Genome-wide association analysis identifies ancestry-specific genetic variation associated with acute response to metformin and glipizide in SUGAR-MGH

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Characterisation of genetic variation that influences the response to glucose-lowering medications is instrumental to precision medicine for treatment of type 2 diabetes. The Study to Understand the Genetics of the Acute Response to Metformin and Glipizide in Humans (SUGAR-MGH) examined the acute response to metformin and glipizide in order to identify new pharmacogenetic associations for the response to common glucose-lowering medications in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

One thousand participants at risk for type 2 diabetes from diverse ancestries underwent sequential glipizide and metformin challenges. A genome-wide association study was performed using the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array. Imputation was performed with the TOPMed reference panel. Multiple linear regression using an additive model tested for association between genetic variants and primary endpoints of drug response. In a more focused analysis, we evaluated the influence of 804 unique type 2 diabetes- and glycaemic trait-associated variants on SUGAR-MGH outcomes and performed colocalisation analyses to identify shared genetic signals.

RESULTS

Five genome-wide significant variants were associated with metformin or glipizide response. The strongest association was between an African ancestry-specific variant (minor allele frequency [MAFAfr]=0.0283) at rs149403252 and lower fasting glucose at Visit 2 following metformin (p=1.9×10-9); carriers were found to have a 0.94 mmol/l larger decrease in fasting glucose. rs111770298, another African ancestry-specific variant (MAFAfr=0.0536), was associated with a reduced response to metformin (p=2.4×10-8), where carriers had a 0.29 mmol/l increase in fasting glucose compared with non-carriers, who experienced a 0.15 mmol/l decrease. This finding was validated in the Diabetes Prevention Program, where rs111770298 was associated with a worse glycaemic response to metformin: heterozygous carriers had an increase in HbA1c of 0.08% and non-carriers had an HbA1c increase of 0.01% after 1 year of treatment (p=3.3×10-3). We also identified associations between type 2 diabetes-associated variants and glycaemic response, including the type 2 diabetes-protective C allele of rs703972 near ZMIZ1 and increased levels of active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (p=1.6×10-5), supporting the role of alterations in incretin levels in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

We present a well-phenotyped, densely genotyped, multi-ancestry resource to study gene-drug interactions, uncover novel variation associated with response to common glucose-lowering medications and provide insight into mechanisms of action of type 2 diabetes-related variation.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The complete summary statistics from this study are available at the Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal ( https://hugeamp.org ) and the GWAS Catalog ( www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/ , accession IDs: GCST90269867 to GCST90269899).

Systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials comparing sulfonylureas and low hypoglycaemic risk antidiabetic drugs

BACKGROUND

Safety of sulfonylurea drugs in the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes is still under debate. The aim of this study was to compare the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular adverse events of sulfonylureas and drugs with a low risk for hypoglycaemia in adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (PubMed, OVID), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, WOS and Lilacs.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled head-to-head trials that compared sulfonylureas with active control with low hypoglycaemic potential in adults (≥ 18 years old) with type 2 diabetes published up to August 2015. The drug classes involved in the analysis were metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists.

OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were MACE, cardiovascular events and severe hypoglycaemia.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Two reviewers checked study eligibility, independently extracted data and assessed quality with disagreements resolved through discussion. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials v2. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by using fixed effects model. The study is registered on PROSPERO (26/05/2016 CRD42016038780).

RESULTS

Our final analysis comprised 31 studies (26,204 patients, 11,711 patients given sulfonylureas and 14,493 given comparator drugs). In comparison to drugs with low hypoglycaemic potential, sulfonylureas had higher odds for all-cause mortality (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.00-1.75), MACE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.61), myocardial infarction (fatal and non-fatal) (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.17-2.38) and hypoglycaemia (OR 5.24, 95% CI 4.20-6.55). Subsequent sensitivity analysis revealed differences in the effect of sulfonylureas, with an increased risk of all-cause mortality with glipizide but not the other molecules.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis raises concern about the safety of SUs compared to alternative drugs involved in current analysis. Important differences may exist within the drug class, and glimepiride seems to have best safety profile.

Metagenomic analysis reveals crosstalk between gut microbiota and glucose-lowering drugs targeting the gastrointestinal tract in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6 month, two-arm randomised trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The use of oral glucose-lowering drugs, particularly those designed to target the gut ecosystem, is often observed in association with altered gut microbial composition or functional capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The gut microbiota, in turn, plays crucial roles in the modulation of drug efficacy. We aimed to assess the impacts of acarbose and vildagliptin on human gut microbiota and the relationships between pre-treatment gut microbiota and therapeutic responses.

METHODS

This was a randomised, open-labelled, two-arm trial in treatment-naive type 2 diabetes patients conducted in Beijing between December 2016 and December 2017. One hundred participants with overweight/obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were recruited from the Pinggu Hospital and randomly assigned to the acarbose (n=50) or vildagliptin (n=50) group using sealed envelopes. The treatment period was 6 months. Blood, faecal samples and visceral fat data from computed tomography images were collected before and after treatments to measure therapeutic outcomes and gut microbiota. Metagenomic datasets from a previous type 2 diabetes cohort receiving acarbose or glipizide for 3 months were downloaded and processed. Statistical analyses were applied to identify the treatment-related changes in clinical variables, gut microbiota and associations.

RESULTS

Ninety-two participants were analysed. After 6 months of acarbose (n=44) or vildagliptin (n=48) monotherapy, both groups achieved significant reductions in HbA_1c (from 60 to 46 mmol/mol [from 7.65% to 6.40%] in the acarbose group and from 59 to 44 mmol/mol [from 7.55% to 6.20%] in the vildagliptin group) and visceral fat areas (all adjusted p values for pre-post comparisons <0.05). Both arms showed drug-specific and shared changes in relative abundances of multiple gut microbial species and pathways, especially the common reductions in Bacteroidetes species. Three months and 6 months of acarbose-induced changes in microbial composition were highly similar in type 2 diabetes patients from the two independent studies. Vildagliptin treatment significantly enhanced fasting active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels. Baseline gut microbiota, rather than baseline GLP-1 levels, were strongly associated with GLP-1 response to vildagliptin, and to a lesser extent with GLP-1 response to acarbose.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

This study reveals common microbial responses in type 2 diabetes patients treated with two glucose-lowering drugs targeting the gut differently and acceptable performance of baseline gut microbiota in classifying individuals with different GLP-1 responses to vildagliptin. Our findings highlight bidirectional interactions between gut microbiota and glucose-lowering drugs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02999841 FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Project: 2016YFC1304901.

Characterization of the chemical profile and the effects of ethanolic extracts of Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex Reissek on glucose metabolism in normal hyperglycemic rats

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex Reissek, Celastraceae, is popularly known as "espinheira-santa" and used to treat pathologies related to the stomach. However, in popular culture, this species has also been used to treat other disorders such as diabetes, but without scientific evidence, requiring more phytochemical and pharmacological studies on the plant.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This work aims to investigate the anti-hyperglycemic potential of ethanolic extracts obtained from leaves from two different accessions of Maytenus ilicifolia (MIA and MIB) in normal hyperglycemic rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The animals were divided into different experimental groups: normal hyperglycemic (negative control); MIA (treatment of Maytenus ilicifolia extract from access 116); MIB (treatment with Maytenus ilicifolia extract from access 122; and glipizide (positive control). At 30 min after treatment, all animals received glucose overload orally. Blood collection occurred at different periods for the assessment of blood glucose (0, 60, 90 and 210 min after treatment) and at the end of the experiment blood was collected through cardiac puncture and the liver, muscle, pancreas and intestine were dissected for further analysis.

RESULTS

Chromatographic analysis identified oleic and palmitic acid as the most common constituents, and both extracts of Maytenus ilicifolia caused a reduction in blood glucose levels within 60 min after administration of glucose overload when compared to the normal hyperglycemic group. No significant changes were observed in hepatic and muscular glycogen levels, plasma insulin concentration and disaccharidases activity with none of the extracts in the model employed. However, hyperglycemic rats treated with the extracts showed a marked increase in triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that Maytenus ilicifolia extracts from different locations showed differences in chemical composition which did not reflect significant differences in the results of biological tests. In addition, it was possible to conclude that the treatment with Maytenus ilicifolia had a discreet anti-hyperglycemic effect; however, it was not possible to identify the responsible mechanism, being necessary, therefore, new studies using different technologies in order to determine the possible mechanisms of action of the extract.

The presence of two reduced function variants in CYP2C9 influences the acute response to glipizide

AIMS

To examine whether the presence of two common missense variants in the CYP2C9 gene (rs1799853, encoding Arg144Cys and denoted as *2, and rs1057910, encoding Ile359Leu and denoted as *3) influences the acute physiological response to a single glipizide dose in individuals naïve to diabetes medications.

METHODS

In the Study to Understand the Genetics of the Acute Response to Metformin and Glipizide in Humans (SUGAR-MGH), 786 individuals genotyped for rs1799853/rs41291560 (*2) and rs1057910/rs9332214 (*3) were treated with 5 mg glipizide in the fasting state. Glucose and insulin levels were measured at baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min for calculation of phenotypic endpoints of glipizide response. The challenge was aborted as a result of hypoglycaemia, defined as glucose <2.8 mmol/l or hypoglycaemia-related symptoms.

RESULTS

Carriers with two reduced function alleles had a 50% larger insulin area under the curve than carriers with zero or one copy (P=0.037), although this finding was primarily driven by an individual with a robust insulin response. In adjusted analyses, the risk of aborting the glipizide challenge was doubled in two-copy carriers (P=0.034). No significant findings were observed in glucose-based endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Carriers of two reduced function alleles in CYP2C9 may experience an increased insulin response to glipizide and be predisposed to a higher risk of hypoglycaemia, although no effect of genotype was seen in glucose-based measurements. Further studies are needed to clarify the utility of CYP2C9 genotyping to guide sulfonylurea treatment.

Comparison of mortality and cardiovascular event risk associated with various insulin secretagogues: A nationwide real-world analysis

AIMS

Several insulin secretagogues are widely used to treat diabetes; however, few outcome-based comparative studies have clarified which one of these should be used when indicated. We investigated mortality and cardiovascular event risk associated with optimal forms of insulin secretagogues.

METHODS

In this cohort study using real-world data from the diabetes database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance program, patients with diabetes were enrolled if their initial treatment was glimepiride, gliclazide, glipizide, glyburide, or repaglinide from 1999 to 2013. Each group was propensity score-matched to the glimepiride group before comparison. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and the combined cardiovascular event risk of acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Hazard ratios were calculated by Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

There were 66,790, 97,426, 38,806, 92,970, and 11,468 participants in the glimepiride, gliclazide, glipizide, glyburide, and repaglinide groups, respectively. The median follow-up time was 8 years. Glimepiride was associated with the best clinical outcome, showing the lowest mortality and lowest cardiovascular event risk of the five insulin secretagogues. Using patients on glimepiride as the reference group, the adjusted hazard ratios of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular event risk were 1.52 (p < 0.001) and 1.22 (p = 0.005) for gliclazide, 1.42 (p < 0.001) and 1.19 (p = 0.073) for glipizide, 1.43 (p < 0.001) and 1.32 (p < 0.001) for glyburide, and 1.88 (p < 0.001) and 1.69 (p = 0.001) for repaglinide.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with diabetes taking an insulin secretagogue, glimepiride was associated with the best clinical outcome, showing the lowest mortality and cardiovascular event risk.

Reflections on the sulphonylurea story: A drug class at risk of extinction or a drug class worth reviving?

The role of sulphonylureas (SUs) in modern clinical practice poses ongoing clinical debate. With the advent of newer agents in diabetes management, there is an increasing shift away from the prescribing of SUs, but not necessarily to more effective agents. This review provides a different perspective on the debate, reflecting in depth upon the physiology of SUs, drawing on insights gained from monogenic diabetes to highlight the potential benefit of lower doses of SUs, and the probable benefit of gliclazide over most other, if not all SUs, in terms of sulphonylurea failure and cardiovascular outcomes.

Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is the commonest cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both conditions commonly co-exist. Glucometabolic changes and concurrent dialysis in diabetes and CKD make glucose-lowering challenging, increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Glucose-lowering agents have been mainly studied in people with near-normal kidney function. It is important to characterise existing knowledge of glucose-lowering agents in CKD to guide treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and safety of insulin and other pharmacological interventions for lowering glucose levels in people with diabetes and CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 February 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs looking at head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in people with diabetes and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and quality of data and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four studies (128 records, 13,036 participants) were included. Nine studies compared sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; 13 studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; 2 studies compared glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists to placebo; 8 studies compared glitazones to no glitazone treatment; 1 study compared glinide to no glinide treatment; and 4 studies compared different types, doses or modes of administration of insulin. In addition, 2 studies compared sitagliptin to glipizide; and 1 study compared each of sitagliptin to insulin, glitazars to pioglitazone, vildagliptin to sitagliptin, linagliptin to voglibose, and albiglutide to sitagliptin. Most studies had a high risk of bias due to funding and attrition bias, and an unclear risk of detection bias.Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 1092 participants: MD -0.29%, -0.38 to -0.19 (-3.2 mmol/mol, -4.2 to -2.2); I2 = 0%), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (5 studies, 855 participants: MD -0.48 mmol/L, -0.78 to -0.19; I2 = 0%), systolic blood pressure (BP) (7 studies, 1198 participants: MD -4.68 mmHg, -6.69 to -2.68; I2 = 40%), diastolic BP (6 studies, 1142 participants: MD -1.72 mmHg, -2.77 to -0.66; I2 = 0%), heart failure (3 studies, 2519 participants: RR 0.59, 0.41 to 0.87; I2 = 0%), and hyperkalaemia (4 studies, 2788 participants: RR 0.58, 0.42 to 0.81; I2 = 0%); but probably increase genital infections (7 studies, 3086 participants: RR 2.50, 1.52 to 4.11; I2 = 0%), and creatinine (4 studies, 848 participants: MD 3.82 μmol/L, 1.45 to 6.19; I2 = 16%) (all effects of moderate certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce weight (5 studies, 1029 participants: MD -1.41 kg, -1.8 to -1.02; I2 = 28%) and albuminuria (MD -8.14 mg/mmol creatinine, -14.51 to -1.77; I2 = 11%; low certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors may have little or no effect on the risk of cardiovascular death, hypoglycaemia, acute kidney injury (AKI), and urinary tract infection (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether SGLT2 inhibitors have any effect on death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), hypovolaemia, fractures, diabetic ketoacidosis, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, DPP-4 inhibitors may reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 867 participants: MD -0.62%, -0.85 to -0.39 (-6.8 mmol/mol, -9.3 to -4.3); I2 = 59%) but may have little or no effect on FBG (low certainty evidence). DPP-4 inhibitors probably have little or no effect on cardiovascular death (2 studies, 5897 participants: RR 0.93, 0.77 to 1.11; I2 = 0%) and weight (2 studies, 210 participants: MD 0.16 kg, -0.58 to 0.90; I2 = 29%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, DPP-4 inhibitors may have little or no effect on heart failure, upper respiratory tract infections, and liver impairment (low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, it is uncertain whether DPP-4 inhibitors have any effect on eGFR, hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, GLP-1 agonists probably reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 867 participants: MD -0.53%, -1.01 to -0.06 (-5.8 mmol/mol, -11.0 to -0.7); I2 = 41%; moderate certainty evidence) and may reduce weight (low certainty evidence). GLP-1 agonists may have little or no effect on eGFR, hypoglycaemia, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether GLP-1 agonists reduce FBG, increase gastrointestinal symptoms, or affect the risk of pancreatitis (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, it is uncertain whether glitazones have any effect on HbA1c, FBG, death, weight, and risk of hypoglycaemia (very low certainty evidence).Compared to glipizide, sitagliptin probably reduces hypoglycaemia (2 studies, 551 participants: RR 0.40, 0.23 to 0.69; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to glipizide, sitagliptin may have had little or no effect on HbA1c, FBG, weight, and eGFR (low certainty evidence). Compared to glipizide, it is uncertain if sitagliptin has any effect on death or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty).For types, dosages or modes of administration of insulin and other head-to-head comparisons only individual studies were available so no conclusions could be made.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in diabetes and CKD is limited. SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists are probably efficacious for glucose-lowering and DPP-4 inhibitors may be efficacious for glucose-lowering. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors probably reduce BP, heart failure, and hyperkalaemia but increase genital infections, and slightly increase creatinine. The safety profile for GLP-1 agonists is uncertain. No further conclusions could be made for the other classes of glucose-lowering agents including insulin. More high quality studies are required to help guide therapeutic choice for glucose-lowering in diabetes and CKD.

Association between use of warfarin with common sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemic events: retrospective cohort analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Is warfarin use associated with an increased risk of serious hypoglycemic events among older people treated with the sulfonylureas glipizide and glimepiride?

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of pharmacy and medical claims from a 20% random sample of Medicare fee for service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. It included 465,918 beneficiaries with diabetes who filled a prescription for glipizide or glimepiride between 2006 and 2011 (4,355,418 person quarters); 71,895 (15.4%) patients also filled a prescription for warfarin (416,479 person quarters with warfarin use). The main outcome measure was emergency department visit or hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of hypoglycemia in person quarters with concurrent fills of warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride compared with the rates in quarters with glipizide/glimepiride fills only, Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for individual characteristics. Secondary outcomes included fall related fracture and altered consciousness/mental status.

SUMMARY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS

In quarters with glipizide/glimepiride use, hospital admissions or emergency department visits for hypoglycemia were more common in person quarters with concurrent warfarin use compared with quarters without warfarin use (294/416,479 v 1903/3,938,939; adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.42). The risk of hypoglycemia associated with concurrent use was higher among people using warfarin for the first time, as well as in those aged 65-74 years. Concurrent use of warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride was also associated with hospital admission or emergency department visit for fall related fractures (3919/416,479 v 20,759/3,938,939; adjusted odds ratio 1.47, 1.41 to 1.54) and altered consciousness/mental status (2490/416,479 v 14,414/3,938,939; adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 1.16 to 1.29). Unmeasured factors could be correlated with both warfarin use and serious hypoglycemic events, leading to confounding. The findings may not generalize beyond the elderly Medicare population.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

A substantial positive association was seen between use of warfarin with glipizide/glimepiride and hospital admission/emergency department visits for hypoglycemia and related diagnoses, particularly in patients starting warfarin. The findings suggest the possibility of a significant drug interaction between these medications.

FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING

JAR and DPG receive support from the National Institute on Aging, the Commonwealth Fund, and the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at the University of Southern California. ABJ receives support from the NIH Office of the Director. No additional data are available.

Long-term glycaemic response and tolerability of dapagliflozin versus a sulphonylurea as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: 4-year data

AIMS

To assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on to metformin in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The present study was an extension of an earlier randomized, double-blind, phase III study of dapagliflozin (n = 406) vs glipizide (n = 408) to 208 weeks (4 years). Patients continued to receive their assigned medication. No statistical treatment-group comparisons were calculated.

RESULTS

At 208 weeks, dapagliflozin compared with glipizide produced sustained reductions in glycated haemoglogin (HbA1c): -0.30% [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.51 to -0.09], in total body weight: -4.38 kg (95% CI -5.31 to -3.46) and in systolic blood pressure (SBP): -3.67 mmHg (95% CI -5.92 to -1.41). The HbA1c coefficient of failure was significantly lower for dapagliflozin than for glipizide: 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.25) versus 0.61 (95% CI 0.49-0.72, difference -0.42; p = 0.0001). Dapagliflozin was not associated with glomerular function deterioration, while this occurred more frequently in patients in the glipizide group. Fewer patients reported hypoglycaemia in the dapagliflozin compared with the glipizide group (5.4 vs 51.5%). Genital and urinary tract infections were more common with dapagliflozin than with glipizide, but their incidence decreased with time and all events responded well to antimicrobial treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients completing 4 years of treatment, dapagliflozin was well tolerated and associated with sustained glycaemic efficacy and greater reductions in body weight and SBP versus glipizide.

Effects of combined therapy with glipizide and Aralia root bark extract on glycemic control and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The root bark of Aralia is a rich source of bioactive components that may improve glycemic control and lipid status. In this study, 148 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were assigned randomly to receive either glipizide alone or glipizide plus Aralia root bark extract (ARBE) for 8 weeks to test the effects of ARBE plus glipizide therapy on glycemic control and lipid profiles in these patients.

RESULTS

Levels of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2 h postprandial plasma glucose (2-h PPG) in both groups significantly decreased from baseline. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased marginally significantly in participants taking glipizide plus ARBE compared with the glipizide group (P = 0.06). Participants in the combination group had significant decreases in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and the between-group difference achieved statistical significance for LDL-C (P = 0.04). Reduction in HbA1c in the combination group was significantly associated with changes in TC (r = 0.32; P = 0.006) and LDL-C (r = 0.34; P = 0.005), and the change in FPG was inversely correlated with LDL-C reduction (r = 0.34; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2DM, combination therapy with glipizide and ARBE resulted in moderately lowering HbA1c and LDL-C levels compared with glipizide alone.

Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sulfonylureas are common second-line options for management of type 2 diabetes; however, they are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared with other antidiabetic drugs. Since tissue selectivity and risk of hypoglycaemia differ among sulfonylureas, we aimed to assess whether mortality and the risk of cardiovascular events also varies.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Embase from inception to June 11, 2014, to identify controlled studies reporting the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related mortality, or myocardial infarction for at least two sulfonylureas. We examined differences in cardiovascular event risk among sulfonylureas with random effects models for direct pairwise comparisons and network meta-analyses to incorporate direct and indirect data.

FINDINGS

14 970 (9%) of 167 327 patients in 18 studies died: 841 (4%) of 19 334 gliclazide users, 5482 (11%) of 49 389 glimepiride users, 2106 (15%) of 14 464 glipizide users, 5296 (7%) of 77 169 glibenclamide users, 1066 (17%) of 6187 tolbutamide users, and 179 (23%) of 784 chlorpropamide users. Inconsistency was low for the network meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, and the relative risk of death compared with glibenclamide was 0·65 (95% credible interval 0·53-0·79) for gliclazide, 0·83 (0·68-1·00) for glimepiride, 0·98 (0·80-1·19) for glipizide, 1·13 (0·90-1·42) for tolbutamide, and 1·34 (0·98-1·86) for chlorpropamide. Similar associations were noted for cardiovascular-related mortality: the relative risk compared with glibenclamide was 0·60 (95% credible interval 0·45-0·84) for gliclazide, 0·79 (0·57-1·11) for glimepiride, 1·01 (0·72-1·43) for glipizide, 1·11 (0·79-1·55) for tolbutamide, and 1·45 (0·88-2·44) for chlorpropamide.

INTERPRETATION

Gliclazide and glimepiride were associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality compared with glibenclamide. Clinicians should consider possible differences in risk of mortality when selecting a sulfonylurea.

FUNDING

None.

Durability of the efficacy and safety of alogliptin compared with glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 2-year study

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term durability of the efficacy of alogliptin compared with glipizide in combination with metformin in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on stable-dose metformin.

METHODS

This multicentre, double-blind, active-controlled study randomized 2639 patients aged 18-80 years to 104 weeks of treatment with metformin in addition to alogliptin 12.5 mg once daily (n = 880), alogliptin 25 mg once daily (n = 885) or glipizide 5 mg once daily, titrated to a maximum of 20 mg (n = 874). The primary endpoint was least square mean change from baseline in HbA1c level at 104 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 55.4 years, the mean diabetes duration was 5.5 years and the mean baseline HbA1c was 7.6%. HbA1c reductions at week 104 were -0.68%, -0.72% and -0.59% for alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg and glipizide, respectively [both doses met the criteria for non-inferiority to glipizide (p<0.001); alogliptin 25 mg met superiority criteria (p=0.010)]. Fasting plasma glucose concentration decreased by 0.05 and 0.18 mmol/l for alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg, respectively, and increased by 0.30 mmol/l for glipizide (p < 0.001 for both comparisons with glipizide). Mean weight changes were -0.68, -0.89 and 0.95 kg for alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg and glipizide, respectively (p < 0.001 for both comparisons with glipizide). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 23.2% of patients in the glipizide group vs. 2.5 and 1.4% of patients in the alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg groups, respectively. Pancreatitis occurred in one patient in the alogliptin 25 mg group and three in the glipizide group.

CONCLUSIONS

Alogliptin efficacy was sustained over 2 years in patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone.

Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin

AIMS

To assess the long-term glycaemic durability, safety and tolerability of dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin alone.

METHODS

This was a 52-week, randomised, double-blind study of dapagliflozin (n = 406) versus glipizide (n = 408), uptitrated over 18 weeks according to tolerability and glycaemic response to a maximum of 10 and 20 mg/day, respectively, as add-on therapies to metformin (≥ 1500 mg/day) with a 156-week double-blind extension period. Data over 104 weeks are reported here.

RESULTS

In total, 53.1% of patients completed 104 weeks of treatment. After the greater initial decrease (0-18 weeks) in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) with glipizide, the 18-104-week HbA1c coefficient of failure (CoF) was lower with dapagliflozin (0.13%/year) than with glipizide (0.59%/year), resulting in significant dapagliflozin versus glipizide differences of -0.46%/year (95% CI -0.60,-0.33; p = 0.0001) for CoF and -0.18%(-2.0 mmol/mol) [95% CI -0.33(-3.6),-0.03(-0.3); p = 0.021] for 104-week HbA1c. Dapagliflozin produced sustained reductions in weight and systolic blood pressure, whereas glipizide increased weight and systolic blood pressure, giving 104-week dapagliflozin versus glipizide differences of -5.1 kg (95% CI: -5.7,-4.4) and -3.9 mmHg (95% CI: -6.1,-1.7), respectively. Over 104 weeks, the hypoglycaemia rate was 10-fold lower with dapagliflozin than with glipizide (4.2 vs. 45.8%), whereas patient proportions with events suggestive of genital infection and of urinary tract infection (UTI) were greater with dapagliflozin (14.8 and 13.5%, respectively) than with glipizide (2.9 and 9.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 2 years, compared with glipizide, dapagliflozin demonstrated greater glycaemic durability, sustained reductions in weight and systolic blood pressure and a low hypoglycaemia rate; however, genital infections and UTIs occurred more frequently.

Disseminated cryptococcosis in a diabetic patient

Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic infection caused by Cryptococcus neoformans that typically presents in immunocompromised patients, most commonly in those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. It rarely has been described in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Defects in the host defense mechanisms due to hyperglycemia predispose diabetic patients to opportunistic infections such as cryptococcosis. We present a rare case of disseminated cryptococcosis in a 48-year-old HIV-negative man with DM.

Branched chain and aromatic amino acids change acutely following two medical therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Elevated circulating levels of branched chain and aromatic amino acids (BCAA/AAAs) are associated with insulin resistance and incident type 2 diabetes (T2D). BCAA/AAAs decrease acutely during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a diagnostic test for T2D. It is unknown whether changes in BCAA/AAAs also signal an early response to commonly used medical therapies for T2D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry approach was used to measure BCAA/AAAs in 30 insulin sensitive (IS) and 30 insulin resistant (IR) subjects before and after: (1) one dose of a sulfonylurea medication, glipizide, 5 mg orally; (2) two days of twice daily metformin 500 mg orally; and (3) a 75-g OGTT. Percent change in BCAA/AAAs was determined after each intervention.

RESULTS

Following glipizide, which increased insulin and decreased glucose in both subject groups, BCAA/AAAs decreased in the IS subjects only (all P<0.05). Following metformin, which decreased glucose and insulin in only the IR subjects, 4 BCAA/AAAs increased in the IR subjects at or below P=0.05, and none changed in the IS subjects. Following OGTT, which increased glucose and insulin in all subjects, BCAA/AAAs decreased in all subjects (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BCAA/AAAs changed acutely during glipizide and metformin administration, and the magnitude and direction of change differed by the insulin resistance status of the individual and the intervention. These results indicate that BCAA/AAAs may be useful biomarkers for monitoring the early response to therapeutic interventions for T2D.

The beneficial effect of metformin on β-cell function in non-obese Chinese subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

AIM

Studies with metformin suggest a favourable change in β-cell function over sulphonylureas in the early course of obese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but it remains unclear whether a similar effect is observed in non-obese individuals. Here we investigated the effects of metformin or glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutics system extended-release formulation (GITS) on β-cell function in non-obese patients with newly diagnosed T2DM.

METHODS

A total of 160 newly diagnosed patients with fasting glucose 7.0-13.0 mmol/L and body mass index <30 kg/m(2) from five centres in China were randomized to metformin or glipizide GITS for 24 weeks. Early insulin secretion [the ratio of area under the curve (AUC) of insulin to glucose during 0-30 min (InsAUC30 /GluAUC30 )] and insulin sensitivity [Matsuda index (ISIM )] were assessed during the standard meal tolerance test before and after therapy. Plasma glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) and glucagon levels were also measured.

RESULTS

Metformin improved InsAUC30 /GluAUC30 significantly (from 8.1 ± 0.6 pmol/mmol to 10.7 ± 0.7 pmol/mmol, p < 0.05), comparable to results with glipizide GITS. In the metformin-treated lean (body mass index < 25 kg/m(2) ) subgroup, the increase in ISIM was not significant, but the improvement in InsAUC30 /GluAUC30 was of great magnitude. Increased GLP-1 responses during meal tolerance test and decreased fasting glucagon level were observed after metformin treatment. Correlation analysis showed that the improvement of InsAUC30 /GluAUC30 was associated with the changes in HbA1c (r = -0.374, p = 0.000), ISIM (r = 0.356, p = 0.001), and ΔGLP-10-30 (r = 0.225, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin improved β-cell function in non-obese subjects with newly diagnosed T2DM, which was partly independent of the change in insulin sensitivity in these subjects. This study provides evidence-based data to support metformin use in non-obese patients with T2DM as the first-line agent, which can improve both insulin sensitivity and β-cell function.

Alogliptin versus glipizide monotherapy in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild hyperglycaemia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, 1-year study

AIM

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus glipizide in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over 1 year of treatment.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of elderly T2DM patients (aged 65-90 years) with mild hyperglycaemia on diet/exercise therapy alone [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5-9.0%] or plus oral antidiabetic monotherapy (HbA1c 6.5-8.0%). Patients were randomized to once-daily alogliptin 25 mg or glipizide 5 mg titrated to 10 mg, if needed. Hypoglycaemic episodes were systematically captured under predefined criteria.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, HbA1c mean changes from a baseline of 7.5% were -0.14% with alogliptin (n = 222) and -0.09% with glipizide (n = 219) at the end of the study, demonstrating non-inferiority of alogliptin to glipizide [least squares (LS) mean difference = -0.05%; one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI): -∞, 0.13%]. More clinically relevant HbA1c reductions occurred among patients who completed the study: -0.42 and -0.33% with alogliptin and glipizide, with non-inferiority again confirmed (LS mean difference = -0.09%; one-sided 97.5% CI: -∞, 0.07%). Overall, alogliptin was safe and well tolerated, with notably fewer hypoglycaemic episodes than glipizide [5.4% (31 episodes) vs. 26.0% (232 episodes), respectively]; three patients experienced severe hypoglycaemia, all with glipizide. Alogliptin also resulted in favourable weight changes versus glipizide (-0.62 vs. 0.60 kg at week 52; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Alogliptin monotherapy maintained glycaemic control comparable to that of glipizide in elderly patients with T2DM over 1 year of treatment, with substantially lower risk of hypoglycaemia and without weight gain.

[Glycosuria with SGLT-2 inhibitors--a new treatment approach for type 2 diabetes mellitus]

BACKGROUND

A new mechanism of action in the form of sodium-glucose co-transporter-(SGLT-)2 inhibitors will be available shortly for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients.

METHOD

Overview.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Fasting and postprandial blood glucose and HbA(1c) concentrations are indirectly reduced by the inhibition of glucose reabsorption and increased glycosuria. SGLT-2 inhibitors also have a positive impact on body weight and blood pressure of type 2 diabetics. In the available registration trials conducted to date, the SGLT-2 inhibitors appeared overall as a safe class of drugs. The clinical importance of an increased incidence of genital infections--in particular in special patientpopulations--requires further clarification. Long-term trials are currently underway to verify safety and in particular cardiovascular effects of this drug class.

Increase in overall mortality risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide or glimepiride monotherapy versus metformin: a retrospective analysis

AIMS

It remains uncertain if differences in mortality risk exist among the sulfonylureas, especially in patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to assess the overall mortality risk of the individual sulfonylureas versus metformin in a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an academic health centre enterprise-wide electronic health record (EHR) system to identify 23 915 patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated monotherapy with metformin (N = 12774), glipizide (N = 4325), glyburide (N = 4279) or glimepiride (N = 2537), ≥ 18 years of age, with and without a history of CAD, and not on insulin or a non-insulin injectable at baseline. The patients were followed for mortality by documentation in the EHR and Social Security Death Index. Multivariable Cox models with propensity analysis were used to compare cohorts.

RESULTS

An increase in overall mortality risk was observed in the entire cohort with glipizide (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.39-1.94), glyburide (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.35-1.88), and glimepiride (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.37-2.06) versus metformin; however, in those patients with documented CAD, a statistically significant increase in overall mortality risk was only found with glipizide (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.07-1.87) and glyburide (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04-1.83) versus metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Glipizide, glyburide and glimepiride are associated with an increased risk of overall mortality versus metformin. Our results suggest that if a sulfonylurea is required to obtain glycaemic control, glimepiride may be the preferred sulfonylurea in those with underlying CAD.

The risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes receiving different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: a retrospective analysis

AIMS

Sulfonylureas have been shown to increase mortality when used in combination with metformin. This may not be a class effect of sulfonylureas, but rather secondary to differences in properties inherent to the individual sulfonylureas (hypoglycaemic risk, sulfonylurea receptor selectivity and effects on myocardial ischemic preconditioning). The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an academic health center enterprise-wide electronic health record system to identify 7320 patients with Type 2 diabetes (3768 initiators of glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin, 2277 initiators of glipizide and metformin and 1275 initiators of glimepiride and metformin), ≥ 18 years of age and not on insulin or a non-insulin injectable at baseline. The patients were followed for mortality by documentation in the electronic health record and Social Security Death Index. Multivariable Cox models with propensity analysis were used to compare cohorts.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in overall mortality risk was observed among the different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: glimepiride and metformin vs. glipizide and metformin (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89-1.20), glimepiride and metformin vs. glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.90-1.30), or with glipizide and metformin vs. glyburide (glibenclamide) and metformin (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results did not identify an increased mortality risk among the different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin, suggesting that overall mortality is not substantially influenced by the choice of sulfonylurea.

Resolution of insulin-requiring diabetes in a liver transplant recipient after treatment of a pheochromocytoma: case report and review of literature

The aim of this paper was to report the case of type 2 diabetes and significant insulin resistance that improved dramatically after removal of a pheochromocytoma in a liver transplant recipient , and to provide a review of the relevant literature. We describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic results and management of the patient. In addition, we performed a PubMed search for related English language articles, to provide an overview of the pertinent literature. A 53 year old woman with a history of an orthotopic liver transplantation and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes was admitted to the hospital with fever, diaphoresis, tachycardia and hypertension. A pheochromocytoma was diagnosed and removed. The patient subsequently developed hypoglycemia and required no further insulin therapy. Pheochromocytomas have been described to lead to hyperglycemia and diabetes, due to the suppression of insulin release and increased insulin resistance. Furthermore, a review of the literature revealed only 3 other reported cases of pheochromocytomas in organ transplant recipients. None of these pheochromocytomas were believed to have occurred de novo after transplantation. This is the first report of a pheochromocytoma in a liver transplant recipient and possibly the first case of a de novo pheochromocytoma in any organ transplant recipient. Moreover, this case showcases pheochromocytomas as a rare cause of diabetes mellitus.

Glycemic control and hypoglycemia in Veterans Health Administration patients converted from glyburide to glipizide

BACKGROUND

In 2009, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) released a national bulletin regarding the risk of hypoglycemia associated with the use of glyburide in elderly patients with renal dysfunction. Providers were encouraged to avoid glyburide and use glipizide in patients with a calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) of less than 50 mL per minute. Since this initiative, many veterans were converted by their providers from glyburide to glipizide regardless of renal impairment.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) identify whether hemoglobin A1c remained equivalent in patients converted from glyburide to glipizide, (b) evaluate the prevalence of hypoglycemia during treatment with glyburide or glipizide, (c) compare change in glycemic control for renally impaired versus nonimpaired patients, and (d) analyze dosage conversion ratios selected by providers and measures of patient follow-up after conversion including time until A1c measurement and number of glipizide dose titrations.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of veterans converted from glyburide to glipizide from January 1, 2008, through May 31, 2010, who had documented A1c values concurrent with glyburide and glipizide use. A 2-sided equivalence analysis was used for the primary outcome. Equivalence was defined as a change in mean A1c of ± 0.2. Hypoglycemia was defined as blood glucose of less than 70 mg per dL, symptoms of hypoglycemia, or hypoglycemia that led to a fall, loss of consciousness, emergency room visit, hospitalization, or death. The pre- to post-conversion change in rates of hypoglycemia was tested for significance using a McNemar's test.

RESULTS

In the 141 (99.3% male, 53.9% CrCl less than 50 mL per minute, mean age = 74.0 years) patients meeting inclusion criteria between 2008-2010, the average change in A1c (+ 0.34) was nonequivalent after conversion from glyburide to glipizide (7.08% vs. 7.42%, respectively). Hypoglycemia occurred more frequently during treatment with glyburide than glipizide (31.2% vs. 12.8%, respectively, P less than 0.001). Mean dose conversion ratios were consistent with VHA recommendations (1 mg per day glyburide = 1.26- 1.55 mg per day glipizide).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from glyburide to glipizide was associated with an increase in A1c, but the incidence of hypoglycemia was reduced. Results of this study are consistent with the recommendation of the American Diabetes Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes to use second-generation sulfonylureas other than glyburide. Patients converted to glipizide should be monitored closely to adjust therapy as appropriate to maintain glycemic control.

Effects and patient compliance of sustained-release versus immediate-release glipizides in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This review aimed to address effects of sustained-release versus immediate-release glipizide on glucose control, insulin secretion, and compliance. We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical database from inceptions to May 31, 2011, screened reference lists of relevant studies, and contacted pharmaceutical companies. Randomized trials and cohort studies were included. We pooled data using a random-effect model. Nineteen trials involving a total of 1440 patients and 2 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 13452 patients were included. Trials were of low quality. No trials reported patient important outcomes. The reduction of fasting plasma glucose from the baseline appeared larger for sustained-release than for immediate-release glipizide (mean difference -0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.01). The reduction was not significantly different between the two drugs for HbA1c (-0.03%, -0.20% to 0.14%) or 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (-0.21 mmol/L, -0.96 to 0.55). Sustained-release glipizide appeared to reduce insulin secretion from the baseline, whereas the immediate-release formulation increased the secretion (fasting insulin: -1.04 vs. 0.88 μIU/ml; 2-hour postprandial insulin: -2.94 vs. 0.24 μIU/ml). Patients administering sustained-release glipizide had less hypoglycemia (Peto odds ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.52) and lower missed dosing (Peto odds ratio 11. 42, 95% CI 6.47 to 20.18). The cohort studies showed patient compliance results consistent with those of the trials. Sustained-release glipizide appears to achieve similar glucose control with decreased insulin secretion, fewer hypoglycemic episodes, and higher patient compliance than immediate-release glipizide. However, these findings are inconclusive due to inadequate study quality, short follow up, and unavailability of patient important outcomes.

Comparable long-term mortality risk associated with individual sulfonylureas in diabetes patients with heart failure

AIMS

The aim was to investigate the outcomes of individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

All patients hospitalized with HF for the first time in 1997-2006, alive 30 days after discharge, and who received anti-diabetic monotherapy with glimepiride (n=1097), glibenclamide (glyburide) (n=1031), glipizide (n=557), gliclazide (n=251), or tolbutamide (n=541) were identified from nationwide registers. Risk of all-cause mortality was assessed by multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Over the median observational time of 744 (Inter Quartile Range 268-1451) days, 2242 patients (64%) died. The analysis demonstrated similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for treatment with glimepiride (1.10 [95% confidence interval 0.92-1.33]), glibenclamide (1.12 [0.93-1.34]), glipizide (1.14 [0.93-1.38]), tolbutamide (1.04 [0.85-1.26]), and gliclazide (reference). Grouped according to pancreatic specificity, i.e., with tolbutamide, glipizide, and gliclazide as specific, and glibenclamide, and glimepiride as non-specific agents, no differential prognosis was found between the two groups (HR 1.04 [0.96-1.14], for non-specific, compared to pancreas specific agents). The prognosis was not dependent on prior acute myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease (p for interactions >0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In current clinical practice, it is unlikely that there are considerable differences in risk of mortality associated with individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure.

Sitagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint for A1C reduction, lack of hypoglycemia and no body weight gain compared with glipizide

Sitagliptin and glipizide added to metformin provided similar degrees of glycemic efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy at 1 year; however, significantly more patients in the sitagliptin group achieved an A1C reduction of >0.5% without hypoglycemia and without an increase in body weight.

Use of sulphonylurea and cancer in type 2 diabetes-The Hong Kong Diabetes Registry

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycaemia is a risk factor for cancer and some sulphonylureas have anti-oxidant properties. This study examined associations between use of sulphonylureas and cancer.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 6103 Hong Kong Chinese patients with T2DM, free of cancer, was analysed using Cox models. Sulphonylurea usage was defined as use of the drugs at or within 2.5 years before enrolment and/or during follow-up periods. We adjusted for identified risk factors of cancer, use of other drugs, non-linear associations of lipids with cancer and probabilities of use of these drugs at different times and doses where appropriate.

RESULTS

During a median of 4.91 years of follow-up, 271 developed cancer. Glibenclamide, gliclazide and glipizide were ever used in 32.5% (n = 1983), 47.8% (n = 2920) and 13.5% (n = 823). After adjustment for covariates, use of gliclazide and glibenclamide was associated with reduced cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, there were interactions between metformin and glibenclamide/glipizide use towards lower adjusted cancer risks.

CONCLUSIONS

In T2DM, use of glibenclamide and gliclazide may be associated with reduced cancer risk.

Meal fat storage in subcutaneous adipose tissue: comparison of pioglitazone and glipizide treatment of type 2 diabetes

Treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with pioglitazone changes abdominal fat in the opposite direction as treatment with glipizide. To determine whether these two medications affect adipose tissue meal fatty acid storage differently we studied 19 T2DM treated with either pioglitazone (n = 8) or glipizide (n = 11) and 11 non-DM control subjects matched for age, BMI, abdominal and leg fat. A breakfast mixed meal containing [1-(14)C]triolein was given and abdominal and femoral subcutaneous (sc) adipose tissue biopsies were collected 6 and 24 h later to measure meal fatty acid storage. The portion of meal fatty acids stored in upper body sc and lower body sc adipose tissue did not differ between non-DM and T2DM subjects either at 6 or 24 h. Likewise, meal fatty acid storage did not differ between the T2DM participants treated with pioglitazone or glipizide. We conclude that meal fatty acid storage in upper body and lower body sc adipose tissue is not abnormal in T2DM patients treated with pioglitazone or glipizide.

[Three-year observation of permanent neonatal diabetes]

The aim of this paper is to present a three-year observation of four children with permanent neonatal diabetes caused by heterozygous activating mutations in both KCNJ11 gene for Kir6.2 and ABCC8 gene for SUR1 subunits (three patients after three years of clinical observation and one patient after two years of clinical observation, respectively). In three cases with Kir6.2 mutation, developmental delay was diagnosed. In all four patients the glucagon test revealed normal c-peptide secretion. During the treatment with sulfonylureas (SU), glycaemia remained within the normal range, HbA1c<7%, in our patients. In all children reduction a of SU doses was required.

Glibenclamide improves the response to insulin treatment in non-insulin-dependent diabetics with second failure to sulfonylurea therapy

The effect of combined insulin-glibenclamide therapy on glucose control was evaluated in a double-blind placebo controlled study of 20 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and second failure to oral antidiabetic therapy with glibenclamide or glipizide. After an observation period of 1-3 months, insulin treatment was initiated which resulted in rapid improvement of the glycemic control within 6 weeks. Thereafter glibenclamide or placebo was added to insulin for a further 12 weeks. Glibenclamide improved the glycemic control as expressed by a diminution of blood glucose and HbA1c. This was observed in spite of the fact that the daily insulin dose was reduced by approximately 30% in the glibenclamide-treated group of patients. It is concluded that in NIDDM patients with second failure to glibenclamide ot glipizide therapy, the responsiveness to glibenclamide may be at least partially restored by a short period of insulin treatment. It is suggested that therapy with insulin and glibenclamide is an appropriate treatment regimen for NIDDM patients with second failure to sulfonylurea therapy.

Glipizide does not affect absorption of glucose and xylose in diabetics without residual beta-cell function

We have previously demonstrated that oral glipizide suppresses the absorption of xylose in diabetics treated with diet alone. We suggested that glipizide might influence postprandial glucose levels by interfering with absorptive mechanisms. In the present study we have extended our observations to insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDM). Nine non-obese diabetics without residual beta-cell function and with normal respiratory sinus arrhythmia and Valsalva ratio were studied on two occasions. Their ordinary insulin treatment was discontinued 24 hours before the study and glucose control was maintained by i.v. insulin infusion. The experiments began at 8 a.m. after an overnight fast. Insulin was given as a continuous i.v. infusion of 0.01 U/kg/h at 8-11 a.m. and 0.005 U/kg/h at 11 a.m. -2 p.m. At 8 a.m. the patients ingested 25 g of xylose and 15 g of glucose in 300 ml of water. Glipizide (5 mg) or placebo were given 30 min prior to the glucose-xylose load in random order, each patient serving as his own control. Blood samples were taken every 60 min for analysis of glucose, xylose, C-peptide and glipizide. The rise in blood glucose in the control experiment was similar to that previously seen in non-insulin-dependent diabetics (NIDDM) given the same xylose-glucose load. Glipizide did not exert any effects on either blood C-peptide, glucose or xylose levels. We conclude that oral glipizide administered in a therapeutic dose does not reduce xylose absorption in IDDM, in contrast to its previously demonstrated effect in NIDDM.

Hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase activity in non-insulin dependent diabetics. Effect of enzyme-inducing drugs

The role of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) in postreceptional glucose handling in non-insulin dependent diabetics ( NIDDs ) was in investigated by comparing the enzyme values in diagnostic liver biopsy samples with fasting blood glucose (BG), immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and plasma antipyrine half-life (T/2). The NIDDs , treated with sulphonylureas, had elevated serum aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase values associated with fatty liver with or without fibrosis. G6Pase activity was reduced in the NIDDs compared with subjects who had undergone gallstone surgery (p less than 0.001), insulin dependent diabetics (p less than 0.001), and age- and sex-matched non-diabetics (p less than 0.001). G6Pase was inversely related to BG and antipyrine T/2, but not to IRI or conventional liver function tests. Therapy with phenobarbital and medroxyprogesterone acetate, known inducers, increased G6Pase activity, shortened antipyrine T/2, reduced BG and did not alter IRI, in four NIDDs . Low liver G6Pase activity in NIDDs may hence be one factor underlying the impaired glycemic control.

Glibenclamide and glipizide in maturity onset diabetes. A double-blind cross-over study

The effects of glibenclamide and glipizide on the concentrations of S-glucose, S-insulin and S-lipids and on the 24-hour urinary glucose excretion were studied in 37 patients with maturity onset diabetes. A double-blind, cross over double-dummy technique was used. The fasting S-insulin concentration was higher during glibenclamide therapy, while the increase in insulin concentration one hour postprandially was stronger during glipizide therapy, supporting the concept that glibenclamide has a more prolonged and glipizide a more fast-acting effect on insulin secretion. The S-glucose concentration was lower in the fasting state as well as one hour postprandially during glibenclamide therapy which, together with a lower 24-hour urinary glucose excretion, indicates that glibenclamide has a stronger blood glucose-lowering effect. Although statistically significant, the differences were marginal from a clinical point of view. The lipid levels remained unchanged.

Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France

CONTEXT

Hypoglycaemia from antihyperglycaemic drugs may have a significant impact on patients' health-related quality of life. Combination use of metformin and a sulphonylurea has become increasingly common; yet, the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in these patients is not well documented.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient-reported experience of hypoglycaemia, worry about hypoglycaemic symptoms and the impact of hypoglycaemia on patients' quality of life associated with use of sulphonylurea co-administered with metformin.

DESIGN

This was an observational, cross-sectional, multi-centre study.

SETTING

A total of 98 primary care centres in France during October to December 2005.

PATIENTS

A total of 400 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were > or = 35 years old and who had been treated with metformin and a sulphonylurea for at least 6 months, completed questionnaires during their usual primary care office visit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency and severity of hypoglycaemic symptoms in the past 6 months, the Worry subscale of the Hypoglycaemic Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 136 (34%) patients reported experiencing hypoglycaemia, of whom 78 (58%) experienced mild, 40 (30%) experienced moderate and 16 (12%) experienced severe or very severe symptoms. Mean score on the HFS-II Worry scale was higher for patients who reported having hypoglycaemia than for those who did not (19.0 vs. 10.2; p < 0.0001) and increased with severity of hypoglycaemic symptoms. In linear regression analyses, more severe symptoms of hypoglycaemia were significantly associated with higher scores on the HFS-II Worry scale (p = 0.0162) among patients with hypoglycaemic symptoms. Summary scores on the EQ-5D were lower for patients who reported hypoglycaemia than for those who did not (p = 0.0001) and, in multivariate analysis, the experience of hypoglycaemia was negatively associated with the EQ-5D summary score (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence and severity of hypoglycaemic symptoms were associated with increased patient worry about hypoglycaemia and lower health-related quality of life among type 2 diabetic patients being treated with both metformin and a sulphonylurea.

Sitagliptin: new drug. Type 2 diabetes: limited efficacy, too many unknown risks

(1) Many drugs are available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, but only metformin and glibenclamide have a proven impact on morbidity and mortality outcomes (only morbidity in the case of glibenclamide). If monotherapy with one of these drugs is inadequately effective, there is a choice of abandoning strict glycaemic control, combining the two drugs, or adding insulin. (2) Sitagliptin, a glucose-lowering inhibitor of DPP-4 (dipeptidyl dipeptidase 4), the enzyme responsible for catabolising physiological incretins, is the latest addition to the list of oral glucose-lowering drugs. (3) Sitagliptin has not been tested for its effect on morbidity or mortality endpoints. (4) Five placebo-controlled trials lasting from 18 to 24 weeks have evaluated sitagliptin monotherapy (3 trials), sitagliptin combined with metformin, or sitagliptin combined with pioglitazone. These trials showed that sitagliptin induced a limited reduction in glycated haemoglobin levels, which usually remained above the cutoff point (7%) generally used to define proper glycaemic controlled. (5) A trial comparing sitagliptin + metformin versus glipizide + metformin, and a direct comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide, provided a too low level of evidence to convincingly demonstrate the non-inferiority of the sitagliptin combination. (6) In one trial the sitagliptin + metformin combination was significantly more effective on glycated haemoglobin levels than either drug used alone. (7) In the short term, the main adverse effects of sitagliptin are nausea and constipation. In the long term, there is a risk of infections, especially upper respiratory tract infections. Cases of depression have also been reported. Sitagliptin sometimes increases creatinine levels. Pharmacological data suggest there might be an increased risk of cancer and muscular and neurological disorders. (8) In summary, whether used alone or in combination, the antidiabetic effects of sitagliptin, so far studied on surrogate endpoints, are too modest, given the outstanding safety issues, to recommend its use in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Recognition of fasting or overall hyperglycaemia when starting insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of various regimens of initial insulin treatment in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes was compared with regard to diurnal glucose variation.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Insulin therapy initiated on hospital wards, follow-up as outpatients for 12 months.

SUBJECTS

Fifty-two type 2 diabetic patients (HbA1c >7.5%, mean 9.8%) on maximal oral therapy. Interventions. Insulin only (IO), bedtime insulin with sulphonylurea (glipizide) (IS), or bedtime insulin with metformin (IM).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

HbA1c and body weight.

RESULTS

HbA1c decreased on average by 1.8, 1.0 and 1.5 percentage points in the IO, IS, and IM groups, respectively (p always <0.025). Body weight increased, most in the IO patients (+6.2 kg), least in the IM patients (+3.4 kg). Analysing all treatment groups combined, a similar HbA1c reduction was observed in patients with overall hyperglycaemia (low fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c ratio) and in patients with fasting hyperglycaemia (high fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c ratio). Within the overall hyperglycaemia group, the IS and IM patients had smaller decreases in HbA1c (-1.5 and -1.3 percentage points, respectively) than the IO patients (-2.7 percentage points). On the other hand, within the fasting hyperglycaemia group HbA1c reductions were -1.2, -0.8 and -1.5 percentage points, in the IO, IS, and IM groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Not all poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients should automatically be treated with an oral agent and bedtime insulin. Two daily insulin injections is a valid choice, particularly if the patient has overall hyperglycaemia.

Lack of an effect of pioglitazone or glipizide on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-y agonist with vascular beneficial effects, and glipizide, an insulin secretagogue, on novel inflammatory vascular risk markers in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We studied 11 subjects without diabetes and 19 matched subjects with diabetes. The subjects with diabetes were randomly assigned to receive either 45 mg daily of pioglitazone (N = 8) or 10 mg daily of glipizide (N = 11) (median dose) for 12 weeks. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LpPLA2), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1), intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), and e-selectin were measured by established techniques before and after therapy with either agent. The subjects without diabetes were studied only once.

RESULTS

The study subjects with diabetes had higher (P<0.05) LpPLA2, e-selectin, and VCAM-1 levels than did those without diabetes. ICAM-1 levels tended to be higher (P = 0.07) in the study subjects with than in those without diabetes. Neither pioglitazone nor glipizide therapy significantly altered LpPLA2 or VCAM-1 concentrations. While pioglitazone therapy reduced (P<0.05) eselectin concentrations, glipizide therapy reduced (P<0.03) ICAM-1 concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Type 2 diabetes is associated with elevated concentrations of the novel vascular risk marker LpPLA2 and inflammatory risk markers e-selectin and VCAM-1. Neither pioglitazone nor glipizide significantly altered LpPLA2, VCAM-1, or highly sensitive C-reactive protein levels after 12 weeks of therapy. In study subjects with type 2 diabetes, e-selectin concentrations declined significantly with pioglitazone therapy, whereas ICAM-1 concentrations decreased significantly with glipizide therapy.

Evaluation of the superiority of insulin glargine as basal insulin replacement by continuous glucose monitoring system

To evaluate the superiority of insulin glargine as basal insulin replacement by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose blood glucose was not well controlled with sulphanylureas were enrolled. At first, they were treated with extended-release glipizide (glucotrol XL) 5mg/d before breakfast for 2 weeks, then randomized to combination treatment with glargine (16 patients) or NPH (8 patients) and treated for 12 weeks. CGMS were carried in the second week after treatment with glucotrol XL, and in the 12th week after combination treatment. The data of CGMS showed: (1) When FPG were well controlled in both groups (glargine group versus NPH group: 6.0+/-1.0 mmol/L versus 5.8+/-1.3 mmol/L), the blood glucose level at 3:00 a.m. (5.1+/-0.9 mmol/L versus 4.2+/-0.8 mmol/L) were higher (P<0.05), TPG< or =3.0 mmol/L at night were lower (2.56+/-1.79 versus 5.88+/-1.96), and the rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia (1/16 versus 4/8) were less (P=0.028) in glargine group than those in NPH group. (2) CGMS showed that the daily blood glucose profile excursion were more smoother in glargine group than those in NPH group. In conclusion, it was confirmed with CGMS that compared with traditionally basal insulin replacement with NPH, the combination treatment with glargine injection at bedtime may be predominant for stabilizing the daily blood glucose profile excursion and decreasing the nocturnal hypoglycemia events incidence. So glargine may be a more ideal basal insulin replacement than NPH.

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, compared with the sulfonylurea, glipizide, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin vs. glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) > or = 6.5 and < or = 10%] on metformin monotherapy.

METHODS

After a metformin dose titration/stabilization period (> or = 1500 mg/day), 1172 patients were randomized to the addition of sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. (N = 588) or glipizide 5 mg/day (uptitrated to a potential maximum 20 mg/day) (N = 584) for 52 weeks. The primary analysis assessed whether sitagliptin was non-inferior to glipizide regarding HbA(1c) changes from baseline at Week 52 using a per-protocol approach.

RESULTS

From a mean baseline of 7.5%, HbA(1c) changes from baseline were -0.67% at Week 52 in both groups, confirming non-inferiority. The proportions achieving an HbA(1c) < 7% were 63% (sitagliptin) and 59% (glipizide). Fasting plasma glucose changes from baseline were -0.56 mmol/l (-10.0 mg/dl) and -0.42 mmol/l (-7.5 mg/dl) for sitagliptin and glipizide, respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia episodes was significantly (p < 0.001) higher with glipizide (32%) than with sitagliptin (5%), with 657 events in glipizide-treated patients compared with 50 events in sitagliptin-treated patients. Sitagliptin led to weight loss (change from baseline =-1.5 kg) compared with weight gain (+1.1 kg) with glipizide [between-treatment difference (95% confidence interval) =-2.5 kg (-3.1, -2.0); p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the addition of sitagliptin compared with glipizide provided similar HbA(1c)-lowering efficacy over 52 weeks in patients on ongoing metformin therapy. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated, with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia relative to glipizide and with weight loss compared with weight gain with glipizide.

Reproducibility of renal function measurements in adult men with diabetic nephropathy: research and clinical implications

BACKGROUND/AIM

Measurement of the renal function is critical to follow progression of kidney disease. Short-term and long-term variabilities in these measurements have significant impacts on clinical decision making and clinical trials. The goal of this study was to describe the variability in these measurements and to calculate minimum sample size estimates over varying time frames for clinical trials.

METHODS

We studied 44 elderly men with diabetic nephropathy who participated in a clinical trial. Glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow were measured by continuous infusion technique with five urine collection periods on two occasions 4 months apart. Protein and creatinine excretion rates were measured in the same specimens. In addition, two consecutive 24-hour specimens every month for 4 months were collected to analyze urine protein, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and electrolytes. A hierarchical random effects model was used to analyze the reproducibility from hour to hour, from day to day, and from month to month.

RESULTS

A total of 824 urine specimens were analyzed, of which 412 constituted specimens collected in the short term and 412 were 24-hour urine collections. Hour-to-hour variation accounted for 45% for urinary clearance of iothalamate, but for only 0.5% of the variability in plasma clearance of iothalamate. Day-to-day variability in 24-hour urinary excretion rates for creatinine was 46% and for protein 10%. Month-to-month variability in 24-hour excretion rates for creatinine was 11% and for protein 19%. The urine protein/creatinine ratio had a day-to-day variability of 2% and a month-to-month variability of 19%. Sample size requirements can be reduced by correcting for urine creatinine for some but not all urinary analytes.

CONCLUSIONS

In nephrotic men with diabetic nephropathy, the coefficient of variation in the month-to-month protein excretion rate is 36%. Approximately 28 patients in each arm of two groups are needed to detect a difference in protein excretion rate of 28% (1 g/day in this study). The coefficient of variation in plasma iothalamate clearance over 4 months is 16%. To detect a 10% change in glomerular filtration rate between two groups, 44 patients per group are needed. To be deemed statistically significant, a change in daily protein excretion rate of at least 72% over month(s) is needed in individual patients.

[Glycemic index of meals and postprandial glycemia in patients with permanent neonatal diabetes due to Kir6.2 gene mutations]

Activating mutations in the KCNJ11 gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit of Kir6.2 result in the phenotype of permanent neonatal diabetes (PNDM). Patients with PNDM can be successfully transferred from insulin to sulphonylurea. It is not clear, however, whether the type of diet may play a role in the metabolic control in PNDM patients. This report describes two cases of patients with PNDM due to the R201H mutation coming from the Polish Nationwide Registry of PNDM treated with the same sulphonylurea (glipizide GITS). In one of them, diet was practically free (Pol1), the other one (Pol2) avoided high glycemic-index products. Both mutation carriers were submitted to a 72 h continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) (Medtronic, CA). Before the CGMS record, families were encouraged not to alter their usual pattern of food intake during recording periods and to use food diaries. The postprandial glycemia in Poll reached the maximal level of 9.5 mmo/l, 5 episodes of glycemia above 8.0 mmol/l lasting overall for about 6 hours followed the ingestion of high-glycemic-index (>70) meals. Patient Pol2 did not use high-glycaemic-index-products and his postprandial blood glucose did not exceed 7.0 mmol/l. Following the CGMS record, an additional diet-oriented educational session with patient Poll and his parents was performed, Poll declared to avoid the intake of high-glycemic-index products. He remained on the same dose of Glipizide GITS. Results of home blood glucose monitoring performed 2 months later showed normoglycemia. We conclude that to achieve normoglycemia, patients with PNDM who are on sulphonylurea should refrain from eating high glycemic-index products.

Sustained-release versus immediate-release glipizide for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in chinese patients: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week clinical study

BACKGROUND

Few data exist that have compared sulfonylurea formulations in differing ethnic populations. Most studies of sulfonylureas have been performed in white patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a sustained-release glipizide (GSR) formulation with those of immediate-release glipizide (GIR) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical study enrolled adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were already being treated with diet and a sulfonylurea. Patients were randomized to receive either GSR 10 mg PO QD or GIR 5 mg PO BID for 12 weeks. Because these 2 formulations differed in appearance, each patient also received placebo resembling the alternate formulation, to be received at the alternate frequency. Drugs dispensed but not used were returned to the investigators and counted to monitor compliance with the protocol. For efficacy assessment, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were measured before and after treatment. Tolerability was measured by adverse events (AEs), which were evaluated by the attending physician during each clinical visit.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients (37 men, 20 women) enrolled in the study, 41 completed it. All were Han Chinese of Taiwanese origin, and had the following characteristics: age range, 33 to 69 years; mean (SE) height, 161.99 (9.42) cm; and mean (SE) body mass index, 25.21 (3.43) kg/m2. An intent-to-treat analysis found that the mean (SE) changes from baseline in FPG (-30.00 [10.67] vs -25.96 [11.15] mg/dL) and in HbA(1c) (-0.08% [0.24%] vs +0.14% [0.22%]) during the 12-week period of the study were not significantly different between the 2 formulations. For patients in the per-protocol analysis, mean (SE) changes from baseline in FPG (-30.00 [10.67] vs -16.52 [7.79] mg/dL) and HbA(1c) (-0.08% [0.24%] vs +0.11% [0.25%]) were also not significantly different. The most frequently reported AEs were urinary abnormality (22.2%) and tachycardia (6.7%) for the GSR group and GIR group, respectively. No serious drug-related AEs were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

In this small study, treatment with oral GSR (10 mg QD) was not significantly different from that of treatment with GIR (5 mg BID) with respect to short-term (12 weeks) FPG and HbA(1c) reductions in these ethnic Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving treatment with a sulfonylurea.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with glipizide therapy

We describe a patient with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (erythema multiforme major) associated with an increase in glipizide dosage administration. Glipizide is a second-generation sulfonylurea commonly used to treat patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Although several reports have documented Stevens-Johnson syndrome caused by first-generation sulfonylureas, our case appears to be the first report of a second-generation sulfonylurea associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome.