1
|
Wedge DC, Gundem G, Mitchell T, Woodcock DJ, Martincorena I, Ghori M, Zamora J, Butler A, Whitaker H, Kote-Jarai Z, Alexandrov LB, Van Loo P, Massie CE, Dentro S, Warren AY, Verrill C, Berney DM, Dennis N, Merson S, Hawkins S, Howat W, Lu YJ, Lambert A, Kay J, Kremeyer B, Karaszi K, Luxton H, Camacho N, Marsden L, Edwards S, Matthews L, Bo V, Leongamornlert D, McLaren S, Ng A, Yu Y, Zhang H, Dadaev T, Thomas S, Easton DF, Ahmed M, Bancroft E, Fisher C, Livni N, Nicol D, Tavaré S, Gill P, Greenman C, Khoo V, Van As N, Kumar P, Ogden C, Cahill D, Thompson A, Mayer E, Rowe E, Dudderidge T, Gnanapragasam V, Shah NC, Raine K, Jones D, Menzies A, Stebbings L, Teague J, Hazell S, Corbishley C, de Bono J, Attard G, Isaacs W, Visakorpi T, Fraser M, Boutros PC, Bristow RG, Workman P, Sander C, Hamdy FC, Futreal A, McDermott U, Al-Lazikani B, Lynch AG, Bova GS, Foster CS, Brewer DS, Neal DE, Cooper CS, Eeles RA. Sequencing of prostate cancers identifies new cancer genes, routes of progression and drug targets. Nat Genet 2018; 50:682-692. [PMID: 29662167 PMCID: PMC6372064 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer represents a substantial clinical challenge because it is difficult to predict outcome and advanced disease is often fatal. We sequenced the whole genomes of 112 primary and metastatic prostate cancer samples. From joint analysis of these cancers with those from previous studies (930 cancers in total), we found evidence for 22 previously unidentified putative driver genes harboring coding mutations, as well as evidence for NEAT1 and FOXA1 acting as drivers through noncoding mutations. Through the temporal dissection of aberrations, we identified driver mutations specifically associated with steps in the progression of prostate cancer, establishing, for example, loss of CHD1 and BRCA2 as early events in cancer development of ETS fusion-negative cancers. Computational chemogenomic (canSAR) analysis of prostate cancer mutations identified 11 targets of approved drugs, 7 targets of investigational drugs, and 62 targets of compounds that may be active and should be considered candidates for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Wedge
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| | - Gunes Gundem
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Mitchell
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dan J Woodcock
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mohammed Ghori
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jorge Zamora
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Adam Butler
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Hayley Whitaker
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Cancer Genomics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Early Detection Programme, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefan Dentro
- Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Cancer Genomics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dan M Berney
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Nening Dennis
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Sue Merson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Steve Hawkins
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - William Howat
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yong-Jie Lu
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Adam Lambert
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara Kremeyer
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Katalin Karaszi
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Luke Marsden
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lucy Matthews
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Valeria Bo
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Leongamornlert
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stuart McLaren
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Anthony Ng
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yongwei Yu
- Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | - Sarah Thomas
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Bancroft
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Naomi Livni
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - David Nicol
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Simon Tavaré
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pelvender Gill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vincent Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Pardeep Kumar
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Declan Cahill
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Alan Thompson
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Erik Mayer
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nimish C Shah
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Keiran Raine
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - David Jones
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew Menzies
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lucy Stebbings
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jon Teague
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Steven Hazell
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Tapio Visakorpi
- Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, BioMediTech, University of Tampere and Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Michael Fraser
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Chris Sander
- cBio Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Andrew G Lynch
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- School of Mathematics and Statistics/School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, Fife, UK
| | - G Steven Bova
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, BioMediTech, University of Tampere and Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Daniel S Brewer
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin S Cooper
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smeets E, Lynch AG, Prekovic S, Van den Broeck T, Moris L, Helsen C, Joniau S, Claessens F, Massie CE. The role of TET-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation in prostate cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2018; 462:41-55. [PMID: 28870782 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins are recently characterized dioxygenases that regulate demethylation by oxidizing 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and further derivatives. The recent finding that 5hmC is also a stable and independent epigenetic modification indicates that these proteins play an important role in diverse physiological and pathological processes such as neural and tumor development. Both the genomic distribution of (hydroxy)methylation and the expression and activity of TET proteins are dysregulated in a wide range of cancers including prostate cancer. Up to now it is still unknown how changes in TET and 5(h)mC profiles are related to the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. In this review, we explore recent advances in the current understanding of how TET expression and function are regulated in development and cancer. Furthermore, we look at the impact on 5hmC in prostate cancer and the potential underlying mechanisms. Finally, we tried to summarize the latest techniques for detecting and quantifying global and locus-specific 5hmC levels of genomic DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Smeets
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - A G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Prekovic
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Van den Broeck
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Moris
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Helsen
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Claessens
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C E Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Camacho N, Van Loo P, Edwards S, Kay JD, Matthews L, Haase K, Clark J, Dennis N, Thomas S, Kremeyer B, Zamora J, Butler AP, Gundem G, Merson S, Luxton H, Hawkins S, Ghori M, Marsden L, Lambert A, Karaszi K, Pelvender G, Massie CE, Kote-Jarai Z, Raine K, Jones D, Howat WJ, Hazell S, Livni N, Fisher C, Ogden C, Kumar P, Thompson A, Nicol D, Mayer E, Dudderidge T, Yu Y, Zhang H, Shah NC, Gnanapragasam VJ, Isaacs W, Visakorpi T, Hamdy F, Berney D, Verrill C, Warren AY, Wedge DC, Lynch AG, Foster CS, Lu YJ, Bova GS, Whitaker HC, McDermott U, Neal DE, Eeles R, Cooper CS, Brewer DS. Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data. PLoS Genet 2017; 13:e1007001. [PMID: 28945760 PMCID: PMC5628936 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation in prostate cancer. 64 recurrent regions of loss and gain were detected, of which 28 were novel, including regions of loss with more than 15% frequency at Chr4p15.2-p15.1 (15.53%), Chr6q27 (16.50%) and Chr18q12.3 (17.48%). Comprehensive mutation screens of genes, lincRNA encoding sequences, control regions and conserved domains within SCNAs demonstrated that a two-hit genetic model was supported in only a minor proportion of recurrent SCNA losses examined (15/40). We found that recurrent breakpoints and regions of inversion often occur within Knudson model SCNAs, leading to the identification of ZNF292 as a target gene for the deletion at 6q14.3-q15 and NKX3.1 as a two-hit target at 8p21.3-p21.2. The importance of alterations of lincRNA sequences was illustrated by the identification of a novel mutational hotspot at the KCCAT42, FENDRR, CAT1886 and STCAT2 loci at the 16q23.1-q24.3 loss. Our data confirm that the burden of SCNAs is predictive of biochemical recurrence, define nine individual regions that are associated with relapse, and highlight the possible importance of ion channel and G-protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) pathways in cancer development. We concluded that a two-hit genetic model accounts for about one third of SCNA indicating that mechanisms, such haploinsufficiency and epigenetic inactivation, account for the remaining SCNA losses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niedzica Camacho
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandra Edwards
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan D. Kay
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Matthews
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kerstin Haase
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | - Nening Dennis
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Kremeyer
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Zamora
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Adam P. Butler
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Gunes Gundem
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Sue Merson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Hawkins
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Ghori
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Marsden
- Department of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Lambert
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Katalin Karaszi
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Pelvender
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Charlie E. Massie
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- CRUK Cambridge Centre, Early Detection Programme, Urological Malignancies Programme, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keiran Raine
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - David Jones
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - William J. Howat
- Histopathology and in situ hybridization Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Hazell
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Livni
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Ogden
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pardeep Kumar
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Thompson
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Nicol
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erik Mayer
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yongwei Yu
- Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongwei Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nimish C. Shah
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent J. Gnanapragasam
- Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - William Isaacs
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tapio Visakorpi
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Freddie Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Berney
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, The Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Verrill
- Department of Cellular Pathology and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - David C. Wedge
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Oxford Big Data Institute & Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew G. Lynch
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- School of Mathematics and Statistics/School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
| | | | - Yong Jie Lu
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, The Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - G. Steven Bova
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and BioMediTech Institute, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Hayley C. Whitaker
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - David E. Neal
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Colin S. Cooper
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel S. Brewer
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
- Organisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ross-Adams H, Lamb AD, Dunning MJ, Halim S, Lindberg J, Massie CM, Egevad LA, Russell R, Ramos-Montoya A, Vowler SL, Sharma NL, Kay J, Whitaker H, Clark J, Hurst R, Gnanapragasam VJ, Shah NC, Warren AY, Cooper CS, Lynch AG, Stark R, Mills IG, Grönberg H, Neal DE. Corrigendum to "Integration of Copy Number and Transcriptomics Provides Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer: A Discovery and Validation Cohort Study" [EBioMedicine 2 (9) (2015) 1133-1144]. EBioMedicine 2017; 17:238. [PMID: 28292578 PMCID: PMC5680481 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Ross-Adams
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - A D Lamb
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - M J Dunning
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - S Halim
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - J Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - C M Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - L A Egevad
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - R Russell
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - A Ramos-Montoya
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - S L Vowler
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - N L Sharma
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK.
| | - J Kay
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK; Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - H Whitaker
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK; Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - J Clark
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - R Hurst
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - V J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - N C Shah
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | - A Y Warren
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | - C S Cooper
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - A G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - R Stark
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - I G Mills
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK; Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, N-0318 Oslo, Norway; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; Prostate Cancer UK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
| | - H Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - D E Neal
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shaw GL, Whitaker H, Corcoran M, Dunning MJ, Luxton H, Kay J, Massie CE, Miller JL, Lamb AD, Ross-Adams H, Russell R, Nelson AW, Eldridge MD, Lynch AG, Ramos-Montoya A, Mills IG, Taylor AE, Arlt W, Shah N, Warren AY, Neal DE. The Early Effects of Rapid Androgen Deprivation on Human Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2016; 70:214-8. [PMID: 26572708 PMCID: PMC4926724 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The androgen receptor (AR) is the dominant growth factor in prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, understanding how ARs regulate the human transcriptome is of paramount importance. The early effects of castration on human PCa have not previously been studied 27 patients medically castrated with degarelix 7 d before radical prostatectomy. We used mass spectrometry, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression array (validated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) to compare resected tumour with matched, controlled, untreated PCa tissue. All patients had levels of serum androgen, with reduced levels of intraprostatic androgen at prostatectomy. We observed differential expression of known androgen-regulated genes (TMPRSS2, KLK3, CAMKK2, FKBP5). We identified 749 genes downregulated and 908 genes upregulated following castration. AR regulation of α-methylacyl-CoA racemase expression and three other genes (FAM129A, RAB27A, and KIAA0101) was confirmed. Upregulation of oestrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) expression was observed in malignant epithelia and was associated with differential expression of ESR1-regulated genes and correlated with proliferation (Ki-67 expression). PATIENT SUMMARY This first-in-man study defines the rapid gene expression changes taking place in prostate cancer (PCa) following castration. Expression levels of the genes that the androgen receptor regulates are predictive of treatment outcome. Upregulation of oestrogen receptor 1 is a mechanism by which PCa cells may survive despite castration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg L Shaw
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK; University College Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
| | - Hayley Whitaker
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Corcoran
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark J Dunning
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hayley Luxton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; University College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; University College London, London, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jodi L Miller
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alastair D Lamb
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Ross-Adams
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roslin Russell
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam W Nelson
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew D Eldridge
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Ian G Mills
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Nordic EMBL Partnership, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Departments of Cancer Prevention and Urology, Institute of Cancer Research and Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway; Prostate Cancer UK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Angela E Taylor
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wiebke Arlt
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nimish Shah
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alioto TS, Buchhalter I, Derdak S, Hutter B, Eldridge MD, Hovig E, Heisler LE, Beck TA, Simpson JT, Tonon L, Sertier AS, Patch AM, Jäger N, Ginsbach P, Drews R, Paramasivam N, Kabbe R, Chotewutmontri S, Diessl N, Previti C, Schmidt S, Brors B, Feuerbach L, Heinold M, Gröbner S, Korshunov A, Tarpey PS, Butler AP, Hinton J, Jones D, Menzies A, Raine K, Shepherd R, Stebbings L, Teague JW, Ribeca P, Giner FC, Beltran S, Raineri E, Dabad M, Heath SC, Gut M, Denroche RE, Harding NJ, Yamaguchi TN, Fujimoto A, Nakagawa H, Quesada V, Valdés-Mas R, Nakken S, Vodák D, Bower L, Lynch AG, Anderson CL, Waddell N, Pearson JV, Grimmond SM, Peto M, Spellman P, He M, Kandoth C, Lee S, Zhang J, Létourneau L, Ma S, Seth S, Torrents D, Xi L, Wheeler DA, López-Otín C, Campo E, Campbell PJ, Boutros PC, Puente XS, Gerhard DS, Pfister SM, McPherson JD, Hudson TJ, Schlesner M, Lichter P, Eils R, Jones DTW, Gut IG. A comprehensive assessment of somatic mutation detection in cancer using whole-genome sequencing. Nat Commun 2015; 6:10001. [PMID: 26647970 PMCID: PMC4682041 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As whole-genome sequencing for cancer genome analysis becomes a clinical tool, a full understanding of the variables affecting sequencing analysis output is required. Here using tumour-normal sample pairs from two different types of cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and medulloblastoma, we conduct a benchmarking exercise within the context of the International Cancer Genome Consortium. We compare sequencing methods, analysis pipelines and validation methods. We show that using PCR-free methods and increasing sequencing depth to ∼ 100 × shows benefits, as long as the tumour:control coverage ratio remains balanced. We observe widely varying mutation call rates and low concordance among analysis pipelines, reflecting the artefact-prone nature of the raw data and lack of standards for dealing with the artefacts. However, we show that, using the benchmark mutation set we have created, many issues are in fact easy to remedy and have an immediate positive impact on mutation detection accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler S. Alioto
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivo Buchhalter
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Sophia Derdak
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barbara Hutter
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthew D. Eldridge
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Lawrence E. Heisler
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
| | - Timothy A. Beck
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
| | - Jared T. Simpson
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
| | - Laurie Tonon
- Synergie Lyon Cancer Foundation, Centre Léon Bérard, Cheney C, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon 69373, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Sertier
- Synergie Lyon Cancer Foundation, Centre Léon Bérard, Cheney C, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon 69373, France
| | - Ann-Marie Patch
- Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Natalie Jäger
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Mail Stop-5120, Stanford, California 94305-5120, USA
| | - Philip Ginsbach
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Ruben Drews
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Nagarajan Paramasivam
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Rolf Kabbe
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Sasithorn Chotewutmontri
- Genome and Proteome Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Nicolle Diessl
- Genome and Proteome Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Christopher Previti
- Genome and Proteome Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Sabine Schmidt
- Genome and Proteome Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Benedikt Brors
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Lars Feuerbach
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Michael Heinold
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Susanne Gröbner
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Andrey Korshunov
- Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | | | - Adam P. Butler
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Jonathan Hinton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - David Jones
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Andrew Menzies
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Keiran Raine
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Rebecca Shepherd
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Lucy Stebbings
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Jon W. Teague
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Paolo Ribeca
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Castro Giner
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Beltran
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emanuele Raineri
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Dabad
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simon C. Heath
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Gut
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robert E. Denroche
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
| | - Nicholas J. Harding
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
| | - Takafumi N. Yamaguchi
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
| | - Akihiro Fujimoto
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Hidewaki Nakagawa
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Víctor Quesada
- Universidad de Oviedo—IUOPA, C/Fernando Bongera s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Rafael Valdés-Mas
- Universidad de Oviedo—IUOPA, C/Fernando Bongera s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Sigve Nakken
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Vodák
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- The Bioinformatics Core Facility, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - Lawrence Bower
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Andrew G. Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Charlotte L. Anderson
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia
| | - Nicola Waddell
- Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - John V. Pearson
- Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Sean M. Grimmond
- Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
- WolfsonWohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland G61 1QH, UK
| | - Myron Peto
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, USA
| | - Paul Spellman
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, USA
| | | | - Cyriac Kandoth
- The Genome Institute, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA
| | - Semin Lee
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - John Zhang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | - Singer Ma
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Sahil Seth
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - David Torrents
- IRB-BSC Joint Research Program on Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Liu Xi
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - David A. Wheeler
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Carlos López-Otín
- Universidad de Oviedo—IUOPA, C/Fernando Bongera s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Elías Campo
- Hematopathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paul C. Boutros
- Synergie Lyon Cancer Foundation, Centre Léon Bérard, Cheney C, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon 69373, France
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L7
| | - Xose S. Puente
- Universidad de Oviedo—IUOPA, C/Fernando Bongera s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Daniela S. Gerhard
- National Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Genomics, 31 Center Drive, 10A07, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2580, USA
| | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - John D. McPherson
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L7
| | - Thomas J. Hudson
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L7
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8
| | - Matthias Schlesner
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Peter Lichter
- Division of Molecular Genetics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120,Germany
- Heidelberg Center for Personalised Oncology (DKFZ-HIPO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Eils
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Center for Personalised Oncology (DKFZ-HIPO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Bioquant Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - David T. W. Jones
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Ivo G. Gut
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cooper CS, Eeles R, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Gundem G, Alexandrov LB, Kremeyer B, Butler A, Lynch AG, Camacho N, Massie CE, Kay J, Luxton HJ, Edwards S, Kote-Jarai Z, Dennis N, Merson S, Leongamornlert D, Zamora J, Corbishley C, Thomas S, Nik-Zainal S, Ramakrishna M, O'Meara S, Matthews L, Clark J, Hurst R, Mithen R, Bristow RG, Boutros PC, Fraser M, Cooke S, Raine K, Jones D, Menzies A, Stebbings L, Hinton J, Teague J, McLaren S, Mudie L, Hardy C, Anderson E, Joseph O, Goody V, Robinson B, Maddison M, Gamble S, Greenman C, Berney D, Hazell S, Livni N, Fisher C, Ogden C, Kumar P, Thompson A, Woodhouse C, Nicol D, Mayer E, Dudderidge T, Shah NC, Gnanapragasam V, Voet T, Campbell P, Futreal A, Easton D, Warren AY, Foster CS, Stratton MR, Whitaker HC, McDermott U, Brewer DS, Neal DE. Corrigendum: analysis of the genetic phylogeny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal prostate tissue. Nat Genet 2015; 47:689. [PMID: 26018901 DOI: 10.1038/ng0615-689b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
8
|
Cooper CS, Eeles R, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Gundem G, Alexandrov LB, Kremeyer B, Butler A, Lynch AG, Camacho N, Massie CE, Kay J, Luxton HJ, Edwards S, Kote-Jarai ZS, Dennis N, Merson S, Leongamornlert D, Zamora J, Corbishley C, Thomas S, Nik-Zainal S, O'Meara S, Matthews L, Clark J, Hurst R, Mithen R, Bristow RG, Boutros PC, Fraser M, Cooke S, Raine K, Jones D, Menzies A, Stebbings L, Hinton J, Teague J, McLaren S, Mudie L, Hardy C, Anderson E, Joseph O, Goody V, Robinson B, Maddison M, Gamble S, Greenman C, Berney D, Hazell S, Livni N, Fisher C, Ogden C, Kumar P, Thompson A, Woodhouse C, Nicol D, Mayer E, Dudderidge T, Shah NC, Gnanapragasam V, Voet T, Campbell P, Futreal A, Easton D, Warren AY, Foster CS, Stratton MR, Whitaker HC, McDermott U, Brewer DS, Neal DE. Analysis of the genetic phylogeny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal prostate tissue. Nat Genet 2015; 47:367-372. [PMID: 25730763 PMCID: PMC4380509 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 316] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide DNA sequencing was used to decrypt the phylogeny of multiple samples from distinct areas of cancer and morphologically normal tissue taken from the prostates of three men. Mutations were present at high levels in morphologically normal tissue distant from the cancer, reflecting clonal expansions, and the underlying mutational processes at work in morphologically normal tissue were also at work in cancer. Our observations demonstrate the existence of ongoing abnormal mutational processes, consistent with field effects, underlying carcinogenesis. This mechanism gives rise to extensive branching evolution and cancer clone mixing, as exemplified by the coexistence of multiple cancer lineages harboring distinct ERG fusions within a single cancer nodule. Subsets of mutations were shared either by morphologically normal and malignant tissues or between different ERG lineages, indicating earlier or separate clonal cell expansions. Our observations inform on the origin of multifocal disease and have implications for prostate cancer therapy in individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin S Cooper
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Department of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - David C Wedge
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Human Genome Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, VIB and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Gunes Gundem
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Barbara Kremeyer
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Adam Butler
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew G Lynch
- Statistics and Computational Biology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Charlie E Massie
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hayley J Luxton
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sandra Edwards
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - ZSofia Kote-Jarai
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nening Dennis
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Sue Merson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Jorge Zamora
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Sarah Thomas
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Sarah O'Meara
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lucy Matthews
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rachel Hurst
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Richard Mithen
- Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Informatics and Bio-Computing, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Department Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Fraser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Susanna Cooke
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Keiran Raine
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - David Jones
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew Menzies
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lucy Stebbings
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jon Hinton
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Jon Teague
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Stuart McLaren
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Laura Mudie
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Claire Hardy
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Olivia Joseph
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Victoria Goody
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ben Robinson
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Mark Maddison
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Stephen Gamble
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Dan Berney
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Steven Hazell
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Naomi Livni
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - Pardeep Kumar
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Alan Thompson
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | | | - David Nicol
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Erik Mayer
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Nimish C Shah
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thierry Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Campbell
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Douglas Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Hayley C Whitaker
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Daniel S Brewer
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, UK
| | - David E Neal
- Urological Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wiesner M, Naylor SJ, Copping A, Furlong A, Lynch AG, Parkes M, Hunter JO. Symptom classification in irritable bowel syndrome as a guide to treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 44:796-803. [PMID: 19452358 DOI: 10.1080/00365520902964705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains unsatisfactory. There are no objective markers for diagnosis, and classification (currently based on symptoms) provides little insight into potential causes or optimal therapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether a Swedish classification of IBS based on cluster analysis of patients' symptoms might provide a guide to successful treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients in a research clinic for IBS were classified according to criteria published by Ragnarsson & Bodemar (R&B) and also assessed independently by a clinician. Patients fulfilling the R&B criteria for subgroups 1 and 2 received specific treatments, either bulk laxatives or dietary treatment to reduce colonic fermentation, respectively. Patients who did not fit into these categories were given "best treatment" targeted at their predominant symptoms, but not limited in any way. Results before and after follow-up were assessed using a validated symptom-scoring scale. RESULTS Seventy-one successive patients were recruited, and the numbers falling into R&B subgroups 1 and 2 were 15 (21%), and 28 (39%), respectively, leaving 28 (39%) unclassified. Receiver operating characteristic plots showed that the criteria for separation into subgroups 1 and 2 correlated well with the clinician's assessment. After treatment, symptom scores for the whole group showed a significant improvement (p<0.0001), but results were significantly better in subgroups 1 and 2 than in those unclassified, even when allowance was made for a potential therapeutic placebo effect of 40%. CONCLUSION The R&B classification provides a helpful guide to treatment in many cases of IBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen Wiesner
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lynch AG, Dunning MJ, Iddawela M, Barbosa-Morais NL, Ritchie ME. Considerations for the processing and analysis of GoldenGate-based two-colour Illumina platforms. Stat Methods Med Res 2009; 18:437-52. [PMID: 19153169 DOI: 10.1177/0962280208099451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Illumina's GoldenGate technology is a two-channel microarray platform that allows for the simultaneous interrogation of about 1,500 locations in the genome. GoldenGate has proved a flexible platform not only in the choice of those 1,500 locations, but also in the choice of the property being measured at them. It retains the desirable properties of Illumina's BeadArrays in that the probes (in this case 'beads') are randomly arranged across the microarray, there are multiple instances of each probe and many samples can be processed simultaneously. As for other Illumina technologies, however, these properties are not exploited as they might be. Here we review the various common adaptations of the GoldenGate platform, review the analysis methods that are associated with each adaptation and then, with the aid of a number of example data sets we illustrate some of the improvements that can be made over the default analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Lynch
- University of Cambridge/Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
SUMMARY With their many replicates and their random layouts, Illumina BeadArrays provide greater scope fordetecting spatial artefacts than do other microarray technologies. They are also robust to artefact exclusion, yet there is a lack of tools that can perform these tasks for Illumina. We present BASH, a tool for this purpose. BASH adopts the concepts of Harshlight, but implements them in a manner that utilizes the unique characteristics of the Illumina technology. Using bead-level data, spatial artefacts of various kinds can thus be identified and excluded from further analyses. AVAILABILITY The beadarray Bioconductor package (version 1.10 onwards), www.bioconductor.org
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Cairns
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB20RE, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fanshawe TR, Lynch AG, Ellis IO, Green AR, Hanka R. Assessing agreement between multiple raters with missing rating information, applied to breast cancer tumour grading. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2925. [PMID: 18698346 PMCID: PMC2488396 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2008] [Accepted: 07/18/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We consider the problem of assessing inter-rater agreement when there are missing data and a large number of raters. Previous studies have shown only 'moderate' agreement between pathologists in grading breast cancer tumour specimens. We analyse a large but incomplete data-set consisting of 24,177 grades, on a discrete 1-3 scale, provided by 732 pathologists for 52 samples. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We review existing methods for analysing inter-rater agreement for multiple raters and demonstrate two further methods. Firstly, we examine a simple non-chance-corrected agreement score based on the observed proportion of agreements with the consensus for each sample, which makes no allowance for missing data. Secondly, treating grades as lying on a continuous scale representing tumour severity, we use a Bayesian latent trait method to model cumulative probabilities of assigning grade values as functions of the severity and clarity of the tumour and of rater-specific parameters representing boundaries between grades 1-2 and 2-3. We simulate from the fitted model to estimate, for each rater, the probability of agreement with the majority. Both methods suggest that there are differences between raters in terms of rating behaviour, most often caused by consistent over- or under-estimation of the grade boundaries, and also considerable variability in the distribution of grades assigned to many individual samples. The Bayesian model addresses the tendency of the agreement score to be biased upwards for raters who, by chance, see a relatively 'easy' set of samples. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Latent trait models can be adapted to provide novel information about the nature of inter-rater agreement when the number of raters is large and there are missing data. In this large study there is substantial variability between pathologists and uncertainty in the identity of the 'true' grade of many of the breast cancer tumours, a fact often ignored in clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Fanshawe
- Department of Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marioni JC, Thorne NP, Valsesia A, Fitzgerald T, Redon R, Fiegler H, Andrews TD, Stranger BE, Lynch AG, Dermitzakis ET, Carter NP, Tavaré S, Hurles ME. Breaking the waves: improved detection of copy number variation from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genome Biol 2008; 8:R228. [PMID: 17961237 PMCID: PMC2246302 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2007] [Revised: 10/10/2007] [Accepted: 10/25/2007] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Datasets used for detecting copy number variation (CNV) are shown to be affected by a technical artifact. A novel CNV calling algorithm is presented which removes this artifact and identifies regions of CNV better than existing methods. Background Large-scale high throughput studies using microarray technology have established that copy number variation (CNV) throughout the genome is more frequent than previously thought. Such variation is known to play an important role in the presence and development of phenotypes such as HIV-1 infection and Alzheimer's disease. However, methods for analyzing the complex data produced and identifying regions of CNV are still being refined. Results We describe the presence of a genome-wide technical artifact, spatial autocorrelation or 'wave', which occurs in a large dataset used to determine the location of CNV across the genome. By removing this artifact we are able to obtain both a more biologically meaningful clustering of the data and an increase in the number of CNVs identified by current calling methods without a major increase in the number of false positives detected. Moreover, removing this artifact is critical for the development of a novel model-based CNV calling algorithm - CNVmix - that uses cross-sample information to identify regions of the genome where CNVs occur. For regions of CNV that are identified by both CNVmix and current methods, we demonstrate that CNVmix is better able to categorize samples into groups that represent copy number gains or losses. Conclusion Removing artifactual 'waves' (which appear to be a general feature of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) datasets) and using cross-sample information when identifying CNVs enables more biological information to be extracted from aCGH experiments designed to investigate copy number variation in normal individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Marioni
- Computational Biology Group, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Walsh SR, Boyle JR, Lynch AG, Sadat U, Carpenter JP, Tang TY, Gaunt ME. Suprarenal endograft fixation and medium-term renal function: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47:1364-1370. [PMID: 18280095 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2007] [Revised: 11/05/2007] [Accepted: 11/11/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suprarenal fixation is widely used in endovascular aneurysm repair. Numerous small, underpowered studies have concluded that it does not increase the risk of renal impairment compared with infrarenal fixation. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that renal infarction is more common with suprarenal fixation, but the effect on renal function remains unclear. METHODS Electronic abstract databases, article reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for series reporting renal function data after suprarenal fixation. There was considerable study heterogeneity with respect to key factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction and length of follow-up. Authors were contacted to obtain individual patient data for a pooled reanalysis using standardized criteria. RESULTS Of 46 potentially relevant citations, only 11 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Complete data sets were available for four studies (1065 patients), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for postoperative renal impairment in the suprarenal fixation and infrarenal fixation groups and compared by the log-rank test. Median time free of renal impairment was 38.5 months in the infrarenal fixation group compared with 32.4 months in the suprarenal fixation group (P = .0038). However, to account for significant methodologic differences, further analysis was required using a Weibull regression model fitted in open Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling (BUGS). The pooled hazard ratio for deterioration of renal function after suprarenal fixation was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-10). CONCLUSION Currently available data are insufficient to determine the precise effect of suprarenal fixation on medium-term renal function. Conventional Kaplan-Meier analysis of the pooled data set suggested that suprarenal fixation increased the risk of renal dysfunction; however, the effect disappeared when sophisticated statistical modelling was performed to account for study heterogeneity. A randomised controlled trial of suprarenal fixation may resolve this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart R Walsh
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Burnet NG, Lynch AG, Jefferies SJ, Price SJ, Jones PH, Antoun NM, Xuereb JH, Pohl U. High grade glioma: imaging combined with pathological grade defines management and predicts prognosis. Radiother Oncol 2007; 85:371-8. [PMID: 18035440 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2007] [Revised: 09/24/2007] [Accepted: 10/03/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is ambiguity in pathological grading of high grade gliomas within the WHO 2000 classification, especially those with predominant oligodendroglial differentiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS All adult high grade gliomas treated radically, 1996-2005, were assessed. Cases in which pathology was grade III but radiology suggested glioblastoma (GBM) were classified as 'grade III/IV'; their pathology was reviewed. RESULTS Data from 245 patients (52 grade III, 18 grade III/IV, 175 GBM) were analysed using a Cox Proportional Hazards model. On pathology review, features suggestive of more aggressive behaviour were found in all 18 grade III/IV tumours. Oligodendroglial components with both necrosis and microvascular proliferation were present in 7. MIB-1 counts for the last 8 were all above 14%, mean 27%. Median survivals were: grade III 34 months, grade III/IV 10 months, GBM 11 months. Survival was not significantly different between grade III/IV and GBM. Patients with grade III/IV tumours had significantly worse outcome than grade III, with a hazard of death 3.7 times higher. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight the current inconsistency in pathological grading of high grade tumours, especially those with oligodendroglial elements. Patients with histological grade III tumours but radiological appearances suggestive of GBM should be managed as glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil G Burnet
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Price SJ, Jena R, Green HAL, Kirkby NF, Lynch AG, Coles CE, Pickard JD, Gillard JH, Burnet NG. Early radiotherapy dose response and lack of hypersensitivity effect in normal brain tissue: a sequential dynamic susceptibility imaging study of cerebral perfusion. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007; 19:577-87. [PMID: 17629467 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2005] [Revised: 02/15/2007] [Accepted: 04/27/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To determine if magnetic resonance perfusion markers can be used as an analytical marker of subclinical normal brain injury after radiotherapy, by looking for a dose-effect relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four patients undergoing conformal radiotherapy to 54Gy in 30 fractions for low-grade gliomas were imaged with conventional T(2)-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging as well as dynamic contrast susceptibility perfusion imaging. Forty regions of interest were determined from the periventricular white matter. All conventional sequences were examined for evidence of radiation-induced changes. Patients were imaged before radiotherapy, after one fraction, at the end of treatment and then at 1 and 3 months from the end of radiotherapy. For each region the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and mean transit time (MTT) expressed as a ratio of the baseline value, and radiotherapy dose were determined. RESULTS Of the 40 regions, seven occurred within the gross tumour volume and a further four occurred in regions later infiltrated by tumour, and were thus excluded. Regions within the 80% isodose showed a reduction in rCBV and rCBF over the 3 month period. There was no significant alteration in rCBV or rCBF in regions outside the 60% isodose (i.e. <32Gy). MTT did not alter in any region. There seemed to be a threshold effect at 132 days from the end of radiotherapy of 47% (standard error of the mean 11.5, about 25.4Gy) for rCBV and 59% (standard error of the mean 14.2, about 31.9Gy) for rCBF. CONCLUSIONS There was a dose-related reduction in rCBV and rCBF in normal brain after radiotherapy at higher dose levels. Although this study used a limited number of patients, it suggests that magnetic resonance perfusion imaging seems to act as a marker of subclinical response of normal brain and that there is an absence of an early hypersensitivity effect with small doses per fraction. Further studies are required with larger groups of patients to show that these results are statistically robust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Price
- Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Cambridge University and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bernard F, Outtrim J, Lynch AG, Menon DK, Matta BF. Hemodynamic steroid responsiveness is predictive of neurological outcome after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2007; 5:176-9. [PMID: 17290084 DOI: 10.1385/ncc:5:3:176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/1999] [Revised: 11/30/1999] [Accepted: 11/30/1999] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To determine the impact of physiologic doses of hydrocortisone on neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS We conducted a retrospective study in a neurocritical care unit at a university teaching hospital. We included 29 patients with moderate and severe TBI requiring vasoactive drugs to maintain adequate arterial blood pressure who received corticosteroid. Infected patients were excluded. Blood cortisol levels were measured before and 30 and 60 minutes after the administration of a high-dose corticotropin stimulation test (HDST). Patients received hydrocortisone replacement therapy (200-300 mg/day) and vasoactive drugs requirements were noted. Intracranial pressure was managed according to a predefined protocol. RESULTS A total of 14 out of 29 (48%) of patients were classified as responders to hydrocortisone (stopping vasoactive drugs within 3 days of starting hydrocortisone). The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was used to assess neurologic outcome at 6 months. A favorable outcome (GOS 4 and 5) was observed in 11 out of 14 (79%) of responders and five out of 15 (33%) of nonresponders (p = 0.03). Of the responders, 12 out of 14 (85%) had a baseline cortisol below 414 nmol/L, and five out of 14 (36%) had primary adrenal insufficiency (AI) (primary AI: low baseline cortisol, and poor response to the HDST). Age, severity of injury, and response to hydrocortisone were predictive of outcome in multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS Adrenal insufficiency is frequent after TBI, and hydrocortisone replacement therapy seems to be associated with a favorable neurologic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Bernard
- University Department of Critical Care Medicine and General Internal Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Callaghan CJ, Lynch AG, Amin I, Fazel M, Lindop MJ, Gaunt ME, Varty K. Overnight Intensive Recovery: Elective Open Aortic Surgery Without a Routine ICU Bed. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 30:252-8. [PMID: 16061164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2004] [Accepted: 03/03/2005] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most patients are managed on the intensive care unit (ICU) after elective open aortic surgery. We preoperatively identify patients suitable for extubation in theatre with overnight management in theatre recovery before discharge back to the ward (overnight intensive recovery (OIR)). The safety of this was investigated. DESIGN Retrospective case note analysis of all patients who underwent EOAS from 1998 to 2002, recording in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Physiological and operative severity score for the enUmeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) data were collected prospectively. METHODS Patients were divided into those selected for OIR and those booked for elective ICU admission. Observed morbidity and mortality data were compared with predicted outcomes generated by Portsmouth-POSSUM and POSSUM equations. RESULTS Hundred and fifty-two out of 178 patients used OIR; 155 patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The elective ICU group had significantly higher anaesthetic risk scores (ASA grade), larger AAA, greater intraoperative blood loss and longer operations. In the OIR group, ten patients (7%) needed ICU admission within 48h postoperatively. Complications occurred in 85/152, with two deaths. There was no excess morbidity or mortality in the OIR group (predicted 95% CI 83-105 and 5-17, respectively). CONCLUSION Most patients having elective open aortic surgery can be managed safely using OIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Callaghan
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lynch AG. Using SPSS for Windows. Kristin E. Voelkl and Susan B. Gerber, Springer, New York, 1999. No. of pages: xvi+228. ISBN 0-387-98563-8. Doing Statistics with SPSS. Alistair W. Kerr, Howard K. Hall and Stephen A. Kozub, Sage Publications, London, 2002. No. of pages: vii+238. ISBN 0-7169-7385-0. Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows Versions 8-10: A Beginner's Guide New Edition. Jeremy J. Foster, Sage Publications, London, 2002. No. of pages: xvii+252. ISBN 0-7169-6927-0. Stat Med 2003. [DOI: 10.1002/sim.1496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
20
|
Warnich L, Waso HF, Groenewald IM, Bester AE, de Villiers JN, Kotze MJ, Lynch AG, Louw JH. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the protoporphyrinogen oxidase gene: inter-population heterogeneity of allelic variation. Mol Cell Probes 2001; 15:217-21. [PMID: 11513556 DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the protoporphyrinogen oxidase gene (PPOX) were used for inter-population comparisons of six South African populations and two non-South African Caucasian populations. Novel polymorphisms identified in the promoter region and exon 11 of the PPOX gene, as well as three known variants in exon 1 and intron 2, were analysed using single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and restriction enzyme analyses. Significant population differences were found for four of the five polymorphisms analysed. A G-to-A transition was found at nucleotide position -1081 and is the first polymorphism to be identified in the 5' promoter region of the gene. A novel A-to-C substitution at nucleotide position 3880 in exon 11 was not detected in subjects of European descent. This study represents the first inter-population comparison of allelic variation at the PPOX locus. The significant differences observed between populations demonstrate the importance of population considerations when marker association studies are performed at this locus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Warnich
- Department of Genetics, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Lynch AG, Klein NW. Polysome activity in relation to growth and protein starvation in brains and hearts of cultured early chick embryos. Biochim Biophys Acta 1978; 519:194-203. [PMID: 566560 DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(78)90072-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In previous studies, brains but not hearts of intact early chick embryos were found to be sensitive to protein starvation. In this study, the in vitro protein synthetic activity of polysomes isolated from brains was found to be greater than those isolated from hearts. Starvation reduced the protein synthetic activity of polysomes in vitro but the extent of the reduction was approximately the same for both brains and hearts. A reduction in the amount of ribosomes as polysomes may have contributed to the lower synthetic activity of polysomes from tissues of starved embryos but not to the differences in synthetic activities between brains and hearts. In addition, neither the stability of isolated polysomes nor ribosome-associated ribonuclease activity appeared responsible for the differences observed in polysome synthetic activities. In direct relationship to the differential sensitivity of brains and hearts to starvation observed in the intact embryo, ribosomes isolated from brains of both growing and starved embryos were more readily degraded during in vitro incubation than those from hearts.
Collapse
|