Glipizide increases plasma insulin but not C-peptide level after a standardized breakfast in type 2 diabetic patients

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, anagliptin, alters hepatic insulin clearance in relation to the glycemic status in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the impact of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, anagliptin, on hepatic insulin clearance (HIC) in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients and explored its relationship to glycemic status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 765 participants in anagliptin phase 2 and 3 studies were analyzed. Adjusted changes in variables during 12 weeks of anagliptin therapy were compared with a placebo. HIC was calculated as the ratio, C-peptide area under the curve 0-120 min to insulin area under the curve 0-120 min, after a meal tolerance test. To explore the effects of baseline HIC levels on variables, participants receiving anagliptin were divided according to quartiles of baseline HIC. Furthermore, multivariate analysis investigated the association between baseline HIC levels and glycemic status.

RESULTS

Anagliptin significantly reduced glycosylated hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001 vs placebo) and HIC levels (P < 0.01). Longer duration of diabetes, lower body mass index, higher glycosylated hemoglobin and lower insulin secretion capacity were observed with increases in baseline HIC levels. Improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin, glycoalbumin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol levels were greater in the relatively higher HIC group (baseline HIC levels ≥median) than in the lower HIC group (

CONCLUSIONS

Anagliptin affected HIC levels according to HIC baseline levels. Higher baseline HIC values might result in improved hyperglycemia through reduced HIC.

Collapse

Key Words

• Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor
• Hepatic insulin clearance
• Meal tolerance test

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Aged
• Asian People
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism
• Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/pharmacology
• Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use
• Double-Blind Method
• Female
• Humans
• Insulin/metabolism
• Liver/metabolism
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Pyrimidines/pharmacology
• Pyrimidines/therapeutic use

Collapse

Grants

• Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd.
• Kowa Co., Ltd

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Takahiro Abe Department of Hematology, Endocrinology and MetabolismNiigata University Faculty of MedicineNiigataJapan
Yasuhiro Matsubayashi Department of Hematology, Endocrinology and MetabolismNiigata University Faculty of MedicineNiigataJapan
Sayaka Muragishi Kowa Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
Akihiro Yoshida Department of Hematology, Endocrinology and MetabolismNiigata University Faculty of MedicineNiigataJapan Kowa Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
Hideki Suganami Kowa Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
Kenichi Furusawa Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd.NagoyaJapan
Kazuya Fujihara Department of Hematology, Endocrinology and MetabolismNiigata University Faculty of MedicineNiigataJapan
Shiro Tanaka Department of Clinical BiostatisticsGraduate School of Medicine Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
Kohei Kaku Kawasaki Medical SchoolOkayamaJapan
Hirohito Sone Department of Hematology, Endocrinology and MetabolismNiigata University Faculty of MedicineNiigataJapan

Collapse

Short-Term SGLT2 Inhibitor Administration Does Not Alter Systemic Insulin Clearance in Type 2 Diabetes

Background: Decreased insulin clearance could be a relatively upstream abnormality in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Previous studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) increases insulin–C-peptide ratio, a marker of insulin clearance, and improves metabolic parameters. We evaluated the effects of the SGLT2i tofogliflozin on metabolic clearance rate of insulin (MCRI) with a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp study, the gold standard for measuring systemic insulin clearance. Methods: Study participants were 12 Japanese men with type 2 diabetes. We evaluated MCRI and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity with a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (insulin infusion rate, 40 mU/m²·min) before and immediately after a single dose (n = 12) and 8 weeks (n = 9) of tofogliflozin. We also measured ectopic fat in muscle and liver and the abdominal fat area using ¹H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively, before and after 8 weeks of tofogliflozin. Results: MCRI did not change after a single dose of tofogliflozin (594.7 ± 67.7 mL/min·m² and 608.3 ± 90.9 mL/min·m², p = 0.61) or after 8 weeks (582.5 ± 67.3 mL/min·m² and 602.3 ± 67.0 mL/min·m², p = 0.41). The 8-week treatment significantly improved glycated hemoglobin and decreased body weight (1.7%) and the subcutaneous fat area (6.4%), whereas insulin sensitivity and ectopic fat in muscle and liver did not change significantly. Conclusions: MCRI did not change after a single dose or 8 weeks of tofogliflozin. Increased MCRI does not precede a decrease in body fat or improved glycemic control.

Sulfonylureas: a new look at old therapy

Sulfonylurea compounds were the first available oral antidiabetic agents and they remain an important tool in our quest for optimal glucose control. The sulfonylureas stimulate the release of insulin from pancreatic β-cells and have a number of extrapancreatic effects, including decreasing hepatic insulin clearance and reducing glucagon secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although these agents have been the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), their safety and clinical utility has been a matter of active debate in recent years, as their use is associated with risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain. We review the discovery and mechanisms of action of sulfonylureas, and the results of clinical trials to provide practical information on the pros and cons of their use in clinical practice. This review addresses advances in our understanding of mechanisms of action of sulfonylurea agents, their efficacy in T2DM, side effects, and impact on cardiovascular disease outcomes.

Effects of body temperature maintenance on glucose, insulin, and corticosterone responses to acute hypoxia in the neonatal rat

One of the biggest challenges of premature birth is acute hypoxia. Hypothermia during acute hypoxic periods may be beneficial. We hypothesized that prevention of hypothermia during neonatal hypoxia disrupts glucose homeostasis and places additional metabolic challenges on the neonate. Pups at PD2 and PD8 were exposed to 8% O2 for 3 h, during which they were allowed to either spontaneously cool or were kept isothermic. There was also a time control group that was subjected to normoxia and kept isothermic. Plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, corticosterone, and catecholamines were measured from samples collected at baseline, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h. In postnatal day 2 (PD2) rats, hypoxia alone resulted in no change in plasma glucose by 1 h, an increase by 2 h, and a subsequent decrease below baseline values by 3 h. Hypoxia with isothermia in PD2 rats elicited a large increase in plasma insulin at 1 h. In PD8 rats, hypoxia with isothermia resulted in an initial increase in plasma glucose, but by 3 h, glucose had decreased significantly to below baseline levels. Hypoxia with and without isothermia elicited an increase in plasma corticosterone at both ages and an increase in plasma epinephrine in PD8 rats. We conclude that the insulin response to hypoxia in PD8 rats is associated with an increase in glucose similar to an adult; however, insulin responses to hypoxia in PD2 rats were driven by something other than glucose. Prevention of hypothermia during hypoxia further disrupts glucose homeostasis and increases metabolic challenges.

Metabolic effects of chronic glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system on serum glucose, insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, and hepatic insulin extraction in glucose-tolerant, first-degree relatives of African American patients with type 2 diabetes: new insights on mechanisms of action

We examined the long-term metabolic effects of a potent sulfonylurea (SU), glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (glipizide GITS) in normal glucose-tolerant (NGT), first-degree relatives of African American patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind manner for 24 months and 6 months after discontinuation of glipizide GITS. Fifty NGT African American first-degree relatives (n = 50)) were randomized to receive either glipizide GITS (GITS, 5 mg/d) or identical placebo (PLAC). The NGT consisted of NGT/GITS (n = 16; mean age, 43.1 +/- 8.7years; body mass index [BMI], 34.8 +/- 10) and NGT/PLAC (n = 34; 45.5 +/- 9.7 years; BMI, 31.3 +/- 3.1years). Each of the subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) at baseline and at yearly intervals for 2 years. Insulin sensitivity (Si) and glucose effectiveness (Sg) were determined by Bergman's minimal model method. Hepatic insulin extraction (HIE) was calculated as the molar ratio of C-peptide and insulin. The mean fasting serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels in the NGT/GITS were not different from that of the NGT/PLAC. After oral glucose challenge, mean serum glucose responses slightly increased (P = not significant [NS]) at 12 and 24 months in the NGT/GITS group when compared with the baseline, 0 month, but remained unchanged in the NGT/PLAC group. In addition, serum insulin and C-peptide responses significantly increased in the NGT/GITS group, but were unchanged in the NGT/PLAC group at 12 and 24 months versus 0 month. The HIE, during OGTT, decreased by 30% from the baseline (0 month) values in the NGT/ GITS, but remained unchanged in the NGT/PLAC group at 12 and 24 months. Mean Si decreased by 30% from the baseline in the NGT/GITS group by 12 and 24 months, but remained unchanged in the NGT/PLAC group. However, the disposition index (DI) remained normal in the NGT/GITS and the NGT/PLAC groups. The DI data in the NGT/GITS group suggested that beta cells maintained the ability to compensate for the lower Si during the chronic GITS administration in our high risk African Americans. Chronic GITS was well tolerated without any symptoms of either hypoglycemia or weight gain in the NGT/IGTS group. After discontinuation of GITS, the altered metabolic parameters significantly improved, returning to baseline values in the NGT/IGTS group in 6 months. In summary, chronic glipizide GITS administration (5 mg/d) was associated with increased beta-cell secretion, peripheral hyperinsulinemia, reduced Si, and reduced HIE in glucose-tolerant, first-degree relatives of African American patients with type 2 diabetes. These metabolic changes were reversible within 6 months after discontinuation of glipizide GITS. Our study defines a unique mode of action of glipizide GITS in African Americans at high risk for type 2 diabetes. We conclude that the use of glipizide GITS in the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes in nondiabetic first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes impaired glucose homeostasis.

Control of postprandial hyperglycemia: optimal use of short-acting insulin secretagogues

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of acute premeal administration of glipizide versus nateglinide in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia in subjects with non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 20 subjects (10 female, 10 male) with non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes were admitted overnight to the General Clinical Research Center on four occasions. In random order, 10 mg glipizide (30 min premeal), 120 mg nateglinide (15 min premeal), 10 mg glipizide plus nateglinide (30 and 15 min premeal, respectively), or placebo pills (30 and 15 min premeal) were administered in a double-blind fashion before a standardized breakfast. Blood was drawn for analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide at -0.05, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h relative to the meal.

RESULTS

The subjects were aged 56 +/- 2 years and were moderately obese (BMI 31 +/- 1 kg/m(2)), with a mean HbA(1c) of 7.4 +/- 0.4%. The peak postprandial glucose excursion above baseline was higher with placebo (6.1 +/- 0.5 mmol/l) than glipizide (4.3 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P = 0.002), nateglinide (4.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P = 0.001), or glipizide plus nateglinide (4.1 +/- 0.5 mmol/l, P = 0.001). The area under the curve for the glucose excursion above baseline was also higher with placebo (14.1 +/- 1.8 mmol/h. l) compared with glipizide (6.9 +/- 2.4 mmol/h. l, P = 0.002), nateglinide (9.7 +/- 2 mmol/h. l, P = 0.004), or glipizide plus nateglinide (5.6 +/- 2.2 mmol/h. l, P < 0.001). Peak and integrated glucose excursions did not differ significantly between glipizide and nateglinide. However, by 4 h postmeal, plasma glucose levels were significantly higher with nateglinide (9 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) compared with the premeal baseline (7.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P = 0.04) and compared with the 4-h postprandial glucose level after administration of glipizide (7.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P = 0.02). Integrated postprandial insulin levels were higher with glipizide (1,556 +/- 349 pmol/h. l) than nateglinide (1,364 +/- 231 pmol/h. l; P = 0.03). Early insulin secretion, as measured by insulin levels at 30 min postmeal, did not differ between glipizide and nateglinide.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute premeal administration of nateglinide or glipizide has equal efficacy in controlling postbreakfast hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes when each drug is administered at the optimum time before the meal. Glipizide causes a more pronounced and sustained postmeal insulin secretory response compared with nateglinide. Glipizide facilitates the return to near-fasting glucose levels at 4 h postmeal, but with the possible risk of increased frequency of postmeal hypoglycemia in drug-naive patients. The clinical decision to use glipizide versus nateglinide should be based on factors other than the control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes.

Glyburide increases the secretion, tissue uptake, and action of insulin in conscious normal dogs

The action of glyburide on glucose homeostasis involves pancreatic and extrapancreatic mechanisms. The relative importance of each of these processes in the hypoglycemic response to sustained administration of glyburide is unknown. In addition, the effect of this drug on the hepatic extraction of insulin is controversial. This investigation uses direct techniques in conscious normal dogs to examine the impact of glyburide therapy (2.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks) on glucose homeostasis. Preparatory surgery included placement of Doppler flow probes on hepatic vessels and insertion of catheters in carotid artery, portal vein, hepatic vein, and renal vein. After recovery from surgery, animals underwent an intravenous glucose tolerance test ([IGTT] 0.3 g - kg (-1) intravenous glucose bolus) and an insulin infusion clamp test ([IICT] 2 mU - kg (-1) - min (-1) intravenous insulin during 150 minutes) followed by glyburide therapy. After 4 weeks, the IGTT and IICT were repeated. Glyburide increased the insulin secretory response during the late phase of the IGTT and augmented glucose clearance during the IICT. Hepatic extraction of insulin was also stimulated by glyburide. We conclude that the hypoglycemic action of long-term glyburide administration involves stimulation of both insulin secretion by the pancreas and glucose disposal by peripheral tissues. In addition, glyburide augments the extraction of insulin by the liver, and such an effect might prevent the development of sustained high levels of insulin in blood perusing peripheral tissues.

A novel mechanism of glipizide sulfonylurea action: decreased metabolic clearance rate of insulin

To examine whether sulfonylureas inhibit the metabolic clearance rate (MCR) of insulin, 19 healthy young subjects participated in two experiments. In the first protocol (n = 10), a 3-h oral glucose load was performed with and without 2 mg of glipizide given 30 min before glucose ingestion. The total insulin response was 60% greater with than without glipizide (5.9 +/- 0.6 vs 3.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; P < 0.001). However, the total C-peptide responses were virtually identical (4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.8 +/- 0.4 nmol/l) in both studies. In the second protocol (n = 9), the MCR of insulin was measured during 4-h euglycemic insulin clamps performed with and without glipizide. In the study with glipizide, the subjects ingested 5 mg of glipizide at 120 min. The steady-state plasma insulin concentration during the 4th h, i.e., 1-2 h after glipizide ingestion, was significantly higher than during the 2nd h, i.e., before glipizide ingestion (99 +/- 22 vs 78 +/- 17 microU/ml; P < 0.01). In addition, glucose uptake during the 4th h was greater (8.0 +/- 1.6 vs 6.4 +/- 1.5 mg/kg.min) and the MCR of insulin was reduced (503 +/- 126 vs 621 +/- 176 ml/m2.min; P < 0.01). We conclude that glipizide augments plasma insulin levels both by enhancing its secretion and by decreasing the MCR of insulin.

Does glibenclamide influence the clearance of insulin and glucose uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Sulphonylureas have been proposed to decrease the clearance of insulin based on the finding that they increase peripheral insulin concentrations more than C-peptide concentrations. However, direct evidence for such an effect has so far been lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate whether glibenclamide affects clearance of insulin in Type 2 diabetic patients. Nine patients with Type-2 diabetes participated in the study. Insulin clearance and glucose metabolism was assessed with a 240 min euglycaemic insulin clamp in combination with infusion of somatostatin (400 micrograms h-1) to completely suppress endogenous insulin secretion. Either saline or glibenclamide was infused throughout the clamp in random order. During both the glibenclamide and the saline protocol the C-peptide level declined to < 0.07 nmol l-1 within 150 min, indicating that insulin secretion was completely suppressed. However, peripheral clamp insulin concentrations remained similar during both saline and glibenclamide protocols (3374 +/- 258 vs. 3350 +/- 265 pmol l-1 x 240 min, p = NS). There was no significant difference in the metabolic clearance rate of insulin during the glibenclamide compared to the saline experiment neither during the first 120 min (796 +/- 36 vs. 757 +/- 34 ml m-2min-1) nor during the last 2 h of the clamp (780 +/- 43 vs. 724 +/- 35 ml m-2min-1). Total glucose metabolism during the first two (14 +/- 2 vs. 15 +/- 2 mumol kg-1 min-1) and the last 2 h of the clamp was similar both during saline and glibenclamide infusions (27 +/- 4 vs. 28 +/- 4 mumol kg-1min-1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The relationship between early insulin release and glucose tolerance in healthy subjects

Sulphonylureas improve glucose tolerance by stimulating insulin secretion. Whether improved glucose tolerance results from enhanced early insulin release or greater total insulin secretion is not clear. Therefore insulin and C-peptide responses to oral glucose were measured in healthy subjects with and without a single dose of oral and intravenous glipizide. The intravenous glipizide administration caused a marked early insulin response, whereas oral glipizide administration resulted in greater total and peak insulin concentration. Oral glipizide did not reduce plasma glucose until 45 min of the glucose load. In contrast, enhancement of the early insulin response with intravenous glipizide almost completely prevented postprandial glucose rise. In conclusion, early insulin release is a major factor determining oral glucose tolerance in healthy subjects.

C-peptide and the classification of diabetes mellitus patients in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Report number 6. The ETDRS Research Group

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), conducted at 22 clinical centers during the period 1980 to 1989, collected baseline data on C-peptide levels after ingestion of Sustacal in 582 patients with diabetes mellitus, prior to enrollment in the trial. Data on several clinical factors associated with diabetes were also collected from all 3711 enrolled patients. C-peptide data were used to develop sets of clinical criteria for the classification of ETDRS patients and to compare and contrast definitions of type of diabetes used in previous studies. The distribution of C-peptide levels was strikingly bimodal, suggesting a division of study participants into two groups--those with levels at 80 pmol/L or less and those with more than 80 pmol/L of C-peptide after Sustacal ingestion. Constellations of clinical characteristics that could serve as proxies for C-peptide level were ascertained. The result was two sets of clinically developed definitions for type of diabetes in the ETDRS. According to the more restrictive set of definitions, three groups were identified, compared to two groups using the "broad" set of definitions. Discriminant analysis was also used to classify ETDRS patients, yielding similar results. A comparison of definitions of type of diabetes used in the ETDRS and in previous studies revealed that even in the absence of C-peptide data, clinically derived definitions provided good discrimination between type I and type II diabetes.

Long-term effects of glipizide on insulin secretion and blood glucose control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Of 23 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), whose fasting blood glucose had not reached less than or equal to 6.0 mmol.l-1 after 10 weeks of dietary regulation, 15, who had had a weight reduction of -2.8 kg by dietary control, did achieve a fasting blood glucose less than or equal to 6.0 mmol.l-1 after addition of less than or equal to 20 mg glipizide daily. They had a sustained (greater than or equal to 2 years) increase in meal-induced insulin secretion (32% increase in postprandial C-peptide AUC), and a sustained reduction in postprandial hyperglycaemia (34% reduction in AUC). Ten of the patients took a mean daily dose less than 5 mg (4.8 mg) and had a sustained increase in insulin secretion rate (increased C-peptide slope). The 15 patients had no elevation of basal insulin secretion and no impairment of weight reduction. The remaining 8 subjects, who showed little or no weight reduction on dietary control, had little or no reduction in fasting blood glucose despite long-term treatment with 20 mg glipizide daily, a less sustained increase in meal-induced insulin secretion, a smaller reduction of postprandial hyperglycaemia, and an increase in body weight. On diagnosis the 8 subjects did not differ from the other 15 subjects in age, body weight, blood glucose, HbA1c, C-peptide or insulin, nor in their glucose and insulin responses to a test dose of glipizide; the main reason for the apparent drug failure appeared to be deficient compliance with dietary regulation rather than a primary inability to respond to sulphonylurea treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The initial management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) should include patient education, dietary counselling and, when feasible, individualised physical activity. It is only when such measures fail that drug therapy should be considered. Dietary management of NIDDM includes a restriction in calories, and these should be appropriately distributed as carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. Supplementation of the diet with soluble fibre and supplementation with magnesium salts if hypomagnesaemia is demonstrated, is recommended. However, supplementation with fish oils or with fish oil-derived omega-3 fatty acids is not currently recommended. Oral drug therapies used in NIDDM include sulphonylurea derivatives, which are a first-line treatment in patients who are not grossly obese, metformin, which is the treatment of choice for obese patients, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose, which are used mainly to reduce postprandial blood glucose peaks. These types of drugs can be used alone or in combination. Insulin therapy may be required to achieve adequate control of blood glucose levels in some patients. In several instances, it is suggested that insulin therapy be combined with sulphonylureas (essentially when residual insulin secretion is present), with metformin, or with alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. The treatment of disorders associated with NIDDM, such as obesity, hypertension or hyperlipidaemia, requires particular attention in diabetic patients, since some drugs can adversely affect glycaemic control. Oral drugs for the treatment of NIDDM include sulphonylurea derivatives used in first-line treatment in patients who are not grossly obese, metformin, which is often the treatment of choice for obese patients and, more recently, the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, such as acarbose, which are effective in reducing the postprandial rise in blood glucose.

Extrapancreatic insulin effect of glibenclamide

In eight patients with uncomplicated non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, serum insulin levels, serum C-peptide levels and blood glucose levels were measured before and after oral administration of glibenclamide 0.1 mg/kg body weight and a test meal, or after a test meal alone. The rise in serum insulin levels persisted longer after glibenclamide. The initial rise in serum insulin was of the same magnitude in both situations, as was the rise in serum C-peptide levels during the entire 5 h study. It is concluded that glibenclamide is able to maintain a more prolonged increase in serum insulin levels by inhibiting the degradation of insulin in the vascular endothelial cells of the liver. The inhibition contributes to the blood glucose lowering effect of glibenclamide.

Acute effect of glipizide on glucose tolerance in obesity and diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)

The attempt has been made to identity the lowest dose of glipizide, a second generation sulphonylurea, capable of improving glucose tolerance in overweight and obese subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance. Thirty one obese subjects, 12 with non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), 9 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 10 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) each underwent four OGTTS (75 g), at 1 week intervals, after administration in random order of placebo or glipizide 0.5, 1.0 or 2.5 mg 30 min before glucose. Glucose tolerance in all groups was progressively improved by the increasing doses of glipizide and was normalized by 1.0 mg glipizide in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and by 2.5 mg glipizide in NIDDM. Insulin release was not significantly affected by glipizide in the three groups of subjects. The data indicate that it is possible, at least in acute experiments, to improve glucose tolerance in overweight and obese subjects with IGT, with NGT and with NIDDM, with doses of glipizide that do not affect insulin release.

Effects of glipizide on beta-endorphin secretions in response to hyperglycaemia in obese cafeteria rats

Regulation of blood glucose involves the integration of the central nervous system with both hormonal and neural mechanisms. Considerable evidence suggests that beta-endorphin is involved in the regulation of feeding in experimental animals and man. Previous studies have shown that beta-endorphin plays an important role during hyperglycaemia. Glipizide has been shown to increase glucose metabolism by both pancreatic and extrapancreatic actions. This study indicates that glipizide may exert its pharmacological action in obese cafeteria rats through a modification of beta-endorphin secretions via central and peripheral mechanisms.

Effects of glipizide on beta-endorphin concentration in the brain of genetically diabetic (db/db) mice

Sulphonylurea drugs have been shown to augment glucose metabolism by both pancreatic and extrapancreatic actions. The regulation of glucose involves a modification of beta-endorphin secretions via central and peripheral mechanisms. beta-Endorphin participates in the regulation of feeding and is implicated both in obesity and diabetes mellitus. This study shows that glipizide could exert its pharmacological action in genetically diabetic (db/db) mice via beta-endorphin secretions by a central mechanism.

Sulphonylurea antidiabetic drugs. An update of their clinical pharmacology and rational therapeutic use

Apart from the amelioration of symptoms, a major aim of the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, type 2 diabetes) should be the prevention of cardiovascular complications. These are associated with the chronic hyperglycaemia that is characteristic of NIDDM, and the risk of complications is already increased in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). For these reasons, and because hyperglycaemia appears to be a self-perpetuating condition, treatment should be introduced as early as possible and should be aimed at normalisation of blood glucose. To enable early detection and intervention, screening is necessary. As diet regulation alone rarely suffices to normalise blood glucose, addition of sulphonylurea drugs is indicated in many cases. If introduced in the IGT phase, sulphonylureas drugs combined with diet regulation may postpone the development of IGT to manifest NIDDM, and may reduce the increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Sulphonylureas stimulate insulin release, possibly via interaction with receptors in the pancreatic B cells. In addition, such treatment enhances the reduced insulin action. This might be a primary effect but is also a consequence of the increased access to insulin and the subsequent reduction of hyperglycaemia. Sulphonylureas may enhance insulin availability by reducing insulin clearance. Effects on blood lipids are probably secondary phenomena. Fast and short acting sulphonylureas may improve the impaired meal-induced acute insulin release. If combined with weight-reducing diet regulation and introduced early, such treatment can maintain (near) normal blood glucose levels and an improved insulin action for several years without increasing basal insulin secretion, without chronic hyperinsulinaemia, and without weight increase. If not combined with diet regulation, sulphonylurea therapy is likely to fail. If introduced when NIDDM is advanced, the efficacy of these drugs is limited, with secondary failures developing at a rate of 5 to 10% per year. Continuous (24-hour-a-day) exposure to drug treatment could possibly desensitise the B cell to sulphonylurea stimulation. 'Second-generation' sulphonylurea drugs have a higher potency than 'first-generation' drugs, but this need not signify a greater clinical efficacy. The effect of several of these drugs may be increased if they are ingested half an hour before meal(s). Short acting sulphonylureas may be safer than long acting ones, which seem more likely to cause long lasting and fatal hypoglycaemia, at least in elderly patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacology of sulfonylureas

Sulfonylureas seem to have similar mechanisms of action, including an acceleration and increase of insulin secretion, an increase of the systemic availability of insulin, and probably indirectly, an increase of insulin action. Sulfonylureas may postpone the development of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) to manifest non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and all NIDDM subjects should benefit from sulfonylurea treatment except those in whom insulin secretion has been attenuated. The most effective use is the combination of diet restriction and sulfonylurea introduced in NIDDM subjects soon after transition from IGT to NIDDM. A simple screening procedure has been devised to find the subjects at this early stage. Newer sulfonylureas, such as glipizide and glyburide, are more potent than the older ones, such as tolbutamide and chlorpropamide. During chronic treatment, glipizide and glyburide seem to be equally effective in reducing blood glucose levels, and they do so without causing a chronic elevation of insulin secretion, signifying that they do not increase the risk of pancreatic B cell exhaustion. Glipizide has rapid and complete absorption, as well as a rapid distribution and elimination. This may explain why it is less liable than other sulfonylureas to provoke long-lasting hypoglycemia, which is the major danger when using sulfonylureas. Despite its rapid elimination, 7.5 to 15 mg glipizide can be administered once daily without loss of therapeutic efficacy. This may be due in part to enterohepatic recirculation of the drug in response to meals. The therapeutic efficacy is increased if glipizide is received half an hour before breakfast.

Lack of primary effect of sulphonylurea (glipizide) on plasma lipoproteins and insulin action in former type 2 diabetics with attenuated insulin secretion

A double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation has been made into the effects of 8 weeks of glipizide treatment in diabetics previously classified as Type 2 but with subsequent attenuation of insulin secretion and thence maintained on exogenous insulin. Although all patients were exposed to therapeutic plasma concentrations of glipizide, fasting blood glucose, haemoglobin A1 and plasma lipoproteins (HDL, LDL, total cholesterol and triglycerides) did not show any consistent improvement following this treatment. It appears unlikely that SU (glipizide) has any primary effect on insulin action or on plasma lipoproteins. Its primary action is to augment insulin release and availability, so, its use should be restricted to Type 2 diabetics who retain insulin secretion.