Management based on exhaled nitric oxide levels adjusted for atopy reduces asthma exacerbations in children: A dual centre randomized controlled trial

Use of exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis and monitoring of childhood asthma: myth or maxim?

Asthma is a common condition in children. This review describes the evidence from the literature and international asthma guidelines for using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in the diagnosis and monitoring of childhood asthma. The accuracy of FENO measuring devices could be further improved, the difference in FENO results between devices are equivalent to what is considered a clinically important difference. For diagnosing asthma no guideline currently recommends FENO is used as the first test, but many recommend FENO as part of a series of tests. A cut-off of 35 ppb is widely recommended as being supportive of an asthma diagnosis, but evidence from children at risk of asthma suggests that a lower threshold of 25 ppb may be more appropriate. Nine randomised clinical trials including 1885 children have added FENO to usual asthma care and find that exacerbations are reduced when care is guided by FENO (OR for exacerbation compared to usual care 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94). What is not clear is what cut-off(s) of FENO should be used to trigger a change in treatment. After 30 years of intensive research there is not sufficient evidence to recommend FENO for routine diagnosing and monitoring asthma in children.

Educational aims

To give the reader an overview of literature that supports and does not support the role of FENO in diagnosing asthma in children.To give the reader an overview of literature that supports and does not support the role of FENO in monitoring asthma in children.To give the reader an understanding of the role of FENO in international guidelines for diagnosing and monitoring asthma in children.

Understanding the Updates in the Asthma Guidelines

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that affects millions of Americans, with variable symptoms of bronchospasm and obstruction among individuals over time. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) published the 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines based on the latest research since the 2007 Expert Panel Report-3 (EPR-3). The following article reviews the 21 new recommendations on the six core topics in asthma: use of intermittent inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy, use of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide test in asthma diagnosis and monitoring, indoor allergen mitigation, immunotherapy, and bronchial thermoplasty. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate recommendations as strong or conditional based on the evidence. The recommendations were based on systematic reviews of the literature and focused on patient-centered critical outcomes of asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life. Understanding the recommendations with consideration of individual values through shared decision-making may improve asthma outcomes.

Exhaled Metabolite Patterns to Identify Recent Asthma Exacerbations

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that can lead to exacerbations, defined as acute episodes of worsening respiratory symptoms and lung function. Predicting the occurrence of these exacerbations is an important goal in asthma management. The measurement of exhaled breath by electronic nose (eNose) may allow for the monitoring of clinically unstable asthma and exacerbations. However, data on its ability to perform this is lacking. We aimed to evaluate whether eNose could identify patients that recently had asthma exacerbations. We performed a cross-sectional study, measuring exhaled breath using the SpiroNose in adults with a physician-reported diagnosis of asthma. Patients were randomly divided into a training (n = 252) and validation (n = 109) set. For the analysis of eNose signals, principal component (PC) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were performed. LDA, based on PC1-4, reliably discriminated between patients who had a recent exacerbation from those who had not (training receiver operating characteristic (ROC)–area under the curve (AUC) = 0.76,95% CI 0.69–0.82), (validation AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.87). Our study showed that, exhaled breath analysis using eNose could accurately identify asthma patients who recently had an exacerbation, and could indicate that asthma exacerbations have a specific exhaled breath pattern detectable by eNose.

Use of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide to Guide the Treatment of Asthma: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE_NO) test is a point-of-care test that is used in the assessment of asthma.

Objective: To provide evidence-based clinical guidance on whether FE_NO testing is indicated to optimize asthma treatment in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered.

Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to form a consensus document regarding a single question relevant to the use of FE_NO. The question was selected from three potential questions based on the greatest perceived impact on clinical practice and the unmet need for evidence-based answers related to this question. The panel performed systematic reviews of published randomized controlled trials between 2004 and 2019 and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members evaluated and approved the recommendations.

Main Results: After considering the overall low quality of the evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation for FE_NO-based care. In patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered, we suggest that FE_NO is beneficial and should be used in addition to usual care. This judgment is based on a balance of effects that probably favors the intervention; the moderate costs and availability of resources, which probably favors the intervention; and the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in daily practice.

Conclusions: Clinicians should consider this recommendation to measure FE_NO in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered based on current best available evidence.

Does lung function change in the months after an asthma exacerbation in children?

BACKGROUND

There are limited data describing lung function changes in children after an asthma exacerbation. Our hypothesis was that lung function does not fully recover in children in the months following an asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

We used a data set of children with asthma where lung function (including FEV₁ , FEV₁ /FVC ratio and FEF_25-75 ) was measured at 3-month intervals over a year. Mixed-level models compared spirometry measured on two occasions 3 months apart before a single exacerbation (assessments 1 and 2) with measurements made on two occasions after the exacerbation (assessments 3 and 4), with adjustment for covariates. Changes in spirometry over a year were also analysed across those with exacerbations in no, one or more than one 3-month periods.

RESULTS

For the 113 children who had a single exacerbation, spirometry measured at assessments 1 or 2 did not differ from measurements at assessments 3 or 4 when the whole population was considered. When stratified into tertiles by change in %FEV₁ between assessments 2 and 3, those with the greater reduction were more likely to be treated with long-acting beta-agonist, but in this category, %FEV₁ at assessment 4 had returned to the value at assessment 1. %FEV₁ did not change over a 12-month period within and between the three exacerbation categories (n = 809).

CONCLUSION

One or more asthma exacerbation was not associated with a fall in lung function for the whole population. In a subset of individuals, lung function does fall after an exacerbation but returns to pre-exacerbation values after a period of months.

Cost utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring for the management of children asthma

Introduction

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide is a simple, non-invasive measurement of airway inflammation with minimal discomfort to the patient and with results available within a few minutes. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of asthma management using fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring in patients between 4 and 18 years of age.

Methods

A Markov model was used to estimate the cost-utility of asthma management using fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring versus asthma management without using fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring (standard therapy) in patients between 4 and 18 years of age. Cost data were obtained from a retrospective study on asthma from a tertiary center, in Medellin, Colombia, while probabilities of the Markov model and utilities were obtained from the systematic review of published randomized clinical trials. The analysis was carried out from a societal perspective.

Results

The model showed that fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring was associated with a lower total cost than standard therapy (US $1333 vs. US $1452 average cost per patient) and higher QALYs (0.93 vs. 0.92 average per patient). The probability that fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring provides a more cost-effective use of resources compared with standard therapy exceeds 99% for all willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Conclusion

Asthma management using fractional exhaled nitric oxide monitoring was cost-effective for treating patients between 4 and 18 years of age with mild to moderate allergic asthma. Our study suggests evidence that could be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines, but this should be replicated in different clinical settings.

The Predictive Role of Biomarkers and Genetics in Childhood Asthma Exacerbations

Asthma exacerbations are associated with significant childhood morbidity and mortality. Recurrent asthma attacks contribute to progressive loss of lung function and can sometimes be fatal or near-fatal, even in mild asthma. Exacerbation prevention becomes a primary target in the management of all asthmatic patients. Our work reviews current advances on exacerbation predictive factors, focusing on the role of non-invasive biomarkers and genetics in order to identify subjects at higher risk of asthma attacks. Easy-to-perform tests are necessary in children; therefore, interest has increased on samples like exhaled breath condensate, urine and saliva. The variability of biomarker levels suggests the use of seriate measurements and composite markers. Genetic predisposition to childhood asthma onset has been largely investigated. Recent studies highlighted the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms even on exacerbation susceptibility, through involvement of both intrinsic mechanisms and gene-environment interaction. The role of molecular and genetic aspects in exacerbation prediction supports an individual-shaped approach, in which follow-up planning and therapy optimization take into account not only the severity degree, but also the risk of recurrent exacerbations. Further efforts should be made to improve and validate the application of biomarkers and genomics in clinical settings.

2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group

The 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group was coordinated and supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health. It is designed to improve patient care and support informed decision making about asthma management in the clinical setting. This update addresses six priority topic areas as determined by the state of the science at the time of a needs assessment, and input from multiple stakeholders:A rigorous process was undertaken to develop these evidence-based guidelines. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Evidence-Based Practice Centers conducted systematic reviews on these topics, which were used by the Expert Panel Working Group as a basis for developing recommendations and guidance. The Expert Panel used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), an internationally accepted framework, in consultation with an experienced methodology team for determining the certainty of evidence and the direction and strength of recommendations based on the evidence. Practical implementation guidance for each recommendation incorporates findings from NHLBI-led patient, caregiver, and clinician focus groups. To assist clincians in implementing these recommendations into patient care, the new recommendations have been integrated into the existing Expert Panel Report-3 (EPR-3) asthma management step diagram format.

Cost-utility of use of sputum eosinophil counts to guide management in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Tailoring asthma interventions based on sputum eosinophils are beneficial in reducing the frequency of asthma exacerbations. The routine use of sputum eosinophils in asthma in children is not uniformly adopted. The main barriers to policymakers adopting new technologies are always doubts about their cost-utility in scenarios with scarce health resources. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of sputum eosinophil counts to guide management in children with asthma, from a societal perspective.

METHODS

A Markov simulation with three mutually exclusive nonabsorbent states was used. The intervention evaluated was adjustment of asthma therapy based on sputum eosinophils to adjusting therapy based on clinical symptoms with or without spirometry/peak flow in children between 4 and 18 years of age (EO). The group comparison was adjusting therapy based on clinical symptoms with or without spirometry/peak flow (SC). The analysis was carried out from a societal perspective. The analytic horizon was 12 months.

RESULTS

The model showed that EO was associated with lower cost than SC (US $1375 vs US $1454 average annual cost per patient), and higher QALYs (0.95 vs 0.92 average per patient); showing dominance. The probability that EO provides a more cost-effective use of resources compared with standard therapy exceeds 99% for all willingness to pay thresholds.

CONCLUSION

EO was cost-effective for infants with asthma to guide asthma management in Children. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines and should be replicated to validate their results in other middle-income countries.

Effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide for asthma management in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a noninvasive strategy for diagnosing and managing asthma, but limited evidence is available for the effects of FENO-guided asthma management in children. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FENO for asthma management in children.

METHODS

In total, six databases were searched, and 23 randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of FENO-guided asthma management with those not using FENO in pediatric asthma were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data for relevant endpoints were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis of the effectiveness of FENO for asthma management in children showed that FENO-guided asthma management helped reduce the numbers of children with asthma exacerbations (risk ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI:] 0.63-0.84; P < .0001) and the exacerbation frequency (standardized mean difference: -1.57; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.88; P < .00001). Furthermore, it improved the predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 minute (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 3.67; 95% CI: 0.91-6.43; P = .009) and was also found to be associated with an increase of daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose (WMD: 64.17 μg; 95% CI: 53.59-74.75; P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that the FENO-guided asthma management strategy could partially improve the outcomes of pediatric asthma at the expense of increased ICS use.

Does treatment guided by exhaled nitric oxide fraction improve outcomes in subgroups of children with asthma?

INTRODUCTION

Exhaled nitric oxide fraction (F _ENO), a biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, may be useful to guide asthma treatment. F _ENO-guided treatment may be more effective in certain subgroups for improving asthma outcomes compared to standard treatment.

METHODS

An individual patient data analysis was performed using data from seven randomised clinical trials (RCTs) which used F _ENO to guide asthma treatment. The incidence of an asthma exacerbation and loss of control, and the time to first exacerbation and loss of control were described between five subgroups of RCT participants.

RESULTS

Data were available in 1112 RCT participants. Among those not treated with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), but not among those who were treated with LTRA, F _ENO-guided treatment was associated with reduced exacerbation risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94), longer time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-0.99) and borderline reduced risk for loss of control (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-1.00). Nonobese children, compared to obese children, were less likely to lose asthma control when treatment was guided by F _ENO (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99) and time to loss of control was longer (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma treatment guided by F _ENO may be more effective in achieving better asthma outcomes for patients who are not treated with LTRA and who are not obese, compared to standard practice.

What is a clinically meaningful change in exhaled nitric oxide for children with asthma?

INTRODUCTION

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_E NO) may be a useful objective measurement to guide asthma treatment. What remains uncertain is what change in F_E NO is clinically significant.

METHODS

An individual patient data analysis was performed using data from seven randomized clinical trials which used F_E NO to guide asthma treatment. The absolute and percentage intra-subject change in F_E NO measurements over "stable" and also "unstable" 3-month periods were described.

RESULTS

Data were available in 1112 randomized controlled trial participants and ≥1 stable period was present for 665 individuals. The interquartile range (IQR) and limits of agreement (LoA) for change in absolute F_E NO among individuals whose initial F_E NO was <50 parts per billion (ppb) were -7 to +9 ppb and -43 to +50 ppb, and for those with initial F_E NO ≥50 ppb IQR was -29 to +17 ppb and LoA was -80 to +76 ppb. For percentage change in F_E NO, the IQR and LoA for individuals whose initial F_E NO was <50 ppb were -33% to +51% and -157% to +215%, and for those with initial F_E NO ≥50 ppb were -33% to +35% and -159% to +192%. The variation in F_E NO values for a stable period was similar irrespective of whether it was followed by a stable or unstable period.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 3-month period where F_E NO is initially <50 ppb, a rise of <10 ppb or of <50% (based on IQR) is unlikely to be related to asthma. When F_E NO is initially ≥50 ppb an percentage change of <50% (based on IQR) is unlikely to be asthma-related.

Inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase can reduce extracellular traps from neutrophils in asthmatic children in vitro

AIM

This study aimed to explore the link between neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and childhood asthma, to investigate the ability of nitric oxide (NO) to induce NETs in asthmatic children and find inhibitors to reduce NETs in the NO synthesis pathway.

METHODS

A total of 49 children with mild persistent asthma were included in the study and 20 healthy children's blood samples were collected as healthy controls. Children with asthma were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups according to the presence or absence of symptoms on the day of blood collection. Neutrophils in peripheral blood were isolated and plasma was preserved. NO donor (sodium nitroferricyanide(III) dehydrate [SNP]) could provide NO and proved by a fluorescent probe. A PicoGreen Kit was used to detect the NETs quantificationally. Fluorescence microscopy prepared to observe the main structures of NETs. We measured NETs components (extracellular free double-stranded DNA [dsDNA]) in healthy, symptomatic and asymptomatic groups' plasma samples, and we compared the ability of SNP with phosphate-buffered saline, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) to induce NETs. NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors were added to see the impact on NETs formation.

RESULTS

Plasma was obtained from all blood samples of 69 children. The neutrophils of 40 asthmatic and 20 healthy children were successfully obtained, the recovery rate was over 95%, and the cell activity was over 80%. There was higher extracellular free dsDNA in the plasma of symptomatic group (n = 27) than asymptomatic group (n = 22) and healthy group (n = 20; P < .05). Studies on neutrophils from 40 children with asthma found that NO can be produced by adding SNP, PMA, and LPS. SNP could induce NETs with dose- and time-dependent. PMA (160 nM) had the strongest ability to induce NETs, LPS (200 ng/mL) followed, SNP (200 µM) was the weakest (P < .05), and the amount of NETs in the asthma group was significantly higher than that in the healthy group (P < .05). NOS inhibitors had the same blocking capacity for PMA- and LPS-induced NETs (P > .05), while NG-nitro- l-arginine methyl ester (500 µM) had the strongest inhibitory effect on SNP induction with time-dependent (P < .05). Inducible NOS was found in the NETs structure.

CONCLUSION

Children with asthma had higher levels of NETs in peripheral blood, especially when they had asthma symptoms. We verified the ability of NO to induce NETs, and found neutrophils from asthmatic children can produce more NETs in vitro. NOS inhibitors blocked this process may provide new therapeutic targets for childhood asthma.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Values in Indigenous Australians 3 to 16 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) levels can identify eosinophilic asthma phenotypes. We aimed to determine Feno values of healthy Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) Australians, differences between these Indigenous ethnic groups, and appropriateness of published cutoff values.

METHODS

We measured Feno levels in 1,036 Indigenous Australians (3-16 years of age). Participants were classified into healthy (ie, no asthma or atopy history) or asthmatic and/or atopic groups.

RESULTS

Median Feno values and distribution did not differ between Indigenous ethnicities. For healthy participants < 12 years of age (n = 390), 7.2% of our cohort fell into the inflammatory zone of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and British Thoracic Society (BTS)/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines (cutoff 35 parts per billion [ppb]), but only 3.8% fell into this category when using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (50 ppb). Similarly, when using the NICE and BTS/SIGN guidelines (40 ppb) for participants 12 to 16 years of age (n = 213), more healthy participants fell into the inflammatory zone compared with the ATS and GINA guidelines (50 ppb) (9.9% vs 4.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Feno values for healthy Indigenous Australians children (3-16 years of age) are likely higher than published white-based values. The GINA recommended cutoff value (> 50 ppb) appears the most appropriate for identifying healthy Indigenous children but requires confirmation from a larger study.

Change in FEV1 and Feno Measurements as Predictors of Future Asthma Outcomes in Children

BACKGROUND

Repeated measurements of spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) are recommended as part of the management of childhood asthma, but the evidence base for such recommendations is small. We tested the hypothesis that reducing spirometric indices or increasing Feno will predict poor future asthma outcomes.

METHODS

A one-stage individual patient data meta-analysis used data from seven randomized controlled trials in which Feno was used to guide asthma treatment; spirometric indices were also measured. Change in %FEV₁ and % change in Feno between baseline and 3 months were related to having poor asthma control and to having an asthma exacerbation between 3 and 6 months after baseline.

RESULTS

Data were available from 1,112 children (mean age, 12.6 years; mean %FEV₁, 94%). A 10% reduction in %FEV₁ between baseline and 3 months was associated with 28% increased odds for asthma exacerbation (95% CI, 3-58) and with 21% increased odds for having poor asthma control (95% CI, 0-45) 6 months after baseline. A 50% increase in Feno between baseline and 3 months was associated with 11% increase in odds for poor asthma control 6 months after baseline (95% CI, 0-16). Baseline Feno and %FEV₁ were not related to asthma outcomes at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated measurements of %FEV₁ that are typically within the "normal" range add to clinical risk assessment of future asthma outcomes in children. The role of repeated Feno measurements is less certain because large changes were associated with small changes in outcome risk.

Tailoring asthma treatment on eosinophilic markers (exhaled nitric oxide or sputum eosinophils): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines guide health practitioners to adjust treatments to the minimum level required for asthma control. As many people with asthma have an eosinophilic endotype, tailoring asthma medications based on airway eosinophilic levels (sputum eosinophils or exhaled nitric oxide, FeNO) may improve asthma outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise the evidence from our updated Cochrane systematic reviews, for tailoring asthma medication based on eosinophilic inflammatory markers (sputum analysis and FeNO) for improving asthma-related outcomes in children and adults.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane reviews with standardised searches up to February 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

The Cochrane reviews included randomised controlled comparisons of tailoring asthma medications based on sputum analysis or FeNO compared with controls (primarily clinical symptoms and/or spirometry/peak flow).

RESULTS

The 16 included studies of FeNO-based management (seven in adults) and 6 of sputum-based management (five in adults) were clinically heterogeneous. On follow-up, participants randomised to the sputum eosinophils strategy (compared with controls) were significantly less likely to have exacerbations (62 vs 82/100 participants with ≥1 exacerbation; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62). For the FeNO strategy, the respective numbers were adults OR 0.60 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.84) and children 0.58 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.75). However, there were no significant group differences for either strategy on daily inhaled corticosteroids dose (at end of study), asthma control or lung function.

CONCLUSION

Adjusting treatment based on airway eosinophilic markers reduced the likelihood of asthma exacerbations but had no significant impact on asthma control or lung function.

Race and ethnicity have significant influence on fractional exhaled nitric oxide

BACKGROUND

Race and ethnicity have been shown to influence fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). There is a need to investigate cutoff points for different races and ethnicities to improve clinical application.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate cutoff points for different races and ethnicities by analyzing the FeNO data collected by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2012.

METHODS

This study included 23,433 participants. After excluding participants with confounding factors, 11,084 participants were eligible for data analysis. Based on age and the probability of having allergic airway inflammation, participants were divided into 4 groups. The geometric mean and 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of FeNO in Hispanic, white, black, and other races were analyzed in all groups.

RESULTS

Compared with white participants, the geometric mean for FeNO in black participants was 36% to 41% higher in children and 5% to 8% higher in adults. Hispanic children had significantly higher FeNO values (14% to 19%) compared with non-Hispanic white children; however, those differences were not significant in adults. Other races had significantly higher FeNO values in children (24-54%) and adults (9-29%) compared with white participants. Further, for normal healthy black children, the 95th percentile was 40.2 parts per billion (ppb), which is significantly higher than the cutoff point recommended by current guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Although there are significant differences in FeNO values among races and ethnicities, the current cutoff point at 50 ppb is sufficient to separate healthy from asthmatic populations in adults. However, for black children, we suggest increasing the cutoff point from 35 to 40 ppb to avoid unnecessary diagnosis and treatment.

Biomarkers in inflammometry pediatric asthma: utility in daily clinical practice

Asthma is a common disease in both high and lower income countries that starts early and persists often for life. A correct and accurate diagnosis, treatment and follow-up during childhood are essential for a better understanding of adult asthma and avoiding over- or under-treatment. Th2 inflammation in children with asthma symptoms is usually assessed by measuring with serum total IgE, blood eosinophilia and FeNO levels that may help to predict asthma, particularly in those infants and young children in whom lung function tests are difficult to perform. FeNO measurement, compared to intra-individual levels, may be useful also for ascertaining treatment adherence. Nevertheless, an isolated measurement may be insufficient and only the combination of these markers improves the diagnosis, phenotyping and follow-up of an asthmatic child.

Biomarkers and asthma management: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma is heterogeneous with different endotypes/phenotypes. Response to corticosteroids is variable and novel biological therapies are proving useful. Biomarkers allow individualization of treatment. This review provides an update on available data regarding asthma biomarkers with focus on their utility for prediction of response to steroidal and new biological therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Blood eosinophils are a biomarker with acceptable accuracy as a surrogate for sputum eosinophilia, are associated with relevant outcomes, and are more readily measureable. New evidence supports fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)-based treatment algorithms for cost-effective maintenance of asthma control/quality of life. Serum and sputum-derived periostin are biomarkers of lung function decline and associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Transcriptomics show promise for endotyping; their role in management remains to be determined. Biomarker panels may improve predictive value as shown for the combination of FENO/urinary bromotyrosine in prediction of steroid responsiveness. Novel biological therapies are proving effective in biomarker-selected populations.

SUMMARY

Biomarkers including blood eosinophils and FENO are proving to have utility for the effective administration of steroidal and novel biological therapies in asthma, allowing individualized treatment. Transcriptomics can discriminate subtypes of asthma and may have a role in delivery of individualized therapy.

Addressing unmet needs in understanding asthma mechanisms: From the European Asthma Research and Innovation Partnership (EARIP) Work Package (WP)2 collaborators

Asthma is a heterogeneous, complex disease with clinical phenotypes that incorporate persistent symptoms and acute exacerbations. It affects many millions of Europeans throughout their education and working lives and puts a heavy cost on European productivity. There is a wide spectrum of disease severity and control. Therapeutic advances have been slow despite greater understanding of basic mechanisms and the lack of satisfactory preventative and disease modifying management for asthma constitutes a significant unmet clinical need. Preventing, treating and ultimately curing asthma requires co-ordinated research and innovation across Europe. The European Asthma Research and Innovation Partnership (EARIP) is an FP7-funded programme which has taken a co-ordinated and integrated approach to analysing the future of asthma research and development. This report aims to identify the mechanistic areas in which investment is required to bring about significant improvements in asthma outcomes.

Can exhaled volatile organic compounds predict asthma exacerbations in children?

BACKGROUND

Asthma control does not yet meet the goals of asthma management guidelines. Non-invasive monitoring of airway inflammation may help to improve the level of asthma control in children.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To identify a set of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that is most predictive for an asthma exacerbation in children. (2) To elucidate the chemical identity of predictive biomarkers.

METHODS

In a one-year prospective observational study, 96 asthmatic children participated . During clinical visits at 2 month intervals, asthma control, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, lung function (FEV₁, FEV₁/VC) and VOCs in exhaled breath were determined by means of gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Random Forrest classification modeling was used to select predictive VOCs, followed by plotting of receiver operating characteristic-curves (ROC-curves).

RESULTS

An inverse relationship was found between the predictive power of a set of VOCs and the time between sampling of exhaled breath and the onset of exacerbation. The sensitivity and specificity of the model predicting exacerbations 14 days after sampling were 88% and 75%, respectively. The area under the ROC-curve was 90%. The sensitivity for prediction of asthma exacerbations within 21 days after sampling was 63%. In total, 7 VOCs were selected for the classification model: 3 aldehydes, 1 hydrocarbon, 1 ketone, 1 aromatic compound, and 1 unidentified VOC.

CONCLUSION

VOCs in exhaled breath showed potential for predicting asthma exacerbations in children within 14 days after sampling. Before using this in clinical practice, the validity of predicting asthma exacerbations should be studied in a larger cohort.

Does Ethnicity Influence Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Healthy Individuals?: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) is used clinically as a biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Awareness of the factors influencing Feno values is important for valid clinical interpretation.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and reference lists of included articles to evaluate whether ethnicity influences Feno values, and to determine if this influence affects clinical interpretation according to current guidelines. We included all studies that performed online Feno measurements on at least 25 healthy, non-Caucasian individuals, and examined the effect of ethnicity on Feno.

RESULTS

From 62 potential studies, 12 studies were included. One study recruited only children (< 12 years of age), six studies recruited children and/or adolescents, four studies recruited adults only, and a single study involved children, adolescents, and adults. In total, 16 different ethnic populations representing 11 ethnicities were studied. Ethnicity was considered a significant influencing factor in 10 of the included studies. We found the geometric mean Feno to be above the normal healthy range in two studies. We also identified five studies in which at least 5% of participants had Feno results above the age-specific inflammatory ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity influences Feno values, and for some ethnic groups this influence likely affects clinical interpretation according to current guidelines. There is a need to establish healthy Feno reference ranges for specific ethnic groups to improve clinical application.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels to guide treatment for children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines aim to guide health practitioners to optimise treatment for patients to minimise symptoms, improve or maintain good lung function, and prevent acute exacerbations. The principle of asthma guidelines is based on a step-up or step-down regimen of asthma medications to maximise health using minimum doses. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a marker of eosinophilic inflammation and tailoring asthma medications in accordance to airway eosinophilic levels may improve asthma outcomes such as indices of control or reduce exacerbations, or both.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of tailoring asthma interventions based on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), in comparison to not using FeNO, that is, management based on clinical symptoms (with or without spirometry/peak flow) or asthma guidelines (or both), for asthma-related outcomes in children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and reference lists of articles. The last searches were in June 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjustment of asthma medications based on FeNO levels compared to those not using FeNO, that is, management based on clinical symptoms or asthma guidelines (or both) involving children.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reviewed results of searches against predetermined criteria for inclusion. Two review authors independently selected relevant studies, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for further information with responses provided from three.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included nine studies; these studies differed in a variety of ways including definition of asthma exacerbations, FeNO cut-off levels used (12 parts per billion (ppb) to 30 ppb), the way in which FeNO was used to adjust therapy and duration of study (6 to 12 months). Of 1426 children randomised, 1329 completed the studies. The inclusion criteria for the participants in each study varied but all had a diagnosis of asthma. There was a significant difference in the number of children having one or more asthma exacerbations over the study period, they were significantly lower in the FeNO group in comparison to the control group (odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 0.75; 1279 participants; 8 studies). The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) over 52 weeks was 9 (95% CI 6 to 15). There was no difference between the groups when comparing exacerbation rates (mean difference (MD) -0.37, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.06; 736 participants; 4 studies; I² = 67%). The number of children in the FeNO group requiring oral corticosteroid courses was lower in comparison to the children in the control group (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.83; 1169 participants; 7 studies; I² = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for exacerbations requiring hospitalisation (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.36; 1110 participants; 6 studies; I² = 0%). There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the secondary outcomes (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), FeNO levels, symptom scores or inhaled corticosteroid doses at final visit). The included studies recorded no adverse events.Three studies had inadequate blinding and were thus considered to have a high risk of bias. However, when these studies were removed in subgroup analysis, the difference between the groups for the primary outcome (exacerbations) remained statistically significant. The GRADE quality of the evidence ranged from moderate (for the outcome 'Number of participants who had one or more exacerbations over the study period') to very low (for the outcome 'Exacerbation rates'), based on lack of blinding, statistical heterogeneity and imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this updated review with five new included studies, tailoring asthma medications based on FeNO levels (in comparison with primarily guideline management) significantly decreased the number of children who had one or more exacerbations over the study period but did not impact on the day-to-day clinical symptoms or inhaled corticosteroid doses. Therefore, the use of FeNO to guide asthma therapy in children may be beneficial in a subset of children, it cannot be universally recommended for all children with asthma.Further RCTs need to be conducted and these should encompass different asthma severities, different settings including primary care and less affluent settings, and consider different FeNO cut-offs.

Evaluation of monitoring strategies for childhood asthma

INTRODUCTION

The goal of monitoring pediatric asthma is to obtain and maintain asthma control, which is defined as minimizing asthma symptoms, restrictions to daily activities and the use of rescue medication. Long term goals include reducing the risk of fixed airflow limitation, and preventing asthma exacerbations and side effects of treatment. Several monitoring tools are available but no consensus exists on how to monitor patients in the most optimal way. Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of different tools and address general considerations on monitoring childhood asthma. Asthma care should be tailored to the individual patient. The health care professional should decide which monitoring strategy and frequency is optimal for the individual patient. Expert commentary: Personalized medicine should be the key issue in monitoring asthma in children. It is crucial to monitor disease activity and deterioration but there is no monitoring strategy that is clearly superior compared to others: The optimal strategy and frequency will vary between patients. Actually, both treatment and monitoring of pediatric asthma probably benefit from a personalized approach.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels to guide treatment for adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines aim to guide health practitioners to optimise treatment for patients so as to minimise symptoms, improve or maintain good lung function, and prevent acute exacerbations or flare-ups. The principle of asthma guidelines is based on a step-up or step-down regimen of asthma medications to maximise good health outcomes using minimum medications. Asthma maintenance therapies reduce airway inflammation that is usually eosinophilic. Tailoring asthma medications in accordance with airway eosinophilic levels may improve asthma outcomes such as indices of control or reduce exacerbations or both. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a marker of eosinophilic inflammation, and as it is easy to measure, has an advantage over other measurements of eosinophilic inflammation (for example sputum eosinophils).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of tailoring asthma interventions based on exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), in comparison to not using FeNO, that is management based on clinical symptoms (with or without spirometry/peak flow) or asthma guidelines or both, for asthma-related outcomes in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of articles. The last searches were undertaken in June 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjustment of asthma medications based on exhaled nitric oxide levels compared to not using FeNO, that is management based on clinical symptoms (with or without spirometry/peak flow) or asthma guidelines or both.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reviewed results of searches against predetermined criteria for inclusion. We independently selected relevant studies in duplicate. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for further information, receiving responses from four.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven adult studies; these studies differed in a variety of ways including definition of asthma exacerbations, FeNO cutoff levels used (15 to 35 ppb), the way in which FeNO was used to adjust therapy, and duration of study (4 to 12 months). Of 1700 randomised participants, 1546 completed the trials. The mean ages of the participants ranged from 28 to 54 years old. The inclusion criteria for the participants in each study varied, but all had a diagnosis of asthma and required asthma medications. In the meta-analysis, there was a significant difference in the primary outcome of asthma exacerbations between the groups, favouring the FeNO group. The number of people having one or more asthma exacerbations was significantly lower in the FeNO group compared to the control group (odds ratio (OR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 0.84). The number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) over 52 weeks was 12 (95% CI 8 to 32). Those in the FeNO group were also significantly more likely to have a lower exacerbation rate than the controls (rate ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77). However, we did not find a difference between the groups for exacerbations requiring hospitalisation (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.67) or rescue oral corticosteroids (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.48). There was also no significant difference between groups for any of the secondary outcomes (FEV1, FeNO levels, symptoms scores, or inhaled corticosteroid doses at final visit).We considered three included studies that had inadequate blinding to have a high risk of bias. However, when these studies were excluded from the meta-analysis, the difference between the groups for the primary outcomes (exacerbations) remained statistically significant. The GRADE quality of the evidence ranged from moderate (for the outcome 'exacerbations') to very low (for the outcome 'inhaled corticosteroid dose at final visit') based on the lack of blinding and statistical heterogeneity. Six of the seven studies were industry supported, but the company had no role in the study design or data analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

With new studies included since the last version of this review, which included adults and children, this updated meta-analysis in adults with asthma showed that tailoring asthma medications based on FeNO levels (compared with primarily on clinical symptoms) decreased the frequency of asthma exacerbations but did not impact on day-to-day clinical symptoms, end-of-study FeNO levels, or inhaled corticosteroid dose. Thus, the universal use of FeNO to help guide therapy in adults with asthma cannot be advocated. As the main benefit shown in the studies in this review was a reduction in asthma exacerbations, the intervention may be most useful in adults who have frequent exacerbations. Further RCTs encompassing different asthma severity, ethnic groups in less affluent settings, and taking into account different FeNO cutoffs are required.

Pediatric pulmonology year in review 2015: Part 3

Our journal covers a broad range of research and scholarly topics related to children's respiratory disorders. For updated perspectives on the rapidly expanding knowledge in our field, we will summarize the past year's publications in our major topic areas, as well as selected publications in these areas from the core clinical journal literature outside our own pages. The current review (Part 3) covers articles on asthma, diagnostic testing/endoscopy, respiratory complications of neuromuscular disorders, and rare lung diseases. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:747-753. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cost-effectiveness of FENO-based and web-based monitoring in paediatric asthma management: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In children with asthma, web-based monitoring and inflammation-driven therapy may lead to improved asthma control and reduction in medications. However, the cost-effectiveness of these monitoring strategies is yet unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of web-based monthly monitoring and of 4-monthly monitoring of FENO as compared with standard care.

METHODS

An economic evaluation was performed alongside a randomised controlled multicentre trial with a 1-year follow-up. Two hundred and seventy-two children with asthma, aged 4-18 years, were randomised to one of three strategies. In standard care, treatment was adapted according to Asthma Control Test (ACT) at 4-monthly visits, in the web-based strategy also according to web-ACT at 1 month intervals, and in the FENO-based strategy according to ACT and FENO at 4-monthly visits. Outcome measures were patient utilities, healthcare costs, societal costs and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in QALYs and costs between the three strategies. The web-based strategy had 77% chance of being most cost-effective from a healthcare perspective at a willingness to pay a generally accepted €40 000/QALY. The FENO-based strategy had 83% chance of being most cost-effective at €40 000/QALY from a societal perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Economically, web-based monitoring was preferred from a healthcare perspective, while the FENO-based strategy was preferred from a societal perspective, although in QALYs and costs no statistically significant changes were found as compared with standard care. As clinical outcomes also favoured the web-based and FENO-based strategies, these strategies may be useful additions to standard care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR1995).

Pathogenesis and prevention strategies of severe asthma exacerbations in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Exacerbations of asthma in children are most frequently precipitated by respiratory infections with a seasonal pattern. However, management takes little account of the underlying infective or other precipitant abnormality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Interactions between environmental triggers, the airway microbiome and innate immune responses are key determinants of exacerbations. Elevated innate cytokines interleukin (IL)-33 and IL-25, and abnormal molecular responses in the interferon pathway are associated with rhinoviral infections. Exacerbations caused by fungal allergens also induce IL-33, highlighting this as an attractive therapeutic target. An equal contribution of bacterial and viral infection during exacerbations, particularly in preschool children, has become increasingly apparent, but some organisms may be protective. Investigation of mechanisms underlying infection-related exacerbations especially in preschool children is needed.Progressive loss of lung function from exacerbations is most pronounced in children aged 6-11 years, and low FEV1 is now recognized as a key predictor for the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and premature death. Although prevention of exacerbations is critical, suboptimal patient education, prescription and adherence to maintenance therapy, and a lack of predictive biomarkers, remain key unaddressed issues in children.

SUMMARY

Precipitants and predictors of exacerbations, together with the child's age and clinical phenotype, need to be used to achieve individualized management in preference to the current uniform approach for all.

A systematic review of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in the routine management of childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive biomarker of eosinophilic inflammation which may be used to guide the management of asthma in childhood.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise the available evidence on the efficacy of FeNO-guided management of childhood asthma.

METHODS

Databases including MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FeNO-guided management with any other monitoring strategy were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs, and a number of outcomes were examined, including: exacerbations, medication use, quality of life, adverse events, and other markers of asthma control. Meta-analyses were planned if multiple studies with suitable heterogeneity were available. However, due to wide variations in study characteristics, meta-analysis was not possible.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were identified. There was some evidence that FeNO-guided monitoring results in improved asthma control during the first year of management, although few results attained statistical significance. The impact on severe exacerbations was unclear. Similarly, the impact on use of anti-asthmatic drugs was unclear, and appears to depend on the step up/down protocols, and the clinical characteristics of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential benefit of FeNO monitoring is equivocal. Trends toward reduced exacerbation and increased medication use were seen, but typically failed to reach statistical significance. There are a number of issues that complicate data interpretation, including differences in the likely severity of included cohorts and variations in treatment algorithms. Further work is needed to systematically explore the impact of these parameters.

Prediction of asthma exacerbations in children by innovative exhaled inflammatory markers: results of a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

In asthma management guidelines the primary goal of treatment is asthma control. To date, asthma control, guided by symptoms and lung function, is not optimal in many children and adults. Direct monitoring of airway inflammation in exhaled breath may improve asthma control and reduce the number of exacerbations.

AIM

1) To study the use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC), in the prediction of asthma exacerbations in a pediatric population. 2) To study the predictive power of these exhaled inflammatory markers combined with clinical parameters.

METHODS

96 asthmatic children were included in this one-year prospective observational study, with clinical visits every 2 months. Between visits, daily symptom scores and lung function were recorded using a home monitor. During clinical visits, asthma control and FeNO were assessed. Furthermore, lung function measurements were performed and EBC was collected. Statistical analysis was performed using a test dataset and validation dataset for 1) conditionally specified models, receiver operating characteristic-curves (ROC-curves); 2) k-nearest neighbors algorithm.

RESULTS

Three conditionally specified predictive models were constructed. Model 1 included inflammatory markers in EBC alone, model 2 included FeNO plus clinical characteristics and the ACQ score, and model 3 included all the predictors used in model 1 and 2. The area under the ROC-curves was estimated as 47%, 54% and 59% for models 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The k-nearest neighbors predictive algorithm, using the information of all the variables in model 3, produced correct predictions for 52% of the exacerbations in the validation dataset.

CONCLUSION

The predictive power of FeNO and inflammatory markers in EBC for prediction of an asthma exacerbation was low, even when combined with clinical characteristics and symptoms. Qualitative improvement of the chemical analysis of EBC may lead to a better non-invasive prediction of asthma exacerbations.

Exhaled nitric oxide and the management of childhood asthma--yet another promising biomarker "has been" or a misunderstood gem

Childhood asthma is a common chronic condition. Approximately five percent of all children in western countries are prescribed treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to prevent asthma symptoms. Current guidelines advocate titrating ICS dose to symptoms but this approach is not without problem, e.g. how to discern asthmatic from non-asthmatic symptoms? And when to reduce ICS dose? This review describes the strengths and weaknesses of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) as an objective index for individualising asthma control in children. Epidemiological and mechanistic evidence suggest that FENO should be a promising biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation (a hall mark for asthma) but somewhat surprisingly, clinical trials in children have not consistently found benefit from adding FENO to a symptom-based approach to ICS treatment in children. There are a number of reasons why FENO has apparently failed to translate from promising biomarker to clinically useful tool, and one reason may be a lack of understanding of what merits a significant intrasubject change in FENO. This review describes the rise and apparent fall of FENO as biomarker for asthma and then focuses on more recent evidence which suggest that FENO may prove to have a role in the management of childhood asthma, and in particular preventing exacerbations.