Effects of chlordiazepoxide on schedule-induced water and alcohol consumption in the squirrel monkey

Reinforcing effectiveness of midazolam, ethanol, and sucrose: behavioral economic comparison of a mixture relative to its component solutions

Benzodiazepines (BZs) are relatively safe when administered alone. However, these drugs can produce severe side effects when coadministered with ethanol. Despite these adverse consequences, rates of concurrent BZ and ethanol misuse are increasing, and it is unclear whether this behavior is maintained by an enhanced reinforcing effect of the mixture. To address this issue, the current study compared the reinforcing effectiveness of sucrose solutions mixed with midazolam, ethanol, or both. Eight male rats were trained to orally self-administer solutions of either sucrose (S), sucrose+midazolam (SM), sucrose+ethanol (SE), or sucrose+midazolam+ethanol (SME). The response requirement was increased between sessions until the number of reinforcers earned was zero and the relationship between response requirement and reinforcers earned was analyzed using the exponential model of demand. Although baseline intake was similar across drug conditions, consumption of SM was least affected by increases in cost, indicating that it possessed the highest reinforcing effectiveness (i.e. least elastic). The reinforcing effectiveness of S, SE, and SME did not differ significantly. The finding that the reinforcing effectiveness of the SME was less than that of SM does not support the supposition that BZ and ethanol coadministration is maintained by a higher reinforcing effectiveness of the mixture.

A comparison of dehydroepiandrosterone and 7-keto dehydroepiandrosterone with other drugs that modulate ethanol intake in rats responding under a multiple schedule

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), 7-keto DHEA, and several comparison drugs (ethanol, chlordiazepoxide, rauwolscine, and RO15-4513) were administered to male rats responding under a multiple schedule of food and ethanol presentation to determine their selectivity for decreasing ethanol-maintained responding. DHEA and 7-keto DHEA significantly decreased both ethanol-maintained and food-maintained responding, compared with the control, while also decreasing the blood ethanol concentration (BEC). Acute ethanol administration also decreased responding for both food and ethanol; however, ethanol-maintained responding was more potently decreased than food-maintained responding. BEC remained relatively stable after increasing ethanol doses. Among the other drugs tested, RO15-4513 was the most selective for decreasing ethanol-maintained responding compared with food-maintained responding, and it decreased BECs as ethanol-maintained responding decreased. The largest dose of rauwolscine significantly decreased responding for food, whereas it did not affect ethanol-maintained responding compared with the control. Low to intermediate doses of rauwolscine produced small, nonsignificant increases in ethanol-maintained responding and BECs. Chlordiazepoxide produced significant decreases in food-maintained responding and the dose of ethanol presented, but only at the highest dose tested. Although DHEA and 7-keto DHEA did not decrease ethanol-maintained responding as selectively as ethanol or RO15-4513 under the multiple schedule, these neurosteroids may be valuable pharmacological tools in the development of new treatments for alcohol abuse and dependence.

Effects of reinforcement amount on attack induced under a fixed-interval schedule in pigeons

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained on a chained fixed-interval 4-min (12-min for 1 subject) fixed-ratio 1 schedule of food presentation. Attacks toward a restrained and protected conspecific were recorded. In the first experiment, the amount of food presented per interval was manipulated across phases by varying the number of fixed ratios required in the terminal link of the chain. Measures of attack for all pigeons during the fixed-interval component increased monotonically as a function of food amount. In the second experiment, two different food amounts alternated within each experimental session under a multiple schedule. For both pigeons in this experiment, measures of attack were higher during the component that delivered the larger food amount per interval. The differences in levels of attack induced by the two food amounts in Experiment 2, however, were not as great as in Experiment 1; apparently this was because attack during the first interval of each component was controlled in part (P-5626) or entirely (P-7848) by the reinforcement amount delivered at the end of the previous component. Attack was also a function of the location of the interfood interval within the session. For both pigeons, attack tended to decrease throughout the session. The results of both experiments suggest that attack is an increasing function of reinforcement amount under fixed-interval schedules, but that this function may be influenced by the manner in which reinforcement amount is manipulated, by the duration of the interfood interval, and by the location of the interfood interval within the experimental session. In general, these results are compatible with theories of induced attack and other schedule-induced behavior that emphasize aversive after-effects of reinforcement presentation.

Ro 15-4513 selectively attenuates ethanol, but not sucrose, reinforced responding in a concurrent access procedure; comparison to other drugs

The experiments described in this report used a concurrent access procedure to study ethanol reinforcement. Rats were trained to lever press for a 10% sucrose solution and a 10% ethanol/10% sucrose mixture, and both reinforcers were available on variable-interval 5-s schedules. In baseline and vehicle injection sessions, the animals distributed their responding between both solutions. When injected with the partial inverse benzodiazepine agonist Ro 15-4513 (3, 9, and 18 mg/kg), responding for the ethanol solution decreased while responding for sucrose remained intact. Ethanol injections (0.5 and 1.0 g/kg) engendered a similar profile. Chlordiazepoxide led to an increase in ethanol mix responding at 2 mg/kg and a decrease in ethanol mix responding at higher doses; no dose affected sucrose responding. Morphine (0.5-16 mg/kg) decreased responding for both the ethanol mix and sucrose solutions, more or less simultaneously. Naloxone (0.125-20 mg/kg) selectively reduced ethanol mix responding at low doses, and decreased responding for both reinforcers at high doses. In another group of animals, isocaloric alternatives were concurrently available: 10% ethanol/0.25% saccharin versus 14% sucrose. Injections of Ro 15-4513 and chloridiazepoxide produced similar results as in the first group of rats: an increase in ethanol mix responding with low dose chlordizepoxide, and a decrease in ethanol mix responding with Ro 15-4513. However, naloxone injections did not selectively affect responding for either of the reinforcers when they were isocaloric. These results are discussed in terms of ethanol's neuropharmacological actions.

New drugs for the treatment of experimental alcoholism

This article presents a current overview of the efforts to suppress pharmacologically the craving, dependence, or other factors associated with the self-selection of alcohol in an experimental animal. The contemporary status of the pharmacotherapy of experimental alcoholism similarly is described for different animal models of alcohol drinking. An evaluation is presented of several classes of drug for their efficacy in ameliorating the volitional ingestion of alcohol in the presence of an alternative fluid. Currently, two main experimental animal models of alcoholism are being used in this endeavor: (a) genetic lines or substrains of high alcohol preferring or high drinking rats; and (b) strains of nondrinking or low alcohol preferring rats which are induced chemically to prefer alcohol. Because of technical, methodological, and other issues surrounding the procedures used to assess the efficacy of a drug in reducing alcohol intake, several of the newer findings remain controversial. For example, serious side effects on the intake of food, caloric regulation, motor activity, or other functions would preclude the clinical utility of the drug. However, several drugs which affect monoaminergic neurons as well as opioid systems in the brain now seem to offer promise as agents which do possess clinical benefits. Two of these drugs, FG5606 (amperozide) and FG 5893 are essentially "antialcoholic" or anticraving and are without any significant side effects on cerebral mechanisms responsible for hunger, caloric intake, motor activity, or other physiological process. Amperozide, a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist with dopamine releasing properties, is particularly notable because of its irreversible nature in attenuating alcohol preference for months after its administration. It is concluded that future pharmacological research on presently available and newly developed compounds will provide exciting opportunities to the clinician who can utilize a particular drug as an adjunctive tool in the therapeutic treatment of the alcoholic individual.

Buspirone alters alcohol drinking induced in rats by tetrahydropapaveroline injected into brain monoaminergic pathways

The effect of the novel anxiolytic, buspirone, administered systemically was determined in Sprague-Dawley rats induced to drink ethyl alcohol chronically by repeated microinjections of 25 ng/microliter tetrahydropapaveroline HBr (THP) into brain-stem monoaminergic pathways. Self-selection of alcohol in concentrations from 3% to 30% was determined for each rat in a free-choice drinking situation with water available as the alternative fluid. After stereotaxic implantation of guide tubes, THP was microinjected repeatedly into striatal lemniscal and preoptic sites which were found to mediate significant increases in alcohol preference. After the baseline level of intake of a single, maximally preferred alcohol concentration was established, each rat was treated with either saline vehicle or buspirone given intramuscularly b.i.d. in doses of 5.0 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg. Overall, the repeated administration of either dose of buspirone produced a significant decrease in the voluntary alcohol intake of the rats as measured by the proportion measure and absolute g of alcohol ingested. However, the alteration in drinking varied from animal to animal with respect to both magnitude and duration of the anxiolytic's effect. The response to buspirone seemed to be dependent in part on the individual site in each animal at which THP had been infused to evoke alcohol intake. Post-mortem histological analysis revealed that buspirone-treated rats reduced alcohol consumption by 83% if THP had been microinjected into substantia nigra; by 60% if given in the nucleus accumbens-preoptic area; and by 34% when injected into the medial lemniscus-zona incerta. These results suggest, therefore, that buspirone can exert a specific effect in attenuating the consumption of alcohol of the rat in a free-choice situation. In relation to the differential actions of the anxiolytic, it is envisaged that on an anatomical basis the antagonism of alcohol drinking may be mediated by a pharmacological alteration of circumscribed pathways associated with dopaminergic or serotonergic neurons.

Buspirone attenuates volitional alcohol intake in the chronically drinking monkey

Four macaque monkeys which showed excessive preference for ethyl alcohol solutions in a self-selection paradigm were used as subjects. Earlier these animals had been given intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of human cerebrospinal fluid, which produced pharmacologically significant effects on the animals' alcohol consumption. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether the parenteral administration of a new anxiolytic compound, buspirone, would alter the pattern of alcohol drinking already established in the monkey. Initially the maximally selected concentration of alcohol of 12% was determined on the basis of a standard ad lib alcohol-water preference screen. Each monkey was offered 12% alcohol and water for a basal pre-injection period of 4 days. Then, on each of the next three days, either the saline control vehicle or buspirone, 1.25, 5.0 or 20.0 mg/kg, was injected intramuscularly at 930 and 1630 hours. On these days, behavioral observations were recorded before and after buspirone's administration in order to evaluate the latency as well as recovery from the drug's effect. Subsequently, a four-day post-injection, 12% alcohol-water test was conducted. Although the saline control and 1.25 mg/kg dose of buspirone were without effect on alcohol intake, both the 5.0 and 20.0 mg/kg doses of buspirone attenuated significantly the consumption of alcohol by the monkeys. This reduction in terms of absolute g/kg as well as the proportion of alcohol to water ingested was approximately 30-60% of baseline intakes. Following buspirone treatment, the amount of alcohol consumed returned essentially to previously high levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chlordiazepoxide effects on ethanol self-administration: dependence on concurrent conditions

Experiments examined the effects of acute doses of chlordiazepoxide upon ethanol self-administration in the rat. A concurrent-schedule procedure was used that employed choice between ethanol (5%) and a second fluid (either water or a 1% sucrose solution). When ethanol and water were the available fluids, chlordiazepoxide at doses of 15 and 20 mg/kg reduced ethanol-reinforced responding and intake, with a greater reduction occurring at the 20 mg/kg dose. However, when ethanol and sucrose were concurrently available, in many rats only the 20 mg/kg dose of chlordiazepoxide reduced ethanol-reinforced responding. The differences in dose response function occurred in most animals without large changes in the baseline ethanol-reinforced responding across the two concurrent conditions. Thus the dose-effect curve relating chlordiazepoxide and ethanol self-administration can be altered, dependent upon the nature of the concurrently available reinforcers.

Chlordiazepoxide's interaction with ethanol intake in the rat: relation to ethanol exposure paradigms

Chlordiazepoxide's interaction with ethanol (5% v/v) intake was assessed in rats on a feeding regimen producing high daily quantities of ethanol intake (schedule-induction procedure with intermittent feeding), more moderate amounts of ethanol intake (a single daily feeding), and small amounts of ethanol intake (free feeding). Six days of twice daily sham injections (IP) were followed by 12 days of 0 (vehicle), 5, 10, or 15 mg/kg (twice daily) chlordiazepoxide, and finally six days of the saline (vehicle) injections. Rats in the intermittent feeding daily consumed 9.9-12.3 g/kg (80-95 ml) of ethanol on baseline which was reduced 15 to 33% by the drug. In the single feed condition most rats were drinking 70 to 85 ml (8.8-10.3 g/kg) of ethanol and this was reduced 15-40% by the drug. During the six days after drug, intake in both of these feeding regimens returned to the baseline level. Ethanol intake of rats under the free feeding condition (48 ml, 3.5 g/kg on average) was not affected by the drug, nor was water intake under any of the three feeding regimens.

Effects of chlordiazepoxide on food anticipation, drinking and other behaviors in food-deprived and satiated rats

Two groups of rats, Deprived and Satiated, were presented with food according to a fixed time 60-sec schedule. They were then injected with saline, 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg of chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride according to a Latin square design. During saline administration time spent visiting the food tray, time spent drinking, number of tray entries and the amount of water ingested were always greater in the Deprived than in the Satiated group; whereas the opposite was true for grooming. As chlordiazepoxide dose increased time spent visiting the food tray increased in both groups, but the effect was bigger in the Satiated than in the Deprived group. Drinking was not affected by the drug. Grooming and sniffing-rearing were reduced as the dose increased.

Novel non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics

Several new non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics are reported. These include tracazolate, zopiclone, CL218,872, CGS9896, buspirone, MK-801 and fenobam. A comparison of anticonflict effects and propensity to cause sedation and potentiate the actions of ethanol is given as well as their effects upon the binding of [3H]flunitrazepam in vitro. Their anxiolytic properties after treatment with the benzodiazepine antagonist, RO15-1788, are reported also. Tracazolate shows a wide separation between anxiolytic activity and ability to cause sedation and to potentiate alcohol. It enhanced binding of [3H]-flunitrazepam in contrast to benzodiazepines which displace it. Buspirone was without anticonflict activity and had no effect on benzodiazepine binding while fenobam and MK-801, also without effect on binding, showed large and small differences on causing sedation and potentiating alcohol respectively. Among the displacers of [3H]flunitrazepam zopiclone showed diminished sedation liability, compared to diazepam, as did CL218,872 and CGS9896. Zopiclone caused potentiation of ethanol however, at doses close to anxiolytic doses, while CL218,872 and CGS9896 showed a wider safety margin for potentiation of ethanol compared to anxiolytic doses. The drug RO15-1788 antagonised the anticonflict effects of benzodiazepine displacers and had no effects upon the other agents studied.

Suppression of saccharin-induced drinking in the nondeprived rat by low dose diazepam treatment

Access to a highly palatable 0.005 M sodium saccharin solution resulted in considerable overdrinking in nondeprived rats over a 6 hr observation period. Contrary to previous reports documenting benzodiazepine-induced hyperdipsia in animals challenged with thirst stimuli or in animals exhibiting schedule-induced drinking, diazepam (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) had no effect to enhance the intake of the saccharin solution. Instead, diazepam produced a significant suppression of fluid consumption, in a manner not monotonically related to dose. Thus, diazepam (0.3 mg/kg) produced maximal suppression which did not dissipate over a 6 hr period, while diazepam (3.0 mg/kg) had no effect. Possible behavioral mechanisms by which low dose diazepam treatment might reduce the drinking are briefly considered.

Pharmacological properties of tracazolate: a new non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic agent

Tracazolate (ICI 136,753, 4-butylamino-1-ethyl-6-methyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester) demonstrated dose-related anticonflict activity in rats and mice. The potency of tracazolate appears to be one-quarter to one-half that of chlordiazepoxide. No tolerance to the anticonflict activity of either tracazolate or chlordiazepoxide was evident following 12 consecutive days of treatment. Tracazolate exhibits a much greater separation between sedative and therapeutic doses than does chlordiazepoxide. Furthermore, based on rodent studies, tracazolate should be much less likely than the benzodiazepines to potentiate the actions of barbiturates and ethanol in man. Tracazolate potentiated both the anticonvulsant and anxiolytic effects of chlordiazepoxide in rodents. Unlike benzodiazepines, tracazolate enhances the binding of benzodiazepines to its receptor site. These results suggest that tracazolate is a novel agent with potential clinical utility as an anxiolytic drug.

Effects of isoproterenol and chlordiazepoxide on drinking and conflict behaviors in rats

Isoproterenol, a beta-adrenergic agents, induced drinking in water-satiated rats. Isopropeternol exhibited significant anti-conflict activity on water-deprived rats in the Shock-induced Suppression of Drinking (SSD) procedure. Chlordiazepoxide (CDP), at the highest dose tested, also increased drinking in non-deprived naive rats. As expected, CDP demonstrated highly significant anti-conflict activity in thirsty rats (SSD test). These results suggest that in conflict procedures, where food or water is used as a reward, agents that affect the consumatory drive mechanisms could show up as "false positives." Moreover, agents that affect primary drives (e.g., CDP), in addition to their anti-anxiety activity, could show additive activity in such conflict procedures.

Concurrent drinking by pigeons on fixed-interval reinforcement schedules

Three experienced pigeons were exposed to at least ten consecutive 100-min sessions on each of three food-reinforced fixed-interval (FI) schedules: FI 50-sec, FI 100-sec and FI 200-sec. Water was freely available. Drinking was largely confined to the first third of each fixed interval, and the mean sessional water intake was directly related to the food-reinforcement rate for each animal. The animals drank very quickly, i.e., 3--4 ml/sec, but the drinking bouts were brief, i.e., 0.8--1.4 sec, and infrequent, i.e., 2--5/hr. The parameters describing concurrent drinking in the pigeon are strikingly different from those describing rats' drinking under similar reinforcement schedules, which may contribute to the difficulty in demonstrating schedule-induced polydipsia in the pigeon.

Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine on schedule-controlled and schedule-induced responding

The effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine were studied on rates and patterns of lever pressing and schedule-induced licking under fixed-interval schedules of food pellet presentation. In addition, the effects of caffeine were studied on lever pressing and licking under a multiple fixed-ratio fixed-interval schedule. Caffeine reduced mean overall rates of licking at lower doses than it reduced mean overall rates of pressing under the fixed-interval schedules, but the effects of caffeine on both licking and lever pressing depended largely on the control rate of responding. d-Amphetamine reduced mean overall rates of lever pressing and licking at about the same dose, but the effects of d-amphetamine also were a function of the control rate of responding.

Schedule-induced drinking and thirst: a pharmacological analysis

Similar levels of water consumption were induced in two groups of rats by means either of prior fluid deprivation or a schedule of food pellet delivery. Injections of d-amphetamine (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) had similar attenuating effects of drinking induced by both procedures. Chlordiazepoxide (2.5, 5.0, 10 and 20 mg/kg), however, exerted differential actions on schedule-induced and deprivation-induced drinking. Drinking induced by deprivation was facilitated by all doses of this drug while the higher doses decreased levels of schedule-induced drinking. This result emphasises the difficulties involved in using the concept of thirst in explanations of behavior and of drug action.

The effects of d-amphetamine and scopolamine on drinking induced by a multiple schedule

Three food-deprived rats obtained food pellets on a multiple fixed-interval fixed-time schedule. During fixed-interval components a 45 mg pellet was made available for a lever-press every minute (FI 1 min). When the fixed-time component was in operation the lever was retracted and a pellet was delivered every minute (FT 1 min) independent of behaviour. A water bottle was available to each subject and similar levels of schedule-induced drinking developed during the two schedule components. The effects of several doses (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine and scopolamine were assessed on lever-pressing and drinking maintained by this procedure. Both drugs increased rates of lever-pressing at lower doses and reduced levels of licking and water intake at all doses. The patterning of fixed-interval lever pressing was altered by both drugs increasing the proportion of responses emitted during early parts of the intervals. d-Amphetamine also increased the proportion of licks that occurred during early segments of the interfood intervals, while scopolamine had variable effects on patterns of licking. There were no consistent differences in the effects of the drugs on licking induced by the two schedules.

Effects of diazepam on behaviour suppressed by extinction in pigs

Diazepam injected to pigs previously trained to perform an operant response for food according to a continuous reinforcement schedule significantly increased resistance to extinction compared to control pigs. In pigs submitted to a time-out procedure diazepam increased the number of nonreinforced responses at the beginning of the acquisition but was unable to disinhibit suppressed behaviour in the later stages of acquisition when the extinguished behaviour was well acquired. The results are discussed with respect to antiaversive or disinhibitory effects of benzodiazepines and an alternative interpretation, the strengthening of the prevailing behavioural tendency in the animal's repertoire at the time of test, is put forward.

Scopolamine and adjunctive drinking in rats

Nine, food-deprived rats were each given daily sessions during which 60 45-mg food pellets were delivered individually at 60-sec intervals, independently of behaviour. Water spouts were available to the animals and the intermittent delivery of food induced high levels of adjunctive drinking. The administration of scopolamine (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg) produced a dose-related attenuation of this drinking. A dose of physostigmine (0.2 mg/kg) was found to slightly reduce levels of drinking but this dose did not consistently modify the action of scopolamine on this behaviour. Tolerance was found to occur to the action of the highest dose of scopolamine (1.0 mg/kg).

Effects of diazepam and ripazepam on two measures of adjunctive drinking in rats

Four rats were maintained at 85% of their pre-experimental body weights and were given daily 1 hr sessions during which they were each placed in a test chamber in which a 45 mg food pellet was delivered regularly every min independently of behavior. During these sessions water spouts were available to the rats and all 4 animals developed high levels of adjunctive drinking, a burst of licking typically following the consumption of each food pellet. This behavior was found to be sensitive to the effects of diazepam and ripazepam. Small doses of both drugs increased the volume of water consumed during a session. The number of licks was not increased to the same extent, however. Larger doses of both drugs resulted in decreased numbers of licks and decreased water intake although licking appeared on several occasions to be more sensitive than water intake to this action of the drugs. A possible explanation of these effects is that the drugs affected the topography of the rats' licking at the water spouts. Whatever the mechanism involved, however, these results suggest that in such experiments measures of both water intake and number of licks should be obtained.

Effect of chlordiazepoxide on schedule-controlled responding and schedule-induced drinking

Lever pressing of four rats was maintained under a multiple fixed ratio 80, fixed interval 2-min schedule of food presentation. Water was concurrently available from a drinking tube. Overall rates of lever pressing were highest under the fixed ratio schedule and, for three rats, most drinking occurred during the pause preceding responding under the fixed interval schedule. Chlordiazepoxide increased the lower rates of lever pressing maintained under the fixed interval schedule but generally decreased the higher response rates under the fixed ratio schedule. The effects of chlordiazepoxide on schedule-induced licking also depended on the extent to which this response occurred in each schedule component. Typically chlordiazepoxide produced relatively greater increases in the lower levels of licking and either increased less or decreased licking in that component where, under control conditions, this response was more extensive. Chlordiazepoxide also produced overall increases in the total amount of water consumed during the session. When the number of food pellets obtained during the experimental session was given all at one time in the home cage, the amount of water ingested over a period of time equivalent to the session duration was substantially less than that consumed during the experimental session. Chlordiazepoxide did not increase home cage water consumption under this condition.