Electrophysiologic correlations with clinical outcomes in CIDP

Cranial nerve involvement in patients with immune-mediated neuropathy: an observational blink reflex study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess cranial nerve involvement in a large adult cohort of patients with immune-mediated neuropathy undergoing immunoglobulin treatment by measuring blink reflex R1 latency prolongation in correlation with clinical findings and nerve conduction studies.

METHODS

104 patients underwent blink reflex examination and ulnar nerve conduction studies and were assessed by the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability score, the revised Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) and focused clinical examination.

RESULTS

Prolonged R1 latencies were identified in 23 of 104 patients (22.1 %). These patients had more severe functional impairments according to the ALSFRS-R, yet only five clinically presented with bulbar dysfunction, facial- or trigeminal nerve impairment. Overall R1 latency was inversely correlated to ulnar motor conduction velocity. In preliminary follow-up assessments under continuous immunoglobulin treatment, prolonged R1 latencies partially improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranial nerve involvement is a common feature in immune-mediated neuropathies and is associated with a more severe disease stage. Here, R1 prolongation was detected less frequently compared to previously reported untreated cohorts.

SIGNIFICANCE

Blink reflex studies can detect subclinical cranial nerve involvement in immune-mediated neuropathies. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of measuring R1 latency.

Versorgungssituation von CIDP-Patienten in neun deutschen Zentren des Neuritis Netzes

Hintergrund

Die Diagnose und Behandlung von Patienten mit immunvermittelten Polyneuropathien ist aufgrund der Heterogenität der Erkrankungen herausfordernd.

Ziel der Arbeit

Ein aktueller epidemiologischer Überblick über die Versorgungssituation von Patienten mit immunvermittelten Polyneuropathien innerhalb des deutschen Neuritis-Netzwerks „Neuritis Netz“.

Material und Methoden

Es erfolgte eine Umfrage in neun deutschen neurologischen Zentren, die auf die Betreuung von Patienten mit Immunneuropathie spezialisiert sind. Wir erfassten Diagnose, Vorgehen in der Diagnostik und Nachsorge, typische Symptome bei Manifestation und im Krankheitsverlauf sowie Therapiedaten.

Ergebnisse

Die Erhebung umfasst Daten von 1529 jährlich behandelten Patienten mit Immunneuropathien, 1320 davon mit chronisch inflammatorisch demyelinisierender Polyneuropathie (CIDP). Die Diagnostik umfasste fast immer Lumbalpunktionen sowie Elektroneuro- und -myografien entsprechend den aktuellen Leitlinien. Der Einsatz von Ultraschall, Biopsie und MRT war unterschiedlich. Wichtigster klinischer Parameter zum Therapiemonitoring in allen Zentren war die motorische Funktion in den klinischen Nachuntersuchungen. Zur Erhaltungstherapie wurde bei rund 15 % der Patienten ein breites Spektrum unterschiedlicher Immunsuppressiva eingesetzt.

Diskussion

Die Studie liefert wichtige epidemiologische Daten zur aktuellen Versorgungsituation von Patienten mit Immunneuropathien in Deutschland. Die Weiterentwicklung spezifischer Empfehlungen zur Therapie und Nachverfolgung von CIDP-Patienten ist notwendig, um einen einheitlichen Standard der Patientenversorgung zu gewährleisten. Dieses wird durch die strukturierte Zusammenarbeit von Exzellenzzentren wie dem deutschen Neuritis Netz erheblich unterstützt.

Contemporary challenges in the diagnosis and management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research, multiple inter-related diagnostic and management challenges remain for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed on diagnosis and treatment in CIDP. The clinical features and disease course were evaluated. Investigative techniques, including electrophysiology, cerebrospinal fluid examination, neuropathology, imaging and neuroimmunology, were considered in relation to technical aspects, sensitivity, specificity, availability and cost. Available evidenced-based treatments and those with possible efficacy despite lack of evidence, were considered, as well as current methods for evaluation of treatment effects.

EXPERT OPINION

CIDP remains a clinical diagnosis, supported first and foremost by electrophysiology. Other investigative techniques have limited impact. Most patients with CIDP respond to available first-line treatments and immunosuppression may be efficacious in those who do not. Consideration of the natural history and of the high reported remission rate, of under-recognised associated disabling features, of treatment administration modalities and assessment methods, require enhanced attention.

The value of MUNIX as an objective electrophysiological biomarker of disease progression in CIDP

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Objective outcome measures to monitor treatment response and guide treatment are lacking in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We aimed to evaluate the motor unit number index (MUNIX) as an outcome measurement in patients with CIDP and investigate the correlation of MUNIX with functional and standard electrodiagnostic tests in a single follow-up study.

METHODS

We evaluated MUNIX of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and tibialis anterior (TA) muslces bilaterally. Muscle force was assessed by Medical Research Council sumscores (MRCSS). Functional measures used were the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score (ONLS) and the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) at baseline and after six months of treatment. Standard electrophysiology was evaluated by the Nerve Conduction Study Score (NCSS).

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included at baseline, and 16 completed the follow-up study. Significant correlations were found between the MUNIX sumscore and both MRCSS and NCSS at baseline, between both the pinch strength and grip and upper limb MUNIX at baseline and follow-up, and between MUNIX of TA and both lower limb MRCSS with lower limb ONLS at baseline and follow-up. Significant correlations also were found between MUNIX sumscore change and MRCSS change, R-ODS change, and ONLS change.

DISCUSSION

MUNIX changes correlated with strength and electrophysiological improvements in CIDP patients. This suggests that MUNIX may represent a useful objective biomarker for patient follow-up.

Outcome measures and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from research to clinical practice

Introduction: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated syndrome characterized clinically by weakness and/or numbness that evolves over 2 months or more. The heterogeneity of clinical features necessitates an individualized approach to disease monitoring that takes lessons learned from clinical trials and applies them to clinical practice.Areas covered: This review discusses the importance of clinimetrics and biomarkers in CIDP diagnosis and disease monitoring. Highlighted are the challenges of defining responses to immunotherapy, the usefulness, and limitations of utilizing evidence-based clinical outcome measures during routine clinical care, and the evolving understanding of how diagnostic and disease activity biomarkers may reshape our treatment and disease monitoring paradigms.Expert opinion: Although disability and impairment outcome measures are commonly used in CIDP to indicate disease status, the nonspecific nature of these metrics limits the ability to attribute a change in any given metric to a change in CIDP. This interpretive challenge may be magnified by inconsistencies in the direction of change as well as a strong placebo effect. There is a need to improve our understanding of minimally important changes in existing outcome measures as a means to personalize treatment and to better assess disease activity status with biomarker discovery.

Electrophysiological predictors of response to subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess axonal function prior to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy or placebo in relation to relapse in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to determine whether axonal damage can predict therapy response.

METHODS

Relapse rates in patients from the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study, where patients were treated with placebo or SCIG (IgPro20), were analyzed by baseline (post-intravenous immunoglobulin stabilization) axonal damage (≤1 mV peroneal compound muscle action potential) status.

RESULTS

In patients with non-axonal damage, relapses were significantly higher with placebo (73.0%) than IgPro20 (0.2 g/kg: 39.1%, 0.4 g/kg: 19.2%). In patients with axonal damage, IgPro20 had no effect on relapse (placebo: 25.0%, IgPro20: 0.2 g/kg: 30.0%, 0.4 g/kg: 19.4%). Patients with axonal damage relapsed significantly less on placebo versus non-axonal damage, but they also demonstrated higher baseline disability.

CONCLUSION

Axonal damage may correspond to relapse upon treatment withdrawal; patients with axonal damage relapse less, possibly reflecting poor response to immunoglobulin therapy, while non-axonal damage patients may experience more relapse, perhaps indicating better treatment response.

SIGNIFICANCE

In CIDP patients with axonal loss, immunoglobulin therapy may not be as effective. Assessing axonal damage could help guide therapy, with immunoglobulins ideally used before substantial axonal damage arises.

Monitoring Clinical Course and Treatment Response in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy During Routine Care: A Review of Clinical and Laboratory Assessment Measures

Importance

Identifying clinical change in many neurologic diseases, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), can be challenging. At the same time, how change is defined heavily influences a patient's diagnostic and treatment pathway. It can be especially problematic when equivocal subjective observations are interpreted as clinically meaningful and then used to make diagnostic and treatment decisions. Change in clinical trials is strictly defined by a preselected metric, but there is a perception that formal outcomes collection during routine clinical care is neither feasible nor necessary. Given the importance placed on how change is interpreted, there is a need to select assessments that can be applied to routine care that are representative of the neurologic disease state.

Observations

For an outcome measure to be useful during clinical trials, it must have good reliability, validity, be responsive to change, and have clinical meaning. To be useful during routine clinical care, the assessment must additionally be easy to collect without the need for extensive training or equipment and should provide an immediately available result that can be rapidly quantified and interpreted. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is clinically heterogeneous and so is best evaluated with a diverse group of assessment tools. Assessing strength impairment, disability, and quality of life is ideally suited for everyday practice when caring for patients with CIDP. While electrophysiologic studies, imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and nodal/paranodal antibodies can provide diagnostic data, they are less practical and helpful longitudinal assessment tools.

Conclusions and Relevance

Sound clinimetric outcome measures in CIDP are widely available and have the potential to help clinicians objectify treatment response and disease progression. Such data are critically important when justifying the need for ongoing or periodic immunotherapy, documenting relapse or deterioration, or providing reassurance of disease improvement, stability, or remission.

Electrophysiological testing in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin: The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study

OBJECTIVE

To assess electrophysiology parameters that can reflect patients' clinical status and show changes in nerve function with treatment, in a study of subcutaneous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

METHODS

Nerve conduction studies (latency, conduction velocity, conduction block and compound muscle action potential [CMAP] on upper limb median, ulnar, and lower limb peroneal motor nerves) were conducted in the placebo-controlled PATH (Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra) study of two doses of maintenance subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) IgPro20 in CIDP.

RESULTS

Averaged proximal latency substantially increased with placebo (+1.1 ms) indicating electrophysiologic deterioration but remained stable with IgPro20 (0.2 g/kg bodyweight [bw]: +0.1 ms; 0.4 g/kg bw: -0.1 ms). Distal latencies were also more prolonged with placebo versus IgPro20. Averaged motor nerve conduction velocity substantially decreased with placebo (-1.6 m/s) versus increasing in both IgPro20 groups (+0.2 m/s and +1.0 m/s, respectively). Conduction block and CMAP amplitudes did not change substantially.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the effectiveness of maintenance IgPro20, as nerve function changed in the direction of increasing nerve dysfunction with placebo but remained stable with ongoing IgPro20 therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Electrophysiology testing can support assessment of clinical status in CIDP to determine treatment efficacy.

Longitudinal study on nerve ultrasound and corneal confocal microscopy in NF155 paranodopathy

We report the case of a 27‐year‐old patient with subacute anti‐neurofascin‐155 neuropathy with bifacial palsy, who showed excellent response to rituximab. We provide longitudinal data of established clinical scores, nerve conduction studies, antibody titers, and novel imaging methods (nerve ultrasonography and corneal confocal microscopy). Clinical and electrophysiological improvement followed the reduction of serum antibody titer and correlated with a reduction of corneal inflammatory cellular infiltrates whereas the increase in the cross‐sectional area of the peripheral nerves remained 12 months after first manifestation. Our findings suggest that novel techniques provide useful follow‐up parameters in paranodopathies.

Electrophysiological Responsiveness to Long-Term Therapy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Case Report

Electrophysiological studies are essential for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), but the utility of nerve conduction studies in monitoring outcomes in individual CIDP patients is controversial. Electrophysiological improvements after short-term treatment have been described in large cohorts of CIDP patients, but the magnitude of the changes is small and might be obscured in individual patients due to the variation inherent in nerve conduction testing. We present the case of a CIDP patient treated successfully with immunosuppression and followed for 31 years with serial standardized clinical and electrophysiological evaluations. Improvement in electrophysiological parameters lagged clinical changes for up to 2 years, but all motor parameters improved (distal motor and F wave latencies, conduction velocities, and compound muscle action potential amplitudes) even with evidence of initial axonal damage. Worsening of electrophysiological parameters, specifically increasing F wave latencies, heralded clinical relapse by as much as a year. Electrophysiological parameters do improve with treatment in CIDP patients, although the changes can take up to 2 years, and also worsening electrophysiological parameters can herald clinical relapse and might help guide therapeutic decisions.

Impact of disuse muscular atrophy on the compound muscle action potential

BACKGROUND

Disuse atrophy from immobilization is the result of decreased neural activity and muscle unloading.

METHODS

We studied the impact of disuse on hand intrinsic compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in a cohort of 39 patients with unilateral 6-week immobilization of the hand in a cast, after distal radius fracture. We excluded patients with nerve injury. We compared side-to-side CMAP characteristics at the time of cast removal and at a subsequent follow-up visit, after a mean interval of 7.8 weeks.

RESULTS

Statistically significant reductions in CMAP amplitude were noted for the abductor pollicis brevis (29.2%), abductor digiti minimi (19.0%), and first dorsal interosseus (24.9%). There was partial repair of the relative CMAP reduction at the follow-up visit (20.1%, 10.7%, and 8.7%, respectively). There was no significant change in CMAP duration.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a framework for quantifying the degree of hand intrinsic CMAP amplitude reduction attributed to disuse.

Measuring disease activity and predicting response to intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is characterised by significant clinical heterogeneity and as such reliable biomarkers are required to measure disease activity and assess treatment response. Recent advances in our understanding of disease pathogenesis and the discovery of novel serum-based, electrophysiologic and imaging biomarkers allow clinicians to make more informed decisions regarding individualised treatment regimes.

As a chronic immune-mediated process typified by relapse following withdrawal of immunomodulatory therapy, a substantial proportion of patients with CIDP require long term treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), a scarce and expensive donor-derived resource. The required duration and intensity of immunoglobulin treatment vary widely between individuals, highlighting both the heterogeneous nature of the underlying disease process as well as the variable pharmacologic properties of IVIg.

This review outlines the use of multimodal biomarkers in the longitudinal evaluation of nerve injury and how recent developments have impacted our ability to predict both response to immunoglobulin administration and its withdrawal.

IgPro20, the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra® study (PATH), and the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with subcutaneous IgG

Subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) administration may be preferred over the intravenous route (IVIG) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) because it minimizes ‘end of cycle’ treatment-related fluctuations, reduces systemic adverse effects, improves convenience/quality of life and potentially lowers overall costs. Early reports of the use of highly concentrated SCIG preparations suggested they were effective and well-tolerated in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. This was confirmed in the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra® study of 172 subjects randomized to receive maintenance therapy with placebo or one of two doses of IgPro20 (20% IgG stabilized with L-Proline) for 6 months. Risk of relapse was reduced by SCIG in a dose-related manner as compared with placebo. A total of 88% of polyneuropathy and treatment with hizentra subjects felt the subcutaneous method was ‘easy to learn’. Local adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, and systemic adverse events were infrequent. Some patients may prefer maintenance therapy with SCIG over IVIG.

Does grip strength reflect isokinetic muscle strength in lower limbs in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy?

INTRODUCTION

Grip strength (GS) is a common measure of general muscle strength in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, it is important to investigate the correlation and responsiveness of GS compared with isokinetic muscle strength (IKS) and function of the lower limbs.

METHODS

Seventy patients with CIDP were evaluated with GS, IKS, and functional measures of the lower limbs. Reevaluation was performed after 2 and 10/12 weeks. Correlation and response analyses were performed.

RESULTS

GS correlated with IKS at the ankle (IKS_ankle ; maximum Spearman's rank-order correlation [R_S ] = 0.58) and with walking performance (maximum R_S  = -0.38). IKS_ankle was more responsive to detect change (standardized response mean [SRM] = 0.57) than GS (SRM = 0.27).

DISCUSSION

GS does not seem to be an appropriate surrogate measure of IKS and function of the lower limbs in patients with CIDP. Muscle Nerve 58: 449-452, 2018.

The electrophysiological response to immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To characterize changes in motor nerve conduction studies (MNCS) and motor unit number index (MUNIX) following treatment with subcutaneous immunoglobulin and to assess whether these changes are related to muscle strength.

METHODS

Data from 23 patients participating in a randomized, controlled trial were analyzed. MNCS and MUNIX were performed before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Isokinetic strength (IMS) was measured in various muscles together with grip strength (GS).

RESULTS

Proximally evoked compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes and MUNIX tended to be better preserved in treated patients (P=.049 and .045). Changes in other parameters did not differ between groups. There was no correlation between changes in electrophysiological parameters and IMS. Changes in GS were related to median nerve motor conduction velocity, distal motor latency, CMAP amplitudes, and distally evoked CMAP duration (P=.013-.035).

CONCLUSION

Proximally evoked CMAP amplitudes appear to be the best MNCS parameter to assess treatment outcome in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): an overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic progressive or relapsing and remitting disease that usually causes weakness and sensory loss. The symptoms are due to autoimmune inflammation of peripheral nerves. CIPD affects about 2 to 3 per 100,000 of the population. More than half of affected people cannot walk unaided when symptoms are at their worst. CIDP usually responds to treatments that reduce inflammation, but there is disagreement about which treatment is most effective.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) and non-Cochrane systematic reviews of any treatment for CIDP and to compare the effects of treatments.

METHODS

We considered all systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any treatment for any form of CIDP. We reported their primary outcomes, giving priority to change in disability after 12 months.Two overview authors independently identified published systematic reviews for inclusion and collected data. We reported the quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. Two other review authors independently checked review selection, data extraction and quality assessments.On 31 October 2016, we searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (in theCochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Plus for systematic reviews of CIDP. We supplemented the RCTs in the existing CSRs by searching on the same date for RCTs of any treatment of CIDP (including treatment of fatigue or pain in CIDP), in the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Plus.

MAIN RESULTS

Five CSRs met our inclusion criteria. We identified 23 randomised trials, of which 15 had been included in these CSRs. We were unable to compare treatments as originally planned, because outcomes and outcome intervals differed. CorticosteroidsIt is uncertain whether daily oral prednisone improved impairment compared to no treatment because the quality of the evidence was very low (1 trial, 28 participants). According to moderate-quality evidence (1 trial, 41 participants), six months' treatment with high-dose monthly oral dexamethasone did not improve disability more than daily oral prednisolone. Observational studies tell us that prolonged use of corticosteroids sometimes causes serious side-effects. Plasma exchangeAccording to moderate-quality evidence (2 trials, 59 participants), twice-weekly plasma exchange produced more short-term improvement in disability than sham exchange. In the largest observational study, 3.9% of plasma exchange procedures had complications. Intravenous immunoglobulinAccording to high-quality evidence (5 trials, 269 participants), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) produced more short-term improvement than placebo. Adverse events were more common with IVIg than placebo (high-quality evidence), but serious adverse events were not (moderate-quality evidence, 3 trials, 315 participants). One trial with 19 participants provided moderate-quality evidence of little or no difference in short-term improvement of impairment with plasma exchange in comparison to IVIg. There was little or no difference in short-term improvement of disability with IVIg in comparison to oral prednisolone (moderate-quality evidence; 1 trial, 29 participants) or intravenous methylprednisolone (high-quality evidence; 1 trial, 45 participants). One unpublished randomised open trial with 35 participants found little or no difference in disability after three months of IVIg compared to oral prednisone; this trial has not yet been included in a CSR. We know from observational studies that serious adverse events related to IVIg do occur. Other immunomodulatory treatmentsIt is uncertain whether the addition of azathioprine (2 mg/kg) to prednisone improved impairment in comparison to prednisone alone, as the quality of the evidence is very low (1 trial, 27 participants). Observational studies show that adverse effects truncate treatment in 10% of people.According to low-quality evidence (1 trial, 60 participants), compared to placebo, methotrexate 15 mg/kg did not allow more participants to reduce corticosteroid or IVIg doses by 20%. Serious adverse events were no more common with methotrexate than with placebo, but observational studies show that methotrexate can cause teratogenicity, abnormal liver function, and pulmonary fibrosis.According to moderate-quality evidence (2 trials, 77 participants), interferon beta-1a (IFN beta-1a) in comparison to placebo, did not allow more people to withdraw from IVIg. According to moderate-quality evidence, serious adverse events were no more common with IFN beta-1a than with placebo.We know of no other completed trials of immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory agents for CIDP. Other treatmentsWe identified no trials of treatments for fatigue or pain in CIDP. Adverse effectsNot all trials routinely collected adverse event data; when they did, the quality of evidence was variable. Adverse effects in the short, medium, and long term occur with all interventions. We are not able to make reliable comparisons of adverse events between the interventions included in CSRs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We cannot be certain based on available evidence whether daily oral prednisone improves impairment compared to no treatment. However, corticosteroids are commonly used, based on widespread availability, low cost, very low-quality evidence from observational studies, and clinical experience. The weakness of the evidence does not necessarily mean that corticosteroids are ineffective. High-dose monthly oral dexamethasone for six months is probably no more or less effective than daily oral prednisolone. Plasma exchange produces short-term improvement in impairment as determined by neurological examination, and probably produces short-term improvement in disability. IVIg produces more short-term improvement in disability than placebo and more adverse events, although serious side effects are probably no more common than with placebo. There is no clear difference in short-term improvement in impairment with IVIg when compared with intravenous methylprednisolone and probably no improvement when compared with either oral prednisolone or plasma exchange. According to observational studies, adverse events related to difficult venous access, use of citrate, and haemodynamic changes occur in 3% to17% of plasma exchange procedures.It is uncertain whether azathioprine is of benefit as the quality of evidence is very low. Methotrexate may not be of benefit and IFN beta-1a is probably not of benefit.We need further research to identify predictors of response to different treatments and to compare their long-term benefits, safety and cost-effectiveness. There is a need for more randomised trials of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agents, routes of administration, and treatments for symptoms of CIDP.

Predicting the Response to Intravenous Immunoglobulins in an Animal Model of Chronic Neuritis

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a disabling autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are effective in CIDP, but the treatment response varies greatly between individual patients. Understanding this interindividual variability and predicting the response to IVIg constitute major clinical challenges in CIDP. We previously established intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 deficient non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice as a novel animal model of CIDP. Here, we demonstrate that similar to human CIDP patients, ICAM-1 deficient NOD mice respond to IVIg treatment by clinical and histological measures. Nerve magnetic resonance imaging and histology demonstrated that IVIg ameliorates abnormalities preferentially in distal parts of the sciatic nerve branches. The IVIg treatment response also featured great heterogeneity allowing us to identify IVIg responders and non-responders. An increased production of interleukin (IL)-17 positively predicted IVIg treatment responses. In human sural nerve biopsy sections, high numbers of IL-17 producing cells were associated with younger age and shorter disease duration. Thus, our novel animal model can be utilized to identify prognostic markers of treatment responses in chronic inflammatory neuropathies and we identify IL-17 production as one potential such prognostic marker.

Disease activity in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation of disease status in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is often done by a combination of clinical evaluation and electrodiagnostic studies. A CIDP disease activity status (CDAS) was developed to standardize outcomes in CIDP patients. We aimed to determine if the CDAS was concordant with classical evaluation and whether CDAS enables benchmarking of CIDP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 305 CIDP patients and identified 206 patients with >1 visit and applied the CDAS to this cohort. We examined relationships between the CDAS and classical evaluation as to outcomes and compared our cohort to other CIDP cohorts who had CDAS.

RESULTS

We found that the CDAS mirrored disease severity as measured by electrophysiology and vibration perception thresholds in that CDAS class 5 had more severe neuropathy. Our results are similar to other cohorts in the middle CDAS strata with the exception of fewer subjects in CDAS 1 and more in CDAS 5. The only demographic factor predicting CDAS 5 in our cohort was age, and the overall treatment response rate using the CDAS classification was 79.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

CDAS appears to have sufficient face-validity as a grading system to assess disease activity in relation to treatment status. The use of CDAS appears to allow benchmarking of patients with CIDP that may be useful in subject selection for clinical trials and also to highlight differences in practice.

Electrophysiologic testing in diabetic neuropathy

Electrophysiologic studies provide objective data concerning nerve and muscle function. This information enables the diagnosis of disease states and monitoring of disease progression. This chapter describes the changes in electrophysiologic function in both prediabetes and diabetes and discusses the utility of this testing in patients with diabetes. Both the strengths and limitations of electrophysiology are discussed.

Improving the management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

This article considers several issues of current interest relating to the management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), including diagnostic pitfalls, differences between CIDP patients with and without concurrent diabetes mellitus and how to best measure treatment response in daily practice. Despite the availability of diagnostic criteria, many patients diagnosed with CIDP do not meet these criteria; reasons for misdiagnosis are discussed. There are no definitive predictors of treatment response in CIDP; however, certain clinical and electrophysiological characteristics may be helpful. Patients with CIDP and concurrent diabetes present an additional diagnostic challenge; the differences between these groups, including possible differences in response predictors are discussed. Finally, the most appropriate outcome measures for use in daily practice are considered.

Elevated Vibration Perception Thresholds in CIDP Patients Indicate More Severe Neuropathy and Lower Treatment Response Rates

INTRODUCTION

Vibration perception threshold (VPT) examination using a neurothesiometer provides objective, sensitive and specific information, and has been utilized mainly in patients with diabetic polyneropathy.

OBJECTIVES

Explore the utility of VPT examination in CIDP patients.

METHODS

CIDP subjects attending the Neuromuscular clinic between 01/2013 and 12/2014 were evaluated. Demographic data, clinical history, physical examination, VPT values, and electrophysiologic data from their charts were extracted.

RESULTS

70 charts were reviewed. 55 CIDP patients had elevated VPT, associated with higher frequency of abnormal sensory testing for various modalities (92.7% vs. 46.7%, p<0.0001), lower sensory and motor amplitudes and reduced conduction velocities on nerve conduction studies, and lower treatment response rates (54% vs. 93%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

VPT examination is a simple tool, which is a reliable and sensitive measure not only for diabetic neuropathy, but also for CIDP. Moreover, in CIDP, elevated VPT values are also associated with lower treatment response rates.

Childhood CIDP: Study of 31 patients and comparison between slow and rapid-onset groups

OBJECTIVES

To describe 31 children presenting a CIDP; to compare patients with rapid-onset disease vs. patients with slow-onset disease, a rapid-onset disease being defined by a time to peak impairment of less than 8 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review identified 31 patients completing criteria for childhood CIDP, with 24 "confirmed CIDP" and 7 "possible CIDP". Data collected were time to peak impairment, clinical presentation, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve conduction study, nerve biopsy, treatments. Evaluation at the end of follow-up was reported according to modified Rankin scale.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (42%) exhibited symptoms in less than 2 months with more often cranial nerve abnormalities (38% vs. 6%, p = 0.059), and sensitive symptoms (62% vs. 11%, p = 0.0057). They evolved predominantly in a relapsing way (69% vs. 22%, p = 0.0047). Length of the disease was also longer in the rapid-onset group (5.5 years vs. 3.83 years) but without statistical difference. The slow-onset group exhibited more frequently ataxia at onset (28% vs. 8%, p > 0.05), and evolved predominantly in a progressive manner (61% vs. 15%, p > 0.05). Outcome was similar and good in the two groups. At least 3 out of the 4 major electrophysiological criteria were positive for 27/31 children (87%). Axonal involvement could be present very early. Immunoglobulins were given in 29 cases and corticosteroids in 22. A partial or complete recovery 1 month after first treatment was reported in 30 cases. Among second-line treatments, only azathioprine seemed effective in two out of three intractable children.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences noted between the two groups should be tested in wider populations. Electrophysiological criteria are restrictive and axonal involvement should be studied. Prospective trials are required to find out the best first and second line treatments.

New insights into the management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and its variants can be challenging to diagnose and treat. A combination of clinical, electrophysiological and laboratory features is often required to reach a diagnosis. New data are emerging about potential biomarkers and factors that may indicate treatment needs in individual patients. High-quality evidence exists for the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of CIDP, including quality of life (QoL) benefits. Besides pharmacological treatment, psychological factors must also be addressed to improve patients' QoL. Home-based IVIG infusion therapy is currently a well-established approach in some countries. A 6-month pilot study conducted in Ontario, Canada, provided proof of safety and patient acceptance of home-based IVIG therapy, although some logistical issues emerged.

Treatment responsiveness in CIDP patients with diabetes is associated with unique electrophysiological characteristics, and not with common criteria for CIDP

OBJECTIVES

Characterize treatment responsiveness in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of CIDP subjects assessed between 1997 and 2013 and compared treatment response rates in those with and without DM, using different sets of criteria.

RESULTS

99 CIDP patients were included, 34 CIDP+DM and 65 CIDP-DM patients, both having similar treatment response rates. CIDP patients fulfilling European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria had higher treatment response rates. Responders fulfilled a higher number of American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and EFNS/PNS criteria and had a higher number of demyelinating features in the total cohort and in CIDP-DM but not in CIDP+DM patients. CIDP+DM responders, however, had unique electrophysiologic characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Fulfilling EFNS/PNS and AAN criteria, and higher number of demyelinating features, are associated with higher treatment response rates in CIDP-DM but not in CIDP+DM patients, implying the need for adjusting current criteria to predict treatment response rates in CIDP-DM patients.

Optimizing IgG therapy in chronic autoimmune neuropathies: a hypothesis driven approach

Prolonged intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is used for the chronic autoimmune neuropathies chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy, but the doses and treatment intervals are usually chosen empirically due to a paucity of data from dose-response studies. Recent studies of the electrophysiology and immunology of these diseases suggest that antibody-induced reversible dysfunction of nodes of Ranvier may play a role in conduction block and disability which responds to immunotherapy more rapidly than would be expected for demyelination or axonal damage per se. Clinical reports suggest that in some cases, the effects of each dose of IVIG may be transient, wearing-off before the next dose is due. These observations lead us to hypothesize that that therapeutic IgG acts by competing with pathologic autoantibodies and that individual patients may require different IgG levels for optimal therapeutic effects. Frequent IVIG dosing and weekly subcutaneous IgG have been tried as ways of continuously maintaining high serum IgG levels, resulting in stabilization of neuromuscular function in small case series. Frequent grip strength and disability measurements, performed by the patient at home and reported electronically, can be used to assess the extent and duration of responses to IgG doses. Individualization of IgG treatment regimens may optimize efficacy, minimize disability, and identify nonresponders.

Rapid and reversible responses to IVIG in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases suggest mechanisms of action involving competition with functionally important autoantibodies

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is widely used in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases whose pathogenesis is undefined. Many different effects of IVIG have been demonstrated in vitro, but few studies actually identify the mechanism(s) most important in vivo. Doses and treatment intervals are generally chosen empirically. Recent studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy show that some effects of IVIG are readily reversible and highly dependent on the serum IgG level. This suggests that in some autoantibody-mediated neuromuscular diseases, IVIG directly competes with autoantibodies that reversibly interfere with nerve conduction. Mechanisms of action of IVIG which most likely involve direct competition with autoantibodies include: neutralization of autoantibodies by anti-idiotypes, inhibition of complement deposition, and increasing catabolism of pathologic antibodies by saturating FcRn. Indirect immunomodulatory effects are not as likely to involve competition and may not have the same reversibility and dose-dependency. Pharmacodynamic analyses should be informative regarding most relevant mechanism(s) of action of IVIG as well as the role of autoantibodies in the immunopathogenesis of each disease. Better understanding of the role of autoantibodies and of the target(s) of IVIG could lead to more efficient use of this therapy and better patient outcomes.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a viable treatment option for CIDP

OBJECTIVE

Only 70-80% of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) respond satisfactorily to the established first-line immunomodulatory treatments. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been performed as a last treatment resort in a few therapy-refractory cases with CIDP. We describe the results of AHSCT in 11 consecutive Swedish patients with therapy-refractory CIDP with a median follow-up time of 28 months.

METHOD

Case data were gathered retrospectively for AHSCT treatments in 11 patients with CIDP refractory to the first-line immunomodulatory treatments, intravenous high-dose immunoglobulin, corticosteroids and plasma exchange and to one or more second-line treatments used in 10 of the 11 patients.

RESULTS

The median Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score within 1 month prior to AHSCT was 6 and the Rankin score 4. Total INCAT and Rankin scores improved significantly within 2-6 months after AHSCT and continued to do so at last follow-up. The motor action potential amplitudes (CMAP) improved already within 4 months (median) after AHSCT. Three of the 11 patients relapsed during the follow-up period, requiring retransplantation with AHSCT in one. Eight of the 11 patients maintained drug-free remission upon last follow-up. AHSCT was safe but on the short term associated with a risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, CMV disease, haemorrhagic cystitis and pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results though hampered by the limited number of patients and the lack of a control group suggest AHSCT to be efficacious in therapy-refractory CIDP, with a manageable complication profile. Confirmation of these results is necessary through randomised controlled trials.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: update on clinical features, phenotypes and treatment options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we focus on less recognised signs and symptoms in typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and on the clinical presentation, course of disease and response to treatment of the atypical CIDP phenotypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Frequently occurring and often disabling symptoms in CIDP such as fatigue, pain and tremor have recently been emphasised, whereas autonomic dysfunction, if present, is usually mild. Sensory CIDP is probably the most frequent atypical CIDP phenotype and diagnosis can be difficult in the absence of clear demyelinating features on nerve conduction studies. The most important study comparing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone showed a lower rate of discontinuation due to inefficacy, adverse events or intolerance with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. However, improvement after corticosteroids seems to be more long-lasting than after intravenous immunoglobulin suggesting superior long-term immunosuppressive and immunomodulating effect of corticosteroids in CIDP.

SUMMARY

Symptoms other than the classical motor and sensory symptoms can lead to significant disability in CIDP patients. Based on limited evidence from largely small retrospective case series, we conclude that atypical CIDP phenotypes often have a different course of disease and sometimes response to treatment when compared with typical CIDP. Prospective multicentre cohort studies using standardised clinical description, electrophysiological parameters and outcome measures are needed to study the natural disease course of these phenotypes including response to different treatments.

Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a sporadically occurring, acquired neuropathic condition of autoimmune origin with chronic progressive or relapsing-remitting disease course. CIDP is a treatable disorder; a variety of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agents are available to modify, impede, and even reverse the neurological deficits and sequelae that manifest in the course of the disease. However, in many cases CIDP is not curable. Challenges that remain in the treatment of CIDP patients are well recognized and include a remarkably individual heterogeneity in terms of disease course and treatment response as well as a lack of objective and feasible measures to predict and monitor the responsiveness to the available therapies. In this chapter an overview of the currently used drugs in the treatment of CIDP patients is given and some important and controversial issues that arise in the context of care for CIDP patients are discussed.

[The role of dynamic electromyography in the follow-up of chronic immune polyneuropathies]

Nerve conduction studies providing insight into demyelinating process are essential for the diagnostic of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. For the diagnostic, several sets of electrophysiologic criteria have been established. To assess the response to treatment, nerve conduction studies are often used in trials and in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the useful of these classical electrophysiologic techniques is debated because of their lack of sensibility and specificity. In the last 20 years, several works have showed that dysfunction of channels and pump of the axonal membrane at the site and around the site of the conduction block can precipitate conduction failure and produce weakness. These important features explaining clinical status are not correctly assessed by conventional nerve conduction studies. New nerve conduction examinations in dynamic conditions can explore these hyperexcitability modifications.

Polyclonal immunoglobulin G for autoimmune demyelinating nervous system disorders

Demyelinating diseases with presumed autoimmune pathogenesis are characterised by direct or indirect immune-mediated damage to myelin sheaths, which normally surround nerve fibres to ensure proper electrical nerve conduction. Parenteral administration of polyclonal IgG purified from multi-donor human plasma pools may beneficially modulate these misguided immune reactions via several mechanisms that are outlined in this review. Convincing therapeutic evidence from controlled trials now exists for certain disorders of the peripheral nervous system, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy. In addition, there is evidence for potential therapeutic benefits of IgG in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system, including multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. This review introduces these disorders, briefly summarises the established treatment options, and discusses therapeutic evidence for the use of polyclonal immunoglobulins with a particular emphasis on recent clinical trials and meta-analyses.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Chronic Inflammatory polyneuropathies are an important group of neuromuscular disorders that present chronically and progress over more than 8 weeks, being referred to as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Despite tremendous progress in elucidating disease pathogenesis, the exact triggering event remains unknown. Our knowledge regarding diagnosis and management of CIDP and its variants continues to expand, resulting in improved opportunities for identification and treatment. Most clinical neurologists will be involved in the management of patients with these disorders, and should be familiar with available therapies for CIDP. We review the distinctive clinical, laboratory, and electro-diagnostic features that aid in diagnosis. We emphasize the importance of clinical patterns that define treatment responsiveness and the most appropriate therapies in order to improve prognosis.

Fibular motor nerve conduction studies and ankle sensorimotor capacities

INTRODUCTION

Nerve conduction studies provide information regarding the status of peripheral nerves, but relationships with sensorimotor capacities that influence mobility have not been defined.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted on data from 41 older subjects (20 women and 21 men, age 69.1 ± 8.3 years), including 25 with diabetic neuropathy of varying severity and 16 without diabetes or neuropathy. Measurements included routine fibular motor nerve conduction studies and laboratory-based determination of ankle inversion/eversion proprioceptive thresholds and ankle inversion/eversion motor function.

RESULTS

Independent of age, fibular amplitude correlated robustly with ankle inversion/eversion proprioceptive thresholds (R(2) = 0.591, P < 0.001), moderately with ankle inversion and eversion rates of torque generation (R(2) = 0.216; P = 0.004 and R(2) = 0.200; P = 0.006, respectively), and more strongly when fibular motor amplitude was normalized for body mass index (R(2) = 0.350; P < 0.001 and R(2) = 0.275; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibular motor amplitude was strongly associated with ankle sensorimotor capacities that influence lateral balance and recovery from perturbations during gait. The results suggest that nerve conduction study measures have potential for an expanded clinical role in evaluating mobility function in the population studied.

Effects of treadmill running on rat gastrocnemius function following botulinum toxin A injection

Exercise can improve and maintain neural or muscular function, but the effects of exercise in physiological adaptation to paralysis caused by botulinum toxin A has not been well studied. Twenty-four rats were randomly assigned into control and treadmill groups. The rats assigned to the treadmill group were trained on a treadmill three times per week with the running speed set at 15 m/min. The duration of training was 20 min/session. Muscle strength, nerve conduction study and sciatic functional index (SFI) were used for functional analysis. Treadmill training improved the SFI at 2, 3, and 4 weeks (p = 0.01, 0.004, and 0.01, respectively). The maximal contraction force of the gastrocnemius muscle in the treadmill group was greater than in the control group (p < 0.05). The percentage of activated fibers was higher in the treadmill botox group than the percentage for the control botox group, which was demonstrated by differences in amplitude and area of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) under the curve between the groups (p < 0.05). After BoNT-A injection, treadmill improved the physiological properties of muscle contraction strength, CMAP amplitude, and the recovery of SFI.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment of CIDP

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic autoimmune neuropathy. Despite clinical challenges in diagnosis-owing in part to the existence of disease variants, and different views on how many electrophysiological abnormalities are needed to document demyelination-consensus criteria seem to have been reached for research or clinical practice. Current standard of care involves corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and/or plasmapheresis, which provide short-term benefits. Maintenance therapy with IVIg can induce sustained remission, increase quality of life and prevent further axonal loss, but caution is needed to avoid overtreatment. Commonly used immunosuppressive drugs offer minimal benefit, necessitating the development of new therapies for treatment-refractory patients. Advances in our understanding of the underlying immunopathology in CIDP have identified new targets for future therapeutic efforts, including T cells, B cells, and transmigration and transduction molecules. New biomarkers and scoring systems represent emerging tools with the potential to predict therapeutic responses and identify patients with active disease for enrollment into clinical trials. This Review highlights the recent advances in diagnosing CIDP, provides an update on the immunopathology including new target antigens, and discusses current treatments, ongoing challenges and future therapeutic directions.