The effects of citalopram in single and repeated doses and with alcohol on physiological and psychological measures in healthy subjects

Integrated network pharmacology and transcriptomics to reveal the mechanism of Passiflora against depressive disorder: An observational study

Relevant studies have pointed out that Passiflora could relieve depressive disorder (DD) related symptoms, such as anxiety and insomnia, but its mechanism in DD has not been reported. In this study, DD-related transcriptome data was extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Subsequently, 50 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened by "limma," and the enrichment analysis of these DEGs revealed that they were associated with neuro-inflammatory-related signaling pathways, including IL-17, TNF, NF-kappa B, etc signaling pathways. Then, CCDC58, CXCL5, EGR1, LOC101929855, SCML1, and THBS1 were screened as biomarkers of DD by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis. Moreover, Harmaline, Harmine, Quercetin, and Kaempferol were the key chemically active ingredients of Passiflora. Noticeable, THBS1 and Quercetin were connected closely. In addition, the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the key biomarkers (EGR1 and THBS1) were significantly lowly expressed in DD samples. In summary, we identified 2 key biomarkers of DD and 4 key chemically active ingredients of Passiflora. The potential mechanism of antidepressant effect of DD associated with neuro-inflammatory responses and neurotransmitter function. These might related to the synergistic activity of its key active ingredients with TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, etc, which work with EGR1 and THBS1 to regulate IL-17, NF-kappa B, TNF, etc signaling pathways. These findings might help to deepen the understanding of the mechanism of Passiflora in clinical treatment of DD.

Dry mouth effects from drugs used for depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder in adults: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Poor oral health is increasingly recognised as an important comorbidity in people with psychiatric illness. One risk factor is psychotropic-induced dry mouth.

AIMS

To perform a systematic review of the severity of dry mouth due to psychotropic drugs in adults (CRD42021239725). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

METHOD

We searched the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and Web of Science. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) measuring the severity of drug-induced hyposalivation and xerostomia.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs with 605 participants were included. Severity of drug-induced dry mouth was compared among eight drug classes and/or against placebo. All studies were published 20 to 40 years ago and included tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), serotonin specific reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other drug classes. Meta-analysis was not feasible owing to design heterogeneity. TCAs caused more severe dry mouth, both objectively and subjectively, than placebo or other drug classes. SSRIs were generally associated with less severe symptoms. However, there was no information on antipsychotics or more recently available antidepressants, and there was minimal information on mood stabilisers. Most studies were on healthy subjects, limiting the generalisability of findings. Only one study measured both objective and subjective dry mouth, which have different clinical implications.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychotropic-induced dry mouth is a poorly researched area, and well-designed RCTs of newer psychotropic drugs using standardised objective and subjective measures are indicated. Given the ongoing use of TCAs for treatment-resistant depression, prescribers need to remain vigilant for xerostomia.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, and citalopram in healthy subjects

Daridorexant (ACT-541468) is a new dual orexin receptor antagonist being evaluated for the treatment of insomnia, which is a common comorbidity of depression and anxiety. Therefore, daridorexant is likely to be administered concomitantly with agents (e.g., citalopram) used to treat these disorders. In this single-centre, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential design Phase 1 study with the inclusion of two double-blind crossover parts, the pharmacokinetic (PK; blood sampling at regular intervals) and pharmacodynamic (PD; battery of objective and subjective PD tests performed at regular intervals) interactions between daridorexant (50 mg) and citalopram (20 mg, single dose and at steady state) as well as the safety/tolerability in healthy subjects were investigated. There were no relevant effects of citalopram (single dose/steady state) on daridorexant exposure and vice versa. PD variables measured after morning administration of daridorexant alone showed effects consistent with a sleep-promoting compound. Only co-administration of daridorexant with citalopram at steady state led to relevant changes in objective (unstable tracking) and subjective (visual analogue scale alertness and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) PD endpoints compared to daridorexant alone. No serious or severe adverse events were reported, while no clinically relevant treatment-emergent effects on ECG parameters, clinical laboratory, or vital signs were observed. In conclusion, the co-administration of daridorexant and citalopram lead to only minor changes in PK parameters, while performance of PD assessments following co-administration were mainly driven by the expected central nervous system effects of daridorexant. Doses up to 50 mg daridorexant can be safely co-administered with citalopram.

Lack of Effect of Vortioxetine on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ethanol, Diazepam, and Lithium

INTRODUCTION

Because the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine is likely to be coadministered with other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs, potential drug-drug interactions warrant examination.

OBJECTIVE

These studies evaluated whether there are pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions between vortioxetine and ethanol, diazepam, or lithium.

METHODS

This series of phase I studies included healthy men and women (only men in the lithium study) aged 18-45 years. The ethanol study was a randomized, double-blind, two-parallel group, four-period crossover study in which subjects received a single dose of vortioxetine (20 or 40 mg) or placebo with or without ethanol, and the diazepam study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-sequence, two-period crossover study in which subjects received a single dose of diazepam following multiple doses of vortioxetine 10 mg/day or placebo. These two studies evaluated the effect of coadministration on standardized psychomotor parameters and on selected pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug. The lithium study was a single-blind, single-sequence study evaluating the effect of multiple doses of vortioxetine 10 mg/day on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lithium.

RESULTS

Concomitant administration of vortioxetine and single doses of either ethanol or diazepam had no significant effect on the psychomotor performance of subjects compared with administration of ethanol or diazepam alone. Vortioxetine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol, diazepam, or lithium, and ethanol had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant administration of these agents with vortioxetine was generally well tolerated, with no clinically relevant drug-drug pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions identified.

Multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine increases frontal cortical oscillations unlike escitalopram and duloxetine--a quantitative EEG study in rats

Background and Purpose

EEG studies show that 5-HT is involved in regulation of sleep–wake state and modulates cortical oscillations. Vortioxetine is a 5-HT₃, 5-HT₇, and 5-HT_1D receptor antagonist, 5-HT_1B partial agonist, 5-HT_1A agonist, and 5-HT transporter inhibitor. Preclinical (animal) and clinical studies with vortioxetine show positive impact on cognitive metrics involving cortical function. Here we assess vortioxetine's effect on cortical neuronal oscillations in actively awake rats.

Experimental Approach

Telemetric EEG recordings were obtained with the following treatments (mg·kg⁻¹, s.c.): vehicle, vortioxetine (0.1, 1.0, 3.0, 10), 5-HT_1A agonist flesinoxan (2.5), 5-HT₃ antagonist ondansetron (0.30), 5-HT₇ antagonist SB-269970-A (10), escitalopram (2.0), duloxetine (10) and vortioxetine plus flesinoxan. Target occupancies were determined by ex vivo autoradiography.

Key Results

Vortioxetine dose-dependently increased wakefulness. Flesinoxan, duloxetine, ondansetron, but not escitalopram or SB-269970-A increased wakefulness. Quantitative spectral analyses showed vortioxetine alone and with flesinoxan increased θ (4–8 Hz), α (8–12 Hz) and γ (30–50 Hz) power. Duloxetine had no effect on θ and γ, but decreased α power, while escitalopram produced no changes. Ondansetron and SB-269970 (≈31–35% occupancy) increased θ power. Flesinoxan (≈41% occupancy) increased θ and γ power.

Conclusions and Implications

Vortioxetine increased wakefulness and increased frontal cortical activity, most likely because of its 5-HT₇ and 5-HT₃ antagonism and 5-HT_1A agonism. Vortioxetine differs from escitalopram and duloxetine by increasing cortical θ, α and γ oscillations. These preclinical findings suggest a role of vortioxetine in modulating cortical circuits known to be recruited during cognitive behaviours and warrant further investigation as to their clinical impact.

Effect of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on behavior and key members of the brain serotonin system in mouse strains genetically predisposed to behavioral disorders

The effect of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) on behavior and on the serotonin (5-HT) system of a mouse strain predisposed to depressive-like behavior, ASC/Icg (Antidepressant Sensitive Cataleptics), in comparison with the parental "nondepressive" CBA/Lac mice was studied. Within 7 days after acute administration, GDNF (800 ng, i.c.v.) decreased cataleptic immobility but increased depressive-like behavioral traits in both investigated mouse strains and produced anxiolytic effects in ASC mice. The expression of the gene encoding the key enzyme for 5-HT biosynthesis in the brain, tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (Tph-2), and 5-HT1A receptor gene in the midbrain as well as 5-HT2A receptor gene in the frontal cortex were increased in GDNF-treated ASC mice. At the same time, GDNF decreased 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor gene expression in the hippocampus of ASC mice. GDNF failed to change Tph2, 5-HT1A , or 5-HT2A receptor mRNA levels in CBA mice as well as 5-HT transporter gene expression and 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor functional activity in both investigated mouse strains. The results show 1) a GDNF-induced increase in the expression of key genes of the brain 5-HT system, Tph2, 5-HT1A , and 5-HT2A receptors, and 2) significant genotype-dependent differences in the 5-HT system response to GDNF treatment. The data suggest that genetically defined cross-talk between neurotrophic factors and the brain 5-HT system underlies the variability in behavioral response to GDNF.

Serotonergic modulation of response inhibition and re-engagement? Results of a study in healthy human volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive functions dependent on the prefrontal cortex, such as the ability to suppress behavior (response inhibition) and initiate a new one (response re-engagement) is important in the activities of daily life. Central serotonin (5-HT) function is thought to be a critical component of these cognitive functions. In recent studies, 5-HT failed to affect stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), a fundamental process in behavioral inhibition. We were interested if response inhibition and re-engagement are influenced through central 5-HT activity as mediated via the 5-HT transporter.

METHODS

Here, using a stop-change task, we investigated the effects of acute and repeated treatment with 10 mg escitalopram, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, in 36 healthy human volunteers on response inhibition and re-engagement in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with cross-over design.

RESULTS

Results do not show an influence of escitalopram on response inhibition or response re-engagement as we did not find differences in SSRT or change reaction time (CRT).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the results of previous studies suggesting that 5-HT is not critical in inhibition of already initiated responses and response re-engagement. We hypothesize that results are due to different forms of behavioral inhibition and 5-HT may critical to other forms.

Escitalopram prolonged fear induced by simulated public speaking and released hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation

Simulated public speaking (SPS) test is sensitive to drugs that interfere with serotonin-mediated neurotransmission and is supposed to recruit neural systems involved in panic disorder. The study was aimed at evaluating the effects of escitalopram, the most selective serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor available, in SPS. Healthy males received, in a double-blind, randomized design, placebo (n = 12), 10 (n = 17) or 20 (n = 14) mg of escitalopram 2 hours before the test. Behavioural, autonomic and neuroendocrine measures were assessed. Both doses of escitalopram did not produce any effect before or during the speech but prolonged the fear induced by SPS. The test itself did not significantly change cortisol and prolactin levels but under the higher dose of escitalopram, cortisol and prolactin increased immediately after SPS. This fear-enhancing effect of escitalopram agrees with previously reported results with less selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the receptor antagonist ritanserin, indicating that serotonin inhibits the fear of speaking in public.

Differential effects of escitalopram on attention: a placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study

RATIONALE

The role of serotonin (5-HT) in attention is not fully understood yet.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate whether attention is modulated after treatment with escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).

METHODS

We administered 10 mg of escitalopram to 20 healthy subjects in a placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over design for 1 day or to another 20 participants for a period of 7 days. Attention was assessed at time of plasma peak escitalopram concentration using the computerised Attention Network Test (ANT), which is a combined flanker and cued reaction time task.

RESULTS

The results showed differential effects of serotonergic manipulation on attention depending on sequence of intake. For the acute treatment, we found significant differences between escitalopram and placebo for all warning conditions dependent of sequence of intake: participants receiving escitalopram as first treatment showed significant slower reaction times in all warning conditions as compared with placebo while participants receiving escitalopram as second treatment showed significant faster reaction times as compared with placebo. For the sub-chronic treatment, we found significant differences between escitalopram and placebo depending on sequence of intake, but only for the flanker condition: participants receiving escitalopram first had significant slower reaction times in incongruent trials with escitalopram as compared with placebo while participants starting with placebo had significant shorter reaction times in incongruent trials with escitalopram.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the results showed a differential effect of escitalopram in cognition, especially in attention, and are discussed with regard to an interaction between serotonin and familiarity with the attention test.

Hand-motor dysfunction in depression: characteristics and pharmacological effects

Motor retardation is a relevant aspect of depression. Kinematic analysis of movements can be applied to explore which type of motor dysfunction is associated with depression and to examine motor side effects of antidepressants. Using this tool, we aimed to investigate fine motor performance in patients suffering from depression and to compare a selective noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor (NARI) (reboxetine) and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (citalopram) regarding motor side effects after 4 weeks of treatment. In the first study (I), we examined 37 depressed patients and 37 healthy subjects using a digitizing graphic tablet and kinematic analysis of handwriting and rapid drawing movements. Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender distribution, handedness (preponderance of right-handers) and educational level. In the second study (ll), we examined different types of hand movements in 16 depressed patients receiving citalopram (flexible dosage) and 12 depressed patients treated with reboxetine (varying dosage) using the afore-mentioned methods. Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, handedness and the baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score. I: Depressed patients performed drawing with significantly less regular velocity than controls (p < 0.001), but normal velocity. Handwriting of depressed patients was abnormally slow (p = 0.04). II: Reboxetine led to a significant improvement of repetitive drawing movements in depression. In contrast, citalopram had no pronounced effects on hand movements in depressed patients. I: Irregular patterns of velocity peaks in depressed patients point to basal ganglia dysfunction and/or deficient activity of the sensorimotor cortex and the supplementary motor area as possible substrates of hand-motor disturbances in depression. II: Computer-aided analysis of hand movements is a sensitive tool for the registration of differential pharmaceutical effects on hand-motor function in depression.

EEG topography and tomography (LORETA) in the classification and evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of psychotropic drugs

By multi-lead computer-assisted quantitative analyses of human scalp-recorded electroencephalogram (QEEG) in combination with certain statistical procedures (quantitative pharmaco-EEG) and mapping techniques (pharmaco-EEG mapping or topography), it is possible to classify psychotropic substances and objectively evaluate their bioavailability at the target organ, the human brain. Specifically, one may determine at an early stage of drug development whether a drug is effective on the central nervous system (CNS) compared with placebo, what its clinical efficacy will be like, at which dosage it acts, when it acts and the equipotent dosages of different galenic formulations. Pharmaco-EEG maps of neuroleptics, antidepressants, tranquilizers, hypnotics, psychostimulants and nootropics/cognition-enhancing drugs will be described. Methodological problems, as well as the relationships between acute and chronic drug effects, alterations in normal subjects and patients, CNS effects and therapeutic efficacy will be discussed. Imaging of drug effects on the regional brain electrical activity of healthy subjects by means of EEG tomography such as low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) has been used for identifying brain areas predominantly involved in psychopharmacological action. This will be shown for the representative drugs of the four main psychopharmacological classes, such as 3 mg haloperidol for neuroleptics, 20 mg citalopram for antidepressants, 2 mg lorazepam for tranquilizers and 20 mg methylphenidate for psychostimulants. LORETA demonstrates that these psychopharmacological classes affect brain structures differently. By considering these differences between psychotropic drugs and placebo in normal subjects, as well as between mental disorder patients and normal controls, it may be possible to choose the optimum drug for a specific patient according to a key-lock principle, since the drug should normalize the deviant brain function. Thus, pharmaco-EEG topography and tomography are valuable methods in human neuropsychopharmacology, clinical psychiatry and neurology.

Differential effects of indoleamines on auditory choice reaction, selective attention, and pitch discrimination

The indoleamines serotonin and melatonin (MT) affected visual processing such as choice reaction. This study determined whether the indoleamines influence the processing of auditory stimuli. Serotonergic activity was increased using citalopram (CIT). We compared effects of single doses of 40 mg CIT, 1 mg MT, and placebo (randomized double-blind, cross-over design) in 18 healthy men. The applied tests assessed auditory choice reaction, selective attention, and serial discrimination using pitch variations as stimuli in each task. CIT reduced the performance in choice reaction and selective attention but not discrimination. MT tended to reduce selective attention and to improve discrimination. The findings suggest that indoleamines had different effects on distinct kinds of auditory processing. Serotonergic activation improved visual choice reaction, whereas the opposite effect was found in the auditory domain. We conclude that disorders and drugs affecting the indoleamines must be considered differentially in the auditory and the visual system.

Biomarkers for the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in healthy subjects

AIMS

Studies of novel centrally acting drugs in healthy volunteers are traditionally concerned with kinetics and tolerability, but useful information may also be obtained from biomarkers of clinical endpoints. This paper provides a systematic overview of CNS-tests used with SSRIs in healthy subjects. A useful biomarker should meet the following requirements: a consistent response across studies and drugs; a clear response of the biomarker to a therapeutic dose; a dose-response relationship; a plausible relationship between biomarker, pharmacology and pathogenesis.

METHODS

These criteria were applied to all individual tests found in studies of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), performed in healthy subjects since 1966, identified with a systematic MedLine search. Separate databases were created to evaluate the effects of single or multiple dose SSRI-studies, and for amitriptyline whenever the original report included this antidepressant as a positive control. Doses of the antidepressant were divided into high- and low-dose ranges, relative to a medium range of therapeutic doses. For each test, the drug effects were scored as statistically significant impairment/decrease (-), improvement/increase (+) or no change (=) relative to placebo.

RESULTS

56 single dose studies and 22 multiple dose studies were identified, investigating the effects of 13 different SSRIs on 171 variants of neuropsychological tests, which could be clustered into seven neuropsychological domains. Low single doses of SSRIs generally stimulated tests of attention and memory. High doses tended to impair visual/auditory and visuomotor systems and subjective performance, while showing an acceleration in motor function. The most pronounced effects were observed using tests that measure flicker discrimination (improvement at low doses: 75%, medium doses: 40%, high doses: 43% of studies); REM sleep (inconsistent decrease after medium doses, decrease in 83% of studies after high doses); and EEG recordings, predominantly in alpha (decrease in 60% and 43% of studies after low and medium doses, respectively) and in theta activity (increase in 43% and 33% of studies after medium and high doses, respectively). Amitriptyline generally impaired central nervous system (CNS) functions, which increased with doses. Multiple doses caused less pronounced effects on the reported tests. The most responsive tests to amitriptyline appeared to be EEG alpha and theta, and REM sleep duration.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRIs in healthy subjects appear to cause slight stimulating effects after low doses, which tend to diminish with dose. The most consistent effects were observed with flicker discrimination tests, EEG (alpha and beta bands), REM sleep duration, and subjective effects at higher doses. These effects are small compared with amitriptyline and other CNS-active drugs. Multiple dosing with SSRIs caused even fewer measurable differences from placebo, probably due to adaptive processes. SSRI-effects are best detected with a test battery that is sensitive to general CNS-stimulation, but such tests only comprise a very small portion of the close to 200 different methods that were found in current review.

Differential effects of reboxetine and citalopram on hand-motor function in patients suffering from major depression

RATIONALE

Motor dysfunctions might be a more common side effect of serotonergic than noradrenergic antidepressants. However, the effects of antidepressants on motor function in depression have rarely been analyzed systematically. Computerized methods allow the objective registration of drug-induced motor dysfunction and were applied in this study.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of a selective noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor (NARI) (reboxetine) and a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) (citalopram) on hand-motor function in patients with major depression.

METHODS

Different types of hand movements (drawing of circles and handwriting probes) were recorded and analyzed in 16 acutely depressed inpatients receiving citalopram (30-60 mg/day) and 12 acutely depressed inpatients treated with reboxetine (4-8 mg/day), using a digitizing tablet for the analysis of movement dynamics. Both groups were comparable regarding mean age (42-43 years), gender, handedness (preponderance of right-handers) and the mean baseline HAMD score (about 27). Five kinematical parameters reflecting velocity, regularity and degree of automation of hand movements have been computed.

RESULTS

Reboxetine had significantly more favorable effects on fine motor function (increased velocity of rapid hand movements) in depressed patients than citalopram. These differences became obvious when patients conducted more complex tasks and are not explained by differential antidepressant effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are in line with the hypothesis that SSRI tend to have small, but more pronounced negative effects on motor function than NARI.

The effects of St John's wort extract on heart rate variability, cognitive function and quantitative EEG: a comparison with amitriptyline and placebo in healthy men

AIMS

To compare the effects of multiple dosing with St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) extract and amitriptyline on heart rate variability, cognitive function and quantitative EEG (qEEG) with placebo in healthy humans.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, cross over study of 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects orally received capsules with 255-285 mg St John's wort extract (900 micro g hypericin content), 25 mg amitriptyline and placebo three times daily for periods of 14 days each with at least 14 days between. The doses of amitriptyline and St John's wort extract are comparable with respect to their antidepressant activity. Compliance was confirmed by coadministration of 10 mg of riboflavin with each capsule and detection of urinary vitamin B2 on treatment day 11 with high performance liquid chromatography. Measurements of heart rate variability, psychometric tests and qEEG were performed before start of medication and repeatedly on the last treatment day.

RESULTS

St John's wort extract did not affect heart rate variability (HRV) whereas amitripytline significantly decreased it: the difference in the percentage number of adjacent RR intervals> 50 ms (pNN50) was 8.6 (-2.6, 19.9; mean; 95% confidence interval) between St John's wort extract and placebo and -17.6 (-24.7, -10.4) between amitriptyline and placebo. Neither St John's wort extract nor amitriptyline had an influence on cognitive performance such as choice reaction, psychomotor coordination, short-term memory and responsiveness to distractive stimuli. Amitriptyline but not St John's wort extract decreased self rated activity (P < 0.05). Both drugs caused significant qEEG changes. St John's wort extract increased theta power density. Amitriptyline increased theta as well as fast alpha power density.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple doses of St John's wort extract do not affect heart rate variability nor cognitive function. Chronic administration of amitriptyline causes a decrement of HRV and subjective sedation but it does not impair cognitive performance.

A preliminary investigation on the acute pharmacodynamic effects of hypericum on cognitive and psychomotor performance

Research has indicated that the herb St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) has comparable efficacy to conventional antidepressants in the treatment of depression. Although clinical studies have demonstrated that hypericum has a superior side-effect profile compared to standard antidepressants, no study has directly compared the cognitive and psychomotor effects of hypericum with those of other antidepressants. The aim of the current study was to examine the acute effects of hypericum on cognitive and psychomotor function, and to compare its effects with those of amitriptyline. Thirteen healthy volunteers received an acute dose of placebo, amitriptyline (25 mg, positive control) or hypericum (900 mg or 1800 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and subjective measures of sedation were administered before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Amitriptyline impaired performance on a battery of psychological tests, which included critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), profile of mood states (POMS) and the line analogue rating scale (LARS), while hypericum had neutral effects on performance in these tests. However, hypericum induced a dose-related impairment on DSST. Current findings suggest that clinical doses of hypericum do not impair attention, sensorimotor function or information processing.

Review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies with citalopram

Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is N-demethylated to N-desmethylcitalopram partially by CYP2C19 and partially by CYP3A4 and N-desmethylcitalopram is further N-demethylated by CYP2D6 to the likewise inactive metabolite di-desmethylcitalopram. The two metabolites are not active. The fact that citalopram is metabolised by more than one CYP means that inhibition of its biotransformation by other drugs is less likely. Besides citalopram has a wide margin of safety, so even if there was a considerable change in serum concentration then this would most likely not be of clinical importance. In vitro citalopram does not inhibit CYP or does so only very moderately. A number of studies in healthy subjects and patients have confirmed, that this also holds true in vivo. Thus no change in pharmacokinetics or only very small changes were observed when citalopram was given with CYP1A2 substrates (clozapine and therophylline), CYP2C9 (warfarin), CYP2C19 (imipramine and mephenytoin), CYP2D6 (sparteine, imipramine and amitriptyline) and CYP3A4 (carbamazepine and triazolam). At the pharmacodynamic level there have been a few documented cases of serotonin syndrome with citalopram and moclobemide and buspirone. It is concluded that citalopram is neither the source nor the cause of clinically important drug-drug interactions.

Citalopram: a comprehensive review

Citalopram is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor that has demonstrated antidepressant efficacy in numerous controlled clinical trials. Additional studies have shown that the drug benefits patients with other illnesses that are related in some way to serotonergic dysfunction, including anxiety, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, premenstrual dysphoria, alcohol dependence and the behavioural disturbances of dementia. This paper reviews the full spectrum of citalopram's clinical efficacy, as well as its safety and tolerability, in a range of patients.

Serotonin, noradrenaline and cognitive function: a preliminary investigation of the acute pharmacodynamic effects of a serotonin versus a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor

Comparisons of the behavioural side-effect profiles of antidepressants that inhibit either serotonin or both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake, may reveal differences in cognitive and psychomotor functions, which may be attributed to their relative pharmacological selectivity for potentiating monoamine neurotransmission in the central nervous system. The aim of the present study was to determine the acute pharmacodynamic effects of citalopram and venlafaxine, on cognitive and psychomotor performance. Nine healthy male volunteers received a single clinical dose of citalopram, venlafaxine or amitriptyline (positive control) in a double-blind placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and a subjective measure of sedation were examined before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Citalopram improved psychomotor responses to sensory stimuli and sustained attention, with significant decreases in movement times of the choice reaction time test and an increase in critical flicker fusion threshold. Venlafaxine did not affect performances on any of the cognitive or psychomotor tests examined. Differences may be related to relative potencies of the compounds for monoamine reuptake inhibition.

Citalopram

Citalopram is a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) developed by H. Lundbeck A/S in Denmark. It is the most selective serotonin antidepressant with proven efficacy, a favourable pharmacokinetic profile and a low potential for interactions with other concomitant medication. The drug has a low incidence of side effects, even when compared to the other SSRIs and good patient compliance and satisfaction is a feature of this drug. These factors make the drug a good choice for depressed patients who require continuation and long-term treatment, as well as for elderly patients. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Depression in epilepsy: etiology, phenomenology, and treatment

A history of depression or depressive symptomatology has been reported in up to two-thirds of patients with medically intractable epilepsy, whereas community studies have demonstrated affective disorder only in a quarter of these patients. Depression has been reported peri- and interictally. However, differentiation may be difficult in patients with frequent seizures. Most authors have found no correlation between depression and epilepsy variables. However, complex partial seizures, especially of temporal lobe origin, appear to be etiologic factors, particularly in men with left-sided foci. Depression is also more common in patients treated with polytherapy especially with barbiturates, phenytoin, and vigabatrin. Depression has also been described de novo after temporal lobectomy. Psychosocial factors also play a part, but underlying risk factors (e.g., genetic, endocrine and metabolic) may explain the increased rates of depression in people with epilepsy compared to those with other neurologic and chronic medical conditions. The depression appears to be endogenous. Patients tend to exhibit fewer neurotic traits and more psychotic symptoms such as paranoia, delusions, and persecutory auditory hallucinations. Treatment approaches include psychotherapy, rationalization of antiepileptic drug medication, antidepressant treatment, and ECT. The tricyclic and related antidepressants appear to be epileptogenic, especially in people at high risk (personal or family history of seizures, abnormal pretreatment EEG, brain damage, alcohol or substance abuse/withdrawal and concurrent use of CNS-active medication). Seizures tend to occur early in treatment or after dose increments, especially if rapidly titrated. There is little evidence that the newer antidepressants, e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, moclobemide, venlafaxine, or nefazodone are more epileptogenic than placebo.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of affective disorders--III. Tolerability, safety and pharmacoeconomics

The clinical use of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) is often complicated by toxicity and safety problems due to their effects on multiple mechanisms of action, many of which are unnecessary for therapeutic effect. The development of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), with their selective mode of action, has resulted in a class of antidepressant drugs possessing an improved side-effect profile, while retaining good clinical efficacy. Their introduction into clinical practice has led to enhanced patient compliance with antidepressant therapy and the ability to maintain treatment over longer periods of time at an adequate therapeutic dose. Although, as a result of their selective action, side-effects associated with SSRI therapy are minimised, distinct variations between individual SSRIs in terms of their tolerability profiles have been observed. The wealth of clinical data now available has revealed differences in their potential to cause psychiatric and neurological side-effects, dermatological reactions, anticholinergic side-effects, changes in body weight, sexual dysfunction, cognitive impairment, discontinuation reactions and drug-drug interactions. Patients who suffer from concomitant depression and physical illness may experience different tolerability profiles, in addition to the greater likelihood that they will be receiving concomitant medications with the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with coadministered SSRI therapy. In addition, the safety margin of SSRIs in overdose may vary within the group. Knowledge of the differences that exist among the SSRIs in respect of tolerability and safety will aid physicians in the selection of the most beneficial treatment strategy for their patients. A successful clinical outcome leads to a reduced economic burden for the patient, their family and the healthcare services. Thus, pharmacoeconomic considerations are also important in choosing antidepressant therapy. The SSRIs, despite relatively higher prescription costs, have been demonstrated to be a more cost-effective option than the TCAs. Furthermore, there is evidence that the emerging clinical differences between SSRIs may translate into significantly different economic outcomes within the group.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

The recently introduced antidepressants, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) [citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline], are known for their clinical efficacy, good tolerability and relative safety. They differ from each other in chemical structure, metabolism and pharmacokinetic properties. Therapeutic drug monitoring of these compounds is not widely used, as the plasma concentration ranges within which clinical response with minimal adverse effects appears to be optimal are not clearly defined. Almost all recent assays developed for the quantitative determination of SSRIs and their metabolites in blood are based either on the separation of SSRIs by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or gas chromatography (GC). Citalopram and fluoxetine have been introduced as racemic compounds. There are some differences in the pharmacological profile, metabolism and pharmacokinetics between the enantiomers of the parent compounds and their demethylated metabolites. Stereoselective chromatographic methods for their analysis in blood are now available. With regard to the SSRIs presently available, no clearcut plasma concentration-clinical effectiveness relationship in patients with depression has been shown, nor any threshold which defines toxic concentrations. This may be explained by their low toxicity and use at dosages where serious adverse effects do not appear. SSRIs vary widely in their qualitative and quantitative interaction with cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes in the liver. CYP2D6 is inhibited by SSRIs, in order of decreasing potency paroxetine, norfluoxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram and fluvoxamine. This may have clinical consequences with some but not all SSRIs, when they are taken with tricyclic antidepressants. Except for citalopram and paroxetine, little is known about the enzymes which control the biotransformation of the SSRIs. There have been many reports on marked pharmacokinetic interactions between fluoxetine and tricyclic antidepressants. Fluoxetine has a stronger effect on their hydroxylation than on their demethylation. Interactions observed between fluoxetine and alprazolam, midazolam and carbamazepine seem to occur on the level of CYP3A. Fluvoxamine strongly inhibits the N-demethylation of some tricyclic antidepressants of the tertiary amine type and of clozapine. This may lead to adverse effects but augmentation with fluvoxamine can also improve response in very rapid metabolisers, as it increases the bioavailability of the comedication. Fluvoxamine inhibits with decreasing potency, CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP1A1, but it is also an inhibitor of CYP3A. Fluoxetine and fluvoxamine have shown to increase methadone plasma concentrations in dependent patients. Some authors warn about a combination of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors with SSRIs, as this could lead to a serotonergic syndrome. Studies with healthy volunteers suggest, however, that a combination of moclobemide and SSRIs, such as fluvoxamine, should not present serious risks in promoting a serotonin syndrome. A combination of moclobemide and fluvoxamine has successfully been used in refractory depression, but more studies are needed, including plasma-concentration monitoring, before this combined treatment can be recommended. Paroxetine is a substrate of CYP2D6, but other enzyme(s) could also be involved. Its pharmacokinetics are linear in poor metabolisers of sparteine, and non-linear in extensive metabolisers. Due to its potent CYP2D6 inhibiting properties, comedication with this SSRI can lead to an increase of tricyclic antidepressants in plasma, as shown with amitriptyline and trimipramine. CYP3A has been claimed to be involved in the biotransformation of sertraline to norsertraline. Clinical investigations (with desipramine) confirmed in vitro findings that CYP2D6 inhibition by sertraline is only moderate. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

A study of the pharmacodynamic interaction between befloxatone and ethanol on performance and mood in healthy volunteers

The effects of befloxatone (20 mg o.d. for 10 days) alone and in combination with ethanol on psychomotor performance, memory and mood were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. On treatment days 6, 8 and 10, subjects received 0.5 and 0.8 g/kg ethanol and ethanol placebo in randomly assigned, balanced orders, 2 h post-drug. Critical fusion frequency, choice reaction time, postural instability, critical tracking and mood were measured 1h before ethanol and 1, 3 and 5 h afterwards. Divided attention, sustained attention and memory (immediate and delayed recall) were also measured in single tests, 2.5-5 h post-ethanol.Ethanol's effects were generally significant when blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) after both doses were the highest; i.e. 0.48-0.67 and 0.96-1.10 mg/ml. Those effects were virtually gone after the subjects' mean BACs fell below 0.40 mg/ml. Befloxatone alone had no significant impairing effect in any test. Neither did it significantly interact with ethanol to cause any greater impairment than the latter alone. It was concluded that befloxatone does not potentiate the sedating and impairing effects of ethanol.

EEG profile of litoxetine after single and repeated administration in healthy volunteers

1. Litoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with antidepressant activity in animal models and in depressed patients. 2. This double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 12 healthy young male volunteers. The aim was to assess the EEG profile of litoxetine in parallel with its pharmacokinetics after a single dose or multiple administrations for 4 days (6 doses) of two dosages (10 mg and 25 mg). Spectral analysis of four EEG leads (F4-T4, F3-T3, T4-02 and T3-01) was done up to 12 h post-dose. 3. In single or multiple doses, litoxetine induced EEG changes characterised by a dose-related increase in fast beta energies, mainly beta 2, without any changes in slow waves (delta and theta). A slight reduction in alpha activity occurred only after repeated doses. 4. EEG changes occurred after a single oral administration and lasted at least 12 h with litoxetine blood concentrations ranging from 4 to 10 ng ml-1. With repeated administrations, the pharmacodynamic steady-state was achieved as the increase in beta 2 energies was the same before and 12 h post-dose. These effects occurred with litoxetine blood concentrations ranging from 3 to 7 ng ml-1 with the 10 mg dosage and from 8 to 18 ng ml-1 with the 25 mg dosage. The EEG profile did not change after 4 days of repeated administration, indicating that tolerance did not develop. 5. Cmax and AUC showed proportionality between the administered dosages of 10 and 25 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Serotonin-altering medications and desire, consumption and effects of alcohol-treatment implications

The relationship between serotonin neurotransmission and alcohol consumption (AC) was first determined in preclinical studies. AC generally increases following treatments which decrease serotonin activity, and levels of 5-HT and metabolites are low in some brain regions of alcohol-preferring rats. Pharmacological treatments which enhance serotonergic neurotransmission (uptake inhibitors, releasers, agonists) consistently reduce AC in rats. Serotonin uptake inhibitors (SUI; e.g., citalopram, fluoxetine) have been studied extensively in humans. In several double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trials, SUI consistently decreased short-term (2-4 weeks) AC by averages of 15% to 20% in nondepressed mildly/moderately dependent alcoholics who received no other treatment. Some subjects decreased AC by up to 60%. The effects of SUI on AC were dose-dependent and not related to side effects (few and mild) or changes in anxiety or depression (not observed). SUI decreased desire to drink and liking for alcohol, suggesting a mechanism of action, to be considered in the development of treatments to reduce AC and prevent relapse. However, while an adjunctive brief psychosocial intervention enhanced the short-term effect of a SUI, the long-term (12-week) effects of SUI and placebo were similar. Other drugs acting on the 5-HT system have been tested in humans, but results are inconclusive. For example, buspirone, a 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, reduced anxiety and alcohol craving, but not AC; a 5-HT partial agonist, m-CPP, increased craving in abstinent alcoholics; modest reductions in AC were observed with a 5-HT3 antagonist, ondansetron (0.5 mg/day, but not 4 mg/day). Ritanserin, a 5-HT2 antagonist, reduced desire to drink and prevented relapse in a small (n = 5) study, and there was some indication that it reduced desire to drink and enhanced alcohol effects without reducing AC, in another study. The therapeutic potential of these medications is being studied. SUI and other serotonin-altering medications are promising new neuropharmacological treatments for AC.

Citalopram. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness

Citalopram is an antidepressant belonging to a new class of drugs which enhance serotoninergic neurotransmission through potent and selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake. Preliminary trials suggest that its short term therapeutic efficacy is significantly greater than that of placebo and mianserin, and comparable to that of amitriptyline, maprotiline and imipramine. It appears to be a weaker antidepressant agent than clomipramine, but better tolerated. Its elimination half-life of 33 hours permits once daily oral administration. Symptomatic improvement obtained with short term treatment has been maintained when therapy has been extended for up to 1 year; in the few patients studied for this extended period, the relapse rate was lower than with fluvoxamine, fluoxetine or imipramine. Compared to standard antidepressant agents, citalopram is well tolerated. It does not appear to be cardiotoxic, has not been associated with seizures in humans, and is relatively nonsedating. Unlike the tricyclic antidepressants, citalopram has minimal anticholinergic effects. Mild and transient nausea, with or without vomiting, is the most frequent adverse effect--occurring in 20% of patients--and increased perspiration, headache, dry mouth, tremor and insomnia are experienced by 15 to 18% of patients. Citalopram thus offers similar therapeutic efficacy and a more favourable tolerability profile than the tricyclic antidepressants. Preliminary data suggest that it may be particularly useful in patients who cannot tolerate the anticholinergic or cardiovascular side effects of tricyclic antidepressants and in those for whom sedation is not indicated.

Modulation of baseline behavior in rats by putative serotonergic agents in three ethoexperimental paradigms

The present study adopts an ethoexperimental approach to examine the deportment subsequent to alteration in serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission following treatment with site-specific neuropharmacological probes. The impact of perturbation in (5-HT) neurotransmission on baseline behavior was analyzed employing three animal models of anxiety, i.e., hole-board, elevated plus maze, and bright/dark arena. Inbred male rats (Wistar strain, weighing between 150 and 200 g) were used in this study. The vivarium and the behavioral laboratory were specially designed to permit operation of reversed light-dark cycle and all experiments were performed during the dark period. Pharmacological tools selected to influence 5-HT levels include (1) a combination of tranylcypromine and tryptophan (TCP + TRYPT) (0.75 mg/kg + 40 mg/kg) which augments 5-HT biosynthesis; (2) p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA: 200 mg/kg), an inhibitor of 5-HT biosynthesis; and (3) 5-HT reuptake blockers, namely zimelidine (ZIM) (40 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (FLU) (10 mg/kg). Rats under the influence of PCPA exhibited anxiolytic response, whereas those under treatments to raise 5-HT levels, viz., TCP + TRYPT, ZIM and FLU, displayed anxiogenic-like reactions. Several other agents known to specifically interact with 5-HT receptor subtypes were also tested. 5-HT2 receptor stimulants, such as quipazine (5 mg/kg) and MK 212 (0.5 mg/kg), were found to be anxiogenic. Buspirone (2 mg/kg), a 5-HT1 agonist, surmounted normal behavioral inhibition. However, another 5-HT1 stimulant, 8-OH-DPAT (0.025 mg/kg), had anxiogenic action. Pretreatment with 5-HT3 antagonists [zacopride (2 mg/kg) and GR 38032F (0.1 mg/kg)] and putative 5-HT1 antagonist [propranolol (10 mg/kg)] resulted in borderline disinhibition of normal behavioral inhibition to novel environments. In contrast, cyproheptadine (0.5 mg/kg), a 5-HT2 antagonist, provoked anxiogenic-like behavior. Altogether, uniform results were obtained for each probe in all the three models, suggesting that the battery of anxiety tests chosen in this study is reliable and sensitive to detect unknown pharmacological responses. The results support the hypothesis that stimulation of serotonergic neurotransmission heightens normal anxiety, whereas its blockade releases normal behavioral inhibition. Furthermore, this work establishes the validity of using the three paradigms in evaluating the involvement of multiple neurotransmitter receptors in the control of behavior of rodents under natural circumstances and also detects any aberration following exposure to novelty and stress.

Kinetic and dynamic interactions of oral viqualine and ethanol in man

We have studied the interaction of viqualine, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake inhibitor, with ethanol in 16 healthy men aged 20 to 34 years. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive ethanol dosed to maintain blood alcohol concentrations of 17-22 mmol.l-1 (n = 8) or orange juice (n = 8) on each of two test days one week apart and preceded, in random order, by 3 days of viqualine 75 mg bd or placebo. Ethanol had no effect on steady-state viqualine concentrations or the inhibition of 5-HT uptake. Viqualine did not affect acetaldehyde concentrations or cause an aversive alcohol-sensitizing reaction. The deleterious effects of ethanol on word recall, manual tracking, body sway, and self-ratings of intoxication, sedation, and performance were not modified by the presence of viqualine. Within each beverage group performances and self-ratings on viqualine and placebo days were not different. The first dose of viqualine was associated with transient nausea. Viqualine and ethanol do not interact kinetically or dynamically on the variables examined in this study.

Identification of 5-HT3 recognition sites in the ferret area postrema

The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist [3H]zacopride was used to identify 5-HT3 recognition sites in the ferret area postrema. Specific binding was determined by the inclusion of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist BRL 43694 in the incubation media, and was shown to be much higher in the area postrema than in other brain regions. The increased binding in the area postrema may reflect either a greater number of binding sites, a higher affinity for such sites, or both. The results indicate that 5-HT3 recognition sites are present within the area postrema and may afford an antiemetic site of action for zacopride and other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.

Interactions of antidepressants and ethanol on spontaneous locomotor activity and rotarod performance in NMRI and C57BL/6 mice

In order to find appropriate doses for studying antidepressant-ethanol interaction in two mouse strains, spontaneous locomotor activity and rotarod performance were first studied in NMRI mice after amitriptyline 3-30 mg/kg, mianserin 3-30 mg/kg, nomifensine 1- 10 mg/kg, citalopram 3-100 mg/kg, and ethanol 1-3 g/kg intraperitoneally. Ethanol increased significantly locomotor activity at 1 g/kg and impaired rotarod performance at 2 and 3 g/kg. Amitriptyline and mianserin decreased dose-dependently locomotor activity at doses ≥ 10 mg/kg. Nomifensine and citalopram increased locomotor activity at 10 mg/kg and citalopram 100 mg/kg decreased it. Rotarod performance was affected only by amitriptyline 10 and 30 mg/kg and citalopram 100 mg/kg, which impaired performance. Interaction studies with the two strains using amitriptyline, mianserin, nomifensine and citalopram 10 mg/kg and ethanol 1 g/kg showed that C57BL/6 mice were less sensitive than NMRI mice to the stimu lating effects of ethanol and more sensitive to impairment of rotarod performance by amitrip tyline and mianserin. C57BL/6 mice had a significantly poorer baseline performance on rotarod, and the citalopram plus ethanol combination impaired their performance severely, although drugs alone did not impair this test. The results suggest that decreased locomotor activity as a measure of antidepressant-induced sedation does not parallel with impaired performance on rotarod and that significant strain differences can be seen in psy chopharmacological tests and responses to drugs in mice.

A comparative study of the interactions of alcohol with amitriptyline, fluoxetine and placebo in normal subjects

1. Twelve normal volunteer subjects were given amitriptyline, fluoxetine and placebo in clinically relevant doses, each for a period of 7 days. A minimum of 28 days intervened between each drug treatment. 2. A battery of physiological, psychomotor and subjective tests was administered before drugs and on days 4 and 8. 3. On day 8 a measured dose of alcohol was given and the tests repeated 1 hour and 3 hours later. 4. Before alcohol, little effect was shown on physiological or psychomotor activity. Subjective ratings indicated that amitriptyline was less-well tolerated than fluoxetine. 5. Significant differences were found for many measures after alcohol but there were few differences with respect to the drugs.