The effect of the enantiomers of 3-PPP on conditioned avoidance responding in the rat

Dose dependency of sex differences in the effects of repeated haloperidol administration in avoidance conditioning in mice

Sex differences in the effects of haloperidol in active avoidance conditioning in mice have previously been found in various studies carried out in our laboratory. Males were more affected than females by the disruptive effects of this neuroleptic. The work described here broadens the study of these sex differences to higher doses of haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) using a repeated administration schedule (5 days). The results did not show sex differences in the deteriorating effects of this dopamine antagonist in the escape-avoidance response, but a tendency in the number of nonresponses was observed in the same direction as former results: male animals were more sensitive than females to the inhibitory effect of the low dose of haloperidol. It is concluded that the appearance of sex differences in the effects of haloperidol on active avoidance conditioning is a dose-dependent phenomenon.

The higher the dose, the greater the sex differences in escape-avoidance response in mice after acute administration of haloperidol

Sex differences in the effects of haloperidol in the escape-avoidance response have previously been found in various studies carried out in our laboratory in which mice were used as experimental subjects. Males were more affected than females by the disruptive effects of this neuroleptic of frequent clinical use. In the present work these sex differences were evaluated in a unique training session using several doses of the drug (0.075, 0.25, and 0.75 mg/kg i.p.). The number of avoidances, escapes, nonresponses, crossings during the adaptation period, crossings during intertrial intervals, and response latencies were analyzed. Statistically significant sex differences were found in the number of escapes and nonresponses: males showed fewer escape responses and more nonresponses than females. These sex differences were dose dependent: a positive correlation was obtained between doses of haloperidol and sex differences observed in the number of escapes and nonresponses. The higher the dose, the greater the sex differences. These are related not only to the impairment of motor activity, because no sex differences were found in the number of crossings during the adaptation period and intertrial intervals.

Dopamine agonists facilitate footshock-elicited locomotion in rats, and suppress level-press responding for food

Several dopamine agonists (apomorphine, quinpirole, 7-OH-DPAT, and U-91356A) suppressed locomotor activities of rats exploring a Y-maze, presumably through activation of dopamine autoreceptors. If brief electric shocks were applied to the grid floor during exploration, locomotion was unchanged in control rats, but the locomotor suppression from the dopamine agonists was converted to a profound stimulation. This locomotor stimulation was completely antagonized by pretreatment with sulpiride. SKF 38393 and clonidine produced no locomotor stimulation in the shock environment. To test whether the locomotor stimulant effect from dopamine agonists generalized to a food-reinforced behavior, rats were trained to lever-press for food according to a multiple (VI-10", VI-40") schedule. The above compounds only suppressed responding with no stimulation, and the suppressant effect on food-reinforced behavior was also blocked by sulpiride. It is concluded that the behavioral inhibitory effect from dopamine autoreceptor activation can be readily overcome by exteroceptive stimulation, which uncovers a powerful motor stimulant effect. This stimulant effect, however, did not generalize to lever-press responding for food.

Antipsychotic-like profile of combined treatment with raclopride and 8-OH-DPAT in the rat: enhancement of antipsychotic-like effects without catalepsy

The administration of the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT, 0.1 mg kg-1 sc-20 min, produced a moderate suppression of conditioned avoidance behavior (60% of controls) in the rat. This effect, however, was not seen after administration of higher doses, 0.4 and 1.6 mg kg-1 sc. The number of intertrial crosses were not affected by the lower dose but significantly increased by administration of the two higher doses of 8-OH-DPAT. The dopamine D2 receptor blocking agent raclopride, 0.05 mg kg-1, by itself did not suppress the avoidance behavior, but in combination with 8-OH-DPAT produced suppression of avoidance behavior (30% of controls) as well as intertrial crosses. Open field locomotor activity was suppressed by raclopride, 0.1 mg kg-1 sc, or by 8-OH-DPAT, 0.1 mg kg-1 sc. The combined treatment produced a further suppression of locomotor activity and a marked increase in "immobility" (stationary movements). Treadmill locomotion, however, was not affected by either compound by itself, whereas the combined treatment impaired treadmill performance. Suppression of treadmill performance by a higher dose of raclopride, 0.4 mg kg-1 sc, was not altered by the additional treatment with 8-OH-DPAT, 0.1 mg kg-1. In contrast to the additive effects of 8-OH-DPAT and raclopride on conditioned avoidance behavior, open field locomotion and treadmill performance, the catalepsy produced by raclopride, 16 mg kg-1 was completely antagonised by treatment with 8-OH-DPAT 0.1 mg kg-1. Taken together, the present findings demonstrate strong interactions between a 5-HT agonist and a DA D2 antagonist on some critical tests for antipsychotic-like actions and extrapyramidal motor effects in rats, and suggest new possibilities in the search for new antipsychotic drugs with higher clinical efficacy and less extrapyramidal side effects.

Differential effects of sigma and phencyclidine receptor ligands on learning

Several phencyclidine (PCP) and sigma receptor ligands were examined for their effects on a single trial passive avoidance test in rats. Rats were administered the PCP receptor ligands (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5Hdibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-im ine maleate (MK-801), PCP, ketamine or the sigma receptor ligands (+)-N-allylnormetazocine ((+)-NANM), (+)-pentazocine, (+)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine ((+)-3-PPP) or 1,3-Di(2-[5-3H]tolyl)guanidine (DTG) subcutaneously prior to acquisition of the passive avoidance response, and tested 24 h later for retention. MK-801 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg), PCP (0.54-1.7 mg/kg), ketamine (10.0-17.2 mg/kg) and (+)-N-allylnormetazocine (5.4-10.0 mg/kg) produced significant memory deficits. (+)-Pentazocine (54 mg/kg) and (+)-3-PPP (30 mg/kg) also produced retention deficits, but at significantly higher doses. DTG (0.3-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) had no effect on retention. There was a positive correlation between production of retention deficits and the compounds' PCP receptor binding affinity. The results suggest that the sigma receptor is not involved in learning the passive avoidance response.

Anxiolytic-like action of the 3-PPP enantiomers in the Vogel conflict paradigm

The effect of the (+)- and (-)-enantiomers of 3-PPP [conventional and atypical dopamine (DA)-receptor active agent, respectively] were investigated in a commonly used animal model of anxiety: the Vogel licking-conflict test. Low doses (less than or equal to 0.5 mg/kg SC) of both 3-PPP enantiomers resulted in anti-conflict (= anxiolytic-like) actions in this test. (-)-3-PPP proved to be almost as potent as apomorphine in releasing the punished responding (minimum effective doses; (-)-3-PPP: 0.016, and apomorphine: 0.006 mg/kg SC), whereas (+)-3-PPP was about 10 times less effective than apomorphine. In the higher dose range (greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/kg), both 3-PPP enantiomers instead induced an apparent "pro"-conflict effect; i.e. decreased responding to a level significantly below baseline, thus resulting in a biphasic dose-response curve. Simple alterations in the animals' motivation to drink, in shock threshold or in motor capabilities did not seem to be major explanatory factors either for the anti- or for the "pro"-conflict effects. With regard to the latter, the possibility is discussed of an interaction between the experimental test situation and non conflict-related effects of the drugs, thus interfering with the punished drinking. The findings are interpreted within the concept that low doses of the 3-PPP enantiomers, in particular (-)-3-PPP, may attenuate anxiety-elicited increases in the neurotransmission in certain meso-cortical/limbic DA pathways, i.e. consistent with the previously shown preferentially "limbic" net antidopaminergic profile of action of (-)-3-PPP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Central dopaminergic properties of HW-165 and its enantiomers; trans-octahydrobenzo(f)quinoline congeners of 3-PPP

In the further development of CNS dopamine autoreceptor active compounds related to 3-PPP, the transfused 7-hydroxy-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10b-octahydrobenzo(f)quinoline HW-165 and its enantiomers were synthesised. This paper describes the basic pharmacological properties of these latter, novel "atypical" dopaminergic agents, based on an extensive series of biochemical and behavioural experiments in rats. By and large, the pharmacological activities of HW-165 - essentially, if not exclusively, residing in its (4aS,10bS)-(-)-enantiomer - were similar to those displayed by (S)-(-)-3-PPP, indicating the simultaneous presence of central dopamine (autoreceptor) agonist and weak (postsynaptic) antagonist properties in the molecule. Thus, in non-pretreated animals HW-165 and its active species monotonically suppressed the spontaneous locomotion without causing catalepsy or other appreciable motor disabilities, and at the same time selectively reduced the dopamine synthesis, release/turnover and utilisation. Some differences in these biochemical responses to HW-165 [racemate or (-)-enantiomer] were, however, noted in the limbic vs. striatal brain areas (e.g. decrease of dopamine synthesis particularly in the limbic parts). On the other hand, while failing to reverse reserpine-induced akinesia or to elicit stereotyped behaviour, the agents markedly inhibited the dopamine synthesis in either of the dopamine-dominated cerebral regions in the reserpinised as well as in gamma-butyrolactone (GBL)-treated rats. As shown for racemic HW-165 after reserpine pretreatment, the inhibition of dopamine synthesis was completely and stereoselectively blocked by (+)-butaclamol, thereby supporting direct dopamine receptor interaction. Racemic HW-165 readily antagonised the d-amphetamine-induced locomotor hyperactivity. Apomorphine-induced hyperactivity was, however, distinctly more resistant to antagonism by HW-165 [racemate or (-)-enantiomer]. Moreover, the latter agents fully prevented the apomorphine-induced inhibition of striatal dopamine synthesis in otherwise non-pretreated rats, while only partly counteracting this effect of apomorphine in the limbic regions of such animals, and in either brain area of rats treated with gamma-butyro-lactone. The findings are interpreted within the context of the mixed dopamine agonist/antagonist properties (referred above) of HW-165 and its active (-)-species in relation to the adaptive state of central dopamine receptors and possible regional variations in feedback strength and organisation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Involvement of extrapyramidal motor mechanisms in the suppression of locomotor activity by antipsychotic drugs: a comparison between the effects produced by pre- and post-synaptic inhibition of dopaminergic neurotransmission

The effects of two proposed dopaminergic autoreceptor agonists, (-)3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine (3-PPP) and the azepine derivative B-HT 920, on spontaneous locomotor activity, treadmill locomotion, and catalepsy in the rat have been compared with the effects produced by the postsynaptic dopamine (DA) receptor blocking agent haloperidol. It was found that the threshold dose for suppression of exploratory locomotor activity was 0.5, 0.005 and 0.2 mg/kg for (-)3-PPP, B-HT 920 and haloperidol, respectively. The corresponding doses for suppression of treadmill locomotion were 8.0, 5.12 and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, (-)3-PPP and B-HT 920, in contrast to haloperidol, did not produce any catalepsy. Thus, using exploratory locomotor activity as an index of limbic forebrain DA functions and treadmill locomotion and catalepsy as indices of extrapyramidal DA functions, the DA autoreceptor agonists, in contrast to the postsynaptic antagonist, show a difference in the doses required to produce these effects. The designation of the behavioral functions as "limbic" or extrapyramidal is supported by the finding that scopolamine, 0.8 mg/kg, antagonized the haloperidol-induced suppression (0.2 mg/kg) of treadmill locomotion, but not the suppression of exploratory locomotor activity.

An electrophysiological analysis of the actions of the 3-PPP enantiomers on the nigrostriatal dopamine system

Extracellular single unit recording and microiontophoretic studies were carried out in chloral hydrate-anesthetized gallamine-paralyzed rats to investigate the actions of the enantiomers of the dopamine (DA) analogue 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine, 3-PPP, on the nigrostriatal DA system. Intravenously administered (+)- or (-)-3-PPP consistently inhibited nigral DA neuronal activity; these actions were readily antagonized by haloperidol but were not affected by a pretreatment of reserpine plus alpha-methyltyrosine. In contrast to (+)-3-PPP, the (-)-enantiomer produced only partial inhibition of the majority of cells studied and was also capable of partially reversing the inhibitory action of apomorphine. A prior hemitransection of the brain did not alter the inhibitory action of either enantiomer. Whereas iontophoretically ejected (+)-3-PPP consistently reduced DA cell firing rate, similarly applied (-)-3-PPP reduced the activity of only some DA cells, while the majority were not influenced. In addition, iontophoresis of (-)-3-PPP could reduce the inhibitory effect of similarly applied DA or (+)-3-PPP. The (+)-enantiomer reduced caudate neuronal activity both after intravenous administration and iontophoresis. Intravenously administered (-)-3-PPP failed to influence or increased the activity of these neurons and reversed the inhibitory action of apomorphine. However, iontophoretically ejected drug reduced caudate cell activity and did not influence the inhibitory action of DA. The activity of non-DA zona reticulata neurons was inconsistently influenced by the 3-PPP enantiomers. It is concluded that (+)-3-PPP is a directly acting DA agonist, stimulating both DA autoreceptors and postsynaptic DA receptors. In contrast, (-)-3-PPP appears to be a partial agonist at nigral DA autoreceptors, whereas the action of the drug at putative postsynaptic DA receptors in the caudate remains to clarified.

Dopamine-receptor agonists: mechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity. I. Review of the evidence

The behavioural, biochemical, neuroendocrinological and electrophysiological actions of the enantiomers of the dopamine (DA) analogue 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine, 3-PPP, are extensively reviewed. (+)-3-PPP acts in a fashion similar to classical direct-acting DA agonists, stimulating both DA autoreceptors and postsynaptic DA receptors, although in some situations the drug appears to exhibit partial agonist activity. (-)-3-PPP exerts a variety of actions in different pharmacological models. Either agonistic, antagonistic or both agonistic and antagonistic activity are observed depending on the anatomical location of the relevant DA receptors and the experimental conditions. The actions of transdihydrolisuride (TDHL) and the trans-fused 7-OH-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10b-octahydrobenzo(f)quinoline (HW 165) are also discussed. These agents possess a similar spectrum of action to (-)-3-PPP suggesting a new generation of DA agonists which exhibit variable intrinsic activity at different DA receptors. Finally, evidence is presented indicating that the 3-PPP enantiomers display selectivity for DA receptors.

Postsynaptic dopamine agonistic effects of 3-PPP enantiomers revealed by bilateral 6-hydroxy-dopamine lesions and by chronic reserpine treatment in rats

The motor effects of some DA autoreceptor agonists and apomorphine in rats with bilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the median forebrain bundle were studied. Whereas (-)-3-PPP, (+)-3-phenethyl-PP and EMD 23448 decreased motility in sham-operated controls, a pronounced hypermotility was induced in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats. 3-PPP enantiomers and apomorphine had similar potency as that found in test models for DA autoreceptor activity in normal rats, e.g. motility inhibition. The DA receptor involvement in the effect of (-)-3-PPP was confirmed by neuroleptic antagonism. (-)-3-PPP and EMD 23448 had similar intrinsic activity as apomorphine, whereas (+)-3-phenethyl-PP and (+)-3-PPP had lower maximal effect. However, the DA autoreceptor agonists differed from apomorphine: The development of postsynaptic supersensitivity to these drugs appeared 4-7 days after the lesion compared to 1-2 days for apomorphine and (+)-3-PPP. Furthermore, no active oral stereotypy was induced by the autoreceptor selective compounds in contrast to the effect observed after apomorphine and (+)-3-PPP. In a separate experiment using circling behaviour in unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rats the different time-course of appearance of supersensitivity to (-)-3-PPP, (+)-3-PPP and apomorphine was confirmed. After chronic reserpine treatment a similar postsynaptic supersensitivity to (-)-3-PPP was observed with a development time between 4 and 7 days and with a similar intensity as that observed in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats. In contrast, after chronic neuroleptic treatment for 12 days, (-)-3-PPP was unable to induce hyperactivity 3-7 days after withdrawal. The results indicate that DA autoreceptor agonists are able to stimulate postsynaptic DA receptors in conditions without endogenous transmitter supply for at least 4-7 days, but not after chronic receptor blockade in a similar period. This should lead to consideration of DA autoreceptor agonists as potential antiparkinsonian drugs without stimulant effects on normosensitive postsynaptic DA receptors.

Effects of (-)3-PPP on acquisition and retention of a conditioned avoidance response in the rat

The administration of (-)3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine (3-PPP) was found to partially, but significantly, suppress the acquisition (4-8 mg/kg IP) and performance (8-16 mg/kg IP) of a conditioned avoidance response (CAR) in male Sprague-Dawley rats. All statistically significant effects were observed within 2 h of injection. Furthermore, using a situation in which the CAR was dependent on a visual successive discrimination, it was shown that discriminative performance was unaffected, and that (-)3-PPP (12.5-25 mg/kg IP) but not (+)3-PPP, suppressed the CAR. When (-)3-PPP (6.25 mg/kg IP) was combined with haloperidol (0.1-0.4 mg/kg IP), additive effects on the CAR performance were observed. Considering these effects, and the doses of (-)3-PPP required to suppress the CAR performance, it is concluded that the effects obtained in the present experiments are primarily due to a blockade of postsynaptic DA receptors.

Central dopamine receptor agonist and antagonist actions of the enantiomers of 3-PPP

The two enantiomers of the putative centrally acting dopamine (DA) autoreceptor agonist 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine, 3-PPP (Hjorth et al. 1981), were pharmacologically evaluated. An extensive series of biochemical and behavioural experiments unexpectedly revealed that both (+)- and (-)-3-PPP showed clear, but differential, effects on the DA receptors. Thus, (+)-3-PPP is a DA agonist with autoreceptor as well as postsynaptic receptor stimulatory properties. In contrast, although (-)-3-PPP similarly activates DA autoreceptors it acts concomitantly as an antagonist at postsynaptic DA receptors. Moreover, both behavioural and biochemical data on motor activity and DA synthesis and turnover suggest a preferential limbic action for the (-)-enantiomer. These results are discussed in terms of the dual antidopaminergic action of (-)-3-PPP coupled with anatomical differences in the feedback organisation in central (viz, limbic vs striatal) DA systems. It is suggested that compounds like (-)-3-PPP may be of potential clinical utility in the treatment of psychotic disorders, whilst lacking the seriously incapacitating motor dysfunctions produced by current neuroleptic therapy.