Longterm prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma following liver transplantation and resection

Current advances and future directions in combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

The low incidence of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is an important factor limiting research progression. Our study extensively included nearly three decades of relevant literature and assembled the most comprehensive database comprising 5,742 patients with cHCC-CCA. We summarized the characteristics, tumor markers, and clinical features of these patients. Additionally, we present the evolution of cHCC-CCA classification and explain the underlying rationale for these classification standards. We reviewed cHCC-CCA diagnostic advances using imaging features, tumor markers, and postoperative pathology, as well as treatment options such as surgical, adjuvant, and immune-targeted therapies. In addition, recent advances in more effective chemotherapeutic regimens and immune-targeted therapies were explored. Furthermore, we described the molecular mutation features and potential specific markers of cHCC-CCA. The prognostic value of Nestin has been proven, and we speculate that Nestin will also play a role in classification and diagnosis. However, further research is needed. Moreover, we believe that the possibility of using machine learning liquid biopsy for preoperative diagnosis and establishing a scoring system are directions for future research.

Liver transplantation meets gastrointestinal cancer

Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease, providing a life-saving intervention for patients with severely compromised liver function in both the acute and chronic setting. While LT has also become a routine procedure for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), offering a potential cure by treating both the tumor and the underlying liver disease, its relevance in the context of other malignancies such as cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA), combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) or liver metastases is still the subject of intense debate and no definite recommendations have yet been established. This review summarizes the current therapeutic standards in the context of LT for gastrointestinal malignancies and provides a reflection and outlook on current scientific and clinical developments.

Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival and disease-free survival among resected patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (CHCC-CC) is a rare subtype of primary liver malignancy and has been treated equally as intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) according to the 8th AJCC staging system. Owing to its rarity, its prognostic factors have been rarely explored and defined.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched up till January 1st, 2023 and eligible studies were restricted to studies reported prognostic factors of resected CHCC-CC. Standard Parmar modifications were used to determine pooled univariable hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

A total of eleven studies with 1286 patients with resected classical CHCC-CC were finally included. Pooled results indicated that serum tumor biomarkers, including AFP, CA199, and CEA, were prognostic factors for postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Moreover, liver cirrhosis (P = 0.010), HBV infection (P = 0.030), and HCV infection (P < 0.001) were prognostic factors for OS. Age (HR = 1.03, P = 0.005) was a prognostic factor for DFS. Tumor size (OS: HR = 2, P < 0.001, DFS: HR = 2.15, P < 0.001), tumor number (OS: HR = 2.05, P < 0.001; DFS: HR = 1.96, P = 0.006), surgical margin (OS: HR = 2.33, <0.001001; DFS: HR = 2.35, P < 0.001), node metastasis (OS: HR = 2.96, P < 0.001; DFS: HR = 2.1, P < 0.001), vascular invasion (OS: HR = 2.17, P < 0.001; DFS: HR = 2.64, P < 0.001), and postoperative prophylactic trans-arterial chemotherapy embolization (PPTACE) (OS: HR = 1.67, P = 0.04; DFS: HR = 2.31, P < 0.001) were common prognostic factors for OS and DFS.

CONCLUSION

Various risk factors unmentioned in the 8th AJCC staging system were identified. These promising findings would facilitate a more personalized predictive model and help clinicians to stratify patients with different survival outcomes.

Liver transplantation for combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) are not traditionally considered eligible for liver transplantation (LT) due to poor outcomes.

AIM

To compare outcomes between living donor LT (LDLT) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and LT patients with cHCC-CC and to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence and death after LT in cHCC-CC patients.

METHODS

Data for pathologically diagnosed cHCC-CC patients (n = 111) who underwent LT from 2000 to 2018 were collected for a nine-center retrospective review. Patients (n = 141) who received LDLT for HCC at Samsung Medical Center from January 2013 to March 2017 were selected as the control group. Seventy patients in two groups, respectively, were selected by 1:1 matching.

RESULTS

Cumulative disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the cHCC-CC group were significantly worse than in the HCC group both before and after matching. Extrahepatic recurrence incidence in the cHCC-CC group was higher than that in the HCC group (75.5% vs 33.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the cHCC-CC group had significantly higher rates of tumor recurrence and death compared to the HCC group. In cHCC-CC subgroup analysis, frequency of locoregional therapies > 3, tumor size > 3 cm, and lymph node metastasis were predisposing factors for tumor recurrence in multivariate analysis. Only a maximum tumor size > 3 cm was a predisposing factor for death.

CONCLUSION

The poor prognosis of patients diagnosed with cHCC-CC after LT can be predicted based on the explanted liver. Frequent regular surveillance for cHCC-CC patients should be required for early detection of tumor recurrence.

An international multicentre evaluation of treatment strategies for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma✰

Background & Aims

Management of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is not well-defined. Therefore, we evaluated the management of cHCC-CCA using an online hospital-wide multicentre survey sent to expert centres.

Methods

A survey was sent to members of the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) and the International Cholangiocarcinoma Research Network (ICRN), in July 2021. To capture the respondents' contemporary decision-making process, a hypothetical case study with different tumour size and number combinations was embedded.

Results

Of 155 surveys obtained, 87 (56%) were completed in full and included for analysis. Respondents represented Europe (68%), North America (20%), Asia (11%), and South America (1%) and included surgeons (46%), oncologists (29%), and hepatologists/gastroenterologists (25%). Two-thirds of the respondents included at least one new patient with cHCC-CCA per year. Liver resection was reported as the most likely treatment for a single cHCC-CCA lesion of 2.0-6.0 cm (range: 73-93%) and for two lesions, one up to 6 cm and a second well-defined lesion of 2.0 cm (range: 60-66%). Nonetheless, marked interdisciplinary differences were noted. Surgeons mainly adhered to resection if technically feasible, whereas up to half of the hepatologists/gastroenterologists and oncologists switched to alternative treatment options with increasing tumour burden. Fifty-one (59%) clinicians considered liver transplantation as an option for patients with cHCC-CCA, with the Milan criteria defining the upper limit of inclusion. Overall, well-defined cHCC-CCA treatment policies were lacking and management was most often dependent on local expertise.

Conclusions

Liver resection is considered the first-line treatment of cHCC-CCA, with many clinicians supporting liver transplantation within limits. Marked interdisciplinary differences were reported, depending on local expertise. These findings stress the need for a well-defined multicentre prospective trial comparing treatments, including liver transplantation, to optimise the therapeutic management of cHCC-CCA.

Impact and implications

Because the treatment of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), a rare form of liver cancer, is currently not well-defined, we evaluated the contemporary treatment of this rare tumour type through an online survey sent to expert centres around the world. Based on the responses from 87 clinicians (46% surgeons, 29% oncologists, 25% hepatologists/gastroenterologists), representing four continents and 25 different countries, we found that liver resection is considered the first-line treatment of cHCC-CCA, with many clinicians supporting liver transplantation within limits. Nonetheless, marked differences in treatment decisions were reported among the different specialties (surgeon vs. oncologist vs. hepatologist/gastroenterologist), highlighting the urgent need for a standardisation of therapeutic strategies for patients with cHCC-CCA.

Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Collision Tumors: An Update of Current Management Practices

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare form of primary hepatic collision tumor, with an incidence ranging from 0.4 to 14.2%. Given the diagnostic challenges and lack of randomized trials, standardized treatment has yet to be established. We aim to review the literature to summarize the diagnosis, molecular characteristics, current treatment modalities, and challenges for cHCC-CC. A literature review was performed using PubMed. We included studies investigating and describing cHCC-CC, focusing on surgical, medical, and radiologic treatments. Overall prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival rate under 30%. Minor or major hepatectomy with R0 resection is the only curative treatment; however, recurrence is likely (as high as 50% within 5 years). The role of liver transplantation is also highly debated given the biliary nature of these tumors, with cHCC-CC as a relative contraindication for liver transplantation. Although gemcitabine-based treatments had higher progression-free survival over sorafenib, there is no standard chemotherapy regimen. Treatment with gemcitabine and platinum demonstrates improved disease control rates compared to gemcitabine in conjunction with 5-fluorouracil (78.4% verse 38.5% respectively). Additionally, platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens exhibit a higher overall response rate than non-platinum regimens (21.4% verse 7.0% respectively). These molecular-directed therapies have prolonged survival for HCC, but further investigation needs to be done to assess their utility in patients with cHCC-CC. cHCC-CC is a rare and complex subset of primary hepatic neoplasms with a dismal prognosis and unstandardized treatment options. Further trials need to be performed to investigate systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy options for patients with unresectable disease.

Mixed Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comparison of Survival between Mixed Tumors, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver malignancy, followed by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). In addition, there is a mixed form for which only limited data are available. The aim of this study was to compare recurrence and survival of the mixed form within the cohorts of patients with HCC and ICC from a single center.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2020, all patients who underwent surgical exploration for ICC, HCC, or mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (mHC-CC) were included in this retrospective analysis. The data were analyzed, focusing on preoperative and operative details, histological outcome, and tumor recurrence, as well as overall and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 673 surgical explorations were performed, resulting in 202 resections for ICC, 344 for HCC (225 non-cirrhotic HCC, ncHCC; 119 cirrhotic HCC, cHCC), and 14 for mHC-CC. In addition, six patients underwent orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) in the belief of dealing with HCC. In 107 patients, tumors were irresectable (resection rate of 84%). Except for the cHCC group, major or even extended liver resections were required. Vascular or visceral extensions were performed regularly. Overall survival (OS) was highly variable, with a median OS of 17.6 months for ICC, 26 months for mHC-CC, 31.8 months for cHCC, and 37.2 months for ncHCC. Tumor recurrence was common, with a rate of 45% for mHC-CC, 48.9% for ncHCC, 60.4% for ICC, and 67.2% for cHCC. The median recurrence-free survival was 7.3 months for ICC, 14.4 months for cHCC, 16 months for mHC-CC, and 17 months for ncHCC. The patients who underwent OLT for mHC-CC showed a median OS of 57.5 and RFS of 56.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

mHC-CC has a comparable course and outcome to ICC. The cholangiocarcinoma component seems to be the dominant one and, therefore, may be responsible for the prognosis. 'Accidental' liver transplant for mHC-CC within the Milan criteria offers a good long-term outcome. This might be an option in countries with no or minor organ shortage.

Pathology of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma: An Update

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver cancer that is composed of both hepatocellular and cholangiocellular differentiated cells. It is slightly more common in men and among Asian and Pacific islanders. Overall, risk factors are similar to classic risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The classification has significantly evolved over time. The last WHO classification (2019) mainly emphasized diagnosis on morphological basis with routine stainings, discarded previously recognized classifications with carcinomas with stem cell features, introduced intermediate cell carcinoma as a specific subtype and considered cholangiolocarcinoma as a subtype of cholangiocellular carcinoma. Immunohistochemical markers may be applied for further specification but have limited value for diagnosis. Recent discoveries in molecular pathway regulation may pioneer new therapeutic approaches for this poor prognostic and challenging diagnosis.

Promising role of liver transplantation in patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare but vital heterogeneous histological subtype of primary liver cancer (PLC) with no standardized treatment strategy. This study aimed to preliminarily investigate the role of liver transplantation (LT) in CHC and develop a novel risk scoring model (RSM) to evaluate the benefits of transplantation.

Methods

The study cohort was taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The annual percent change (APC) in incidence or ratio was calculated utilizing the Joinpoint regression. Propensity score matching (PSM) was introduced to reduce the selection bias between groups. A novel RSM was developed based on the independent prognostic factors identified by the Cox regression model. The predictive performance of the RSM was compared with the Milan Criteria and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Criteria, respectively.

Results

A total of 223 CHC patients were enrolled, and 60 (26.9%) of them received LT. The incidence-based mortality did not decrease between 2004 and 2015 (APC =1.7%, P=0.195). Although LT was considered an independent protective predictor for CHC, it showed a declining ratio from 33.3% in 2004 to 15.4% in 2015 (APC =-8.9%, P=0.012). The LT recipients had better outcomes than others who underwent hepatectomy or local destruction (P<0.05). Compared with other subtypes of PLC, the post-transplantation prognoses of CHC patients were similar to those with hepatocellular carcinoma (P>0.05) but significantly better than those with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (P<0.05). Based on the RSM (vascular invasion: 1 point; tumor size >2 cm: 1 point; multiple tumors: 2 points), patients were stratified into two prognostic subgroups: the low-risk (scoring ≤2) and the high-risk (scoring >2 or extrahepatic metastasis) groups. Patients in the low-risk group were more likely to benefit from LT. The predictive performance of the RSM outperformed the Milan and UCSF Criteria in both the training and validation sets.

Conclusions

Therapeutic strategies for CHC should be further improved. Patients with CHC should also be considered potential LT candidates. The novel RSM could be helpful to stratify patients and assist clinical decision-making.

Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular: Cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching

Background

Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CCA) is a rare primary hepatic neoplasm. Currently, there are no well‐structured studies that analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection in cHCC‐CCA alone. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long‐term survival of laparoscopic liver resection with open liver resection in cHCC‐CCA.

Methods

Patients with a postoperative pathologic report of cHCC‐CCA who underwent liver resection from August 2004 to December 2017 were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze the 3‐y disease‐free survival and 3‐y overall survival. Propensity score matching was done to reduce the influence of confounding variables.

Results

A total of 145 patients were pathologically confirmed to have cHCC‐CCA, of which 10 patients were excluded due to having received palliative surgery. Of the remaining 135 patients, 43 underwent laparoscopic and 92 underwent open liver resection; propensity score matching yielded 30 patients for each group. The 3‐y overall survival was 38 (88.4%) in the laparoscopic group and 84 (91.3%) in the open group before propensity score matching (P = .678), and 25 (83.3%) and 28 (93.3%), respectively, after matching (P = .257). The 3‐y disease‐free survival was 24 (55.8%) in the laparoscopic group and 32 (34.8%) in the open group before matching (P = .040), and 17 (56.7%) and 16 (53.3%), respectively, after matching (P = .958). The hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group before and after matching, while other operative outcomes were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic liver resection for cHCC‐CCA is technically feasible and safe, having a shorter hospital stay without compromising oncological outcomes.

Prognostic Factors of Liver Transplantation for HCC: Comparative Literature Review

PURPOSE

The aim of the review study is investigation of the prognostic factors of the liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A literature review has been made, especially in countries where dominantly living donor liver transplantation is performed, such as Turkey. Liver transplantation from deceased donor and from living donor has been evaluated about as advantages and disadvantages, and their effects on prognosis have been compared. In addition, hepatocellular carcinoma series of Koç University Liver Transplantation center has been presented.

RESULTS

Liver transplantation is still the best treatment option with 5-year 50% survival rate for hepatocellular carcinoma even in patient who has locally advanced tumor. The patient's survival is not only an important issue but also the living donor's safety is controversial particularly when expectation of recipient's 5-year survival is below 50% due to donor complication.

CONCLUSION

Detailed preoperative examination, appropriate patient selection, and timing of surgery are seen the most important issues in liver transplant's patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sarcopenia predicts an adverse prognosis in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after surgery

Background

The prognostic value of sarcopenia in combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CC) patients after surgery has not been evaluated, while the efficacy of the available tumor stage for cHCC‐CC remains controversial.

Methods

All consecutive cHCC‐CC patients after surgery were retrieved. The patients were stratified by the sex‐specific medians of the psoas muscle index into groups with or without sarcopenia. Prognosis was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier (K–M) method, and the K–M curves were adjusted by inverse probability weighting (IPW). A nomogram based on Cox regression analysis was established and further compared with primary liver cancer (PLC) stages by internal validation based on bootstrap resampling and k‐fold cross‐validation.

Results

A total of 153 patients were stratified into sarcopenia and non‐sarcopenia groups. The sarcopenia group revealed statistically worse overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) using the K–M method and K–M curves adjusted by IPW. Multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested sarcopenia as an independent risk factor for OS (HR = 1.55; p = 0.040) and DFS (HR = 1.55; p = 0.019). Subgroup analysis based on baseline variables showed sarcopenia as a stable risk factor for the prognosis. Our nomogram outperformed PLC stages in prognostic prediction, as evidenced by the best c‐index, area under the curve, and positive improvement of the net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement. A fivefold cross‐validation revealed consistent results. Decision curve analysis revealed higher net benefits of the nomogram than PLC stages.

Conclusions

Sarcopenia is an independent and stable risk factor for the prognosis of cHCC‐CC patients after surgery. Our nomogram might aid high‐risk patient identification and clinical decisions.

Survival outcomes of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma compared with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER population-based cohort study

Background

Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a heterogeneous group of primary liver cancers characterized by the coexistence of both hepatic and biliary cellular contents. The aim of this study was to compare CHC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and investigate the treatment and survival of patients with CHC.

Methods

Data on CHC and ICC, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and survival outcomes were extracted from the SEER database between 2004 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses of all data were performed to identify the risk factors associated with survival outcomes. The overall survival (OS) rates of CHC patients who underwent hepatic resection (HR) or liver transplantation (LT) were also assessed before and after propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 1066 consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with CHC (n = 286) or ICC (n = 780) were identified. The mean age of the CHC cohort was 60.8±10.7 years old. Among the CHC group, a large proportion of the patients were men and of White ethnicity (73.1% and 71.3%, respectively). The majority of tumors were poorly differentiated (37.8%), while the most common AJCC stage at presentation was stage I (31.4%). Multivariable analysis of all CHC patients revealed that only tumor size, M₁ stage, AJCC stage IIIC, AJCC stage IV, surgery, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS. The OS was comparable with the ICC in the initial 36 months and better in the subsequent follow‐up after treatment. Surgery was associated with better survival outcomes, whether in the early or advanced stages. Regarding the specific types of surgery, the OS rates were similar in selected patients following HR or LT.

Conclusion

In patients with CHC, surgical intervention resulted in better long‐term survival outcomes than nonsurgical treatments. The OS rate of CHC patients compared with that of ICC patients was discriminated before and after a 3‐year follow‐up.

EASL versus LI-RADS: Intra-individual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast and gadoxetic acid for diagnosis of small HCC

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and European Association for the Study (EASL) criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis have been updated in 2018. We aimed to compare the HCC diagnostic performance of LI-RADS and EASL criteria with extracellular contrast agents-MRI (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agents-MRI (HBA-MRI).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 179 participants with cirrhosis (n = 105) or non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (n = 74) who underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo nodule(s) measuring 10-30 mm. We compared the HCC diagnostic performance of EASL and LR-5 in both MRIs.

RESULTS

In an analysis of 215 observations (175 HCCs, 17 non-HCC malignancies and 23 benign lesions) identified from cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CHB participants, LR-5 with ECA-MRI provided the highest sensitivity (80.7%), followed by EASL with ECA-MRI (76.2%), LR-5 with HBA-MRI (67.3%) and EASL with HBA-MRI (63.0%, all P < .05). The specificities were comparable (89.4%-91.5%). When the analysis is limited to participants with pathological cirrhosis (123 observations), the sensitivity of LR-5 with ECA-MRI was similar to that of EASL with ECA-MRI (82.7% vs 80.2%, P = .156), but higher than LR-5 with HBA-MRI (65.1%) or EASL with HBA-MRI (62.8%, both P < .001), with comparable specificities (87.5%-91.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The LR-5 with ECA-MRI yielded the highest sensitivity with a similar specificity for HCC diagnosis in cirrhosis and non-cirrhotic CHB participants, while the sensitivities of LR-5 and EASL with ECA-MRI are similar for cirrhosis participants. This indicates non-invasive diagnosis criteria can differ by contrast agents and presence of cirrhosis.

Comprehensive radiomics nomogram for predicting survival of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is defined as a single nodule showing differentiation into HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and has a poor prognosis.

AIM

To develop a radiomics nomogram for predicting post-resection survival of patients with cHCC-CCA.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically diagnosed cHCC-CCA were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Radiomics features were extracted from portal venous phase computed tomography (CT) images using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression and random forest analysis. A nomogram integrating the radiomics score and clinical factors was developed using univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression. Nomogram performance was assessed in terms of the C-index as well as calibration, decision, and survival curves.

RESULTS

CT and clinical data of 118 patients were included in the study. The radiomics score, vascular invasion, anatomical resection, total bilirubin level, and satellite lesions were found to be independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and were therefore included in an integrative nomogram. The nomogram was more strongly associated with OS (hazard ratio: 8.155, 95% confidence interval: 4.498-14.785, P < 0.001) than a model based on the radiomics score or only clinical factors. The area under the curve values for 1-year and 3-year OS in the training set were 0.878 and 0.875, respectively. Patients stratified as being at high risk of poor prognosis showed a significantly shorter median OS than those stratified as being at low risk (6.1 vs 81.6 mo, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This nomogram may predict survival of cHCC-CCA patients after hepatectomy and therefore help identify those more likely to benefit from surgery.

Liver transplantation in malignant disease

Liver transplantation for malignant disease has gained increasing attention as part of transplant oncology. Following the implementation of the Milan criteria, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the first generally accepted indication for transplantation in patients with cancer. Subsequently, more liberal criteria for HCC have been developed, and research on this topic is still ongoing. The evident success of liver transplantation for HCC has led to the attempt to extend its indication to other malignancies. Regarding perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, more and more evidence supports the use of liver transplantation, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, some data also show a benefit for selected patients with very early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a very rare but nonetheless established indication for liver transplantation in primary liver cancer. In contrast, patients with hepatic angiosarcoma are currently not considered to be optimal candidates. In secondary liver tumors, neuroendocrine cancer liver metastases are an accepted but comparability rare indication for liver transplantation. Recently, some evidence has been published supporting the use of liver transplantation even for colorectal liver metastases. This review summarizes the current evidence for liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver cancer.

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma: MRI features correlated with tumor biomarkers and prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine how MRI features are correlated to biomarkers, and to the prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients.

METHODS

The study enrolled 160 cHCC-CCA patients pathologically confirmed according to the 2019 WHO classification. The preoperative MRI features and clinical data were retrospectively evaluated and compared between patients grouped by AFP or CA19-9 level and with pathological findings. The RFS and OS of cHCC-CCA patients were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. Moreover, predictors of RFS and OS were investigated using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients (mean age, males vs. females: 55.7 ± 10.2 years vs. 54.9 ± 14.0 years) were evaluated. The incidence of nodule-in-nodule architecture, mosaic architecture, intratumoral hemorrhage, hepatic capsule retraction, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and portal vein thrombus was significantly higher in patients with AFP > 20 ng/ml (all p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age (HR 1.031, p = 0.03), CA19-9 > 37 U/ml (HR 1.880, p = 0.04), arterial phase peritumoral enhancement (HR 2.287, p = 0.01), and delayed enhancement (HR 0.377, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of poor RFS, while arterial phase peripheral enhancement (HR 2.391, p = 0.04) was an independent predictor of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

cHCC-CCA imaging features are complex and not correlated with AFP or CA19-9. Age, CA19-9 > 37 U/ml, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and delayed enhancement are independent predictors of poor RFS. Arterial phase peripheral enhancement is an independent predictor of poor OS.

KEY POINTS

• The imaging features of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma are complex and are not correlated with the alpha fetoprotein or CA19-9 levels. • Age, CA19-9 > 37 U/ml, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and delayed enhancement are independent predictors of poor recurrence-free survival in combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma patients. • Arterial phase peripheral enhancement is an independent predictor of poor overall survival in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma.

Radio-pathologic correlation of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma): changes in the 2019 WHO classification and impact on LI-RADS classification at liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

To explain the new changes in pathologic diagnoses of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (PLC) according to the updated 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and how it impacts Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 209 patients with pathologically proven biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-MRI between January 2009 and December 2018. Imaging analysis including LI-RADS classification and pathologic review including the proportion of tumor components were performed. Frequencies of each diagnosis and subtype according to the 2010 and 2019 WHO classifications were compared, and changes in LI-RADS classification were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine significant tumor component for LI-RADS classification.

RESULTS

Of the 209 biphenotypic PLCs of the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) were diagnosed as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 7 (3.3%) as cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) using the 2019 WHO classification. Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the proportion of LR-5 and LR-M categories between the WHO 2010 and 2019 classifications (p = 0.941). Proportion of HCC component was the only independent factor for LI-RADS classification (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to the 2019 WHO classification, 15% of biphenotypic PLCs from the 2010 WHO classification were re-diagnosed as HCCs or CCAs, and a substantial proportion of biphenotypic PLCs of the 2019 WHO classification could be categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 on Gd-EOB-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Among 209 diagnosed biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) lesions were reclassified as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as HCCs, and 7 (3.3%) as CCAs using the 2019 WHO classification. • Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs at the 2019 WHO classification, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. • LI-RADS classification relied on the proportion of HCC component (adjusted odds ratio,1.02; p < 0.001).

Post-resection prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma cannot be predicted by the 2019 World Health Organization classification

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) has wide histologic diversity. This study investigated the prognostic impacts of cHCC-CCA histology according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 153 patients who underwent surgical resection for cHCC-CCA at Asan Medical Center between August 2012 and July 2019.

RESULTS

During the study period, 153 patients, 112 (73.2%) men and 41 (26.8%) women with a mean age of 56.4 ± 10.8 years, underwent R0 resection for cHCC-CCA. Mean tumor diameter was 4.2 ± 2.6 cm, and 147 (96.1%) patients had solitary tumors. According to 2019 WHO classification, 111 (72.5%) patients had cHCC-CCA alone, and 29 of them (26.1%) showed stem cell features. cHCC-CCA-intermediate cell carcinoma and cHCC-CCA-cholangiolocellular carcinoma were identified in 27 (17.6%) and 15 (9.8%), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor recurrence and patient survival rates were 31.8% and 92.1%, 49.8% and 70.9%, and 59.0% and 61.7%, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that significant prognostic factors were tumor size >5 cm, microscopic and macroscopic vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stage, and status of stem cell features. Multivariate analysis revealed 8th AJCC tumor stage and status of stem cell features as independent prognostic factors. 2019 WHO classification was not associated with post-resection prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

2019 WHO classification was not associated with post-resection prognosis, thus was considered as simplified histologic classification requiring prognostic validation. We suggest that stem cell features should be included as an essential component of the pathology report for cHCC-CCA.

Factors associated with 5-year survival of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (HCC/CC) is a rare primary hepatic malignancy which carries a poor prognosis due to its aggressive nature. Few centers have enough cases to draw definitive conclusions and there is limited understanding of prognosis. Given the rarity of HCC/CC, an analysis of large national cancer database was needed to obtain larger number of HCC/CC cases.

AIM

To identify associated factors for 5-year survival of HCC/CC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database obtained from SEER*Stat 8.3.6 software. Previously defined histology code 8180 for the International Classification of Disease for Oncology, 3rd edition was used to identify HCC/CC cases from 2004 to 2015. We collected demographics, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, treatment, tumor size, and survival data. These data were converted to categorical variables. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used to assess normal distribution. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables without normal distribution, and t-test was used to compare continuous variables with a normal distribution. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyzed 5-year survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze factors associated with 5-year survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was done on 5-year survival. We defined P < 0.05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

We identified 497 patients with the following characteristics: Mean age 62.4 years (SD: 11.3), 149 (30.0%) were female, racial distribution was: 276 (55.5%) white, 53 (10.7%) black, 84 (16.9%) Asian and Pacific Islander (API), 77 (15.5%) Hispanic, and 7 (1.4%) others or unknown. Stage I/II disease occurred in 41.5% and tumor size < 50 mm was seen in 35.6% of patients. Twenty-four (4.8%) received locoregional therapy (LRT), 119 (23.9%) underwent resection, and 50 (10.1%) underwent liver transplantation. The overall median survival was 6 mo [Interquartile range (IQR): 1-22]. After multivariate logistic regression, tumor size < 50 mm [Odds ratios (OR): 2.415, P = 0.05], resection (OR: 12.849, P < 0.01), and transplant (OR: 27.129, P < 0.01) showed significance for 5-year survival. Age > 60, sex, race, AJCC stages, metastasis, and LRT were not significant. However, API vs white showed significant OR of 2.793 (CI: 1.120-6.967). Cox proportional hazard regression showed AJCC stages, tumor size < 50 mm, LRT, resection, and transplant showed significant hazard ratio.

CONCLUSION

HCC/CC patients with tumor size < 50 mm, resection, and transplant were associated with an increase in 5-year survival. API showed advantageous OR and hazard ratios over white, black.

Living donor liver transplantation for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: A case series of four patients

•

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver carcinoma.

•

The indications for live transplantation for cHCC-CCA remain controversial.

•

In this case series, patients who met the Milan criteria on the pathological examination had good prognosis.

•

By itself, cHCC-CCA was not a contraindication for liver transplantation.

Introduction

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver carcinoma whose components include both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Indications for liver transplantation for cHCC-CCA remain controversial.

Case presentations

Four patients underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for cHCC-CCA. All patients had multiple tumor nodules preoperatively diagnosed as HCC. Postoperative pathological examinations revealed that one of the tumors was cHCC-CCA. Cases 1 and 2 underwent LDLT for cirrhosis with HCC tumors that met Milan criteria. Case 3 underwent LDLT for recurrent HCC tumors with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Although the preoperative examinations showed that the patient met the Kyoto, but not Milan criteria, postoperative pathological examinations revealed that the patient did meet Milan criteria. The three patients who met Milan criteria on postoperative pathological examination had no recurrences after LDLT. Case 4 had multiple tumors with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Although the preoperative examinations showed that the patient did not meet Milan criteria—but did meet Kyoto criteria—, on postoperative pathological examinations, the patient met neither Millan nor Kyoto criteria. He died of tumor recurrence 15 months after LDLT.

Discussion and conclusions

Our experiences suggested that patients who meet Millan or Kyoto criteria experienced acceptable outcomes of LDLT for cHCC-CCA. By itself, cHCC-CCA is not contraindication for liver transplantation.

Evaluation of Primary Liver Cancers Using Hepatocyte-Specific Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Pitfalls and Potential Tips

When radiologists interpret hepatic focal lesions seen on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, it is important not only to distinguish malignant lesions from benign ones but also to distinguish nonhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancies from HCCs. In addition, most major guidelines, including those of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center, allow for the noninvasive imaging diagnosis of HCC in at-risk patients. However, ~40% of HCC cases show atypical imaging features mimicking non-HCC malignancies. Furthermore, several benign and malignant lesions, such as flash-filling hemangioma and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, frequently look like HCC. In contrast, although multiparametric MRI options, including hepatobiliary phase and diffusion-weighted imaging, provide useful information that could help address these challenges, there remain several unresolved issues with regard to the noninvasive diagnostic criteria characterizing HCC. In this article, we discuss the typical imaging features and challenging situations related to primary liver cancers in MRI, while considering how to make a correct diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Adjuvant Transarterial chemoembolization does not influence recurrence-free or overall survival in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

The prognosis of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is usually poor, and effective adjuvant therapy is missing making it important to investigate whether these patients may benefit from adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of adjuvant TACE for long-term recurrence and survival after curative resection before and after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Methods

In this retrospective study, of 230 patients who underwent resection for CHC between January 1994 and December 2014, 46 (18.0%) patients received adjuvant TACE. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify the independent predictive factors of survival. Cox regression analyses and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients who did or did not receive adjuvant TACE.

Results

A total of 230 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.9 years; 172 men) were enrolled, and 46 (mean age 52.7 ± 11.1 years; 38 men) patients received TACE. Before PSM, in multivariate regression analysis, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), tumour nodularity, macrovascular invasion (MVI), lymphoid metastasis, and extrahepatic metastasis were associated with OS. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), MVI, lymphoid metastasis, and preventive TACE (HR: 2.763, 95% CI: 1.769–4.314, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. PSM created 46 pairs of patients. Before PSM, adjuvant preventive TACE was not associated with an increased risk of OS (HR: 0.911, 95% CI: 0.545–1.520, p = 0.720) or DFS (HR: 3.345, 95% CI: 1.686–6.638, p = 0.001). After PSM, the 5-year OS and DFS rates were comparable in the TACE group and the non-TACE group (OS: 22.7% vs 14.9%, respectively, p = 0.75; DFS: 11.2% vs 14.4%, respectively, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

The present study identified that adjuvant preventive TACE did not influence DFS or OS after curative resection of CHC.

Resection of Mixed Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is a biphenotypic liver cancer thought to have unfavorable tumor biology and a poor prognosis. Surgical outcomes of HCC-CC remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of HCC-CC. We analyzed a series of patients undergoing resection for HCC-CC (n = 47), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 468), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC; n = 108) at a single Western center between 2001 and 2015. Patients with HCC-CC were matched to patients with HCC and ICC on important clinical factors including tumor characteristics (size, vascular invasion, and differentiation) and underlying cirrhosis. Patients with HCC-CC had rates of viral hepatitis comparable to patients with HCC (78.7% versus 80.0%), and 42.5% had underlying cirrhosis. When matched on tumor size, HCC-CC was more poorly differentiated than HCC (68.3% versus 27.3%; P < 0.001) and ICC (68.3% versus 34.8%; P = 0.01) but had similar postresection survival (5-year survival: HCC-CC 49.7%, HCC 54.8%, ICC 68.7%; P = 0.61) and recurrence (3-year recurrence: HCC-CC 57.9%, HCC 61.5%, and ICC 56%; P = 0.58). Outcomes were similar between HCC-CC and HCC when matched on underlying cirrhosis and tumor size. Cancer type was not predictive of survival or tumor recurrence. Survival after resection of HCC-CC is similar to HCC when matched for tumor size, despite HCC-CC tumors being more poorly differentiated. Exclusion of HCC-CC from management strategies recommended for HCC, including consideration for liver transplantation, may not be warranted.

Treatment of Combined Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is a rare primary liver cancer. It is constituted by neoplastic cells of both hepatocellular and cholangiocellular derivation. Different histology types of HCC-CC have been reported, hinting at heterogeneous carcinogenic pathways leading to the development of this cancer. Due to its rarity and complexity, mixed HCC-CC is a scantly investigated condition with unmet needs and unsatisfactory outcomes. Surgery remains the preferred treatment in resectable patients. The risk of recurrence, however, is high, especially in comparison with other primary liver cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma. In unresectable or recurring patients, the therapeutic options are challenging due to the dual nature of the neoplastic cells. Consequently, the odds of survival of patients with HCC-CC remains poor. We analysed the literature systematically about the treatment of mixed HCC-CC, reviewing the main therapeutic options and their outcomes and analysing the most interesting developments in this topic with a focus on new potential therapeutic avenues.

Pretransplant Hepatic Malignancy Increases Risk of De Novo Malignancy after Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and development of de novo malignancy (DNM) after liver transplantation (LT) are the major causes of late recipient death.

METHODS

We analyzed the incidence of extrahepatic DNM following living donor LT according to the status of pretransplant hepatic malignancy. We selected 2,076 adult patients who underwent primary LDLT during 7 years from January 2010 to December 2016.

RESULTS

The pretransplant hepatic malignancy group (n = 1,012) showed 45 cases (4.4%) of the following extrahepatic DNMs: posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in 10; lung cancer in 10; stomach cancer in 6; colorectal cancer in 5; urinary bladder cancer in 3; and other cancers in 11. The pretransplant no hepatic malignancy group (n = 1,064) showed 25 cases (2.3%) of the following extrahepatic DNMs: colorectal cancer in 3; stomach cancer in 3; leukemia in 3; lung cancer in 3; PTLD in 2; prostate cancer in 2; and other cancers in 9. Incidences of extrahepatic DNM in the pretransplant hepatic malignancy and no hepatic malignancy groups were as follows: 1.1% and 0.5% at 1 year, 3.2% and 2.0% at 3 years, 4.6% and 2.5% at 5 years, and 5.4% and 2.8% at 8 years, respectively (P = 0.006). Their overall patient survival rates were as follows: 97.3% and 97.2% at 1 year, 91.6% and 95.9% at 3 years, 89.8% and 95.4% at 5 years, and 89.2% and 95.4% at 8 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Pretransplant hepatic malignancy was the only significant risk factor for posttransplant extrahepatic DNM.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients who had pretransplant hepatic malignancy be followed up more strictly because they have a potential risk of primary hepatic malignancy recurrence as well as a higher risk of extrahepatic DNM than patients without pretransplant hepatic malignancy.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection

Background

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare subtype of primary liver cancers. Its prognostic factors remain unclear. The study aimed to evaluate its long-term outcome and prognostic factors by retrospectively reviewing the series of cHCC-CC after curative resection from our institute.

Methods

A total of 55 pathologically confirmed cHCC-CC patients undergoing curative resections between January 2003 and January 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were included. The clinicopathological and follow-up data were retrieved. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were analysed by Kaplan–Meier curve. The independent prognostic factors were determined by using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses.

Results

There were 41 males and 14 females, with a median age of 51.0 (interquartile range, 44.0–60.0) years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and RFS rates in cHCC-CC were 80.0%, 25.5%, and 16.4%, respectively, and 52.7%, 21.8%, and 10.9%, respectively. The median OS and RFS were 24.9 and 14.5 months, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that elevated alpha-fetal protein (AFP) and/or CA19-9, vascular invasion, local extra-hepatic invasion, and lymph-node metastasis (LNM) were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for OS and RFS (all P < 0.005). Furthermore, elevated AFP and/or CA19-9 were independent unfavorable prognostic factors in various subgroups of cHCC-CC, including patients aged <60 years, positive hepatitis B surface antigen, cirrhosis, single tumor, tumor size ≥5 cm, no vascular invasion, no LNM, and no local extra-hepatic invasion (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Elevated AFP and/or CA19-9, vascular invasion, local extra-hepatic invasion, and LNM were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for long-term survival of cHCC-CC undergoing curative resections. Patients with normal levels of AFP and CA19-9 had better prognosis.

Risk Factors of Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is commonly diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) preoperatively. Therefore, unexpected recurrence occurs in some patients after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 patients who underwent LT for cHCC-CC from January 2005 to December 2015.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients, 11 (55%) had concurrent HCC and 10 (50%) had multiple cHCC-CCs. Before LT, 13 patients had undergone transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 9), radiofrequency ablation, and TACE (n = 3) or surgical resection (n = 1). Four of the patients (20%) had the classical type, whereas 16 (80%) had subtypes with stem cell features. Six of the 16 patients (37.5%) with subtypes with stem cell features and 3 of the 4 patients (75%) with the classical type showed recurrence after LT. In multivariate analysis, the classical type was significantly associated with poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.65, confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-60.05, P = .03) and poorer overall survival (HR: 8.89, CI: 1.37-57.84, P = .02). Spontaneous tumor necrosis also showed significance on RFS (P = .03) among 11 patients with nontreated lesions.

CONCLUSION

In cHCC-CC, the classical type and spontaneous tumor necrosis were associated with recurrence. If these risk factors are found after LT, short-interval follow-up and strategies such as chemotherapy and/or use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to prevent recurrence are needed.

Combining imaging and tumour biopsy improves the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is by definition a highly heterogeneous tumour, which significantly impacts its diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of imaging using computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance (MR) and biopsy for the diagnosis of cHCC-CCA.

METHODS

cHCC-CCA resected between December 2006 and April 2017 with available pre-operative imaging and tumour biopsy were retrospectively included. cHCC-CCA diagnosis was based on morphological and immunophenotypical features. A total of 21 cHCC-CCA were compared to 21 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) as controls. All biopsies were reviewed. Two radiologists reviewed the cases and classified tumours into four patterns (type 1 [progressive enhancement of the entire lesion, iCCA type], type 2 [arterial enhancement with washout, HCC type], type 3 [mixed pattern with combinations of 1, 2 and 4] and type 4 [atypical pattern, areas of arterial enhancement without washout and/or hypovascular]).

RESULTS

The presence of a type 3 pattern at imaging had a 48% sensitivity and 81% specificity for cHCC-CCA diagnosis. The initial diagnosis performed on biopsy was cHCC-CCA in 8/21 patients (38%). After reviewing and including immunophenotypical markers, two more cases were diagnosed as cHCC-CCA (48% sensibility, 100% specificity). When either imaging or biopsy suggested the diagnosis of cHCC-CCA, the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 82% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that a two-step strategy combining imaging as the first step and biopsy as the second step improved the diagnostic performance of cHCC-CCA.

Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare form of primary liver cancer with features of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence, demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival of patients with CHC.

METHODS

Data on CHC between 2004 and 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry and analyzed.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-nine patients with CHC were identified; 367 were male. Median age at diagnosis was 62.5 ± 12 years. The overall incidence of CHC between 2004 and 2014 was 0.05 per 100,000 per year. Incidence increased with age, with the highest incidence in men occurring between 60 and 64 years and 75-79 years for women. Women had a higher incidence of CHC compared to men (0.08 vs 0.03 per 100,000 per year). Most tumors were poorly differentiated (30.8%) while the most common stage at presentation was stage 4 (26.8%). 39.5% of these tumors were resected while 6.8% received radiation and 34% received chemotherapy. One- and 5-year cause-specific survival for CHC was 41.9% and 17.7%, respectively, with a median survival of 8 months. Worse outcomes were noted among patients with tumor stage 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-2.87, P = 0.000), stage 4 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.75, P = 0.027), those not treated with surgery (HR 4.94, 95% CI 3.64-6.68, P = 0.000), those who did not receive radiation (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.08-2.70, P = 0.021), those who did not receive chemotherapy (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.20-1.99, P = 0.001), and those with increasing tumor size on chemotherapy (HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00, P = 0.013).

DISCUSSION

CHC is the combined presentation of 2 malignancies. Incidence appears to be increasing and is associated with age and male gender. While surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are associated with improved outcomes, patients who did not undergo surgery are at highest risk for death.

Locoregional Therapy of Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma versus Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional therapy (LRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC-CC or HCC treated with LRT between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Ten patients (8 men; median age, 60 y) with 12 HCC-CCs (mean diameter, 4.2 cm ± 1.9; mean number, 3.7 ± 3.3) treated with chemoembolization (n = 6), yttrium-90 radioembolization (n = 2), RF ablation (n = 1), or chemoembolization/RF ablation (n = 1) were compared with 124 patients (92 men; median age, 59 y) with 134 HCCs (mean diameter, 4.8 cm ± 4.0; mean number, 2.6 ± 2.2) treated with chemoembolization (n = 51), yttrium-90 radioembolization (n = 17), RF ablation (n = 41), or chemoembolization/RF ablation (n = 15). Propensity score-matched analysis with conditional logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, LRT modality, tumor-specific features, and Child-Pugh class. Tumor-volume doubling time (TVDT) before LRT and objective response rates were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact test; progression-free survival (PFS) and transplant-free survival (TFS) were compared by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, HCC-CC was associated with lower median TVDT (2.4 months vs 5.2 months, P = .03), objective response (30% vs 71%, P = .01), and median PFS (2.4 months vs 7.4 months, HR 4.3, 95% CI 2.2-8.4, P < .0001). Propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated greater distant progression (60% vs 30%, P = .003) and significantly shorter median PFS (2.4 months vs 6.0 months, HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.9, P = .017) for HCC-CC. No significant difference was observed in TFS (7.5 months vs 13.8 months, HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.4-6.1).

CONCLUSIONS

HCC-CC was associated with reduced PFS and greater distant progression after LRT compared with HCC, indicating a need for adjunctive treatment strategies to improve outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma after hepatectomy or liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare primary liver malignancy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence available on the long-term outcomes of cHCC-CC patients after either hepatectomy or liver transplantation (LT).

DATA SOURCES

Relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2018 were identified by searching PubMed and Embase and reviewed systematically. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 42 observational studies involving 1691 patients (1390 for partial hepatectomy and 301 for LT) were included in the analysis. The median tumor recurrence and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 65% (range 38%-100%) and 29% (range 0-63%) after hepatectomy versus 54% (range 14%-93%) and 41% (range 16%-73%) after LT, respectively. Meta-analysis found no significant difference in OS and tumor recurrence between LT and hepatectomy groups.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy rather than LT should be considered as the prior treatment option for cHCC-CC.

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC): an update of genetics, molecular biology, and therapeutic interventions

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare and aggressive primary hepatic malignancy with significant histological and biological heterogeneity. It presents with more aggressive behavior and worse survival outcomes than either hepatocellular carcinoma or CC and remains a diagnostic challenge. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for its optimal management. Major hepatectomy with hilar node resection remains the mainstay of treatment in operable cases. Advances in the genetic and molecular characterization of this tumor will contribute to the better understanding of its pathogenesis and shape its future management.

LI-RADS Classification and Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancers at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI

Purpose To (a) evaluate the postsurgical prognostic implication of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories of primary liver cancers and (b) determine the performance of LI-RADS version 2017 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 194 patients with cirrhosis and surgically proven single primary liver cancer (53 with cHCC-CC, 44 with IHCC, and 97 with HCC) were evaluated with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between 2009 and 2014. The mean patient age was 57 years (age range, 30-83 years). There were 155 men with a mean age of 56 years (range, 30-81 years) and 39 women with a mean age of 58 years (range, 38-83 years). Two independent readers assigned an LI-RADS category for each nodule. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and their associated factors were evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. Results In the multivariable analysis, the LI-RADS category was an independent factor for OS (hazard ratio, 4.2; P < .001) and RFS (hazard ratio, 2.6; P = .01). The LR-M category showed more correlation with poorer OS and RFS than did the LR-4 or LR-5 category for all primary liver cancers (P < .001 for both), HCCs (P = .01 and P < .001, respectively), and cHCC-CCs (P = .01 and P = .03, respectively). The LR-5 category had a sensitivity of 69% (67 of 97) and a specificity of 87% (84 of 97) in the diagnosis of HCC; most false-positive diagnoses (85%, 11 of 13) were the result of misclassification of cHCC-CCs. Conclusion The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category was associated with postsurgical prognosis of primary liver cancers, independent of pathologic diagnosis. The LI-RADS enabled the correct classification of most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, whereas differentiation of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from HCC was unreliable. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bashir and Chernyak in this issue.

Response to Loco-Regional Therapy Predicts Outcomes After Liver Transplantation for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CCA) is a rare liver malignancy distinct from either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cholangiocarcinoma. Liver transplantation (LT) is not recommended for HCC-CCA because of suboptimal outcomes. Non-invasive diagnosis of HCC-CCA is extremely challenging; thus, some HCC-CCAs are presumed as HCC on imaging and listed for LT with the correct diagnosis ultimately made on explant pathology. We compared HCC-CCA with HCC to determine the utility of response to pre-transplant loco-regional therapy (LRT) in predicting outcomes for HCC-CCA after LT as a potential means of identifying appropriate HCC-CCA patients for LT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 19 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC-CCA were individually matched to 38 HCC patients (1:2) based on age, sex, and Milan criteria at listing was performed. The modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors was used to categorize patients as responders or non-responders to pre-transplant LRT based on imaging performed before and after LRT. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were examined.

RESULTS

OS at 3 years post-transplant was 74% for HCC-CCA and 87% for HCC. RFS at 3 years was 74% for HCC-CCA, and 87% for HCC. Among responders to LRT, the 3-year OS was 92% for HCC-CCA and 88% for HCC; among non-responders, 3-year OS was 43% for HCC-CCA and 83% for HCC. Higher 3-year OS was observed among HCC-CCA responders (77%) compared with HCC-CCA non-responders (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

OS was similarly high among.

Propensity-Matched Analysis of Patients with Mixed Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas (HCC-CCAs) are rare tumors with both hepatocellular and biliary differentiation. While liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is contraindicated in known HCC-CCA because of concerns of poor prognosis. We sought to compare posttransplant oncologic outcomes for HCC-CCA and a matched cohort of HCC LT recipients. A retrospective, single-center analysis (1984-2015) identified 12 patients with mixed HCC-CCA who were matched 1:3 to patients with HCC on both pretransplant (radiologic diameter and alpha-fetoprotein) and explant (pathologic diameter, grade/differentiation, and vascular invasion) tumor characteristics. Compared with HCC patients matched on pretransplant characteristics (n = 36), HCC-CCA had higher explant tumor grade, more poorly differentiated tumors, but similar T stage and vascular invasion. HCC-CCA recipients trended toward inferior recurrence-free survival at 5 years (28% versus 61%; P = 0.12) and greater recurrence (HCC-CCA: 50%, median time to recurrence 297 days versus HCC: 22%, median time to recurrence 347 days; P = 0.07). However, when matched to a separate HCC cohort with similar explant pathology, HCC-CCA had similar 5-year recurrence-free survival (42% versus 44%; P = 0.45) and posttransplant recurrence (50% versus 27%; P = 0.13). All 6 HCC-CCA recurrences occurred with poorly differentiated tumors (median survival 21.3 months), without a single recurrence in 5 of the 12 HCC-CCA patients with well-moderately differentiated tumors (median survival 60.2 months). Mixed HCC-CCA tumors are more likely poorly differentiated tumors compared with HCC with similar pretransplant characteristics. However, compared with HCC with similar pathologic characteristics, they display similar recurrence-free survival and are not inherently more aggressive tumors. Low-grade, well-moderately differentiated HCC-CCAs have excellent survival with a low risk for post-LT recurrence, and they should not be excluded from LT. Improved pretransplant identification of pathologic characteristics in HCC-CCA may allow for successful utilization of LT in this subset of patients.

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 for combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) in the differential diagnosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and prediction of prognosis on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

Patients at high risk of HCC with pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCAs (n = 70) and a matched control of HCCs (n = 70) who had undergone Gd-EOB-MRI were included. LI-RADS category was assigned for each lesion by two radiologists. Imaging features and surgical outcomes were compared between cHCC-CCAs of LR-M and LR-5/4 using the χ² test or Fisher's exact test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

cHCC-CCAs and HCCs were categorised as LR-M, LR-5/4 and LR-TIV in 61.4% (43/70), 37.1% (26/70) and 1.4% (1/70) and 10.0% (7/70), 88.6% (62/70) and 1.4% (1/70), respectively. cHCC-CCAs of LR-5/4, in comparison to LR-M, showed significantly higher frequencies of major HCC features: arterial hyperenhancement (96.2% (25/26) vs. 58.1% (25/43), p = 0.001), washout appearance (80.8% (21/26) vs. 48.8% (21/43), p = 0.011) and enhancing capsule (34.6% (9/26) vs. 11.6% (5/43), p = 0.031). After curative surgery, patients with cHCC-CCAs of LR-M showed a higher early recurrence rate (≤ 6 months) than did those with LR-5/4 (27.8% (10/36) vs. 4.8% (1/21), p = 0.041), whereas no significant difference was observed in RFS (log-rank p = 0.084).

CONCLUSIONS

By using LI-RADS on Gd-EOB-MRI, a substantial proportion of cHCC-CCAs can be categorised as non-LR-M. In addition, cHCC-CCAs mimicking HCCs on imaging (LR-5/4) may indicate better surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those of LR-M.

KEY POINTS

• cHCC-CCAs can be categorised as either LR-M or non-LR-M on Gd-EOB-MRI. • cHCC-CCAs of LR-5/4 frequently demonstrate major HCC imaging features. • LI-RADS categorisation may provide prognostic information after surgery in cHCC-CCAs.