1
|
Sushentsev N, Hamm G, Flint L, Birtles D, Zakirov A, Richings J, Ling S, Tan JY, McLean MA, Ayyappan V, Horvat Menih I, Brodie C, Miller JL, Mills IG, Gnanapragasam VJ, Warren AY, Barry ST, Goodwin RJA, Barrett T, Gallagher FA. Metabolic imaging across scales reveals distinct prostate cancer phenotypes. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5980. [PMID: 39013948 PMCID: PMC11252279 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50362-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Hyperpolarised magnetic resonance imaging (HP-13C-MRI) has shown promise as a clinical tool for detecting and characterising prostate cancer. Here we use a range of spatially resolved histological techniques to identify the biological mechanisms underpinning differential [1-13C]lactate labelling between benign and malignant prostate, as well as in tumours containing cribriform and non-cribriform Gleason pattern 4 disease. Here we show that elevated hyperpolarised [1-13C]lactate signal in prostate cancer compared to the benign prostate is primarily driven by increased tumour epithelial cell density and vascularity, rather than differences in epithelial lactate concentration between tumour and normal. We also demonstrate that some tumours of the cribriform subtype may lack [1-13C]lactate labelling, which is explained by lower epithelial lactate dehydrogenase expression, higher mitochondrial pyruvate carrier density, and increased lipid abundance compared to lactate-rich non-cribriform lesions. These findings highlight the potential of combining spatial metabolic imaging tools across scales to identify clinically significant metabolic phenotypes in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Sushentsev
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Gregory Hamm
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lucy Flint
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Birtles
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aleksandr Zakirov
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jack Richings
- Predictive AI & Data, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephanie Ling
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer Y Tan
- Predictive AI & Data, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mary A McLean
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vinay Ayyappan
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ines Horvat Menih
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cara Brodie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jodi L Miller
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian G Mills
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon T Barry
- Bioscience, Early Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard J A Goodwin
- Integrated BioAnalysis, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy (FCM) Ensures Representative Tissue in Prostate Cancer Biobanking: A Feasibility Study. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232012103. [PMID: 36292970 PMCID: PMC9603154 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Biobanking of prostate carcinoma is particularly challenging due to the actual cancer within the organ often without clear margins. Frozen sections are to date the only way to examine the biobank material for its tumor content. We used ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) to analyze biobank samples prior to cryoasservation. Methods: 127 punch biopsies were acquired from prostatectomy-specimens from 40 patients. These biopsies were analyzed with a Vivascope 2500-G4 prior to their transfer to the biobank. In difficult cases, larger samples of the prostatectomy specimens were FCM scanned in order to locate tumor foci. After patient acquisition, all samples were taken from the biobank and analyzed. We compared the results of the FCM examinations with the results of conventional histology and measured the DNA content. Results: With upstream FCM, the tumor content of biobank samples could be determined with high confidence. The detection rate of representative biobank samples was increased due to the rapid feedback. The biobank samples were suitable for further molecular analysis. Conclusion: FCM allows for the first time lossless microscopic analysis of biobank samples prior to their cryoasservation and guarantees representative tumor and normal tissue for further molecular analysis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Buhigas C, Warren AY, Leung WK, Whitaker HC, Luxton HJ, Hawkins S, Kay J, Butler A, Xu Y, Woodcock DJ, Merson S, Frame FM, Sahli A, Abascal F, Martincorena I, Bova GS, Foster CS, Campbell P, Maitland NJ, Neal DE, Massie CE, Lynch AG, Eeles RA, Cooper CS, Wedge DC, Brewer DS. The architecture of clonal expansions in morphologically normal tissue from cancerous and non-cancerous prostates. Mol Cancer 2022; 21:183. [PMID: 36131292 PMCID: PMC9494848 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-022-01644-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 80% of cases of prostate cancer present with multifocal independent tumour lesions leading to the concept of a field effect present in the normal prostate predisposing to cancer development. In the present study we applied Whole Genome DNA Sequencing (WGS) to a group of morphologically normal tissue (n = 51), including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and non-BPH samples, from men with and men without prostate cancer. We assess whether the observed genetic changes in morphologically normal tissue are linked to the development of cancer in the prostate. RESULTS Single nucleotide variants (P = 7.0 × 10-03, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and small insertions and deletions (indels, P = 8.7 × 10-06) were significantly higher in morphologically normal samples, including BPH, from men with prostate cancer compared to those without. The presence of subclonal expansions under selective pressure, supported by a high level of mutations, were significantly associated with samples from men with prostate cancer (P = 0.035, Fisher exact test). The clonal cell fraction of normal clones was always higher than the proportion of the prostate estimated as epithelial (P = 5.94 × 10-05, paired Wilcoxon signed rank test) which, along with analysis of primary fibroblasts prepared from BPH specimens, suggests a stromal origin. Constructed phylogenies revealed lineages associated with benign tissue that were completely distinct from adjacent tumour clones, but a common lineage between BPH and non-BPH morphologically normal tissues was often observed. Compared to tumours, normal samples have significantly less single nucleotide variants (P = 3.72 × 10-09, paired Wilcoxon signed rank test), have very few rearrangements and a complete lack of copy number alterations. CONCLUSIONS Cells within regions of morphologically normal tissue (both BPH and non-BPH) can expand under selective pressure by mechanisms that are distinct from those occurring in adjacent cancer, but that are allied to the presence of cancer. Expansions, which are probably stromal in origin, are characterised by lack of recurrent driver mutations, by almost complete absence of structural variants/copy number alterations, and mutational processes similar to malignant tissue. Our findings have implications for treatment (focal therapy) and early detection approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Buhigas
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Wing-Kit Leung
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Hayley J Luxton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Steve Hawkins
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Adam Butler
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - Yaobo Xu
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - Dan J Woodcock
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Sue Merson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Fiona M Frame
- Cancer Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, North Yorkshire, UK
| | - Atef Sahli
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Federico Abascal
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - Iñigo Martincorena
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - G Steven Bova
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33014, Tampere, FI, Finland
| | | | - Peter Campbell
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - Norman J Maitland
- Cancer Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, North Yorkshire, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK
| | - Andy G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- School of Medicine/School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9AJ, UK
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Colin S Cooper
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - David C Wedge
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Daniel S Brewer
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
- Earlham Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Wade J, Noble S, Garfield K, Young G, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Blazeby J, Bryant R, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario D, Rowe E, Neal D. Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-176. [PMID: 32773013 PMCID: PMC7443739 DOI: 10.3310/hta24370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the UK. Prostate-specific antigen testing followed by biopsy leads to overdetection, overtreatment as well as undertreatment of the disease. Evidence of treatment effectiveness has lacked because of the paucity of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional treatments. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional treatments for localised prostate cancer (active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy) in men aged 50-69 years. DESIGN A prospective, multicentre prostate-specific antigen testing programme followed by a randomised trial of treatment, with a comprehensive cohort follow-up. SETTING Prostate-specific antigen testing in primary care and treatment in nine urology departments in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Between 2001 and 2009, 228,966 men aged 50-69 years received an invitation to attend an appointment for information about the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study and a prostate-specific antigen test; 82,429 men were tested, 2664 were diagnosed with localised prostate cancer, 1643 agreed to randomisation to active monitoring (n = 545), radical prostatectomy (n = 553) or radical radiotherapy (n = 545) and 997 chose a treatment. INTERVENTIONS The interventions were active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy. TRIAL PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Definite or probable disease-specific mortality at the 10-year median follow-up in randomised participants. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Overall mortality, metastases, disease progression, treatment complications, resource utilisation and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 17 prostate cancer-specific (p = 0.48) and 169 all-cause (p = 0.87) deaths. Eight men died of prostate cancer in the active monitoring group (1.5 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.0); five died of prostate cancer in the radical prostatectomy group (0.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.2 per 1000 person years) and four died of prostate cancer in the radical radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 2.0 per 1000 person years). More men developed metastases in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring, n = 33 (6.3 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 4.5 to 8.8); radical prostatectomy, n = 13 (2.4 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.2 per 1000 person years); and radical radiotherapy, n = 16 (3.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.9 per 1000 person-years; p = 0.004). There were higher rates of disease progression in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring (n = 112; 22.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 19.0 to 27.5 per 1000 person years); radical prostatectomy (n = 46; 8.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 11.9 per 1000 person-years); and radical radiotherapy (n = 46; 9.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 12.0 per 1000 person years; p < 0.001). Radical prostatectomy had the greatest impact on sexual function/urinary continence and remained worse than radical radiotherapy and active monitoring. Radical radiotherapy's impact on sexual function was greatest at 6 months, but recovered somewhat in the majority of participants. Sexual and urinary function gradually declined in the active monitoring group. Bowel function was worse with radical radiotherapy at 6 months, but it recovered with the exception of bloody stools. Urinary voiding and nocturia worsened in the radical radiotherapy group at 6 months but recovered. Condition-specific quality-of-life effects mirrored functional changes. No differences in anxiety/depression or generic or cancer-related quality of life were found. At the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probabilities that each arm was the most cost-effective option were 58% (radical radiotherapy), 32% (active monitoring) and 10% (radical prostatectomy). LIMITATIONS A single prostate-specific antigen test and transrectal ultrasound biopsies were used. There were very few non-white men in the trial. The majority of men had low- and intermediate-risk disease. Longer follow-up is needed. CONCLUSIONS At a median follow-up point of 10 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low, irrespective of the assigned treatment. Radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy reduced disease progression and metastases, but with side effects. Further work is needed to follow up participants at a median of 15 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 37. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Grace Young
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mary Robinson
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Eleanor Walsh
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Prescott
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - David Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heavey S, Costa H, Pye H, Burt EC, Jenkinson S, Lewis G, Bosshard‐Carter L, Watson F, Jameson C, Ratynska M, Ben‐Salha I, Haider A, Johnston EW, Feber A, Shaw G, Sridhar A, Nathan S, Rajan P, Briggs TP, Sooriakumaran P, Kelly JD, Freeman A, Whitaker HC. PEOPLE: PatiEnt prOstate samPLes for rEsearch, a tissue collection pathway utilizing magnetic resonance imaging data to target tumor and benign tissue in fresh radical prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 2019; 79:768-777. [PMID: 30807665 PMCID: PMC6618051 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 1 million men are diagnosed with prostate cancer each year worldwide, with a wide range of research programs requiring access to patient tissue samples for development of improved diagnoses and treatments. A random sampling of prostate tissue is sufficient for certain research studies; however, there is growing research need to target areas of the aggressive tumor as fresh tissue. Here we set out to develop a new pathway "PEOPLE: PatiEnt prOstate samPLes for rEsearch" to collect high-quality fresh tissue for research use, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to target areas of tumor and benign tissue. METHODS Prostate tissue was sampled following robotic radical prostatectomy, using MRI data to target areas of benign and tumor tissue. Initially, 25 cases were sampled using MRI information from clinical notes. A further 59 cases were sampled using an optimized method that included specific MRI measurements of tumor location along with additional exclusion criteria. All cases were reviewed in batches with detailed clinical and histopathological data recorded. For one subset of samples, DNA was extracted and underwent quality control. Ex vivo culture was carried out using the gelatin sponge method for an additional subset. RESULTS Tumor was successfully fully or partially targeted in 64% of the initial cohort and 70% of the optimized cohort. DNA of high quality and concentration was isolated from 39 tumor samples, and ex vivo culture was successfully carried out in three cases with tissue morphology, proliferation, and apoptosis remaining comparable before and after 72 hours culture. CONCLUSION Here we report initial data from the PEOPLE pathway; using a method for targeting areas of tumor within prostate samples using MRI. This method operates alongside the standard clinical pathway and minimizes additional input from surgical, radiological, and pathological teams, while preserving surgical margins and diagnostic tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Heavey
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics GroupUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Helena Costa
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hayley Pye
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics GroupUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emma C. Burt
- Department of Molecular HaematologyBarts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Sophia Jenkinson
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Fran Watson
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Charles Jameson
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Marzena Ratynska
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Imen Ben‐Salha
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Aiman Haider
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Andrew Feber
- Divison of Surgery and Interventional SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Greg Shaw
- Department of Uro‐OncologyUCLH NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Department of Uro‐OncologyUCLH NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Department of Uro‐OncologyUCLH NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - Timothy P. Briggs
- Department of Uro‐OncologyUCLH NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | | | - John D. Kelly
- Department of Uro‐OncologyUCLH NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Research Department of PathologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hayley C. Whitaker
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics GroupUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parry MA, Srivastava S, Ali A, Cannistraci A, Antonello J, Barros-Silva JD, Ubertini V, Ramani V, Lau M, Shanks J, Nonaka D, Oliveira P, Hambrock T, Leong HS, Dhomen N, Miller C, Brady G, Dive C, Clarke NW, Marais R, Baena E. Genomic Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-visible and -nonvisible Lesions in Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 2:1-11. [PMID: 30929837 PMCID: PMC6472613 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway is undergoing a radical change with the introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), genomic testing, and different prostate biopsy techniques. It has been proposed that these tests should be used in a sequential manner to optimise risk stratification. OBJECTIVE To characterise the genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic features of mpMRI-visible and -nonvisible PCa in clinically localised disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicore analysis of fresh prostate tissue sampled immediately after radical prostatectomy was performed for intermediate- to high-risk PCa. INTERVENTION Low-pass whole-genome, exome, methylation, and transcriptome profiling of patient tissue cores taken from microscopically benign and cancerous areas in the same prostate. Circulating free and germline DNA was assessed from the blood of five patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Correlations between preoperative mpMRI and genomic characteristics of tumour and benign prostate samples were assessed. Gene profiles for individual tumour cores were correlated with existing genomic classifiers currently used for prognostication. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 43 prostate cores (22 tumour and 21 benign) were profiled from six whole prostate glands. Of the 22 tumour cores, 16 were tumours visible and six were tumours nonvisible on mpMRI. Intratumour genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity was found within mpMRI-visible lesions. This could potentially lead to misclassification of patients using signatures based on copy number or RNA expression. Moreover, three of the six cores obtained from mpMRI-nonvisible tumours harboured one or more genetic alterations commonly observed in metastatic castration-resistant PCa. No circulating free DNA alterations were found. Limitations include the small cohort size and lack of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the continued use of systematic prostate sampling in addition to mpMRI, as avoidance of systematic biopsies in patients with negative mpMRI may mean that clinically significant tumours harbouring genetic alterations commonly seen in metastatic PCa are missed. Furthermore, there is inconsistency in individual genomics when genomic classifiers are applied. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study shows that tumour heterogeneity within prostate tumours visible on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can lead to misclassification of patients if only one core is used for genomic analysis. In addition, some cancers that were missed by mpMRI had genomic aberrations that are commonly seen in advanced metastatic prostate cancer. Avoiding biopsies in mpMRI-negative cases may mean that such potentially lethal cancers are missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina A Parry
- Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Shambhavi Srivastava
- Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Computational Biology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Adnan Ali
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Genitourinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK; Prostate Oncobiology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Alessio Cannistraci
- Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Jenny Antonello
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - João Diogo Barros-Silva
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Prostate Oncobiology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Valentina Ubertini
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Prostate Oncobiology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Vijay Ramani
- Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maurice Lau
- Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonathan Shanks
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Daisuke Nonaka
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas Hambrock
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Hui Sun Leong
- Computational Biology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Nathalie Dhomen
- Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Crispin Miller
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Computational Biology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; RNA Biology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Ged Brady
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Caroline Dive
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK
| | - Noel W Clarke
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Genitourinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK; Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, Salford NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
| | - Richard Marais
- Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK.
| | - Esther Baena
- Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK; Prostate Oncobiology, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luca BA, Brewer DS, Edwards DR, Edward S, Whitaker HC, Merson S, Dennis N, Cooper RA, Hazell S, Warren AY, Eeles R, Lynch AG, Ross-Adams H, Lamb AD, Neal DE, Sethia K, Mills RD, Ball RY, Curley H, Clark J, Moulton V, Cooper CS. DESNT: A Poor Prognosis Category of Human Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:842-850. [PMID: 28753852 PMCID: PMC5669460 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A critical problem in the clinical management of prostate cancer is that it is highly heterogeneous. Accurate prediction of individual cancer behaviour is therefore not achievable at the time of diagnosis leading to substantial overtreatment. It remains an enigma that, in contrast to breast cancer, unsupervised analyses of global expression profiles have not currently defined robust categories of prostate cancer with distinct clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE To devise a novel classification framework for human prostate cancer based on unsupervised mathematical approaches. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Our analyses are based on the hypothesis that previous attempts to classify prostate cancer have been unsuccessful because individual samples of prostate cancer frequently have heterogeneous compositions. To address this issue, we applied an unsupervised Bayesian procedure called Latent Process Decomposition to four independent prostate cancer transcriptome datasets obtained using samples from prostatectomy patients and containing between 78 and 182 participants. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Biochemical failure was assessed using log-rank analysis and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Application of Latent Process Decomposition identified a common process in all four independent datasets examined. Cancers assigned to this process (designated DESNT cancers) are characterized by low expression of a core set of 45 genes, many encoding proteins involved in the cytoskeleton machinery, ion transport, and cell adhesion. For the three datasets with linked prostate-specific antigen failure data following prostatectomy, patients with DESNT cancer exhibited poor outcome relative to other patients (p=2.65×10-5, p=4.28×10-5, and p=2.98×10-8). When these three datasets were combined the independent predictive value of DESNT membership was p=1.61×10-7 compared with p=1.00×10-5 for Gleason sum. A limitation of the study is that only prediction of prostate-specific antigen failure was examined. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate the existence of a novel poor prognosis category of human prostate cancer and will assist in the targeting of therapy, helping avoid treatment-associated morbidity in men with indolent disease. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate cancer, unlike breast cancer, does not have a robust classification framework. We propose that this failure has occurred because prostate cancer samples selected for analysis frequently have heterozygous compositions (individual samples are made up of many different parts that each have different characteristics). Applying a mathematical approach that can overcome this problem we identify a novel poor prognosis category of human prostate cancer called DESNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan-Alexandru Luca
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Daniel S Brewer
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
- The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | - Dylan R Edwards
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Sandra Edward
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sue Merson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Nening Dennis
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Rosalin A Cooper
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Steven Hazell
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - The CancerMap Group
- A list of participants and their affiliations appears in the Supplemental Information
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Andy G Lynch
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Ross-Adams
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alastair D Lamb
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Krishna Sethia
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Robert D Mills
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Richard Y Ball
- Department of Histopathology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Helen Curley
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Jeremy Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Vincent Moulton
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | - Colin S Cooper
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lindh C, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Yaxley J, Gudjónsdóttir J, Clements M, Lindberg J, Egevad L. A novel technique for biobanking of large sections of radical prostatectomy specimens. Histopathology 2017; 72:481-489. [PMID: 28881048 DOI: 10.1111/his.13386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Harvesting of unfixed tissue from radical prostatectomy specimens for research purposes is challenging. Many prostate cancers cannot be identified at gross inspection, and this tumour is notoriously multifocal and heterogeneous. We aimed to develop a technique to allow detailed topographic analysis and the sampling of a sufficient amount of tumour without jeopardising clinical reporting. METHODS AND RESULTS A custom-made double-bladed knife was utilised for cutting a 4-mm-thick horizontal section of the prostate. The slices were split into segments that were frozen in gel, cryosections were cut, and RNA integrity numbers (RINs) were analysed. Sections were cut from all blocks of 20 cases, and the cutting time was monitored. Slides were scanned, and the slices were digitally reconstructed. Cutting frozen sections of an entire slice took 79-253 min (mean 162 min). Tumour was detected in frozen sections of 85% (17/20) of cases and in 46% (72/155) of blocks. The morphological quality was determined to be excellent, and RIN values were high (mean 8.9). CONCLUSIONS This novel protocol for biobanking of fresh tissue from prostatectomy specimens provides sufficient tumour material for research purposes, while also enabling reporting of histopathology. The harvesting of a full tissue slice facilitates studies of tumour multifocality and heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claes Lindh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Aquesta Pathology and University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John Yaxley
- Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jóna Gudjónsdóttir
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Camacho N, Van Loo P, Edwards S, Kay JD, Matthews L, Haase K, Clark J, Dennis N, Thomas S, Kremeyer B, Zamora J, Butler AP, Gundem G, Merson S, Luxton H, Hawkins S, Ghori M, Marsden L, Lambert A, Karaszi K, Pelvender G, Massie CE, Kote-Jarai Z, Raine K, Jones D, Howat WJ, Hazell S, Livni N, Fisher C, Ogden C, Kumar P, Thompson A, Nicol D, Mayer E, Dudderidge T, Yu Y, Zhang H, Shah NC, Gnanapragasam VJ, Isaacs W, Visakorpi T, Hamdy F, Berney D, Verrill C, Warren AY, Wedge DC, Lynch AG, Foster CS, Lu YJ, Bova GS, Whitaker HC, McDermott U, Neal DE, Eeles R, Cooper CS, Brewer DS. Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data. PLoS Genet 2017; 13:e1007001. [PMID: 28945760 PMCID: PMC5628936 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation in prostate cancer. 64 recurrent regions of loss and gain were detected, of which 28 were novel, including regions of loss with more than 15% frequency at Chr4p15.2-p15.1 (15.53%), Chr6q27 (16.50%) and Chr18q12.3 (17.48%). Comprehensive mutation screens of genes, lincRNA encoding sequences, control regions and conserved domains within SCNAs demonstrated that a two-hit genetic model was supported in only a minor proportion of recurrent SCNA losses examined (15/40). We found that recurrent breakpoints and regions of inversion often occur within Knudson model SCNAs, leading to the identification of ZNF292 as a target gene for the deletion at 6q14.3-q15 and NKX3.1 as a two-hit target at 8p21.3-p21.2. The importance of alterations of lincRNA sequences was illustrated by the identification of a novel mutational hotspot at the KCCAT42, FENDRR, CAT1886 and STCAT2 loci at the 16q23.1-q24.3 loss. Our data confirm that the burden of SCNAs is predictive of biochemical recurrence, define nine individual regions that are associated with relapse, and highlight the possible importance of ion channel and G-protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) pathways in cancer development. We concluded that a two-hit genetic model accounts for about one third of SCNA indicating that mechanisms, such haploinsufficiency and epigenetic inactivation, account for the remaining SCNA losses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niedzica Camacho
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandra Edwards
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan D. Kay
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Matthews
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kerstin Haase
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | - Nening Dennis
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Kremeyer
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Zamora
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Adam P. Butler
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Gunes Gundem
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Sue Merson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Hawkins
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Ghori
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Marsden
- Department of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Lambert
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Katalin Karaszi
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Pelvender
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Charlie E. Massie
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- CRUK Cambridge Centre, Early Detection Programme, Urological Malignancies Programme, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keiran Raine
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - David Jones
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - William J. Howat
- Histopathology and in situ hybridization Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Hazell
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Livni
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Ogden
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pardeep Kumar
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Thompson
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Nicol
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erik Mayer
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yongwei Yu
- Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongwei Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nimish C. Shah
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent J. Gnanapragasam
- Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - William Isaacs
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tapio Visakorpi
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Freddie Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Berney
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, The Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Verrill
- Department of Cellular Pathology and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - David C. Wedge
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Oxford Big Data Institute & Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew G. Lynch
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- School of Mathematics and Statistics/School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
| | | | - Yong Jie Lu
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, The Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - G. Steven Bova
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Hayley C. Whitaker
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - David E. Neal
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Colin S. Cooper
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel S. Brewer
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
- Organisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tolkach Y, Eminaga O, Wötzel F, Huss S, Bettendorf O, Eltze E, Abbas M, Imkamp F, Semjonow A. Blind Biobanking of the Prostatectomy Specimen: Critical Evaluation of the Existing Techniques and Development of the New 4-Level Tissue Extraction Model With High Sampling Efficacy. Prostate 2017; 77:396-405. [PMID: 27862105 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fresh tissue is mandatory to perform high-quality translation studies. Several models for tissue extraction from prostatectomy specimens without guidance by frozen sections are already introduced. However, little is known about the sampling efficacy of these models, which should provide representative tissue in adequate volumes, account for multifocality and heterogeneity of tumor, not violate the routine final pathological examination, and perform quickly without frozen section-based histological control. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sampling efficacy of the existing tissue extraction models without guidance by frozen sections ("blind") and to develop an optimized model for tissue extraction. METHODS Five hundred thirty-three electronic maps of the tumor distribution in prostates from a single-center cohort of the patients subjected to radical prostatectomy were used for analysis. Six available models were evaluated in silico for their sampling efficacy. Additionally, a novel model achieving the best sampling efficacy was developed. RESULTS The available models showed high efficacies for sampling "any part" from the tumor (up to 100%), but were uniformly low in efficacy to sample all tumor foci from the specimens (with the best technique sampling only 51.6% of the all tumor foci). The novel 4-level extraction model achieved a sampling efficacy of 93.1% for all tumor foci. CONCLUSIONS The existing "blind" tissue extraction models from prostatectomy specimens without frozen sections control are suitable to target tumor tissues but these tissues do not represent the whole tumor. The novel 4-level model provides the highest sampling efficacy and a promising potential for integration into routine. Prostate 77: 396-405, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Tolkach
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Okyaz Eminaga
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fabian Wötzel
- Gerhard-Domagk Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sebastian Huss
- Gerhard-Domagk Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Elke Eltze
- Institute of Pathology, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Abbas
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Florian Imkamp
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Axel Semjonow
- Prostate Center, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shaw GL, Whitaker H, Corcoran M, Dunning MJ, Luxton H, Kay J, Massie CE, Miller JL, Lamb AD, Ross-Adams H, Russell R, Nelson AW, Eldridge MD, Lynch AG, Ramos-Montoya A, Mills IG, Taylor AE, Arlt W, Shah N, Warren AY, Neal DE. The Early Effects of Rapid Androgen Deprivation on Human Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2016; 70:214-8. [PMID: 26572708 PMCID: PMC4926724 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The androgen receptor (AR) is the dominant growth factor in prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, understanding how ARs regulate the human transcriptome is of paramount importance. The early effects of castration on human PCa have not previously been studied 27 patients medically castrated with degarelix 7 d before radical prostatectomy. We used mass spectrometry, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression array (validated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) to compare resected tumour with matched, controlled, untreated PCa tissue. All patients had levels of serum androgen, with reduced levels of intraprostatic androgen at prostatectomy. We observed differential expression of known androgen-regulated genes (TMPRSS2, KLK3, CAMKK2, FKBP5). We identified 749 genes downregulated and 908 genes upregulated following castration. AR regulation of α-methylacyl-CoA racemase expression and three other genes (FAM129A, RAB27A, and KIAA0101) was confirmed. Upregulation of oestrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) expression was observed in malignant epithelia and was associated with differential expression of ESR1-regulated genes and correlated with proliferation (Ki-67 expression). PATIENT SUMMARY This first-in-man study defines the rapid gene expression changes taking place in prostate cancer (PCa) following castration. Expression levels of the genes that the androgen receptor regulates are predictive of treatment outcome. Upregulation of oestrogen receptor 1 is a mechanism by which PCa cells may survive despite castration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg L Shaw
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK; University College Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
| | - Hayley Whitaker
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Corcoran
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark J Dunning
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; University College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; University College London, London, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jodi L Miller
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alastair D Lamb
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Ross-Adams
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roslin Russell
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam W Nelson
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew D Eldridge
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Ian G Mills
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Nordic EMBL Partnership, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Departments of Cancer Prevention and Urology, Institute of Cancer Research and Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway; Prostate Cancer UK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Angela E Taylor
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wiebke Arlt
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nimish Shah
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Madhu B, Shaw GL, Warren AY, Neal DE, Griffiths JR. Response of Degarelix treatment in human prostate cancer monitored by HR-MAS 1H NMR spectroscopy. Metabolomics 2016; 12:120. [PMID: 27429605 PMCID: PMC4927592 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-016-1055-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The androgen receptor (AR) is the master regulator of prostate cancer cell metabolism. Degarelix is a novel gonadotrophin-releasing hormone blocker, used to decrease serum androgen levels in order to treat advanced human prostate cancer. Little is known of the rapid metabolic response of the human prostate cancer tissue samples to the decreased androgen levels. OBJECTIVES To investigate the metabolic responses in benign and cancerous tissue samples from patients after treatment with Degarelix by using HRMAS 1H NMR spectroscopy. METHODS Using non-destructive HR-MAS 1H NMR spectroscopy we analysed the metabolic changes induced by decreased AR signalling in human prostate cancer tissue samples. Absolute concentrations of the metabolites alanine, lactate, glutamine, glutamate, citrate, choline compounds [t-choline = choline + phosphocholine (PC) + glycerophosphocholine (GPC)], creatine compounds [t-creatine = creatine (Cr) + phosphocreatine (PCr)], taurine, myo-inositol and polyamines were measured in benign prostate tissue samples (n = 10), in prostate cancer specimens from untreated patients (n = 7) and prostate cancer specimens from patients treated with Degarelix (n = 6). RESULTS Lactate, alanine and t-choline concentrations were significantly elevated in high-grade prostate cancer samples when compared to benign samples in untreated patients. Decreased androgen levels resulted in significant decreases of lactate and t-choline concentrations in human prostate cancer biopsies. CONCLUSIONS The reduced concentrations of lactate and t-choline metabolites due to Degarelix could in principle be monitored by in vivo 1H MRS, which suggests that it would be possible to monitor the effects of physical or chemical castration in patients by that non-invasive method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basetti Madhu
- />Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE UK
| | - Greg L. Shaw
- />Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE UK
- />Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- />University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- />Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E. Neal
- />Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE UK
- />Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- />Nuffield Department of Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - John R. Griffiths
- />Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Whitington T, Gao P, Song W, Ross-Adams H, Lamb AD, Yang Y, Svezia I, Klevebring D, Mills IG, Karlsson R, Halim S, Dunning MJ, Egevad L, Warren AY, Neal DE, Grönberg H, Lindberg J, Wei GH, Wiklund F. Gene regulatory mechanisms underpinning prostate cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet 2016; 48:387-97. [PMID: 26950096 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Molecular characterization of genome-wide association study (GWAS) loci can uncover key genes and biological mechanisms underpinning complex traits and diseases. Here we present deep, high-throughput characterization of gene regulatory mechanisms underlying prostate cancer risk loci. Our methodology integrates data from 295 prostate cancer chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing experiments with genotype and gene expression data from 602 prostate tumor samples. The analysis identifies new gene regulatory mechanisms affected by risk locus SNPs, including widespread disruption of ternary androgen receptor (AR)-FOXA1 and AR-HOXB13 complexes and competitive binding mechanisms. We identify 57 expression quantitative trait loci at 35 risk loci, which we validate through analysis of allele-specific expression. We further validate predicted regulatory SNPs and target genes in prostate cancer cell line models. Finally, our integrated analysis can be accessed through an interactive visualization tool. This analysis elucidates how genome sequence variation affects disease predisposition via gene regulatory mechanisms and identifies relevant genes for downstream biomarker and drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Whitington
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ping Gao
- Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Wei Song
- Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Helen Ross-Adams
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alastair D Lamb
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yuehong Yang
- Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Ilaria Svezia
- Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Daniel Klevebring
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ian G Mills
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Prostate Cancer UK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Robert Karlsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Silvia Halim
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark J Dunning
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gong-Hong Wei
- Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Fredrik Wiklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ross-Adams H, Lamb A, Dunning M, Halim S, Lindberg J, Massie C, Egevad L, Russell R, Ramos-Montoya A, Vowler S, Sharma N, Kay J, Whitaker H, Clark J, Hurst R, Gnanapragasam V, Shah N, Warren A, Cooper C, Lynch A, Stark R, Mills I, Grönberg H, Neal D. Integration of copy number and transcriptomics provides risk stratification in prostate cancer: A discovery and validation cohort study. EBioMedicine 2015; 2:1133-44. [PMID: 26501111 PMCID: PMC4588396 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the heterogeneous genotypes and phenotypes of prostate cancer is fundamental to improving the way we treat this disease. As yet, there are no validated descriptions of prostate cancer subgroups derived from integrated genomics linked with clinical outcome. METHODS In a study of 482 tumour, benign and germline samples from 259 men with primary prostate cancer, we used integrative analysis of copy number alterations (CNA) and array transcriptomics to identify genomic loci that affect expression levels of mRNA in an expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) approach, to stratify patients into subgroups that we then associated with future clinical behaviour, and compared with either CNA or transcriptomics alone. FINDINGS We identified five separate patient subgroups with distinct genomic alterations and expression profiles based on 100 discriminating genes in our separate discovery and validation sets of 125 and 103 men. These subgroups were able to consistently predict biochemical relapse (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.016 respectively) and were further validated in a third cohort with long-term follow-up (p = 0.027). We show the relative contributions of gene expression and copy number data on phenotype, and demonstrate the improved power gained from integrative analyses. We confirm alterations in six genes previously associated with prostate cancer (MAP3K7, MELK, RCBTB2, ELAC2, TPD52, ZBTB4), and also identify 94 genes not previously linked to prostate cancer progression that would not have been detected using either transcript or copy number data alone. We confirm a number of previously published molecular changes associated with high risk disease, including MYC amplification, and NKX3-1, RB1 and PTEN deletions, as well as over-expression of PCA3 and AMACR, and loss of MSMB in tumour tissue. A subset of the 100 genes outperforms established clinical predictors of poor prognosis (PSA, Gleason score), as well as previously published gene signatures (p = 0.0001). We further show how our molecular profiles can be used for the early detection of aggressive cases in a clinical setting, and inform treatment decisions. INTERPRETATION For the first time in prostate cancer this study demonstrates the importance of integrated genomic analyses incorporating both benign and tumour tissue data in identifying molecular alterations leading to the generation of robust gene sets that are predictive of clinical outcome in independent patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Ross-Adams
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - A.D. Lamb
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - M.J. Dunning
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - S. Halim
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - J. Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C.M. Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L.A. Egevad
- Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R. Russell
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - A. Ramos-Montoya
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - S.L. Vowler
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - N.L. Sharma
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK
| | - J. Kay
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - H. Whitaker
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - J. Clark
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - R. Hurst
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - V.J. Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - N.C. Shah
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - A.Y. Warren
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - C.S. Cooper
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - A.G. Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - R. Stark
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - I.G. Mills
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
- Prostate Cancer UK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - H. Grönberg
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - D.E. Neal
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Massie CE, Spiteri I, Ross-Adams H, Luxton H, Kay J, Whitaker HC, Dunning MJ, Lamb AD, Ramos-Montoya A, Brewer DS, Cooper CS, Eeles R, Warren AY, Tavaré S, Neal DE, Lynch AG. HES5 silencing is an early and recurrent change in prostate tumourigenesis. Endocr Relat Cancer 2015; 22:131-44. [PMID: 25560400 PMCID: PMC4335379 DOI: 10.1530/erc-14-0454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, resulting in over 10 000 deaths/year in the UK. Sequencing and copy number analysis of primary tumours has revealed heterogeneity within tumours and an absence of recurrent founder mutations, consistent with non-genetic disease initiating events. Using methylation profiling in a series of multi-focal prostate tumours, we identify promoter methylation of the transcription factor HES5 as an early event in prostate tumourigenesis. We confirm that this epigenetic alteration occurs in 86-97% of cases in two independent prostate cancer cohorts (n=49 and n=39 tumour-normal pairs). Treatment of prostate cancer cells with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine increased HES5 expression and downregulated its transcriptional target HES6, consistent with functional silencing of the HES5 gene in prostate cancer. Finally, we identify and test a transcriptional module involving the AR, ERG, HES1 and HES6 and propose a model for the impact of HES5 silencing on tumourigenesis as a starting point for future functional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Inmaculada Spiteri
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Ross-Adams
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark J Dunning
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alastair D Lamb
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonio Ramos-Montoya
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel S Brewer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin S Cooper
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon Tavaré
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andy G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UKDivision of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UKDepartment of Biological Sciences and School of MedicineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondon and Sutton, UKDepartments of PathologyUrologySurgical OncologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cooper CS, Eeles R, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Gundem G, Alexandrov LB, Kremeyer B, Butler A, Lynch AG, Camacho N, Massie CE, Kay J, Luxton HJ, Edwards S, Kote-Jarai ZS, Dennis N, Merson S, Leongamornlert D, Zamora J, Corbishley C, Thomas S, Nik-Zainal S, O'Meara S, Matthews L, Clark J, Hurst R, Mithen R, Bristow RG, Boutros PC, Fraser M, Cooke S, Raine K, Jones D, Menzies A, Stebbings L, Hinton J, Teague J, McLaren S, Mudie L, Hardy C, Anderson E, Joseph O, Goody V, Robinson B, Maddison M, Gamble S, Greenman C, Berney D, Hazell S, Livni N, Fisher C, Ogden C, Kumar P, Thompson A, Woodhouse C, Nicol D, Mayer E, Dudderidge T, Shah NC, Gnanapragasam V, Voet T, Campbell P, Futreal A, Easton D, Warren AY, Foster CS, Stratton MR, Whitaker HC, McDermott U, Brewer DS, Neal DE. Analysis of the genetic phylogeny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal prostate tissue. Nat Genet 2015; 47:367-372. [PMID: 25730763 PMCID: PMC4380509 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 331] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide DNA sequencing was used to decrypt the phylogeny of multiple samples from distinct areas of cancer and morphologically normal tissue taken from the prostates of three men. Mutations were present at high levels in morphologically normal tissue distant from the cancer, reflecting clonal expansions, and the underlying mutational processes at work in morphologically normal tissue were also at work in cancer. Our observations demonstrate the existence of ongoing abnormal mutational processes, consistent with field effects, underlying carcinogenesis. This mechanism gives rise to extensive branching evolution and cancer clone mixing, as exemplified by the coexistence of multiple cancer lineages harboring distinct ERG fusions within a single cancer nodule. Subsets of mutations were shared either by morphologically normal and malignant tissues or between different ERG lineages, indicating earlier or separate clonal cell expansions. Our observations inform on the origin of multifocal disease and have implications for prostate cancer therapy in individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin S Cooper
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Department of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - David C Wedge
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Human Genome Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, VIB and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Gunes Gundem
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Barbara Kremeyer
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Adam Butler
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew G Lynch
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hayley J Luxton
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sandra Edwards
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - ZSofia Kote-Jarai
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nening Dennis
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Sue Merson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Jorge Zamora
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Sarah Thomas
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Sarah O'Meara
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lucy Matthews
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rachel Hurst
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Richard Mithen
- Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Informatics and Bio-Computing, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Department Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Fraser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Susanna Cooke
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Keiran Raine
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - David Jones
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew Menzies
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lucy Stebbings
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jon Hinton
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jon Teague
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Stuart McLaren
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Laura Mudie
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Claire Hardy
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Olivia Joseph
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Victoria Goody
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ben Robinson
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Mark Maddison
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Stephen Gamble
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Dan Berney
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Steven Hazell
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Naomi Livni
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Pardeep Kumar
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Alan Thompson
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - David Nicol
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Erik Mayer
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Nimish C Shah
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thierry Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Campbell
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Douglas Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Hayley C Whitaker
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Daniel S Brewer
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vlajnic T, Oeggerli M, Rentsch C, Püschel H, Zellweger T, Thalmann GN, Ruiz C, Bubendorf L. Ceramic foam plates: a new tool for processing fresh radical prostatectomy specimens. Virchows Arch 2014; 465:637-42. [PMID: 25323812 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1665-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Revised: 08/25/2014] [Accepted: 10/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Procurement of fresh tissue of prostate cancer is critical for biobanking and generation of xenograft models as an important preclinical step towards new therapeutic strategies in advanced prostate cancer. However, handling of fresh radical prostatectomy specimens has been notoriously challenging given the distinctive physical properties of prostate tissue and the difficulty to identify cancer foci on gross examination. Here, we have developed a novel approach using ceramic foam plates for processing freshly cut whole mount sections from radical prostatectomy specimens without compromising further diagnostic assessment. Forty-nine radical prostatectomy specimens were processed and sectioned from the apex to the base in whole mount slices. Putative carcinoma foci were morphologically verified by frozen section analysis. The fresh whole mount slices were then laid between two ceramic foam plates and fixed overnight. To test tissue preservation after this procedure, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded whole mount sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence, and silver in situ hybridization (FISH and SISH, respectively). There were no morphological artifacts on H&E stained whole mount sections from slices that had been fixed between two plates of ceramic foam, and the histological architecture was fully retained. The quality of immunohistochemistry, FISH, and SISH was excellent. Fixing whole mount tissue slices between ceramic foam plates after frozen section examination is an excellent method for processing fresh radical prostatectomy specimens, allowing for a precise identification and collection of fresh tumor tissue without compromising further diagnostic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatjana Vlajnic
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Schoenbeinstrasse 40, 4031, Basel, Switzerland,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oxley J. Understanding the Histopathology. Prostate Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118347379.ch3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
19
|
Hagen RM, Rhodes A, Oxley J, Ladomery MR. A M-MLV reverse transcriptase with reduced RNaseH activity allows greater sensitivity of gene expression detection in formalin fixed and paraffin embedded prostate cancer samples. Exp Mol Pathol 2013; 95:98-104. [PMID: 23739432 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2013] [Accepted: 05/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) human tissue collections are an invaluable resource for retrospective gene expression studies. However formalin fixation results in chemical modification of RNA and increased RNA degradation. This can affect RNA yield and quality. A critical step when analysing gene expression is the conversion of RNA to complementary DNA (cDNA) using a reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme. FFPE derived RNA may affect the performance and efficiency of the RT enzyme and cDNA synthesis. We directly compared three commonly used FFPE RNA isolation methods and measured RNA yield, purity and integrity. We also assessed the effectiveness of three commercially available Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV) RTs on cDNA synthesis and gene expression sensitivity when using FFPE RNA as a template. Our results show that gene detection sensitivity is dependent on the isolation method, RT and length of the PCR amplicon (<200bp) when using FFPE RNA. The use of an M-MLV RT enzyme with reduced RNaseH activity gave significantly increased qRT-PCR sensitivity when using FFPE RNA derived from prostate tissue. The choice of RT can also affect perceived changes in target gene expression and thus the same RT should be used when attempting to reproduce results from different studies. This study highlights the need to optimise and evaluate RNA isolation methods and RTs when using FFPE RNA as a template in order to maximise a successful outcome in PCR applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Hagen
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|