Melatonin modulation of prolactin and gonadotrophin secretion. Systems ancient and modern

Influence of Prolactin Secretion Changes on Sperm Head Size and Freezability in Ibex and Mouflon

Aim: This work examined the influence of induced changes in prolactin (PRL) secretion on sperm cryoresistance of ibex and the mouflon. Materials and Methods: PRL secretion was modified in a first experiment by the use of bromocriptine (BCR, dopamine agonist) during the non-breeding season, and in a second experiment by the use of sulpiride (SLP, dopamine D₂-receptor antagonist) during the rutting season. Slow and ultra-rapid freezing protocols were used to cryopreserve sperm samples. Results: BCR decreased blood plasma PRL concentrations, whereas SLP increased them. Cryoresistance ratios (CRs) for curvilinear velocity (VCL), straight-line velocity (VSL), and average path velocity (VAP) in BCR-treated mouflons were lower than in controls using slow-freezing (p < 0.05), while CRs of motility and morphologically normal sperm of BCR-treated mouflons were greater than controls with ultra-rapid freezing (p < 0.05). BCR increased the head sperm dimensions in ibexes (p < 0.001); conversely, BCR decreased the head dimensions in mouflons (p < 0.001). CR-motility, CR-amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH), CR-viability, and CR-acrosome integrity in SLP-treated mouflons were lower than in controls with slow-freezing (p < 0.01); CR-viability and CR-acrosome were lower than controls with ultra-rapid freezing (p < 0.05). In ibexes, CR-ALH was lower for SLP-treated (p < 0.05). SLP treatment increased head dimensions in ibexes (p < 0.001) but did not affect the sperm head of mouflons. Conclusion: Our findings show that high levels of blood plasma PRL negatively affect the cryoresistance of ibex and mouflon sperm.

Expression analysis of DIO2, EYA3, KISS1 and GPR54 genes in year-round estrous and seasonally estrous rams

The expression characteristics of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis-related candidate genes, DIO2, EYA3, KISS1 and GPR54, were analyzed in year-round estrous rams (small-tail Han sheep, STH) and seasonally estrous rams (Sunite sheep, SNT) using qPCR. The results were as follows: DIO2 was mainly expressed in pituitary, and KISS1 was specifically expressed in hypothalamus in the two groups. However, EYA3 and GPR54 were widely expressed in the cerebrum, cerebellum, hypothalamus, pituitary, testis, epididymis, vas deferens and adrenal gland tissues in both breeds, with significant differences in the cerebellum, hypothalamus, pituitary, testis and vas deferens tissues. We speculated that DIO2 and KISS1 may have positive roles in different regions in ram year-round estrus. Moreover, the expression patterns of EYA3 and GPR54 suggested that they may regulate the estrous mode of ram via testis and vas deferens. This is the first study to systematically analyze the expression patterns of HPG axis-related genes in rams.

Are Humans Seasonally Photoperiodic?

Humans exhibit seasonal variation in a wide variety of behavioral and physiological processes, and numerous investigators have suggested that this might be because we are sensitive to seasonal variation in day length. The evidence supporting this hypothesis is inconsistent. A new hypothesis is offered here—namely, that some humans indeed are seasonally photoresponsive, but others are not, and that individual variation may be the cause of the inconsistencies that have plagued the study of responsiveness to photoperiod in the past. This hypothesis is examined in relation to seasonal changes in the reproductive activity of humans, and it is developed by reviewing and combining five bodies of knowledge: correlations of human birthrates with photoperiod; seasonal changes in the activity of the neuroendocrine pathway that could link photoperiod to gonadal steroid secretion in humans; what is known about photoperiod, latitude, and reproduction of nonhuman primates; documentation of individual variation in photoresponsiveness in rodents and humans; and what is known about the evolutionary ecology of humans.

Understanding melatonin receptor pharmacology: latest insights from mouse models, and their relevance to human disease

Melatonin, the neuro-hormone synthesized during the night, has recently seen an unexpected extension of its functional implications toward type 2 diabetes development, visual functions, sleep disturbances, and depression. Transgenic mouse models were instrumental for the establishment of the link between melatonin and these major human diseases. Most of the actions of melatonin are mediated by two types of G protein-coupled receptors, named MT1 and MT2 , which are expressed in many different organs and tissues. Understanding the pharmacology and function of mouse MT1 and MT2 receptors, including MT1 /MT2 heteromers, will be of crucial importance to evaluate the relevance of these mouse models for future therapeutic developments. This review will critically discuss these aspects, and give some perspectives including the generation of new mouse models.

A survey of molecular details in the human pineal gland in the light of phylogeny, structure, function and chronobiological diseases

The human pineal gland is a neuroendocrine transducer that forms an integral part of the brain. Through the nocturnally elevated synthesis and release of the neurohormone melatonin, the pineal gland encodes and disseminates information on circadian time, thus coupling the outside world to the biochemical and physiological internal demands of the body. Approaches to better understand molecular details behind the rhythmic signalling in the human pineal gland are limited but implicitly warranted, as human chronobiological dysfunctions are often associated with alterations in melatonin synthesis. Current knowledge on melatonin synthesis in the human pineal gland is based on minimally invasive analyses, and by the comparison of signalling events between different vertebrate species, with emphasis put on data acquired in sheep and other primates. Together with investigations using autoptic pineal tissue, a remnant silhouette of premortem dynamics within the hormone's biosynthesis pathway can be constructed. The detected biochemical scenario behind the generation of dynamics in melatonin synthesis positions the human pineal gland surprisingly isolated. In this neuroendocrine brain structure, protein-protein interactions and nucleo-cytoplasmic protein shuttling indicate furthermore a novel twist in the molecular dynamics in the cells of this neuroendocrine brain structure. These findings have to be seen in the light that an impaired melatonin synthesis is observed in elderly and/or demented patients, in individuals affected by Alzheimer's disease, Smith-Magenis syndrome, autism spectrum disorder and sleep phase disorders. Already, recent advances in understanding signalling dynamics in the human pineal gland have significantly helped to counteract chronobiological dysfunctions through a proper restoration of the nocturnal melatonin surge.

Seasonal breeding as a neuroendocrine model for puberty in sheep

Puberty is defined as the awakening of the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis. Sheep are seasonal breeders, experiencing an annual period of reproductive quiescence and renaissance that can be utilized as a model for the onset of puberty. Kisspeptin and gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone appear to be important for the seasonal shift in reproductive activity and the former is mandatory for puberty. The non-breeding season is characterized by an increase in the negative feedback effect of estrogen on GnRH and gonadotropin secretion, as is the case in the pre-pubertal period. This effect of estrogen may be transmitted by kisspeptin cells. Additionally, dopaminergic A14/A15 neurons facilitate the seasonal change in estrogen negative feedback. Integrated function of these three groups of neurons appears to modulate the annual shift in photoperiod to a physiological change in fertility. This review compares and contrasts seasonal cycles of reproduction with the mechanisms that relate to the onset of puberty.

Endocrine mechanisms of seasonal adaptation in small mammals: from early results to present understanding

Seasonal adaptation is widespread among mammals of temperate and polar latitudes. The changes in physiology, morphology and behaviour are controlled by the photoneuroendocrine system that, as a first step, translates day lengths into a hormonal signal (melatonin). Decoding of the humoral melatonin signal, i.e. responses on the cellular level to slight alterations in signal duration, represents the prerequisite for appropriate timing of winter acclimatization in photoperiodic animals. Corresponding to the diversity of affected traits, several hormone systems are involved in the regulation downstream of the neural integration of photoperiodic time measurement. Results from recent studies provide new insights into seasonal control of reproduction and energy balance. Most intriguingly, the availability of thyroid hormone within hypothalamic key regions, which is a crucial determinant of seasonal transitions, appears to be regulated by hormone secretion from the pars tuberalis of the pituitary gland. This proposed neuroendocrine pathway contradicts the common view of the pituitary as a gland that acts downstream of the hypothalamus. In the present overview of (neuro)endocrine mechanisms underlying seasonal acclimatization, we are focusing on the dwarf hamster Phodopus sungorus (long-day breeder) that is known for large amplitudes in seasonal changes. However, important findings in other mammalian species such as Syrian hamsters and sheep (short-day breeder) are considered as well.

Substance P-immunoreactive cells in the ovine pars tuberalis

The pars tuberalis (PT) is a distinct subdivision of the anterior pituitary gland that plays a central role in regulating seasonal prolactin release. In sheep, there is compelling evidence that seasonal changes in light, transformed into a melatonin signal, are interpreted by the PT to modulate the release of a factor which affects prolactin release. The identity of this factor(s) is unknown but has been preemptively called 'tuberalin'. In the present study, we report on an initial immunocytochemical investigation where we have identified that many ovine PT cells are immunoreactive for the tachykinin substance P (SP). Few cells in the pars distalis immunoreact for SP. The SP-immunoreactive cells did not colocalize with beta-luteinizing hormone. RT-PCR confirmed the presence of preprotachykinin A mRNA in the PT. We hypothesize that SP, and possibly other preprotachykinin A-derived tachykinins, may play a role in the seasonal regulation of prolactin secretion in sheep.

Rhythmic expression of clock genes in the ependymal cell layer of the third ventricle of rodents is independent of melatonin signaling

Reproductive physiology is regulated by the photoperiod in many mammals. Decoding of the photoperiod involves circadian clock mechanisms, although the molecular basis remains unclear. Recent studies have shown that the ependymal cell layer lining the infundibular recess of the third ventricle (EC) is a key structure for the photoperiodic gonadal response. The EC exhibits daylength-dependent changes in the expression of photoperiodic output genes, including the type 2 deiodinase gene (Dio2 ). Here we investigated whether clock genes (Per1 and Bmal1) and the albumin D-binding protein gene (Dbp) are expressed in the EC of Syrian hamsters, and whether their expression differs under long-day and short-day conditions. Expression of all three genes followed a diurnal rhythm; expression of Per1 and Dbp in the EC peaked around lights-off, and expression of Bmal1 peaked in the early light phase. The amplitude of Per1 and Dbp expression was higher in hamsters kept under long-day conditions than in those kept under short-day conditions. Notably, the expression of these genes was not modified by exogenous melatonin within 25 h after injection, whereas Dio2 expression was inhibited 19 h after injection. Targeted melatonin receptor (MT1, MT2, and both MT1 and MT2) disruption in melatonin-proficient C3H mice did not affect the rhythmic expression of Per1 in the EC. These data show the existence of a molecular clock in the rodent EC. In the hamster, this clock responds to long-term changes in the photoperiod, but is independent of acute melatonin signals. In mice, the EC clock is not affected by deletion of melatonin receptors.

Decoding the nightly melatonin signal through circadian clockwork

Photoperiod regulates the timing of seasonal cycles in reproduction, energy metabolism, moult and other seasonal characteristics, and the effects are transduced through changes in the duration of nocturnal melatonin secretion from the pineal gland. Short daily melatonin signals (4-8 h/day) activate a summer physiology, while long signals (> 10 h/day) produce a winter phenotype. Decoding signal duration occurs in specific target cells in the brain and pituitary gland, each governing a different component of the seasonal adaptation. The pars tuberalis (PT) of the pituitary regulates prolactin release and provides a tractable model system to investigate the molecular decoding mechanism. In the PT, melatonin onset at dusk activates cryptochrone (Cry1) gene expression and melatonin offset at dawn activates period (Per1) gene expression, thus the Cry/Per interval varies directly with nightlength, and inverse to daylength. It is proposed that photoperiod-induced changes in this phase-relationship dictates the level of CRY/PER protein heterodimer formation, and in turn, the level of transcriptional drive to the genes that control PT output--up-regulated under long days stimulating prolactin secretion and a summer physiology, and--down-regulated by short days in winter. The melatonin signal is thus decoded through circadian clock genes.

Melatonin Plays a Crucial Role in the Regulation of Rhythmic Clock Gene Expression in the Mouse Pars Tuberalis

Circadian rhythms in physiology and behavior are driven by a central clock residing within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Molecularly, the biological clock is based on the transcriptional/translational feedback loop of clock genes (mPer, mCry, Clock, and Bmal1). Circadian expression of clock genes is not limited to the SCN, but is found in many peripheral tissues. Peripheral rhythms depend on neuroendocrine/neuronal output from the SCN. Melatonin, the hormone of darkness, represents an important neuroendocrine output of the circadian clock. The hypophyseal pars tuberalis (PT) is one of the main target regions for melatonin. The aim of the study was to test whether mPer, mCry, Clock, and Bmal1 are rhythmically expressed in the mouse PT and how the absence of melatonin receptors affects clock gene expression. We analyzed clock gene expression by in situ hybridization and compared wild-type (WT), melatonin 1 receptor knockout (MT1 ko), and melatonin 2 receptor knockout (MT2 ko) mice. mPer1, mCry1, Clock, and Bmal1, but not mPer2 and mCry2, were rhythmically expressed in the PT of WT and MT2 ko mice. In the PT of MT1 ko mice, expression of mPer1, mCry1, Clock, and Bmal1 was dramatically reduced. We conclude that melatonin, acting through the MT1 receptor, is an important regulator of rhythmic clock gene expression in the mouse PT.

Rhythms in clock proteins in the mouse pars tuberalis depend on MT1 melatonin receptor signalling

Melatonin provides a rhythmic neuroendocrine output, driven by a central circadian clock that encodes information about phase and length of the night. In the hypophyseal pars tuberalis (PT), melatonin is crucial for rhythmic expression of the clock genes mPer1 and mCry1, and melatonin acting in the PT influences prolactin secretion from the pars distalis. To examine further the possibility of a circadian clockwork functioning in the PT, and the impact of melatonin on this tissue, we assessed circadian clock proteins by immunohistochemistry and compared the diurnal expression in the PT of wild type (WT), and MT1 melatonin receptor-deficient (MT1-/-) mice. While in the PT of WT mice mPER1, mPER2, and mCRY1 showed a pronounced rhythm, mCRY2, CLOCK, and BMAL1 were constitutively present. Despite reported differences in maximal levels and timing of mCry1, mPer1, and mPer2 RNAs, the corresponding protein levels peaked simultaneously during late day, suggesting a codependency for their stabilization and/or nuclear entry. MT1-/- mice had reduced levels of mPER1, mCRY1, CLOCK and BMAL1, consistent with the earlier reported reduction in mRNA expression of these clock genes. Surprisingly, mPER2-immunoreaction was constitutively low, although mPer2 was rhythmically expressed in the PT of MT1-/- mice. This suggests that mPER2 is degraded due to the reduced levels of its stabilizing interaction partners mPER1 and mCRY1. The results show that melatonin, acting through the MT1, determines availability of the circadian proteins mPER1, mPER2 and mCRY1 and thus plays a crucial role in regulating rhythmicity in PT cells.

Photoperiod regulates clock gene rhythms in the ovine liver

To investigate the photoperiodic entrainment of peripheral rhythms in ruminants, we studied the expression of clock genes in the liver in the highly seasonal Soay sheep. Animals were kept under long (LD 16:8) or short photoperiod (LD 8:16). Daily rhythms in locomotor activity were recorded, and blood concentrations of melatonin and cortisol were measured by RIA. Per2, Bmal1, and Cry1 gene expression was determined by Northern blot analyses using ovine RNA probes in liver collected every 4h for 24h. Liver Per2 and Bmal1, but not Cry1, expression was rhythmic in all treatments. Under long days, peak Per2 expression occurred at end of the night with a similar timing to Bmal1, whereas, under short days the Per2 maximum was in the early night with an inverse pattern to Bmal1. There was a photoperiodxtime interaction for only Per2 (P < 0.001). The 24-h pattern in plasma cortisol matched the observed phasing of Per2 expression, suggesting that it may act as an endocrine entraining factor. The clock gene rhythms in the peripheral tissues were different in timing compared with the ovine suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN, central pacemaker) and pars tuberalis (melatonin target tissue), and the hepatic rhythms were of lower amplitude compared with photoperiodic rodents. Thus, there are likely to be important species differences in the way the central and peripheral clockwork encodes external photoperiod.

Measuring seasonal time within the circadian system: regulation of the suprachiasmatic nuclei by photoperiod

Day-length (photoperiod) is the primary environmental signal used to synchronise endogenous rhythms of physiology and behaviour. In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus house the master circadian clock. The SCN incorporate photoperiodic information and therefore measure both daily and seasonal time. Over the past decade, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the molecular basis of circadian clocks. It is now becoming apparent that the core molecular clock mechanism is itself regulated by photoperiod, although there is currently debate as to how this occurs. One recent model proposes that distinct groups of core 'clock genes' are associated with either morning or evening phases of the daily light/dark cycle. However, the validity of associating particular genes to morning and evening has been questioned. This article reviews the evidence for photoperiodic regulation of circadian clock function and then discusses alternative models that may explain the available data.

Just the two of us: melatonin and adenosine in rodent pituitary function

The function of the pituitary gland is tightly controlled by neuronal and hormonal afferents of the brain. In this review, the role of the neurohormone melatonin and the neuromodulator adenosine for rodent pituitary function will be elucidated. Adenosine is known as an important paracrine modulator for pituitary endocrine and folliculostellate cells, with availability regulated by local metabolic cellular activity. In general, adenosine inhibits the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) pathway in pituitary cells by binding to A1-, and A3-adenosinergic receptors, and activates it via A2-adenosinergic receptors. The neurohormone melatonin integrates time-of-day and time-of-year into pituitary function via binding to MT1-melatonin receptors. Melatonin impacts at the hypothalamic level neurons that synthesize releasing and release-inhibiting hormones, and at the pituitary level only cells of the hypophyseal pars tuberalis (PT). Thereby, the daily changes in the duration of the nocturnal melatonin surge are decoded and subsequently relayed to the pars distalis to adapt gonadotropin and prolactin release, respectively, to season. An exciting integration of time within the regulation of pituitary function was deciphered by analysing transmembrane signalling events in cells of the hypophyseal PT: a consecutive daily impact of initially the neurohormone melatonin and later the neuromodulator adenosine on rodent PT cells leads to a circadian rhythm in the transcription of cyclic-AMP-sensitive genes.

Molecular characterization of the long-day response in the Soay sheep, a seasonal mammal

In mammals, seasonal timekeeping depends on the generation of a nocturnal melatonin signal that reflects nightlength/daylength. To understand the mechanisms by which the melatonin signal is decoded, we studied the photoperiodic control of prolactin secretion in Soay sheep, which is mediated via melatonin responsive cells in the pars tuberalis of the pituitary. We demonstrate that the phases of peak expression of the clock genes Cryptochrome1 (Cry1), Period1 (Per1), and RevErbalpha respond acutely to altered melatonin secretion after a switch from short to long days. Cry1 is activated by melatonin onset, forming the dusk component of the molecular decoder, while Per1 expression at dawn reflects the offset of melatonin secretion. The Cry1-Per1 interval immediately adjusts to the melatonin signal on the first long day, and this is followed within 24 hr by an increase in prolactin secretion. The timing of peak RevErbalpha expression also responds to a switch to long days due to altered melatonin secretion but does not immediately reset to an entrained long-day state. These data suggest that effects of melatonin on clock gene expression are pivotal events in the neuroendocrine response and that pars tuberalis cells can act as molecular calendars, carrying a form of "photoperiodic memory."

Rhythmic melatonin secretion does not correlate with the expression of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase, inducible cyclic amp early repressor, period1 or cryptochrome1 mRNA in the sheep pineal

The pineal gland, through nocturnal melatonin, acts as a neuroendocrine transducer of daily and seasonal time. Melatonin synthesis is driven by rhythmic activation of the rate-limiting enzyme, arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT). In ungulates, AA-NAT mRNA is constitutively high throughout the 24-h cycle, and melatonin production is primarily controlled through effects on AA-NAT enzyme activity; this is in contrast to dominant transcriptional control in rodents. To determine whether there has been a selective loss of circadian control of AA-NAT mRNA expression in the sheep pineal, we measured the expression of other genes known to be rhythmic in rodents (inducible cAMP early repressor ICER, the circadian clock genes Period1 and Cryptochrome1, as well as AA-NAT). We first assayed gene expression in pineal glands collected from Soay sheep adapted to short days (Light: dark, 8-h: 16-h), and killed at 4-h intervals through 24-h. We found no evidence for rhythmic expression of ICER, AA-NAT or Cryptochrome1 under these conditions, whilst Period1 showed a low amplitude rhythm of expression, with higher values during the dark period. In a second group of animals, lights out was delayed by 8-h during the final 24-h sampling period, a manipulation that causes an immediate shortening of the period of melatonin secretion. This did not significantly affect the expression of ICER, AA-NAT or Cryptochrome1 in the pineal, whilst a slight suppressive effect on overall Per1 levels was observed. The attenuated response to photoperiod change appears to be specific to the ovine pineal, as the first long day induced rapid changes of Period1 and ICER expression in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei and pituitary pars tuberalis, respectively. Overall, our data suggest a general reduction of circadian control of transcript abundance in the ovine pineal gland, consistent with a marked evolutionary divergence in the mechanism regulating melatonin production between terrestrial ruminants and fossorial rodents.

Reproductive performance of gilts and sows in temperate versus subarctic and arctic zones of Norway

The reproductive performance of gilts and sows from two regions in Norway was investigated in a retrospective analysis of data from the litter recording system. In the Northern region (North; between 65 degrees N and 71 degrees N), there are extreme shifts in natural photoperiod between winter and summer. In the Southern region (South; between 59 degrees N and 60 degrees 30'N), photoperiodic changes are less dramatic. Gilts were 8 days older at first mating or insemination in the North than in the South (P<0.01). A significantly lower proportion of sows in the North were mated or inseminated within 5 days post-weaning than in the South, a difference present both among primiparous and multiparous sows (P<0.01). Overall farrowing rate in the North was lower than in the South, but litter size (total number born) among those pigs that farrowed was larger. After correction for year, month, breed and age at first service, there were still lower odds of farrowing for gilts in North than in South. Neither for primiparous nor multiparous sows were regional differences in farrowing probability significant when year, month, breed and weaning to service interval were included in the model. Gilts and primiparous sows had a lower probability of farrowing following insemination during summer or autumn months, but service month was not significantly related to the farrowing probability of multiparous sows. For gilts, litter size was positively related to age at first service. For sows, litter size was lowest at weaning to service intervals between 6 and 10 days. Total numbers of piglets born per litter were estimated to be 0.36, 0.38 and 0.55 larger in the North than in the South (differences in least square means; gilts, primiparous sows and multiparous sows, respectively) (P<0.01). Litter size was lower after service during natural long photoperiod than during the rest of the year.

An analysis of canine hair re-growth after clipping for a surgical procedure

Hair growth and replacement have been studied extensively in humans, sheep and laboratory rodents, but in dogs and other mammalian species few studies have been published. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the time required for the hair to re-grow in dogs after clipping for a surgical procedure; (2) to define whether the season of the year influenced the period of time required for re-growth and; (3) to determine if season might influence the telogen: anagen ratio. Eleven Labrador retrievers were recruited during spring, 10 during summer, six during autumn and 10 during winter. Hairs re-grew to their preclipped length in 14.6 weeks, 14.5 weeks, 13.6 weeks and 15.4 weeks when shaved in the spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. The differences in these values were not significant suggesting that season has no effect on the rate of hair re-growth in Labrador retrievers housed indoors (P = 0.12). The mean values for the telogen: anagen ratio in each season were: 5.2 (spring), 6.1 (summer), 9.5 (autumn), and 5.3 (winter). The differences in these values also were not significant (P = 0.89). The percentage of hairs in telogen was over 80% in all four seasons.

Blood melatonin and prolactin concentrations in dairy cows exposed to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields during 8 h photoperiods

Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that electric and magnetic field (EMF) exposure may result in endocrine responses similar to those observed in animals exposed to long days. In the first experiment, 16 lactating, pregnant Holstein cows were assigned to two replicates according to a crossover design with treatment switchback. All animals were confined to wooden metabolic cages and maintained under short day photoperiods (8 h light/16 h dark). Treated animals were exposed to a vertical electric field of 10 kV/m and a horizontal magnetic field of 30 microT (EMF) for 16 h/day for 4 weeks. In a second, similar experiment, 16 nonlactating, nonpregnant Holstein cows subjected to short days were exposed to EMF, using a similar protocol, for periods corresponding to the duration of one estrous cycle. In the first experiment, circulating MLT concentrations during the light period showed a small numerical decrease during EMF exposure (P < .05). Least-square means for the 8 h light period were 9.9 versus 12.4 pg/ml, SE = 1.3. Melatonin concentrations during the dark period were not affected by the treatment. A similar trend was observed in the second experiment, where MLT concentrations during the light period tended to be lower (8.8 pg/ml vs. 16.3 pg/ml, P < .06) in the EMF exposed group, and no effects were observed during the dark period. Plasma prolactin (PRL) was increased in the EMF exposed group (16.6 vs. 12.7 ng/ml, P < .02) in the first experiment. In the second experiment, the overall PRL concentrations found were lower, and the mean plasma PRL concentration was not affected by treatment. These experiments provide evidence that EMF exposure may modify the response of dairy cows to photoperiod.

Top-down Approaches to the Study of Natural Variation in Complex Physiological Pathways Using the White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) as a Model

Variation in complex physiological pathways has important effects on human function and medical treatment. Complex pathways involve cells at multiple locations, which serve different functions regulated by many genes and include complex neuroendocrine pathways that regulate physiological function. One of two competing hypotheses regarding the effects of selection on complex pathways predicts that variability should be common within complex pathways. If this hypothesis is correct, then we should expect wide variation in neuroendocrine function to be typical within natural populations. To test this hypothesis, a complex neuroendocrine pathway that regulates photoperiod-dependent changes in fertility in a natural population of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) was used to test for natural genetic variability in multiple components of the pathway. After testing only six elements in the photoperiod pathway in P. leucopus, genetic variation in the following four of these elements was evident: the circadian clock, melatonin receptor abundance or affinity, sensitivity of the reproductive axis to steroid negative feedback, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal activity. If this result can be extended to humans, the prediction would be that significant variation at multiple loci in complex neuroendocrine pathways is common among humans, and that variation would exist even in human populations from a common genetic background. This finding could only be drawn from an "exotic" animal model derived from a natural source population, confirming the continuing importance of nontraditional models alongside the standard laboratory species.

Differential distribution of melatonin receptors in the pituitary gland of Xenopus laevis

A major target site for melatonin action is thought to be the pituitary gland. We have detected differential expression and co-localization of the Mel(1a) and Mel(1c) receptors in cells of the Xenopus laevis pituitary gland. Sections of Xenopus pituitary glands were labeled with Mel(1a) and/or Mel(1c) antibodies, in combination with antibodies to arginine vasotocin (AVT), alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH), prolactin (PRL), and luteinizing hormone (LH). Mel(1a) immunoreactivity was localized to cells of the pars intermedia and to elements within the pars nervosa. Mel(1c) immunoreactivity was also localized to the pars nervosa, and significant labeling was also observed in discrete clusters of cells in the pars distalis. Mel(1a) was absent from the pars distalis, while Mel(1c) was absent from the pars intermedia. Mel(1a) and Mel(1c) were co-localized in the pars nervosa. AVT was present in the pars nervosa, and appeared to be localized to the cell clusters of the pars distalis in which the Mel(1c) receptor was localized. alpha-MSH co-localized with the Mel(1a) receptor in the pars intermedia. LH appeared to localize to many of the cells in the pars distalis, with the notable exception of the Mel(1c) receptor-positive clusters of cells. PRL did not appear to co-localize with either melatonin receptor. The pattern of differential expression of the Mel(1a) and Mel(1c) receptors suggests that the receptors specifically mediate the cellular response to melatonin binding in the specific cell populations.

[Chrono-endocrinology--quo vadis?]

The present review deals with important new chronobiological results especially in the field of chronoendocrinology, shedding new light on the circadian organisation of mammals including man. In vitro studies have shown that the concept of the existence of a single circadian oscillator located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus has to be extended. Circadian oscillators have also been found to exist in the retina, islets of Langerhans, liver, lung, and fibroblasts. Another major result is the detection of a new photopigment, melanopsin, present in a subpopulation of retinal ganglion cells which are lightsensitive and project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus, acting as zeitgeber for the photic entrainment of the circadian rhythm. We are only beginning to understand how the circadian oscillator transmits the circadian message to the endocrine system. The generation of circadian and seasonal rhythms of hormone synthesis is best understood in the pineal gland and its hormone melatonin. Seasonal changes of melatonin synthesis are transduced in the pars tuberalis of the adenohypophysis which is now entering the limelight of chronoendocrinological research. Currently, the elucidation of the genetic basis and the molecular organisation of the circadian oscillator within individual cells is a major thrust in chronobiological research.

Melatonin-dopamine interactions: from basic neurochemistry to a clinical setting

To review the interaction between melatonin and the dopaminergic system in the hypothalamus and striatum and its potential clinical use in dopamine-related disorders in the central nervous system. Medline-based search on melatonin-dopamine interactions in mammals. Melatonin. the hormone produced by the pineal gland at night. influences circadian and seasonal rhythms, most notably the sleep-wake cycle and seasonal reproduction. The neurochemical basis of these activities is not understood yet. Inhibition of dopamine release by melatonin has been demonstrated in specific areas of the mammalian central nervous system (hypothalamus, hippocampus, medulla-pons, and retina). Antidopaminergic activities of melatonin have been demonstrated in the striatum. Dopaminergic transmission has a pivotal role in circadian entrainment of the fetus, in coordination of body movement and reproduction. Recent findings indicate that melatonin may modulate dopaminergic pathways involved in movement disorders in humans. In Parkinson patients melatonin may, on the one hand, exacerbate symptoms (because of its putative interference with dopamine release) and, on the other, protect against neurodegeneration (by virtue of its antioxidant properties and its effects on mitochondrial activity). Melatonin appears to be effective in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. a severe movement disorder associated with long-term blockade of the postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptor by antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenic patients. The interaction of melatonin with the dopaminergic system may play a significant role in the nonphotic and photic entrainment of the biological clock as well as in the fine-tuning of motor coordination in the striatum. These interactions and the antioxidant nature of melatonin may be beneficial in the treatment of dopamine-related disorders.

Refractoriness to melatonin occurs independently at multiple brain sites in Siberian hamsters

The mid-winter development of refractoriness to melatonin (Mel) triggers recrudescence of the atrophied reproductive apparatus of rodents. As a consequence, over-wintering animals become reproductively competent just before the onset of spring conditions favorable for breeding. The neural target tissues that cease to respond to winter Mel signals have not been identified. We now report that the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, which contains the principal circadian clock, and the reuniens and paraventricular nuclei of the thalamus, each independently becomes refractory to melatonin. Small implants of Mel that were left in place for 40 wk and that act locally on these brain nuclei, induced testicular regression within 6 wk in male Siberian hamsters; 12 wk later Mel implants no longer suppressed reproduction and gonadal recrudescence ensued. Hamsters that were then given a systemic Mel infusion s.c. immediately initiated a second gonadal regression, implying that neurons at each site become refractory to Mel without compromising responsiveness of other Mel target tissues. Refractoriness occurs locally and independently at each neural target tissue, rather than in a separate "refractoriness" substrate. Restricted, target-specific actions of Mel are consistent with the independent regulation by day length of the several behavioral and physiological traits that vary seasonally in mammals.