1
|
Mallela J, Pereira L, Simon E, Makkapati S, Forty S, Bruno S, Giblin T, Rosenblum J. Communicating Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Treatment Guidelines in Practice: The Importance of Documentation for Ensuring Positive Impacts on Oncology Care. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38959174 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Improvements in outcomes for adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology patients have lagged behind those of other age-specific cancer populations. Research has indicated that low availability of clinical trials, biological differences of this age-group, and several psychosocial factors including higher emotional distress impact outcomes. To improve care and survival rates for these patients, hospitals have implemented AYA oncology programs. The current study evaluated documentation of care in an AYA program housed in an academic medical center based on three areas emphasized in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for AYAs: clinical trial enrollment, fertility, and psychosocial care. Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for 45 patients treated before the start of the AYA oncology program and 45 patients treated after program initiation. Patients aged 15-39 years with a diagnosis of a malignant tumor were included. Variables evaluated included documentation of clinical trial enrollment, fertility preservation and sexual health considerations, and behavioral health referrals. Results: Documentation of most clinical trial and fertility variables did not significantly improve from pre- to post-program, although a higher number of patients had these variables documented post-program. Behavioral health referrals increased significantly from 52.8% pre-program to 95.4% post-program. Conclusion: Access to behavioral health care improved the most following implementation of our AYA program, which is likely because of the integration of a dedicated psychologist for AYAs when the program began. The practice of guideline-based care for this population can be better assessed and improved with designated behavioral health providers and more systematic documentation processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaya Mallela
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Lila Pereira
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York, USA
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
- Boston Children's Health Physicians, Hawthorne, New York, USA
| | - Emily Simon
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tara Giblin
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York, USA
- Boston Children's Health Physicians, Hawthorne, New York, USA
| | - Jeremy Rosenblum
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York, USA
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
- Boston Children's Health Physicians, Hawthorne, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leavitt AP, Albritton KH, Cazzell M, Stevenson E. Expansion of the Fertility Preservation Program to All Newly Diagnosed Prepubertal Patients with Cancer at a Pediatric Hospital. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY NURSING 2024; 41:212-219. [PMID: 38523328 DOI: 10.1177/27527530231221134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Background: As the majority of pediatric patients with cancer survive their disease, generating a population of over 500,000 childhood cancer survivors in the United States, it is imperative to minimize the lifelong consequences of treatment, which include temporary or permanent infertility caused by certain cancer treatments. A fertility consultation at diagnosis can provide patients and families with the opportunity to be informed regarding the likelihood of gonadal dysfunction and to consider fertility preservation. Method: After our pediatric hospital started to offer tissue cryopreservation, we initiated this evidence-based interventional quality improvement project. Our primary aim was to ensure that all newly diagnosed prepubertal patients with cancer who met the criteria for fertility tissue preservation were correctly identified and offered an educational consultation and preservation. Results: Between July 15, 2022 and October 30, 2022, 54 patients' treatment plans were evaluated to determine treatment-related infertility risk using the Oncofertility Consortium Pediatric Initiative Network's Risk Assessment tool. Fifteen patients were at a high level of significantly increased risk and 13 were eligible for consultation. Seven (46%) patients and their families received a consultation. Initiation of treatment before referral was the primary reason for lack of consultation. Six of seven patients receiving consultation (86%) elected to undergo preservation. Preservation procedures did not cause a delay in starting treatment for those patients. Discussion: A fertility preservation program with established policies and processes can increase the likelihood that prepubertal patients at high risk for infertility are correctly identified, educated, and offered preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia P Leavitt
- Clinical Operations, Cancer Screening, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Mary Cazzell
- Nursing Research, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pasten González A, Salvador Alarcón C, Mora J, Martín Gimenez MP, Carrasco Torrents R, Krauel L. Current Status of Fertility Preservation in Pediatric Oncology Patients. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:537. [PMID: 38790532 PMCID: PMC11120648 DOI: 10.3390/children11050537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Cancer poses significant emotional challenges for children and adolescents, despite improvements in survival rates due to new therapies. However, there is growing concern about the long-term effects, including fertility issues. This review examines recent advancements and future directions in fertility preservation within a pediatric population subjected to oncological therapies. Worldwide, there is variability in the availability of fertility preservation methods, influenced by factors like development status and governmental support. The decision to pursue preservation depends on the risk of gonadotoxicity, alongside factors such as diagnosis, treatment, clinical status, and prognosis. Currently, options for preserving fertility in prepubertal boys are limited compared to girls, who increasingly have access to ovarian tissue preservation. Adolescents and adults have more options available, but ethical considerations remain complex and diverse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Pasten González
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Cristina Salvador Alarcón
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Jaume Mora
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Marta P. Martín Gimenez
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Rosalia Carrasco Torrents
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Lucas Krauel
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain; (A.P.G.); (M.P.M.G.); (R.C.T.)
- Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona, SJD Barcelona Children’s Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona, 08950 Barcelona, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Landay SL, Burns JA, Bickle ML, Baltich Nelson B, Nipp RD. Fertility preservation in reproductive-aged female patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:612. [PMID: 37796328 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08081-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in adults younger than 50 years is steadily increasing in the USA, and treatment for CRC can impact future fertility. However, fertility decision-making in female patients with CRC can be complex, with fertility preservation (FP) counseling occurring inconsistently. PURPOSE The goal of this scoping review was to assess the literature regarding the frequency and quality of fertility preservation (FP) discussions taking place among oncology clinicians and their reproductive-age female patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to identify existing gaps in care and inform future research, interventions, or potential changes in practice. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases in order to identify studies pertaining to FP counseling in reproductive-age female patients with CRC. We used Covidence to screen studies for relevance and to extract data. Findings of interest included rate of fertility and/or FP discussions, patient characteristics associated with fertility discussions, initiators of discussions, rate of referrals to fertility specialists, patient utilization of FP services, and unmet fertility needs. We performed both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis. RESULTS We identified five studies that met our inclusion criteria, all published between 2007 and 2022. Frequency of fertility counseling discussions was low across studies, with a range of 15 to 52.5% of female patients with CRC receiving counseling. Patient characteristics which may be associated with likelihood of fertility discussion included age, parity, number of children, cancer location and stage, treatment type, and quality of life. The literature suggested that fertility discussions were initiated by clinicians about two-thirds of the time, and medical oncologists were the clinicians most likely to initiate. Studies did capture unmet fertility-related patient needs; participants who did not receive counseling often expressed desire for these discussions and regret that they did not occur. CONCLUSION Despite increasing incidence of CRC in patients at younger ages, this scoping review found a dearth of research conducted on young female CRC patients' experiences with fertility counseling and referrals. Notably, the existing research reveals that relatively few of these patients are receiving appropriate counseling. Additional research is needed to clarify current FP counseling practices, patient and clinician perceptions about FP, and ways to improve the quantity and quality of FP counseling in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia L Landay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jamie A Burns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital-Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Madison L Bickle
- OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Ryan D Nipp
- OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pawłowski P, Ziętara KJ, Michalczyk J, Fryze M, Buchacz A, Zaucha-Prażmo A, Zawitkowska J, Torres A, Samardakiewicz M. Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents during Oncological Treatment-A Review of Healthcare System Factors and Attitudes of Patients and Their Caregivers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4393. [PMID: 37686669 PMCID: PMC10487203 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is any therapeutic intervention to safeguard the fertility of cancer patients. Anti-cancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc.) entail the risk of reproductive disorders through cytotoxic effects on gamete-building cells, especially those not yet fully developed. This literature review analyzes the available data on securing fertility in pediatric and adolescent populations to identify the methods used and describe aspects related to financing, ethics, and the perspective of patients and their parents. Topics related to oncofertility in this age group are relatively niche, with few peer-reviewed articles available and published studies mostly on adults. Compared to pubertal individuals, a limited number of fertility preservation methods are used for prepubertal patients. Funding for the procedures described varies from country to country, but only a few governments choose to reimburse them. Oncofertility of pediatric and adolescent patients raises many controversies related to the decision, parents' beliefs, having a partner, ethics, as well as the knowledge and experience of healthcare professionals. As the fertility of young cancer patients is at risk, healthcare professionals should make every effort to provide them with an opportunity to fulfill their future reproductive plans and to have a family and offspring. Systemic solutions should form the basis for the development of oncofertility in pediatric and adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Pawłowski
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Karolina Joanna Ziętara
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Justyna Michalczyk
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Magdalena Fryze
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Anna Buchacz
- Youth Cancer Europe, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Agnieszka Zaucha-Prażmo
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Joanna Zawitkowska
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Anna Torres
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Marzena Samardakiewicz
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nahata L, Anazodo A, Cherven B, Logan S, Meacham LR, Meade CD, Zarnegar-Lumley S, Quinn GP. Optimizing health literacy to facilitate reproductive health decision-making in adolescent and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 Suppl 5:e28476. [PMID: 32633029 PMCID: PMC7785658 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite being considered "standard of care" by many organizations, fertility and reproductive health communications and counseling practices remain inconsistent for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) newly diagnosed with cancer and during survivorship. One factor known to affect how information is provided and received in the medical setting is health literacy. Providers should consider health literacy to optimize reproductive health communication with AYAs as they cope with their diagnosis, understand what it means for their future, process information about treatment options, learn about their potential harmful effects on fertility, make quick decisions about fertility preservation, and navigate a future family planning course. Thus, the objectives of this manuscript are to (a) summarize literature on reproductive health literacy; (b) describe health literacy frameworks; (c) examine ways to assess health literacy; and (d) identify ways to enhance clinician-patient communication in the AYA oncofertility setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Nahata
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lillian R. Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Division of Population Science, Health Outcomes & Behavior
| | - Sara Zarnegar-Lumley
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hong YH, Park C, Paik H, Lee KH, Lee JR, Han W, Park S, Chung S, Kim HJ. Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:221-242. [PMID: 37387349 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is a major concern in young patients diagnosed with breast cancer and planning to receive multimodality treatment, including gonadotoxic chemotherapy with or without age-related decline through long-term endocrine therapy. Most breast cancer patients undergo multimodality treatments; many short-term and long-term side effects arise during these therapies. One of the most detrimental side effects is reduced fertility due to gonadotoxic treatments with resultant psychosocial stress. Cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, and ovarian tissue are currently available fertility preservation methods for these patients. As an adjunct to these methods, in vitro maturation or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist could also be considered. It is also essential to communicate well with patients in the decision-making process on fertility preservation. It is essential to refer patients diagnosed with breast cancer on time to fertility specialists for individualized treatment, which may lead to desirable outcomes. To do so, a multimodal team-based approach and in-depth discussion on the treatment of breast cancer and fertility preservation is crucial. This review aims to summarize infertility risk related to currently available breast cancer treatment, options for fertility preservation and its details, barriers to oncofertility counseling, and psychosocial issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Hee Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haerin Paik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seho Park
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seockhoon Chung
- Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ludemann J, Pruett M, Klosky JL, Meacham L, Cherven B. The evolution of fertility preservation care models in a large pediatric cancer and blood disorders center. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30052. [PMID: 36308423 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children and adolescents who receive gonadotoxic treatments are at risk for future infertility. While there is a growing focus on integrating fertility preservation (FP) within pediatric cancer and blood disorder centers, wide variations in care models and methods exist across institutions. The purpose of this work is to describe the evolution of FP care models within a large pediatric hematology/oncology center. METHODS Models of care and associated timeframes are described, including a pre-FP program model, establishment of a formal FP program, integration of nurse navigators, and the addition of FP consult stratification based on urgency (urgent/nonurgent). The number of patient consults within each model, patient sex, diagnosis (oncologic/hematologic), and consult timing (pre-gonadotoxic treatment/posttreatment completion) were abstracted from the clinical database. RESULTS The number of annual consults increased from 24 during the pre-FP program model (2015) to 181 during the current care model (2020). Over time, the proportion of consults for females and patients with nonmalignant hematologic disorders increased. Patient stratification reduced the proportion of consults needing to be completed urgently from 75% at the advent of the FP program to 49% in the current model. CONCLUSIONS The evolution of care models within our FP program allowed for growth in the number of consults completed, expansion of services to more patients with nonmalignant hematologic disorders, and more consults for female patients. Nurse navigators play a critical role in care facilitating referrals, coordination, and patient education. Urgency stratification has allowed FP team members to manage increasing FP-related encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Ludemann
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Megan Pruett
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James L Klosky
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lillian Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Global uptake of fertility preservation by women undergoing cancer treatment: An unmet need in low to high-income countries. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102189. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Di Tucci C, Galati G, Mattei G, Chinè A, Fracassi A, Muzii L. Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102500. [PMID: 35626104 PMCID: PMC9139810 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately one million new cases of cancer are diagnosed in women of reproductive age every year. In the last few decades, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have improved the survival rate. However, the adverse effects of anticancer therapy on the ovaries and uterus have a significant impact on future fertility and may affect the quality of life of cancer survivors. Unfortunately, evidence about the trend of ovarian reserve loss over time is insufficient for predicting the duration of the fertile period. Currently, impaired fertility in cancer survivors is a growing issue that is complicated by an increasing number of women delaying childbearing. This review focuses on the detrimental effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery on reproductive functions and describes the mechanisms causing reduced fertility in cancer survivors. Moreover, in this review, the available fertility preservation strategies to guarantee the chance of motherhood in cancer survivors are illustrated. Abstract The incidence of cancer in reproductive-aged women is 7%, but, despite the increased number of cancer cases, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have raised the survival rate. Furthermore, in the last four decades, there has been a rising trend of delaying childbearing. There has been an increasing number of couples referred to Reproductive Medicine Centers for infertility problems after one partner has been treated for cancer. In these cases, the main cause of reduced fertility derives from treatments. In this review, we describe the effects and the risks of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in women with cancer, and we will focus on available fertility preservation techniques and their efficacy in terms of success in pregnancy and live birth rates.
Collapse
|
11
|
Iannarino NT, Palmer-Wackerly AL. Fertility Preservation Decision-Making Communication between Young Adult Cancer Patients and Their Romantic Partners: An Application of the DECIDE Typology. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2022; 37:778-789. [PMID: 33438453 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1868065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Infertility risk and fertility preservation (FP) are often salient quality-of-life concerns for young adults (YAs; i.e., 18-39 years old) who have experienced a cancer diagnosis. However, we know little about how members of this population communicate with close loved ones when faced with choices about FP before beginning cancer treatment. In this study, we apply the Family Determinants of Clinical Decisions (DECIDE) Typology to explore how YA cancer patients and their romantic partners negotiate unique and complex decisions about fertility with one another, their parents, and other family members. Through individual semi-structured interviews with 12 YA patient-romantic partner dyads, we found that most (n = 8) YA couples were collaborative in their decision-making communication, but that they varied in the extent to which they valued family involvement (i.e., open-, filtered-, and closed-collaborative). Other YA patients were independent and did not involve any partners or family members in decision-making, or they exemplified incongruent decision-making styles between the involved parties. Our findings have multiple implications for decision-making theory and practice in both cancer and FP communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas T Iannarino
- Department of Language, Culture, and Communication, University of Michigan-Dearborn
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Development and Validity Testing of an Assessment Tool for Oncofertility Barriers in Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers on the Breast Cancer Team. THE JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH : JNR 2022; 30:e195. [PMID: 35234209 DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary healthcare providers, especially clinical nurses, lack a valid tool to assess the comprehensive barriers affecting oncofertility care in breast cancer treatment. PURPOSE The aims of the research were to develop a self-assessment scale on oncofertility barriers and test its validity and reliability. METHODS This was a methodological study. The initial 36 items of the developed Oncofertility Barrier Scale (OBS) were generated through qualitative study and a review of the literature. This scale was further refined using expert validity (n = 10), face validity (n = 10), and item analysis (n = 184). Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and direct oblimin rotation was used to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the OBS was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest analyses. RESULTS The mean item-level and scale-level content validity indices of the initial OBS were higher than .96. The data were shown to be feasible for the factor analysis, and a six-factor solution was chosen that accounted for approximately 57.6% of the total variance. These factors included (a) lack of information and education, (b) rigid thinking toward oncofertility care, (c) cancer patient stereotypes, (d) fertility risk, (e) insufficient support, and (f) interrupted oncofertility care. The Cronbach's alpha of the 27-item OBS was .91, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .55. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The final version of the developed OBS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify the barriers to fertility cancer care that should be resolved by the breast cancer care team.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dorfman CS, Stalls JM, Mills C, Voelkel S, Thompson M, Acharya KS, Baker KC, Wagner LM, Miller N, Boswell A, Corbett C. Addressing Barriers to Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: The Role of Oncofertility Patient Navigation. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NAVIGATION & SURVIVORSHIP 2021; 12:332-348. [PMID: 34804640 PMCID: PMC8601663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infertility is a common late effect for cancer survivors. Whereas assisted reproductive technology has made it possible for survivors to take steps to preserve fertility before starting treatment, only a minority of patients proceed with preservation. Patient-, provider-, health system-, and societal-level barriers to fertility preservation (FP) exist. Oncofertility patient navigation is a valuable resource for addressing FP barriers. OBJECTIVES To highlight the critical role of oncofertility patient navigation in addressing barriers to FP within an academic oncofertility program. METHODS The role of the oncofertility patient navigator in reducing FP barriers, promoting informed decision-making, and ensuring program sustainability is described. Program metrics illustrating the impact of oncofertility patient navigation on referrals for FP counseling and access to FP in the last year also are provided. DISCUSSION The oncofertility program at our academic adult and pediatric medical centers aims to facilitate rapid referral to fertility counseling and preservation services for postpubertal cancer patients. The patient navigator is integral to the success of the program. The navigator ensures that patients are: (1) well-informed about the potential impact of cancer on fertility and FP options, (2) aware of available resources (eg, financial) for pursuing FP, (3) able to access FP services if desired, and (4) well supported in making an informed FP decision. The inclusion of the patient navigator has led to an almost 2-fold increase in referrals for FP counseling in the past year over the historic annual average. CONCLUSIONS Our institution's oncofertility program, with patient navigation at the core, provides a potential model for increasing patient access to oncofertility care and promoting program sustainability. Oncofertility patient navigation is a valuable resource for providing patients and families with education and support regarding FP decision-making, as well as addressing the multilevel barriers to FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Juliann M Stalls
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Coleman Mills
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Shannon Voelkel
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Mallori Thompson
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kelly S Acharya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Karen C Baker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Lars M Wagner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Nolan Miller
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Cheyenne Corbett
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Quinn GP, Ginsberg JP, Loeffen EAH, Hudson MM, Burns KC, van Santen HM, Berger C, Diesch T, Dirksen U, Giwercman A, Gracia C, Hunter SE, Kelvin JF, Klosky JL, Laven JSE, Lockart BA, Neggers SJCMM, Peate M, Phillips B, Reed DR, Tinner EME, Byrne J, Veening M, van de Berg M, Verhaak CM, Anazodo A, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Asogwa OA, Brownsdon A, Wallace WH, Green DM, Skinner R, Haupt R, Kenney LB, Levine J, van de Wetering MD, Tissing WJE, Paul NW, Kremer LCM, Inthorn J. Communication and ethical considerations for fertility preservation for patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e68-e80. [PMID: 33539755 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30595-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who will be treated with gonadotoxic therapies are at increased risk for infertility. Many patients and their families desire biological children but effective communication about treatment-related infertility risk and procedures for fertility preservation does not always happen. The PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group reviewed the literature and developed a clinical practice guideline that provides recommendations for ongoing communication methods for fertility preservation for patients who were diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger and their families. Moreover, the guideline panel formulated considerations of the ethical implications that are associated with these procedures. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the evidence and recommendations. In this clinical practice guideline, existing evidence and international expertise are combined to develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate ongoing communication between health-care providers and patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who might be at high risk for fertility impairment and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Font-Gonzalez
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Erik A H Loeffen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Karen C Burns
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Claire Berger
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France; Host Research Team EA4607 Autonomic Nervous System, Epidemiology, Physiology, Exercise, and Health, Jean Monnet University of Saint-Étienne, Education and Research Cluster Lyon, Saint-Étienne, France
| | - Tamara Diesch
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Uta Dirksen
- Department of Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Essen, Germany
| | - Aleksander Giwercman
- Division of Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Clarisa Gracia
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah E Hunter
- Starship Blood and Cancer Centre, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - James L Klosky
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joop S E Laven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Barbara A Lockart
- Division of Pediatric Surgery and Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Sophia Children's Hospital and Pituitary Center Rotterdam, Endocrinology Section, Department of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bob Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Damon R Reed
- Adolescent Young Adult Oncology Program, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eva Maria E Tinner
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marleen van de Berg
- Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Chris M Verhaak
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandra Brownsdon
- Children and Young Peoples' Cancer Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel M Green
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Lisa B Kenney
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Norbert W Paul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Julia Inthorn
- Institute for the History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ayuandari S, Khasanah N, Riyanti IW, Dewanto A, Enisar Sangun DI, Wiweko B. Current Awareness and Attitude toward Fertility Preservation in Indonesia: A Nationwide Survey Among Health-care Providers. J Hum Reprod Sci 2021; 14:81-86. [PMID: 34083997 PMCID: PMC8057139 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_239_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Fertility preservation (FP) is necessary for cancer patients who develop infertility due to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In Indonesia, many systematic steps and long-term continued actions must be taken to establish FP units since there has been an increasing incidence of cancer among people under 45 years old. AIMS This study aimed at a comprehensive evaluation on the awareness and practices of health-care providers (HCPs) toward FP. SETTINGS AND DESIGN This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A validated nationwide online survey was completed by 160 HCPs as a representative sample from 11 provinces in 2017 that provide medical care to cancer patients at hospitals or clinics. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, logistic regression, and Pearson correlation tests were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS Respondents were specialists (59.4%) and other HCPs (40.6%). Around 60% of the HCPs who performed cancer therapies already discussed the fertility issues with their patients. Meanwhile, the HCPs (60.7%) also tended not to consult and refer their patients to fertility experts (P < 0.05). However, those who discussed the risk of infertility with patients tended to consult with and refer them to a fertility consultant for further FP procedure as the follow-up for their discussions (odds ratio = 8.98, confidence interval 95%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In Indonesia, FP awareness of the HCPs who performed cancer therapy was high. Nevertheless, attitudes to refer patients to fertility experts for possible FP management still need to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarrah Ayuandari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing-Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Nurida Khasanah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing-Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ismi W. Riyanti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing-Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Agung Dewanto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing-Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Diannisa Ikarumi Enisar Sangun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing-Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Budi Wiweko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
- Yasmin IVF Clinic, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Human Reproductive, Infertility and Family Planning Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
- Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
King DA, Lane S, Yeomanson D. Fifteen-minute consultation: Fertility preservation in children with cancer. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2020; 105:342-346. [PMID: 32414812 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Advances in the treatment of childhood cancer have led to significant numbers of children surviving into adulthood and beyond. There is therefore an increasing focus on reduction of long-term effects of treatment including subfertility. In this article, we give an overview of the different methods of fertility preservation and how to discuss this important topic in children newly diagnosed with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Anthony King
- Paediatric Oncology, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sheila Lane
- Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Yeomanson
- Paediatric Oncology, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cooley LF, Wren J, Keeter MK, Lam I, Bennett N, Brannigan RE. Anti-TNF agents and potential effects on male fertility: are men being counseled? BMC Urol 2020; 20:111. [PMID: 32718310 PMCID: PMC7385975 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00658-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult men with autoimmune conditions are commonly prescribed anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents; however, there is a paucity of quality evidence as to their effect on male fertility (e.g. semen parameters and sperm quality). Our objective was to determine if men with autoimmune conditions are being counseled regarding the unknown reproductive effects of anti-TNF agents prior to initiation of therapy. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 1010 male patients age 18-45 who were prescribed an anti-TNF agent were assessed for (1) receipt of counseling regarding potential reproductive effects; (2) screening for anatomic or laboratory abnormalities associated with infertility; (3) election for sperm cryopreservation. RESULTS Only 10.3% of men received counseling, and this was not associated with age (p = 0.77). Those who received counseling were significantly more likely to have a genitourinary exam performed, be assessed for presence of a varicocele, be asked about or endorse low libido or erectile dysfunction, have a testosterone, LH, FSH, or prolactin level checked, and have a semen analysis performed (all, p < 0.0001). Rates of sperm cryopreservation were low, but statistically higher in men who received counseling (5.77% (+) counseling, 1.10% (-) counseling) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The limited current literature lacks a consensus regarding the short- and long-term male reproductive effects of anti-TNF therapy. Despite this lack of clarity, rates of pre-initiation counseling were low. Rates of sperm cryopreservation, while improved in the counseled group remained low, suggesting prescribing physicians may be unaware of this option for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Folgosa Cooley
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Arkes 23-015, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - James Wren
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Arkes 23-015, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Mary Kate Keeter
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Arkes 23-015, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Isaac Lam
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Arkes 23-015, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Nelson Bennett
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Arkes 23-015, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Robert E Brannigan
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Arkes 23-015, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Norton W, Wright E. Barriers and Facilitators to Fertility-Related Discussions with Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer: Nurses' Experiences. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:481-489. [PMID: 32155354 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Improvements in cancer survival rates for teenagers and young adults (TYAs) have resulted in quality-of-life issues into survivorship becoming increasingly important. However, infertility is a potential late side effect of cancer treatment, which can negatively impact on quality of life. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies have resulted in increasingly effective fertility preservation (FP) options. Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with TYAs with cancer aged 13-24 years. Methods: An interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Eleven purposively selected nurses working on a specialist TYA cancer unit participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using IPA. Results: Parents/family were experienced as self-appointed informal gatekeepers who were perceived to hold the power to control nurses' access to communicate with young people about fertility issues. Nurses adopted a supportive role, which was enhanced by the positive nature of their relationship with the TYA. Uncertainty was expressed over whether the TYA had been fully informed of their infertility risk and potential FP options. Conclusions: Nurses should manage parental involvement sensitively if TYAs are to make informed decisions regarding their future reproductive health. There is a need for clear role delineation in fertility discussions to ensure that TYAs are provided with the opportunity to discuss infertility risk and be referred to a specialist before initiating cancer treatment. Nurses should cultivate the primacy of the nurse-TYA relationship to improve fertility care. Further research into the factors that TYAs may consider beneficial within the nurse-patient relationship is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Norton
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Wright
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lehmann V, Kutteh WH, Sparrow CK, Bjornard KL, Klosky JL. Fertility-related services in pediatric oncology across the cancer continuum: a clinic overview. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3955-3964. [PMID: 31872295 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05248-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fertility-related services in pediatric oncology are increasing, but barriers to care remain and few structured programs are described in the literature. Therefore, the study objectives were (1) to characterize fertility-related services in a large pediatric oncology center and (2) to discuss recommendations for fertility-related services across the pediatric cancer continuum. METHODS Medical records of all cases referred to our Fertility Preservation Clinic within a 3-year period were reviewed, which included 292 patients/survivors with malignant disease. Approximately half (n = 152/292, 52.1%) were cancer patients referred prior to treatment (n = 92/152) or while on active therapy (n = 60/152). The other half (n = 140/292; 47.9%) were survivors who had completed treatment. RESULTS Referrals more than doubled over 3 years. Most patients referred before treatment were offered and opted for FP (72.8% attempted; 58.9% completed). More male than female patients opted for FP (77.6% vs. 22.4%), but completion rates were higher among females (93.3% vs. 76.9%). Rates of FP before treatment did not increase over time (p = .752). Many patients on-treatment were referred for infertility risk counseling, demonstrating information/support needs in this group. Referred survivors questioned their fertility post-treatment and completed fertility assessments, indicating intact fertility among few (~ 15%). CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrated the acceptance and increasing need for fertility-related services in pediatric oncology across the cancer continuum, including FP before treatment, counseling during treatment, and fertility assessment in survivorship. Based on our experiences, current recommendations are discussed and include standardized procedures, streamlined referrals, adequate communication/education (of providers and families), and meeting specific needs of young cancer patients/survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Lehmann
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - William H Kutteh
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
- Fertility Associates of Memphis, 80 Humphreys Center Drive, Memphis, TN, 38120, USA
| | - Charlene K Sparrow
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Kari L Bjornard
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - James L Klosky
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
- The Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, 5461 Meridian Mark Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Covelli A, Facey M, Kennedy E, Brezden-Masley C, Gupta AA, Greenblatt E, Baxter NN. Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers to Discussing Infertility and Fertility Preservation With Young Women With Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1914511. [PMID: 31693121 PMCID: PMC6865261 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Infertility can be a devastating adverse effect of cancer treatment for young women. Fertility preservation may be an important and influential factor in treatment decisions. Despite American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommending discussion around potential infertility with patients, nearly 50% of young women with cancer remain uninformed. Objective To understand and describe from clinicians' perspectives the barriers to discussing infertility and fertility preservation with young women with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study used purposeful, maximum variation, and snowball sampling strategies to recruit 22 clinicians from cancer centers and community hospitals in 5 Canadian provinces, 5 practice areas, and 12 practice sites. Eligibility criteria included clinicians who regularly treat young women with cancer who might need fertility preservation. Telephone interviews that lasted between 30 to 75 minutes were conducted between May and November 2014 using a semistructured interview guide. Thematic analysis was used to discern the nature of barriers, and the Cabana framework was used to organize and interpret these findings. Analysis was conducted from May 2014 until May 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinician perspectives on what influences their nonadherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, which recommend discussing fertility preservation with patients. Results A total of 22 clinicians were interviewed, including 8 medical oncologists, 4 surgical oncologists, 4 fertility specialists, 3 hematology and oncology specialists, and 3 nurse practitioners or clinician nurse specialists. Seventeen clinicians were women and 5 clinicians were men; the median (range) time in practice was 10 (0.67-37) years. Analysis suggested that clinicians' unfamiliarity with infertility risks, fertility preservation technologies, referral processes, and procedures, as well as environmental factors and their perceptions of fertility preservation, influenced their practices regarding fertility discussions. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this qualitative study suggest that the individual and environmental challenges that clinicians experience might negatively affect their willingness and ability to raise fertility-related issues with young women with cancer. Multiple strategies are needed to address these challenges to improve overall care of young women with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Covelli
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcia Facey
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Abha A Gupta
- Department of Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ellen Greenblatt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fertility preservation in patients with hematologic malignancies and recipients of hematopoietic cell transplants. Blood 2019; 134:746-760. [PMID: 31292116 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2018846790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with hematologic malignancies and those undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) face a complex set of challenges when considering options for fertility preservation (FP). There are no standard options for prepubertal children, and women with hematologic malignancies may not be eligible for standard FP options. Fortunately, initial therapies for most blood cancers are not highly gonadotoxic, affording an important opportunity for postremission counseling and referrals to fertility specialists. These patients face a high risk of relapse, and many will be referred for autologous or allogeneic HCT, which carries an extremely high risk of infertility. The expanding indications for HCT to include benign hematologic disorders as well as autoimmune diseases mandate that all hematologists are familiar with these risks. Oncofertility researchers are continually pushing the boundaries of what may be possible for our patients; in the meantime, communication and shared decision-making between hematologists and patients, as well as program-building, education, and outreach are essential to ensure that these patients, many of whom will be cured, maintain all of their options for a fulfilling life after intensive therapy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Srikanthan A, Ethier JL, Amir E. The Voices of Young Women with Breast Cancer: Providing Support and Information for Improved Fertility Preservation Discussions. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 8:547-553. [PMID: 31158039 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Fertility is a concern for young women with breast cancer. We explore patient experiences with fertility discussions at diagnosis to identify barriers and preferences to patient-centered delivery of care. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted on consecutive, female breast cancer survivors, 39 years of age or younger at diagnosis and within 2 years of diagnosis, who attended routine outpatient follow-up at a large academic teaching center. Interviews lasted 30 minutes and were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted to explore experiences around fertility discussions. Strength of the theme was determined by examining the frequency of a response. Data collection and analysis continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Results: Analysis comprised 50 women with a median age of 34.5 years (range 25-39 years). Thirty-nine women (78%) had completed university education. Thirty-three women (66%) recalled having fertility preservation discussions at diagnosis. The most common themes identified include the following: (i) the requirement for more patient support, (ii) improving information, (iii) integration of patient values, (iv) creating options for patients, (v) financial limitations, and (vi) the need to look beyond the immediate impact. Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort of young adult breast cancer survivors, fertility discussion experiences at diagnosis remain suboptimal. Improved information and a focus on individual patient desires can improve experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirrtha Srikanthan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Josee-Lyne Ethier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Canada
| | - Eitan Amir
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Panjwani AA, Marín-Chollom AM, Pervil IZ, Erblich J, Rubin LR, Schuster MW, Revenson TA. Illness Uncertainties Tied to Developmental Tasks Among Young Adult Survivors of Hematologic Cancers. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 8:149-156. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aliza A. Panjwani
- Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center & Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York
| | | | - Ian Z. Pervil
- The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
| | - Joel Erblich
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College & The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
| | - Lisa R. Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, New York
| | | | - Tracey A. Revenson
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College & The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lampic C, Wettergren L. Oncologists' and pediatric oncologists' perspectives and challenges for fertility preservation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98:598-603. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Lampic
- Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - Lena Wettergren
- Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cancer and fertility: optimizing communication between patients and healthcare providers. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 13:53-58. [PMID: 30625120 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews the status of guidelines and recommendations for communication between patients with cancer and healthcare providers (HCPs) concerning fertility issues. RECENT FINDINGS The timing, the type of information provided, and the openness of HCPs can all affect how patients with cancer perceive discussions regarding fertility concerns and preservation. In addition, whether such discussions occur is associated with intrinsic factors, such as age and sex of the patients as well as HCP's knowledge level. It has also been found that the patients have different needs for information regarding fertility preservation and preferences for types of communication strategies regarding the impact of their disease and treatments on options for family planning. SUMMARY Although discussions about fertility concerns in the context of cancer between physicians and patients are occurring more frequently, there are inconsistent findings regarding satisfaction with these discussions. Recent research has found that the timing, type of information given, and level of openness of the HCP can impact how patients perceive communications regarding the risks of cancer treatment on fertility preservation options and future family planning. Age, sex, and HCP's knowledge of fertility risks and fertility preservation services are also notable factors associated with whether and how extensively discussions about fertility take place. More women than men report having a fertility discussion with an HCP. However, men are more likely to report satisfaction with the fertility discussion than women.
Collapse
|
26
|
Takae S, Lee JR, Mahajan N, Wiweko B, Sukcharoen N, Novero V, Anazodo AC, Gook D, Tzeng CR, Doo AK, Li W, Le CTM, Di W, Chian RC, Kim SH, Suzuki N. Fertility Preservation for Child and Adolescent Cancer Patients in Asian Countries. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:655. [PMID: 31681163 PMCID: PMC6804405 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: At present, fertility is one of the main concerns of young cancer patients. Following this trend, "fertility preservation (FP)" has been established and has become a new field of reproductive medicine. However, FP for child and adolescent (C-A) cancer patients is still developing, even in advanced countries. The aim of the present study was to assess the barriers to FP for C-A patients by investigating the current status of FP for C-A patients in Asian countries, which just have started FP activities. Method: A questionnaire survey of founding members of the Asian Society for Fertility Preservation (ASFP) was conducted in November 2018. Main findings: Of the 14 countries, 11 country representatives replied to this survey. FP for C-A patients is still developing in Asian countries, even in Australia, Japan, and Korea, which have organizations or academic societies specialized for FP. In all countries that replied to the present survey, the patients can receive embryo cryopreservation (EC), oocyte cryopreservation (OC), and sperm cryopreservation (SC) as FP. Compared with ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTC) is an uncommon FP treatment because of its still extremely experimental status (7 of 11 countries provide it). Most Asian countries can provide FP for C-A patients in terms of medical technology, but most have factors inhibiting to promote FP for C-A patients, due to lack of sufficient experience and an established system promoting FP for C-A patients. "Don't know how to provide FP treatment for C-A" is a major barrier. Also, low recognition in society and among medical staff is still a particularly major issue. There is also a problem with cooperative frameworks with pediatric departments. To achieve high-quality FP for C-A patients, a multidisciplinary approach is vital, but, according to the present study, few paramedical staff can participate in FP for C-A patients in Asia. Only Australia and Korea provide FP information by video and specific resources. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated the developing status of FP for C-A patients in Asian countries. More intensive consideration and discussion are needed to provide FP in Asian societies based on the local cultural and religious needs of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seido Takae
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
- *Correspondence: Seido Takae
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Budi Wiweko
- Division of Reproductive Endocrionolgy and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
| | - Nares Sukcharoen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bankok, Thailand
| | - Virgilio Novero
- St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
- Section of Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Antoinette Catherine Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre and Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Debra Gook
- Melbourne IVF, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chii-Ruey Tzeng
- Division of Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Wen Li
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Second Military Medical University, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Wen Di
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ri-Cheng Chian
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Seok Hyun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Latif N, Ali N. Patient and Physician Perspective on Sperm Banking to Overcome Post-Treatment Infertility in Young Cancer Patients in Pakistan. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 8:54-60. [PMID: 30256151 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivor rates have increased over the past few decades leading to a growing interest in research related to quality of life (QoL). We attempted to explore the unique barriers that might prevent adult male cancer patients from accessing sperm cryopreservation in Pakistan. METHODS Semi-structured interviews of male cancer patients aged 18-45 years were audio-recorded in Urdu and translated to English and were transcribed ad verbatim. The topics included information regarding risk of infertility following chemotherapy, future reproductive choices, and barriers to sperm cryopreservation. Questionnaire to physicians containing four content domains of knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers to sperm banking was also delivered. Data were entered and analyzed on SPSS. RESULTS Of the 25 patients interviewed, there were 10 cases of leukemia, 3 cases of lymphoma, 2 cases each of colorectal carcinoma and multiple myeloma, 1 case each of neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma, and solitary cases involving the lung, breast, thymus, brain, jaw, and testis. Four patients knew about the risk of infertility. All patients were aware of the option of sperm cryopreservation. Two patients had their sperm preserved before the initiation of chemotherapy. Perceived treatment-related expenses appeared to be the major barrier to sperm cryopreservation in nine patients. This was followed by lack of information, which was cited by eight patients, and religious reasons (n = 2 patients). Other barriers were female gender of the doctor and patient's preferences. Four patients stated no barriers. Nine physicians responded to the questionnaire. Seventy-eight percent of physicians agreed that cancer treatment increases the risk of infertility. 33.3% strongly agreed and 55.6% agreed that infertility can have an adverse impact on QoL. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant lack of awareness among male cancer patients regarding infertility following cancer treatment. It is imperative that physicians inform them of this and discuss treatment options, along with addressing potential barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Latif
- 1 Civil Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Natasha Ali
- 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Roher SIG, Gupta AA, Gibson BE, Lorenzo AJ, Gibson JL. Adolescent Males' Understanding of Infertility as a Long-Term Effect of Cancer Therapy. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 8:49-53. [PMID: 30183444 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer therapy can result in infertility in childhood cancer survivors; however, little is known about how young adolescent males make sense of infertility and potential future parenthood. What's more, research shows that many healthcare professionals in Canada do not discuss fertility preservation (FP) with this vulnerable population. This study examines how male adolescent childhood cancer survivors understand infertility as a long-term effect of cancer treatments. We used a narrative analysis to examine 16 interviews with 14-18-year-old males. The findings from this research illustrate that FP discussions may raise meaningful questions for young men about how they see themselves and construct their identities. The findings also demonstrate that young men's beliefs about FP may be informed by family narratives, and it shows that biological parenthood may be important to adolescent males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie I G Roher
- 1 Social and Behavioural Health Sciences Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abha A Gupta
- 2 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barbara E Gibson
- 3 Department of Physical Therapy, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Armando J Lorenzo
- 4 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Gibson
- 5 Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Greimel E, Lanceley A, Oberguggenberger A, Nordin A, Kuljanic K, Schmalz C, Arraras JI, Chie W, Jensen PT, Tomaszewski KA, Creutzberg CL, Galalae R, Toelen H, Inwald EC, Bjelic-Radisic V. Differences in health care professionals' and cancer patients' views on sexual health issues. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2299-2302. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Andy Nordin
- East Kent Hospitals University Foundation NHS Trust; Kent UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Razvan Galalae
- Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen GmbH; Gelsenkirchen Germany
| | - Hilde Toelen
- University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Campus Gasthuisberg; Leuven Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lau GA, Schaeffer AJ. Current standing and future directions in pediatric oncofertility: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:S276-S282. [PMID: 30159233 PMCID: PMC6087837 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.05.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In this narrative review, we discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of infertility in childhood and adolescent cancer. We also review the current guidelines and ethical issues related to pediatric oncofertility. Finally, we present recent advances in basic science and translational research in pediatric fertility preservation (FP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen A Lau
- Division of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Factors influencing the documentation of fertility-related discussions for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018; 34:42-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
32
|
Skaczkowski G, White V, Thompson K, Bibby H, Coory M, Orme LM, Conyers R, Phillips MB, Osborn M, Harrup R, Anazodo A. Factors influencing the provision of fertility counseling and impact on quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2018; 36:484-502. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1443986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Skaczkowski
- center for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- center for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Thompson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Bibby
- center for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Coory
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M. Orme
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Conyers
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer center, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Michael Osborn
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, Raanani H, Dirnfeld M, Patrizio P. Medical egg freezing: How cost and lack of insurance cover impact women and their families. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2018; 5:82-92. [PMID: 30014045 PMCID: PMC6024226 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 10/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Medical egg freezing (MEF) is being recommended increasingly for women at risk of losing their reproductive ability due to cancer chemotherapy or other fertility-threatening medical conditions. This first, binational, ethnographic study of women who had undergone MEF sought to explore women's experiences under two different funding systems: (i) the USA, where the cost of MEF is rarely covered by private or state health insurance; and (ii) Israel, where the cost of MEF is covered by national health insurance. Women were recruited from four American and two Israeli in-vitro fertilization clinics where MEF is offered. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 women (33 Americans, 12 Israelis) who had completed at least one cycle of MEF. All of the Israeli women had cancer diagnoses, but were not faced with the additional burden of funding an MEF cycle. In marked contrast, the American women - 23 with cancer diagnoses and 10 with other fertility-threatening medical conditions - struggled, along with their families, to 'piece together' MEF funding, which added significant financial pressure to an already stressful situation. Given the high priority that both American and Israeli women in this study placed on survival and future motherhood, it is suggested that insurance funding for MEF should be mandated in the USA, as it is in Israel. This article concludes by describing new state legislative efforts in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lynn M. Westphal
- Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Stanford University, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Dror Meirow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF and Fertility Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Hila Raanani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF and Fertility Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Martha Dirnfeld
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology-IVF, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Ruth & Bruce Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, Raanani H, Dirnfeld M, Patrizio P. Medical egg freezing: the importance of a patient-centered approach to fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:49-59. [PMID: 29124460 PMCID: PMC5758476 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1081-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This binational qualitative study of medical egg freezing (MEF) examined women's motivations and experiences, including their perceived needs for patient-centered care in the midst of fertility- and life-threatening diagnoses. METHODS Forty-five women who had undertaken MEF were interviewed in the USA (33 women) and in Israel (12 women) between June 2014 and August 2016. Interviews lasted approximately 1 h and were conducted by two senior medical anthropologists, one in each country. Women were recruited from four American IVF clinics (two academic, two private) and two Israeli clinics (both academic) where MEF is being offered to cancer patients and women with other fertility-threatening medical conditions. RESULTS Women who undertake MEF view their fertility and future motherhood as important components of their identities and recovery and, thus, are grateful for the opportunity to pursue fertility preservation. However, women who undergo MEF have special needs, given that they tend to be a "vulnerable" population of young (age < 30), unmarried, resource-constrained women, who are facing not only fertility loss but also the "double jeopardy" of cancer. Through in-depth, qualitative interviews, these women's MEF stories reveal 10 dimensions of care important to fertility preservation, including five "system factors" (information, coordination and integration, accessibility, physical comfort, cost) and five "human factors" (adolescent issues, male partner involvement, family involvement, egg disposition decisions, emotional support). Together, these dimensions of care constitute an important framework that can be best described as "patient-centered MEF." CONCLUSIONS Women pursuing MEF have special medical needs and concerns, which require particular forms of patient-centered care. This study outlines 10 dimensions of patient-centered fertility preservation that are appropriate for MEF patients. This approach may help IVF clinics to be better prepared for delivering top-quality care to mostly young, single women facing the daunting prospect of fertility loss and life-threatening medical diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia C. Inhorn
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, 10 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | | | - Lynn M. Westphal
- Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Stanford University, 1195 W. Fremont Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94087 USA
| | - Joseph Doyle
- Shady Grove Fertility, 9600 Blackwell Road, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
| | - Norbert Gleicher
- Center for Human Reproduction, 21 E. 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Dror Meirow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF and Fertility Unit, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek Ha’ella St, 52621 Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Hila Raanani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF and Fertility Unit, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek Ha’ella St, 52621 Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Martha Dirnfeld
- Division Reproductive Endocrinology-IVF, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Faculty of Medicine, Technion, 3436212 Haifa, Israel
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- Yale Fertility Center, Yale University, 150 Sargent Drive, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Komatsu H, Yagasaki K, Yamauchi H. Fertility decision-making under certainty and uncertainty in cancer patients. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2017; 15:40-45. [PMID: 29389500 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to understand how reproductive-age women with breast cancer make fertility-related decisions. METHODS Using grounded theory methodology, we collected data from 11 reproductive-age women with breast cancer between March and August 2016. Verbatim transcriptions were analyzed using constant comparative analysis and open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS "Fertility Decision-Making under Certainty and Uncertainty" emerged as a core category. Fertility decision-making started with the participants' "values and preferences" about having a child. In making a decision, there were certainty ("Information" and "Emotional support") and uncertainty ("Time constraints," "Recurrent risk," "Labeling," and "Unmet needs") factors. Participants had more uncertainty factors than certainty factors, and healthcare professionals' services accounted for one of the uncertainty factors. CONCLUSIONS After fertility preservation counseling, women with cancer made difficult decisions in stressful situations without sufficient healthcare information and support. Tailored information should be provided to individual women in collaboration between oncology and reproductive health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Komatsu
- Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Kaori Yagasaki
- Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Hideko Yamauchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Patrizio P. Medical egg freezing and cancer patients’ hopes: Fertility preservation at the intersection of life and death. Soc Sci Med 2017; 195:25-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
37
|
Armuand G, Nilsson J, Rodriguez‐Wallberg K, Malmros J, Arvidson J, Lampic C, Wettergren L. Physicians' self-reported practice behaviour regarding fertility-related discussions in paediatric oncology in Sweden. Psychooncology 2017; 26:1684-1690. [PMID: 28734133 PMCID: PMC5656910 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate practice behaviours of Swedish physicians with regard to discussing the impact of cancer treatment on fertility with paediatric oncology patients and their parents, and to identify factors associated with such discussions. METHODS A cross-sectional survey study was conducted targeting all physicians in Sweden working in paediatric oncology care settings. Participants responded to a questionnaire measuring practice behaviour, attitudes, barriers, and confidence in knowledge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with seldom discussing fertility. RESULTS More than half of the physicians routinely talked with their patients/parents about the treatment's potential impact on fertility (male patients: 62%; female patients: 57%; P = 0.570). Factors associated with less frequently discussing fertility with patients/parents were working at a non-university hospital (male patients: OR 11.49, CI 1.98-66.67; female patients: OR 33.18, CI 4.06-271.07), concerns that the topic would cause worry (male patients: OR 8.23, CI 1.48-45.89; female patients: OR 12.38, CI 1.90-80.70), and perceiving the parents as anxious (male patients: OR 7.18, CI 1.20-42.85; female patients: OR 11.65, CI 1.32-103.17). CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, we recommend structured training in how to communicate about fertility issues in stressful situations, which in turn might increase fertility-related discussions in paediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G.M. Armuand
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - J. Nilsson
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - K.A. Rodriguez‐Wallberg
- Department of Oncology‐PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Reproductive MedicineKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - J. Malmros
- Paediatric Oncology Unit, Astrid Lindgren Children's HospitalKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
- Department of Women's and Children's HealthKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - J. Arvidson
- Department of Women's and Children's HealthUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| | - C. Lampic
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - L. Wettergren
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Romao RLP, Lorenzo AJ. Fertility preservation options for children and adolescents with cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2017; 11:S97-S102. [PMID: 28265333 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer in children and adolescents has seen a stark rise in survival rates in the last decades; overall survival in excess of 80% can be reasonably expected for many newly diagnosed patients with malignancies in this age group. Survivorship has unfolded several specific issues faced by these patients, including fertility concerns. Hence, fertility preservation efforts have been discussed and undertaken with increased frequency. METHODS In this article, the authors provide a broad overview of the current recommendations surrounding fertility preservation in this patient population. Reasons to offer fertility preservation, target groups for interventions, and methods available based on age group and gender are discussed in detail. RESULTS The medical literature and patient advocates strongly support a discussion about fertility preservation at the time of diagnosis; the risk of infertility is real and parents and families wish to be informed about it. In postpubertal males, sperm-banking is relatively straightforward and should be attempted by most newly diagnosed patients, ideally before commencement of treatment. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue in higher-risk prepubertal males is feasible, but still experimental. Female fertility preservation is more complex, requires more invasive procedures, and can delay initiation of treatment due to the requirement for hormone stimulation of follicles prior to harvesting. CONCLUSIONS Oncofertility initiatives in children and youth are still in their early days and will continue to expand; urologists should be prepared to offer counselling and interventions when appropriate to this growing vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo L P Romao
- Division of Pediatric Urology and Pediatric General Surgery, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Armando J Lorenzo
- Division of Pediatric Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|