1
|
Hey M, Kogel K, Dambon J, Mewes A, Jürgens T, Hocke T. Factors to Describe the Outcome Characteristics of a CI Recipient. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4436. [PMID: 39124703 PMCID: PMC11313646 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: In cochlear implant (CI) treatment, there is a large variability in outcome. The aim of our study was to identify the independent audiometric measures that are most directly relevant for describing this variability in outcome characteristics of CI recipients. An extended audiometric test battery was used with selected adult patients in order to characterize the full range of CI outcomes. Methods: CI users were recruited for this study on the basis of their postoperative results and divided into three groups: low (1st quartile), moderate (medium decentile), and high hearing performance (4th quartile). Speech recognition was measured in quiet by using (i) monosyllabic words (40-80 dB SPL), (ii) speech reception threshold (SRT) for numbers, and (iii) the German matrix test in noise. In order to reconstruct demanding everyday listening situations in the clinic, the temporal characteristics of the background noise and the spatial arrangements of the signal sources were varied for tests in noise. In addition, a survey was conducted using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire and the Listening Effort (LE) questionnaire. Results: Fifteen subjects per group were examined (total N = 45), who did not differ significantly in terms of age, time after CI surgery, or CI use behavior. The groups differed mainly in the results of speech audiometry. For speech recognition, significant differences were found between the three groups for the monosyllabic tests in quiet and for the sentences in stationary (S0°N0°) and fluctuating (S0°NCI) noise. Word comprehension and sentence comprehension in quiet were both strongly correlated with the SRT in noise. This observation was also confirmed by a factor analysis. No significant differences were found between the three groups for the SSQ questionnaire and the LE questionnaire results. The results of the factor analysis indicate that speech recognition in noise provides information highly comparable to information from speech intelligibility in quiet. Conclusions: The factor analysis highlighted three components describing the postoperative outcome of CI patients. These were (i) the audiometrically measured supra-threshold speech recognition and (ii) near-threshold audibility, as well as (iii) the subjective assessment of the relationship to real life as determined by the questionnaires. These parameters appear well suited to setting up a framework for a test battery to assess CI outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Hey
- ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.K.); (J.D.); (A.M.)
| | - Kevyn Kogel
- ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.K.); (J.D.); (A.M.)
| | - Jan Dambon
- ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.K.); (J.D.); (A.M.)
| | - Alexander Mewes
- ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (K.K.); (J.D.); (A.M.)
| | - Tim Jürgens
- Institute of Acoustics, University of Applied Sciences Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany;
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Winn MB. The Effort of Repairing a Misperceived Word Can Impair Perception of Following Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear 2024:00003446-990000000-00300. [PMID: 38886880 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In clinical and laboratory settings, speech recognition is typically assessed in a way that cannot distinguish accurate auditory perception from misperception that was mentally repaired or inferred from context. Previous work showed that the process of repairing misperceptions elicits greater listening effort, and that this elevated effort lingers well after the sentence is heard. That result suggests that cognitive repair strategies might appear successful when testing a single utterance but fail for everyday continuous conversational speech. The present study tested the hypothesis that the effort of repairing misperceptions has the consequence of carrying over to interfere with perception of later words after the sentence. DESIGN Stimuli were open-set coherent sentences that were presented intact or with a word early in the sentence replaced with noise, forcing the listener to use later context to mentally repair the missing word. Sentences were immediately followed by digit triplets, which served to probe carryover effort from the sentence. Control conditions allowed for the comparison to intact sentences that did not demand mental repair, as well as to listening conditions that removed the need to attend to the post-sentence stimuli, or removed the post-sentence digits altogether. Intelligibility scores for the sentences and digits were accompanied by time-series measurements of pupil dilation to assess cognitive load during the task, as well as subjective rating of effort. Participants included adults with cochlear implants (CIs), as well as an age-matched group and a younger group of listeners with typical hearing for comparison. RESULTS For the CI group, needing to repair a missing word during a sentence resulted in more errors on the digits after the sentence, especially when the repair process did not result in a coherent sensible perception. Sentences that needed repair also contained more errors on the words that were unmasked. All groups showed substantial increase of pupil dilation when sentences required repair, even when the repair was successful. Younger typical hearing listeners showed clear differences in moment-to-moment allocation of effort in the different conditions, while the other groups did not. CONCLUSIONS For CI listeners, the effort of needing to repair misperceptions in a sentence can last long enough to interfere with words that follow the sentence. This pattern could pose a serious problem for regular communication but would go overlooked in typical testing with single utterances, where a listener has a chance to repair misperceptions before responding. Carryover effort was not predictable by basic intelligibility scores, but can be revealed in behavioral data when sentences are followed immediately by extra probe words such as digits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Winn
- Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen SL, Zhang BY, Lee YC, Lin CC, Sun YS, Chan KC, Wu CM. Importance of age at 2nd implantation and interimplant interval to the outcome of bilateral prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implantation. J Chin Med Assoc 2024; 87:434-441. [PMID: 38349155 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000001068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Taiwan, the number of cases of sequential bilateral pediatric cochlear implantation (CI) is increasing but data regarding its effectiveness and impact of the reimbursement policy are lacking. We examined the speech perception and quality of life (QOL) of bilateral prelingually deaf children who underwent sequential CI, considering the effects of age at the time of second implantation and interimplant interval. METHODS We enrolled 124 Mandarin-speaking participants who underwent initial cochlear implant (CI1) in 2001-2019 and a second CI (CI2) in 2015-2020. Patients were followed up for ≥2 years and were categorized into groups based on age at the time of CI2 implantation (<3.5, 3.6-7, 7.1-10, 10.1-13, and 13.1-18 years) and interimplant interval (0.5-3, 3.1-5, 5.1-7, 7.1-10, and >10 years). We evaluated speech perception, device usage rates, and QOL using subjective questionnaires (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing and Comprehension Cochlear Implant Questionnaire). RESULTS Speech perception scores of CI2 were negatively correlated with ages at the time of CI1 and CI2 implantation and interimplant interval. Older age and a longer interimplant interval were associated with higher nonuse rates for CI2 and worse auditory performance and QOL. Among individuals aged >13 years with interimplant intervals >10 years, up to 44% did not use their second ear. Patients aged 7.1 to 10 years had better speech perception and higher questionnaire scores than those aged 10.1 to 13 and 13.1 to 18 years. Furthermore, patients aged 10.1 to 13 years had a lower rate of continuous CI2 usage compared to those aged 7.1 to 10 years. CONCLUSION Timely implantation of CI2 is essential to achieve optimal outcomes, particularly among sequentially implanted patients with long-term deafness in the second ear and no improvement with hearing aids following CI1 implantation. For CI2 implantation, an upper limit of age of 10 years and interimplant interval of 7 years are essential to prevent suboptimal outcomes. These data can provide useful information to implant recipients, their families, and medical and audiological professionals, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and potential impacts of the timing of CI2 implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Lung Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bang-Yan Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Medical Foundation), New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Chieh Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Medical Foundation), New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chia-Chen Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Medical Foundation), New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Sheng Sun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kai-Chieh Chan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Che-Ming Wu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Medical Foundation), New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lailach S, Stephan P, Martin J, Zahnert T, Neudert M. Influence of depressive disorders, stress, and personality traits on quality of life after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:1717-1734. [PMID: 37917166 PMCID: PMC10942889 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08284-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine whether preoperative depressiveness, stress, and personality influence quality of life (QOL) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. METHODS In this prospective study, 79 patients undergoing CI surgery were evaluated preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Disease-specific QOL was assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and general QOL with the WHOQOL-BREF. Depressiveness and stress were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to classify comorbidities. The Big Five Personality Test (B5T) was used to assess the basic personality dimensions. Speech comprehension was evaluated in quiet with the Freiburg monosyllable test and in noise with the Oldenburg sentence test. RESULTS After CI surgery, the total NCIQ score improved significantly (Δ 17.1 ± 14.7, p < 0.001). General QOL (WHOQOL-BREF, Δ 0.4 ± 9.9, p = 0.357), stress (Δ 0.25 ± 3.21, p = 0.486), and depressiveness (Δ 0.52 ± 3.21, p = 0.121) were unaffected by CI surgery. Patients without elevated depressiveness (p < 0.01) or stress (p < 0.001) had significantly better total NCIQ scores. The results of the multiple regression analyses show that, after adjusting for the CCI, personality, age, and mental health stress (ß = - 0.495, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with postoperative NCIQ outcome scores. Depressiveness and neuroticism had the strongest influence on the generic QOL (ß = - 0.286 and ß = - 0.277, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Stress symptoms and personality traits are significant predictive factors for disease-specific QOL, as well as hearing status. This should be considered in the preoperative consultation and in optimizing the rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susen Lailach
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
| | - Paula Stephan
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Johanna Martin
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Thomas Zahnert
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Marcus Neudert
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brewer DM, Bernstein CM, Calandrillo D, Muscato N, Introcaso K, Bosworth C, Olson A, Vovos R, Stillitano G, Sydlowski S. Teledelivery of Aural Rehabilitation to Improve Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:1861-1867. [PMID: 37688797 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) This randomized controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of a Telehealth Aural Rehabilitation (TeleAR) training protocol to improve outcomes for adult cochlear implant (CI) users. METHODS This was a multisite clinical study with participants randomized to either an AR treatment or active control group. The AR protocol consisted of auditory training (words, sentences, and speech tracking), informational counseling, and communication strategies. The control group participants engaged in cognitive stimulation activities (crosswords, sudoku, etc.). Each group completed 6 weekly 90-min individual treatment sessions delivered remotely. Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users participated. Assessments were completed pretreatment and 1 week and 2 months posttreatment. RESULTS Repeated-measures ANOVA and planned contrasts were used to compare group performance on AzBio Sentences, Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). The two groups were statistically equivalent on all outcome measures at pre-assessment. There was a statistically significant main effect of time for all measures. Improvement over time was observed for participants in both groups, with greater improvement seen for the AR than the CT group on all outcome measures. The AR group showed medium to large effect sizes on all measures over time, suggesting clinically significant outcomes. CONCLUSION This randomized controlled study provides evidence of improved speech recognition and psychosocial outcomes following 6 weeks of TeleAR intervention. For adult post-lingually deafened CI users, including those >3 months post-activation, AR treatment can leverage neuroplasticity to maximize outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 134:1861-1867, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Majerus Brewer
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Claire Marcus Bernstein
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Dominique Calandrillo
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Nancy Muscato
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Kailey Introcaso
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Cassandra Bosworth
- Audiology and Speech Pathology in Department of Otolaryngology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, U.S.A
| | - Anne Olson
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky College of Health Sciences, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | - Rachel Vovos
- The Cleveland Clinic, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Gina Stillitano
- The Cleveland Clinic, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Sarah Sydlowski
- The Cleveland Clinic, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lailach S, Martin J, Stephan P, Kronesser D, Zahnert T, Neudert M. Influence of cochlear implantation on the working ability of hearing-impaired patients: A prospective study on potential influencing factors. Cochlear Implants Int 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38532283 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2024.2332035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates the effect of cochlear implantation (CI) on work ability. The influences of quality of life (QOL), age, mental health, and hearing were analyzed. METHODS Seventy-nine patients undergoing CI surgery were evaluated preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Work ability was evaluated using the Work Ability Index (WAI). QOL was assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and the WHOQOL-BREF. Mental health was assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire. RESULTS The WAI was unaffected by CI (Δ 0.8 ± 6.8, p = 0.42). No significant changes in WAI were observed for employees (Δ - 1.1 ± 5.7, p = 0.25) and pensioners (Δ -0.4 ± 7.8, p = 0.73). Patients without elevated depressiveness, stress, or somatoform symptoms had significantly better WAI.The multiple regression analyses show that WHOQOL-BREF (ß = 0.49, p ≤ 0.001), age (ß = -0.34, p ≤ 0.001), and depressiveness (ß = 0.33, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with WAI. In the employee group, the NCIQ (ß = 0.58, p = 0.008) had the strongest association with the WAI. CONCLUSION Age, mental health, and QOL are predictive factors for work ability. This should be considered in the consultation and the rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susen Lailach
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Johanna Martin
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Paula Stephan
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Dominique Kronesser
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Thomas Zahnert
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| | - Marcus Neudert
- Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gutierrez JA, Shannon CM, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA, Lambert PR. Comparison of Quality of Life Outcomes for Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Implantable Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e129-e136. [PMID: 38270194 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare quality of life (QOL) outcomes of percutaneous and transcutaneous bone conduction devices (pBCD and tBCD, respectively). DATABASES REVIEWED Pubmed, Scopus, CINAHL. METHODS A systematic review was performed searching for English language articles from inception to March 15, 2023. Studies reporting QOL outcomes measured using a validated tool following implantation of either pBCDs or tBCDs were considered for inclusion. QOL outcomes included scores for Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. A meta-analysis of continuous measures was performed. RESULTS A total of 52 articles with 1,469 patients were included. Six hundred eighty-nine patients were implanted with pBCDs, and the remaining 780 were implanted with tBCDs. Average Glasgow Benefit Inventory scores for the tBCD group (33.0, 95% confidence interval [22.7-43.3]) were significantly higher than the pBCD group (30.9 [25.2-36.6]) (Δ2.1 [1.4-2.8], p < 0.0001). Mean Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory scores (Δ3.9 [2.0-5.8], p = 0.0001) and mean gain in Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit scores (Δ5.6 [4.8-6.4], p < 0.0001) were significantly higher among patients implanted with tBCDs than those implanted with pBCDs. Patients implanted with tBCDs also had significantly higher gains on the Speech (Δ1.1 [0.9-1.3], p < 0.0001), Spatial (Δ0.8 [0.7-0.9], p < 0.0001), and Qualities of Hearing (Δ1.2 [1.1-1.3], p < 0.0001) portions of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale than those implanted with pBCDs. CONCLUSIONS Patients implanted with transcutaneous devices had better QOL outcomes than those implanted with percutaneous devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reddy P, Schneider KJ, Tamati TN, Moberly AC. Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Social Life. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e78-e83. [PMID: 38082459 PMCID: PMC11027959 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Explore the effects of hearing loss on social life and identify residual social life deficits that remain after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively obtained data. SETTING Tertiary care adult neurotology center. PATIENTS Adults between the ages of 35 and 83 years were included with either normal hearing (NH) or a cochlear implant (CI). INTERVENTIONS CI and non-CI-specific quality-of-life (QOL) surveys focused on social and overall QOL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (1) The difference in QOL survey responses between NH and CI participants. (2) The relationship between CI-specific global and social QOL responses and non-CI-specific social QOL responses in CI users. RESULTS A total of 51 participants were included: 31 CI users and 20 NH participants. Of the social QOL questionnaires, CI users reported significantly poorer scores on Self-Efficacy in Social Interactions than NH peers ( p = 0.049). Both Self-Efficacy in Social Interactions scores and Social Isolation Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with the CI-specific social domain of QOL ( r = 0.64 and -0.58, respectively). Only the Self-Efficacy in Social Interactions scores had a moderate association with global CI QOL ( r = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS CI users self-report similar social life outcomes as their NH peers with the exception of poorer self-efficacy in social situations. Moreover, self-efficacy in social interactions and social isolation were associated with social QOL in CI users, and self-efficacy in social interactions was associated with broader CI-related QOL. Findings support the relevance of individuals' perception of social life to their overall QOL with a CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Reddy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kara J Schneider
- Hearing Health Solutions from Ohio ENT & Allergy Physicians, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Terrin N Tamati
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Aaron C Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lailach S, Lenz A, Zahnert T, Neudert M. Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. HNO 2024; 72:25-32. [PMID: 37656221 PMCID: PMC10799117 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01342-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with a cochlear implant (CI) should be evaluated for a new speech processor every 6 years. The aim of this analysis was to assess the subjective and audiological benefit of upgrades. METHODS Speech understanding and subjective benefit were analyzed in 99 patients with the old and the new speech processor after 4 weeks of wearing. Speech understanding was assessed using the Freiburg monosyllabic test in quiet (FBE) at 65 dB and 80 dB, and the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) at 65 dB noise with adaptive speech sound level. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was used to assess subjective hearing impairment, and the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) was used to assess subjective satisfaction. RESULTS The speech processor upgrade resulted in a significant improvement of speech understanding in quiet at 65 dB (mean difference 8.9 ± 25.9 percentage points, p < 0.001) and 80 dB (mean difference 8.1 ± 29.7 percentage points, p < 0.001) and in noise (mean difference 3.2 ± 10.7 dB signal-to-noise ratio [S/N], p = 0.006). Using the APHAB, a significant improvement (mean difference 0.07 ± 0.16, p < 0.001) in hearing impairment was demonstrated in all listening situations. The APSQ showed significantly higher patient satisfaction with the new speech processor (mean difference 0.42 ± 1.26, p = 0.006). A comparative assessment of the benefit based on subjective and speech audiometric results identified a proportion of patients (35-42%) who subjectively benefited from the upgrade but had no measurable benefit based on speech audiometry. CONCLUSION There was a significant improvement in audiologically measurable and subjectively reflected speech understanding and patient satisfaction after the upgrade. In patients with only a small improvement in audiologically measurable speech understanding, the subjective benefit should also be assessed with validated measurement instruments in order to justify an upgrade to the payers in the health sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susen Lailach
- Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Alexander Lenz
- Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Zahnert
- Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Neudert
- Saxonian Cochlear Implant Centre, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sturm JJ, Brandner G, Ma C, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Why Do Candidates Forgo Cochlear Implantation? Laryngoscope 2023; 133:3548-3553. [PMID: 37114650 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify barriers and facilitating factors in cochlear implant (CI) utilization by comparing functional measures between CI candidates who undergo or forgo implantation. METHODS Forty-three participants were separated into two groups: (1) 28 participants who underwent CI and (2) 15 participants who elected not to proceed with CI despite meeting eligibility criteria (no-CI). Prior to implantation, all participants completed the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-Expectations instrument. They were also surveyed on factors contributing to their decision to either undergo or forgo CI. Word and speech recognition were determined using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and the AzBio tests, respectively. RESULTS CIQOL-Expectations scores were indistinguishable between groups, but there were substantial differences in baseline CIQOL-35 Profile scores. Compared to the CI group, the no-CI group exhibited higher pre-CI scores in the Emotional (Cohen's d [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.1, 1.5]) and Entertainment (Cohen's d [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.1, 1.5]) domains. Survey data revealed that the most commonly reported barriers to pursuing CI in the no-CI cohort were fear of surgical complications (85%), cost associated with implantation (85%), and perception that hearing was not poor enough for CI surgery (85%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this study indicate that functional outcome expectations are similar between candidates who elect to receive or forgo CI, yet those who forgo CI have higher baseline CI-specific QOL abilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 133:3548-3553, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Sturm
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gabriel Brandner
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Cheng Ma
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Theodore R McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dorismond C, Patro A, Holder JT, Perkins EL. Correlation Between Quality of Life and Speech Recognition Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:1015-1020. [PMID: 37832582 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the relationship between Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 Global (CIQOL-10) scores and speech recognition scores 6 and 12 months after cochlear implantation (CI) and to compare CIQOL-10 scores for patients who met the benchmark speech recognition scores with those who did not. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS One hundred twenty-four adults who underwent CI between 2018 and 2021 and completed a CIQOL-10 questionnaire at their 6- and/or 12-month postoperative visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CIQOL-10, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word, and AzBio in quiet and noise scores. RESULTS At 6 months, weak positive correlations were found between CIQOL-10 and CNC (n = 78, r = 0.234, p = 0.039) and AzBio in quiet (n = 73, r = 0.293, p = 0.012) scores but not AzBio in noise scores (n = 39, r = 0.207, p = 0.206). At 12 months, weak positive correlations were found between CIQOL-10 and CNC (n = 98, r = 0.315, p = 0.002), AzBio in quiet (n = 88, r = 0.271, p = 0.011), and AzBio in noise (n = 48, r = 0.291, p = 0.045) scores. Patients who met the benchmark CNC scores had notably higher CIQOL-10 scores than those who did not at 6 months (52.0 vs 45.5, p = 0.008) and 12 months (52.0 vs 45.5, p = 0.003). A similar relationship was found for those who met the benchmark AzBio in quiet scores at both 6 months (52.0 vs 44.0, p = 0.006) and 12 months (52.0 vs 46.5, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION CIQOL-10 scores have weak positive correlations with postoperative speech recognition outcomes at 6 and 12 months. This highlights the need for the continued use of quality-of-life measures, such as the CIQOL-10, in assessing CI outcomes to gain a more comprehensive understanding of patients' experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
| | - Jourdan T Holder
- Department of Hearing and Speech Science, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Skarzynski PH, Cywka KB, Czajka N, Kutyba J, Tavora-Vieira D, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G, Staecker H, Humphrey B, Zernotti M, Zernotti M, Magele A, Ploder M, Zabeu JS. QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6906. [PMID: 37887644 PMCID: PMC10605987 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20206906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to report quality of life (QoL) scores in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and to generate guidance for clinicians on using QoL measures to individualize CI counselling and rehabilitation and to increase access to CIs as a mode of rehabilitation. Participants (n = 101) were unilateral CI users with single-sided deafness (SSD; n = 17), asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL; n = 26), or bilateral hearing loss (Uni; n = 58). Generic QoL was assessed via the Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), and disease-specific QoL was assessed via the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) at preimplantation and at 6 and 12 months of CI use. All groups had significantly increased HUI-3 scores at both intervals. The SSD group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 at visit 3, the AHL group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 and most NCIQ subdomains at both intervals, and the Uni group showed significant benefit with both tests at both intervals. Unilateral CI recipients demonstrate improved QoL within the first 12 months of device use. Regular assessment with generic and disease-specific questionnaires has the potential to play an important role in personalizing treatment and possibly in increasing access to CI provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Miryam Calvino
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Katarzyna B. Cywka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Natalia Czajka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Justyna Kutyba
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | | | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; (P.V.d.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; (P.V.d.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Bryan Humphrey
- ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; (M.Z.); (M.Z.)
| | - Maximo Zernotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; (M.Z.); (M.Z.)
| | - Astrid Magele
- ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria; (A.M.)
| | - Marlene Ploder
- ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria; (A.M.)
| | - Julia Speranza Zabeu
- Hospital de Reabilitacão de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Campus Bauru, Bauru 17012-230, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lailach S, Lenz A, Zahnert T, Neudert M. [Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. German version]. HNO 2023; 71:583-591. [PMID: 37540233 PMCID: PMC10462568 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01341-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with a cochlear implant (CI) should be evaluated for a new speech processor every 6 years. The aim of this analysis was to assess the subjective and audiological benefit of upgrades. METHODS Speech understanding and subjective benefit were analyzed in 99 patients with the old and the new speech processor after 4 weeks of wearing. Speech understanding was assessed using the Freiburg monosyllabic test in quiet (FBE) at 65 dB and 80 dB, and the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) at 65 dB noise with adaptive speech sound level. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was used to assess subjective hearing impairment, and the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) was used to assess subjective satisfaction. RESULTS The speech processor upgrade resulted in a significant improvement of speech understanding in quiet at 65 dB (mean difference 8.9 ± 25.9 percentage points, p < 0.001) and 80 dB (mean difference 8.1 ± 29.7 percentage points, p < 0.001) and in noise (mean difference 3.2 ± 10.7 dB signal-to-noise ratio [S/N], p = 0.006). Using the APHAB, a significant improvement (mean difference 0.07 ± 0.16, p < 0.001) in hearing impairment was demonstrated in all listening situations. The APSQ showed significantly higher patient satisfaction with the new speech processor (mean difference 0.42 ± 1.26, p = 0.006). A comparative assessment of the benefit based on subjective and speech audiometric results identified a proportion of patients (35-42%) who subjectively benefited from the upgrade but had no measurable benefit based on speech audiometry. CONCLUSION There was a significant improvement in audiologically measurable and subjectively reflected speech understanding and patient satisfaction after the upgrade. In patients with only a small improvement in audiologically measurable speech understanding, the subjective benefit should also be assessed with validated measurement instruments in order to justify an upgrade to the payers in the health sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susen Lailach
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Sächsisches Cochlear Implant Centrum, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - Alexander Lenz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Sächsisches Cochlear Implant Centrum, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Zahnert
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Sächsisches Cochlear Implant Centrum, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Marcus Neudert
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Sächsisches Cochlear Implant Centrum, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Walia A, Bao J, Dwyer N, Rathgeb S, Chen S, Shew MA, Durakovic N, Herzog JA, Buchman CA, Wick CC. Predictors of Short-Term Changes in Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e146-e154. [PMID: 36728163 PMCID: PMC9928883 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed 1) to measure the effect of cochlear implantation on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) questionnaire and 2) to determine audiologic, demographic, and non-CI/hearing-related QOL factors influencing the CIQOL. STUDY DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS Thirty-seven adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CIQOL-global score preimplantation and 6 months postimplantation. Physical function score as measured by the short-form survey, audiologic, and demographic variables. RESULTS CIQOL showed significant improvement from preimplantation to 6 months postactivation with a mean difference of 14.9 points (95% confidence interval, 11.3 to 18.5, p < 0.0001). Improvement in CIQOL (ΔCIQOL) correlated linearly with age ( r = -0.49, p = 0.001) and improvement in speech perception testing ( r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). Multivariate modeling using age and change in consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant (CNC) score explained 46% of the variability measured by the ΔCIQOL-global score. CONCLUSIONS Nearly all CI recipients achieve significant gains for all domains as measured by the CIQOL. However, younger patients and those with a greater improvement in speech perception performance (CNC) are more likely to achieve a greater CIQOL benefit. Results here suggest the importance of considering preoperative CIQOL and speech perception measures when evaluating predictors of HR-QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Walia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee YH, Ho PH, Chen PY, Chen XX, Sun YC, Chu CH, Lin HC. Long-term auditory performance and psychosocial benefits of cochlear implantation in Mandarin-speaking older adults. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103876. [PMID: 37084611 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although previous studies have shown the efficacy of cochlear implants (CIs) in older adults, no study written in English has focused on Mandarin-speaking older recipients. Mandarin is a tonal language, it is hard to lip-read and tone recognition for CI users. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term post-CI outcomes in Mandarin-speaking older adults and the difference between them and younger recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-six post-lingually deafened adults were included. Speech perception tests (vowel, consonant, disyllable words, Mandarin monosyllable recognition test, and categories of audiology performance were evaluated) and psychosocial scale were evaluated. RESULTS There were no significant differences between older and younger recipients in post-CI open-set speech perception. However, older recipients had significantly lower social and total scores in the subjective questionnaire than younger recipients. In both duration of deafness less than seven years and hearing years in life over 92.6 %, older recipients had no less capable speech perception than in younger. CONCLUSION Mandarin-speaking older recipients can improve not only speech perception but also psychosocial benefits. Well hearing experience may confer an advantage to older recipients, despite their older implanted age. These results can help provide pre-CI consultation guidelines for older Mandarin-speaking recipients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tolisano AM, Pillion EM, Dirks CE, Ryan MT, Bernstein JGW. Quality of Life Impact of Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: Assessing the Interrelationship of Objective and Subjective Measures. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e125-e132. [PMID: 36728614 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect on quality of life (QOL) of cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) using the first psychometrically developed CI-specific QOL tool for English-speaking patients and to assess its relationship to objective perceptual measures. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary-care medical center. PATIENTS English-speaking adults with SSD or AHL. INTERVENTIONS Unilateral CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) score, CI-alone speech-in-quiet (SIQ) score (CNC and AzBio), binaural speech-in-noise (SIN) threshold, binaural azimuthal sound localization (SL) error. RESULTS At the most recent postoperative evaluation (median, 9.3 months postimplantation), 25 of 28 subjects (89%) had a CIQOL improvement, with the improvement considered clinically beneficial (>3 points) for 18 of 28 subjects (64%). Group-mean CIQOL improvement was observed at the first postoperative visit and did not change significantly thereafter. Objective perceptual measures (SL, SIQ, SIN) continued to improve over 12 months after implantation. Linear mixed-model regression analyses showed a moderate positive correlation between SIN and SIQ improvements (r = 0.50 to 0.59, p < 0.0001) and a strong positive correlation between the improvement in the two SIQ measures (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). No significant relationships were observed ( p > 0.05) among QOL or the objective perceptual measures. CONCLUSIONS QOL improved for the majority of subjects implanted for SSD and AHL. Different time courses for improvement in QOL and audiologic tests, combined with the lack of significant relationships among them, suggest that QOL outcomes reflect different aspects of the CI experience than those captured by speech-understanding and localization measures. SIQ may substitute for SIN when clinical constraints exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elicia M Pillion
- Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Coral E Dirks
- Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew T Ryan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stenbäck V, Marsja E, Ellis R, Rönnberg J. Relationships between behavioural and self-report measures in speech recognition in noise. Int J Audiol 2023; 62:101-109. [PMID: 35306958 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2047232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using data from the n200-study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between behavioural (the Swedish HINT and Hagerman speech-in-noise tests) and self-report (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ)) measures of listening under adverse conditions. DESIGN The Swedish HINT was masked with a speech-shaped noise (SSN), the Hagerman was masked with a SSN and a four-talker babble, and the subscales from the SSQ were used as a self-report measure. The HINT and Hagerman were administered through an experimental hearing aid. STUDY SAMPLE This study included 191 hearing aid users with hearing loss (mean PTA4 = 37.6, SD = 10.8) and 195 normally hearing adults (mean PTA4 = 10.0, SD = 6.0). RESULTS The present study found correlations between behavioural measures of speech-in-noise and self-report scores of the SSQ in normally hearing individuals, but not in hearing aid users. CONCLUSION The present study may help identify relationships between clinically used behavioural measures, and a self-report measure of speech recognition. The results from the present study suggest that use of a self-report measure as a complement to behavioural speech in noise tests might help to further our understanding of how self-report, and behavioural results can be generalised to everyday functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Stenbäck
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Division of Education, Teaching and Learning, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping university, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Erik Marsja
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Rachel Ellis
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Jerker Rönnberg
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sharma RK, Smetak MR, Patro A, Lindquist NR, Perkins EL, Holder JT, Haynes DS, Tawfik KO. Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:1149-1154. [PMID: 36201525 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays. INTERVENTIONS Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models. CONCLUSION During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection. LEARNING OBJECTIVE To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight). DESIRED RESULT To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III. INDICATE IRB OR IACUC Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul K Sharma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Miriam R Smetak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Nathan R Lindquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Elizabeth L Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | | | - David S Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Kareem O Tawfik
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xiu B, Paul BT, Chen JM, Le TN, Lin VY, Dimitrijevic A. Neural responses to naturalistic audiovisual speech are related to listening demand in cochlear implant users. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:1043499. [DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1043499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a weak relationship between clinical and self-reported speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Such poor correspondence may be due to differences in clinical and “real-world” listening environments and stimuli. Speech in the real world is often accompanied by visual cues, background environmental noise, and is generally in a conversational context, all factors that could affect listening demand. Thus, our objectives were to determine if brain responses to naturalistic speech could index speech perception and listening demand in CI users. Accordingly, we recorded high-density electroencephalogram (EEG) while CI users listened/watched a naturalistic stimulus (i.e., the television show, “The Office”). We used continuous EEG to quantify “speech neural tracking” (i.e., TRFs, temporal response functions) to the show’s soundtrack and 8–12 Hz (alpha) brain rhythms commonly related to listening effort. Background noise at three different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), +5, +10, and +15 dB were presented to vary the difficulty of following the television show, mimicking a natural noisy environment. The task also included an audio-only (no video) condition. After each condition, participants subjectively rated listening demand and the degree of words and conversations they felt they understood. Fifteen CI users reported progressively higher degrees of listening demand and less words and conversation with increasing background noise. Listening demand and conversation understanding in the audio-only condition was comparable to that of the highest noise condition (+5 dB). Increasing background noise affected speech neural tracking at a group level, in addition to eliciting strong individual differences. Mixed effect modeling showed that listening demand and conversation understanding were correlated to early cortical speech tracking, such that high demand and low conversation understanding occurred with lower amplitude TRFs. In the high noise condition, greater listening demand was negatively correlated to parietal alpha power, where higher demand was related to lower alpha power. No significant correlations were observed between TRF/alpha and clinical speech perception scores. These results are similar to previous findings showing little relationship between clinical speech perception and quality-of-life in CI users. However, physiological responses to complex natural speech may provide an objective measure of aspects of quality-of-life measures like self-perceived listening demand.
Collapse
|
20
|
McRackan TR, Hand BN, Velozo CA, Dubno JR. Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 Suppl 12:S1-S13. [PMID: 36082873 PMCID: PMC9650765 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a functional staging system using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) framework. The CIQOL-35 Profile was developed and validated following a rigorous research design and found to be more comprehensive and psychometrically sound than previous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) applied to adult CI users. However, interpreting the CIQOL-35 Profile (and all PROMs) relative to real-world functioning remains difficult for patients and clinicians, which limits the capacity of PROMs to direct clinical care. To address this limitation, a functional staging system based on PROM scores was developed to provide detailed descriptions of patients' self-reported abilities (clinical vignettes) without sacrificing the inherent value of the psychometrically derived scores. The current study (1) creates an evidence-based CIQOL functional staging system using advanced psychometric techniques, (2) confirms the clarity and meaningfulness of the staging system with patients, and (3) implements the staging system to measure CIQOL stage progression using data from a longitudinal study design. METHODS Item response theory (IRT) analyses of CIQOL-35 Profile data from 705 experienced adult CI users and expert opinion were used to determine the cut-scores that separated adjacent stages for the six CIQOL-35 domains (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social). The research team then created clinical vignettes based on item response patterns for each stage. Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 10 adult CI users to determine the clarity and meaningfulness of the CIQOL stages and associated clinical vignettes. Finally, we prospectively collected CIQOL-35 Profile scores from 42 CI users prior to cochlear implantation and then at 3- and 6-months post-CI activation to measure CIQOL stage progression. RESULTS Psychometric analyses identified five statistically distinct stages for the communication domain and three stages for all other domains. Using IRT analysis results for guidance, research team members independently identified the cut-scores that represented transitions between the functional stages for each domain with excellent agreement (κ = 0.98 [95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99]). Next, the key informant interviews revealed that CI users found the clinical vignettes to be clear and only minor changes were required. Participants also agreed that stage progression represented meaningful improvements in functional abilities. Finally, 88.1% of 42 patients in the prospective cohort (n = 37) improved from pre-CI functional stage by at least one functional stage in one or more domains. The communication domain had the greatest number of patients improve by one or more stages (59.5%) and the social domain the fewest (25.6%). There was also a trend for less improvement at 3- and 6-months post-CI activation for patients at higher pre-CI functional stages, even though higher stages were achievable. CONCLUSION The new CIQOL functional staging system provides an evidence-based understanding of the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users from pre-CI to 3- to 6-months post-CI activation across multiple domains. In addition, study results provide the proportion of CI users in each stage at each timepoint. Results can be used during discussions of expectations with potential CI users to provide enhanced insight regarding realistic outcomes and the anticipated timing for improvements. The use of the CIQOL functional staging system also presents an opportunity to develop individualized goal-based rehabilitation strategies that target barriers to stage advancement faced by CI users. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 132:S1-S13, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore R McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Craig A Velozo
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175156. [PMID: 36079089 PMCID: PMC9457208 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Hearing-related quality of life (QoL) after cochlear implantation (CI) is as important as audiological performance. We evaluated the functional results and QoL after CI in a heterogeneous patient cohort with emphasis on patients with long-term deafness (>10 years). Methods: Twenty-eight patients (n = 32 implanted ears, within n = 12 long-term deaf ears) implanted with a mid-scala electrode array were included in this retrospective mono-centric cohort study. Speech intelligibility for monosyllables (SIM), speech reception thresholds (SRT50) and QoL with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were registered. Correlation of SIM and QoL was analyzed. Results: SIM and SRT50 improved significantly 12 months postoperatively up to 54.8 ± 29.1% and 49.3 ± 9.6 dB SPL, respectively. SIM progressively improved up to 1 year, but some early-deafened, late implanted patients developed speech understanding several years after implantation. The global and all subdomain QoL scores increased significantly up to 12 months postoperatively and we found a correlation of SIM and global QoL score at 12 months postoperatively. Several patients of the “poor performer” (SIM < 40%) group reported high improvement of hearing-related QoL. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation provides a benefit in hearing-related QoL, even in some patients with low postoperative speech intelligibility results. Consequently, hearing-related QoL scores should be routinely used as outcome measure beside standard speech understanding tests, as well. Further studies with a prospective multi-centric design are needed to identify factors influencing post-implantation functional results and QoL in the patient group of long-term deafness.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ma C, Fried J, Nguyen SA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Camposeo EL, Meyer TA, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Longitudinal Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2022; 133:1014-1024. [PMID: 36004817 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine patterns of change and plateau in speech recognition scores in postlingually hearing impaired adult cochlear implant recipients. The study also examines variations in change patterns for different speech materials and testing conditions. STUDY DESIGN Used systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS Articles in English reporting speech recognition scores of adults with postlingual hearing loss at pre-implantation and at least two post-implantation time points were included. Statistically significant changes were determined by meta-analysis and the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS A total of 22 articles representing 1954 patients were included. Meta-analysis of mean difference demonstrated significant improvements in speech recognition score for words in quiet (37.4%; 95% confidence interval [34.7%, 40.7%]), sentences in quiet (49.4%; 95% confidence interval [44.9%, 53.9%]), and sentences in noise (30.8%; 95% confidence interval [25.2%, 36.4%]) from pre-op to 3 months. Scores continued to increase from 3 to 12 months but did not reach significance. Similarly, significant improvements from pre-op to 3 months were observed for consonant nucleus consonant (CNC) words in quiet (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [33.8%, 40.4%]), hearing in noise test (HINT) sentences in quiet (46.5%; 95% confidence interval [37.0%, 56.0%]), AzBio sentences in quiet (45.9%; 95% confidence interval [44.2%, 47.5%]), and AzBio sentences in noise (26.4%; 95% confidence interval [18.6%, 34.2%]). HINT sentences in noise demonstrated improvement from pre-op to 3 months (35.1%; 95% confidence interval [30.0%, 40.3%]) and from 3 to 12 months (15.5%; 95% confidence interval [7.2%, 23.8%]). CONCLUSIONS Mean speech recognition scores demonstrate significant improvement within the first 3 months, with no further statistically significant improvement after 3 months. However, large individual variation should be expected and future research is needed to explain the sources of these individual differences. Laryngoscope, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Ma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Jacob Fried
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Elizabeth L Camposeo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Ted A Meyer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Theodore R McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Urík M, Šikolová S, Hošnová D, Kruntorád V, Bartoš M, Jabandžiev P. Long-Term Device Satisfaction and Safety after Cochlear Implantation in Children. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081326. [PMID: 36013275 PMCID: PMC9410025 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Objectives: For full benefit in children implanted with a cochlear implant (CI), wearing the device all waking hours is necessary. This study focuses on the relationship between daily use and audiological outcomes, with the hypothesis that frequent daily device use coincides with high device satisfaction resulting in better functional gain (FG). Confounding factors such as implantation age, device experience and type of device were considered. (2) Results: Thirty-eight CI children (65 ears) were investigated. In total, 76.92% of the children were using their device for >12 h per day (h/d), 18.46% for 9−12 h/d, the remaining for 6−9 h/d and one subject reported 3 h/d. The revision rate up to the 90-month follow-up (F/U) was 4.6%. The mean FG was 59.00 ± 7.67 dB. The Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) separated for single unit (SU) versus behind the ear (BTE) devices showed significantly better results for the latter in terms of wearing comfort (WC) (p = 0.00062). A correlation between device use and FG was found with a device experience of <2 years (n = 29; r2 = 0.398), whereas no correlation was seen with ≥2 years of device experience (n = 36; r2 = 0.0038). (3) Conclusion: This study found significant relationships between daily device use and FG, wearing comfort and long-term safety (90 months).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Urík
- Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +420-532-234-440
| | - Soňa Šikolová
- Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Dagmar Hošnová
- Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vít Kruntorád
- Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Bartoš
- Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Jabandžiev
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kay-Rivest E, Schlacter J, Waltzman SB. Cochlear implantation outcomes in the older adult: a scoping review. Cochlear Implants Int 2022; 23:280-290. [PMID: 35774034 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2091723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current study aimed to identify and map the available evidence surrounding cochlear implantation (CI) in older adults. Five outcomes were evaluated: speech perception scores, perioperative complications, neurocognitive outcomes, quality of life outcomes and vestibular dysfunction and fall rates after surgery. METHODS A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews and included patients over the age of 60. RESULTS Ninety-seven studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 7,182 patients. Mean (SD) speech perception scores in quiet and in noise pre-and postoperatively were 7.9% (6.7) and 52.8% (14.3) and 8.0% (68.1) and 68.1% (15.9) respectively. Postoperative cardiac arrhythmias, urinary retention, and delirium occurred slightly more frequently in older adults. In terms of cognition, most studies noted stability or improvement one year after implantation. A majority of studies indicated better quality of life post-CI. Rates of fall after surgery were rarely reported, and there was a general paucity of data surrounding vestibular function changes after CI. DISCUSSION This scoping review identifies many positive outcomes linked to CI in older adults. No findings suggest a single patient characteristic that would warrant refusal to consider evaluation for cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kay-Rivest
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie Schlacter
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan B Waltzman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Giallini I, Nicastri M, Inguscio BMS, Portanova G, Magliulo G, Greco A, Mancini P. Effects of the "Active Communication Education" Program on Hearing-Related Quality of Life in a Group of Italian Older Adults Cochlear Implant Users. Front Psychol 2022; 13:827684. [PMID: 35668973 PMCID: PMC9163787 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Active Communication Education (ACE) program on the social/emotional impacts of hearing loss (HL) in a group of older adults with a cochlear implant (CI). Design Prospective cohort study design, with a “within-subject” control procedure. Study Sample Twenty adults over-65 post-lingually deafened CI users. All subjects were required to be native Italian speakers, to have normal cognitive level, have no significant psychiatric conditions and/or diagnosed incident dementia, and used CI for at least 9 months. Materials and Methods Twenty participants were assessed using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) before, during, and after ACE program, with a one and 6-month follow up. The cognitive and audiological evaluation was carried out before commencing the ACE program. Results The ACE program had a positive impact by reducing HL’s social/emotional effects. Participants benefited from a rehabilitative approach by improving multilevel skills: comprehension of audiological and hearing dimensions, acquisition of communicative, pragmatic and problem-solving strategies, and interaction and sharing of experiences with peers. Conclusion Although targeting the older adults with moderate HL, the ACE program also seemed to benefit older adult CI users. An improvement in social and emotional adaptation to hearing difficulties can, in turn, significantly promote optimal use of CI in the older adults, thereby possibly reducing the risk of losing motivation and engagement in device use and in rehabilitation protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Giallini
- Department of Sense Organs, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Nicastri
- Department of Sense Organs, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Ginevra Portanova
- Department of Sense Organs, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magliulo
- Department of Sense Organs, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Greco
- Department of Sense Organs, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Mancini
- Department of Sense Organs, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dietz A, Heinrich A, Törmäkangas T, Iso-Mustajärvi M, Miettinen P, Willberg T, Linder PH. The Effectiveness of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Finnish Recipients. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:786939. [PMID: 35733938 PMCID: PMC9207276 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.786939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding speech is essential for adequate social interaction, and its functioning affects health, wellbeing, and quality of life (QoL). Untreated hearing loss (HL) is associated with reduced social activity, depression and cognitive decline. Severe and profound HL is routinely rehabilitated with cochlear implantation. The success of treatment is mostly assessed by performance-based outcome measures such as speech perception. The ultimate goal of cochlear implantation, however, is to improve the patient’s QoL. Therefore, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) would be clinically valuable as they assess subjective benefits and overall effectiveness of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the patient-reported benefits of unilateral cochlear implantation in an unselected Finnish patient cohort of patients with bilateral HL. The study design was a prospective evaluation of 118 patients. The patient cohort was longitudinally followed up with repeated within-subject measurements preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were one performance-based speech-in-noise (SiN) test (Finnish Matrix Sentence Test), and two PROMs [Finnish versions of the Speech, Spatial, Qualities of Hearing questionnaire (SSQ) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ)]. The results showed significant average improvements in SiN scores, from +0.8 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) preoperatively to −3.7 and −3.8 dB SNR at 6 and12 month follow-up, respectively. Significant improvements were also found for SSQ and NCIQ scores in all subdomains from the preoperative state to 6 and 12 months after first fitting. No clinically significant improvements were observed in any of the outcome measures between 6 and 12 months. Preoperatively, poor SiN scores were associated with low scoring in several subdomains of the SSQ and NCIQ. Poor preoperative SiN scores and low PROMs scoring were significantly associated with larger postoperative improvements. No significant association was found between SiN scores and PROMs postoperatively. This study demonstrates significant benefits of cochlear implantation in the performance-based and patient-reported outcomes in an unselected patient sample. The lack of association between performance and PROMs scores postoperatively suggests that both capture unique aspects of benefit, highlighting the need to clinically implement PROMs in addition to performance-based measures for a more holistic assessment of treatment benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarno Dietz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- *Correspondence: Aarno Dietz,
| | - Antje Heinrich
- Division of Human Communication, Development and Hearing, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Timo Törmäkangas
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | | | - Petrus Miettinen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tytti Willberg
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pia H. Linder
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Evaluating the Revised Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire in Cochlear Implant Users Cochlear Implant Outcome Assessment Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e571-e577. [PMID: 35283464 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The 59-item Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) was developed based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for vocational rehabilitation to assess work related functioning. It was revised to include 17 questions, assigned to 14 ICF categories relevant to cochlear implant (CI) users. This cross-sectional multicenter study aimed to evaluate CI users' responses on the WORQ questions to describe and generate ICF qualifiers for the revised WORQ in CI users, forming part of a broader framework of CI outcome measures linked to the ICF. METHODS One hundred seventy-seven adults over the age of 18 years with a minimum of one year's device experience were included in the analysis. The WORQ was completed by the participants at a routine visit to the clinic, via email, or via post. RESULTS Most of the CI users perceived no problem on the WORQ questions (53.7%-91%), finished secondary school (54.2%) or obtained a college or university degree (32.8%) and are either employed (41.2%) or retired (34.5%). CI users that are currently working mostly have a full-time position (34.5%). Subjects reported no problem (91%) with sensation of falling, while handling communication devices and techniques (10.9%) and tinnitus (9.6%) showed the highest number of subjects reporting a complete problem. CONCLUSIONS Overall, most of the CI users experienced no impairment, restriction or limitation on the WORQ questions and their assigned ICF categories. Their education level resembles the education level of the general population and they seem to integrate or reintegrate well in professional life postoperatively.
Collapse
|
28
|
Brumer N, Elkins E, Hillyer J, Hazlewood C, Parbery-Clark A. Relationships Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Front Psychol 2022; 13:859722. [PMID: 35572246 PMCID: PMC9096554 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies examining the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and speech perception ability in cochlear implant (CI) users have yielded variable results, due to a range of factors, such as a variety of different HRQoL questionnaires and CI speech testing materials in addition to CI configuration. In order to decrease inherent variability and better understand the relationship between these measures in CI users, we administered a commonly used clinical CI speech testing battery as well as two popular HRQoL questionnaires in bimodal and bilateral CI users. Methods The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), a modified five-factor version of the GBI (GBI-5F), and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were administered to 25 CI users (17 bimodal and 8 bilateral). Speech perception abilities were measured with the AzBio sentence test in several conditions (e.g., quiet and noise, binaural, and first-ear CI only). Results Higher performance scores on the GBI general subscore were related to greater binaural speech perception ability in noise. There were no other relationships between the GBI or NCIQ and speech perception ability under any condition. Scores on many of the GBI-5F factors were substantially skewed and asymmetrical; therefore, correlational analyses could not be applied. Across all participants, binaural speech perception scores were greater than first-ear CI only scores. Conclusion The GBI general subscore was related to binaural speech perception, which is considered the everyday listening condition of bimodal and bilateral CI users, in noise; while the more CI-specific NCIQ did not relate to speech perception ability in any listening condition. Future research exploring the relationships between the GBI, GBI-5F, and NCIQ considering bimodal and bilateral CI configurations separately is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadav Brumer
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Elkins
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jake Hillyer
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Chantel Hazlewood
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12050649. [PMID: 35625577 PMCID: PMC9138212 DOI: 10.3390/biom12050649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As biomolecular approaches for hearing restoration in profound sensorineural hearing loss evolve, they will be applied in conjunction with or instead of cochlear implants. An understanding of the current state-of-the-art of this technology, including its advantages, disadvantages, and its potential for delivering and interacting with biomolecular hearing restoration approaches, is helpful for designing modern hearing-restoration strategies. Cochlear implants (CI) have evolved over the last four decades to restore hearing more effectively, in more people, with diverse indications. This evolution has been driven by advances in technology, surgery, and healthcare delivery. Here, we offer a practical treatise on the state of cochlear implantation directed towards developing the next generation of inner ear therapeutics. We aim to capture and distill conversations ongoing in CI research, development, and clinical management. In this review, we discuss successes and physiological constraints of hearing with an implant, common surgical approaches and electrode arrays, new indications and outcome measures for implantation, and barriers to CI utilization. Additionally, we compare cochlear implantation with biomolecular and pharmacological approaches, consider strategies to combine these approaches, and identify unmet medical needs with cochlear implants. The strengths and weaknesses of modern implantation highlighted here can mark opportunities for continued progress or improvement in the design and delivery of the next generation of inner ear therapeutics.
Collapse
|
30
|
Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19052503. [PMID: 35270201 PMCID: PMC8909702 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of hearing implant (HI) use on quality of life (QoL) and to determine which QoL measure(s) quantify QoL with greater sensitivity in users of different types of HIs. Participants were adult cochlear implant (CI), active middle ear implant (VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE (VSB)), or active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (the BONEBRIDGE (BB)) recipients. Generic QoL and disease-specific QoL were assessed at three intervals: pre-activation, 6 months of device use, and 12 months of device use. 169 participants completed the study (110 CI, 18VSB, and 41BB). CI users' QoL significantly increased from 0-6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. On some device-specific measures, their QoL also significantly increased between 6 and 12 m device use. VSB users' QoL significantly increased between all tested intervals with the disease-specific measure but not the generic measure. BB users' QoL significantly increased from 0-6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. In sum, HI users experienced significant postoperative increases in QoL within their first 12 m of device use, especially when disease-specific measures were used. Disease-specific QoL measures appeared to be more sensitive than their generic counterparts.
Collapse
|
31
|
Aylward A, Gordon SA, Murphy-Meyers M, Allen CM, Patel NS, Gurgel RK. Caregiver Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e191-e197. [PMID: 34855684 PMCID: PMC8752477 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors affecting quality of life (QOL) in caregivers of older cochlear implant (CI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Academic medical center. PATIENTS Adults over age 65 receiving CI between July 13, 2000 and April 3, 2019. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Linear regression models for caregiver QOL measured by Significant Other Scale for Hearing Disability (SOS-HEAR), with independent variables: caregiver role, patient gender, 11 factor modified frailty index (mFI), duration of hearing loss, hearing aid use, age at surgery, time since surgery, change in pure tone average (PTA), processor input type and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ). Correlations between SOS-HEAR and patient speech recognition scores. RESULTS Questionnaires were mailed to all 294 living CI recipients. Seventy-one caregivers completed the questionnaire. Only patient gender and mFi were significant predictors of caregiver QOL on both univariate (p ≤ 0.001, β= -20.26 [95% confidence interval -30.21, -10.3]; 0.005, -0.72 [-1.20, -0.23], respectively) and multivariate (p = 0.005, β = -20.09, -33.05 to -7.13; 0.003, -0.93 [-1.50, -0.37]) analysis, where caregivers of female patients with lower mFI (better health) had better QOL scores. Caregiver QOL was significantly associated with patient's change in PTA and self-reported QOL scores on univariate (p = 0.041, β = 0.52 [0.08, 0.96]; 0.024, -0.27 [-0.52, -0.02]) but not multivariate analysis. Time since CI was significant only on multivariate analysis (0.041, -0.17 [-0.33, -0.01]). Caregiver QOL did not correlate with patient speech recognition scores. CONCLUSIONS Higher QOL scores were found among caregivers of healthier, female CI recipients. Patient hearing measurements did not correspond with better caregiver QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Aylward
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Steven A Gordon
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Neil S Patel
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Richard K Gurgel
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shafiro V, Luzum N, Moberly AC, Harris MS. Perception of Environmental Sounds in Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review. Front Neurosci 2022; 15:788899. [PMID: 35082595 PMCID: PMC8785216 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.788899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Improved perception of environmental sounds (PES) is one of the primary benefits of cochlear implantation (CI). However, past research contains mixed findings on PES ability in contemporary CI users, which at times contrast with anecdotal clinical reports. The present review examined extant PES research to provide an evidence basis for clinical counseling, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest directions for future work in this area of CI outcome assessment. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched using medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords broadly identified to reference CI and environmental sounds. Records published between 2000 and 2021 were screened by two independent reviewers in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data were subsequently extracted and evaluated according to synthesis without-meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most examined PES in post-lingually implanted adults, with one study focused on pre/perilingual adults. Environmental sound identification (ESI) in quiet using open- or closed-set response format was most commonly used in PES assessment, included in all selected studies. ESI accuracy in CI children (3 studies) and adults (16 studies), was highly variable but generally mediocre (means range: 31–87%). Only two studies evaluated ESI performance prospectively before and after CI, while most studies were cross-sectional. Overall, CI performance was consistently lower than that of normal-hearing peers. No significant differences in identification accuracy were reported between CI candidates and CI users. Environmental sound identification correlated in CI users with measures of speech perception, music and spectro-temporal processing. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review indicate considerable limitations in the current knowledge of PES in contemporary CI users, especially in pre/perilingual late-implanted adults and children. Although no overall improvement in PES following implantation was found, large individual variability and existing methodological limitations in PES assessment may potentially obscure potential CI benefits for PES. Further research in this ecologically relevant area of assessment is needed to establish a stronger evidence basis, identify CI users with significant deficits, and improve CI users' safety and satisfaction through targeted PES rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeriy Shafiro
- Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
- *Correspondence: Valeriy Shafiro
| | - Nathan Luzum
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Michael S. Harris
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Babajanian EE, Patel NS, Gurgel RK. The Impact of Cochlear Implantation: Cognitive Function, Quality of Life, and Frailty in Older Adults. Semin Hear 2021; 42:342-351. [PMID: 34912162 PMCID: PMC8660171 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This review examines the relationship between cochlear implantation and cognition and quality of life in older adults, as well as how frailty affects outcomes for older patients with cochlear implants. A growing body of evidence suggests that there is a strong association between hearing loss and cognitive impairment. Preliminary studies suggest that cochlear implantation in older adults may be protective against cognitive decline. While studies have observed a positive impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life, currently it is unclear what factors contribute the most to improved quality of life. Frailty, as a measurement of general health, likely plays a role in complication rates and quality-of-life outcomes after cochlear implantation, though larger prospective studies are required to further elucidate this relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric E Babajanian
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Neil S Patel
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Richard K Gurgel
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Consumer engagement via interactive artificial intelligence and mixed reality. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
35
|
Driver S, Soulby A, Shallita N, Walters H, Jones I, Jiang D. The development and clinical use of the Guy's and St Thomas' quality of life questionnaire (GAST) for adult cochlear implant patients. Cochlear Implants Int 2021; 23:21-31. [PMID: 34429043 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1961364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To Review the benefit of the GAST questionnaire (Tilston, S. 2003. Assessing the quality of life in adult cochlear implant users. MSc dissertation. London: City University.) to measure hearing related quality of life for adults pre and post-cochlear implantation. To develop a scoring methodology as to what score constitutes a significantly 'good' or 'poor' change to better target rehabilitation to those most in need.Design: The GAST Questionnaire was developed using a robust cycle of validation and reliability analyses using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Norusis, M. 1993. SPSS for windows: professional statistics. release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.). The scoring methodology was developed by dividing 83 patient full data sets into quintiles for the delta of quality of life improvement and the 9-12 month post-implantation GAST score.Results: The GAST questionnaire design was deemed robust. The scoring methodology used led to the 20th percentile score highlighting individuals requiring further support and the 80th percentiles for those suitable for partial booking.Conclusion: The GAST questionnaire is a useful way of identifying the patients in need of support as well as to measure patient reported quality of life improvements following cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Driver
- Hearing Implant Centre, Audiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, City University, London, UK
| | - Andrew Soulby
- Hearing Implant Centre, Audiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, City University, London, UK
| | - Natasha Shallita
- Hearing Implant Centre, Audiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, City University, London, UK
| | - Hazel Walters
- Hearing Implant Centre, Audiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, City University, London, UK
| | - Isabelle Jones
- Hearing Implant Centre, Audiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, City University, London, UK
| | - Dan Jiang
- Hearing Implant Centre, Audiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, City University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments. Ear Hear 2021; 42:896-908. [PMID: 33735907 PMCID: PMC8222065 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may provide a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the real-world experiences of cochlear implant (CI) users and complement information obtained from speech recognition outcomes. To address this unmet clinical need, the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile instrument and CIQOL-10 Global measure were developed according to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) and COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The CIQOL-35 Profile consists of 35 items in six domain constructs (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social) and the CIQOL-10 Global contains 10 items that provide an overall CIQOL score. The present study compares psychometric properties of the newly developed CIQOL instruments to two legacy PROMs commonly used in adult CI users. DESIGN Using a prospective cohort design, a sample of 334 adult CI users recruited from across the United States provided responses to (1) the CIQOL instruments; (2) a CI-specific PROM (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, NCIQ); and (3) a general-health PROM (Health Utilities Index 3 [HUI-3]). Responses were obtained again after 1 mo. The reliability and validity of the CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments were compared with the legacy PROMs (NCIQ and HUI-3). Psychometric properties and construct validity of each instrument were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory (IRT), and test-retest reliability (using Pearson's correlations), where appropriate. RESULTS All six CIQOL-35 Profile domains and the CIQOL-10 Global instrument demonstrated adequate to strong construct validity. The majority of the NCIQ subdomains and NCIQ total score had substantial confirmatory factor analysis model misfit, representing poor construct validity. Therefore, IRT analysis could only be applied to the basic sound performance and activity limitation subdomains of the NCIQ. IRT results showed strong psychometric properties for all CIQOL-35 Profile domains, the CIQOL-10 Global instrument, and the basic sound performance and activity limitation subdomains of the NCIQ. Test-retest reliability was strong for the CIQOL-35 Profile, CIQOL-10 Global, and NCIQ, but moderate to weak for the HUI-3; the hearing score of the HUI-3 demonstrated the weakest reliability. CONCLUSION The CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global are more psychometrically sound and comprehensive than the NCIQ and the HUI-3 for assessing QOL in adult CI users. Due to poor reliability, we do not recommend using the HUI-3 to measure QOL in this population. With validation and psychometric analyses complete, the CIQOL-35 Profile measure and CIQOL-10 Global instrument are now ready for use in clinical and research settings to measure QOL and real-world functional abilities of adult CI users.
Collapse
|
37
|
Glasgow Benefit Inventory in Cochlear Implantation: A Reliable Though Ancillary Quality of Life Metric. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e1464-e1469. [PMID: 34353979 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is a health-related quality of life instrument used to detect changes in health status following otolaryngologic interventions. Despite its use in cochlear implant literature, assessment of utility, reliability, and validity of GBI in an adult cochlear implants (CI) patient population has yet to be performed. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series. SETTING Academic, tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Postlingually deafened, adult CI patients with at least 1 year of device use. INTERVENTIONS Five hundred fifty-two patients were administered GBI questionnaires at least 1 year following CI activation during follow-up visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES GBI total and subscale scoring were compared to either the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults or Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Moreover, a factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were performed to determine GBI validity and internal reliability, respectively. RESULTS The average overall GBI score was 38.6 ± 21.7. This was weakly correlated to the reduction in Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults/Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (τb = 0.282, p < 0.05). High factor loading with minimal cross-loading was noted on a three-factor solution, which emulated the original GBI development. Internal reliability was acceptable for the general benefit (α = 0.913) and social support subclasses (α = 0.706), whereas physical health's was low (α = 0.643). CONCLUSIONS Although GBI possesses adequate convergent and discriminant validity with acceptable reliability, its routine use to capture CI-specific health-related changes should not supersede validated CI-specific QoL instruments.
Collapse
|
38
|
Can a Self-report Measure Be Used to Assess Cognitive Skills in Adults With Hearing Loss? Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e684-e689. [PMID: 33625197 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESES Adult cochlear implant candidates would self-report their executive functioning abilities as poorer than normal-hearing peers. These executive function abilities would correlate with laboratory-based cognitive tests. Lastly, executive functioning (EF) abilities would be associated with hearing-related quality of life. BACKGROUND Executive function refers to cognitive abilities involved in behavioral regulation during goal-directed activity. Pediatric and adult users have demonstrated delays and deficits in executive function skills compared with normal-hearing peers. This study aimed to compare self-report executive function in adult cochlear implant candidates and normal-hearing peers and to relate executive function skills to laboratory-based cognitive testing and hearing-related quality of life. METHODS Twenty-four postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant candidates were enrolled, along with 42 normal-hearing age-matched peers. Participants completed self-reports of executive function using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function- Adult (BRIEF-A). Participants were also tested using laboratory-based cognitive measures, as well as assessment of hearing-related quality of life on the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Groups were compared on BRIEF-A scores, and relations between BRIEF-A and lab-based cognitive measures as well as Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire scores were examined. RESULTS Self-report executive function on the BRIEF-A was not significantly different between groups. Consistent relations of self-report executive function and nonverbal reasoning were identified. Strong relations were not found between self-report executive function and hearing-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Executive function as measured by BRIEF-A demonstrates some relation with a laboratory-based metric of nonverbal reasoning, but not other cognitive measures. Hearing-impaired individuals did not report poorer EF than normal-hearing controls. EF additionally did not correlate with quality of life. Our findings provide preliminary, partial validation of the BRIEF-A instrument in the preoperative evaluation of adult cochlear implant candidates.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kobosko J, Jedrzejczak WW, Barej A, Pankowska A, Geremek-Samsonowicz A, Skarzynski H. Cochlear implants in adults with partial deafness: subjective benefits but associated psychological distress. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:1387-1394. [PMID: 32671540 PMCID: PMC8057983 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06199-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study investigated adults with partial deafness (PD) and asked them to rate the benefits of their cochlear implant (CI), their general level of satisfaction with it, and their level of psychological distress. Of particular interest was the role of gender. METHODS The study comprised 71 participants (41 females) with PD who had been provided with a CI. The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) was used to assess the benefits of their CI. Satisfaction with their CI was measured using a visual analog scale. The severity of mental distress was assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). RESULTS On various NCIQ scales, the average benefits of a CI were rated at 66%. Females gave a lower rating than males. The mental distress experienced by the group was significantly higher than in the general population. Females had more severe symptoms of anxiety and insomnia than males. There was a significant relationship between psychological distress and CI benefit, but only in females. Besides general distress, the most affected spheres were related to psychosocial functioning-"self-esteem", "activity limitation", and "social interaction". Contrary to expectations, there was no relationship between mental distress and CI satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The perceived benefits of a CI in subjects with PD relate mostly to the level of mental distress, although gender is an important factor. For females, their emotional state affects how beneficial their CI is perceived. Due to the higher levels of mental distress, females tend to need more psychological intervention and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Kobosko
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland
| | - W Wiktor Jedrzejczak
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland.
| | - Anna Barej
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Pankowska
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland
| | - Anna Geremek-Samsonowicz
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bernstein CM, Brewer DM, Bakke MH, Olson AD, Machmer EJ, Spitzer JB, Schauer PC, Sydlowski SA, Levitt H. Maximizing Cochlear Implant Outcomes with Short-Term Aural Rehabilitation. J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32:144-156. [PMID: 33890268 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of adults are receiving cochlear implants (CIs) and many achieve high levels of speech perception and improved quality of life. However, a proportion of implant recipients still struggle due to limited speech recognition and/or greater communication demands in their daily lives. For these individuals a program of aural rehabilitation (AR) has the potential to improve outcomes. PURPOSE The study investigated the effects of a short-term AR intervention on speech recognition, functional communication, and psychosocial outcomes in post lingually deafened adult CI users. RESEARCH DESIGN The experimental design was a multisite clinical study with participants randomized to either an AR treatment or active control group. Each group completed 6 weekly 90-minute individual treatment sessions. Assessments were completed pretreatment, 1 week and 2 months post-treatment. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty-five post lingually deafened adult CI recipients participated. AR group: mean age 66.2 (48-80); nine females, four males; months postactivation 7.7 (3-16); mean years severe to profound deafness 18.4 (2-40). Active control group: mean age 62.8 (47-85); eight females, four males; months postactivation 7.0 (3-13); mean years severe to profound deafness 18.8 (1-55). INTERVENTION The AR protocol consisted of auditory training (words, sentences, speech tracking), and psychosocial counseling (informational and communication strategies). Active control group participants engaged in cognitive stimulation activities (e.g., crosswords, sudoku, etc.). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Repeated measures ANOVA or analysis of variance, MANOVA or multivariate analysis of variance, and planned contrasts were used to compare group performance on the following measures: CasperSent; Hearing Handicap Inventory; Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire; Client Oriented Scale of Improvement; Glasgow Benefit Inventory. RESULTS The AR group showed statistically significant improvements on speech recognition performance, psychosocial function, and communication goals with no significant improvement seen in the control group. The two groups were statistically equivalent on all outcome measures at preassessment. The robust improvements for the AR group were maintained at 2 months post-treatment. CONCLUSION Results of this clinical study provide evidence that a short-term AR intervention protocol can maximize outcomes for adult post lingually deafened CI users. The impact of this brief multidimensional AR intervention to extend CI benefit is compelling, and may serve as a template for best practices with adult CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Marcus Bernstein
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Diane Majerus Brewer
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Matthew H Bakke
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Anne D Olson
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky College of Health Sciences, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Elizabeth Jackson Machmer
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Center for Educational Research Partnerships, Rochester, New York
| | - Jaclyn B Spitzer
- Columbia University Medical Center, Audiology and Speech Pathology in Otolaryngology, New York, New York.,Montclair State University, Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bloomfield, New Jersey
| | - Paula C Schauer
- Prince Georges County School System, Instructional Specialist Audiology, Landover, Maryland
| | | | - Harry Levitt
- Advanced Hearing Concepts, Bodega Bay, California
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aylward A, Murphy-Meyers M, Allen CM, Patel NS, Gurgel RK. Frailty and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:350-356. [PMID: 33874790 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211004589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship among frailty index, hearing measures, and hearing-related quality of life (QOL) in older recipients of cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Academic medical center. METHODS Adults aged ≥65 years at the time of receiving cochlear implants between July 13, 2000, and April 3, 2019, were asked to complete a questionnaire on hearing-related QOL. Chart review was performed to identify patients' characteristics. Correlations were calculated between frailty index and audiologic outcome measures as well as between speech recognition scores and QOL scores. Linear regression models were developed to examine the impact of clinical characteristics, frailty index, and hearing measures on hearing-related QOL. RESULTS Data for 143 respondents were included. The mean age was 80.7 years (SD, 7.1), with a mean 27.8 years of hearing loss (SD, 17.4) before implantation. The mean frailty index was 11.1 (SD, 10.6), indicating that patients had 1 or 2 of the measured comorbidities on average. No correlation was found between lower frailty index (better health) and hearing scores, including pure tone averages (PTAs) and speech recognition scores. Lower frailty index and larger improvement in PTA after cochlear implantation predicted better QOL scores on univariate analysis (respectively, P = .002, β = -0.42 [95% CI, -0.68 to -0.16]; P = .008, β = -0.15 [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.04]) and multivariate analysis (P = .047, β = -0.28 [95% CI, -0.55 to -0.01]; P = .006, β = -0.16 [95% CI, -0.28 to -0.05]). No speech recognition scores correlated with QOL after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS Frailty index does not correlate with hearing scores after cochlear implantation in older adults. Lower frailty index and more improvement in PTA predict better QOL scores after cochlear implantation in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Aylward
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | - Neil S Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Richard K Gurgel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
James CJ, Graham PL, Betances Reinoso FA, Breuning SN, Durko M, Huarte Irujo A, Royo López J, Müller L, Perenyi A, Jaramillo Saffon R, Salinas Garcia S, Schüssler M, Schwarz Langer MJ, Skarzynski PH, Mecklenburg DJ. The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:589296. [PMID: 33716706 PMCID: PMC7947658 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.589296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Older adults with mild or no hearing loss make more errors and expend more effort listening to speech. Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing to deaf patients but with limited fidelity. We hypothesized that patient-reported hearing and health-related quality of life in CI patients may similarly vary according to age. Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) of hearing scale and Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI) questionnaires were administered to 543 unilaterally implanted adults across Europe, South Africa, and South America. Data were acquired before surgery and at 1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with visit, age group (18–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and 65+), and side of implant as main factors and adjusted for other covariates. Tinnitus and dizziness prevalence did not vary with age, but older groups had more preoperative hearing. Preoperatively and postoperatively, SSQ scores were significantly higher (Δ0.75–0.82) for those aged <45 compared with those 55+. However, gains in SSQ scores were equivalent across age groups, although postoperative SSQ scores were higher in right-ear implanted subjects. All age groups benefited equally in terms of HUI gain (0.18), with no decrease in scores with age. Overall, younger adults appeared to cope better with a degraded hearing before and after CI, leading to better subjective hearing performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petra L Graham
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Marcin Durko
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Alicia Huarte Irujo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Royo López
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Lida Müller
- Tygerberg Hospital-Stellenbosch University Cochlear Implant Unit, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - Adam Perenyi
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Sandra Salinas Garcia
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark Schüssler
- Deutsches HörZentrum Hannover der HNO-Klinik, Medizische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
McRackan TR, Reddy P, Costello MS, Dubno JR. Role of Preoperative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e130-e136. [PMID: 33229876 PMCID: PMC8316998 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Preoperative expectations affect patient outcomes in many health conditions, but expectations are rarely assessed in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. This study is a first step in assessing the contribution of preoperative expectations to postoperative CI outcomes, including speech recognition, CI quality of life (CIQOL), and CI satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Fourty one adult CI patients. INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Preoperative expectation questionnaire results, pre- and postoperative speech recognition (CNC and AzBio) scores, postoperative CIQOL domain scores and global scores, and CI satisfaction scores using a visual analog scale (VAS). Cohen's d was used to express effect size. RESULTS Overall, patients with lower preoperative CI performance expectations showed higher postoperative QOL. This effect was large for the emotional, entertainment, and social domains (d = 0.85-1.02) of the CIQOL-35 and medium for the communication, listening effort domains, and the Global score (d = 0.55-0.63). Preoperative performance expectations showed minimal associations with preoperative versus postoperative change in CNC (d = -0.26; -0.69-0.18) or AzBio scores (d = -0.28; -0.72-0.15). Determining the extent to which preoperative expectations played a role in postoperative satisfaction with CIs was limited by the clustering of satisfaction scores in the upper range of the scale (VAS mean 81.1). CONCLUSIONS This study provides preliminary evidence that patients' expectations before cochlear implantation may influence their postoperative quality of life and other outcomes, but not postoperative speech recognition. This suggests that an increased emphasis should be placed on measuring and counseling expectations in CI candidates. This assumption needs to be confirmed with additional research with larger sample sizes, more sensitive satisfaction measures, and a prospective design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore R McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Opperman E, le Roux T, Masenge A, Eikelboom RH. The effect of tinnitus on hearing-related quality of life outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2020; 60:246-254. [PMID: 33100038 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1828633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the effect of tinnitus distress on the hearing-related quality of life (QoL) outcomes over time in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. DESIGN A retrospective, longitudinal study of adult CI recipients was conducted. Hearing-related QoL and tinnitus distress were assessed using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ) preoperatively and at 6-months, 12-months and >24-month postoperatively. The association between tinnitus distress and hearing-related QoL outcomes over time was investigated. Furthermore, 13 potential predictive factors were identified from the retrospective dataset. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify variables that influence hearing-related QoL outcomes over time. STUDY SAMPLE The study sample included 210 adult (≥18 years) CI recipients implanted between 2001 and 2017. RESULTS Lower tinnitus distress and younger age at implantation were significant predictors of better hearing-related QoL in adult CI recipients. A significant reduction in tinnitus distress up to two years post-implantation was found, as well as greater tinnitus distress correlating with poorer hearing-related QoL outcomes. CONCLUSION Tinnitus distress negatively affects the hearing-related QoL outcomes of adult CI recipients. Tinnitus distress and age at implantation were found to be significant predictors of hearing-related QoL when controlling for other predictive factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elmien Opperman
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Talita le Roux
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Andries Masenge
- Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.,Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Moberly AC, Vasil K, Baxter J, Klamer B, Kline D, Ray C. Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020; 5:911-918. [PMID: 33134539 PMCID: PMC7585234 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the United States, most adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs) do not undergo a comprehensive auditory rehabilitation (CAR) approach, which may result in suboptimal outcomes. The objectives of this pilot study were to demonstrate that a CAR approach incorporating auditory training (AT) by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) is feasible in adults receiving CIs and to explore whether this approach results in improved outcomes. METHODS Twenty-four postlingually deaf adult CI candidates were serially assigned to one of three groups: (a) a "CAR group" that received standard of care implantation, programming by an audiologist, an additional preoperative counseling session, and eight one-hour AT sessions; (b) a "passive control" standard-of-care group; and (c) an "active control" group that also received the extra preoperative counseling session. Participants were tested preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months after CI using measures of word and sentence recognition in quiet and in babble, as well as measures of quality of life (QOL). RESULTS The CAR approach was feasible, but this pilot study was underpowered to determine efficacy. Differential time courses of speech recognition improvement were seen for sentence and word recognition. All QOL measurements showed improvement from pre-CI to 1 month post-CI activation. Results revealed issues to consider for a larger-scale study of CAR revolving around participant selection, study measures, and sample size. CONCLUSION The CAR approach is feasible in new CI users. A larger trial is needed to investigate whether CAR leads to better outcomes or faster improvement in this clinical population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Kara Vasil
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Jodi Baxter
- Department of Speech and Hearing ScienceThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Brett Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical InformaticsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - David Kline
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical InformaticsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Christin Ray
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the benefits of bimodal listening (i.e., addition of contralateral hearing aid) for cochlear implant (CI) users on real-world tasks involving high-talker variability speech materials, environmental sounds, and self-reported quality of life (quality of hearing) in listeners' own best-aided conditions. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study between groups. SETTING Outpatient hearing clinic. PATIENTS Fifty experienced adult CI users divided into groups based on normal daily listening conditions (i.e., best-aided conditions): unilateral CI (CI), unilateral CI with contralateral HA (bimodal listening; CIHA), or bilateral CI (CICI). INTERVENTION Task-specific measures of speech recognition with low (Harvard Standard Sentences) and high (Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-set corpus) talker variability, environmental sound recognition (Familiar Environmental Sounds Test-Identification), and hearing-related quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Test group differences among CI, CIHA, and CICI conditions. RESULTS No group effect was observed for speech recognition with low or high-talker variability, or hearing-related quality of life. Bimodal listeners demonstrated a benefit in environmental sound recognition compared with unilateral CI listeners, with a trend of greater benefit than the bilateral CI group. There was also a visual trend for benefit on high-talker variability speech recognition. CONCLUSIONS Findings provide evidence that bimodal listeners demonstrate stronger environmental sound recognition compared with unilateral CI listeners, and support the idea that there are additional advantages to bimodal listening after implantation other than speech recognition measures, which are at risk of being lost if considering bilateral implantation.
Collapse
|
47
|
Shao D, Moberly AC, Ray C. Quality of Life Outcomes Reported by Patients and Significant Others Following Cochlear Implantation. Am J Audiol 2020; 29:404-409. [PMID: 32598160 DOI: 10.1044/2020_aja-19-00101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study tested the hypotheses that both patients receiving cochlear implants (CIs) and their significant others (SOs) would demonstrate improvements in perceived hearing handicap over time following cochlear implantation and that the SOs would demonstrate delayed patterns of perceived improvement compared to the patients who directly experienced the changes in hearing function provided by the CI. Method A study sample of 19 pairs of postlingually deafened adult candidates with CIs and their SOs answered questions about the patients' hearing handicap. Patient- and SO-reported scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after CI activation. The study hypotheses were tested using linear mixed-effects models. Results Patients and SOs independently reported improvements on self-reported hearing handicap measures at 1, 3, and 6 months post CI activation compared to preoperatively. Correlations between patient- and SO-reported scores were significant at all intervals; however, the asynchrony between pairs at 1 month postactivation was greater in magnitude compared to the other intervals. Conclusions Findings support the hypotheses of the study. Results should inform future clinical practice and research to guide the expectations of patients and their SOs as they adjust to hearing with a CI and experience various benefits and challenges over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Shao
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | - Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | - Christin Ray
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cochlear Implant Therapy Improves the Quality of Life in Older Patients—A Prospective Evaluation Study. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:1214-1221. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
49
|
Skidmore JA, Vasil KJ, He S, Moberly AC. Explaining Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Complementary Contributions of Demographic, Sensory, and Cognitive Factors. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e795-e803. [PMID: 32558759 PMCID: PMC7875311 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESES Adult cochlear implant (CI) outcomes depend on demographic, sensory, and cognitive factors. However, these factors have not been examined together comprehensively for relations to different outcome types, such as speech recognition versus quality of life (QOL). Three hypotheses were tested: 1) speech recognition will be explained most strongly by sensory factors, whereas QOL will be explained more strongly by cognitive factors. 2) Different speech recognition outcome domains (sentences versus words) and different QOL domains (physical versus social versus psychological functioning) will be explained differentially by demographic, sensory, and cognitive factors. 3) Including cognitive factors as predictors will provide more power to explain outcomes than demographic and sensory predictors alone. BACKGROUND A better understanding of the contributors to CI outcomes is needed to prognosticate outcomes before surgery, explain outcomes after surgery, and tailor rehabilitation efforts. METHODS Forty-one adult postlingual experienced CI users were assessed for sentence and word recognition, as well as hearing-related QOL, along with a broad collection of predictors. Partial least squares regression was used to identify factors that were most predictive of outcome measures. RESULTS Supporting our hypotheses, speech recognition abilities were most strongly dependent on sensory skills, while QOL outcomes required a combination of cognitive, sensory, and demographic predictors. The inclusion of cognitive measures increased the ability to explain outcomes, mainly for QOL. CONCLUSIONS Explaining variability in adult CI outcomes requires a broad assessment approach. Identifying the most important predictors depends on the particular outcome domain and even the particular measure of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Skidmore
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Andries E, Gilles A, Topsakal V, Vanderveken OM, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Mertens G. Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessments after Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults. Audiol Neurootol 2020; 26:61-75. [PMID: 32653882 DOI: 10.1159/000508433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CI) have increasingly been adopted in older adults with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss as a result of the growing and aging world population. Consequently, researchers have recently shown great interest in the cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation and its effect on quality of life (QoL) in older CI users. Therefore, a systematic review and critical evaluation of the available literature on QoL in older adult CI users was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were selected by searching MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library and by checking the reference lists of relevant articles. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the study sample were adults aged 50 years and older with postlingual onset of bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, (2) all subjects received a multi-electrode CI, and (3) QoL was assessed before and after implantation. Out of 1,093 records, 18 articles were accepted for review. Several studies demonstrated significant positive effects of cochlear implantation on QoL in older adults, but high-level evidence-based medicine is lacking. An improvement of QoL was generally reported when using disease-specific instruments, which are designed to detect treatment-specific changes, whereas the outcomes of generic QoL questionnaires, assessing general health states, were rather ambiguous. However, only generic questionnaires would be able to provide calculations of the cost-effectiveness of CI and comparisons across patient populations, diseases, or interventions. Hence, generic and disease-specific QoL instruments are complementary rather than contradictory. In general, older CI users' QoL was assessed using a variety of methods and instruments, which complicated comparisons between studies. There is a need for a standardized, multidimensional, and comprehensive QoL study protocol including all relevant generic and disease-specific instruments to measure and compare QoL, utility, and/or daily life performance in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Andries
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium, .,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium,
| | - Annick Gilles
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent (HoGent), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Olivier M Vanderveken
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|