1
|
Angelou C, Patallo IS, Doherty D, Romano F, Schettino G. A review of diamond dosimeters in advanced radiotherapy techniques. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 39221583 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
This review article synthesizes key findings from studies on the use of diamond dosimeters in advanced radiotherapy techniques, showcasing their applications, challenges, and contributions to enhancing dosimetric accuracy. The article explores various dosimeters, highlighting synthetic diamond dosimeters as potential candidates especially due to their high spatial resolution and negligible ion recombination effect. The clinically validated commercial dosimeter, PTW microDiamond (mD), faces limitations in small fields, proton and hadron therapy and ultra-high dose per pulse (UHDPP) conditions. Variability in reported values for field sizes < $<$ 2 × $\times$ 2cm 2 ${\rm cm}^2$ is noted, reflecting the competition between volume averaging and density perturbation effects. PTW's introduction of flashDiamond (fD) holds promise for dosimetric measurements in UHDPP conditions and is reliable for commissioning ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beam systems, pending the clinical validation of the device. Other advancements in diamond detectors, such as in 3D configurations and real-time dose per pulse x-ray detectors, are considered valuable in overcoming challenges posed by modern radiotherapy techniques, alongside relative dosimetry and pre-treatment verifications. The studies discussed collectively provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of diamond dosimetry in the field of radiotherapy, and offer insights into future directions for research and development in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Angelou
- Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Radiotherapy and Radiation Dosimetry, National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, UK
| | | | - Daniel Doherty
- Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Francesco Romano
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Schettino
- Radiotherapy and Radiation Dosimetry, National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ando Y, Okada M, Matsumoto N, Ikuhiro K, Ishihara S, Kiriu H, Tanabe Y. Evaluation of output factors of different radiotherapy planning systems using Exradin W2 plastic scintillator detector. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024; 47:1177-1189. [PMID: 38753285 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01438-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the output factors (OPF) of different radiation therapy planning systems (TPSs) using a plastic scintillator detector (PSD). The validation results for determining a practical field size for clinical use were verified. The implemented validation system was an Exradin W2 PSD. The focus was to validate the OPFs of the small irradiation fields of two modeled radiation TPSs using RayStation version 10.0.1 and Monaco version 5.51.10. The linear accelerator used for irradiation was a TrueBeam with three energies: 4, 6, and 10 MV. RayStation calculations showed that when the irradiation field size was reduced from 10 × 10 to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2, the results were within 2.0% of the measured values for all energies. Similarly, the values calculated using Monaco were within approximately 2.0% of the measured values for irradiation field sizes between 10 × 10 and 1.5 × 1.5 cm2 for all beam energies of interest. Thus, PSDs are effective validation tools for OPF calculations in TPS. A TPS modeled with the same source data has different minimum irradiation field sizes that can be calculated. These findings could aid in verification of equipment accuracy for treatment planning requiring highly accurate dose calculations and for third-party evaluation of OPF calculations for TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Masahiro Okada
- Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Natsuko Matsumoto
- Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kawasaki Ikuhiro
- Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoshinori Tanabe
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 5-1 Shikata-cho, 2-chome, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sait AA, Yoganathan SA, Jones GW, Patel T, Rastogi N, Pandey SP, Mani S, Boopathy R. Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:055001. [PMID: 38906125 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification.Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 × 10 cm2, 5 × 5 cm2, 4 × 4 cm2, 3 × 3 cm2, 2 × 2 cm2, 1 × 1 cm2, 0.5 × 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines.Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%.Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Aziz Sait
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India
| | - S A Yoganathan
- Radiation Oncology, NCCCR, Hamad Medical Corporation Doha, Qatar
| | - Glenn W Jones
- University of West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine and Research, Nassau, The Bahamas
| | - Tusar Patel
- Department of Medical Physics, Advanced Medical Physics, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Rastogi
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India
| | - S P Pandey
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India
- Delhi Technical Campus, Knowledge Park-III, Greater Noida (UP), India
| | - Sunil Mani
- Department of Medical Physics, Advanced Medical Physics, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Raghavendiran Boopathy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, OK, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan AU, Das IJ, Yadav P. Computational and experimental small field dosimetry using a commercial plastic scintillator detector for the 0.35 T MR-linac. Phys Med 2024; 123:103403. [PMID: 38870643 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) are considered ideal dosimeters for small field dosimetry in conventional linear accelerators (linacs), the impact of the magnetic field strength on the response of the PSD must be investigated. METHODS A linac Monte Carlo (MC) head model for a low-field MR-linac was validated for small field dosimetry and utilized to calculate field output factors (OFs). The MC-calculated OFs were compared with the treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated OFs and measured OFs using a Blue Physics (BP) Model 10 commercial PSD and a synthetic diamond detector. The field-specific correction factors, [Formula: see text] , were calculated for the PSD in the presence of a 0.35 T and magnetic field. The impact of the source focal spot size and initial electron energy on the MC-calculated OFs was investigated. RESULTS Good agreement to within 2 % was found between the MC-calculated OFs and BP PSD OFs except for the 0.415 × 0.415 cm2 field size. The BP PSD [Formula: see text] correction factors were calculated to be within 1 % of unity. For field sizes ≥1.66 × 1.66 cm2, the MC-calculated OFs were relatively insensitive to the focal spot size and initial electron energy to within 2.5 %. However, for smaller field sizes, the MC-calculated OFs were found to differ up to 9.50 % and 7.00 % when the focal spot size and initial electron energy was varied, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The BP PSD was deemed suitable for small field dosimetry in MR-linacs without requiring any [Formula: see text] correction factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahtesham Ullah Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Debnath SBC, Tonneau D, Fauquet C, Tallet A, Darréon J. Cerenkov free micro-dosimetry in small-field radiation therapy technique. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:125018. [PMID: 38810619 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad51c6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Optical fiber-based scintillating dosimetry is a recent promising technique owing to the miniature size dosimeter and quality measurement in modern radiation therapy treatment. Despite several advantages, the major issue of using scintillating dosimeters is the Cerenkov effect and predominantly requires extra measurement corrections. Therefore, this work highlighted a novel micro-dosimetry technique to ensure Cerenkov-free measurement in radiation therapy treatment protocol by investigating several dosimetric characteristics.Approach.A micro-dosimetry technique was proposed with the performance evaluation of a novel infrared inorganic scintillator detector (IR-ISD). The detector essentially consists of a micro-scintillating head based on IR-emitting micro-clusters with a sensitive volume of 1.5 × 10-6mm3. The proposed system was evaluated under the 6 MV LINAC beam used in patient treatment. Overall measurements were performed using IBATMwater tank phantoms by following TRS-398 protocol for radiotherapy. Cerenkov measurements were performed for different small fields from 0.5 × 0.5 cm2to 10 × 10 cm2under LINAC. In addition, several dosimetric parameters such as percentage depth dose (PDD), high lateral resolution beam profiling, dose linearity, dose rate linearity, repeatability, reproducibility, and field output factor were investigated to realize the performance of the novel detector.Main results. This study highlighted a complete removal of the Cerenkov effect using a point-like miniature detector, especially for small field radiation therapy treatment. Measurements demonstrated that IR-ISD has acceptable behavior with dose rate variability (maximum standard deviation ∼0.18%) for the dose rate of 20-1000 cGy s-1. An entire linear response (R2= 1) was obtained for the dose delivered within the range of 4-1000 cGy, using a selected field size of 1 × 1 cm2. Perfect repeatability (max 0.06% variation from average) with day-to-day reproducibility (0.10% average variation) was observed. PDD profiles obtained in the water tank present almost identical behavior to the reference dosimeter with a build-up maximum depth dose at 1.5 cm. The small field of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2profiles have been characterized with a high lateral resolution of 100µm.Significance. Unlike recent plastic scintillation detector systems, the proposed micro-dosimetry system in this study requires no Cerenkov corrections and showed efficient performance for several dosimetric parameters. Therefore, it is expected that considering the detector correction factors, the IR-ISD system can be a suitable dose measurement tool, such as in small-field dose measurements, high and low gradient dose verification, and, by extension, in microbeam radiation and FLASH radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sree Bash Chandra Debnath
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, LP3 UMR 7341, 13288 Marseille, France
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CINaM UMR 7325, Marseille, 13288, France
| | - Didier Tonneau
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CINaM UMR 7325, Marseille, 13288, France
| | - Carole Fauquet
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CINaM UMR 7325, Marseille, 13288, France
| | - Agnes Tallet
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu K, Holmes S, Schüler E, Beddar S. A comprehensive investigation of the performance of a commercial scintillator system for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:4504-4512. [PMID: 38507253 PMCID: PMC11147715 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dosimetry in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) beamlines is significantly challenged by limitations in real-time monitoring and accurate measurement of beam output, beam parameters, and delivered doses using conventional radiation detectors, which exhibit dependencies in ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) and high dose-per-pulse (DPP) beamline conditions. PURPOSE In this study, we characterized the response of the Exradin W2 plastic scintillator (Standard Imaging, Inc.), a water-equivalent detector that provides measurements with a time resolution of 100 Hz, to determine its feasibility for use in UHDR electron beamlines. METHODS The W2 scintillator was exposed to an UHDR electron beam with different beam parameters by varying the pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings of an electron UHDR linear accelerator system. The response of the W2 scintillator was evaluated as a function of the total integrated dose delivered, DPP, and mean and instantaneous dose rate. To account for detector radiation damage, the signal sensitivity (pC/Gy) of the W2 scintillator was measured and tracked as a function of dose history. RESULTS The W2 scintillator demonstrated mean dose rate independence and linearity as a function of integrated dose and DPP for DPP ≤ 1.5 Gy (R2 > 0.99) and PRF ≤ 90 Hz. At DPP > 1.5 Gy, nonlinear behavior and signal saturation in the blue and green signals as a function of DPP, PRF, and integrated dose became apparent. In the absence of Cerenkov correction, the W2 scintillator exhibited PW dependence, even at DPP values <1.5 Gy, with a difference of up to 31% and 54% in the measured blue and green signal for PWs ranging from 0.5 to 3.6 µs. The change in signal sensitivity of the W2 scintillator as a function of accumulated dose was approximately 4%/kGy and 0.3%/kGy for the measured blue and green signal responses, respectively, as a function of integrated dose history. CONCLUSION The Exradin W2 scintillator can provide output measurements that are both dose rate independent and linear in response if the DPP is kept ≤1.5 Gy (corresponding to a mean dose rate up to 290 Gy/s in the used system), as long as proper calibration is performed to account for PW and changes in signal sensitivity as a function of accumulated dose. For DPP > 1.5 Gy, the W2 scintillator's response becomes nonlinear, likely due to limitations in the electrometer related to the high signal intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Emil Schüler
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jermain PR, Muir B, McEwen M, Niu Y, Pang D. Accurate machine-specific reference and small-field dosimetry for a self-shielded neuro-radiosurgical system. Med Phys 2024; 51:4423-4433. [PMID: 38695760 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The newly available ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgical system is designed for the treatment of intracranial lesions, with several unique features that include a self-shielding, gyroscopic gantry, wheel collimation, non-orthogonal kV imaging, short source-axis distance, and low-energy megavoltage beam. Systematic characterization of its radiation as well as other properties is imperative to ensure its safe and effective clinical application. PURPOSE To accurately determine the radiation output of the ZAP-X with a special focus on the smaller diameter cones and an aim to provide useful recommendations on quantification of small field dosimetry. METHODS Six different types of detectors were used to measure relative output factors at field sizes ranging from 4 to 25 mm, including the PTW microSilicon and microdiamond diodes, Exradin W2 plastic scintillator, Exradin A16 and A1SL ionization chambers, and the alanine dosimeter. The 25 mm cone served as the reference field size. Absolute dose was determined with both TG-51-based dosimetry using a calibrated PTW Semiflex ion chamber and measurements using alanine dosimeters. RESULTS The average radiation output factors (maximum deviation from the average) measured with the microDiamond, microSilicon, and W2 detectors were: for the 4 mm cone, 0.741 (1.0%); for the 5 mm cone: 0.817 (1.0%); for the 7.5 mm cone: 0.908 (1.0%); for the 10 mm cone: 0.946 (0.4%); for the 12.5 mm cone: 0.964 (0.2%); for the 15 mm cone: 0.976 (0.1%); for the 20 mm cone: 0.990 (0.1%). For field sizes larger than 10 mm, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers also yielded consistent output factors within 1.5% of those obtained using the microSilicon, microdiamond, and W2 detectors. The absolute dose measurement obtained with alanine was within 1.2%, consistent with combined uncertainties, compared to the PTW Semiflex chamber for the 25 mm reference cone. CONCLUSION For field sizes less than 10 mm, the microSilicon diode, microDiamond detector, and W2 scintillator are suitable devices for accurate small field dosimetry of the ZAP-X system. For larger fields, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers can also be used. Furthermore, alanine dosimetry can be an accurate verification of reference and absolute dose typically measured with ion chambers. Use of multiple suitable detectors and uncertainty analyses were recommended for reliable determination of small field radiation outputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Jermain
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Bryan Muir
- Metrology Research Centre, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Malcolm McEwen
- Metrology Research Centre, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ying Niu
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Dalong Pang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Das IJ, Khan AU, Dogan SK, Longo M. Grid/lattice therapy: consideration of small field dosimetry. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1088-1098. [PMID: 38552328 PMCID: PMC11135801 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Small-field dosimetry used in special procedures such as gamma knife, Cyberknife, Tomotherapy, IMRT, and VMAT has been in evolution after several radiation incidences with very significant (70%) errors due to poor understanding of the dosimetry. IAEA-TRS-483 and AAPM-TG-155 have provided comprehensive information on small-fields dosimetry in terms of code of practice and relative dosimetry. Data for various detectors and conditions have been elaborated. It turns out that with a suitable detectors dose measurement accuracy can be reasonably (±3%) achieved for 6 MV beams for fields >1×1 cm2. For grid therapy, even though the treatment is performed with small fields created by either customized blocks, multileaf collimator (MLC), or specialized devices, it is multiple small fields that creates combined treatment. Hence understanding the dosimetry in collection of holes of small field is a separate challenge that needs to be addressed. It is more critical to understand the scattering conditions from multiple holes that form the treatment grid fields. Scattering changes the beam energy (softer) and hence dosimetry protocol needs to be properly examined for having suitable dosimetric parameters. In lieu of beam parameter unavailability in physical grid devices, MLC-based forward and inverse planning is an alternative path for bulky tumours. Selection of detectors in small field measurement is critical and it is more critical in mixed beams created by scattering condition. Ramification of small field concept used in grid therapy along with major consideration of scattering condition is explored. Even though this review article is focussed mainly for dosimetry for low-energy megavoltage photon beam (6 MV) but similar procedures could be adopted for high energy beams. To eliminate small field issues, lattice therapy with the help of MLC is a preferrable choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Ahtesham Ullah Khan
- San Bortolo Hospital, Medical Physics Department, Viale F. Rodolfi 37, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
| | - Serpil K Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Mariaconcetta Longo
- San Bortolo Hospital, Medical Physics Department, Viale F. Rodolfi 37, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu K, Velasquez B, Schüler E. Technical note: High-dose and ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) evaluation of Al 2 O 3 :C optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter nanoDots and powdered LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for radiation therapy applications. Med Phys 2024; 51:2311-2319. [PMID: 37991111 PMCID: PMC10939935 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dosimetry in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beamlines poses a significant challenge owing to the limited usability of standard dosimeters in high dose and high dose-per-pulse (DPP) applications. PURPOSE In this study, Al2 O3 :C nanoDot optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs), single-use powder-based LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), and Gafchromic EBT3 film were evaluated at extended dose ranges (up to 40 Gy) in conventional dose rate (CONV) and UHDR beamlines to determine their usability for calibration and dose verification in the setting of FLASH radiation therapy. METHODS OSLDs and TLDs were evaluated against established dose-rate-independent Gafchromic EBT3 film with regard to the potential influence of mean dose rate, instantaneous dose rate, and DPP on signal response. The dosimeters were irradiated at CONV or UHDR conditions on a 9-MeV electron beam. Under UHDR conditions, different settings of pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude were used to characterize the individual dosimeters' response in order to isolate their potential dependencies on dose, dose rate, and DPP. RESULTS The OSLDs, TLDs, and Gafchromic EBT3 film were found to be suitable at a dose range of up to 40 Gy without any indication of saturation in signal. The response of OSLDs and TLDs in UHDR conditions were found to be independent of mean dose rate (up to 1440 Gy/s), instantaneous dose rate (up to 2 MGy/s), and DPP (up to 7 Gy), with uncertainties on par with nominal values established in CONV beamlines (± 4%). In cross-comparing the response of OSLDs, TLDs and Gafchromic film at dose rates of 0.18-245 Gy/s, the coefficient of variation or relative standard deviation in the measured dose between the three dosimeters (inter-dosimeter comparison) was found to be within 2%. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the dynamic range of OSLDs, TLDs, and Gafchromic film to be suitable up to 40 Gy, and we developed a protocol that can be used to accurately translate the measured signal in each respective dosimeter to dose. OSLDs and powdered TLDs were shown to be viable for dosimetric measurement in UHDR beamlines, providing dose measurements with accuracies on par with Gafchromic EBT3 film and their concurrent use demonstrating a means for redundant dosimetry in UHDR conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brett Velasquez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emil Schüler
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Das IJ, Sohn JJ, Lim SN, Sengupta B, Feijoo M, Yadav P. Characteristics of a plastic scintillation detector in photon beam dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14209. [PMID: 37983685 PMCID: PMC10795454 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plastic scintillating detectors (PSD) have gained popularity due to small size and are ideally suited in small-field dosimetry due to no correction needed and hence detector reading can be compared to dose. Likewise, these detectors are active and water equivalent. A new PSD from Blue Physics is characterized in photon beam. PURPOSE Innovation in small-field dosimetry detector has led us to examine Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for use in photon beams from linear accelerator. METHODS BP-PSD was acquired and its characteristics were evaluated in photon beams from a Varian TrueBeam. Data were collected in a 3D water tank. Standard parameters; dose, dose rate, energy, angular dependence and temperature dependence were studied. Depth dose, profiles and output in a reference condition as well as small fields were measured. RESULTS BP-PSD is versatile and provides data very similar to an ion chamber when Cerenkov radiation is properly accounted. This device measures data pulse by pulse which very few detectors can perform. The differences between ion chamber data and PSD are < 2% in most cases. The angular dependence is a bit pronounces to 1.5% which is due to PSD housing. Depth dose and profiles are comparable within < 1% to an ion chamber. For small fields this detector provides suitable field output factor compared to other detectors and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated data without any added correction factor. CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of Blue Physics PSD is uniquely suitable in photon beam and more so in small fields. The data are reproducible compared to ion chamber for most parameters and ideally suitable for small-field dosimetry without any correction factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J. Das
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Jooyoung J. Sohn
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Sara N. Lim
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Bishwambhar Sengupta
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tahmasbi M, Capela M, Santos T, Mateus J, Ventura T, do Carmo Lopes M. Particular issues to be considered in small field dosimetry for TrueBeam STx commissioning. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 202:111066. [PMID: 37865066 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to report the relevant issues concerning small fields in the commissioning of a TrueBeam STx for photon energies of 6MV, 10MV, 6FFF, and 10FFF. Percent depth doses, profiles, and field output factors were measured according to the beam model configuration of the treatment planning system. Multiple detectors were used based on the IAEA TRS-483 protocol as well as EBT3 radiochromic film. Analytical Anisotropic and Acuros XB algorithms, were configured and validated through basic dosimetry comparisons and end-to-end clinical tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marziyeh Tahmasbi
- Radiologic Technology Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran; Medical Physics Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.
| | - Miguel Capela
- Medical Physics Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Tania Santos
- Medical Physics Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Josefina Mateus
- Medical Physics Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Tiago Ventura
- Medical Physics Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Maria do Carmo Lopes
- Medical Physics Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Coimbra Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mateus D, Greco C, Peralta L. Field output correction factors of small static field for IBA razor nanochamber. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 10:015004. [PMID: 37939486 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad0ae0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose.The goal of this work is present results of field output factors (OF) using an IBA CC003 (Razor NanoChamber) and compare these results with PTW 60019 (MicroDiamond) and IBA Razor Diode. The experimental results for IBA CC003 were also compared with Monte Carlo (MC) Simulation, using Penelope and Ulysses programs. In addition, field output correction factors (kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr) for IBA CC003 were derived with three different methods: (1) using PTW 60019 and IBA Razor as reference detectors; (2) comparison between MC and experimental measurements; and (3) using only MC.Material and Methods. The beam collimation included in this study were (1) square field size between 10 × 10 and 0.5 × 0.5 cm2defined by the MLC and jaws and (2) cones of different diameters. For IBA CC003 it was determined the polarity and ion collection efficiency correction factors in parallel and perpendicular orientation.Results.The results indicate (1) the variation of polarity effect with the field size is relevant for the determination of OF using IBA CC003, especially for parallel orientation; (2) there is no significant variation of the ion collection efficiency with the field size using IBA CC003 in parallel orientation; (3) OF differences between IBA CC003 and PTW 60019/IBA Razor, and experimental and MC results, increase with decreasing field size;ThekQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrresults indicate (1) using the first and second method,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrincrease with decreasing field size, which can be related with the influence of the volume effect and (2) using the third method,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrdecrease with decreasing field size, which can be explained by the perturbation effect.Conclusions. Our results demonstrate the need of applyingkQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor IBA CC003 forSclin≤1 cm, to compensate for volume averaging and perturbations effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mateus
- Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Mercurius Health S.A, Lisboa, Portugal
- Fundação Champalimaud, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - C Greco
- Fundação Champalimaud, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - L Peralta
- Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ringholz J, Sauer OA, Wegener S. Small field output correction factors at 18 MV. Med Phys 2023; 50:7177-7191. [PMID: 37531177 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The response of various detectors in the radiotherapy energy range has been investigated, especially for 6 and 10 MV energies for small fields, and is summarized in TRS-483. However, data for accelerator energies above 10 MV are sparse or unavailable for many detectors, especially for the energy of 18 MV. Small variations in field output factors for the commissioning of a treatment planning system can have a high impact on calculation of dose distributions. PURPOSE Many studies describe an energy dependence of the response for a large number of detectors. We wanted to close the gap for the 18 MV energy regime and determined field output correction factors for different detectors at 18 MV. METHODS An ELEKTA Versa HD accelerator at 18 MV was used together with a PTW MP3 water phantom at an SSD of 90 cm. The following detectors were examined: PTW Semiflex 31021, PinPoint 3D 31022, diode 60012, diode 60008 and microDiamond 60019, Sun Nuclear EDGE detector, IBA PFD, SFD, Razor Chamber, Razor Nano Chamber and Razor Diode, Standard Imaging Scintillator Exradin W2 1x3, W2 1x1 and Gafchromic EBT3 film. The dose response was determined at a depth of 10 cm for square fields between 0.5 and 10 cm side length. As reference data a composure of radiochromic film data for small fields (s ≤ 3 $s\le 3$ cm) and data of all compatible chambers for larger fields (s ≥ 3 $s\ge 3$ cm) was used. The effective field sizes of small fields were determined from profiles obtained on radiochromic film. The obtained field output correction factors obey the rules of the TRS-483 protocol. RESULTS The W2 1x1 scintillator and the Razor Chamber showed the smallest deviations from the reference curve. The shielded diodes (diode 60008, EDGE detector) showed the highest over-response at small fields, followed by PFD, microDiamond and the unshielded diodes (diode 60012, SFD). The ionization chambers exhibited the well-known volume effect, that is, strong under-response at small fields of up to 9% for the PinPoint 3D, 7% for the Razor Chamber and up to 30% for the Semiflex detector for the smallest studied field size. The small chambers showed a polarity effect in axial orientation, especially the Razor Nano Chamber. Corrections at 18 MV are generally larger than those provided by TRS-483, continuing the trend of increasing corrections between 6 and 10 MV also at a higher accelerator energy. Only the PinPoint 3D Chamber showed a slightly smaller correction. CONCLUSIONS Field output correction factors were determined for square field sizes between 0.5 and 10 cm at 18 MV. Most detectors needed a larger correction than at 6 and 10 MV. Thus, the use of correction factors will improve beam data for 18 MV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Ringholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Timakova E, Bazalova-Carter M, Zavgorodni S. Characterization of a 0.8 mm 3Medscint plastic scintillator detector system for small field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:175040. [PMID: 37494941 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aceacf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) have demonstrated ability to meet requirements of small field dosimetry. Medscint developed a 1 mm long, 1 mm diameter cylindrical PSD with effective volume of 0.8 mm3. Clinically relevant, small field dosimetric properties of this detector, combined with a novel scintillation dosimetry system-HYPERSCINT RP-200, and HYPERDOSE analysis software were evaluated in this study.Approach. This novel scintillator-based dosimetry system was characterized with 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF x-ray beams delivered by Varian TrueBeamTMlinear accelerator. The detector was characterized for leakage, short-term repeatability, dose response linearity, angular response, dose rate response, and field size dependence for radiation field sizes of 0.25 × 0.25 to 10 × 10 cm2. Measured detector specific output ratios were compared with microDiamond output factors to determine small field output correction factors,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr.Main results. The dosimetry system showed excellent short-term repeatability with standard deviation of only 0.04 ± 0.01%. It demonstrated good dose linearity with variations less than 1.0% for 14.4 cGy and above. The dosimetry system was found to be independent of dose rate and angle of irradiation, with deviations for both below 0.5%. Leakage was found to be comparable to background readings. For 6 MV-WFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 1 × 1 cm2agreed with output factors measured with PTW TN60019 microDiamond, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes. For 10 MV-FFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 2 × 2 cm2agreed with PTW TN60019 microDiamond output factors, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes.kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor field sizes down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2were determined to be within 6% of unity for both 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF energy beams.Significance. The HYPERSCINT RP-200 dosimetry system coupled with a 0.8 mm3PSD showed excellent dosimetric properties and was found to be clinically relevant for relative dosimetry down to field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2and potentially smaller.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Timakova
- University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sergei Zavgorodni
- University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guillochon N, Balde M, Popotte C, Pondard S, Desport C, Kien N, Carbillet F, Moreno R, Munier M. Validation of a New Scintillating Fiber Dosimeter for Radiation Dose Quality Control in Computed Tomography. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:2614. [PMID: 36904817 PMCID: PMC10007295 DOI: 10.3390/s23052614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: The IVIscan is a commercially available scintillating fiber detector designed for quality assurance and in vivo dosimetry in computed tomography (CT). In this work, we investigated the performance of the IVIscan scintillator and associated method in a wide range of beam width from three CT manufacturers and compared it to a CT chamber designed for Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) measurements. (2) Methods: We measured weighted CTDI (CTDIw) with each detector in accordance with the requirements of regulatory tests and international recommendations for the minimum, maximum and the most used beam width in clinic and investigated the accuracy of the IVIscan system based on the assessment of the CTDIw deviation from the CT chamber. We also investigated the IVIscan accuracy for the whole range of the CT scans kV. (3) Results: We found excellent agreement between the IVIscan scintillator and the CT chamber for the whole range of beam widths and kV, especially for wide beams used on recent technology of CT scans. (4) Conclusions: These findings highlight that the IVIscan scintillator is a relevant detector for CT radiation dose assessments, and the method associated with calculating the CTDIw saves a significant amount of time and effort when performing tests, especially with regard to new CT technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mamoutou Balde
- Fibermetrix, 7 Allée de l’Europe, 67960 Entzheim, France
| | - Christian Popotte
- Fibermetrix, 7 Allée de l’Europe, 67960 Entzheim, France
- INSERM U1296 Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mélodie Munier
- Fibermetrix, 7 Allée de l’Europe, 67960 Entzheim, France
- ALARA Group, 67960 Entzheim, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ringholz J, Wegener S, Sauer OA. Technical note: Determining equivalent squares of high-energetic photon fields. Med Phys 2023; 50:1242-1250. [PMID: 36289176 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed a method based on a physical pencil beam model for accurate equivalent square calculations for rectangular and irregular fields, for different definitions of equivalent squares, for beams with and without flattening filter, different photon energies, and depths in water. METHODS We considered two equivalent square definitions: equal dose at a point on the beam axis and equal depth dose, measured as tissue phantom ratio at 20 and 10 cm depth ( TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ ). As dose engine, we used an analytical pencil beam model. By integrating the pencil beam kernels, we assigned square fields to rectangular fields minimizing the dose, respectively, the TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ difference. The results were compared with measurements at 100 mm depth for nominal beam energies of 6 and 18 MV, the Sterling equation, the geometric mean, and data from BJR Suppl 25 (British Institute of Radiology, 1996). RESULTS Pencil beam results were closest to the measurements. An energy dependence of several millimeters for small field dimensions and depth dependencies for very elongated fields were observed. For the assignment of WFF square to FFF rectangular fields, using the equal- TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ definition, our method agrees with previously published results. For circular fields approximated by leaves, we found deviations to the data from BJR Suppl. 25 below 1 mm for diameters smaller than 200 mm. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that the validity range for geometric mean and Sterling equation is limited. Ergo, instead of specifying specific validity ranges, we suggest using the pencil beam method, valid for all aspect ratios, including elongated fields in the primary dose dominated regime. We published our method as python library and graphical user interface on GitHub. Users can choose between two definitions of equivalent square and between WFF and FFF fields. The implemented pencil beam method for irregular fields is also usable for quality assurance such as monitor unit checks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Ringholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Otto Andreas Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Small field output factor measurement and verification for CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy and radiosurgery system using 3D polymer gel, ionization chamber, diode, diamond and scintillator detectors, Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 192:110576. [PMID: 36473319 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The dosimetry of small fields has become tremendously important with the advent of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery, where small field segments or very small fields are used to treat tumors. With high dose gradients in the stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy treatment, small field dosimetry becomes challenging due to the lack of lateral electronic equilibrium in the field, x-ray source occlusion, and detector volume averaging. Small volume and tissue-equivalent detectors are recommended to overcome the challenges. With the lack of a perfect radiation detector, studies on available detectors are ongoing with reasonable disagreement and uncertainties. The joint IAEA and AAPM international code of practice (CoP) for small field dosimetry, TRS 483 (Alfonso et al., 2017) provides guidelines and recommendations for the dosimetry of small static fields in external beam radiotherapy. The CoP provides a methodology for field output factor (FOF) measurements and use of field output correction factors for a series of small field detectors and strongly recommends additional measurements, data collection and verification for CyberKnife (CK) robotic stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery system using the listed detectors and more new detectors so that the FOFs can be implemented clinically. The present investigation is focused on using 3D gel along with some other commercially available detectors for the measurement and verification of field output factors (FOFs) for the small fields available in the CK system. The FOF verification was performed through a comparison with published data and Monte Carlo simulation. The results of this study have proved the suitability of an in-house developed 3D polymer gel dosimeter, several commercially available detectors, and Gafchromic films as a part of small field dosimetric measurements for the CK system.
Collapse
|
18
|
Yadav P, DesRosiers CM, Mitra RK, Srivastava SP, Das IJ. Variability of Low-Z Inhomogeneity Correction in IMRT/SBRT: A Multi-Institutional Collaborative Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12030906. [PMID: 36769553 PMCID: PMC9918128 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Dose-calculation algorithms are critical for radiation treatment outcomes that vary among treatment planning systems (TPS). Modern algorithms use sophisticated radiation transport calculation with detailed three-dimensional beam modeling to provide accurate doses, especially in heterogeneous medium and small fields used in IMRT/SBRT. While the dosimetric accuracy in heterogeneous mediums (lung) is qualitatively known, the accuracy is unknown. The aim of this work is to analyze the calculated dose in lung patients and compare the validity of dose-calculation algorithms by measurements in a low-Z phantom for two main classes of algorithms: type A (pencil beam) and type B (collapse cone). The CT scans with volumes (target and organs at risk, OARs) of a lung patient and a phantom build to replicate the human lung data were sent to nine institutions for planning. Doses at different depths and field sizes were measured in the phantom with and without inhomogeneity correction across multiple institutions to understand the impact of clinically used dose algorithms. Wide dosimetric variations were observed in target and OAR coverage in patient plans. The correction factor for collapsed cone algorithms was less than pencil beam algorithms in the small fields used in SBRT. The pencil beam showed ≈70% variations between measured and calculated correction factors for various field sizes and depths. For large field sizes the trends of both types of algorithms were similar. The differences in measured versus calculated dose for type-B algorithms were within ±10%. Significant variations in the target and OARs were observed among various TPS. The results suggest that the pencil beam algorithm does not provide an accurate dose and should not be considered with small fields (IMRT/SBRT). Type-B collapsed-cone algorithms provide better agreement with measurements, but still vary among various systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poonam Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Colleen M. DesRosiers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Raj K. Mitra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA
| | - Shiv P. Srivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dignity Health System, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Indra J. Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-312-926-6448 or +1-215-385-4523
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ferrer C, Huertas C, García D, Sáez M. Dosimetric characterization of a novel commercial plastic scintillation detector with an MR-Linac. Med Phys 2023; 50:2525-2539. [PMID: 36611266 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plastic scintillators have been used as radiation detectors for the past few years, as they are water-equivalent and independent of the dose, dose rate, and angle of incidence. In addition, they are also independent of the presence of a magnetic field and could be used for in vivo dosimetry in an MR-Linac. With the advent of a new commercial scintillation detector, Blue Physics Model 10, its characterization has been performed on an MR-Linac with a view to future applications. PURPOSE To perform the dosimetric characterization and study potential applications of a novel commercial plastic scintillation detector in a MR-Linac. METHODS Scintillation detector description, calibration procedure, short-term repeatability, dose-response linearity, dose-rate dependence, angular dependence, and temperature dependence have been studied. Percent-depth-dose (PDD) and beam profiles were measured for small fields and a standard field, as well as output factors, for comparison with other PTW detectors: a diamond diode and PinPoint and Semiflex 3D ionization chambers. The suitability of the plastic scintillator for in vivo dosimetry in a magnetic field has also been studied measuring the dose to a point in an anthropomorphic phantom while acquiring MR imaging. This measured dose was compared with that calculated with Monaco planning system and with that measured with a PTW Semiflex 3D chamber, the latter without acquiring MR images. RESULTS Short-term repeatability presented negligible variations (<0.4%) for 100 and 20 MU. Similar results were obtained for dose-response linearity and dose-rate dependence. A small angular dependence was determined, while the scintillator resulted practically independent of the temperature. PDDs showed excellent agreement except in the build-up region, and calculated penumbras with the profiles given by the scintillator were between the ones obtained with the diamond detector and the PinPoint ionization chamber. Measured OF with the scintillator were the highest between all detectors, 1.26% higher than the value obtained with the microdiamond for the smallest field measured, 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 . Finally, the total dose to a point measured with the scintillator was 0.51% higher compared to that calculated by the planning system. CONCLUSION The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation system showed excellent dosimetric characteristics. Its response independent of the temperature and the presence of a magnetic field make it suitable for in vivo dosimetry in an MR-Linac while acquiring MR images, which could solve the impossibility of performing a dosimetric QA for each adapted plan. Furthermore, its temporal resolution allows independent radiation pulses to be measured and visualized, which could be used in future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Ferrer
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Concepción Huertas
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - David García
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Moisés Sáez
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wu NG. Extending the Eclipse TM AcurosXB output factor table for small field radiosurgery. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13877. [PMID: 36585844 PMCID: PMC9859982 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the necessity of extending the output factor table (OF Table) of the Varian EclipseTM Treatment Planning System for small field stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT) treatments. METHODS A new AcurosXB 15.6 beam model was created in the Eclipse Beam Configuration, which is identical to the one that has been used in the clinic with a default 3 × 3 cm to 40 × 40 cm OF Table, except the OF Table in the new model was extended to cover the range from 1 × 1 cm to 40 × 40 cm. 80 small square and rectangular output factors were measured on a Varian TrueBeam utilizing a Standard Imaging Exradin W2-1×1 scintillator detector, inside a PTW BeamScan water tank with 95 cm SSD at 5 cm depth. Cerenkov contamination was corrected using a rectangular field method (2 cm × 15 cm field). Nine Radiosurgery plans with primary jaw setting ranging from 0.7 cm to 2.0 cm were evaluated by both beam models. The monitor unit (MU) differences between the two beam models were calculated for identical 3-dimensional (3D) absolute dose distributions. Output factors, measured versus Eclipse calculated, were compared down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm primary jaw setting. RESULTS For the 6FFF beam, the difference between the two beam models was ∼ 6% for 1 × 1 cm jaw settings and 4% at 1.5 × 1.5 cm, with the extended OF Table requiring higher MUs for the same dose prescription and same 3-dimensional isodose distribution. For the 6MV beam, the corresponding difference is ∼7.5% for 1 × 1 cm, 5% for 1.5 × 1.5 cm, and 3% for 2 × 2 cm jaw settings, with the extended OF Table requiring higher MUs. For jaw settings smaller than 1 × 1 cm, measured dose can be considerably smaller than Eclipse predicted dose, even with the OF Table extension. This is reflected by the fact that the output factor for 0.5 × 0.5 cm, calculated via Eclipse external beam, was more than 30% greater than that measured for both 6FFF and 6MV beams. CONCLUSIONS Eclipse does a satisfactory job for primary jaw sizes down to 2 cm. For jaw settings smaller than 1.5 cm, the OF Table in Eclipse should be extended to improve the dose calculation accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Genevieve Wu
- Department of Radiation MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Esteves J, Pivot O, Ribouton J, Jalade P, Zouaoui A, Desbat L, Rit S, Blanc F, Haefeli G, Hopchev P, Galvan JM, Lu GN, Pittet P. A novel QA phantom based on scintillating fiber ribbons with implementation of 2D dose tomography for small-field radiotherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:619-632. [PMID: 35933612 PMCID: PMC10087208 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel instrument for real-time quality assurance (QA) procedures in radiotherapy. The system implements a scintillation-based phantom and associated signal acquisition and processing modules and aims to monitor two-dimensional (2D) dose distributions of small fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the proposed phantom, we have designed and realized a prototype implementing six high-resolution tissue-equivalent scintillating fiber ribbons stacked with in-plane 30° rotated orientations from each other. Each ribbon output is coupled to a silicon photodiode linear array (with an element pitch of 400 μm) to detect scintillating signal, which represents the projected irradiation profile perpendicular to the ribbon's orientation. For the system providing six acquired projected dose profiles at different orientations, we have developed a two-step signal processing method to perform 2D dose reconstruction. The first step is to determine irradiation field geometry parameters using a tomographic geometry approach, and the second one is to perform specific penumbra estimation. The QA system prototype has been tested on a Novalis TrueBeam STX with a 6-MV photon beam for small elliptic fields defined by 5- and 10-mm cone collimators and for 10 × 10- and 20 × 10-mm2 rectangular fields defined by the micro-multileaf collimator. Gamma index analysis using EBT3 films as reference has been carried out with tight 2%-dose-difference (DD)/700-μm-distance-to-agreement (DTA) as well as 1%-DD/1-mm-DTA criteria for evaluating the system performances. The testing also includes an evaluation of the proposed two-step field reconstruction method in comparison with two conventional methods: filtered back projection (FBP) and simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT). RESULTS The reconstructed 2D dose distributions have gamma index pass rates higher than 95% for all the tested configurations as compared with EBT3 film measurements with both 2%-DD/700-μm-DTA and 1%-DD/1-mm criteria. 2D global gamma analysis shows that the two-step and FBP radiation field reconstruction methods systematically outperform the SIRT approach. Moreover, higher gamma index success rates are obtained with the two-step method than with FBP in the case of the fields defined with the stereotactic cones. CONCLUSIONS The proposed small-field QA system makes a use of six water-equivalent scintillating detectors (fiber ribbons) to acquire dose distribution. The developed two-step signal processing method performs tomographic 2D dose reconstruction. A system prototype has been built and tested using hospital facilities with small rectangular and elliptic fields. Testing results show 2D reconstructed dose distributions with high accuracy and resolution. Such a system could potentially be an alternative approach to film dosimetry for small-field QA, which is still widely used as reference in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josué Esteves
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Odran Pivot
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | - Julien Ribouton
- Service de Radiophysique et Radiovigilance, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Patrice Jalade
- Service de Radiophysique et Radiovigilance, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Abdelaali Zouaoui
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Laurent Desbat
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | - Simon Rit
- Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, CREATIS, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Jean-Marc Galvan
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Guo-Neng Lu
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Patrick Pittet
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270, Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thrower S, Prajapati S, Holmes S, Schüler E, Beddar S. Characterization of the Plastic Scintillator Detector System Exradin W2 in a High Dose Rate Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beam. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:6785. [PMID: 36146135 PMCID: PMC9505273 DOI: 10.3390/s22186785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: The Exradin W2 is a commercially available scintillator detector designed for reference and relative dosimetry in small fields. In this work, we investigated the performance of the W2 scintillator in a 10 MV flattening-filter-free photon beam and compared it to the performance of ion chambers designed for small field measurements. (2) Methods: We measured beam profiles and percent depth dose curves with each detector and investigated the linearity of each system based on dose per pulse (DPP) and pulse repetition frequency. (3) Results: We found excellent agreement between the W2 scintillator and the ion chambers for beam profiles and percent depth dose curves. Our results also showed that the two-voltage method of calculating the ion recombination correction factor was sufficient to correct for the ion recombination effect of ion chambers, even at the highest DPP. (4) Conclusions: These findings show that the W2 scintillator shows excellent agreement with ion chambers in high DPP conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Thrower
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Surendra Prajapati
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Medical Physics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Medical Physics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Medical Physics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Evaluation of calibration methods of Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for CyberKnife small-field dosimetry. RADIAT MEAS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2022.106821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
24
|
Jacqmin DJ, Miller JR, Barraclough BA, Labby ZE. Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13728. [PMID: 35861648 PMCID: PMC9359019 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery. Methods Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector. Results W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements. Conclusion The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin J Jacqmin
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jessica R Miller
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Brendan A Barraclough
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zacariah E Labby
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Parveen N, Ramachandran P, Seshadri V, Perrett B, Fielding A. Comparison and Validation of Multiple Detectors against Monte Carlo Simulation for the Use of Small-Field Dosimetry. J Med Phys 2022; 47:235-242. [PMID: 36684698 PMCID: PMC9847003 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_35_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to compare the Exradin W2 scintillator, PTW microDiamond, IBA Razor Nano, and IBA Razor chamber detectors for small-field dose measurements and validate the measured data against the EGSnrc user code and observe the variation between daisy-chained and direct measurement methods for the above detectors. Materials and Methods The W2 scintillator, microDiamond, Razor Nano, and Razor chamber detectors were used to measure the in-plane and cross-plane profiles and the output factors (OFs) at 10 cm depth, and 90 source-to-surface distance for 6MV X-rays (Elekta Versa HD). The field sizes ranged from 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm to 5 cm × 5 cm. The BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc user codes (EGSnrc) were used to simulate the reference profiles. Gamma analysis was performed to compare the measured and simulated dose distributions. Results The OFs measured with the W2 scintillator, microDiamond, Razor Nano chamber, Razor chamber, and the calculated Monte Carlo (MC) showed agreement to within 1% for the 3 cm × 3 cm field size. The uncertainty in the MC simulation was observed to be 0.4%. The percent difference in OFs measured using daisy-chained and direct measurement methods was within 0.15%, 0.4%, 1.4%, and 2.4% for microDiamond, W2 scintillator, Nano, and Razor chamber detectors, respectively. Conclusion The lateral beam profiles and OFs of W2 scintillator, microDiamond, Razor Nano, and Razor chambers exhibit good agreement with the MC simulation within the nominal field sizes. Our results demonstrate that we can achieve considerable time-saving by directly measuring small-field OFs without daisy-chained methods using microDiamond and W2 scintillator. In terms of ease of use, sensitivity, reproducibility, and from a practical standpoint, we recommend microDiamond for small-field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Parveen
- Therapeutic Physics, Radiation Oncology, Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Prabhakar Ramachandran
- Therapeutic Physics, Radiation Oncology, Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Venkatakrishnan Seshadri
- Therapeutic Physics, Radiation Oncology, Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ben Perrett
- Therapeutic Physics, Radiation Oncology, Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Fielding
- School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Han B, Capaldi D, Kovalchuk N, Simiele E, White J, Zaks D, Xing L, Surucu M. Beam commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13607. [PMID: 35482018 PMCID: PMC9194984 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This study reports the beam commissioning results for the first clinical RefleXion Linac. Methods: The X1 produces a 6 MV photon beam and the maximum clinical field size is 40 × 2 cm2 at source‐to‐axis distance of 85 cm. Treatment fields are collimated by a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) system with 64 leaves with width of 0.625 cm and y‐jaw pairs to provide either a 1 or 2 cm opening. The mechanical alignment of the radiation source, the y‐jaw, and MLC were checked with film and ion chambers. The beam parameters were characterized using a diode detector in a compact water tank. In‐air lateral profiles and in‐water percentage depth dose (PDD) were measured for beam modeling of the treatment planning system (TPS). The lateral profiles, PDDs, and output factors were acquired for field sizes from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm2 field to verify the beam modeling. The rotational output variation and synchronicity were tested to check the gantry angle, couch motion, and gantry rotation. Results: The source misalignments were 0.049 mm in y‐direction, 0.66% out‐of‐focus in x‐direction. The divergence of the beam axis was 0.36 mm with a y‐jaw twist of 0.03°. Clinical off‐axis treatment fields shared a common center in y‐direction were within 0.03 mm. The MLC misalignment and twist were 0.57 mm and 0.15°. For all measured fields ranging from the size from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm2, the mean difference between measured and TPS modeled PDD at 10 cm depth was −0.3%. The mean transverse profile difference in the field core was −0.3% ± 1.1%. The full‐width half maximum (FWHM) modeling was within 0.5 mm. The measured output factors agreed with TPS within 0.8%. Conclusions: This study summarizes our specific experience commissioning the first novel RefleXion linac, which may assist future users of this technology when implementing it into their own clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dante Capaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Eric Simiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - John White
- RefleXion Medical, Hayward, California, USA
| | | | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dose area product primary standards established by graphite calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB for small radiation fields in radiotherapy. Phys Med 2022; 98:18-27. [PMID: 35489128 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present primary standards establishment in terms of Dose Area Product (DAP) for small field sizes. METHODS A large section graphite calorimeter and two plane-parallel ionization chambers were designed and built in-house. These chambers were calibrated in a 6MV FFF beam at the maximum dose rate of 1400 UM/min for fields defined by specifically designed circular collimators of 5, 7.5, 10, 13 and 15 mm diameter and jaws of 5, 7, 10, 13 and 15 mm side length on a Varian TrueBeam linac. RESULTS The two chambers show the same behaviour regardless of field shape and size. From 5 to 15 mm, calibration coefficients slightly increase with the field size with a magnitude of 1.8% and 1.1% respectively for the two chambers, and are independent of the field shape. This tendency was confirmed by Monte Carlo calculations. The average associated uncertainty of the calibration coefficients is around 0.6% at k=1. CONCLUSIONS For the first time, primary standards in terms of DAP were established by graphite calorimetry for an extended range of small field sizes. These promising results open the door for an alternative approach in small fields dosimetry.
Collapse
|
28
|
Das IJ, Dogan SK, Gopalakrishnan M, Ding GX, Longo M, Franscescon P. Validity of equivalent square field concept in small field dosimetry. Med Phys 2022; 49:4043-4055. [PMID: 35344220 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The equivalent Square (ES) concept has been used for traditional radiation fields defined by the machine collimating system. For small fields, the concept Sclin was introduced based on measuring dosimetric field width (full-width half maximum, FWHM) of the cardinal axis of the beam profiles. The pros and cons of this concept are evaluated in small fields and compared with the traditional ES using area and perimeter (4A/P) method based on geometric field size settings e.g. light field settings. METHODS One hundred thirty-seven square and rectangular fields from 5-50 mm with every possible permutation (keeping one jaw fixed and varying other jaw from 5 mm to 50 mm) were utilized to measure FWHM for the validation of Sclin . Using a microSilicon detector and a scanning water tank, measurements were performed on an Elekta (Versa) machine with Agility head and a Varian TrueBeam with different MLC/Jaw design to evaluate the Sclin concept and to understand the effect of exchange factor in small fields. Field output factors were also measured for all 137 fields. RESULTS The data fitting for fields ranging from 5-50 mm between the traditional 4A/P method and Sclin shows differences and indicates a linear relationship with distinct separation of slope for Elekta and Varian machines. As Elekta does not have y jaws, the ES based on 4A/P < Sclin but for the Varian linac 4A/P > Sclin for square fields. Our measured data shows that both methods are equally valid but does vary by the machine design. The field output factor is dependent on the elongation factor as well as machine design. For fields with sides ≥10 mm, the exchange factor is nearly identical in both machines with magnitude up to 4% which is close to measurement uncertainty (±3%) but for small fields (<10 mm) the Elekta machine has higher exchange factors compared to the Varian machine. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that the two concepts for defining equivalent field (Sclin and 4A/P) are equivalent and can be directly related through an empirical equation. This study confirms that 4A/P is still valid for small fields except for very small fields (≤10 mm) where source occlusion is a dominating factor. The Sclin method is potentially sensitive to measurement uncertainty due to measurement of FWHM which is machine, detector and user dependent, while the 4A/P method relies mainly on geometry of the machine and has less dependency on type of machine, detector and user. The exchange factors are comparable for both types of machines. The conclusion is based on data from an Elekta with Agility head and a Varian TrueBeam machine that may have potential for bias due to light field/collimator set up and alignment. Care should be taken in extrapolating these data to any other machine. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Serpil K Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Mariaconcetta Longo
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ospedale Di Vicenza, Viale Rodolfi, Vicenza, 36100, Italy
| | - Paolo Franscescon
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ospedale Di Vicenza, Viale Rodolfi, Vicenza, 36100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brown TAD, Ayers RG, Popple RA. Commissioning a multileaf collimator virtual cone for the stereotactic radiosurgery of trigeminal neuralgia. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13562. [PMID: 35157356 PMCID: PMC9121036 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A multileaf collimator (MLC), virtual‐cone treatment technique has been commissioned for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) at Tri‐Cities Cancer Center (TCCC). This novel technique was initially developed at the University of Alabama in Birmingham (UAB); it is designed to produce a spherical dose profile similar to a fixed, 5‐mm conical collimator distribution. Treatment is delivered with a 10‐MV flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beam using a high‐definition MLC on a Varian Edge linear accelerator. Absolute dose output and profile measurements were performed in a 20 × 20 × 14 cm3 solid‐water phantom using an Exradin W2 scintillation detector and Gafchromic EBT3 film. Dose output constancy for the virtual cone was evaluated over 6 months using an Exradin A11 parallel plate chamber. The photo‐neutron dose generated by these treatments was assessed at distances of 50 and 100 cm from isocenter using a Ludlum Model 30–7 Series Neutron Meter. TGN treatments at TCCC have been previously delivered at 6‐MV FFF using a 5‐mm stereotactic cone. To assess the dosimetric impact of using a virtual cone, eight patients previously treated for TGN with a 5‐mm cone were re‐planned using a virtual cone. Seven patients have now been treated for TGN using a virtual cone at TCCC. Patient‐specific quality assurance was performed for each patient using Gafchromic EBT‐XD film inside a Standard Imaging Stereotactic Dose Verification Phantom. The commissioning results demonstrate that the virtual‐cone dosimetry, first described at UAB, is reproducible on a second Edge linear accelerator at an independent clinical site. The virtual cone is a credible alternative to a physical, stereotactic cone for the treatment of TGN at TCCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rex G Ayers
- Northwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA
| | - Richard A Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rudek B, Bernstein K, Osterman S, Qu T. Replacing gamma knife beam-profiles on film with point-detector scans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13522. [PMID: 35001499 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Detector arrays and profile-scans have widely replaced film-measurements for quality assurance (QA) on linear accelerators. Film is still used for relative output factor (ROF) measurements, positioning, and dose-profile verification for annual Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) QA. This study shows that small-field active detector measurements can be performed in the easily accessed clinical mode and that they are an effective replacement to time-consuming and exacting film measurements. METHODS Beam profiles and positioning scans for 4-mm, 8-mm, and 16-mm-collimated fields were collected along the x-, y-, and z-axes. The Exradin W2-scintillator and the PTW microdiamond-detector were placed in custom inserts centered in the Elekta solid-water phantom for these scans. GafChromic EBT3-film was irradiated with single uniformly collimated exposures as the clinical-standard reference, using the same solid-water phantom for profile tests and the Elekta film holder for radiation focal point (RFP)/patient-positioning system (PPS) coincidence. All experimental data were compared to the tissue-maximum-ratio-based (TMR10) dose calculation. RESULTS The detector-measured beam profiles and film-based profiles showed excellent agreement with TMR10-predicted full-width, half-maximum (FWHM) values. Absolute differences between the measured FWHM and FWHM from the treatment-planning system were on average 0.13 mm, 0.08 mm, and 0.04 mm for film, microdiamond, and scintillator, respectively. The coincidence between the RFP and the PPS was measured to be ≤0.5 mm with microdiamond, ≤0.41 mm with the W2-1 × 1 scintillator, and ≤0.22 mm using the film-technique. CONCLUSIONS Small-volume field detectors, used in conjunction with a clinically available phantom, an electrometer with data-logging, and treatment plans created in clinical mode offer an efficient and viable alternative for film-based profile tests. Position verification can be accurately performed when CBCT-imaging is available to correct for residual detector-position uncertainty. Scans are easily set up within the treatment-planning-system and, when coupled with an automated analysis, can provide accurate measurements within minutes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Rudek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sunshine Osterman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tanxia Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hupman MA, Hill IG, Syme A. Measuring small field profiles and output factors with a stemless plastic scintillator array. Med Phys 2021; 49:624-631. [PMID: 34792193 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To fabricate a 1D stemless plastic scintillation detector (SPSD) array using organic photodiodes and to use the detector to measure small field profiles and output factors. METHODS An organic photodiode array was fabricated by spin coating a mixture of P3HT and PCBM organic semiconductors onto an ITO-coated glass substrate and depositing aluminum top contacts. Four bulk scintillators of various dimensions were placed on top of the photodiode array. A fifth scintillator was used that had been segmented by laser etching and the septa filled with black paint. Each detector array was first calibrated using a reference field of 95 cm SSD, 5 cm depth, and 10 × 10 cm2 field size for a 6 MV photon beam. After calibration, profiles were measured for three small field sizes: 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 , 1 × 1 cm2 , and 2 × 2 cm2 . Using the central pixel of the array, output factors were measured for field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 25 × 25 cm2 . Small field profiles were compared to film measurements and output factors compared to ion chamber measurements. RESULTS The segmented scintillator measured profiles that were in good agreement with film for all three field sizes. Output factors agreed to within 1.2% of ion chamber over the field size range of 1 × 1 cm2 to 25 × 25 cm2 . At 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 the segmented scintillator underestimated the output factor compared to film and a microDiamond detector. Bulk scintillators failed to produce a good agreement with film for measured profiles and deviations from ion chamber for output factors were apparent at field sizes below 5 × 5 cm2 . In comparison to a bulk scintillator of dimensions 5 × 5 × 0.5 cm3 the etched scintillator saw a reduction of 5.1, 7.1, and 10.5 times the signal for field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 , 1 × 1 cm2 , and 2 × 2 cm2 , respectively. The reduction of signal comes from reduced cross-talk that was present in all of the bulk scintillator geometries to various degrees. CONCLUSION A 1D SPSD array was demonstrated with various scintillator designs. The etched scintillator array demonstrated excellent small field profile measurements when compared to film and output factors (down to 1 × 1 cm2 field size) when compared to micro ion chamber and diamond detector measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Hupman
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ian G Hill
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Alasdair Syme
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, QEII Health Science Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shi M, Chuang CF, Kovalchuk N, Bush K, Zaks D, Xing L, Surucu M, Han B. Small-field measurement and Monte Carlo model validation of a novel image-guided radiotherapy system. Med Phys 2021; 48:7450-7460. [PMID: 34628666 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The RefleXion™ X1 is a novel radiotherapy system that is designed for image-guided radiotherapy, and eventually, biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT). BgRT is a treatment paradigm that tracks tumor motion using real-time positron emission signals. This study reports the small-field measurement results and the validation of a Monte Carlo (MC) model of the first clinical RefleXion unit. METHODS The RefleXion linear accelerator (linac) produces a 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) photon beam and consists of a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) system with 64 leaves and two pairs of y-jaws. The maximum clinical field size achievable is 400 × 20 mm2 . The y-jaws provide either a 10 or 20 mm opening at source-to-axis distance (SAD) of 850 mm. The width of each MLC leaf at SAD is 6.25 mm. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) and relative beam profiles were acquired using an Edge diode detector in a water tank for field sizes from 12.5 × 10 to 100 × 20 mm2 . Beam profiles were also measured using films. Output factors of fields ranging from 6.25 × 10 to 100 × 20 mm2 were measured using W2 scintillator detector, Edge detector, and films. Output correction factors k of the Edge detector for RefleXion were calculated. An MC model of the linac including pre-MLC beam sources and detailed structures of MLC and lower y-jaws was validated against the measurements. Simulation codes BEAMnrc and GATE were utilized. RESULTS The diode measured PDD at 10 cm depth (PDD10) increases from 53.6% to 56.9% as the field opens from 12.5 × 10 to 100 × 20 mm2 . The W2-measured output factor increases from 0.706 to 1 as the field opens from 6.25 × 10 to 100 × 20 mm2 (reference field size). The output factors acquired by diode and film differ from the W2 results by 1.65% (std = 1.49%) and 2.09% (std = 1.41%) on average, respectively. The profile penumbra and full-width half-maximum (FWHM) measured by diode agree well with the film results with a deviation of 0.60 mm and 0.73% on average, respectively. The averaged beam profile consistency calculated between the diode- and film-measured profiles among different depths is within 1.72%. By taking the W2 measurements as the ground truth, the output correction factors k for Edge detector ranging from 0.958 to 1 were reported. For the MC model validation, the simulated PDD10 agreed within 0.6% to the diode measurement. The MC-simulated output factor differed from the W2 results by 2.3% on average (std = 3.7%), while the MC simulated beam penumbra differed from the diode results by 0.67 mm on average (std = 0.42 mm). The MC FWHM agreed with the diode results to within 1.40% on average. The averaged beam profile consistency calculated between the diode and MC profiles among different depths is less than 1.29%. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the first small-field dosimetry of a clinical RefleXion system. A complete and accurate MC model of the RefleXion linac has been validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengying Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Cynthia F Chuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Karl Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Bin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pinnaduwage DS, Srivastava SP, Yan X, Jani SS, Jenkins C, Barani IJ, Sorensen S. Small-field beam data acquisition, detector dependency, and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system. Med Phys 2021; 48:6121-6136. [PMID: 34260069 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study reports a single-institution experience with beam data acquisition and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded sterotactic radiosurgery unit and investigates detector dependency on field output factors (OFs), off-axis ratios (OARs), and percent depth dose (PDD) measurements within the context of small-field dosimetry. METHODS The delivery platform for this unit consists of a 2.7-MV S-band linear accelerator mounted on coupled gimbals that rotate around a common isocenter (source-to-axis distance [SAD] = 450 mm), allowing for more than 260 noncoplanar beam angles. Beam collimation is achieved via a tungsten collimator wheel with eight circular apertures ranging from 4 mm to 25 mm in diameter. Three diodes (PTW 60012 Diode E, PTW 60018 SRS Diode, and Sun Nuclear EDGE) and a synthetic diamond detector (PTW 60019 micro Diamond [µD] detector) were used for OAR, PDD, and OF measurements. OFs were also acquired with a PTW 31022 PinPoint ionization chamber. Beam scanning was performed using a 3D water tank at depths of 7, 50, 100, 200, and 250 mm with a source-to-surface distance of 450 mm. OFs were measured at the depth of maximum dose (dmax = 7 mm) with the SAD at 450 mm. Gafchromic EBT3 film was used to validate OF and profile measurements and as a reference detector for estimating correction factors for active detector OFs. Deviations in field size, penumbra, and PDDs across the different detectors were quantified. RESULTS Relative OFs (ROFs) for the diodes were within 1.4% for all collimators except for 5 and 7.5 mm, for which SRS Diode measurements were higher by 1.6% and 2.6% versus Diode E. The µD ROFs were within 1.4% of the diode measurements. PinPoint ROFs were lower by >10% for the 4-mm and 5-mm collimators versus the Diode E and µD. Corrections to OFs using EBT3 film as a reference were within 1.2% for all diodes and the µD detector for collimators 10 mm and greater and within 2.0%, 2.8%, and 1.1% for the 7.5-, 5-, and 4-mm collimators, respectively. The maximum difference in full width at half maximum (FWHM) between the Diode E and the other active detectors was for the 25-mm collimator and was 0.09 mm (µD), 0.16 mm (SRS Diode), and 0.65 mm (EDGE). Differences seen in PDDs beyond the depth of dmax were <1% across the three diodes and the µD. FWHM and penumbra measurements made using EBT3 film were within 1.34% and 3.26%, respectively, of the processed profile data entered into the treatment planning system. CONCLUSIONS Minimal differences were seen in OAR and PDD measurements acquired with the diodes and the µD. ROFs measured with the three diodes were within 2.6% and within 1.4% versus the µD. Gafchromic Film measurements provided independent verification of the OAR and OF measurements. Estimated corrections to OFs using film as a reference were <1.6% for the Diode E, EDGE, and µD detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilini S Pinnaduwage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Shiv P Srivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Xiangsheng Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Shyam S Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Igor J Barani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Stephen Sorensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Das IJ, Francescon P, Moran JM, Ahnesjö A, Aspradakis MM, Cheng CW, Ding GX, Fenwick JD, Saiful Huq M, Oldham M, Reft CS, Sauer OA. Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions. Med Phys 2021; 48:e886-e921. [PMID: 34101836 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Small-field dosimetry used in advance treatment technologies poses challenges due to loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium (LCPE), occlusion of the primary photon source, and the limited choice of suitable radiation detectors. These challenges greatly influence dosimetric accuracy. Many high-profile radiation incidents have demonstrated a poor understanding of appropriate methodology for small-field dosimetry. These incidents are a cause for concern because the use of small fields in various specialized radiation treatment techniques continues to grow rapidly. Reference and relative dosimetry in small and composite fields are the subject of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dosimetry code of practice that has been published as TRS-483 and an AAPM summary publication (IAEA TRS 483; Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination, Technical Report Series No. 483; Palmans et al., Med Phys 45(11):e1123, 2018). The charge of AAPM task group 155 (TG-155) is to summarize current knowledge on small-field dosimetry and to provide recommendations of best practices for relative dose determination in small megavoltage photon beams. An overview of the issue of LCPE and the changes in photon beam perturbations with decreasing field size is provided. Recommendations are included on appropriate detector systems and measurement methodologies. Existing published data on dosimetric parameters in small photon fields (e.g., percentage depth dose, tissue phantom ratio/tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratios, and field output factors) together with the necessary perturbation corrections for various detectors are reviewed. A discussion on errors and an uncertainty analysis in measurements is provided. The design of beam models in treatment planning systems to simulate small fields necessitates special attention on the influence of the primary beam source and collimating devices in the computation of energy fluence and dose. The general requirements for fluence and dose calculation engines suitable for modeling dose in small fields are reviewed. Implementations in commercial treatment planning systems vary widely, and the aims of this report are to provide insight for the medical physicist and guidance to developers of beams models for radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Paolo Francescon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Di Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Jean M Moran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anders Ahnesjö
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria M Aspradakis
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Chee-Wai Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John D Fenwick
- Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark Oldham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chester S Reft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik fur Strahlentherapie, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gonod M, Chacon Avila C, Suarez MA, Crouzilles J, Laskri S, Vinchant JF, Aubignac L, Grosjean T. Miniaturized scintillator dosimeter for small field radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33971635 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abffbb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The concept of a miniaturized inorganic scintillator detector is demonstrated in the analysis of the small static photon fields used in external radiation therapy. Such a detector is constituted by a 0.25 mm diameter and 0.48 mm long inorganic scintillating cell (1.6 × 10-5cm3detection volume) efficiently coupled to a narrow 125μm diameter silica optical fiber using a tiny photonic interface (an optical antenna). The response of our miniaturized scintillator detector (MSD) under 6 MV bremsstrahlung beam of various sizes (from 1 × 1 cm2to 4 × 4 cm2) is compared to that of two high resolution reference probes, namely, a micro-diamond detector and a dedicated silicon diode. The spurious Cerenkov signal transmitted through our bare detector is rejected with a basic spectral filtering. The MSD shows a linear response regarding the dose, a repeatability within 0.1% and a radial directional dependence of 0.36% (standard deviations). Beam profiling at 5 cm depth with the MSD and the micro-diamond detector shows a mismatch in the measurement of the full widths at 80% and 50% of the maximum which does not exceed 0.25 mm. The same difference range is found between the micro-diamond detector and a silicon diode. The deviation of the percentage depth dose between the MSD and micro-diamond detector remains below 2.3% within the first fifteen centimeters of the decay region for field sizes of 1 × 1 cm2, 2 × 2 cm2and 3 × 3 cm2(0.76% between the silicon diode and the micro-diamond in the same field range). The 2D dose mapping of a 0.6 × 0.6 cm2photon field evidences the strong 3D character of the radiation-matter interaction in small photon field regime. From a beam-probe convolution theory, we predict that our probe overestimates the beam width by 0.06%, making our detector a right compromise between high resolution, compactness, flexibility and ease of use. The MSD overcomes problem of volume averaging, stem effects, and despite its water non-equivalence it is expected to minimize electron fluence perturbation due to its extreme compactness. Such a detector thus has the potential to become a valuable dose verification tool in small field radiation therapy, and by extension in Brachytherapy, FLASH-radiotherapy and microbeam radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gonod
- Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL)-Dijon, France
| | - Carlos Chacon Avila
- FEMTO-ST Institute-Optics Department-UMR 6174-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté-CNRS-Besançon, France
| | - Miguel Angel Suarez
- FEMTO-ST Institute-Optics Department-UMR 6174-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté-CNRS-Besançon, France
| | - Julien Crouzilles
- SEDI-ATI Fibres Optiques, 8 Rue Jean Mermoz, F-91080 Évry-Courcouronnes, France
| | - Samir Laskri
- SEDI-ATI Fibres Optiques, 8 Rue Jean Mermoz, F-91080 Évry-Courcouronnes, France
| | | | | | - Thierry Grosjean
- FEMTO-ST Institute-Optics Department-UMR 6174-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté-CNRS-Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hachemi T, Chaoui ZEA, Khoudri S. PENELOPE simulations and experiment for 6 MV clinac iX accelerator for standard and small static fields. Appl Radiat Isot 2021; 174:109749. [PMID: 33940355 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this work was to produce accurate data for use as a 'gold standard' and a valid tool for measurements in reference dosimetry for standard/small static field sizes from 0.5 × 0.5 to 10 × 10 cm2. It is based on the accuracy of the phase space files (PSFs) as a key quantity. Because the IAEA general public database provides few PSFs for the Varian iX, we simulated the head through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and calculated validated PSFs for 12 square field sizes including seven for small static fields. The resulting dosimetric calculations allowed us to reach a good level of agreement in comparison to our relative and absolute dose measurements performed on a Varian iX in water phantom. Measured and MC calculated output factors were investigated for different detectors. Based on the TRS 483 formalism and MC (PENELOPE/penEasy), we calculated output correction factors for the unshielded Diode-E (T60017) and the PinPoint-3D (T31016) micro-chamber according to manufacturers' blueprints. Our MC results were in agreement with the recommended data; they compete with recent measurements and MC simulations and in particular the TRS 483 MC data obtained from similar simulations. Moreover, our MC results provide supplemental data in comparison to TRS 483 data in particular for the PinPoint-3D (T31016). We suggest our MC output correction factors as new datasets for future TRS compilations. The work was substantial, used different robust MC strategies depending on the scoring regions, and led in most cases to uncertainties of less than 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Hachemi
- Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Devices, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Algeria.
| | - Zine-El-Abidine Chaoui
- Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Devices, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Algeria
| | - Saad Khoudri
- Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Devices, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Algeria; Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer de Sétif, Algeria
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Debnath SBC, Tonneau D, Fauquet C, Tallet A, Goncalves A, Darreon J. Dosimetric characterization of a small-scale (Zn,Cd)S:Ag inorganic scintillating detector to be used in radiotherapy. Phys Med 2021; 84:15-23. [PMID: 33813200 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In modern radiotherapy techniques, to ensure an accurate beam modeling process, dosimeters with high accuracy and spatial resolution are required. Therefore, this work aims to propose a simple, robust, and a small-scale fiber-integrated X-ray inorganic detector and investigate the dosimetric characteristics used in radiotherapy. METHODS The detector is based on red-emitting silver-activated zinc-cadmium sulfide (Zn,Cd)S:Ag nanoclusters and the proposed system has been tested under 6 MV photons with standard dose rate used in the patient treatment protocol. The article presents the performances of the detector in terms of dose linearity, repeatability, reproducibility, percentage depth dose distribution, and field output factor. A comparative study is shown using a microdiamond dosimeter and considering data from recent literature. RESULTS We accurately measured a small field beam profile of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 at a spatial resolution of 100 µm using a LINAC system. The dose linearity at 400 MU/min has shown less than 0.53% and 1.10% deviations from perfect linearity for the regular and smallest field. Percentage depth dose measurement agrees with microdiamond measurements within 1.30% and 2.94%, respectively for regular to small field beams. Besides, the stem effect analysis shows a negligible contribution in the measurements for fields smaller than 3x3 cm2. This study highlights the drastic decrease of the convolution effect using a point-like detector, especially in small dimension beam characterization. Field output factor has shown a good agreement while comparing it with the microdiamond dosimeter. CONCLUSION All the results presented here anticipated that the developed detector can accurately measure delivered dose to the region of interest, claim accurate depth dose distribution hence it can be a suitable candidate for beam characterization and quality assurance of LINAC system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Didier Tonneau
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CINaM UMR 7325, 13288 Marseille, France
| | - Carole Fauquet
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CINaM UMR 7325, 13288 Marseille, France
| | - Agnes Tallet
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, CNRS UMR 7258, INSERM UMR 1068, CRCM, 13009 Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Akino Y, Okamura K, Das IJ, Isohashi F, Seo Y, Tamari K, Hirata T, Hayashi K, Inoue S, Ogawa K. Technical Note: Characteristics of a microSilicon X shielded diode detector for photon beam dosimetry. Med Phys 2021; 48:2004-2009. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi Akino
- Oncology Center Osaka University Hospital 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Keita Okamura
- Department of Medical Technology Osaka University Hospital 2‐15 Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Indra J. Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology Northwestern Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine 251 East Huron Street, Galter Pavilion Chicago ILLC‐17860611USA
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Yuji Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Keisuke Tamari
- Department of Radiation Oncology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Hayashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Shinichi Inoue
- Department of Medical Technology Osaka University Hospital 2‐15 Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 2‐2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita Osaka565‐0871Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lam S, Bradley D, Khandaker M. Small-field radiotherapy photon beam output evaluation: Detectors reviewed. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
Kim TJ, Cheng K, Zhang H, Liu S, Skinner L, Xing L. Second window near-infrared dosimeter (NIR2D) system for radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:175013. [PMID: 32869751 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9b56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Fiber-coupled scintillation dosimeters are a cost-effective alternative to the conventional ion chambers in radiation dosimetry. However, stem effects from optical fibers such as Cerenkov radiation incur significant errors in the readout signal. Here we introduce a second near-infrared window dosimeter, dubbed as NIR2D, that can potentially be used as real-time radiation detector for clinical megavoltage beams. Lanthanide-based rare-earth NaYF4 nano-phosphors doped with both erbium and cerium elements were synthesized, and a compact 3D printed reader device integrated with a photodetector and data acquisition system was designed. The performance of the NIR2D was tested using a pre-clinical orthovoltage radiation source and a clinical megavoltage radiation source. The system was tested for dose linearity (100, 200, 600 MU), dose rate dependency (100, 200, 400, 600 MU min-1), and energy dependency (6, 10, 15 MV). Test results with the clinical linear accelerator demonstrated excellent dose linearity and dose rate independency when exposed to 6 MV linac beams-both data follows a linear trendline with R2 > 0.99. On the other hand, the NIR2D was energy dependent, where the readout dropped by 9% between 6 and 15 MV. For stem effects, we observed a finite Cerenkov contribution of 1%-3% when exposed between 100-600 MU min-1 (6 MV) and 3%-6% when exposed between 5-15 MV (600 MU min-1). While the stem effects were still observable, we expect that enhancing the current optical setup will simultaneously improve the scintillation signal and reduce the stem effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Jin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America. These authors contributed equally to this work
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bai L, Xiao Q, Wang Q, Zhao J, Li G, Bai S. Dosimetric characteristics of a 2D silicon diode array for stereotactic radiotherapy end-to-end patient-specific QA. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
42
|
Rilling M, Allain G, Thibault S, Archambault L. Tomographic‐based 3D scintillation dosimetry using a three‐view plenoptic imaging system. Med Phys 2020; 47:3636-3646. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Madison Rilling
- Département de physique de génie physique et d’optique Faculté des sciences et de génie Université Laval 1045 avenue de la Médecine Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- Centre d’optique photonique et laser Université Laval 2375 rue de la Terrasse Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec‐Université Laval Hôtel‐Dieu de Québec 11 Côte du Palais Québec QC G1R 2J6 Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l’Université Laval 9 rue McMahon Québec QC G1R 3S3 Canada
| | - Guillaume Allain
- Département de physique de génie physique et d’optique Faculté des sciences et de génie Université Laval 1045 avenue de la Médecine Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Simon Thibault
- Département de physique de génie physique et d’optique Faculté des sciences et de génie Université Laval 1045 avenue de la Médecine Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Louis Archambault
- Département de physique de génie physique et d’optique Faculté des sciences et de génie Université Laval 1045 avenue de la Médecine Québec QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec‐Université Laval Hôtel‐Dieu de Québec 11 Côte du Palais Québec QC G1R 2J6 Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l’Université Laval 9 rue McMahon Québec QC G1R 3S3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Akino Y, Fujiwara M, Okamura K, Shiomi H, Mizuno H, Isohashi F, Suzuki O, Seo Y, Tamari K, Ogawa K. Characterization of a microSilicon diode detector for small-field photon beam dosimetry. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:410-418. [PMID: 32211851 PMCID: PMC7299273 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This study characterized a new unshielded diode detector, the microSilicon (model 60023), for small-field photon beam dosimetry by evaluating the photon beams generated by a TrueBeam STx and a CyberKnife. Temperature dependence was evaluated by irradiating photons and increasing the water temperature from 11.5 to 31.3°C. For Diode E, microSilicon, microDiamond and EDGE detectors, dose linearity, dose rate dependence, energy dependence, percent-depth-dose (PDD), beam profiles and detector output factor (OFdet) were evaluated. The OFdet of the microSilicon detector was compared to the field output factors of the other detectors. The microSilicon exhibited small temperature dependence within 0.4%, although the Diode E showed a linear variation with a ratio of 0.26%/°C. The Diode E and EDGE detectors showed positive correlations between the detector reading and dose rate, whereas the microSilicon showed a stable response within 0.11%. The Diode E and microSilicon demonstrated negative correlations with the beam energy. The OFdet of microSilicon was the smallest among all the detectors. The maximum differences between the OFdet of microSilicon and the field output factors of microDiamond were 2.3 and 1.6% for 5 × 5 mm2 TrueBeam and 5 mm φ CyberKnife beams, respectively. The PDD data exhibited small variations in the dose fall-off region. The microSilicon and microDiamond detectors yielded similar penumbra widths, whereas the other detectors showed steeper penumbra profiles. The microSilicon demonstrated favorable characteristics including small temperature and dose rate dependence as well as the small spatial resolution and output factors suitable for small field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi Akino
- Oncology Center, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 (D10), Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suita Tokushukai Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0814, Japan
| | - Masateru Fujiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suita Tokushukai Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0814, Japan
| | - Keita Okamura
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hiroya Shiomi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Mizuno
- Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuji Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tamari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Debnath SBC, Fauquet C, Tallet A, Goncalves A, Lavandier S, Jandard F, Tonneau D, Darreon J. High spatial resolution inorganic scintillator detector for high-energy X-ray beam at small field irradiation. Med Phys 2020; 47:1364-1371. [PMID: 31883388 PMCID: PMC7155062 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Small field dosimetry for radiotherapy is one of the major challenges due to the size of most dosimeters, for example, sufficient spatial resolution, accurate dose distribution and energy dependency of the detector. In this context, the purpose of this research is to develop a small size scintillating detector targeting small field dosimetry and compare its performance with other commercial detectors. Method An inorganic scintillator detector (ISD) of about 200 µm outer diameter was developed and tested through different small field dosimetric characterizations under high‐energy photons (6 and 15 MV) delivered by an Elekta Linear Accelerator (LINAC). Percentage depth dose (PDD) and beam profile measurements were compared using dosimeters from PTW namely, microdiamond and PinPoint three‐dimensional (PP3D) detector. A background fiber method has been considered to quantitate and eliminate the minimal Cerenkov effect from the total optical signal magnitude. Measurements were performed inside a water phantom under IAEA Technical Reports Series recommendations (IAEA TRS 381 and TRS 483). Results Small fields ranging from 3 × 3 cm2, down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 were sequentially measured using the ISD and commercial dosimeters, and a good agreement was obtained among all measurements. The result also shows that, scintillating detector has good repeatability and reproducibility of the output signal with maximum deviation of 0.26% and 0.5% respectively. The Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) was measured 0.55 cm for the smallest available square size field of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2, where the discrepancy of 0.05 cm is due to the scattering effects inside the water and convolution effect between field and detector geometries. Percentage depth dose factor dependence variation with water depth exhibits nearly the same behavior for all tested detectors. The ISD allows to perform dose measurements at a very high accuracy from low (50 cGy/min) to high dose rates (800 cGy/min) and was found to be independent of dose rate variation. The detection system also showed an excellent linearity with dose; hence, calibration was easily achieved. Conclusions The developed detector can be used to accurately measure the delivered dose at small fields during the treatment of small volume tumors. The author's measurement shows that despite using a nonwater‐equivalent detector, the detector can be a powerful candidate for beam characterization and quality assurance in, for example, radiosurgery, Intensity‐Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy. Our detector can provide real‐time dose measurement and good spatial resolution with immediate readout, simplicity, flexibility, and robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carole Fauquet
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CINaM, UMR 7325, 13288, Marseille, France
| | - Agnes Tallet
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, UMR 7258, INSERM, UMR 1068, CRCM, 13009, Marseille, France
| | | | - Franck Jandard
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CINaM, UMR 7325, 13288, Marseille, France
| | - Didier Tonneau
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CINaM, UMR 7325, 13288, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|