Fetal hydrops and the Incremental yield of Next-generation sequencing over standard prenatal Diagnostic testing (FIND) study: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis

RASopathies are the most common set of monogenic syndromes identified by exome sequencing for nonimmune hydrops fetalis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

RASopathies are a group of malformation syndromes known to lead to nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) in severe presentations. Pathogenic variants can be de novo or parentally inherited. Despite being a known frequent presentation, the fraction of monogenic NIHF cases due to RASopathies is limited in the literature. Also, the specific parental contribution of RASopathies to NIHF is not well described. Our objective was to review pooled exome sequencing (ES) diagnostic yield of RASopathies for NIHF and to determine the parental contribution of RASopathy to NIHF. We performed a systematic review of prenatal ES studies from January 1, 2000 to August 1, 2022. Thirty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Cases with RASopathy gene variants were reviewed. NIHF cases were further classified as isolated or non-isolated. Thirty-six ES studies including 46 pregnancies with NIHF and a diagnosed RASopathy were reviewed. Forty-four diagnostic variants and 2 variants of uncertain significance in 12 RASopathy genes were identified. Expanding on what was previously published, a total of 506 NIHF cases were extracted with 191 cases yielding a positive diagnosis by ES. The overall rate of RASopathy diagnosis in clinically diagnosed NIHF cases was 9% (44/506). The rate of RASopathy diagnosis among NIHF cases with positive genetic diagnosis by ES was 23% (44/191). Of the 46 cases identified, 13 (28%) variants were parentally inherited; specifically, 5/13 (38%) maternal, 3/13 (23%) paternal, 2/13 (15%) biparental, and 3/13 (23%) unspecified. Majority of NIHF cases 29/46 (63%) were isolated. Among NIHF cases with positive ES diagnoses, RASopathy diagnostic yield by ES was 23%. NIHF secondary to RASopathies was parentally inherited in 28% of cases. Most cases of NIHF due to RASopathy were isolated, with no prenatal detection of associated anomalies.

Prenatal Management and Perinatal Outcome in a Large Series of Hydrops Fetalis

INTRODUCTION

Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) is the most frequent etiology of hydrops fetalis (HF), accounting for around 95% of cases. It associates high perinatal mortality and morbidity rates. The aim of the study was, first, to investigate etiology, prenatal management, and perinatal outcome in a large single-center series of HF; second, to identify prenatal prognostic factors with impact on perinatal outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational retrospective study of 80 HF diagnosed or referred to a single tertiary center between 2012 and 2021. Clinical characteristics, etiology, prenatal management, and perinatal outcome were recorded. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), early neonatal death (first 7 days of life) and late neonatal death (between 7 and 28 days).

RESULTS

Seventy-six of the 80 cases (95%) were NIHF, main etiology being genetic disorders (28/76; 36.8%). A total of 26 women (32.5%) opted for termination of pregnancy, all of them in the NIHF group. IUFD occurred in 24 of 54 patients (44.4%) who decided to continue the pregnancy. Intrauterine treatment was performed in 29 cases (53.7%). There were 30 newborns (55.6%). Adverse perinatal outcome rate was 53.7% (29/54), significantly higher in those diagnosed <20 weeks of gestation (82.4% < 20 weeks vs. 40.5% ≥ 20 weeks; p = 0.004). Survival rate was higher when fetal therapy was performed compared to the expectantly managed group (58.6% vs. 32%; p = 0.05). Intrauterine blood transfusion and thoraco-amniotic shunt were the procedures that achieved the highest survival rates (88.9% and 100%, respectively, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

NIHF represented 95% of HF with genetic disorders as the main etiology. Most of them were diagnosed before 20 weeks of gestation, with worse prognosis than cases detected later in gestation. Rates of TOP, IUFD, and early neonatal death were higher in NIHF. Intrauterine therapy, when indicated, improved the perinatal outcome.

Monogenic conditions and central nervous system anomalies: A prospective study, systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Determine the incremental diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) over chromosome microarray (CMA) or G-banding karyotype in fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities.

METHODS

Data were collected via electronic searches from January 2010 to April 2022 in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE. The NHS England prenatal exome cohort was also included. Incremental yield was calculated as a pooled value using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included (n = 1583 cases). The incremental yield with pES for any CNS anomaly was 32% [95%CI 27%-36%; I2 = 72%]. Subgroup analysis revealed apparent incremental yields in; (a) isolated CNS anomalies; 27% [95%CI 19%-34%; I2 = 74%]; (b) single CNS anomaly; 16% [95% CI 10%-23%; I2 = 41%]; (c) more than one CNS anomaly; 31% [95% Cl 21%-40%; I2 = 56%]; and (d) the anatomical subtype with the most optimal yield was Type 1 malformation of cortical development, related to abnormal cell proliferation or apoptosis, incorporating microcephalies, megalencephalies and dysplasia; 40% (22%-57%; I2 = 68%). The commonest syndromes in isolated cases were Lissencephaly 3 and X-linked hydrocephalus.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal exome sequencing provides a high incremental diagnostic yield in fetuses with CNS abnormalities with optimal yields in cases with multiple CNS anomalies, particularly those affecting the midline, posterior fossa and cortex.

Outcome and etiology of fetal pleural effusion, fetal ascites and hydrops fetalis after fetal intervention: retrospective observational cohort from a single institution

OBJECTIVES

Non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) is the pathological accumulation of fluids in fetal compartments, without maternal isoimmunization. Fetal interventions (e.g. shunting, fetal paracentesis, fetal thoracocentesis, fetal pleurodesis) are used to alleviate fluid accumulations, but the outcome is uncertain because the underlying causes of NIHF vary. We aimed to explore the etiology and long-term outcome of NIHF after fetal intervention.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of fetuses with NIHF, defined by the presence of fetal ascites, pleural or pericardial effusion, skin edema or cystic hygroma, or a combination of these features, who underwent intervention at our institution during the period 2012-2021. Clinical surveillance, genetic analysis and viral infection screening were used to define the etiology. Chart reviews and telephone interviews were conducted to assess the long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 55 fetuses were enrolled and 46 cases had final follow-up data after delivery. Etiology was identified in 33 cases, including four for which the underlying causes were not identified initially using small-gene-panel tests but which were later diagnosed with monogenic disorders by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Twenty-three cases with follow-up survived, having a follow-up period of 2-11 years at the time of writing, of which 17 were healthy. All 11 cases initially presenting as congenital chylothorax survived with favorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The etiologies of NIHF are heterogeneous, and the long-term (spanning 2-11 years) outcome of fetal intervention varies, according to the underlying etiology, with cases caused by congenital chylothorax having the best prognosis. Genome-wide tests, such as WES, may be helpful in determining the underlying condition in cases caused by a genetic disorder, and this may affect fetal therapy approaches in the future. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Incremental yield of whole-genome sequencing over chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing for congenital anomalies in prenatal period and infancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

First, to determine the incremental yield of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) over quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR)/chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with and without exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses, neonates and infants with a congenital anomaly that was or could have been detected on prenatal ultrasound. Second, to evaluate the turnaround time (TAT) and quantity of DNA required for testing using these pathways.

METHODS

This review was registered prospectively in December 2022. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDLINE (Web of Science), The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched electronically (January 2010 to December 2022). Inclusion criteria were cohort studies including three or more fetuses, neonates or infants with (i) one or more congenital anomalies; (ii) an anomaly which was or would have been detectable on prenatal ultrasound; and (iii) negative QF-PCR and CMA. In instances in which the CMA result was unavailable, all cases of causative pathogenic copy number variants > 50 kb were excluded, as these would have been detectable on standard prenatal CMA. Pooled incremental yield was determined using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins' I2 test. Subanalyses were performed based on pre- or postnatal cohorts, cases with multisystem anomalies and those meeting the NHS England prenatal ES inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies incorporating 902 eligible cases were included, of which eight (44.4%) studies focused on prenatal cohorts, incorporating 755 cases, and the remaining studies focused on fetuses undergoing postmortem testing or neonates/infants with congenital structural anomalies, constituting the postnatal cohort. The incremental yield of WGS over QF-PCR/CMA was 26% (95% CI, 18-36%) (I2  = 86%), 16% (95% CI, 9-24%) (I2  = 85%) and 39% (95% CI, 27-51%) (I2  = 53%) for all, prenatal and postnatal cases, respectively. The incremental yield increased in cases in which sequencing was performed in line with the NHS England prenatal ES criteria (32% (95% CI, 22-42%); I2  = 70%) and in those with multisystem anomalies (30% (95% CI, 19-43%); I2  = 65%). The incremental yield of WGS for variants of uncertain significance (VUS) was 18% (95% CI, 7-33%) (I2  = 74%). The incremental yield of WGS over QF-PCR/CMA and ES was 1% (95% CI, 0-4%) (I2  = 47%). The pooled median TAT of WGS was 18 (range, 1-912) days, and the quantity of DNA required was 100 ± 0 ng for WGS and 350 ± 50 ng for QF-PCR/CMA and ES (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

While WGS in cases with congenital anomaly holds great promise, its incremental yield over ES is yet to be demonstrated. However, the laboratory pathway for WGS requires less DNA with a potentially faster TAT compared with sequential QF-PCR/CMA and ES. There was a relatively high rate of VUS using WGS. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Access to prenatal exome sequencing for fetal malformations: A qualitative landscape analysis in the US

OBJECTIVE

There is increasing evidence supporting the clinical utility of next generation sequencing for identifying fetal genetic disorders. However, there are limited data on the demand for and accessibility of these tests, as well as payer coverage in the prenatal context. We sought to identify clinician perspectives on the utility of prenatal exome sequencing (ES) and on equitable access to genomic technologies for the care of pregnancies complicated by fetal structural anomalies.

METHOD

We conducted two focus group discussions and six interviews with a total of 13 clinicians (11 genetic counselors; 2 Maternal Fetal Medicine/Geneticists) from U.S. academic centers and community clinics.

RESULTS

Participants strongly supported ES for prenatal diagnostic testing in pregnancies with fetal structural anomalies. Participants emphasized the value of prenatal ES as an opportunity for a continuum of care before, during, and after a pregnancy, not solely as informing decisions about abortions. Cost and coverage of the test was the main access barrier, and research was the main pathway to access ES in academic centers.

CONCLUSION

Further integrating the perspectives of additional key stakeholders are important for understanding clinical utility, developing policies and practices to address access barriers, and assuring equitable provision of prenatal diagnostic testing.

Isolated non-immune hydrops fetalis: an observational study on complete spontaneous resolution, perinatal outcome, and long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to investigate spontaneous resolution and postnatal outcome in non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF). We specifically studied NIHF cases that occurred without any other anomalies in the prenatal diagnostic workup, defined as isolated NIHF (iNIHF).

METHODS

To identify iNIHF we retrospectively classified prenatal findings of 700 NIHF singletons, diagnosed in our prenatal referral center between 1997 and 2016. We studied the occurrence of prenatal resolution in iNIHF and linked it to the perinatal outcome. We obtained long-term outcome by contacting the parents, children, and the pediatricians and listed all functional and structural anomalies and temporary logopedic, psychosocial and motoric impairments.

RESULTS

Among 70 iNIHF cases, 54 (77.1%) resolved completely prenatally. The baby-take-home rate was 98.1% in these cases. In contrast, the baby-take-home rate in the subgroup without complete resolution was 25.0%. We achieved pediatric long-term outcome in 27 of 57 survivors (47.4%) of iNIHF with a mean follow-up period of 10.9 years. Among these 27 children, fetal hydrops had completely resolved prenatally in 26 cases and had regressed to a mild effusion in one case. In the pediatric development, two children had significant functional impairment and two children showed recurrent skin edema.

CONCLUSION

Complete spontaneous resolution was the most common intrauterine course of iNIHF in our collective. Completely resolved iNIHF had a favorable perinatal outcome in our study. Our data on the long-term outcomes are consistent with the assumption of an increased rate of functional impairments.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Internal study number of Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf: 6177R. Date of registration: December 2017.

Diagnostic yield from prenatal exome sequencing for non-immune hydrops fetalis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) has multiple genetic etiologies diagnosable by exome sequencing (ES). We evaluated the yield of prenatal ES for NIHF, and the contribution of additional clinical findings and history. Systematic review was performed with PROSPERO tag 232951 using CINAHL, PubMed, and Ovid MEDLINE from January 1, 2000 through December 1, 2021. Selected studies performed ES to augment standard prenatal diagnostic approaches. Cases meeting a strict NIHF phenotype were tabulated with structured data imputed from papers or requested from authors. Genetic variants and diagnostic outcomes were harmonized across studies using current ACMG and ClinGen variant classification guidelines. Thirty-one studies reporting 445 NIHF cases had a 37% (95% CI: 32%-41%) diagnostic rate. There was no significant difference between isolated NIHF and NIHF with fetal malformations or between recurrent and simplex cases. Diagnostic rate was higher for consanguineous than non-consanguineous cases. Disease categories included RASopathies (24%), neuromuscular (21%), metabolic (17%), lymphatic (13%), other syndromes (9%), cardiovascular (5%), hematologic (2%), skeletal (2%), and other categories (7%). Inheritance patterns included recessive (55%), dominant (41%), and X-linked (4%). ES should be considered in the diagnostic workup of NIHF with and without associated ultrasound findings regardless of history of recurrence or consanguinity.

A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series

Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.

Implementation of Public Funded Genome Sequencing in Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies

With the advancements in prenatal diagnostics, genome sequencing is now incorporated into clinical use to maximize the diagnostic yield following uninformative conventional tests (karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis). Hong Kong started publicly funded prenatal genomic sequencing as a sequential test in the investigation of fetal structural anomalies in April 2021. The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance and usefulness of this new service over one year. We established a web-based multidisciplinary team to facilitate case selection among the expert members. We retrospectively analyzed the fetal phenotypes, test results, turnaround time and clinical impact in the first 15 whole exome sequencing and 14 whole genome sequencing. Overall, the molecular diagnostic rate was 37.9% (11/29). De novo autosomal dominant disorders accounted for 72.7% (8/11), inherited autosomal recessive disorders for 18.2% (2/11), and inherited X-linked disorders for 9.1% (1/11). The median turnaround time for ongoing pregnancy was 19.5 days (range, 13-31 days). Our study showed an overall clinical impact of 55.2% (16/29), which influenced reproductive decision-making in four cases, guided perinatal management in two cases and helped future family planning in ten cases. In conclusion, our findings support the important role of genome sequencing services in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies in a population setting. It is important to adopt a multidisciplinary team approach to support the comprehensive genetic service.

Cost-Effectiveness of Exome Sequencing versus Targeted Gene Panels for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Effusions and Non-Immune Hydrops Fetalis

BACKGROUND

Although exome sequencing has a greater overall diagnostic yield than targeted gene panels in the evaluation of nonimmune hydrops fetalis and fetal effusions, the cost-effectiveness of this approach is not known.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the costs and outcomes of targeted gene panels vs exome sequencing for prenatally diagnosed nonimmune hydrops fetalis and fetal effusions when next-generation sequencing is pursued following nondiagnostic standard nonimmune hydrops fetalis evaluations, including karyotype or chromosomal microarray.

STUDY DESIGN

A decision-analytical model was designed using TreeAge Pro to compare 10 genetic testing strategies, including a single test only (RASopathy, metabolic, or nonimmune hydrops fetalis-targeted gene panel or exome sequencing), sequential testing (RASopathy panel followed by nonimmune hydrops fetalis panel, metabolic panel followed by nonimmune hydrops fetalis panel, RASopathy panel followed by exome sequencing, metabolic panel followed by exome sequencing, and nonimmune hydrops fetalis panel followed by exome sequencing), and no additional genetic testing. Our theoretical cohort included cases with normal karyotype and/or microarray and excluded cases of alloimmunization and congenital viral infections. As nonimmune hydrops fetalis and fetal effusions can present throughout gestation, whereas pregnancy management options vary depending on gestational age, outcomes were calculated for 3 time intervals: 10 to 18, 18 to 22, and >22 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. Additional outcomes included termination of pregnancy, stillbirth, neonatal death, and neonates born with mild, moderate, and severe or profound disease phenotypes. The cost-effectiveness threshold was $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year.

RESULTS

Among women <18 weeks of gestation, exome sequencing alone was the dominant strategy associated with the lowest costs ($221 million) and the highest quality-adjusted life years (10,288). Strategies with exome sequencing alone or as a sequential test resulted in more terminations but fewer stillbirths, neonatal deaths (NNDs), and affected infants than strategies without exome sequencing. Among women between 18 and 22 weeks of gestation, exome sequencing alone was also associated with the lowest costs ($188 million) and the highest quality-adjusted life years (8734), and similar trends were observed in pregnancy outcomes. Among patients >22 weeks of gestations, when termination was not available, exome sequencing was associated with lower costs ($300 million) and the highest quality-adjusted life years (8492). Exome sequencing was cost-effective up to a cost per test of $50,451 at <18 weeks of gestation, $50,423 at 18 to 22 weeks of gestation, and $9530 at >22 weeks of gestation. Targeted genetic panels and exome sequencing were cost-effective strategies compared with no additional genetic testing.

CONCLUSION

For cases of nonimmune hydrops fetalis and fetal effusions with nondiagnostic karyotype or microarray, next-generation sequencing was cost-effective compared with a strategy without additional genetic testing. For those that undergo next-generation sequencing, exome sequencing was the cost-effective strategy compared with all other testing strategies using targeted gene panels, leading to lower costs and fewer adverse perinatal outcomes. Exome sequencing was cost-effective in a setting without the option for pregnancy termination. These data supported the routine use of exome sequencing when next-generation sequencing is pursued for establishing a genetic diagnosis underlying otherwise unexplained nonimmune hydrops fetalis and fetal effusions.

Current Perspectives of Prenatal Cell-free DNA Screening in Clinical Management of First-Trimester Septated Cystic Hygroma

First-trimester septated cystic hygroma occurs in approximately 1 in 268 pregnancies and has long been associated with a markedly increased risk of fetal aneuploidy and, among euploid fetuses, an increased risk of structural anomalies primarily affecting the cardiac and skeletal systems. Invasive prenatal diagnosis – chorionic villus sampling and/or amniocentesis – encompasses the time-honored clinical tools for the next step in management following prenatal sonographic diagnosis of first-trimester septated cystic hygroma. Currently, prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for fetal aneuploidy with select microdeletions is gradually replacing the considerably less sensitive, and labor-intensive combined first-trimester screening. These new technologies have opened potential new venues in the clinical management of this ominous late first-trimester sonographic diagnosis. Advances in cfDNA technologies are now permitting detection of chromosomal copy number variants (CNV) larger than 7Mb across genome and select serious single-gene disorders (mainly impacting skeletal and neurological development), affecting quality of life and may benefit from medical and/or surgical management. This commentary will address the available non-invasive prenatal screening technologies, which clearly enhance immediate genetic analysis modalities applicable in the presence of the complex sonographic finding of first-trimester septated cystic hygroma.

Diagnostic yield using whole-genome sequencing and in-silico panel of 281 genes associated with non-immune hydrops fetalis in clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic yield of clinical whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in prenatally diagnosed non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 23 fetuses with prenatally diagnosed NIHF, negative for trisomies and copy-number variants, referred for analysis by WGS with an in-silico panel of 281 genes associated with hydrops fetalis. Due to identification of a high proportion of causative variants in the HRAS gene in the main cohort, Sanger sequencing of HRAS was performed in a replication cohort, consisting of 24 additional fetuses with NIHF that were negative for trisomies and copy-number variants and had not undergone WGS.

RESULTS

Of the 23 fetuses in the main cohort, a molecular diagnosis was achieved in 12 (52.2%). Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in seven genes: HRAS (n = 5), RIT1 (n = 2), FOXP3 (n = 1), GLB1 (n = 1), MAP2K1 (n = 1), PTPN11 (n = 1) and RASA1 (n = 1). The inheritance pattern of the 12 causative variants was autosomal dominant in 10 cases (HRAS, MAP2K1, PTPN11, RASA1, RIT1), autosomal recessive in one (GLB1) and X-linked recessive in one (FOXP3). Of the 24 fetuses in the replication cohort, a pathogenic variant in HRAS was identified in one, resulting in an overall frequency of causative HRAS variants of 12.8% (6/47) in our two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a diagnostic yield of 52% with clinical WGS in NIHF using an in-silico panel of 281 genes. However, the high diagnostic yield may be attributed to the small sample size and possible over-representation of severe phenotypes in the included fetuses. Bearing in mind that chromosomal abnormalities were excluded in our cohorts, a detection rate of up to 75% is possible in prenatally diagnosed NIHF when WGS analysis includes calling of chromosomal aberrations. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

A single center experience in 90 cases with nonimmune hydrops fetalis: diagnostic categories ‒ mostly aneuploidy and still often idiopathic

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) is still poor with a high mortality and morbidity rate despite progress in perinatal care. This study was designed to investigate etiology and outcome of NIHF.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 90 NIHF cases from 2007 to 2019 was conducted at University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. Demographics, genetic results, prenatal and postnatal outcomes including one year survival as well as autopsy data were extracted. Etiology of hydrops was classified using 13 previously established categories. In 4 patients observed between 2016 and 2019, we used a next-generation-sequencing (NGS) panel for genetic evaluation.

RESULTS

Ninety NIHF cases were identified, with a median gestational age (GA) at diagnosis of 14 weeks. There were 25 live-born infants with a median GA of 34 weeks at birth, 15 patients survived to one year. There was aneuploidy in more than one third of the cases. All 90 cases were subclassified into etiologic categories with chromosomal 35, idiopathic 15, syndromic 11, cardiovascular 9, inborn errors of metabolism 6, lymphatic dysplasia 3, thoracic 3, infections 3, gastrointestinal 3 and hematologic 2. The NGS panel was used in 4 cases and 4 diagnoses were made.

CONCLUSIONS

In 90 cases with NIHF we identified an aneuploidy in more than one third of the cases. Improved techniques, such as possibly specific genetic analysis, could reduce the high rate of unexplained cases of NIHF.

Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation

Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3–5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF-PCR and microarray techniques, however monogenic disorders are not diagnosed by these tests. Next generation sequencing as a secondary prenatal genetic test offers additional diagnostic yield for congenital abnormalities deemed to be potentially associated with an underlying genetic aetiology, as demonstrated by two large cohorts: the ‘Prenatal assessment of genomes and exomes’ (PAGE) study and ‘Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study’ performed at Columbia University in the US. These were large and prospective studies but relatively ‘unselected’ congenital malformations, with little Clinical Genetics input to the pre-test selection process. This review focuses on the incremental yield of next generation sequencing in single system congenital malformations, using evidence from the PAGE, Columbia and subsequent cohorts, with particularly high yields in those fetuses with cardiac and neurological anomalies, large nuchal translucency and non-immune fetal hydrops (of unknown aetiology). The total additional yield gained by exome sequencing in congenital heart disease was 12.7%, for neurological malformations 13.8%, 13.1% in increased nuchal translucency and 29% in non-immune fetal hydrops. This demonstrates significant incremental yield with exome sequencing in single-system anomalies and supports next generation sequencing as a secondary genetic test in routine clinical care of fetuses with congenital abnormalities.

Evolving fetal phenotypes and clinical impact of progressive prenatal exome sequencing pathways: cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine (1) the diagnostic yield and turnaround time (TAT) of two consecutive prenatal exome sequencing (ES) pathways, (2) the evolution of the fetal phenotype and (3) the clinical impact of detecting causative pathogenic variants and incidental findings.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected fetal cases that underwent trio ES in the presence of a structural anomaly and normal chromosomal microarray testing in the West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham, UK. The study included two phases: (1) between July 2018 and October 2020, the clinical pathway from the Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) study was adopted and involved prenatal trio ES based on a panel of 1542 development disorder genes and case selection by a multidisciplinary team; (2) between October 2020 and July 2021, prenatal trio ES investigation was based on the National Health Service (NHS) England R21 pathway, with definitive inclusion criteria and a panel of 1205 prenatally relevant genes. Deep phenotyping was performed throughout pregnancy and postnatally.

RESULTS

A total of 54 cases were included. The diagnostic yield before vs after R21 pathway implementation was 28.0% (7/25) and 55.2% (16/29), respectively (P = 0.04). The respective values for mean TAT were 54.0 days (range, 14-213 days) and 14.2 days (range, 3-29 days). In cases in which a causative pathogenic variant was identified and in which the pregnancy reached the third trimester, additional anomalies were detected between the second and third trimesters in 73.3% (11/15) of cases, predominantly secondary to progressive hydropic features (3/11 (27.3%)), arthrogryposis (3/11 (27.3%)) or brain anomaly (2/11 (18.2%)). In three cases, a variant of uncertain significance was reclassified to likely pathogenic based on postnatal information. Detection of a causative pathogenic variant had a significant clinical impact in 78.3% (18/23) of cases, most frequently affecting decision-making regarding the course of the pregnancy and neonatal management (7/18 (38.9%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal ES using the NHS England R21 pathway showed great promise when applied to this cohort, allowing a genetic diagnosis to be made in over half of preselected cases with a fetal structural anomaly on ultrasound. Monitoring and real-time updating of fetal phenotype and reclassification of variants based on postnatal findings is vital to increase the clinical impact that is already evident from this emerging genomic technology. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Prenatal phenotyping: A community effort to enhance the Human Phenotype Ontology

Technological advances in both genome sequencing and prenatal imaging are increasing our ability to accurately recognize and diagnose Mendelian conditions prenatally. Phenotype-driven early genetic diagnosis of fetal genetic disease can help to strategize treatment options and clinical preventive measures during the perinatal period, to plan in utero therapies, and to inform parental decision-making. Fetal phenotypes of genetic diseases are often unique and at present are not well understood; more comprehensive knowledge about prenatal phenotypes and computational resources have an enormous potential to improve diagnostics and translational research. The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) has been widely used to support diagnostics and translational research in human genetics. To better support prenatal usage, the HPO consortium conducted a series of workshops with a group of domain experts in a variety of medical specialties, diagnostic techniques, as well as diseases and phenotypes related to prenatal medicine, including perinatal pathology, musculoskeletal anomalies, neurology, medical genetics, hydrops fetalis, craniofacial malformations, cardiology, neonatal-perinatal medicine, fetal medicine, placental pathology, prenatal imaging, and bioinformatics. We expanded the representation of prenatal phenotypes in HPO by adding 95 new phenotype terms under the Abnormality of prenatal development or birth (HP:0001197) grouping term, and revised definitions, synonyms, and disease annotations for most of the 152 terms that existed before the beginning of this effort. The expansion of prenatal phenotypes in HPO will support phenotype-driven prenatal exome and genome sequencing for precision genetic diagnostics of rare diseases to support prenatal care.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, where karyotype/chromosomal microarray (CMA) is normal.

Methods

Following electronic searches of four databases, we included studies with ≥10 structurally abnormal fetuses undergoing ES or whole genome sequencing. The incremental diagnostic yield of ES over CMA/karyotype was calculated and pooled in a meta‐analysis. Sub‐group analyses investigated effects of case selection and fetal phenotype on diagnostic yield.

Results

We identified 72 reports from 66 studies, representing 4350 fetuses. The pooled incremental yield of ES was 31% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26%–36%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield was significantly higher for cases pre‐selected for likelihood of monogenic aetiology compared to unselected cases (42% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield differed significantly between phenotypic sub‐groups, ranging from 53% (95% CI 42%–63%, p < 0.0001) for isolated skeletal abnormalities, to 2% (95% CI 0%–5%, p = 0.04) for isolated increased nuchal translucency.

Conclusion

Prenatal ES provides a diagnosis in an additional 31% of structurally abnormal fetuses when CMA/karyotype is non‐diagnostic. The expected diagnostic yield depends on the body system(s) affected and can be optimised by pre‐selection of cases following multi‐disciplinary review to determine that a monogenic cause is likely.

What's already known about this topic?

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) increases genetic diagnoses in fetuses with structural abnormalities and a normal karyotype and chromosomal microarray.

Published diagnostic yields from ES are varied and may be influenced by study size, case selection and fetal phenotype.

What does this study add?

This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of the literature to date and investigates the diagnostic yield of ES for a range of isolated system anomalies, to support clinical decision‐making on how to offer prenatal ES.

Exome sequencing vs targeted gene panels for the evaluation of nonimmune hydrops fetalis

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used in prenatal diagnosis. Targeted gene panels and exome sequencing are both available, but the comparative diagnostic yields of these approaches are not known.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing with the simulated application of commercial targeted gene panels in a large cohort of fetuses with nonimmune hydrops fetalis.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a cohort study of exome sequencing for nonimmune hydrops fetalis, in which recruitment, exome sequencing, and phenotype-driven variant analysis were completed in 127 pregnancies with features of nonimmune hydrops fetalis. An Internet search was performed to identify commercial laboratories that offer targeted gene panels for the prenatal evaluation of nonimmune hydrops fetalis or for specific disorders associated with nonimmune hydrops fetalis using the terms "non-immune hydrops fetalis," "fetal non-immune hydrops," "hydrops," "cystic hygroma," "lysosomal storage disease," "metabolic disorder," "inborn error of metabolism," "RASopathy," and "Noonan." Our primary outcome was the proportion of all genetic variants identified through exome sequencing that would have been identified if a targeted gene panel had instead been used. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of genetic variants that would have been identified by type of targeted gene panel (general nonimmune hydrops fetalis, RASopathy, or metabolic) and the percent of variants of uncertain significance that would have been identified on the panels, assuming 100% analytical sensitivity and specificity of panels for variants in the included genes.

RESULTS

Exome sequencing identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in 37 of 127 cases (29%) in a total of 29 genes. A variant of uncertain significance, strongly suspected to be associated with the phenotype, was identified in another 12 cases (9%). We identified 7 laboratories that offer 10 relevant targeted gene panels; 6 are described as RASopathy panels, 3 as nonimmune hydrops fetalis panels, and 1 as a metabolic panel. The median number of genes included on each of these panels is 22, ranging from 11 to 148. Had a nonimmune hydrops fetalis targeted gene panel been used instead of exome sequencing, 13 to 15 of the 29 genes (45%-52%) identified in our nonimmune hydrops fetalis cohort would have been sequenced, and 19 to 24 of the pathogenic variants (51%-62%) would have been detected. The yield was predicted to be the lowest with the metabolic panel (11%) and the highest with the largest nonimmune hydrops fetalis panel (62%). The largest nonimmune hydrops fetalis targeted gene panel would have had a diagnostic yield of 18% compared with 29% with exome sequencing. The exome sequencing platform used provided 30× or more coverage for all of the exons on the commercial targeted gene panels, supporting our assumption of 100% analytical sensitivity for exome sequencing.

CONCLUSION

The broader coverage of exome sequencing for genetically heterogeneous disorders, such as nonimmune hydrops fetalis, made it a superior alternative to targeted gene panel testing.

How genomics is changing the practice of prenatal testing

New genomic laboratory technology namely microarrays and high throughput sequencing (HTS) as well as a steady progress in sonographic image capture and processing have changed the practice of prenatal diagnosis during the last decade fundamentally. Pregnancies at high risk for common trisomies are reliably identified by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and expert sonography has greatly improved the assessment of the fetal phenotype. Preconceptional comprehensive carrier screening using HTS is available for all parents, if they should wish to do so. A definite fetal diagnosis, however, will still require invasive testing for most conditions. Chromosomal microarrays (CMA) have greatly enhanced the resolution in the detection of chromosome anomalies and other causal copy number variations (CNV). Gene panel or whole exome sequencing (WES) is becoming the routine follow up of many anomalies detected by ultrasound after CNVs have been excluded. The benefits and limitations of the various screening as well as diagnostic options are perceived as complex by many who find it challenging to cope with the need for immediate choices. The communication of facts to ensure an informed decision making is obviously a growing challenge with the advent of the new genomic testing options. This contribution provides an overview of the current practice and policies in Switzerland.

Utility of fetal whole exome sequencing in the etiological evaluation and outcome of nonimmune hydrops fetalis

INTRODUCTION

Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) has varied etiology. We assessed the etiological spectrum and evaluated the utility of fetal whole exome sequencing (fWES) for the diagnosis of NIHF.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated antenatally diagnosed fetuses with NIHF between July 2018 and December 2019 according to the routine diagnostic algorithm. Fetuses that remained undiagnosed after routine NIHF workup were subjected to fetal chromosomal microarray and/or WES. Pregnancies were followed up for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 45 fetuses, consanguinity and recurrent hydrops fetalis were observed in 13.3% (6/45) and 28.8% (13/45), respectively. Overall, an etiological diagnosis was possible in 75.5% (34/45) of fetuses, while the cause remained unknown in 24.4% (11/45). A genetic etiology was identified in 46.6% (21/45): aneuploidy and monogenic disorders in 28.8% (13/45) and 17.8% (8/45), respectively. fWES on 19 fetuses detected disease-causing variants in 42.1% (8/19). Nine novel variants were detected in RAPSN, ASCC1, NEB, PKD1L1, GUSB, and PIEZO1. Only 8.8% (4/45) of the cohort survived without morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the etiological spectrum and the disease-causing variants in an Indian cohort of hydropic fetuses.