Outcome-based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

A nomogram for predicting adverse perinatal outcome with fetal growth restriction: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major determinant of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed to develop a prediction model for the risk of FGR developing adverse perinatal outcome (APO) and evaluate its performance.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive singleton gestations meeting the ACOG-endorsed criteria for FGR from January 2022 to June 2023 at Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Clinical information, ultrasound indicators and serum biomarkers were collected. The primary composite APO comprised one or more of: perinatal death, intrauterine demise, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, seizures, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis and the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit > 7 days. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to screen variables for nomogram model construction. The discrimination, calibration and clinical effectiveness of the nomogram were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plots and decision curve analysis in training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 122 pregnancies were enrolled in the final statistical analysis. Five variables were identified to establish a nomogram, including gestational weeks at diagnosis, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler, abnormal uterine artery Doppler, and multiples of the median values of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.99) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98) in the training and validation cohort respectively, indicated satisfactory discriminative ability of the nomogram. The calibration plots showed favorable consistency between the nomogram's predictions and actual observations. Decision curve analysis supported its practical value in a clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram was developed and validated to possess the promising capacity of predicting APO in FGR-afflicted neonates, and may prove useful in counseling and management of pregnancies complicated by FGR.

Enhancing Small-for-Gestational-Age Prediction: Multi-Country Validation of Nuchal Thickness, Estimated Fetal Weight, and Machine Learning Models

OBJECTIVE

The first objective is to develop a nuchal thickness reference chart. The second objective is to compare rule-based algorithms and machine learning models in predicting small-for-gestational-age infants.

METHOD

This retrospective study involved singleton pregnancies at University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia, developed a nuchal thickness chart and evaluated its predictive value for small-for-gestational-age using Malaysian and Singapore cohorts. Predictive performance using conjunctive (AND)/disjunctive (OR) rule-based algorithms was assessed. Seven machine learning models were trained on Malaysia data and evaluated on both Malaysia and Singapore cohorts.

RESULTS

5519 samples were collected from the University Malaya Medical Centre. Small-for-gestational-age infants exhibit significantly lower nuchal thickness (small-for-gestational-age: 4.57 [1.04] mm, appropriate-for-gestational-age: 4.86 [1.06] mm, p < 0.001). Implementing disjunctive rule (nuchal thickness < 10th centile or estimated fetal weight < 10th centile) significantly improved small-for-gestational-age prediction across all growth charts, with balanced accuracy gains of 5.83% in Malaysia (p < 0.05) and 7.75% in Singapore. The best model for predicting small-for-gestational-age was: logistic regression with five variables (abdominal circumference, femur length, nuchal thickness, maternal age, and ultrasound-confirmed gestational age), which achieved an area under the curve of 0.75 for Malaysia cohorts; support vector machine with all variables, achieved area under the curve of 0.81 for Singapore cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-for-gestational-age infants demonstrate significantly reduced second-trimester nuchal thickness. Employing the disjunctive rule enhanced small-for-gestational-age prediction. Logistic regression and support vector machines show superior performance among all models, highlighting the advantages of machine learning. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess clinical utility.

Comparison of umbilical artery pulsatility index reference ranges

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of four published reference standards for the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) in predicting small-for-gestational age (SGA), adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications in pregnancies at risk for fetal growth restriction.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective study of singleton pregnancies that underwent fetal growth assessment by ultrasound between 26 and 36 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies with estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference < 20th percentile with UA-PI measurements available were included. We excluded fetuses with chromosomal anomaly or congenital malformation and those without delivery information. The predictive ability of UA-PI > 95th percentile according to the reference standards of Acharya et al., the INTERGROWTH-21st Project, the Fetal Medicine Foundation and Parra-Cordero et al. for SGA, a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes and a composite of obstetric complications was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 1054 pregnancies that underwent fetal growth evaluation by ultrasound, 207 were included in our analysis. SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications were diagnosed in 94 (45.4%), 50 (24.2%) and 69 (33.3%) cases, respectively. All reference standards had similar and statistically significant but poor predictive accuracy for SGA (AUC of 0.55 to 0.56), adverse neonatal outcomes (AUC of 0.57 to 0.60) and obstetric complications (AUC of 0.55 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The reference standards for UA-PI evaluated herein have poor predictive ability for SGA, adverse neonatal outcomes and obstetric complications. At present, no particular UA-PI reference standard can be recommended over others. Larger trials are needed to answer this research question. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Fetal Growth Restriction: A Pragmatic Approach

An accurate diagnosis of fetal growth restriction relies on a precise estimation of gestational age based on a carefully obtained history as well as early ultrasound, since a difference of just a few days can lead to a significant error. There is a continuum of risk for adverse outcome that depends on the certainty of dates and presence or absence of comorbidities, in addition to the estimated fetal weight percentile and the umbilical artery waveform. The results of several studies, most notably the TRUFFLE trial, demonstrate that optimal management of fetal growth restriction with an abnormal umbilical artery waveform requires daily electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, and this monitoring does not require computerized interpretation. The role of ductus venosus waveform, biophysical profile, and middle cerebral artery waveform is less clear, and the results of these three modalities should be interpreted with caution. KEY POINTS: · A correct diagnosis of fetal growth restriction requires a very precise estimate of gestational age.. · In the presence of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler, the cornerstone of surveillance is daily electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.. · Surveillance with biophysical profile, ductus venosus waveform, and middle cerebral artery waveform are less important than daily electronic fetal heart rate monitoring..

Use of a weight indexed umbilical artery systolic diastolic ratio to predict the risk for adverse outcomes among growth restricted fetuses

Background and Objectives: To evaluate weight-indexed umbilical systolic diastolic ratio (UASDR) to discriminate risk for adverse outcomes among growth restricted fetuses (FGR).Design and Setting: Retrospective study using prenatal ultrasound data and neonatal outcome data. Two primary outcomes: admission to intensive care and a composite outcome of severe neonatal morbidity. We included births among individuals with a singleton pregnancy at 24-40 weeks gestation without other indications for preterm delivery. We calculated the percentile of the measured standard UASDR, and the same value indexed to the EFW (iUASDR).Results: 296 pregnancies met inclusion criteria. Forty-seven percent required NICU admission and 31% developed a component of the composite outcome. The sensitivity of the iUASDR increased at lower birthweight percentiles. The positive predictive value of the standard UASDR was higher among fetuses with EFW <5th % and <10th % for NICU admission and composite outcome ((EFW <5th %) 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.91) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.72) and ((EFW <10th %) 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.89) and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.69) compared with indexed values.Discussion: Data does not support use of the iUASDR to improve the test characteristics of the UASDR. Despite a moderate increase in specificity, the positive predictive value was low. UASDR non-indexed or standard values in conjunction with clinical findings and severity of FGR perform best.

Placental pathology lesions: International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology vs Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine fetal growth restriction definitions

BACKGROUND

Research on the definition of fetal growth restriction (FGR) has focused on predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. A significant limitation of this approach is that the individual outcomes of interest could be related to the condition and the treatment. Evaluation of outcomes that reflect the pathophysiology of FGR may overcome this limitation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of the FGR definitions established by the International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) to predict placental histopathological findings associated with placental insufficiency and a composite adverse neonatal outcome (ANeO).

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, the ISUOG and the SMFM guidelines were used to identify pregnancies with FGR and a corresponding control group. The primary outcome was the prediction of placental histopathological findings associated with placental insufficiency, defined as lesions associated with maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM). A composite ANeO (ie, umbilical artery pH≤7.1, Apgar score at 5 minutes ≤4, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation, intrapartum fetal distress requiring expedited delivery, and perinatal death) was investigated as a secondary outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves were determined for each FGR definition. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between each definition and the studied outcomes. A subgroup analysis of the diagnostic performance of both definitions stratifying the population in early and late FGR was also performed.

RESULTS

Both societies' definitions showed a similar diagnostic performance as well as a significant association with the primary (ISUOG adjusted odds ratio 3.01 [95% confidence interval 2.42, 3.75]; SMFM adjusted odds ratio 2.85 [95% confidence interval 2.31, 3.51]) and secondary outcomes (ISUOG adjusted odds ratio 1.95 [95% confidence interval 1.56, 2.43]; SMFM adjusted odds ratio 2.12 [95% confidence interval 1.70, 2.65]). Furthermore, both FGR definitions had a limited discriminatory capacity for placental histopathological findings of MVM and the composite ANeO (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve ISUOG 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.65], 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.61]; area under the receiver-operating-characteristics SMFM 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.66], 0.60 [95% confidence interval 0.57, 0.62]).

CONCLUSION

The ISUOG and the SMFM FGR definitions have limited discriminatory capacity for placental histopathological findings associated with placental insufficiency and a composite ANeO. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

Perinatal outcomes of fetoscopic selective laser photocoagulation for spontaneous twin-anemia polycythemia sequence

OBJECTIVES

Antenatal management of monochorionic pregnancies complicated by twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) remains sub-optimally defined. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fetoscopic selective laser photocoagulation with respect to fetal and neonatal survival.

METHODS

A case series is reported with patients referred to the Texas Children's Fetal Center for evaluation and management of suspected spontaneous TAPS without concomitant twin-to-twin syndrome from 2014 to 2023. All evaluations were performed by our team and patients with stage II-IV TAPS were offered expectant management, intrauterine transfusion, or laser therapy. Cases of post-laser TAPS were excluded from this study. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

During a 10-year time period, 18 patients presented to our center for the management of TAPS. Thirteen patients had stage II-IV TAPS (13/18, 72%) and elected to proceed with laser photocoagulation. All procedures were completed, and "solomonization" was performed for 12/13. Normalization of middle cerebral artery Dopplers in both fetuses was noted after all cases. There was one intrauterine fetal death of the 26 viable fetuses after laser treatment, which was complicated by selective growth restriction. Most patients (12/13) were delivered by Cesarean section at a mean gestational age of 29 ± 3 weeks. Subsequently, there was one ex-donor neonatal death in an infant who had prenatal hydrops. Overall, 30-day postnatal survival was 24/26 fetuses (92.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of spontaneous TAPS, laser therapy is feasible and appears to be an effective approach with overall favorable perinatal outcomes.

The role of the PLGF in the prediction of the outcome in pregnancies with a small for gestational age fetus

PURPOSE

To explore the value of measuring maternal serum PLGF in the prediction of the outcome of small for gestational age fetuses (SGA).

METHODS

Singleton pregnancies referred with suspicion of SGA in the third trimester were included if they had: no indication for nor signs of imminent delivery, fetal abdominal circumference (AC) at or below the 10th centile and/or estimated fetal weight (EFW) at or below the 10th centile and/or umbilical artery pulsatility index (Umb-PI) at or above the 90th centile for gestation. Women with pre-eclampsia at presentation were excluded. Maternal blood was drawn at the first (index) visit and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Fifty-one fetuses were examined. Multiple regression analysis showed that family history of microsomia, index EFW and PLGF were significant predictors of the birthweight centile; index femur length centile and PLGF were significant predictors of pre-eclampsia; PLGF and index systolic blood pressure were significant predictors of iatrogenic preterm delivery < 37 weeks, whereas PLGF and index EFW were significant predictors of birthweight ≤ 5th centile and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. For all outcomes, the addition of maternal-fetal parameters did not improve the prediction compared to PLGF alone. Using a cutoff of 0.3 MoM for PLGF would identify 94.1% of the pregnancies with iatrogenic preterm delivery and/or intra-uterine death and all of the cases that developed pre-eclampsia, for a screen positive rate of 54.9%. Women with PLGF ≤ 0.3 MoM had a poor fetal/maternal outcome (iatrogenic preterm delivery, pre-eclampsia, intra-uterine death) in 61.5% of cases.

CONCLUSION

In pregnancies complicated by SGA, PLGF identifies a very high-risk group that may benefit from intense surveillance.

Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE

Antenatal growth assessment using ultrasound aims to identify small fetuses that are at higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. This study explored whether the association between suboptimal fetal growth and adverse perinatal outcome varies with different definitions of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and different weight charts/standards.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 17 261 singleton non-anomalous pregnancies at ≥ 24 + 0 weeks' gestation that underwent routine ultrasound at a tertiary referral hospital. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and Doppler indices were converted into percentiles using a reference standard (INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21)) and various reference charts (Hadlock, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) and Swedish). Test characteristics were assessed using the consensus definition, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) definition and Swedish criteria for FGR. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as perinatal death, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit at term, 5-min Apgar score < 7 and therapeutic cooling for neonatal encephalopathy. The association between FGR according to each definition and adverse perinatal outcome was compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to test the strength of association between ultrasound parameters and adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound parameters were also tested for correlation.

RESULTS

IG-21, Hadlock and FMF fetal size references classified as growth-restricted 1.5%, 3.6% and 4.6% of fetuses, respectively, using the consensus definition and 2.9%, 8.8% and 10.6% of fetuses, respectively, using the SMFM definition. The sensitivity of the definition/chart combinations for adverse perinatal outcome varied from 4.4% (consensus definition with IG-21 charts) to 13.2% (SMFM definition with FMF charts). Specificity varied from 89.4% (SMFM definition with FMF charts) to 98.6% (consensus definition with IG-21 charts). The consensus definition and Swedish criteria showed the highest specificity, positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio in detecting adverse outcome, irrespective of the reference chart/standard used. Conversely, the SMFM definition had the highest sensitivity across all investigated growth charts. Low EFW, abnormal mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and abnormal cerebroplacental ratio were significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome and there was a positive correlation between the covariates. Multivariate logistic regression showed that UtA-PI > 95th percentile and EFW < 5th percentile were the only parameters consistently associated with adverse outcome, irrespective of the definitions or fetal growth chart/standard used.

CONCLUSIONS

The apparent prevalence of FGR varies according to the definition and fetal size reference chart/standard used. Irrespective of the method of classification, the sensitivity for the identification of adverse perinatal outcome remains low. EFW, UtA-PI and fetal Doppler parameters are significant predictors of adverse perinatal outcome. As these indices are correlated with one other, a prediction algorithm is advocated to overcome the limitations of using these parameters in isolation. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The Association of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy with Infant Mortality, Preterm Delivery, and Small for Gestational Age

Gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, and chronic hypertension (CHTN) are associated with adverse infant outcomes and disproportionately affect minoritized race/ethnicity groups. We evaluated the relationships between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and/or CHTN with infant mortality, preterm delivery (PTD), and small for gestational age (SGA) in a statewide cohort with a diverse racial/ethnic population. All live, singleton deliveries in South Carolina (2004-2016) to mothers aged 12-49 were evaluated for adverse outcomes: infant mortality, PTD (20 to less than <37 weeks) and SGA (<10th birthweight-for-gestational-age percentile). Logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics. In 666,905 deliveries, mothers had superimposed preeclampsia (HDP + CHTN; 1.0%), HDP alone (8.0%), CHTN alone (1.8%), or no hypertension (89.1%). Infant mortality risk was significantly higher in deliveries to women with superimposed preeclampsia, HDP, and CHTN compared with no hypertension (relative risk [RR] = 1.79, 1.39, and 1.48, respectively). After accounting for differing risk by race/ethnicity, deliveries to women with HDP and/or CHTN were more likely to result in PTD (RRs ranged from 3.14 to 5.25) or SGA (RRs ranged from 1.67 to 3.64). As CHTN, HDP and superimposed preeclampsia confer higher risk of adverse outcomes, prevention efforts should involve encouraging and supporting mothers in mitigating modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.

Early-onset fetal growth restriction: comparison of two management protocols in a single tertiary center

OBJECTIVE

Compare the neonatal outcomes of two protocols of diagnosis and surveillance of pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women diagnosed with early-onset FGR between 2017 and 2020. We compared the obstetric and perinatal outcomes between two different management protocols (before and after 2019).

RESULTS

Seventy-two cases of early-onset FGR were diagnosed in the forementioned period: 45 (62.5%) were managed according to protocol 1 and 27 (37.5%) according to protocol 2. Mean gestational age at delivery was significantly different between groups: 34.9 ± 3.1 weeks (95% CI 34.0-35.9) in group 1 and 32.3 ± 4.4 weeks (95% CI 30.4-33.9) in group 2. 74.1% (20) of newborns in group 2 were admitted in de NICU, a significant difference when compared with 46.7% of group 1. There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining serious neonatal adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study published comparing two different protocols of management of FGR. The implementation of the new protocol seems to have led to a decrease in the number of fetuses labeled as growth restricted and to a decrease in the gestational age of delivery of such fetuses, but without increasing the rate of serious neonatal adverse outcomes.

SYNOPSIS

The implementation of the 2016 ISUOG guidelines for the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction seems to have led to a decrease in the number of fetuses labeled as growth restricted and to a decrease in the gestational age of delivery of such fetuses, but without increasing the rate of serious neonatal adverse outcomes.

Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth nomograms were developed to screen for fetal growth restriction and guide clinical care to improve perinatal outcomes; however, existing literature remains inconclusive regarding which nomogram is the gold standard.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the ability of 4 commonly used nomograms (Hadlock, International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-unified standard, and World Health Organization fetal growth charts) and 1 institution-specific reference to predict small for gestational age and poor neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all nonanomalous singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound at ≥20 weeks of gestation between 2013 and 2020 and delivering at a single academic center. Using random selection methods, the study sample was restricted to 1 pregnancy per patient and 1 ultrasound per pregnancy completed at ≥22 weeks of gestation. Fetal biometry data were used to calculate estimated fetal weight and percentiles according to the aforementioned 5 nomograms. Maternal and neonatal data were extracted from electronic medical records. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between estimated fetal weight of <10th and <3rd percentiles compared with estimated fetal weight of 10th to 90th percentile as the reference group for small for gestational age and the neonatal composite outcomes (perinatal mortality, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or seizures, respiratory morbidity, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, hyperbilirubinemia or hypoglycemia requiring neonatal intensive care unit admission, and retinopathy of prematurity). Receiver operating characteristic curve contrast estimation (primary analysis) and test characteristics were calculated for all nomograms and the prediction of small for gestational age and the neonatal composite outcomes. We restricted the sample to ultrasounds performed within 28 days of delivery; moreover, similar analyses were completed to assess the prediction of small for gestational age and neonatal composite outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 10,045 participants, the proportion of fetuses classified as <10th percentile varied across nomograms from 4.9% to 9.7%. Fetuses with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile had an increased risk of small for gestational age (odds ratio, 9.9 [95% confidence interval, 8.5-11.5] to 12.8 [95% confidence interval, 10.9-15.0]). In addition, the estimated fetal weight of <10th and <3rd percentile was associated with increased risk of the neonatal composite outcome (odds ratio, 2.4 [95% confidence interval, 2.0-2.8] to 3.5 [95% confidence interval, 2.9-4.3] and 5.7 [95% confidence interval, 4.5-7.2] to 8.8 [95% confidence interval, 6.6-11.8], respectively). The prediction of small for gestational age with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile had a positive likelihood ratio of 6.3 to 8.5 and an area under the curve of 0.62 to 0.67. Similarly, the prediction of the neonatal composite outcome with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile had a positive likelihood ratio of 2.1 to 3.1 and an area under the curve of 0.55 to 0.57. When analyses were restricted to ultrasound within 4 weeks of delivery, among fetuses with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile, the risk of small for gestational age increased across all nomograms (odds ratio, 16.7 [95% confidence interval, 12.6-22.3] to 25.1 [95% confidence interval, 17.0-37.0]), and prediction improved (positive likelihood ratio, 8.3-15.0; area under the curve, 0.69-0.75). Similarly, the risk of neonatal composite outcome increased (odds ratio, 3.2 [95% confidence interval, 2.4-4.2] to 5.2 [95% confidence interval, 3.8-7.2]), and prediction marginally improved (positive likelihood ratio, 2.4-4.1; area under the curve, 0.60-0.62). Importantly, the risk of both being small for gestational age and having the neonatal composite outcome further increased (odds ratio, 21.4 [95% confidence interval, 13.6-33.6] to 28.7 (95% confidence interval, 18.6-44.3]), and the prediction of concurrent small for gestational age and neonatal composite outcome greatly improved (positive likelihood ratio, 6.0-10.0; area under the curve, 0.80-0.83).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort, Hadlock, recent fetal growth nomograms, and a local population-derived fetal growth reference performed comparably in the prediction of small for gestational age and neonatal composite outcomes.

Reduced adipose tissue in growth-restricted fetuses using quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images

OBJECTIVES

Fat-water MRI can be used to quantify tissues' lipid content. We aimed to quantify fetal third trimester normal whole-body subcutaneous lipid deposition and explore differences between appropriate for gestational age (AGA), fetal growth restriction (FGR), and small for gestational age fetuses (SGAs).

METHODS

We prospectively recruited women with FGR and SGA-complicated pregnancies and retrospectively recruited the AGA cohort (sonographic estimated fetal weight [EFW] ≥ 10th centile). FGR was defined using the accepted Delphi criteria, and fetuses with an EFW < 10th centile that did not meet the Delphi criteria were defined as SGA. Fat-water and anatomical images were acquired in 3 T MRI scanners. The entire fetal subcutaneous fat was semi-automatically segmented. Three adiposity parameters were calculated: fat signal fraction (FSF) and two novel parameters, i.e., fat-to-body volume ratio (FBVR) and estimated total lipid content (ETLC = FSF*FBVR). Normal lipid deposition with gestation and differences between groups were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven AGA, 18 FGR, and 9 SGA pregnancies were included. All three adiposity parameters increased between 30 and 39 weeks (p < 0.001). All three adiposity parameters were significantly lower in FGR compared with AGA (p ≤ 0.001). Only ETLC and FSF were significantly lower in SGA compared with AGA using regression analysis (p = 0.018-0.036, respectively). Compared with SGA, FGR had a significantly lower FBVR (p = 0.011) with no significant differences in FSF and ETLC (p ≥ 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body subcutaneous lipid accretion increased throughout the third trimester. Reduced lipid deposition is predominant in FGR and may be used to differentiate FGR from SGA, assess FGR severity, and study other malnourishment pathologies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Fetuses with growth restriction have reduced lipid deposition than appropriately developing fetuses measured using MRI. Reduced fat accretion is linked with worse outcomes and may be used for growth restriction risk stratification.

KEY POINTS

• Fat-water MRI can be used to assess the fetal nutritional status quantitatively. • Lipid deposition increased throughout the third trimester in AGA fetuses. • FGR and SGA have reduced lipid deposition compared with AGA fetuses, more predominant in FGR.

Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter?

BACKGROUND

Criteria for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction differ widely according to national and international guidelines, and further heterogeneity arises from the use of different biometric and Doppler reference charts, making the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction highly variable.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare fetal growth restriction definitions between Delphi consensus and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definitions, using different standards/charts for fetal biometry and different reference ranges for Doppler velocimetry parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

From the TRUFFLE 2 feasibility study (856 women with singleton pregnancy at 32+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation and at risk of fetal growth restriction), we selected 564 women with available mid-pregnancy biometry. For the comparison, we used standards/charts for estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference from Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, and GROW and Chitty. Percentiles for umbilical artery pulsatility index and its ratios with middle cerebral artery pulsatility index were calculated using Arduini and Ebbing reference charts. Sensitivity and specificity for low birthweight and adverse perinatal outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Different combinations of definitions and reference charts identified substantially different proportions of fetuses within our population as having fetal growth restriction, varying from 38% (with Delphi consensus definition, INTERGROWTH-21st biometric standards, and Arduini Doppler reference ranges) to 93% (with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition and Hadlock biometric standards). None of the different combinations tested appeared effective, with relative risk for birthweight <10th percentile between 1.4 and 2.1. Birthweight <10th percentile was observed most frequently when selection was made with the GROW/Chitty charts, slightly less with the Hadlock standard, and least frequently with the INTERGROWTH-21st standard. Using the Ebbing Doppler reference ranges resulted in a far higher proportion identified as having fetal growth restriction compared with the Arduini Doppler reference ranges, whereas Delphi consensus definition with Ebbing Doppler reference ranges produced similar results to those of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition. Application of Delphi consensus definition with Arduini Doppler reference ranges was significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome, with any biometric standards/charts. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition could not accurately detect adverse perinatal outcome irrespective of estimated fetal weight standard/chart used.

CONCLUSION

Different combinations of fetal growth restriction definitions, biometry standards/charts, and Doppler reference ranges identify different proportions of fetuses with fetal growth restriction. The difference in adverse perinatal outcome may be modest, but can have a significant impact in terms of rate of intervention.

Directive clinique no 442 : Retard de croissance intra-utérin : Dépistage, diagnostic et prise en charge en contexte de grossesse monofœtale

OBJECTIF

Le retard de croissance intra-utérin est une complication obstétricale fréquente qui touche jusqu'à 10 % des grossesses dans la population générale et qui est le plus souvent due à une pathologie placentaire sous-jacente. L'objectif de la présente directive clinique est de fournir des déclarations sommaires et des recommandations pour appuyer un protocole clinique de dépistage, diagnostic et prise en charge du retard de croissance intra-utérin pour les grossesses à risque ou atteintes.

POPULATION CIBLE

Toutes les patientes enceintes menant une grossesse monofœtale. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en application des recommandations de la présente directive devrait améliorer la compétence des cliniciens quant à la détection du retard de croissance intra-utérin et à la réalisation des interventions indiquées. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée a été colligée par des recherches effectuées jusqu'en septembre 2022 dans les bases de données PubMed, Medline, CINAHL et Cochrane Library en utilisant un vocabulaire contrôlé au moyen de termes MeSH pertinents (fetal growth retardation and small for gestational age) et de mots-clés (fetal growth, restriction, growth retardation, IUGR, FGR, low birth weight, small for gestational age, Doppler, placenta, pathology). Seuls les résultats de revues systématiques, d'essais cliniques randomisés ou comparatifs et d'études observationnelles ont été retenus. La littérature grise a été obtenue par des recherches menées dans des sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, des registres d'essais cliniques et des sites Web de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Obstétriciens, médecins de famille, infirmières, sages-femmes, spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle, radiologistes et autres professionnels de la santé qui prodiguent des soins aux patientes enceintes. RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: Mise à jour de la directive sur le dépistage, le diagnostic et la prise en charge du retard de croissance intra-utérin pour les grossesses à risque ou atteintes. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS: Prédiction du retard de croissance intra-utérin Prévention du retard de croissance intra-utérin Détection du retard de croissance intra-utérin Examens en cas de retard de croissance intra-utérin soupçonné Prise en charge du retard de croissance intra-utérin précoce Prise en charge du retard de croissance intra-utérin tardif Prise en charge du post-partum et consultations préconception.

Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with "small" fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction

BACKGROUND

Previous research endeavors examining the association between clinical characteristics, sonographic indices, and the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction have been hampered by a lack of agreement regarding its definition. In 2016, a consensus definition was reached by an international panel of experts via the Delphi procedure, but as it currently stands, this has not been endorsed by all professional organizations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether an independent association exists between estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference of <10th percentile and adverse perinatal outcomes when consensus criteria for growth restriction are not met.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were derived from a passive prospective cohort of singleton nonanomalous pregnancies at a single academic tertiary care institution (2010-2022) that fell into 3 groups: (1) consecutive fetuses that met the Delphi criteria for fetal growth restriction, (2) small-for-gestational-age fetuses that failed to meet the consensus criteria, and (3) fetuses with birthweights of 20th to 80th percentile randomly selected as an appropriately grown (appropriate-for-gestational-age) comparator group. This nested case-control study used 1:1 propensity score matching to adjust for confounders among the 3 groups: fetal growth restriction cases, small-for-gestational-age cases, and controls. Our primary outcome was a composite: perinatal demise, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, cord pH of ≤7.10, or base excess of ≥12. Pregnancy characteristics with a P value of <.2 on univariate analyses were considered for incorporation into a multivariable model along with fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age to evaluate which outcomes were independently predictive of adverse perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 2866 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 2186 matched pairs, including 511 (23%), 1093 (50%), and 582 (27%) patients in the small-for-gestational-age, appropriate-for-gestational-age, and fetal growth restriction groups, respectively. Moreover, 210 pregnancies (10%) were complicated by adverse perinatal outcomes. None of the pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age OR appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses resulted in perinatal demise. Twenty-three of 511 patients (5%) in the small-for-gestational-age group had adverse outcomes based on 5-minute Apgar scores and/or cord gas results compared with 77 of 1093 patients (7%) in the appropriate-for-gestational-age group (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-1.00). Furthermore, 110 of 582 patients (19%) with fetal growth restriction that met the consensus criteria had adverse outcomes (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.25-4.20), including 34 patients with perinatal demise or death before discharge. Factors independently associated with increased odds of adverse outcomes included chronic hypertension, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and early-onset fetal growth restriction. Small-for-gestational age was not associated with the primary outcome after adjustment for 6 other factors included in a model predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. The bias-corrected bootstrapped area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.74). The bias-corrected bootstrapped area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a 7-factor model predicting adverse perinatal outcomes was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.74).

CONCLUSION

This study found no evidence that fetuses with an estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference of 3rd to 9th percentile that fail to meet the consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction (based on Doppler waveforms and/or growth velocity of ≥32 weeks) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Although the growth of these fetuses should be monitored closely to rule out evolving growth restriction, most cases are healthy constitutionally small fetuses. The management of these fetuses in the same manner as those with suspected pathologic growth restriction may result in unnecessary antenatal testing and increase the risk of iatrogenic complications resulting from preterm or early term delivery of small fetuses that are at relatively low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Guideline No. 442: Fetal Growth Restriction: Screening, Diagnosis, and Management in Singleton Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

Fetal growth restriction is a common obstetrical complication that affects up to 10% of pregnancies in the general population and is most commonly due to underlying placental diseases. The purpose of this guideline is to provide summary statements and recommendations to support a clinical framework for effective screening, diagnosis, and management of pregnancies that are either at risk of or affected by fetal growth restriction.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant patients with a singleton pregnancy.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline should increase clinician competency to detect fetal growth restriction and provide appropriate interventions.

EVIDENCE

Published literature in English was retrieved through searches of PubMed or MEDLINE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library through to September 2022 using appropriate controlled vocabulary via MeSH terms (fetal growth retardation and small for gestational age) and key words (fetal growth, restriction, growth retardation, IUGR, FGR, low birth weight, small for gestational age, Doppler, placenta, pathology). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Grey literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Table A1 for definitions and Table A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, radiologists, and other health care providers who care for pregnant patients.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Updated guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and management of pregnancies at risk of or affected by FGR.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS: Prediction of FGR Prevention of FGR Detection of FGR Investigations in Pregnancies with Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction Management of Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction Management of Late-Onset FGR Postpartum management and preconception counselling.

Role of First Trimester Screening Biochemical Markers to Predict Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorders and SGA Neonates-A Narrative Review

Early recognition of high-risk pregnancies through biochemical markers may promote antenatal surveillance, resulting in improved pregnancy outcomes. The goal of this study is to evaluate the possibilities of using biochemical markers during the first trimester of pregnancy in the prediction of hypertensive pregnancy disorders (HPD) and the delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates. A comprehensive search was conducted on key databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, for articles relating to the use of biochemical markers in the prediction of HPD and SGA. The findings show that changes in the levels of biomarkers in the early pregnancy phases could be an important indicator of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The literature shows that low PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A) and PlGF (placental growth factor) levels, low alkaline phosphatase (AP), higher sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase-1) levels, higher AFP (alfa fetoprotein) levels, and elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as β-HGC (free beta human chorionic gonadotropin), interferon-gamma (INF-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may be associated with risks including the onset of HPD, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and delivery of SGA neonates. Comparatively, PAPP-A and PlGF appear to be the most important biochemical markers for the prediction of SGA and HPD.

Can prenatal ultrasound predict adverse neonatal outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-affected pregnancies?

BACKGROUND

On the basis of available data, at least 1 ultrasound assessment of pregnancies recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection is recommended. However, reports on prenatal imaging findings and potential associations with neonatal outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy have been inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the sonographic characteristics of pregnancies after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and assess the association of prenatal ultrasound findings with adverse neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an observational prospective cohort study of pregnancies diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction between March 2020 and May 2021. Prenatal ultrasound evaluation was performed at least once after diagnosis of infection, with the following parameters measured: standard fetal biometric measurements, umbilical and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, placental thickness, amniotic fluid volume, and anatomic survey for infection-associated findings. The primary outcome was the composite adverse neonatal outcome, defined as ≥1 of the following: preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, small for gestational age, respiratory distress, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal demise, or other neonatal complications. Secondary outcomes were sonographic findings stratified by trimester of infection and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prenatal ultrasound findings were compared with neonatal outcomes, severity of infection, and trimester of infection.

RESULTS

A total of 103 SARS-CoV-2-affected mother-infant pairs with prenatal ultrasound evaluation were identified; 3 cases were excluded because of known major fetal anomalies. Of the 100 included cases, neonatal outcomes were available in 92 pregnancies (97 infants); of these, 28 (29%) had the composite adverse neonatal outcome, and 23 (23%) had at least 1 abnormal prenatal ultrasound finding. The most common abnormalities seen on ultrasound were placentomegaly (11/23; 47.8%) and fetal growth restriction (8/23; 34.8%). The latter was associated with a higher rate of the composite adverse neonatal outcome (25% vs 1.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 22.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.63-194.91; P<.001), even when small for gestational age was removed from this composite outcome. The Cochran Mantel-Haenszel test controlling for possible fetal growth restriction confounders continued to show this association (relative risk, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-5.9; P<.001). Median estimated fetal weight and birthweight were lower in patients with the composite adverse neonatal outcome (P<.001). Infection in the third trimester was associated with lower median percentile of estimated fetal weight (P=.019). An association between placentomegaly and third-trimester SARS-CoV-2 infection was noted (P=.045).

CONCLUSION

In our study of SARS-CoV-2-affected maternal-infant pairs, rates of fetal growth restriction were comparable to those found in the general population. However, composite adverse neonatal outcome rates were high. Pregnancies with fetal growth restriction after SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with an increased risk for the adverse neonatal outcome and may require close surveillance.

Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Twin gestations account for approximately 3% of all births. Although there appear to be physiologic differences in the third trimester growth of twins compared with singleton gestations, reasons for this remain unclear. As growth-restricted fetuses and neonates are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, there is a clinical need to optimize our ability to delineate normally from pathologically grown twins.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have addressed current limitations in the way growth restriction is diagnosed in twin gestations. Twin-specific fetal and neonatal growth charts have been shown to decrease the number of cases inappropriately labeled as growth restricted compared with singleton nomograms. In addition, individual growth assessment (IGA) is a promising method of diagnosing pathological growth using each fetus's growth potential rather than a comparison of the estimated fetal weight with population nomograms.

SUMMARY

There is a recent focus on improving our understanding of physiologic and pathologic twin growth. The increased use of twin-specific growth curves is likely to result in a decrease in the incidence of FGR diagnosis among twin gestations and could improve the outcomes of twins currently misclassified as FGR. Future research will hopefully clarify the reasons behind differences seen in twin versus singleton third trimester twin growth.

Definitions matter: detection rates and perinatal outcome for infants classified prenatally as having late fetal growth restriction using SMFM biometric vs ISUOG/Delphi consensus criteria

OBJECTIVES

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is often secondary to placental dysfunction and is suspected prenatally based on biometric or circulatory abnormalities detected on ultrasound. The aims of this study were to compare the screening performance of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) biometric criteria (estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th centile) with that of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)-endorsed Delphi consensus criteria for late FGR for delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant at term, emergency Cesarean section (CS) for non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), perinatal mortality and composite severe neonatal morbidity.

METHODS

We classified retrospectively non-anomalous singleton infants as having late FGR (diagnosed ≥ 32 weeks) according to SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria in a cohort of women who had been referred to the Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia and who delivered at term between January 2014 and December 2020. The study outcomes were delivery of a SGA infant (birth weight (BW) < 10th or < 3rd centile), emergency CS for NRFS, perinatal mortality (defined as stillbirth or neonatal death within 28 days of a live birth) and a composite of severe neonatal morbidity. We assessed the screening performance of various ultrasound variables by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio.

RESULTS

The SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi consensus criteria collectively classified 1030 cases as having late FGR. Of these, 400 cases were classified by both SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria, whilst 548 cases were classified using only SMFM criteria and 82 cases were classified only by ISUOG/Delphi criteria. Prenatal detection of late FGR by SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria was associated with increased odds of delivery of an infant with BW < 10th centile (SMFM: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 133.0 (95% CI, 94.7-186.6); ISUOG/Delphi: aOR, 69.5 (95% CI, 49.1-98.2)) or BW < 3rd centile (SMFM: aOR, 348.7 (95% CI, 242.6-501.2); ISUOG/Delphi: aOR, 215.4 (95% CI, 148.4-312.7)). Compared with the SMFM criteria, the ISUOG/Delphi criteria were associated with lower odds (aOR, 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-0.8)) of predicting a SGA infant with BW < 10th centile, but higher odds of predicting emergency CS for NRFS (aOR, 2.30 (95% CI, 1.14-4.66)) and composite neonatal morbidity (aOR, 1.22 (95% CI, 1.05-1.41)). Both SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria were associated with high LR+, specificity, PPV and NPV for the prediction of infants with BW < 10th and BW < 3rd centile. However, both methods functioned much less efficiently for the prediction of composite severe neonatal morbidity or emergency CS for NRFS, with LR+ < 10. The SMFM biometric criteria alone, particularly AC < 3rd centile, had the highest LR+ values for the prediction of perinatal mortality.

CONCLUSION

Both the SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria had strong screening potential for the detection of infants with BW < 10th or < 3rd centile but not for adverse neonatal outcome. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Neonatal outcome of infants with umbilical cord arterial pH less than 7

INTRODUCTION

Umbilical arterial pH of less than 7 is often used as the threshold below which the risks of neonatal death and adverse long-term neurological outcomes are considered to be higher. Yet within the group with pH <7, the risks have not been further stratified. Here, we aimed to investigate the predictors of adverse long-term outcomes of this group of infants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 248 infants born after 34 weeks of gestation in a tertiary obstetric unit, between 2003 and 2017, with cord arterial pH <7 or base excess ≤-12 mmol/L at birth. The infants were categorized into two groups: (1) intact survivors, or (2) neonatal/infant deaths or cerebral palsy or developmental delay. The umbilical arterial pH and base excess levels, Apgar scores, mode of delivery, gestational age, small for gestational age, birth in the era before the implementation of neonatal hypothermic therapy, and the presence of a known sentinel event, were compared between the groups using univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 248 infants, there were 222 intact survivors (89.5%) and 26 infants with poor outcomes (10.5%), including eight deaths (3.2%) and 18 (7.3%) with cerebral palsy and/or developmental delay. Univariate analysis showed that infants with adverse outcomes had significantly lower cord arterial pH (6.85 vs 6.95, with p < 0.001), lower cord arterial base excess (-19.95 vs -15.90 mmol/L, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of having AS at 5 min <7 (65.4% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of having a sentinel event (34.6% vs 16.7%, p = 0.034). Multivariate analysis confirmed cord arterial pH of <6.9 and an Apgar score at 5 min <7 as independent prognostic factors (the adjusted odds ratios were 4.64 and 6.62, respectively). The risk of adverse outcome increased from 4.3% when the arterial pH was between 6.9 and <7, to 30% when the pH was <6.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants born with umbilical artery pH <7 still have a high chance of 89.5% to become intact survivors. A cord arterial pH of <6.9 and an Apgar score at 5 min <7 are independent prognostic factors for neonatal/infant death or adverse long-term neurological outcomes.

Genetic causes of isolated and severe fetal growth restriction in normal chromosomal microarray analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the genetic burden in fetuses with isolated and severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) using Trio whole-exome sequencing (WES) with a normal chromosomal microarray.

METHOD

This retrospective study analyzed WES results of singleton fetuses with isolated and severe FGR, whose estimated fetal weight (EFW) was less than the third percentile by Hadlock formula, in a tertiary center between March 2016 and March 2022. Cases with abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and TORCH results were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty-one fetuses with isolated and severe FGR and negative CMA results underwent Trio-WES. Of all patients, eight (15.7%) were diagnosed with FGR at its early onset (<32 weeks) and showed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants involving Nipped-B-like protein gene (NIPBL) (n = 3), fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (n = 1), pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1 (n = 1), collagen, type I, alpha 1 (n = 1), superkiller viralicidic activity 2-like (n = 1), and chloride voltage-gated channel (CLCN5) (n = 1). De novo-generated variants were identified in five fetuses, of which two were novel, including c.6983C>A (p. Thr2328Lys) in NIPBL and c.934-1G>T in CLCN5. Genetic disorders involved Cornelia de Lange syndrome and metabolic and skeletal genetic diseases.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that Trio-WES can improve effectivity of prenatal diagnoses for isolated and severe FGR in cases with normal CMA results, aiding prenatal genetic counseling and pregnancy management for FGR fetuses.

Current practice in the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: An international survey

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current practice in respect of diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction among obstetricians in different countries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An e-questionnaire was sent via REDCap with "click thru" links in emails and newsletters to obstetric practitioners in different countries and settings with different levels of expertise. Clinical scenarios in early and late fetal growth restriction were given, followed by structured questions/response pairings.

RESULTS

A total of 275 participants replied to the survey with 87% of responses complete. Participants were obstetrician/gynecologists (54%; 148/275) and fetal medicine specialists (43%; 117/275), and the majority practiced in a tertiary teaching hospital (56%; 153/275). Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction diagnosis were used by 81% of participants (223/275) and 82% (225/274) included a drop in fetal growth velocity in their diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction. For early fetal growth restriction, TRUFFLE criteria were used for fetal monitoring and delivery timing by 81% (223/275). For late fetal growth restriction, indices of cerebral blood flow redistribution were used by 99% (250/252), most commonly cerebroplacental ratio (54%, 134/250). Delivery timing was informed by cerebral blood flow redistribution in 72% (176/244), used from ≥32 weeks of gestation. Maternal biomarkers and hemodynamics, as additional tools in the context of early-onset fetal growth restriction (≤32 weeks of gestation), were used by 22% (51/232) and 46% (106/230), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction are fairly homogeneous among different countries and levels of practice, particularly for early fetal growth restriction. Indices of cerebral flow distribution are widely used in the diagnosis and management of late fetal growth restriction, whereas maternal biomarkers and hemodynamics are less frequently assessed but more so in early rather than late fetal growth restriction. Further standardization is needed for the definition of cerebral blood flow redistribution.

Severity of small-for-gestational-age and morbidity and mortality among very preterm neonates

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the association between small for gestational age (SGA) severity and morbidity and mortality in a contemporary, population of very preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

This secondary analysis of a California statewide database evaluated singleton infants born during 2008-2018 at 24-32 weeks' gestation, with a birthweight <15th percentile. We analyzed neonatal outcomes in relation to weight for gestational age (WGA) and symmetry of growth restriction.

RESULTS

An increase in WGA by one z-score was associated with decreased major morbidity or mortality risk (aRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.77) and other adverse outcomes. The association was maintained across gestational ages and did not differ by fetal growth restriction diagnosis. Symmetric growth restriction was not associated with neonatal outcomes after standardizing for gestational age at birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing SGA severity had a significant impact on neonatal outcomes among very preterm infants.

Conditional standards for the quantification of foetal growth in an ethnic Chinese population: a longitudinal study

This was an observational study of low-risk singleton pregnancies in an ethnic Chinese population. Foetal biometric variables which included biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were measured repeatedly. The standard views for measurement were obtained according to INTERGROWTH-21st criteria. A linear mixed model with fractional polynomial regression was used to describe the longitudinal design. The study included 1289 foetuses and a total of 5125 ultrasound scans, of which each foetus was scanned at least three times, the intervals between scans being at least two weeks. The parameters of the linear mixed models were estimated by Stata v.16 (College Station, TX). Using these parameters, the equations of the mean and variance for BPD, HC, AC and FL were constructed. The conditional percentiles or Z scores could be calculated based on the above equations and previous measurements of the same foetus. A spreadsheet was provided for implementation.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Longitudinal data derived from serial measurements are therefore appropriate for assessing both foetal size and foetal growth. At present, most reference charts of ethnic Chinese foetal biometry are derived from cross-sectional data, which can only assess foetal size.What do the results of this study add? In this study, we have constructed conditional standards for foetal biometry in an ethnic Chinese population and provided a spreadsheet for querying.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The conditional standards can be used to assess foetal growth in clinical practice. In the future, we hope that these foetal growth standards can be applied to determine whether abnormal growth increases the risk of adverse outcomes.

Third trimester uterine artery Doppler for prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abnormal uterine artery Doppler (UtAD) studies early in gestation have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, their association with complications in the third trimester is weak. We aim to review the prediction ability for perinatal complications of these indices in the third trimester.

RECENT FINDINGS

Abnormal UtAD waveforms in the third trimester are associated with preeclampsia, small-for-gestational age infants (SGA), preterm birth, perinatal death, and other perinatal complications, such as cesarean section for fetal distress, 5 min low Apgar score, low umbilical artery pH, and neonatal admission to the ICU, particularly in SGA infants. UtAD prediction performance is improved by the addition of maternal characteristics as well as biochemical markers to prediction models and is more precise if the evaluation is made closer to delivery or diagnosis.

SUMMARY

This review shows that the prediction accuracy of UtAD for adverse pregnancy outcomes during the third trimester is moderate at best. UtAD have limited additive value to prediction models that include PlGF and sFlt-1. Serial assessments rather than a single third trimester evaluation may enhance the prediction performance of the UtAD combined models.

Desempeño predictivo de los criterios diagnósticos de restricción de crecimiento fetal para resultados adversos perinatales en un hospital de Popayán, Colombia

Objetivos: determinar el desempeño predictivo de la definición de retardo de crecimiento fetal (RCF) de ultrasonografía de la Sociedad de Medicina Materno Fetal (SMMF), consenso Delphi (CD) y Medicina Fetal de Barcelona (MFB) respecto a resultados adversos perinatales en cada una, e identificar si hay asociación entre diagnóstico de RCF y resultados adversos perinatales. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectiva. Se incluyeron gestantes con embarazo único de 24 a 36 semanas con 6 días, quienes fueron atendidas en la unidad de medicina materna fetal con evaluación ecográfica de crecimiento fetal y atención de parto en una institución hospitalaria pública de referencia ubicada en Popayán, Colombia. Se excluyeron embarazos con hallazgos ecográficos de anomalías congénitas. Muestreo por conveniencia. Se midieron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas de las gestantes al ingreso, la edad gestacional, el diagnóstico de RCF y el resultado adverso perinatal compuesto. Se analizó la capacidad predictiva de tres criterios diagnósticos de restricción de crecimiento fetal para malos resultados perinatales y la asociación entre el diagnóstico de RCF y mal resultado periantal. Resultados: se incluyeron 228 gestantes, cuya edad media fue de 26,8 años, la prevalencia de RCF según los tres criterios fue de 3,95 %, 16,6 % y 21,9 % para CD, MFB y SMMF respectivamente. Ningún criterio aportó área bajo la curva aceptable para predicción de resultado neonatal adverso compuesto, el diagnóstico de RCF por CD y SMMF se asoció a resultados adversos perinatales con RR de 2,6 (IC 95 %: 1,5-4,3) y 1,57 (IC 95 %: 1,01-2,44), respectivamente. No se encontró asociación por MFB RR: 1,32 (IC 95 %: 0,8-2,1). Conclusiones: ante un resultado positivo para RCF, el método Delphi se asocia de manera más importante a los resultados perinatales adversos.Los tres métodos tienen una muy alta proporción de falsos negativos en la predicción de mal resultado perinatal. Se requieren estudios prospectivos que reduzcan los sesgos de medición y datos ausentes.