Effects of a flavor-placement reversal test after different modalities of taste aversion learning

Relevance of the nucleus of the solitary tract, gelatinous part, in learned preferences induced by intragastric nutrient administration

Food preferences have been investigated in Wistar rats utilizing a learned concurrent flavor preference behavioral procedure. Previous studies have demonstrated that the perivagal administration of neurotoxin capsaicin disrupts the learning of preferences induced by intragastric administration of rewarding nutrients (pre-digested milk). The vagus nerve projects almost exclusively towards the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST), a brain medullary gateway for visceral signals. The objective of this study was to investigate the participation of the lateral portion of the dorsomedial region, the gelatinous subnucleus (SolG), in the learning of a concurrent preference task. Results show that unlike neurologically intact animals, which learn this task correctly, animals lesioned in the gelatinous part of NST manifest a disruption of discrimination learning. Thus, intakes of the flavored stimulus paired with predigested liquid diet and of the flavored stimulus paired with physiological saline were virtually identical. However, SolG- and sham-lesioned groups consumed similar total amounts of both flavors. These findings suggest that SolG, as a relay of the vagus nerve, along with its anatomical projection, the external lateral parabrachial subnucleus (LPBe), may constitute an anatomical axis that is important in the induction of concurrent flavor/side preferences. It also appears to be relevant in other behavioral processes that require rapid processing of information from the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Rewarding effects of the electrical stimulation of the parabrachial complex: taste or place preference?

The lateral parabrachial complex has been related to various emotional-affective processes. It has been shown that electrical stimulation of the external Lateral Parabrachial (LPBe) nucleus can induce reinforcing effects in place preference and taste discrimination tasks but does not appear to support self-stimulation. This study examined the relative relevance of place and taste stimuli after electrical stimulation of the LPBe nucleus. A learning discrimination task was conducted that simultaneously included both sensory indexes (taste and place) in order to determine the preference of animals for one or the other. After a taste stimulus reversal task, the rewarding effect of stimulation was found to be preferentially associated with place. These results are discussed in the context of the rewarding action and biological constraints induced by different natural and artificial reinforcing agents.

The D2/D3-receptor antagonist tiapride impairs concurrent but not sequential taste aversion learning

Taste aversion learning (TAL) is a learning modality in which the animals reject a gustatory stimulus associated with the administration of noxious visceral substances. This learning can be established by concurrent or sequential procedures that involve different anatomical and functional mechanisms and may constitute distinct learning modalities. The dopaminergic system has been related to various learning processes and goal-directed behaviours. The present study examined the effect of the administration of tiapride, a D(2)/D(3) dopaminergic antagonist, on concurrent and sequential TAL. Results obtained showed that pre-treatment with tiapride blocks the acquisition of concurrent TAL but does not affect sequential TAL, including reversal learning tasks. These results demonstrate the involvement of the D(2)/D(3) dopaminergic receptors in the former but not the latter learning process. The dopaminergic system appears to participate in concurrent TAL, an "implicit" learning modality, but not in sequential TAL, which is considered a relational/explicit acquisition process.

Learned flavor preferences induced by intragastric administration of rewarding nutrients: role of capsaicin-sensitive vagal afferent fibers

Learned flavor preferences can be established after intragastric nutrient administration by two different behavioral procedures, concurrent and sequential. In a concurrent procedure, two flavored stimuli are offered separately but at the same time on a daily basis: one stimulus is paired with the simultaneous intragastric administration of partially digested food and the other with physiological saline. In sequential learning, the two stimuli are presented during alternate sessions. Neural mechanisms underlying these learning modalities have yet to be fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to examine the role of vagal afferent fibers in the visceral processing of rewarding nutrients during concurrent (experiment 1) and sequential (experiment 2) flavor preference learning in Wistar rats. For this purpose, capsaicin, a neurotoxin that destroys slightly myelinated or unmyelinated sensory axons, was applied to the subdiaphragmatic region of the esophagus to selectively damage most of the vagal afferent pathways that originate in the gastrointestinal system. Results showed that capsaicin [1 mg of capsaicin dissolved in 1 ml of vehicle (10% Tween 80 in oil)] blocked acquisition of concurrent but not sequential flavor preference learning. These results are interpreted in terms of a dual neurobiological system involved in processing the rewarding effects of intragastrically administered nutrients. The vagus nerve, specifically capsaicin-sensitive vagal afferent fibers, would only be essential in concurrent flavor preference learning, which requires rapid processing of visceral information.

Hippocampal inactivation enhances taste learning

Learning tasks are typically thought to be either hippocampal-dependent (impaired by hippocampal lesions) or hippocampal-independent (indifferent to hippocampal lesions). Here, we show that conditioned taste aversion (CTA) learning fits into neither of these categories. Rats were trained to avoid two taste stimuli, one novel and one familiar. Muscimol infused through surgically implanted intracranial cannulae temporarily inactivated the dorsal hippocampus during familiarization, subsequent CTA training, or both. As shown previously, hippocampal inactivation during familiarization enhanced the effect of that familiarization on learning (i.e., hippocampal inactivation enhanced latent inhibition of CTA); more novel and surprising, however, was the finding that hippocampal inactivation during training sessions strongly enhanced CTA learning itself. These phenomena were not caused by specific aspects of our infusion technique--muscimol infusions into the hippocampus during familiarization sessions did not cause CTAs, muscimol infusions into gustatory cortex caused the expected attenuation of CTA, and hippocampal inactivation caused the expected attenuation of spatial learning. Thus, we suggest that hippocampal memory processes interfere with the specific learning mechanisms underlying CTA, and more generally that multiple memory systems do not operate independently.