Patient Characteristics Associated with Receipt of Prescription Weight-Management Medications Among Veterans Participating in MOVE!

Utilization of antiobesity medications within the Military Health System

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of overweight and obesity among beneficiaries of the Military Health System (MHS) is 41.6% and 30.5%, respectively. This incurs significant medical, fiscal, and military readiness costs. It is not currently known how the utilization of antiobesity medications (AOMs) within the MHS compares with that in the Veterans Health Administration or the private sector. Our aim was to assess the utilization of AOMs within the MHS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data gathered from the MHS Data Repository and the inclusion of all adult TRICARE Prime and Plus beneficiaries ages 18 to 64 years who were prescribed at least one TRICARE-approved AOM during the years 2018 to 2022.

RESULTS

The total study population included 4,414,127 beneficiaries, of whom 1,871,780 were active-duty service members. The utilization of AOMs among the eligible population was 0.56% (0.44% among active-duty personnel). Liraglutide was the most-prescribed AOM (36% of the total). Female sex, age greater than or equal to 30 but less than 60 years, and enlisted or warrant officer rank were all associated with statistically significant higher odds of receiving AOMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable with the US private sector, the MHS significantly underutilizes AOMs, including among active-duty service members, despite coverage of AOMs since 2018.

MicroRNA in cardiometabolic health and disease: The perspectives of sex, gender and personalised medicine

BACKGROUND

Personalized medicine represents a novel and integrative approach that focuses on an individual's genetics and epigenetics, precision medicine, lifestyle and exposures as key players of health status and disease phenotypes.

METHODS

In this narrative review, we aim to carefully discuss the current knowledge on gender disparities in cardiometabolic diseases, and we consider the sex- specific expression of miRNAs and their role as promising tool in precision medicine.

RESULTS

Personalised medicine overcomes the restricted care of patient based on a binomial sex approach, by enriching itself with a holistic and dynamic gender integration. Recognized as a major worldwide health emergency, cardiometabolic disorders continue to rise, impacting on health systems and requiring more effective and targeted strategies. Several sex and gender drivers might affect the onset and progression of cardiometabolic disorders in males and females at multiple levels. In this respect, distinct contribution of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, molecular and physiological pathways, sex hormones, visceral fat and subcutaneous fat and lifestyle lead to differences in disease burden and outcomes in males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex and gender play a pivotal role in precision medicine because the influence the physiology of each individual and the way they interact with environment from intrauterine life.

Effectiveness and safety of drugs for obesity

Recent publicity around the use of new antiobesity medications (AOMs) has focused the attention of patients and healthcare providers on the role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of obesity. Newer drug treatments have shown greater efficacy and safety compared with older drug treatments, yet access to these drug treatments is limited by providers' discomfort in prescribing, bias, and stigma around obesity, as well as by the lack of insurance coverage. Now more than ever, healthcare providers must be able to discuss the risks and benefits of the full range of antiobesity medications available to patients, and to incorporate both guideline based advice and emerging real world clinical evidence into daily clinical practice. The tremendous variability in response to antiobesity medications means that clinicians need to use a flexible approach that takes advantage of specific features of the antiobesity medication selected to provide the best option for individual patients. Future research is needed on how best to use available drug treatments in real world practice settings, the potential role of combination therapies, and the cost effectiveness of antiobesity medications. Several new drug treatments are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials, suggesting that the future for pharmacotherapy of obesity is bright.

Weight Loss Outcomes in a Veterans Affairs Pharmacotherapy-based Weight Management Clinic

Context

Despite a high prevalence of obesity in the veteran population, antiobesity medications (AOMs) have been underused in the Veterans Health Administration. Real-world reports on outcomes when AOMs have been used in veterans is limited.

Objective

To analyze weight loss outcomes from a local Veterans Health Administration pharmacotherapy-based weight management clinic (WMC).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of veterans enrolled in a local WMC for 15 months from August 2016 through September 2018 and followed through November 2019. Patients were offered 1 of 5 available AOMs based on their comorbidities. Factors associated with weight loss (5% or more weight loss) were assessed.

Key results

A total of 159 patients were seen in a WMC, 149 (93.7%) veterans were prescribed an AOM, and 129 returned for follow-up. Overall, 61/129 (47%) patients achieved 5% or greater weight loss and 28/129 (22%) achieved 10% or greater weight loss within 15 months. Clinically significant weight loss (%) over the first 15 months was achieved with phentermine/topiramate ER (-6.3%) and liraglutide (-7.5%), but not with orlistat (-3.9%) and lorcaserin (-3.6%). Comorbid obstructive sleep apnea was negatively associated with achieving ≥5% weight loss.

Conclusion

Phentermine/topiramate ER and liraglutide were found to be effective AOMs among veterans. Further work is needed to mitigate barriers to AOM initiation given the continued rise in obesity.

Real World Use of Anti-Obesity Medications and Weight Change in Veterans

BACKGROUND

Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) can be initiated in conjunction with participation in the VA national behavioral weight management program, MOVE!, to help achieve clinically meaningful weight loss.

OBJECTIVE

To compare weight change between Veterans who used AOM + MOVE! versus MOVE! alone and examine AOM use, duration, and characteristics associated with longer duration of use.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using VA electronic health records.

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans with overweight or obesity who participated in MOVE! from 2008-2017.

MAIN MEASURES

Weight change from baseline was estimated using marginal structural models up to 24 months after MOVE! initiation. The probability of longer duration of AOM use (≥ 180 days) was estimated via a generalized linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Among MOVE! participants, 8,517 (1.6%) used an AOM within 24 months after MOVE! initiation with a median of 90 days of cumulative supply. AOM + MOVE! users achieved greater weight loss than MOVE! alone users at 6 (3.2% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), 12 (3.4% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001), and 24 months (2.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001), and had a greater probability of achieving ≥ 5% weight loss at 6 (38.8% vs. 26.0%, p < 0.001), 12 (43.1% vs. 28.4%, p < 0.001), and 24 months (40.4% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001). Veterans were more likely to have ≥ 180 days of supply if they were older, exempt from medication copays, used other medications with significant weight-gain, significant weight-loss, or modest weight-loss side effects, or resided in the West North Central or Pacific regions. Veterans were less likely to have ≥ 180 days of AOM supply if they had diabetes or initiated MOVE! later in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

AOM use following MOVE! initiation was uncommon, and exposure was time-limited. AOM + MOVE! was associated with a higher probability of achieving clinically significant weight loss than MOVE! alone.

Phentermine in the Modern Era of Obesity Pharmacotherapy: Does It Still Have a Role in Treatment?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of the history, mechanism of action, and expected treatment effects of the anti-obesity medication (AOM), phentermine. It also includes a summary of recent research and practical guidance for prescribing clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research on phentermine is sparse and consists primarily of observational studies with methodologic limitations. These studies suggest that phentermine use is associated with clinically significant weight loss in adults and that the medication is generally well tolerated. Large-scale observational studies evaluating phentermine's safety have not identified an increased risk of cardiovascular events or elevations in blood pressure. There is no data to support the notion that phentermine is addictive. Although it remains the most commonly prescribed AOM in the USA, phentermine has little rigorous research to support its efficacy and safety in long-term treatment, which creates a dilemma with guideline-recommended chronic use of AOMs. While we await forthcoming conclusive data on this front, clinicians may consider using phentermine long-term in selected patients, if such prescribing is consistent with local regulatory statutes.

"Anti-obesity medications" or "medications to treat obesity" instead of "weight loss drugs" - why language matters - an official statement of the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (ABESO) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM)

Obesity is largely undertreated, in part because of the stigma surrounding the disease and its treatment. The use of the term "weight loss drugs" to refer to medications for the treatment of obesity may contribute to this stigma, leading to the idea that anyone who wants to lose weight could use them and that short-term use, only in the active weight loss phase would be enough. On the contrary, the use of terms such as "medications to treat obesity" or "anti-obesity medications" conveys the idea that the treatment is directed at the disease rather than the symptom. This joint statement by the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (ABESO) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) intends to alert the press, healthcare professionals and scientific community about the importance of the appropriate use of language, with the aim of improving obesity care.

Obesity treatment initiation, retention, and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs MOVE! Program among rural and urban veterans

Objective

Rural veterans have high obesity rates. Yet, little is known about this population's engagement with the Veterans Affairs (VA) weight management program (MOVE!). The study objective is to determine whether MOVE! enrollment, anti-obesity medication use, bariatric surgery use, retention, and outcomes differ by rurality for veterans with severe obesity.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration patient databases, including VA patients with severe obesity during 2015-2017. Patients were categorized using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Primary outcomes included proportion of patients and risk-adjusted likelihood of initiating VA MOVE!, anti-obesity medication, or bariatric surgery and risk-adjusted highly rural|Hazard Ratio (HR) of any obesity treatment. Secondary outcomes included treatment retention (≥12 weeks) and successful weight loss (5%) among patients initiating MOVE!, and risk-adjusted odds of retention and successful weight loss.

Results

Among 640,555 eligible veterans, risk-adjusted relative likelihood of MOVE! treatment was significantly lower for rural and HR veterans (HR = 0.83, HR = 0.67, respectively). Initiation rates of anti-obesity medication use were significantly lower as well, whereas bariatric surgery rates, retention, and successful weight loss did not differ.

Conclusions

Overall treatment rates with MOVE!, bariatric surgery, and anti-obesity medications remain low. Rural veterans are less likely to enroll in MOVE! and less likely to receive anti-obesity medications than urban veterans.

Sex/Gender Differences in Obesity Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity is a heterogeneous condition, yet sex/gender is rarely considered in the prevention or clinical care of this disease. This review examined and evaluated recent literature regarding the influence of sex and gender on obesity prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment in adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity is more prevalent in women than men in most countries, but in some countries and population subgroups, this gap is more pronounced. Several obesity-related comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes and hypertension, demonstrate sex-specific pathways. Women, compared to men, are more likely to be diagnosed with obesity and seek and obtain all types of obesity treatment including behavioral, pharmacological, and bariatric surgery. Men tend to have greater absolute weight loss, but this difference is attenuated once accounting for baseline weight. Obesity is a multifactorial condition with complex interactions among sex/gender, sociocultural, environmental, and physiological factors. More sex/gender research is needed to investigate mechanisms underlying sex/gender differences in prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment, identify ways to increase men's interest and participation in obesity treatment, and examine differences in obesity prevalence and treatments for transgender and gender non-conforming individuals.

Sex- and Gender-Based Pharmacological Response to Drugs

In humans, the combination of all sex-specific genetic, epigenetic, and hormonal influences of biologic sex produces different in vivo environments for male and female cells. We dissect how these influences of sex modify the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple drugs and provide examples for common drugs acting on specific organ systems. We also discuss how gender of physicians and patients may influence the therapeutic response to drugs. We aim to highlight sex as a genetic modifier of the pharmacological response to drugs, which should be considered as a necessary step toward precision medicine that will benefit men and women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study discusses the influences of biologic sex on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and provides examples for common drugs acting on specific organ systems. This study also discusses how gender of physicians and patients influence the therapeutic response to drugs.

Obesity Pharmacotherapy is Effective in the Veterans Affairs Patient Population: A Local and Virtual Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a major public health challenge, and the US military veteran population is disproportionately affected. Using deidentified records from a local weight management clinic and a national clinical data repository, obesity pharmacotherapy use and effectiveness for weight loss and obesity comorbidities in this vulnerable population were assessed.

METHODS

During the initial year of the local clinic, 43 records with monthly follow-up of MOVE! lifestyle intervention augmented by obesity pharmacotherapy were found. Nationally, more than 2 million records of prescribed obesity pharmacotherapy compared with metformin as control were identified. Records with detailed documentation of weight trends from 1 year before to 1 year after the prescription date for further analysis were selected for review.

RESULTS

The most commonly prescribed medications in the local clinic were metformin, liraglutide, and combination phentermine/topiramate. On average, weight loss of -4.0 ± 2.1 kg over the initial 6-month intervention was observed. In the national cohort, 577,491 records with an obesity or control metformin prescription and adequate weight documentation were identified. The most effective pharmacotherapy in the national cohort was phentermine/topiramate (-0.0931 ± 0.0198 kg/wk difference), followed by liraglutide, lorcaserin, and orlistat.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity pharmacotherapy is effective in achieving clinically meaningful weight loss in veterans as part of an integrated care approach.

Testing a self-directed lifestyle intervention among veterans: The D-ELITE pragmatic clinical trial

Nearly half of Veterans have obesity, fueling chronic diseases. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers an evidence-based behavioral weight management intervention called MOVE!, mostly delivered through in-person group sessions. Few eligible Veterans participate due to factors like distance and preferences, mirroring barriers in the general population. Practical alternatives to standard in-person programs are needed to improve access and engagement. A self-directed lifestyle intervention called D-ELITE-delivered through pre-recorded videos by DVD or online streaming-previously efficacious in a general primary care population, may provide such an alternative. This pragmatic clinical trial will evaluate whether D-ELITE improves weight and general health status among Veterans with obesity, relative to VA usual care. The yearlong intervention includes one orientation by phone, supplemental lifestyle coaching primarily via technology-based messages, 12 DVD or online streaming sessions over 3 months, and continued self-directed weight management for months 4-12. Participants use MyFitnessPal.com or paper booklets for self-monitoring weight, diet, and physical activity. Follow-up assessments at 12 and 24 months are administered by mail or phone. The study hypothesis is that compared with usual care, D-ELITE will lead to greater improvements in 12-month weight loss, per VA electronic health records, and general physical health status, assessed using the self-reported SF-12 physical composite score. We will also explore D-ELITE's effects on secondary biometric (e.g., HbA1c) and intermediate (e.g., diet) outcomes, reach, and budget impact. If effective, D-ELITE will offer a potentially scalable, low-cost alternative to VA's existing weight loss interventions by mitigating barriers presented by distance and technology.

The limits and challenges of antiobesity pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacotherapy is a useful adjunct when patients with obesity are unable to achieve adequate benefit from lifestyle interventions.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the history of antiobesity drugs, efficacy, and risks of currently approved drugs, limits of their usefulness in clinical practice, gaps in knowledge, methodological limitations of clinical trials, and reasons for underutilization.

EXPERT OPINION

In randomized controlled trials, currently approved antiobesity drugs have yielded an average weight loss ranging from approximately 3% to 9% relative to placebo at 1 year. Inadequate inclusion of racial and ethnic minorities and men, and high dropout rates in clinical trials limit generalizability of these findings to clinical practice. Weight loss achieved with antiobesity drugs is generally associated with lowered glycemia, but improvements in blood pressure and lipid measures tend to be marginal. There is limited evidence for sustained weight loss beyond 1 year and for safety and efficacy of antiobesity drugs in children and adolescents, and in post-bariatric surgery patients. None have demonstrated reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events or other significant disease outcomes. Limited health insurance coverage and negative perceptions of physicians have hindered the utilization of antiobesity drugs.

Eating Disorders and Overweight/Obesity in Veterans: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Treatment Considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eating disorders (EDs) and overweight/obesity (OW/OB) have a significant impact on veterans. This review highlights current research on EDs and OW/OB in this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prevalence estimates for both EDs and OW/OB among veterans remain consistent with and possibly higher than those in the general population. Both diagnoses share multiple risk factors, including trauma history, and mental health comorbidities. Although weight loss treatments have been fairly well studied among veteran samples, there are no published investigations on psychotherapies for EDs in this population. The Veterans Healthcare Administration is working to train providers in ED treatments. VHA treatments for OW/OB show some benefits and areas for improvement. Areas for future research include structured assessments for EDs and disordered eating behaviors in veterans to clarify prevalence estimates. There is a need for interventions that consider common mechanisms for ED and OW/OB, and there is a need for more research on the associations between different types of trauma and ED/OW/OB in veterans.

Anorectic state of obesity medications in the United States. Are leaner times ahead?

Introduction: Obesity is considered to be a chronic disease. Currently there are five prescription-only medications on the US market for the long-term management of obesity. However, these medications are underutilized by obese or overweight individuals seeking medical assistance for weight management.Areas covered: This special report provides an overview of the emerging obesity pharmacotherapies based on the data available from recruiting and active phase II/III trials from a registry of clinical trials. The authors also give their expert opinion and provide their future perspectives on the treatment of obesity based on what is known.Expert opinion: Despite obesity being a chronic condition affecting 40% of the US population, there is a low demand for obesity medications in the US market. Although the potential obesity medications that are currently being investigated in phase II/III clinical trials are promising, it is unclear whether the future pharmacotherapies will be enough to meet the health care need.