Effect of mazindol on brain dopamine turnover in spiperone-treated rats

Cannabinoid transmission and reward-related events

The reward/reinforcement circuitry of the mammalian brain consists of synaptically interconnected neurons associated with the medial forebrain bundle, linking the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, and ventral pallidum. Electrical stimulation of this circuit supports intense self-stimulation in animals and, in humans, produces intense pleasure or euphoria. This circuit is strongly implicated in the neural substrates of drug addiction and in such addiction-related phenomena as withdrawal dysphoria and craving. This circuit is also implicated in the pleasures produced by natural rewards (e.g., food, sex). Cannabinoids are euphorigenic in humans and have addictive liability in vulnerable persons, but were long considered "anomalous" drugs of abuse, lacking pharmacological interaction with these brain reward substrates. It is now clear, however, that cannabinoids activate these brain substrates and influence reward-related behaviors. From these actions, presumably, derive both the abuse potential of cannabinoids and the possible clinical efficacy in dysphoric states.

Effects of GBR 12909 on locomotor activity and dopamine turnover in mice: comparison with apomorphine

The effects of GBR 12909 1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]-ethyl]-4- [3-phenylpropyl]piperazine, a very potent and selective dopamine uptake inhibitor, and apomorphine, a dopamine receptor agonist, alone and in combination were investigated on locomotor activity and dopamine turnover in discrete brain regions of mice. The levels of dopamine and its metabolites were examined 40 min after the administration of GBR 12909 and/or apomorphine, when the effects of the drugs on locomotor activity were approximately at a peak. GBR 12909 (10 mg/kg i.p.) reversed a low dose of apomorphine (0.05 mg/kg s.c.)-induced suppression in locomotor activity and significantly increased this activity. Despite the dramatic change in the behavior, GBR 12909 did not influence the decrease in 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC)/dopamine ratio (which is one of the indications of transmitter turnover) induced by a low dose of apomorphine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum. In contrast, GBR 12909 did not enhance the high-dose apomorphine (2 mg/kg s.c.)-induced hyperlocomotion, and did not modify the larger decrease in dopamine turnover produced by the high dose of apomorphine in the frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum. This suggests that postsynaptic dopamine receptors may reach maximum stimulation at a high dose of apomorphine. These results indicate that a behavioral change induced via stimulation of postsynaptic dopamine receptors does not necessarily lead to an alteration in dopamine turnover.

Fluoxetine at anorectic doses does not have properties of a dopamine uptake inhibitor

Although fluoxetine is a highly selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake in vitro and in vivo, some investigators have suggested that dopamine uptake inhibition may contribute to anorectic actions of fluoxetine. The present experiments were done to determine fluoxetine's effects in some animal protocols in which dopamine uptake inhibitors have characteristic actions. Mazindol prevented the depletion of striatal dopamine and its metabolites by amphetamine in iprindole-pretreated rats, but fluoxetine had no effect. Mazindol prevented the depletion of striatal dopamine and its metabolites by 6-hydroxydopamine injected intracerebroventricularly into rats, but fluoxetine had no effect. Mazindol enhanced the elevation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid concentration in rat brain after spiperone injection, but fluoxetine did not cause that effect. Fluoxetine did not mimic amfonelic acid in antagonizing the retention of alpha-methyl-m-tyramine invant striatum after the injection of alpha-methyl-m-tyrosine. These results show that fluoxetine, at doses that are effective in blocking the serotonin uptake carrier and causing anorexia, does not block the dopamine uptake carrier.

Anomalous effect of mazindol on dopamine uptake as measured by in vivo voltammetry and microdialysis

The effect of mazindol on the dopamine (DA) uptake system in the rat striatum was studied by in vivo voltammetry and microdialysis. An increase in the maximal uptake rate was observed by voltammetry 30 min after i.p. administration of 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg doses but not after a dose of 25 mg/kg, while stimulated release was enhanced at all doses. The increased maximal uptake is in contrast to increased levels of extracellular DA observed with microdialysis following mazindol administration. This divergence of action is anomalous in the context of current understanding of the DA uptake system.

Ketamine-induced hyperlocomotion associated with alteration of presynaptic components of dopamine neurons in the nucleus accumbens of mice

The underlying mechanisms of ketamine-induced hyperlocomotion were examined in mice. An intraperitoneal (IP) injection of ketamine (3-150 mg/kg) increased locomotor activity in a dose-dependent fashion. A low dose of ketamine (30 mg/kg) produced peak locomotion within the first 10 min followed by a rapid decline. In contrast, a high dose (150 mg/kg) inhibited locomotor activity to the control level during the first 30 min. Thereafter the activity gradually increased and reached a peak at approximately 2 h followed by a gradual decline. The hyperactivities induced by both low and high doses of ketamine were inhibited by a low dose of haloperidol (0.10 mg/kg, IP), a dopamine (DA) receptor antagonist. However, neither a high dose of phenoxybenzamine (10 mg/kg, IP), an alpha-blocker nor a high dose of propranolol (20 mg/kg, IP), a beta-blocker inhibited the hyperactivities. Destruction of catecholaminergic terminals by 6-hydroxydopamine suppressed ketamine-induced hyperlocomotion. Regional brain monoamine assays revealed that, at peak locomotion, a low dose of ketamine (30 mg/kg) selectively increased DA turnover in the nucleus accumbens which is a forebrain region believed to be involved in the initiation and regulation of locomotor activity, while a high dose (150 mg/kg) increased not only DA but also norepinephrine and serotonin turnover in many regions of the brain. In vitro, ketamine slightly provoked [3H]DA release from nucleus accumbens and striatal slices to a similar extent, but inhibited synaptosomal uptake of [3H]DA in the nucleus accumbens to a greater degree than in the striatum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dopamine re-uptake inhibitors show inconsistent effects on the in vivo release of dopamine as measured by intracerebral dialysis in the rat

The effects of the dopamine (DA) re-uptake blockers amfonelic acid and GBR 12909 on the in vivo release of DA were investigated. DA release was measured by means of a fully automated brain dialysis system. GBR 12909 induced a 3-fold increase in the output of DA; amfonelic acid was without effect. These results indicate a dissociation between the behavioural effects of DA re-uptake blockers and the effects on DA release. A strong synergistic rise of DA release was observed when haloperidol was co-administered with amfonelic acid or GBR 12909. The potentiation of DA release was completely prevented by infusion of 1 microM tetrodotoxin.

Neuropharmacology of drugs affecting food intake

The importance of the central monoamines NE, DA and 5-HT in ingestive behavior has inevitably resulted in considerable effort being expended in attempting to implicate these monoamines in the mechanism of action of anorectic drugs. The statements that amphetamine-induced anorexia is unlikely to be due to central serotoninergic systems and that central noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems are not implicated in the appetite suppressant effect of fenfluramine are in all probability correct. However, to attribute the ability of drugs to decrease food intake unequivocally to a specific effect on central monoaminergic systems is almost certainly an oversimplification, due to the fact that other putative neurotransmitters, such as GABA and peptides, play a critical role in eating. This can be achieved either directly or by modulating the release of other transmitters. An added complication in attempting to correlate a specific neurochemical process to a behavioral effect, such as anorexia, is the complexity of the central actions of the drug. At best, a predominant but not an exclusive process can be identified. Perhaps the in-built constraint of attempting to correlate a specific neurochemical effect to the desired action of a drug is accountable for the absence of a second generation of centrally acting anorectic drugs. Dramatic progress has been made in elucidating the factors involved in ingestive behavior over the last 5-10 years. This information should, and must, provide the catalyst for more efficacious anorectic drugs because obesity represents one of the few major diseases for which adequate drug therapy does not exist.

Pharmacological studies with several analogs of mazindol: correlation between effects on dopamine uptake and various in vivo responses

Several structural analogs of mazindol were tested as inhibitors of the uptake of [3H] dopamine in rat neostriatum, of [3H] norepinephrine in rat occipital cortex and of [3H] serotonin in whole rat brain. A rather wide range of potencies was observed but a number of the drugs were even more potent than mazindol as uptake inhibitors. All of the drugs studied were weak releasing agents for previously accumulated [3H]amines. Several of the drugs caused large increases in motor activity in normal mice but not in reserpinized mice. However, these same drugs were able to prevent amphetamine-induced increases in activity in reserpinized mice, and were able to induce ipsilateral circling in rats with a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the nigrostriatal pathway. Two of these same drugs were tested and found to be potent inhibitors of prolactin secretion. Correlations will be made between the capacities of the drugs to inhibit dopamine uptake and the in vivo responses mentioned above.

Effect of antidepressants, lithium and electroconvulsive treatment on rat serum prolactin levels

The ability of antidepressant drugs, electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), or lithium chloride (LiCl), to modify prolactin secretion in the rat was studied. Chlorimipramine, citalopram, fluoxetine, imipramine and zimelidine potentiated the low dose 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)-induced increase in prolactin secretion, suggesting inhibition of serotonin (5-HT) uptake by these drugs. Amitriptyline, doxepin, iprindole, mianserin and trazadone inhibited the prolactin stimulating effects of high doses of 5-HTP and quipazine, suggesting that these drugs have 5-HT receptor blocking properties. Tandamine inhibited only 5-HTP-induced increase in prolactin secretion. Chronic administration of imipramine, potentiated the effect of low dose 5-HTP significantly more than an acute dose. Amitriptyline, produced similar inhibition of the 5-HTP-induced increase in prolactin secretion after both acute and chronic administration. The ability of bupropion and mazindol to inhibit alpha-methylparatyrosine-induced prolactin secretion, and of nomifensine to inhibit reserpine-induced prolactin secretion, is consistent with other evidence that these agents are indirect dopamine (DA) agonists. Desipramine, acutely, had no effect on any of the above paradigms but after chronic administration, potentiated the effect of low dose 5-HTP on prolactin secretion. Nortriptyline had no effect on prolactin secretion after acute or chronic treatment. ECT for 10 days did not affect the ability of a 5-HT agonist or d-amphetamine to modify prolactin secretion. However, chronic, but not acute, treatment with LiCl markedly enhanced the prolactin response to 5-HT agonists and reserpine while shifting the dose response curve for d-amphetamine and apomorphine to the right. These results are discussed in light of current theories of the role of 5-HT and DA in depression.