Plasma concentrations, bioavailability and dissolution of chlorpropamide

Reflections on the sulphonylurea story: A drug class at risk of extinction or a drug class worth reviving?

The role of sulphonylureas (SUs) in modern clinical practice poses ongoing clinical debate. With the advent of newer agents in diabetes management, there is an increasing shift away from the prescribing of SUs, but not necessarily to more effective agents. This review provides a different perspective on the debate, reflecting in depth upon the physiology of SUs, drawing on insights gained from monogenic diabetes to highlight the potential benefit of lower doses of SUs, and the probable benefit of gliclazide over most other, if not all SUs, in terms of sulphonylurea failure and cardiovascular outcomes.

Kinetic Analysis of Chlorpropamide Dissolution from Solid Dispersions

Solid dispersions (SDs) of chlorpropamide were prepared by the solvent deposition technique using two grades of microcrystalline cellulose as carrier materials with different ratios of drug to carrier. The dissolution rate of chlorpropmide from the SDs was carried out at two physiological pH values of 1.1 and 7.25 simulating gastric and intestinal environments. The dissolution was dependent on the grade, the ratio of drug to carrier and pH. The higher dissolution was observed for more hydrophilic grade of the carrier as well as the higher ratio of carrier to drug. At the higher pH the drug dissolved much faster than the lower pH. X-ray diffraction showed some reduced drug crystallinity in SDs whereas infrared spectroscopy revealed no drug interactions with solvent and the carriers. The enhanced dissolution was attributed to the reduced drug crystallinity, decreased particle size, increased wettability and reduced aggregation of the hydrophobic drug particles. A novel model denoted as reciprocal powered time model with its theoretical justification was employed to analyze the dissolution data and proved to be superior to commonly used models for the analysis of the data. There was a quantitative relation between the model parameter and the ratio of carrier to drug which could be of value in dissolution rate prediction.

The relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of oral hypoglycaemic drugs

Oral hypoglycaemic drugs have widely differing pharmacokinetic properties. Possible pharmacodynamic benefits include greater efficacy and fewer adverse effects. In general, it has not been possible to demonstrate unequivocal differences in clinical efficacy between the sulphonylureas during long term use, although there are clear differences in potency. These differences have been emphasised to the extent that the term 'second-generation' has been used for the most potent sulphonylureas, but there is little to suggest that potency is of any therapeutic significance. Trials to study differences in efficacy have rarely been of acceptable design. They have often used fixed doses of drugs, begging the question of whether true potency ratios have been established for chronic treatment. They have rarely involved substantial numbers of patients in double-blind crossover studies with a suitable washout period. Trials which show that there is a clear relationship between drug concentrations in blood and drug effects (whether therapeutic effects or adverse effects such as severe hypoglycaemia) are generally lacking. Qualitative and semiquantitative analysis of adverse effects supports the concept that drugs with a long half-life (e.g. chlorpropamide), renally excreted active metabolites (e.g. acetohexamide) or unusual properties (e.g. glibenclamide, which accumulates progressively in islet tissue) are more likely to cause prolonged hypoglycaemia, which may be fatal. The major adverse effect of treatment with biguanides is lactic acidosis, and this probably occurs more commonly in patients treated with phenformin than those treated with metformin because of pharmacogenetic variation in phenformin metabolism. The available evidence therefore favours the use of drugs with a short elimination half-life which are extensively metabolised and which have no active metabolites.

Pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide in epileptic patients: effects of enzyme induction and urine pH on chlorpropamide elimination

The effects of liver enzyme induction and of urine pH on the pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide have been studied. A single oral dose of chlorpropamide 250 mg was administered to 8 patients on antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin, carbamazepine) and to 8 healthy volunteers. The half-life of chlorpropamide was significantly shorter in the patients (34.4 h) than in the healthy volunteers (50.2 h), but the difference between the groups in the half-life of antipyrine was even more pronounced (5.1 vs 11.4 h). The clearance and volume of distribution of total chlorpropamide were significantly higher in the patients (2.99 ml X h-1 X kg-1 and 126 ml X kg-1) than in the healthy volunteers (1.60 ml X h-1 X kg-1 and 106 ml X kg-1). The unbound fraction of chlorpropamide in serum was also higher in the patients (5.7%) than in the healthy subjects (4.4%). Neither the volume of distribution nor the clearance of the free fraction of chlorpropamide differed significantly between the groups. There was a significant correlation between the half-lives of chlorpropamide and antipyrine, and the half-life of chlorpropamide also had at least as good an inverse correlation with the urinary excretion of unchanged chlorpropamide. The renal clearance of chlorpropamide correlated well with urine pH and was almost 100-fold higher at pH 7 than at pH 5. Both the metabolic and renal clearances of chlorpropamide are important in its elimination. At urine pH higher than 6.5-7, the renal clearance of chlorpropamide represents more than half its total clearance regardless the degree of induction of liver enzymes.

Oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update

Despite the availability of oral hypoglycaemic agents for nearly 30 years, their precise mode of action and role in the management of diabetes mellitus remains poorly defined and controversial. They are regarded by many, though not all, clinicians as helpful adjuncts in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes who have failed to respond satisfactorily to an adequate programme of dietary treatment. Their initial effectiveness is greatest in those patients who have had diabetes for less than 5 years, are overweight at the time of initiation of therapy, and whose fasting blood glucose levels are not unduly raised (less than 200 mg/dl). If they are receiving treatment with insulin and a shift to oral compounds is contemplated, success in the changeover is more likely if the daily dose has been less than 20 to 30 units daily. While their efficacy in maintaining adequate glycaemic control over the short term in responsive patients is unquestioned, the long term benefit of oral hypoglycaemic agents in reducing morbidity and mortality of late complications remains to be substantiated. In this regard, where long term efficacy is difficult to quantify, physician vigilance for chronic toxicity assumes a special importance. Notwithstanding the potential for interaction between sulphonylureas and numerous other drugs, significant adverse effects are uncommon. Hypoglycaemia is the major health concern associated with the use of sulphonylureas, and lactic acidosis has been the major problem with biguanides. Careful patient selection is thus the key to ensuring efficacy and avoiding toxicity. Recent evidence suggests that while the insulinotropic action of the sulphonylureas may explain the short term hypoglycaemic effect of these compounds, their reported action in enhancing insulin sensitivity, both at the receptor and post-receptor levels, more likely accounts for the long term maintenance of improved carbohydrate tolerance. The relatively new ('second generation') sulphonylurea compounds have not been shown to possess clearly defined advantages over the older preparations; the potentially beneficial effects of gliclazide on the microangiopathic changes of diabetes require considerable further evaluation.

Chlorpropamide-alcohol flush: significance of body weight, sex and serum chlorpropamide level

Chlorpropamide-alcohol flush (CPAF) tests were carried out in 15 male and 15 female Type 2 diabetics. Twelve subjects were CPAF-positive and 18 were -negative. The two groups did not differ in age or duration of diabetes, but the CPAF-positive subjects weighed less (mean difference 13 kg) and had higher plasma chlorpropamide levels. There was a negative correlation between plasma chlorpropamide and body weight, and a positive correlation between plasma chlorpropamide and the increase in facial skin temperature. Females had higher plasma chlorpropamide, a greater skin temperature increase and lower body weight than males; there were 11 females and only 1 male amongst the 12 CPAF-positive subjects. The findings confirm that plasma chlorpropamide is a major determinant of the CPAF reaction and also show that body weight strongly influences the chlorpropamide level and, consequently, the outcome of the CPAF test. The sex difference in body weight probably accounts for most, if not all, of the sex difference in the incidence of the CPAF.

Wide variation in serum chlorpropamide concentration in outpatients

Serum chlorpropamide concentrations (s-CPA) were determined and related to clinical findings in 83 outpatients with maturity onset diabetes. The daily doses of CPA (mg/kg) varied six-fold, but s-CPA ranged 18-fold between the patients. There was a significant correlation between dose and s-CPA (r = 0.61), which rose to 0.75 in the 30 patients who had prescribed no other drugs. Patients given other drugs concomitantly were over-represented amongst subjects with extreme values of apparent plasma clearance of CPA. There was no correlation either between serum creatinine or age and s-CPA. Of the 83 patients 40 (48%) had acceptable blood and urinary glucose values according to our criteria; but as 17 were overweight, only 23 patients (28%) had acceptable clinical control. Of the remaining 60 patients, too low a dose was being given to only 12, and dietary failure was the most probable explanation in the others. Thirteen patients (16%) probably did not need CPA. It is likely that this is a partial explanation for the high utilisation of oral antidiabetic drugs in Sweden. There was no general correlation between dose or s-CPA and blood glucose values, but analysis of s-CPA may still be of value in explaining unexpected changes in clinical control.

Electron-capture gas chromatography of plasma sulphonylureas after extractive methylation

Conditions for the extractive alkylation of eight sulphonylurea hypoglycemic drugs have been evaluated. Extractive methylation of the compounds was achieved within 90 min using tetrabutylammonium as counter-ion (0.1 M at pH = 6.9) with 5% methyl iodide in dichloro-methane as organic phase. Mass spectral analysis showed derivatives methylated at the sulphonamide nitrogen. A higher pH or use of tetrapentylammonium as counter-ion caused hydrolysis of the sulphonylureas. The derivatives showed a high electron-capture response with minimum concentrations detectable in the range 1-4 x 10(-16) moles sec-1. Therapeutic plasma concentrations of glipzide and tolbutamide were determined by direct extractive methylation of the compounds from the plasma sample. The glipizide derivative was determined by electron-capture gas chromatography down to about 20 ng/ml in a 0.5-ml plasma sample. The relative standard deviation at the 0.2 microgram/ml level of glipizide was 6% (n = 6). The corresponding figure in the determination of tolbutamide at the 10 microgram/ml level was 3% (n = 10).

Bioavailability of chlorpropamide

1. The serum profiles of chlorpropamide obtained following single doses of two tablet preparations and from a suspension formulation have been compared in healthy volunteers. The amounts of chlorpropamide absorbed from the three formulations were similar but the drug was absorbed more rapidly from the suspension than from either tablet formulation. There was a small but therapeutically insignificant difference in the rate of absorption of the drug from the two tablets. 2. Changes in blood glucose concentrations were found to be related to the drug serum profile characteristics of the formulations.