Operative utilization of balloon versus traditional endoscopic sinus surgery

Does endoscopic balloon dilatation improve intranasal drug delivery to the olfactory cleft? A pre-clinical cadaver feasibility study

Background

Although systemic steroids have been shown to improve olfactory function, topical steroids have not demonstrated the same efficacy. This could a result of limited drug delivery to the narrow, superiorly placed olfactory cleft. This study aimed to examine the penetration of intranasal drugs to the olfactory cleft following endonasal balloon dilatation.

Methods

Balloon dilatation was performed in 12 thawed, fresh-frozen cadaver specimens. In the Mygind position, nasal drops mixed with blue food dye were administered into the nostril before and after the dilatation procedure. Endoscopic videos were recorded to assess dye staining of the olfactory cleft and osteo-meatal complex using a 4-point Likert scale.

Results

Prior to balloon dilatation, the mean penetration of nasal drops into the olfactory cleft was 1.34, which improved significantly (p < 0.05) to 2.66 following the procedure. There was no change in dye penetration into the osteo-meatal complex after balloon dilatation.

Conclusion

The results of this exploratory study suggest that balloon dilatation may improve the delivery of nasal drops to the olfactory cleft area. The clinical applicability and impact on olfactory function will require further assessment.

Cost-Effectiveness of Open vs. Endoscopic Repair of Zenker's Diverticulum

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of open versus endoscopic surgical repair of Zenker's diverticulum.

METHODS

In this study, an economic decision tree was utilized to compare the cost-effectiveness of open surgery compared to endoscopic surgery. The primary outcome in this analysis was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) that was calculated based on the economic decision tree. The probability of post-operative esophageal perforation complications, revision rates, and effectiveness of each procedure along with associated costs were extracted to construct the decision tree. Univariate sensitivity analysis was then utilized to determine how changes in esophageal perforation rate affect the cost-effectiveness of each surgical approach.

RESULTS

The ICER of open surgery for Zenker's diverticulum was $67 877, above most acceptable willingness to pay (WTP) thresholds. Additionally, if the probability of esophageal perforation with endoscopic surgery is above 5%, then open surgery becomes a more cost-effective option. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations also showed that at the WTP thresholds of $30 000 and $50 000, endoscopic surgery is the most cost-effective method with 83.9% and 67.6% certainty, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Open surgery and endoscopic surgery are 2 treatment strategies for Zenker's diverticulum that each have their own advantages and disadvantages that can complicate the decision-making process. With no previous cost-effectiveness analysis of open versus endoscopic surgery for Zenker's diverticulum, our results support the endoscopic approach at most common WTP thresholds. Particularly with the current focus on rising healthcare costs, our results can serve as an important adjunct to medical decision-making for patients undergoing treatment for Zenker's diverticulum.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document.

METHODS

ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.

RESULTS

ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided.

CONCLUSION

This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Endoscopic Management of Maxillary Sinus Diseases of Dentoalveolar Origin

Endoscopic surgery on the maxillary sinus has experienced significant advances in technique and approaches since the maxillary antrostomy was introduced in the 1980s. Disease processes that previously required open surgical approaches to the maxillary sinus can now be treated endoscopically while preserving form and function of the sinus and without injuring the maxillary sinus mucosa or disrupting normal mucociliary clearance. Understanding the techniques described in this article will allow surgeons to appropriately plan treatment strategies for patients with a variety of maxillary sinus diseases from dentoalveolar origin.

Rate and Factors Associated With Change in Surgeon for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

A subset of patients will undergo revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with a different otolaryngologist than the one who performed their primary surgery. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence of and clinicodemographic factors associated with a change in surgeon for revision ESS.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent at least two outpatient ESS procedures between 2009 and 2014 using the State Ambulatory Surgery Database for Florida were included in the study. Change in surgeon was defined by a change in a unique provider identifier for the revision procedure. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine characteristics associated with a change in surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 2,963 patients were included. For the revision procedure, 47.7% of patients changed their surgeon. On multivariable logistic regression, a medium- (odds ratio [OR]: 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.77) or high-volume (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.42-0.61) surgeon performing the index surgery and advanced age (≥65 years) (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63-0.99) were associated with decreased odds of surgeon change for revision ESS. Longer time elapsed between index and revision surgery (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.13-1.17) was associated with increased odds of surgeon change.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients who undergo revision ESS select a surgeon other than the one who performed their primary procedure. Surgeon volume, age, and time between surgeries affect the likelihood of a change in surgeon for revision ESS. These findings may provide introductory insights into patient preferences and decision making in the surgical management of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1049-E1053, 2021.

[Sinus balloon dilation for treatment of chronic sinusitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis]

Objective:To systematically assess the efficacy of sinus balloon dilation（SBCD） for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis（CRS）. Method:To research the references whose the contents were related to the randomized controlled trials of sinus balloon dilation for treatment of chronic sinusitis from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WanFang, CNKI and other databases from January 2000 to June 2019. Assessed the quality and extracted the data of these included references and made Meta analysis by RevMan5.3 software. Result:A total of 11 references in English and Chinese were included. Result:Of Meta analysis showed that the difference had no statistical significance between the SNOT-20 score which were based on the statistics measured 3 months later and 6 months later [3 months later, SMD=-0.30, 95%CI（-1.01-0.41）, P=0.40, 6 months later, SMD=-0.53, 95%CI（-3.22-2.16）, P=0.70]and the score in the control group. Lund-Mackay CT score [SMD＝-0.69, 95%CI（-0.72--0.66, P<0.00001） ]and VAS symptom score [SMD＝-1.67, 95%CI（-1.91--1.44）, P<0.00001]following SBCD versus FESS in the treatment of CRS had statistical significance. Besides, SBCD had a lower incidence [OR=0.29, 95%CI（0.14-0.59）, P=0.0007]to develop postoperative complications compared with that in the control group. Conclusion:Balloon dilation of sinuses can significantly relieve the symptoms of patients with chronic sinusitis, this effect is equal or even better. Moreover, the incidence of developing the postoperative complications is lower, which SBCD of CRS is worthy of clinical popularization.

Balloon Catheter Dilation in Pediatric Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Paranasal sinus balloon catheter dilation (BCD) represents a tool that has been shown to be safe in the management of pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis (pCRS); however, its efficacy compared to standard treatment regimens has not been well established.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical utility of BCD in pCRS.

METHODS

Articles reporting BCD for pCRS in patients under 18 years of age were identified via the following search terms: sinusitis OR rhinosinusitis AND balloon dilatation OR balloon dilation OR balloon sinuplasty OR sinuplasty AND adolescent OR children OR infant OR pediatric OR toddler. The primary outcome analyzed includes quality of life improvement as measured via Sinus and Nasal Quality of Life Survey (SN-5) or Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores.

RESULTS

Eighty studies were abstracted; 10 studies were included for final qualitative analysis after dual investigator screening. Three studies described BCD with surgical controls, including adenoidectomy, saline irrigation, or maxillary antrostomy. Noninferiority was not demonstrated (ie, BCD is inferior) in 2 of 3 studies. Pooled analysis utilizing a random effects model revealed a decreased effect size yet no statistically significant difference between BCD and standard operative techniques as measured by quality of life measures (g = -0.04, I² = 41%).

CONCLUSION

This work highlights a lack of published evidence regarding the role of BCD in pCRS. Two of the 3 included studies demonstrated the inferiority of BCD when compared to other standard surgical interventions, whereas meta-analysis was unable to detect any statistically significant difference between standard treatment regimens. Future scientific investigations are necessary to assess the comparative effectiveness of BCD in pCRS.

Analysis of Sinus Balloon Catheter Dilation Providers Based on Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data

BACKGROUND

The use of balloon catheter dilation (BCD) to treat chronic rhinosinusitis has increased dramatically since its conception, necessitating further characterization of BCD providers and trends in its usage. Medicare data on BCD providers have made it possible to study recent demographic patterns. There has also been an increase in mid-level providers' scope of otolaryngologic practice that is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand BCD adoption by studying volume of BCD procedures as well as training, geography, and practice socioeconomic characteristics of BCD providers for Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We reviewed Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use Files for 2014 and 2015 for providers with claims for BCD of the sinuses. We extracted provider zip code, state, gender, and number of services per BCD code. We obtained median household income by zip code and geographic region based on US Census Bureau data. Providers were classified using an Internet search to determine practice setting and type of specialty training/certification.

RESULTS

In 2014 and 2015, 428 providers performed 42 494 BCDs billed to Medicare beneficiaries. Among BCD providers, 5.1% were female, 98.1% had Doctor of Medicine/Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine credentials, and 1.9% had nurse practitioner/physician assistant credentials. Over the 2-year period, the median number of BCDs was 63 for physicians and 37 for mid-level providers. Fellowship-trained rhinologists performed a median of 38 BCDs over 2 years. The most common subspecialty certification/training was in facial plastics and reconstructive surgery. The majority of providers (63.8%) performed 1 to 99 BCDs over the 2 years. In the South, there were 21.9 BCD procedures performed per 100 000 people compared to 7.3 in the Northeast, 9.3 in the Midwest, and 8.5 in the West.

CONCLUSION

There is a large range in total BCD procedures performed by individual providers, and this varies by certain provider characteristics. Mid-level providers have emerged as a significant population performing BCD.

Adverse Events Associated with Balloon Sinuplasty: A MAUDE Database Analysis

Objective

Balloon sinuplasty utilization has increased significantly since its introduction over a decade ago. However, the most common associated complications are still unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze adverse events related to balloon sinuplasty.

Study Design

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Setting

Food and Drug Administration’s MAUDE database (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience; 2008-2018).

Subjects and Methods

The MAUDE database was searched for all reports on adverse events involving balloon sinuplasty devices from the 3 leading manufacturers: Acclarent, Entellus, and Medtronic. Reported events were reviewed and categorized.

Results

During the study period, there were 211 adverse events from 208 reports divided into the following categories: patient related (n = 102, 48.3%), device related (n = 101, 47.9%), and packaging related (n = 8, 3.8%). Four periprocedural deaths were reported but were not clearly associated with technical complications. The most common device-related complications were guide catheter malfunction (39.6%), balloon malfunction (38.6%), and imprecise navigation (17.8%). The most common patient-related complications were cerebrospinal fluid leak (36.3%), eye swelling (29.4%), and epistaxis (11.8%). A lateral canthotomy was performed in 30.0% of eye-swelling complications. Sixty percent of eye complications occurred during balloon dilation of the maxillary sinus. The years 2014 (n = 48) and 2012 (n = 32) had the highest number of adverse events reported as compared with all other years.

Conclusion

The most common adverse events associated with balloon sinuplasty include balloon malfunction, guide catheter malfunction, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and significant eye swelling. Health care providers should discuss these possible complications when consenting patients for balloon sinuplasty.

Analysis of the operative utilization of concurrent rhinoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To quantify and analyze the concurrent performance of rhinoplasty (RP) (with or without septoplasty) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to extract cases of RP (n = 22,360), FESS (n = 99,173), and concurrent RP with FESS (RP + FESS) (n = 1,321) within the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases of California, Florida, Maryland, and New York from 2009 to 2011. Patient demographics, surgeon volume, charge, concurrent nasal procedures, and operating room (OR) time were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 1,321 RP + FESS combination cases, a majority involved primary rhinoplasty (n = 697, 52.8%), followed by nasal valve repair (n = 563, 42.6%) and revision rhinoplasty (n = 61, 4.6%). High-volume (n > 30), medium-volume (n = 10-30), and low-volume rhinoplasty surgeons (n ≤ 9) were observed to perform a similar number of FESS + RP combination surgeries (153, 152, and 155, respectively). A majority of RP + FESS involved two or fewer sinuses (65%). Mean OR time for RP + FESS was 189.4 ± 4.2 minutes, approximately 50 minutes shorter than the sum of standalone RP performed individually (138.8 ± 1.0 minutes) and standalone FESS (102.9 ± 0.4 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

RP + FESS more frequently involved fewer sinuses (compared with FESS alone) and was also less likely to involve revision rhinoplasty (compared with rhinoplasty alone); therefore, these cases may be selected for lower sinus disease burden and less complex rhinoplasty compared to standalone procedures. Procedures combining rhinoplasty and sinus surgery had a reduction in OR time compared to the hypothetical sum of two standalone procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:E311-E319, 2020.

The intraoperative accuracy of maxillary balloon dilation: a blinded trial

BACKGROUND

Balloon sinus dilation (BSD) is a commonly performed sinus procedure in the United States. Several cadaveric studies have evaluated BSD accuracy and the maxillary sinus has consistently been shown to be the most challenging to cannulate. We designed an independent study to evaluate the intraoperative accuracy of maxillary sinus BSD.

METHODS

A prospective, single-blinded trial evaluating the accuracy of maxillary sinus BSD was performed using 2 commercially available BSD systems (guidewire- and probe-based systems) randomly assigned to patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for chronic rhinosinusitus without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) or a skullbase approach in patients without sinus disease. All patients underwent maxillary BSD followed by uncinectomy to reveal dilation of the natural maxillary sinus ostia. The recorded procedures were reviewed by 3 fellowship-trained rhinologists from different institutions blinded to the BSD system utilized. The primary endpoint compared accuracy of maxillary BSD attempts. The secondary endpoint compared accuracy between the 2 systems.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine maxillary BSD procedures were performed in 18 patients (age range, 20-79 years; mean, 51 years) without nasal polyposis undergoing maxillary antrostomy as part of a more extensive procedure. BSD was successful in 18 of 29 (62%) attempts and unsuccessful in 9 of 29 (31%) attempts, with statistically "almost perfect" interrater agreement (kappa = 0.86). There was no statistical difference between the 2 BSD systems (p = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Maxillary BSD appeared to be less accurate in living patients when compared with findings from previously published cadaver studies. There were no differences in accuracy between the probe- and guidewire-based systems. This is the first non-industry-sponsored study evaluating maxillary sinus BSD in living patients. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical implications of our findings.

Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Balloon Sinuplasty

Objective

Although balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is increasing in popularity, little is known about which patients are the ideal candidates. The objective of this study is to investigate factors that may be associated with BSP failure.

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Setting

Academic center.

Subjects and Methods

This is a 6-year (July 2011-June 2017) retrospective review of patients who underwent BSP or revision endoscopic sinus surgery (rESS) after BSP within a single tertiary health system. Demographics, clinical findings, and radiographic findings were investigated for association with rESS via univariate analyses and a multivariable backward elimination selection procedure.

Results

A total of 154 patients were identified (median age, 53 years): 146 patients underwent BSP at a single health system, with 16 (11%) undergoing rESS; 8 patients underwent BSP at an outside institution and underwent rESS with the senior author. Mean ± SD follow-up was 12.8 ± 16.6 months. Univariate analyses revealed that prior endoscopic sinus surgery, polyps, allergic rhinitis, and gram-negative infection were significantly associated with rESS. As for radiographic findings, a higher Lund-Mackay score, neo-osteogenesis, moderate or complete opacification, and hyperdensities were associated with rESS. The final model after multivariable selection showed that higher radiographic scores (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17) and neo-osteogenesis (odds ratio, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.68-16.42) were associated with higher odds for rESS.

Conclusions

This study identifies several clinical and radiographic factors that may be associated with the need for rESS after BSP. Surgeons can take these factors into consideration when deciding whether a patient should forego BSP and undergo conventional FESS.

How often is sinus surgery performed for chronic rhinosinusitis with versus without nasal polyps?

BACKGROUND

There currently are no data on the relative frequency of endoscopic sinus surgeries (ESS) performed for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) versus chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the rate of surgical interventions for CRSwNP and CRSsNP.

METHODS

Cases identified by CPT codes were extracted from the 2009-2011 State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for California, Florida, Maryland, and New York. Patient demographics, extent of surgery, mean charges, and operating room (OR) time were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 97,228 ESS cases were performed in the four states; 29.3% of surgeries were for patients with CRSwNP, 66.0% of patients with CRSsNP, and 4.8% for other indications. The proportion of ESS for CRSwNP varied across states, with California having the highest percentage (34.6%) and Maryland having the lowest (26.4%) (p < 0.0001). Patients with Medicaid (33.8%) and Medicare (32.2%) had higher rates of surgery for CRSwNP compared with patients with private insurance (29.9%) (p < 0.001). Surgeons who performed a higher volume of sinus surgery compared to lower volume surgeons performed a lower percentage of surgery for CRSwNP (24.4 versus 33.5%; p < 0.001). ESS cases for CRSwNP were more extensive (relative risk of four sinus surgeries of 1.88; p < 0.0001), used image guidance more frequently (relative risk, 1.39; p < 0.0001), and were less likely to include a balloon procedure (relative risk, 0.69; p < 0.0001). Patients with CRSwNP had longer OR times (ESS that involved all four sinuses took 14 minutes longer) (p < 0.0001), but no difference in charges compared with patients with CRSsNP who underwent a similar extent of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Almost 30% of ESS were performed for CRSwNP, and these cases were, on average, more extensive, used more OR time, and more often used image guidance than surgeries for CRSsNP. The rate of surgery performed for CRSwNP varied based on geography, payer, and surgical volume, which indicted that patient selection impacted surgical management.

Medical Therapy Versus Balloon Sinus Dilation in Adults With Chronic Rhinosinusitis (MERLOT): 12-Month Follow-up

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a devastating disease affecting nearly 30 million people in the United States. An interim analysis of data from the present study suggested that, in patients who had previously failed medical therapy, balloon sinus dilation (BSD) plus medical management (MM) provides a significant improvement in the quality of life (QOL) at 24 weeks postprocedure compared to MM alone. Objective The primary objective of this final analysis was to evaluate the durability of treatment effects through the 52-week follow-up. Methods Adults aged 19 and older with CRS who had failed MM elected either BSD plus MM or continued MM. Patients were evaluated at 2 (BSD arm only), 12, 24, and 52 weeks posttreatment. Balloon dilations were performed either as an office-based procedure under local anesthesia or in the operating room per physicians' and patients' discretion. The primary end point was change in patient-reported QOL as measured by Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) total score from baseline to the 24-week follow-up. Secondary outcomes including changes in CSS, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) total and subscores, sinus medication usage, missed days of work/school, number of medical care visits, and sinus infections from baseline to the 52-week follow-up are reported here within. Results BSD led to sustained greater improvements in self-reported QOL using the CSS and RSDI total scores with a trend toward improvement in the SNOT-20 total score from baseline to the 52-week follow-up compared to continued MM. There were no changes in medication usage apart from nasal steroid usage for which the MM cohort had an increase in usage. There were no device-related serious adverse events. Conclusion The current analysis highlights the safety, effectiveness, and durability of BSD in CRS patients aged 19 and older who had previously failed MM.

Patient and surgeon factors explain variation in the frequency of frontal sinus surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Ethmoidectomy may be sufficient to address frontal sinus disease, but some surgeons may perform frontal recess dissection initially. Our objectives were to describe patient-associated factors with frequency of frontal sinus surgery and analyze the association with provider volume.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

The 2013 State Ambulatory Surgery Databases of New Jersey, Florida, and Kentucky were queried to identify adults who underwent anterior ethmoidectomy or total ethmoidectomy using standard Current Procedural Terminology codes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the odds of undergoing concurrent frontal sinus exploration along with ethmoidectomy, adjusting for age, gender, race, insurance type, median income, and the metropolitan designation by zip code. We also examined provider and center volume, use of image guidance, and total charges.

RESULTS

There were 10,564 ethmoidectomies, of which 4,726 had concurrent frontal sinus surgery. Women were less likely to have frontal sinus surgery (P = .0011), as were patients with Medicare (P = .007). Hispanics were more likely to have frontal sinus surgery (P = .0003). Surgeons with higher surgical volumes were more likely to perform frontal sinus surgery; it was also more likely to be performed in centers where more sinus procedures occurred (P < .0001, both).

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in the utilization of frontal sinus surgery is associated with patient sex, ethnicity, insurance status, geography, as well as provider and hospital volumes. These data support the idea that nonclinical factors may influence the treatment of frontal sinus disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:2008-2014, 2018.

The XprESS Multi-Sinus Dilation System for the Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

The XprESS multi-sinus dilation system (XprESS) is a minimally invasive alternative to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) used in the treatment of people with chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis refractory to medical treatment. The manufacturer of XprESS, Entellus Medical, claims the technology is as effective as FESS in improving quality of life and is associated with quicker recovery times and reduced costs. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected XprESS for evaluation. Nine trials published in 13 papers were correctly identified by the company as relevant to the decision problem, including one randomised controlled trial (REMODEL study). From this evidence, the company concluded that XprESS is as beneficial as FESS for a range of clinical endpoints. The External Assessment Centre (EAC) agreed with the company's conclusion in a subgroup of patients, but judged that the evidence did not generalise to patients within the NHS fully. The company constructed a de novo costing model. XprESS generated cost-savings of £1302 per patient compared with FESS. The EAC critiqued and updated the model's inputs, with differences in results driven by changes in assumptions on procedure duration, length of hospital stay and the proportion of procedures undertaken in an outpatient setting under local anaesthetic. Although cost-incurring in the base case, XprESS generated cost savings under certain scenarios. The MTAC reviewed the evidence and supported the case for adoption, issuing positive draft recommendations. After public consultation NICE published this as Medical Technologies Guidance 30.

A six-month analysis of frontal sinus drainage pathway in patients with frontal sinusitis after balloon sinuplasty

BACKGROUND

The balloon catheter has been used for a decade to dilate paranasal sinus outflow tracts. The question is: how wide and how durable is the dilation of drainage pathways in patients in long-term observations after this procedure?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to observe the changes occurring in the frontal sinus drainage pathway (FSDP) in patients with frontal sinusitis at least 6 months after surgery using balloon catheters in an isolated procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed and measured the FSDP width on computed tomography (CT) of 23 images before and after the use of balloon catheters. We also assessed mucosal changes using Zinreich's scale, and symptom improvements with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20).

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference in the width of the FSDP was found before and after sinuplasty in the study group (p ≤ .0016). On average, the FSDP increased by 24.1%. Clinically meaningful and statistically significant (p ≤ .0002) symptom improvement as indicated by the mean SNOT-20 score was observed. Mucosal changes were also statistically significant (p ≤ .0018) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The findings at least 6 months after follow-up indicated that the use of balloon catheters in an isolated procedure allowed durable modeling of FSDP and was associated with radiological and clinical improvements.

Industry relationships are associated with performing a greater number of sinus balloon dilation procedures

BACKGROUND

Industry outreach promotes awareness of novel technologies. However, concerns have been raised that such relationships may also unduly impact medical decision-making. Our objective in this study was to evaluate industry relationships among practitioners who frequently employ balloon dilation (BD), characterizing whether there is any association between financial relationships and BD utilization.

METHODS

Provider utilization data (FY-2014) was accessed for individuals billing BD procedures to Medicare, the largest healthcare payor in the United States. The names of individuals included in these data sets were cross-referenced with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment site to determine the extent of industry relationships during this same year. Individuals included in this analysis were organized by those with "significant" ($1,000 to $10,000) and "major" (> $10,000) industry relationships. Practice setting, training, and experience were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 302 otolaryngologists who billed enough BDs for inclusion in this data set, 99.3% were in private practice, 89.7% were board-certified, 8.3% had facial plastic and reconstructive fellowship training, and 1.3% had rhinology fellowship training. There was a significant increase in BDs performed with increasing BD company financial contributions (analysis of variance, p = 0.0003). Individuals without "significant" relationships with BD companies billed fewer BDs than those with at least "significant" (>$1,000) relationships (57.0 ± 4.3 vs 87.7 ± 10.0, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is an association between receiving money from industry and the frequency with which otolaryngologists employ BD. Although our analysis demonstrates an association, these results in no way imply causation. Further analysis exploring the reasons for this association may be necessary.

Balloon dilation of sinus ostia in the Department of Defense: Diagnoses, actual indications, and outcomes

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the primary diagnoses for which balloon catheter dilation (BCD) of sinus ostia is being employed in a profit-blind health care system, the Department of Defense.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013, 319 consecutive patient charts were reviewed for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) diagnoses, presence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) defined by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS), preoperative Lund-Mackay scores, nasal endoscopy findings, sinuses dilated, postoperative outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Of the 319 patients identified, 217 had sufficient documentation to be included. A CRS ICD-9 code was applied in 182 of 217 (83.9%) and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis in 12 of 217 (5.6%). Only 50.5% of CRS patient charts met criteria using EPOS guidelines. In contrast, 39.6% met the ICD-9 criteria for atypical facial pain. Patients with Lund-Mackay scores ≤ 4 were reviewed for number of sinuses dilated. Eighty-eight of 123 patients (71.5%) had sinuses dilated that were free from opacification/mucosal edema on preoperative imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon dilation of sinus ostia has an expanding role in treating sinus disease. In the studied population, BCD is often utilized for alternate indications for which there is currently no evidence of efficacy. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this technology in treating these alternate indications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 127:544-549, 2017.

Paranasal Sinus Balloon Catheter Dilation for Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Paranasal sinus balloon catheter dilation (BCD) represents a commonly used tool in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) for which the indications, utilization, and outcomes have not been well established. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate change in quality of life and sinus opacification following paranasal sinus BCD in the treatment of CRS.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were utilized to identify English-language studies reporting patient outcomes following BCD for CRS. Primary outcomes included the impact of BCD on validated measures of quality of life and sinonasal opacification.

RESULTS

Systematic review identified 17 studies for qualitative analysis. Studies generally included cases with limited disease based on radiographic opacification. Five studies contained extractable data for change in 20-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) 1 year following BCD, with significant improvement in self-reported quality of life (P = .04). Five studies reported a significant change in paranasal sinus opacification following BCD (P < .001). Two studies directly compared change in SNOT-20 between BCD and endoscopic sinus surgery, without demonstration of significant difference in outcome (P = .07). Subgroup analysis found that change in SNOT-20 score was greater after BCD in the operating room than in the office (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence supporting the role of BCD in CRS remains incomplete. Long-term within-group improvements in quality-of-life and sinus opacification scores are demonstrated among a restricted adult population with CRS. Additional study is needed to further evaluate the role for BCD in specific settings and patient subgroups.