The effect of bowel resection on survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leakage in intestinal resections for advanced ovarian cancer (EDMOCS)

INTRODUCTION

Serum levels of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been used to predict anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery, but information is scarce in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) surgery with bowel resection. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of procalcitonin and CRP in detecting anastomotic leakage after AOC surgery with bowel resection. The study also aimed to determine the optimal postoperative reference values and the best day for evaluating these markers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, observational and multicentric trial included 92 patients with AOC undergoing debulking surgery with bowel resection between 2017 and 2020 in 10 reference hospitals in Spain. Procalcitonin and CRP levels were measured at baseline and on postoperative days 1-6. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of procalcitonin and CRP at each postoperative day. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Anastomotic leakage was detected in six patients (6.5%). Procalcitonin and CRP values were consistently higher in patients with anastomotic leakage at all postoperative days. The maximum area under the curve (AUC) for procalcitonin was observed at postoperative day 1 (AUC = 0.823) with a cutoff value of 3.8 ng/mL (83.3% sensitivity, 81.3% specificity). For CRP, the maximum AUC was found at postoperative day 3 (AUC = 0.833) with a cutoff level of 30.5 mg/dL (100% sensitivity, 80.4% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein are potential biomarkers for early detection of anastomotic leakage after ovarian cancer surgery with bowel resection. Further prospective studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these findings.

Optimal debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients: MRI may predict the necessity of rectosigmoid resection

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether MRI can predict the necessity of rectosigmoid resection (RR) for optimal debulking surgery (ODS) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients and to compare the predictive accuracy of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) MRI.

METHODS

The MRI of 82 OC were retrospectively analyzed, including six bowel signs (length, transverse axis, thickness, circumference, muscularis involvement, and submucosal edema) and four para-intestinal signs (vaginal, parametrial, ureteral, and sacro-recto-genital septum involvement). The parameters reflecting the degree of muscularis involvement were measured. Patients were divided into non-RR and RR groups based on the operation and postoperative outcomes. The independent predictors of the need for RR were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Imaging for 82 patients was evaluated (67 without and 15 with NACT). Submucosal edema and muscularis involvement (OR 13.33 and 8.40, respectively) were independent predictors of the need for RR, with sensitivities of 83.3% and 94.4% and specificities of 93.9% and 81.6%, respectively. Among the parameters reflecting the degree of muscularis involvement, circumference ≥ 3/12 had the highest prediction accuracy, increasing the specificity from 81.6% for muscularis involvement only to 98.0%, with only a slight decrease in sensitivity (from 94.4% to 88.9%). The predictive sensitivities of pre-NACT and post-NACT MRI were 100.0% and 12.5%, respectively, and the specificities were 85.7% and 100.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI analysis of rectosigmoid muscularis involvement and its circumference can help predict the necessity of RR in OC patients, and pre-NACT MRI may be more suitable for evaluation.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

We analyzed preoperative pelvic MRI in OC patients. Our findings suggest that MRI has predictive potential for identifying patients who require RR to achieve ODS.

KEY POINTS

The need for RR must be determined to optimize treatment for OC patients. Muscularis involvement circumference ≥ 3/12 could help predict RR. Pre-NACT MRI may be superior to post-NACT MRI in predicting RR.

Survival impact of bowel resection in patients with FIGO stage II-IV ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

To compare the effect of bowel resection vs stripping on the clinical outcomes of patients with FIGO II-IV ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with FIGO II-IV ovarian cancer who suffered from bowel involvement and underwent cytoreductive surgery between January 2014 and March 2022. Patients' survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twelve patients were included. 48 patients underwent bowel resection (BR), and 364 patients underwent bowel tumor stripping (BTS). The BR group had longer operative duration, hospital stay, time to post-operative chemotherapy, and more intraoperative bleeding. The median PFS was 37 months (95% CI 12-62) in BTS compared to 25 months (95% CI 10-40) in BR among patients who achieved R0 resection (p = 0.590). Among those with R1 resection, the median PFS in BST was 23 months (95% CI 16-30) and that in BR was 15 months (95% CI 12-18, p = 0.136); moreover, a favorable median PFS was observed in BTS with residual bowel lesions (23 months, 95% CI 14-32), compared to BR (15 months, 95% CI 12-18, p = 0.144). Multivariate analysis indicated that FIGO stage, PCI, cytoreduction time and residual lesions were independent prognostic factors of PFS.

CONCLUSION

For patients with FIGO stage II-IV ovarian cancer with bowel implicated, bowel resection is necessary to achieve complete removal to improve the survival. If complete resection was judged unfeasible, cautious decision of bowel resection is required. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy might reduce the ratio of bowel resection for some with mesenteric involvement.

Parenchymal liver metastasis in advanced ovarian cancer: Can bowel involvement influence the frequency and the related mortality rate?

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study estimates the frequency of parenchymal liver metastasis (PLM) and the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with FIGO Stage IIIC-IV Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) with bowel involvement.

STUDY DESIGN

Between November 2008 and July 2020, all consecutive patients with FIGO Stage IIIC-IV EOC who underwent Visceral Peritoneal Debulking and bowel resection(s) at the Gynaecological Oncology Unit of "Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)", Aviano, Italy, without evidence of PLM at pre-operative imaging assessment, were included in the study. The presence and the time of the onset of PLM during the follow-up period were detected by diagnostic imaging (CT-scan, Ultrasound and PET). The OS of patients with and without PLM was compared. Considering the bowel's layers, the association between depth of bowel involvement, number of PLM, and the relative OS rate was evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 47.3 (12-138) months. PLM occurred in 24/72 (33.0%) cases; the average onset time of PLM was 13 months. PLM was associated with increased significant mortality risk and an average OS of 33.2 versus 56.8 months (p < 0.001). The risk of developing PLM correlated directly with the depth of bowel involvement. However, there was no statistical difference between the layers in terms of OS at the end of the observational period.

CONCLUSIONS

PLM occurred more frequently among patients with EOC and bowel involvement. The PLM arose within 15 months of follow-up and the frequency increased according to the depth of involvement. Particularly, the difference is remarkably higher starting from muscular layer where the total number of PLM arose significantly (p = 0.02). Although there was no significant difference among the infiltrated bowel layers in terms of OS, patients with bowel involvement up to muscular had a dramatic reduction in the OS rate during the first 30 months of follow-up.

Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological malignancies. Opinions differ regarding the role of ultra-radical (extensive) cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity associated with ultra-radical/extensive surgery in the management of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 11), MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid up to November 2021. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies (NRS), analysed using multivariate methods, that compared ultra-radical/extensive and standard surgery in women with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We identified three NRS and conducted meta-analyses where possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three retrospective observational studies for inclusion in the review. Two studies included women exclusively undergoing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and the other study including both PDS and interval debulking surgical (IDS) procedures. All studies were at critical risk of bias due to retrospective and non-randomised study designs. Meta-analysis of two studies, assessing 397 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures, as part of PDS, may have a lower risk of mortality compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.82; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis including women with more-extensive disease (carcinomatosis) (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; n = 283, very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. One study reported a comparison of radical versus standard surgical procedures associated with both PDS and IDS procedures, but a multivariate analysis was only undertaken for disease-free survival (DFS) and therefore the certainty of the evidence was not assessable for overall survival (OS) and remains very low. The lack of reporting of OS meant the study was at high risk of bias for selective reporting of outcomes. One study, 203 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures as part of PDS may have a lower risk of disease progression or death compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis in one study including women with carcinomatosis (adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82; n = 139; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. A combined analysis in one study found that women who underwent radical procedures (using both PDS and IDS) may have an increased chance of disease progression or death than those who received standard surgery (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; n = 527; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. In absolute and unadjusted terms, the DFS was 19.3 months in the standard surgery group, 15.8 in the PDS group and 15.9 months in the IDS group. All studies were at critical risk of bias and we only identified very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes reported in the review. Perioperative mortality, adverse events and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were either not reported or inadequately reported in the included studies. Two studies reported perioperative mortality (death within 30 days of surgery), but they did not use any statistical adjustment. In total, there were only four deaths within 30 days of surgery in both studies. All were observed in the standard surgery group, but we did not report a risk ratio (RR) to avoid potentially misleading results with so few deaths and very low-certainty evidence. Similarly, one study reported postoperative morbidity, but the authors did not use any statistical adjustment. Postoperative morbidity occurred more commonly in women who received ultra-radical surgery compared to standard surgery, but the certainty of the evidence was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found only very low-certainty evidence comparing ultra-radical surgery and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer. The evidence was limited to retrospective, NRSs and so is at critical risk of bias. The results may suggest that ultra-radical surgery could result in improved OS, but results are based on very few women who were chosen to undergo each intervention, rather than a randomised study and intention-to-treat analysis, and so the evidence is very uncertain. Results for progression/DFS were inconsistent and evidence was sparse. QoL and morbidity was incompletely or not reported in the three included studies. A separate prognostic review assessing residual disease as a prognostic factor in this area has been addressed elsewhere, which demonstrates the prognostic effect of macroscopic debulking to no macroscopic residual disease. In order to aid existing guidelines, the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced-stage ovarian cancer could be addressed through the conduct of a sufficiently powered, RCT comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery, or well-designed NRSs, if this is not possible.

Rectosigmoid sparing en bloc pelvic resection for fixed ovarian tumors: Surgical technique and perioperative and oncologic outcomes

Purpose

Patients with advanced ovarian cancer often undergo en bloc rectosigmoid resection with total hysterectomy to completely debulk the pelvis. We describe a unique rectosigmoid sparing en bloc pelvic resection technique for fixed ovarian tumors infiltrating the colon wall.

Methods

From July 2020 to June 2021, 20 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) underwent rectosigmoid sparing en bloc pelvic resection successfully at our institution. We summarized our surgical technique and the peri-operative and oncological outcomes.

Results

Twenty cases with bowel infiltration achieved en bloc pelvic resection with rectosigmoid tumorectomy in a centripetal fashion. Only two patients required mucosal repair. None of the patients experienced any complications associated with en bloc resection. No pelvic recurrence occurred within the median follow-up time of 12 months.

Conclusion

Rectosigmoid sparing en bloc pelvic resection may be feasible for select patients with fixed ovarian tumors infiltrating the colon wall.

Computed tomographic enterography (CTE) in evaluating bowel involvement in patients with ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the utility of CTE in the evaluation of bowel invasion in patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

This observational study included 73 patients who received CTE before operation between September 2019 and December 2021. Two radiologists reviewed CTE images, focusing on the sites and depth of bowel involvement. Based on the findings during surgical exploration, we evaluated the diagnostic power, like sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+ LR), and negative likelihood ratio (- LR) of CTE. Additionally, the characteristic images of bowel involvement on CTE corresponding to surgical findings were shown in the study.

RESULTS

The rate of macroscopic bowel invasion in this cohort was 49.31% (36/73), of which eight patients had small bowel involvement, 17 patients had colon involvement and 27 patients had sigmoid-rectum involvement. CTE detected bowel invasion in the small intestine with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 87.50%, 92.31%, 58.33%, 98.36%, 91.78%; for colon, the statistics were 58.82%, 96.43%, 83.33%, 88.52%, 87.67% and for sigmoid-rectum 62.96%, 82.61%, 68.00%, 79.17%, 75.34%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CTE appeared a preferable diagnostic power on the small bowel and colon invasion in patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

The surgical outcomes and perioperative complications of bowel resection as part of debulking surgery of advanced ovarian cancer patients

Background

To review the utilization of bowel resection in ovarian cancer surgery in our institution.

Methods

All ovarian cancer patients who received bowel resection between 2006/01 and 2018/12 were identified. Postoperative morbidities were assessed according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC).

Results

There were 182 patients in the anastomosis group and 100 patients in the ostomy group, yielding a total of 282 patients. The median age was 57 years, and most patients had high-grade serous histology (88.7%). Forty-nine (17.3%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. During the operation, 78.7% of patients had ascites, and the median volume was 800 mL. Extensive bowel resection (at least two-segment) and upper abdominal operation were performed in 29 (10.2%) and 69 (24.4%) patients, respectively. The rectosigmoid colon was the most commonly resected (83.8%) followed by right hemicolectomy (5.9%) and small bowel resection (2.8%). No macroscopic residual disease was observed in 42.9% of the patients, whereas 87.9% had residual disease ≤ 1 cm. Among the entire cohort, 23.0% (65/282) experienced different complications. Severe complications (CDC 3–5) accounted for 9.2% of complications and were mostly categorized as pleural effusion requiring drainage (3.5%) followed by wound dehiscence requiring delayed repair in the operating room (1.8%). Nine patients experienced anastomotic leakage (AL): one in the ostomy group with extensive bowel resection and eight in the anastomosis group. The overall AL rate was 4.2% (9/212) per anastomosis.

Conclusions

The execution of bowel resection as part of debulking surgery in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer resulted in a severe morbidity rate of 9.2%.

Clinical Significance of Mesenteric Lymph Node Involvement in the Pattern of Liver Metastasis in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric lymph node (MLN) involvement is often observed in ovarian cancer (OC) with rectosigmoid invasion. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of MLN involvement in the pattern of liver metastasis in patients with OC.

METHODS

We included 85 stage II-IV OC patients who underwent primary or interval debulking surgery. Twenty-seven patients underwent rectosigmoid resection, whose status of MLN involvement was judged from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of resected specimens. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological characteristics, including MLN involvement, was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

MLN involvement was detected in 14/85 patients with stage II-IV OC. Residual tumor status, cytology of ascites, and MLN involvement were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.033, p = 0.014, and p = 0.008, respectively). When patients were classified into three groups (no MLN, one MLN, two or more MLNs), the number of MLNs involved corresponded to three distinct groups in PFS (p = 0.001). The 3-year cumulative incidence of liver metastasis of patients with MLN involvement was significantly higher than that of patients without MLN involvement (61.1% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001). MLN involvement was significantly associated with liver metastasis of hematogenous origin (p < 0.001) compared with peritoneal disseminated origin.

CONCLUSION

MLN involvement is an important prognostic factor in OC, predicting poor prognosis and liver metastasis of hematogenous origin.

Extrapelvic bowel resection and anastomosis in cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is known as the second most common cause of death among gynecologic cancers. Survival outcome has been reported to be significantly associated with the efforts to minimize residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. As ovarian cancer often invades the small and large bowel without boundary, bowel surgery has been a crucial part of the cytoreductive surgery to achieve complete tumor removal. The scope of surgical resections has progressively expanded to include small and large bowel resections, making advanced surgical skills essential for gynecologic oncologists. In this review, we discuss the extra-pelvic bowel resection in cytoreductive surgery, with a focus on the regional anatomy and surgical techniques.

Rectosigmoid resection during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: morbidity of gynecologic oncology vs. colorectal team

Objective

This study investigates the specific morbidity of rectosigmoid resection (RSR) during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in a consecutive series of patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer and compares the results of the colo-rectal vs. the gynaecologic oncology team.

Methods

All patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer who had VPD and RSR were included in the study. Between 2009 and 2013 all operations were performed by the gynecologic oncology team alone (group 1). Since 2013 the RSR was performed by the colorectal team together with the gynecologic oncologist (group 2). All pre-operative information and surgical details were compared to exclude significant bias. Intra- and post-operative morbidity events were recorded and compared between groups.

Results

One hundred and sixty-two patients had a RSR during VPD, 93 in group 1 and 69 in group 2. Groups were comparable for all pre-operative features other than: albumin (1<2) hemoglobin (2<1) and up-front surgery (1>2). Overall morbidity was 33% vs. 40% (p=0.53), bowel specific morbidity 11.8% vs. 11.5% (p=0.81), anastomotic leak 4.1% vs. 6.1% (p=0.43) and re-operation rate 9.6% vs. 6.1% (p=0.71) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. None of them were significantly different. The rate of bowel diversion was 36.5% in group 1 vs. 46.3% in group 2 (p=0.26).

Conclusions

Our study failed to demonstrate any significant difference in the morbidity rate of RSR based on the team performing the surgery. These data warrant further investigation as they are interesting with regards to education, finance, and medico-legal aspects.

Diagnostic flow-chart to identify bowel involvement in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: Can laparoscopy improve the accuracy of CT scan?

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the diagnostic power of CT scan combined with exploratory laparoscopy (EXL) at identifying large bowel involvement in patients with stage IIIC-IV primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) by comparing with the macroscopic surgical findings at laparotomy.

METHODS

All patients with FIGO Stage IIIC-IV EOC who had Visceral Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) were included in the study. Results of CT scan, EXL and laparotomy (LPT) with regards to the bowel involvement were prospectively recorded in an ad hoc study form. Setting LPT findings as the gold standard, positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT and EXL were calculated. In addition, the diagnostic power of the combination CT scan + EXL was investigated.

RESULTS

Ninety-four out of 177 patients (53.2%) had a bowel resection during VPD. CT-scan alone had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 56.7%, 72.4%, 70.8%, 58.5% and 63.8% respectively. EXL alone 84.4%, 93.8%, 93.8%, 84.3%, 88.8%. CT combined with EXL detected bowel involvement with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 87.5%, 70.4%, 77.8%, 82.6% and 79.6% and respectively. The combined tests showed a statistically significant improvement vs. CT scan alone (p < 0001) in sensitivity, NPV and accuracy, with non-significant difference in specificity and PPV.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-scan alone shows a limited diagnostic power at detecting large bowel involvement in patients with stage IIIC-IV EOC. The combination of CT scan with EXL increases the diagnostic power and enables to appropriately plan the bowel resection and consent the patients.

Multifactorial impact on the outcome of interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of multiple clinical features upon the outcome of interval cytoreductive surgery and thus upon the survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients receiving NACT followed by IDS between 2009 and 2017. Patients were analyzed according to the pre-NACT CA125, pre-IDS CA125, pre-IDS CA125 decline, patients' pre-IDS BMI, multisite bowel involvement and different working years of surgeons, for their influence upon the IDS outcome (e.g. optimal vs suboptimal) and the survival.

RESULTS

After interval debulking surgery following 1-6 cycles of NACT, all patients analyzed were identified as optimal (n = 113) and suboptimal (n = 47) based on patients' record. The PFS/OS were 21/68 months and 9/26 months in optimal and suboptimal groups, respectively (p = .000, p = .000). Although differential levels of pre-IDS CA125, pre-IDS CA125 decline, bowel involvement and surgeons' working years were found to be significantly different between the two groups, surgeons' working years and multisite bowel invasion were the independent factors for IDS outcome, and the latter one was also highly related to survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Following NACT, the rate of optimal IDS might be improved for patients without multisite bowel involvement. For those with bowel involvement, management strategy made by well-experienced surgeons might be a key factor for the outcome of IDS.

Comparison of posterior rectal dissection techniques during rectosigmoid colon resection as part of cytoreductive surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: Close rectal dissection versus total mesorectal excision

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of close rectal dissection (CRD) compared with those of total mesorectal excision (TME) as the posterior rectal dissection procedure during rectosigmoid colectomy performed as part of cytoreductive surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 163 patients who underwent posterior rectal dissection for rectosigmoid resection, including low anterior resection or subtotal colectomy, as part of ovarian cancer surgery from 2006 to 2018. The TME technique was mainly performed by colorectal surgeons, and the CRD technique preserving the mesorectal tissue was performed by an experienced gynecologic oncology surgeon. The patients were divided into the TME group and the CRD group, and their clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients with ovarian cancer underwent rectosigmoid colon resection. Among the patients, 87 (53.4%) underwent CRD and 76 (46.6%) underwent TME as the posterior rectal dissection technique. The disease severity according to FIGO stage (p = .390) and the residual disease status (p = .412) were not statistically different between the 2 groups. However, the postoperative incidences of anastomotic leakage (p = .045) and prolonged ileus (>7 days, p = .055) were higher in the TME group. The pelvic recurrence rate and progression-free survival did not differ between the 2 groups (p = .663 and .790, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the perioperative outcomes, CRD may be an alternative technique for rectal dissection in ovarian cancer with less perioperative morbidity and equivalent oncologic outcomes.

Perioperative outcomes of extensive bowel resection during cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To achieve optimal cytoreduction, extensive bowel resections are sometimes required in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Few studies have focused on the extent or number of resections of bowel surgeries and their feasibility.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent bowel surgery as part of debulking procedures at Ajou University Hospital from 2006 to 2018. Patients who received extensive bowel resections (two-segment resections or subtotal colectomy) were identified, and their perioperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients underwent bowel surgery. Of them, 128 (74.4%) underwent one-segment bowel resection, 25 (14.5%) underwent two-segment bowel resections, and 19 (11.1%) underwent subtotal colectomy. Although the operative time, transfusion rate, and postoperative bleeding events were higher in patients who underwent extensive bowel resection, the rates of perioperative complications were not significantly higher in this group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in two (1.5%) patients in the one-segment resection group, one (4.2%) patient in the multiple resection group, and two (10.5%) patients in the subtotal colectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple bowel resections (up to two segments) are feasible and can be safely performed with an acceptable complication rate in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Rectosigmoidectomy and Douglas Peritonectomy in the Management of Serosal Implants in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Surgery: Survival and Surgical Outcomes

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of rectosigmoid resection (RR) and Douglas peritonectomy (DP) on postoperative complications and survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer surgery.

Methods/Materials

Patients who underwent optimal cytoreductive surgery including RR and DP between January 2007 and January 2013 were included. Patients with deeper invasion into the muscularis and mucosal layer reported in pathology results and colon wall injury necessitating suturing or resection suggesting invasion of implants into the colon wall were excluded. The decision for RR or DP was made according to the surgical team and patients’ preference. Resections were performed with the suspicion of colon wall invasion. The collected data were age, previous operations, preoperative cancer antigen 125 and albumin levels, surgical procedures, duration of surgery, tumor histology, recurrence, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and length of hospital stay. Kaplan-Meir survival estimates were calculated and compared between the groups using the log-rank test. Cox proportional models were built to evaluate factors that affected disease-free and overall survival.

Results

Age, body mass index, preoperative cancer antigen 125 levels, albumin levels, and amount of ascites were similar between the groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was performed in 15% of both groups. End colostomy was performed in 23.7% of the RR group, and only 5.08% of the patients underwent diverting ileostomy procedures. There was no significant difference in terms of surgical complications between the groups. Recurrence occurred in the RR and DP groups at rates of 42% and 47%, respectively. Only primary debulking surgery had an effect on overall survival (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.88). Overall survival and disease-free survival were similar in the RR and DP groups.

Conclusions

Douglas peritonectomy showed similar survival and surgical outcomes to RR and provided shorter hospital stay and earlier admission to chemotherapy in the management of serosal implants during advanced-stage ovarian cancer surgery.

Survival impact of low anterior resection in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer grossly confined to the pelvic cavity: a Korean multicenter study

Objective

To evaluate survival impact of low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) grossly confined to the pelvis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 397 patients who underwent primary staging surgery for treatment of 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II–IIIA EOC: 116 (29.2%) IIA, 212 (53.4%) IIB, and 69 (17.4%) IIIA. Patients with grossly enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes positive for metastatic carcinoma were excluded. Of 92 patients (23.2%) with gross tumors at the rectosigmoid colon, 68 (73.9%) underwent tumorectomy and 24 (26.1%), LAR for rectosigmoid lesions. Survival outcomes between patients who underwent tumorectomy and LAR were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

During the median follow-up of 55 months (range, 1–260), 141 (35.5%) recurrences and 81 (20.4%) deaths occurred. Age (52.8 vs. 54.5 years, p=0.552), optimal debulking (98.5% vs. 95.0%, p=0.405), histologic type (serous, 52.9% vs. 50.0%, p=0.804), FIGO stage (p=0.057), and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy ≥6 cycles (85.3% vs. 79.2%, p=0.485) were not different between groups. No significant difference in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 57.9% vs. 62.5%, p=0.767) and overall survival (OS; 84.7% vs. 63.8%, p=0.087), respectively, was noted between groups. Postoperative ileus was more frequent in patients subjected to LAR than those who were not (4/24 [16.7%] vs. 11/373 [2.9%], p=0.001). The 5-year PFS (60.3% vs. 57.9%, p=0.523) and OS (81.8% vs. 87.7%, p=0.912) between patients who underwent tumorectomy and those who did not were also similar.

Conclusion

Survival benefit of LAR did not appear to be significant in EOC patients with grossly pelvis-confined tumors.

Impact of Extended Primary Surgery on Suboptimally Operable Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Objectives

Extensive surgical efforts to achieve an optimal debulking (no residual tumor) in primary surgery of ovarian cancer are today’s criterion standard in gyneco-oncologic surgery. However, it is controversial whether extensive surgery, including resections of metastases in the upper abdomen and bowel resections, is justifiable in patients with not completely operable lesions.

Methods

All patients who had undergone surgery for ovarian cancer in the years 2002 to 2013 at our institution were viewed (n = 472). We retrospectively identified 278 operations for primary ovarian cancer. Ninety-six (35%) of the 278 patients showed postoperative tumor residuals and were included in this study.

Results

Fifty-five (57%) of 96 patients underwent bowel resection, showing significantly higher complication rates (64% vs 39% minor complications, P = 0.017; 31% vs 9.8% severe complications, P = 0.013) compared with patients without bowel resections as well as no improvement in progression-free or overall survival (median overall survival, 19.5 vs 32.9; P = 0.382). Multiple anastomoses (≥2) were associated with higher rates for anastomotic leakage (16.7% vs 2.6%, P = 0.02) and a higher mortality (16.7% vs 0%, P = 0.04) compared with patients with only 1 anastomosis. Extensive surgery of the upper abdomen was not associated with a significant increase in complication rates.

Conclusions

Because of the increased morbidity of bowel resections without any evidence for improvement of survival, we suggest to restrain from further resection of intestines if an optimal debulking seems not feasible after removal of the major tumor bulk.

Total rectosigmoidectomy versus partial rectal resection in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To compare in a sample of Italian patients intraoperative, perioperative complications, Quality of Life (QoL), recurrence rate and overall survival of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients according to the type of surgery performed on sigma-rectum, total rectosigmoid resection (TRR) versus partial rectosigmoid resection (PRR).

METHODS

From May 2004 to May 2010, consecutive patients affected by epithelial AOC (FIGO Stage III-IV) were assessed for this prospective case-control study, According to the type of colorectal surgery performed to approach rectosigmoid involvement, patients were allocated into Group A (TRR) and Group B (PRR). PRR was performed when the complete removal of disease led to a laceration <30-40% of intestinal wall circumference.

RESULTS

82 and 72 patients were included in Group A and Group B respectively. Surgical outcomes were statistically similar except hospital stay which was significantly lower in the PRR group. There was not a statistically significant difference as regarding intra-operative, perioperative and postoperative complications, even if a higher rate of major complications were recorded in TRR. An improvement in QoL's scores has been recorded in PRR's group. There was not a statistically difference concerning the optimal debulking rate (92% and 96% respectively) and 5-year Overall Survival (48% and 52% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PRR seems to be feasible in over 40% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer and recto-sigmoid colon involvement. It is related to higher QoL and can be easily performed, without jeopardizing surgical radicality, in those cases in which conservative surgery at intestinal tract does not compromise residual tumor.

The Prognostic Role of Optimal Cytoreduction in Advanced, Bowel Infiltrating Ovarian Cancer

AIM

In locally advanced ovarian cancer with bowel involvement appropriate surgical treatment is still controversial. Objective was to delineate factors to select those most likely to benefit from radical surgery in patients with locally advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated 207 consecutive patients with primary stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery between 2000 and 2007. Every patient received stage-related surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 53.5 months. Data collected included stage, histology, extent of cytoreduction and type of bowel resection. Univariate survival analyses were performed to investigate variables associated with outcome.

RESULTS

Optimal cytoreduction (OCR) (R ≤ 1 cm) was achieved in 76.8%. Most patients presented histologic grade 2/3 (96.6%), serous ovarian cancers (84.1%) and lymph node involvement (52.2%). Complete cytoreduction (R = 0 mm) has significant best prognostic impact in FIGO IIB-IV (p = .026). Regarding bowel involvement, bowel resection was performed in 82 patients (39.6%). In this subgroup of patients complete cytoreduction led to significant better overall survival than R > 0 mm-1 cm, even in FIGO IIIC-IV patients (p = .027); this fact is independent of bowel resection. Noticeably, for survival bowel resection achieving residual tumor mass below 1 cm was also one main prognostic factor and even recurrence rate was associated with residual tumor mass.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the major prognostic factor in patients with advanced ovarian cancer needing colorectal resection is completeness of cytoreduction. Therefore, in advanced ovarian cancer patients, multivisceral surgery is indicated to achieve OCR (R ≤ 1 cm) with or without bowel resection with best prognostic impact.

Prognostic role of bowel involvement in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Optimal debulking surgery is postulated to be useful in survival of ovarian cancer patients. Some studies highlighted the possible role of bowel surgery in this topic. We wanted to evaluate the role of bowel involvement in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent optimal cytoreduction.

Methods

Between 1997 and 2004, 301 patients with advanced epithelial cancer underwent surgery at Department of Gynecological Oncology of Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) National Cancer Institute Aviano (PN) Italy. All underwent maximal surgical effort, including bowel and upper abdominal procedure, in order to achieve optimal debulking (R < 0.5 cm). PFS and OS were compared with residual disease, grading and surgical procedures.

Results

Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 244 patients (81.0%); R0 in 209 women (69.4.%) and R < 0.5 in 35 (11.6%). Bowel resection was performed in 116 patients (38.5%): recto-sigmoidectomy alone (69.8%), upper bowel resection only (14.7%) and both recto-sigmoidectomy and other bowel resection (15.5%). Pelvic peritonectomy and upper abdomen procedures were carried out in 202 (67.1%) and 82 (27.2%) patients respectively. Among the 284 patients available for follow-up, PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with R < 0.5. Among the 229 patients with optimal debulking (R < 0.5), 137 patients (59.8%) developed recurrent disease or progression. In the 229 R < 0.5 group, bowel involvement was associated with decreased PFS and OS in G1-2 patients whereas in G3 patients OS, but not PFS, was adversely affected. In the 199 patients with R0, PFS and OS were significantly better (p < 0.01) for G1-2 patients without bowel involvement whereas only significant OS (p < 0.05) was observed in G3 patients without bowel involvement versus G3 patients with bowel involvement.

Conclusions

Optimal cytoreduction (R < 0.5 cm and R0) is the most important prognostic factor for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. In the optimally cytoreduced (R < 0.5 and R0) patients, bowel involvement is associated with dismal prognosis for OS both in patients with G1-2 grading and in patients with G3 grading. Bowel involvement in G3 patients, carries instead the same risk of recurrence for PFS.

Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women and the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological malignancies. Opinions differ regarding the role of ultra-radical (extensive) cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer treatment. 

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity associated with ultra-radical/extensive surgery in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to November 2010). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies, analysed using multivariate methods, that compared ultra-radical/extensive and standard surgery in adult women with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. One non-randomised study was identified so no meta-analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

One non-randomised study met our inclusion criteria. It analysed retrospective data for 194 women with stage IIIC advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent either ultra-radical (extensive) or standard surgery and reported disease specific overall survival and perioperative mortality. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for prognostic factors, identified better disease specific survival among women receiving ultra-radical surgery, although this was not statistically significant (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40 to 1.04). In a subset of 144 women with carcinomatosis, those who underwent ultra-radical surgery had significantly better disease specific survival than women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98). Progression-free survival and quality of life (QoL) were not reported and adverse events were incompletely documented. The study was at high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found only low quality evidence comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer and carcinomatosis. The evidence suggested that ultra-radical surgery may result in better survival.  It was unclear whether there were any differences in progression-free survival, QoL and morbidity between the two groups. The cost-effectiveness of this intervention has not been investigated. We are, therefore, unable to reach definite conclusions about the relative benefits and adverse effects of the two types of surgery.In order to determine the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer, a sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery or well-designed non-randomised studies would be required.

Can we identify the patients who are likely to undergo bowel resectionat the time of surgery for ovarian cancer?

Surgery for ovarian cancer carries a risk of bowel resection to either achieve optimal debulking or relieve obstruction. This prospective study assessed the likelihood of bowel resection in 842 women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer and identified factors associated with increased risk. Bowel resection was performed in 8.6% of women. The likelihood of bowel resection increased significantly (p < 0.0001, chi2 test) with: Secondary surgery (22% vs 5.8% at primary surgery). Symptoms of bowel disturbance (21.9% vs 6.3% if no symptoms). FIGO stage III/IV disease (12.8% vs 2% in stage I/II). CA125 levels >or=2500 (12.9% vs 4.8% if CA125<2500). These women should be selectively offered pre-operative computerised tomography, stoma marking and counselling by stoma nurses. The 5-year survival was 14% in patients following bowel resection compared with 44% in patients not having bowel resection. Bowel resection should be performed only if it will result in optimal debulking or it relieves imminent bowel obstruction.

Total colectomy as part of primary cytoreductive surgery in advanced Müllerian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate morbidities and surgical outcomes of total colectomy conducted during primary cytoreductive surgery in advanced Müllerian cancer.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical records of 22 patients with stage IIIC or IV advanced Müllerian cancer that underwent total colectomy at the National Cancer Center Korea between January 2003 and December 2007.

RESULTS

Total colectomy was performed in 22 patients, of whom 2 (9.1%) underwent prophylactic ileostomy and 1 (4.5%) permanent ileostomy. Optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor <1 cm) was possible in 20 patients (90.9%). Median times at passage of flatus and initiation of tolerable diet were days 4 (2-10) and 6 (4-18) postoperatively, respectively. Nine postoperative morbidities, not directly related to ileo-rectal anatomosis, occurred in 7 patients (31.8%) and were successfully managed conservatively. No fistula developed during a mean follow-up of 16 months (range, 2-56). There was no surgery-related mortality. Diarrhea after total colectomy was well managed by medical treatment in most patients. Median time to recovery to previous bowel habits was 12 months (range, 6-20) in the 11 patients evaluable. Five-year progression free survival and overall survival rates were 38.6% and 74.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Total colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure in terms of minimizing residual tumor in most patients with advanced Müllerian cancer with acceptable morbidities.

Depth of invasion for appendiceal metastasis of ovarian cancers: does it have any clinical significance?

AIM

Depth of appendiceal metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) has not been previously analyzed for a possible relationship with clinico-pathological variables.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with EOC treated at Hacettepe University were retrospectively analyzed. All of the patients had appendiceal metastasis. Pathological slides were re-reviewed by the same pathologist. Appendiceal metastases were defined as serosal (if tumoral spread involved only serosa of the appendix) or sero-mucosal (if tumoral spread also involved either muscular or mucosal surfaces of the appendix). Univariate and multivariate analysis did not reveal a significant difference with respect to the prognostic variables between the groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients had serosal appendiceal metastasis (56.5%), while the remaining 30 patients (43.5%) had appendiceal metastasis extending toward the muscular layer (seromucosal metastasis: 16 within muscularis mucosa, 14 within the mucosa of the appendix). The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 54.58 years (range, 26-88 years), with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.9). Comparison of the survival rates between the two groups did not reveal a significant difference. Three-year survival rates were 23.3% in the serosal metastasis and 27.9% in the seromucosal metastasis group (P = 0.9). This figure was 25% for patients with only muscular metastasis and 41.6% for patients with appendiceal metastasis extending to the mucosal layer (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report to analyze the metastatic pattern of EOC on the appendix with respect to depth of invasion which could not reveal a significant difference.

Transverse colectomy in ovarian cancer surgical cytoreduction: operative technique and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To describe the operative techniques and associated clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transverse colectomy as a component of cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients underwent transverse colectomy as part of primary (n=33) or secondary (n=6) cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer between 1/97 and 4/07. The surgical techniques, associated morbidity, and clinical outcomes are described.

RESULTS

Among primary surgery patients, 75.6% had Stage IIIC disease, and 24.2% had Stage IV disease. Transverse colon surgery consisted of: partial colectomy in 33 cases and total transverse colectomy in 6 cases. Transverse colectomy with rectosigmoid colectomy was performed in 61.5% of patients, with two separate colonic anastomoses in 48.7%. The majority (89.7%) of transverse colon anastomoses were stapled, most commonly a functional end-to-end colocolostomy. Two patients required end colostomy. The median EBL was 500 cm(3). Residual disease was: no gross in 33.3%, 0.1-1.0 cm in 59.0%, and >1 cm in 7.7% of patients. Post-operative morbidity occurred in 25.6% of patients, with a fistula rate of 5.1% and a mortality rate of 2.6%. The median survival time after primary surgery was 68.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Transverse colectomy can contribute significantly to a maximal ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgical effort and carries acceptable morbidity. Resection of a non-contiguous segment of rectosigmoid colon is frequently necessary, and placement of two separate colonic anastomoses is associated with a low risk of anastomotic breakdown.

Surgical Management of Mesenteric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients Undergoing Rectosigmoid Colectomy for Locally Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the incidence of mesenteric lymph node metastases in patients undergoing rectosigmoid resection for epithelial ovarian carcinoma and to evaluate the potential contribution of sigmoid mesocolectomy toward achieving complete surgical cytoreduction.

METHODS

Pathology results for patients undergoing rectosigmoid colectomy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma from August 1998 through September 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-three patients with pathological documentation of mesenteric lymph nodes were selected for further review. A focused analysis was performed on cases with an adequate surgical sampling of mesenteric lymph nodes (more than one positive or five total mesenteric lymph nodes) to determine the overall incidence of nodal metastases. Chi2 analysis was used to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with mesenteric lymphatic spread.

RESULTS

A total of 39 (73.6%) of 53 patients had an adequate mesenteric resection suitable for nodal analysis. In this subgroup, 32 (82.1%) of 39 patients had one or more mesenteric lymph nodes containing metastatic ovarian carcinoma. Invasion beyond the serosa of the rectosigmoid colon was present in 31 (79.5%) of 39 of cases; however, increasing depth of invasion was not associated with risk of mesenteric nodal disease. In addition to bowel wall involvement, the only clinical factor that correlated with mesenteric lymph node involvement was concurrent tumor spread to retroperitoneal lymph nodes (P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Locally advanced ovarian carcinoma involving the rectosigmoid colon is associated with a high incidence of mesenteric nodal metastasis. Standard surgical technique should include a sigmoid mesocolectomy with resection of the associated lymphatic tributaries at the time of rectosigmoid colectomy if the surgical objective is complete cytoreduction of occult nodal disease.

Survival impact of multiple bowel resections in patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinicopathological factors and survival outcome of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing multiple bowel resections to achieve optimal (< or = 1 cm) cytoreduction.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed identifying patients undergoing optimal primary cytoreductive surgery with > or = 2 bowel resections between 10/1997 and 2/2006. The two control groups consisted of (1) patients undergoing optimal cytoreduction with < or = 1 bowel resections matched [1:2] for age and stage and (2) patients left with suboptimal disease. Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the effects of demographic and surgico-pathologic factors on survival outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients underwent > or = 2 bowel resections. Sixty-eight patients underwent < or = 1 bowel resections. All patients had optimal cytoreduction and 40/102 patients (39.2%) underwent complete cytoreduction. Patients undergoing multiple bowel resections experienced a higher EBL (700 v 500 mL, p=0.01) and longer LOS (10 v 7 days, p=0.01) compared to patients with < or = 1 bowel resections. Multivariate analysis revealed the amount of residual disease to be a statistically significant and radiation therapy to the right pelvic sidewall and cul-de-sac independent predictor of overall survival. The median overall survival time for patients undergoing > or = 2 bowel resections was 28.3 months, which was comparable to patients undergoing < or = 1 bowel resections, (37.8 months, p=0.09) but statistically significantly superior to patients left with suboptimal residual disease (12 months, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although primary surgery that includes > or = 2 bowel resections is associated with longer LOS and a higher EBL, such extensive procedures are warranted if they will contribute to an overall optimal residual disease state.

Extended cytoreduction of intraabdominal metastatic ovarian cancer in the left upper quadrant utilizing en bloc resection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to describe the development of and experience with a technique for en bloc resection of left upper quadrant intraperitoneal metastatic ovarian cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

From May 7, 2002-August 14, 2004, 6 women underwent en bloc resection of extensive tumor contiguously involving the omentum, colon, gastrocolic ligament and spleen. This represents about 5% of all cytoreductive operations performed during that time. Four of the 6 had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A description of the technique is included in the text. Two women required partial gastrectomy and partial pancreatectomy. Separate segmental resection or subtotal colectomy was performed in 3 women. Cytoreduction was optimal in all 6 cases. Significant complications occurred in 3 of the women. Disease-free survival ranged from 2-12 months.

CONCLUSION

In highly selected patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer, en bloc resection of extensive left upper quadrant intraabdominal tumor may be a reasonable method for accomplishing optimal cytoreduction.

Current management strategies for ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer originates in the layer of cells that covers the surface of the ovaries. The disease spreads readily throughout the peritoneal cavity and to the lymphatics, often before causing symptoms. Of the cancers unique to women, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate. Most women are diagnosed as having advanced stage disease, and efforts to develop new screening approaches for ovarian cancer are a high priority. Optimal treatment of ovarian cancer begins with optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. Ovarian cancer, even in advanced stages, is sensitive to a variety of chemotherapeutics. Although improved chemotherapy has increased 5-year survival rates, overall survival gains have been limited because of our inability to eradicate all disease. Technologic advances that allow us to examine the molecular machinery that drives ovarian cancer cells have helped to identify numerous therapeutic targets within these cells. In this review, we provide an overview of ovarian cancer with particular emphasis on recent advances in operative management and systemic therapies.

Intestinal surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines the current role of intestinal surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Institutions differ considerably in surgical procedures and therapeutic outcomes for this disease. Moreover, therapeutic outcomes are influenced by the inclusion criteria for surgical procedures and the degree of surgical completion. We discuss the role of intestinal surgery and suggest surgical indications for intestinal surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer is better when there is a smaller postoperative tumor mass. However, it is necessary to investigate the effects of intestinal surgery on residual tumor mass and its prognostic benefits. Here, recent reports were reviewed to ascertain the usefulness and safety of intestinal surgery for advanced ovarian cancer and examine surgical indications and institutional requirements.

SUMMARY

By performing aggressive intestinal surgery such as combined bowel resection, optimal cytoreductive surgery can be performed in 70-98% of cases. The morbidity associated with intestinal surgery is acceptably low. Prognostic benefits for intestinal surgery are clear in patients with operable ovarian cancer with no residual disease. Women with suspected ovarian cancer should therefore be referred to centers with experienced tumor surgeons.

“Optimal” cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A commentary

OBJECTIVE

To derive the most appropriate threshold to classify primary cytoreductive operations as "optimal" and address the clinical significance of this issue.

METHODS

Criteria used to classify primary cytoreductive outcomes are reviewed. Survival outcomes are analyzed to address relative influences of the completeness of cytoreduction and "biological aggressiveness", as manifested by the extent of intra-abdominal metastases.

RESULTS

Most cohorts analyzing relative influences of metastatic tumor burden and the dimension of residual disease on survival report completeness of cytoreduction to influence the prognosis more significantly than tumor burden, with necessity to perform various procedures having minimal or no influence. Equivalent survival is reported for completely cytoreduced patients with stage III disease whether substages IIIa/b (smaller tumor burden) are excluded or included. However, some stage IIIc series report more favorable median and 5-year survivals for small fractions of completely cytoreduced patients than series with a large visibly disease-free fraction. Increasing fractions of complete cytoreduction are reported in recent cohorts, without increase in morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete primary cytoreduction improves the prognosis for survival significantly more than a small dimension of residual disease. Although prospective randomized trials addressing surgical issues have not been undertaken and numerous variables may reflect "biological aggressiveness" by influencing the prognosis, available data justify elimination of macroscopic disease to be the most appropriate objective of primary cytoreductive surgery. Stratification of survival by dimensions of residual disease in an investigational setting should include a visibly disease-free subgroup and if used, the term "optimal" should be applied to patients undergoing complete cytoreduction.

Role of rectosigmoidectomy and stripping of pelvic peritoneum in outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The peritoneum of the cul-de-sac is frequently affected in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Stripping of the pelvic peritoneum (SoP) combined with rectosigmoidectomy (RS) in patients with confluent tumor are safe techniques that can eradicate macroscopic disease. We evaluated the therapeutic value of this maximal surgical effort in advanced ovarian cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from all consecutive patients with stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer, primarily operated on from 1994 through 1998, were collected and analyzed using the chi-square test, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves including log-rank test.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-four eligible patients were identified; 209 patients had tumor involving the peritoneum of the cul-de-sac. For this subgroup, those who were managed with stripping of the peritoneum (SoP, n=77) or rectosigmoidectomy (RS, N=57) had improved 5-year overall survivals relative to those who were not (n=75). (SoP=37% versus RS=39% versus neither=6%; p < 0.0001). In the subgroup of patients with cul-de-sac involvement optimally cytoreduced, we noted a survival benefit for those who were managed with a maximal pelvic surgical effort (5-year overall survival, 38% [SoP] versus 38% [RS] versus 15% [neither]; p=0.02). When evaluating patients with no macroscopic residual disease, a survival advantage for patients managed with RS compared with SoP was observed (5-year overall survival, 89% (RS) versus 50% (RS); p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of cul-de-sac disease by SoP and RS is associated with improved survival in ovarian cancer patients. Tumor resection with en bloc RS may be preferable to allowing microscopic or infiltrative residual tumor.

The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the survival impact of adding extensive upper abdominal surgical cytoreduction to standard surgical techniques for advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The records of all patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery at our institution from 1998 to 2003 were reviewed. The cohort was divided into 3 groups. Group 1 patients required extensive upper abdominal surgery, such as diaphragm peritonectomy/resection, resection of parenchymal liver or porta hepatis disease and/or splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy, to achieve optimal cytoreduction (residual disease<or=1 cm). Group 2 patients were optimally cytoreduced by standard surgical techniques, including hysterectomy, oophorectomy, omentectomy, and bowel resection. Group 3 patients were suboptimally cytoreduced. Primary outcome measures were response to primary chemotherapy, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The cohort of 262 patients was divided as follows: Group 1, 57 patients; Group 2, 122 patients; and Group 3, 83 patients. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 1-94 months). Frequency of clinical complete response in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 82%, 78%, and 57%, respectively. The median progression-free survival for Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 24, 23, and 11 months, respectively. Progression-free survival for Groups 1 and 2 were equivalent (P=0.53) and were significantly longer than for Group 3 (P<0.001). The median overall survival was 84 and 38 months for Groups 2 and 3, respectively, and had not been reached for Group 1 by 68 months. Patients in Group 1 had equivalent overall survival to patients in Group 2 (P=0.74) and improved survival over patients in Group 3 (P<0.001). Prognostic factors significant on multivariate analysis included stage, optimal status, and ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring extensive upper abdominal procedures to achieve optimal cytoreduction demonstrated a similar initial response, progression-free survival, and overall survival to patients optimally cytoreduced by standard surgical techniques. The presence of bulky upper abdominal disease alone did not appear to indicate poor tumor biology. This initial maximal surgical effort was associated with improved survival in patients who would have otherwise been suboptimally cytoreduced.

Colorectal resection in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the operative details and complications of colorectal resection in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent colorectal resection for ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer were identified in our surgical database for the period 1988 through 2002.

RESULTS

Of the 125 patients who were identified, 73% were undergoing primary cytoreduction; 18% were undergoing secondary cytoreduction, and 7% were undergoing interval cytoreduction. The mean length of colon that was removed was 15.7 cm. The method of anastomosis was stapler in 63% and hand sewn in 22%; 15% patients had no anastomosis performed. A protective ostomy was used in 13% of patients. Optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm) was achieved in 74%. Operative complications occurred in 37% of patients, with the most common being hemorrhage (25%). Anastomotic leaks occurred in 2.5% of the patients, and the most common postoperative complication was ileus (28%). Postoperative bowel function returned to normal in 71% of patients.

CONCLUSION

To obtain optimal cytoreduction in patients with ovarian cancer, colorectal resection often is necessary. Colorectal resection can be performed with a low risk of anastomotic complications, and patients frequently have the return of normal bowel function.

Major hepatectomy and right hemicolectomy at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: report of a case

Major liver involvement at the time of diagnosis is a rare event in patients with ovarian cancer, and the issue of major hepatectomy at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery is controversial. A 61-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with nonspecific abdominal pain of 2-month duration and weight loss of 5 kg during the last semester. A computed tomography scan demonstrated bilateral ovarian masses, extending to the right iliac fossa, pressing the cecum-ascending colon. In the liver parenchyma, three cystic lesions were found of about 6-cm maximum diameter each, along with pelvic lymphadenopathy. There was no ascites. The diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer was clinically suspected; the patient underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, right hemicolectomy, omentectomy, left lobectomy, deroofing, and draining of the cystic formation of the right liver lobe along with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Systemic chemotherapy (six cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin) was subsequently administered, and after 15 months of follow-up period, the patient is still in first remission and alive. Ovarian cancer with concomitant extensive right colon infiltration and hematogenous liver metastases can be successfully managed with aggressive surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy in carefully selected patients.

Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Residual disease after initial surgery for ovarian cancer is the strongest prognostic factor for survival. However, the extent of surgical resection required to achieve optimal cytoreduction is controversial. Our goal was to estimate the effect of aggressive surgical resection on ovarian cancer patient survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC ovarian cancer undergoing primary surgery was conducted between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1998. The main outcome measures were residual disease after cytoreduction, frequency of radical surgical resection, and 5-year disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

The study comprised 194 patients, including 144 with carcinomatosis. The mean patient age and follow-up time were 64.4 and 3.5 years, respectively. After surgery, 131 (67.5%) of the 194 patients had less than 1 cm of residual disease (definition of optimal cytoreduction). Considering all patients, residual disease was the only independent predictor of survival; the need to perform radical procedures to achieve optimal cytoreduction was not associated with a decrease in survival. For the subgroup of patients with carcinomatosis, residual disease and the performance of radical surgical procedures were the only independent predictors. Disease-specific survival was markedly improved for patients with carcinomatosis operated on by surgeons who most frequently used radical procedures compared with those least likely to use radical procedures (44% versus 17%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, residual disease was the only independent predictor of survival. Minimizing residual disease through aggressive surgical resection was beneficial, especially in patients with carcinomatosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Preliminary results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who are inadequate for optimum primary surgery

AIM

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who were inadequate for primary optimal surgery.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIc/IV that was unresectable according to computed tomography findings were eligible for this study. Three cycles of paclitaxel plus cisplatin NAC were administered and the response was evaluated. Patients were then selected for interval debulking surgery or three cycles of additional chemotherapy with the same regimen according to the resectability and response. Interval debulking surgery followed by second-line chemotherapy was applied to patients with no response to NAC. During the same period, patients who did not agree to the protocol were treated by the conventional method of tumor debulking surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and served as the control group. A comparison of both groups of patients was carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were involved in the study. All patients were evaluable. Eighteen patients underwent NAC and 22 patients were treated by conventional therapy. Optimal debulking was possible in 14 patients (77.8%) in the NAC group and in 10 patients (45.5%) in the conventional therapy group (P = 0.04). The mean estimated blood loss was 620 cc (range: 300-1500 cc) in the NAC group and 1061 cc (range: 300-3500 cc) in the conventional therapy group (P = 0.04). However, no significant differences were found in the disease-free and overall survival rates between the two groups (P = 0.48 and P = 0.61, respectively).

CONCLUSION

NAC provided a higher rate of optimum cytoreduction and equivalent survival with less invasive surgery and reduced morbidity compared with conventional therapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer inadequate for primary optimum surgery. Therefore, NAC may be a valuable alternative treatment for these patients.

Surgical indications for combined partial rectosigmoidectomy in ovarian cancer

AIM

To evaluate surgical indications for combined partial rectosigmoidectomy in ovarian cancer with direct invasion of the rectum and sigmoid colon or dissemination into the pouch of Douglas.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 25 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery and rectosigmoidectomy between 1990 and 2002 at our hospital. Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology staging of tumors was II (n = 6), III (n = 17) or IV (n = 2). The histologic type was serous adenocarcinoma (n = 18), clear cell adenocarcinoma (n = 4), and others (n = 3). Bowel resection was performed during primary surgery in 18 patients, and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in seven patients. Cumulative survival rate was compared between NAC and non-NAC groups. Patients were divided into three groups based on extent of surgical resection to compare survival rates: no residual tumor (n = 19); maximum residual tumor diameter <1 cm (n = 5); and maximum residual tumor diameter > or =1 cm (n = 1).

RESULTS

Cumulative 5-year survival was 41.3% for all patients. Cumulative 5-year survival in the 18 patients who underwent bowel resection during primary surgery was 62.2%, compared to 13.9% in the seven patients who underwent bowel resection after NAC. Cumulative 5-year survival based on extent of surgical resection was: no residual tumor, 60.8%; residual <1 cm, 0%; and residual > or =1 cm, 0%. Cumulative 5-year survival for patients with complete tumor resection (no residual tumor), excluding clear cell adenocarcinoma, was 79.5%.

CONCLUSION

In ovarian cancer with direct invasion of the rectum or sigmoid colon or dissemination into the pouch of Douglas, complete tumor resection with rectosigmoidectomy during primary surgery is associated with good clinical outcomes.

Splenectomy in the context of primary cytoreductive operations for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the need to perform splenectomy due to metastatic disease in the context of complete primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer diminishes the prognosis for survival.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2004, 356 stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer patients underwent resection of all visible disease before systemic platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Forty-nine (13.8%) required a splenectomy due to metastatic disease. Survival was analyzed (log rank) on the basis of whether splenectomy was necessary. The frequency of performing other procedures, operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and hospitalization, was compared (Chi-square test; discrete and binomial data, t test; continuous data) on the basis of whether a splenectomy was required.

RESULTS

Survival was not influenced (log rank) by the requirement of splenectomy (required; median 56.4 months, estimated 5-year survival of 48% vs. not required; median 76.8 months, estimated 5-year survival of 58% P = 0.4). The splenectomy subgroup more commonly required en-bloc resection of reproductive organs with rectosigmoid (89.8% vs. 55.7%, P < 0.001), diaphragm stripping (63.3% vs. 33.6%, <0.001)), full-thickness diaphragm resection (28.6% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001), and resection of grossly positive retroperitoneal nodes (67.3% vs. 46.3%, P = 0.006). The splenectomy group had a longer operative time (238 min vs. 192 min, P = 0.004), estimated blood loss (1663 ml vs. 1167 ml, P = 0.001), transfusion rate (5.3 units prbc vs. 3.2 units prbc, P = 0.002), and hospitalization (16.1 vs. 12.2 days P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The need for splenectomy to achieve complete cytoreduction is a reflection of advanced disease but is not a manifestation of tumor biology precluding long-term survival.

Ovarian cancer surgical resectability: relative impact of disease, patient status, and surgeon

OBJECTIVES

Currently, we are unable to predict which patients are most likely to undergo successful debulking of ovarian cancer. We investigated the impact of clinical and surgical-pathologic factors at the time of initial exploration on the ability to achieve optimal cytoreduction.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer operated at Mayo Clinic between 1994 and 1998 were included. The following pre- and intraoperative factors were included as dichotomous variables: age, ASA, CA125, ascites volume, carcinomatosis, diaphragm and mesentery involvement, and tendency of the operating surgeon (defined by the performance of radical procedures in more vs. less than 50% of patients operated). Pearson chi(2) test and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

ASA, ascites, carcinomatosis, diaphragmatic tumor, mesentery involvement, and surgeon tendency all significantly correlated with residual disease (RD) in univariate analysis. However, only ASA, carcinomatosis and surgeon were independently associated with optimal RD. The subset of patients having ASA 3 or 4 and carcinomatosis comprised a high-risk group with just 46% achieving optimal RD overall. Even within this high-risk group, the rate of optimal cytoreduction ranged from 67% to 42% dependent upon surgeon tendency to employ radical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk factors such as patient condition and extent of disease impact the ability to achieve optimal RD. However, this is greatly influenced by surgical effort. Models to predict optimal surgical outcomes based only on tumor and patient characteristics will be highly practice-dependent: thus, their utility in selecting patient for non-traditional primary approach to ovarian cancer must be looked at cautiously.

Sites of bowel resected to achieve optimal ovarian cancer cytoreduction: implications regarding surgical management

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to 1) report on the distribution of bowel segments resected in a population of patients who underwent primary optimal cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer, and 2) discuss implications for surgical management regarding resection of these bowel segments.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study from 1995 to 2003 of 144 ovarian cancer patients who underwent primary optimal cytoreductive operations that included bowel resection.

RESULTS

Bowel segments removed and major complications are presented in tabulated form. Eighty-one out of 144 resections were rectosigmoid only. Thirty-six percent had extensive involvement of colon segments separate from the rectosigmoid. Excluding hemorrhage, 9 patients (6%) experienced a major complication.

CONCLUSION

The present study does suggest the necessity for a highly individualized approach to the surgical management of epithelial ovarian cancer patients who can be optimally cyto-reduced by resection of multifocal colonic involvement. Further study is needed to better assess the complications, function, and oncologic outcome of the different surgical approaches to these patients.

Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative influences of the extent of disease present before surgery and completeness of cytoreduction on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients (408) with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer had cytoreductive surgery before systemic platinum-based combination chemotherapy. A ranking system (0-3) was devised to prospectively quantify the extent of disease involving: (1) right upper quadrant (diaphragm/hepatic, and adjacent peritoneal surfaces), (2) left upper quadrant (omentum/gastro-colic ligament, spleen, stomach, transverse colon, splenic flexure of colon), (3) pelvis (reproductive organs, recto-sigmoid, pelvic peritoneum), (4) retroperitoneum (pelvic/aortic nodes), and (5) central abdomen (small bowel, ascending/descending colon, mesentery, anterior abdominal wall, pericolic gutters). Survival was analyzed (log rank and Cox regression) on the basis of the rankings at these anatomic regions, the sum of intraabdominal rankings, and the cytoreductive outcome.

RESULTS

Overall median and estimated 5-year survivals were 58.2 months and 49%. On univariate analysis, the central abdominal (P = 0.008) and left upper quadrant (P = 0.03) rankings, the sum of rankings (P = 0.01), and the cytoreductive outcome (P </= 0.0001) influenced survival (log rank). Survival was independently (stepwise Cox model) influenced by the sum of rankings (0-5, RR 1.00; 6-10, RR 1.24; 11-15, RR 1.44; P = 0.05), and completeness of cytoreduction (visibly disease-free, RR 1.00; </=1 cm residual, RR 2.32; >1 cm residual, RR 2.98; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreduction to a visibly disease-free outcome has a more significant influence on survival than the extent of metastatic disease present before surgery. Operative efforts should not be abbreviated on the hypothesis that extensive disease at specific anatomic regions precludes long-term survival.

Quality of life in women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to examine the outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a special emphasis on the patients' quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Seventeen patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on the extent of disease on computer tomography. All patients received combined platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Debulking surgery was performed after three cycles or six cycles of chemotherapy, depending on the response to the chemotherapy. Patients' QOL was studied over time using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and was then compared with that of patients treated with conventional treatment in the previous cohort.

RESULTS

The response rate to chemotherapy assessed at three cycles was 82.4%. The rate of optimum debulking to residual disease less than 2 cm after chemotherapy was 76.9%, and 38.5% had no gross residual disease after surgery. The median overall survival was 22.9 months. The median disease-free interval was 13.3 months. The overall QOL improved after chemotherapy and this continued to improve up to 12 months. The other functional scales also showed improvements over time, apart from the initial transient deterioration in the role functioning and cognitive functioning at 3 months after chemotherapy. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy seem to have better but statistically insignificant difference in QOL parameters than patients treated conventionally.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an alternative treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer in whom the chance of optimal cytoreduction is low. The patients' overall quality of life and functional status improve after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.