A rational approach for the development of reduced-size analogues of neuropeptide Y with high affinity to the Y1 receptor

The Importance of 6-Aminohexanoic Acid as a Hydrophobic, Flexible Structural Element

6-aminohexanoic acid is an ω-amino acid with a hydrophobic, flexible structure. Although the ω-amino acid in question is mainly used clinically as an antifibrinolytic drug, other applications are also interesting and important. This synthetic lysine derivative, without an α-amino group, plays a significant role in chemical synthesis of modified peptides and in the polyamide synthetic fibers (nylon) industry. It is also often used as a linker in various biologically active structures. This review concentrates on the role of 6-aminohexanoic acid in the structure of various molecules.

Strategies for the development of conotoxins as new therapeutic leads

Peptide toxins typically bind to their target ion channels or receptors with high potency and selectivity, making them attractive leads for therapeutic development. In some cases the native peptide as it is found in the venom from which it originates can be used directly, but in many instances it is desirable to truncate and/or stabilize the peptide to improve its therapeutic properties. A complementary strategy is to display the key residues that make up the pharmacophore of the peptide toxin on a non-peptidic scaffold, thereby creating a peptidomimetic. This review exemplifies these approaches with peptide toxins from marine organisms, with a particular focus on conotoxins.

Analogs of pancreatic polypeptide and peptide YY with a locked PP-fold structure are biologically active

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY) and neuropeptide Y (NPY), members of the PP-fold family share a high degree of sequence homology. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray crystallography studies have shown these peptides can adopt a tightly organized tertiary structure called the PP-fold, which has long been assumed to be the active structure of this family of peptides. To date, however, no studies have been completed with PYY and PP which confirm if the PP-fold structure is important for their physiological actions. The aim of the study was to test if PYY and PP locked into the PP-fold maintained biological activity. Therefore, we designed and produced analogs of PP and PYY in a cyclic conformation with two cysteine amino acid substitutions at the N-terminus and at position 27. These were oxidized to form a cysteine disulfide bond locking the peptides into the PP-fold structure. Studies demonstrate that the cyclic analogs have both similar in vivo activity to their parent molecules, and affinity for the Y2 and Y4 receptors. Results suggest that the proposed PP and PYY-fold is likely to be their biologically active conformation.

Countervailing modulation of Ih by neuropeptide Y and corticotrophin-releasing factor in basolateral amygdala as a possible mechanism for their effects on stress-related behaviors

Stress and anxiety-related behaviors controlled by the basolateral amygdala (BLA) are regulated in vivo by neuropeptide Y (NPY) and corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF): NPY produces anxiolytic effects, whereas CRF produces anxiogenic effects. These opposing actions are likely mediated via regulation of excitatory output from the BLA to afferent targets. In these studies, we examined mechanisms underlying the effects of NPY and CRF in the BLA using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology in rat brain slices. NPY, even with tetrodotoxin present, caused a dose-dependent membrane hyperpolarization in BLA pyramidal neurons. The hyperpolarization resulted in the inhibition of pyramidal cells, despite arising from a reduction in a voltage-dependent membrane conductance. The Y(1) receptor agonist, F(7)P(34) NPY, produced a similar membrane hyperpolarization, whereas the Y(1) antagonist, BIBO3304 [(R)-N-[[4-(aminocarbonylaminomethyl)-phenyl]methyl]-N(2)-(diphenylacetyl)-argininamide trifluoroacetate], blocked the effect of NPY. The NPY-inhibited current was identified as I(h), which is active at and hyperpolarized to rest. Responses to NPY were occluded by either Cs(+) or ZD7288 (4-ethylphenylamino-1,2-dimethyl-6-methylaminopyrimidinium chloride), but unaffected by the G(IRK)-preferring blockers Ba(2+) and SCH23390 [(R)-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-l-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride]. Application of CRF, with or without TTX present, depolarized NPY-sensitive BLA pyramidal neurons, resulting from an increase in I(h). Electrophysiological and immunocytochemical data were consistent with a major role for the HCN1 subunit. Our results indicate that NPY, via Y(1) receptors, directly inhibits BLA pyramidal neurons by suppressing a postsynaptic I(h), whereas CRF enhances resting I(h), causing an increased excitability of BLA pyramidal neurons. The opposing actions of these two peptides on the excitability of BLA output cells are consistent with the observed behavioral actions of NPY and CRF in the BLA.

G protein-coupled receptors function as logic gates for nanoparticle binding and cell uptake

More selective interactions of nanoparticles with cells would substantially increase their potential for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Thus, it would not only be highly desirable that nanoparticles can be addressed to any cell with high target specificity and affinity, but that we could unequivocally define whether they rest immobilized on the cell surface as a diagnostic tag, or if they are internalized to serve as a delivery vehicle for drugs. To date no class of targets is known that would allow direction of nanoparticle interactions with cells alternatively into one of these mutually exclusive events. Using MCF-7 breast cancer cells expressing the human Y(1)-receptor, we demonstrate that G protein-coupled receptors provide us with this option. We show that quantum dots carrying a surface-immobilized antagonist remain with nanomolar affinity on the cell surface, and particles carrying an agonist are internalized upon receptor binding. The receptor functions like a logic "and-gate" that grants cell access only to those particles that carry a receptor ligand "and" where the ligand is an agonist. We found that agonist- and antagonist-modified nanoparticles bind to several receptor molecules at a time. This multiligand binding leads to five orders of magnitude increased-receptor affinities, compared with free ligand, in displacement studies. More than 800 G protein-coupled receptors in humans provide us with the paramount advantage that targeting of a plethora of cells is possible, and that switching from cell recognition to cell uptake is simply a matter of nanoparticle surface modification with the appropriate choice of ligand type.

Anticonvulsant Met-enkephalin analogues containing backbone spacers reveal alternative non-opioid signaling in the brain

Prosthesis of non-critical parts of a polypeptide backbone is an attractive strategy to simplify bioactive peptides. This approach was applied to an opioid neuropeptide, Met-enkephalin, in which two adjacent Gly2-Gly3 residues were replaced with a series of non-peptidic backbone spacers varying in length and/or physicochemical properties. The backbone spacers did not affect the overall structural properties of the analogues, but they did dramatically reduce their affinities and agonist activities toward delta- and mu-opioid receptors. Molecular modeling suggested that the decrease of the affinity of Met-enkephalin to delta-opioid receptor could be accounted for by the loss of a single hydrogen bond. Remarkably, the analogues containing the most isostere spacers retained potent antinociceptive and anticonvulsant properties that were comparable to that of the endogenous peptide. This unexpected high in vivo potency could not be accounted for by an increase in metabolic stability. Moreover, the antiepileptic activity could not be reversed by opioid receptor antagonists. In summary, the results obtained with the analogues containing backbone spacers suggest a novel mechanism for seizure control in the brain that involves alternative non-opioid signaling.

Conotoxins containing nonnatural backbone spacers: cladistic-based design, chemical synthesis, and improved analgesic activity

Disulfide-rich neurotoxins from venomous animals continue to provide compounds with therapeutic potential. Minimizing neurotoxins often results in removal of disulfide bridges or critical amino acids. To address this drug-design challenge, we explored the concept of disulfide-rich scaffolds consisting of isostere polymers and peptidic pharmacophores. Flexible spacers, such as amino-3-oxapentanoic or 6-aminohexanoic acids, were used to replace conformationally constrained parts of a three-disulfide-bridged conotoxin, SIIIA. The peptide-polymer hybrids, polytides, were designed based on cladistic identification of nonconserved loci in related peptides. After oxidative folding, the polytides appeared to be better inhibitors of sodium currents in dorsal root ganglia and sciatic nerves in mice. Moreover, the polytides appeared to be significantly more potent and longer-lasting analgesics in the inflammatory pain model in mice, when compared to SIIIA. The resulting polytides provide a promising strategy for transforming disulfide-rich peptides into therapeutics.

The anti-epileptic actions of neuropeptide Y in the hippocampus are mediated by Y2 and not Y5 receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) potently inhibits glutamate release and seizure activity in rodent hippocampus in vitro and in vivo, but the nature of the receptor(s) mediating this action is controversial. In hippocampal slices from rats and several wild-type mice, a Y2-preferring agonist mimicked, and the Y2-specific antagonist BIIE0246 blocked, the NPY-mediated inhibition both of glutamatergic transmission and of epileptiform discharges in two different slice models of temporal lobe epilepsy, stimulus train-induced bursting (STIB) and 0-Mg2+ bursting. Whereas Y5 receptor-preferring agonists had small but significant effects in vitro, they were blocked by BIIE0246, and a Y5 receptor-specific antagonist did not affect responses to any agonist tested in any preparation. In slices from mice, NPY was without effect on evoked potentials or in either of the two slice seizure models. In vivo, intrahippocampal injections of Y2- or Y5-preferring agonists inhibited seizures caused by intrahippocampal kainate, but again the Y5 agonist effects were insensitive to a Y5 antagonist. Neither Y2- nor Y5-preferring agonists affected kainate seizures in mice. A Y5-specific antagonist did not displace the binding of two different NPY ligands in WT or mice, whereas all NPY binding was eliminated in the mouse. Thus, we show that Y2 receptors alone mediate all the anti-excitatory actions of NPY seen in the hippocampus, whereas our findings do not support a role for Y5 receptors either in vitro or in vivo. The results suggest that agonists targeting the Y2 receptor may be useful anticonvulsants.

Are Hormones from the Neuropeptide Y Family Recognized by Their Receptors from the Membrane-Bound State?

Hormones and many other neurotransmitters, growth factors, odorant molecules, and light all present stimuli for a class of membrane-anchored receptors called G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GPCRs are the largest family of cell-surface receptors involved in signal transduction. About 1% of all known genes of Drosophila and more than 5% of the genes of Caenorhabditis elegans encode GPCRs. In addition, more than 50% of current therapeutic agents on the market target these receptors. When the enormous biological and pharmaceutical importance of these receptors is considered, it is surprising how little is known about the mechanism with which these receptors recognize their natural ligands. In this review we present a structural approach, utilizing techniques of high-resolution NMR spectroscopy, to address the question of whether peptides from the neuropeptide Y family of neurohormones are recognized directly from solution or from the membrane-bound state. In our studies we discovered that the structures of the membrane-bound species are better correlated to the pharmacological properties of these peptides than the solution structures are. These findings are supported by the observation that many biophysical properties of these peptides seem to be optimized for membrane binding. We finally present a scenario of possible events during receptor recognition.

Blockade of neuropeptide Y(2) receptors and suppression of NPY's anti-epileptic actions in the rat hippocampal slice by BIIE0246

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been shown to suppress synaptic excitation in rat hippocampus by a presynaptic action. The Y(2) (Y(2)R) and the Y(5) (Y(5)R) receptors have both been implicated in this action. We used the non-peptide, Y(2)R-selective antagonist, BIIE0246, to test the hypothesis that the Y(2)R mediates both the presynaptic inhibitory and anti-epileptic actions of NPY in rat hippocampus in vitro. NPY and the Y(2)R-selective agonist, [ahx(5-24)]NPY, both inhibited the population excitatory postsynaptic potential (pEPSP) evoked in area CA1 by stratum radiatum stimulation in a concentration-dependent manner. BIIE0246 suppressed the inhibitory effects of both agonists, suppressing the maximal inhibition without causing a change in the agonist EC(50), in a manner inconsistent with competitive antagonism. BIIE0246 washed out from hippocampal slices extremely slowly. Application of agonist at high concentrations (1 - 3 microM) for prolonged periods did not alter the rate of washout, but did partially overcome the antagonism, inconsistent with an insurmountable antagonism by BIIE0246. In the stimulus train-induced bursting (STIB) model of ictal activity in hippocampal slices, both NPY and [ahx(5-24)]NPY inhibited primary afterdischarge (1 degrees AD) activity. BIIE0246 (100 nM) completely suppressed the actions of NPY and [ahx(5-24)]NPY in this model. In contrast, the potent Y(5)R-selective agonist, Ala(31)Aib(32)NPY, affected neither 1 degrees AD activity in the presence of BIIE0246, nor, by itself, even the pEPSP in CA1. BIIE0246 potently suppresses NPY actions in rat hippocampus, suggesting a dominant role for Y(2)R there. The apparently insurmountable antagonism observed may result from the lipophilic nature of the antagonist.

A Y2 receptor mimetic aptamer directed against neuropeptide Y

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino acid neuropeptide that exerts its activity by at least five different receptor subtypes that belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors. We isolated an aptamer directed against NPY from a nuclease-resistant RNA library. Mapping experiments with N-terminally, C-terminally, and centrally truncated analogues of NPY revealed that the aptamer recognizes the C terminus of NPY. Individual replacement of the four arginine residues at positions 19, 25, 33, and 35 by l-alanine showed that arginine 33 is essential for binding. The aptamer does not recognize pancreatic polypeptide, a highly homologous Y4 receptor-specific peptide of the gut. Furthermore, the affinity of the aptamer to the Y5 receptor-selective agonist [Ala(31),Aib(32)]NPY and the Y1/Y5 receptor-binding peptide [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY was considerably reduced, whereas Y2 receptor-specific NPY mutants were bound well by the aptamer. Accordingly, the NPY epitope was recognized by the Y2 receptor, and the aptamer was highly similar. This Y2 receptor mimicking effect was further confirmed by competition binding studies. Whereas the aptamer competed with the Y2 receptor for binding of [(3)H]NPY with high affinity, a low affinity displacement of [(3)H]NPY was observed at the Y1 and the Y5 receptors. Consequently, competition at the Y2 receptor occurred with a considerably lower K(i) value compared with the Y1 and Y5 receptors. These results indicate that the aptamer mimics the binding of NPY to the Y2 receptor more closely than to the Y1 and Y5 receptors.

Multiple NPY receptors Inhibit GABA(A) synaptic responses of rat medial parvocellular effector neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus

We have recently shown that NPY and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, which potently induce or inhibit feeding, respectively, have opposing modulatory actions on GABAergic synapses in the medial parvocellular region of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (mpPVN). Because this action might underlie the effects of NPY on feeding, we have examined the pharmacology of NPY responses using electrophysiological recordings. Focal electrical stimulation within the PVN elicited a GABA(A) synaptic response in some mpPVN neurons, which was reversibly inhibited by NPY in a concentration-dependent manner (EC(50) = 28 nM). NPY did not alter the response to the GABA(A) agonist, muscimol. Agonist responses to NPY analogs were not consistent with a single NPY receptor subtype; the most subtype selective agonists were less effective than the more broadly selective ones. Antagonist blockade of individual receptor subtypes partly inhibited NPY action, while fully blocking effects of selective agonists. Combining Y1 and Y5 antagonists blocked actions of NPY entirely, but the Y2 antagonist also completely blocked actions of NPY in some neurons. NPY inhibits GABA(A) synaptic transmission onto mpPVN neurons, but this can be mediated by three different NPY receptors. Controversy regarding the receptor or receptor subtypes involved in NPY-mediated feeding may arise from the multiple NPY receptors present.

Novel analogues of neuropeptide Y with a preference for the Y1-receptor

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant neuropeptides in the mammalian brain and acts in humans via at least three receptor subtypes: Y1, Y2, and Y5. Whereas selective agonists and antagonists are known for the Y2- and Y5-receptors, the Y1-receptor still lacks a highly selective agonist. This work presents the first NPY-based analogues with Y1-receptor preference and agonistic properties. Furthermore, the importance of specific amino acids of NPY for binding to the Y-receptor subtypes is presented. Amongst the analogues tested, [Phe7,Pro34]pNPY (where pNPY is porcine neuropeptide Y) showed the most significant Y1-receptor preference (> 1 : 3000-fold), with subnanomolar affinity to the Y1-receptor, and Ki values of approximately 30 nM for the Y2- and Y5-subtype, respectively. Variations of position 6, especially [Arg6,Pro34]pNPY and variations within positions 20-23 of NPY were found to result in further analogues with significant Y1-receptor preference (1 : 400-1 : 2000). In contrast, cyclo S-S [Cys20,Cys24]pNPY was found to be a highly selective ligand at the Y2-receptor, binding only threefold less efficiently than NPY. Analogues containing variations of positions 31 and 32 showed highly reduced affinity to the Y1-receptor, while binding to the Y5-receptor was affected less. Inhibition of cAMP-accumulation of selected peptides with replacements within position 20-23 of NPY showed preserved agonistic properties. The NPY analogues tested give insights into ligand-receptor interaction of NPY at the Y1-, Y2- and Y5-receptor and contribute to our understanding of subtype selectivity. Furthermore, the Y1-receptor-preferring peptides are novel tools that will provide insight into the physiological role of the Y1-receptor.

Characterisation of Neuropeptide Y Receptor Subtypes by Synthetic NPY Analogues and by Anti-receptor Antibodies

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a 36-mer neuromodulator, binds to the receptors Y₁, Y₂, Y₄ and Y₅ with nanomolar affinity. They all belong to the rhodopsin-like G-protein coupled, seven transmembrane helix spanning receptors. In this study, Ala-substituted and centrally truncated NPY analogues were compared with respect to affinity to the Y-receptors. Furthermore, antibodies against the second (E2) and the third (E3) extracellular loop of NPY Y₁-, Y₂- and Y₅-receptor subtypes were raised and affinity to intact cells was tested by immunofluorescence assays. Both methods were applied in order to receive subtype selective tools and to characterise ligand binding. The analogues [A¹³]-pNPY and [A²⁷]-pNPY showed subtype selectivity for the Y₂-receptor. Sera against the E2 loop of the Y₁-receptor and against the E2 loop of the Y₂-receptor were subtype selective. Two antibodies against the Y₅ E2 and E3 loop recognised the Y₅- and Y₂-receptor subtypes. In combination, these sera are able to distinguish between the Y₁-, Y₂-, and Y₅-receptor subtypes. The analogues and antibodies represent valuable tools to distinguish NPY receptors on membranes and intact cells.

Studies of the human, rat, and guinea pig Y4 receptors using neuropeptide Y analogues and two distinct radioligands

The neuropeptide Y-family receptor Y4 differs extensively between human and rat in sequence, receptor binding, and anatomical distribution. We have investigated the differences in binding profile between the cloned human, rat, and guinea pig Y4 receptors using NPY analogues with single amino acid replacements or deletion of the central portion. The most striking result was the increase in affinity for the rat receptor, but not for human or guinea pig, when amino acid 34 was replaced with proline; [Ahx(8-20),Pro(34)]NPY bound to the rat Y4 receptor with 20-fold higher affinity than [Ahx(8-20)]NPY. Also, the rat Y4 tolerates alanine in position 34 since p[Ala(34)]NPY bound with similar affinity as pNPY while the affinity for hY4 and gpY4 decreased about 50-fold. Alanine substitutions in position 33, 35, and 36 as well as the large loop-deletion, [Ahx(5-24)]NPY, reduced the binding affinity to all three receptors more than 100-fold. NPY and PYY competed with (125)I-hPP at Y4 receptors expressed in CHO cells according to a two-site model. This was investigated for gpY4 by saturation with either radiolabeled hPP or pPYY. The number of high-affinity binding-sites for (125)I-pPYY was about 60% of the receptors recognized by (125)I-hPP. Porcine [Ala(34)]NPY and [Ahx(8-20)]NPY bound to rY4 (but not to hY4 or gpY4) according to a two-site model. These results suggest that different full agonists can distinguish between different active conformations of the gpY4 receptor and that Y4 may display functional differences in vivo between human, guinea pig, and rat.

Binding properties of three neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes from zebrafish: comparison with mammalian Y1 receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) are two related 36-amino-acid peptides found in all vertebrates and are involved in many physiological processes. Five receptor subtypes have been cloned in mammals (Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5, and y6). We have recently cloned three NPY/PYY receptor subtypes in zebrafish, called Ya, Yb, and Yc. Here we report on a direct comparison of the pharmacological properties of these three receptors in vitro using porcine NPY with alanine substitutions in positions 33-36 as ligands and three analogues with internal deletions: [Ahx(8-20)]NPY, [Ahx(8-20), Pro(34)]NPY, and [Ahx(5-24)]NPY. In all cases, the zYc receptor was the most sensitive to the modifications of the NPY molecule and zYa was the least sensitive (except for the Arg --> Ala replacement at position 33). Our data identified zYa as a receptor that can bind ligands specific for Y1, Y2, and Y4 receptors, while zYb and zYc were more Y1-like. All peptides with internal deletions bound to the zYa receptor with affinities similar to that of intact pNPY. Neither the Y1-selective antagonists BIBP3226 and SR120819A nor the Y2-selective BIIE0246 bound to any of the zebrafish receptors, although the amino acids identified as important for BIBP3226 binding were almost completely conserved. These results may prove helpful in molecular modeling of the three-dimensional receptor structure.

Molecular characterization of the ligand-receptor interaction of the neuropeptide Y family

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belong to the NPY hormone family and activate a class of receptors called the Y-receptors, and also belong to the large superfamily of the G-protein coupled receptors. Structure-affinity and structure-activity relationship studies of peptide analogs, combined with studies based on site-directed mutagenesis and anti-receptor antibodies, have given insight into the individual characterization of each receptor subtype relative to its interaction with the ligand, as well as to its biological function. A number of selective antagonists at the Y1-receptor are available whose structures resemble that of the C-terminus of NPY. Some of these compounds, like BIBP3226, BIBO3304 and GW1229, have recently been used for in vivo investigations of the NPY-induced increase in food intake. Y2-receptor selective agonists are the analog cyclo-(28/32)-Ac-[Lys28-Glu32]-(25-36)-pNPY and the TASP molecule containing two units of the NPY segment 21-36. Now the first antagonist with nanomolar affinity for the Y2-receptor is also known, BIIE0246. So far, the native peptide PP has been shown to be the most potent ligand at the Y4-receptor. However, by the design of PP/NPY chimera, some analogs have been found that bind not only to the Y4-, but also to the Y5-receptor with subnanomolar affinities, and are as potent as NPY at the Y1-receptor. For the characterization of the Y5-receptor in vitro and in vivo, a new class of highly selective agonists is now available. This consists of analogs of NPY and of PP/NPY chimera which all contain the motif Ala31-Aib32. This motif has been shown to induce a 3(10)-helical turn in the region 28-31 of NPY and is suggested to be the key motif for high Y5-receptor selectivity. The results of feeding experiments in rats treated with the first highly specific Y5-receptor agonists support the hypothesis that this receptor plays a role in the NPY-induced stimulation of food intake. In conclusion, the selective compounds for the different Y receptor subtypes known so far are promising tools for a better understanding of the physiological properties of the hormones of the NPY family and related receptors.

Neuropeptide Y(5) receptors reduce synaptic excitation in proximal subiculum, but not epileptiform activity in rat hippocampal slices

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) potently inhibits excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus, acting predominantly via a presynaptic Y(2) receptor. Recent reports that the Y(5) receptor may mediate the anticonvulsant actions of NPY in vivo prompted us to test the hypothesis that Y(5) receptors inhibit synaptic excitation in the hippocampal slice and, furthermore, that they are effective in an in vitro model of anticonvulsant action. Two putative Y(5) receptor-preferring agonists inhibited excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by stimulation of stratum radiatum in pyramidal cells. We recorded initially from area CA1 pyramidal cells, but subsequently switched to cells from the subiculum, where a much greater frequency of response was observed to Y(5) agonist application. Both D-Trp(32)NPY (1 microM) and [ahx(8-20)]Pro(34)NPY (3 microM), a centrally truncated, Y(1)/Y(5) agonist we synthesized, inhibited stimulus-evoked EPSCs in subicular pyramidal cells by 44.0 +/- 5.7% and 51.3 +/- 3.5% (mean +/- SE), in 37 and 58% of cells, respectively. By contrast, the less selective centrally truncated agonist, [ahx(8-20)] NPY (1 microM), was more potent (66.4 +/- 4.1% inhibition) and more widely effective, suppressing the EPSC in 86% of subicular neurons. The site of action of all NPY agonists tested was most probably presynaptic, because agonist application caused no changes in postsynaptic membrane properties. The selective Y(1) antagonist, BIBP3226 (1 microM), did not reduce the effect of either more selective agonist, indicating that they activated presynaptic Y(5) receptors. Y(5) receptor-mediated synaptic inhibition was more frequently observed in slices from younger animals, whereas the nonselective agonist appeared equally effective at all ages tested. Because of the similarity with the previously reported actions of Y(2) receptors, we tested the ability of Y(5) receptor agonists to suppress stimulus train-induced bursting (STIB), an in vitro model of ictaform activity, in both area CA3 and the subiculum. Neither [ahx(8-20)]Pro(34)NPY nor D-Trp(32)NPY were significantly effective in suppressing or shortening STIB-induced afterdischarge, with <20% of slices responding to these agonists in recordings from CA3 and none in subiculum. By contrast, 1 microM each of [ahx(8-20)]NPY, the Y(2) agonist, [ahx(5-24)]NPY, and particularly NPY itself suppressed the afterdischarge in area CA3 and the subiculum, as reported earlier. We conclude that Y(5) receptors appear to regulate excitability to some degree in the subiculum of young rats, but their contribution is relatively small compared with those of Y(2) receptors, declines with age, and is insufficient to block or significantly attenuate STIB-induced afterdischarges.

The bioactive conformation of neuropeptide Y analogues at the human Y2-receptor

Several attempts to investigate the bioactive conformation of neuropeptide Y have been made so far. As cyclic peptides are much more rigid than linear ones, we decided to synthesise cyclic analogues of the C-terminal dodekapeptide amide neuropeptide Y Ac-25-36. Cyclisation was performed by side chain lactamisation of ornithine or lysine and glutamic or aspartic acid. The affinity of the 19 peptides ranged from Ki 0.6 nM to greater than 10,000 nM. We found that the size, position, orientation, configuration. and the location of the cycle plays an important role for receptor recognition. Circular dichroic studies have been performed to characterise the secondary structure of each peptide. Receptor binding studies were carried out on human neuroblastoma cell lines SK-N-MC (Y1) and SMS-KAN (Y2), and on rabbit kidney membranes (Y2). The pharmacological and spectral data showed that the alpha-helix content was not the predominant factor for high Y2-receptor affinity. Instead, the location and the size of the hydrophobic lactam bridge, and the conserved C-terminal tetrapeptide (Arg-Glu-Arg-Tyr) seemed to be the main parameters. Using molecular dynamics, the structures of four cyclic peptides (i,i+4) have been investigated and compared with the previously published NMR structure of one of the cyclic peptide analogues. Significant differences have been found in the overall three-dimensional fold of the peptides. The distances between the N- and the C-terminus allow discrimination between peptides with high binding affinity and those with low binding affinity, because of the correlation that was found with the measured affinity. Thus, this study suggests that a turn-like structure and the orientation of the C-terminus towards the N-terminus play major roles for high affinity binding of cyclic dodecapeptides to the Y2-receptor. None of the cyclic segments exhibits significant affinity to the Y1-receptor. Thus, these results support the hypothesis of a discontinuous binding site of neuropeptide Y at the Y1-receptor.

Activity of centrally truncated analogues of neuropeptide Y at Y1 and Y2 receptor subtypes in vivo

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a sympathetic cotransmitter, has both prejunctional and postjunctional actions in the cardiovascular system. In anaesthetized rats, the bioassay system used here, NPY attenuates cardiac vagal action (a prejunctional or Y2 action) and increases blood pressure (a postjunctional or Y1 action). Several NPY analogues were tested against NPY. In these, centrally located amino acid sequences of various lengths were removed, and replaced with simpler 'spacers'. As the parent NPY molecule is considered to exist in a U-shape, these central truncations were intended to shorten the depth of the U, while maintaining the integrity of its two ends. The centrally truncated NPY analogues examined here retain activity at both receptor subtypes in vivo. These findings indicate that the U-shape of the parent molecule probably exists to assist stability, but that receptor binding occurs through sequences closer to the termini.

Fluorescent labelled analogues of neuropeptide Y for the characterization of cells expressing NPY receptor subtypes

Porcine neuropeptide Y (NPY), a 36 amino acid hormone of the pancreatic polypeptide family, and subtype selective analogues have been synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis. The peptides were labelled with Cy3, a commercially available fluorescent marker based on a cyanine dye, by solid phase strategy. During the cleavage a partial fragmentation of the fluorescent marker occurred. This has been investigated by means of HPLC and electrospray mass spectrometry. The labelled analogues of NPY showed high affinity to the NPY receptor subtypes Y1 and Y2. Thus, Cy3-NPY, Y1-selective Cy3-[Pro34] NPY and Y2 selective Cy3-[Ahx5-24] NPY were used to label SK-N-MC- and SMS-KAN-cells, which are stably expressing the Y1-(SK-N-MC) and the Y2-receptor subtype (SMS-KAN). The binding of the labelled analogues to the receptors was reversible and specific. The photoactivatable analogue, [(Tmd)Phe27] NPY, which showed high affinity to both receptor subtypes was labelled with Cy3 in solution. Whereas the fluorescent labelling of the cells with analogues without photoactivatable amino acid was reversible, successful photocrosslinking could be investigated by the irreversible staining of the cells using Cy3-[(Tmd)Phe27] NPY. These subtype selective analogues are exciting tools to trace receptors in tissues and to identify the pharmacologically characterized subtypes without radioactivity.

Modified, cyclic dodecapeptide analog of neuropeptide Y is the smallest full agonist at the human Y2 receptor

In order to stabilize the C-terminal dodecapeptide of neuropeptide Y (NPY) we replaced Leu28 and Thr32 by Lys and Glu, respectively, and subsequently linked these residues by lactamization. This peptide analog of NPY shows a more than 100-fold increase in affinity compared to the C-terminal linear dodecapeptide in receptor binding studies performed at human neuroblastoma cells SMS-KAN, which exclusively express the Y2 receptor subtype. Signal transduction was investigated by measuring Ca2+ current inhibition in human SH-SY5Y cells and cyclic [Lys28-Glu32] NPY Ac-25-36 and NPY were shown to be equipotent in this assay. Thus, this molecule is the smallest Y2 receptor selective full agonist of NPY. Using 2D-NMR experiments and molecular modelling techniques, the structures of the linear and cyclic peptides have been investigated and significant differences have been found, which may explain the improvement in biological activity. Thus, a model of the bioactive conformation of NPY at the human Y2 receptor is suggested.