In vitro forecasting of drugs which may interfere with the biotransformation of midazolam

Mechanism-based inactivation of cytochromes P450: implications in drug interactions and pharmacotherapy

Cytochrome P40 (CYP) enzymes dominate the metabolism of numerous endogenous and xenobiotic substances. While it is commonly believed that CYP-catalysed reactions result in the detoxication of foreign substances, these reactions can also yield reactive intermediates that can bind to cellular macromolecules to cause cytotoxicity or irreversibly inactivate CYPs that create them.Mechanism-based inactivation (MBI) produces either irreversible or quasi-irreversible inactivation and is commonly caused by CYP metabolic bioactivation to an electrophilic reactive intermediate. Many drugs that have been known to cause MBI in CYPs have been discovered as perpetrators in drug-drug interactions throughout the last 20-30 years.This review will highlight the key findings from the recent literature about the mechanisms of CYP enzyme inhibition, with a focus on the broad mechanistic elements of MBI for widely used drugs linked to the phenomenon. There will also be a brief discussion of the clinical or pharmacokinetic consequences of CYP inactivation with regard to drug interaction and toxicity risk.Gaining knowledge about the selective inactivation of CYPs by common therapeutic drugs helps with the assessment of factors that affect the systemic clearance of co-administered drugs and improves comprehension of anticipated interactions with other drugs or xenobiotics.

Reversible Mechanisms of Enzyme Inhibition and Resulting Clinical Significance

Inhibition of a drug-metabolizing enzyme by the reversible interaction of a drug with the enzyme, thus decreasing the metabolism of another drug, is a major cause of clinically significant drug-drug interactions. This chapter defines the four reversible mechanisms of inhibition exhibited by drugs: competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and mixed competitive/noncompetitive. An in vitro procedure to determine the potential of a drug to be a reversible inhibitor is also provided. Finally, a number of examples of clinically significant drug-drug interactions resulting from reversible inhibition are described.

Translational High-Dimensional Drug Interaction Discovery and Validation Using Health Record Databases and Pharmacokinetics Models

Polypharmacy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Combining epidemiological studies with pharmacokinetic modeling, we detected and evaluated high-dimensional DDIs among 30 frequent drugs. Multidrug combinations that increased the risk of myopathy were identified in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and electronic medical record (EMR) databases by a mixture drug-count response model. CYP450 inhibition was estimated among the 30 drugs in the presence of 1 to 4 inhibitors using in vitro / in vivo extrapolation. Twenty-eight three-way and 43 four-way DDIs had significant myopathy risk in both databases and predicted increases in the area under the concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) >2-fold. The high-dimensional DDI of omeprazole, fluconazole, and clonidine was associated with a 6.41-fold (FAERS) and 18.46-fold (EMR) increased risk of myopathy local false discovery rate (<0.005); the AUCR of omeprazole in this combination was 9.35. The combination of health record informatics and pharmacokinetic modeling is a powerful translational approach to detect high-dimensional DDIs.

Possible drug-drug interaction in dogs and cats resulted from alteration in drug metabolism: A mini review

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (in particular at metabolism) may result in fatal adverse effects in some cases. This basic information, therefore, is needed for drug therapy even in veterinary medicine, as multidrug therapy is not rare in canines and felines. The aim of this review was focused on possible drug-drug interactions in dogs and cats. The interaction includes enzyme induction by phenobarbital, enzyme inhibition by ketoconazole and fluoroquinolones, and down-regulation of enzymes by dexamethasone. A final conclusion based upon the available literatures and author's experience is given at the end of the review.

Irreversible enzyme inhibition kinetics and drug-drug interactions

This chapter describes the types of irreversible inhibition of drug-metabolizing enzymes and the methods commonly employed to quantify the irreversible inhibition and subsequently predict the extent and time course of clinically important drug-drug interactions.

Integration of in vitro binding mechanism into the semiphysiologically based pharmacokinetic interaction model between ketoconazole and midazolam

In vitro screening for drug–drug interactions is an integral component of drug development, with larger emphasis now placed on the use of in vitro parameters to predict clinical inhibition. However, large variability exists in K_i reported for ketoconazole with midazolam, a model inhibitor–substrate pair for CYP3A. We reviewed the literature and extracted K_i for ketoconazole as measured by the inhibition of hydroxymidazolam formation in human liver microsomes. The superset of data collected was analyzed for the impact of microsomal binding, using Langmuir and phase equilibrium binding models, and fitted to various inhibition models: competitive, noncompetitive, and mixed. A mixed inhibition model with binding corrected by an independent binding model was best able to fit the data (K_ic = 19.2 nmol/l and K_in = 39.8 nmol/l) and to predict clinical effect of ketoconazole on midazolam area under the concentration–time curve. The variability of reported K_i may partially be explained by microsomal binding and choice of inhibition model.

Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology

GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). The type A GABA receptor (GABA(A)R) system is the primary pharmacological target for many drugs used in clinical anesthesia. The α1, β2, and γ2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs located in the various parts of CNS are thought to be involved in versatile effects caused by inhaled anesthetics and classic benzodiazepines (BZD), both of which are widely used in clinical anesthesiology. During the past decade, the emergence of tonic inhibitory conductance in extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs has coincided with evidence showing that these receptors are highly sensitive to the sedatives and hypnotics used in anesthesia. Anesthetic enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition seems to be preferentially increased in regions shown to be important in controlling memory, awareness, and sleep. This review focuses on the physiology of the GABA(A)Rs and the pharmacological properties of clinically used BZDs. Although classic BZDs are widely used in anesthesiological practice, there is a constant need for new drugs with more favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and fewer side effects. New hypnotics are currently developed, and promising results for one of these, the GABA(A)R agonist remimazolam, have recently been published.

Ketobemidone is a substrate for cytochrome P4502C9 and 3A4, but not for P-glycoprotein

The role of the major drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes as well as P-glycoprotein (PGP) was investigated in the disposition of ketobemidone in vitro. Formation of norketobemidone from ketobemidone was studied and compared with the activities of 11 major CYP enzymes in human liver microsomes. The formation of norketobemidone from ketobemidone (1 microM) correlated best with CYP2C9 activity, measured as losartan oxidation (rs = 0.82, n = 19, p < 0.001), but there was also a strong correlation with CYP3A4 activity. Additionally, a good correlation was observed with CYP2C19, CYP2C8 and CYP2B6 at a ketobemidone concentration of 50 microM. Inhibition studies confirmed the involvement of CYP2C9 and CTP3A4 in the formation of norketobemidone. The formation rate of norketobemidone was three times higher in the CYP2C9*1*1 genotype group compared with the CYP2C9*1*2, CYP2C9*1*3 and CYP2C9*3*3 genotypes (p < 0.01). Treatment with verapamil as a PGP inhibitor did not affect the transport of ketobemidone in Caco-2 cells, indicating that PGP is not involved. The data suggest that CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 play a major role in the formation of norketobemidone at clinically relevant concentrations.

Model for the drug–drug interaction responsible for CYP3A enzyme inhibition. II: establishment and evaluation of dexamethasone-pretreated female rats

1. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A catalysis of testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation in female rat liver microsomes was significantly induced, then reached a plateau level after pretreatment with 80 mg kg(-1) day(-1) dexamethasone (DEX) for 3 days. 2. Midazolam was mainly metabolized by CYP3A in DEX-treated female rat liver microsomes from an immuno-inhibition study, and the apparent K(m) was 1.8 microM, similar to that in human microsomes. 3. Ketoconazole and erythromycin, typical CYP3A inhibitors, demonstrated extensive inhibition of midazolam metabolism in DEX-treated female rat liver microsomes, and the apparent K(i) values were 0.088 and 91.2 microM, respectively. The values were similar to those in humans, suggesting that DEX-treated female rat liver microsomes have properties similar to those of humans. 4. After oral administration of midazolam, the plasma midazolam concentration in DEX-treated female rats significantly decreased compared with control female rats. The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) and elimination half-life were one-11th and one-20th of those of control female rats, respectively. 5. Using DEX-treated female rats, the effect of CYP3A inhibitors on midazolam pharmacokinetics was evaluated. The AUC and maximum concentration in plasma (C(max)) increased when ketoconazole was co-administered with midazolam. 6. It was shown that the drug-drug interaction that occurs in vitro is also observed in vivo after oral administration of midazolam. In conclusion, the DEX-treated female rat could be a useful model for evaluating drug-drug interactions based on CYP3A enzyme inhibition.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of midazolam in children with severe malaria and convulsions

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and buccal midazolam (MDZ) in children with severe falciparum malaria and convulsions.

METHODS

Thirty-three children with severe malaria and convulsions lasting ≥5 min were given a single dose of MDZ (0.3 mg kg⁻¹) IV (n = 13), IM (n = 12) or via the buccal route (n = 8). Blood samples were collected over 6 h post-dose for determination of plasma MDZ and 1′-hydroxymidazolam concentrations. Plasma concentration–time data were fitted using pharmacokinetic models.

RESULTS

Median (range) MDZ C_max of 481 (258–616), 253 (96–696) and 186 (64–394) ng ml⁻¹ were attained within a median (range) t_max of 10 (5–15), 15 (5–60) and 10 (5–40) min, following IV, IM and buccal administration, respectively. Mean (95% confidence interval) of the pharmacokinetic parameters were: AUC(0,∞) 596 (327, 865), 608 (353, 864) and 518 (294, 741) ng ml⁻¹ h; V_d 0.85 l kg⁻¹; clearance 14.4 ml min⁻¹ kg⁻¹, elimination half-life 1.22 (0.65, 1.8) h, respectively. A single dose of MDZ terminated convulsions in all (100%), 9/12 (75%) and 5/8 (63%) children following IV, IM and buccal administration. Four children (one in the IV, one in the IM and two in the buccal groups) had respiratory depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of MDZ at the currently recommended dose resulted in rapid achievement of therapeutic MDZ concentrations. Although IM and buccal administration of MDZ may be more practical in peripheral healthcare facilities, the efficacy appears to be poorer at the dose used, and a different dosage regimen might improve the efficacy.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

Midazolam (MDZ), a water-soluble benzodiazepine, can be administered via several routes, including intravenously (IV), intramuscularly (IM) and buccal routes to terminate convulsions. It may be a suitable alternative to diazepam to stop convulsions in children with severe malaria, especially at peripheral healthcare facilities. The pharmacokinetics of MDZ have not been described in African children, in whom factors such as the aetiology and nutritional status may influence the pharmacokinetics.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Administration of MDZ (IV, IM, or buccal) at the currently recommended dose (0.3 mg kg⁻¹) resulted in rapid achievement of median maximum plasma concentrations of MDZ within the range 64–616 ng ml⁻¹, with few clinically significant cardio-respiratory effects. A single dose of MDZ rapidly terminated (within 10 min) seizures in all (100%), 9/12 (75%) and 5/8 (63%) children following IV, IM and buccal administration, respectively. Although IM and buccal MDZ may be the preferred treatment for children in the pre-hospital settings the efficacy appears to be poorer.

Polymorphisme génétique et interactions médicamenteuses : leur importance dans le traitement de la douleur

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of certain genetic polymorphisms on variable responses to analgesics

SOURCES

Systematic review, by means of a structured computerized search in the Medline database (1966-2004). Articles in English and French were selected. References in relevant articles were also retrieved.

MAIN FINDINGS

Most analgesics are metabolized by CYP isoenzymes subject to genetic polymorphism. NSAIDs are metabolized by CYP2C9; opioids described as "weak" (codeine, tramadol), anti-depressants and dextromethorphan are metabolized by CYP2D6 and some "potent" opioids (buprenorphine, methadone or fentanyl) by CYP3A4/5. After the usual doses have been administered, drug toxicity or, on the contrary, therapeutic ineffectiveness may occur, depending on polymorphism and the substance. Drug interactions mimicking genetic defects because of the existence of CYP inhibitors and inducers, also contribute to the variable response to analgesics. Some opioids are substrates of P-gp, a transmembrane transporter also subject to genetic polymorphism. However, P-gp could only play a minor modulating role in man on the central effects of morphine, methadone and fentanyl.

CONCLUSION

In the near future, pharmacogenetics should enable us to optimize therapeutics by individualizing our approach to analgesic drugs and making numerous analgesics safer and more effective. The clinical usefulness of these individualized approaches will have to be demonstrated by appropriate pharmacoeconomic studies and analyses.

Model for the drug-drug interaction responsible for CYP3A enzyme inhibition. I: evaluation of cynomolgus monkeys as surrogates for humans

1. Anti-human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 antiserum completely inhibited midazolam metabolism in monkey liver microsomes, suggesting that midazolam was mainly metabolized by CYP3A enzyme(s) in monkey liver microsomes. 2. Midazolam metabolism was also inhibited in vitro by typical chemical inhibitors of CYP3A, such as ketoconazole, erythromycin and diltiazem, and the apparent K(i) values for ketoconazole, erythromycin and diltiazem were 0.127, 94.2 and 29.6 microM, respectively. 3. CYP3A inhibitors increased plasma midazolam concentrations when midazolam and CYP3A inhibitors were co-administered orally. However, the pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam were not changed by treatment with CYP3A inhibitors when midazolam was given intravenously. This suggests that CYP3A inhibitors modified the first-pass metabolism in the liver and/or intestine, but not systemic metabolism. 4. The drug-drug interaction responsible for CYP3A enzyme(s) inhibition was observed when midazolam and inhibitors were co-administrated orally. Therefore, it was concluded that monkeys given midazolam orally could be useful models for predicting drug-drug interactions in man based on CYP3A enzyme inhibition.

Predicting drug clearance from recombinantly expressed CYPs: intersystem extrapolation factors

1. Recombinantly expressed human cytochromes P450 (rhCYPs) have been underused for the prediction of human drug clearance (CL). 2. Differences in intrinsic activity (per unit CYP) between rhCYP and human liver enzymes complicate the issue and these discrepancies have not been investigated systematically. We define intersystem extrapolation factors (ISEFs) that allow the use of rhCYP data for the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of human drug CL and the variance that is associated with interindividual variation of CYP abundance due to genetic and environmental effects. 3. A large database (n = 451) of metabolic stability data has been compiled and used to derive ISEFs for the most commonly used expression systems and CYP enzymes. 4. Statistical models were constructed for the ISEFs to determine major covariates in order to optimize experimental design to increase prediction accuracy. 5. Suggestions have been made for the conduct of future studies using rhCYP to predict human drug clearance.

VALIDATED ASSAYS FOR HUMAN CYTOCHROME P450 ACTIVITIES

The measurement of the effect of new chemical entities on human cytochrome P450 marker activities using in vitro experimentation represents an important experimental approach in drug development. In vitro drug interaction data can be used in guiding the design of clinical drug interaction studies, or, when no effect is observed in vitro, the data can be used in place of an in vivo study to claim that no interaction will occur in vivo. To make such a claim, it must be assured that the in vitro experiments are performed with absolute confidence in the methods used and data obtained. To meet this need, 12 semiautomated assays for human P450 marker substrate activities have been developed and validated using approaches described in the GLP (good laboratory practices) as per the code of U.S. Federal Regulations. The assays that were validated are: phenacetin O-deethylase (CYP1A2), coumarin 7-hydroxylase (CYP2A6), bupropion hydroxylase (CYP2B6), amodiaquine N-deethylase (CYP2C8), diclofenac 4'-hydroxylase and tolbutamide methylhydroxylase (CYP2C9), (S)-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19), dextromethorphan O-demethylase (CYP2D6), chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylase (CYP2E1), felodipine dehydrogenase, testosterone 6 beta-hydroxylase, and midazolam 1'-hydroxylase (CYP3A4 and CYP3A5). High-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, using stable isotope-labeled internal standards, has been applied as the analytical method. This analytical approach, through its high sensitivity and selectivity, has permitted the use of very low incubation concentrations of microsomal protein (0.01-0.2 mg/ml). Analytical assay accuracy and precision values were excellent. Enzyme kinetic and inhibition parameters obtained using these methods demonstrated high precision and were within the range of values previously reported in the scientific literature. These methods should prove useful in the routine assessments of the potential for new drug candidates to elicit pharmacokinetic drug interactions via inhibition of cytochrome P450 activities.

Prediction of the in vivo interaction between midazolam and macrolides based on in vitro studies using human liver microsomes

Clinical studies have revealed that plasma concentrations of midazolam after oral administration are greatly increased by coadministration of erythromycin and clarithromycin, whereas azithromycin has little effect on midazolam concentrations. Several macrolide antibiotics are known to be mechanism-based inhibitors of CYP3A, a cytochrome P450 isoform responsible for midazolam hydroxylation. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively predict in vivo drug interactions in humans involving macrolide antibiotics with different inhibitory potencies based on in vitro studies. alpha- and 4-Hydroxylation of midazolam by human liver microsomes were evaluated as CYP3A-mediated metabolic reactions, and the effect of preincubation with macrolides was examined. The hydroxylation of midazolam was inhibited in a time- and concentration-dependent manner following preincubation with macrolides in the presence of NADPH, whereas almost no inhibition was observed without preincubation. The kinetic parameters for enzyme inactivation (K'app and kinact) involved in midazolam alpha-hydroxylation were 12.6 microM and 0.0240 min-1, respectively, for erythromycin, 41.4 microM and 0.0423 min-1, respectively, for clarithromycin, and 623 microM and 0.0158 min-1, respectively, for azithromycin. Similar results were obtained for the 4-hydroxylation pathway. These parameters and the reported pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam and macrolides were then used to simulate in vivo interactions based on a physiological flow model. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of midazolam after oral administration was predicted to increase 2.9- or 3.0-fold following pretreatment with erythromycin (500 mg t.i.d. for 5 or 6 days, respectively) and 2.1- or 2.5-fold by clarithromycin (250 mg b.i.d. for 5 days or 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 days, respectively), whereas azithromycin (500 mg o.d. for 3 days) was predicted to have little effect on midazolam AUC. These results agreed well with the reported in vivo observations.

Cytochrome P450 inhibition using recombinant proteins and mass spectrometry/multiple reaction monitoring technology in a cassette incubation

Detailed cytochrome P450 (P450) inhibition profiles are now required for the registration of novel molecular entities. This method uses combined substrates (phenacetin, diclofenac, S-mephenytoin, bufuralol, and midazolam) with combined recombinant P450 enzymes (CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4) in an attempt to limit interactions with other more minor P450s and associated reductases. Kinetic analysis of single substrate with single P450 (sP450) yielded apparent Km values of 25, 2, 20, 9, and 3 microM, for CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4, respectively. Combined substrates with combined P450s (cP450) yielded apparent Km values of 65, 4, 19, 7, and 2 microM. Selectivity of the substrates for each P450 isoform was checked. Phenacetin proved to be the least selective substrate. However, the ratio of the various P450s was modified in the final assay such that metabolism of phenacetin by other enzymes was approximately 20% of the metabolism by CYP1A2. IC50 determinations with alpha-naphthoflavone (0.04 microM), sulfaphenazole (0.26 microM), tranylcypromine (9 microM), quinidine (0.02 microM), and ketoconazole (0.01 microM) were similar for sP450 and cP450 enzymes. The assay was further evaluated with 11 literature compounds and 52 in-house new chemical entities, and the data compared with radiometric/fluorescent values. The overall protein level of the assay was reduced from the original starting point, as this led to some artificially high IC50 measurements when compared with existing lower protein assays (radiometric/fluorometric). This method offers high throughput P450 inhibition profiling with potential advantages over current radiometric or fluorometric methods.

Quinine 3-hydroxylation as a biomarker reaction for the activity of CYP3A4 in man

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the usefulness of the 3-hydroxylation of quinine as a biomarker reaction for the activity of CYP3A4 in man and to study the interindividual variation in the metabolic ratio (MR), i.e. quinine/3-hydroxyquinine.

METHODS

Data from a previous study (A) was used for determination of the MR of quinine in plasma and urine at different time points. In study B, 24 healthy Swedish subjects received 250 mg quinine hydrochloride first alone and later together with four other CYP probe drugs [losartan (CYP2C9), omeprazole (CYP2C19), debrisoquine (CYP2D6) and caffeine (CYP1A2)] administered on the same day. Plasma and urine samples were collected before quinine intake and 16 h thereafter and analysed for quinine and 3-hydroxyquinine using high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma and/or urine were collected for the other probes at different time points. MRs of all the probes were determined and correlations to quinine MR were studied.

RESULTS

In study A, the MR in plasma was stable over 96 h. The ratio increased from 5.8 to 12.2 (P=0.006) during co-administration with ketoconazole, whereas no significant difference (P=0.76) was observed during co-administration with fluvoxamine (from 5.8 to 6.0). In study B, there was no significant difference (P=0.36) between the mean MRs when quinine was given alone (4.7) or together with the four other drugs (4.5). There was a significant correlation between the MR of quinine and omeprazole sulphone formation (r=0.52, P<0.01), but not to the MRs of the other probes. There was a fivefold interindividual variability in the MR.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR of quinine in plasma or urine may serve as a stable measure of the activity of CYP3A4 in man. These results together with in vitro data show that quinine is also a specific CYP3A4 probe.

Microsomal protein concentration modifies the apparent inhibitory potency of CYP3A inhibitors

The effect of microsomal protein concentration on the inhibitory potency of a series of CYP3A inhibitors was assessed in vitro using diazepam 3-hydroxylation (yielding temazepam) as an index of CYP3A activity. With diazepam concentrations fixed at 100 micro M, inhibition of temazepam formation by fixed concentrations of ritonavir, ketoconazole, itraconazole, OH-itraconazole, norfluoxetine, and fluvoxamine decreased substantially as active protein concentrations increased from 0.0625 to 3.0 mg/ml. However protein concentration had only a small effect on the inhibitory activity of fluconazole. Equilibrium dialysis indicated extensive microsomal binding of all inhibitors except fluconazole; binding increased with higher protein concentrations. Based on the CYP3A content of liver microsomes, decrements in inhibitory potency of stronger inhibitors (ketoconazole and ritonavir) could be explained by specific binding, whereas nonspecific binding is anticipated to account for the effect on weaker inhibitors (norfluoxetine and fluvoxamine). Thus, microsomal binding (specific, nonspecific, or a combination of both) may have a major effect on estimation of inhibitory potency of p450 inhibitors and may contribute to variations among laboratories. The effect can be minimized by use of the lowest possible microsomal protein concentration for in vitro studies of metabolic inhibition.

Enzyme kinetics for the formation of 3-hydroxyquinine and three new metabolites of quinine in vitro; 3-hydroxylation by CYP3A4 is indeed the major metabolic pathway

The formation kinetics of 3-hydroxyquinine, 2'-quininone, (10S)-11-dihydroxydihydroquinine, and (10R)-11-dihydroxydihydroquinine were investigated in human liver microsomes and in human recombinant-expressed CYP3A4. The inhibition profile was studied by the use of different concentrations of ketoconazole, troleandomycin, and fluvoxamine. In addition, formation rates of the metabolites were correlated to different enzyme probe activities of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 in microsomes from 20 human livers. Formation of 3-hydroxyquinine had the highest intrinsic clearance in human liver microsomes (mean +/- S.D.) of 11.0 +/- 4.6 micro l/min/mg. A markedly lower intrinsic clearance, 1.4 +/- 0.7, 0.5 +/- 0.1, and 1.1 +/- 0.2 micro l/min/mg was measured for 2'-quininone, (10R)-11-dihydroxydihydroquinine and (10S)-11-dihydroxydihydroquinine, respectively. Incubation with human recombinant CYP3A4 resulted in a 20-fold higher intrinsic clearance for 3-hydroxyquinine compared with 2'-quininone formation whereas no other metabolites were detected. The formation rate of 3-hydroxyquinine was completely inhibited by ketoconazole (1 micro M) and troleandomycin (80 micro M). Strong inhibition was observed on the formation of 2'-quininone whereas the formation of (10S)-11-dihydroxydihydroquinine was partly inhibited by these two inhibitors. No inhibition on the formation of (10R)-11-dihydroxydihydroquinine was observed. There was a significant correlation between the formation rates of quinine metabolites and activities of the CYP3A4 selected marker probes. This in vitro study demonstrates that 3-hydroxyquinine is the principal metabolite of quinine and CYP3A4 is the major enzyme involved in this metabolic pathway.

[Sedation induced by midazolam in intensive care: pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic aspects]

OBJECTIVE

Review on midazolam in order to optimize drug utilisation and therapeutic monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

Research of English or French articles published until August 2001, using Medline database. The key words were: midazolam, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic, sedation, drug interaction.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles, clinical cases and letters to the Editor were selected. Animal studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were analysed according to their interest in midazolam clinical practice.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Midazolam is a benzodiazepine widely used in intensive care unit, as a sedative, anxiety-relieving, and amnesic drug. Midazolam could be used in patients with cardiac, or respiratory failure, and in neurosurgery. A great interindividual variability on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response was observed. In intensive care patients, elimination half-life is known to be widely increased. Midazolam is metabolised by hepatic microsomes. The major metabolite is the 1-hydroxymidazolam, which is pharmacologically active. A prolonged sedation due to an accumulation of conjugated metabolite was observed in renal failure patients. Enzymatic inductors or inhibitors could influence pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of midazolam.

CONCLUSION

According to midazolam pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, an individual dosage adjustment is essential for long-term sedation. Target controlled sedation could be a mean to limit the variability and to reach quickly the pharmacodynamic effect.

Simvastatin and atorvastatin enhance hypotensive effect of diltiazem in rats

Effects of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, simvastatin and atorvastatin, on diltiazem-induced hypotension were examined in anaesthetized rats and compared to that of pravastatin. Vehicle, 2 mg/kg/day simvastatin, 2 mg/kg/day atorvastatin, or 4 mg/kg/day pravastatin was administered orally for 4 days. Diltiazem at 3 mg/kg was given orally 2 hours after the final administration of the inhibitors. Arterial blood pressure was measured via a cannula introduced into the left carotid artery, and heart rate was counted from the pulse pressure. In all groups, diltiazem significantly decreased the mean arterial blood pressure without any changes in heart rate. Pretreatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin significantly enhanced the hypotensive effect of diltiazem, while that with pravastatin did not. Heart rate was not modified by pretreatment with the inhibitors. The results indicate that concomitant use of diltiazem with simvastatin or atorvastatin enhances diltiazem-induced hypotension, probably by competitive inhibition of diltiazem metabolism with simvastatin and atorvastatin metabolisms.

Inhibition of cytochrome P450 2C9 activity in vitro by 5-hydroxytryptamine and adrenaline

In the present study, the occurrence of a modulatory effect of 14 neurotransmitters, precursors and metabolites on the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) enzyme activity, as determined by diclofenac 4-hydroxylation, was studied in human liver microsomes. Two indoleamines, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and adrenaline, showed a non-competitive-type inhibitory effect of approximately 90% of the diclofenac 4-hydroxylase activity, with Ki values of 63.5 (0.7 and 156 (89.3 microM, respectively. The rest of substances analysed were weak inhibitors or had no inhibitory effect. CYP2C subfamily is present in human brain, although CYP2C9 isozyme has not yet been identified in this tissue, and CYP2C9 is involved in the metabolism of psychoactive drugs. Therefore, the fact that endogenous compounds could modulate the CYP2C9 activity, suggests that an hypothetical local activity of brain CYP2C9 might be susceptible to regulatory mechanisms. The possible clinical implications of this modulation are discussed.

Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance

This article reviews the metabolic pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with the systemic antifungal agents: the azoles ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, the allylamine terbinafine and the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole. The majority of these interactions are metabolic and are caused by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic and/or small intestinal metabolism of coadministered drugs. Human liver microsomal studies in vitro, clinical case reports and controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies in patients or healthy volunteers are reviewed. A brief overview of the CYP system and the contrasting effects of the antifungal agents on the different human drug-metabolising CYP isoforms is followed by discussion of the role of P-glycoprotein in presystemic extraction and the modulation of its function by the antifungal agents. Methods used for in vitro drug interaction studies and in vitro-in vivo scaling are then discussed, with specific emphasis on the azole antifungals. Ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolising CYP isoform in humans, CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs with CYP3A substrates such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, alprazolam, triazolam, midazolam, nifedipine, felodipine, simvastatin, lovastatin, vincristine, terfenadine or astemizole can result in clinically significant drug interactions, some of which can be life-threatening. The interactions of ketoconazole with cyclosporin and tacrolimus have been applied for therapeutic purposes to allow a lower dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant and a reduced risk of fungal infections. The potency of fluconazole as a CYP3A4 inhibitor is much lower. Thus, clinical interactions of CYP3A substrates with this azole derivative are of lesser magnitude, and are generally observed only with fluconazole dosages of > or =200 mg/day. Fluconazole, miconazole and sulfamethoxazole are potent inhibitors of CYP2C9. Coadministration of phenytoin, warfarin, sulfamethoxazole and losartan with fluconazole results in clinically significant drug interactions. Fluconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C19 in vitro, although the clinical significance of this has not been investigated. No clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted or documented between the azoles and drugs that are primarily metabolised by CYP1A2, 2D6 or 2E1. Terbinafine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 and may cause clinically significant interactions with coadministered substrates of this isoform, such as nortriptyline, desipramine, perphenazine, metoprolol, encainide and propafenone. On the basis of the existing in vitro and in vivo data, drug interactions of terbinafine with substrates of other CYP isoforms are unlikely.

Effects of chronic administration of glucocorticoid on midazolam pharmacokinetics in humans

Midazolam (MDZ) is metabolized by CYP3A. Glucocorticoids are potent inducers of CYP3A in humans. The possible interaction between intravenous MDZ and chronically administered glucocorticoids was investigated during surgery in patients. MDZ (0.2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously to 8 patients taking glucocorticoid chronically and 10 patients not taking glucocorticoid. In patients taking glucocorticoid, the AUC0-infinity and CL of MDZ was decreased to 63.9% (16.3 +/- 10.5 vs 25.5 +/- 20.7 microg x min/mL) and increased to 127.5% (16.7 +/- 10.7 vs 13.1 +/- 8.3 mL/min/kg) of that in the control group, respectively. The terminal t1/2 values of MDZ were similar in two groups. In patients taking glucocorticoid, the AUC0-infinity of 1'-hydroxymidazolam (1'-OH MDZ) was 66.7% of that in the control group (7.6 +/- 2.6 vs 11.4 +/- 9.7 microg x min/mL), and the terminal t1/2 of 1'-OH MDZ was significantly (p < 0.01) decreased (1.8 +/- 0.5 vs 3.0 +/- 0.8 hr). Accumulative urinary excretion of 1'-OH MDZ glucuronide was increased to 157.6%. These observations might be results from induction of CYP3A4 and/or UDP-glucuronosyltransferase by glucocorticoids.

Midazolam alpha-hydroxylation by human liver microsomes in vitro: inhibition by calcium channel blockers, itraconazole and ketoconazole

The inhibitory effects of five calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine and verapamil) and three azole antifungal agents (itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole and ketoconazole) on the alpha-hydroxylation of midazolam, a probe drug for CYP3A4-mediated interactions in humans, were studied in vitro using human liver microsomes. IC50 and Ki values were determined for each inhibitor. The kinetics of the formation of alpha-hydroxymidazolam were best described by simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The estimated values of Vmax and Km were 696 pmol min.-(1) mg(-1) and 7.46 micromol l(-1), respectively. All the compounds studied inhibited midazolam alpha-hydroxylation activity in a concentration-dependent manner, but there were marked differences in their relative inhibitory potency. Ketoconazole was the most potent inhibitor of midazolam alpha-hydroxylation (IC50 0.12 micromol l (-1)), being 10 times more potent than itraconazole (IC50 1.2 micromol l(-1)). The inhibitory effect of hydroxyitraconazole (IC50 2.3 micromol l (-1) was almost as large as that of itraconazole. Among the calcium channel blockers, mibefradil was the most potent inhibitor of the alpha-hydroxylation of midazolam, with an IC50 value (1.6 micromol l (-1)) similar to that of itraconazole. The other calcium channel blockers were much weaker inhibitors than mibefradil: verapamil exhibited a modest inhibitory effect with an IC50 of 23 micromol l(-1), while isradipine, nifedipine and diltiazem, with IC50 values ranging from 57 to >100 micromol l (-1), were weak inhibitors. This rank order of potency against the alpha-hydroxylation Qf midazolam was verified by the Ki values. With the exception of diltiazem, these in vitro results conform with the observed interaction potential of these agents with midazolam and many other CYP3A4 substrates in vivo in man.

Fluvoxamine is a potent inhibitor of the metabolism of caffeine in vitro

The selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, fluvoxamine, is a very potent inhibitor of CYP1A2, and accordingly causes pharmacokinetic interactions with drugs metabolised by CYP1A2, such as caffeine, theophylline, imipramine, tacrine and clozapine. Interaction between caffeine and fluvoxamine has been described in vivo, leading to lowering of total clearance of caffeine by 80% during fluvoxamine intake. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate this interaction in vitro in human liver microsomes. A high-performance liquid chromatography method was developed in order to assay 1,3-dimethylxanthine, 1,7-dimethylxanthine, 3,7-dimethylxanthine and 1,3,7-trimethyluric acid formed from caffeine by human liver microsomes. The limit of detection was 0.06 nmol.mg protein-1.hr-1. As expected, fluvoxamine was a very potent inhibitor of the formation of the N-demethylated caffeine metabolites, displaying Ki values of 0.08-0.28 microM. The formation of 1,7-dimethylxanthine was virtually abolished by 10 microM of fluvoxamine, indicating that the N3-demethylation of caffeine is almost exclusively catalysed by CYP1A2. The CYP3A4 inhibitors, ketoconazole and bromocriptine, inhibited 1,3,7-trimethyluric acid formation with Kis of 0.75 microM and 5 microM, respectively, thus further supporting the involvement of CYP3A4 in the 8-hydroxylation of caffeine. The study shows that fluvoxamine, as expected, is a potent inhibitor of the metabolism of caffeine in vitro.

Effects of glucocorticoids on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam in rats

We investigated the effect of dexamethasone (80 mg/kg per day for 2 days) and prednisolone (600 mg/kg per day for 2 days, equivalent to dexamethasone for glucocorticoid (GC) potency) on both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam (MDZ), a substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, in 8-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals received a single injection of MDZ (pharmacokinetic study, 10 mg/kg; pharmacodynamic study, 55.5 mg/kg) in the tail vein 24 h after the last dose of GC or placebo. The elimination half-life (t(1/2)) and the area under the concentration-time curve of MDZ were significantly reduced by pretreatment with dexamethasone to 58.9% and 44.7% of the control value, respectively, and the clearance of MDZ was significantly increased by dexamethasone. Similar changes observed by prednisolone pretreatment did not reach significance. The t(1/2) of the dexamethasone pretreatment group (14.4+/-0.7 min) was significantly shorter than that of the prednisolone group (20.9+/-1.5 min). The amount of CYP3A2 protein and the activity of erythromycin N-demethylase were significantly increased by dexamethasone and prednisolone pretreatments, but dexamethasone showed a greater effect than prednisolone. Sleeping time was significantly shortened by dexamethasone and prednisolone pretreatment to 38.7% and 57.1% of control value, respectively. The current study demonstrates that the anesthetic effect of MDZ would be reduced in patients treated with dexamethasone or prednisolone, and that the CYP3A induction was greater by dexamethasone than by prednisolone, implying that the potency of CYP3A induction may differ among GCs even when GC activity is the same.

Metabolism and drug interactions of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in transplant patients: are the statins mechanistically similar?

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (EC 1.1.1.88) inhibitors are the most effective drugs to lower cholesterol in transplant patients. However, immunosuppressants and several other drugs used after organ transplantation are cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A, EC 1.14.14.1) substrates. Pharmacokinetic interaction with some of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, specifically lovastatin and simvastatin, leads to an increased incidence of muscle skeletal toxicity in transplant patients. It is our objective to review the role of drug metabolism and drug interactions of lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin. In the treatment of transplant patients, from a drug interaction perspective, pravastatin, which is not significantly metabolized by CYP enzymes, and fluvastatin, presumably a CYP2C9 substrate, compare favorably with the other statins for which the major metabolic pathways are catalyzed by CYP3A.

The interaction of diltiazem with lovastatin and pravastatin

BACKGROUND

Lovastatin is oxidized by cytochrome P4503A to active metabolites but pravastatin is active alone and is not metabolized by cytochrome P450. Diltiazem, a substrate and a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A enzymes, is commonly coadministered with cholesterol-lowering agents.

METHODS

This was a balanced, randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study in 10 healthy volunteers, with a 2-week washout period between the phases. Study arms were (1) administration of a single dose of 20 mg lovastatin, (2) administration of a single dose of 20 mg pravastatin, (3) administration of a single dose of lovastatin after administration of 120 mg diltiazem twice a day for 2 weeks, and (4) administration of a single dose of pravastatin after administration of 120 mg diltiazem twice a day for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Diltiazem significantly (P < .05) increased the oral area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of lovastatin from 3607 +/- 1525 ng/ml/min (mean +/- SD) to 12886 +/- 6558 ng/ml/min and maximum serum concentration (Cmax) from 6 +/- 2 to 26 +/- 9 ng/ml but did not influence the elimination half-life. Diltiazem did not affect the oral AUC, Cmax, or half-life of pravastatin. The average steady-state serum concentrations of diltiazem were not significantly different between the lovastatin (130 +/- 58 ng/ml) and pravastatin (110 +/- 30 ng/ml) study arms.

CONCLUSION

Diltiazem greatly increased the plasma concentration of lovastatin, but the magnitude of this effect was much greater than that predicted by the systemic serum concentration, suggesting that this interaction is a first-pass rather than a systemic event. The magnitude of this effect and the frequency of coadministration suggest that caution is necessary when administering diltiazem and lovastatin together. Further studies should explore whether this interaction abrogates the efficacy of lovastatin or enhances toxicity and whether it occurs with other cytochrome P4503A4-metabolized 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, such as simvastatin, fluvastatin, and atorvastatin.

The contribution of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A to the interaction between midazolam and clarithromycin

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative contribution of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A inhibition to the interaction between the prototypic CYP3A substrates midazolam and clarithromycin.

METHODS

On day 1, 16 volunteers (eight men and eight women; age range, 20 to 40 years; weight range, 45 to 100 kg) received simultaneous doses of midazolam intravenously (0.05 mg/kg over 30 minutes) and orally (4 mg of a stable isotope, 15N3-midazolam). Starting on day 2, 500 mg clarithromycin was administered orally twice daily for 7 days. On day 8, intravenous and oral doses of midazolam were administered 2 hours after the final clarithromycin dose. Blood and urine samples were assayed for midazolam, 15N3-midazolam, and metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in the urinary excretion of 1'-hydroxymidazolam after intravenous and oral dosing on day 1 or day 8, indicating that the oral dose was completely absorbed into the gut wall. The oral clearance of midazolam was found to be significantly greater in female subjects (1.9 +/- 1.0 versus 1.0 +/- 0.3 L/hr/kg; p < 0.05) than in male subjects but not systemic clearance (0.35 +/- 0.1 versus 0.44 +/- 0.1 L/hr/kg). For women not receiving oral contraceptives (n = 6) a significant gender-related difference was observed for systemic and oral clearance and for area under the curve and elimination half-life after oral administration. A significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the systemic clearance of midazolam from 28 +/- 9 L/hr to 10 +/- 3 L/hr occurred after clarithromycin administration. Oral midazolam availability was significantly increased from 0.31 +/- 0.1 to 0.75 +/- 0.2 after clarithromycin dosing. Likewise, intestinal and oral availability were significantly increased from 0.42 +/- 0.2 to 0.83 +/- 0.2 and from 0.74 +/- 0.1 to 0.90 +/- 0.04, respectively. A significant correlation was observed between intestinal and oral availability (n = 32, r = 0.98, p < 0.05). After clarithromycin administration, a significant correlation was observed between the initial hepatic or intestinal availability and the relative increase in hepatic or intestinal availability, respectively. Female subjects exhibited a greater extent of interaction after oral and intravenous dosing than male subjects (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that in addition to the liver, the intestine is a major site of the interaction between oral midazolam and clarithromycin. Interindividual variability in first-pass extraction of high-affinity CYP3A substrates such as midazolam is primarily a function of intestinal enzyme activity.

In vitro and in vivo drug interactions involving human CYP3A

Cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) is importantly involved in the metabolism of many chemically diverse drugs administered to humans. Moreover, its localization in high amounts both in the small intestinal epithelium and liver makes it a major contributor to presystemic elimination following oral drug administration. Drug interactions involving enzyme inhibition or induction are common following the coadministration of two or more CYP3A substrates. Studies using in vitro preparations are useful in identifying such potential interactions and possibly permitting extrapolation of in vitro findings to the likely in vivo situation. Even if accurate quantitative predictions cannot be made, several classes of drugs can be expected to result in a drug interaction based on clinical experience. In many instances, the extent of such drug interactions is sufficiently pronounced to contraindicate the therapeutic use of the involved drugs.

Oral antifungal drug interactions

The recent approval of itraconazole and terbafine for the treatment of onychomycosis has launched a new era in the therapeutic management of this previously resistant form of dermatomycoses. These agents represent safe and effective treatments. The clinician should, however, become knowledgeable with the potential drug interactions that are discussed in this article.

Effect of route of administration of fluconazole on the interaction between fluconazole and midazolam

OBJECTIVE

Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine hypnotic extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 enzyme. Orally ingested azole antimycotics, including fluconazole, interfere with the metabolism of oral midazolam during its absorption and elimination phases. We compared the effect of oral and intravenous fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally ingested midazolam.

METHODS

A double-dummy, randomized, cross-over study in three phases was performed in 9 healthy volunteers. The subjects were given orally fluconazole 400 mg and intravenously saline within 60 min; orally placebo and intravenously fluconazole 400 mg; and orally placebo and intravenously saline. An oral dose of 7.5 mg midazolam was ingested 60 min after oral intake of fluconazole/placebo, i.e. at the end of the corresponding infusion. Plasma concentrations of midazolam, alpha-hydroxymidazolam and fluconazole were determined and pharmacodynamic effects were measured up to 17 h.

RESULTS

Both oral and intravenous fluconazole significantly increased the area under the midazolam plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-3, AUC0-17) 2- to 3-fold, the elimination half-life of midazolam 2.5-fold and its peak concentration (Cmax) 2- to 2.5-fold compared with placebo. The AUC0-3 and the Cmax of midazolam were significantly higher after oral than after intravenous administration of fluconazole. Both oral and intravenous fluconazole increased the pharmacodynamic effects of midazolam but no differences were detected between the fluconazole phases.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the metabolism of orally administered midazolam was more strongly inhibited by oral than by intravenous administration of fluconazole.

Effect of dirithromycin on human CYP3A in vitro and on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of terfenadine in vivo

Terfenadine is metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 3A subfamily of enzymes (CYP3A). Certain macrolide antibiotic agents inhibit CYP3A and, when coadministered with terfenadine, result in a drug interaction. The authors compared the abilities of dirithromycin (a new macrolide antibiotic agent), its major metabolite erythromycylamine, and the known CYP3A substrate terfenadine to inhibit CYP3A in vitro. The hydroxylation of midazolam in human liver microsomes was used as a probe for CYP3A activity. Dirithromycin and erythromycylamine were low affinity inhibitors of CYP3A (inhibitory binding affinities of 493 mumol/L and 701 mumol/L, respectively); conversely, terfenadine was a moderate affinity inhibitor (inhibitory binding affinity of 28 mumol/L). Based on these data, the authors tested the hypothesis that dirithromycin would not interact with terfenadine in humans. Six healthy men received terfenadine alone (60 mg twice daily) for 8 days, after which dirithromycin (500 mg once daily) was added to the terfenadine regimen for an additional 10 days. The pharmacokinetics of terfenadine (and its acid metabolite) and the QTc interval were measured during both treatments, and it was found that neither parameter was affected. In this study, dirithromycin was found to have low affinity for human CYP3A in vitro, which is in accordance with the study's finding that in vivo dirithromycin has no major effect on the metabolism of the CYP3A substrate terfenadine in humans.

Itraconazole increases serum digoxin concentration

Itraconazole can interact with several drugs by inhibiting their metabolism. Many drugs known to increase serum digoxin concentration are inhibitors of CYP enzymes (e.g. verapamil, diltiazem, amiodarone, cyclosporine). Case reports suggest that itraconazole, added to digoxin therapy, may induce digoxin intoxications; hence we wanted to study their possible interaction. In this two-phase study ten healthy young volunteers ingested 0.25 mg of digoxin daily for 20 days. Concomitantly, they received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once daily for 10 days in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study design. Serum concentrations of digoxin and itraconazole were measured (12 hr after administration) on days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20. Digoxin concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and confirmed (days 10 and 20) by affinity column-mediated immunoassay. Itraconazole increased serum digoxin concentration in each of the subjects. On the 10th day of the placebo phase serum digoxin concentration was 1.0 +/- 0.1 nmol/l, and on the 10th day of the itraconazole phase 1.8 +/- 0.1 nmol/l (P < 0.001). Care should be taken if itraconazole is prescribed to patients using digoxin. The mechanism of the itraconazole-digoxin interaction is unclear but may be related to CYP3A4-mediated changes in the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Interaction between amiodarone and lidocaine

We investigated the in vitro and in vivo interaction between amiodarone and lidocaine. The interaction on a molecular level was first studied in microsomes from 11 human livers. Close correlations between amiodarone N-monodesethylase activities and (a) the amounts of cytochrome P-4503A4 (CYP3A4), and (b) the rates of lidocaine N-monodesethylation were observed. Lidocaine inhibited amiodarone N-monodesethylation (Ki = 120 microM) competitively; inversely, amiodarone suppressed lidocaine N-monodesethylase activity in the same manner (Ki = 47 microM). Moreover, the metabolite N-monodesethylamiodarone (DEA) was stable and inhibited lidocaine metabolism in a concentration-dependent manner. The in vivo interaction was investigated in 6 cardiac patients. Each of them received a dose of 1 mg/kg lidocaine hydrochloride intravenously (i.v.) on three different occasions: before amiodarone treatment (control), and after cumulative doses of 3 g (phase I) and 13 g (phase II), respectively, amiodarone hydrochloride. The analysis of lidocaine pharmacokinetics showed an increase in lidocaine area under the curve (AUC) when amiodarone was administered, whereas that of N-monodesethylated lidocaine decreased. Moreover, the systemic clearance of lidocaine decreased, while the elimination half-life (t1/2) and the distribution volume at steady state of lidocaine remained unchanged. The pharmacokinetic parameters during phase II were the same as those during phase 1, indicating that the interaction had already occurred early in the loading phase of amiodarone administration. The interaction between amiodarone and lidocaine may be explained by the inhibition of CYP3A4 by amiodarone and/or by its main metabolite DEA.

Midazolam hydroxylation by human liver microsomes in vitro: inhibition by fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, and by azole antifungal agents

Biotransformation of the imidazobenzodiazepine midazolam to its alpha-hydroxy and 4-hydroxy metabolites was studied in vitro using human liver microsomal preparations. Formation of alpha-hydroxy-midazolam was a high-affinity (Km = 3.3 mumol/L) Michaelis-Menten process coupled with substrate inhibition at high concentrations of midazolam. Formation of 4-hydroxy-midazolam had much lower apparent affinity (57 mumol/L), with minimal evidence of substrate inhibition. Based on comparison of Vmax/Km ratios for the two pathways, alpha-hydroxy-midazolam formation was estimated to account for 95% of net intrinsic clearance. Three azole antifungal agents were inhibitors of midazolam metabolism in vitro, with inhibition being largely consistent with a competitive mechanism. Mean competitive inhibition constants (Ki) versus alpha-hydroxy-midazolam formation were 0.0037 mumol/L for ketoconazole, 0.27 mumol/L for itraconazole, and 1.27 mumol/L for fluconazole. An in vitro-in vivo scaling model predicted inhibition of oral midazolam clearance due to coadministration of ketoconazole or itraconazole; the predicted inhibition was consistent with observed interactions in clinical pharmacokinetic studies. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant fluoxetine and its principal metabolite, norfluoxetine, also were inhibitors of both pathways of midazolam biotransformation, with norfluoxetine being a much more potent inhibitor than was fluoxetine itself. This finding is consistent with results of other in vitro studies and of clinical studies, indicating that fluoxetine, largely via its metabolite norfluoxetine, may impair clearance of P450-3A substrates.

Itraconazole drastically increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid

BACKGROUND

Lovastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug that can cause myopathy as a rare side effect. Concomitant use of certain drugs (e.g., cyclosporine) increases the risk of skeletal muscle toxicity. Lovastatin is metabolized by CYP3A4. Because itraconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, we wanted to study a possible interaction between these drugs.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once a day for 4 days. On day 4, each subject ingested a single 40 mg dose of lovastatin. Plasma concentrations of lovastatin, lovastatin acid, itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, and creatine kinase were measured up to 24 hours.

RESULTS

On average, itraconazole increased the peak concentration (Cmax) of lovastatin and the area under the lovastatin concentration-time curve (AUC) more than twentyfold (p < 0.001). The mean Cmax of the active metabolite, lovastatin acid, was increased 13-fold (range, tenfold to 23-fold; p < 0.001) and the AUC(0-24) twentyfold (p < 0.001). In one subject plasma creatine kinase was increased tenfold within 24 hours of lovastatin administration during the itraconazole phase but not during the placebo phase. No increase in creatine kinase was observed in the other subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole greatly increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid. Inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism probably explains the increased toxicity of lovastatin caused not only by itraconazole but also by cyclosporine, erythromycin, and other inhibitors of CYP3A4. Their concomitant use with lovastatin and simvastatin should be avoided, or the dose of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors should be reduced accordingly.

Inhibition of terfenadine metabolism in vitro by azole antifungal agents and by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants: relation to pharmacokinetic interactions in vivo

Biotransformation of the H-1 antagonist terfenadine to its desalkyl and hydroxy metabolites was studied in vitro using microsomal preparations of human liver. These metabolic reactions are presumed to be mediated by Cytochrome P450-3A isoforms. The azole antifungal agent ketoconazole was a highly potent inhibitor of both reactions, having mean inhibition constants (Ki) of 0.037 and 0.34 microM for desalkyl- and hydroxy-terfenadine formation, respectively. Itraconazole also was a potent inhibitor, with Ki values of 0.28 and 2.05 microM, respectively. Fluconazole, on the other hand, was a weak inhibitor. Six selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants tested in this system were at least 20 times less potent inhibitors of terfenadine metabolism than was ketoconazole. An in vitro-in vivo scaling model used in vitro Ki values, typical clinically relevant plasma concentrations of inhibitors, and presumed liver:plasma partition ratios to predict the degree of terfenadine clearance impairment during coadministration of terfenadine with these inhibitors in humans. The model predicted a large and potentially hazardous impairment of terfenadine clearance by ketoconazole and, to a slightly lesser extent, by itraconazole. However, fluconazole and the six selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) at usual clinical doses were not predicted to impair terfenadine clearance to a degree that would be of clinical importance. Caution is nonetheless warranted with the coadministration of SSRIs and terfenadine when high doses of SSRIs (particularly fluoxetine) are administered. Also, some individuals may be unusually susceptible to metabolic inhibition for a variety of reasons.