Behaviorally induced sensitivity to the discriminable properties of LSD

Influence of sensitization on the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate in mice

Methylphenidate (MPH) remains an important therapy for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, but aspects of its pharmacology remain unclear. In the present study, we used a regimen of MPH (8 mg/kg daily×14 days) in C57BL/6J mice to determine whether establishing locomotor sensitization to MPH influenced the acquisition and the dose-response function of MPH in a classic drug discrimination procedure. MPH-sensitized mice (SENS group) showed enhanced locomotor activity to the 8 mg/kg exposure dose as well as a 2 mg/kg dose before discrimination training. However, the SENS mice did not acquire discrimination of either a low dose (2 mg/kg) or a higher dose (4 mg/kg) of MPH any more rapidly than the CTRL mice. Further, during generalization testing, the dose-response functions for the SENS and CTRL mice were identical. Therefore, we did not find that previous exposure to MPH, which produced a sensitized locomotor response, facilitated MPH discrimination.

Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review

Drug discrimination has been an important technique in behavioural pharmacology for at least 40 years. The characteristics of drug-produced discriminative stimuli are influenced by behavioural and pharmacological variables, including the doses used to establish discriminations. This review covers studies on the effects of varying the training dose of a drug in a search for general principles that are applicable across different drug classes and methodological approaches. With respect to quantitative changes, relationships between training dose and the rate of acquisition or magnitude of stimulus control were found for most drug classes. Acquisition accelerated with dose up to a point beyond which drug-induced impairments of performance had a deleterious impact. Sensitivity to the training drug as measured by ED(50) values typically increased when the training dose was reduced. Qualitative changes were more complex and appeared to fall into three categories: (a) changes in profiles of generalization between partial and full agonists; (b) reduced specificity of some discriminations at small training doses; and (c) changes in the relative salience of actions mediated through different neurotransmitter systems or from central and peripheral sites. Three-lever discrimination procedures incorporating 'drug versus drug' or 'dose versus dose' contingencies enabled detection of more subtle differences than the simple 'drug versus no drug' approach when applied to the opioid, hallucinogen and barbiturate classes of drugs. These conclusions have implications for the interpretation of data from studies that use either within-subject or between-subject designs for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs.

Early preclinical studies of discriminable sedative and hallucinogenic drug effects

RATIONALE

One important technique in behavioral pharmacology is to train laboratory animals to discriminate between a psychoactive drug effect and a nondrug condition. Tests with different drugs have identified several categories of drugs that have different discriminable effects.

OBJECTIVES

The two authors describe and discuss the early research on discriminable effects of sedative and hallucinogenic drugs and their acquaintance with each other at Yale University prior to their early and frequent publications on discriminable drug effects. Herb Barry studied sedative drugs primarily and Jim Appel studied hallucinogenic drugs.

RESULTS

Sedative drugs include ethyl alcohol, barbiturates, and benzodiazepines. Their discriminable effects are largely attributable to the activation of an inhibitory neurotransmitter, gamma-amino butyric acid. Alcohol has the most pervasive effect in accordance with the high dose required to alter behavior. Hallucinogenic drugs include lysergic acid diethylamide and mescaline. They increase the activity of the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine and, perhaps, dopamine in the central nervous system (CNS). In spite of their relatively low concentrations in the brain, both of these neurotransmitters have many important behavioral effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Various sedative drugs cause a discriminable decrease in the function of the CNS. Different types of sedatives can be discriminated from each other. Indole and phenylethylamine hallucinogens have potent discriminative stimulus properties, which are related to the actions of biogenic amine neurotransmitters in the CNS.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in rats

OBJECTIVE

To examine the discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant (SR141716A) using a discriminated taste aversion (DTA) procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Groups of rats were trained to discriminate between drug (5.6 or 3 mg/kg) and vehicle in DTA (t' = 20 min). The 30-min drinking opportunity after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental (EXP) animals. When offered fluid after vehicle pretreatment, EXP animals subsequently were given intraperitoneal saline (NaCl, 10 ml/kg). Post-drinking treatment for controls (CONT) was NaCl irrespective of the pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle). Tests examined other doses and drugs (t' = 20 min).

RESULTS

The rimonabant analog AM251 (1 to 5.6 mg/kg) substituted for rimonabant. AM281 also appeared to substitute, but interpretation is complicated by unconditioned effects (drinking suppressed also in the CONT group). The CB(2)R antagonists SR144528 (18 and 30 mg/kg), AM630 (1 to 10 mg/kg), and the CB(1)R agonist methanandamide (mAEA, 3 and 10 mg/kg) did not substitute. There was a dose-related attenuation of the rimonabant-induced suppression of saccharin drinking when Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC; 0.3 to 5.6 mg/kg), but not mAEA (1 to 10 mg/kg), was given together with rimonabant (3 mg/kg). Unconditioned effects occurred with the mAEA-rimonabant combination, not evident for combinations of rimonabant and Delta9-THC. mAEA (10 mg/kg) plus AM251 (5.6 mg/kg) resulted in strong unconditioned effects.

CONCLUSION

Rimonabant induces a discriminative stimulus in DTA that continues to show potential for further examination of cannabinoid receptor antagonism.

The role of nicotinic receptor α7 subunits in nicotine discrimination

The subtypes of nicotinic receptors at which the behavioural effects of nicotine originate are not fully understood. The experiments described here use mice lacking the alpha7 subunit of nicotinic receptors to investigate the role of alpha7-containing receptors in nicotine discrimination. Wild-type and alpha7-knockout mice were trained in a two-lever nicotine discrimination procedure using a tandem schedule of food reinforcement. Mutant mice exhibited baseline rates of lever-pressing as low as 52.2% of rates in wild-type controls (n=21-24). Mutant and wild-type mice acquired discrimination of nicotine (0.4 or 0.8 mg/kg) at a similar rate (n=10-12) and reached similar final levels of accuracy (71.9 +/- 4.4% and 90.8 +/- 3.1% after 60 training sessions for 0.4 and 0.8 mg/kg training doses, respectively, in mutant mice, as compared with 75.0 +/- 6.5% and 87.6 +/- 4.8% for wild types). The genotypes exhibited similar steep dose-response curves for nicotine discrimination. In both genotypes, dose-response curves for mice trained with 0.8 mg/kg of nicotine were displaced three- to four-fold to the right as compared with those for the mice trained with the smaller dose. The predominant effect of nicotine on the overall rate of responding was a reduction at the largest doses tested and there was no difference between the genotypes. The results suggest that nicotinic receptors containing the alpha7 subunit do not contribute to the discriminative stimulus or response-rate-depressant effects of nicotine, although they may regulate baseline rates of operant responding.

Delta9-THC training dose as a determinant for (R)-methanandamide generalization in rats: a systematic replication

Järbe et al. (1998a) trained rats to discriminate between (-)-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) and vehicle, using different training doses in order to create assays with different efficacy demands, to examine whether (R)-methanandamide, an analog of the endogenous ligand anandamide, had lower efficacy than delta9-THC. Rats were initially trained with 3 mg/kg delta9-THC, then tested with (R)-methanandamide and delta9-THC. Thereafter, the rats were split into two groups and retrained with either 1.8 or 5.6 mg/kg delta9-THC, followed by additional tests with the two agonists. The current study systematically replicated this study in two groups of rats, trained from the outset to discriminate between vehicle and either 1.8 or 5.6 mg/kg delta9-THC, respectively. Two-lever operant drug discrimination procedures were used. The outcomes in the two studies were similar. In tests with (R)-methanandamide, full substitution occurred in the low-dose delta9-THC training group, whereas substitution was partial in the high-dose delta9-THC training group. (R)-Methanandamide in higher doses exerted marked suppression of lever pressing. In tests with delta9-THC, full substitution occurred in both delta9-THC-trained groups, and rates of responding were comparable to those observed during regular drug training sessions. In conclusion, both sets of data indicate that cannabinoid agonists either can have varying degrees of efficacy at a receptor site, or may produce their behavioral actions through multiple mechanisms, or both. Prevailing training-dose condition rather than prior training-dose history is the major determinant for the substitution pattern.

Drug discrimination training with low doses: maintenance of discriminative control

Procedures are reported that maintain control by the drug cue during and after drug discrimination training with lower doses that yield predominantly vehicle-appropriate choices. Twelve pigeons were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (CDP) from saline using two-key (drug vs. vehicle) drug discrimination procedures. Intermixed within each block of 30 sessions were nine sessions of training with 8.0 mg/kg CDP, nine with one of seven lower training doses (4.0, 2.8, 2.0, 1.4, 1.0, 0.7, or 0.5 mg/kg CDP), and 12 with saline. The lower training dose was decreased across blocks. The three lowest training doses (1.0, 0.7, and 0.5 mg/kg CDP) yielded predominantly saline-appropriate choices but had no effect on discrimination of 8.0 mg/kg CDP or saline. Three doses (2.0, 1.4, and 1.0 mg/kg CDP) were retrained, and each yielded percentages of drug-appropriate choices nearly identical to those obtained during previous training. This drug discrimination procedure maintains control by the drug cue during and after training with vehicle-like doses of the training drug and may allow for repeated assessment of effects of low training doses.

Sensitivity of pentylenetetrazol discrimination increased by a stimulus fading technique

The interoceptive stimulus produced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) is pharmacologically similar to anxiety and is used in a behavioral assay for anxiety-related stimuli (the PTZ model of anxiety). The stimulus fading technique was tested as a method to increase the sensitivity of this assay. Rats were trained with food-reward to press one lever after injection of PTZ and an alternate lever after saline. Rats initially learned the discrimination at a PTZ dose of 20 mg/kg. They were then trained with sequentially lower doses until they reliably discriminated a PTZ dose of 10 mg/kg. Substitution tests with other doses and drugs showed that, after the fading procedure, dose-response curves were shifted to lower doses for PTZ, Ro 5-3663, and nicotine Similarly, the dose of diazepam required to block the low dose of PTZ was lower than that required to block the higher dose of PTZ. These results indicated that the sensitivity of the discrimination was enhanced in rats trained to discriminate a lower dose of PTZ. Doses of nikethamide, cocaine, and yohimbine that did not substitute for the higher dose of PTZ also did not substitute for the lower dose. These data suggest that rats can be trained to discriminate a low dose of PTZ by the stimulus fading technique. Moreover, they suggest that this training method does not compromise the specificity of the discrimination.

Temporal factors in drug discrimination: Experiments with nicotine

The role of the presession interval (PI) in drug discrimination research has been studied in rats trained to discriminate nicotine from saline in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure. Different groups of rats were trained at different Pls, varying between 5 and 35 min, and tests were then carried out for qualitative and quantitative differences between the cues. There was complete generalization from nicotine cues trained at one time to tests carried out at other times. The sensitivity of the cues at different Pls to the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine was very similar. Generalization to amphetamine was nearly complete when the nicotine cue was established with PI of 20-35 min and only partial when the PI for the nicotine was 5 min. Thus, there was no clear evidence for any qualitative difference between nicotine cues established with different PIs. However, the PI influenced quantitative aspects of the nicotine cue in a marked and complex manner. Increasing the PI during training produced a two- to three-fold decrease in the ED(50), whereas increasing the PI during testing produced a two- to three-fold increase in the ED(50). This shows that the effects of changing the PIs during training and testing were similar in magnitude but opposite in direction. These changes in ED(50) values can be explained by pharmacokinetic considerations in conjunction with knowledge of the role of training dose in the discrimination of nicotine. The quantitative sensitivity of the drug discrimination procedure can be substantially influenced by the choice of temporal parameters used in training and testing.

Similarities and differences between behavioral control by drug-produced stimuli and by sensory stimuli

Drug-induced state-dependent learning and drug discriminations may be based on sensory stimuli induced by drug actions, or at least on events in the brain that have properties analogous to those of sensory stimuli. A variety of comparisons between behavioral control by drug-induced stimuli and by classically defined interoceptive and exteroceptive stimuli are possible. These allow inferences to be made about the nature of drug stimuli, the properties of behavioral paradigms that we use to investigate them, and the mechanisms by which drugs achieve behavioral control in drug discrimination and state-dependent learning paradigms. Each of these topics is selectively reviewed in this paper.

A comparison of testing procedures on the discriminative morphine stimulus

The study investigated the effects of reinforcement and non-reinforcement during test sessions, and the effects of duration of generalization test sessions on the generalization of a morphine-induced discriminative stimulus. Rats were trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg morphine from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task and were then tested for generalization of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mg/kg morphine with the training drug under both reinforced and non-reinforced contingencies during 4-min test periods. The percentage of drug-appropriate responses and response rates were recorded for the first 2 min and the second 2 min of each test session. A higher proportion of drug-appropriate responding occurred with an intermediate dose of morphine when reinforcement was available during test sessions. The frequency of responding was higher during the last 2 min than during the first 2 min of reinforced test sessions. The changes in response rate observed between the first 2 min and the last 2 min of the test sessions also depended on the reinforcement contingency available and the dose of morphine administered presession. The testing parameters thus altered the degree of generalization and the shape of the generalization curve of the morphine discrimination.

Environmental modification of tolerance to morphine discriminative stimulus properties in rats

The development of tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine was examined in rats trained to discriminate saline and 3.2 mg/kg morphine under a multiple timeout 15 min, 5 min fixed-ratio 30 schedule of food delivery. Generalization gradients were generated by administering increasing doses of morphine before successive timeout periods within the experimental session. Over the course of the study, the minimal discriminable dose (MDD) of morphine under control conditions fluctuated but did not systematically increase or decrease. Acute pretreatments of 3.2-17.8 mg/kg morphine 4-24 h before a generalization test resulted in minor changes in the MDD. To examine development of tolerance, supplemental doses of morphine (17.8 mg/kg) or saline were administered twice daily while discrimination training was either suspended or continued. Tolerance was assessed by weekly generalization tests. Greater tolerance developed to the morphine stimulus when training was suspended than when training was continued. For both training conditions, response rates during generalization tests were markedly suppressed during supplemental morphine administration, and original generalization gradients were recaptured within 2 weeks after termination of supplemental morphine administration. Supplemental saline administration did not alter the discriminative or rate-altering effects of morphine under either training condition. Thus, the magnitude of tolerance to a morphine discriminative stimulus reflected an interaction of supplemental drug treatment with the training conditions imposed during that treatment.

Induction of and recovery from tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of l-cathinone

Rats previously trained to discriminate between 0.6 mg/kg l-cathinone and saline in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task were administered l-cathinone at the same dose, every 8 hours for 10 days. Discrimination testing during this chronic administration phase of experimentation indicated that the animals' ability to discriminate both 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg l-cathinone decreased when compared to their discriminative ability prior to chronic administration. In contrast, discrimination of the non-drug state, i.e., saline, was not affected. Comparison of dose-response curves prior to and during chronic cathinone administration indicated a 3-4 fold shift to the right for the latter curve. Continued testing after termination of chronic treatment resulted in a return to pre-chronic discriminative performance by the fifteenth day after cessation. These results indicate that tolerance to the discriminative effects of l-cathinone can be produced within 10 days of chronic administration and recovery from this observed tolerance occurs within 15 days of cessation of chronic administration.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the serotonin agonist MK 212

In an attempt to clarify the role of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the discriminative stimulus properties of MK 212 (6-chloro-2[1-piperazinyl]pyrazine), male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 mg/kg of this compound from saline. While the putative 5-HT agonists fenfluramine and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (MCPP) mimicked MK 212 in a dose-related manner, d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OHDPAT), 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT), quipazine, Ru 24969, and 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP) failed to substitute completely. The 5-HT1/5-HT2 antagonists BC 105, metergoline, and methysergide completely blocked the MK 212 cue, while the selective 5-HT2 antagonists ketanserin and pirenperone, the dopamine antagonists haloperidol and spiperone, and the beta-noradrenergic antagonist propranolol were without effect. The substitutions of fenfluramine and MCPP for MK 212 support a role for 5-HT in the MK 212 cue; however, the lack of substitution of many other 5-HT agonists is difficult to explain. The complete antagonism by 5-HT1/5-HT2 but not by selective 5-HT2, antagonists suggests the possibility that 5-HT1 receptors mediate the stimulus properties of MK 212. Further research is needed to support this hypothesis and to investigate the relative role of 5-HT and other neurotransmitters in the stimulus effects of MK 212.

Analyzing mechanism(s) of hallucinogenic drug action with drug discrimination procedures

Some of the advantages of using drug discrimination (DD) procedure to analyze the mechanisms of action of hallucinogenic and related drugs were illustrated by reviewing research with lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Because they ensure that drug-induced alterations in interoceptive "state" become biologically meaningful "cues," these procedures are reliable, robust, sensitive and specific. With reference to LSD, many DD experiments suggest: (1) that while hallucinogens substitute for (mimic) LSD (in rats), such substitution does not predict hallucinogenic potency (in humans) but does predict similarities in mechanism(s) of action; (2) the behavioral (in vivo) effects of LSD, unlike those of some of its congeners, are mediated primarily by central, serotonergic (5-HT) neuronal mechanism although LSD may also have (secondary) dopamine (DA) agonist properties; (3) both the locus and the nature of these LSD-5-HT interactions are unclear: cells arising from B-7, B-8 and B-9 regions of the dorsal-medial raphe may be involved; pretreatment with agents that deplete 5-HT and increase the stereospecific binding of 3H-LSD in vitro (p-chlorophenylalanine; 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine) enhance sensitivity to LSD in vivo.

The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization

Different groups of rats were trained to discriminate fentanyl (F) (0.03, 0.02, or 0.01 mg/kg) from saline or to discriminate 0.03 mg/kg fentanyl (F) from alternative stimulus conditions (saline, 0.15 mg/kg nicotine, or 0.01 mg/kg F). When percentage of responses on the drug lever and percentage of time spent responding on the drug lever were used as dependent variables, it was found that training dose and alternative stimulus condition both affected the ED50 and the slope of the F generalization gradient. ED50 and slope values based on group data were not significantly different from values based on individual data. Differences between from values based on individual data. Differences between the results of the first and second 2.5-min period of the extinction test were not significant. ED50 and slope values were unaffected by the preceding training session, except in the group trained to discriminate 0.03 from 0.01 mg/kg F. A lever selection measure showed a significant effect of alternative stimulus condition on ED50 values only. Training dose and alternative stimulus condition also affected the generalization to morphine. Under none of the conditions explored in this study did generalization occur to amphetamine or nicotine. The results are discussed in terms of the relative nature of drug generalization.

Psilocybin as a discriminative stimulus: lack of specificity in an animal behavior model for 'hallucinogens'

Fifteen rats were trained to discriminate between the tryptamine hallucinogen psilocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine; 1.0 mg/kg) and saline in a two-lever choice task. Dose-response and time-response curves were obtained. The psilocybin cue generalized to psilocin (the dephosphorylated congener of psilocybin) and to the prototypical indoleamine hallucinogen LSD, but not to the phenylethylamine hallucinogen mescaline. These results indicate that the hallucinogenic effects of these drugs in humans may not be identical with their discriminative stimulus functions in animals, and that these four compounds may not be members of a single drug class. The term 'hallucinogen' may thus be a misnomer in the context of drug discrimination studies in nonhumans.

Discriminative stimulus properties of L-5-hydroxytryptophan: behavioral evidence for multiple serotonin receptors

Rats were trained to discriminate the stimulus properties of L-5-hydroxytryptophan (L-5-HTP) (30 mg/kg SC), the immediate precursor of serotonin (5-HT). The peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor R04-4602, administered prior to L-5-HTP, greatly attenuated the disruptive effects observed on responding when L-5-HTP alone was injected. Following acquisition, the discrimination was dose-dependent and generalized to fenfluramine, a 5-HT-releasing drug, but not to amphetamine, a catecholamine-releasing agent. Further evidence for the involvement of 5-HT receptor stimulation in mediating the discrimination was that pretreatment with fluoxetine, a highly specific 5-HT uptake inhibitor, markedly potentiated the cue. Nevertheless, the classical 5-HT antagonists methysergide, cyproheptadine, metergoline, and methiothepin did not block the L-5-HTP-related discriminative stimulus. This finding suggested that the cue properties of L-5-HTP might be mediated by a population of 5-HT receptors previously identified electrophysiologically in limbic structures. As in the present experiment, the putative 5-HT antagonists did not block the synaptic effects of 5-HT in these structures.

Behavior analysis and experimental pharmacology

This paper provides an introduction to the field of behavioral pharmacology. A brief description of the main characteristics of behavior analysis is followed by a review of the contributions of experimental pharmacology to behavior analysis and vice versa. Finally, a section on new procedures in behavioral pharmacology outlines experimental situations in which complex kinds of behavior can to studied. These include: (a) temporal discrimination; (b) preference to be free and informed; (c) commitment, choice and self-control; and (d) high-order concept formation.

Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats

Amphetamine and some relate compounds were compared in rats trained to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (0.4, 1.0 or 1.6 mg/kg) or cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) from the non drug condition in a standard, two-bar procedure with food reinforcement (n=5-6). Amphetamine and cocaine were generalized completely with each other, in most cases at dose levels which did not greatly reduce the overall numbers of responses. The ED50 values for amphetamine and cocaine varied with the drug and dose used for training, and it was concluded that the stimuli produced by the two drugs were similar but may not be identical. There was an excellent correlation between ED50 values derived from indices of bar selection and percentage-responding on the drug-appropriate bar. Apomorphine was generalized with amphetamine only in the rats trained with the higher doses of amphetamine, and only when administered in doses which greatly reduced the overall number of responses. Para-hydroxyamphetamine increased responding on the drug-appropriate bar only when administered in high doses to the rats trained with the lowest dose of amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg). The results strengthen the evidence that the particular drug and dose level used for training can significantly affect the outcome of generalization tests, and challenge the notion that the discriminability of drugs is an immutable property that is amenable to absolute measurement.

The effect of serotonin depletion on the discriminability of LSD

Nine groups of rats were trained to discriminate LSD (0.12 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever, water-reinforced, drug discrimination procedure. After stable discriminative performance was obtained (>95% correct), groups were administered one of several treatments which lower the concentration of serotonin (5-HT) in brain: (1) 12.5, 25, 50, 100 or 200 microgram of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT) intraventricularly (IVT); (2) 3 X 100 mg/kg of p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA) intraperitoneally (IP); or (3) 20 mg/kg of p-chloroamphetamine (PCA) IP. Control rats received either IVT injections of 5,7-DHT vehicle or IP injections of PCA or PCPA vehicles. Beginning 12 days after treatment, lever preference following various doses of LSD was determined. The results indicated that only the 200 microgram dose of 5,7-DHT and PCPA caused a significant potentiation of LSD-lever responding at the 0.03 mg/kg dose of LSD while all treatments except 12.5 and 25 microgram of 5,7-DHT resulted in significant depletion of 5-HT. Moreover, amount of 5-HT and percent LSD responding following 0.03 mg/kg LSD were not significantly correlated. It was concluded that 5-HT depletion, per se, cannot account for supersensitivity to the behavioral effects of LSD.

Drug discrimination training with progressively lowered doses

Rats were trained to discriminate drug from no-drug conditions in a two-lever operant task. Moderately high dosages were used initially. Whenever the discrimination was learned, training was continued with progressively reduced dosages. Eventually the rats discriminated extremely low doses of phenobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, cyclazocine, and fentanyl.

Evidence supporting lack of discriminative stimulus properties of a combination of naltrexone and morphine

The aim of the present experiment was to study the potentially discriminable effects of combinations of morphine and naltrexone during long-term treatment. Three groups of gerbils had to discriminate the effects of morphine (12 mg/kg) and those of either saline (4 ml/kg), naltrexone (2 mg/kg), or a combination of this dose of morphine plus naltrexone injected IP 60 min prior to the start of the discriminative training in a T-shaped maze. Rapid development of drug discriminative control of choice behavior (left or right turn in the maze) was evident in these 3 groups which is in marked contrast to the performance of gerbils trained with morphine-naltrexone combination vs. saline or gerbils trained with naltrexone only vs. saline. Neither of these latter groups reached the criterion of performing 8 correct first-trial choices in 10 consecutive training sessions during the 60 training sessions allowed, while the 3 other groups began their criterion performance after only 7--8 training sessions. Thus the discriminative properties of certain combinations of morphine and naltrexone are weak and therfore are not easily discriminable from the effects induced by saline.

Induced tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine

Twenty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in five two-lever operant chambers on a DRL-15 sec schedule of positive food reinforcement to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from 1 ml/kg saline. Following acquistions of discrimination a counterbalanced design of extinction tests was performed before and after repeated administration of 20 mg/kg cocaine or saline (three times a day at five hr intervals for seven days). The extinction tests consisted of testing responses of animals following 1 ml/kg saline, 2.5 mg/kg cocaine, or 5 mg/kg cocaine. The results showed no significant difference in animals' level choice before and after repeated injection with saline. However, the percent cocaine lever choice with the two doses of cocaine was lower after repeated administration of cocaine than before the repeated injections. This indicates tolerance developed to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine.

Discriminative properties of pentobarbital after repeated noncontingent exposure in gerbils

Two groups of gerbils were pretreated with pentobarbital (P-barb.) (10 and 20 mg/kg) for 20 days before being subjected to drug discrimination training in a (T-shaped shock-escape maze. The rapidity with which these gerbils acquired the discrimination was compared to that of gerbils that were drug naive until beginning the P-barb.-discrimination training. The acquisition rates of the respective groups did not differ substantially within each dose level (10 and 20 mg/kg), although open-field activity (primarily the rearing scores) differentiated the P-barb.- and vehicle-pretreated animals at both dose levels. The peak effect in rectal temperature, however, was not markedly different after the first and 20th drug exposures, although the temperature effects leveled off earlier during the second recording session. In conclusion, certain parameters (open-field activity) may be changed as a consequence of repeated administrations of P-barb. without a significant parallel loss of the cue or stimulus properties of the drug.

Alterations in the behavioral effects of LSD by motivational and neurohumoral variables

Forty naive male albino rats were trained to press a bar on a fixed-ratio (FR 32) schedule of water reinforcement. They were then divided into two groups, one of which (N = 20) received 5 min of extra water 12 hr before each experimental session; the other group (N = 20) received no extra water. Half of the animals in each group was given three daily doses (100 mg/kg) of the trytophan hydroxylase inhibitor p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (PCPA) while the remaining animals were given control injections of the PCPA vehicle. Ten days following the last administration of PCPA (or vehicle) all animals were given a low dose of LSD (20 mug/kg). Bar-pressing behavior was significantly disrupted only in those animals receiving both PCPA and extra water. Central (whold brain) concentrations of serotonin (5-HT) were significantly lower in all animals which had been treated with PCPA. These results, along with those previously reported, suggest that amount of deprivation can be an important determinant of both the ability of drugs to alter behavior and the dependence of such alterations upon underlying neuronal activity.