The Dubai Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The IFOS Consensus

The role of an anti-reflux diet in the treatment of chronic cough caused by laryngopharyngeal reflux

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of an anti-reflux diet in the treatment of patients with chronic cough caused by laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients with chronic cough (lasting over 3 months) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) confirmed by hypopharyngeal-esophageal 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH), according to Dubai criteria. Participants were categorized based on cough severity using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 1 to 10. A VAS < 5 was considered to indicate mild cough, whereas a VAS ≥ 5 were considered to indicate severe cough. Patients with mild cough were treated by anti-reflux diet only, while those with severe cough received additional treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and alginates. After 3 months, treatment effectiveness was evaluated by assessing the reduction in cough severity.

RESULTS

In patients with mild cough, anti-reflux diet alone proved to be effective, yielding improvement in 83.3% of cases. Among patients with severe cough, a combination of anti-reflux diet, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and alginates proved was effective in 81.8% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Diet alone is an effective and sufficient treatment for mild chronic cough in patients with LPR. For patients with severe chronic cough with LPT, combined anti-reflux measures are effective.

Neural-Mediated Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and the Role of Esophageal Dysmotility

The diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) remain challenging due to complex pathophysiological interactions, including autonomic nerve dysfunction and impaired esophageal motility. The lack of definitive diagnostic tools, insufficient exclusion of alternative causes, and variability in study design and methodology often lead to inconsistent treatment responses and suboptimal outcomes. Functional laryngeal disorders and hypersensitivity further complicate accurate diagnosis and management. High-resolution manometry, combined with multichannel impedance testing, has highlighted the role of esophageal dysmotility in LPR symptoms. This article focuses on the neural-mediated mechanisms and esophageal dysmotility contributing to LPR.

Association between Helicobacter pylori, reflux and chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The prevalence, role, and clinical relevance of Helicobacter Pylori (HP) in sinonasal tissues of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of Helicobacter Pylori (HP) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSSNP).

METHODS

Three investigators conducted a PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library systematic review of the prevalence and clinical relevance of HP infection in CRS patients through the PRISMA framework. A bias analysis was conducted to identify potential heterogeneity and biases across studies.

RESULTS

Of the 42 identified studies, 20 met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 741 CRS patients and 368 controls. HP was detected in 37.1% (n = 127/342) of polyps of CRSwNP patients with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and 32.7% (n = 37/113) of polyp tissue with the immunohistochemistry (IHC). Controls reported a nasal PCR and IHC detection rates of 14.8% (n = 36/243) and 3.6% (n = 3/84), respectively. The HP rate did not differ between CRSwNP and CRSsNP. Among patients with CRS, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing detected blood HP antigens in 48.7% (n = 74/152) of CRS patients and 41.6% (n = 37/89) of controls. The detection of HP in polyps was associated with the severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). There was an important heterogeneity between studies for the inclusion criteria, methods of HP detection, and reflux outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Helicobacter Pylori can be detected in one-third of sinonasal tissues from patients with CRS and can be considered a biomarker of GERD. The potential role of HP in the development of CRS remains unclear. The heterogeneity between studies limits the drawing of valid conclusions.

Mucosal integrity of the larynx and hypopharynx and the response to proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether impairment of integrity of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal mucosa in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) could be related to response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

Chronic hoarseness with Reflux Finding Score (RFS) > = 7 was evaluated using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI). Upper endoscopy was performed and samples of the laryngeal posterior commissure were collected to evaluate ex vivo laryngeal mucosal integrity by transepithelial resistance (TER) using Ussing chamber. In vivo, hypopharyngeal integrity was measured using intraluminal impedance. Clinical responders scored < 13 and had a drop of at least 50% in the initial RSI after 8 weeks of pantoprazole.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients completed the protocol, Esophagitis was detected in 28% of the patients, and one patient presented acid exposure above 6%. After treatment, 66.67% responded to PPI. Laryngeal basal TER and TER drops after the weakly acidid challenge showed no difference between PPI responders and non-responders. Hypopharyngeal basal impedance was similar between the groups. After acid exposure test, there was a lower impedance in non-responders.

CONCLUSION

In laryngopharyngeal reflux, hypopharyngeal mucosal integrity was lower in PPI non-responders. These preliminary results suggest that the weaker laryngopharyngeal mucosa in refractory LPR may require new therapies aimed at improving barrier function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Effectiveness of Changing Drug Classes in Patients With Refractory Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of drug class changes in patients with refractory laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series with prospective data.

SETTING

Multicenter study.

METHODS

The data of patients treated for a refractory LPRD from September 2017 to December 2023 were collected. The effectiveness of drug class changes was assessed through the reflux symptom score (RSS) change. Signs were evaluated with the Reflux Sign Assessment. The RSS reduction was used to categorize the therapeutic responses as mild (20%-40% RSS reduction), moderate (40.1%-60% RSS reduction), high (60.1%-80%), and complete (>80%).

RESULTS

Among the 334 medical records, 74 (22.2%) patients had refractory LPRD defined as no RSS change in the pre- to 3-month posttreatment. The mean age was 52.6 ± 15.5 years. Changing drug class was associated with significant 3- to 6-month posttreatment reductions of RSS and RSA. Thirty patients (39%) did not experience symptom reduction after changing drugs. Changing alginate to magaldrate and magaldrate to alginate was associated with the highest responder rate (76.9%). Changing PPI and alginate/magaldrate molecules led to a response rate of 62.5%. In patients initially treated with a combination of PPI and alginate or magaldrate, changing PPI without changing alginate/magaldrate led to a 37.5% response rate. The baseline RSS was predictive of the 3- and 6-month RSS (therapeutic response).

CONCLUSION

Changing drug class, especially alginate-to-magaldrate, may be an effective therapeutic approach for patients with a refractory LPRD.

Diagnostic Testing for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: The Role of 24-hour Hypopharyngeal-Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH Monitoring

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) presents as a constellation of nonspecific upper aerodigestive tract symptoms and signs. Among many objective tools available on the market, hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) is considered to date the gold standard technique for diagnosing LPRD, as well as tailoring treatment according to the different LPR profiles. More studies are needed to further validate and standardize diagnostic criteria and evaluate long-term outcomes of patients diagnosed and treated for LPRD using HEMII-pH.

Anxiety and Depression Features in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the anxiety and depression features in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHODS

A laryngologist and librarian conducted a PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library systematic review related to anxiety, depression, and mental health in LPRD through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements.

RESULTS

Of the 96 identified studies, 22 publications met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 2162 patients with suspected LPRD (n = 1607), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; n = 423), both LPRD and GERD (n = 132), and 926 healthy/asymptomatic individuals. The LPRD diagnosis was mainly based on symptoms and findings. Twenty-six different mental health instruments were used across the studies. Anxiety was found in 28.8%-39.3% of patients with suspected LPRD. Depression was documented in 6.3%-45.6% of suspected LPRD. Most studies reported a significantly higher prevalence/incidence of anxiety and depression in suspected LPRD compared to controls. The LPRD symptom severity was associated with the severity of anxiety and depression in all studies exploring association findings. The anxiety and depression symptoms were reported as higher in LPRD compared to GERD populations. The bias analysis highlighted an important heterogeneity between studies, especially for the LPRD diagnosis and the mental health instruments used.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of depression and anxiety is commonly higher in suspected LPRD compared to asymptomatic individuals. Future studies are needed to understand the association between the development of LPRD and mental health disorders.

Link between pharyngeal acid reflux episodes and the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed, reliable predictors of their responsiveness are unclear. Reflux monitoring technologies like dual potential of hydrogen (pH) sensors and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) could improve diagnosis. Research suggests that a composite pH parameter, defined by ≥ 2 pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) episodes and/or excessive esophageal acid reflux (EAR), predicts PPI efficacy. The criteria for PAR episodes, a pharyngeal pH drop of ≥ 2 units to < 5 within 30 seconds during esophageal acidification, showed strong interobserver reliability. We hypothesized that PAR episodes alone might also predict PPI responsiveness.

AIM

To investigate whether PAR episodes alone predict a positive response to PPI therapy.

METHODS

Patients suspected of having LPR were prospectively recruited from otolaryngologic clinics in three Taiwanese tertiary centers. They underwent a 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH test using either 3-pH-sensor or hypopharyngeal MII-pH catheters while off medication, followed by a 12-week esomeprazole course (40 mg twice daily). Participants were categorized into four groups based on pH results: PAR alone, EAR alone, both pH (+), and both pH (-). The primary outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in primary laryngeal symptoms, with observers blinded to group assignments.

RESULTS

A total of 522 patients (mean age 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were recruited. Of these, 190 (mean age 51.5 ± 12.4 years, 61% male) completed the treatment, and 89 (47%) responded to PPI therapy. Response rates were highest in the PAR alone group (73%, n = 11), followed by EAR alone (59%, n = 68), both pH (+) (56%, n = 18), and both pH (-) (33%, n = 93). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopic esophagitis showed that participants with PAR alone, EAR alone, and both pH (+) were 7.4-fold (P = 0.008), 4.2-fold (P = 0.0002), and 3.4-fold (P = 0.03) more likely to respond to PPI therapy, respectively, compared to the both pH (-) group. Secondary analyses using the definition of ≥ 1 PAR episode were less robust.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of proven hypopharyngeal predictors, this post-hoc analysis found that baseline ≥ 2 PAR episodes alone are linked to PPI responsiveness, suggesting the importance of hypopharyngeal reflux monitoring.

Decoding Pediatric Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Unraveling Symptoms Through Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Insights

Background: The relationship between symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and objective reflux measurements obtained through multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring remains unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between LPR symptoms and objective reflux episodes and possible associations between fibreoptic ENT findings, eosinophil counts, and serum IgE levels with reflux episodes detected by MII-pH. Methods: In this prospective study, MII-pH monitoring, fiberoptic laryngoscopy, nasal swabs for eosinophils, total serum IgE levels, and symptom assessment (Reflux Symptom Index, RSI) were performed in all children with suspected LPR. The Reflux Findings Score (RFS) was determined based on the laryngoscopy findings. Results: A total of 113 patients (mean age, 8 years) with LPR symptoms were included in the study. The number of reflux episodes was highest in children with chronic cough and recurrent broncho-obstruction. Secondary outcomes showed positive correlations between reflux episodes and ENT findings, particularly hypopharyngeal hyperemia, arytenoid hyperemia, and arytenoid erythema (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The number of total, acidic, and weakly acidic reflux episodes was significantly positively correlated with RSI and RFS. Proximal total, acidic, and weakly acidic reflux episodes showed significant correlations with eosinophil counts in nasal swabs but negative correlations with serum IgE levels. Conclusions: This study highlights the significant role of weakly acidic reflux in pediatric LPR and its association with respiratory symptoms. Our findings emphasize the importance of objective monitoring techniques in the assessment of LPR and provide insights for refining diagnostic and management strategies.

European clinical practice guideline: managing and treating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To propose a European consensus for managing and treating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) to guide primary care and specialist physicians.

METHODS

Twenty-three European experts (otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons) participated in a modified Delphi process to revise 38 statements about the definition, clinical management, and treatment of LPRD. Three voting rounds were conducted on a 5-point scale and a consensus was defined a priori as agreement by 80% of the experts.

RESULTS

After the third round, 36 statements composed the first European Consensus Report on the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of LPRD. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosing LPRD (> 1 pharyngeal reflux event) and treating the LPRD with personalized therapy. The empirical treatment needs to be based on diet, stress reduction, and alginates or antiacids to address the acidic and alkaline reflux events. Proton pump inhibitors are kept for patients with acidic LPRD and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) findings. The treatment needs to be as short as possible (minimum two months). The medication can be progressively reduced for patients with relief of symptoms. Changing medication class can be considered for refractory LPRD rather than an increase in drug doses.

CONCLUSION

A consensus endorsed by the Confederation of European Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Societies is presented to improve the management and treatment of LPRD. The approved statements could improve collaborative research through the adoption of common management approaches to LPRD.

Reflux Disease in Singers: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) features in singers.

METHODS

According to the PRISMA statements, two investigators searched the literature related to the prevalence of symptoms, findings, and clinical therapeutic outcomes of reflux in singers through a PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library systematic review.

RESULTS

Of the 91 identified studies, 18 publications met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 2288 singers and 1398 controls, respectively. There were 1243 (54.3%) professional singers, 450 (19.7%) amateurs, 329 (14.4%) singing students, and 102 (4.5%) singing teachers. The LPRD diagnosis and findings were based on objective evaluations in 2/18 studies. According to validated and unvalidated patient-reported outcome questionnaires, reflux symptoms have been found in 25.0% to 65% of singers, with a RSI > 13 in 25.0%-33.9% of cases. The prevalence of LPRD signs ranged from 18.1% to 73.4% of singers without voice complaints and 18.1%-73.4% of singers with voice complaints at the time of the evaluation. No study investigated the pretreatment to post treatment changes in symptoms, findings, and voice outcome. Substantial heterogeneity was found between studies for reflux diagnosis, symptom and sign evaluations, singer profiles (musical styles, voice range), and association outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of symptoms and findings attributed to LPRD can be high in singer populations. However, the nonspecificity of symptoms and findings, the lack of objective reflux testing, and the heterogeneity in the singer profile limit the drawing of valid conclusions for the prevalence of LPRD. Based on the findings collected in this systematic review, the authors proposed a semistructured questionnaire, including key points for primary singer evaluation.

Pharmacological and Biological Relevance in the Medical Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A State-of-the-Art Review

The laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) treatment remains controversial due to the poor effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this paper, the author reviewed the current primary treatments used in clinical studies for managing LPRD and discussed the pharmacological, biological, and physiological properties of medication for providing clinical relevance for otolaryngological practice. A comprehensive review of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature was conducted to document and analyze the medical treatments of LPRD in the largest case series published in the past 20 years. Fifty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing that 67 different therapeutic regimens were used in the LPRD studies in the past 20 years with nine different therapeutic durations. PPIs have been used as a single therapy in 70.1% of cases. PPIs were combined with another drug in 23.9% of cases. Alginates and antacids were used as single therapy or in association with other drugs in 10.5% and 3.0% of cases, respectively. There was an important variability of molecules, doses, and regimens. There is an important gap between current therapeutic practice and the recent advancements in the pathophysiology of LPRD. The pharmacological and physiological findings of this review can reasonably support the notion that alternative gastroesophageal reflux disease therapies (alginate, antacids) could take a significant place in the treatment of primary or recalcitrant LPRD. Future studies are needed to confirm the stability of the LPRD profile at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH and the role of digestive enzymes in the development of upper aerodigestive tract mucosa inflammation and symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is mainly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as esomeprazole, which have shortcomings like delayed absorption and increased osteoporosis. Fexuprazan is a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset and long duration of action. To assess the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared to esomeprazole in patients with LPRD.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, active-controlled trial was conducted in nine otolaryngologic clinics. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥ 13 and reflux finding score (RFS) ≥ 7 were randomly assigned to the fexuprazan or esomeprazole groups, and received fexuprazan 40-mg or esomeprazole 40-mg once daily for 8 weeks. The outcomes were (1) mean change, change rate, and valid rate in RSI, RFS, and LPR-related questionnaires; and (2) adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients (fexuprazan n = 68, esomeprazole n = 68) were followed up for ≥ 1 month. Each parameter significantly improved after 4 and 8 weeks in each group, with no significant differences between the two groups. For those with severe symptoms (RSI ≥ 18), the fexuprazan group (n = 32) showed more improvement in the mean change and change rate in the RSI than esomeprazole group (n = 31) after 4 weeks (p = .036 and .045, respectively). This phenomenon was especially observed in hoarseness and troublesome cough.

CONCLUSION

Fexuprazan improved symptoms and signs without no serious adverse events in patients with LPRD. In patients with severe symptoms, fexuprazan resulted in a faster symptom improvement than PPI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

KCT0007251, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22100 .

Advances in laryngopharyngeal reflux: Etiology, diagnosis, and management

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) manifests as a variety of nonspecific upper aerodigestive tract symptoms. Rather than a single disorder, LPR may be conceived of as a spectrum of subtypes with varying clinical presentations. LPR signs and symptoms arise from the direct and/or indirect effects of refluxate, physical and molecular injury of the mucosa, and neurologic responses to esophageal events. Specific constituents of refluxate exert distinct mucosal responses and immediate or delayed effects resulting in transient or persistent symptoms and/or laryngeal hypersensitivity. While the complex etiology of LPR presents challenges to its diagnosis and management, tools that aid the identification of LPR subtypes can provide insight into treatment decision-making. Hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring provides detailed analysis of reflux events, enabling the development of individualized treatment plans, yet cost and availability limit its widespread use. Alginates offer temporary symptom relief and antireflux surgery may provide benefit when symptoms are recalcitrant to other approaches. Pepsin inhibitors hold promise as a medical therapy when surgery is not an option. Laryngeal hypersensitivity should be considered as part of a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Promising medical and scientific research continues to yield new insights into the complex etiology of LPR and novel strategies for its diagnosis and management.

Inter-rater Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10) among otolaryngologists and speech therapists with various experiences.

METHODS

Six experts (2 otolaryngologists, 2 speech-therapists, and 2 speech-therapist students) rated 300 clinical images of oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal signs from patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease diagnosis at the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated with Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and Cronbach-α. The severity of scores was compared between judges. The intra-rater (test-retest) reliability was evaluated with the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The pictures of 40 patients were included. There were 18 females and 22 males. The mean age was 52.6 ± 13.9 years. The Cronbach-α was 0.854, which indicates a high internal consistency between judges. The overall ICC was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.715-0.845; P = 0.001). The ICC varied among judges with the highest value for students (ICC = 0.960) and SLP seniors versus students (ICC = 0.805). The severity of RSA-10 rating scores was influenced by the number of reflux patients seen (rs =-0.941; P = 0.001) and the number of fiberscope examinations performed (rs =-0.812; P = 0.049). The RSA-10 was more severely scored by speech therapists with the least experience compared to otolaryngologists with the most experience in fiberscope/reflux patient assessment.

CONCLUSION

The RSA-10 demonstrated adequate global ICC and internal consistency among otolaryngologists and speech therapists with various degrees of experience. The assessment of RSA was influenced by the fibroscopy experience, and the number of reflux patients seen.

Minimum Effective Duration of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Treatment: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the minimum therapeutic duration for patients with primary laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) through the evaluation of symptom changes at multiple time points.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective uncontrolled.

SETTING

University medical center.

METHODS

Patients with LPRD at the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring were recruited from the European Reflux Clinic. Depending on the type of LPRD, patients were treated with a combination of proton-pump inhibitors, alginate, or magaldrate. Symptoms were evaluated with the reflux symptom score (RSS) at baseline and throughout treatment (1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month posttreatment). The most appropriate therapeutic duration was determined using the RSS changes. Signs were evaluated with the reflux sign assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients completed the study. The mean age was 49.9 ± 15.7 years. At 1-month posttreatment, 97 patients (61.0%) were considered as early responders to treatment, and the treatment was stopped for 52 patients (32.7%). Of the 62 early nonresponders, 34 patients (21.4%) reached responded to treatment after 3 to 9 months. The cumulative therapeutic success rate at 1-month posttreatment (61.0%) progressively increased to reach a range of 82.4% to 99.3% at 9-month posttreatment. The RSS mainly decreased in the first month of treatment in early responders. In early nonresponders, RSS progressively decreased throughout the 9-month treatment period. The baseline severity of RSS is a strong predictor of therapeutic response.

CONCLUSION

A therapeutic regimen of 1 month can be sufficient to treat one third of LPRD patients. The early nonresponders may require 3 to 9 months of treatment.

Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10)

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10) for documenting the physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHODS

Patients with LPRD at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from two European hospitals. Three experienced otolaryngologists rated RSA-10 in patients and controls for assessing internal validity. RSA-10 was rated within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α in patients and controls. Convergent validity was evaluated through a correlation analysis between RSA-10 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the RSA-10 evaluations of the three otolaryngologists through Fleiss kappa. Pre- to posttreatment change of RSA-10 was evaluated to assess responsiveness to change. The RSA-10 thresholds were examined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients completed the pre- to posttreatment evaluations from January 2020 to December 2023. A total of 115 asymptomatic individuals completed the study. RSA-10 reported high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.822) and test-retest reliability (rs = 0.725). The RSA-10 scores of patients were significantly higher than those of controls (p = 0.001), suggesting high internal validity. RSA-10 was significantly correlated with the RFS (rs = 0.771). The interrater reliability was adequate for sub- and total RSA-10 scores (k = 0.708). RSA-10 significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment (p = 0.001). An RSA-10 > 13 may be suggestive of LPRD. Both RSA-10 > 13 and Reflux Symptom Score-12 > 11 were associated with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 97.3%.

CONCLUSION

The RSA-10 is a reliable and valid clinical instrument for documenting the most prevalent laryngeal and extra-laryngeal findings associated with LPRD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3981-3988, 2024.

Applications of ChatGPT in Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery: A State of the Art Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature on the application, accuracy, and performance of Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMED, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature on the applications of ChatGPT in otolaryngology was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT provides imperfect patient information or general knowledge related to diseases found in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. In clinical practice, despite suboptimal performance, studies reported that the model is more accurate in providing diagnoses, than in suggesting the most adequate additional examinations and treatments related to clinical vignettes or real clinical cases. ChatGPT has been used as an adjunct tool to improve scientific reports (referencing, spelling correction), to elaborate study protocols, or to take student or resident exams reporting several levels of accuracy. The stability of ChatGPT responses throughout repeated questions appeared high but many studies reported some hallucination events, particularly in providing scientific references.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

To date, most applications of ChatGPT are limited in generating disease or treatment information, and in the improvement of the management of clinical cases. The lack of comparison of ChatGPT performance with other large language models is the main limitation of the current research. Its ability to analyze clinical images has not yet been investigated in otolaryngology although upper airway tract or ear images are an important step in the diagnosis of most common ear, nose, and throat conditions. This review may help otolaryngologists to conceive new applications in further research.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis: Factors associated with patient satisfaction

PURPOSE

To examine the patient experience of laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis and factors that contributed to perceived difficulty with the process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 32-question anonymous survey was administered to individuals over 18 years old who reported a diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. The survey contained questions regarding demographics and individuals' experiences during the diagnostic workup along with the generic short patient experiences questionnaire. Percentages were calculated for all variables. Kendall rank correlation coefficient was performed to measure the strength and direction of association between laryngopharyngeal reflux workup and perceived difficulty with diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 232 respondents, 59.9 % reported difficulty with the diagnostic process. Strong positive correlations were found between perceived difficulty with laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis and the following factors: total number of physicians seen (τb = 0.483, p < 0.001), time from symptom onset (τb = 0.300, p < 0.001), and time from first physician visit (τb = 0.479, p < 0.001). Results from the generic short patient experiences questionnaire showed moderate negative correlations between perceived difficulty with diagnosis and the following factors: perceived competence of physician (τb = -0.228, p < 0.001), perception that the physician cared for the patient (τb = -0.253, p < 0.001), perceived interest the physician had in the patient (τb = -0.259, p < 0.001), and time interacting with the physician (τb = -0.226, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents report difficulty being diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux. This correlates with increased time to receive a diagnosis, increased number of physicians seen, and factors related to the patient-physician relationship. Physicians can improve patient experience by focusing on clear communication with interactive patient appointments, and scheduling high yield diagnostic tests.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Management: A Narrative Review

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common and often misinterpreted clinical entity responsible for various symptoms affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. This narrative literature review aims to review the pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of LPR, emphasizing the emerging understanding of gastric content reflux in aerodigestive tissue irritation. Understanding the pathophysiology of LPR will allow general practitioners and specialists to accurately recognize and treat a condition that causes substantial morbidity in the affected patients. Using evidence-based findings from randomized controlled trials, clinical studies, and meta-analyses, the present investigation aims to outline and unify previous research into LPR. A review of anatomical structures, pathogenic mechanisms, endoscopic findings in LPR, and clinical manifestations and treatment options are also discussed. Though controversy around the diagnosis and management of LPR persists, emerging research in cellular damage and diagnostic tools promises to provide increasingly accurate and reliable modalities for characterizing LPR. Hopefully, future research will unify the field and provide overarching guidelines for both primary care and specialists. The present investigation provides an integrated perspective on LPR, a clinically prevalent and complex disease.

Piloting an intraoral pH device to track gastroesophageal reflux in adults

This study evaluated in vivo, an intraoral device against the gold standard esophageal device for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) monitoring. Subjects scheduled for a catheter-based esophageal pH/impedance testing at a gastroenterology clinic were recruited. They were screened using the GerdQ questionnaire, demographics and dental conditions recorded. A prototype intraoral device, consisting of a Bravo™ capsule embedded in an Essix-style retainer fabricated for each subject, monitored intraoral pH. Concurrently, subjects underwent 24-h esophageal pH-impedance monitoring. A self-administered survey elicited the comfort and acceptance of both devices. The study recruited ten adult subjects (23 to 60-years-old) with a median GerdQ score of 9.5 corresponding to a 79% likelihood of GERD. Subjects with severe dental erosion had significantly (p < 0.05) higher acid exposure time and more non-meal reflux events. No adverse events were associated with the intraoral device while one was recorded for the esophageal device. The intraoral device was significantly more comfortable to place, more comfortable to wear, and interfered less with daily routine compared to the esophageal device. Accuracy of the intraoral device ranged between 86.15% and 37.82%. Being more tolerable than traditional esophageal pH monitoring, intraoral pH monitoring may be a useful adjunct for the diagnosis and management of GERD.

Performance and Consistency of ChatGPT-4 Versus Otolaryngologists: A Clinical Case Series

OBJECTIVE

To study the performance of Chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer-4 (ChatGPT-4) in the management of cases in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Multicenter University Hospitals.

METHODS

History, clinical, physical, and additional examinations of adult outpatients consulting in otolaryngology departments of CHU Saint-Pierre and Dour Medical Center were presented to ChatGPT-4, which was interrogated for differential diagnoses, management, and treatment(s). According to specialty, the ChatGPT-4 responses were assessed by 2 distinct, blinded board-certified otolaryngologists with the Artificial Intelligence Performance Instrument.

RESULTS

One hundred cases were presented to ChatGPT-4. ChaGPT-4 indicated a mean of 3.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.09, 3.59) additional examinations per patient versus 2.10 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.34; P = .001) for the practitioners. There was strong consistency (k > 0.600) between otolaryngologists and ChatGPT-4 for the indication of upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy, positron emission tomography and computed tomography, audiometry, tympanometry, and psychophysical evaluations. Primary diagnosis was correctly performed by ChatGPT-4 in 38% to 86% of cases depending on subspecialty. Additional examinations indicated by ChatGPT-4 were pertinent and necessary in 8% to 31% of cases, while the treatment regimen was pertinent in 12% to 44% of cases. The performance of ChatGPT-4 was not influenced by the human-reported level of difficulty of clinical cases.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT-4 may be a promising adjunctive tool in otolaryngology, providing extensive documentation about additional examinations, primary and differential diagnoses, and treatments. The ChatGPT-4 is more effective in providing a primary diagnosis, and less effective in the selection of additional examinations and treatments.

Correlation of Dry Eye Disease and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Based on Improved Symptoms With Combined Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between dry eye disease (DED) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) from the perspective of treatment response.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional studies.

SETTING

Analysis of data from patients with DED-related symptoms and LPR-related symptoms from May 2022 to January 2023 at AIER Eye Hospital (Hainan).

METHODS

The Ocular Surface Symptom Index (OSDI) scales and The Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) were investigated in patients attending China Aier Eye Hospital (Hainan) from May 2022 to January 2023, and OSDI scores >12 were categorized as DED, and RSS scores >13 were categorized as suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (suspected LPR). Patients with DED and suspected LPR were randomly divided into three groups (group A: 0.3% sodium vitreous acid drops and 1% cyclosporine A drops only; group B: 0.3% sodium vitreous acid drops, 1% cyclosporine A drops, and Gastroftal tablets containing magnesium alginate and cimicifuga oil and esomeprazole; and group C: Gastroftal tablets and esomeprazole only orally) and were reviewed after 3 months for the RSS- and DED-related examinations.

RESULT

Two hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled. One hundred and ninety-one DED-positive and 28 DED-negative patients, 84 suspected LPR-positive and 135 LPR-negative patients, and the OSDI scores of LPR patients were significantly higher than those of LPR-negative patients (P < 0.001). Parameters related to DED and LPR were significantly lower in patients in group B than in groups A and C after treatment (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LPR and DED are closely related. For patients with both LPR and DED, treating LPR and DED at the same time may be a better option.

ChatGPT-4 accuracy for patient education in laryngopharyngeal reflux

INTRODUCTION

Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence-powered language model chatbot able to help otolaryngologists in practice and research. The ability of ChatGPT in generating patient-centered information related to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) was evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-five questions dedicated to definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of LPRD were developed from the Dubai definition and management of LPRD consensus and recent reviews. Questions about the four aforementioned categories were entered into ChatGPT-4. Four board-certified laryngologists evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 with a 5-point Likert scale. Interrater reliability was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean scores (SD) of ChatGPT-4 answers for definition, clinical presentation, additional examination, and treatments were 4.13 (0.52), 4.50 (0.72), 3.75 (0.61), and 4.18 (0.47), respectively. Experts reported high interrater reliability for sub-scores (ICC = 0.973). The lowest performances of ChatGPT-4 were on answers about the most prevalent LPR signs, the most reliable objective tool for the diagnosis (hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH)), and the criteria for the diagnosis of LPR using HEMII-pH.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT-4 may provide adequate information on the definition of LPR, differences compared to GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), and clinical presentation. Information provided upon extra-laryngeal manifestations and HEMII-pH may need further optimization. Regarding the recent trends identifying increasing patient use of internet sources for self-education, the findings of the present study may help draw attention to ChatGPT-4's accuracy on the topic of LPR.

Digestive Biomarkers of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Preliminary Prospective Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the digestive enzymes and biomarkers in the saliva of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and asymptomatic individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective controlled study.

SETTING

Multicenter study.

METHODS

Patients with LPR at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from January 2020 to April 2023 from 2 University Hospitals. The saliva of patients (off PPIs) and asymptomatic individuals was collected to measure pH, elastase, bile salts, cholesterol, gastric, and pancreatic lipases. Anxiety, symptoms, and findings were studied through perceived stress scale (PSS), reflux symptom score (RSS), and reflux sign assessment (RSA).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven LPR patients and 57 asymptomatic individuals completed the evaluations. LPR patients reported higher PSS, RSS, and RSA than asymptomatic individuals. The mean saliva pH was more alkaline in LPR patients (7.23: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.08, 7.38) compared to controls (6.13; 95% CI: 5.95, 6.31; P = .001). The mean concentration of elastase was higher in patients (51.65 µg/mL; 95% CI: 44.47, 58.83 µg/mL) versus asymptomatic individuals (25.18 µg/mL; 95% CI: 21.64, 28.72 µg/mL; P = .001). The saliva cholesterol reported higher concentration in healthy individuals (3.43 mg/dL; 95% CI: 3.21, 3.65 mg/dL) compared to patients (1.16 mg/dL; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.27 mg/dL; P = .001). The saliva pH, and elastase concentration were significantly associated with the baseline RSS, while saliva cholesterol was negatively associated with the severity of RSS and RSA.

CONCLUSION

Cholesterol, bile salts, and elastase are biomarkers of LPR and should be considered to develop future non-invasive saliva device for the detection of LPR.

Narrative review of relationship between chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a possible cause of chronic cough is known for decades. However, more than 75% of patients with extraoesophageal symptoms do not suffer from typical symptoms of GERD like pyrosis and regurgitations and have negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For such a condition term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was introduced and is used for more than two decades. Since the comprehensive information on relationship between chronic cough and LPR is missing the aim of this paper is to summarize current knowledge based on review of published information during last 13 years. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is found in 20% of patients with chronic cough. The main and recognized diagnostic method for LPR is 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, revealing reflux episodes irritating the upper and lower respiratory tract mucosa. The treatment of LPR should be initiated with dietary and lifestyle measures, followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and other measures. Despite progress, more research is needed for accurate diagnosis and targeted therapies. Key areas for exploration include biomarkers for diagnosis, the impact of non-acid reflux on symptom development, and the efficacy of new drugs. Further studies with a focused population, excluding other causes like asthma, and using new diagnostic criteria for LPR are essential. It's crucial to consider LPR as a potential cause of unexplained chronic cough and to approach diagnosis and treatment with a multidisciplinary perspective.

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: An Assessment of Efficacy and Predictors of Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an effective treatment for typical reflux symptoms, but data on its impact on laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is limited. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of MSA for LPR and to identify predictors of outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 775 patients who underwent MSA between 2013 and 2021. LPR was defined as presence of atypical reflux symptoms and a reflux symptom index (RSI) score >13. Favorable outcome was defined as primary symptom resolution, freedom from proton pump inhibitors, and five-point improvement or RSI score normalization. Preoperative clinical, high-resolution manometry, and impedance-pH data were analyzed for impact on favorable outcome using univariate followed by multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

There were 128 patients who underwent MSA for LPR. At a mean (SD) follow-up of 13 (5.4) months, favorable outcome was achieved by 80.4% of patients, with median (IQR) RSI score improving from 29 (22-35) to 9 (4-17), (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of favorable outcome on multivariable analysis included LPR with typical reflux symptoms [OR (95% CI): 8.9 (2.3-31.1), P = 0.001], >80% intact swallow on high-resolution manometry [OR (95% CI): 3.8 (1.0-13.3), P = 0.035], upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure >34 mmHg [OR (95% CI): 4.1 (1.1-14.1), P = 0.027] and short total proximal acid clearance time [OR (95% CI): 1.1 (1.0-1.1), P = 0.031]. Impedance parameters including number of LPR events, full column reflux and proximal acid exposure events were similar between outcome groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MSA is an effective surgery for patients with LPR. Patients with concomitant typical reflux symptoms, normal esophageal body motility, and competent UES benefit the most from surgery. Individual impedance-pH parameters were not associated with outcome.