality-adjusted life years gained. If data permits, we will use network meta-analysis to compare and rank effectiveness of different interventions, and test effect modification of intervention effectiveness using subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses. DISCUSSION The results will be important for policymakers when making decisions between multiple possible alternative strategies to prevent CVD. Compared to results from existing multiple separate pairwise meta-analyses, this overarching synthesis of all relevant work will enhance decision-making. The findings will be crucial to inform evidence-based priorities and guidelines for policies and planning prevention strategies of CVD. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019123940.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan A. Uthman
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Lena Al-Khudairy
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Chidozie U. Nduka
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Rachel Court
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Hema Mistry
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - G . J. Melendez-Torres
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
| | - Sian Taylor-Phillips
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Aileen Clarke
- Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Malik AH, Aronow WS. Comparative Therapeutic Assessment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction—A Network Meta-Analysis. Am J Ther 2020; 27:e286-e296. [PMID: 30615598 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000000892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
17
|
Kish M, Chan K, Perry K, Ko YJ. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of adjuvant therapy for curatively resected biliary tract cancers. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e20-e26. [PMID: 32218664 PMCID: PMC7096209 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent randomized controlled trials (rcts) have contributed high-quality data about adjuvant therapy in curatively resected biliary tract cancer (btc); however, a standard approach to treating those patients still has not been developed. Methods We conducted a systematic review of published studies and abstracts up to and including June 2018, choosing rcts involving patients with btc receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after complete surgical resection. Network meta-analysis methods were used for indirect comparisons of overall survival (os) and relapse-free survival (rfs) for various adjuvant therapies. Results Five rcts were included in qualitative synthesis, and three rcts (bilcap, prodige 12-accord 18, and bcat) had data sufficient for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results from the indirect comparison demonstrated no significant improvement in os for capecitabine compared with gemcitabine or with gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (gemox), the hazard ratios (hrs) being 0.82 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.53 to 1.27] and 0.86 (95% ci: 0.56 to 1.34) respectively. Similarly, no significant improvement in rfs was observed for capecitabine compared with gemcitabine or gemox. Conclusions Although in the present analysis, we found no statistically significant improvements in os or rfs for capecitabine compared with gemox or gemcitabine, capecitabine can-until further prospective trials are completed-be considered the standard of care in the adjuvant setting based on a single randomized phase iii study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kish
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - K Chan
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - K Perry
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Y J Ko
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Haslbeck FB, Karen T, Loewy J, Meerpohl JJ, Bassler D. Musical and vocal interventions to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tanja Karen
- University Hospital Zürich; Department of Neonatology; Frauenklinikstrasse 10 Zürich Switzerland
| | - Joanne Loewy
- The Louis Armstrong Center for Music and Medicine; Beth Israel Medical Center New York City USA
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation); Breisacher Str. 153 Freiburg Germany D-79110
| | - Dirk Bassler
- University Hospital Zürich; Department of Neonatology; Frauenklinikstrasse 10 Zürich Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steeb T, Heppt MV, Becker L, Kohl C, French LE, Berking C. Long-term efficacy of interventions for actinic keratosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2019; 8:237. [PMID: 31604446 PMCID: PMC6788027 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1156-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Actinic keratoses (AK) are common precancerous lesions of the skin due to cumulative sun exposure. A variety of interventions are available for the treatment; however, the majority of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses focus on short-term efficacy outcomes. This network meta-analysis aims to investigate the long-term (> 12 months) efficacy of interventions for AK. METHODS To identify relevant studies, we will perform a systematic literature research in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL and hand-search pertinent trial registers. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts for eligibility. We will include RCTs with an inter-individual (parallel arm) design. The study population includes patients with a clinical or histopathologic diagnosis of AK. Eligibility will be restricted to the following interventions: surgical approaches, cryosurgery, ablative laser treatment, topical drug treatment with 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, diclofenac, or photodynamic therapy. As outcomes, we will consider the following endpoints: (1) the participant complete clearance rate, (2) the participant partial clearance rate, (3) the lesion-specific clearance, (4) the mean lesion reduction per patient, and (5) the number of withdrawals due to adverse events after at least 12 months after the end of treatment. Monotherapy or placebo will serve as a comparison. Estimates of effects from individual studies will be pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity will be evaluated based on I2 and chi-square test. The risk of bias will be estimated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool by two review authors independently. The quality of evidence of the outcomes will be assessed with the GRADE approach. A network meta-analysis will be performed to combine direct and indirect evidence from the included RCTs. DISCUSSION The potential of interventions to achieve a sustained clearance of AK has not been assessed to date. To investigate the long-term efficacy of interventions is important as the natural disease course is highly variable and relapses occur frequently even after initial lesion clearance. This review will help to set a framework for clinical decision making in patients with AK. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION CRD42018095903 (PROSPERO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of LMU, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of LMU, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Lars Becker
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of LMU, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Kohl
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of LMU, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Lars E. French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of LMU, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of LMU, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Torbahn G, Hofmann H, Rücker G, Bischoff K, Freitag MH, Dersch R, Fingerle V, Motschall E, Meerpohl JJ, Schmucker C. Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Therapy in Early Cutaneous Lyme Borreliosis: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2019; 154:1292-1303. [PMID: 30285069 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Importance Controversies about the choice of antibiotic agent and treatment modality exist in the management of erythema migrans in early cutaneous Lyme borreliosis (LB). Objective To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of all randomized clinical trials on various antibiotic agents and treatment modalities in early cutaneous LB. Data Sources Electronic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were conducted from inception until July 2017. The reference lists of the included studies were hand searched, authors were contacted, and ongoing trials were searched at ClinicalTrials.gov. Study Selection One reviewer screened the titles and abstracts of the 9975 reports identified by the electronic searches. Full-text copies of 161 potentially relevant articles were obtained, and 2 reviewers independently assessed those articles for inclusion. Adults with a physician-confirmed early localized skin infection who were treated with antibiotics of any dose or duration were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data on study, patient, and intervention characteristics. Network meta-analyses on treatment effects and adverse outcomes were calculated with a frequentist approach using the R package netmeta. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidance for NMA was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Main Outcomes and Measures Treatment effects for response to treatment (resolution of symptoms) and treatment-related adverse events. Results Overall, 19 studies (2532 patients) were included. The mean patient age ranged between 37 and 56 years, and the percentage of female patients ranged from 36% to 60%. The antibiotics investigated were doxycycline, cefuroxime axetil, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, azithromycin, penicillin V, and minocycline. Pooled effect sizes from NMAs did not suggest any significant differences in treatment response by antibiotic agent (eg, amoxicillin vs doxycycline odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.41-3.87), dose, or duration (eg, doxycycline, 200 mg/d for 3 weeks, vs doxycycline, 200 mg/d for 2 weeks, odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.49-3.34). Treatment failures were rare at both 2 months (4%; 95% CI, 2%-5%) and 12 months (2%, 95% CI, 1%-3%) after treatment initiation. There were also no differences in the effect sizes among antibiotic agents and treatment modalities for treatment-related adverse outcomes, which were generally mild to moderate. Certainty of evidence was categorized as low and very low mostly because of imprecision, indirectness, and study limitations (high risk of bias) of the included studies. Conclusions and Relevance This NMA suggests that neither the antibiotic agent nor treatment modality contributed to comparative effectiveness or drug-related adverse outcomes. This finding is relevant for physicians treating patients with LB and for patient decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Torbahn
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Heidelore Hofmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of General Practice and Family Medicine, Department of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Karin Bischoff
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael H Freitag
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rick Dersch
- National Reference Centre for Borrelia, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Volker Fingerle
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Edith Motschall
- Division of General Practice and Family Medicine, Department of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christine Schmucker
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schwingshackl L, Schwarzer G, Rücker G, Meerpohl JJ. Perspective: Network Meta-analysis Reaches Nutrition Research: Current Status, Scientific Concepts, and Future Directions. Adv Nutr 2019; 10:739-754. [PMID: 31075165 PMCID: PMC6743830 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmz036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditional pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) is a very useful method that pools evidence from one study design type if appropriate; its widespread use in nutrition research is an important phenomenon. Recently, a promising method for more advanced evidence-synthesis, called network meta-analysis (NMA), was introduced. NMA is an extension of PMA that enables simultaneous comparison of multiple interventions. NMA combines direct evidence (i.e., trials comparing 2 interventions directly) and indirect evidence (i.e., from a connected route via ≥1 comparators, e.g. placebo) in a network of studies. NMAs have the potential to advance knowledge in the field of nutrition as they provide insights that cannot be obtained by individual 2-arm randomized controlled trials or PMA. Thus, in this perspective paper, we aim to summarize the current (methodologic) status of published NMAs in nutrition research and emphasize advances and strengths in comparison with traditional PMA through specific examples, and highlight potential pitfalls and limitations. NMA is an emerging methodology in the field of nutrition research. A PubMed search identified only 23 nutrition research-related NMAs published since the inception of journals up to January 8, 2019 (61% of them published since 2017), compared with >5000 published PMAs. Moreover, we aim to highlight the scientific concepts and standards through the use of the following NMA example: "Which type of oils/solid fats offers the greatest impact on blood lipids?" In this regard, we discuss intervention definitions, transitivity/similarity, statistical methods, description and visualization of results, inconsistency, ranking, dissemination bias, assessing the certainty of evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, and reporting guidelines. We expect that rigorously conducted NMAs based on high-quality systematic reviews will become the new evidence synthesis benchmark in nutrition research. However, caution is warranted because abuse and misinterpretations of PMA and NMA findings could hamper the scientific field and possibly decision-making regarding public policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guido Schwarzer
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
A comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 145:2313-2323. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02964-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
23
|
Prevention of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators-A Network Meta-analysis. Am J Ther 2019; 26:e469-e480. [PMID: 30946044 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000000928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) offers a challenge with no set guidelines regarding which therapy offers a best safety and efficacy profile. STUDY QUESTION Which therapeutic strategy, among antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA), offers the most effective and safe approach in patients with ICDs? DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of antiarrhythmic drugs or CA against a placebo group. RCTs were identified from a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. STUDY DESIGN Our outcomes of interest were reductions in appropriate ICD shocks, inappropriate ICD shocks, and overall mortality. We used the event rates in both groups, and then using a frequentist approach employing a graph theory methodology, we constructed a network meta-analysis model. RESULTS Fourteen RCTs with 3815 participants and 6 different interventions treatments were included in our network meta-analysis. The most effective treatment for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia after ICD is amiodarone followed by CA. Amiodarone is most effective in the reduction of appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.74] and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04-0.60), respectively. CA was effective in the reduction of appropriate ICD shocks (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.87), whereas sotalol was effective in the reduction of inappropriate ICD shocks (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95). There was no significant reduction in the overall mortality from any therapy. There was a trend of increased mortality associated with amiodarone therapy (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.92-6.26). CONCLUSIONS Amiodarone remains the most efficacious therapy for the reduction of appropriate and inappropriate shocks in patients with ICD. No therapy resulted in mortality reduction, but amiodarone showed a trend toward increased mortality.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tonin FS, Borba HH, Mendes AM, Wiens A, Fernandez-Llimos F, Pontarolo R. Description of network meta-analysis geometry: A metrics design study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212650. [PMID: 30785955 PMCID: PMC6382117 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The conduction and report of network meta-analysis (NMA), including the presentation of the network-plot, should be transparent. We aimed to propose metrics adapted from graph theory and social network-analysis literature to numerically describe NMA geometry. Methods A previous systematic review of NMAs of pharmacological interventions was performed. Data on the graph’s presentation were collected. Network-plots were reproduced using Gephi 0.9.1. Eleven geometric metrics were tested. The Spearman test for non-parametric correlation analyses and the Bland-Altman and Lin’s Concordance tests were performed (IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0). Results From the 477 identified NMAs only 167 graphs could be reproduced because they provided enough information on the plot characteristics. The median nodes and edges were 8 (IQR 6–11) and 10 (IQR 6–16), respectively, with 22 included studies (IQR 13–35). Metrics such as density (median 0.39, ranged 0.07–1.00), median thickness (2.0, IQR 1.0–3.0), percentages of common comparators (median 68%), and strong edges (median 53%) were found to contribute to the description of NMA geometry. Mean thickness, average weighted degree and average path length produced similar results than other metrics, but they can lead to misleading conclusions. Conclusions We suggest the incorporation of seven simple metrics to report NMA geometry. Editors and peer-reviews should ensure that guidelines for NMA report are strictly followed before publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda S. Tonin
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Helena H. Borba
- Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Antonio M. Mendes
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Astrid Wiens
- Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- * E-mail: (RP); (FFL)
| | - Roberto Pontarolo
- Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
- * E-mail: (RP); (FFL)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Das A, Roy B, Schwarzer G, Silverman MG, Ziegler O, Bandyopadhyay D, Philpotts LL, Sinha S, Blumenthal JA, Das S. Comparison of treatment options for depression in heart failure: A network meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2019; 108:7-23. [PMID: 30419488 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression independently predicts poor outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients, including increased mortality, morbidity and 30-day re-hospitalization. In this network meta-analysis, we compared different interventions designed to treat depression in HF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Electronic searches were conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO up to November 2016. Included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared interventions (Exercise therapy (ET), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or antidepressant (AD) medications) for depression in heart failure patients. The primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms based on validated measures of depression. Network meta-analysis based on random effects model estimating standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), compared the effects of the 3 classes of interventions with respect to usual care or placebo control conditions. RESULTS A total of 21 RCTs (including 4563 HF patients) reporting the effects of treating depression in HF patients were included in the analysis. In comparison to placebo or usual standard of care, ET (SMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.22) and CBT (SMD -0.29; 95% CI -0.58 to -0.01) were associated with reduction in depressive symptoms whereas AD (SMD -0.16; 95% CI -0.44 to 0.11) was less effective. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis is suggestive of therapeutic benefit of ET and CBT in comparison to usual standard of care in treating depression in HF patients. However, comparison among the three interventions was not conclusive. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted to compare the therapeutic effects of ET, CBT and AD in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avash Das
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
| | - Bhaskar Roy
- Division of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Connecticut, USA
| | - Guido Schwarzer
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Olivia Ziegler
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | | | - Shirshendu Sinha
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Health System and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mankato, MN, USA
| | - James A Blumenthal
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Saumya Das
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thom H, White IR, Welton NJ, Lu G. Automated methods to test connectedness and quantify indirectness of evidence in network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2018; 10:113-124. [PMID: 30403829 PMCID: PMC6492288 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 04/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Network meta‐analysis compares multiple treatments from studies that form a connected network of evidence. However, for complex networks, it is not easy to see if the network is connected. We use simple techniques from graph theory to test the connectedness of evidence networks in network meta‐analysis. The method is to build the adjacency matrix for a network, with rows and columns corresponding to the treatments in the network and entries being one or zero depending on whether the treatments have been compared or not, and with zeros along the diagonal. Manipulation of this matrix gives the indirect connection matrix. The entries of this matrix determine whether two treatments can be compared, directly or indirectly. We also describe the distance matrix, which gives the minimum number of steps in the network required to compare a pair of treatments. This is a useful assessment of an indirect comparison as each additional step requires further assumptions of homogeneity in, for example, design and target populations of included trials. If there are no loops in the network, the distance is a measure of the degree of assumptions needed; it is approximately this with loops. We illustrate our methods using several constructed examples and giving R code for computation. We have also implemented the techniques in the Stata package “network.” The methods provide a fast way to ensure comparisons are only made between connected treatments and to assess the degree of indirectness of a comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Thom
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ian R White
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicky J Welton
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Guobing Lu
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:113-120. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
28
|
Donegan S, Dias S, Tudur-Smith C, Marinho V, Welton NJ. Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. Res Synth Methods 2018; 9:243-260. [PMID: 29377598 PMCID: PMC6001528 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Meta‐regression results must be interpreted taking into account the range of covariate values of the contributing studies. Results based on interpolation or extrapolation may be unreliable. In network meta‐regression (NMR) models, which include covariates in network meta‐analyses, results are estimated using direct and indirect evidence; therefore, it may be unclear which studies and covariate values contribute to which result. We propose graphs to help understand which trials and covariate values contribute to each NMR result and to highlight extrapolation or interpolation. Methods We introduce methods to calculate the contribution that each trial and covariate value makes to each result and compare them with existing methods. We show how to construct graphs including a network covariate distribution diagram, covariate‐contribution plot, heat plot, contribution‐NMR plot, and heat‐NMR plot. We demonstrate the methods using a dataset with treatments for malaria using the covariate average age and a dataset of topical fluoride interventions for preventing dental caries using the covariate randomisation year. Results For the malaria dataset, no contributing trials had an average age between 7–25 years and therefore results were interpolated within this range. For the fluoride dataset, there are no contributing trials randomised between 1954–1959 for most comparisons therefore, within this range, results would be extrapolated. Conclusions Even in a fully connected network, an NMR result may be estimated from trials with a narrower covariate range than the range of the whole dataset. Calculating contributions and graphically displaying them aids interpretation of NMR result by highlighting extrapolated or interpolated results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Donegan
- Department of Biostatistics, Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Sofia Dias
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Catrin Tudur-Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Valeria Marinho
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK
| | - Nicky J Welton
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Weibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, Rücker G, Raj D, Schaefer MS, Backhaus I, Kienbaum P, Eberhart LHJ, Kranke P. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Weibel
- University of Würzburg; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care; Oberduerrbacher Str. 6 Würzburg Germany
| | - Yvonne Jelting
- University of Würzburg; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care; Oberduerrbacher Str. 6 Würzburg Germany
| | - Nathan Leon Pace
- University of Utah; Department of Anesthesiology; 3C444 SOM 30 North 1900 East Salt Lake City UT USA 84132-2304
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg; Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics; Stefan-Meier-Str. 26 Freiburg Germany 79104
| | - Diana Raj
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital; Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine; 1345 Govan Road Glasgow UK G51 4TF
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- University Hospital Düsseldorf; Department of Anaesthesiology; Moorenstr. 5 Düsseldorf Germany 40225
| | - Insa Backhaus
- Sapienza University of Rome; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases; Piazzale Aldo Moro 5 Rome Italy 00185
| | - Peter Kienbaum
- University Hospital Düsseldorf; Department of Anaesthesiology; Moorenstr. 5 Düsseldorf Germany 40225
| | - Leopold HJ Eberhart
- Philipps-University Marburg; Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine; Baldingerstrasse 1 Marburg Germany 35043
| | - Peter Kranke
- University of Würzburg; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care; Oberduerrbacher Str. 6 Würzburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
YANG HS, FANG YG, XU HF, LI XT, SHANG J, YIN YQ. Systematic evaluation on the clinical efficacy of acupoint stimulation therapy for treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency on the basis of network Meta-analysis. WORLD JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE-MOXIBUSTION 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s1003-5257(17)30137-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
31
|
Meid AD, Mächler S, Haefeli WE, Mikus G. Real-world complexity of atrial fibrillation treatment with oral anticoagulants: design and interpretation of pharmacoepidemiological studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83:2321-2324. [PMID: 28734007 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D Meid
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Mächler
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Walter E Haefeli
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerd Mikus
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Operative and medical treatment of chronic anal fissures-a review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:663-676. [PMID: 28396998 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-017-1335-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Anal fissures are a common problem and have a cumulative lifetime incidence of 11%. Previous reviews on anal fissures show inconsistent results regarding post-interventional healing and incontinence rates. In this review our aim was to compare the treatments for chronic anal fissures by incorporating indirect comparisons using network meta-analysis. The PubMed database was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1975 and 2015. The primary outcome measures were healing and incontinence rates after lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS), anal dilatation (DILA), anoplasty and/or fissurectomy (FIAP), botulinum toxin (BT) and noninvasive treatment (NIT). Random effects network meta-analyses were complemented by fixed effects and Bayesian models. The present analysis included 44 RCTs and 3268 patients. After a median follow-up of 2 months, the healing rates for LIS, DILA, FIAP, BT and NIT were 93.1, 84.4, 79.8, 62.6, and 58.6% and the incontinence rates were 9.4, 18.2, 4.9, 4.1, and 3.0%, respectively. Compared with NIT, the odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for healing after LIS, DILA, FIAP and BT was 9.9 (5.4-18.1), 8.6 (3.1-24.0), 3.5 (1.0-12.7) and 1.9 (1.1-3.5), respectively, on network meta-analysis. The OR (95% CI) for incontinence after LIS, DILA, FIAP and BT was 6.8 (3.1-15.1), 16.9 (6.0-47.8), 3.9 (1.0-15.1) and 1.6 (0.7-3.7), respectively. Ranking of treatments, fixed effects and Bayesian models confirmed these findings. In conclusion, based on our meta-analysis LIS is the most efficacious treatment but is compromised by a high rate of postoperative incontinence. Given the trade-offs between the risks and benefits, FIAP and BT might be good alternatives for the treatment of chronic anal fissures.
Collapse
|
33
|
Three-dimensional evidence network plot system: covariate imbalances and effects in network meta-analysis explored using a new software tool. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 86:182-195. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 03/05/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
34
|
Tonin FS, Rotta I, Mendes AM, Pontarolo R. Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2017; 15:943. [PMID: 28503228 PMCID: PMC5386629 DOI: 10.18549/pharmpract.2017.01.943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 229] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Systematic reviews and pairwise meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, at
the intersection of clinical medicine, epidemiology and statistics, are
positioned at the top of evidence-based practice hierarchy. These are important
tools to base drugs approval, clinical protocols and guidelines formulation and
for decision-making. However, this traditional technique only partially yield
information that clinicians, patients and policy-makers need to make informed
decisions, since it usually compares only two interventions at the time. In the
market, regardless the clinical condition under evaluation, usually many
interventions are available and few of them have been studied in head-to-head
studies. This scenario precludes conclusions to be drawn from comparisons of all
interventions profile (e.g. efficacy and safety). The recent development and
introduction of a new technique – usually referred as network
meta-analysis, indirect meta-analysis, multiple or mixed treatment comparisons
– has allowed the estimation of metrics for all possible comparisons in
the same model, simultaneously gathering direct and indirect evidence. Over the
last years this statistical tool has matured as technique with models available
for all types of raw data, producing different pooled effect measures, using
both Frequentist and Bayesian frameworks, with different software packages.
However, the conduction, report and interpretation of network meta-analysis
still poses multiple challenges that should be carefully considered, especially
because this technique inherits all assumptions from pairwise meta-analysis but
with increased complexity. Thus, we aim to provide a basic explanation of
network meta-analysis conduction, highlighting its risks and benefits for
evidence-based practice, including information on statistical methods evolution,
assumptions and steps for performing the analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda S Tonin
- MSc. (Pharm). Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Federal University of Paraná. Curitiba (Brazil).
| | - Inajara Rotta
- PhD. Pharmacy Service, Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná. Curitiba (Brazil).
| | - Antonio M Mendes
- MSc. (Pharm). Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Federal University of Paraná. Curitiba (Brazil).
| | - Roberto Pontarolo
- PhD. Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná. Curitiba (Brazil).
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kiefer C, Sturtz S, Bender R. Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2015; 112:803-8. [PMID: 26634940 PMCID: PMC4678383 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Revised: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews provide a structured summary of the results of trials that have been carried out on any particular subject. If the data from multiple trials are sufficiently homogenous, a meta-analysis can be performed to calculate pooled effect estimates. Traditional meta-analysis involves groups of trials that compare the same two interventions directly (head to head). Lately, however, indirect comparisons and network metaanalyses have become increasingly common. METHODS Various methods of indirect comparison and network meta-analysis are presented and discussed on the basis of a selective review of the literature. The main assumptions and requirements of these methods are described, and a checklist is provided as an aid to the evaluation of published indirect comparisons and network meta-analyses. RESULTS When no head-to-head trials of two interventions are available, indirect comparisons and network metaanalyses enable the estimation of effects as well as the simultaneous analysis of networks involving more than two interventions. Network meta-analyses and indirect comparisons can only be useful if the trial or patient characteristics are similar and the observed effects are sufficiently homogeneous. Moreover, there should be no major discrepancy between the direct and indirect evidence. If trials are available that compare each of two treatments against a third one, but not against each other, then the third intervention can be used as a common comparator to enable a comparison of the other two. CONCLUSION Indirect comparisons and network metaanalyses are an important further development of traditional meta-analysis. Clear and detailed documentation is needed so that findings obtained by these new methods can be reliably judged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna Kiefer
- Medical Biometry Department, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Köln
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|