Glipizide versus tolbutamide, an open trial. Effects on insulin secretory patterns and glucose concentrations

WITHDRAWN: Sulphonylurea monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group withdrew this review as of Issue 7, 2015 because of the involvement of one author (SS Lund) being employed in a pharmaceutical company. The authors of the review and the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group did not find that this was a breach of the rules of the Cochrane Collaboration at the time when it was published. However, after the publication of the review, the Cochrane Collaboration requested withdrawal of the review due to the employment of the author. A new protocol for a review to cover this topic will be published. This will have a new title and a markedly improved protocol fulfilling new and important developments and standards within the Cochrane Collaboration as well as an improved inclusion and search strategy making it necessary to embark on a completely new review project.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Sulphonylurea monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing health problem worldwide. Whether sulphonylureas show better, equal or worse therapeutic effects in comparison with other antidiabetic interventions for patients with T2DM remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of sulphonylurea monotherapy versus placebo, no intervention or other antidiabetic interventions for patients with T2DM.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched publications in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS and CINAHL (all until August 2011) to obtain trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria for our review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included clinical trials that randomised patients 18 years old or more with T2DM to sulphonylurea monotherapy with a duration of 24 weeks or more.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were other patient-important outcomes and metabolic variables. Where possible, we used risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to analyse the treatment effect of dichotomous outcomes. We used mean differences with 95% CI to analyse the treatment effect of continuous outcomes. We evaluated the risk of bias. We conducted trial sequential analyses to assess whether firm evidence could be established for a 10% relative risk reduction (RRR) between intervention groups.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 72 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 22,589 participants; 9707 participants randomised to sulphonylureas versus 12,805 participants randomised to control interventions. The duration of the interventions varied from 24 weeks to 10.7 years. We judged none of the included trials as low risk of bias for all bias domains. Patient-important outcomes were seldom reported.First-generation sulphonylureas (FGS) versus placebo or insulin did not show statistical significance for all-cause mortality (versus placebo: RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.45; P = 0.15; 2 trials; 553 participants; high risk of bias (HRB); versus insulin: RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.59; P = 0.26; 2 trials; 1944 participants; HRB). FGS versus placebo showed statistical significance for cardiovascular mortality in favour of placebo (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.22; P = 0.006; 2 trials; 553 participants; HRB). FGS versus insulin did not show statistical significance for cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.71; P = 0.39; 2 trials; 1944 participants; HRB). FGS versus alpha-glucosidase inhibitors showed statistical significance in favour of FGS for adverse events (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.76; P = 0.01; 2 trials; 246 participants; HRB) and for drop-outs due to adverse events (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.67; P = 0.004; 2 trials; 246 participants; HRB).Second-generation sulphonylureas (SGS) versus metformin (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.58; P = 0.68; 6 trials; 3528 participants; HRB), thiazolidinediones (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.41; P = 0.70; 7 trials; 4955 participants; HRB), insulin (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.18; P = 0.72; 4 trials; 1642 participants; HRB), meglitinides (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.47 to 4.42; P = 0.52; 7 trials; 2038 participants; HRB), or incretin-based interventions (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.68; P = 0.51; 2 trials; 1503 participants; HRB) showed no statistically significant effects regarding all-cause mortality in a random-effects model. SGS versus metformin (RR 1.47; 95% CI 0.54 to 4.01; P = 0.45; 6 trials; 3528 participants; HRB), thiazolidinediones (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.55 to 3.07; P = 0.55; 7 trials; 4955 participants; HRB), insulin (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.28; P = 0.80; 4 trials; 1642 participants; HRB) or meglitinide (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.53; P = 0.97; 7 trials, 2038 participants, HRB) showed no statistically significant effects regarding cardiovascular mortality. Mortality data for the SGS versus placebo were sparse. SGS versus thiazolidinediones and meglitinides did not show statistically significant differences for a composite of non-fatal macrovascular outcomes. SGS versus metformin showed statistical significance in favour of SGS for a composite of non-fatal macrovascular outcomes (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.93; P = 0.02; 3018 participants; 3 trials; HRB). The definition of non-fatal macrovascular outcomes varied among the trials. SGS versus metformin, thiazolidinediones and meglitinides showed no statistical significance for non-fatal myocardial infarction. No meta-analyses could be performed for microvascular outcomes. SGS versus placebo, metformin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors or meglitinides showed no statistical significance for adverse events. SGS versus alpha-glucosidase inhibitors showed statistical significance in favour of SGS for drop-outs due to adverse events (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.96; P = 0.04; 9 trials; 870 participants; HRB). SGS versus meglitinides showed no statistical significance for the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. SGS versus metformin and thiazolidinediones showed statistical significance in favour of metformin (RR 5.64, 95% CI 1.22 to 26.00; P = 0.03; 4 trials; 3637 participants; HRB) and thiazolidinediones (RR 6.11, 95% CI 1.57 to 23.79; P = 0.009; 6 trials; 5660 participants; HRB) for severe hypoglycaemia.Third-generation sulphonylureas (TGS) could not be included in any meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or non-fatal macro- or microvascular outcomes. TGS versus thiazolidinediones showed statistical significance regarding adverse events in favour of TGS (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99; P = 0.03; 3 trials; 510 participants; HRB). TGS versus thiazolidinediones did not show any statistical significance for drop-outs due to adverse events. TGS versus other comparators could not be performed due to lack of data.For the comparison of SGS versus FGS no meta-analyses of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal macro- or microvascular outcomes, or adverse events could be performed.Health-related quality of life and costs of intervention could not be meta-analysed due to lack of data.In trial sequential analysis, none of the analyses of mortality outcomes, vascular outcomes or severe hypoglycaemia met the criteria for firm evidence of a RRR of 10% between interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from RCTs to support the decision as to whether to initiate sulphonylurea monotherapy. Data on patient-important outcomes are lacking. Therefore, large-scale and long-term randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias, focusing on patient-important outcomes are required.

Stevioside counteracts the glyburide-induced desensitization of the pancreatic beta-cell function in mice: studies in vitro

The sulfonylurea glyburide (GB) is one of the most frequently used drugs in diabetes treatment. Long-term pretreatment with GB causes elevated basal insulin secretion (BIS) and decreased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). These characteristics may play an important role for the development of hypoglycemia and secondary failure. Stevioside (SVS), a substance extracted from leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, enhances GSIS but not BIS. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether 24-hour exposure of isolated mouse islets to GB causes dose-dependent decrease in the GSIS and whether it is possible to counteract this desensitization by SVS. We also tested the impact of the incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on the GB-induced desensitization. After 24-hour preincubation with GB in combination with SVS or GLP-1, we measured the basal and glucose-stimulated insulin responses and the total islet insulin content. We also determined the fold change in gene expression of pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 and glucose transporter isoform 2. After 24-hour preincubation in 11.1 mmol/L glucose, GB (10(-11)-10(-3) mol/L) caused a dose-dependent decrease in GSIS (16.7 mmol/L glucose) (P < .001). GB (10(-7) mol/L) pretreatment elevated BIS, but neither SVS (10(-7) mol/L) nor GLP-1 (10(-7) mol/L) could reverse this. Interestingly, the GB-induced desensitization of GSIS was counteracted by both SVS (P < .05) and GLP-1 (P < .05). SVS reversed the decrease in insulin content caused by GB pretreatment (P < .05). GB pretreatment did not change gene expression of pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 nor glucose transporter isoform 2, whereas SVS significantly up-regulated the expression of both genes by more than 2-fold (P < .05). Our results showed that SVS in combination with GB did not reverse GB-induced increase in BIS, whereas both SVS and GLP-1 counteracted GB-induced desensitization of GSIS. SVS is able to counteract the desensitizing effects of GB and may be a putative new drug candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Treatment for childhood type 2 diabetes

Urine glucose screening at school implemented in Japan is useful for detecting childhood type 2 diabetes at the early stage of the disease. Most patients detected by the screening can improve hyperglycemia and reduce overweight within one to three months by changing lifestyle with diet and exercise. For patients who are unable to alter their lifestyle and for those who have hyperglycemia despite maintaining these changes, a variety of oral hypoglycemic agents, including α-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas, glitinides, metformin, thiazolidenediones, and insulin are available. Metformin is considered to be the most effective oral agent as monotherapy for Japanese young persons with type 2 diabetes, because most of them are obese with insulin resistance. The approach to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes often differs from that most frequently used in patients with type 1 diabetes. Adjustment of the dose of insulin at each injection using sliding scales or algorithms is not required in most cases. In some cases, combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylureas or use of insulin is more effective for stabilization of blood glucose values. Therapeutic means for childhood type 2 diabetes should be variable depending on each patient's characteristics.

Mealtime glucose regulation with nateglinide in healthy volunteers: comparison with repaglinide and placebo

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of nateglinide (A-4166), repaglinide, and placebo on mealtime insulin secretion and glycemic control in healthy subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in this open-label five-period crossover study. They received single 10-min preprandial doses of 120 mg nateglinide, 0.5 or 2 mg repaglinide, or placebo or 1 min preprandially of 2 mg repaglinide. Subjects received each dose only once, 48 h apart. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments were performed from 0 to 12 h postdose.

RESULTS

Nateglinide induced insulin secretion more rapidly than 2 and 0.5 mg repaglinide and placebo (10 min preprandial), with mean rates of insulin rise of 2.3, 1.3, 1.15, and 0.8 microU x ml(-1) x min(-1), respectively, over the 0- to 30-min postmeal interval. After peaking, insulin concentrations decreased rapidly in the nateglinide-treated group and were similar to placebo within 2 h postdose. After 2 mg repaglinide, peak insulin concentrations were delayed and returned to baseline more slowly than with nateglinide treatment. Nateglinide treatment produced lower average plasma glucose concentrations in the 0- to 2-h postdose interval than either dose of repaglinide and placebo (P < 0.05 vs. 0.5 mg repaglinide and placebo). Plasma glucose concentrations returned more rapidly to predose levels with nateglinide treatment than with either dose of repaglinide. Treatment with repaglinide produced a sustained hypoglycemic effect up to 6 h postdose.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-dose study in nondiabetic volunteers, nateglinide provided a more rapid and shorter-lived stimulation of insulin secretion than repaglinide, resulting in lower meal-related glucose excursions. If similar results are observed in diabetes, nateglinide may produce a more physiological insulin secretory response with the potential for a reduced risk of postabsorptive hypoglycemia.

The use of sulphonylureas in the elderly

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous disorder characterised by defects in insulin secretion as well as reduced insulin action. During aging, glucose intolerance will gradually develop, and this is manifested primarily by an increase in the postprandial blood glucose response while fasting blood glucose levels are often less elevated. Abnormal beta-cell secretion of insulin is a main feature of this. Treatment of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus focuses on reduction of (hyperglycaemic) complaints and prevention of the development or progression of secondary complications. Although regular physical activity and dietary measures, aiming at bodyweight normalisation, are the cornerstones of therapy, pharmacological treatment with oral blood glucose lowering-agents often proves necessary to control the hyperglycaemia. In the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) it was clearly shown that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were intensively treated with oral blood glucose-lowering agents or insulin developed less microvascular complications. The question whether achievement of strict metabolic control is also of benefit in elderly patients, is still unanswered. Sulphonylureas are drugs which stimulate insulin secretion by enhancing the release of insulin from the pancreatic beta-cells without an effect on insulin synthesis. They are frequently used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and several preparations are available. In general, there are no major differences in effectiveness between the various sulphonylureas. Long term treatment with sulphonylureas will decrease fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels by 3 to 5 mmol/L, and glycosylated haemoglobin by 20%. However, after its initial decline, plasma glucose level will often go up slightly during the following months to years. Sulphonylureas are usually well tolerated. Hypoglycaemia is the most frequently occurring adverse effect, which may be very serious and damaging in the elderly. It has been associated primarily with long-acting sulphonylureas, like chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide). Hypoglycaemic episodes may trigger serious events like myocardial infarction or stroke. Therefore, shorter-acting compounds like tolbutamide and gliclazide have been relatively well tolerated and appear to be the best choice to treat elderly patients. It is advisable to start with a low dose and increase the dose, when needed, in small steps. The efficacy of sulphonylureas is much greater when they are taken before a meal. Because of the fact that type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive disease, and residual beta-cell function decreases with time, insulin therapy may ultimately be warranted in a significant number of patients.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence

NIDDM in children and adolescents represents a heterogeneous group of disorders with different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Most subtypes of NIDDM that occur in childhood are uncommon, but some, such as early onset of "classic" NIDDM, seem to be increasing in prevalence. This observed increase is thought to be caused by societal factors that lead to sedentary lifestyles and an increased prevalence of obesity. In adults, hyperglycemia frequently exists for years before a diagnosis of NIDDM is made and treatment is begun. Microvascular complications, such as retinopathy, are often already present at the time of diagnosis. Children are frequently asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, so screening for this disorder in high-risk populations is important. Screening should be considered for children of high-risk ethnic populations with a strong family history of NIDDM with obesity or signs of hyperinsulinism, such as acanthosis nigricans. Even for children in these high-risk groups who do not yet manifest hyperglycemia, primary care providers can have an important role in encouraging lifestyle modifications that might delay or prevent onset of NIDDM.

Effect of sulphonylurea therapy on plasma insulin, intact and 32/33 split proinsulin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study was undertaken to clarify the effect of sulphonylurea therapy on beta cell function in 27 subjects with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Plasma glucose, insulin, intact and 32/33 split proinsulin were measured at diagnostic OGTT. After 8-12 weeks on a conventional diet, subjects with a fasting glucose > 9 mmol l-1 (n = 12) were commenced on sulphonylurea therapy. At diagnosis, the sulphonylurea requiring group were more hyperglycaemic (p < 0.0001), less obese (p < 0.05) and more insulin deficient with a lower 30 min insulin (p < 0.0002) than the diet group. Following dietary intervention in the sulphonylurea group, weight remained unchanged but there was a reduction in fasting glucose (p < 0.009). Fasting insulin, intact proinsulin, and 32/33 split proinsulin remained unchanged. After 12 weeks of sulphonylurea therapy there was a weight gain of 1.5 kg (p < 0.01), but a reduction in fasting glucose (p < 0.0001). Fasting insulin and intact proinsulin increased (p < 0.004) but 32/33 split proinsulin remained unchanged. There was a significant increase in both the fasting insulin to glucose ratio (p < 0.005), and intact to 32/33 split proinsulin ratio (p < 0.02). Final fasting glucose following sulphonylurea therapy was positively correlated with the initial intact and 32/33 split proinsulin and the fasting glucose following dietary treatment. It is clear from this work that sulphonylureas have a complex effect on beta cell physiology and as well as stimulating release of insulin they increase the release of intact proinsulin but not that of 32/33 split proinsulin, hence they increase the intact to 32/33 split proinsulin ratio.

Chronic exposure to glibenclamide impairs insulin secretion in isolated rat pancreatic islets

We investigated the effect of 24 h exposure to 100 nmol/l glibenclamide on insulin secretion in isolated rat pancreatic islets. The insulin content was similar in control islets and in islets preincubated with 100 nmol/l glibenclamide for 24 h. In islets preexposed to glibenclamide: 1) the subsequent response to a maximal glibenclamide stimulatory concentration (10 mumol/l, 1 h at 37 C) was greatly reduced in comparison to control islets (0.69 +/- 0.20% vs 2.16 +/- 0.41%; mean +/- SE; n = 14; p less than 0.001); 2) the response to 100 mumol/l tolbutamide stimulation was also reduced (0.55 +/- 0.15% vs 2.38 +/- 0.44%; n = 8; p less than 0.001); 3) the response to 16.7 mmo/l glucose, both in the presence or in the absence of 1 mmol/l IBMX, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, was also diminished by about 50% (1.79 +/- 0.39% vs. 3.22 +/- 0.42%; n = 14, p less than 0.001). In glibenclamide pretreated islets, blunted responses to stimuli were confirmed also by dynamic studies using a perifusion system. The effect of glibenclamide preincubation was fully reversible: when islets cultured in the presence of glibenclamide were transferred to a glibenclamide-free medium for further 24 h, insulin release in response to glibenclamide stimulation returned to control values. We conclude that prolonged exposure of rat pancreatic islets to glibenclamide induces a reversible desensitization to a variety of metabolic stimuli. The inhibition by prolonged glibenclamide exposure of a common pathway in the mechanism of insulin release is one possible explanation for these results.

Acute effect of glipizide on glucose tolerance in obesity and diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)

The attempt has been made to identity the lowest dose of glipizide, a second generation sulphonylurea, capable of improving glucose tolerance in overweight and obese subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance. Thirty one obese subjects, 12 with non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), 9 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 10 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) each underwent four OGTTS (75 g), at 1 week intervals, after administration in random order of placebo or glipizide 0.5, 1.0 or 2.5 mg 30 min before glucose. Glucose tolerance in all groups was progressively improved by the increasing doses of glipizide and was normalized by 1.0 mg glipizide in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and by 2.5 mg glipizide in NIDDM. Insulin release was not significantly affected by glipizide in the three groups of subjects. The data indicate that it is possible, at least in acute experiments, to improve glucose tolerance in overweight and obese subjects with IGT, with NGT and with NIDDM, with doses of glipizide that do not affect insulin release.

Insulin release and peripheral sensitivity at the oral glucose tolerance test

With the use of a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, both insulin release (IRG) and the degree of peripheral sensitivity (SI) were evaluated simultaneously in groups with normal (NGT) and impaired (IGT) glucose tolerance as well as NIDDM. IRG was expressed as the ratio of the area under the insulin curve to that of the glucose curve above fasting levels. The peripheral glucose uptake rate (M) during the OGTT was measured as the difference between the glucose load and the increase in the amount of glucose in the glucose space during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). SI was expressed as the ratio of the metabolic clearance rate (M/mean blood glucose) to log mean serum insulin. In the non-obese groups, both mean IRG and mean SI values were decreased with an increasing degree of hyperglycemia from NGT to NIDDM. Decreased mean SI values were also found in obese subjects. IGT-subjects given 3 months of diet and exercise achieved improved SI values. A non-obese NIDDM-group had higher mean IRG and mean SI values after 6 months of treatment with glipizide. The results were comparable to data obtained with more complicated techniques, such as the insulin clamp and suppression tests, and should be easy to apply on a large scale in epidemiological studies.

Combination of insulin with glipizide increases peripheral glucose disposal in secondary failure type 2 diabetic patients

Twenty Type 2 diabetic patients, recently converted to insulin because of inadequate control on oral hypoglycaemic agents, were studied. Endogenous insulin reserve was measured by glucagon stimulation, and insulin-mediated peripheral glucose disposal by a hyperglycaemic (11 mmol l-1) clamp, measurements being repeated after 8 weeks of glipizide or placebo therapy in addition to the patients' usual insulin. The study was randomized and double blind. Fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels did not change on glipizide or placebo. Insulin-mediated glucose disposal rose from 2.5 (1.5-8.0) (median (range] to 4.2 (2.3-8.4) mg kg-1 min-1 in the glipizide group (n = 9, p less than 0.01), but did not change in the placebo group. Glycosylated haemoglobin did not change in either group, but median fasting plasma glucose fell from 10.6 (6.1-15.1) to 9.0 (6.4-11.2) mmol l-1 in the glipizide group (p less than 0.02). Fasting insulin rose on glipizide from 10.1 (4.0-23.2) to 13.0 (6.4-33.8) mU l-1 (p less than 0.02). Insulin dosage fell in the glipizide group from 36 to 26 U day-1, as 4 patients experienced hypoglycaemic symptoms. HDL-Cholesterol fell in all patients on glipizide, from 0.94 (0.79-2.13) to 0.79 (0.62-1.95) mmol l-1 (p less than 0.01). Combination of insulin with the sulphonylurea glipizide in secondary failure Type 2 diabetic patients leads to increased insulin-mediated peripheral glucose disposal. Glipizide may have an adverse effect on HDL-cholesterol, which is unrelated to change in diabetic control.

Fasting hyperglycemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: contributions of excessive hepatic glucose production and impaired tissue glucose uptake

The factors responsible for fasting hyperglycemia were investigated in 77 normal weight non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDD) and 72 age-, sex-, and weight-matched control individuals. In diabetic subjects with mild fasting hyperglycemia (less than 140 mg/dL) hepatic glucose production (1.85 +/- 0.03 mg/kg.min) was similar to controls (1.84 +/- 0.02); the major factor responsible for the elevated basal glucose level in the diabetic group was a decreased efficiency in the tissue uptake of glucose, as reflected by a 30% decline in the rate of glucose clearance (1.56 +/- 0.03 v 2.00 +/- 0.03 mL/kg.min, P less than .001). In contrast, in diabetic subjects with fasting plasma glucose concentrations above 140 mg/dL, basal hepatic glucose production was significantly elevated (2.42 +/- 0.08 mg/kg.min, P less than .001) and correlated closely with the increase in fasting plasma glucose concentration (r = .796, P less than .001). The basal rate of whole body glucose clearance reached a plateau value at fasting glucose levels of 160 to 180 mg/dL and did not contribute to the further rise in fasting plasma glucose concentrations above 160 to 180 mg/dL. Decreased efficiency of tissue glucose uptake is responsible the development of fasting hyperglycemia in patients with mild NIDDM (fasting plasma glucose less than 140 mg/dL). As the diabetic state worsens, an increase in basal hepatic glucose production is the major factor responsible for the progressive rise in fasting glucose levels.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update

Oral hypoglycaemic drugs, sulphonylureas and biguanides, occupy an important place in the treatment of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients who fail to respond satisfactorily to diet therapy and physical exercise. Although the precise mechanisms of action of these compounds are still poorly understood, there is sufficient agreement that sulphonylureas have both pancreatic and extrapancreatic effects, whereas biguanides have predominantly extrapancreatic actions. By using labelled compounds or measuring the circulating concentrations, the main pharmacokinetic properties of oral hypoglycaemic agents have been assessed and, in some cases, their pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships have been evaluated. A correlation between diabetes control and plasma sulphonylurea or biguanide concentrations is generally lacking at the steady-state, with the possible exception of long-acting agents; after either oral or intravenous dosing, the reduction of plasma glucose is usually related to the increased circulating drug concentrations. The toxic effects of oral hypoglycaemic drugs are more frequent in the elderly and in the presence of conditions that may lead to drug accumulation or potentiation (increased dosage, use of long-acting compounds, hepatic and renal disease, interaction with other drugs); however, a relationship between toxic effects and drug plasma levels has been reported only for biguanides.

Lack of primary effect of sulphonylurea (glipizide) on plasma lipoproteins and insulin action in former type 2 diabetics with attenuated insulin secretion

A double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation has been made into the effects of 8 weeks of glipizide treatment in diabetics previously classified as Type 2 but with subsequent attenuation of insulin secretion and thence maintained on exogenous insulin. Although all patients were exposed to therapeutic plasma concentrations of glipizide, fasting blood glucose, haemoglobin A1 and plasma lipoproteins (HDL, LDL, total cholesterol and triglycerides) did not show any consistent improvement following this treatment. It appears unlikely that SU (glipizide) has any primary effect on insulin action or on plasma lipoproteins. Its primary action is to augment insulin release and availability, so, its use should be restricted to Type 2 diabetics who retain insulin secretion.

Evidence for direct effect of tolbutamide on hepatic glycogenolysis induced by Ca2+-dependent hormones

The effects of tolbutamide and glibenclamide on hepatic glycogenolysis in perfused rat liver were investigated. Tolbutamide per se did not influence glucose output from the liver, but at therapeutic concentrations (about 350 microM) it significantly inhibited the glycogenolysis induced by phenylephrine, vasopressin and angiotensin II, while glibenclamide did not. Neither tolbutamide nor glibenclamide inhibited the glycogenolysis induced by glucagon. Tolbutamide potentiated the inhibitory effect of submaximal concentrations of insulin on glycogenolysis induced by phenylephrine. This effect of tolbutamide was elicitable even in the absence of calcium in the perfusate, and was additive to that of trifluoperazine. However, tolbutamide did not potentiate the inhibitory effect of insulin on glucagon-induced glycogenolysis. Tolbutamide inhibited the glycogenolysis induced by A23187, a calcium ionophore. These results indicate that, in addition to its known effect on insulin secretion, tolbutamide has a direct effect on the liver to inhibit glycogenolysis induced by Ca2+-dependent hormones (catecholamines, vasopressin and angiotensin II) and A23187. Thus, it is likely that tolbutamide inhibits the effect of Ca2+ mobilized by Ca2+-dependent hormones to stimulate glycogenolysis.

Glipizide: a second-generation sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agent. Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use

Glipizide is a second-generation sulfonylurea in which the substitutions on the arylsulfonylurea nucleus are large, relatively nonpolar groups. This chemical change increases the intrinsic hypoglycemic activity of the molecule 100-fold on a weight basis compared to first-generation agents. In addition, the pharmacokinetic properties, spectrum and severity of side effects and metabolism of this agent are somewhat different from those of first-generation sulfonylureas. The most important component of the antidiabetic action of glipizide is its effect in potentiating insulin action. Glipizide-mediated increases in nutrient-stimulated insulin secretion may contribute to its antidiabetic action. The drug is effective in controlling the blood glucose in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. It is at least as effective as and probably more effective than first-generation sulfonylureas in controlling hyperglycemia in diabetes. Glipizide is relatively free of serious side effects and is contraindicated principally in patients with significant liver or kidney disease.

Glyburide: a second-generation sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agent. History, chemistry, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, clinical use and adverse effects

Glyburide, a second-generation hypoglycemic sulfonylurea, is 200 times as potent as tolbutamide. This increase is due to greater intrinsic hypoglycemic potency of the molecule rather than to a prolonged biologic half-life. Glyburide is inactivated by the liver to 4-trans-hydroxyglyburide and 3-cis-hydroxyglyburide; 50% of these compounds is excreted in the urine and 50% in the bile. Although the serum concentration of glyburide can be measured by radioimmunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography, the importance of its serum concentration in the reduction of hyperglycemia is not yet established. Glyburide has a therapeutic effectiveness comparable to that of the first-generation sulfonylurea chlorpropamide; however, it has a lower frequency of adverse effects. To date it has a low frequency of clinically significant interactions with other drugs. Glyburide should not be prescribed for patients with liver disease or significant renal disease. Because glyburide is a potent hypoglycemic agent, it should be prescribed in small initial doses, particularly for elderly patients with diabetes. At the present time there is no definite evidence that it modifies the increased risk of cardiovascular disease of diabetic patients. Although glyburide is a potent stimulator of pancreatic insulin secretion after short-term administration, an additional mechanism of action during long-term administration is to decrease the resistance of muscle and liver to the action of insulin. It is a useful medication for patients with type II diabetes whose hyperglycemia is not adequately reduced by dietary management and exercise. It can be used as the initial drug in these patients or as the replacement drug for those with primary or secondary failure during therapy with first-generation sulfonylureas.

Oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update

Despite the availability of oral hypoglycaemic agents for nearly 30 years, their precise mode of action and role in the management of diabetes mellitus remains poorly defined and controversial. They are regarded by many, though not all, clinicians as helpful adjuncts in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes who have failed to respond satisfactorily to an adequate programme of dietary treatment. Their initial effectiveness is greatest in those patients who have had diabetes for less than 5 years, are overweight at the time of initiation of therapy, and whose fasting blood glucose levels are not unduly raised (less than 200 mg/dl). If they are receiving treatment with insulin and a shift to oral compounds is contemplated, success in the changeover is more likely if the daily dose has been less than 20 to 30 units daily. While their efficacy in maintaining adequate glycaemic control over the short term in responsive patients is unquestioned, the long term benefit of oral hypoglycaemic agents in reducing morbidity and mortality of late complications remains to be substantiated. In this regard, where long term efficacy is difficult to quantify, physician vigilance for chronic toxicity assumes a special importance. Notwithstanding the potential for interaction between sulphonylureas and numerous other drugs, significant adverse effects are uncommon. Hypoglycaemia is the major health concern associated with the use of sulphonylureas, and lactic acidosis has been the major problem with biguanides. Careful patient selection is thus the key to ensuring efficacy and avoiding toxicity. Recent evidence suggests that while the insulinotropic action of the sulphonylureas may explain the short term hypoglycaemic effect of these compounds, their reported action in enhancing insulin sensitivity, both at the receptor and post-receptor levels, more likely accounts for the long term maintenance of improved carbohydrate tolerance. The relatively new ('second generation') sulphonylurea compounds have not been shown to possess clearly defined advantages over the older preparations; the potentially beneficial effects of gliclazide on the microangiopathic changes of diabetes require considerable further evaluation.

Studies on the mechanism of improved glucose control during regular exercise in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes

The effects of 6 weeks of thrice weekly training on glycaemic control were assessed in 20 sedentary Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and 11 control subjects matched for previous physical activity. Maximal oxygen uptake was lower in the diabetic patients than in control subjects before training (26.2 +/- 1.1 versus 32.6 +-/ 1.7 ml X kg-1 X min-1; p less than 0.001). Glycosylated haemoglobin levels decreased in the diabetic patients during the training programme (12.2 +/- 0.5 to 10.7 +/- 0.4%; p less than 0.02). Oral and intravenous glucose tolerance determined 72 h after the last exercise period showed only minimal improvement. Plasma glucose levels were, however, significantly lower at 12 h than 72 h after exercise in eight subjects tested at both time points. These data suggest than an exercise programme can produce a significant decrease in glycosylated haemoglobin levels in Type 2 diabetic males probably due, in great measure, to the cumulative effect of transient improvements in glucose tolerance which follow each individual period of exercise.