1
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Raouraoua N, Bates PA, Giulini M, Honorato RV, van Noort C, Teixeira JMC, Bonvin AMJJ, Kong R, Shi H, Lu X, Chang S, Liu J, Guo Z, Chen X, Morehead A, Roy RS, Wu T, Giri N, Quadir F, Chen C, Cheng J, Del Carpio CA, Ichiishi E, Rodriguez‐Lumbreras LA, Fernandez‐Recio J, Harmalkar A, Chu L, Canner S, Smanta R, Gray JJ, Li H, Lin P, He J, Tao H, Huang S, Roel‐Touris J, Jimenez‐Garcia B, Christoffer CW, Jain AJ, Kagaya Y, Kannan H, Nakamura T, Terashi G, Verburgt JC, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Fujuta H, Sekijima M, Kihara D, Khan O, Kotelnikov S, Ghani U, Padhorny D, Beglov D, Vajda S, Kozakov D, Negi SS, Ricciardelli T, Barradas‐Bautista D, Cao Z, Chawla M, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Yin R, Cheung M, Guest JD, Lee J, Pierce BG, Shor B, Cohen T, Halfon M, Schneidman‐Duhovny D, Zhu S, Yin R, Sun Y, Shen Y, Maszota‐Zieleniak M, Bojarski KK, Lubecka EA, Marcisz M, Danielsson A, Dziadek L, Gaardlos M, Gieldon A, Liwo A, Samsonov SA, Slusarz R, Zieba K, Sieradzan AK, Czaplewski C, Kobayashi S, Miyakawa Y, Kiyota Y, Takeda‐Shitaka M, Olechnovic K, Valancauskas L, Dapkunas J, Venclovas C, Wallner B, Yang L, Hou C, He X, Guo S, Jiang S, Ma X, Duan R, Qui L, Xu X, Zou X, Velankar S, Wodak SJ. Impact of AlphaFold on structure prediction of protein complexes: The CASP15-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2023; 91:1658-1683. [PMID: 37905971 PMCID: PMC10841881 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 54, the 5th joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round offered 37 targets, including 14 homodimers, 3 homo-trimers, 13 heterodimers including 3 antibody-antigen complexes, and 7 large assemblies. On average ~70 CASP and CAPRI predictor groups, including more than 20 automatics servers, submitted models for each target. A total of 21 941 models submitted by these groups and by 15 CAPRI scorer groups were evaluated using the CAPRI model quality measures and the DockQ score consolidating these measures. The prediction performance was quantified by a weighted score based on the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group among their five best models. Results show substantial progress achieved across a significant fraction of the 60+ participating groups. High-quality models were produced for about 40% of the targets compared to 8% two years earlier. This remarkable improvement is due to the wide use of the AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold2-Multimer software and the confidence metrics they provide. Notably, expanded sampling of candidate solutions by manipulating these deep learning inference engines, enriching multiple sequence alignments, or integration of advanced modeling tools, enabled top performing groups to exceed the performance of a standard AlphaFold2-Multimer version used as a yard stick. This notwithstanding, performance remained poor for complexes with antibodies and nanobodies, where evolutionary relationships between the binding partners are lacking, and for complexes featuring conformational flexibility, clearly indicating that the prediction of protein complexes remains a challenging problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F. Lensink
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et FonctionnelleLilleFrance
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et FonctionnelleLilleFrance
| | - Nessim Raouraoua
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et FonctionnelleLilleFrance
| | - Paul A. Bates
- Biomolecular Modeling LaboratoryThe Francis Crick InstituteLondonUK
| | - Marco Giulini
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo V. Honorato
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte van Noort
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Joao M. C. Teixeira
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Xufeng Lu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Jian Liu
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Zhiye Guo
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Xiao Chen
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Alex Morehead
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Raj S. Roy
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Tianqi Wu
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Nabin Giri
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Farhan Quadir
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Chen Chen
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | | | - Eichiro Ichiishi
- International University of Health and Welfare (IUHV Hospital)Nasushiobara‐CityJapan
| | - Luis A. Rodriguez‐Lumbreras
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vida y del Vino (ICVV)CSIC ‐ Universidad de La Rioja ‐ Gobierno de La RiojaLogronoSpain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Juan Fernandez‐Recio
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vida y del Vino (ICVV)CSIC ‐ Universidad de La Rioja ‐ Gobierno de La RiojaLogronoSpain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Ameya Harmalkar
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Lee‐Shin Chu
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Sam Canner
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Rituparna Smanta
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jeffrey J. Gray
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Program in Molecular BiophysicsJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Hao Li
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Peicong Lin
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Jiahua He
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Huanyu Tao
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Sheng‐You Huang
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Jorge Roel‐Touris
- Protein Design and Modeling Lab, Dept. of Structural BiologyMolecular Biology Institute of Barcelona (IBMB‐CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | - Anika J. Jain
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Yuki Kagaya
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Harini Kannan
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
- Dept. of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of BiosciencesIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Genki Terashi
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Jacob C. Verburgt
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Yuanyuan Zhang
- Dept. of Computer SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Zicong Zhang
- Dept. of Computer SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Hayato Fujuta
- Dept. of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of BiosciencesIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
| | | | - Daisuke Kihara
- Dept. of Computer SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Surendra S. Negi
- Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular BiophysicsUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonTexasUSA
| | | | | | - Zhen Cao
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohit Chawla
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)Saudi Arabia
- Department of Chemistry and BiologyUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
| | | | - Rui Yin
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Melyssa Cheung
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Johnathan D. Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Jessica Lee
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Brian G. Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Ben Shor
- School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Tomer Cohen
- School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Matan Halfon
- School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | | | - Shaowen Zhu
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
| | - Rujie Yin
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
- Department of Computer Science and EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
- Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Translational Medical SciencesTexas A&M UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuta Miyakawa
- School of PharmacyKitasato UniversityMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuomi Kiyota
- School of PharmacyKitasato UniversityMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | | | - Kliment Olechnovic
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Lukas Valancauskas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Justas Dapkunas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Ceslovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Bjorn Wallner
- Bioinformatics Division, Department of Physics, Chemistry, and BiologyLinkoping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Lin Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
- School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringThe University of SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Chengyu Hou
- School of Electronics and Information EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Xiaodong He
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
- Shenzhen STRONG Advanced Materials Research Institute Col, LtdShenzhenPeople's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Guo
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Shenda Jiang
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Xiaoliang Ma
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Liming Qui
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
- Dept. of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
- Dept. of BiochemistryUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
- Institute for Data Science and InformaticsUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe, European Molecular Biology LaboratoryEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI)HinxtonCambridgeUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guan R, Liu W, Li N, Cui Z, Cai R, Wang Y, Zhao C. Machine learning models based on residue interaction network for ABCG2 transportable compounds recognition. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2023; 337:122620. [PMID: 37769706 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
As the one of the most important protein of placental transport of environmental substances, the identification of ABCG2 transport molecules is the key step for assessing the risk of placental exposure to environmental chemicals. Here, residue interaction network (RIN) was used to explore the difference of ABCG2 binding conformations between transportable and non-transportable compounds. The RIN were treated as a kind of special quantitative data of protein conformation, which not only reflected the changes of single amino acid conformation in protein, but also indicated the changes of distance and action type between amino acids. Based on the quantitative RIN, four machine learning algorithms were applied to establish the classification and recognition model for 1100 compounds with transported by ABCG2 potential. The random forest (RF) models constructed with RIN presented the best and satisfied predictive ability with an accuracy of training set of 0.97 and the test set of 0.96 respectively. In conclusion, the construction of residue interaction network provided a new perspective for the quantitative characterization of protein conformation and the establishment of prediction models for transporter molecular recognition. The ABCG2 transport molecular recognition model based on residue interaction network provides a possible way for screening environmental chemistry transported through placenta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruining Guan
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Wencheng Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ningqi Li
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Zeyang Cui
- School of Information Science & Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ruitong Cai
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Yawei Wang
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China
| | - Chunyan Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wodak SJ, Vajda S, Lensink MF, Kozakov D, Bates PA. Critical Assessment of Methods for Predicting the 3D Structure of Proteins and Protein Complexes. Annu Rev Biophys 2023; 52:183-206. [PMID: 36626764 PMCID: PMC10885158 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-102622-084607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Advances in a scientific discipline are often measured by small, incremental steps. In this review, we report on two intertwined disciplines in the protein structure prediction field, modeling of single chains and modeling of complexes, that have over decades emulated this pattern, as monitored by the community-wide blind prediction experiments CASP and CAPRI. However, over the past few years, dramatic advances were observed for the accurate prediction of single protein chains, driven by a surge of deep learning methodologies entering the prediction field. We review the mainscientific developments that enabled these recent breakthroughs and feature the important role of blind prediction experiments in building up and nurturing the structure prediction field. We discuss how the new wave of artificial intelligence-based methods is impacting the fields of computational and experimental structural biology and highlight areas in which deep learning methods are likely to lead to future developments, provided that major challenges are overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoshana J Wodak
- VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marc F Lensink
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576-UGSF-Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France;
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA;
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Paul A Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsuchiya Y, Yamamori Y, Tomii K. Protein-protein interaction prediction methods: from docking-based to AI-based approaches. Biophys Rev 2022; 14:1341-1348. [PMID: 36570321 PMCID: PMC9759050 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-022-01032-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs), such as protein-protein inhibitor, antibody-antigen complex, and supercomplexes play diverse and important roles in cells. Recent advances in structural analysis methods, including cryo-EM, for the determination of protein complex structures are remarkable. Nevertheless, much room remains for improvement and utilization of computational methods to predict PPIs because of the large number and great diversity of unresolved complex structures. This review introduces a wide array of computational methods, including our own, for estimating PPIs including antibody-antigen interactions, offering both historical and forward-looking perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Tsuchiya
- grid.208504.b0000 0001 2230 7538Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-4-7 Aomi, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-0064 Japan
| | - Yu Yamamori
- grid.208504.b0000 0001 2230 7538Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-4-7 Aomi, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-0064 Japan
| | - Kentaro Tomii
- grid.208504.b0000 0001 2230 7538Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-4-7 Aomi, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-0064 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antibody CDR amino acids underlying the functionality of antibody repertoires in recognizing diverse protein antigens. Sci Rep 2022; 12:12555. [PMID: 35869245 PMCID: PMC9307644 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16841-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibodies recognize protein antigens with exquisite specificity in a complex aqueous environment, where interfacial waters are an integral part of the antibody–protein complex interfaces. In this work, we elucidate, with computational analyses, the principles governing the antibodies’ specificity and affinity towards their cognate protein antigens in the presence of explicit interfacial waters. Experimentally, in four model antibody–protein complexes, we compared the contributions of the interaction types in antibody–protein antigen complex interfaces with the antibody variants selected from phage-displayed synthetic antibody libraries. Evidently, the specific interactions involving a subset of aromatic CDR (complementarity determining region) residues largely form the predominant determinant underlying the specificity of the antibody–protein complexes in nature. The interfacial direct/water-mediated hydrogen bonds accompanying the CDR aromatic interactions are optimized locally but contribute little in determining the epitope location. The results provide insights into the phenomenon that natural antibodies with limited sequence and structural variations in an antibody repertoire can recognize seemingly unlimited protein antigens. Our work suggests guidelines in designing functional artificial antibody repertoires with practical applications in developing novel antibody-based therapeutics and diagnostics for treating and preventing human diseases.
Collapse
|
6
|
Park S, Seok C. GalaxyWater-CNN: Prediction of Water Positions on the Protein Structure by a 3D-Convolutional Neural Network. J Chem Inf Model 2022; 62:3157-3168. [PMID: 35749367 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Proteins interact with numerous water molecules to perform their physiological functions in biological organisms. Most water molecules act as solvent media; hence, their roles may be considered implicitly in theoretical treatments of protein structure and function. However, some water molecules interact intimately with proteins and require explicit treatment to understand their effects. Most physics-based computational methods are limited in their ability to accurately locate water molecules on protein surfaces because of inaccurate energy functions. Instead of relying on an energy function, this study attempts to learn the locations of water molecules from structural data. GalaxyWater-convolutional neural network (CNN) predicts water positions on protein chains, protein-protein interfaces, and protein-compound binding sites using a 3D-CNN model that is trained to generate a water score map on a given protein structure. The training data are compiled from high-resolution protein crystal structures resolved together with water molecules. GalaxyWater-CNN shows improved water prediction performance both in the coverage of crystal water molecules and in the accuracy of the predicted water positions when compared with previous energy-based methods. This method shows a superior performance in predicting water molecules that form hydrogen-bond networks precisely. The web service and the source code of this water prediction method are freely available at https://galaxy.seoklab.org/gwcnn and https://github.com/seoklab/GalaxyWater-CNN, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangwoo Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.,Galux Inc., Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08738, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith ST, Shub L, Meiler J. PlaceWaters: Real-time, explicit interface water sampling during Rosetta ligand docking. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269072. [PMID: 35639743 PMCID: PMC9154094 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Water molecules at the protein-small molecule interface often form hydrogen bonds with both the small molecule ligand and the protein, affecting the structural integrity and energetics of a binding event. The inclusion of these 'bridging waters' has been shown to improve the accuracy of predicted docked structures; however, due to increased computational costs, this step is typically omitted in ligand docking simulations. In this study, we introduce a resource-efficient, Rosetta-based protocol named "PlaceWaters" to predict the location of explicit interface bridging waters during a ligand docking simulation. In contrast to other explicit water methods, this protocol is independent of knowledge of number and location of crystallographic waters in homologous structures. We test this method on a diverse protein-small molecule benchmark set in comparison to other Rosetta-based protocols. Our results suggest that this coarse-grained, structure-based approach quickly and accurately predicts the location of bridging waters, improving our ability to computationally screen drug candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon T. Smith
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Laura Shub
- Biomedical Informatics Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
- Departments of Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Biomedical Informatics, Center for Structural Biology and Institute of Chemical Biology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University Medical School, SAC, Leipzig, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Mauri T, Nadzirin N, Velankar S, Chaleil RAG, Clarence T, Bates PA, Kong R, Liu B, Yang G, Liu M, Shi H, Lu X, Chang S, Roy RS, Quadir F, Liu J, Cheng J, Antoniak A, Czaplewski C, Giełdoń A, Kogut M, Lipska AG, Liwo A, Lubecka EA, Maszota-Zieleniak M, Sieradzan AK, Ślusarz R, Wesołowski PA, Zięba K, Del Carpio Muñoz CA, Ichiishi E, Harmalkar A, Gray JJ, Bonvin AMJJ, Ambrosetti F, Vargas Honorato R, Jandova Z, Jiménez-García B, Koukos PI, Van Keulen S, Van Noort CW, Réau M, Roel-Touris J, Kotelnikov S, Padhorny D, Porter KA, Alekseenko A, Ignatov M, Desta I, Ashizawa R, Sun Z, Ghani U, Hashemi N, Vajda S, Kozakov D, Rosell M, Rodríguez-Lumbreras LA, Fernandez-Recio J, Karczynska A, Grudinin S, Yan Y, Li H, Lin P, Huang SY, Christoffer C, Terashi G, Verburgt J, Sarkar D, Aderinwale T, Wang X, Kihara D, Nakamura T, Hanazono Y, Gowthaman R, Guest JD, Yin R, Taherzadeh G, Pierce BG, Barradas-Bautista D, Cao Z, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Sun Y, Zhu S, Shen Y, Park T, Woo H, Yang J, Kwon S, Won J, Seok C, Kiyota Y, Kobayashi S, Harada Y, Takeda-Shitaka M, Kundrotas PJ, Singh A, Vakser IA, Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č, Duan R, Qiu L, Xu X, Zhang S, Zou X, Wodak SJ. Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2021; 89:1800-1823. [PMID: 34453465 PMCID: PMC8616814 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70-75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70-80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F Lensink
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Théo Mauri
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nurul Nadzirin
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Tereza Clarence
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Paul A Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Guangbo Yang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Xufeng Lu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Raj S Roy
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Farhan Quadir
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Anna Antoniak
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Artur Giełdoń
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Mateusz Kogut
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Adam Liwo
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Emilia A Lubecka
- Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | | | - Rafał Ślusarz
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Patryk A Wesołowski
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
- Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Karolina Zięba
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Eiichiro Ichiishi
- International University of Health and Welfare Hospital (IUHW Hospital), Nasushiobara City, Japan
| | - Ameya Harmalkar
- Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexandre M J J Bonvin
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ambrosetti
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo Vargas Honorato
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Zuzana Jandova
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Panagiotis I Koukos
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Siri Van Keulen
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte W Van Noort
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon Réau
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorge Roel-Touris
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Innopolis University, Russia
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrey Alekseenko
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Institute of Computer-Aided Design of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryota Ashizawa
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Zhuyezi Sun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Usman Ghani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nasser Hashemi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Mireia Rosell
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis A Rodríguez-Lumbreras
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Fernandez-Recio
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Sergei Grudinin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | - Yumeng Yan
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao Li
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peicong Lin
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Sheng-You Huang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Jacob Verburgt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daipayan Sarkar
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Tunde Aderinwale
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yuya Hanazono
- Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Johnathan D Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Rui Yin
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Ghazaleh Taherzadeh
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian G Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Zhen Cao
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Romina Oliva
- University of Naples "Parthenope", Napoli, Italy
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Shaowen Zhu
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeonuk Woo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsol Yang
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sohee Kwon
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jonghun Won
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yasuomi Kiyota
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiki Harada
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Amar Singh
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Shuang Zhang
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The biological significance of proteins attracted the scientific community in exploring their characteristics. The studies shed light on the interaction patterns and functions of proteins in a living body. Due to their practical difficulties, reliable experimental techniques pave the way for introducing computational methods in the interaction prediction. Automated methods reduced the difficulties but could not yet replace experimental studies as the field is still evolving. Interaction prediction problem being critical needs highly accurate results, but none of the existing methods could offer reliable performance that can parallel with experimental results yet. This article aims to assess the existing computational docking algorithms, their challenges, and future scope. Blind docking techniques are quite helpful when no information other than the individual structures are available. As more and more complex structures are being added to different databases, information-driven approaches can be a good alternative. Artificial intelligence, ruling over the major fields, is expected to take over this domain very shortly.
Collapse
|
10
|
Yin R, Guest JD, Taherzadeh G, Gowthaman R, Mittra I, Quackenbush J, Pierce BG. Structural and energetic profiling of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain antibody recognition and the impact of circulating variants. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009380. [PMID: 34491988 PMCID: PMC8448325 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic highlights the need for a detailed molecular understanding of protective antibody responses. This is underscored by the emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Alpha (B.1.1.7) and Delta (B.1.617.2), some of which appear to be less effectively targeted by current monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. Here we report a high resolution and comprehensive map of antibody recognition of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD), which is the target of most neutralizing antibodies, using computational structural analysis. With a dataset of nonredundant experimentally determined antibody-RBD structures, we classified antibodies by RBD residue binding determinants using unsupervised clustering. We also identified the energetic and conservation features of epitope residues and assessed the capacity of viral variant mutations to disrupt antibody recognition, revealing sets of antibodies predicted to effectively target recently described viral variants. This detailed structure-based reference of antibody RBD recognition signatures can inform therapeutic and vaccine design strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Yin
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Johnathan D. Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ghazaleh Taherzadeh
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ipsa Mittra
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jane Quackenbush
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Brian G. Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kumar SU, Priya Doss CG. Residue interaction networks of K-Ras protein with water molecules identifies the potential role of switch II and P-loop. Comput Biol Med 2021; 135:104597. [PMID: 34237589 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The mutant K-Ras with aberrant signaling is the primary cause of several cancers. The proposed study investigated the influence of water molecules in K-Ras crystal structure, where they have a significant function by understanding their residue interaction networks (RINs). We analyzed the RINs of K-Ras with and without water molecules and determined their interaction properties. RINs were developed with the help of StructureViz2 and RINspector; further, the changes in K-Ras backbone flexibility were predicted with the DynaMine. We found that the residues K42, I142, and L159 are the hotspots from water, including the K-Ras-GTP complex with the highest residue centrality analysis (RCA) Z-score. The DynaMine prediction calculated the NMR S2 value for the frequently mutated positions G12, G13, and Q61 showing a minor shift in flexibility, which make up the P-Loop and switch II of the K-Ras protein. This flexibility shift can account for changes in conformational activity and the protein's GTPase activity, making it difficult to recognize by the effectors and exchange factors. Taken together, our study helps in understanding the functional importance of the water molecules in K-Ras protein and the impact of mutation that modulate the conformational state of the protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Udhaya Kumar
- School of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India
| | - C George Priya Doss
- School of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pavlovicz RE, Park H, DiMaio F. Efficient consideration of coordinated water molecules improves computational protein-protein and protein-ligand docking discrimination. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1008103. [PMID: 32956350 PMCID: PMC7529342 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Highly coordinated water molecules are frequently an integral part of protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces. We introduce an updated energy model that efficiently captures the energetic effects of these ordered water molecules on the surfaces of proteins. A two-stage method is developed in which polar groups arranged in geometries suitable for water placement are first identified, then a modified Monte Carlo simulation allows highly coordinated waters to be placed on the surface of a protein while simultaneously sampling amino acid side chain orientations. This “semi-explicit” water model is implemented in Rosetta and is suitable for both structure prediction and protein design. We show that our new approach and energy model yield significant improvements in native structure recovery of protein-protein and protein-ligand docking discrimination tests. Well-coordinated water molecules—those forming multiple hydrogen bonds with nearby polar groups—play an important role in the structure of biomolecular systems, yet the effect of these waters is often not considered in molecular energy computations. In this paper, we describe a method to efficiently consider these water molecules both implicitly and explicitly at the interfaces formed by two polar molecules. In computations related to determining how a protein interacts with binding partners, we show that the use of this new method significantly improves results. Future application of this approach may improve the design of new protein and small molecule drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan E. Pavlovicz
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Hahnbeom Park
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Frank DiMaio
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lensink MF, Nadzirin N, Velankar S, Wodak SJ. Modeling protein‐protein, protein‐peptide, and protein‐oligosaccharide complexes: CAPRI 7th edition. Proteins 2020; 88:916-938. [DOI: 10.1002/prot.25870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F. Lensink
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle F‐59000 Lille France
| | - Nurul Nadzirin
- European Molecular Biology LaboratoryEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Cambridge UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology LaboratoryEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Cambridge UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Nadzirin N, Velankar S, Chaleil RAG, Gerguri T, Bates PA, Laine E, Carbone A, Grudinin S, Kong R, Liu RR, Xu XM, Shi H, Chang S, Eisenstein M, Karczynska A, Czaplewski C, Lubecka E, Lipska A, Krupa P, Mozolewska M, Golon Ł, Samsonov S, Liwo A, Crivelli S, Pagès G, Karasikov M, Kadukova M, Yan Y, Huang SY, Rosell M, Rodríguez-Lumbreras LA, Romero-Durana M, Díaz-Bueno L, Fernandez-Recio J, Christoffer C, Terashi G, Shin WH, Aderinwale T, Subraman SRMV, Kihara D, Kozakov D, Vajda S, Porter K, Padhorny D, Desta I, Beglov D, Ignatov M, Kotelnikov S, Moal IH, Ritchie DW, de Beauchêne IC, Maigret B, Devignes MD, Echartea MER, Barradas-Bautista D, Cao Z, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Cao Y, Shen Y, Baek M, Park T, Woo H, Seok C, Braitbard M, Bitton L, Scheidman-Duhovny D, Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č, Kundrotas PJ, Belkin S, Chakravarty D, Badal VD, Vakser IA, Vreven T, Vangaveti S, Borrman T, Weng Z, Guest JD, Gowthaman R, Pierce BG, Xu X, Duan R, Qiu L, Hou J, Merideth BR, Ma Z, Cheng J, Zou X, Koukos PI, Roel-Touris J, Ambrosetti F, Geng C, Schaarschmidt J, Trellet ME, Melquiond ASJ, Xue L, Jiménez-García B, van Noort CW, Honorato RV, Bonvin AMJJ, Wodak SJ. Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2019; 87:1200-1221. [PMID: 31612567 PMCID: PMC7274794 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo-oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo-oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher-order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved "ab-initio" docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance "gap" was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template-based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F. Lensink
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Nurul Nadzirin
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Tereza Gerguri
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Paul A. Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Elodie Laine
- CNRS, IBPS, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative (LCQB), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alessandra Carbone
- CNRS, IBPS, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative (LCQB), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | - Sergei Grudinin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Ran-Ran Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Xi-Ming Xu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Miriam Eisenstein
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | | - Emilia Lubecka
- Institute of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Paweł Krupa
- Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Łukasz Golon
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Adam Liwo
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
- School of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Guillaume Pagès
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Maria Kadukova
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia
| | - Yumeng Yan
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Sheng-You Huang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Mireia Rosell
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC), Logroño, Spain
| | - Luis A. Rodríguez-Lumbreras
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC), Logroño, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan Fernandez-Recio
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC), Logroño, Spain
- Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (IBMB-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Woong-Hee Shin
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Tunde Aderinwale
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | | | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dmitri Beglov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Sergey Kotelnikov
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Iain H. Moal
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Didier Barradas-Bautista
- Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zhen Cao
- Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Romina Oliva
- Department of Sciences and Technologies, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Napoli, Italy
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Minkyung Baek
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeonuk Woo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Merav Braitbard
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Live Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lirane Bitton
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dina Scheidman-Duhovny
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Live Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Petras J. Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Saveliy Belkin
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Devlina Chakravarty
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Varsha D. Badal
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Ilya A. Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Thom Vreven
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Sweta Vangaveti
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Tyler Borrman
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Zhiping Weng
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Johnathan D. Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Brian G. Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jie Hou
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Benjamin Ryan Merideth
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Zhiwei Ma
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Panagiotis I. Koukos
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorge Roel-Touris
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ambrosetti
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cunliang Geng
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jörg Schaarschmidt
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mikael E. Trellet
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adrien S. J. Melquiond
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Li Xue
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte W. van Noort
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo V. Honorato
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shinobu A, Takemura K, Matubayasi N, Kitao A. Refining evERdock: Improved selection of good protein-protein complex models achieved by MD optimization and use of multiple conformations. J Chem Phys 2018; 149:195101. [PMID: 30466278 DOI: 10.1063/1.5055799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
A method for evaluating binding free energy differences of protein-protein complex structures generated by protein docking was recently developed by some of us. The method, termed evERdock, combined short (2 ns) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit water and solution theory in the energy representation (ER) and succeeded in selecting the near-native complex structures from a set of decoys. In the current work, we performed longer (up to 100 ns) MD simulations before employing ER analysis in order to further refine the structures of the decoy set with improved binding free energies. Moreover, we estimated the binding free energies for each complex structure based on an average value from five individual MD snapshots. After MD simulations, all decoys exhibit a decrease in binding free energy, suggesting that proper equilibration in explicit solvent resulted in more favourably bound complexes. During the MD simulations, non-native structures tend to become unstable and in some cases dissociate, while near-native structures maintain a stable interface. The energies after the MD simulations show an improved correlation between similarity criteria (such as interface root-mean-square distance) to the native (crystal) structure and the binding free energy. In addition, calculated binding free energies show sensitivity to the number of contacts, which was demonstrated to reflect the relative stability of structures at earlier stages of the MD simulation. We therefore conclude that the additional equilibration step along with the use of multiple conformations can make the evERdock scheme more versatile under low computational cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ai Shinobu
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Takemura
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Matubayasi
- Division of Chemical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
| | - Akio Kitao
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brysbaert G, Blossey R, Lensink MF. The Inclusion of Water Molecules in Residue Interaction Networks Identifies Additional Central Residues. Front Mol Biosci 2018; 5:88. [PMID: 30364190 PMCID: PMC6193073 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The relevance of water molecules for the recognition and the interaction of biomolecules is widely appreciated. In this paper we address the role that water molecules associated to protein complexes play for the functional relevance of residues by considering their residue interaction networks (RINs). These are commonly defined on the basis of the amino acid composition of the proteins themselves, disregarding the solvation state of the protein. We determine properties of the RINs of two protein complexes, colicin E2/Im2 and barnase/barstar, with and without associated water molecules, using a previously developed methodology and its associated application RINspector. We find that the inclusion of water molecules in RINs leads to an increase in the number of central residues which adds a novel mechanism to the relevance of water molecules for protein function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Brysbaert
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Ralf Blossey
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Marc F Lensink
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Takemura K, Matubayasi N, Kitao A. Binding free energy analysis of protein-protein docking model structures by evERdock. J Chem Phys 2018; 148:105101. [PMID: 29544320 DOI: 10.1063/1.5019864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To aid the evaluation of protein-protein complex model structures generated by protein docking prediction (decoys), we previously developed a method to calculate the binding free energies for complexes. The method combines a short (2 ns) all-atom molecular dynamics simulation with explicit solvent and solution theory in the energy representation (ER). We showed that this method successfully selected structures similar to the native complex structure (near-native decoys) as the lowest binding free energy structures. In our current work, we applied this method (evERdock) to 100 or 300 model structures of four protein-protein complexes. The crystal structures and the near-native decoys showed the lowest binding free energy of all the examined structures, indicating that evERdock can successfully evaluate decoys. Several decoys that show low interface root-mean-square distance but relatively high binding free energy were also identified. Analysis of the fraction of native contacts, hydrogen bonds, and salt bridges at the protein-protein interface indicated that these decoys were insufficiently optimized at the interface. After optimizing the interactions around the interface by including interfacial water molecules, the binding free energies of these decoys were improved. We also investigated the effect of solute entropy on binding free energy and found that consideration of the entropy term does not necessarily improve the evaluations of decoys using the normal model analysis for entropy calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Takemura
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Matubayasi
- Division of Chemical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
| | - Akio Kitao
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jeszenői N, Schilli G, Bálint M, Horváth I, Hetényi C. Analysis of the influence of simulation parameters on biomolecule-linked water networks. J Mol Graph Model 2018; 82:117-128. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
The immune systems protect our bodies from foreign molecules or antigens, where antibodies play important roles. Antibodies evolve over time upon antigen encounter by somatically mutating their genome sequences. The end result is a series of antibodies that display higher affinities and specificities to specific antigens. This process is called affinity maturation. Recent improvements in computer hardware and modeling algorithms now enable the rational design of protein structures and functions, and several works on computer-aided antibody design have been published. In this chapter, we briefly describe computational methods for antibody affinity maturation, focusing on methods for sampling antibody conformations and for scoring designed antibody variants. We also discuss lessons learned from the successful computer-aided design of antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Kuroda
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kouhei Tsumoto
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
- Medical Proteomics Laboratory, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lensink MF, Velankar S, Baek M, Heo L, Seok C, Wodak SJ. The challenge of modeling protein assemblies: the CASP12-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2017; 86 Suppl 1:257-273. [PMID: 29127686 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
We present the quality assessment of 5613 models submitted by predictor groups from both CAPRI and CASP for the total of 15 most tractable targets from the second joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction experiment. These targets comprised 12 homo-oligomers and 3 hetero-complexes. The bulk of the analysis focuses on 10 targets (of CAPRI Round 37), which included all 3 hetero-complexes, and whose protein chains or the full assembly could be readily modeled from structural templates in the PDB. On average, 28 CAPRI groups and 10 CASP groups (including automatic servers), submitted models for each of these 10 targets. Additionally, about 16 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring experiments. A range of acceptable to high quality models were obtained for 6 of the 10 Round 37 targets, for which templates were available for the full assembly. Poorer results were achieved for the remaining targets due to the lower quality of the templates available for the full complex or the individual protein chains, highlighting the unmet challenge of modeling the structural adjustments of the protein components that occur upon binding or which must be accounted for in template-based modeling. On the other hand, our analysis indicated that residues in binding interfaces were correctly predicted in a sizable fraction of otherwise poorly modeled assemblies and this with higher accuracy than published methods that do not use information on the binding partner. Lastly, the strengths and weaknesses of the assessment methods are evaluated and improvements suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F Lensink
- University Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Minkyung Baek
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lim Heo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shoshana J Wodak
- VIB Structural Biology Research Center, VUB, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lai JK, Ambia J, Wang Y, Barth P. Enhancing Structure Prediction and Design of Soluble and Membrane Proteins with Explicit Solvent-Protein Interactions. Structure 2017; 25:1758-1770.e8. [PMID: 28966016 PMCID: PMC5909693 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Solvent molecules interact intimately with proteins and can profoundly regulate their structure and function. However, accurately and efficiently modeling protein solvation effects at the molecular level has been challenging. Here, we present a method that improves the atomic-level modeling of soluble and membrane protein structures and binding by efficiently predicting de novo protein-solvent molecule interactions. The method predicted with unprecedented accuracy buried water molecule positions, solvated protein conformations, and challenging mutational effects on protein binding. When applied to homology modeling, solvent-bound membrane protein structures, pockets, and cavities were recapitulated with near-atomic precision even from distant homologs. Blindly refined atomic-level structures of evolutionary distant G protein-coupled receptors imply strikingly different functional roles of buried solvent between receptor classes. The method should prove useful for refining low-resolution protein structures, accurately modeling drug-binding sites in structurally uncharacterized receptors, and designing solvent-mediated protein catalysis, recognition, ligand binding, and membrane protein signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K Lai
- Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joaquin Ambia
- Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yumeng Wang
- Structural and Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Barth
- Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Structural and Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Marcu O, Dodson EJ, Alam N, Sperber M, Kozakov D, Lensink MF, Schueler-Furman O. FlexPepDock lessons from CAPRI peptide-protein rounds and suggested new criteria for assessment of model quality and utility. Proteins 2017; 85:445-462. [PMID: 28002624 PMCID: PMC6618814 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CAPRI rounds 28 and 29 included, for the first time, peptide-receptor targets of three different systems, reflecting increased appreciation of the importance of peptide-protein interactions. The CAPRI rounds allowed us to objectively assess the performance of Rosetta FlexPepDock, one of the first protocols to explicitly include peptide flexibility in docking, accounting for peptide conformational changes upon binding. We discuss here successes and challenges in modeling these targets: we obtain top-performing, high-resolution models of the peptide motif for cases with known binding sites but there is a need for better modeling of flanking regions, as well as better selection criteria, in particular for unknown binding sites. These rounds have also provided us the opportunity to reassess the success criteria, to better reflect the quality of a peptide-protein complex model. Using all models submitted to CAPRI, we analyze the correlation between current classification criteria and the ability to retrieve critical interface features, such as hydrogen bonds and hotspots. We find that loosening the backbone (and ligand) RMSD threshold, together with a restriction on the side chain RMSD measure, allows us to improve the selection of high-accuracy models. We also suggest a new measure to assess interface hydrogen bond recovery, which is not assessed by the current CAPRI criteria. Finally, we find that surprisingly much can be learned from rather inaccurate models about binding hotspots, suggesting that the current status of peptide-protein docking methods, as reflected by the submitted CAPRI models, can already have a significant impact on our understanding of protein interactions. Proteins 2017; 85:445-462. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orly Marcu
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Emma-Joy Dodson
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nawsad Alam
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michal Sperber
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brooks University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794
| | - Marc F Lensink
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Lille, 59000, France
| | - Ora Schueler-Furman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yan Y, Wen Z, Wang X, Huang SY. Addressing recent docking challenges: A hybrid strategy to integrate template-based and free protein-protein docking. Proteins 2017; 85:497-512. [PMID: 28026062 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Revised: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Protein-protein docking is an important computational tool for predicting protein-protein interactions. With the rapid development of proteomics projects, more and more experimental binding information ranging from mutagenesis data to three-dimensional structures of protein complexes are becoming available. Therefore, how to appropriately incorporate the biological information into traditional ab initio docking has been an important issue and challenge in the field of protein-protein docking. To address these challenges, we have developed a Hybrid DOCKing protocol of template-based and template-free approaches, referred to as HDOCK. The basic procedure of HDOCK is to model the structures of individual components based on the template complex by a template-based method if a template is available; otherwise, the component structures will be modeled based on monomer proteins by regular homology modeling. Then, the complex structure of the component models is predicted by traditional protein-protein docking. With the HDOCK protocol, we have participated in the CPARI experiment for rounds 28-35. Out of the 25 CASP-CAPRI targets for oligomer modeling, our HDOCK protocol predicted correct models for 16 targets, ranking one of the top algorithms in this challenge. Our docking method also made correct predictions on other CAPRI challenges such as protein-peptide binding for 6 out of 8 targets and water predictions for 2 out of 2 targets. The advantage of our hybrid docking approach over pure template-based docking was further confirmed by a comparative evaluation on 20 CASP-CAPRI targets. Proteins 2017; 85:497-512. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumeng Yan
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei, 430074, People's Republic of China
| | - Zeyu Wen
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei, 430074, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinxiang Wang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei, 430074, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng-You Huang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei, 430074, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lensink MF, Velankar S, Wodak SJ. Modeling protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition. Proteins 2016; 85:359-377. [PMID: 27865038 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the sixth report evaluating the performance of methods for predicting the atomic resolution structures of protein complexes offered as targets to the community-wide initiative on the Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions (CAPRI). The evaluation is based on a total of 20,670 predicted models for 8 protein-peptide complexes, a novel category of targets in CAPRI, and 12 protein-protein targets in CAPRI prediction Rounds held during the years 2013-2016. For two of the protein-protein targets, the focus was on the prediction of side-chain conformation and positions of interfacial water molecules. Seven of the protein-protein targets were particularly challenging owing to their multicomponent nature, to conformational changes at the binding site, or to a combination of both. Encouragingly, the very large multiprotein complex with the nucleosome was correctly predicted, and correct models were submitted for the protein-peptide targets, but not for some of the challenging protein-protein targets. Models of acceptable quality or better were obtained for 14 of the 20 targets, including medium quality models for 13 targets and high quality models for 8 targets, indicating tangible progress of present-day computational methods in modeling protein complexes with increased accuracy. Our evaluation suggests that the progress stems from better integration of different modeling tools with docking procedures, as well as the use of more sophisticated evolutionary information to score models. Nonetheless, adequate modeling of conformational flexibility in interacting proteins remains an important area with a crucial need for improvement. Proteins 2017; 85:359-377. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F Lensink
- University of Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Lille, 59000, France
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom
| | - Shoshana J Wodak
- VIB Structural Biology Research Center, VUB Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Xu X, Qiu L, Yan C, Ma Z, Grinter SZ, Zou X. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions. Proteins 2016; 85:424-434. [PMID: 27802576 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are either through direct contacts between two binding partners or mediated by structural waters. Both direct contacts and water-mediated interactions are crucial to the formation of a protein-protein complex. During the recent CAPRI rounds, a novel parallel searching strategy for predicting water-mediated interactions is introduced into our protein-protein docking method, MDockPP. Briefly, a FFT-based docking algorithm is employed in generating putative binding modes, and an iteratively derived statistical potential-based scoring function, ITScorePP, in conjunction with biological information is used to assess and rank the binding modes. Up to 10 binding modes are selected as the initial protein-protein complex structures for MD simulations in explicit solvent. Water molecules near the interface are clustered based on the snapshots extracted from independent equilibrated trajectories. Then, protein-ligand docking is employed for a parallel search for water molecules near the protein-protein interface. The water molecules generated by ligand docking and the clustered water molecules generated by MD simulations are merged, referred to as the predicted structural water molecules. Here, we report the performance of this protocol for CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 containing 20 valid docking targets and 11 scoring targets. In the docking experiments, we predicted correct binding modes for nine targets, including one high-accuracy, two medium-accuracy, and six acceptable predictions. Regarding the two targets for the prediction of water-mediated interactions, we achieved models ranked as "excellent" in accordance with the CAPRI evaluation criteria; one of these two targets is considered as a difficult target for structural water prediction. Proteins 2017; 85:424-434. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
| | - Chengfei Yan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
| | - Zhiwei Ma
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
| | - Sam Z Grinter
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.,Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.,Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.,Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
On the ability of molecular dynamics simulation and continuum electrostatics to treat interfacial water molecules in protein-protein complexes. Sci Rep 2016; 6:38259. [PMID: 27905545 PMCID: PMC5131287 DOI: 10.1038/srep38259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Interfacial waters are increasingly appreciated as playing a key role in protein-protein interactions. We report on a study of the prediction of interfacial water positions by both Molecular Dynamics and explicit solvent-continuum electrostatics based on the Dipolar Poisson-Boltzmann Langevin (DPBL) model, for three test cases: (i) the barnase/barstar complex (ii) the complex between the DNase domain of colicin E2 and its cognate Im2 immunity protein and (iii) the highly unusual anti-freeze protein Maxi which contains a large number of waters in its interior. We characterize the waters at the interface and in the core of the Maxi protein by the statistics of correctly predicted positions with respect to crystallographic water positions in the PDB files as well as the dynamic measures of diffusion constants and position lifetimes. Our approach provides a methodology for the evaluation of predicted interfacial water positions through an investigation of water-mediated inter-chain contacts. While our results show satisfactory behaviour for molecular dynamics simulation, they also highlight the need for improvement of continuum methods.
Collapse
|
27
|
Vangone A, Rodrigues JPGLM, Xue LC, van Zundert GCP, Geng C, Kurkcuoglu Z, Nellen M, Narasimhan S, Karaca E, van Dijk M, Melquiond ASJ, Visscher KM, Trellet M, Kastritis PL, Bonvin AMJJ. Sense and simplicity in HADDOCK scoring: Lessons from CASP-CAPRI round 1. Proteins 2016; 85:417-423. [PMID: 27802573 PMCID: PMC5324763 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Our information-driven docking approach HADDOCK is a consistent top predictor and scorer since the start of its participation in the CAPRI community-wide experiment. This sustained performance is due, in part, to its ability to integrate experimental data and/or bioinformatics information into the modelling process, and also to the overall robustness of the scoring function used to assess and rank the predictions. In the CASP-CAPRI Round 1 scoring experiment we successfully selected acceptable/medium quality models for 18/14 of the 25 targets - a top-ranking performance among all scorers. Considering that for only 20 targets acceptable models were generated by the community, our effective success rate reaches as high as 90% (18/20). This was achieved using the standard HADDOCK scoring function, which, thirteen years after its original publication, still consists of a simple linear combination of intermolecular van der Waals and Coulomb electrostatics energies and an empirically derived desolvation energy term. Despite its simplicity, this scoring function makes sense from a physico-chemical perspective, encoding key aspects of biomolecular recognition. In addition to its success in the scoring experiment, the HADDOCK server takes the first place in the server prediction category, with 16 successful predictions. Much like our scoring protocol, because of the limited time per target, the predictions relied mainly on either an ab initio center-of-mass and symmetry restrained protocol, or on a template-based approach whenever applicable. These results underline the success of our simple but sensible prediction and scoring scheme. Proteins 2017; 85:417-423. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vangone
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - J P G L M Rodrigues
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - L C Xue
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - G C P van Zundert
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - C Geng
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - Z Kurkcuoglu
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - M Nellen
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - S Narasimhan
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - E Karaca
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - M van Dijk
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - A S J Melquiond
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - K M Visscher
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - M Trellet
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - P L Kastritis
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| | - A M J J Bonvin
- Department of Chemistry, Computational Structural Biology Group, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schindler CEM, Chauvot de Beauchêne I, de Vries SJ, Zacharias M. Protein-protein and peptide-protein docking and refinement using ATTRACT in CAPRI. Proteins 2016; 85:391-398. [PMID: 27785830 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The ATTRACT coarse-grained docking approach in combination with various types of atomistic, flexible refinement methods has been applied to predict protein-protein and peptide-protein complexes in CAPRI rounds 28-36. For a large fraction of CAPRI targets (12 out of 18), at least one model of acceptable or better quality was generated, corresponding to a success rate of 67%. In particular, for several peptide-protein complexes excellent predictions were achieved. In several cases, a combination of template-based modeling and extensive molecular dynamics-based refinement yielded medium and even high quality solutions. In one particularly challenging case, the structure of an ubiquitylation enzyme bound to the nucleosome was correctly predicted as a set of acceptable quality solutions. Based on the experience with the CAPRI targets, new interface refinement approaches and methods for ab-initio peptide-protein docking have been developed. Failures and possible improvements of the docking method with respect to scoring and protein flexibility will also be discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:391-398. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina E M Schindler
- Physics Department T38, Technische Universität München, Garching, 85748, Germany.,Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, München, 81377, Germany
| | | | - Sjoerd J de Vries
- Physics Department T38, Technische Universität München, Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Martin Zacharias
- Physics Department T38, Technische Universität München, Garching, 85748, Germany.,Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, München, 81377, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pallara C, Jiménez-García B, Romero M, Moal IH, Fernández-Recio J. pyDock scoring for the new modeling challenges in docking: Protein-peptide, homo-multimers, and domain-domain interactions. Proteins 2016; 85:487-496. [PMID: 27701776 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Revised: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The sixth CAPRI edition included new modeling challenges, such as the prediction of protein-peptide complexes, and the modeling of homo-oligomers and domain-domain interactions as part of the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment. Other non-standard targets included the prediction of interfacial water positions and the modeling of the interactions between proteins and nucleic acids. We have participated in all proposed targets of this CAPRI edition both as predictors and as scorers, with new protocols to efficiently use our docking and scoring scheme pyDock in a large variety of scenarios. In addition, we have participated for the first time in the servers section, with our recently developed webserver, pyDockWeb. Excluding the CASP-CAPRI cases, we submitted acceptable models (or better) for 7 out of the 18 evaluated targets as predictors, 4 out of the 11 targets as scorers, and 6 out of the 18 targets as servers. The overall success rates were below those in past CAPRI editions. This shows the challenging nature of this last edition, with many difficult targets for which no participant submitted a single acceptable model. Interestingly, we submitted acceptable models for 83% of the evaluated protein-peptide targets. As for the 25 cases of the CASP-CAPRI experiment, in which we used a larger variety of modeling techniques (template-based, symmetry restraints, literature information, etc.), we submitted acceptable models for 56% of the targets. In summary, this CAPRI edition showed that pyDock scheme can be efficiently adapted to the increasing variety of problems that the protein interactions field is currently facing. Proteins 2017; 85:487-496. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Pallara
- Life Sciences Department, Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Life Sciences Department, Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Romero
- Life Sciences Department, Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iain H Moal
- Life Sciences Department, Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.,European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Fernández-Recio
- Life Sciences Department, Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yu J, Andreani J, Ochsenbein F, Guerois R. Lessons from (co-)evolution in the docking of proteins and peptides for CAPRI Rounds 28-35. Proteins 2016; 85:378-390. [PMID: 27701780 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Computational protein-protein docking is of great importance for understanding protein interactions at the structural level. Critical assessment of prediction of interactions (CAPRI) experiments provide the protein docking community with a unique opportunity to blindly test methods based on real-life cases and help accelerate methodology development. For CAPRI Rounds 28-35, we used an automatic docking pipeline integrating the coarse-grained co-evolution-based potential InterEvScore. This score was developed to exploit the information contained in the multiple sequence alignments of binding partners and selectively recognize co-evolved interfaces. Together with Zdock/Frodock for rigid-body docking, SOAP-PP for atomic potential and Rosetta applications for structural refinement, this pipeline reached high performance on a majority of targets. For protein-peptide docking and interfacial water position predictions, we also explored different means of taking evolutionary information into account. Overall, our group ranked 1st by correctly predicting 10 targets, composed of 1 High, 7 Medium and 2 Acceptable predictions. Excellent and Outstanding levels of accuracy were reached for each of the two water prediction targets, respectively. Altogether, in 15 out of 18 targets in total, evolutionary information, either through co-evolution or conservation analyses, could provide key constraints to guide modeling towards the most likely assemblies. These results open promising perspectives regarding the way evolutionary information can be valuable to improve docking prediction accuracy. Proteins 2017; 85:378-390. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinchao Yu
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, F-91198, France
| | - Jessica Andreani
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, F-91198, France
| | - Françoise Ochsenbein
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, F-91198, France
| | - Raphaël Guerois
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, F-91198, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vreven T, Pierce BG, Borrman TM, Weng Z. Performance of ZDOCK and IRAD in CAPRI rounds 28-34. Proteins 2016; 85:408-416. [PMID: 27718275 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We report the performance of our protein-protein docking pipeline, including the ZDOCK rigid-body docking algorithm, on 19 targets in CAPRI rounds 28-34. Following the docking step, we reranked the ZDOCK predictions using the IRAD scoring function, pruned redundant predictions, performed energy landscape analysis, and utilized our interface prediction approach RCF. In addition, we applied constraints to the search space based on biological information that we culled from the literature, which increased the chance of making a correct prediction. For all but two targets we were able to find and apply biological information and we found the information to be highly accurate, indicating that effective incorporation of biological information is an important component for protein-protein docking. Proteins 2017; 85:408-416. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thom Vreven
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Brian G Pierce
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Tyler M Borrman
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Zhiping Weng
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lensink MF, Velankar S, Kryshtafovych A, Huang SY, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Sali A, Segura J, Fernandez-Fuentes N, Viswanath S, Elber R, Grudinin S, Popov P, Neveu E, Lee H, Baek M, Park S, Heo L, Rie Lee G, Seok C, Qin S, Zhou HX, Ritchie DW, Maigret B, Devignes MD, Ghoorah A, Torchala M, Chaleil RAG, Bates PA, Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M, Negi SS, Weng Z, Vreven T, Pierce BG, Borrman TM, Yu J, Ochsenbein F, Guerois R, Vangone A, Rodrigues JPGLM, van Zundert G, Nellen M, Xue L, Karaca E, Melquiond ASJ, Visscher K, Kastritis PL, Bonvin AMJJ, Xu X, Qiu L, Yan C, Li J, Ma Z, Cheng J, Zou X, Shen Y, Peterson LX, Kim HR, Roy A, Han X, Esquivel-Rodriguez J, Kihara D, Yu X, Bruce NJ, Fuller JC, Wade RC, Anishchenko I, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA, Imai K, Yamada K, Oda T, Nakamura T, Tomii K, Pallara C, Romero-Durana M, Jiménez-García B, Moal IH, Férnandez-Recio J, Joung JY, Kim JY, Joo K, Lee J, Kozakov D, Vajda S, Mottarella S, Hall DR, Beglov D, Mamonov A, Xia B, Bohnuud T, Del Carpio CA, Ichiishi E, Marze N, Kuroda D, Roy Burman SS, Gray JJ, Chermak E, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Tovchigrechko A, Wodak SJ. Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2016; 84 Suppl 1:323-48. [PMID: 27122118 PMCID: PMC5030136 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Revised: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein-protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact-sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology-built subunit models and the smaller pair-wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323-348. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F Lensink
- University Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Lille, F-59000, France.
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom
| | | | - Shen-You Huang
- Research Support Computing, University of Missouri Bioinformatics Consortium, and Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94158
| | - Joan Segura
- GN7 of the National Institute for Bioinformatics (INB) and Biocomputing Unit, National Center of Biotechnology (CSIC), Madrid, 28049, Spain
| | - Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes
- Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY233FG, United Kingdom
| | - Shruthi Viswanath
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712
- Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712
| | - Ron Elber
- Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712
- Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712
| | - Sergei Grudinin
- LJK, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble, 38000, France
- INRIA, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - Petr Popov
- LJK, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble, 38000, France
- INRIA, Grenoble, 38000, France
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudniy, Russia
| | - Emilie Neveu
- LJK, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble, 38000, France
- INRIA, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - Hasup Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Minkyung Baek
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangwoo Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Lim Heo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu Rie Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Sanbo Qin
- Department of Physics and Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, USA
| | - Huan-Xiang Zhou
- Department of Physics and Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, USA
| | | | - Bernard Maigret
- CNRS, LORIA, Campus Scientifique, BP 239, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54506, France
| | | | - Anisah Ghoorah
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius
| | - Mieczyslaw Torchala
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, the Francis Crick Institute, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, London, WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
| | - Raphaël A G Chaleil
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, the Francis Crick Institute, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, London, WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
| | - Paul A Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, the Francis Crick Institute, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratory, London, WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
| | - Efrat Ben-Zeev
- G-INCPM, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel
| | - Miriam Eisenstein
- Department of Chemical Research Support, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel
| | - Surendra S Negi
- Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, Texas, 77555-0857
| | - Zhiping Weng
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Thom Vreven
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Brian G Pierce
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Tyler M Borrman
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | - Jinchao Yu
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France
| | - Françoise Ochsenbein
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France
| | - Raphaël Guerois
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France
| | - Anna Vangone
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - João P G L M Rodrigues
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Gydo van Zundert
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Mehdi Nellen
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Li Xue
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Ezgi Karaca
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Adrien S J Melquiond
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Visscher
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Panagiotis L Kastritis
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M J J Bonvin
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Chengfei Yan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Jilong Li
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Zhiwei Ma
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
- Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211
| | - Yang Shen
- Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago, 6045 S Kenwood Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60637
| | - Lenna X Peterson
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907
| | - Hyung-Rae Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907
| | - Amit Roy
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montano 59840
| | - Xusi Han
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907
| | | | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 47907
| | - Xiaofeng Yu
- Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Neil J Bruce
- Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan C Fuller
- Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca C Wade
- Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Molecular Biology (ZMBH), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivan Anishchenko
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047
| | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047
| | - Kenichiro Imai
- Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Koto-Ku, Japan
| | - Kazunori Yamada
- Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Koto-Ku, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Oda
- Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Koto-Ku, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Kentaro Tomii
- Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Koto-Ku, Japan
- Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Chiara Pallara
- Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, C/Jordi Girona 29, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
| | - Miguel Romero-Durana
- Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, C/Jordi Girona 29, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, C/Jordi Girona 29, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
| | - Iain H Moal
- Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, C/Jordi Girona 29, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
| | - Juan Férnandez-Recio
- Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, C/Jordi Girona 29, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
| | - Jong Young Joung
- Center for in-Silico Protein Science, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 130-722, Korea
| | - Jong Yun Kim
- Center for in-Silico Protein Science, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 130-722, Korea
| | - Keehyoung Joo
- Center for in-Silico Protein Science, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 130-722, Korea
- Center for Advanced Computation, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 130-722, Korea
| | - Jooyoung Lee
- Center for in-Silico Protein Science, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 130-722, Korea
- School of Computational Science, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 130-722, Korea
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott Mottarella
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David R Hall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dmitri Beglov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Artem Mamonov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bing Xia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tanggis Bohnuud
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carlos A Del Carpio
- Institute of Biological Diversity, International Pacific Institute of Indiana, Bloomington, Indiana, 47401
- Drosophila Genetic Resource Center, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Ukyo-Ku, 616-8354, Japan
| | - Eichiro Ichiishi
- International University of Health and Welfare Hospital (IUHW Hospital), Asushiobara-City, Tochigi Prefecture, 329-2763, Japan
| | - Nicholas Marze
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
| | - Daisuke Kuroda
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
| | - Shourya S Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
| | - Edrisse Chermak
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia
| | - Romina Oliva
- University of Naples "Parthenope", Napoli, Italy
| | - Andrey Tovchigrechko
- J. Craig Venter Institute, 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland, 20850
| | - Shoshana J Wodak
- Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- VIB Structural Biology Research Center, VUB Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
de Ruyck J, Brysbaert G, Blossey R, Lensink MF. Molecular docking as a popular tool in drug design, an in silico travel. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem 2016; 9:1-11. [PMID: 27390530 PMCID: PMC4930227 DOI: 10.2147/aabc.s105289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
New molecular modeling approaches, driven by rapidly improving computational platforms, have allowed many success stories for the use of computer-assisted drug design in the discovery of new mechanism-or structure-based drugs. In this overview, we highlight three aspects of the use of molecular docking. First, we discuss the combination of molecular and quantum mechanics to investigate an unusual enzymatic mechanism of a flavoprotein. Second, we present recent advances in anti-infectious agents' synthesis driven by structural insights. At the end, we focus on larger biological complexes made by protein-protein interactions and discuss their relevance in drug design. This review provides information on how these large systems, even in the presence of the solvent, can be investigated with the outlook of drug discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ralf Blossey
- University Lille, CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Lille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hydration of proteins and nucleic acids: Advances in experiment and theory. A review. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2016; 1860:1821-35. [PMID: 27241846 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most biological processes involve water, and the interactions of biomolecules with water affect their structure, function and dynamics. SCOPE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the current knowledge of protein and nucleic acid interactions with water, with a special focus on the biomolecular hydration layer. Recent developments in both experimental and computational methods that can be applied to the study of hydration structure and dynamics are reviewed, including software tools for the prediction and characterization of hydration layer properties. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS In the last decade, important advances have been made in our understanding of the factors that determine how biomolecules and their aqueous environment influence each other. Both experimental and computational methods contributed to the gradually emerging consensus picture of biomolecular hydration. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE An improved knowledge of the structural and thermodynamic properties of the hydration layer will enable a detailed understanding of the various biological processes in which it is involved, with implications for a wide range of applications, including protein-structure prediction and structure-based drug design.
Collapse
|
35
|
Hou Q, Lensink MF, Heringa J, Feenstra KA. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0155251. [PMID: 27166787 PMCID: PMC4864233 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Large-scale identification of native binding orientations is crucial for understanding the role of protein-protein interactions in their biological context. Measuring binding free energy is the method of choice to estimate binding strength and reveal the relevance of particular conformations in which proteins interact. In a recent study, we successfully applied coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to measure binding free energy for two protein complexes with similar accuracy to full-atomistic simulation, but 500-fold less time consuming. Here, we investigate the efficacy of this approach as a scoring method to identify stable binding conformations from thousands of docking decoys produced by protein docking programs. To test our method, we first applied it to calculate binding free energies of all protein conformations in a CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions) benchmark dataset, which included over 19000 protein docking solutions for 15 benchmark targets. Based on the binding free energies, we ranked all docking solutions to select the near-native binding modes under the assumption that the native-solutions have lowest binding free energies. In our top 100 ranked structures, for the ‘easy’ targets that have many near-native conformations, we obtain a strong enrichment of acceptable or better quality structures; for the ‘hard’ targets without near-native decoys, our method is still able to retain structures which have native binding contacts. Moreover, in our top 10 selections, CLUB-MARTINI shows a comparable performance when compared with other state-of-the-art docking scoring functions. As a proof of concept, CLUB-MARTINI performs remarkably well for many targets and is able to pinpoint near-native binding modes in the top selections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time interaction free energy calculated from MD simulations have been used to rank docking solutions at a large scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingzhen Hou
- Center for Integrative Bioinformatics VU (IBIVU), VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081A, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc F. Lensink
- University Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 UGSF - Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Jaap Heringa
- Center for Integrative Bioinformatics VU (IBIVU), VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081A, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K. Anton Feenstra
- Center for Integrative Bioinformatics VU (IBIVU), VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081A, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jeszenői N, Bálint M, Horváth I, van der Spoel D, Hetényi C. Exploration of Interfacial Hydration Networks of Target–Ligand Complexes. J Chem Inf Model 2016; 56:148-58. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Jeszenői
- Department
of Genetics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány
Péter sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
- MTA
NAP-B Molecular Neuroendocrinology Group, Institute of Physiology,
Szentágothai Research Center, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mónika Bálint
- Department
of Biochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány
Péter sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Horváth
- Chemistry
Doctoral School, University of Szeged, Dugonics tér 13, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - David van der Spoel
- Uppsala
Center for Computational Chemistry, Science for Life Laboratory, Department
of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Uppsala, Box 596, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Csaba Hetényi
- MTA-ELTE
Molecular Biophysics Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pázmány sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
We report the performance of our approaches for protein-protein docking and interface analysis in CAPRI rounds 20-26. At the core of our pipeline was the ZDOCK program for rigid-body protein-protein docking. We then reranked the ZDOCK predictions using the ZRANK or IRAD scoring functions, pruned and analyzed energy landscapes using clustering, and analyzed the docking results using our interface prediction approach RCF. When possible, we used biological information from the literature to apply constraints to the search space during or after the ZDOCK runs. For approximately half of the standard docking challenges we made at least one prediction that was acceptable or better. For the scoring challenges we made acceptable or better predictions for all but one target. This indicates that our scoring functions are generally able to select the correct binding mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thom Vreven
- Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Park H, Lee H, Seok C. High-resolution protein-protein docking by global optimization: recent advances and future challenges. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2015; 35:24-31. [PMID: 26295792 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2015] [Revised: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
A computational protein-protein docking method that predicts atomic details of protein-protein interactions from protein monomer structures is an invaluable tool for understanding the molecular mechanisms of protein interactions and for designing molecules that control such interactions. Compared to low-resolution docking, high-resolution docking explores the conformational space in atomic resolution to provide predictions with atomic details. This allows for applications to more challenging docking problems that involve conformational changes induced by binding. Recently, high-resolution methods have become more promising as additional information such as global shapes or residue contacts are now available from experiments or sequence/structure data. In this review article, we highlight developments in high-resolution docking made during the last decade, specifically regarding global optimization methods employed by the docking methods. We also discuss two major challenges in high-resolution docking: prediction of backbone flexibility and water-mediated interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hahnbeom Park
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Hasup Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bayden AS, Moustakas DT, Joseph-McCarthy D, Lamb ML. Evaluating Free Energies of Binding and Conservation of Crystallographic Waters Using SZMAP. J Chem Inf Model 2015; 55:1552-65. [DOI: 10.1021/ci500746d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S. Bayden
- Oncology and Infection Innovative Medicines Units, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
| | - Demetri T. Moustakas
- Oncology and Infection Innovative Medicines Units, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
| | - Diane Joseph-McCarthy
- Oncology and Infection Innovative Medicines Units, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
| | - Michelle L. Lamb
- Oncology and Infection Innovative Medicines Units, AstraZeneca R&D Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Janin J, Wodak SJ, Lensink MF, Velankar S. Assessing Structural Predictions of Protein-Protein Recognition: The CAPRI Experiment. REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118889886.ch4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
41
|
Kuenemann MA, Bourbon LML, Labbé CM, Villoutreix BO, Sperandio O. Which three-dimensional characteristics make efficient inhibitors of protein-protein interactions? J Chem Inf Model 2014; 54:3067-79. [PMID: 25285479 DOI: 10.1021/ci500487q] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The specific properties of protein-protein interactions (PPI) (flat, large and hydrophobic) make them harder to tackle with low-molecular-weight compounds. Learning from the properties of successful examples of PPI interface inhibitors (iPPI) at earlier stages of developments, has been pinpointed as a powerful strategy to circumvent this trend. To this end, we have computationally analyzed the bioactive conformations of iPPI and those of inhibitors of conventional targets (e.g enzymes) to highlight putative iPPI 3D characteristics. Most noticeably, the essential property revealed by this study illustrates how efficiently iPPI manages to bind to the hydrophobic patch often present at the core of protein interfaces. The newly identified properties were further confirmed as characteristics of iPPI using much larger data sets (e.g iPPI-DB, www.ippidb.cdithem.fr ). Interestingly, the absence of correlation of such properties with the hydrophobicity and the size of the compounds opens new ways to design potent iPPI with better pharmacokinetic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélaine A Kuenemann
- Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMRS 973 Inserm , Paris 75013, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Guilhot-Gaudeffroy A, Froidevaux C, Azé J, Bernauer J. Protein-RNA complexes and efficient automatic docking: expanding RosettaDock possibilities. PLoS One 2014; 9:e108928. [PMID: 25268579 PMCID: PMC4182525 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein-RNA complexes provide a wide range of essential functions in the cell. Their atomic experimental structure solving, despite essential to the understanding of these functions, is often difficult and expensive. Docking approaches that have been developed for proteins are often challenging to adapt for RNA because of its inherent flexibility and the structural data available being relatively scarce. In this study we adapted the RosettaDock protocol for protein-RNA complexes both at the nucleotide and atomic levels. Using a genetic algorithm-based strategy, and a non-redundant protein-RNA dataset, we derived a RosettaDock scoring scheme able not only to discriminate but also score efficiently docking decoys. The approach proved to be both efficient and robust for generating and identifying suitable structures when applied to two protein-RNA docking benchmarks in both bound and unbound settings. It also compares well to existing strategies. This is the first approach that currently offers a multi-level optimized scoring approach integrated in a full docking suite, leading the way to adaptive fully flexible strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Guilhot-Gaudeffroy
- AMIB Project, Inria Saclay-Île de France, Palaiseau, France
- Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique (LRI), CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique (LIX), CNRS UMR 7161, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
| | - Christine Froidevaux
- AMIB Project, Inria Saclay-Île de France, Palaiseau, France
- Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique (LRI), CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
| | - Jérôme Azé
- AMIB Project, Inria Saclay-Île de France, Palaiseau, France
- Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique (LRI), CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), CNRS UMR 5506, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France
| | - Julie Bernauer
- AMIB Project, Inria Saclay-Île de France, Palaiseau, France
- Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique (LIX), CNRS UMR 7161, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Advances in Human Biology: Combining Genetics and Molecular Biophysics to Pave the Way for Personalized Diagnostics and Medicine. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.1155/2014/471836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Advances in several biology-oriented initiatives such as genome sequencing and structural genomics, along with the progress made through traditional biological and biochemical research, have opened up a unique opportunity to better understand the molecular effects of human diseases. Human DNA can vary significantly from person to person and determines an individual’s physical characteristics and their susceptibility to diseases. Armed with an individual’s DNA sequence, researchers and physicians can check for defects known to be associated with certain diseases by utilizing various databases. However, for unclassified DNA mutations or in order to reveal molecular mechanism behind the effects, the mutations have to be mapped onto the corresponding networks and macromolecular structures and then analyzed to reveal their effect on the wild type properties of biological processes involved. Predicting the effect of DNA mutations on individual’s health is typically referred to as personalized or companion diagnostics. Furthermore, once the molecular mechanism of the mutations is revealed, the patient should be given drugs which are the most appropriate for the individual genome, referred to as pharmacogenomics. Altogether, the shift in focus in medicine towards more genomic-oriented practices is the foundation of personalized medicine. The progress made in these rapidly developing fields is outlined.
Collapse
|
44
|
Proteins Feel More Than They See: Fine-Tuning of Binding Affinity by Properties of the Non-Interacting Surface. J Mol Biol 2014; 426:2632-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2013] [Revised: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|